甜瓜S-腺苷甲硫氨酸脫羧酶基因的克隆及白粉病誘導(dǎo)表達(dá)分析

劉長(zhǎng)命，張顯，王永琦

1 商洛學(xué)院，陜西 商洛 726000

2 西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué) 園藝學(xué)院，陜西 楊凌 712100

Muskmelon is one of the most important cultivated plants worldwide. However, in China,melon was threatened by various abiotic and biotic stresses[1]. Powdery mildew, which is strictly biotrophic and completely dependent on the living host cells for survival[2], is a common disease of melon under field and greenhouse conditions worldwide. Many recent studies have shown thatPodosphaera xanthii(P. xanthii) is predominant in most countries[3-5]. Based on our previous study[6], it could be preliminarily confirmed that theP. xanthiirace 2F is the predominant physiological race within cucurbitaceous plants in Guanzhong areas,Shaanxi Province of China.

Currently, control of powdery mildew on melon is mainly achieved by widespread application of various fungicides. Although powdery mildew can be controlled by fungicides, the cost and the environmental impact of residues are undesirable consequences, and the long term use has led to fungicide resistance of powdery mildew races[7].Furthermore, with the accumulation of toxic heavy metals in soil, the exceeded level of relevant metal ions will be found in melon, which seriously affects the melon food safety. Compared with the application of fungicides, using resistant cultivars is a more effective and environmentally safe approach to disease control.

Plants use various mechanisms to defend against pathogens, and these are often initiated by plant disease resistance genes, which may encode cell receptors that detect the presence of a specific pathogen and these initiate the activation of signal transduction pathways. Polyamines (PAs) are small ubiquitous compounds that have been implicated in the regulation of many physiological progresses and a variety of stress responses in plants[8]. The enhanced level of polyamines plays an important role in the protective response of plants to various abiotic stresses[9]. SAMDC is one of the key regulatory enzymes in the biosynthesis of polyamines. There are some reports aboutSAMDCgenes responses to abiotic stresses in plants[10].However, very few study about biotic stresses was conducted in melon.

In our previous study using cDNA-AFLP method, we observed an EST (expression sequence tag) that was induced in leaves of ‘Yuantian930’upon infection withP. xanthii[6]. We analyzed the EST sequence and found that it was the only one completely consistent withSAMDCin melon genome sequence database (https://melonomics.net/). Since‘Yuantian930’ has been shown to be highly resistant to powdery mildew, we undertook the present study to gain a better understanding of SAMDC in melon and verified its potential role in powdery mildew resistance. We cloned the full-length ofCmSAMDCgene from ‘Yuantian930’ and further analyzed its expression in response toP. xanthii. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not there was a relationship between melon resistance and the response ofCmSAMDCtoP. xanthiiinfection. To our knowledge, this is the first report ofSAMDCgene potentially related to powdery mildew resistance in melon.

1 Materials and methods

1.1 Plant material and inoculation method

The powdery mildew (PM) resistant clone,Chinese wild melonC. melo‘Yuantian930’ was used in this study, which was provided by the melon and watermelon research group of Horticulture Institute of Northwest A&F University, China. TheP. xanthiiisolate used in this work was collected from natural infections in cucurbit and through mono bacterial colony propagation. The melon seedlings were grown in the plant growth chamber at 30 ℃/18 ℃ (day/night) operating a 16h/8 h(light/dark) photoperiod and 70%–85% relative humidity. PM inoculation were performed by spraying plants with a suspension of 106sporangia/mLP. xanthiiconidiophores, and then the plants were kept in the same conditions. The leaves from the infected plants (at the forth-leaf stage)were collected after 0 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 120 h, stored at –80 ℃. As a control, leaves were collected from plants treated with sterile water only.

1.2 RN A extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from melon leaves using the Trizol reagent following the instructions of the Trizol kit (Tiangen, Beijing). Residual DNA was removed by DNase Ⅰ (Promega, Madison,WI, USA). Concentration of total RNA was measured with an ultraviolet spectrophotometer(V-550, JASCO, Japan) at 260 nm. RNA purity was checked by determining theA260/A280ratio, and RNA integrity was examined by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. SmartTMRACE cDNA Amplification Kit was used to synthesize cDNA,following the instructions of the Clontech kit(Clontech-TaKaRa Bio Inc., Japan).

1.3 Cloning of melon CmSAMDC

On the basis of the EST fragment ofCmSAMDCfrom Chinese wild melonC. melo‘Yuntian-930’ by cDNA-AFLP analysis and the data from melon genome sequence database, the gene-specific primers (Table 1)CmSAMDCs andCmSAMDCa containing full ORF (open reading frame) were designed using Primer Premier 5.0, and theBamH I andEcoR I restriction sites were added.PCR amplification ofCmSAMDCwith one microliter of cDNA from infected leaves was added to a PCR mix containing 2 U ofTaqpolymerase(MBI Fermentas), 1× PCR buffer, 2.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.1 mmol/L of each dNTP, and 0.5 mmol/L of the forward and reverse degenerate primers. The final volume of each reaction was 25 μL and PCR was performed using a Bio-Rad thermocycler following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 ℃for 3 min; followed by 35 cycles of 94 ℃ for 30 s,56 ℃ for 1 min, 72℃for 1 min; and a final extension at 72 ℃ for 10 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gel. The fragments of expected size was isolated and puri fi ed using the Gel Extraction Kit (BioTake, USA). The pGEM-T Easy Vector System (Promega, Madison,USA) was used for DNA cloning. The positive clones identified by PCR and enzyme digestion were sequenced by the Beijing Aoke Biotech Co.Ltd. (Beijing, China).

1.4 Sequence analysis

The similarity analysis of nucleotide and protein sequences was carried out using the Blast tool at NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast).The deduced amino acid sequence was analyzed with the Predict Protein Analysis System(http://www.predictprotein.org/). The parameters for the given protein were computed using the ProtParam tool at the ExPASy Proteomics Server(http://web.expasy.org/protparam/). The transmembrane regions and orientation of given protein was predicted using the TMHMM Server v. 2.0(http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/). The multiple sequences alignment was performed with Clustal X and Genedoc software, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the MEGA 5.1 software by the Neighbor-joining method. The reliability of each node on phylogenetic tree was tested by bootstrapping 1 000 times.

表1 所用引物序列Table 1 Primers used in this study

1.5 Quantitativ e real-time PCR and data analysis

The first-strand cDNA was synthesized using the Reverse Transcription System Kit (Promega,USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.A pair of gene-specific primers (Table 1)CmSAMDCf andCmSAMDCf were designed following the recommended guidelines for qRT-PCR primer design, and primers specific for the melonActingene (GenBank Accession No.AY859055) were used as the internal control (Table 1).The product size was 147 bp.

Relative levels of gene expression were analyzed with the Themal Cycler Dice?Real Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and normalized with the results forActin. Each 20 μL PCR reaction contained 10 μL of SYBR?Premix ExTaqTMⅡ (2×), 0.8 μL of PCR Forward Primer(10 μmol/L), 0.8 μL of PCR Reverse Primer(10 μmol/L), 2 μL of cDNA (200 ng/μL), and 6.4 μL of ddH2O. The PCR cycling conditions consisted of an initial polymerase activation step at 95 ℃ for 30 s,followed by 40 cycles of 95 ℃ for 5 s and 60 ℃ for 30 s. Output data generated by the instrument on-board software iQ5 (Bio-Rad) were transferred to Sigmaplot software (v.10.0, Systat Inc., CA,USA) for analysis. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR was performed in three replicates for each sample.In addition, reverse transcription negative control was included to check for potential genomic DNA contamination. The relative expression ofCmSAMDCgene was calculated according to the method of 2–△△Ct. The △△CT=(CT,Target–CT,Actin)Timex–(CT,Target–CT,Actin)Time0,CT,Targetmeans theCTvalue of target gene,CT,Actinmeans theCTvalue of control gene, Time x means the post inoculation time (12 h,24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 120 h), Time 0 means the time before inoculation (0 h).

1.6 Expression of CmSAMDC in E. coli

After verifying the sequence, the recombinant plasmid of positive clone was digested withBamH I/EcoR I and ligated directly into the prokaryotic expression vector pET-28a (Fermentas, USA),which was predigested with the same enzymes. A recombination reaction yielding a pET-28a andCmSAMDCfusion construct was conducted. After sequencing and con fi rming by restriction digestion,the positive recombinant prokaryotic expression plasmids, designated pET28a-CmSAMDC, were then transformed into competentE. colistrain BL21(DE3) for expression of the fusion protein. TransformedE. colicells were incubated at 37 ℃ overnight in Luria-Bertani medium with 50 mg/L Kan. 1 mL of the overnight cultures were added into 50 mL of fresh LB medium containing Kan and incubated with shaking at 37 ℃ untilOD600reached 0.6.Isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside (IPTG) was added to a final concentration of 1 mmol/L and the incubation was continued at 37 ℃. 2 mL of thallus were collected at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h and 8 h respectively after IPTG was added, followed by centrifuging at 12 000×gfor 30 s, and then resuspended with 5×buffer solution [every 10 mL reaction contained:0.6 mL Tris-HCl (1 mol/L, pH 6.8), 5 mL glycerol(50%), 2 mL SDS (10%), 0.5 mL mercaptoethanol,1 mL bromophenol blue (1%), 0.9 mL ddH2O]. The resulting lysate was heated at 100 ℃ for 10 min,and then centrifuged at 12 000×gfor 1 min. The supernatant was used as a sample for SDS-PAGE.After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Isola tion of CmSAMDC gene

Based on the study conducted before, a length of 479 bp product was found highly identical toSAMDCinCucumis sativus,Brassica junceaandArabidopsis thaliana[11]. Given this, the full ORF ofSAMDCgene with a length of 1 095 bp was amplified from ‘Yuntian 930’ and namedCmSAMDC(GenBank Accession No. KF151861).Results from agarose gel electrophoresis showed that the PCR products had the expected molecular size of 1 095 bp, which suggested that the full length ofCmSAMDCgene was successfully ampli fi ed by gene special primers (Fig. 1).

圖1 CmSAMDC基因的擴(kuò)增Fig. 1 Amplification of CmSAMDC gene. M: DL2000 marker; 1: the CmSAMDC cDNA.

2.2 Bioinform atics analysis of CmSAMDC

The results showed that the deduced peptide consists of 364 amino acid residues, with a predicted molecular weight of 40 kDa, and theoretical pI of 4.61. The transmembrane regions and orientation was predicted that the given protein probably has no transmembrane region (Fig. 2).Phylogenetic analysis comprising the SAMDC protein sequences from twenty plants revealed that theCmSAMDCprotein had close distance withCucumis sativus,Arabidopsis thaliana,Brassica junceaandCitrofortunella microcarpa, as they all belong to dicotyledon, and the lowest similarity was detected as toSaccharum officinarum,Triticum aestivumandZea mays, since the last three belong to monocot (Fig. 3).

In this study, the expected size ofSAMDCgene in melon was isolated, and the sequence analyses indicated that theCmSAMDCfrom ‘Yuantian930’shares a high level of sequence homology with other plants ofSAMDCgenes[12-15]. Phylogenetic analysis and the alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences with other plants revealed a series of common features, which was consistent with former studies[16].

圖2 跨膜域與方向的預(yù)測(cè)Fig. 2 The transmembrane regions and orientation prediction. The line with solid dot and solid square means the polypeptide inside or outside the membrane respectively; the line with solid hexagon means the transmembrane region.

2.3 Expr ession of CmSAMDC in E. coli BL21(DE3)

After the array and orientation of the insert sequence were con fi rmed by restriction digestion with enzymeEcoRⅠ/BamHⅠand sequencing, the PCR product was directly cloned into pET-28a.Sequencing results showed thatCmSAMDCgene has been inserted correctly into pET-28a vector(Fig. 4). Upon IPTG induction, fusion proteins containing the desired protein were expressed inE. coliBL21 (DE3). As illustrated by the SDS-PAGE(Fig. 5), the fusion protein was detected as a broad and a predominant band at 43 kDa (including 3 kDa His-tag)in the induced cell lysate with pET28a-SAMDC (lane 4 h and 6 h), and six hours of IPTG induction would be suitable. The molecular mass was consistent with the molecular weight calculated from the amino acid sequence. No reaction was observed with no-loading vector and 0 h as well.

2.4 Expression analysis of CmSAMDC

The expression level ofCmSAMDCin response toP. xanthiiin PM-resistant clone‘Yuntian930’ was investigated at different time by qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 6,CmSAMDCwas constitutively expressed at low levels in leaves of‘Yuantian930’ before inoculation, then it was peaked at 48 h as almost 7 times high as observed in control. These results suggested that transcription ofCmSAMDCis indeed upregulated in Chinese wild PM-resistant melonC. melo‘Yuntian-930’ upon infection ofP. xanthiipathogens.

圖3 20種植物SAMDC蛋白氨基酸進(jìn)化樹分析Fig. 3 Phylogenetic tree analysis based on the alignment of deduced amino acid sequences of SAMDC protein in 20 plants. Two major classes were identified and classified to dicotyledon and monocot. The numbers below the branches refer to the percentage of 1 000 bootstrap replications supporting the nodes.

圖4 融合表達(dá)載體的酶切鑒定Fig. 4 Validation of fusion expression vector by digestion. M: DNA marker (250, 1 000, 2 500, 5 000, 10 000,12 500, 15 000 bp); 1: pGEM-T-SAMDC digested with EcoRⅠand BamHⅠ; 2: pET28a-SAMDC digested with EcoRⅠand BamHⅠ.

圖5 pET-28a-CmSAMDC重組體的原核表達(dá)分析Fig. 5 CmSAMDC proteins expressed in E. coli and separated by SDS-PAGE. The arrows showed the molecular weight of the target protein agreed well with the predicted.

圖6 中國(guó)野生甜瓜白粉病菌侵染后CmSAMDC基因表達(dá)分析Fig. 6 Expression profiles of CmSAMDC gene in Chinese wild melon after P. xanthii infection. Each experiment was repeated three times, and the standard error bars were indicated. Total RNA was extracted from leaves of C. melo clone ‘Yuntian930’, and analyzed at 0 h,12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 120 h after inoculation with P. xanthii. The leaves of the plants on which sterile water was sprayed were collected as the control leaves (CK).

For coping with biotic and abiotic stresses,plants have evolved a wide range of defense mechanisms. These defense mechanisms depend on a series of proteins, including many involved in regulating cellular response to stress and signaling crosstalk[17]. Many of these proteins involved the production of phytohormones, pathogenesis-related proteins and transcription factors[18]. The pathogen defense mechanism in plants has been reported to be associated with early and strong gene expression[19]. Most plant resistance genes are transcriptionally regulated in response to pathogen attack. In rice, the transcription of resistance geneXa1appears to increase following pathogen inoculation[20], which indicates that the transcription of the resistance gene depends on the type of plant-pathogen interaction.

During this experiment, we have examined the expression pattern ofSAMDCin PM-resistant clone‘Yuantian930’ in response toP. xanthiiand it showed higher levels and stronger expression,which was almost 7 times as high as observed in no pathogen inoculation. This trend is similar toSAMDCexpressing in sugarcane[13], tall fescue[14]and tomato under abiotic stress[21]. In addition, the author’s further research also shows thatSAMDCgene plays protective roles in melon resistance to powdery mildew infection by transgenic arabidopsis plants expressingCmSAMDC[22]. Thus,SAMDCwas involved inP. xanthii-induced defense response besides the important role in response to abiotic stress[23-26]. However, the close relationship of SAMDC and powdery mildew stress need to be further verified.

3 Conclusion

In summary, we have demonstrated thatCmSAMDCgene was induced byP. xanthiiin PM-resistant melon leaves and likely plays a positive role in defense mechanisms that confer resistance to powdery mildew in melon. Further investigations ofCmSAMDCmay aid us in understanding the mechanism(s) of PM resistance in melon.

REFERENCES

[1]Akkurt M, Welter L, Maul E, et al. Development of SCAR markers linked to powdery mildew (Uncinulanecator) resistance in grapevine (Vitis viniferaL. andVitissp.). Mol Breed, 2007, 19(2): 103-111.

[2]Cheng H, Kun WP, Liu DS, et al. Molecular cloning and expression analysis ofCmMlo1in melon. Mol Bio Rep,2012, 39(2): 1903-1907.

[3]Fekete C, Fung RWM, Szabó Z, et al. Up-regulated transcripts in a compatible powdery mildew-grapevine interaction. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2009, 47(8): 732-738.

[4]Kim M, Panstruga R, Elliott C, et al. Calmodulin interacts with MLO protein to regulate defence against mildew in barley. Nature, 2002, 416(6879): 447-451.

[5]Consonni C, Humphry ME, Hartmann HA, et al.Conserved requirement for a plant host cell protein in powdery mildew pathogenesis. Nat Genet, 2006, 38(6):716-720.

[6]Xian F. Genetic mechanisms, hormonal changes and cDNA-AFLP analysis of resistance to powdery mildew in wild melon [sp. Agrestis(NAUD.) Greb.][D].Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2012 (in Chinese).咸豐. 野生甜瓜[sp.Agrestis(Naud.) Greb.]抗白粉病的遺傳機(jī)制和激素變化及其 cDNA-AFLP分析[D].楊凌: 西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué), 2012.

[7]Fekete C, Fung RWM, Szabó Z, et al. Up-regulated transcripts in a compatible powdery mildew-grapevine interaction. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2009, 47(8):732-738.

[8]Dangl JL, Jones JDG. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature, 2001, 411(6839):826-833.

[9]Kubi? J. Exogenous spermidine differentially alters activities of some scavenging system enzymes, H2O2and superoxide radical levels in water-stressed cucumber leaves. J Plant Physiol, 2008, 165(4):397-406.

[10]Walters DR. Polyamines and plant disease.Phytochemistry, 2003, 64(1): 97-107.

[11]Liu CM, Xian F, Tian ZG, et al. Analysis of gene expression profiling in the incompatible interaction between Chinese wild melon ‘Yuntian930’ andPodosphaera xanthii. Acta Phytopathol Sin, 2014, 44(1):65-73 (in Chinese).劉長(zhǎng)命, 咸豐, 田治國(guó), 等. 野生甜瓜‘云甜 930’與白粉病菌互作的基因表達(dá)特征. 植物病理學(xué)報(bào), 2014,44(1): 65-73.

[12]Roy M, Wu R. Overexpression ofS-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase gene in rice increases polyamine level and enhances sodium chloride-stress tolerance. Plant Sci,2002, 163(5): 987-992.

[13]Liu JX, Que YX, Guo JL, et al. Molecular cloning of sugarcaneS-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase gene(Sc-SAMDC) and its expression analysis. Sci Agric Sin,2010, 43(7): 1448-1457 (in Chinese).劉金仙, 闕友雄, 郭晉隆,等. 甘蔗 S-腺苷蛋氨酸脫羧酶基因Sc-SAMDC的克隆和表達(dá)分析. 中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué), 2010, 43(7): 1448-1457.

[14]Wang XL, Liu XX, Wang SY, et al. Cloning and differential expression analysis ofS-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase geneFaSAMDCin tall fescue. Acta Pratacult Sin, 2011, 20(4): 169-179 (in Chinese).王小利, 劉曉霞, 王舒穎, 等. 高羊茅腺苷甲硫氨酸脫羧酶基因FaSAMDC的克隆與差異表達(dá)分析. 草業(yè)學(xué)報(bào), 2011, 20(4): 169-179.

[15]Wi SJ, Kim WT, Park KY. Overexpression of carnationS-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase gene generates a broad-spectrum tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Cell Rep, 2006, 25(10):1111-1121.

[16]Li CQ, Shao JF, Wang YJ, et al. Analysis of banana transcriptome and global gene expression profiles in banana roots in response to infection by race 1 and tropical race 4 ofFusarium oxysporumf. sp. cubense.BMC Genomics, 2013, 14: 851.

[17]Alcázar R, Altabella T, Marco F, et al. Polyamines:molecules with regulatory functions in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Planta, 2010, 231(6): 1237-1249.

[18]Koh S, André A, Edwards H, et al.Arabidopsis thalianasubcellular responses to compatibleErysiphe cichoracearuminfections. Plant J, 2005, 44(3):516-529.

[19]Wen XP, Pang XM, Matsuda N, et al. Over-expression of the apple spermidine synthase gene in pear confers multiple abiotic stress tolerance by altering polyamine titers. Transgenic Res, 2008, 17(2): 251-263.

[20]Kim ST, Kim SG, Hwang DH, et al. Proteomic analysis of pathogen-responsive proteins from rice leaves induced by rice blast fungusMagnaporthe grisea.Proteomics, 2004, 4(11): 3569-3578.

[21]Liu ZY, Wang XX, Gao JC, et al. Cloning and sequence analysis of aS-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase gene(SlSAMDC1) in tomato. Acta Horticult Sin, 2008, 35(8):1137-1146 (in Chinese).劉志勇, 王孝宣, 高建昌, 等. 番茄 S-腺苷蛋氨酸脫羧酶基因SlSAMDC1的克隆與序列分析. 園藝學(xué)報(bào),2008, 35(8): 1137-1146.

[22]Liu CM, Li XL, Yang RP, et al. The protective roles of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (SAMDC) gene in melon resistance to powdery mildew infection. Hort Environ Biotechnol, 2014, 55(6): 557-567.

[23]Perchepied L, Bardin M, Dogimont C, et al.Relationship between loci conferring downy mildew and powdery mildew resistance in melon assessed by quantitative trait loci mapping. Phytopathology, 2005,95(5): 556-565.

[24]Sabelli PA, Larkins BA. Regulation and function of retinoblastoma related plant genes. Plant Sci, 2009,177(6): 540-548.

[25]Zhang SP, Xiao YN, Zhao JR, et al. Digital gene expression analysis of early root infection resistance toSporisorium reilianumf. sp.zeaein maize. Mol Genet Genomics, 2013, 288(1/2): 21-37.

[26]Crowley T, Walters DR. Polyamine metabolism in an incompatible interaction between barley and the powdery mildew fungus,Blumeria graminisf. sp.hordei.J Phytopathol, 2002, 150(11/12): 581-586.