• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Isolation and callus formation of Gracilariopsis bailiniae(Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) protoplasts*

    2018-12-22 07:00:26CHENHaihong陳海紅CHENWeizhou陳偉洲SHIJingyi石經(jīng)儀CHENZepan陳澤攀ZHANGYi張毅
    Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 2018年6期
    關(guān)鍵詞:石經(jīng)海紅張毅

    CHEN Haihong (陳海紅), CHEN Weizhou (陳偉洲), SHI Jingyi (石經(jīng)儀),CHEN Zepan (陳澤攀), ZHANG Yi (張毅)

    Marine Biology Institution, Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology of Guangdong Province, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China

    Abstract This paper reports the first successful isolation of protoplasts from Gracilariopsis bailiniae and their callus formation. The base solution type, concentration of isolating enzymes, concentration of sorbitol,incubation time, temperature and pH of the enzyme solution were tested to optimize the protoplast yield.The optimized isolation conditions were: 40% base solution 3 (deionized water containing 25 mmol/L MESTris and 25 mmol/L CaCl 2·2H 2 O) and 60% crude Marinomonas sp. YS-70 agarase solution, containing 2%w/v cellulase, 1% w/v macerozyme R-10 and 0.4 mol/L sorbitol, with incubation for 4 h at 28°C and pH 6.5.The highest yield of viable protoplasts, which was obtained in these conditions, was (1.75±0.25)×10 6 cells/g fresh weight. Cell wall regeneration of most protoplasts from G. bailiniae was complete within 60 h and the first division of cells happened after ≥3 days. Two division types were observed in the first division of protoplasts from G. bailiniae— asymmetric division and symmetric division. After the first division, the cells underwent a series of divisions to form callus cell masses.

    Keyword: Gracilariopsis bailiniae; enzyme; marine bacterium; protoplast isolation; cell division; callus

    1 INTRODUCTION

    Gracilariopsisbailiniaeshows fast growth and heat-resistance (Zhong et al., 2014). It is a food for abalones and a raw material for agar extraction that is farmed in Fujian and Guangdong Provinces, China(Hurtado-Ponce, 1992; Pan and Li, 2010).Agarophytes (Gelidium,GracilariaandGracilariopsis) have considerable industrial importance since they are the principal source of raw material for the agar industry worldwide (Zemke-White and Ohno, 1999; Smit, 2004). In recent years,there has been increasing global demand for agar,which is used widely for microbial culture and in the food, health care products, medical and chemical industries, because of its gel, thickening and stabilization properties (Liu et al., 2013). The supply of agarophytes from wild stocks can no longer meet the demand for agar. Thus, large-scale cultivation of agarophytes is required (Gupta et al., 2013). The continuous supply of seed material is a key step for successful aquaculture (Saminathan et al., 2015).However, the limitations of traditional seed production methods for most agarophytes have restricted exploitation of these seaweeds for industrial use(Mantri, 2009). Thus, development of seed stock methods for agarophytes is crucial to achieve largescale production of seedlings.

    Protoplasts are living plant cells devoid of cell walls which can be applied in somatic hybridization,proteomics, metabolomics, cybridization and protoclonal variation studies (Fujita and Saito, 1990;Davey et al., 2005; Reddy et al., 2008). Theoretically,a protoplast can lead to the regeneration of one or more plants from a single cell due to the totipotence of plant cells (Huddy et al., 2013). Moreover, many protoplasts can be isolated from a small fragment of algal thallus, so protoplasts can be excellent tools for seed stock production and plant breeding (Gupta et al., 2011; Huddy et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2014). Chen(1998) and Chen and Shih (2000) developed methods for producing stocks of seedlings using protoplasts from green algae (UlvafasciataandMonostroma latissimum). Protoplasts fromMonostromaandPorphyrahave also been successfully tested for seeding and regeneration in laboratory conditions(Kito et al., 1998; Dipakkore et al., 2005; Reddy et al., 2006), and protoplasts from some species ofGracilariaandGracilariopsishave successfully been regenerated to whole thalli (Cheney, 1990; Yan and Wang, 1993; Reddy et al., 2008; Yeong et al., 2008;Wang et al., 2014; Huddy et al., 2015). These studies indicated that using protoplasts as seed stocks for cultivation is feasible. However, methods for protoplast isolation and regeneration of agarophyte species have not been sufficiently established (Wang,1994; Baweja et al., 2009). There are very few reports about protoplast isolation fromGracilariaandGracilariopsisspecies (Reddy et al., 2010; Gupta et al., 2011; Huddy et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2014).

    In the present study, we used a marine bacterium,Marinomonassp. YS-70, that can produce agarase.The crude agarase solution from this bacterium mixed with commercial enzymes (cellulase and macerozyme R-10) as a cell wall hydrolase produced good yields of protoplasts fromGracilariopsisbailiniae. This paper reports the optimization of the protoplast isolation conditions and the callus formation of these protoplasts.

    2 MATERIAL AND METHOD

    2.1 Experimental algae

    Thalli ofG.bailiniaewere obtained from the breeding pond of Hainan Ocean and Fisheries Sciences Research Base, Qionghai, Hainan, China. In the laboratory, the seaweed samples were cleaned of mud and epiphytes using a soft brush and filtered seawater. Then, the thalli were maintained in ventilated tanks at 27°C and 40–60 μmol photons/(m2·s) (12 h light:12 h dark) (Zhong et al., 2014).

    2.2 Preparation of agarase

    Marinomonassp. YS-70, which was isolated from red algae, was used for the preparation of agarase.The bacteria were inoculated into 100 mL of 2216E medium in a 500-mL conical flask. The 2216E medium was composed of 5 g tryptone (OXOID), 1 g yeast extract (OXOID), 0.01 g FePO4(Sangon) and 0.2% agar (OXOID), dissolved in 1 000 mL aged seawater (final pH adjusted to 7.3). After incubating at 26°C for 48 h in a reciprocal shaker (120 r/min), the bacterial solution was centrifuged at 10 444 r/min for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and stored at -80°C until use in protoplast isolation.

    2.3 Agarase assay

    Agarase assay was carried out by estimating the reducing sugar released using the 3,5-dinitrosalisylic acid (DNS) method (Tang, 2012). The activity of agarase was determined at pH 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, 7.5,8.5, 9.5 and 10.5. The reaction mixture was prepared from 0.1 mL crude agarase solution and 0.9 mL buffer(0.05 mol/L) containing 20 g/L agar; the buffers used were citric acid (pH 3.5–5.5), phosphate (pH 6.5–7.5),and glycine-NaOH (pH 8.5–10.5). The reaction mixture was incubated at 40°C for 30 min. Then,1 mL of DNS was mixed with 1 mL of the reaction mixture, heated for 5 min in a boiling water bath, and then cooled. The release of reducing sugar was determined by measuring the absorbance at 540 nm against a standard curve for galactose. One unit of agarase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme(mL) that produced reducing sugar equivalent to 1 μg D-galactose per min in these conditions.

    2.4 Isolation of protoplasts from G. bailiniae

    For the optimization of protoplast isolation, thalli were cleaned with a soft brush and rinsed three times with filtered seawater. After cleaning,G.bailiniaethalli were cut into 2–3 mm long pieces using a sterile scalpel blade in a culture dish and rinsed three times in filtered seawater. Then, approximately 0.5 g of seaweed pieces were incubated in 5 mL of enzyme solution in a 50-mL conical flask placed in the dark on a rotary shaker (90 r/min) for 4 h at pH 6.5. The initial enzyme solution (before various parameters were optimized) contained 1% (w/v) cellulase and 0.8 mol/L sorbitol in 40% base solution (deionized water containing 25 mmol/L 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid-Tris [MES-Tris] and 25 mmol/L CaCl2·2H2O) and 60% crude agarase solution. After incubation, the enzyme mixture was filtered through 45 μm nylon mesh to remove undigested algal pieces,and the remaining filtrate was centrifuged at 1 247 r/min for 8 min at 25°C. After that, 80% of the supernatant was discarded, and the protoplasts were resuspended in 5 mL MES medium containing 0.6 mol/L D-sorbitol and this procedure was repeated twice. Then,protoplast numbers were determined in a blood counting chamber. Each set of conditions was tested with three replicates.

    Fig.1 pH-activity curve of Marinomonas sp. YS-70 agarase

    For protoplast regeneration experiments, the thalli ofG.bailiniaewere prepared more stringently. First,thallus tips (within 3 cm from the apex) were selected,cleaned with a soft brush and rinsed three times with filtered seawater. After that, the thallus tips were treated with an ultrasonic cleaner (KQ-250DB) at 100% power for 3 min before soaking in sterile seawater containing 1.5% KI for 10 min. Finally, the thallus tips were immersed in sterile seawater containing 0.1 g/L ampicillin sulfate, 0.1 g/L kanamycin sulfate, 0.02 g/L neomycin sulfate and 2 mg/L GeO2for 48 h at 25°C.Then, theG.bailiniaethalli were used to isolate protoplasts, as described above.

    2.5 Optimization of protoplast isolation parameters

    For protoplast isolation fromG.bailiniae, first, the base solution was optimized from among seawater(base-solution 1), deionized water (base-solution 2),and deionized water containing 25 mmol/L MES-Tris and 25 mmol/L CaCl2·2H2O (base-solution 3). Then,the concentration of cellulase (0%, 1%, 2%, 3% or 4% w/v), macerozyme R-10 (0%, 0.5%, 1% or 1.5%w/v) and sorbitol (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 or 1.0 mol/L), and the incubation time (2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 h), temperature (25,28 or 31°C) and enzyme solution pH (5.9, 6.1, 6.3, 6.5 or 6.7), were also optimized, in order. The optimal conditions identified in the proceeding tests were used in subsequent tests.

    2.6 Protoplast staining

    To confirm the viability of protoplasts, we used 0.5% w/v Evans blue (Biotopped, Beijing, China) to stain protoplasts, which were observed under a light microscope (Zhang et al., 2014). The viable protoplast yields were determined as follows:

    Viable protoplast yield=total number of protoplasts×survival rate.

    Fig.2 Effect of different base solutions on protoplast yield of G. bailiniae thalli

    To confirm true protoplasts lacking a cell wall,0.01% (w/v) Fluorescent Brightener 28 (Sigma) was used to stain protoplasts, and they were observed under a fluorescence microscope (LEICA DMI3000 B) with UV light (Wang et al., 2014).

    2.7 Culture of protoplasts

    Protoplasts ofG.bailiniaewere dispensed into 2 mL MES medium containing 0.6 mol/L sorbitol in 35 mm×10 mm Petri dishes with a protoplast density of 5×104–1×105cells/mL. Then, protoplasts were cultured at 26°C with a 12 h:12 h light:dark cycle(16 μmol/(m2·s)). After culturing for 2 days, the culture medium was replaced with ? MES medium containing 0.6 mol/L sorbitol. Then, the ? culture medium was replaced with MES medium when the protoplasts had been cultured for a total of 4 days.After that, 50% of the culture medium was replaced every 3 days with MES medium.

    2.8 Statistical analysis

    Analysis of variance was used for the comparison of results in different conditions.P<0.05 was considered significant.

    3 RESULT

    3.1 Agarase activity assay

    Marinomonassp. YS-70 agarase activity was high at pH 5.5 to 8.5 (Fig.1) and the highest enzyme activity was observed at pH 5.5. Lower and higher pH values resulted in lower enzyme activity.

    3.2 Effect of the base solution type

    Fig.3 Effect of enzyme constituents and concentrations on protoplast yield from G. bailiniae thalli

    As Fig.2 shows, the protoplast yield was significantly (P<0.05) increased by using basesolution 3 and the highest protoplast yield((12.5±1.3)×105cells/g fresh weight [f. wt]) was obtained with this treatment. There was no significant difference in the protoplast yield between treatment with base-solution 1 and base-solution 2. The lowest protoplast yield ((1.08±0.59)×105cells/g f. wt) was obtained on treatment with base-solution 1.

    3.3 Optimization of cell wall degrading enzyme combination and concentration

    As Fig.3a and b show, the protoplast yields fromG.bailiniaethalli were significantly affected by the concentration of added enzymes (P<0.05). The protoplast yield was highest when the enzyme mixture contained 60% crudeMarinomonassp. YS-70 agarase solution, 2% w/v cellulase and 1% w/v macerozyme R-10. A large quantity of protoplasts could be obtained when the mixture of enzymes consisted of agarase and cellulase only (Fig.3a), i.e., when the concentration of macerozyme R-10 was 0%. However, few protoplasts were released fromG.bailiniaethalli when agarase was mixed with macerozyme R-10 without cellulase (Fig.3b).

    Fig.4 Effects of (a) different incubation pH, (b) sorbitol concentration, (c) incubation temperature, and (d)time on protoplast yield from G. bailiniae thalli

    3.4 Optimization of incubation pH, sorbitol concentration and incubation temperature and time

    pH 6.5 was found to be the optimal pH for protoplast yield ofG.bailiniae, with a significantly increased yield compared with the other pH values assessed (P<0.05) (Fig.4a).

    Fig.5 Protoplasts of G. bailin i ae

    The protoplast yields were not significantly different with sorbitol treatments of 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 mol/L (Fig.4b); the highest protoplast yield was obtained when the sorbitol concentration was 0.4 mol/L. The yield of protoplast decreased significantly (P<0.05) when the sorbitol concentration was >0.6 mol/L. Based on these results, a sorbitol concentration of 0.4 mol/L was considered optimal for protoplast yield.

    Protoplast yields fromG.bailiniaewere not significantly different between the incubation temperatures of 25 and 28°C, and the optimal yield was obtained at 28°C. The protoplast yield decreased significantly (P<0.05) at 31°C (Fig.4c).

    Protoplasts were released fromG.bailiniaeas early as 2 h after the start of incubation of the thalli in enzyme solution. Protoplast yields increased with incubation time (Fig.4d). However, the survival rate of the protoplasts decreased as the incubation time increased. As Fig.4d shows, the protoplast yield fromG.bailiniaeobtained after 4.0 h was(31.3±4.5)×105cells/g f.wt and the survival rate was 56%, the highest viable yield among the tested incubation times. Therefore, an incubation period of 4 h was considered optimal for viable protoplast yield.

    3.5 Protoplast cell wall regeneration and cell division

    Freshly isolated protoplasts fromG.bailiniaewere spherical with diameter from 7 to 35 μm (Fig.5a).Living protoplasts appeared yellow and dead protoplasts were dark blue when stained with Evans blue (Fig.5b). True protoplasts were red and undigested cell walls were green when they were stained with Fluorescent Brightener 28 and observed under UV light (Fig.6a). Regeneration of the cell wall began from one pole of the protoplast (Fig.6b). After being cultured for 48 h, the surface of most protoplasts was covered with regenerated cell wall and then the cell wall thickened. After 60 h of culture, the cell wall regeneration was almost complete (Fig.6c). We found that the first division of most protoplasts occurred on the third day after protoplasts were isolated. There were two division types for the first division of protoplasts fromG.bailiniae, asymmetric division and symmetric division (Fig.7a). In the former,protoplasts produced a small bud from one side of the cell, and in the latter, protoplasts divided into two cells from the cell middle. After the first division, the divided cells could develop into callus masses over several days of culture (Fig.7b, c).

    4 DISCUSSION

    Common sources of algal cell wall degrading enzymes are digestive gland juices of herbivorous marine invertebrates, culture filtrates of marine bacteria, and commercial preparations (Yan and Wang, 1993; Araki et al., 1998; Mussio and Rusig,2006; Reddy et al., 2008; Yeong et al., 2008; Gupta et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014).However, the enzyme activity of digestive gland juices from marine invertebrates varies with sampling time, sampling species and production batch of enzymes, and this material has highly deleterious effects on protoplast viability (Wang, 1994; Zhao et al., 2005). Commercial cell wall degrading enzyme preparations have sometimes been assessed for protoplast isolation fromGracilariaspecies. Yeong et al. (2008) and Huddy et al. (2013) obtained a large quantity of protoplasts fromGracilariachangiiandGracilariagracilisusing commercial cellulase,macerozyme and agarase. In our tests, protoplasts could not be isolated effectively fromGracilariopsis bailiniaeusing commercial agarase (TAKARA),cellulase and macerozyme R-10 (data not shown), but we obtained many protoplasts fromG.bailiniaewhen the commercial agarase was replaced by crude agarase solution fromMarinomonassp. YS-70. This might be because the commercial agarase is purer and could not completely degrade the complex amorphous matrix including sulfated polygalactans (agarcolloids or agars) in the cell wall ofG.bailiniae, resulting in non-release of protoplasts.

    Fig.6 Cell wall regeneration of protoplasts from G. bailiniae

    Fig.7 Protoplast regeneration of G. bailiniae

    Studies have shown that red algae have a wide variety of matrix polysaccharides in their cell walls,which vary in amount depending on the species(Bellanger et al., 1990; Graham and Wilcox, 2000;Reddy et al., 2008). In our study, cellulase and agarase were necessary for protoplast isolation. We could not obtain a good protoplast yield fromG.bailiniaewith a single cell wall degrading enzyme or enzyme mixtures lacking agarase or cellulase, which suggests the cell wall ofG.bailiniaeis complex. Macerozyme R-10 presumably enhanced the protoplast yield because macerozyme has been shown to digest pectin and polygalactans in many studies of protoplast isolation from agarophyte species (Evans and Bravo,1983; Yeong et al., 2008; Gupta et al., 2011; Huddy et al., 2013). However, the commercial enzyme is partially purified and contains (a) toxic substance(s)(Inoue et al., 2011), so the optimization of cell wall degrading enzyme concentration was necessary. A combination of 2% w/v cellulase, 1% w/v macerozyme and 60% crude agarase prepared fromMarinomonassp. YS-70 resulted in the highest protoplast yield among the combinations and concentrations of enzymes we tested.

    pH is an important parameter for protoplast isolation. In general, the pH used in published reports of algal protoplast isolation ranges between pH 5.8 and 7.0 (Cheney et al., 1986; Bj?rk et al., 1990; Yan and Wang, 1993; Mussio and Rusig, 2006; Reddy et al., 2006; Yeong et al., 2008; Lafontaine et al., 2011).However, Gupta et al. (2011) reported an optimal pH of 7.5 for the isolation of protoplasts fromGracilaria verrucosaandGracilariadura. In our study, the optimal pH was 5.0 for commercial cellulase activity and 5.0 to 6.0 for macerozyme R-10, while the crude agarase fromMarinomonassp. YS-70 had its highest activity at pH 5.5–8.5 (Fig.1). Thus, weakly acidic or neutral solution (pH 5–7) could maintain relatively high activity of all three enzymes. The optimal pH of 6.5 for protoplast yield observed in this study is consistent with this conclusion.

    Protoplast yield is influenced by many physicochemical factors, especially the constituents of the enzyme solution. In some previous studies of protoplast isolation from seaweed, CaCl2·2H2O, MES buffer, or both, were added into the enzyme solution(Dipakkore et al., 2005; Mussio and Rusig, 2006;Yeong et al., 2008; Huddy et al., 2013), but other studies did not use these reagents (Bj?rk et al., 1990;Wang et al., 2014). In the present study, the protoplast yield was significantly enhanced by base-solution 3(deionized water containing 25 mmol/L MES-Tris buffer and 25 mmol/L CaCl2·2H2O). It is possible that the MES-Tris buffer maintained a stable pH for enzyme function and CaCl2·2H2O as a plasma membrane stabilizer protected the plasmalemma of the protoplasts (Wang, 1994). We found that a deionized water-based solution gave a higher protoplast yield than seawater based-solution. Similar results were also reported in studies of protoplast isolation fromUlva,EnteromorphaandMonostroma(Dipakkore et al., 2005). This phenomenon was possibly because ions in the seawater result in reduced activity of cell wall lytic enzymes (Dipakkore et al.,2005).

    In this study, 0.4 mol/L sorbitol was found to be the optimal concentration for protoplast yield. Similarly,sorbitol was used as the osmotic stabilizer by Wang et al. (2014) in protoplast isolation fromGracilariopsis lemaneiformis, but the concentration of sorbitol in their study was 0.8 mol/L. Osmotic conditions help protoplasts to maintain their integrity after the cell walls are removed (Compton et al., 2000). Sugars and sugar alcohols, such as mannitol, sorbitol and glucose,are commonly used as osmotic stabilizers in protoplast isolation (Araki et al., 1998; Lafontaine et al., 2011;Wang et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014). Use of the inorganic osmoticum NaCl was also reported in protoplast isolation fromLaminariaspecies (Butler et al., 1989).

    In our experiments, the optimal incubation temperature for protoplast yield fromG.bailiniaewas 28°C, close to the optimal growth temperature ofG.bailiniaein nature (Zhong et al., 2014). An optimal incubation temperature for protoplast isolation close to the optimal growth temperature of the algae was also observed for the tropical speciesGracilaria changiiand the temperate speciesGracilaria Verrucosa(Araki et al., 1998; Yeong et al., 2008;Gupta et al., 2011).

    The protoplast yield increased, but the protoplast survival percentage decreased, when the incubation time increased during isolation. A similar result was found in the protoplast isolation fromKappaphycus alvarezii(Zhang et al., 2014). Optimal incubation times for protoplast isolation from many algae are between 2.5 and 3 h, for example 2.5 h forGracilaria verrucosa(Araki et al., 1998), and 3 h forGracilaria changii(Yeong et al., 2008),Gracilariagracilis(Huddy et al., 2013),MonostromanitidumandPorphyrayezoensis(Kito et al., 1998). Incubation times >6 h cause the cells to be overdigested, resulting in a significant reduction of the protoplast yield(Yeong et al., 2008).

    Cell wall resynthesis of protoplasts was observed to start within 12 h (data not shown) after protoplast isolation fromG.bailiniae. Cell wall regeneration began at one pole of the protoplast. A similar pattern of cell wall deposition, beginning at a single pole of the protoplast, was also noted forGracilariagracilis(Huddy et al., 2013) andK.alvarezii(Zablackis et al.,1993). Two division types for the first division—asymmetric division and symmetric division—were first reported in the protoplast regeneration ofGracilariopsisgenera. After the first division, the divided cells can develop into callus-like masses. In the present study, many callus masses were obtained in the cultivation process, which might have potential for application in production of metabolites ofG.bailiniae. Meanwhile, some seaweeds, such asKappaphycusalvarezii(Reddy et al., 2003), have regenerated whole plants from their calli, so the callus masses obtained in our study might have the potential to produce seed material forG.bailiniae.

    In previous reports, protoplasts ofGracilaria changiiandGracilariagracilisregenerated after 2 months of culture (Yeong et al., 2008; Huddy et al.,2015), and protoplasts ofGracilariopsislemaneiformisregenerated after 90 days of culture (Wang et al.,2014). However, we have been unable to regenerate protoplasts ofG.bailiniaeinto whole plants. The capacity for protoplast regeneration might be related to the growth conditions of the algal thalli. Using algae which are in good condition could improve the yield and the survival rate of protoplasts, and be good for protoplast regeneration (Bj?rk et al., 1990; Wang et al., 2014). The thalli ofG.bailiniaeused in our study had been cultured for 1 month before protoplast isolation, so they might have been in poor condition and unsuitable for subsequent regeneration. In addition, the culture medium used in our study might not be suitable for protoplast regeneration ofG.bailiniae. Huddy et al. (2015) regeneratedGracilaria gracilisprotoplasts into whole plants in Provasoli’s enriched seawater (PES) medium. However, Yeong et al. (2008) obtained wholeGracilariachangiiplants from protoplasts only in MES medium but not PES medium. Moreover, the densities of protoplasts in our culture system were 5×104–1×105cells/mL, which might not be suitable for protoplast regeneration.Thus, further studies, especially to determine the optimum conditions for the growth of protoplasts into wholeG.bailiniaeplants, need to be conducted.

    5 CONCLUSION

    In this study, we established a protocol for protoplast isolation fromG.bailiniaeand investigated primary development of the protoplasts. This study thus provides a theoretical basis for seedling production ofG.bailiniae, and a protoplast isolation method for protoplast fusion and hybridization work.Furthermore, a large number of callus masses could be obtained in our study, which might have potential application in production ofG.bailiniaemetabolites.

    6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    The authors thank Professor LIU Tao (Ocean University of China), Professor MEI Zhiping(Shantou University), Dr. WANG Hui (Shantou University) and Ms. WANG Zhongxia (Ocean University of China) for providing much advice and kind assistance.

    猜你喜歡
    石經(jīng)海紅張毅
    生活有錢有閑,妻子為何還想離婚?
    哈代詩歌的民謠藝術(shù)
    石經(jīng)
    寶藏(2022年2期)2022-07-30 07:41:02
    唐石經(jīng)刊刻的善本價值
    鴨綠江(2020年21期)2020-10-14 06:05:46
    《秋水共長天一色》
    青年生活(2019年6期)2019-09-10 17:55:38
    韓國古代石刻文字考釋問題及華嚴石經(jīng)文字的復(fù)原
    海紅姑娘
    黃河之聲(2018年20期)2018-12-14 05:14:38
    Noether Symmetry and Conserved Quantities of Fractional Birkhoffian System in Terms of Herglotz Variational Problem?
    Perturbation to Noether Symmetries and Adiabatic Invariants for Generalized Birkhoff Systems Based on El-Nabulsi Dynamical Model
    Fractional Action-Like Variational Problem and Its Noether Symmetries for a Nonholonomic System
    永久网站在线| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 69人妻影院| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 乱人视频在线观看| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产在视频线精品| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 久久草成人影院| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产91av在线免费观看| 一级av片app| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 性色avwww在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 成人二区视频| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| h日本视频在线播放| 我要搜黄色片| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产精品.久久久| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 91av网一区二区| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 禁无遮挡网站| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | www日本黄色视频网| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 1024手机看黄色片| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 综合色av麻豆| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 老司机影院成人| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 成年av动漫网址| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 日本一二三区视频观看| 日本一本二区三区精品| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 亚洲在线观看片| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 嫩草影院入口| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 一级毛片电影观看 | 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲五月天丁香| 韩国av在线不卡| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产精品野战在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 美女大奶头视频| 免费av毛片视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 男女国产视频网站| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| a级毛色黄片| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 老司机影院毛片| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 97热精品久久久久久| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 97超碰精品成人国产| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 久久精品夜色国产| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 99热网站在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 久久久久国产网址| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产 一区精品| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产高潮美女av| 精品久久久久久久久av| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 在线a可以看的网站| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 成人三级黄色视频| 日韩中字成人| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 精品国产三级普通话版| 九色成人免费人妻av| 久久久久久大精品| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 久久午夜福利片| 国产精华一区二区三区| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 日本黄大片高清| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 人妻系列 视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片 | 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 免费看日本二区| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 免费观看人在逋| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 青春草国产在线视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 久久久久久久久大av| 69人妻影院| 国产乱来视频区| 简卡轻食公司| 日韩高清综合在线| 午夜久久久久精精品| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产精品一及| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 国产单亲对白刺激| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 有码 亚洲区| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 在线天堂最新版资源| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲av一区综合| a级毛色黄片| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 少妇的逼好多水| 久久久久九九精品影院| 如何舔出高潮| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| av视频在线观看入口| a级毛色黄片| 亚洲性久久影院| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 搞女人的毛片| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲在线观看片| 日韩中字成人| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 欧美激情在线99| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 久久这里只有精品中国| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 久久久久国产网址| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 美女大奶头视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 欧美三级亚洲精品| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 天堂网av新在线| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 久久久久性生活片| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 97热精品久久久久久| 久久久久久久久久成人| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 99热网站在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 深夜a级毛片| 热99re8久久精品国产| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 性色avwww在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 一级毛片我不卡| 伦精品一区二区三区| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| av专区在线播放| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 又爽又黄a免费视频| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看 | 成人无遮挡网站| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 免费看a级黄色片| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲在线观看片| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 久久精品影院6| 简卡轻食公司| 免费看光身美女| 日韩大片免费观看网站 | 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产在视频线在精品| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产探花极品一区二区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 简卡轻食公司| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 嫩草影院新地址| 欧美潮喷喷水| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 美女高潮的动态| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产在视频线精品| 特级一级黄色大片| 床上黄色一级片| 精品久久久久久成人av| ponron亚洲| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 免费观看在线日韩| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 搞女人的毛片| 久久久久久久久大av| or卡值多少钱| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲不卡免费看| 久久精品人妻少妇| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 午夜视频国产福利| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 国产成年人精品一区二区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产视频内射| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 69人妻影院| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 18+在线观看网站| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| or卡值多少钱| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲av福利一区| 老司机影院成人| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 色综合色国产| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 亚洲综合精品二区| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 日本色播在线视频| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| av福利片在线观看| 久久久久久大精品| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看 | 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 尾随美女入室| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产三级在线视频| 一级黄片播放器| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 特级一级黄色大片| 久久久久久大精品| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 一本久久精品| 国产在线男女| 深夜a级毛片| 午夜激情欧美在线| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 性色avwww在线观看| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 草草在线视频免费看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| av免费观看日本| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| kizo精华| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产美女午夜福利| 大香蕉久久网| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 美女黄网站色视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲av男天堂| 欧美成人a在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 免费观看在线日韩| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 日韩欧美三级三区| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 一级爰片在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 免费看光身美女| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 91av网一区二区| 人妻系列 视频| 如何舔出高潮| av福利片在线观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 日韩中字成人| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 免费看日本二区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 老司机影院成人| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 免费大片18禁| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 欧美激情在线99| 色综合色国产| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产在视频线精品| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 色5月婷婷丁香| 一夜夜www| .国产精品久久| 在现免费观看毛片| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 色视频www国产| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 少妇的逼好多水| 久久久久久久久中文| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产三级在线视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲图色成人| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 91狼人影院| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 韩国av在线不卡| 久久热精品热| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 中文欧美无线码| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 欧美日本视频| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 久久热精品热| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲av福利一区| 中文资源天堂在线| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 99久久人妻综合| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 男人舔奶头视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看|