【摘要】 目的:探究不同劑量的艾司氯胺酮用于普外急腹癥手術(shù)對(duì)術(shù)后恢復(fù)質(zhì)量的影響。方法:選取2023年6月—2024年10月上饒市人民醫(yī)院收治的90例急腹癥患者為研究對(duì)象,使用隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為對(duì)照組(n=30)、A組(n=30)和B組(n=30)。麻醉誘導(dǎo)時(shí),A組靜注艾司氯胺酮0.3 mg/kg,B組靜注艾司氯胺酮0.5 mg/kg,對(duì)照組靜注等量0.9%氯化鈉注射液,麻醉維持時(shí),A組、B組各自持續(xù)泵注艾司氯胺酮0.3 mg/(kg·h)、0.5 mg/(kg·h),均持續(xù)泵注注射用鹽酸瑞芬太尼0.1~0.3 μg/(kg·min),間斷給予苯磺順阿曲庫銨注射液,對(duì)照組泵注丙泊酚4~6 mg/(kg·h)、注射用鹽酸瑞芬太尼0.1~0.3 μg/(kg·min),間斷給予苯磺順阿曲庫銨注射液。比較三組麻醉恢復(fù)情況、血流動(dòng)力學(xué)、應(yīng)激反應(yīng)、炎癥指標(biāo)、術(shù)后24 h時(shí)恢復(fù)質(zhì)量、不良反應(yīng)差異。結(jié)果:A組和B組氣管導(dǎo)管拔出時(shí)間、呼吸恢復(fù)時(shí)間、睜眼時(shí)間、麻醉恢復(fù)時(shí)間均早于對(duì)照組,且A組氣管導(dǎo)管拔出時(shí)間、呼吸恢復(fù)時(shí)間、睜眼時(shí)間、麻醉恢復(fù)時(shí)間均早于B組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05);三組在T1、T2、T3時(shí)HR、MAP均較T0時(shí)降低,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05);A組和B組HR、MAP均高于對(duì)照組,且A組HR、MAP均高于B組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05);術(shù)后1、2 d時(shí),三組NE、Glu水平均較術(shù)前上升,B組、A組NE、Glu均低于對(duì)照組,且B組NE、Glu均低于A組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05);術(shù)后1、2 d時(shí),三組CRP、WBC水平均較術(shù)前升高,B組、A組CRP、WBC均低于對(duì)照組,且B組CRP、WBC均低于A組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05);術(shù)后24 h時(shí),三組患者QOR-40得分比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05),且B組、A組QOR-40得分均高于對(duì)照組(Plt;0.05);B組術(shù)后眩暈、眼球震顫、術(shù)后譫妄發(fā)生率均高于A組和對(duì)照組,A組、B組術(shù)后心動(dòng)過緩、低血壓發(fā)生率均低于對(duì)照組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05)。結(jié)論:在普外急腹癥手術(shù)中,靜脈輸注艾司氯胺酮能顯著縮短麻醉恢復(fù)時(shí)間,維持血流動(dòng)力學(xué)穩(wěn)定,減輕術(shù)后應(yīng)激反應(yīng)和炎癥反應(yīng),改善術(shù)后恢復(fù)質(zhì)量,低劑量(0.3 mg/kg)艾司氯胺酮在促進(jìn)快速恢復(fù)、減少心動(dòng)過緩、低血壓等心血管不良反應(yīng)方面更具優(yōu)勢(shì),而高劑量(0.5 mg/kg)在減輕應(yīng)激反應(yīng)和炎癥反應(yīng)方面效果更顯著。
【關(guān)鍵詞】 艾司氯胺酮 急腹癥 手術(shù) 恢復(fù)質(zhì)量
Influence of Different Doses of Esketamine on Postoperative Recovery Quality in Acute Abdominal Surgery in Department of General Surgery/MIAO Qian, ZHANG Pingheng, YE Zhenyuan. //Medical Innovation of China, 2025, 22(09): 114-119
[Abstract] Objective: To investigate the influence of different doses of Esketamine on the quality of postoperative recovery in patients with acute abdominal surgery in department of general surgery. Method: A total of 90 patients with acute abdomen admitted to Shangrao People's Hospital from June 2023 to October 2024 were selected as the research subjects, and they were divided into control group (n=30), group A (n=30) and group B (n=30) by random number table method. During anesthesia induction, group A was intravenously injected with 0.3 mg/kg
of Esketamine, group B was intravenously injected with 0.5 mg/kg of Esketamine, and the control group was intravenously injected with the same amount of 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection. During anesthesia maintenance, group A and group B were continuously pumped with Esketamine at 0.3 mg/(kg·h) and 0.5 mg/( kg·h) respectively, and were continuously pumped with Remifentanil Hydrochloride for Injection at 0.1-0.3 μg/(kg·min), and were given intermittently Cisatracurium Besilate Injection, and control group was pumped with Propofol at 4-6 mg/(kg·h) and Remifentanil Hydrochloride for Injection at 0.1-0.3 μg/(kg·min), and was intermittently given Cisatracurium Besilate Injection. The differences in anesthesia recovery status, hemodynamics, stress response, inflammatory indicators, recovery quality at 24 hours after surgery and adverse reactions were compared among the three groups. Result: The tracheal catheter extraction time, respiratory recovery time, eye opening time and anesthesia recovery time were earlier in group A and group B than those in control group, and were earlier in group A than those in group B (Plt;0.05). At T1, T2, T3, the HR and MAP in the three groups were risen compared with those at T0 (Plt;0.05), and the HR and MAP in group A and group B were higher than those in the control group, and HR and MAP were higher in group A than those in group B (Plt;0.05). At 1 day and 2 days after surgery, the levels of NE and Glu in the three groups were risen compared with those before surgery, and the levels of NE and Glu were lower in group B and group A than those in control group, and were also lower in group B than those in group A (Plt;0.05). The levels of CRP and WBC in the three groups at 1 day and 2 days after surgery were risen compared to those before surgery, and the levels of CRP and WBC in group B and group A were lower than those in control group, and the levels of CRP and WBC in group B were lower than those in group A (Plt;0.05). At 24 hours after surgery, there was a statistical significance in the QOR-40 score among the three groups (Plt;0.05), the QOR-40 score in group B and group A was higher than that in control group (Plt;0.05). The incidence rates of postoperative vertigo, nystagmus and postoperative delirium in group B were higher than those in group A and control group, and the incidence rates of postoperative bradycardia and hypotension in group A and group B were lower compared with those in control group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion: During acute abdominal surgery in department of general surgery, intravenous infusion of Esketamine can significantly shorten the time to anesthesia recovery, maintain hemodynamic stability, attenuate postoperative stress and inflammatory responses, and improve the quality of postoperative recovery. A low dose of Esketamine
(0.3 mg/kg) appears to be more advantageous in promoting rapid recovery and reducing cardiovascular adverse reactions such as bradycardia and hypotension. Whereas a higher dose (0.5 mg/kg) demonstrates more pronounced effects in alleviating stress and inflammatory responses.
[Key words] Esketamine Acute abdomen Surgery Recovery quality
First-author's address: Department of Anesthesiology, Shangrao People's Hospital, Shangrao 334000, China
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2025.09.026
急腹癥是指盆腔、腹腔、臟器及腹膜后組織出現(xiàn)急劇病理改變導(dǎo)致患者出現(xiàn)以腹痛表現(xiàn)為主且伴有全身反應(yīng)的臨床綜合征[1],主要由腹腔臟器的炎癥、穿孔、出血、梗阻引起,患者病情變化速度較快,并且發(fā)病率高[2-3]。近年來,隨著我國居民生活水平改變,急腹癥的發(fā)病率呈上升趨勢(shì)[4]。嚴(yán)重者常合并感染性休克、全身性炎癥反應(yīng)等,導(dǎo)致患者發(fā)生不良預(yù)后結(jié)局,病死率增加[5]。有研究認(rèn)為,手術(shù)本身、手術(shù)過程中進(jìn)行的麻醉操作及患者可能存在的炎癥感染均會(huì)導(dǎo)致機(jī)體發(fā)生應(yīng)激反應(yīng),促使機(jī)體釋放相關(guān)炎癥應(yīng)激因子[6]。艾司氯胺酮能夠快速阻斷N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受體,抑制傷害性刺激地傳入,降低機(jī)體對(duì)手術(shù)刺激的敏感性[7-9]。但艾司氯胺酮應(yīng)用于急腹癥手術(shù)適宜劑量還待確定。本研究通過分析不同劑量的艾司氯胺酮用于普外急腹癥手術(shù)對(duì)術(shù)后恢復(fù)質(zhì)量的影響,現(xiàn)報(bào)道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
選取2023年6月—2024年10月上饒市人民醫(yī)院收治的90例急腹癥患者為研究對(duì)象,納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)確診急腹癥;(2)需要進(jìn)行手術(shù)治療;(3)年齡gt;18歲,且lt;75歲;(4)意識(shí)清楚;(5)美國麻醉醫(yī)師協(xié)會(huì)(ASA)分級(jí)為Ⅰ、Ⅱ級(jí)。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)存在麻醉禁忌證;(2)合并重要臟器功能的嚴(yán)重?fù)p傷;(3)合并惡性腫瘤;(4)麻醉藥物過敏;(5)合并精神障礙;(6)妊娠期或哺乳期;(7)合并血液系統(tǒng)疾病;(8)依從性差。使用隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為對(duì)照組(n=30)、A組(n=30)和B組(n=30)。本研究經(jīng)上饒市人民醫(yī)院醫(yī)學(xué)倫理委員會(huì)批準(zhǔn)。患者及家屬知情同意本研究。
1.2 方法
所有患者均行靜脈麻醉,麻醉誘導(dǎo)前充分給予面罩吸氧去氮3 min。(1)麻醉誘導(dǎo)時(shí),依次靜注咪達(dá)唑侖注射液(生產(chǎn)廠家:福安藥業(yè)集團(tuán)慶余堂制藥有限公司,批準(zhǔn)文號(hào):國藥準(zhǔn)字H20243613,規(guī)格:5 mL︰5 mg)0.05 mg/kg、枸櫞酸舒芬太尼注射液(生產(chǎn)廠家:福安藥業(yè)集團(tuán)慶余堂制藥有限公司,批準(zhǔn)文號(hào):國藥準(zhǔn)字H20203650,規(guī)格:
1 mL︰50 μg)0.4 μg/kg、丙泊酚乳狀注射液(生產(chǎn)廠家:西安力邦制藥有限公司,批準(zhǔn)文號(hào):國藥準(zhǔn)字H20123318,規(guī)格:50 mL︰1.0 g)2 mg/kg、苯磺順阿曲庫銨注射液(生產(chǎn)廠家:湖南科倫制藥有限公司,批準(zhǔn)文號(hào):國藥準(zhǔn)字H20223546,規(guī)格:5 mL︰10 mg)0.2 mg/kg。(2)A組患者在氣管插管前1 min靜注鹽酸艾司氯胺酮注射液(生產(chǎn)廠家:江蘇恒瑞醫(yī)藥有限公司,批準(zhǔn)文號(hào):國藥準(zhǔn)字H20193336,規(guī)格:2 mL/50 mg)0.3 mg/kg。(3)B組患者在氣管插管前1 min靜注鹽酸艾司氯胺酮注射液0.5 mg/kg。(4)對(duì)照組患者在氣管插管前1 min靜注等量0.9%氯化鈉注射液(生產(chǎn)廠家:四川科倫藥業(yè)股份有限公司,批準(zhǔn)文號(hào):國藥準(zhǔn)字H51021157,規(guī)格:250 mL︰2.25 g);均以相同速度恒速輸注上述劑量藥物。待患者睫毛反應(yīng)消失后置入氣管導(dǎo)管,成功后連接麻醉機(jī),維持機(jī)體呼吸末二氧化碳分壓(PetCO2)35~45 mmHg;麻醉維持:麻醉過程中對(duì)照組泵注丙泊酚4~6 mg/(kg·h)及注射用鹽酸瑞芬太尼(生產(chǎn)廠家:宜昌人福藥業(yè)有限責(zé)任公司,批準(zhǔn)文號(hào):國藥準(zhǔn)字H20030200,規(guī)格:5 mg)0.1~0.3 μg/(kg·min),間斷給予苯磺順阿曲庫銨注射液,A組和B組各自持續(xù)泵注鹽酸艾司氯胺酮注射液0.3 mg/(kg·h)、0.5 mg/(kg·h),均持續(xù)泵注注射用鹽酸瑞芬太尼0.1~0.3 μg/(kg·min),間斷給予苯磺順阿曲庫銨注射液。麻醉醫(yī)師根據(jù)術(shù)中患者情況調(diào)整輸注速度。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo)與評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
比較三組患者麻醉恢復(fù)情況[氣管導(dǎo)管拔出時(shí)間(自停止麻醉藥物給藥至患者滿足自主呼吸穩(wěn)定、意識(shí)恢復(fù)、保護(hù)性反射存在、肌力正常等拔管指征后移除氣管導(dǎo)管的時(shí)間)、呼吸恢復(fù)時(shí)間(自停止麻醉藥物給藥至患者恢復(fù)自主呼吸,呼吸頻率≥8次/min,潮氣量≥5 mL/kg,SpO2≥95%且無須機(jī)械通氣的時(shí)間)、睜眼時(shí)間(自停止麻醉藥物給藥至患者能按指令睜眼或出現(xiàn)明確意識(shí)活動(dòng)如點(diǎn)頭、肢體活動(dòng)的時(shí)間)、麻醉恢復(fù)時(shí)間(自停止麻醉藥物給藥至患者達(dá)到出恢復(fù)室的時(shí)間)];比較三組患者麻醉前(T0)、誘導(dǎo)后(T1)、插管后(T2)、切皮后5 min(T3)時(shí)血流動(dòng)力學(xué)[心率(HR),平均動(dòng)脈壓(MAP)];術(shù)前、術(shù)后1 d、術(shù)后2 d時(shí)應(yīng)激反應(yīng);術(shù)前、術(shù)后1 d、術(shù)后2 d時(shí)三組患者炎癥指標(biāo);患者術(shù)后24 h時(shí)恢復(fù)質(zhì)量、術(shù)后不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率。
1.3.1 指標(biāo)檢測(cè)方法 相應(yīng)時(shí)間點(diǎn)采集患者靜脈血4 mL,離心分離,使用放射免疫法檢測(cè)患者去甲腎上腺(NE)、血糖(Glu),使用酶聯(lián)免疫吸附法檢測(cè)患者C反應(yīng)蛋白(CRP)、白細(xì)胞(WBC)。
1.3.2 術(shù)后恢復(fù)質(zhì)量評(píng)估標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 使用40項(xiàng)恢復(fù)質(zhì)量評(píng)分(QOR-40)對(duì)患者術(shù)后恢復(fù)情況進(jìn)行評(píng)估。QOR-40涵蓋5個(gè)維度、40個(gè)條目,滿分為200分,患者得分越高,術(shù)后恢復(fù)質(zhì)量越好[10]。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理
采用統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件SPSS 26.0處理數(shù)據(jù),計(jì)數(shù)資料以率(%)表示,采用字2檢驗(yàn)對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理,計(jì)量資料以(x±s)表示,多組間比較采用單因素方差分析,兩兩比較采用LSD-t檢驗(yàn),組內(nèi)比較采用配對(duì)t檢驗(yàn)。Plt;0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2 結(jié)果
2.1 三組基線資料比較
三組基線資料比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Pgt;0.05),具有可比性,見表1。
2.2 三組麻醉恢復(fù)情況比較
A組和B組氣管導(dǎo)管拔出時(shí)間、呼吸恢復(fù)時(shí)間、睜眼時(shí)間、麻醉恢復(fù)時(shí)間均早于對(duì)照組,A組氣管導(dǎo)管拔出時(shí)間、呼吸恢復(fù)時(shí)間、睜眼時(shí)間、麻醉恢復(fù)時(shí)間均早于B組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05);三組拔管后SpO2比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Pgt;0.05)。見表2。
2.3 三組血流動(dòng)力學(xué)比較
三組在T1、T2、T3時(shí)HR、MAP均較T0時(shí)降低,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05);T1、T2、T3時(shí),A組和B組HR、MAP均高于對(duì)照組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05);T1、T2、T3時(shí),A組HR、MAP均高于B組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05)。見表3。
2.4 三組應(yīng)激反應(yīng)比較
術(shù)后1、2 d時(shí),三組NE、Glu水平均較術(shù)前上升,且B組、A組NE、Glu均低于對(duì)照組,B組NE、Glu均低于A組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05),見表4。
2.5 三組炎癥指標(biāo)比較
術(shù)后1、2 d,三組CRP、WBC均較術(shù)前升高,但B組、A組CRP、WBC均低于對(duì)照組,B組CRP、WBC均低于A組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05),見表5。
2.6 三組術(shù)后恢復(fù)質(zhì)量比較
術(shù)后24 h時(shí),A組、B組、對(duì)照組QOR-40
得分分別為(176.56±9.56)、(170.16±8.45)、(169.58±8.11)分,三組患者QOR-40得分比較,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=14.150,Plt;0.05),且B組、A組QOR-40得分均高于對(duì)照組(Plt;0.05)。
2.7 三組術(shù)后不良反應(yīng)比較
B組術(shù)后眩暈、眼球震顫、術(shù)后譫妄發(fā)生率均高于A組和對(duì)照組,A組和B組術(shù)后心動(dòng)過緩和低血壓發(fā)生率均低于對(duì)照組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05),見表6。
3 討論
急腹癥手術(shù)屬于急診手術(shù),血流動(dòng)力學(xué)相對(duì)不平穩(wěn)。本研究結(jié)果顯示,三組HR、MAP均較T0時(shí)均下降,且T1時(shí)B組、A組的HR、MAP表達(dá)水平均高于對(duì)照組,A組HR、MAP均高于B組,說明低劑量艾司氯胺酮對(duì)于維持血流動(dòng)力學(xué)穩(wěn)定的效果更佳。其原因可能在于:對(duì)照組于插管前予以生理鹽水,并不具備麻醉效果,麻醉誘導(dǎo)時(shí)予以常規(guī)泵注丙泊酚、注射用鹽酸瑞芬太尼及間斷給予苯磺順阿曲庫銨注射液,而A組、B組患者在常規(guī)麻醉誘導(dǎo)、麻醉維持時(shí)提供艾司氯胺酮注射,能夠發(fā)揮良好鎮(zhèn)靜鎮(zhèn)痛、麻醉效果,故此二組患者術(shù)中血流動(dòng)力學(xué)更為穩(wěn)定。有研究表明,艾司氯胺酮對(duì)于維持血流動(dòng)力學(xué)的穩(wěn)定具有重要作用[11-13]。周瓏艷等[14]研究同樣證實(shí)了艾司氯胺酮對(duì)應(yīng)激反應(yīng)的優(yōu)勢(shì),本研究結(jié)果與之相似。
手術(shù)能導(dǎo)致機(jī)體大量釋放炎癥因子,加重機(jī)體組織損傷,加之急腹癥本身存在原發(fā)病灶引發(fā)的局部病變導(dǎo)致的炎癥與腹腔感染性炎癥,因此需觀察患者炎癥反應(yīng)[15-16]。從三組患者CRP、WBC來看,急腹癥手術(shù)能導(dǎo)致患者誘發(fā)炎癥反應(yīng),但使用大劑量艾司氯胺酮有助于減輕術(shù)后炎癥反應(yīng),推測(cè)其原因可能與艾司氯胺酮能抑制手術(shù)導(dǎo)致的炎癥及免疫激活,抑制炎癥反應(yīng)及炎癥因子的系統(tǒng)級(jí)聯(lián),而加大使用劑量則有效增強(qiáng)了艾司氯胺酮的效果。張玉鳳等[17]研究報(bào)道,艾司氯胺酮與其他麻醉藥物聯(lián)用時(shí)能減少阿片類藥物的使用;艾司氯胺酮也可抑制瑞芬太尼所引起的痛覺過敏[18]。
本研究結(jié)果提示,A組和B組氣管導(dǎo)管拔出時(shí)間、呼吸恢復(fù)時(shí)間、睜眼時(shí)間、麻醉恢復(fù)時(shí)間均早于對(duì)照組,A組氣管導(dǎo)管拔出時(shí)間、呼吸恢復(fù)時(shí)間、睜眼時(shí)間、麻醉恢復(fù)時(shí)間均早于B組,術(shù)后1、2 d時(shí),三組NE、Glu水平均較術(shù)前上升,且B組、A組NE、Glu均低于對(duì)照組,B組NE、Glu均低于A組,術(shù)后24 h時(shí),三組間QOR-40得分存在顯著差異,且B組、A組QOR-40得分均高于對(duì)照組,提示艾司氯胺酮復(fù)合麻醉用于急腹癥手術(shù)中可獲取良好麻醉恢復(fù)效果,且術(shù)后應(yīng)激反應(yīng)輕,術(shù)后恢復(fù)質(zhì)量佳。分析其原因,艾司氯胺酮作為非競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性NMDA受體拮抗劑,能有效阻斷谷氨酸介導(dǎo)的疼痛信號(hào)傳遞,減少脊髓背角神經(jīng)元過度興奮,從而降低術(shù)后痛覺過敏和中樞敏化[19]。臨床認(rèn)為,艾司氯胺酮引發(fā)的不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率低于氯胺酮,但呈現(xiàn)劑量相關(guān)性[20]。本研究中A組術(shù)后譫妄發(fā)生率低于B組,亦證實(shí)0.3 mg/kg的艾司氯胺酮用量對(duì)于急腹癥手術(shù)患者而言安全性更高。
綜上所述,在普外急腹癥手術(shù)中,靜脈輸注艾司氯胺酮能顯著縮短麻醉恢復(fù)時(shí)間,維持血流動(dòng)力學(xué)穩(wěn)定,減輕術(shù)后應(yīng)激反應(yīng)和炎癥反應(yīng),改善術(shù)后恢復(fù)質(zhì)量,低劑量(0.3 mg/kg)艾司氯胺酮在促進(jìn)快速恢復(fù)、減少心動(dòng)過緩、低血壓等心血管不良反應(yīng)方面更具優(yōu)勢(shì),而高劑量(0.5 mg/kg)在減輕應(yīng)激反應(yīng)和炎癥反應(yīng)方面效果更顯著。
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1] YEW K S,GEORGE M K,ALLRED H B.Acute abdominal pain in adults:evaluation and diagnosis[J].Am Fam Physician, 2023,107(6):585-596.
[2]陶振洲,李洋,曹廣,等.腹腔鏡技術(shù)在普外科急腹癥診斷及治療中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值研究[J].中國醫(yī)藥,2023,18(9):1347-1350.
[3]謝光榮,王全根,羅冬冬,等.急腹癥患者感染性休克臨床特征分析[J].中國病原生物學(xué)雜志,2018,13(6):644-647.
[4]任杰,許臣,蔡連軍,等.加速康復(fù)外科理念聯(lián)合腹腔鏡手術(shù)在急腹癥治療中的應(yīng)用[J].中國醫(yī)刊,2021,56(4):404-407.
[5]周華,許媛.腹腔膿毒癥治療中器官功能支持的特點(diǎn)及應(yīng)用價(jià)值[J].中國實(shí)用外科雜志,2019,39(6):568-571.
[6]張揚(yáng),馮勇,商瑜.不同麻醉方式對(duì)急腹癥感染性休克患者血流動(dòng)力學(xué)和炎癥應(yīng)激反應(yīng)及免疫功能的影響[J].醫(yī)藥導(dǎo)報(bào),2017,36(5):520-523.
[7]劉寒玉,丁正年,劉存明,等.氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮在低阿片方案中應(yīng)用的研究進(jìn)展[J].臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志,2023,39(1):85-88.
[8]陳亮,張軍,何文勝.艾司氯胺酮對(duì)腹腔鏡手術(shù)病人疼痛介質(zhì)與術(shù)后早期抑郁的影響[J].蚌埠醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2023,48(5):597-600.
[9]王艷飛,王宇浪,王龍江,等.環(huán)泊酚復(fù)合中/小劑量艾司氯胺酮靜脈麻醉在老年無痛胃腸鏡檢查術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J].山東醫(yī)藥,2024,64(17):83-87.
[10]徐時(shí)好,朱天琦,潘晨翔,等.QOR40量表對(duì)腹腔鏡下子宮肌瘤剝除術(shù)應(yīng)用酮咯酸氨丁三醇患者早期康復(fù)質(zhì)量評(píng)估的應(yīng)用研究[J].重慶醫(yī)學(xué),2020,49(8):1269-1273.
[11]婁成鋮,陳雪,王冠,等.艾司氯胺酮與右美托咪定在中老年患者全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)中的比較[J].臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志,2023,39(2):159-162.
[12]武瓊,崔棟然,王瑞,等.不同劑量艾司氯胺酮用于老年全身麻醉手術(shù)患者麻醉誘導(dǎo)對(duì)血流動(dòng)力學(xué)、應(yīng)激反應(yīng)、術(shù)后譫妄影響[J].臨床軍醫(yī)雜志,2024,52(1):95-98.
[13]萬幸,楊青青,樊迪,等.亞麻醉劑量艾司氯胺酮復(fù)合丙泊酚應(yīng)用于無痛胃腸鏡檢查的效果[J].臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志,2022,38(2):144-148.
[14]周瓏艷,劉詠春,盧錫華,等.艾司氯胺酮對(duì)胸腔鏡肺葉切除術(shù)后疼痛及炎癥應(yīng)激的影響[J].重慶醫(yī)學(xué),2023,52(19):2924-2929.
[15]崔波,汪海濤,王超,等.小劑量艾司氯胺酮復(fù)合環(huán)泊酚用于老年患者內(nèi)鏡下逆行胰膽管造影術(shù)的效果[J].臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志,2023,39(3):266-269.
[16]沈燕平,殷利軍,莊文明.小劑量艾司氯胺酮預(yù)防無痛人工流產(chǎn)患者丙泊酚注射痛的效果[J].臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志,2022,38(12):1269-1273.
[17]張玉鳳,孫劍.艾司氯胺酮復(fù)合右美托咪定滴鼻用于患兒疝囊高位結(jié)扎術(shù)前鎮(zhèn)靜的效果[J].臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志,2023,39(1):29-33.
[18]葛倩,趙世凌,戚曉彤,等.艾司氯胺酮對(duì)瑞芬太尼痛覺過敏影響的臨床觀察[J].麻醉安全與質(zhì)控,2024,6(1):7-10.
[19]賈濤,滕金亮.新型麻醉鎮(zhèn)痛藥:艾司氯胺酮[J].中國臨床藥理學(xué)與治療學(xué),2022,27(7):834-840.
[20] ZHANG C,HE J Q,SHI Q Y,et al.Subanaesthetic dose of Esketamine during induction delays anaesthesia recovery a randomized,double-blind clinical trial[J].BMC Anesthesiol,2022,22(1):138.
(收稿日期:2025-01-25) (本文編輯:何玉勤)