• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Elastic electron scattering with formamide-(H2O)n complexes(n=1,2): Influence of microsolvation on the π?and σ?resonances?

    2021-12-22 06:42:36KedongWang王克棟YanWang王言JieLiu劉潔YiwenWang王怡文andHaoxingZhang張浩興
    Chinese Physics B 2021年12期
    關鍵詞:劉潔

    Kedong Wang(王克棟), Yan Wang(王言), Jie Liu(劉潔),Yiwen Wang(王怡文), and Haoxing Zhang(張浩興)

    School of Physics,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007,China

    Keywords: electron scattering,elastic cross section,hydrogen-bonding,shape resonance

    1. Introduction

    Low-energy electrons (LEEs), formed in secondary processes that accompany high-energy light-matter interactions,are the key players in radiation damage of biomolecules, including DNA[1]and proteins.[2]These electrons can be temporarily trapped to form transient negative ion(TNI)species,which further undergo electronic and structural transformation leading to fragmentation, a process called dissociative electron attachment (DEA). LEE-induced damage to DNA was first experimentally demonstrated by Sanche and co-workers who showed that LEE irradiation results in single-and doublestrand breaks in DNA.[3]Since then, many experimental and theoretical works[1,4–9]have been devoted to the LEE-induced fragmentation of biomolecules to obtain a comprehensive picture of the damage mechanism. In the DEA process, bothπ?[10]andσ?[11]shape resonances play an important role. It is worth noting that any effect that can change the position in energy and the lifetime of these resonances may also affect all the processes related to those states,as DEA.

    Many electron scattering experiments and calculations consider biologically relevant molecules in the gas phase and the influence of the environment is neglected in the collision.However, biological radiation damage occurs in a condensed environment where all molecules with a biological function are surround by other molecules,mainly water.Clusters can be proposed as systems that bridge the complexity gap between the gas phase and condensed phase.

    From an experimental point of view, there are a series of the DEA measurements in molecular clusters.[12–16]The experimental study on microhydrated biomolecules including pyrimidine[12]and uracil/thymine[13]show quenching of some of the DEA channels, but this is ascribed by the authors to nuclei-related caging effects rather than changes to resonance spectrum and characteristics. EA mass spectra for uracil, 5-fluorouracil, and 5-bromouracil with different degrees of hydration were reported[14]and energy transfer between these three molecules and the solvent was investigated. Koˇciˇseket al.[15]reported experimental fragmentation patterns for DEA to microhydrated 2-deoxycytidine 5-monophosphate. They observed glycosidic C–N and sugar-phosphate P–O bond dissociations as the primary and secondary fragmentation channels, respectively. A recent experiment for nimorazole made by Mei?neret al.[16]demonstrated that DEA represents only a minor reaction channel which is further suppressed upon hydration.

    Theoretically, the cross sections for dehydrogenation from uracil/thymine have been calculated.[17]Subsequently,the results of this work were presented by Sieradzkaet al.[18,19]They investigated the effect of microsolvation on theπ?shape resonances of pyridine and thymine using theR-matrix method and discussed the additive effect of water molecules hydrogen-bonding to isolate molecules. Bettega and co-workers investigated CH2O–H2O[20]and singly and doubly hydrated formic acid[21]and phenol[22]using the Schwinger multichannel method. They showed thatπ?shape resonances can be either stabilized or destabilized,depending on the role played by water molecules in the H-bonds. Recently, Fabrikant[23]reviewed the suppression and enhancement effects in DEA in a cluster environment.

    Fig.1. Three structures of formamide–H2O complexes named as A to C.

    Fig.2. Six structures of formamide-(H2O)2 complexes named as D to I.

    In this paper we extend the investigation to a single formamide and water complex. Formamide, HCONH2, is the smallest molecule that contains the peptide linkage. Resonant spectra[24–26]for the isolated formamide have been reported with the experimental methodologies, and theoretical calculations including the molecular complex optical potential approach,[26]single-center expansion,[27]Schwinger multichannel method,[28]andR-matrix method.[29]The results show that there is aπ?shape resonance in the energy region from 2.1 eV to 3.8 eV, and aσ?resonance at around 15 eV. This system involves an indirect DEA process, where the electron is captured into theπ?resonance, which crosses theσ?anion potential curve,leading to the C–N bond breakage. To investigate the influence of microsolvation in theπ?andσ?resonances of formamide, we consider one and two surrounding water molecules. We discuss what causes the stabilization or destabilization of theπ?andσ?resonances of solutes in terms of the net charge in the solute. The elastic scattering calculations reported here are carried out with the UK molecularR-matrix code.[30,31]The cross sections are obtained in the static-exchange (SE) approximation for energies ranging from 0.01 to 8 eV. We also perform additional electronic structure calculations to interpret our results. The calculations are performed at the equilibrium geometry. The initial geometries of the cluster are extracted from a liquid phase model which has been described in Ref.[32]. According to their results, the formamide molecule bound with the water molecules together by hydrogen bonds in the sites of O and H of the amino-group. Considering that the isolated formamide molecule belongs toCspoint group,we subsequently reoptimized the clusters in the same point group at B3LYP/6-311++G??level. Three structures obtained in this work are shown in Fig.1.for formamide–H2O complexes,labeled from A to C, and six formamide-(H2O)2structures are shown in Fig.2,labeled from D to I.

    2. Theoretical method

    TheR-matrix method has been described in detail elsewhere[33]and here we only outline its key features. The method is based on the division of space into an internal region containing all theN-electron target charge cloud and an external scattering region. In the inner region the discretized continuum(N+1)-electron wave function is written using the CI expression

    Here theΦidenotes the channel functions constructed from theN-electron target states, andAis an antisymmetrization operator,whilexNis the spatial and spin coordinate of theNth electron,represents theith state of theN-electron target,Bj(r)represent the continuum orbitals. Coefficientsaijkandbikare variational parameters determined as a result of the matrix diagonalization. The second summation in Eq. (1) involvesL2configurations where all electrons are placed in orbitals associated with the target. Such configurations are essential in even the simplest model which does not include any target relaxation, the SE approximation, to allow for orthogonalization between the continuum orbitals and those belonging to the target. In the more sophisticated modelsL2configurations are also essential for introducing the effects of target polarization.Given that both shape and Feshbach resonances are localized in the region of the target then it is clear that the resonance parameters will also be sensitive to these configurations which are included in the calculation.

    In the outer region, a long-range multipole expansion is used to represent the electron-target interaction. TheR-matrix is built at the boundary between the inner and outer regions,using the inner region information, and the one particle multichannel problem is solved by propagating theR-matrix outwards up to a radius (here is 100a0) large enough so that an asymptotic expansion for the radial wave functions can be matched to known analytical solutions. In such a way,the Kmatrix and S-matrix and thus resonance parameters and cross sections can be determined.

    Scattering calculations were carried out in the SE approximations. In the former,only one target wavefunction(for the ground state of the molecule),represented at the Hartree–Fock(HF)level,is included in expansion(1). TheL2functions take a simple form in the following way:

    Since it is not possible to quantify how much polarization theL2functions describe,there is no simple way to determine the optimal number of virtual orbitals(VOs).

    The HF self-consistent field(SCF)wave function with the cc-pVDZ basis set is used in the scattering calculation. Our calculated ground-state energy and dipole moment of the clusters and isolated formamide are collected in Table 1. The dipole moment of 1.57 a.u. was obtained for formamide,which is in good agreement with the available experimental value 1.46 a.u.[34]No experimental values of the dipole moment for these clusters are available. For the scattering calculation,R-matrix radius is taken as 15a0,wherea0is the Bohr radius,and continuum orbitals up togpartial wave(l=4)are represented by Gaussians centered at the molecule center of gravity.[35]

    Table 1. Ground state energies (E)in Hartree and dipole moment(μ)in a.u. for formamide and formamide–(H2O)n complexes(n=1,2).

    We have also calculated the elastic integral cross section(ECS)for the isolated formamide. In order to check the convergence,we tested the result with three different calculations including 20, 30 and 40 VOs for the formamide molecule in the SE approximation. All these three results predictπ?anion states located at the same position about 4.64 eV with a very similar width of 1.78 eV, which is in agreement with the previous study[28,29]in the SE approximation. The result with 40 VOs predicts twoσ?resonances in the energy region between 15.0 and 20.0 eV,and noσ?resonance is detected in the result with 20 VOs. Oneσ?resonance is detected in the 30 VOs result, which agrees with the available SEP results[26,27]that there is aσ?resonance located at about 15.0 eV. Then we choose a total of 30 VOs included in the SE calculation for all systems. Such a result illustrates that,as the energy of the scattering electron increases,modeling of the correlation between it and the molecule becomes more difficult. Hence we present the scattering results in the energy region of 0.01–8 eV and do not study the high-lyingσ?resonance in the scattering results.

    Fig. 3. Elastic integral cross section for electron scattering from formamide,formamide–H2O complex A,and formamide-(H2O)2 complex I with different partial waves l ≤4 and l ≤6 at the SE approximation.

    All the complexes considered here have a permanent electric dipole moment.The long range character of the dipole potential requires the use of the standard Born closure to include higher partial wavel>4 and to improve the cross sections.However,this potential only affects the background scattering and does not change the location of the resonances. Since our main interest here is the description of shape resonances of the complexes, we choose to present only the ECSs without including the Born correction. However,the contributions from the high partial wave could become important with increasing the size of the cluster. Thus,we compare the results using partial wavesl ≤4 andl ≤6 for the isolated formamide,one formamide–H2O complex (here is A), and one formamide–(H2O)2complex (here is I). The UKRmol+suite[36]is used to perform the scattering calculations with the partial wavesl ≤6. The calculated ECSs are shown in Fig. 3. As is expected, the inclusion of the more dipole potential in the calculations increases the cross sections. However, this has no effect on the position of resonances as shown in Fig. 3, and then partial wavesl ≤4 are used to describe the potential in the presentR-matrix method.

    3. Results and discussion

    Figure 4 presents the ECSs andA′′symmetry decomposition for the isolated formamide and three formamide–H2O complexes A to C in the SE approximation, where the signatures of theπ?resonance are clear in all systems. As shown in Fig. 1, the water molecule plays the role of proton acceptor for complex B, while it acts as proton donor for complex C. The calculated resonant position for complex B is located at 5.34 eV,with a 0.70 eV above the resonance of the isolated formamide molecule.However,for complex C the peak moves to a lower energy in comparison to theπ?resonance of formamide, located at 4.21 eV. This corresponds to a downshift of 0.62 eV in comparison with the SE result of the isolated formamide molecule. A slight downshift 0.16 eV is found for complex A. In this complex, there are two hydrogen bondings: the water not only acts as a proton donor(OH···O=C)but also as the proton acceptor (O···HO). The length of hydrogen bonding in the former (1.917 ?A) is shorter than that in the latter(2.053 ?A).Therefore,such a result illustrates that water behaves more strongly as a proton donor than a proton acceptor for complex A.This explains the stabilization of theπ?resonance. These results show that water acting as proton donor stabilizes the resonance. However,when it acts the proton acceptor, the resonance destabilizes and shifts to higher energy. The results confirm the conclusions obtained by Freitas,Bettga and collaborators[20–22]using the Schwinger multichannel method and by Sieradzka and Gorfinkiel[18,19]using theR-matrix method.

    The SE approximation usually gives the shape resonances of the higher energy since it does not include attractive target polarization effects. Nonetheless it is the most appropriate to investigate changes to the resonances due to hydration with theR-matrix approach.The SEP approximation cannot be performed in a converged manner, although it includes polarization effects. Since it is not possible to quantify how much polarization is being described by a specific calculation, we are unable to ensure that the same amount of polarization is included in different calculations. If the experimental data are available, usually one use experimental positions of the low-lying resonances as the way to determine the best set ofL2configurations.[18]Since no prior data are available for the resonances of microhydrated formamide or similar targets,we are unable to adopt this approach in this case. Then it is not possible to confidently obtain quantitative energy shifts from a comparison of the resonance positions from the SEP calculation.

    Fig.4. Elastic integral cross section and the A′′ symmetry decomposition for electron scattering from formamide and formamide–H2O complexes at the SE approximation.

    In Fig. 5 we show the ICSs of six formamide–(H2O)2complexes D to I in the SE approximation, in comparison with the isolated formamide molecule.The contributions from theA′′symmetry to the ICSs of formamide and formamide–(H2O)2complexes are also shown in the picture. There is one structure at around 5.62 eV in the ICS for complex D. This resonant peak shows a shift of 0.98 eV to higher energy compared to the SE result of the formamide molecule. The same behavior is seen for complex F, in which theπ?shape resonance at around 5.03 eV and 0.39 eV higher than the isolated formamide molecule. The slight shifts to higher energy of 0.10 eV and 0.20 eV are found for complex I and complex E, respectively. However, for complexes G and H, the peaks lie at 3.21 eV and 3.77 eV, and correspond to a down shift of 1.43 eV and 0.87 eV, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2, in complex D both water molecules act as the proton acceptor,

    where for G, they act as the proton donor. We observed the expected behavior in the resonances:destabilization for D and stabilization for G.Let us look at the structures for complexes F, H, and I in the picture. It is found that F corresponds to A plus B,H corresponds to A plus C,and I corresponds to B plus C.For theπ?shape resonances in complexes F,H and I,we found that the effect of water on the formamide resonance is approximately additive,theπ?resonances for complexes F and I are destabilized,and for the complex H is stabilized.The similar additive effect of water molecules hydrogen-bonding to thymine was discussed by Sieradzka and Gorfinkiel.[19]

    Fig. 5. Elastic integral cross section and the A′′ symmetry decomposition for electron scattering from formamide and formamide–(H2O)2 complexes at the SE approximation.

    As mentioned above, the positions ofπ?resonances for three formamide–H2O complexes vary from 4.21 eV to 5.34 eV and for six formamide–(H2O)2complexes vary from 3.21 eV to 5.62 eV at the SE approximation. The maximum differences among them are 1.13 eV for formamide–H2O complexes and 2.41 eV for formamide–(H2O)2complexes. This means that conformation plays an important role in the determination of the resonances. This result is in agreement with the findings reported recently by da Mata and coworkers[37]for the case of formaldehyde dimers through the use of molecular complex optical potential(MCOP)approach.Sieradzka and Gorfinkiel[18]discussed the indirect effect on the resonance positions. This effect is due to the changes to molecular geometry resulting from binding with water. It should be noted that our results here equated to the total effect in their results.[18]

    Both position and width are important parameters for a resonance. The microhydration environment leads to the shift in the position of theπ?anion state through the H-bonding,and it may also affect the width of the anion state. Here we fit the resulting eigenphase sums to a Breit–Wigner profile[38]to obtain the position and width of the resonance. Except for the position of the obtained resonances discussed above,their widths are also listed in Table 2. For formamide–H2O complexes,we obtained the widths 1.44 eV,1.98 eV and 1.51 eV for A, B and C, respectively. When compared to the isolated formamide molecule, the calculated widths ofπ?resonance are reduced by 0.34 eV for A and 0.27 eV for C, increased by 0.20 eV for B.For formamide–(H2O)2complexes,the surround water lowers the widths ofπ?resonances to 0.15 eV(for E),0.19 eV(for F),0.80 eV(for G),0.73 eV(for H),and 0.15 eV(for I).Theπ?resonance for D shows almost the same width as the isolated formamide molecule. Our results show the surround water molecules have a substantial influence on the width ofπ?resonance. The width of the resonance is related to the lifetime of the anion state and plays a key role in the DEA process. The narrower the width is, the higher the survival probability of the anion state is, and the larger DEA cross sections are. Our results indicate that the process of electron-induced bond breaking in the formamide molecule can be strongly influenced by surround water molecules and are worthy of further investigation.

    To interpret what causes the stabilization/destabilization of the resonance of the solute in the complexes, we have carried out additional bound state calculations. The results including the scaled virtual orbital energy (SVOE) and the net charge in the solute are presented in Table 2. First, we optimized the geometry at the second-order M?ller–Plesset perturbation theory(MP2)using the 6-31G(d)basis set,and used this geometry and the same basis set to compute the molecular orbitals and their energies at the HF level. We are interested in the lowest unoccupieda′′molecule orbital for the isolated formamide and complexes A to I. These lowest unoccupieda′′molecule orbitals are most concentrated along the C=O bond, and are responsible for theπ?shape resonances. The plots of these orbitals for formamide, A and D are shown in Fig. 6. LUMO+5 for formamide is aσ?(a′)molecule orbital and has the same shape as the resonantσ?orbital shown by Goumanset al.[27]The very similar orbitals are LUMO+7 for formamide–H2O complexes,and LUMO+9 for formamide-(H2O)2complexes. All thesea′orbitals are concentrated along the C–N bond,and could be a pathway to the breakage of the C–N bond. The plots of these orbitals for formamide,A and D are also shown in Fig.6. It is noted that we do not show the correspondingπ?andσ?resonant MOs for all the complexes because they have almost the same shape. Table 2 shows the SVOE values obtained by using an empirical scaling formula.[39,40]Our SVOE value of 2.09 eV for the lowest unoccupieda′′molecule orbital for formamide is in good agreement with the experimental value of 2.05 eV.[24]However, the value of 10.68 eV for the LUMO+5 for formamide is much lower with respect to theσ?resonance positions of 14.9 eV computed by Goumanset al.[27]and 15 eV calculated by Homemet al.[26]For complexes B,D,E,F and I,the SVOE values are higher than the isolated formamide. However, for complexes A,C,G and H,the SVOE values are smaller than the isolated formamide. Since the SVOE values for the lowest unoccupieda′′molecule orbital are related to theπ?shape resonance and these for the relevanta′molecule orbital are related to theσ?shape resonance,such results indicate that theπ?andσ?shape resonances in complexes B, D, E, F and I should destabilize and for complexes A,C,G and H these two shape resonances should stabilize.

    Table 2. Scaled virtual orbital energy (SVOE in eV), the net charge(qnet), and the position (Er in eV) and width (in parenthesis in eV) of the resonance in the SE approximation.

    Fig. 6. The left column shows the lowest unoccupied (LU) a′′ (π?)molecule orbital (MO) for formamide (FM), complex A, and complex D. The right column shows LUMO+5 for FM, LUMO+7 for complex A,and LUMO+9 for complexe D.

    In the following, we would look at the net charge of the solute considering the complexes with one and two water molecules. We performed the Mulliken population analysis with the 6-31G(d)basis set at B3LYP/6-311++G??optimized geometry, and the net charge of each an atom of the solute was summed. The obtained net charges for all the complexes are shown in Table 2. The results show that the net charge in the solute of complexes B,D,E,F and I is negative,while the net charge in the solute of complexes A, C, G, and H is positive. The resonant orbital in the complexes is mostly localized on the solute, as shown in Fig. 6. As a result, the incoming electron feels a more attractive electrostatic potential for a positive net charge solute,leading to the stabilization of the resonance for four complexes A, C, G and H, where the water plays mainly the role of proton donor. In the contrary,a negative net charge of the solute represents a less attractive electrostatic potential,which would lead to the destabilization of the resonance, as in the case of complexes B, D, E, F and I.Here the electrostatic effects due to the net charge are investigated, and good agreement with our scattering calculation results is found.

    Martinet al.[10]investigated the low-energy electron inducing single-strand breaks (SSBs) in DNA, and pointed out the polarization due to the environment may contribute to the stabilization of the resonances and negatively charged sites can lead to the destabilization of the resonances. The final result is determined by the interplay between the polarization effects and electrostatic effects. As shown in Figs. 1 and 2, for four complexes A,C,G and H the water molecules are mainly proton donors in the H-bonding,which is responsible for the positive net charge of the solute. In these cases, both the polarization (due to the surrounding water molecules) and the net charge in the solute may contribute to the stabilization of theπ?andσ?resonances.The water molecules play a role of proton acceptor for complexes B and D.However,for complexes E,F and I,one water plays as proton donor and the other water plays as proton acceptor. The final outcome gives a net of negative charge of the solute by the interplay. For these complexes B,D,E,F and I the polarization indicates stabilization while the net charge leads to the destabilization of the resonance. The final answer about stabilization/destabilization of the resonance can be judged from the cross sections obtained in the scattering calculations,as shown in Figs.4 and 5.

    4. Conclusion

    We have presented elastic cross sections for three structures of formamide–H2O complexes and six structures of formamide-(H2O)2complexes. The scattering calculations have been performed in the SE approximation with the UK molecularR-matrix code for energies up to 8 eV. Our results show theπ?resonance of the formamide molecule stabilizes when surrounding waters act as the proton donor, and destabilizes when surrounding waters molecules act as the proton acceptor. For the case of one water, if the water is not only the proton donor,but also the proton acceptor,it destabilizes.For the case of two water molecules,when one water molecule is the proton donor and the other one is the proton acceptor,it destabilizes.The current calculations for formamide–H2O and formamide-(H2O)2complexes show that the effect of water is approximately additive. In addition, how the microhydration environment affects the width ofπ?shape resonances is also investigated. We find that the surround water molecules can strongly affect the lifetime of the resonance and the related DEA process.

    The lowest unoccupieda′′molecule orbitals of the complexes are localized on the solute and show the sameπ?character of the LUMO of the isolated formamide molecule.LUMO+5 for formamide, LUMO+7 for formamide–H2O complexes and LUMO+9 for formamide-(H2O)2complexes have the same shape and are the resonantσ?orbitals. We have explored the effect from the net charge of the solute that may affect theπ?andσ?shape resonances. Both polarization and positive net charges can contribute to the stabilization of the anion state. A negative net charge may cause destabilization of theπ?orσ?resonance. The change from gas to the condensed-phase and the effects induced by the microsolvation in electron-molecule calculations are important steps in understanding how the environment may affect processes in DNA driven by electron collisions and anion states. The present results, although carried out for a simple molecule,represent a clear invitation for additional studies aiming at resonant dissociation of wet biological molecules by low-energy electrons.

    猜你喜歡
    劉潔
    Periodic electron oscillation in coupled two-dimensional lattices
    來自姥姥的愛
    Communication error prevention model in industrial organization*
    Competences for a culture of prevention*
    Mass transport in a thin layer of power-law fluid in an Eulerian coordinate system*
    愛是奇跡
    37°女人(2015年9期)2015-10-31 08:42:02
    愛是奇跡嗎
    新民周刊(2015年24期)2015-09-10 07:22:44
    愛是奇跡嗎
    幸?!傋x(2015年9期)2015-09-09 05:32:20
    愛是奇跡嗎
    今日文摘(2015年17期)2015-05-30 10:48:04
    愛是奇跡嗎
    波多野结衣高清作品| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 免费av观看视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 手机成人av网站| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 小说图片视频综合网站| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 51国产日韩欧美| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| www.色视频.com| 久久久久久人人人人人| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产高清三级在线| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 我要搜黄色片| 亚洲av美国av| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 欧美色视频一区免费| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| av黄色大香蕉| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 性色avwww在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 九色成人免费人妻av| avwww免费| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 亚洲精品在线美女| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产成人av教育| 禁无遮挡网站| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 校园春色视频在线观看| 51国产日韩欧美| 禁无遮挡网站| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产精品一及| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产三级中文精品| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 人妻久久中文字幕网| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 黄色日韩在线| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲av一区综合| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | 亚洲无线在线观看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 午夜福利18| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 久久久久久久久中文| 级片在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 天天添夜夜摸| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 精品国产三级普通话版| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 男人舔奶头视频| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 成人欧美大片| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 久久草成人影院| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 免费观看人在逋| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 一进一出好大好爽视频| www日本黄色视频网| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 色综合婷婷激情| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 欧美激情在线99| 美女黄网站色视频| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 欧美区成人在线视频| 岛国在线观看网站| 18+在线观看网站| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 岛国在线观看网站| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 内射极品少妇av片p| 一本综合久久免费| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 成人欧美大片| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| xxx96com| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产在视频线在精品| 久久伊人香网站| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| xxxwww97欧美| 美女高潮的动态| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产高清videossex| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产精品永久免费网站| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 免费高清视频大片| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产综合懂色| 99热精品在线国产| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 精品福利观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 深夜精品福利| 乱人视频在线观看| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 亚洲国产色片| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 天堂√8在线中文| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 一级黄片播放器| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| eeuss影院久久| 天堂动漫精品| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 俺也久久电影网| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美大码av| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 露出奶头的视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 精品电影一区二区在线| 一a级毛片在线观看| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产精品野战在线观看| 黄色成人免费大全| 国产精品影院久久| 久久久久久久久大av| 香蕉丝袜av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 免费在线观看日本一区| www日本在线高清视频| 1000部很黄的大片| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 亚洲无线在线观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 亚洲色图av天堂| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 88av欧美| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 精品国产亚洲在线| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| av片东京热男人的天堂| 特级一级黄色大片| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 很黄的视频免费| www日本在线高清视频| 免费高清视频大片| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 极品教师在线免费播放| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 美女黄网站色视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产高清激情床上av| 1024手机看黄色片| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 香蕉久久夜色| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 亚洲av成人av| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产高潮美女av| 欧美午夜高清在线| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 级片在线观看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 久99久视频精品免费| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| av欧美777| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 99riav亚洲国产免费| av黄色大香蕉| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 日本 欧美在线| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 宅男免费午夜| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 悠悠久久av| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| aaaaa片日本免费| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 91麻豆av在线| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 天堂网av新在线| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 99热精品在线国产| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产老妇女一区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 岛国在线观看网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 久久久色成人| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 美女免费视频网站| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 久久精品人妻少妇| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 在线看三级毛片| 少妇高潮的动态图| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 成年版毛片免费区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 在线看三级毛片| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 欧美3d第一页| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 色av中文字幕| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产视频内射| 岛国在线观看网站| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 国产熟女xx| 一a级毛片在线观看| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 深夜精品福利| 国产亚洲欧美98| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产av不卡久久| 免费看日本二区| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 久久精品人妻少妇| av视频在线观看入口| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 欧美激情在线99| 看免费av毛片| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 在线播放无遮挡| 丰满的人妻完整版| 很黄的视频免费| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 在线a可以看的网站| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 内射极品少妇av片p| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 欧美bdsm另类| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 国产av不卡久久| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 欧美午夜高清在线| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 在线国产一区二区在线| 美女黄网站色视频| 久久草成人影院| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产午夜精品论理片| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 久久精品人妻少妇| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 美女免费视频网站| 国产日本99.免费观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 香蕉丝袜av| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 免费高清视频大片| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 亚洲激情在线av| 国产高清videossex| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 在线观看一区二区三区| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 日本一本二区三区精品| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 级片在线观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 内地一区二区视频在线| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 色在线成人网| 在线看三级毛片| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 99热6这里只有精品| 免费看a级黄色片| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 欧美3d第一页| eeuss影院久久| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 日本五十路高清| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产成人aa在线观看| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 色播亚洲综合网| 岛国在线观看网站| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| www.www免费av| 波野结衣二区三区在线 | 国产97色在线日韩免费| 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 国产在视频线在精品| 国产精品一及| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 在线播放国产精品三级| 一区福利在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 久99久视频精品免费| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 欧美午夜高清在线| 午夜久久久久精精品| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产成人av激情在线播放| www.999成人在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 国产av不卡久久| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放|