• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Elastic electron scattering with formamide-(H2O)n complexes(n=1,2): Influence of microsolvation on the π?and σ?resonances?

    2021-12-22 06:42:36KedongWang王克棟YanWang王言JieLiu劉潔YiwenWang王怡文andHaoxingZhang張浩興
    Chinese Physics B 2021年12期
    關鍵詞:劉潔

    Kedong Wang(王克棟), Yan Wang(王言), Jie Liu(劉潔),Yiwen Wang(王怡文), and Haoxing Zhang(張浩興)

    School of Physics,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007,China

    Keywords: electron scattering,elastic cross section,hydrogen-bonding,shape resonance

    1. Introduction

    Low-energy electrons (LEEs), formed in secondary processes that accompany high-energy light-matter interactions,are the key players in radiation damage of biomolecules, including DNA[1]and proteins.[2]These electrons can be temporarily trapped to form transient negative ion(TNI)species,which further undergo electronic and structural transformation leading to fragmentation, a process called dissociative electron attachment (DEA). LEE-induced damage to DNA was first experimentally demonstrated by Sanche and co-workers who showed that LEE irradiation results in single-and doublestrand breaks in DNA.[3]Since then, many experimental and theoretical works[1,4–9]have been devoted to the LEE-induced fragmentation of biomolecules to obtain a comprehensive picture of the damage mechanism. In the DEA process, bothπ?[10]andσ?[11]shape resonances play an important role. It is worth noting that any effect that can change the position in energy and the lifetime of these resonances may also affect all the processes related to those states,as DEA.

    Many electron scattering experiments and calculations consider biologically relevant molecules in the gas phase and the influence of the environment is neglected in the collision.However, biological radiation damage occurs in a condensed environment where all molecules with a biological function are surround by other molecules,mainly water.Clusters can be proposed as systems that bridge the complexity gap between the gas phase and condensed phase.

    From an experimental point of view, there are a series of the DEA measurements in molecular clusters.[12–16]The experimental study on microhydrated biomolecules including pyrimidine[12]and uracil/thymine[13]show quenching of some of the DEA channels, but this is ascribed by the authors to nuclei-related caging effects rather than changes to resonance spectrum and characteristics. EA mass spectra for uracil, 5-fluorouracil, and 5-bromouracil with different degrees of hydration were reported[14]and energy transfer between these three molecules and the solvent was investigated. Koˇciˇseket al.[15]reported experimental fragmentation patterns for DEA to microhydrated 2-deoxycytidine 5-monophosphate. They observed glycosidic C–N and sugar-phosphate P–O bond dissociations as the primary and secondary fragmentation channels, respectively. A recent experiment for nimorazole made by Mei?neret al.[16]demonstrated that DEA represents only a minor reaction channel which is further suppressed upon hydration.

    Theoretically, the cross sections for dehydrogenation from uracil/thymine have been calculated.[17]Subsequently,the results of this work were presented by Sieradzkaet al.[18,19]They investigated the effect of microsolvation on theπ?shape resonances of pyridine and thymine using theR-matrix method and discussed the additive effect of water molecules hydrogen-bonding to isolate molecules. Bettega and co-workers investigated CH2O–H2O[20]and singly and doubly hydrated formic acid[21]and phenol[22]using the Schwinger multichannel method. They showed thatπ?shape resonances can be either stabilized or destabilized,depending on the role played by water molecules in the H-bonds. Recently, Fabrikant[23]reviewed the suppression and enhancement effects in DEA in a cluster environment.

    Fig.1. Three structures of formamide–H2O complexes named as A to C.

    Fig.2. Six structures of formamide-(H2O)2 complexes named as D to I.

    In this paper we extend the investigation to a single formamide and water complex. Formamide, HCONH2, is the smallest molecule that contains the peptide linkage. Resonant spectra[24–26]for the isolated formamide have been reported with the experimental methodologies, and theoretical calculations including the molecular complex optical potential approach,[26]single-center expansion,[27]Schwinger multichannel method,[28]andR-matrix method.[29]The results show that there is aπ?shape resonance in the energy region from 2.1 eV to 3.8 eV, and aσ?resonance at around 15 eV. This system involves an indirect DEA process, where the electron is captured into theπ?resonance, which crosses theσ?anion potential curve,leading to the C–N bond breakage. To investigate the influence of microsolvation in theπ?andσ?resonances of formamide, we consider one and two surrounding water molecules. We discuss what causes the stabilization or destabilization of theπ?andσ?resonances of solutes in terms of the net charge in the solute. The elastic scattering calculations reported here are carried out with the UK molecularR-matrix code.[30,31]The cross sections are obtained in the static-exchange (SE) approximation for energies ranging from 0.01 to 8 eV. We also perform additional electronic structure calculations to interpret our results. The calculations are performed at the equilibrium geometry. The initial geometries of the cluster are extracted from a liquid phase model which has been described in Ref.[32]. According to their results, the formamide molecule bound with the water molecules together by hydrogen bonds in the sites of O and H of the amino-group. Considering that the isolated formamide molecule belongs toCspoint group,we subsequently reoptimized the clusters in the same point group at B3LYP/6-311++G??level. Three structures obtained in this work are shown in Fig.1.for formamide–H2O complexes,labeled from A to C, and six formamide-(H2O)2structures are shown in Fig.2,labeled from D to I.

    2. Theoretical method

    TheR-matrix method has been described in detail elsewhere[33]and here we only outline its key features. The method is based on the division of space into an internal region containing all theN-electron target charge cloud and an external scattering region. In the inner region the discretized continuum(N+1)-electron wave function is written using the CI expression

    Here theΦidenotes the channel functions constructed from theN-electron target states, andAis an antisymmetrization operator,whilexNis the spatial and spin coordinate of theNth electron,represents theith state of theN-electron target,Bj(r)represent the continuum orbitals. Coefficientsaijkandbikare variational parameters determined as a result of the matrix diagonalization. The second summation in Eq. (1) involvesL2configurations where all electrons are placed in orbitals associated with the target. Such configurations are essential in even the simplest model which does not include any target relaxation, the SE approximation, to allow for orthogonalization between the continuum orbitals and those belonging to the target. In the more sophisticated modelsL2configurations are also essential for introducing the effects of target polarization.Given that both shape and Feshbach resonances are localized in the region of the target then it is clear that the resonance parameters will also be sensitive to these configurations which are included in the calculation.

    In the outer region, a long-range multipole expansion is used to represent the electron-target interaction. TheR-matrix is built at the boundary between the inner and outer regions,using the inner region information, and the one particle multichannel problem is solved by propagating theR-matrix outwards up to a radius (here is 100a0) large enough so that an asymptotic expansion for the radial wave functions can be matched to known analytical solutions. In such a way,the Kmatrix and S-matrix and thus resonance parameters and cross sections can be determined.

    Scattering calculations were carried out in the SE approximations. In the former,only one target wavefunction(for the ground state of the molecule),represented at the Hartree–Fock(HF)level,is included in expansion(1). TheL2functions take a simple form in the following way:

    Since it is not possible to quantify how much polarization theL2functions describe,there is no simple way to determine the optimal number of virtual orbitals(VOs).

    The HF self-consistent field(SCF)wave function with the cc-pVDZ basis set is used in the scattering calculation. Our calculated ground-state energy and dipole moment of the clusters and isolated formamide are collected in Table 1. The dipole moment of 1.57 a.u. was obtained for formamide,which is in good agreement with the available experimental value 1.46 a.u.[34]No experimental values of the dipole moment for these clusters are available. For the scattering calculation,R-matrix radius is taken as 15a0,wherea0is the Bohr radius,and continuum orbitals up togpartial wave(l=4)are represented by Gaussians centered at the molecule center of gravity.[35]

    Table 1. Ground state energies (E)in Hartree and dipole moment(μ)in a.u. for formamide and formamide–(H2O)n complexes(n=1,2).

    We have also calculated the elastic integral cross section(ECS)for the isolated formamide. In order to check the convergence,we tested the result with three different calculations including 20, 30 and 40 VOs for the formamide molecule in the SE approximation. All these three results predictπ?anion states located at the same position about 4.64 eV with a very similar width of 1.78 eV, which is in agreement with the previous study[28,29]in the SE approximation. The result with 40 VOs predicts twoσ?resonances in the energy region between 15.0 and 20.0 eV,and noσ?resonance is detected in the result with 20 VOs. Oneσ?resonance is detected in the 30 VOs result, which agrees with the available SEP results[26,27]that there is aσ?resonance located at about 15.0 eV. Then we choose a total of 30 VOs included in the SE calculation for all systems. Such a result illustrates that,as the energy of the scattering electron increases,modeling of the correlation between it and the molecule becomes more difficult. Hence we present the scattering results in the energy region of 0.01–8 eV and do not study the high-lyingσ?resonance in the scattering results.

    Fig. 3. Elastic integral cross section for electron scattering from formamide,formamide–H2O complex A,and formamide-(H2O)2 complex I with different partial waves l ≤4 and l ≤6 at the SE approximation.

    All the complexes considered here have a permanent electric dipole moment.The long range character of the dipole potential requires the use of the standard Born closure to include higher partial wavel>4 and to improve the cross sections.However,this potential only affects the background scattering and does not change the location of the resonances. Since our main interest here is the description of shape resonances of the complexes, we choose to present only the ECSs without including the Born correction. However,the contributions from the high partial wave could become important with increasing the size of the cluster. Thus,we compare the results using partial wavesl ≤4 andl ≤6 for the isolated formamide,one formamide–H2O complex (here is A), and one formamide–(H2O)2complex (here is I). The UKRmol+suite[36]is used to perform the scattering calculations with the partial wavesl ≤6. The calculated ECSs are shown in Fig. 3. As is expected, the inclusion of the more dipole potential in the calculations increases the cross sections. However, this has no effect on the position of resonances as shown in Fig. 3, and then partial wavesl ≤4 are used to describe the potential in the presentR-matrix method.

    3. Results and discussion

    Figure 4 presents the ECSs andA′′symmetry decomposition for the isolated formamide and three formamide–H2O complexes A to C in the SE approximation, where the signatures of theπ?resonance are clear in all systems. As shown in Fig. 1, the water molecule plays the role of proton acceptor for complex B, while it acts as proton donor for complex C. The calculated resonant position for complex B is located at 5.34 eV,with a 0.70 eV above the resonance of the isolated formamide molecule.However,for complex C the peak moves to a lower energy in comparison to theπ?resonance of formamide, located at 4.21 eV. This corresponds to a downshift of 0.62 eV in comparison with the SE result of the isolated formamide molecule. A slight downshift 0.16 eV is found for complex A. In this complex, there are two hydrogen bondings: the water not only acts as a proton donor(OH···O=C)but also as the proton acceptor (O···HO). The length of hydrogen bonding in the former (1.917 ?A) is shorter than that in the latter(2.053 ?A).Therefore,such a result illustrates that water behaves more strongly as a proton donor than a proton acceptor for complex A.This explains the stabilization of theπ?resonance. These results show that water acting as proton donor stabilizes the resonance. However,when it acts the proton acceptor, the resonance destabilizes and shifts to higher energy. The results confirm the conclusions obtained by Freitas,Bettga and collaborators[20–22]using the Schwinger multichannel method and by Sieradzka and Gorfinkiel[18,19]using theR-matrix method.

    The SE approximation usually gives the shape resonances of the higher energy since it does not include attractive target polarization effects. Nonetheless it is the most appropriate to investigate changes to the resonances due to hydration with theR-matrix approach.The SEP approximation cannot be performed in a converged manner, although it includes polarization effects. Since it is not possible to quantify how much polarization is being described by a specific calculation, we are unable to ensure that the same amount of polarization is included in different calculations. If the experimental data are available, usually one use experimental positions of the low-lying resonances as the way to determine the best set ofL2configurations.[18]Since no prior data are available for the resonances of microhydrated formamide or similar targets,we are unable to adopt this approach in this case. Then it is not possible to confidently obtain quantitative energy shifts from a comparison of the resonance positions from the SEP calculation.

    Fig.4. Elastic integral cross section and the A′′ symmetry decomposition for electron scattering from formamide and formamide–H2O complexes at the SE approximation.

    In Fig. 5 we show the ICSs of six formamide–(H2O)2complexes D to I in the SE approximation, in comparison with the isolated formamide molecule.The contributions from theA′′symmetry to the ICSs of formamide and formamide–(H2O)2complexes are also shown in the picture. There is one structure at around 5.62 eV in the ICS for complex D. This resonant peak shows a shift of 0.98 eV to higher energy compared to the SE result of the formamide molecule. The same behavior is seen for complex F, in which theπ?shape resonance at around 5.03 eV and 0.39 eV higher than the isolated formamide molecule. The slight shifts to higher energy of 0.10 eV and 0.20 eV are found for complex I and complex E, respectively. However, for complexes G and H, the peaks lie at 3.21 eV and 3.77 eV, and correspond to a down shift of 1.43 eV and 0.87 eV, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2, in complex D both water molecules act as the proton acceptor,

    where for G, they act as the proton donor. We observed the expected behavior in the resonances:destabilization for D and stabilization for G.Let us look at the structures for complexes F, H, and I in the picture. It is found that F corresponds to A plus B,H corresponds to A plus C,and I corresponds to B plus C.For theπ?shape resonances in complexes F,H and I,we found that the effect of water on the formamide resonance is approximately additive,theπ?resonances for complexes F and I are destabilized,and for the complex H is stabilized.The similar additive effect of water molecules hydrogen-bonding to thymine was discussed by Sieradzka and Gorfinkiel.[19]

    Fig. 5. Elastic integral cross section and the A′′ symmetry decomposition for electron scattering from formamide and formamide–(H2O)2 complexes at the SE approximation.

    As mentioned above, the positions ofπ?resonances for three formamide–H2O complexes vary from 4.21 eV to 5.34 eV and for six formamide–(H2O)2complexes vary from 3.21 eV to 5.62 eV at the SE approximation. The maximum differences among them are 1.13 eV for formamide–H2O complexes and 2.41 eV for formamide–(H2O)2complexes. This means that conformation plays an important role in the determination of the resonances. This result is in agreement with the findings reported recently by da Mata and coworkers[37]for the case of formaldehyde dimers through the use of molecular complex optical potential(MCOP)approach.Sieradzka and Gorfinkiel[18]discussed the indirect effect on the resonance positions. This effect is due to the changes to molecular geometry resulting from binding with water. It should be noted that our results here equated to the total effect in their results.[18]

    Both position and width are important parameters for a resonance. The microhydration environment leads to the shift in the position of theπ?anion state through the H-bonding,and it may also affect the width of the anion state. Here we fit the resulting eigenphase sums to a Breit–Wigner profile[38]to obtain the position and width of the resonance. Except for the position of the obtained resonances discussed above,their widths are also listed in Table 2. For formamide–H2O complexes,we obtained the widths 1.44 eV,1.98 eV and 1.51 eV for A, B and C, respectively. When compared to the isolated formamide molecule, the calculated widths ofπ?resonance are reduced by 0.34 eV for A and 0.27 eV for C, increased by 0.20 eV for B.For formamide–(H2O)2complexes,the surround water lowers the widths ofπ?resonances to 0.15 eV(for E),0.19 eV(for F),0.80 eV(for G),0.73 eV(for H),and 0.15 eV(for I).Theπ?resonance for D shows almost the same width as the isolated formamide molecule. Our results show the surround water molecules have a substantial influence on the width ofπ?resonance. The width of the resonance is related to the lifetime of the anion state and plays a key role in the DEA process. The narrower the width is, the higher the survival probability of the anion state is, and the larger DEA cross sections are. Our results indicate that the process of electron-induced bond breaking in the formamide molecule can be strongly influenced by surround water molecules and are worthy of further investigation.

    To interpret what causes the stabilization/destabilization of the resonance of the solute in the complexes, we have carried out additional bound state calculations. The results including the scaled virtual orbital energy (SVOE) and the net charge in the solute are presented in Table 2. First, we optimized the geometry at the second-order M?ller–Plesset perturbation theory(MP2)using the 6-31G(d)basis set,and used this geometry and the same basis set to compute the molecular orbitals and their energies at the HF level. We are interested in the lowest unoccupieda′′molecule orbital for the isolated formamide and complexes A to I. These lowest unoccupieda′′molecule orbitals are most concentrated along the C=O bond, and are responsible for theπ?shape resonances. The plots of these orbitals for formamide, A and D are shown in Fig. 6. LUMO+5 for formamide is aσ?(a′)molecule orbital and has the same shape as the resonantσ?orbital shown by Goumanset al.[27]The very similar orbitals are LUMO+7 for formamide–H2O complexes,and LUMO+9 for formamide-(H2O)2complexes. All thesea′orbitals are concentrated along the C–N bond,and could be a pathway to the breakage of the C–N bond. The plots of these orbitals for formamide,A and D are also shown in Fig.6. It is noted that we do not show the correspondingπ?andσ?resonant MOs for all the complexes because they have almost the same shape. Table 2 shows the SVOE values obtained by using an empirical scaling formula.[39,40]Our SVOE value of 2.09 eV for the lowest unoccupieda′′molecule orbital for formamide is in good agreement with the experimental value of 2.05 eV.[24]However, the value of 10.68 eV for the LUMO+5 for formamide is much lower with respect to theσ?resonance positions of 14.9 eV computed by Goumanset al.[27]and 15 eV calculated by Homemet al.[26]For complexes B,D,E,F and I,the SVOE values are higher than the isolated formamide. However, for complexes A,C,G and H,the SVOE values are smaller than the isolated formamide. Since the SVOE values for the lowest unoccupieda′′molecule orbital are related to theπ?shape resonance and these for the relevanta′molecule orbital are related to theσ?shape resonance,such results indicate that theπ?andσ?shape resonances in complexes B, D, E, F and I should destabilize and for complexes A,C,G and H these two shape resonances should stabilize.

    Table 2. Scaled virtual orbital energy (SVOE in eV), the net charge(qnet), and the position (Er in eV) and width (in parenthesis in eV) of the resonance in the SE approximation.

    Fig. 6. The left column shows the lowest unoccupied (LU) a′′ (π?)molecule orbital (MO) for formamide (FM), complex A, and complex D. The right column shows LUMO+5 for FM, LUMO+7 for complex A,and LUMO+9 for complexe D.

    In the following, we would look at the net charge of the solute considering the complexes with one and two water molecules. We performed the Mulliken population analysis with the 6-31G(d)basis set at B3LYP/6-311++G??optimized geometry, and the net charge of each an atom of the solute was summed. The obtained net charges for all the complexes are shown in Table 2. The results show that the net charge in the solute of complexes B,D,E,F and I is negative,while the net charge in the solute of complexes A, C, G, and H is positive. The resonant orbital in the complexes is mostly localized on the solute, as shown in Fig. 6. As a result, the incoming electron feels a more attractive electrostatic potential for a positive net charge solute,leading to the stabilization of the resonance for four complexes A, C, G and H, where the water plays mainly the role of proton donor. In the contrary,a negative net charge of the solute represents a less attractive electrostatic potential,which would lead to the destabilization of the resonance, as in the case of complexes B, D, E, F and I.Here the electrostatic effects due to the net charge are investigated, and good agreement with our scattering calculation results is found.

    Martinet al.[10]investigated the low-energy electron inducing single-strand breaks (SSBs) in DNA, and pointed out the polarization due to the environment may contribute to the stabilization of the resonances and negatively charged sites can lead to the destabilization of the resonances. The final result is determined by the interplay between the polarization effects and electrostatic effects. As shown in Figs. 1 and 2, for four complexes A,C,G and H the water molecules are mainly proton donors in the H-bonding,which is responsible for the positive net charge of the solute. In these cases, both the polarization (due to the surrounding water molecules) and the net charge in the solute may contribute to the stabilization of theπ?andσ?resonances.The water molecules play a role of proton acceptor for complexes B and D.However,for complexes E,F and I,one water plays as proton donor and the other water plays as proton acceptor. The final outcome gives a net of negative charge of the solute by the interplay. For these complexes B,D,E,F and I the polarization indicates stabilization while the net charge leads to the destabilization of the resonance. The final answer about stabilization/destabilization of the resonance can be judged from the cross sections obtained in the scattering calculations,as shown in Figs.4 and 5.

    4. Conclusion

    We have presented elastic cross sections for three structures of formamide–H2O complexes and six structures of formamide-(H2O)2complexes. The scattering calculations have been performed in the SE approximation with the UK molecularR-matrix code for energies up to 8 eV. Our results show theπ?resonance of the formamide molecule stabilizes when surrounding waters act as the proton donor, and destabilizes when surrounding waters molecules act as the proton acceptor. For the case of one water, if the water is not only the proton donor,but also the proton acceptor,it destabilizes.For the case of two water molecules,when one water molecule is the proton donor and the other one is the proton acceptor,it destabilizes.The current calculations for formamide–H2O and formamide-(H2O)2complexes show that the effect of water is approximately additive. In addition, how the microhydration environment affects the width ofπ?shape resonances is also investigated. We find that the surround water molecules can strongly affect the lifetime of the resonance and the related DEA process.

    The lowest unoccupieda′′molecule orbitals of the complexes are localized on the solute and show the sameπ?character of the LUMO of the isolated formamide molecule.LUMO+5 for formamide, LUMO+7 for formamide–H2O complexes and LUMO+9 for formamide-(H2O)2complexes have the same shape and are the resonantσ?orbitals. We have explored the effect from the net charge of the solute that may affect theπ?andσ?shape resonances. Both polarization and positive net charges can contribute to the stabilization of the anion state. A negative net charge may cause destabilization of theπ?orσ?resonance. The change from gas to the condensed-phase and the effects induced by the microsolvation in electron-molecule calculations are important steps in understanding how the environment may affect processes in DNA driven by electron collisions and anion states. The present results, although carried out for a simple molecule,represent a clear invitation for additional studies aiming at resonant dissociation of wet biological molecules by low-energy electrons.

    猜你喜歡
    劉潔
    Periodic electron oscillation in coupled two-dimensional lattices
    來自姥姥的愛
    Communication error prevention model in industrial organization*
    Competences for a culture of prevention*
    Mass transport in a thin layer of power-law fluid in an Eulerian coordinate system*
    愛是奇跡
    37°女人(2015年9期)2015-10-31 08:42:02
    愛是奇跡嗎
    新民周刊(2015年24期)2015-09-10 07:22:44
    愛是奇跡嗎
    幸?!傋x(2015年9期)2015-09-09 05:32:20
    愛是奇跡嗎
    今日文摘(2015年17期)2015-05-30 10:48:04
    愛是奇跡嗎
    91字幕亚洲| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 午夜福利高清视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 露出奶头的视频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 三级毛片av免费| aaaaa片日本免费| svipshipincom国产片| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 少妇 在线观看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| a级毛片a级免费在线| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 无限看片的www在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 1024手机看黄色片| 日本三级黄在线观看| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 黄色 视频免费看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 黄色视频不卡| 一本久久中文字幕| 午夜免费鲁丝| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| av视频在线观看入口| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 此物有八面人人有两片| 99热只有精品国产| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 很黄的视频免费| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 久久青草综合色| 搞女人的毛片| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 免费av毛片视频| 露出奶头的视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 成人18禁在线播放| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 手机成人av网站| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 香蕉av资源在线| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 午夜精品在线福利| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 黄片小视频在线播放| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 99久久国产精品久久久| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合 | 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久亚洲真实| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 99re在线观看精品视频| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 校园春色视频在线观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美在线黄色| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产日本99.免费观看| 91老司机精品| 国产精品免费视频内射| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 久久九九热精品免费| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 禁无遮挡网站| svipshipincom国产片| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产精品二区激情视频| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 香蕉国产在线看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 97碰自拍视频| or卡值多少钱| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 美女大奶头视频| 日韩高清综合在线| 观看免费一级毛片| 97碰自拍视频| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产成人av教育| 伦理电影免费视频| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 久久精品人妻少妇| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 窝窝影院91人妻| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 日本a在线网址| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 精品第一国产精品| 少妇 在线观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 欧美zozozo另类| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 色综合婷婷激情| 日韩免费av在线播放| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 搞女人的毛片| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 怎么达到女性高潮| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 国产区一区二久久| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 久久精品91蜜桃| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 88av欧美| 久久久国产成人免费| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产高清videossex| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 日本 欧美在线| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 免费观看精品视频网站| 波多野结衣高清无吗| a级毛片a级免费在线| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 91字幕亚洲| 日韩高清综合在线| 免费观看精品视频网站| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 日本 欧美在线| 高清在线国产一区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 成人国产综合亚洲| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 制服诱惑二区| 国产1区2区3区精品| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 午夜影院日韩av| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 午夜福利免费观看在线| 成人国语在线视频| 一本综合久久免费| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产熟女xx| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 看黄色毛片网站| 色在线成人网| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 色av中文字幕| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 嫩草影院精品99| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 又大又爽又粗| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 在线看三级毛片| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 美女午夜性视频免费| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线 | 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 午夜影院日韩av| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 自线自在国产av| 国产精品二区激情视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久香蕉激情| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 成人欧美大片| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产免费男女视频| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 国产真实乱freesex| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 香蕉av资源在线| 女警被强在线播放| 岛国在线观看网站| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 午夜精品在线福利| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 99久久国产精品久久久| av免费在线观看网站| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 午夜影院日韩av| 制服诱惑二区| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 九色国产91popny在线| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久久久久大精品| svipshipincom国产片| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 色在线成人网| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 曰老女人黄片| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 日本 av在线| www国产在线视频色| 亚洲全国av大片| 亚洲五月天丁香| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 免费观看精品视频网站| www.自偷自拍.com| 中国美女看黄片| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线 | 一本一本综合久久| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产精品野战在线观看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| www.www免费av| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 久久久久久久久中文| 久久中文看片网| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 色在线成人网| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 日本三级黄在线观看| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 久久香蕉国产精品| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 男人舔奶头视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 国产野战对白在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 欧美午夜高清在线| 精品第一国产精品| 午夜免费观看网址| 亚洲第一电影网av| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产野战对白在线观看| tocl精华| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 精品国产亚洲在线| 热99re8久久精品国产| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 精品高清国产在线一区| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 日本 av在线| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| videosex国产| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| av视频在线观看入口| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 女警被强在线播放| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 99热6这里只有精品| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 黄色视频不卡| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 91成人精品电影| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 亚洲专区字幕在线| or卡值多少钱| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 久久人妻av系列| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 美国免费a级毛片| 天天添夜夜摸| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 中文字幕久久专区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 18禁观看日本| 大香蕉久久成人网| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 香蕉国产在线看| www日本黄色视频网| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 丁香欧美五月| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久久久久大精品| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 在线av久久热| 亚洲第一av免费看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 99热6这里只有精品| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 88av欧美| 国产1区2区3区精品| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| netflix在线观看网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 久热这里只有精品99| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 欧美日韩精品网址| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 一级片免费观看大全| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| a级毛片在线看网站| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产精华一区二区三区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| av在线播放免费不卡| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 香蕉av资源在线| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产日本99.免费观看| 99re在线观看精品视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 久久香蕉国产精品| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 男人舔奶头视频|