• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Model analysis of secondary organic aerosol over China with a regional air quality modeling system (RAMS-CMAQ)

    2016-11-23 05:57:00LIJiLinZHANGMeiGenGAOYindCHENLei
    關(guān)鍵詞:體物中東部倍半萜

    LI Ji-Lin, ZHANG Mei-Gen, GAO Yind CHEN Lei

    aState Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP),Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China;bCollege of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;cCenter for Excellence in Urban Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, China

    Model analysis of secondary organic aerosol over China with a regional air quality modeling system (RAMS-CMAQ)

    LI Jia-Lina,b, ZHANG Mei-Gena,c, GAO Yiaand CHEN Leia,b

    aState Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP),Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China;bCollege of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;cCenter for Excellence in Urban Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, China

    The regional air quality modeling system RAMS-CMAQ was updated to incorporate secondary organic aerosol (SOA) production from isoprene and sesquiterpene and to account for the SOA production rate dependence on NOx and SOA aging. The system was then used to simulate spatiotemporal distributions of SOA concentration and its major constituents over China in winter. Modeled monthly mean SOA concentrations were high in central and eastern China and low in western regions. The highest SOA appeared in regions from Beijing—Tianjin—Hebei (BTH) to the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and areas from Sichuan Basin to the southwest border of China,where SOA contributions were less than 10% of the organic aerosol (OA). The lowest concentration was in the Qinghai—Tibet Plateau, accounting for 20%—30% of OA. It is notable that contributions from anthropogenic precursors to SOA were signifcant in winter, especially the wide areas of central and eastern China with contributions generally varying from 50% to 80% of the total SOA. Beijing was used as an example location representative of the heavily polluted BTH area for analysis of major components of SOA. Though the modeled concentration of SOA was still underestimated compared to the observations, it still showed that xylene and toluene were the two greatest contributors to anthropogenic SOA, which was in agreement with the observations. SOA produced from monoterpene was the greatest contributor to biogenic SOA due to the high mass yield of monoterpene, followed by isoprene. More than 57% of SOAs were aged, which may increase the extinction efect of SOA.

    ARTICLE HISTORY

    Revised 17 May 2016

    Accepted 24 May 2016

    Organic aerosol; haze;Beijing—Tianjin—Hebei; VOCs

    為了研究我國(guó)二次有機(jī)氣溶膠(SOA)時(shí)空分布及其主要組分,更新了RAMS-CMAQ的SOA模塊,主要考慮SOA老化,不同NOx濃度下SOA的形成以及異戊二烯和倍半萜烯生成SOA的機(jī)制。結(jié)果表明,SOA在我國(guó)中東部地區(qū)濃度較高而在西部則較低。高SOA覆蓋兩塊區(qū)域:京津冀到長(zhǎng)江中游及四川盆地到我國(guó)西南邊界,但對(duì)有機(jī)氣溶膠(OA)的貢獻(xiàn)不到10%,低SOA主要出現(xiàn)在青藏高原,占OA的20%—30%。值得注意的是,冬季人為源前體物對(duì)SOA的貢獻(xiàn)顯著,在中東部地區(qū)可達(dá)50%—80%。在北京,人為源SOA主要前體物是甲苯和二甲苯而單萜烯則是生物源SOA主要前體物。SOA的老化部分超過(guò)57%,這可能是SOA消光增強(qiáng)的原因。

    1. Introduction

    Organic aerosols (OAs) comprise a signifcant fraction(20%—90%) of the total fne particulate mass in the atmosphere (Zhang et al. 2007). It is well known that OAs signifcantly infuence human health, air quality, and climate change; thus, it has attracted increasing attention in recent years. OAs can be divided into two categories: primary organic aerosol (POA) and secondary organic aerosol (SOA). POA is emitted directly from anthropogenic and biogenic sources, whereas SOA is formed from the oxidation of volatile or semi-volatile organic compounds(SVOCs) in the atmosphere (Seinfeld and Pankow 2003). Because of the poor understanding of the various sources,chemical formation and transformation mechanisms, and physicochemical characterization (Hallquist et al. 2009;Zhang et al. 2007), there are many uncertainties remaining in our knowledge of OAs, among which the formation and evolution of SOAs are the least known.

    During the past twenty years, signifcant eforts have been made to investigate SOAs. A number of feld observational studies and laboratory chamber experiments of SOAs have been carried out domestically and abroadto investigate their properties, sources, chemical aging characteristics as well as diurnal and seasonal variations(Cao et al. 2007; Duan et al. 2007; Huang et al. 2014; Riva et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2008). Additionally, models have been used to predict spatiotemporal distribution and the properties of SOAs (Fu et al. 2008; Han et al. 2008; Jiang et al. 2012). However, it has been noted that current atmospheric models underestimate SOA mass. Heald et al. (2005)showed that concentrations of measured organic carbon(OC) over the northwest Pacifc during the ACE-Asia campaign were 10—100 times higher than that simulated by a global chemical transport model with large diferences in SOA estimations. As we can see, the underestimation of SOA in models is still quite common, and the most likely causes are (1) the uncertainty in emission inventories of volatile organic gases; (2) missing precursors, e.g. emissions of semi-volatile organic gases (Robinson et al. 2007);(3) the exclusion of emissions from regions outside of the studied areas (Jiang et al. 2012); (4) missing physical/chemical processes that contribute to SOA formation (Fu et al. 2008; Robinson et al. 2007); and (5) limited model resolution (e.g. Qian, Gustafson, and Fast 2010).

    In order to improve SOA simulation, much work has been conducted. The use of the volatility basis-set (VBS)approach (Donahue et al. 2006), instead of the traditional two-product method (Odum et al. 1996), has been a major improvement (Han et al. 2016; Lin et al. 2016). In their results, the VBS method indeed increased SOA concentrations, but the models do not capture time variation well. So, further understanding and improvement of SOA mechanisms are needed to enhance the performance of SOA simulation.

    In this study, RAMS-CMAQ was updated to use the most recent SOA production mechanisms, which include incorporating SOA production from isoprene and sesquiterpene, accounting for SOA production rate dependence on nitrogen oxides and SOA aging. The improved model was applied to investigate the spatiotemporal distributions of SOA concentration as well as its contribution to atmospheric aerosols over China in February 2014.

    2. Model description

    In this study, CMAQ version 4.7.1 was chosen as the base model and was confgured to use the gas-phase chemical mechanism model SAPRC99 (the 1999 Statewide Air Pollutant Research Center) (Carter 2000). Compared to previous versions, CMAQ v4.7.1 has been modifed to incorporate two new groups of SOA production pathways:(1) SOA formation from new precursors such as benzene,isoprene, and sesquiterpenes; and (2) SOA formation from new mechanisms, such as NOx-dependent SOA yields from aromatics, acid-catalyzed SOA yields from isoprene, in-cloud SOA formation, and aging of SOA. Furthermore,it allows for the assignment of SOA mass to individual volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

    In this version, SOA is produced from seven VOCs species: long-chain alkanes, high-yield aromatics (toluene),low-yield aromatics (xylene), benzene, isoprene, monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes. There are 19 secondary organic products during the formation process, of which 12 species are semi-volatile. Semi-volatile VOCs (SVOCs),produced from the oxidation of VOCs, are represented by the two-product model and then absorbed into an organic particulate phase (i.e. semi-volatile SOA) through gas/ particle partitioning behavior (Pankow 1994). Unlike the semi-volatile SOA, nonvolatile SOA do not partition back to the gas phase. There are four types of nonvolatile SOAs:(1) low-NOx aromatic SOA, (2) acid-enhanced isoprene,(3) oligomers formed through particle-phase reactions,and (4) SOAs from in-cloud oxidation processes. A detailed description was depicted in (Carlton et al. 2010).

    The emission sources used in this model were obtained by several ways. Anthropogenic emissions of VOCs, black carbon (BC), OC, SO2, NOx, and particle matters were obtained from monthly-based emission inventory of China in 2010 with a spatial resolution of 0.25° × 0.25° and divided into four categories, namely power, industry,residential, and transport (Lu, Zhang, and Streets 2011). NOxand ammonia from soil were provided by the Global Emissions Inventory Activity (GEIA) 1° × 1° monthly inventory (Benkovitz et al. 1996). The open biomass burning emissions (from forest wildfres, savanna burning, and agriculture waste burning) were adopted from the Global Fire Emissions Database Version 2 (Randerson et al. 2007). Besides, emissions of dust and sea salt were estimated online (Gong 2003; Han et al. 2004) in the modeling system.

    Our CMAQ model was driven by meteorology felds simulated by RAMS. The model domain was 6654 × 5440 km2for CMAQ (shown in Figure 1) on a rotated polar-stereographic map projection centered at (35°N, 110°E) with a 64-km-grid-cell. The other detailed model confguration information can be found in Han et al. (2014).

    3. Results and discussion

    In this study, we chose the month of February 2014 as the modeling period because many places in China experienced heavy haze pollution during this episode, especially the region of Huabei.

    3.1. Model evaluation

    Figure 1.Geographic locations of CNMC measurement stations in the model domain.

    Table 1.Statistical summary of the comparison of the daily average meteorological factors and the hourly PM2.5mass concentrations between observations and simulations at 12 stations in February 2014.

    Meteorological factors have important efects on photochemical and aerosol processes. In order to understand the model performance, daily mean meteorological data of 12 stations were used for comparison. The monitoring data from the twelve surface stations (as shown in Figure 1) of the Chinese National Meteorological Center (CNMC) were downloaded from the website (http://www.escience.gov. cn/metdata/page/index.html).

    The observations and model predictions of the daily-average temperature (T), relative humidity (RH), wind speed (WS),and direction of maximum wind speed (WD) at the 12 stations in February are presented in the fgures that not shown. RAMS generally predicted the magnitude and day-to-day variation of T, RH, and WS well. As shown in Table 1(a), average for all 12 stations, the monthly mean observations of T, RH, and WS were 2.74 °C, 67.12%, and 2.21 m s-1, respectively, while mean simulations for these three factors were 2.47 °C, 67.31%,and 2.14 m s-1, respectively. The diferences of the standard deviations of the three factors between measurements and simulations were small. The values of normalized mean bias(NMB) for T, RH, and WS were -9.92%, 0.28%, and -3.10%,respectively, with the correlation coefcients (R) being 0.97,0.84, and 0.62, respectively. However, the simulated directions of maximum wind speed did not coincide well with the observed data. As presented in Table 1(b), the fraction of samples with an absolute error ≤22.5° between simulation and observation was 29.46%, and the fraction of samples with an absolute error ≤11.25° was 14.28%. The most probable reason is the diferent time resolution (every 10 min for measurements and 1 h for simulations). Nevertheless, variance of the predicted wind direction was similar to the measurements at most sites with R = 0.53. As a whole, the predicted and measured meteorological data showed good consistency,and the model can reasonably simulate the variations of meteorological phenomena.

    Figure 2.Modeled distributions of monthly mean (a) SOA with wind feld (b) OA (shaded) and SOA/OA (contour line) (c) PM2.5and OA/PM2.5(d) ASOA/SOA in February 2014.

    To further evaluate the performance of the model during the period, simulated hourly PM2.5results were compared with the observations provided by the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre (CNEMC). For all the stations, though simulated values were mostly higher than the observations (with mean bias being approximately 40 μg m-3), the model had a relatively good ability to capture the variations and trends of fne aerosol mass concentrations. As presented in Table 1(a), the correlation coefcient was 0.62 between the measurements and simulations, with the standard deviations being 90.72 and 103.86 μg m-3for the observed and predicted concentrations, respectively. Above all, it indicated a generally good ability of the model to predict aerosol concentrations.

    3.2. Spatial distribution characteristics of predicted SOA

    The OA mass concentrations were simulated in μg m-3,but measured in μgC m-3. For comparison, SOA and OA in Figure 2(a) and (b) were actually SOC and OC.

    Figure 2(a) shows the spatial distribution of monthly averaged SOA mass concentration and wind feld. As a whole, in China, the concentration of SOA was high in central and eastern regions and low in the western region. SOA concentration generally varied from 0.5 to 1 μg m-3in central and eastern areas, with maximum (1—2 μg m-3) in portion of regions from the Beijing—Tianjin—Hebei (BTH) area to the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, regions from southeast of Sichuan province to the China—Vietnam border and China—Burma border as well as Hainan Province. The model results were lower than the observed ranges of 3.1—29.9 and 1.4—19.6 μg m-3, respectively (Cao et al. 2007;Dan et al. 2004; Li and Bai 2009; Wang et al. 2015), due to the uncertainties in the ratio of OC to elemental carbon(EC) when calculating observed SOC, and the underestimation of emission inventories in our model. The simulated SOA concentration in western region of China was less than 0.2 μg m-3, mainly due to low emissions of related precursors. Outside China, in northeast India, central Burma, Thailand and Cambodia etc., we can also fnd high SOA concentrations (≥3 μg m-3) because of large amountof biomass combustion which may release biogenic VOCs(Rouviere et al. 2006) to produce SOA.

    Figure 2(b) presents the spatial distribution of monthly averaged OA mass concentration and the monthly mean fraction of SOA to OA (SOA/OA). The distribution of OA is similar to SOA: high in the central and eastern regions and low in the western region. The simulated OA concentration was generally in the range of 1—25 μg m-3in central and east China and reached the highest levels (25—35 μg m-3)in the BTH area due to large amount of anthropogenic emissions. The model result in BTH area is comparable to values of (27.2 ± 15.3—38.9 ± 18.4) μg m-3observed by Cao et al. (2007). OA concentrations in eastern Sichuan Basin were also high (25—35 μg m-3), within the observed range of (18.3 ± 8.6—76.7 ± 24.6) μg m-3(Cao et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2014). The reason for the high concentrations is that Sichuan Basin is surrounded by mountains and has some of the lowest wind speeds (Chen and Xie 2012), which is not conducive to the difusion of pollutants. In addition to the increased carbon emissions from domestic heating and the stable atmospheric conditions, high relative humidity may also contribute to the high OA concentration. In western China, OA concentrations were generally lower than 2 μg m-3, although concentrations in some northwestern areas were 2—10 μg m-3mainly due to relatively high anthropogenic emissions from surrounding areas with dense population. The lowest concentration (≤0.2 μg m-3)appeared in the center of Qinghai—Tibet Plateau resulting from very low source emissions. Outside China, in western Burma, northeastern India and the Thailand—Burma border, we also found high OA concentrations (>25 μg m-3)because of biomass combustion, including burning of agricultural waste and fuel wood in Southeast Asia.

    As illustrated in Figure 2(b), the SOA fraction ranged from less than 6% to 30% in China, with a relatively higher contribution (generally 10%—30%) in western regions and lower fraction (<10%) mostly in central and eastern developed areas. The contribution of SOA to OA in south China(6%—20%) and north China (<10%) were within the range of feld measurements of 6%—60% and 8%—32%, respectively (Cao et al. 2003, 2007; Niu et al. 2006; Zhao, Dong,Yang et al. 2013). Both the simulated and observed results indicated that the fraction in the north was lower than in the south due to the lower temperatures and reduced sunlight. The lowest fraction (<6%) mainly appeared in regions where the concentrations of OA were relatively high (e.g. Sichuan Basin and BTH area etc.). Similarly, in the western regions, the SOA/OA fraction was also the lowest in areas where OA concentration was the highest. This illustrates that emission of POA was the main contributor to high OA. The highest fraction (20%—30%) appeared in Tibet—Qinghai area due to low primary source emissions. Outside China, the SOA fraction was quite large (20%—50%) over wide areas of the western Pacifc Ocean and the northern Indian Ocean due to relatively lower POA emissions and greater oxidation of SOA transported from upwind areas. However, among the areas of high OA concentrations, such as northeast India and central Burma, SOA/OA was less than 20%.

    As shown in Figure 2(c), the distribution of PM2.5mass concentration was also similar to the OA and SOA concentrations. The highest concentration (100—135 μg m-3)occurred in BTH and Sichuan Basin and were within the observed range of (126.5 ± 66.1—179.4 ± 87.8) μg m-3and (158 ± 51—311.8 ± 114.1) μg m-3(Cao et al. 2007; Tao et al. 2014) respectively. The lowest (<2 μg m-3) occurred in the Tibet—Qinghai Plateau. Outside China, PM2.5in east India was relatively high with the concentration varying from 40 μg m-3to 80 μg m-3due to biomass burning and transportation in the western India with its high fossil fuel consumption and particulate emissions(Reddy and Venkataraman 2002). As is evident in Figure 2(c), as a whole, the OA fraction was high in central and eastern China (generally 20%—30%) and low (approximately 10%—20%) in western regions. As a result, the contribution of SOA to PM2.5(SOA/PM2.5) in the areas with low and high concentrations were less than 6% and less than 3%, respectively. Outside China, the OA/PM2.5ratio was the highest in central and south Burma and reached up to 80%—90% due to large amount of biomass burning in these areas.

    As presented in Figure 2(d), because of large amount of anthropogenic VOCs emissions, anthropogenic SOA(ASOA) dominated SOA over wide areas of central and east China (50%—80%) in the winter time, with the fraction reaching more than 60% in the regions from the Huabei plain to the upper reaches of the Yellow River as well as the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. The modeled distribution was similar to that predicted by Jiang et al. (2012). It was notable that the contribution to SOA from anthropogenic sources was signifcant in the regions of north of the Huabei plain, the Bohai Sea, and the Yellow Sea with contributions up to 80%, resulting from the atmospheric barrier of the Taihang Mountains and transport of clockwise horizontal airfow. The fraction of ASOA to SOA in portions of western remote areas of China can also reach 40%—50% because of the transport of ASOA from neighboring areas. Outside China, the ASOA fraction was also quite high (50%—70%) in eastern India, resulting from the transport from the western India as well as the Himalayas preventing pollutant transmission to the northeast. In the western Pacifc Ocean and the northern Indian Ocean, the fraction of anthropogenic SOA can reach 60%. However, the fraction in south Burma and Cambodia was small (<10%) because of high biomass burning (Rouviere et al. 2006).

    3.3. Major components of SOA

    The BTH area always experiences heavy pollution in winter, so we took Beijing (BJ, 39.8° N, 116.47°E) as an example site to analyze the major components of SOA in this area. SOA was seriously underestimated compared to the observation (0.93 μg m-3vs. 8.66—23.1 μg m-3) with the concentration diference being a multiple of 9.3—24.8 (Dan et al. 2004; Duan et al. 2005; Zhao, Dong, He et al. 2013). This discrepancy may result from the underestimation of emission inventories in the areas with dense population and high anthropogenic emissions (Liu et al. 2012). In Beijing, the contribution to SOA from anthropogenic sources was approximately 72.39% with the two most important anthropogenic VOC precursors being xylene and toluene. This is consistent with the observations that the benzene series is one of the main VOCs compounds in the BTH area, with the major constituents including benzene, xylene and toluene (Cao et al. 2012; Jiang et al. 2015;Zhou, Hao, and Wang 2011). Here, SOA that formed from aromatic compounds (including benzene, xylene, and toluene) accounted for more than 27% of total SOA, which was approximately 6.0 times more than the contribution from long-chain alkanes. Among BSOA components, SOA formed from monoterpenes was the major contributor,followed by that from isoprene, with fractions being 8.74,and 1.27%, respectively. This may result from the higher mass yield from monoterpene (Lane, Donahue, and Pandis 2008). SOA produced from sesquiterpenes was negligible,with a fraction of approximately 0.04%, probably due to its low emission among biogenic VOCs (Oderbolz et al. 2013). Aged SOA was produced from oligomerization of SOA in the condensed phase. Its properties, especially the optical property, may change through the aging process. In this study, aged SOA accounted for more than 57% of the total SOA, suggesting the greater extinction of SOA in Beijing,which may give rise to the lower visibility during heavy pollution days.

    4. Conclusions

    In this study, we used RAMS-CMAQ with the most recent SOA production mechanisms to investigate spatial mass concentration distributions of SOAs as well as their contribution to total atmospheric aerosols over China in February 2014.

    In China, the distribution of the mean SOA concentration for the month was similar to OA and PM2.5concentrations, which were high in the central and eastern regions and low in the western region. The highest concentrations were mainly concentrated in the areas around the middle reaches of the Yellow River and the Yangtze River (e.g. BTH area) as well as Sichuan Basin, while the lowest generally occurred in the Qinghai—Tibet Plateau. SOA concentration generally varied from 0.5 μg m-3to 1 μg m-3in the central and eastern areas with maximum concentrations being 1—2 μg m-3, and were not more than 0.2 μg m-3in western China because of low emissions of precursors. Though the high SOA concentration was accompanied by high OA and PM2.5,SOA/OA and SOA/PM2.5in these areas (like BTJ regions and Sichuan Basin) were less than 10% and less than 3%,respectively. SOA/OA, and SOA/PM2.5were 10%—30% and less than 6%, respectively, in the low concentration areas like the Tibet—Qinghai Plateau.

    Anthropogenic SOA dominated SOA over wide areas of central and eastern China, with contributions of more than 60%. In portions of the remote western areas of China, the fraction can also reach 40%—50%.

    In terms of Beijing, the contribution to SOA from anthropogenic sources was approximately 72.39% with the two greatest contributions coming from xylene and toluene. Among BSOA components, SOA produced from monoterpenes was the major contributor, followed by SOA from isoprene, with fractions of 8.74% and 1.27%, respectively. In this study, aged SOA, produced from oligomerization reactions of SOA, accounted for more than 57%, suggesting the greater extinction efect of SOA.

    Disclosure statement

    No potential confict of interest was reported by the authors.

    Funding

    This work was supported by the ‘Strategic Priority Research Program (B)' of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB05030105],[XDB05030102], [XDB05030103]; the National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB953802].

    References

    Benkovitz, C. M., M. T. Scholtz, J. Pacyna, L. Tarrason, J. Dignon,E. C. Voldner, P. A. Spiro, J. A. Logan, and T. E. Graedel. 1996.“Global Gridded Inventories of Anthropogenic Emissions of Sulfur and Nitrogen.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 101 (D22): 29239—29253.

    Cao, J. J., S. C. Lee, K. F. Ho, X. Y. Zhang, S. C. Zou, K. Fung, J. C. Chow,and J. G. Watson. 2003. “Characteristics of Carbonaceous Aerosol in Pearl River Delta Region, China during 2001 Winter Period.” Atmospheric Environment 37 (11): 1451—1460.

    Cao, J. J., S. C. Lee, J. C. Chow, J. G. Watson, K. F. Ho, R. J. Zhang,Z. D. Jin, et al. 2007. “Spatial and Seasonal Distributions of Carbonaceous Aerosols over China.” Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 112 (D22). doi:10.1029/2006jd008205.

    Cao, W., J. Shi, B. Han, X. Wang, Y. Peng, W. Qiu, L. Zhao, and Z. Bai. 2012. “Composition and Distribution of Vocs in the Ambient Air of Typical Cities in Northern of China.” China Environmental Science 32 (2): 200—206.

    Carlton, A. G., P. V. Bhave, S. L. Napelenok, E. D. Edney, G. Sarwar,R. W. Pinder, G. A. Pouliot, and M. Houyoux. 2010. “Model Representation of Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7.”Environmental Science & Technology 44 (22): 8553—8560.

    Carter, W. P. L. 2000. Implementation of the SAPRC-99 Chemical Mechanism into the Models-3 Framework Report to the US Environmental Protection Agency. Durham, NC: Research Triangle Park.

    Chen, Y., and S. Xie. 2012. “Temporal and Spatial Visibility Trends in the Sichuan Basin, China, 1973 to 2010.” Atmospheric Research 112: 25—34.

    Chen, Y., S. Xie, B. Luo, and C. Zhai. 2014. “Characteristics and Origins of Carbonaceous Aerosol in the Sichuan Basin, China.”Atmospheric Environment 94: 215—223.

    Dan, M., G. S. Zhuang, X. X. Li, H. R. Tao, and Y. H. Zhuang. 2004.“The Characteristics of Carbonaceous Species and Their Sources in PM2.5in Beijing.” Atmospheric Environment 38 (21): 3443—3452.

    Donahue, N. M., A. L. Robinson, C. O. Stanier, and S. N. Pandis. 2006. “Coupled Partitioning, Dilution, and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics.” Environmental Science & Technology 40 (8): 2635—2643.

    Duan, F. K., K. B. He, Y. L. Ma, Y. T. Jia, F. M. Yang, Y. Lei, S. Tanaka,and T. Okuta. 2005. “Characteristics of Carbonaceous Aerosols in Beijing, China.” Chemosphere 60 (3): 355—364.

    Duan, J., J. Tan, D. Cheng, X. Bi, W. Deng, G. Sheng, J. Fu, and M. H. Wong. 2007. “Sources and Characteristics of Carbonaceous Aerosol in Two Largest Cities in Pearl River Delta Region, China.”Atmospheric Environment 41 (14): 2895—2903.

    Fu, T.-M., D. J. Jacob, F. Wittrock, J. P. Burrows, M. Vrekoussis,and D. K. Henze. 2008. “Global Budgets of Atmospheric Glyoxal and Methylglyoxal, and Implications for Formation of Secondary Organic Aerosols.” Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 113 (D15). doi:10.1029/2007jd009505.

    Gong, S. L. 2003. “A Parameterization of Sea-Salt Aerosol Source Function for Sub- and Super-micron Particles.” Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17 (4). doi:10.1029/2003gb002079.

    Hallquist, M., J. C. Wenger, U. Baltensperger, Y. Rudich,D. Simpson, M. Claeys, J. Dommen, et al. 2009. “The Formation,Properties and Impact of Secondary Organic Aerosol: Current and Emerging Issues.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9(14): 5155—5236.

    Han, Z. W., H. Ueda, K. Matsuda, R. J. Zhang, K. Arao, Y. Kanai, and H. Hasome. 2004. “Model Study on Particle Size Segregation and Deposition during Asian Dust Events in March 2002.”Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 109 (D19). doi:10.1029/2004jd004920.

    Han, Z., R. Zhang, and Q. G. Wang, W. Wang, J. Cao, and J. Xu. 2008. “Regional Modeling of Organic Aerosols over China in Summertime.” Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 113 (D11). doi:10.1029/2007jd009436.

    Han, X., M. Zhang, J. Gao, S. Wang, and F. Chai. 2014. “Modeling Analysis of the Seasonal Characteristics of Haze Formation in Beijing.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14 (18): 10231—10248.

    Han, Z., Z. Xie, G. Wang, R. Zhang, and J. Tao. 2016. “Modeling Organic Aerosols over East China Using a Volatility Basis-set Approach with Aging Mechanism in a Regional Air Quality Model.” Atmospheric Environment 124: 186—198.

    Heald, C. L., D. J. Jacob, R. J. Park, L. M. Russell, B. J. Huebert,J. H. Seinfeld, H. Liao, and R. J. Weber. 2005. “A Large Organic Aerosol Source in the Free Troposphere Missing from Current Models.” Geophysical Research Letters 32 (18). doi:10.1029/ 2005gl023831.

    Huang, R.-J., Y. Zhang, C. Bozzetti, K.-F. Ho, J.-J. Cao, Y. Han,K. R. Daellenbach, et al. 2014. “High Secondary Aerosol Contribution to Particulate Pollution during Haze Events in China.” Nature 514 (7521): 218—222.

    Jiang, F., Q. Liu, X. Huang, T. Wang, B. Zhuang, and M. Xie. 2012.“Regional Modeling of Secondary Organic Aerosol over China Using WRF/Chem.” Journal of Aerosol Science 43 (1): 57—73.

    Jiang, J., W. Jin, L. Yang, Y. Feng, Q. Chang, Y. Li, and J. Zhou. 2015.“The Pollution Characteristic of Vocs of Ambient Air in Winter in Shijiazhang.” Environmental Monitoring in China 31 (1): 79—84.

    Lane, T. E., N. M. Donahue, and S. N. Pandis. 2008. “Simulating Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Using the Volatility Basis-set Approach in a Chemical Transport Model.”Atmospheric Environment 42 (32): 7439—7451.

    Li, W., and Z. Bai. 2009. “Characteristics of Organic and Elemental Carbon in Atmospheric Fine Particles in Tianjin, China.”P(pán)articuology 7 (6): 432—437.

    Lin, J., J. An, Y. Qu, Y. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Tang, F. Wang, and W. Xiang. 2016. “Local and Distant Source Contributions to Secondary Organic Aerosol in the Beijing Urban Area in Summer.”Atmospheric Environment 124: 176—185.

    Liu, Z., Y. Wang, M. Vrekoussis, A. Richter, F. Wittrock, J. P. Burrows,M. Shao, et al. 2012. “Exploring the Missing Source of Glyoxal(Chocho) over China.” Geophysical Research Letters 39. doi:10.1029/2012gl051645.

    Lu, Z., Q. Zhang, and D. G. Streets. 2011. “Sulfur Dioxide and Primary Carbonaceous Aerosol Emissions in China and India,1996—2010.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11 (18): 9839—9864.

    Niu, Y., L. He, M. Hu, J. Zhang, and Y. Zhao. 2006. “Pollution Characteristics of Atmospheric Fine Particles and Their Secondary Components in the Atmosphere of Shenzhen in Summer and in Winter.” Science in China Series B-Chemistry 49(5): 466—474.

    Oderbolz, D. C., S. Aksoyoglu, J. Keller, I. Barmpadimos,R. Steinbrecher, C. A. Skjoth, C. Plass-Duelmer, and A. S. H. Prevot. 2013. “A Comprehensive Emission Inventory of Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds in Europe: Improved Seasonality and Land-cover.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 (4): 1689—1712.

    Odum, J. R., T. Hofmann, F. Bowman, D. Collins, R. C. Flagan, and J. H. Seinfeld. 1996. “Gas/Particle Partitioning and Secondary Organic Aerosol Yields.” Environmental Science & Technology 30 (8): 2580—2585.

    Pankow, J. F. 1994. “An Absorption-model of Gas-particle Partitioning of Organic-compounds in the Atmosphere.”Atmospheric Environment 28 (2): 185—188.

    Qian, Y., W. I. Gustafson Jr., and J. D. Fast. 2010. “An Investigation of the Sub-grid Variability of Trace Gases and Aerosols for Global Climate Modeling.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10 (14): 6917—6946.

    Randerson, J. T., G. R. van der Werf, L. Giglio, G. J. Collatz,and P. S. Kasibhatla. 2007. Global Fire Emissions Database,Version 2 (GFEDv2.1). Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center. doi:10.3334/ ORNLDAAC/849.

    Reddy, M. S., and C. Venkataraman. 2002. “Inventory of Aerosol and Sulphur Dioxide Emissions from India: I — Fossil Fuel Combustion.” Atmospheric Environment 36 (4): 677—697.

    Riva, M., E. S. Robinson, E. Perraudin, N. M. Donahue, and E. Villenave. 2015. “Photochemical Aging of Secondary Organic Aerosols Generated from the Photooxidation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Gas-phase.”Environmental Science & Technology 49 (9): 5407—5416.

    Robinson, A. L., N. M. Donahue, M. K. Shrivastava, E. A. Weitkamp,A. M. Sage, A. P. Grieshop, T. E. Lane, J. R. Pierce, and S. N. Pandis. 2007. “Rethinking Organic Aerosols: Semivolatile Emissions and Photochemical Aging.” Science 315 (5816): 1259—1262.

    Rouviere, A., G. Brulfert, P. Baussand, and J. P. Chollet. 2006.“Monoterpene Source Emissions from Chamonix in the Alpine Valleys.” Atmospheric Environment 40 (19): 3613—3620. Seinfeld, J. H., and J. F. Pankow. 2003. “Organic Atmospheric Particulate Material.” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 54: 121—140.

    Tao, J., J. Gao, L. Zhang, R. Zhang, H. Che, Z. Zhang, Z. Lin, J. Jing,J. Cao, and S. C. Hsu. 2014. “PM2.5Pollution in a Megacity of Southwest China: Source Apportionment and Implication.”Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14 (16): 8679—8699.

    Wang, J., S. S. H. Ho, J. Cao, R. Huang, J. Zhou, Y. Zhao, H. Xu, et al. 2015. “Characteristics and Major Sources of Carbonaceous Aerosols in PM2.5from Sanya, China.” Science of the Total Environment 530: 110—119.

    Zhang, Q., J. L. Jimenez, M. R. Canagaratna, J. D. Allan,H. Coe, I. Ulbrich, M. R. Alfarra, et al. 2007. “Ubiquity and Dominance of Oxygenated Species in Organic Aerosols in Anthropogenically-Infuenced Northern Hemisphere Midlatitudes.” Geophysical Research Letters 34 (13). doi:10.10 29/2007gl029979.

    Zhang, X. Y., Y. Q. Wang, X. C. Zhang, W. Guo, and S. L. Gong. 2008.“Carbonaceous Aerosol Composition over Various Regions of China during 2006.” Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 113 (D14). doi:10.1029/2007jd009525.

    Zhao, P., F. Dong, Y. Yang, D. He, X. Zhao, W. Zhang, Q. Yao, and H. Liu. 2013. “Characteristics of Carbonaceous Aerosol in the Region of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei, China.” Atmospheric Environment 71: 389—398.

    Zhao, P. S., F. Dong, D. He, X. J. Zhao, X. L. Zhang, W. Z. Zhang,Q. Yao, and H. Y. Liu. 2013. “Characteristics of Concentrations and Chemical Compositions for PM2.5in the Region of Beijing,Tianjin, and Hebei, China.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13 (9): 4631—4644.

    Zhou, Y., Z. Hao, and H. Wang. 2011. “Pollution and Source of Atmospheric Volatile Organic Compounds in Urban-rural Juncture Belt Area in Beijing.” Chinese Journal of Environmental Science 32 (12): 3560—3565.

    有機(jī)氣溶膠; 灰霾; 京津冀;揮發(fā)性有機(jī)化合物

    31 March 2016

    CONTACT ZHANG Mei-Gen mgzhang@mail.iap.ac.cn

    ? 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    猜你喜歡
    體物中東部倍半萜
    姜黃中3個(gè)新的沒(méi)藥烷型倍半萜類(lèi)化合物
    中草藥(2023年14期)2023-07-21 07:02:02
    吉林一號(hào)衛(wèi)星在吉林省中東部松林變色立木監(jiān)測(cè)中的應(yīng)用
    遼寧省沿海城市臭氧小時(shí)濃度變化特征及其與前體物濃度相關(guān)性分析
    紫光展銳等發(fā)布首個(gè)PSA認(rèn)證軟硬件—體物聯(lián)網(wǎng)可信數(shù)據(jù)上鏈解決方案
    智能城市(2021年9期)2021-06-14 03:14:18
    澤瀉原三萜、降三萜和倍半萜的分離及其抗炎活性研究
    中東部地區(qū)歷史文化古城鎮(zhèn)色彩的表現(xiàn)特征
    流行色(2020年9期)2020-07-16 08:08:36
    體物盡其妙,品之有寄托——杜甫詠物詩(shī)《房兵曹胡馬》賞析
    文苑(2019年14期)2019-08-09 02:14:34
    野馬追倍半萜內(nèi)酯精制工藝的優(yōu)化
    中成藥(2017年10期)2017-11-16 00:50:02
    一種新型的倍半萜內(nèi)酯
    ——青蒿素
    不同產(chǎn)地和品種白肋煙煙草特有亞硝胺與前體物關(guān)系
    www.色视频.com| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| av线在线观看网站| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 少妇 在线观看| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 老司机影院成人| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 日韩伦理黄色片| 观看美女的网站| 99热6这里只有精品| 成年动漫av网址| 在线看a的网站| 99热网站在线观看| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| av.在线天堂| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| av片东京热男人的天堂| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 在线天堂中文资源库| 午夜日本视频在线| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| av在线老鸭窝| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 热re99久久国产66热| 如何舔出高潮| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 丁香六月天网| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 七月丁香在线播放| 婷婷色综合www| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 黄片播放在线免费| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 免费看光身美女| 香蕉国产在线看| 精品第一国产精品| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| av免费在线看不卡| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产永久视频网站| 亚洲av男天堂| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| videossex国产| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 有码 亚洲区| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 黄色配什么色好看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 高清不卡的av网站| 日本欧美视频一区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 久久精品国产综合久久久 | 搡老乐熟女国产| 在线观看www视频免费| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 久久 成人 亚洲| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 最近手机中文字幕大全| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产麻豆69| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 免费av不卡在线播放| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 黑人高潮一二区| 午夜激情av网站| 伦精品一区二区三区| 视频区图区小说| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 久久av网站| 欧美bdsm另类| 午夜福利视频精品| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 在现免费观看毛片| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 秋霞伦理黄片| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 男女边摸边吃奶| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 国产成人欧美| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 七月丁香在线播放| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 一级毛片电影观看| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 久久久久国产网址| 国产男女内射视频| 另类精品久久| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| av一本久久久久| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 香蕉丝袜av| 成人综合一区亚洲| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 五月开心婷婷网| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产1区2区3区精品| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 久久婷婷青草| av.在线天堂| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 大香蕉久久网| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 午夜日本视频在线| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件 | 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 97超碰精品成人国产| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 欧美另类一区| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 伦精品一区二区三区| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲综合色惰| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 午夜日本视频在线| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 大香蕉久久网| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 有码 亚洲区| 男女午夜视频在线观看 | 午夜影院在线不卡| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 高清毛片免费看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 香蕉丝袜av| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 丁香六月天网| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 在现免费观看毛片| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 高清不卡的av网站| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久久精品94久久精品| 日韩电影二区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 成人二区视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 在线看a的网站| 性色avwww在线观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| av国产精品久久久久影院| 蜜桃在线观看..| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 如何舔出高潮| 最黄视频免费看| a级毛色黄片| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 捣出白浆h1v1| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 成人综合一区亚洲| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 国产av国产精品国产| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产一级毛片在线| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 老司机影院成人| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 久久午夜福利片| 国产成人精品在线电影| 咕卡用的链子| 永久网站在线| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 韩国av在线不卡| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 日本午夜av视频| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 一级毛片 在线播放| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 大码成人一级视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 精品第一国产精品| 九草在线视频观看| 午夜91福利影院| 在线天堂最新版资源| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 久久这里有精品视频免费| 欧美另类一区| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 咕卡用的链子| 永久免费av网站大全| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 91国产中文字幕| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 夫妻午夜视频| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| xxx大片免费视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久影院123| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 男女免费视频国产| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 日韩伦理黄色片| 97在线人人人人妻| 日韩av免费高清视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产在视频线精品| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 日本wwww免费看| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 免费av中文字幕在线| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产麻豆69| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| av卡一久久| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 欧美成人午夜精品| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 午夜日本视频在线| 成年av动漫网址| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 精品少妇内射三级| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| av福利片在线| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 成人国语在线视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产男女内射视频| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | freevideosex欧美| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 有码 亚洲区| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 春色校园在线视频观看| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| av黄色大香蕉| 伦理电影免费视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| a级毛片黄视频| 日本色播在线视频| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久人人爽人人片av| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 美女中出高潮动态图| 午夜免费鲁丝| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 午夜av观看不卡| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 人人澡人人妻人| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 99久久综合免费| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 内地一区二区视频在线| 久久久精品94久久精品| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 少妇 在线观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| videossex国产| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 少妇 在线观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 咕卡用的链子| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 少妇的逼好多水| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 免费看不卡的av| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 大香蕉久久成人网| 免费少妇av软件| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| av天堂久久9| 熟女电影av网| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 九色成人免费人妻av| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在 | 久久久久久人人人人人| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 久久精品国产自在天天线| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 大香蕉久久成人网| 免费少妇av软件| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 老女人水多毛片| 看免费av毛片| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 久久久久久久国产电影| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 日韩av免费高清视频| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 另类精品久久| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 一级a做视频免费观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 飞空精品影院首页| 国产片内射在线| 免费观看在线日韩| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| av天堂久久9| 在线看a的网站| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 天堂8中文在线网| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 自线自在国产av| 国产成人av激情在线播放|