摘 要:旨在研究植物乳桿菌及其后生元對(duì)育成期母貂生長(zhǎng)性能、免疫功能及腸道健康的影響。試驗(yàn)采用2×2試驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),選取40只12周齡的灰色母貂分成4組,每組10個(gè)重復(fù)。4組分別為對(duì)照組、0.1%植物乳桿菌(活菌數(shù)>106CFU·mL-1)添加組、0.3%植物乳桿菌后生元添加組、0.1%植物乳桿菌+0.3%植物乳桿菌后生元添加組。預(yù)試期1周,正試期8周。本試驗(yàn)從生長(zhǎng)性能、試驗(yàn)期間記錄體重和采食量用于測(cè)定生長(zhǎng)性能,試驗(yàn)結(jié)束時(shí)采集血液、空腸組織和內(nèi)容物檢測(cè)血清免疫、黏膜免疫和腸道菌群方面做了檢測(cè)等指標(biāo),結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn):1)植物乳桿菌顯著增加了水貂4周和8周的體重(P<0.05),提高了0~4周和0~8周的平均日增重、平均日采食量(P<0.05),降低了血清IgG、黏膜TNF-α的含量(P<0.05),增加空腸黏膜sIgA含量(P<0.05)。2)植物乳桿菌后生元顯著增加血清IgG、空腸黏膜IFN-γ的含量(P<0.05),降低了IL-2、IL-12和TNF-α的含量(P<0.05)。3)植物乳桿菌及其后生元對(duì)育成期母貂腸道菌群的Alpha多樣性指數(shù)影響不顯著(P>0.05)。在屬水平上,植物乳桿菌組的Sporosarcina、Aminobacter、Agathobacter的相對(duì)豐度顯著低于未添加植物乳桿菌組(P<0.05),F(xiàn)astidiosipila的相對(duì)豐度顯著高于未添加植物乳桿菌組(P<0.05); 植物乳桿菌后生元組Kocuria、Plesiomonas、unclassified_f_Lachnospiraceae、Sanguibacter、Microbacterium、Glutamicibacter和Paracoccus的相對(duì)豐度顯著低于未添加后生元組(P<0.05),Staphylococcus、Weissella、Brevibacterium、Dietzia、Brachybacterium、Carnobacterium、Aerococcus和Sphingomonas的相對(duì)豐度顯著高于未添加后生元組(P<0.05)。4)植物乳桿菌益生菌及后生元對(duì)育成期母貂血清中IgA、IgM含量和黏膜中IL-2、IL-10、IL-8、TNF-α含量影響互作效應(yīng)顯著(P<0.05)。綜上所述,飼糧中添加植物乳桿菌益生菌可提高母貂的生長(zhǎng)性能。植物乳桿菌益生菌及后生元均能夠改善水貂的免疫功能,提高腸道有益菌屬的相對(duì)豐度。
關(guān)鍵詞:植物乳桿菌;植物乳桿菌后生元;水貂;生長(zhǎng)性能;免疫功能;腸道健康
中圖分類號(hào):S862.220.4
文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)志碼:A
文章編號(hào):0366-6964(2024)06-2530-10
收稿日期:2024-09-19
基金項(xiàng)目:山東省現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)特種經(jīng)濟(jì)動(dòng)物產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)體系(SDAIT-21-8)
作者簡(jiǎn)介:李亞霖(1998-),女,山東萊州人,碩士生,主要從事動(dòng)物營(yíng)養(yǎng)與飼料科學(xué)研究,E-mail:859847078@qq.com
*通信作者:王利華,主要從事動(dòng)物營(yíng)養(yǎng)與環(huán)境研究,E-mail:lhwang2007@sina.com
Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus plantarum Postbiotics on
Growth Performance,Immune Status and Intestinal MicrofloraHealth of Growing
Female Minks
LIYalin,ZHENShibo,CAOLin,SUNFengxue,WANGLihua*
(College of Animal Science and Technology,Qingdao Agricultural
University,Qingdao266109,China)
Abstract:(Objective)This experiment was conducted to study the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus plantarum postbiotics on productiongrowth performance,immune status and intestinal microflorahealth of growing female minks.(Methods)A total of40gray female minks at12weeks of age were selected and divided into4groups with10replicates per group.The minks were fed basal diet,basal diet supplemented with0.1%Lactobacillus plantarum(viable bacteria number>106CFU·mL-1),basal diet supplemented with0.3%postbiotics of Lactobacillus plantarum,basal diet supplemented with0.1%Lactobacillus plantarum and0.3%postbiotics of Lactobacillus plantarum,respectively.The pre-experimental period lasted for1week,and the experimental period lasted for8weeks.(Result)Growth performance,serum immunity,mucosal immunity and intestinal microflora were tested in this experiment,and the resultsDuring the experiment,bodyweight and feed intake were recorded to determine the growth performance.At the end of the experiment,blood,jejunum tissue,jejunal content were collected to determine the immune indexes and microflora.The results were showed as follows:1)Compared to the minks in group without Lactobacillus plantarum,minks in Lactobacillus plantarum group had greater body weight at week4and week8(Plt;0.05),average daily gain and average daily feed intake for the first4weeks and the entire8weeks(Plt;0.05),sIgA content in jejunal mucosa(Plt;0.05),and had less IgG content in serum and TNF-α content in jejunal mucosa(Plt;0.05).2)Minks supplemented withCompared to the minks in group without Lactobacillus plantarum postbiotics,minks in postbiotics had greater IgG content in serum and IFN-γ content in jejunal mucosa(Plt;0.05),and less IL-2,IL-12and TNF-α content in jejunal mucosa(Plt;0.05).3)Neither Lactobacillus plantarum nor postbiotics had significant effects on Alpha diversity index of intestinal flora for growing female minks(Pgt;0.05).Minks in Lactobacillus plantarum group had less proportion of Sporosarcina,Aminobacter and Agathobacter,and greater proportion of Fastidiosipila in rectal flora than minks in group without Lactobacillus plantarum(Plt;0.05).Minks in the postbiotics groups had greater proportion of Staphylococcus,Weissella,Brevibacterium,Dietzia,Brachybacterium,Carnobacterium,Aerococcus and Sphingomonas,and less proportion of Kocuria,Plesiomonas,unclassified_f_Lachnospiraceae,Sanguibacter,Microbacterium,Glutamicibacter and Paracoccus in rectal flora than minks in group without postbiotics(Plt;0.05).4)Interactions between Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus plantarum postbiotics were significant for serum IgA and IgM contents,jejunum IL-2,IL-10,TNF-α,IL-8levels(Plt;0.05).(Conclusion)In conclusion,dietary Lactobacillus plantarum supplementation could improve the growth performance of female minks,both Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus plantarum postbiotics improved the immune function of females and increase the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria.
Key words:Lactobacillus plantarum; Lactobacillus plantarum postbiotics; mink; growth performance; immune status; intestinal microflorahealth
*Corresponding author:WANG Lihua,E-mail:lhwang2007@sina.com
水貂的育成期正值一年中最炎熱的時(shí)期。水貂飼糧以動(dòng)物源性鮮飼料為主,鮮飼料在夏季極易腐敗,容易引發(fā)水貂腸道的各種疾病[1]。乳酸菌是一種常用的益生菌,可產(chǎn)生有機(jī)酸和細(xì)菌素等物質(zhì)[2],改善腸道菌群結(jié)構(gòu),增強(qiáng)宿主免疫功能,提高生長(zhǎng)性能[3]。有研究發(fā)現(xiàn),滅活后的乳酸菌依靠菌體的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)排斥和其代謝產(chǎn)物中含有的有機(jī)酸等發(fā)揮作用,與活菌功能相似[4]。這些對(duì)宿主健康有益的無生命微生物和/或其成分的制劑,如滅活菌和代謝產(chǎn)物屬于后生元(postbiotics)[5-6]。由于后生元保質(zhì)期較長(zhǎng),安全性和穩(wěn)定性也相對(duì)較高,能夠彌補(bǔ)益生菌存在的一些不足[7]。因此,后生元已逐漸在動(dòng)物生產(chǎn)中得到應(yīng)用,然而目前在水貂中的應(yīng)用還比較少。本研究以育成期的母貂為研究對(duì)象,通過在日糧中添加益生菌植物乳桿菌及其后生元探討其對(duì)水貂生長(zhǎng)性能、免疫功能和腸道菌群的影響,以期為后生元在水貂中的應(yīng)用提供參考。
1 材料與方法
1.1 試驗(yàn)材料
本試驗(yàn)中使用的植物乳桿菌(Lactobacillus plantarum,LP)為凍干粉形式(編號(hào):194165),菌株購自北納生物公司(BNCC),凍干的植物乳桿菌活化后擴(kuò)繁至大于106CFU·mL-1菌液。植物乳桿菌菌液在高溫滅活后用奶粉按1∶3混合制成植物乳桿菌后生元(postbiotics of Lactobacillus plantarum,PLP)粉劑。
1.2 試驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)
試驗(yàn)采用2×2交叉試驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),植物乳桿菌益生菌的添加量為0、0.1%,植物乳桿菌后生元的添加量為0、0.3%。選取40只12周齡的灰色母貂(初始體重為928.68±20.37g)隨機(jī)分成4組,每組10個(gè)重復(fù)。4組分別為對(duì)照組(基礎(chǔ)日糧中未添加植物乳桿菌益生菌及后生元組),植物乳桿菌益生菌組(基礎(chǔ)飼糧中添加0.1%植物乳桿菌菌液,活菌數(shù)大于106CFU·mL-1),植物乳桿菌后生元組(基礎(chǔ)飼糧中添加0.3%植物乳桿菌后生元),植物乳桿菌益生菌-后生元組(基礎(chǔ)飼糧中添加0.1%植物乳桿菌菌液和0.3%植物乳桿菌后生元)。試驗(yàn)預(yù)試期1周,正試期8周。正試期分為0~4周和5~8周兩階段?;A(chǔ)飼糧組成和營(yíng)養(yǎng)水平見表1。
1.3 飼養(yǎng)管理
飼養(yǎng)試驗(yàn)在煙臺(tái)市海陽的某水貂養(yǎng)殖場(chǎng)進(jìn)行。所有的試驗(yàn)水貂在試驗(yàn)開始之前已完成犬瘟熱與細(xì)小病毒疫苗接種、并埋植褪黑激素(10mg·只-1)。貂舍為雙列式棚舍,貂籠為金屬網(wǎng)拼接而成(75cm×30cm×45cm,L×W×H),每個(gè)貂籠在過道處設(shè)有一個(gè)與貂籠相通的木質(zhì)窩箱(30cm×30cm×30cm,L×W×H)。試驗(yàn)期內(nèi)采用自然光照,每天飼喂2次,將飼料置于籠頂,供水貂自由采食。貂籠內(nèi)設(shè)有水盒保證自由飲水。
1.4 測(cè)定指標(biāo)及方法
1.4.1 生長(zhǎng)性能
在試驗(yàn)開始和試驗(yàn)開始后的第4、第8周分別對(duì)水貂逐只進(jìn)行稱重,稱重前禁食8h,記錄每天采食量,計(jì)算平均日增重(ADG)、平均日采食量(ADFI)和料重比(F/G)。
1.4.2 血清免疫
試驗(yàn)期結(jié)束時(shí),每組選6個(gè)重復(fù),心臟采血10mL,離心機(jī)3000r·min-1離心10min,制備血清,保存于-20℃。用ELISA法檢測(cè)血清中IgA、IgG、IgM的含量。
1.4.3 空腸免疫指標(biāo)及直腸菌群
飼養(yǎng)試驗(yàn)結(jié)束后,每組取6個(gè)重復(fù)進(jìn)行屠宰試驗(yàn),剪取一段空腸置于-80℃冰箱中保存,同時(shí)收集水貂直腸內(nèi)容物于凍存管中,先置于液氮中,后轉(zhuǎn)移至-80℃冰箱保存。
刮取空腸黏膜組織,按1∶9加入生理鹽水制作組織勻漿,在3500r·min-1下低溫離心10min,取上清液。采用酶聯(lián)免疫吸附試驗(yàn)(ELISA)試劑盒(購自南京建成生物工程研究所)測(cè)定分泌型免疫球蛋白(sIgA)、白細(xì)胞介素-1β(IL-1β)、白細(xì)胞介素-8(IL-8)、白細(xì)胞介素-10(IL-10)、白細(xì)胞介素-2(IL-2)、白細(xì)胞介素-6(IL-6)、白細(xì)胞介素-12(IL-12)、腫瘤壞死因子-α(TNF-α)和干擾素-γ(IFN-γ)的濃度,均使用全波長(zhǎng)酶標(biāo)儀(CFX96,伯樂公司)測(cè)定。
用Fast DNA Spin Kit for Soil試劑盒(MP公司,美國(guó))對(duì)直腸內(nèi)容物進(jìn)行DNA抽提,完成基因組DNA抽提后,利用1%瓊脂糖凝膠電泳檢測(cè)抽提的基因組DNA。采用通用引物338F(5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′)和806R(5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′)對(duì)細(xì)菌16S rRNA V3~V4可變區(qū)進(jìn)行PCR擴(kuò)增[8]。在ABI GeneAmp?9700型PCR儀器上進(jìn)行程序設(shè)置:95℃預(yù)變性3min,27個(gè)循環(huán)(95℃變性30s,55℃退火30s,72℃延伸30s),最后72℃延伸10min。使用2%瓊脂糖凝膠回收PCR產(chǎn)物,用AxyPrep DNA(Axygen公司,美國(guó))試劑盒進(jìn)行純化,2%瓊脂糖凝膠電泳檢測(cè)。利用QuantiFluor?-ST藍(lán)色熒光定量系統(tǒng)(Promega公司,美國(guó))進(jìn)行定量檢測(cè)。根據(jù)Illumina MiSeq平臺(tái)進(jìn)行對(duì)純化后的擴(kuò)增片段構(gòu)建PE300文庫,利用Illumina MiSeq PE300平臺(tái)進(jìn)行測(cè)序[9]。
1.5 數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)分析
采用SPSS25.0軟件的一般線性模型(GLM)對(duì)試驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行植物乳桿菌益生菌、植物乳桿菌后生元及二者的互作效應(yīng)進(jìn)行分析,如二者的互作效應(yīng)不顯著,結(jié)果按植物乳桿菌益生菌、植物乳桿菌后生元主效應(yīng)給出;如二者的互作效應(yīng)顯著,結(jié)果分別按對(duì)照組、植物乳桿菌益生菌組、植物乳桿菌后生元組和植物乳桿菌益生菌-后生元組給出,并采用Duncan′s法進(jìn)行多重比較。Plt;0.05為差異顯著。
2 結(jié) 果
2.1 LP和PLP對(duì)育成期母貂生長(zhǎng)性能的影響
因?yàn)橹参锶闂U菌益生菌及后生元對(duì)水貂生長(zhǎng)性能的互作效應(yīng)不顯著(P>0.05),所以結(jié)果按植物乳桿菌益生菌、植物乳桿菌后生元主效應(yīng)給出(表2)。與LP未添加組相比,LP顯著增加水貂4周和8周的體重(P<0.05),提高0~4周和0~8周的平均日增重、平均日采食量(P<0.05)。植物乳桿菌后生元對(duì)試驗(yàn)貂的生長(zhǎng)性能各指標(biāo)均無顯著影響(P>0.05)。
2.2 LP和PLP對(duì)育成期母貂血清免疫的影響
由表3可知,植物乳桿菌益生菌及后生元對(duì)血清中IgG的作用顯著(P<0.05),對(duì)IgA和IgM的作用不顯著(P>0.05)。與LP未添加組相比,LP顯著降低IgG的含量(P<0.05)。與PLP未添加組相比,PLP顯著增加IgG的含量(P<0.05)。植物乳桿菌益生菌及后生元對(duì)水貂IgA和IgM的互作效應(yīng)顯著(P<0.05)。與對(duì)照組相比,LP組的IgA和IgM含量顯著增加(P<0.05)。
2.3 LP和PLP對(duì)育成期母貂空腸黏膜免疫的影響
由表4可知,植物乳桿菌益生菌對(duì)育成期母貂SIgA和TNF-α的含量有顯著影響(P<0.05),植物乳桿菌后生元對(duì)育成期母貂IL-2、IL-12、TNF-α和IFN-γ的含量均有顯著影響(P<0.05)。與LP未添加組相比,LP顯著增加sIgA含量(P<0.05),顯著降低TNF-α的含量(P<0.05)。與PLP未添加組相比,PLP顯著降低IL-2、IL-12和TNF-α的含量(P<0.05),顯著增加IFN-γ的含量(P<0.05)。植物乳桿菌益生菌及后生元對(duì)育成期母貂IL-2、IL-10、IL-8、TNF-α的含量影響互作顯著(P<0.05)。與對(duì)照組相比,LP組的IL-8和IL-2含量顯著降低(P<0.05),LP組、PLP組和LP-PLP組的TNF-α含量均顯著降低(P<0.05)。LP組和PLP組的IL-10含量顯著低于LP-PLP組(P<0.05)。
2.4 LP和PLP對(duì)育成期母貂直腸菌群的影響
2.4.1 LP和PLP對(duì)育成期母貂直腸菌群Alpha多樣性指數(shù)的影響
由表5可知,植物乳桿菌益生菌及后生元對(duì)育成期母貂直腸菌群的Shannon指數(shù)、Simpson指數(shù)、Ace指數(shù)和Chao1指數(shù)均無顯著性影響(P>0.05)。植物乳桿菌益生菌及后生元對(duì)育成期母貂的直腸菌群Alpha多樣性指數(shù)的互作效應(yīng)不顯著(P>0.05)。
2.4.2 LP和PLP對(duì)育成期母貂直腸菌群相對(duì)豐度的影響
因?yàn)橹参锶闂U菌益生菌及后生元對(duì)水貂直腸菌群相對(duì)豐度的互作效應(yīng)不顯著(P>0.05),所以結(jié)果按植物乳桿菌益生菌、植物乳桿菌后生元主效應(yīng)給出(圖1~4)。如圖1所示,LP未添加組的前四種菌屬為L(zhǎng)actobacillus、Cetobacterium、unclassified_f__Peptostreptococcaceae、Enterococcus。LP組的前四種菌屬為Streptococcus、Lactobacillus、Cetobacterium、Angelakisella。與LP未添加組相比,LP組Lactobacillus的相對(duì)豐度減少,Streptococcus的相對(duì)豐度增加。如圖2所示,PLP未添加組的前四種菌屬為Streptococcus、Lactobacillus、Cetobacterium、unclassified_f__Peptostreptococcaceae。PLP組的前四種菌屬為L(zhǎng)actobacillus、Angelakisella、Cetobacterium、Streptococcus。與PLP未添加組相比,PLP組Lactobacillus和Angelakisella的相對(duì)豐度增加,Escherichia-Shigella和Streptococcus的相對(duì)豐度減少。
在屬水平上(圖3),與LP未添加組相比,LP組的Sporosarcina、Aminobacter和Agathobacter的相對(duì)豐度顯著降低(P<0.05),F(xiàn)astidiosipila的相對(duì)豐度顯著增高(P<0.05)。在屬水平上(圖4),與PLP未添加組相比,PLP組Kocuria、Plesiomonas、unclassified_f__Lachnospiraceae、Sanguibacter、Microbacterium、Glutamicibacter和Paracoccus的相對(duì)豐度顯著降低(P<0.05),Staphylococcus、Weissella、Brevibacterium、Dietzia、Brachybacterium、Carnobacterium、Aerococcus和Sphingomonas的相對(duì)豐度顯著增高(P<0.05)。
3 討 論
3.1 LP和PLP對(duì)育成期母貂生長(zhǎng)性能的影響
本試驗(yàn)結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),飼糧中添加植物乳桿菌益生菌能夠改善水貂的生長(zhǎng)性能,但植物乳桿菌后生元并未表現(xiàn)出促生長(zhǎng)作用。這與劉斯斯等[10]在肉雞上和吳飛等[11]在斷奶仔豬上的研究結(jié)果相同。植物乳桿菌通過自身活動(dòng)產(chǎn)生的消化酶等代謝物,可以將機(jī)體中難以消化吸收的大分子物質(zhì)降解為容易被機(jī)體利用的小分子營(yíng)養(yǎng)物質(zhì),來提高營(yíng)養(yǎng)物質(zhì)的吸收率,從而提高生產(chǎn)性能[12]。吳飛等[11]研究發(fā)現(xiàn),后生元可以提高斷奶仔豬的平均日增重,但本試驗(yàn)中后生元并未表現(xiàn)出促生長(zhǎng)作用。本試驗(yàn)所用的后生元經(jīng)高溫滅活制備而成,高溫可能會(huì)破壞植物乳桿菌產(chǎn)生的消化酶活,因此后生元沒有通過改善養(yǎng)分消化率而實(shí)現(xiàn)促生長(zhǎng)的作用。另外試驗(yàn)動(dòng)物也存在著差異。
3.2 LP和PLP對(duì)育成期母貂免疫功能的影響
IgG主要介導(dǎo)抗感染免疫,IgM是機(jī)體體液免疫中出現(xiàn)最早的抗體,具有殺菌激活補(bǔ)體等功能[13],IgA主要參與黏膜免疫[14]。殷成港等[15]研究發(fā)現(xiàn),添加后生元提高了斷奶仔豬血漿中IgA和IgG含量。潘泰典等[16]研究發(fā)現(xiàn),添加植物乳桿菌可以提高肉兔血液中IgG、IgA和IL-2的含量。這與本試驗(yàn)結(jié)果一致。IgM可以調(diào)節(jié)免疫反應(yīng),促進(jìn)IgG的產(chǎn)生和對(duì)外來抗原的初始反應(yīng)[17]。乳酸桿菌的代謝產(chǎn)物激活Th2細(xì)胞產(chǎn)生IL-5,IL-5是有效的IgA產(chǎn)生因子,進(jìn)而促進(jìn)IgA的產(chǎn)生,提高機(jī)體免疫力[18]。
水貂的腸道較短,腸道分小腸(包括十二指腸、空腸、回腸)與大腸(包括結(jié)腸、直腸、肛門)。小腸內(nèi)層較厚,有豐富的絨毛黏膜層,但從內(nèi)層看腸腔觀察分區(qū)不明顯,而空腸相較位于十二指腸和回腸,處于中間位置,較好分辨。腸黏膜免疫屏障中的各種促炎因子和抗炎因子協(xié)同調(diào)節(jié)炎癥的發(fā)生和發(fā)展[19]。sIgA調(diào)節(jié)黏膜穩(wěn)態(tài),保護(hù)腸上皮細(xì)胞免受細(xì)菌毒素影響[20]。IL-1β、IL-6、IFN-γ和TNF-α等細(xì)胞因子具有促炎和免疫調(diào)節(jié)作用。IL-10是一種抗炎細(xì)胞因子,可以通過阻斷促炎細(xì)胞因子的產(chǎn)生,抑制有害的免疫反應(yīng)[21]。Xu等[22]研究發(fā)現(xiàn),給感染產(chǎn)氣莢膜梭菌蛋雞灌服植物乳桿菌,可以降低TNF-α的mRNA相對(duì)表達(dá)量。Dalloul等[23]研究表明,乳酸桿菌類飼料產(chǎn)品可上調(diào)雞腸道IFN-γ表達(dá)。這與本試驗(yàn)的結(jié)果一致。乳酸菌菌株肽聚糖可以調(diào)節(jié)TLR-4信號(hào)通路,抑制炎癥細(xì)胞因子IL-6、IL-1β、TNF-α表達(dá)[24]。植物乳桿菌脂磷壁酸(lipoteichoic acid,LTA)通過降低Pam2CSK誘導(dǎo)的IL-8的表達(dá)從而抑制腸上皮細(xì)胞炎癥發(fā)應(yīng)[25]。植物乳桿菌分泌的聚集促進(jìn)因子蛋白能夠增強(qiáng)益生菌與黏蛋白的結(jié)合能力,有助于益生菌適應(yīng)腸道環(huán)境并限制病原體在腸道黏膜黏附,從而促進(jìn)腸道環(huán)境平衡[26]。
3.3 LP和PLP對(duì)育成期母貂直腸菌群的影響
萬瑾怡和袁建敏[27]研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在肉雞飼糧中添加滅活的植物乳桿菌能使乳酸桿菌(Lactobacillus)的相對(duì)豐度顯著增高,并且腸球菌(Enterococcus)、志賀大腸桿菌(Escherichia-Shigella)等的相對(duì)豐度降低。黃金貴等[5]試驗(yàn)結(jié)果表明,在肉雞飼糧中添加PLP能夠提高其盲腸內(nèi)乳酸桿菌數(shù)量。本試驗(yàn)研究也證實(shí),有益菌的相對(duì)豐度增加。Weissella有顯著的抗微生物和抗炎性質(zhì)[28]。Carnobacterium能夠產(chǎn)生抗菌物質(zhì),并且抑制Vibrio等病原體的活性[29]。Plesiomonas具有一定的耐藥性,并對(duì)動(dòng)物機(jī)體有嚴(yán)重的致病性[30]。Escherichia-Shigella產(chǎn)生的細(xì)菌毒素,導(dǎo)致機(jī)體腹瀉,對(duì)機(jī)體腸道健康造成損傷[31]。Plesiomonas和Escherichia-Shigella等菌屬的相對(duì)豐度降低,Weissella和Carnobacterium等菌屬的相對(duì)豐度增高,與植物乳桿菌及其代謝產(chǎn)物有一定相關(guān)性。乳桿菌屬通過降低pH或改變受體來產(chǎn)生多種短鏈脂肪酸和細(xì)菌素發(fā)揮抑菌或殺菌作用[32]。植物乳桿菌EPS可以阻止有害菌黏附在腸上皮細(xì)胞上,促進(jìn)有益菌的增殖,從而減少有害菌和有害物質(zhì)[33]。試驗(yàn)結(jié)果和已有報(bào)道的菌屬存在差異,可能與試驗(yàn)動(dòng)物和動(dòng)物飼料的不同相關(guān)。
4 結(jié) 論
在本試驗(yàn)條件下,飼糧中添加植物乳桿菌益生菌可提高育成期母貂的生長(zhǎng)性能,植物乳桿菌益生菌及后生元均能夠改善母貂的免疫功能,并且提高了Weissella和Carnobacterium等有益菌菌屬的相對(duì)豐度。
參考文獻(xiàn)(References):
[1]葛平萍,葛向平,宋曉飛,等.水貂病毒性腸炎的診斷與預(yù)防[J].特種經(jīng)濟(jì)動(dòng)植物,2021,24(5):25-26.
GE PP,GE XP,SONG XF,et al.Diagnosis and prevention of mink viral enteritis[J].Special Economic Animals and Plants,2021,24(5):25-26.(in Chinese)
[2]孔祥麗,吳昕雨,許曉曦.植物乳桿菌代謝產(chǎn)物抑菌機(jī)制與應(yīng)用研究進(jìn)展[J].食品安全質(zhì)量檢測(cè)學(xué)報(bào),2021,12(8):3131-3140.
KONG XL,WU XY,XU XX.Research progress on metabolites and bacteriostasis mechanism of Lactobacillus plantarum[J].Journal of Food Safety and Quality,2021,12(8):3131-3140.(in Chinese)
[3]章文明,汪海峰,劉建新.乳酸桿菌益生作用機(jī)制的研究進(jìn)展[J].動(dòng)物營(yíng)養(yǎng)學(xué)報(bào),2012,24(3):389-396.
ZHANG WM,WANG HF,LIU JX.Mechanism of action of probiotic function of lactobacilli[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2012,24(3):389-396.(in Chinese)
[4]張宏福,夏 冰,陳 亮,等.滅活乳酸菌研究與應(yīng)用前沿進(jìn)展[J].飼料工業(yè),2021,42(15):1-8.
ZHANG HF,XIA B,CHEN L,et al.Frontier advances on research and application of inactivated lactic bacteria[J].Feed Industry,2021,42(15):1-8.(in Chinese)
[5]黃金貴,張 勇,李方方,等.植物乳桿菌后生元對(duì)肉雞生長(zhǎng)性能、屠宰性能及腸道健康的影響[J].動(dòng)物營(yíng)養(yǎng)學(xué)報(bào),2022,34(11):7109-7119.
HUANG JG,ZHANG Y,LI FF,et al.Effects of Postbiotics Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance,slaughter performance and intestinal health of broilers[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2022,34(11):7109-7119.(in Chinese)
[6]SALMINEN S,COLLADO MC,ENDO A,et al.Author Correction:the International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics(ISAPP)consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics[J].Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol,2022,19(8):551.
[7]CUEVAS-GONZáLEZ PF,LICEAGA AM,AGUILAR-TOALáJ E.Postbiotics and paraprobiotics:from concepts to applications[J].Food Res Int,2020,136:109502.
[8]LI BB,ZHANG K,LI C,et al.Characterization and comparison of microbiota in the gastrointestinal tracts of the goat(Capra hircus)during preweaning development[J].Front Microbiol,2019,10:2125.
[9]金瑤瑤,徐 彬,王琳燚,等.酶解青蒿聯(lián)合地衣芽孢桿菌對(duì)肉仔雞生長(zhǎng)性能和盲腸菌群的影響[J].動(dòng)物營(yíng)養(yǎng)學(xué)報(bào),2021,33(7):3810-3820.
JIN YY,XU B,WANG LY,et al.Effects of enzymatically treated Artemisia annua combined with Bacillus licheniformis on growth performance and cecal microbiota of broilers[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2021,33(7):3810-3820.(in Chinese)
[10]劉斯斯,張金鳳,于松濤,等.植物乳桿菌對(duì)肉雞生產(chǎn)性能、抗氧化功能及腸道結(jié)構(gòu)發(fā)育的影響[J].黑龍江畜牧獸醫(yī),2022(23):104-108.
LIU SS,ZHANG JF,YU ST,et al.Effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on production performance,antioxidant function and development of intestinal structure in broilers[J].Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine,2022(23):104-108.(in Chinese)
[11]吳 飛,劉 虎,馬樹良,等.無抗日糧中添加后生元對(duì)斷奶仔豬生長(zhǎng)性能及腸道菌群結(jié)構(gòu)的影響[J].中國(guó)畜牧雜志,2021,57(S1):253-256.
WU F,LIU H,MA SL,et al.Effects of adding postbiotics to adiet without antibiotics on growth performance and intestinal flora structure of weaned piglets[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Science,2021,57(S1):253-256.(in Chinese)
[12]曹承旭,郭晶晶,烏日娜,等.植物乳桿菌的生理功能和組學(xué)研究進(jìn)展[J].乳業(yè)科學(xué)與技術(shù),2018,41(1):33-39.
CAO CX,GUO JJ,WU RN,et al.Advances in understanding the physiological function and omics of Lactobacillus plantarum[J].Journal of Dairy Science and Technology,2018,41(1):33-39.(in Chinese)
[13]AJESH K,SREEJITH K.Peptide antibiotics:an alternative and effective antimicrobial strategy to circumvent fungal infections[J].Peptides,2009,30(5):999-1006.
[14]謝紅兵.復(fù)方中草藥免疫增強(qiáng)劑對(duì)斷奶仔豬免疫功能的影響[D].福州:福建農(nóng)林大學(xué),2004.
XIE HB.Effect of compound Chinese herbal medicine feed additives on immune function of weaning piglets[D].Fuzhou:Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,2004.(in Chinese)
[15]殷成港,高 歌,商 譚,等.飼糧中添加后生元對(duì)斷奶仔豬生長(zhǎng)性能、腹瀉率、抗氧化能力及糞便微生物菌群的影響[J].動(dòng)物營(yíng)養(yǎng)學(xué)報(bào),2022,34(8):4932-4943.
YIN CG,GAO G,SHANG T,et al.Effects of dietary postbiotics on growth performance,diarrhea incidence,antioxidant capacity and fecal microbiome of weaned piglets[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2022,34(8):4932-4943.(in Chinese)
[16]潘泰典,張馨潔,高啟明,等.飼糧中添加植物乳桿菌在肉兔飼養(yǎng)中應(yīng)用效果研究[J].飼料工業(yè),2024,45(2):119-124.
PAN TD,ZHANG XJ,GAO QM,et al.Effect of the dietary supplementation of Lactobacillus plantarum on meat rabbits[J].Feed Industry,2024,45(2):119-124.(in Chinese)
[17]EHRENSTEIN MR,COOK HT,NEUBERGER MS.Deficiency in serum immunoglobulin(Ig)m predisposes to development of Igg autoantibodies[J].J Exp Med,2000,191(7):1253-1258.
[18]蔡凱凱,黃占旺,葉德軍,等.益生菌調(diào)節(jié)腸道菌群及免疫調(diào)節(jié)作用機(jī)理[J].中國(guó)飼料,2011(18):34-37.
CAI KK,HUANG ZW,YE DJ,et al.Regulation of intestinal flora of probiotics and its immune function[J].China feed,2011(18):34-37.(in Chinese)
[19]溫 曌,武笑天,楊 玉.益生木質(zhì)纖維素對(duì)雞盲腸黏膜免疫屏障的影響[J].山西農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué),2021,49(5):668-674.
WEN Z,WU XT,YANG Y.Effects of OptiCell on the cecum mucosal immune barrier of chicken[J].Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences,2021,49(5):668-674.(in Chinese)
[20]MANTIS NJ,ROL N,CORTHéSY B.Secretory IgA′s complex roles in immunity and mucosal homeostasis in the gut[J].Mucosal Immunol,2011,4(6):603-611.
[21]SABAT R,GRüTZ G,WARSZAWSKA K,et al.Biology of interleukin-10[J].Cytokine Growth Factor Rev,2010,21(5):331-344.
[22]XU TY,CHEN Y,YU LF,et al.Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum on intestinal integrity and immune responses of egg-laying chickens infected with Clostridium perfringens under the free-range or the specific pathogen free environment[J].BMC Vet Res,2020,16(1):47.
[23]DALLOUL RA,LILLEHOJ HS,TAMIM NM,et al.Induction of local protective immunity to Eimeria acervulina by aLactobacillus-based probiotic[J].Comp Immunol Microbiol Inf Dis,2005,28(5-6):351-361.
[24]WU Z,PAN DD,GUO YX,et al.Peptidoglycan diversity and anti-inflammatory capacity in Lactobacillus strains[J].Carbohydr Polym,2015,128:130-137.
[25]DICKS LM T,DREYER L,SMITH C,et al.A review:the fate of bacteriocins in the human gastro-intestinal tract:do they cross the gut-blood barrier?[J].Front Microbiol,2018,9:2297.
[26]HEVIA A,MARTíNEZ N,LADERO V,et al.An extracellular Serine/Threonine-rich protein from Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB8826is anovel aggregation-promoting factor with affinity to mucin[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,2013,79(19):2059-2066.
[27]萬瑾怡,袁建敏.滅活植物乳桿菌對(duì)肉雞生長(zhǎng)性能和腸道健康的影響[J].中國(guó)畜牧雜志,2023,59(10):299-308.
WAN JY,YUAN JM.Effects of inactivated Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance and intestinal health of broilers[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Science,2023,59(10):299-308.(in Chinese)
[28]AHMED S,SINGH S,SINGH V,et al.The weissella genus:clinically treatable bacteria with antimicrobial/probiotic effects on inflammation and cancer[J].Microorganisms,2022,10(12):2427.
[29]EVANGELISTA AG,DANIELSKI GM,CORRêA JA F,et al.Carnobacterium as abioprotective and potential probiotic culture to improve food quality,food safety,and human health-a scoping review.[J].Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr,2023,63(24):6946-6959.
[30]DENG D,MU ZZ,LV XY,et al.Pathogenicity of Plesiomonas shigelloides and Citrobacter freundii isolated from the endangered Chinese sturgeon(Acipenser sinensis)[J].Microb Pathog,2022,173:105818.
[31]AGBODAZE D.Verocytotoxins(Shiga-like toxins)produced by Escherichia coli:a minireview of their classification,clinical presentations and management of aheterogeneous family of cytotoxins[J].Comp Immunol Microbiol Inf Dis,1999,22(4):221-230.
[32]RINTTIL?T,APAJALAHTI J.Intestinal microbiota and metabolites—Implications for broiler chicken health and performance[J].J Appl Poultry Res,2013,22(3):647-658.
[33]KORCZ E,KERéNYI Z,VARGA L.Dietary fibers,prebiotics,and exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria:potential health benefits with special regard to cholesterol-lowering effects[J].Food Funct,2018,9(6):3057-3068.
(編輯 范子娟)