王中勝,劉志蓮,劉 英
(瀘州市中醫(yī)醫(yī)院麻醉科,瀘州 646100)
老年胃癌患者由于各器官的退行性變以及機(jī)體免疫力減弱,術(shù)后易繼發(fā)肺部感染[1,2]。一旦合并肺部感染,將延長(zhǎng)患者的住院時(shí)間,增高治療費(fèi)用,嚴(yán)重者可危及生命。研究已經(jīng)表明[3],麻醉是導(dǎo)致患者術(shù)后肺部感染的主要危險(xiǎn)因素之一,行氣管插管的全麻患者術(shù)后感染率遠(yuǎn)高于未插管者[4]。因此,選擇合理的麻醉方式,對(duì)減少患者術(shù)后肺部感染
的發(fā)生具有重要意義[5,6],能最大程度減少并發(fā)癥,降低術(shù)后肺部感染的發(fā)生率,本研究探討了不同麻醉方式對(duì)老年胃癌患者術(shù)后肺部感染的影響。
入選2013年3月至2016年3月瀘州市中醫(yī)醫(yī)院收治的老年胃癌患者100例,根據(jù)麻醉方式,采用隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法將患者分為全憑靜脈麻醉(total intravenous anesthesia,TIVA)組、吸入全身麻醉(inhalation anesthesia,IA)組和硬膜外麻醉聯(lián)合靜脈全身麻醉(combined epidural-intravenous anesthesia,CE-IVA)組。TIVA組患者32例,男性18例,女性14例,年齡(67.10±5.32)歲。IA組患者30例,男性16例,女性14例,年齡(66.83±6.10)歲。CE-IVA組患者38例,男性22例,女性16例,年齡(66.90±7.04)歲。納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):美國(guó)麻醉醫(yī)師協(xié)會(huì)(American Society of Anesthesiologists,ASA)分級(jí)Ⅰ~Ⅱ級(jí);年齡≥60歲;均行胃部分切除手術(shù)。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):術(shù)前合并呼吸道及肺部感染;合并免疫、內(nèi)分泌及循環(huán)系統(tǒng)疾病。本研究已通過(guò)醫(yī)院倫理委員會(huì)批準(zhǔn),所有研究對(duì)象已簽署知情同意書(shū)。
患者入手術(shù)室后建立外周靜脈通道,接監(jiān)護(hù)儀連續(xù)監(jiān)測(cè)患者生命體征。三組患者均面罩吸氧去氮,靜脈滴注咪唑安定0.05 mg/kg、丙泊酚2 mg/kg、芬太尼3 μg/kg、順式阿曲庫(kù)銨0.1 mg/kg進(jìn)行靜脈麻醉誘導(dǎo),患者麻醉誘導(dǎo)完成后行氣管插管,然后進(jìn)行間歇性機(jī)械正壓通氣。TIVA組患者靶控輸注丙泊酚6~12 mg/(kg·h),瑞芬太尼0.4~1 mg/(kg·min),每隔30 min間斷靜注維庫(kù)溴銨0.08~0.1 mg/kg以維持麻醉;IA組患者七氟烷吸入麻醉,使得最低有效肺泡濃度(minimum alveolar concentration, MAC)控制在0.75~1.5 MAC,復(fù)合靶控輸注瑞芬太尼0.4 mg/(kg·min)以維持麻醉;CE-IVA組患者麻醉誘導(dǎo)前在腰椎T8~T9或T9~T10椎間隙行硬膜外穿刺置管,0.75%羅哌卡因3~6 ml持續(xù)泵注以維持硬膜外麻醉,微量泵泵注丙泊酚3~6 mg/(kg·h),瑞芬太尼0.2~0.4 mg/(kg·min),每隔30 min間斷靜注維庫(kù)溴銨0.06~0.08 mg/kg以維持全身麻醉狀態(tài)。術(shù)中患者若心率低于50次/min,單次靜脈注射阿托品0.5 mg,若平均動(dòng)脈壓(mean artery pressure,MAP)下降超過(guò)基礎(chǔ)值的20%,則單次靜脈注射麻黃堿5~10 mg。
分別于麻醉前、拔管后5 min測(cè)定呼吸頻率(respiratory rate,RR)、血氧飽和度(blood oxygen saturation,SaO2)和分鐘通氣量(minute ventilation,MV)。手術(shù)完畢停藥后監(jiān)測(cè)患者蘇醒時(shí)間和拔管時(shí)間,術(shù)后第3天監(jiān)測(cè)患者有無(wú)發(fā)熱、咳嗽和咯痰、肺部有無(wú)啰音、血白細(xì)胞計(jì)數(shù)是否>15×109/L,拍胸部X光片檢查肺部。
三組患者在年齡、性別、體質(zhì)量指數(shù)、TNM分期、ASA分級(jí)方面差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05;表1)。
相比麻醉前,三組患者拔管后RR升高,SaO2和MV降低,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);相比TIVA組和IA組患者,CE-IVA組患者拔管后RR明顯降低,而SaO2和MV升高,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05;表2)。
表1 三組患者一般臨床資料比較Table 1 Comparison of clinical data between three groups
BMI: body mass index; TNM: tumor, node, metastases; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists.TIVA: total intravenous anesthesia; IA: inhalation anesthesia; CE-IVA: combined epidural-intravenous anesthesia
表2 三組患者呼吸功能指標(biāo)比較Table 2 Comparison of indices of respiratory function between three
RR: respiratory rate; SaO2: blood oxygen saturation; MV: minute ventilation. TIVA: total intravenous anesthesia; IA: inhalation anesthesia; CE-IVA:combined epidural-intravenous anesthesia. Compared with before anesthesia.*P<0.05; compared with TIVA and IA group,#P<0.05
TIVA組患者蘇醒時(shí)間(14.28±7.19)min、拔管時(shí)間(22.38±8.13)min,IA組患者蘇醒時(shí)間(14.82±6.32)min、拔管時(shí)間(22.02±9.22)min,CE-IVA組患者蘇醒時(shí)間(8.71±2.25)min,拔管時(shí)間(12.28±2.17)min,明顯短于TIVA組和IA組患者,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。
CE-IVA組、TIVA組、IA組患者術(shù)后發(fā)生肺部感染者分別為1例(2.63%),7例(21.88%),8例(26.67%), CE-IVA組患者肺部感染率明顯低于其他2組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。
老年胃癌患者由于肺順應(yīng)性降低、肺泡彈性下降、閉合容量及無(wú)效死腔量增加,術(shù)后易繼發(fā)肺部感染,影響康復(fù)甚至危及生命,已成為老年胃癌患者術(shù)后死亡的原因之一[7,8]。胃癌患者術(shù)后達(dá)到完善鎮(zhèn)痛、極早恢復(fù)自主呼吸,能咳嗽和排痰,可有效降低呼吸道感染的發(fā)生[9,10]。因此,老年胃癌患者手術(shù)麻醉時(shí)取得最佳的麻醉效果,保證術(shù)后良好鎮(zhèn)痛,對(duì)降低患者術(shù)后呼吸系統(tǒng)并發(fā)癥甚為重要[11,12]。研究結(jié)果表明硬膜外麻醉能有效減輕術(shù)后疼痛,使應(yīng)激激素產(chǎn)生減少,可明顯改善高?;颊咝g(shù)后肺功能和預(yù)后,尤其是惡性腫瘤患者[13,14]。
本研究CE-IVA組患者肺部感染率明顯低于TIVA組和IA組,表明硬膜外麻醉聯(lián)合靜脈全身麻醉可改善患者的肺功能,降低患者術(shù)后肺部感染的發(fā)生率。此外,CE-IVA組患者蘇醒時(shí)間和拔管時(shí)間明顯短于TIVA組和IA組患者,達(dá)到了滿足術(shù)者麻醉深度的要求,同時(shí)使患者術(shù)后盡早清醒。CE-IVA組患者SaO2和MV高于TIVA組和IA 組患者,說(shuō)明CE-IVA組患者縮短了進(jìn)行自主呼吸時(shí)間,在呼吸功能改善情況上明顯優(yōu)于TIVA組和IA組患者??傊珻E-IVA組患者在肺部感染發(fā)生情況、蘇醒時(shí)間及拔管時(shí)間上明顯優(yōu)于其他兩組患者,其可能原因是硬膜外麻醉聯(lián)合靜脈全身麻醉可減少患者使用瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚的劑量,從而減輕患者機(jī)體對(duì)藥物的代謝負(fù)擔(dān),進(jìn)而加快患者自主呼吸,縮短患者蘇醒時(shí)間和拔管時(shí)間,降低了患者術(shù)后肺部感染的發(fā)生率。
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
[1] 張?chǎng)卫? 老年慢性支氣管炎合并真菌感染患者的護(hù)理[J]. 實(shí)用臨床醫(yī)藥雜志, 2015, 19(6): 116-117. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201506037.
Zhang XL. The nursing care of the elderly patients with chronic bronchitis complicated with fungal infection[J]. J Clin Med Pract, 2015, 19(6): 116-117. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201506037.
[2] 祝恒山, 漆 秦, 方漢軍, 等. 生物瓣膜置換術(shù)治療老年退行性瓣膜病臨床觀察[J]. 現(xiàn)代中西醫(yī)結(jié)合雜志, 2016, 25(8): 872-874. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2016.08.026.
Zhu HS, Qi Q, Fang HJ,etal. Clinical observation of senile degenerative valvular heart disease treated by biological valve replacement surgery[J]. Mod J Integr Tradit Chin West Med, 2016, 25(8): 872-874. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2016.08.026.
[3] 朱永鋒, 王建平, 張加強(qiáng). 氣管插管全麻手術(shù)患者術(shù)后肺部感染的相關(guān)因素及預(yù)防對(duì)策[J]. 中華醫(yī)院感染學(xué)雜志, 2014, 24(16): 4083-4084. DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2014-134588.
Zhu YF, Wang JP, Zhang JQ. Risk factors and preventive mea-sures for postoperative pulmonary infections after tracheal intubation under general anesthesia[J]. Chin J Nosocomiol, 2014, 24(16): 4083-4084. DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2014-134588.
[4] 于魯源, 陳素麗. 氣管插管全麻復(fù)合硬膜外麻醉對(duì)結(jié)腸癌患者術(shù)后肺部感染的影響[J]. 現(xiàn)代消化及介入診療, 2016, 21(2): 287-289. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2159.2016.02.042.
Yu LY, Chen SL. Effect of general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia on colon cancer patients complicated postoperative pulmonary infection[J]. Mod Dig Intervention, 2016, 21(2): 287-289. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2159.2016.02.042.
[5] 冉德偉. 不同麻醉方法對(duì)直腸癌患者腹腔鏡術(shù)中、術(shù)后的影響[J]. 實(shí)用癌癥雜志, 2016, 31(9): 1518-1520. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2016.09.040.
Ran DW. Intraoperative and postoperative effect of different anesthesia methods on colorectal-carcinoma patients treated by laparoscopic surgery[J]. Prac J Cancer, 2016, 31(9): 1518-1520. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2016.09.040.
[6] 孫付國(guó), 金 亮, 徐 丹, 等. 硬膜外復(fù)合全麻對(duì)老年高血壓患者腹部手術(shù)后并發(fā)癥的影響[J]. 現(xiàn)代生物醫(yī)學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2015, 15(36): 7098-7100. DOI: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2015.36.026.
Sun FG, Jin L, Xu D,etal. Effects of compound epidural anesthesia on the complications of abdominal surgery for elderly patients with hypertension[J]. Prog Mod Biomed, 2015, 15(36): 7098-7100. DOI: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2015.36.026.
[7] 畢聰杰, 謝 丹, 于東海, 等. Wilson框架固定俯臥位脊柱手術(shù)患者壓力控制通氣與容量控制通氣效果的比較[J]. 中華麻醉學(xué)雜志, 2014, 34(11): 1354-1356. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.Issn.0254-1416.2014.11.019.
Bi CJ,Xie D, Yu DH,etal. Comparison of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation in patients undergoing spinal surgery in prone position supported by a Wilson frame[J]. Chin J Anesthesiol, 2014, 34(11): 1354-1356. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1416.2014.11.019.
[8] 吳曉燕, 莊志清, 鄭瑞強(qiáng),等. 跨肺壓導(dǎo)向急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者最佳呼氣末正壓選擇的臨床研究[J]. 中華危重病急救醫(yī)學(xué), 2016, 28(9): 801-806. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2016.09.007.
Wu XY, Zhuang ZQ, Zheng RQ,etal. Clinical research on the selection of optimal positive end-expiratory pressure guided by transpulmonary pressure in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chin Crit Care Med, 2016, 28(9): 801-806. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2016.09.007.
[9] 鄭少顏. 顱內(nèi)腫瘤患者術(shù)后失眠的相關(guān)因素及護(hù)理[J]. 中華現(xiàn)代護(hù)理學(xué)雜志, 2014, 26(3): 271-271.
Zheng SY. Related factors about insomnia and nursing care of postoperative patients with intracranial tumor[J]. J Chin Mod Nurs, 2014, 26(3): 271-271.
[10] 余 利. 靜脈全身麻醉聯(lián)合硬膜外麻醉在食管癌手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J]. 健康導(dǎo)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版), 2015, 20(10): 29-29.
Yu L. The application of intravenous general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia in the surgery of esophageal carcinoma[J]. Health Rep (Med), 2015, 20(10): 29-29.
[11] Bang SM, Jang MJ, Kim KH,etal. Prevention of venous throm-boembolism, 2nd edition: Korean Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2014, 29(2): 164-171. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.2.164.
[12] Bauchat JR, Habib AS. Evidence-based anesthesia for major gynecologic surgery[J]. Anesthesiol Clin, 2015, 33(1): 173-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2014.11.011.
[13] 徐昌兵. 食管癌根治術(shù)采用不同麻醉方法的應(yīng)激反應(yīng)神經(jīng)阻滯及蘇醒效果[J]. 中國(guó)腫瘤臨床與康復(fù), 2016, 23(7): 825-828. DOI: 10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.2016.07.16.
Xu CB. Nerve block of stress response and awake effect responsed to esophageal cancer radical operation using different anesthesia methods[J]. Chin J Clin Oncol Rehabil, 2016, 23(7): 825-828. DOI: 10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.2016.07.16.
[14] Li W, Xu B, Jia KY. Etiological analysis of anesthesia-related pulmonary infections in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery and control measures[J]. Chin J Nosocomiol, 2014, 24(4): 953-955.