• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Response of North Pacific Eastern Subtropical Mode Water to Greenhouse Gas Versus Aerosol Forcing

    2016-11-24 11:33:46XiangLIandYiyongLUOPhysicalOceanographyLaboratoryOceanUniversityofChinaQingdao266100
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2016年4期

    Xiang LI and Yiyong LUOPhysical Oceanography Laboratory,Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100

    Response of North Pacific Eastern Subtropical Mode Water to Greenhouse Gas Versus Aerosol Forcing

    Xiang LI and Yiyong LUO?
    Physical Oceanography Laboratory,Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100

    Mode water is a distinct water mass characterized by a near vertical homogeneous layer or low potential vorticity,and is considered essential for understanding ocean climate variability.Based on the output of GFDL CM3,this study investigates the response of eastern subtropical mode water(ESTMW)in the North Pacific to two different single forcings:greenhouse gases(GHGs)and aerosol.Under GHG forcing,ESTMW is produced on lighter isopycnal surfaces and is decreased in volume.Under aerosol forcing,in sharp contrast,it is produced on denser isopycnal surfaces and is increased in volume. The main reason for the opposite response is because surface ocean-to-atmosphere latent heat flux change over the ESTMW formation region shoals the mixed layer and thus weakens the lateral induction under GHG forcing,but deepens the mixed layer and thus strengthens the lateral induction under aerosol forcing.In addition,local wind changes are also favorable to the opposite response of ESTMW production to GHG versus aerosol.

    greenhouse gases,aerosol,mode water,lateral induction,North Pacific

    1.Introduction

    Mode water is a distinct water mass with vertical consistency of temperature,density and salinity,found in the permanent thermocline.The main feature of mode water is that it can carry low potential vorticity(PV)water from the mixed layer into the subsurface interior,which makes the upper ocean and the underlying layers connected.Formation regions of mode waters are of particular importance for issues of climate change,since they are areas where atmospheric variability is transmitted to large volumes of water that then penetrate,and are furthermore sequestered,below the surface layer.These regions therefore provide a link between the shorter time scales of the atmosphere and the longer time scales of the oceanic subsurface layers.Mode waters that are subducted in the northern region of the subtropical gyre impact the water-mass properties of the thermocline,and they are characterized by recirculation patterns with decadal time scales.Indeed,variability in these mode waters has been hypothesized to be an important part of midlatitude oceanatmosphere feedback scenarios of decadal variability(e.g., Latif and Barnett,1994).Variations in their properties,including temperature,salinity and PV,could impact decadal feedback directly by altering ocean temperature,and indirectly by altering the circulation.

    The subduction of mode waters can be accomplished by Ekman pumping and lateral induction(Marshall et al.,1993), and the latter has been found to play a more important role in the formation of mode waters(Huang and Qiu,1994;Nakamura,1996).This is in agreement with the work of Inui et al. (1999),who found that the path of low-PV water(i.e.,mode water)on each isopycnal surface starts from points where the isopycnal outcropping line intersects the winter mixed layer depth(MLD)horizontal gradients(i.e.,MLD front).The overlap of deep mixed layer regions with isopycnal outcrops is critical in this process;the deep mixed layers provide the low PV water,whereas the layer outcrop sets the density and provides the pathways into the interior.Once the mode water has been isolated from surface forcing,horizontal advection spreads it and its evolution is well beyond the formation area.

    In the North Pacific,three kinds of mode water have been identified.Western subtropical mode water(WSTMW) is formed to the south of the Kuroshio Extension and is distributed around the northwestern part of the subtropical gyre,and central mode water(CMW)is formed to the north of the Kuroshio Extension and is distributed in the central part of the northern subtropical gyre.The third one,eastern subtropical mode water(ESTMW),is formed in the eastern part of the subtropical gyre.ESTMW is centered at (30?N,140?W)with a temperature range of 16?C-22?C and a density range of 24.0-25.4 kg m?3(Hautala and Roemmich,1998).Despite it being weaker than WSTMW andCMW in terms of thickness and area of extent(Hanawa and Talley,2001),ESTMW is worthy of study because its formation region sits along an important conduit for the subtropical-tropical inter-gyre exchange in the North Pacific Ocean.

    ?Authors 2016

    Recent studies have investigated the formation mechanism as well as the climate variability of ESTMW.For example,Toyoda et al.(2004)studied its climatological formation mechanismanddemonstratedtheimportanceofthepreconditioning of the mixed layer over the formation region.Further, Toyoda et al.(2011)examined the interannual variability of ESTMW by analyzing a 1990s ocean dataset from a 4D variational data assimilation experiment.Hu et al.(2011)investigated the mechanism of interannual-to-decadal variability of the subduction rate over the ESTMW formation area during 1958-2001 and found the variability of the wind stress curl plays a dominant role.To explore its response to global warming,Luo et al.(2009)compared solutions from a set of coupled climate models between a present-day climate and a futurewarmerclimateandfoundthatglobalwarminginduces a significant reduction in the volume of the ESTMW.This change is due to a more stratified upper ocean and a shoaling of the winter MLD,resulting mainly from a reduction of the ocean-to-atmosphere heat loss over the eastern subtropical North Pacific.

    Of the human-caused changes to climate forcing,while greenhouse gases(GHGs)warm the planet,aerosols(tiny suspended particles or droplet in the atmosphere)tend to cool.Aerosols differ from GHGs in that their lifetime in the atmosphere is short(a few weeks),before they settle or wash out.Therefore,the cooling effect from aerosols is believed to be regional rather than global,like it is for GHGs(Mitchell et al.,1995).Based on GFDL CM3 output,Wang et al. (2013)recently evaluated both the warming effect of GHGs and the cooling effect of aerosols on WSTMW,as well as a closely related subtropical countercurrent in the North Pacific.Their results show that GHG(aerosol)forcing induces a weakening(strengthening)of WSTMW and thus a deceleration(acceleration)of the subtropical countercurrent,and the cooling effect of aerosols exceeds the warming effect of GHGs.

    For this study,we pay particular attention to ESTMW and examine how the aerosol-induced cooling effect competed with the GHG-induced warming effect in the formation of ESTMW in the North Pacific during the past century.Our main finding is that the response of ESTMW to GHGs and aerosols is just the opposite.Under GHG forcing,ESTMW is decreased in volume and produced on lighter isopycnal surfaces,while it is produced on denser isopycnal surfaces and its volume is significantly increased under aerosol forcing.

    This paper is organized as follows:Section 2 briefly describes the model and simulations.Section 3 examines the response of ESTMW in the North Pacific to GHG versus aerosol forcing.Section 4 discusses the formation mechanisms of the opposite response of ESTMW to GHG and aerosol,and a summary is given in section 5.

    2.Model and data

    We analyze simulations from the newest version of NOAA-GFDL's climate model,CM3.Compared with its earlier version,CM2.1,CM3 represents an evolutionary step with emphasis on improving formulational aspects and capabilities of the atmosphere and land components(Donner et al.,2011;Griffies et al.,2011).CM3 uses a flexible modeling system to couple the GFDL Atmospheric Model version 3(AM3)with the Modular Ocean Model version 4p1 (MOM4p1).AM3 employs a cubed-sphere implementation of the finite-volume dynamical core.Its horizontal resolution is approximately 200 km,and its vertical resolution ranges from approximately 70 m near the Earth's surface to 1-1.5 km near the tropopause and 3-4 km in much of the stratosphere.MOM4p1 employs a finite difference approach to solve the primitive equations.Its resolution is 1?in both latitude and longitude,with refined meridional resolution equatorward of 30?so that it reaches(1/3)?at the equator.The model has 50 levels in the vertical direction with 22 levels of 10-m thickness in the top 220 m.A tripolar horizontal grid with poles over Eurasia,North America and Antarctica is used to avoid polar filtering over the Arctic.Through experiments with historical radiative forcing,notable improvements are apparent in the CM3 climate simulation relative to CM2.1,including more realistic aerosol direct effects,a better shortwave cloud forcing,a modified SST bias pattern,and reduced biases in the Arctic SLP and sea-ice cover.

    As a major U.S.climate model contributing to CMIP5,a number of experiments with CM3 have been performed following CMIP5 protocol(Taylor et al.,2012).These runs include pre-industrial control,historical all forcing,as well as single forcing simulations for the years 1860-2005.The historical all forcing runs enable evaluation of model performance against present climate and observed climate change, and the single forcing runs aim to attribute observed climate change to particular causes,in which two major experiments are performed to yield estimates of the contribution of GHG forcing(GHG-only simulation)and aerosol forcing(aerosolonly simulation)to climate change.

    In this paper,we analyze solutions from the GHG-only, aerosol-only,and historical all forcing simulations.Three members of each simulation are selected and their ensemble means are obtained,which effectively remove natural variability from an individual simulation.The results presented below are through two types of analyses:trends are the linear least-squares regressions of each quantity over 1900-2005, and monthly climatology is averaged over 1950-2005.A note is that the pre-industrial control experiment is used as a reference,and the trend analysis is performed on the difference of the ensemble runs from the control run.

    3.Results

    3.1.Mixed layer depth and lateral induction

    As mentioned previously the lateral induction process is more important in producing ESTMW in the North Pacific.Since the lateral induction,defined as horizontal advection across the sloping mixed layer base,becomes large during winter when the mixed layer deepens,in this section we examine both the winter MLD and lateral induction.

    The MLD reaches its seasonal maximum during winter in the North Pacific.For the historical run(Fig.1c),a local maximum(~200 m)is found in the eastern subtropics centered at(30?N,140?W),corresponding to the formation region of ESTMW(Hosoda et al.,2001).While the maximum winter MLD appears to be deeper in the model,its spatial pattern is in good agreement with observations(Suga et al., 2004;Toyoda et al.,2011).

    Comparing the GHG-only run(Fig.1a)with the historical all forcing run(Fig.1c),although the overall horizontal spatial structure of the winter MLD does not change much, it shoals in the eastern subtropics with its maximum approximately 40 m shallower near the center.Such a change in the mixed layer is associated with smaller MLD horizontal gradients,which in turn will result in weaker lateral induction and thus a decrease of ESTMW.Comparing the aerosol-only run (Fig.1b)with the historical all forcing run(Fig.1c),however,the local mixed layer in the eastern subtropics is seen to deepen,with its maximum approximately 20 m deeper around the center.This change in the mixed layer is associated with larger MLD horizontal gradients,which in turn will result in stronger lateral induction and thus an increase of ESTMW.Furthermore,in comparison with the historical all forcing run,the mixed layer density appears to be lighter in the GHG-only run but denser in the aerosol-only forcing run.

    Over the eastern subtropical region of the North Pacific, therefore,we find that,in stark contrast to the GHG forcing, which produces a shallower mixed layer and thus a weaker MLD front,the aerosol forcing induces a deeper mixed layer and thus a stronger MLD front.The opposite response of the MLD to the GHG and aerosol forcing can be further verified by their trends.For the GHG run(Fig.1d),the MLD exhibits a falling trend over the entire eastern basin,with more significance close to the ESTMW formulation center where the maximum trend exceeds?60 m(100 yr)?1.This indicates that GHG forcing induces more shoaling in the maximum MLD area compared to its surrounding regions,resulting in a weaker MLD front and thus a decrease of lateral induction. For the aerosol run(Fig.1e),just the opposite occurs;the MLD exhibits a distinct rising trend[~60 m(100 yr)?1]in the deep MLD area but a falling trend[?40 m(100 yr)?1]to the southeast.Such a change in the MLD leads to a stronger MLD front and thus an increase of lateral induction.For the historical run(Fig.1f),as a result of the combination of the two forcings,the spatial pattern of the MLD trend is similar to that in the aerosol run,indicating that the aerosol effect exceeds the GHG effect on the MLD.

    Fig.1.Mean depth(color shading;units:m)and density(contour interval=0.2 kg m?3)of the March mixed layer from the (a)GHG-only simulation,(b)aerosol-only simulation,and(c)historical all forcing simulation.Trends of March mixed layer depth[color shading;units:m(100 yr)?1]from the(d)GHG-only simulation,(e)aerosol-only simulation,and(f)historical all forcing simulation.In this and following figures,trends are the linear least-squares regressions of each quantity over 1900-2005.

    Next we examine the lateral induction,which is believed to play an important role in producing the ESTMW in theNorth Pacific.The lateral induction is estimated by uuum·?hm, in which uuumis the horizontal velocity at the bottom of the mixed layer and hmis the MLD.Figure 2 compares the response of the lateral induction to GHG and aerosol forcing with the historical run.In the eastern part of the subtropical gyre,large lateral induction appears to the southeast of the deep MLD where the strong MLD front is located.For the historical run(Fig.2c),its maximum exceeds 130 m yr?1. While the area of the lateral induction is found to shrink due to GHG forcing,with its maximum being reduced to only about 100 m yr?1(Fig.2a),the area expends largely due to aerosol forcing,with its maximum being enhanced to 160 m yr?1(Fig.2b).The opposite response of the lateral induction is further confirmed by their linear trends,i.e.,to the southeast of the deep MLD area the GHG forcing induces a falling trend of?60 m yr?1(100 yr)?1(Fig.2d)but the aerosol forcing induces a rising trend of 100 m yr?1(100 yr)?1(Fig. 2e).In addition,the result of the historical run suggests that the cooling effect of aerosols exceeds the warming effect of GHGs on the lateral induction(Fig.2f),consistent with the findings above from the response of the MLD.

    Fig.2.Mean lateral induction(color shading;units:m yr?1)in March from the(a)GHG-only simulation,(b)aerosol-only simulation,and(c)historical all forcing simulation.Trends of March lateral induction[color shading;units:m yr?1(100 yr)?1] from the(d)GHG-only simulation,(e)aerosol-only simulation,and(f)historical all forcing simulation.

    3.2.Eastern subtropical mode water

    Mode waters are characterized by the vertical homogeneity of their properties,which is quantitatively summarized by its PV.The PV is defined as(f/ρ)(Δρ/Δz),in which f is the Coriolis parameter,ρis seawater density,and Δρ/Δz is the vertical gradient of the density.After strong subduction during the winter season,the intensity of newly formed mode watercanbemeasuredbylow-PVwatervolumeinlatespring near the formation region.Figure 3a shows the volume of the low-PV water in May for each density class from 24.6 to 25.8 kg m?3between the layers defined by the adjacent isopycnals at 0.1 kg m?3interval within the region between 130?-160?W and 15?-25?N.

    IftheESTMWisrepresentedbyPV<1.5×10?10m?1s?1, the core density classes are found to be 25.0-25.2 kg m?3in the GHG run,25.4-25.6 kg m?3in the aerosol run,and 25.3-25.5 kg m?3in the historical,respectively,i.e.,the ESTMW forms on lighter isopycnal surfaces due to GHG forcing but on denser isopycnal surfaces due to aerosol forcing.In addition,the ESTMW volume in the core density layers appears to be smallest in the GHG forcing run,largest in the aerosol forcing run,and somewhere in between in the historical all forcing run.To be more specific(Table 1),its volume is increased by 0.48×1014m3,or 17%,from 2.80×1014m3in the historical simulation to 3.28×1014m3in the aerosol-only simulation,while it is decreased by 1.46×1014m3,or 52%, to 1.34×1014m3in the GHG-only simulation.Figure 3b shows the linear trends of the low-PV water volume for each density class in the scenario runs.It is clear that the volume trend in the GHG run is falling for all density classes,with mostsignificancefrom25.2to25.4kgm?3,whilethevolume trend in the aerosol run is rising for all density classes,with most significance from 25.3 to 25.5 kg m?3.Additionally, the aerosol effect appears again to exceed the GHG effect, resulting in a rising trend of the ESTMW volume in the historical run.Note there is a trend in the control run(Fig.3b),which is the climate drift.In the absence of external forcing,climate models often exhibit long-term trends that cannot be attributed to natural variability.This so-called climate drift arises for various reasons,including perturbations to the climate system in the coupling together of component models,and deficiencies in model physics and numerics.Climate drift is common among the CMIP5 models(Sen Gupta et al., 2013).

    Fig.3.The(a)mean and(b)trend of May low-PV(<1.5×10?10m?1s?1)water volume for each density class within the region between 130?-160?W and 15?-25?N.

    Table 1.Core density layers,mean and trend of the ESTMW volume from the experiments in this study.

    The distributions of May PV are shown in Fig.4 on the core density isopycnal surfaces,as well as along latitudinal and longitudinal sections for the three simulations.Comparing the aerosol-only simulation with the historical simulation,it can be clearly seen that the region with low-PV water in the eastern subtropics is expanded both horizontally and vertically,indicating that the aerosol forcing induces a significant increase in volume of the ESTMW.Comparing the GHG-only simulation with the historical simulation,we see that the region with low-PV water is reduced both horizontally and vertically,indicating that the GHG forcing induces a reduction in volume of the ESTMW,which is in agreement with previous studies(Luo et al.,2009).

    4.Formation mechanisms

    As demonstrated above,a spatially non-uniform shoaling(deepening)of the mixed layer in the eastern subtropics is associated with a weakening(strengthening)of lateral induction,corresponding to the decreased(increased)ESTMW in the North Pacific under GHG(aerosol)forcing.Since the mixed layer change is typically related to the surface forcing change,here we examine the changes in the surface heat flux and wind stress in both the GHG-only and aerosol-only simulations.

    Under GHG forcing,the ocean-to-atmosphere heat loss (Fig.5)is reduced around the center of the ESTMW formation area but increased to its southeast.Such a change in the heat flux results in decreased MLD horizontal gradients and thus reduced lateral induction,leading to less mode water formed in the eastern subtropical gyre.Under aerosol forcing,however,the heat loss over the region is significantly increased,with the maximum being more than 12 W m?2around the center.This change of the surface heat flux produces a less stratified upper ocean and a resultant deepening of the MLD.As a result,the lateral induction is increased and more mode water is produced in the eastern subtropics.For the historical run,similar to what happens under aerosol forcing,the heat loss is increased over the region and thus the formation of the ESTMW is intensified.Among the four physical components included in the heat flux(i.e.,shortwave radi-ation,longwave radiation,sensible heat flux,and latent heat flux),further analysis indicates that the contribution from the latent heat loss is predominant(not shown).

    Fig.4.Potential vorticity(color shading;units:10?11m?1s?1)in May in the core density classes from the(a)GHG-only simulation,(b)aerosol-only simulation,and(c)historical all forcing simulation.Potential vorticity(color shading;units:10?11m?1s?1)and density(contour interval=0.2 kg m?3)in May along the 20.5?N section from the(d)GHG-only simulation,(e) aerosol-only simulation,and(f)historical all forcing simulation.Potential vorticity(color shading;units:10?11m?1s?1)and density(contour interval=0.2 kg m?3)in May along the 150?W section from the(g)GHG-only simulation,(h)aerosol-only simulation,and(i)historical all forcing simulation.

    Fig.5.Ocean-to-atmosphere heat flux changes(color shading;units:W m?2)from the pre-industrial control experiment in the (a)GHG-only simulation,(b)aerosol-only simulation,and(c)historical all forcing simulation.Superimposed is the climatological ocean-to-atmosphere heat flux(contour interval=10 W m?2)in the control experiment.

    As mentioned previously,the lateral induction is associated with the MLD front and the horizontal velocity across the sloping mixed layer base.Now that changes in the former have been found to play an important role in the response of the lateral induction to GHG and aerosol forcing,next we examine if changes in the latter also contribute to the lateral induction response.To examine this,we select a slanted sectionacross the ESTMW formation region from(38?N,150?W) to(20?N,128?W)(the thick red line in Fig.1a).Figure 6 shows the horizontal velocity changes in the GHG,aerosol and historical runs along the slanted section,respectively. For the mean velocity fields(contours in Fig.6),a southeastward current of~1 cm s?1appears over the large MLD front area,which is apparently favorable to the formation of the ESTMW.Under GHG(aerosol)forcing,this southeastward velocity is reduced(increased)by approximately 0.2 cm s?1, contributing to the lesser(greater)production of ESTMW. For the historical run,as a result of the combination of the two forcing effects,its change is similar to that for the aerosol run,demonstrating that the aerosol effect exceeds the GHG effect on the velocity fields.Therefore,the above analysis suggests that the response of lateral induction to GHG and aerosol forcing is a result of changes in both the strength of the MLD front and the horizontal velocity across the sloping mixed layer base over the ESTMW formation region.

    Fig.6.Trends of horizontal velocity[color shading;units:cm s?1(100 yr)?1]along the slanted section(thick red line in Fig.1a)from the(a)GHG-only simulation,(b) aerosol-only simulation,and(c)historical all forcing simulation.Superimposed are the climatological velocity(contour interval=1 cm s?1)and mixed layer depth(circled line)in each experiment.

    To estimate the relative contribution from the changes in the MLD versus horizontal velocity to the lateral induction, wechooseasmallareawherethechangesinthelateralinduction reach their maxima under both GHG and aerosol forcing. It is found that the lateral induction is reduced by 30 m yr?1from 86 m yr?1in the control run to 56 m yr?1in the GHG run,with 80%of this reduction(i.e.,24 m yr?1)from the MLD change and 20%(i.e.,6 m yr?1)from the horizontal velocity change.Meanwhile,it is increased by 34 m yr?1from 86 m yr?1in the control run to 120 m yr?1in the aerosol run,with 68%of this increase(i.e.,23 m yr?1)from the MLD change and 32%(i.e.,11 m yr?1)from the horizontal velocity change.Therefore,the MLD change plays a dominant role in the change of ESTMW in the North Pacific under both GHG and aerosol forcing.

    For the changes in wind stress(Fig.7),the northeast trade winds are weakened(intensified)under GHG(aerosol)forcing,leading directly to local mixed layer shoaling(deepening)due to weaker(stronger)wind stirring.Those changes in the latent heat flux described above can be caused by the weakened(intensified)northeast trade winds under GHG (aerosol)forcing,which promotes less(more)heat loss from theoceanintotheatmospherethroughthewind-evaporation-SST feedback mechanism(Xie et al.,2010).

    Fig.7.Wind stress changes from the pre-industrial control experiment in the(a)GHG-only simulation,(b)aerosol-only simulation,and(c)historical all forcing simulation.

    Fig.8.Ekman pumping changes(color shading;units:10?8m s?1)from the pre-industrial control experiment in the(a) GHG-only simulation,(b)aerosol-only simulation,and(c)historical all forcing simulation.Superimposed is the climatological Ekman pumping(contour interval=0.4×10?8m s?1)in the control experiment.

    In addition to lateral induction,the subduction of ESTMW in the North Pacific can also be accomplished through Ekman pumping(e.g.,Huang and Qiu,1994).Under GHG forcing,the wind changes result in a reduced Ekman pumping(downward is negative)in the eastern subtropical North Pacific(Fig.8a),weakening the ESTMW formation.Under aerosol forcing,the Ekman pumping is significantly enhanced over the region(Fig.8b),strengthening the ESTMW formation.For the historical run,similar to what happens under aerosol forcing,the Ekman pumping over the region is increased and thus the formation of the ESTMW is intensified(Fig.8c).For the central area between 150?-130?W and 20?-35?N,the Ekman pumping is found to be 34 m yr?1in the GHG run,37 m yr?1in the aerosol run,and 35 m yr?1in the historical run.

    Figure 9 shows the vertical distribution of temperature along the slanted section for the three scenario runs.It is interesting to see that there is a cold(warm)anomaly right beneath the mixed layer around the center of the ESTMW formation region under GHG(aerosol)forcing.Such a change in the temperature in the vertical direction results from the changes in the mixed layer depth and the thermocline,due to the changes in the surface heat flux and winds in response to the GHG and aerosol forcing.A vertical movement of the thermocline changes the subsurface temperature through Ekman pumping,directly forced by the wind stress curl change,which appears to be positive(negative)under the GHG(aerosol)forcing over the eastern subtropical North Pacific(Figs.8a and b).Note that positive(negative)wind stress curl anomalies shoal(deepen)the thermocline and produce cold upwelling(warm downwelling)in the North Hemisphere.This is in agreement with the findings of Han et al. (2006).Through an analysis of observed data and model solutions for the second half of the last century,they found that, while increased GHGs act to warm up the upper ocean by increasing downward surface heat flux,anomalous winds in the tropics cause upward Ekman pumping velocity and shoal the thermocline,resulting in an upper-thermocline cooling.For the historical run(Fig.9c),there a warm anomaly appears from the surface down to the thermocline,with more warming around the bottom of the mixed layer.This is a result of the combined forcing from GHGs and aerosols.

    Fig.9.Trends of temperature[color shading;units:?C(100 yr)?1]along the slanted section(thick red line in Fig.1a)from the(a)GHG-only simulation,(b)aerosol-only simulation,and(c)historical all forcing simulation.Superimposed is the climatological temperature(contour interval=2?C)and mixed layer depth(circled line)in each experiment.

    5.Summary and discussion

    By comparing solutions between the single forcing simulations and historical all forcing simulation for the past century from GFDL CM3,this study examined the response of MLD,lateral induction,and mode water in the eastern subtropics of the North Pacific to GHG and aerosol forcing.Under GHG(aerosol)forcing,ESTMW is produced on lighter(denser)isopycnal surfaces and is significantly weak-ened(strengthened)in terms of its formation and evolution. The weakening(strengthening)of ESTMW is due mainly to a reduction(increase)in lateral induction,resulting from a weakening(strengthening)of both MLD horizontal gradients and horizontal velocity at the bottom of the mixed layer over the southeast of the deep MLD area.Further,the weakening(strengthening)of the MLD front arises from a reduction(increase)in local ocean-to-atmosphere latent heat loss, which tends to produce a more(less)stratified upper ocean and thus a shoaling(deepening)of the MLD over the formation region of the ESTMW in the North Pacific.In addition,reduced(enhanced)Ekman pumping resulting from GHG(aerosol)induced wind change contributes directly to a lesser(greater)production of ESTMW.As the aerosol effect exceeds the GHG effect,the spatial patterns of these above changes in the historical simulation are similar to those in the aerosol simulation.

    To validate the response of the ESTMW to the warming effect of GHGs,we also analyzed the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 simulations with GFDL CM3.The RCP simulations are future climate projections that resemble a stronger version of the GHG simulation.Results show that the production of ESTMW in the North Pacific is significantly reduced under both the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 simulations,which is similar to the response to the GHG forcing and thus supports the findings of this study.

    It is important to mention that,limited by the fact that our study relies on only one model,the results could be model-dependent.For example,large uncertainty has been found in the magnitude and spatial pattern of anthropogenic aerosol forcing among the CMIP5 models(e.g.,Rotstayn et al.,2012).Therefore,the response of ESTMW to aerosol forcing may feature large inter-model diversity.Using a range of climate models within the CMIP5 framework,further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms and the extent to which these findings from the present study are model-dependent.

    Lastly,we would like to point out that GFDL CM3 is non-eddy-resolving,and that may be called into question for simulating the ESTMW in the North Pacific.In non-eddyresolving models,subduction on a given isopycnal surface is limited to the cross point between the MLD front and the outcrop line;whereas,in eddy-resolving models and observations,subduction takes place in a broader,zonally elongatedbandwithinthedeepmixedlayerregion.Arecentstudy found that mesoscale eddies significantly enhance the total subduction rate,helping create remarkable peaks in the volume histogram that correspond to the WSTMW and CMW in the North Pacific(Xu et al.,2014).

    Acknowledgements.This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China(Grant No.2012CB955600),National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.41376009 and 41176006),Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(Grant Nos.XDA11010302 and XDA11010201),and the Joint Program of Shandong Province and National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No. U1406401).Y.Y.LUO would also like to acknowledge the support from the Zhufeng and Taishan Projects of the Ocean University of China.

    Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),which permits unrestricted use,distribution,and reproductioninany medium,provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s)and the source,provide a link to the Creative Commons license,and indicate if changes were made.

    REFERENCES

    Donner,L.J.,and Coauthors,2011:The dynamical core,physical parameterizations,and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3.J.Climate,24,3484-3519,doi:10.1175/2011 JCLI3955.1.

    Griffies,S.M.,and Coauthors,2011:The GFDL CM3 coupled climate model:Characteristics of the ocean and sea ice simulations.J.Climate,24,3520-3544,doi:10.1175/2011JCLI 3964.1.

    Han,W.Q.,G.A.Meehl,and A.X.Hu,2006:Interpretation of tropical thermocline cooling in the Indian and Pacific oceans during recent decades.Geophys.Res.Lett.,33,L23615,doi: 10.1029/2006GL027982.

    Hanawa,K.,and L.D.Talley,2001:Mode waters.Ocean Circulation and Climate,G.Siedler,J.Church,and J.Gould,Eds., International Geophysical Series,Vol.77,Academic Press, 373-400.

    Hautala,S.L.,and D.H.Roemmich,1998:Subtropical mode water in the northeast Pacific Basin.Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans,103,13 055-13 066.

    Hosoda,S.,S.P.Xie,K.Takeuchi,and M.Nonaka,2001:Eastern North Pacific subtropical mode water in a general circulation model:Formation mechanism and salinity effects.J. Geophys.Res.,106,19 671-19 681.

    Hu,H.B.,Q.Y.Liu,Y.Zhang,and W.Liu,2011:Variability of subductionratesofthesubtropicalNorthPacificmodewaters. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology,29,1131-1141.

    Huang,R.X.,and B.Qiu,1994:Three-dimensional structure of the wind-driven circulation in the subtropical North Pacific. J.Phys.Oceanogr.,24,1608-1622.

    Inui,T.,K.Takeuchi,and K.Hanawa,1999:A numerical investigation of the subduction process in response to an abrupt intensification of the westerlies.J.Phys.Oceanogr.,29,1993-2015.

    Latif,M.,and T.P.Barnett,1994:Causes of decadal climate variability over the North Pacific and North America.Science, 266,634-637.

    Luo,Y.Y.,Q.Y.Liu,and L.M.Rothstein,2009:Simulated responseofNorthPacificModeWaterstoglobalwarming.Geophys.Res.Lett.,36,L23609,doi:10.1029/2009GL040906.

    Marshall,J.C.,R.G.Williams,and A.J.G.Nurser,1993:Inferring the subduction rate and period over the North Atlantic.J. Phys.Oceanogr.,23,1315-1329.

    Mitchell,J.F.B.,T.C.Johns,J.M.Gregory,and S.F.B.Tett, 1995:Climate response to increasing levels of greenhousegases and sulphate aerosols.Nature,376,501-504.

    Nakamura,H.,1996:A pycnostad on the bottom of the ventilated portion in the central subtropical North Pacific:Its distribution and formation.Journal of Oceanography,52,171-188.

    Rotstayn,L.D.,S.J.Jeffrey,M.A.Collier,S.M.Dravitzki,A.C. Hirst,J.I.Syktus,and K.K.Wong,2012:Aerosol-induced changes in summer rainfall and circulation in the Australasian region:A study using single-forcing climate simulations.Atmospheric Chemistry&Physics,12,5107-6377.

    Sen Gupta,S.A.,N.C.Jourdain,J.N.Brown,and D.Monselesan,2013:Climate drift in the CMIP5 models.J.Climate,26, 8597-8615.

    Suga,T.,K.Motoki,Y.Aoki,and A.M.Macdonald,2004:The North Pacific climatology of winter mixed layer and mode waters.J.Phys.Oceanogr.,34,3-22,doi:10.1175/1520-0485.

    Taylor,K.E.,R.J.Stouffer,and G.A.Meehl,2012:An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design.Bull.Amer.Meteor. Soc.,93,485-498,doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1.

    Toyoda,T.,T.Awaji,Y.Ishikawa,and T.Nakamura,2004:Preconditioning of winter mixed layer in the formation of North Pacific eastern subtropical mode water.Geophys.Res.Lett., 31,L17206,doi:10.1029/2004GL020677.

    Toyoda,T.,T.Awaji,S.Masuda,N.Sugiura,H.Igarashi,T. Mochizuki,and Y.Ishikawa,2011:Interannual variability of North Pacific eastern subtropical mode water formation in the 1990s derived from a 4-dimensional variational ocean data assimilation experiment.Dyn.Atmos.Oceans,51,1-25.

    Wang,L.Y.,Q.Y.Liu,L.X.Xu,and S.-P.Xie,2013:Response of mode water and subtropical countercurrent to greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing in the North Pacific.Journal of Ocean University of China,12,222-229,doi:10.1007/s11802-013-2193-x.

    Xie,S.-P.,C.Deser,G.A.Vecchi,J.Ma,H.Y.Teng,and A.T. Wittenberg,2010:Global warming pattern formation:Sea surface temperature and rainfall.J.Climate,23,966-986.

    Xu,L.X.,S.-P.Xie,J.L.McClean,Q.Y.Liu,and H.Sasaki, 2014:Mesoscale eddy effects on the subduction of North Pacific mode waters.J.Geophys.Res.,119,4867-4886,doi: 10.1002/2014JC009861.

    Li,X.,and Y.Y.Luo,2016:Response of North Pacific eastern subtropical mode water to greenhouse gas versus aerosol forcing.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,33(4),522-532,

    10.1007/s00376-015-5092-9.

    13 April 2015;revised 25 September 2015;accepted 5 November 2015)

    ?Yiyong LUO

    Email:yiyongluo@ouc.edu.cn

    中文字幕制服av| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 色吧在线观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 777米奇影视久久| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 色网站视频免费| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 久久久精品区二区三区| 天堂8中文在线网| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 97在线视频观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 如何舔出高潮| 少妇 在线观看| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 波野结衣二区三区在线| 久久久久精品性色| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 两个人的视频大全免费| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 男女免费视频国产| 日本91视频免费播放| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 亚洲综合色惰| 日本午夜av视频| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| freevideosex欧美| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 只有这里有精品99| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 九九在线视频观看精品| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 久久久久久久久大av| 在线看a的网站| 国产在线视频一区二区| 午夜影院在线不卡| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 色哟哟·www| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 免费av不卡在线播放| av专区在线播放| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 国产成人精品福利久久| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 99热这里只有精品一区| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 丝袜美足系列| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 久久热精品热| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 少妇人妻 视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| av播播在线观看一区| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 在线看a的网站| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 欧美97在线视频| 久久久久久人妻| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 搡老乐熟女国产| av天堂久久9| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产视频首页在线观看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 色哟哟·www| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 国产精品三级大全| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 大码成人一级视频| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 视频区图区小说| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 日本色播在线视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 满18在线观看网站| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 午夜av观看不卡| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| av网站免费在线观看视频| 永久免费av网站大全| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 日日啪夜夜爽| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 熟女av电影| 一个人免费看片子| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 青春草国产在线视频| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲成色77777| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| a级毛色黄片| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 美女福利国产在线| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 飞空精品影院首页| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 国产毛片在线视频| 少妇高潮的动态图| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 永久网站在线| av网站免费在线观看视频| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产精品一国产av| 久久久久视频综合| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 三级国产精品片| 婷婷成人精品国产| av黄色大香蕉| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 全区人妻精品视频| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 中文欧美无线码| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 日本欧美视频一区| h视频一区二区三区| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 成人国产av品久久久| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 曰老女人黄片| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 日韩电影二区| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 久久久久国产网址| 国产精品.久久久| 两个人的视频大全免费| 91国产中文字幕| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 有码 亚洲区| 人人澡人人妻人| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲第一av免费看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久久精品区二区三区| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 久久免费观看电影| 视频区图区小说| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 性色av一级| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 久久久久久久久久成人| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 国产精品成人在线| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 老司机影院毛片| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 久久久精品区二区三区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| av播播在线观看一区| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 少妇 在线观看| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产av精品麻豆| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 中国国产av一级| 热re99久久国产66热| 三级国产精品片| 国产色婷婷99| 国产毛片在线视频| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 日韩伦理黄色片| 春色校园在线视频观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 老司机影院成人| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 精品一区二区免费观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 久久热精品热| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 婷婷成人精品国产| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 桃花免费在线播放| 搡老乐熟女国产| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品.久久久| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 一级毛片我不卡| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 在线看a的网站| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 精品酒店卫生间| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产探花极品一区二区| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 韩国av在线不卡| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 有码 亚洲区| 国产 精品1| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 少妇的逼好多水| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 午夜影院在线不卡| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 91久久精品电影网| 91国产中文字幕| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 少妇人妻 视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 有码 亚洲区| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 内地一区二区视频在线| 在线看a的网站| 免费大片18禁| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 在线观看国产h片| 三级国产精品片| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 久久久久久伊人网av| 性色av一级| 全区人妻精品视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 日日撸夜夜添| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产视频首页在线观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产成人aa在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产成人freesex在线| 高清av免费在线| 色哟哟·www| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 91国产中文字幕| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 美女主播在线视频| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 一本一本综合久久| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 99热全是精品| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 久久午夜福利片| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 久久午夜福利片| 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 黑人高潮一二区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 亚洲性久久影院| 国产成人精品婷婷| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| freevideosex欧美| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 日韩成人伦理影院| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 国产成人精品在线电影| 成人影院久久| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产麻豆69| 欧美日韩黄片免| 久久精品成人免费网站| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 久久久久久久国产电影| 精品福利永久在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 美女福利国产在线| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 蜜桃在线观看..| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 麻豆av在线久日| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久热这里只有精品99| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 日本欧美视频一区| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 久久久久网色| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 另类精品久久| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 一级毛片电影观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 性少妇av在线| 亚洲伊人色综图| 日本wwww免费看| 999久久久国产精品视频| 香蕉国产在线看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| www.精华液| 久久狼人影院| 多毛熟女@视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久这里只有精品19| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 操美女的视频在线观看| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 天天影视国产精品| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产在线观看jvid| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 久久久国产一区二区| 成年动漫av网址| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 日本欧美视频一区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| av网站在线播放免费| 午夜福利欧美成人| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 欧美精品一区二区大全| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 两性夫妻黄色片| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 在线播放国产精品三级| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 男女边摸边吃奶| 日韩一区二区三区影片|