羅 俊孫瑞強(qiáng)王永旺顧恩華
藥物臨床觀察
瑞芬太尼對(duì)小兒七氟烷麻醉自主呼吸的影響
羅 俊1孫瑞強(qiáng)1王永旺2顧恩華1
目的 研究不同劑量瑞芬太尼持續(xù)輸注對(duì)小兒七氟烷麻醉下自主呼吸的影響。方法選擇行斜視矯正手術(shù)的患兒120例,根據(jù)術(shù)中給予瑞芬太尼的劑量,將患兒隨機(jī)均分為生理鹽水組(C組),瑞芬太尼0.03 μg·kg-1· min-1組(L組)、0.06 μg·kg-1·min-1組(M組)和0.09 μg·kg-1·min-1組(H組)。觀察喉罩置入后(T1)、靜注負(fù)荷量后(T2)、持續(xù)輸注10 min(T3)、持續(xù)輸注15 min(T4)、拔出喉罩(T5)時(shí)患兒呼吸頻率(RR)、潮氣量(VT)、分鐘通氣量(MV)、呼末CO2分壓[p(CO2)]、平均動(dòng)脈壓(MBP)和心率(HR)等指標(biāo)。記錄手術(shù)、麻醉時(shí)間和術(shù)中不良反應(yīng)等情況。結(jié)果4組年齡、體質(zhì)量、麻醉時(shí)間和手術(shù)時(shí)間,以及不同時(shí)點(diǎn)HR和MBP差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;且均無(wú)體動(dòng)和低氧血癥的發(fā)生。H組T3、T4、T5時(shí)RR和MV明顯低于其他3組,T3、T4時(shí)p(CO2)高于其他3組(均P<0.05);L組和M組T3、T4、T5時(shí)RR均低于C組,T3、T4時(shí)MV均低于C組,T4時(shí)p(CO2)均高于C組(均P<0.05);L組和M組間差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;4組間VT差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。結(jié)論0.03~0.09 μg·kg-1·min-1瑞芬太尼持續(xù)輸注對(duì)小兒七氟烷麻醉下自主呼吸具有抑制作用,主要表現(xiàn)為RR降低。根據(jù)手術(shù)需要輸注0.03~0.06 μg·kg-1·min-1瑞芬太尼,既可保留患兒自主呼吸,又可減少對(duì)呼吸的抑制作用。
麻醉;瑞芬太尼;七氟烷;自主呼吸;小兒
小兒淺表短小手術(shù)可采用七氟烷麻醉并保留自主呼吸的麻醉方式。瑞芬太尼具有起效迅速,鎮(zhèn)痛效果確切且無(wú)蓄積的優(yōu)點(diǎn)[1],可滿足此麻醉方式的鎮(zhèn)痛需要。研究顯示瑞芬太尼復(fù)合七氟烷麻醉可產(chǎn)生較強(qiáng)的呼吸抑制作用[2]。然而以往的研究多是針對(duì)成人和控制呼吸麻醉[3-4],對(duì)于在小兒使用七氟烷麻醉并保留自主呼吸,且不同劑量的瑞芬太尼對(duì)自主呼吸的影響目前尚無(wú)定論。本研究通過(guò)觀察不同劑量瑞芬太尼靜脈持續(xù)輸注對(duì)小兒七氟烷麻醉下自主呼吸的影響,評(píng)估其安全性和有效性。
1.1 一般資料 選擇2012年3月—2013年6月于天津市眼科醫(yī)院行先天性斜視矯正手術(shù)的患兒120例,年齡3~6歲,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ級(jí),其中男57例,女63例。采用隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法將患兒分為4組,術(shù)中給予不同劑量瑞芬太尼:生理鹽水組(C組)、瑞芬太尼0.03 μg·kg-1·min-1組(L組)、瑞芬太尼0.06 μg·kg-1·min-1組(M組)和瑞芬太尼0.09 μg·kg-1·min-1組(H組),每組30例。所選患兒術(shù)前均能配合檢查,均無(wú)精神方面和其他疾病。術(shù)前無(wú)阿片類藥物接觸史和呼吸系統(tǒng)疾病,同時(shí)排除可能存在圍術(shù)期困難氣道的患兒和術(shù)中發(fā)生眼迷走神經(jīng)反射患兒。本研究經(jīng)天津市眼科醫(yī)院醫(yī)學(xué)倫理委員會(huì)同意,且患者家屬簽署知情同意書。
1.2 方法 患兒麻醉前半小時(shí)肌內(nèi)注射鹽酸戊乙奎醚(長(zhǎng)托寧)0.01 mg/kg,入手術(shù)室常規(guī)監(jiān)測(cè)血壓、心電圖及脈搏血氧飽和度(SPO2)。采用8%七氟烷吸入誘導(dǎo),氧流量6 L/min,患兒睫毛反射消失后建立靜脈,達(dá)到足夠麻醉深度后調(diào)低七氟烷濃度并置入適宜型號(hào)喉罩。呼氣末七氟烷濃度(PETSev) 達(dá)1.3最小肺泡濃度(MAC)后,靜脈給予瑞芬太尼負(fù)荷量1 μg/kg(60 s以上),隨后根據(jù)分組泵注瑞芬太尼。麻醉全程患兒均保留自主呼吸,氧流量為2 L/min,C組PETSev維持在1.3MAC,其他3組維持在1 MAC左右。根據(jù)需要和生命體征調(diào)整麻醉深度,維持心率(HR)變動(dòng)在基礎(chǔ)值的20%范圍內(nèi),保持呼氣末二氧化碳分壓[p(CO2)]<54 mmHg(1 mmHg= 0.133 kPa)。對(duì)發(fā)生低氧血癥(SPO2<0.9,持續(xù)超過(guò)5 s)患兒行輔助呼吸[5]。手術(shù)結(jié)束時(shí)停用七氟烷和瑞芬太尼,待患兒呼吸平穩(wěn),潮氣量(VT)大于6 mL/Kg、呼吸頻率(RR)大于15 次/min后拔除喉罩,根據(jù)氣道情況放置口咽通氣道。送入麻醉后監(jiān)護(hù)室(PACU)常規(guī)吸氧,檢測(cè)生命指征。PACU麻醉醫(yī)師記錄患兒復(fù)蘇時(shí)間和復(fù)蘇期并發(fā)癥等情況,對(duì)嚴(yán)重躁動(dòng)患兒給予鎮(zhèn)靜治療。采用改良Aldrete評(píng)分(0~10分)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),滿8分者可離開(kāi)PACU返回病房。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo) 分別觀察喉罩置入后(T1)、靜脈滴注負(fù)荷量后(T2)、瑞芬太尼持續(xù)輸注10 min(T3),瑞芬太尼持續(xù)輸注15 min(T4)、拔出喉罩時(shí)(T5)患兒RR、VT、分鐘通氣量(MV)、呼氣末p(CO2)以及HR、平均動(dòng)脈壓(MBP)。記錄麻醉和手術(shù)時(shí)間、七氟烷維持濃度、術(shù)中低氧血癥、體動(dòng)、術(shù)后口咽氣道使用以及復(fù)蘇期并發(fā)癥情況。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法 數(shù)據(jù)應(yīng)用SPSS 11.0軟件進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)處理。計(jì)量資料以均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差(±s)表示,組間不同時(shí)點(diǎn)比較采用重復(fù)測(cè)量資料的方差分析。計(jì)數(shù)資料組間比較采用卡方檢驗(yàn)。P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2.1 各組一般情況和麻醉情況的比較 4組年齡、體質(zhì)量、麻醉時(shí)間和手術(shù)時(shí)間差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。L、M和H組七氟烷維持濃度均低于C組,H組低于L和M組(均P<0.05)。L、M和H組術(shù)后口咽氣道使用例數(shù)均低于C組(均P<0.05),L、M和H組間差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,見(jiàn)表1。4組患兒術(shù)中均無(wú)低氧血癥和體動(dòng)的發(fā)生。
Tab.1 Comparison of general data and anaesthesia situation between four groups表1 各組一般情況和麻醉情況的比較 (n=30)
2.2 各組循環(huán)情況的比較 4組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)HR和MBP差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,見(jiàn)表2、3。
Tab.2 Comparison of HR at different time points between four groups表2 各組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)HR的比較(n=30,次/min,±s)
Tab.2 Comparison of HR at different time points between four groups表2 各組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)HR的比較(n=30,次/min,±s)
F時(shí)間=2.194,F(xiàn)組間=1.516,F(xiàn)交互=0.233,均P>0.05
組別C組L組M組H組F T1 111.2±18.3 119.0±15.6 117.7±14.2 118.6±15.6 1.570 T2 115.4±13.5 113.5±15.4 114.6±14.7 110.9±12.7 0.594 T3 113.9±17.3 113.4±15.7 113.3±17.9 115.8±15.2 0.150 T4 123.2±13.2 118.6±13.0 115.6±11.1 112.7±13.3 1.332 T5 116.2±8.3 114.5±9.9 112.2±10.7 115.2±9.5 0.943 F 2.849 1.379 2.328 1.966
Tab.3 Comparison of MBP at different time points between four groups表3 各組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)MBP的比較(n=30,mmHg,±s)
Tab.3 Comparison of MBP at different time points between four groups表3 各組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)MBP的比較(n=30,mmHg,±s)
F時(shí)間=1.382,F(xiàn)組間=1.658,F(xiàn)交互=0.957,均P>0.05
組別C組L組M組H組F T1 64.6±9.2 65.5±9.3 64.8±7.6 66.9±8.8 0.557 T2 64.9±8.9 65.3±8.8 64.8±7.9 65.3±7.7 0.051 T3 64.0±9.1 65.5±1.9 68.3±8.6 64.2±0.6 1.355 T4 62.5±8.5 64.9±7.6 61.5±9.6 64.2±9.2 0.920 T5 64.5±7.7 67.0±8.7 64.3±9.2 65.8±8.6 0.661 F 0.360 0.207 2.559 0.562
2.3 各組呼吸情況的比較
2.3.1 RR (1)組內(nèi)比較。C、L和M組RR均在T2時(shí)明顯降低,后逐漸升高,至T5時(shí)有所降低;H 組RR隨時(shí)間呈降低趨勢(shì),至T5時(shí)有所升高。(2)組間比較。T1、T2時(shí)各組間差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;T3、T4、T5時(shí),L、M和H組RR均低于C組,H組均低于L組和M組(均P<0.05),L組和M組間差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,見(jiàn)表4。
Tab.4 Comparison of RR at different time points between four groups表4 各組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)RR的比較(n=30,次/min,±s)
Tab.4 Comparison of RR at different time points between four groups表4 各組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)RR的比較(n=30,次/min,±s)
F時(shí)間=101.045,F(xiàn)組間=27.765,F(xiàn)交互=14.422,P<0.05
組別C組L組M組H組F T1 35.1±6.2 34.1±6.1 34.8±5.9 34.7±5.8 0.175 T2 23.8±5.8 23.9±5.7 23.4±5.5 22.6±4.6 0.340 T3 33.9±8.2 25.7±6.1a24.7±5.8a19.5±3.6abc30.002*T4 35.5±7.7 27.1±4.9a25.2±6.8a18.3±3.4abc42.796*T5 30.4±4.7 26.7±4.7a25.9±5.5a19.2±4.4abc28.307*F 98.881*33.263*44.315*108.508*
2.3.2 VT(1)組內(nèi)比較。除H組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)VT差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義外,C、L和M組均是T1~T3時(shí)逐漸降低,T4時(shí)升高,T5時(shí)又降低。(2)組間比較。各組間VT差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,見(jiàn)表5。
Tab.5 Comparison of VT at different time points between four groups表5 各組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)VT的比較(n=30,mL,±s)
Tab.5 Comparison of VT at different time points between four groups表5 各組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)VT的比較(n=30,mL,±s)
F時(shí)間=19.376,P<0.05;F組間=1.235,F(xiàn)交互=0.183,P>0.05
組別C組L組M組H組F T1 113.2±32.3 111.3±37.5 113.1±38.1 108.9±37.7 0.38 T2 104.6±34.4 113.9±38.1 110.7±30.1 107.8±31.9 0.91 T3 97.5±29.1 107.4±34.5 106.9±26.9 98.5±26.4 0.98 T4 108.9±26.9 120.2±37.2 118.4±32.5 108.3±31.3 1.12 T5 104.6±34.4 113.9±38.1 100.7±30.1 101.8±23.1 1.18 F 10.19*7.66*4.86*2.52
2.3.3 MV(1)組內(nèi)比較。C、L和M組均是MV在T2時(shí)明顯降低,后逐漸升高;H組T1~T3時(shí)VT明顯降低,T4后逐漸升高。(2)組間比較。T1、T2時(shí)各組間MV差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;T3、T4時(shí)L、M和H組MV均低于C組,H組均低于L組和M組(均P<0.05),L組和M組間差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;T5時(shí)H組MV均低于C、L和M組(均P<0.05),見(jiàn)表6。
Tab.6 Comparison of MV at different time points between four groups表6 各組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)MV的比較(n=30,L,±s)
Tab.6 Comparison of MV at different time points between four groups表6 各組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)MV的比較(n=30,L,±s)
F時(shí)間=39.318,F(xiàn)組間=7.183,F(xiàn)交互=6.187,P<0.05
組別C組L組M組H組F T1 3.6±1.2 3.7±1.3 4.0±1.7 3.8±1.9 0.392 T2 2.5±0.8 2.7±1.2 2.6±0.9 2.3±0.7 1.101 T3 3.4±1.4 2.8±1.3a2.6±0.8a1.9±0.7abc9.190*T4 3.9±1.2 3.3±1.3a2.9±0.8a2.0±0.6abc17.806*T5 3.7±0.7 3.5±1.2 3.3±0.9 2.6±0.9abc12.394*F 18.106*10.074*12.750*16.296*
2.3.4 呼氣末p(CO2)(1)組內(nèi)比較。除M組不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)PETCO2差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義外,C組p(CO2)在T2時(shí)升高,后逐漸降低;L組p(CO2)在T2時(shí)升高,T3、T4時(shí)變化不明顯,T5時(shí)略有下降;H組T1~T4 時(shí)p(CO2)呈增長(zhǎng)趨勢(shì),至T5時(shí)降低。(2)組間比較。T3時(shí),H組呼氣末p(CO2)均高于C、L和M組;T4時(shí),L、M和H組PETCO2均高于C組,H組均高于L組和M組(均P<0.05),L組和M組間差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;T1、T2和T5時(shí),各組間呼氣末p(CO2)差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,見(jiàn)表7。
Tab.7 Comparison of p(CO2)at different time points between four groups表7 各組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)呼氣末p(CO2)的比較(n=30,mmHg,±s)
Tab.7 Comparison of p(CO2)at different time points between four groups表7 各組不同時(shí)點(diǎn)呼氣末p(CO2)的比較(n=30,mmHg,±s)
F時(shí)間=20.706,P<0.05;F組間=1.786,F(xiàn)交互=3.821,P>0.05
組別C組L組M組H組F T1 43.3±4.3 41.1±4.0 42.0±4.9 42.1±4.8 1.148 T2 46.1±5.1 45.2±4.2 45.7±5.1 45.9±5.3 1.057 T3 45.1±5.2 45.1±4.5 45.3±4.7 48.9±4.3abc4.885*T4 44.6±3.9 45.4±4.5a47.7±4.1a51.1±4.3abc21.325*T5 43.8±4.3 44.9±4.0 45.3±4.1 46.2±4.3 1.089 F 6.552*10.623*1.458 6.758*
瑞芬太尼是目前臨床常用的麻醉性鎮(zhèn)痛藥,其對(duì)呼吸的抑制作用作為不良反應(yīng)尤為受到關(guān)注。阿片類藥物的呼吸抑制作用主要由μ受體介導(dǎo),而瑞芬太尼為特異性μ受體激動(dòng)劑,因此更易誘發(fā)呼吸抑制[6]。瑞芬太尼的呼吸抑制作用存在劑量相關(guān)性[7]。Ansermino等[8]的研究顯示瑞芬太尼保留小兒自主呼吸的劑量范圍為0.05~0.3 μg·kg-1·min-1,但此結(jié)論存在爭(zhēng)議。本研究預(yù)試驗(yàn)發(fā)現(xiàn),使用0.12 μg·kg-1·min-1瑞芬太尼可使患兒出現(xiàn)嚴(yán)重的呼吸抑制、低氧血癥以及七氟烷濃度過(guò)低導(dǎo)致麻醉過(guò)淺等情況,故本研究選擇在0.03~0.09 μg·kg-1·min-1范圍內(nèi)進(jìn)行觀察。與以往的研究相比,本研究選擇斜視手術(shù),手術(shù)刺激小時(shí)間短,有利于減少疼痛刺激等影響因素,從而使結(jié)果更準(zhǔn)確地反映瑞芬太尼對(duì)小兒自主呼吸的影響及規(guī)律,本研究同時(shí)除外術(shù)中發(fā)生眼-迷走神經(jīng)反射的患兒,以避免眼-迷走神經(jīng)反射可引起呼吸節(jié)律改變。
本研究結(jié)果顯示,0.03~0.09 μg·kg-1·min-1不同劑量瑞芬太尼持續(xù)輸注使患兒RR明顯下降,并造成MV降低,而對(duì)VT并無(wú)影響,提示該劑量范圍內(nèi)瑞芬太尼對(duì)呼吸的影響為中樞性作用,而對(duì)胸壁運(yùn)動(dòng)等外周性作用影響較小。4組患兒均未出現(xiàn)低氧血癥,但0.09 μg·kg-1·min-1瑞芬太尼對(duì)RR的影響最為顯著,RR較生理鹽水組下降最多達(dá)48.7%,同時(shí)呼氣末p(CO2)明顯升高。中低劑量瑞芬太尼對(duì)RR的影響較小,較生理鹽水組分別下降23.7%和29.1%,對(duì)呼氣末p(CO2)無(wú)明顯影響。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)瑞芬太尼可降低七氟烷MAC[9],在本研究中4組患兒術(shù)中均無(wú)體動(dòng)的發(fā)生,說(shuō)明此劑量范圍內(nèi)瑞芬太尼復(fù)合1 MAC七氟烷,可滿足斜視手術(shù)需要。瑞芬太尼持續(xù)輸注的3組患兒口咽氣道使用率低于生理鹽水組,可能與瑞芬太尼降低了七氟烷用量有關(guān)[10]。
綜上所述,在保留自主呼吸的小兒七氟烷麻醉中持續(xù)輸注0.03~0.09 μg·kg-1·min-1瑞芬太尼可引起中樞性呼吸抑制,造成RR降低,并由此引起MV下降,但術(shù)中并不造成低氧血癥的發(fā)生,可使患兒保留自主呼吸;在滿足手術(shù)要求的情況下,選擇較低濃度瑞芬太尼(0.03~0.06 μg·kg-1·min-1)可明顯降低對(duì)呼吸的抑制作用。對(duì)于不同手術(shù)刺激強(qiáng)度和時(shí)間下,瑞芬太尼對(duì)小兒自主呼吸的影響尚需進(jìn)一步研究。
[1]Teksan L,Baris S,Karakaya D,et al.A dose study of remifentanil in combination with propofol during tracheobronchial foreign body removal inchildren[J].Clin Anesth,2013,25(3):198-201.doi:10.1016/ j.jclinane.2012.10.008.
[2]Aoud MT,Al-Alami AA,Nasr VG,et al.The effect of low-dose remifentanil on responses to the endotracheal tube during emergence from gengral anesthesia[J].Anesth Analg,2009,108(4):1157-1160.doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e31819b03d8.
[3]Fang YK,He X,Shi J,et al.Effects of remifentanil combined with sevoflurane on recovery of spontaneous breathing[J].Tianjin Med J,2011, 39(9):847-848.[方開(kāi)云,何祥,史靜,等.瑞芬太尼復(fù)合七氟烷對(duì)自主呼吸恢復(fù)的影響[J].天津醫(yī)藥,2011,39(9):847-848.]
[4] Pedersen NA,Jensen AG,Kilmose L,et al.Propofol-remifentanil or sevoflurane for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging?A randomised study[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2013,57(8): 988-995.doi:10.1111/aas.12151.
[5]Shen X,Hu CB,Chen YZ,et al.Propofol-remifentanil intravenous anesthesia and spontaneous ventilation for airway foreign body removal in children with preoperative respiratory impairment[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2012,22(12):1166-1170.doi:10.1111/j.1460-9592. 2012.03899.x.
[6]Yan Q,Feng Y.Differences in sedation level and adverse effects produced by equivalent analgesic doses of remifentanil,sufentanil and fentanyl[J].Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology,2012,32(7):853-856.[閆琦,馮藝.等效鎮(zhèn)痛劑量瑞芬太尼、舒芬太尼和芬太尼的鎮(zhèn)靜效應(yīng)和不良反應(yīng)的比較[J].中華麻醉學(xué)雜志,2012,32 (7):853-856.]
[7]Shen X,Hu C,Li W.Tracheal extubation of deeply anesthetized pediatric patients:a comparison of sevoflurane and sevoflurane in combination with low-does remifentanil[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2012,22 (12):1179-1184.doi:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03906.x.
[8]Ansermino JM,Brooks P,Rosen D,et al.Spontaneous ventilation with remifentanil in children[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2005,15(2):115-121.doi:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01397.x.
[9]Aguado D,Abreu M,Benito J,et al.Ketamine and remifentanil interactions on the sevoflurane minimum alveolar concentration and acute opioid tolerance in the rat[J].Anesth Analg,2011,113(3): 505-512.doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318227517a.
[10]Abu-Kishk I,Hod-Feins R,Anekstein Y,et al.Remifentanil use in pediatric scoliosis surgery-an effective alternative to morphine[J]. Yonsei Med,2012,53(5):1014-1021.doi:10.3349/ymj.2012.53.5. 1014.
(2013-11-01收稿 2014-05-14修回)
(本文編輯 陳麗潔)
The Effects of Remifentanil on Spontaneous Ventilation in Children
Sevoflurane Anesthesia
LUO Jun1,SUN Ruiqiang1,WANG Yongwang2,GU Enhua1
1 Department of Anesthesiology,Tianjin Eye Hospital,Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science,Clinical College of Ophthalmology,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300020,China;2 Department of Anesthesiology,Tianjin First Center Hospital
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of different infusion rates of remifentanil infusion on spontaneous ventilation in children received sevoflurane anesthesia.MethodsA total of 120 children underwent strabismus surgery were randomly assigned to four groups:C group(administration of saline),L group(remifentanil 0.03 μg·kg-1·min-1),M group(remifentanil 0.06 μg·kg-1·min-1)and H group(remifentanil 0.09 μg·kg-1·min-1).The mean blood pressure(MBP), heart rate(HR),respiratory rate(RR),tidal volume(VT),minute ventilation(MV),endtidal CO2[p(CO2)]and endtidal SEV were recorded after laryngeal mask insertion(T1),an initial bolus dose of remifentanil(T2),10 mins after remifentanil infusion(T3),15 mins after remifentanil infusion(T4)and laryngeal mask remove(T5)respectively.The adverse events and time of induction,maintenance and emergence were also recoded.ResultsThere were no significant differences in patient age,body mass index,anesthesia time,operation time,HR and MBP at different time points between four groups.No body movement and hypoxemia were observed.The values of RR and MV at T3,T4 and T5 were significantly lower in H group than those of other three groups(P<0.05).Values of p(CO2)at T3 and T4 were significantly higher in H group than those of other three groups(P<0.05).The values of RR at T3,T4 and T5 were significantly lower in L group and M group than those of C group.The values of MV at T3 and T4 were significantly lower in L group and M group than those of C group.p(CO2)at T4 was significantly higher in L group and M group than that of C group(P<0.05),but no significant difference was found between L group and M group.There was no significant difference in value of VT between four groups.ConclusionRemifentanil infusion at a rate of 0.03~0.09 μg·kg-1·min-1could depress spontaneous ventilation in children received sevoflurane anesthesia.The respiratory depression effect is mainly manifested by reduction of RR.It is a good option to choose 0.03~0.06 μg·kg-1·min-1infusion to keep spontaneous ventilation and avoid severe respiratory depression according to the demand of operations in children.
anesthesia;remifentanil;sevoflurane;spontaneous ventilation;pediatric
R614.2
A
10.3969/j.issn.0253-9896.2014.09.024
1天津市眼科醫(yī)院麻醉科,天津市眼科學(xué)與視覺(jué)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室,天津醫(yī)科大學(xué)眼科臨床學(xué)院(郵編300020);2天津市第一中心醫(yī)院麻醉科