中圖分類號:R681.531.1 文獻標志碼:A DOI:10.11958/20242402
Efficacy of selective expansive opendoor laminoplasty in the treatment of multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy
JIANG Zehua,ZHANG Boyu, ZHANG Hongjie2,CUI Haojun ?,3 ,REN Zhishuai1,YU Hao1, ZHOU Mengmeng, ZHU Rusen△
Tianjin3Oo,China; , rsityAffliated ; 3 Graduate School of Tianjin rsity △Corresponding Author E-mail: zrsspine@63.com
Abstract:ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacyof selective expansive open-door laminoplasty (SEOLP) with preservationofC7spinous process inthetreatment of multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathyand its impacton changes insagitalparametersofcervicalspine.MethodsAretrospectiveanalysis wasconductedontheclinicaldataand radiological informationof 73patients whounderwent expansiveopen-door laminoplasty(EOLP)for cervical spondylotic myelopathy inourdepartment between March O8 and June 0.Patients were divided into the SEOLP group ( n =35)and the EOLP group ( n =38)based on the surgical method.Folow-up was conducted forone year.The operation time,blood loss, axial symptom scores,JOAscores,VASscores and neck disabilityindex (NDI) were recorded in two groupsof patients. Radiological datawere also recordedforboth groupsduring the perioperative period,and theC-7Cobbangle,C-7 SVA and T slope were measured.Thecervical curvature index(CCI)andcervical range of motion (ROM)were calculated.The perioperative clinical outcomes andchanges in cervical sagital parameterswere observed,and their corelations were analyzed.ResultsThere were nosignificant differences inbloodloss,operationtime,JOA scores atvarious follow-uptime points between the two groups ( Pgt;0.05 ).During postoperative follow-up,axial symptoms were observed in 5 patients in SEOLP groupand4 patients in EOLPgroup.There were statistically significant diferences in axial symptom scores, incidence and severity of axial symptoms between the two groups ( Plt;0.05 ). The NDI indices at one year after operation were .±.3 for SEOLP group and 4.8±3.5 for EOLP group respectively ( Plt;0.0 ).There were no statistically significant diffrences in T slope andC-7Cobbangle atvarious follow-up time pointsaftersurgerybetween the two groups ( Pgt; 0.05).Oneyearafteroperation,CCIindicesfortwogroups were(3.4±.7)and(.±.4),respectively,with astatistically significant difference (t=.78, Plt;0.05 ). The C-C7 SVA values for two groups at one year after operation were (.4±3.8) mm and (6.7±5.9) mm,respectively (t=3.667, Plt;0.0 ). The results of the correlation analysis showed that there was a significantnegativecoelationbetweenclinicalfunctional improvement (ND)andchangesof theradiologicalparameterC- C7SVA inboth groupsof patients.ConclusionAfter SEOLP,the recoveryof C-C7 SVA is fasterand haslessimpacton cervical spine function,and the occurrence degree and incidence of axial symptoms are lower.
Key Words: cervical spondylotic myelopathy; posterior cervical single open-door laminoplasty; axial symptoms;sagital parameters; clinical efficacy
脊髓型頸椎病主要表現(xiàn)有四肢麻木無力,活動受限,精細動作減退,大小便障礙等,嚴重影響患者的生活質(zhì)量[。頸后路單開門椎管擴大成形術(shù)(expansive open-door laminoplasty,EOLP)被認為是治療脊髓型頸椎病的經(jīng)典手術(shù)方法,它能有效解除脊髓受壓,緩解臨床癥狀。但是,長期隨訪發(fā)現(xiàn)該手術(shù)會造成頸部后方的肌肉和韌帶受損,改變正常的頸椎曲度,導致頸背部出現(xiàn)僵硬、疼痛以及活動受限等軸性癥狀[],嚴重者可致脊柱后凸畸形,進而出現(xiàn)頸椎的矢狀位失衡3]。維持矢狀位平衡對于改善頸椎術(shù)后相關(guān)臨床癥狀非常重要,其有助于維持頸椎的穩(wěn)定性[4]。為了盡量保留頸后部肌肉韌帶復(fù)合體,減少對矢狀位平衡的破壞,改良術(shù)式選擇性頸后路單開門椎管擴大成形術(shù)(EOLP)在進行椎管擴大的同時保留頸7(C7)棘突和椎板[5]。關(guān)于這種術(shù)式對患者術(shù)后神經(jīng)功能恢復(fù)、軸性癥狀的發(fā)生程度、頸椎矢狀位參數(shù)變化等方面的對比,目前缺乏系統(tǒng)和深入的研究。本文回顧性分析了接受SEOLP與EOLP手術(shù)患者的臨床效果,對比了兩者的臨床數(shù)據(jù)及影像學資料,旨在探討保留C7棘突的EOLP對術(shù)后頸椎穩(wěn)定性的影響,以及保留C7棘突與患者術(shù)后臨床癥狀及頸椎功能之間的相關(guān)性。
對象與方法
.研究對象收集08年3月一0年6月天津市人民醫(yī)院脊柱外科接受手術(shù)治療的73例脊髓型頸椎病患者的臨床及影像學資料,其中男40例,女33例,年齡4~78歲,平均(54.±6.5) 歲,病程3個月 ~4 年,平均 (3.5±0.9) 年,隨訪時間年。所有患者手術(shù)由同一組醫(yī)師完成。根據(jù)術(shù)中保留C7棘突與否分為SEOLP組(35例)和EOLP組(38例)。SEOLP組行選擇性頸后路單開門手術(shù),即C3—C6和C4—C6單開門椎管成形術(shù),EOLP組行傳統(tǒng)的C3一C7單開門椎管成形術(shù)。本研究得到天津市人民醫(yī)院學術(shù)和倫理委員會批準通過(倫理編號:04年快審第C39號),所有患者均簽署知情同意書。
.納入標準滿足脊髓型頸椎病診斷標準[5]。通過 保守治療至少3個月,癥狀無緩解或加重。(3)病歷及影像學 資料無缺失。
.3排除標準神經(jīng)根型、椎動脈型、交感型等其他類型頸椎病?;加衅渌芤痤i肩痛的疾病,如凍結(jié)肩等。3)頸椎管內(nèi)占位病變,脊髓空洞癥等引起類似于脊髓型頸椎病的臨床表現(xiàn)的各種神經(jīng)內(nèi)科疾病。(4)頸椎手術(shù)史、頸椎外傷及頸椎感染性疾病。(5)頸椎發(fā)育畸形或椎體突變。(6)隨訪期間接受二次手術(shù)。(7)合并多種系統(tǒng)性疾病或者其他原因不能堅持復(fù)查。
.4手術(shù)方法EOLP組患者均取俯臥位,于頸后正中切口依次切開皮膚及皮下組織。解剖標志為切口上方的最高且分叉的C棘突。C3一C7椎板采用常規(guī)骨膜下剝離法暴露,以暴露椎板。預(yù)先制備C3—C7椎板單開門骨槽及門軸,使用卡爾松咬骨鉗小心咬除C/3以及C7/T之間的黃韌帶。之后將C3一C7椎板翻轉(zhuǎn)并固定于原位,使用關(guān)節(jié)突固定。滿意后沖洗,縫合切口。SEOLP組術(shù)中保留C7的椎板棘突,行C3—C6或者C4一C6椎板翻轉(zhuǎn)并固定在關(guān)節(jié)突上,其他手術(shù)操作步驟與EOLP組相同。
.5觀察指標
.5.臨床觀察指標 記錄組患者手術(shù)時間及出血量。神經(jīng)功能恢復(fù):圍手術(shù)期采用日本骨科協(xié)會(JapaneseOrthopaedicAssociation,JOA)頸椎功能評分評估組患者的神經(jīng)功能恢復(fù)情況。評分范圍為0\~7分,分數(shù)越高表示患者情況越好,神經(jīng)功能恢復(fù)越佳。計算組患者的神經(jīng)功能恢復(fù)情況,以評估各組神經(jīng)功能改善程度。(3)軸性癥狀(axialsymptoms,AS):術(shù)后隨訪記錄組患者軸性癥狀(頸痛 + 肩痛)發(fā)生的時間,嚴重程度(輕、中、重),發(fā)生率及疼痛視覺模擬量表(VAS)評分(0\~0分,0分表示無痛;0分表示劇烈疼痛)。(4)頸椎功能障礙指數(shù)(neckdisabilityindex,NDI):包括疼痛程度、個人生活料理、抬物、閱讀、頭痛、注意力、工作、駕駛、睡眠和娛樂共0項。每項5分,總分從0分(無障礙)至50分(完全癱瘓),分值越高,功能障礙越重。
.5.影像學觀察指標頸椎曲度指數(shù)(cervicalcurvatureindex,CCI):于術(shù)前及術(shù)后年分別采用CCI測量組患者的頸椎畸形序列變化,CCI指數(shù)越小表示頸椎曲度丟失越大。同時比較組患者的頸椎曲度丟失程度。頸椎活動度(ROM):SEOLP組與EOLP組在頸椎過伸和過屈位置時C一C7的活動度。同時比較組患者的ROM丟失情況。(3)頸椎矢狀面參數(shù):由名影像科醫(yī)師收集組患者的影像學數(shù)據(jù),包括頸椎前凸角(C一C7Cobb角,沿C和C7下終板繪制條水平線,然后分別繪制與前條線垂直的附加線,條垂直線所成的角度)T傾斜角(TS,T椎體上終板的延長線與水平線之間的夾角)、C一C7矢狀位垂直軸(C一C7SVA,過C椎體中心的鉛垂線到C7椎體上終板后端之間的距離)及頸椎活動度(ROM,C—C7Cobb后伸位-C—C7Cobb前屈位)。見圖。
.6統(tǒng)計學方法采用SPSS4.0軟件進行數(shù)據(jù)分析,計量數(shù)據(jù)均做正態(tài)分布和方差齊性檢驗,以±s表示,組間比較用獨立樣本t檢驗,組內(nèi)比較采用配對樣本t檢驗,計數(shù)資料以例或例 (%) 表示,比較用 χ 檢驗或秩和檢驗。使用Pearson相關(guān)性分析組患者臨床指標NDI指數(shù)的變化值與影像學指標C一C7SVA變化值之間的相關(guān)性,以 Plt;0.05 為差異有統(tǒng)計學意義。
結(jié)果
.組患者一般資料比較SEOLP組手術(shù)時間短于EOLP組( ?Plt;0.05 ),其他基線資料比較差異無統(tǒng)計學意義( (Pgt;0.05 ,見表。
.組患者臨床療效比較見表。術(shù)前組間JOA評分比較差異無統(tǒng)計學意義,術(shù)后年,SEOLP組與EOLP組均高于術(shù)前,但組間差異無統(tǒng)計學意義 ?Plt;0.05 )。術(shù)前組間NDI指數(shù)比較差異無統(tǒng)計學意義( (Pgt;0.05) ),術(shù)后年組NDI指數(shù)均較術(shù)前降低,且SEOLP組低于EOLP組 (Plt;0.0 。與EOLP組比較,SEOLP組軸性癥狀發(fā)生率較低,嚴重程度較輕,軸性癥狀疼痛VAS較低 (Plt;0.05 ),組軸性癥狀出現(xiàn)時間比較差異無統(tǒng)計學意義( ?Pgt;0.05 )。.3組患者手術(shù)前后影像學參數(shù)比較組患者術(shù)前C—C7SVA、TS、C—C7Cobb角、ROM和CCI指數(shù)差異無統(tǒng)計學意義 (Pgt;0.05) )。術(shù)后年,組CCI指數(shù)與ROM較術(shù)前降低,TS較術(shù)前升高;EOLP組C-C7SVA較術(shù)前升高, C-C7Cobb 角較術(shù)前降低( Plt;0.05, ,且EOLP組CCI指數(shù)明顯低于SEOLP組,C—C7SVA高于SEOLP組 (Plt;0.05) ,組間TS、C—C7Cobb角、ROM比較差異無統(tǒng)計學意義,見表3。行SEOLP患者手術(shù)前后影像學參數(shù)變化情況見圖。
.4組患者臨床指標與影像學參數(shù)的關(guān)系組患者NDI指數(shù)變化值與C—C7SVA變化值均存在負相關(guān),見表4。
3討論
3.多節(jié)段脊髓型頸椎病的治療多節(jié)段脊髓型頸椎病(MCSM)通常指存在個及以上節(jié)段出現(xiàn)脊髓受壓的頸椎病。如椎間盤突出、黃韌帶骨化、關(guān)節(jié)骨質(zhì)增生等,這些病理改變導致脊髓受壓,引發(fā)一系列臨床癥狀,如頸部疼痛、麻木無力或肌肉萎縮、活動受限、走路不穩(wěn)甚至大小便功能障礙,影響患者的生活質(zhì)量[6。手術(shù)旨在解除脊髓的壓迫,促進脊髓功能的恢復(fù)[]。頸椎后路手術(shù)適用于病變廣泛、涉及多個節(jié)段椎管狹窄的患者。常用的后路手術(shù)方法包括后路椎板成形術(shù)(如單開門、雙開門等)和后路椎板減壓固定手術(shù)。其中,EOLP是臨床上最經(jīng)典的一種頸后路手術(shù)方式,應(yīng)用于治療頸椎管狹窄、脊髓型頸椎病等頸椎疾患。通過擴大椎管以解除脊髓壓迫,同時脊髓后移,依靠脊髓的“弓弦效應(yīng)”從而達到間接減壓的效果[8]
患者男,54歲。脊髓型頸椎病入院,行C3—C6單開門椎管成形鈦板內(nèi)固定術(shù)。a:術(shù)前頸椎側(cè)位X線;b:術(shù)前頸椎橫斷面CT;c:術(shù)前頸椎 矢狀面CT;d:術(shù)前頸椎矢狀面MRI;e:術(shù)后頸椎側(cè)位X線;f:術(shù)后頸椎正位X線;g:術(shù)后頸椎矢狀面CT;h與i;術(shù)后頸椎橫斷面CT。 Fig.Changes in imaging parameters before and after surgery in a patient underwent SEOLPSEOLP手術(shù)在保留C7棘突的同時進行椎管擴大成形術(shù),減少了切口暴露對頸后部肌肉韌帶復(fù)合體的破壞,有助于維持頸椎的穩(wěn)定性,減少并發(fā)癥。Lin等9研究發(fā)現(xiàn),保留C7棘突可更好地保持頸椎活動度和矢狀位穩(wěn)定,減少術(shù)中失血,提高手術(shù)的滿意度;雖然SEOLP手術(shù)不能直接消除壓迫物,但它實現(xiàn)了更廣泛的減壓,使脊髓向后飄移;長期隨訪顯示頸椎穩(wěn)定性良好,神經(jīng)功能恢復(fù)較好。
3.種手術(shù)方式的療效對于行椎管成形術(shù)患者,軸性癥狀是困擾術(shù)后頸椎功能的重要因素[0]。很多學者提出了減輕術(shù)后軸性癥狀的方法。Kudo等[]提出,頸椎椎板成形術(shù)聯(lián)合C3椎板切除術(shù)可降低術(shù)后軸性癥狀。頸椎后部肌肉韌帶復(fù)合體的起止點分別在C和C7棘突椎板,傳統(tǒng)的EOLP手術(shù)切除了C7棘突,破壞了頸后部的肌肉韌帶復(fù)合體的完整性,術(shù)后出現(xiàn)頸后部疼痛的時間、程度以及軸性癥狀的發(fā)生率均高于SEOLP手術(shù)[]。本研究中SEOLP組患者軸性癥狀疼痛VAS、軸性癥狀嚴重程度明顯好于EOLP組,這與Macdowall等3的研究結(jié)果類似。同時,患者術(shù)后頸椎活動度的減小也可能與頸椎的肌肉韌帶復(fù)合體破壞后導致的軸性癥狀有關(guān)[4]。本研究組患者術(shù)后均出現(xiàn)頸椎活動度(ROM)減小,也可能是術(shù)后軸性癥狀導致的結(jié)果。
頸椎NDI指數(shù)是公認的一種評估頸椎功能的簡便且可靠指標。組患者手術(shù)后頸椎功能均明顯改善,說明單開門手術(shù)在改善頸椎功能方面起到了很好的作用。但是術(shù)后年SEOLP組NDI指數(shù)明顯優(yōu)于EOLP組,可能的原因是SEOLP術(shù)后保護了頸后部頸椎肌肉韌帶,避免了頸后部肌群的過度萎縮和瘢痕僵硬,降低了軸性癥狀發(fā)生程度和發(fā)生率[5]。
Uehara等[6]研究結(jié)果顯示,術(shù)后早期鍛煉可有效防止頸后肌萎縮和瘢痕組織增生,減少術(shù)后頸部僵硬和疼痛的發(fā)生。因此,根據(jù)患者的情況進行早期頸部肌肉鍛煉是非常有益的,尤其對于切口愈合良好且沒有明顯并發(fā)癥的患者,建議從術(shù)后就開始鍛煉。3.3組患者手術(shù)前后頸椎矢狀位參數(shù)的變化頸椎矢狀位平衡是指頸椎在矢狀面上保持的一種穩(wěn)定的狀態(tài),這種狀態(tài)對于維持正常的頸部功能和脊柱的整體穩(wěn)定性至關(guān)重要。在矢狀面上,頸椎曲度有助于分散頸部的負荷,保護脊髓和神經(jīng)根。頸椎矢狀面平衡通常用多個參數(shù)來評估,包括C一C7SVA、C—C7Cobb角、TS。其中,C—C7SVA是評估頸椎矢狀面平衡最常用的參數(shù)。正常健康成人C—C7SVA約為 0mm ,而當C-C7SVA超過40mm 時,表明頸椎矢狀面平衡受到破壞[7]。
EOLP手術(shù)在術(shù)中可能會對頸部肌肉韌帶復(fù)合體造成損傷,從而影響頸椎矢狀面平衡。研究表明,接受該手術(shù)的患者在術(shù)后會出現(xiàn)矢狀位參數(shù)的變化[8]。本研究中EOLP組患者術(shù)后C—C7SVA和TS出現(xiàn)升高,C—C7Cobb角下降,即矢狀位失衡。從這些參數(shù)變化可以看出,EOLP導致頸椎前傾程度增加,主要是C一C7SVA升高。這種升高可能與手術(shù)過程中頸椎結(jié)構(gòu)的改變以及術(shù)后頸椎的代償性變化有關(guān)。同時,TS的升高與C一C7SVA的增加值呈正相關(guān),也表明頸胸段后凸程度的增加可能是引起頸椎前傾的關(guān)鍵因素之一[9]。術(shù)后隨著隨訪時間的延長,頸后部結(jié)構(gòu)重新趨于穩(wěn)定,肌肉韌帶復(fù)合體重新排列,達到了新的平衡。
3.4術(shù)后臨床療效與頸椎矢狀位參數(shù)的關(guān)系頸椎C—C7SVA是評估頸椎矢狀面平衡的一個重要參數(shù)。研究顯示,C—C7SVA與頸椎功能密切相關(guān)[0]。頸椎生理曲度的情況下,頸后部肌肉韌帶復(fù)合體以及頸后部骨性結(jié)構(gòu)都處于放松的狀態(tài)。當頸后部骨性結(jié)構(gòu)和肌肉韌帶破壞時,伴隨的是頸椎前傾,長時間前傾會造成頸后部肌肉韌帶的疲勞、酸痛,最后出現(xiàn)軸性癥狀,嚴重時可影響術(shù)后頸椎功能,術(shù)后滿意度也會降低[]。本研究結(jié)果顯示組患者NDI指數(shù)變化值與C—C7SVA變化值存在負相關(guān),這表明C一C7SVA的不平衡影響頸椎術(shù)后的功能狀態(tài),從而導致患者頸椎術(shù)后的滿意度降低。原因可能是頸椎C—C7SVA失衡導致頸椎肌肉和韌帶的持續(xù)緊張,進而引發(fā)頸部疼痛和功能受限。頸椎矢狀面失衡還可能影響頸椎的生物力學特性,增加頸椎承受的壓力和負荷,從而加速頸椎退變和損傷的過程,這些都會影響頸椎的功能[]
本研究證實了SEOLP手術(shù)在治療多節(jié)斷脊髓型頸椎病患者中的有效性,該術(shù)式降低了術(shù)后頸椎軸性癥狀的風險,術(shù)后頸椎矢狀位參數(shù)變化較少,維持了頸椎矢狀面平衡。在綜合考慮手術(shù)適應(yīng)證、手術(shù)效果、預(yù)后、手術(shù)并發(fā)癥以及對頸椎穩(wěn)定性影響后,臨床醫(yī)生在選擇該手術(shù)時,還應(yīng)充分評判患者的具體情況和手術(shù)風險,以利于制定個性化的治療方案,在解除脊髓壓迫的同時最大限度地減少患者的術(shù)后不適感。
參考文獻
[]ZILELI M, BORKAR S A,SINHA S,et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: naturalcourseandthevalueofdiagnostictechnique-WFNS spine committee recommendations[J].Neurospine,09,6(3): 386-40. doi:0.445/ns.93840.0.
[] MONTANO N,RICCIARDI L,OLIVI A. Comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy:a Metaanalysis of clinical and radiological outcomes[J]. World Neurosurg, 09,30:530-536.e.doi:0.06/j.wneu.09.06.44.
[3]ZHANG X,GAO Y,GAO K,et al. Factors associated with postoperativeaxialsymptomafterexpansiveopen-door laminoplasty:retrospective study using multivariable analysis[J]. EurSpineJ,00,9 :838-844. doi:0.007/s00586-00- 06494-5.
[4] SAKAI K,YOSHII T,ARAI Y,et al. Impact of preoperative cervical sagittal alignment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament on surgical treatment[J].JOrthop Sci,0,7(6):08-4.doi:0.06/ j.jos.0.08.006.
[5]SHEN X,XU C,WANGR,etal. Evaluation of haplo-paraspinalmuscle-preserving technique to prevent postoperative axial pain in cervical laminoplasty[J]. Int J Spine Surg,03,7 :8-9. doi:0.4444/846.
[6]ABDELMALEK G,UPPAL H,COBAN D,et al.Is cervical disc arthroplastyan effectivetreatmentoptionforpatientswithcervical spondylotic myelopathy? A matched cohort analysis compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J].SpineJ,05,5(5): 9-98. doi: 0.06/j.spinee.04..003.
[7]JAJEHH,LEEA,CHARLSR,etal.A clinical review of hand manifestationsof cervical myelopathy,cervical radiculopathy, radial,ulnar,and median nerve neuropathies[J].J Spine Surg, 04,0:0-34.doi:0.037/jss-3-39.
[8]GUO Q,XU Y,F(xiàn)ANG Z,et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes oftwo modified open-door laminoplasties based on a novel paraspinal approach for treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Spine(Phila Pa 976),0,47(6):E-E3. doi:0.097/BRS.000000000000454.
[9]LIN W,SONG J,ZHANG Y,et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes ofmodified laminoplastywith preservation ofmuscle group inserted into C and C7 spinous processes versus conventional C3-C7 laminoplasty:aprospective,randomized,controlled,noninferiority trial[J].Int JSurg,03,09(4):905-9.doi:0.097/ JS9.0000000000000358.
[0]MACVICARJ,MACVICAR A M,BOGDUK N. The prevalence of \"pure\" lumbar zygapophysial joint pain in patientswith chronic low back pain[J].Pain Med,0, :4-48. doi:0.093/pm/ pnaa383.
[] KUDO H, TAKEUCHI K,WADA K,et al. Ten-year long-term laminectomy preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into the axis compared with those of conventional cervical laminoplasty[J]. Clin Spine Surg,0,34(3):E47-E53.doi:0.097/ BSD.000000000000068.
[]FINLAYSON R J, CURATOLO M. Consensus practice guidelines oninterventions for lumbar facet joint pain:finding a path through troubled waters[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,00,45(6):397-398. doi:0.36/rapm-00-0597.
[3]MACDOWALL A,LOFGREN H,EDSTROM E,et al. Comparison ofposteriormuscle-preservingselective laminectomyand laminectomywith fusion fortreatingcervicalspondylotic myelopathy:study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials,03,4:06.doi:0.86/s3063-03-073-4.
[4] WIGUNA I, MAGETSARI R,NOOR Z,et al. Comparative effectiveness and functional outcome of open-door versus frenchdoor laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy:a Metaanalysis[J]. Open Access Maced JMed Sci,09,7(9): 3348- 335. doi:0.3889/oamjms.09.739.
[5]BRANNIGAN J,DOHLE E,CRITCHLEY G R,et al. Adverse events relating to prolonged hard collar immobilisation:a systematic reviewand Meta-analysis[J].Global Spine J,0,(8):968- 978. doi:0.77/956808794.
[6]UEHARA T,TSUSHIMA E,YAMADA S,et al. A randomized controlled trialforthe intervention effctofearly exercise therapy onaxial pain after cervical laminoplasty[J].Spine SurgRelat Res, 0,6:3-3. doi:0.603/ssrr.0-00.
[7]HUANG Q Q,LIU S S,LIANG G Q. Research progress on the clinical significance ofsagital alignment and balance in cervical spine[J]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi,08,56(8): 634-638. doi: 0.3760/cma.j.issn.059-585.08.08.08.
[8]SAKAURA H,IKEGAMI D,F(xiàn)UJIMORI T,et al. Postoperative changes of spinopelvic sagittal parameters after cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Clin Spine Surg,O4,37(3): E9-E3. doi: 0.097/BSD.000000000000545.
[9] HYUN S J,HAN S, KIM K J,et al. Assessment of T slope minus cervical lordosisand C-7sagittal vertical axis criteria of a cervical spinedeformity classification system using long-term follow-up data after multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery [J].Oper Neurosurg(Hagerstown),09,6 : 0-6.doi:0.093/ons/ opy055.
[0]丁吉,程招軍,張黎龍,等.種固定方式對短節(jié)段頸椎前路椎間 盤切除融合術(shù)后頸椎矢狀位參數(shù)變化的影響[J].天津醫(yī)藥, 00,48(8) : 736-740. DING J,CHENG Z J,ZHANG L L,et al. Effects of two fixation methods on cervical sagittal parameters after short segment fusion of anterior cervical discectomy fusion[J]. Tianjin Med J,00,48(8) :736-740.doi: 0.958/0009.
[]FUJITA T,TAKEUCHI K,YOKOYAMA T,et al. The effect of disruption of the repaired nuchal ligament onclinical outcomes after posterior cervical spine surgery:a retrospective comparative study[J].Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,0,56:3-37. doi: 0.55/j.aott.0.7.
[]XUC, ZHANG Y,DONG M,et al. The relationship between preoperative cervical sagittal balance and clinical outcome of laminoplastytreatedcervical ossification oftheposterior longitudinal ligament patients[J]. Spine J,00,0(9) :4- 49. doi: 0.06/j.spinee.00.05.54. (04--7收稿05-04-4修回)