• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Pedestrian flow through exit: Study focused on evacuation pattern

    2024-01-25 07:14:58BoSiZhang張博思ZhiHongYu余志紅BoLinSun孫柏林ZiYuGuo郭紫鈺andMoChen陳默
    Chinese Physics B 2024年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:陳默柏林

    Bo-Si Zhang(張博思), Zhi-Hong Yu(余志紅), Bo-Lin Sun(孫柏林), Zi-Yu Guo(郭紫鈺), and Mo Chen(陳默)

    School of Safety Engineering,China University of Labor Relations,Beijing 100048,China

    Keywords: evacuation,exit width,flow rate,queued evacuation pattern,random evacuation pattern

    1.Introduction

    In the Code for fire protection design of building GB 50016-2014 (2018 edition), the minimum evacuation clear width for every 100 persons(B)is specified for different kinds of buildings.The total width of exits can be calculated based on the total number of evacuees andBin the evacuation design of building.According to the calculation method,Bequals the product of the width of a single pedestrian stream and the number of required pedestrian streams for evacuating.Thus,a fundamental assumption for calculatingBis orderly evacuation at exits, that is, pedestrians pass through the exit in one queue or several queues.However, the evacuation process of people in panic is usually random and disordered; they may rotate their bodies or lower their shoulders to pass through the exit quickly by crowding other pedestrians.Owing to this,the number of pedestrian streams may be larger than the designed value,on the other hand,the evacuation speed may be reduced since the pedestrians are likely to be stuck at the exit when they are crowded.In a word,the evacuation pattern(queued or random) affects the evacuation rate of pedestrians at the exit,and the design result of exit width in building as well.If the evacuation rate with queued pattern is smaller than with the random pattern, the calculation result of exit width is conservative, otherwise, this influence should be considered in the safe margin.Thus,the evacuation rate with queued evacuation pattern and the evacuation rate with random evacuation pattern need comparing with each other and further studying.

    The evacuation process and walking characteristics of pedestrians at an exit have received considerable attention.[1–3]The exit-selection behavior of pedestrians is important in simulating the evacuation process in a multiple-exit scenario.Loet al.[4]and Wanget al.[5]established pedestrian exit-selection models by using the game theory.Zarita and Lim[6]proposed a revised cellular automata model on exit selection behavior by introducing the probabilistic neural network.Liuet al.[7,8]established a multinomial logit discrete exit-choice model and the influence of information-inducing behavior of pedestrians was explored.Guo and Huang[9]investigated the evacuation processes in rooms with multiple exits through a cellular automata simulation embedded with a logit-based exit selection model.Xuet al.[10]proposed a multi-exit evacuation simulation model by using the deep neural network.Caoet al.[11]investigated the exit selection behavior of pedestrian under fire emergency by using an extended multi-grid model.In addition to these simulation studies, the exit-selection behaviors of pedestrians during evacuation have also been investigated through controlled laboratory experiments[12,13]and virtual reality experiments.[14]

    The pass capacity decreases at the exit, which is typically a bottleneck in an evacuation route.[15]In emergency,the pedestrians want to pass through the exit quickly by crowding other pedestrians, which causes exit congestion and reduces the evacuation rate.[16]Therefore, the evacuation rate at an exit also earns considerable concerns as it has an appreciable influence on the total evacuation time in an emergency.When panic people who have high desired velocity evacuate through an exit,the flow rate may be lower than that of people whose desired velocity are slower: this is known as the faster-isslower(FIS)effect.[17]The FIS effect has been investigated by many researchers.[18–21]According to the researches by Muiret al.,[22]Zhanget al.,[23]and Qiuet al.,[24]the FIS effect is related to both the exit width and the location of exit.To reduce congestion at the exit and increase the evacuation rate in an emergency, it is found that placing an obstacle in front of the exit may be helpful.[17]Many studies have tested the influence of obstacles on the exit evacuation rate through numerical simulation models,[4,25–27]human participant experiments,[28–30]and nonhuman biological experiments.[31–33]In these studies,opinions on the effectiveness of obstacles in increasing the flow rate at the exit are inconsistent.Shiwakotiet al.[34]indicated that the effectiveness of an obstacle is conditional,and that the conditions under which an obstacle can improve the flow rate at an exit still need clarifying.

    The characteristics of the exit and pedestrians also influence the pedestrian flow features at the exit.Yanagisawa and Nishinari[35]and Wanget al.[36]indicated that the exit width can improve evacuation through an exit.Li and Xu[37]presented the most advantageous exit width of the limited-space building in terms of both the evacuation time and the construction cost.The study of Liuet al.[30]showed that the corner exits have a greater effect on the evacuation rate through an exit than the center exits.Wanget al.[36]and Yanagisawa and Nishinari[35]reported that the relative effectiveness of the evacuation rate between center exit and corner exit is related to the exit width and the pedestrian mood(cooperative or competitive).In addition to the exit width and location,other properties of the exit are considered, such as the angle of exit[38]and entry restriction in front of a dual-exit (stair and escalator) bottleneck.[39]Regarding the pedestrian characteristics,the influences of inactive(stationary)pedestrians and pedestrians with crutches on pedestrian dynamics through exits were investigated by Liuet al.[40]and Huet al.,[38]respectively.

    To sum up, there have been many studies of the evacuation process and walking characteristics of pedestrians at exits.However, only a few studies have focused on the influence of movement rules of pedestrians at the exit, which is mainly concerned in the present study.Liuet al.[41]investigated the inflow process of pedestrians through a door under different movement rules experimentally.With the door widths of 0.5 m, 1.0 m, and 1.5 m, the pedestrian inflow experiments were conducted with random,one-queue,and twoqueues movement rules,respectively.According to the experimental results,they reported that pedestrians should queue up to enter the room,and the number of queues should match the door width in consideration of both pedestrian safety and traffic efficiency.The influence of the corridor width in front of a bottleneck on the walking behavior of pedestrians was investigated experimentally by Adrianet al.[42]In their experiments,the exit width was fixed at 0.5 m, and the corridor width was varied from 1.2 m to 5.6 m.They indicated that the corridor width is an important factor affecting the movement of pedestrians in the corridor (whether they queued up or not).The transition widths of corridor where the pedestrian walking behavior changes from queuing to crowding is in a range from 1.2 m to 2.3 m.In a crowded wide-corridor scenario,pedestrians spend most of their time in congestion.Zhuanget al.[43]studied the constraint mechanism of queues at a bottleneck,and conducted controlled experiments in a room with one exit and three entrances.The experiments included the normal walking scenario and queue walking scenario.The results showed that queuing of pedestrians requires more time than normal walking; queuing of pedestrians is more orderly.According to these studies,the movement rules of pedestrians(randomly or queued)had obvious influences on the flow rate and passing of pedestrians at a bottleneck.Overall,queuing of pedestrians lead to the ordered passage through an exit.Random entrances and exits are more likely to cause pedestrian congestion and threaten pedestrian safety.However,there are few quantized conclusions regarding the difference between the flow rate at an exit in random process and the flow rate at an exit in queued process;the influences of crucial factors such as the personnel density and exit width in random process and those in queued process also require further investigation.

    Thus,a comparative study of the pedestrian flow through an exit with queued evacuation pattern and that with random evacuation pattern is conducted experimentally in the present work.The evacuation processes and walking characteristics of pedestrians at an exit with queued and random evacuation patterns are compared with each other in 25 scenarios.

    2.Experimental setting and procedure

    Experiments on pedestrian flow through exits with queued and random evacuation patterns were conducted in a university classroom on October 23, 2022, with permission from the administrator.The layout of the experimental region with dimensions of 5.0 m(W)×4.0 m(L)is shown in Fig.1.The experimental region was enclosed by 14 desks; all desk legs were locked to ensure that they did not move when the participants collided with them during the experiments.The exit was located on the front side of the experimental region;its width, which varied in different scenarios, was controlled by the distance between the desks on the front side.The nearest obstacle (classroom platform) was approximately 2.5 m away from the exit, so as not to reduce the walking speed of the participants significantly after the participants had exited.

    A camera for recording the experimental process at a frequency of 25 frames per second was set at a distance of about 3.0 m outside the exit; the camera was approximately 3.0 m above the floor.The walking characteristics of pedestrians at the exit were derived by analyzing the experimental video.For recognition purposes, the exit location was marked with yellow tape on the floor,as shown in Fig.1(blue line in the diagram).

    Fig.1.Layout of experimental region.

    The experimental conditions are presented in Table 1.The personnel density ranged from 1.0 person/m2to 1.8 person/m2,and the exit width ranged from 0.8 m to 1.8 m.In each scenario, the participants walked out of the exit in queued and random evacuation patterns respectively.A total of 36 participants(10 male and 26 female)participated in the experiments, and they were numbered from one to thirtysix.The participants were all university students aged 19–23 years, and their heights ranged from 156 cm to 186 cm.The experiments were voluntary and paid,and all participants were notified of the experimental content and procedures before the experiments.

    In the queued evacuation experiments,the number of people stream depended on the exit widthWand the width of a single stream of peoplebas shown in Fig.1.As all the participants were adults,the width of a single stream of people was taken as 0.55 m according to the Code for fire protection design of buildings.The number of people streams specified in the queued evacuation experiments was the maximum number of people streams that the exit can accommodate.Thus, only one stream of people was at the exit in the queued evacuation experiment whenWwas 0.8 m and 1.0 m.Two streams of people were present at the exit in the queued evacuation experiment whenWwas 1.2 m and 1.5 m.For the queued evacuation experiment withW=1.8 m,three streams of people were present at the exit.The guide lines of each stream were marked with yellow tape on the floor in the experiments as shown in Fig.1(orange line in the diagram).In the queued evacuation experiments, the participants were instructed to leave the experimental region through the exit in lines as soon as possible;they could choose any queue to line up.In the random evacuation experiments,the participants did not need to queue in the evacuation process.The participants were instructed to leave the experimental region through the exit as soon as possible under the premise of ensuring safety.The experimental procedures of each experiment were listed as follows.

    (i)Inform the number of participants who should participate in the experiment.

    (ii) Declare the evacuation pattern and the experimental requirement.

    (iii) Start the experiment, and the participants evacuate through the exit following the experimental requirements.

    (iv) Terminate the experiment after the last pedestrian walked out of the experimental region.

    Table 1.Conditions of each experiment.

    3.Experimental analysis and discussion

    3.1.Macroscopic analysis of evacuation process

    A comparison of the evacuation process with queued evacuation pattern and the evacuation process with random evacuation pattern is shown in Figs.2 and 3.In the experiments as shown in Fig.2,Wis 1.0 m and the personnel density is 1.6 person/m2, representing a narrow-exit condition in the macroscopic analysis of evacuation process.In Fig.2(a), the pedestrians with the random evacuation pattern are crowded in front of the exit.Some pedestrians rotate their bodies or lower their shoulders to pass through the exit along with other pedestrians.According to the experimental video, there are up to three pedestrians crossing the exit together in the experiments withW=1.0 m,which is narrower than twice ofb,and these pedestrians may block the exit and push each other.This is the main reason why the congestion happens at the exit in random evacuation experiments withW=1.0 m, on the other hand,it also increases the flow rate of the exits due to the fact that the utilization of the exit increases compared with the queued evacuation experiments.In the experiments, people far from the exit quickly move to the exit, forming an arch, because they all want to leave as soon as possible.These pedestrians have to stop when they are close to the exit because the flow rate of the pedestrians is limited in the narrow-exit scenarios.

    The evacuation process in this scenario with a queued evacuation pattern is illustrated in Fig.2(b).When the experiment begins,the participants ran through the exit in an orderly line, and there is almost no pushing or squeezing in front of the exit.The pedestrians far from the exit gradually move toward the pedestrian line.Although some pedestrians attempt to jump into the queue in the middle,the entire evacuation process is more orderly with the queue evacuation pattern than with the random evacuation pattern.Comparing Fig.2(a)with Fig.2(b),the evacuation time with the random evacuation pattern is noticeably less than with the queue evacuation pattern,owing to a greater flow rate at the exit.

    In the experiments illustrated in Fig.3,Wis 1.8 m and the personnel density is 1.6 person/m2, representing a wide-exit condition in the macroscopic analysis of evacuation process.Pushing and squeezing of pedestrians is also observed at the exit in the random evacuation experiment,but the crowdedness of pedestrians at the exits is somewhat relieved compared with that in the random evacuation experiments withW=1.0 m.In the queued evacuation experiment withW=1.8 m, there are three people streams at the exit.The pedestrians ran out of the exit in an orderly manner in three lines, but there are still few queue-jumps in the streams.Comparison of Fig.3(a)with Fig.3(b)shows that the evacuation time in the queued experiment is longer than that in the random experiment.In the conditions withW=1.8 m,the difference in the number of pedestrians crossing the exit side by side with the random evacuation pattern and queued evacuation pattern is not so large as that in the conditions withW=1.0 m.Since the pedestrians can access the exit from any directions with the random evacuation pattern,the pedestrians at the exit are more crowded than with the queued evacuation pattern,that is to say,the time interval between the pedestrians to access the exit is shortened.In addition to the increase of the number of pedestrians passing through the exit side by side,the decrease of time interval for the pedestrians to enter the exit is also a reason why the evacuation process in the random evacuation pattern is faster but more unsafe(crowded)than that in the queued evacuation pattern.

    Fig.2.Evacuation through a narrow exit with queued and random evacuation patterns(blurred for privacy protection).(a)Experiment 2-4-A,(b)experiment 2-4-B.

    Fig.3.Evacuation through wide exit with queued and random evacuation patterns(blurred for privacy protection).(a)Experiment 5-4-A,(b)experiment 5-4-B.

    3.2.Walking characteristics of pedestrians at exit

    Based on the discussion in the above subsection,the evacuation time with the random evacuation pattern is less than with the queue evacuation pattern,but the evacuation process in the random evacuation experiments is less safe, since the pedestrians in front of the exit are more crowded.

    The main reasons for these are the increase of the number of pedestrians exiting at the same time (N) and the decrease of the time interval between the front row and rear row of people (Δt) as illustrated in Fig.4.The above two parameters are mainly discussed in this subsection, which is helpful in understanding the difference between the evacuation process with queued evacuation pattern and the evacuation process with random evacuation pattern.BothNand Δtare obtained by analyzing the experimental video frame by frame in the present study.For a specific frame of video,the number of pedestrians crossing the yellow tape(used to mark the exit location in the experimental region)simultaneously is regarded asNfor this moment.The time interval between the rows of pedestrian crossing the exit successively is recorded as Δt.

    Fig.4.Diagram of two parameters representing walking characteristics of pedestrians at exit.

    Fig.5.Number of people across the exit at the same time in different scenarios.

    A comparison ofNvalues between queued evacuation pattern and random evacuation pattern in different scenarios is shown in Fig.5.In experiments ofW=0.8 m,N=1 with the queued evacuation pattern.With the random evacuation pattern,in most cases,N=1,because the exit is narrow.However,it can become two as shown in Fig.5(a).This means that two pedestrians rotate their bodies or lower their shoulders to go through the exit together, even though the exit is not wide enough for them to pass side by side.

    Exiting is difficult in this condition.Thus,the time interval between the front row and rear row of people is typically longer whenN=2.In the random evacuation experiments,the average value ofNis 1.25 when the personnel density is 1.0 person/m2, and the average value ofNis 1.17 when the personnel density increases to 1.4 person/m2as shown in Fig.5(a).This indicates that the average value ofNdoes not increase with the personnel density increasing whenWis 0.8 m.

    In the experiments withW=1.0 m,the pedestrians walk in one stream when crossing the exit with the queued evacuation pattern.However,in rare cases,N=2 in the queued evacuation experiments withW=1.0 m.The average values ofNare 1.11 and 1.06 with personnel densities of 1.0 person/m2and 1.6 person/m2, respectively.This is becauseWis much wider thanb, and the participants want to exit as soon as possible.In the random experiments, the average value ofNis 1.54 when the personnel density is 1.0 person/m2; the average value ofNis 1.88 when the personnel density is 1.6 person/m2.The value ofNis much larger in the random evacuation experiments than in the queued evacuation experiments.The maximum value ofNis 2 when the personnel density is 1.0 person/m2, and the maximum value ofNis 3 when the personnel density is 1.6 person/m2.

    In the experiments withW=1.8 m,the pedestrians walk in three streams when crossing the exit with the queued evacuation pattern.Unlike the experiments withW=1.0 m, the maximum value ofNin the queued experiments does not exceed the designed value.In the queued experiments,Nwill also be one or two as shown in Fig.5(c).This is because pedestrians in the three streams may not arrive at the exit simultaneously.The average values ofNare 1.81 and 2.00 in the queued experiments with personnel densities of 1.0 person/m2and 1.6 person/m2, respectively.In the random experiments,the values ofNare 1, 2, and 3 when the personnel density is 1.0 person/m2; the average value ofNis 2.00.When the personnel density is 1.6 person/m2,Ncan reach to 4, except for three values in the last condition.The average value ofNis 2.13 in the random evacuation experiment with a personnel density of 1.6 person/m2.As with the queued evacuation experiments,the average value ofNin the random evacuation experiments is larger whenW=1.8 m.However,the difference inNbetween the two evacuation patterns whenW=1.8 m is smaller than that in scenarios withW=1.0 m.

    For a comprehensive analysis, the average values ofNand Δtin all experiments are summarized in Table 2 and 3;the maximum values ofNin all random evacuation experiments are illustrated in Fig.6.In Table 2 and 3, R and Q represent the random evacuation pattern and the queued evacuation patterns,respectively.

    In Table 2,the average value ofNwith the random evacuation pattern is greater than that with the queued evacuation pattern for each scenario.This means that the utilization ratio of the exit increases when pedestrians are allowed to evacuate through the exit randomly;however,this also leads the pedestrians to push and squeeze as shown in Figs.2 and 3.Based on the average value,the difference inNbetween the queued evacuation experiment and the random evacuation experiment is greater whenW=1.0 m andW=1.5 m than with the other three exit widths.According to the average value ofN, the influence of personnel density onNis not significant.Perhaps this may be because the participants can gather toward the exit quickly even in the low-personnel density scenarios,owing to the fact that the experimental region is not very large in this study.So, the influences of the personnel density in the entire experimental region on the local density of pedestrian at the exit and the walking characteristics of pedestrians at exit are not significant.The variation law of the average value ofNwithWis not obvious either.This is because pedestrians in different streams may not arrive at the exit at the same moment in wide-exit conditions,thus,Nis small sometimes,affecting the average value.In the queued evacuation experiments, the entire evacuation process is ordered,andNis usually equal to or smaller than the design value of the people stream based onW.It may be larger than the design value in rare cases as shown in Fig.5.In the random evacuation experiments, the evacuation process is disordered andNincreases with both personnel density and exit width increasing from the perspective of the maximum value ofNas shown in the following Fig.6.

    Table 2.Number of people across exit at the same time,N.

    Table 3.Average value of interval time Δt between people in front row and rear row under different values of W.

    The time interval between the front row and rear row of people is also an important parameter affecting the flow rate of pedestrian at the exit.Based on the average value of Δtin all scenarios presented in Table 3,the personnel density shows no significant influence on Δt.As illustrated in Figs.2 and 3,there are more pedestrians in front of the exit in the random evacuation experiments than in the queued evacuation experiments.Therefore, pedestrians enter the exit faster after the preceding pedestrians have passed, which is often a shorter Δtin the random evacuation experiments.However, Δtof the random evacuation experiment is larger than that of the queued evacuation experiment in some cases withW=0.8 m orW=1.0 m.This is because the pedestrians may be stuck at the narrow exit with the random evacuation pattern when several pedestrians want to exit together in narrow exit scenarios,which counteracts the advantage of the random evacuation pattern in reducing Δt.In the wide-exit cases,it is not common for pedestrians to remain stuck at the exit.Thus,in conditions of exit widths of 1.2 m, 1.5 m, and 1.8 m, the average values of Δtwith the random evacuation pattern are all less than those with the queued evacuation pattern.In the queued evacuation experiment, the average value of Δtdecreases withWincreasing,and it does in the random evacuation experiment.

    Fig.6.Maximum number of people across exit at the same time in different scenarios with random evacuation pattern(The personnel density of the second scenario was 1.3 person/m2 when W =0.8 m,and equaled 1.2 person/m2 in scenarios with other exit widths).

    3.3.Flow rates at exit with different evacuation patterns

    Based on the above discussion,Nis greater in the random evacuation experiments,and Δtis shortened in large-exit conditions when pedestrians evacuate randomly.These will affect the flow rate at the exit with the queued evacuation pattern and random evacuation pattern.In this subsection,the flow rates of pedestrians at the exit in different scenarios are presented,and the influences of the exit width on the flow rate of pedestrians at the exit are explored in detail.

    The numbers of evacuated peopleNeversus time in different scenarios withW=0.8 m,1.0 m,and 1.8 m are plotted in Fig.7.The“zero point”of time illustrated in Fig.7 refers to the 10 frames before the first pedestrian evacuated through the exit, rather than the start time of the experiment, as the initial locations of participants are random.With the unified“zero point”,the comparisons of experimental results become more intuitive but do not affect the slope of the linear fitting as shown in Fig.7.The flow rate of pedestrians will be discussed in the following.The evacuation times for each experiment are shown in Fig.7.For both evacuation patterns,the evacuation time increases with personnel density increasing and decreases with exit width increasing.With the same exit width and personnel density, the evacuation time in the queued evacuation experiment is longer than that in the random evacuation experiment.According to Fig.7, the differences in evacuation time between the queued evacuation experiment and the random evacuation experiment withWof 1.0 m are greater than with the other two conditions illustrated in Fig.7.

    Fig.7.Number of evacuated people versus time and linear fitting results.

    In Fig.7,a linear relationship exists betweenNeand time.Thus,linear fitting of the curves ofNeversus time is performed for all scenarios;the flow rate of pedestrians at the exit is denoted by the slope of the linear fitting.The flow rates of the people at the exit, derived by using the same method for all experiments, are summarized in Table 4.The meanings of R and Q in Table 4 are the same as those in Tables 2 and 3,which represent the random evacuation pattern and the queued evacuation pattern,respectively.LikeNand Δt,there is no obvious relationship between the flow rate of people at the exit and the density of people under the same evacuation pattern.With the increase ofW, the flow rate of people increases for the two evacuation patterns.

    The flow rates of pedestrians at the exit in the random evacuation experiments are larger than in the queued evacuation experiments for all scenarios.This implies that the design value of the total exit width of a building,which is calculated based on the total number of evacuees andB(on the assumption that the evacuees pass through the exit in one queue or several queues),is conservative,even though not all evacuees evacuate in lines in emergency.It should be noted that the above conclusion is obtained through the controlled experiments on random evacuation under moderate crowding condition,and the extreme crowding condition and accident condition need further investigating.

    As mentioned before, the difference in evacuation time(as well as the flow rate at exits)between the two evacuation patterns is mainly related to the differentNand Δt.The increase ofNand decrease of Δtare also the main reasons for the congestion at the exit in the random evacuation pattern.To some extent, the difference between the flow rates of the experiments with the random evacuation pattern ˙FRand queued evacuation pattern ˙FQcan represent the degree of crowdedness at the exit when the pedestrians evacuate through the exit randomly in panic.It can be seen from Table 4 that the difference between ˙FRand ˙FQis related to the difference betweenWand the total width of all accommodated people streams,which is defined as the surplus width of the exit in the present study.To represent this relationship, two dimensionless quantities are defined as

    wherenis the accommodated number of people stream for a certain value ofW:n=1 withWof 0.8 m and 1.0 m;n=2 withWof 1.2 m and 1.5 m;n=3 withWof 1.8 m.These dimensionless quantities are used to represent the difference in flow rate between random evacuation pattern and queued evacuation pattern, and the surplus width of the exit, respectively.

    Table 4.Flow rate at exit with queued and random evacuation patterns.

    The relationship betweenF?andW?is shown in Fig.8.The box plots represent the statistical results forF?in scenarios with different personnel densities with a certainW?.It should be noted that the personnel density of the second scenario is 1.3 person/m2whenW=0.8 m, and equals 1.2 person/m2in scenarios with other exit widths as mentioned before.Based on the mean value of each box,F?increases withW?increasing.WhenW?is less than 0.45,the variation range of the mean value ofF?is small, and all mean values ofF?are less than 0.28.This indicates that the difference in flow rate between the two evacuation patterns is relatively small(less than 28%of ˙FQ)when the surplus width of the exit is no more than 45%ofb.WhenW?is 0.73, the mean value ofF?increases to 0.408; the mean value ofF?reaches 0.82 whenW?increases to 0.73.This implies that the difference in flow rate between the two evacuation patterns increases significantly with the augment of twoW?values.

    The conditions with two largeW?values (i.e.large surplus width of the exit) correspond to the scenarios withW=1.0 m and 1.5 m.According to Table 2,the differences in average value ofNbetween the random evacuation pattern and queued evacuation pattern are also significant in these scenarios.It means that the large surplus width of the exit leads the value ofNand the flow rate in the random evacuation experiment to increase compared with those in the queued evacuation experiment,but at the same time it also leads the crowdedness of the exit in the random evacuation experiments to increase,which can be verified from the process of the evacuation experiments.Therefore,the surplus width of exit should be limited especially when the exit is narrow in the evacuation design of building in case the pedestrians evacuate not all in a queued manner and the congestion of crowds is intensified.The relationship betweenF?andW?obtained in the present study can provide the design basis to some extent,that is,the surplus width of the exit should not exceed 45%of the width of a single pedestrian stream.

    Fig.8.Plots of difference in flow rate with queued and random evacuation patterns versus surplus exit width.

    4.Conclusions

    A comparative study of pedestrian flow through exits with queued evacuation pattern and random evacuation pattern is conducted experimentally.Fifty experiments are conducted;typical behaviors of pedestrians in the evacuation process,walking characteristics of pedestrians at the exit,and the flow rate at the exit with the two evacuation patterns are studied.

    The experimental result show that the number of people crossing the exit simultaneously,N, is greater in the random evacuation experiments than in the queued evacuation experiments.In the narrow-exit conditions,the relationship between the time interval between the front and rear rows of people,Δt, with the queued evacuation pattern and that with the random evacuation pattern is ambiguous.In the wide-exit condition, Δtis shortened when people can evacuate randomly through the exit.In all scenarios explored in this study, the flow rate of pedestrians at the exit is smaller in the queued evacuation experiment than in the random evacuation experiment.This implies that even though not all pedestrians comply with queued evacuation instructions in actual emergency conditions, the evacuation time is still shorter than the designed value, which is calculated on the assumption that all pedestrians evacuate in one queue or several queues, given that the extreme crowding and stampede accidents do not occur.The method of calculating the total evacuation width of building based onBis conservative but acceptable.It should be noted that the crowdedness of pedestrians at the exit is higher with the random evacuation pattern than with the queued evacuation pattern.So,the risk of stampede accident is high with the random evacuation pattern,which should be avoided in emergency.

    Two dimensionless quantitiesF?andW?are defined to represent the difference in flow rates between random evacuation pattern and queued evacuation pattern and the surplus width of the exit which is greater than the total width of all accommodated people streams, respectively.The experimental results show thatF?is low whenW?does not exceed 0.45.In the conditions with the two largerW?(0.73 and 0.82),F?rises suddenly,which is mainly due to the increase of the difference inNbetween the random evacuation pattern and the queued evacuation pattern.Since the number of people streams specified in the queued evacuation experiments is the maximum number of queues than that the exit can accommodate,the increase ofNwith random evacuation pattern can increase the flow rate of pedestrians,but also enlarges the crowdedness of pedestrians at the exit as well.Therefore,the surplus width of the exit should be limited especially in narrow exit conditions,and the relationship betweenF?andW?derived in the present study can provide the the basis to some extent,that is,the surplus width of the exit should not exceed 45%of the width of a single pedestrian stream.

    Acknowledgement

    Project supported by the Special Funds for Basic Operating Expenses of the Centre University of China (Grant No.23ZYJS006).

    猜你喜歡
    陳默柏林
    柏林Wilmina酒店
    浪漫就是愿意為你“花心思”
    They Are Not Allowed to Fight
    陳默的沉默
    D日風(fēng)云之劍指柏林
    齊柏林:飄蕩的云或飛翔的鳥
    海峽姐妹(2017年7期)2017-07-31 19:08:15
    董志塬
    此間優(yōu)雅少年
    意林(2015年18期)2015-05-14 16:49:48
    柏林
    一個人的戰(zhàn)爭
    視野(2011年21期)2011-11-21 09:02:29
    欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 国产成人欧美| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 中国美女看黄片| 在线观看www视频免费| 精品福利观看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 一本久久中文字幕| 在线天堂中文资源库| 亚洲 国产 在线| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 亚洲第一电影网av| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 午夜a级毛片| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产免费男女视频| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 99热只有精品国产| 国产av在哪里看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 久久 成人 亚洲| 成人欧美大片| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 香蕉av资源在线| avwww免费| 国产野战对白在线观看| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| av欧美777| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| www日本在线高清视频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 很黄的视频免费| 天天添夜夜摸| 99热只有精品国产| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 一进一出抽搐动态| a级毛片在线看网站| 深夜精品福利| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲最大成人中文| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 制服诱惑二区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产精品永久免费网站| 性欧美人与动物交配| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 波多野结衣高清作品| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| www.自偷自拍.com| av中文乱码字幕在线| 在线国产一区二区在线| 成人国语在线视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 丰满的人妻完整版| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 在线国产一区二区在线| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 怎么达到女性高潮| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 三级毛片av免费| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 香蕉丝袜av| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 日本 av在线| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 国产99久久九九免费精品| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲中文av在线| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 久久精品影院6| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 精品福利观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 在线视频色国产色| 亚洲成人久久性| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产精品国产高清国产av| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 长腿黑丝高跟| 99re在线观看精品视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 香蕉久久夜色| 无限看片的www在线观看| 无限看片的www在线观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 精品第一国产精品| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 高清在线国产一区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 国产日本99.免费观看| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产日本99.免费观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 性欧美人与动物交配| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 88av欧美| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 18禁观看日本| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产av在哪里看| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 91成年电影在线观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 一进一出抽搐动态| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 丁香六月欧美| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区 | 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 身体一侧抽搐| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| avwww免费| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 久久性视频一级片| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 在线看三级毛片| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 男人舔奶头视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 亚洲五月天丁香| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 校园春色视频在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 午夜久久久久精精品| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 嫩草影视91久久| 亚洲激情在线av| 极品教师在线免费播放| 91国产中文字幕| 国产成人av教育| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 久久久国产成人免费| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 亚洲精品在线美女| 午夜影院日韩av| 天堂动漫精品| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产成人av教育| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 午夜老司机福利片| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产在线观看jvid| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲九九香蕉| 女警被强在线播放| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| av有码第一页| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 老司机福利观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产高清激情床上av| 免费观看人在逋| 日韩高清综合在线| 天堂动漫精品| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 在线天堂中文资源库| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 午夜视频精品福利| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 免费看日本二区| netflix在线观看网站| 999久久久国产精品视频| 天堂动漫精品| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 一本精品99久久精品77| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 69av精品久久久久久| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 一a级毛片在线观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 岛国在线观看网站| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲av成人av| 国产色视频综合| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 99久久国产精品久久久| 99国产精品99久久久久| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 女警被强在线播放| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 大香蕉久久成人网| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | www.自偷自拍.com| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 1024手机看黄色片| 脱女人内裤的视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 级片在线观看| av免费在线观看网站| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 在线观看66精品国产| 精品人妻1区二区| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产精品九九99| 操出白浆在线播放| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久香蕉国产精品| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲精品在线美女| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 日本一本二区三区精品| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 免费av毛片视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 日本在线视频免费播放| av免费在线观看网站| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 人人澡人人妻人| 不卡一级毛片| 久久久久久大精品| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区 | 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 亚洲 国产 在线| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产真实乱freesex| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产精品影院久久| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产av不卡久久| 女警被强在线播放| 9191精品国产免费久久| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 久久精品人妻少妇| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 精品久久久久久成人av| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 免费高清在线观看日韩| av片东京热男人的天堂| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 一区福利在线观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 97碰自拍视频| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 精品第一国产精品| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 成人三级黄色视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美日本视频| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 一级片免费观看大全| 免费在线观看日本一区| 在线视频色国产色| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 成年版毛片免费区| www.999成人在线观看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 露出奶头的视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 日本五十路高清| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 免费av毛片视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲,欧美精品.| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 午夜福利18| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 美国免费a级毛片| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产精品免费视频内射| 黄色视频不卡| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久久久久久久中文| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 成人国语在线视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | av免费在线观看网站| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 亚洲,欧美精品.| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 欧美午夜高清在线| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 精品第一国产精品| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 黄频高清免费视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 国产精品二区激情视频| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区 | a在线观看视频网站| 成人国产综合亚洲| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 中文字幕久久专区| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产区一区二久久| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 久久性视频一级片| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产真实乱freesex| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 久久久久久大精品| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 久久中文看片网| 高清在线国产一区| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲av熟女| 手机成人av网站| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 此物有八面人人有两片| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 免费在线观看日本一区| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 香蕉丝袜av| 日本熟妇午夜| 久久亚洲真实| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 身体一侧抽搐| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国内精品久久久久久久电影|