Simulation studies of tungsten impurity behaviors during neon impurity seeding with tungsten bundled charge state model using SOLPS-ITER on EAST

Shanlu GAO(高善露),Xiaoju LIU(劉曉菊),Guozhong DENG(鄧國(guó)忠),Tingfeng MING(明廷鳳),Guoqiang LI(李國(guó)強(qiáng)),Xuexi ZHANG(張學(xué)習(xí)),Xiaodong WU(吳曉東),Xiaohe WU(鄔瀟河),Bang LI(李邦),Haochen FAN(樊皓塵) and Xiang GAO(高翔),,?

1 Institute of Plasma Physics,Hefei Institutes of Physical Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Hefei 230031,People’s Republic of China

2 University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,People’s Republic of China

3 Advanced Energy Research Center,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,People’s Republic of China

Abstract An investigation into tungsten(W)impurity behaviors with the update of the EAST lower W divertor for H-mode has been carried out using SOLPS-ITER.This work aims to study the effect of external neon(Ne)impurity seeding on W impurity sputtering with the bundled charge state model.As the Ne seeding rate increases,plasma parameters,W concentration(CW),and eroded W flux at both targets are compared and analyzed between the highly resolved bundled model ‘jett’ and the full W charge state model.The results indicate that ‘jett’ can produce divertor behaviors essentially in agreement with the full W charge state model.The bundled scheme with high resolution in low W charge states(＜W20+)has no obvious effect on the Ne impurity distribution and thus little effect on W sputtering by Ne.Meanwhile,parametric scans of radial particle and thermal transport diffusivities(⊥D and χe,i)in the SOL are simulated using the ‘jett’ bundled model.The results indicate that the transport diffusivity variations have significant influences on the divertor parameters,especially for W impurity sputtering.

Keywords:tungsten impurity sputtering,bundled charge state model,transport diffusivity,SOLPS-ITER

1.Introduction

Tungsten(W)is deemed to be the most promising plasmafacing material(PFM)in modern tokamak devices due to its unique physical properties[1],such as having a high melting point(3683 K),high thermal conductivity,a low fuel retention rate,and a high energy threshold for sputtering[2].Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak(EAST),a superconducting diverted tokamak,has completed the engineering installation and commissioning phase for the new lower divertor being changed from graphite tiles to W tiles.W,as a highZimpurity,is a strong radiator in core plasma.It tends to accumulate in the core region,while exceeding a certain concentration(～10-5)could affect the core confinement and plasma performance.

Active impurity seeding is a favorable choice to reduce the heat load and electron temperature at W targets to an acceptable level by effective power radiation[3].External impurity seeding with nitrogen(N),neon(Ne)and argon(Ar),for example,could influence the plasma behaviors and W impurity transport in tokamaks.The behaviors of W impurity sputtered from targets play critical roles in plasma performance for tokamaks[4,5].

SOLPS-ITER is considered to be an important tool for studying the W sputtering and transport with external impurity seeding at present,however,it needs a relatively long computational time to reach steady state,especially when considering W impurity with 74 ionization states and external seeding impurity.Various W bundling schemes,including highly resolved and aggressively bundled models,are compared and analyzed in our previous work for different divertor conditions of L-mode on EAST[6].It indicates that W bundled charge state models provide a marked enhancement in computation speed by a factor of more than five.Besides,it can describe well divertor plasma parameters at targets with a discrepancy of less than 15% for various bundling schemes.It is also found that the discrepancies between net W erosion and deposition are modest among bundled charge state models and full W treatment in ASDEXUpgrade[7].However,radiative impurity seeding is not considered in either of these works.To test the reliability of the W bundled model with external impurity seeding,simulation results from the bundled model ‘jett’[7]are compared to those of the full W model.Further simulation with the bundled model ‘jett’ is carried out to study the W target sputtering and W impurity behaviors with transport diffusivity scans during Ne impurity seeding.

The structure of the paper will be as follows.Section 2 comprises the modeling assumptions and brief descriptions of the bundling scheme in SOLPS-ITER code.We mainly focus on the simulation study of W impurity behaviors in section 3 with all W charge state and bundling charge state models respectively.The detailed comparison of W impurity sputtering based on the scan of the Ne puffing rate is also presented in the section.Analysis of the influence of radial particle and thermal diffusivities on W impurity sputtering is included as well.A summary and discussions are presented in section 4.

2.SOLPS-ITER parameter setups

2.1.Boundary conditions and modeling assumptions

SOLPS-ITER[8]is applied for edge plasma simulation,which couples the B2.5 multi-fluid plasma code with EIRENE Monte Carlo neutral transport solver.W and Ne are treated as impurity species in the simulation.The electron,deuterium ion+D,seeded Ne species(N e1+,Ne2+,…,Ne10+)and each ionization state of W(W1+,W2+,…,W74+)are included in the B2.5 multi-fluid code.EIRENE code handles the transport of neutral particles and solves a series of sources and sinks of energy,particle and momentum,based on the plasma background deduced from B2.5 code.D,D2,Ne,and W are taken into account for neutral dynamics by EIRENE code[9,10].

Drift effects(E×Band diamagnetic)are not included in the simulation due to the massive computation.We select an EAST H-mode equilibrium provided by equilibrium fitting code(EFIT)in this work.Figure 1 shows the physical mesh for SOLPS-ITER simulation and updated lower divertor.The particle diffusivityD⊥and thermal diffusivityχe=χiprofiles along the outer midplane(OMP)are taken as that in figure 2 for H-mode discharge,following the previous simulations for H-mode[11].The input power entering into the core boundary of the computational region is set toPSOL=2.0 MW.It is divided by electrons and ions evenly.

Figure 1.Physical mesh for SOLPS-ITER simulation.

Figure 2.Radial particle and electron/ion thermal diffusivity profiles at OMP.

In SOLPS-ITER code,W source is produced by the physical sputtering from D,Ne and W species at targets based on the standard Roth–Bohdansky model[12].The particle fluxes of W for each ionization state are set as zero at thecore–edge interface(CEI).We use the SOLPS-ITER version 3.0.7,in which the friction and thermal force terms of impurity transport[13]are deduced from the general Braginskii version of the momentum balance equation rather than using the trace impurity assumption in the previous version[14].Redeposition[15–17],as an important process for influencing net erosion and plasma confinement,needs to be considered when analyzing the erosion of target material.In our simulation,the redeposition coefficient of W is assumed to be 90% at both targets.Compared with the redeposition coefficient of the EAST experiment,the value selected is more conservative[18].

2.2.Bundled charge state model

The atomic data of the W bundled scheme are from the ADAS data(model of ‘year 89’)in SOLPS-ITER version 3.0.7.The acceleration of the simulation process after bundling is due to the decrease in the number of conservation equations to be handled.Table 1 shows the scheme of the W bundled model.The numbers shown in the third row represent the partition numbers for the bundled model ‘jett’,which is considerably reduced.The charge state for the bundled particle is not constant but based on the plasma parameters that affect the ionization balance,such as electron density and temperature.The bundled charge state model can shorten the computation time and computer memory remarkably,especially for the simulation including highZimpurity and external impurity seeding.

Table 1.Bundling scheme of W.

Table 2.Radiation and W concentration for different models.

M0 is the full W treatment considering all W charge states separately,including 74 W fluids.M1 ‘jett’ is a highly resolved bundled charge state model with 23 W fluids.M1 bundles W ions partially with the better inclusion of W1+–W20+,which are typically dominant in edge plasma.There is no individual charge state above W20+in the M1 model.A highly resolved bundling scheme with more than 20 W fluids could describe the divertor parameters well to a considerable degree[6].The best approximation of net W erosion is given by the ‘jett’ scheme compared to the full W treatment[7].Therefore,we select the relatively optimal bundling model ‘jett’ in this work.

3.Modeling results and discussion

3.1.Divertor behaviors during Ne impurity seeding

In order to check the discrepancy of plasma behaviors between bundled model ‘jett’ and the all charge states model to the greatest extent,we introduce external impurity seeding.The simulation results are discussed,which emphasize electron temperature,electron density,particle flux,heat flux,radiation and W sputtering at both divertor targets.For the simulation setups,the deuterium ion density at the CEI is set asnD+,CEI=2.0 × 1019m-3.The atom rate of seeded Ne impurity is fixed at ΓNe=1.0 ×1019atoms /s.The low density and seeding rate cause the divertor to operate in the low recycling regime and with high W sputtering,enabling us to better check the accuracy of the‘jett’bundling model.The simulated profiles of electron densityand electron temperaturealong the OMP are shown in figure 3.Thegiven by ‘jett’ is virtually consistent with that of the full W treatment shown in figure 3(a).Considering the underestimation of radiation power loss inside the separatrix[6],for ‘jett’ is a little higher than that of the full W treatment in the core region,but almost the same outside the separatrix.

Figure 4 shows the simulated plasma parameters at both targets,including electron temperature(Te),heat flux(qdep)and particle flux(Γdep).Parametric values around the strike point(SP)are higher for‘jett’than for the all W charge states model,which could be explained by the underestimation of radiated power loss,as illustrated in table 2.Compared with the all W charge states model,the peak discrepancies ofqdepandTein ‘jett’ are less than 18.5% at the targets.Γdepdiffers slightly in figures 4(c)and(f).This indicates that the bundled model ‘jett’ can describe the divertor parameters well,even for the plasmas under a low recycling regime,when considering the Ne impurity seeding.The discrepancy could be expected to be even smaller in the high recycling regime,according to our previous results[6].

Figure 3.Profiles of (a)and (b)along the OMP in ‘jett’ and all charge states models,respectively.

Figure 4.Profiles of Te((a)and(d)), qdep((b)and(e))andΓdep((c)and(f))along inner target and outer target,respectively.

The impurity radiations by both seeded Ne and sputtered W in various subregions,as well as W concentration at the separatrix,are estimated and shown in table 2.The radiation power loss is dominant in the core region,with only a small proportion in the divertor and the SOL region.For radiation power loss by Ne,there is no significant difference between full W treatment and the ‘jett’ model,elucidating that the bundling scheme ‘jett’ has little influence on the ionization balance and transport of Ne impurity.It mainly depends on the ionization mean free path and the screening effect from background plasma,which are determined by the parametersin the divertor and the SOL region.For radiation power loss of W,there is an obvious discrepancy between the radiation of the‘jett’model and that of the all charge states model.It is affected by the bundling scheme especially for the relatively high charge states.The W concentration of the OMP at the separatrix(Csep,W)is as high as 10-3.Csep,Wof‘jett’is higher than full W treatment,which is no more than 24.5%.

Figure 5 shows W ion density of different charge states for‘jett’and all charge states models at OMP.The density of low charge states W1+–W20+is lower in the‘jett’model than in the all charge states model.The estimation of radiation power loss in the‘jett’model is lower than that in the full W treatment illustrated in table 2.Considering the higherTeOMPinside the separatrix of ‘jett’,the density of the high charge state W21+–W74+is higher than that of the full W treatment,which also results in largerCsep,W,as shown in table 2.

Figure 5.Profiles of W ion density for W1+–W20+(a),W21+–W74+(b)and W1+–W74+(c)along the OMP.

The eroded fluxes of W species at the targets are contributed by D,Ne and W species due to their higher incident energy than the sputtering energy threshold of W material.The formula of eroded W flux,,is expressed as follows.W physical sputtering yieldYW,phyis calculated by using semi-empirical formula[19–24],which is influenced by incident energy and incident particle species.

3.2.W sputtering with varied Ne seeding rate

We also scan the Ne puffing rate by varying the values of ΓNe=5.0 ×1018,1.0 ×1019,2.0 ×1019,3.0 ×1019and 4.0 ×1019atoms /s with deuterium densitynD+,CEI=3.0 × 1019m-3.As the atom rate of seeding increases from 5.0 ×1018to 4.0 ×1019atoms /s,the SP values ofTe,qdepandΓdepat both targets are shown in figure 7.Γdepincreases,whileTedecreases,as the Ne puffing rate increases.The value ofqdepdepends not only onΓdepandTe,but also on the power entering into the divertor region and divertor radiation[26].ΓdepandTeplay important roles since the net power in the divertor region is very similar.When the impurity seeding rate is small,Teis still high,and increasedΓdepplays the main role.qdepat inner SP increases as the seeding rate increases from5.0 ×1018to 1.0 ×1019atoms /s.When the seeding rate increases further,the reduction ofTebecomes the important role,thus,qdepgradually reduces when the seeding rate is higher than 1.0 ×1019atoms /s,as shown in 3.0 ×1019atoms /s,the detachment of the outer SP is figure 7(b).Butqdepat the outer SP shows a different trend,which declines gradually,as shown in figure 7(e)for the entire range of Ne seeding rates.The divertor operational regime ranges from high recycling regime to detachment as the Ne puffing rate increases.When the plasma temperature is very low(≤5 eV)at the divertor targets,the divertor is defined as a detachment.It can be observed that the particle flux rolls over near the SP.When the seeding rate exceeds 4.0 ×1019atoms /s at both targets are presented in figures 8 and 9,respectively.Impurity seeding could affect the sputtering and distribution of W impurity.Total W impurity sputtering around SP reduces gradually due to the lowerTeat the targets as the Ne puffing rate increases.W sputtering from deuterium ions is much less in the high recycling regime,therefore,induced by deuterium ions is not shown here.When the Ne seeding rate is not sufficient to suppress W erosion,W self-sputtering plays an important role for total,as indicated in figures 6 and 8.W sputtering is gradually dominated by Ne species,with the increase in Ne seeding rate(ΓNe≥2.0 ×1019atoms/s)shown in figure 9.The disachieved,firstly withTelower than 5 eV,due to more closed geometry for the outer divertor.The peak error of SP values is less than 11.0% at both targets between the two models,which reduces greatly with the increase in Ne seeding rate.

Ne 18 and ΓNe=4.0 ×1019atoms /s.Low-lying states mainly concrepancy indistributions,with different puffing rates shown in figures 8 and 9 between full W charge state mode and ‘jett’ bundled model,is negligible around SP.

Figure 10 demonstrates the distribution of W density from different divided ranges,andCWfor high seeding rate centrate in the plasma edge.Good consistency is obtained for the distribution of W density between the bundled model‘jett’and full W treatment in the high seeding rate,especially for W ions with low charge states dominantly concentrated in the divertor and the SOL region,as shown in figures 10(a)and(b).The main differences in the ions above W20+are found in the core region due to the low resolution for high charge states of the bundled model,which would not result in a significant influence on the divertor plasma behaviors.Besides,it can be seen thatCWis generally as low as 10-5inside the separatrix shown in figures 10(g)and(h).The sputtered W impurity at the far SOL region of targets is dominant,while it is relatively lower around SP in the high seeding rate due to lowT.e

Figure 6.Profiles of by D ion((a)and(d)), by Ne ions((b)and(e))andby W ions((c)and(f))along inner target and outer target,respectively.

Figure 7.SP values of Te((a)and(d)),qdep((b)and(e))andΓdep((c)and(f))along inner target and outer target,respectively,as functions of Ne puffing rate.

Figure 8.Profiles of by Ne ions((a)and(d)),by W ions((b)and(e))and total((c)and(f))along inner target and outer target,respectively,for ΓN e=5.0 ×1018atoms /s.

Figure 9.Profiles of by Ne ions((a)and(d)),by W ions((b)and(e))and total((c)and(f))along inner target and outer target,respectively,for ΓN e=4.0 ×1019atoms /s.

Figure 10.Density of W1+–W9+((a)and(b)),W10+–W20+((c)and(d)),W21+–W74+((e)and(f))andCW((g)and(h))in all charge states and ‘jett’ models,respectively,for ΓN e=4.0 ×1019atoms /s.

Figure 11.Radial particle and thermal diffusivity setting and scan in SOL.

3.3.Influence of transport diffusivity on W sputtering

Generally,radial particle and thermal transport diffusivities are inverted by the plasma profiles,mostly because it is difficult to measure the transport diffusivities in many present tokamak experiments.BOUT++ transport code is widely used to predict the impact of radial transport diffusivities on SOL particle and heat flux widths under different mechanisms[27,28].The magnitude of decay width of plasma characteristic parameters at targets mainly depends on the radial anomalous transport diffusivities in SOLPS-ITER[29],which could affect the divertor plasma behaviors to a large extent.Therefore,we evaluate the influence of transport diffusivities varied within a certain range on divertor parameters and W impurity sputtering behaviors in this subsection.

We assume diffusivities to be the same inside the separatrix and conduct a scan of diffusivities in the SOL withnD+,CEI=3.0 × 1019m-3and a Ne seeding rate of1.0 ×1019atoms /s.Particle and thermal diffusivities in the SOL vary over the range 1.0 to 5.0,which is shown in figure 11.Ion thermal diffusivityχiis set to be the same value as electron thermal diffusivityχe.Whenχi,eremains fixed at 1.0 in the SOL,⊥Dis scanned from 1.0 to 5.0.Thenχi,etakes the same scanning when⊥Dkeeps fixed to 1.0 in the SOL.We keep other input parameters the same.The simulations are only conducted by the ‘jett’ model in this subsection,based on the reasonable agreement results achieved by the model as described above.

Plasma parametersTe,qdepandΓdepat divertor targets by scanning⊥Dare shown in figure 12.For simulation with fixed density and particle transport diffusivity at the inner boundary,the number of particles in the simulation domain is fixed at a certain level,and more particles and energy loss at the outer boundary mean less particles and energy to the divertor region.The radial particle transport is enhanced with the increase of⊥Din the SOL,resulting in an enhanced particle loss at the SOL boundary.One can see that as⊥Dincreases in the SOL,Γdepdecreases significantly at the divertor targets,and thus the reduction ofqdep.Meanwhile,Teincreases which results in the increase in incident energy.

Figure 13 shows the profiles of totalΓWEroat divertor targets.ΓWErois determined byΓionandYW,phy,as indicated in equation(1).As⊥Dincreases,YW,phyincreases due to the increment in incident energy butΓiondecreases,as shown in figure 12.Therefore,the competition betweenΓionandYW,phydetermines the final value of total.It can be seen that totalincreases with the increase in⊥D.Besides,the erosion of the outer target is more severe than that of the inner target due to the relatively high incident particle flux.The divertor regime for diffusivityD⊥=1 is in the high recycling regime,which is different from other scans in the low recycling regime.It shows relatively smallcompared with other scans shown in figure 13.The peak erosion rate increases to 0.161 nm s-1with=⊥D5.0 at the outer target,which means particle diffusivity has a large impact on the W impurity sputtering at the targets.

Figure 14 shows the profiles ofTe,qdepandΓdepat the divertor targets for which onlyχe,iis varied from 1.0 to 5.0 in the SOL.Asχe,iincreases in the SOL,the thermal transport is increased,resulting in an enhanced energy loss at the SOL boundary.Asχe,iincreases,Tedecreases gradually,resulting in the decrease in incident energy.Whenχe,iexceeds 4.0,the detachment occurs withTe≤5 eV at the SP of the outer target.The slight influence onΓdepby variedχe,ican be seen in figures 14(c)and(f).Therebyqdepalso decreases.

Figure 12.Profiles of Te((a)and(d)), qdep((b)and(e))andΓdep((c)and(f))along inner target and outer target,respectively.

Figure 13.Profiles of along(a)inner target and(b)outer target.

Figure 14.Profiles of Te((a)and(d)), qdep((b)and(e))andΓdep((c)and(f))along inner target and outer target,respectively.

Figure 15.Profiles of along(a)inner target and(b)outer target.

4.Summary

In this work,the behaviors of W impurity are performed for an H-mode discharge with the EAST updated lower W divertor using SOLPS-ITER code with the bundled charge state model.The highly resolved bundled model ‘jett’ is selected and evaluated in terms of divertor behaviors and W impurity sputtering with external Ne seeding.The results indicate that the bundled model with high resolution can describe divertor plasma parameters and W impurity behaviors well to a reasonable degree for different divertor operation regimes.It suggests that the W bundling scheme with high resolution in low W charge states(＜W20+)has little influence on the ionization balance and transport of Ne impurity.There is no significant discrepancy in radiation power loss andproduced by Ne species between the bundled model ‘jett’ and the all charge states model.Compared to the full W treatment,the peak differences in plasma parameters at targets are less than 18.5%,estimated by the‘jett’ model at both divertor targets.There is no obvious difference in totalat either target,between ‘jett’ and the all charge states model,during Ne impurity seeding.

In addition,simulation of particle and thermal transport diffusivities,⊥Dandχe,iscanning from 1.0 to 5.0 only in the SOL,with fixed density at the inner boundary,is conducted by the model ‘jett’.As⊥Dincreases,Γdepdecreases due to more particle loss from the wall and induces the increase inTeat the divertor targets,which leads to the increase in.However,Teat the targets decreases gradually with increasingχe,iin the SOL due to more heat flowing to wall,which results in the decrease ofThe change in transport diffusivity has a significant influence on the divertor parameters.Particle diffusivity tends to have a more pronounced effect on the target sputtering than thermal diffusivity.

Drift terms are not taken into consideration because of the numerical difficulty and computational limitation.Attention should be paid to understand the underlying mechanisms of drifts based on the bundled charge state model.The influence of drift terms on the distribution of plasma flow and W impurity transport[32,33]will be investigated in our future work.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Yilin Wang for her comments and suggestions.This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.12075283 and 11975271).