• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Optimizing Sample Size for Assessing the Genetic Diversity in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Based on Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) Markers

    2022-06-02 02:01:52MAOPeiSHENShuhengPUJunLOUKekeZHOUQiangWANGZengyuSUNJuanLIUZhipeng
    草地學(xué)報(bào) 2022年5期

    MAO Pei, SHEN Shu-heng, PU Jun, LOU Ke-ke, ZHOU Qiang, WANG Zeng-yu,SUN Juan*, LIU Zhi-peng*

    (1. State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology,Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730020, China; 2. Grassland Agri-Husbandry Research Center, College of Grassland Science, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, Shandong Province 266109, China)

    Abstract:Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is one of the most economically valuable forage crops in the world. Due to its autotetraploidy and cross-pollination with a complex genome structure,genetic and breeding projects for alfalfa improvement have been significantly hindered. In the present study,six different germplasms of alfalfa including 600 individuals were used for sample size determination. The analysis of genetic diversity of alfalfa was performed with start codon targeted (SCoT) markers. From the PCR amplification,we selected 6 out of 56 primers that were used in previous studies. All analyzed markers were polymorphic,and 80 bands were identified,with 13.3 bands per locus detected. The percentage of polymorphic bands values were all 100%,which indicated that the markers were highly informative. The genetic diversity of alfalfa with 11 random sampling levels (10,15,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,and 100 genotypes) was compared in this study. When the sample size was increased to 40,there was a coverage of at least 95% genetic variation in the six germplasms. Additionally,based on the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) and STRUCTURE analysis,each cultivar in this study could be distinguished from others by utilizing a sample size of 40 individuals. The results of the present study showed that these SCoT markers would benefit the alfalfa research community for genetics and breeding. Furthermore,this study also established the foundation for future cultivar identification,resequencing and evolution in the alfalfa.

    Key words:Medicago sativa;SCoT markers;Genetic diversity;Sample sizes

    Alfalfa (Medicagosativa) belongs to the Fabaceae family;it is grown in 80 million ha worldwide and is one of the most economically valuable crops in the world[1]. Alfalfa has been an important component of sustainable agricultural systems for many years due to several key biological and agricultural features[2-3]. It is not only of huge value as a livestock feed,but also important for water and soil conservation,grass field rotation and soil improvement. Besides its applications in agriculture and animal husbandry,alfalfa also can be used for paper and biofuel production because of its high fiber content biomass,which makes alfalfa a potentially unique bioenergy crop[4-5]. Alfalfa was derived from a species complex (M.sativaspecies complex) that includes diploid and tetraploid interfertile subspecies[6]. Cultivated alfalfa is a perennial species with high genetic complexity at individual and population levels due to its autotetraploidy (2n=4x=32) and cross-pollinated (allogamous)[7]. Moreover,since the tetraploid structure and severe selfing depression of alfalfa,the study of population genetics is also complicated[8].

    The genetic diversity ofM.sativahas been characterized by traditional morphological traits and molecular markers. Compared with conventional phenotyping assessment,molecular marker technology is an efficient supplement and alternative to morphological trait measurements,as the markers are easily detectable and stable in plant tissues regardless of environmental influences[9]. Various molecular assays have been successfully used to evaluate genetic diversity in alfalfa. These assays mainly focus on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)[10],random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)[11],inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism (IRAP)[12],sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP)[13],and simple sequence repeats (SSR)[14]. More recently,many new alternatives and promising molecular assays have emerged. Of these assays,start codon targeted (SCoT) markers are dominantly inherited,which has been developed based on the short conserved region flanking sequences of the adenine-thymine-guanine (ATG) start codon site[15]. SCoT markers display the following advantages:simple operation,low cost,high level of polymorphism,and high abundance in the genome[16]. SCoT markers open their way in various plant investigations:genetic diversity and structure analysis,identify cultivars,quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping,and DNA fingerprinting,including wild rye (Elymussibiricus)[17-18],dandelion (Taraxacumpieninicum)[19],barb goatgrass (Aegilopstriuncialis)[20],cowpea (Vignaunguiculata)[21],potato (Solanumtuberosum)[22],maize (Zeamays)[23]and persian oak (Quercusbrantii)[16]. Nevertheless,as a remarkable tool in detecting genetic diversity and targeting the functional gene of various plant species,the application of the SCOT marker system in alfalfa is still limited.

    The sample size of genotypes evaluated by each group plays an important role in the reliability of alfalfa population diversity research. The optimal sample size of each variety should be detected to achieve the optimum between reasonable labor and the reliability of the data set. While there are few reports on the variation of genetic diversity of different alfalfa varieties with the change of sample sizes. To establish an optimal sampling strategy,additional work regarding the optimal number of individual plants is needed. In the current study,the effectiveness of SCoT markers for the analysis of the genetic diversity of alfalfa and the genetic relationships among six alfalfa varieties were examined,with the goals of determining the appropriate number of individuals that should be sampled to reasonably represent the genetic diversity within a population. A focus on this point could be worthwhile to give a more complete judgment on the analysis by SCoT markers in alfalfa,and the detailed results provide an optimized sampling strategy,which is crucial for the genetic diversity investment of alfalfa for breeding purposes.

    1 MATERIAL AND METHODS

    1.1 Plant Materials and DNA Extraction

    In the present study,six alfalfa varieties (‘Archer’,‘BOJA’,‘CUF101’,‘Maverick’,‘Ranger’,and ‘Zhongmu No.1’) were used in the experiment (Table 1). All varieties from a total of 600 individuals were used for the present study. For each of the six populations,the DNA of 100 individuals per population was extracted from young leaves and analyzed with six SCoT markers. A revised cetyltrime thylammonium ammonium bromide (CTAB) method was used for DNA extraction[24]. Then,the DNA quality and concentration were determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Products,Wilmington,DE,USA). Eventually,the final concentration of each DNA sample was diluted to 50 ng·μL-1and stored at —20℃ for further study.

    Table 1 Medicago sativa varieties used in the study

    1.2 PCR Amplification

    In this study,the PCR reactions were all carried out in volumes of 10 μL,containing 50 ng DNA,5.0 μL 2× Power Taq PCR Master Mix (Bioteke,Beijing,China),1.0 μL primer (10 μM) and 2.0 μL double-distilled water. The PCR programs consisted of an initial denaturation at 94℃ for 4 min,followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94℃,1 min at 50℃ and 2 min at 72℃,and the final extension at 72℃ for 7 min. After PCR amplification,fragments were separated in 1.4% agarose gel containing 0.14 μg·mL-1of Goldview through electrophoresis in 1× TBE buffer solution at 129 V for 2 h 15 min. DNA fragments were visualized under the ultraviolet (UV) light Gel Doc (TM) XR System (BioRad,Hercules,CA,USA),and photo documentation was obtained for each gel. Fifty-six SCoT primers from previous studies were selected[15,27],and the primers were tested and screened by agarose gel electrophoresis.

    1.3 Data Analysis

    First,the amplified bands of 6 SCoT markers were scored as present (1) or absent (0),and only reproducible bands were considered. Six hundred sampled individuals (one hundred genotypes from each variety) were used to analyze the genetic diversity of alfalfa using six SCoT markers. A series of random resampling of these data were made according to the 11 sample sizes (10,15,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,and 100 genotypes) chosen,with 20 replicates for each resampling. Then the genetic diversity parameters were calculated:Polymorphic information content (PIC) values were calculated according to the formula:PIC=1-p2-q2[28];wherepis the frequency of the present band andqis the frequency of the absent band. The Reserve Percentage (RP),which is an important indicator of the proportion of bands remaining in the sample population was calculated[29]. The resolving power of the primer (Rp) in each variety was measured by Rp=ΣIb[30]. In addition,the number of effective alleles (Ne),Shannon’s information index (I)[31]values,and the expected heterozygosity (He) were calculated with GenAlEx software 6.41[32].

    To display variety relationships with different sample sizes,a dendrogram was constructed by Jaccard’s genetic similarity matrix using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA),NTSYS version 2.11[33]. Furthermore,to visualize the population structure of the six alfalfa varieties,Bayesian cluster analysis using STRUCTURE v2.3.4 software[34],with the ‘a(chǎn)dmixture mode’,burn-in period of 10,000 iterations,and a run of 100,000 replications of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) after burn-in,were carried out. For each run,20 independent runs of STRUCTURE were performed with the number of clusters (K) varying from 1 to 10. Maximum likelihood and delta K values were used to determine the optimum number of groups[34,35],and the most likely value of K was computed using STRUCTURE HARVESTER (http://taylor0.biology.ucla.edu/structureHarvester/)[36].

    2 RESULTS

    2.1 SCoT analysis

    Examples of SCoT amplifications were shown in Fig.1,representing band patterns obtained with primers SCoT26. Primers producing banding patterns that were difficult to score and those with inconsistent amplification in all individuals were excluded. Only if the primers can produce clear and repeatable bands can they be used for further study (Fig.1). Finally,six of these primers were chosen for the analysis of genetic diversity parameters in six alfalfa varieties. The oligonucleotide sequences of the 6 SCoT primers were summarized in Table 2. As a result,a total of 80 bands were generated with the six SCoT primers ranging from 6 (SCoT10) to 19 (SCoT3 and SCoT6) with an average number of 13.3 bands per primer in the 600 genotypes of the six alfalfa varieties. The size of the amplified products ranged from 200 bp to 3 500 bp (Table 2). The percentage of polymorphic bands (PPB) of six SCoT primers were all 100%,indicating that the primers had high specificity in these populations. Meanwhile,the resolving power (Rp) of the 6 SCoT primers ranged from 1.89 (SCoT10) to 8.67 (SCoT3). The polymorphic information content (PIC) of six SCoT primers ranged from 0.30 to 0.49,with an average of 0.43. The primer SCoT6 had the lowest PIC (0.30),while the highest PIC was found in primer SCoT37 (0.49) (Table 2). The primers with higher PIC and Rp values have greater potential to investigate more individuals or sampling sites with a small number of primers.

    The number of polymorphic bands,the percentage of polymorphic bands,the observed number of bands,the number of effective alleles,the expected heterozygosity,and Shannon’s Information index were calculated for each variety (Table 3). The number of polymorphic bands for varieties ranged from 52 (variety RA) to 70 (variety CU). The highest percentage of polymorphic bands was 100% for variety AR,while the lowest was 94.59% for variety CU. The observed number of bands ranged from 1.325 to 1.800. The number of effective alleles varied from 1.236 to 1.392. The highest Shannon’s Information index was recorded for variety CU (0.364) and the lowest for variety RA (0.232).

    Fig.1 PCR-amplified band pattern generated in SCoT analysis by primers SCoT26 on DNA of 23 alfalfa individuals:molecular marker (100~5 000 bp) (M)

    Table 2 Information for the six SCoT primers used in the genetic diversity analysis in six alfalfa varieties

    Table 3 Genetic variability within six alfalfa varieties detected by six SCoT markers

    2.2 The Genetic Diversity Analysis of SCoT Markers at different sampling size

    Understanding the genetic diversity and variation among and within varieties is of great significance for the selection of an effective strategy for conservation and sampling management[37]. As shown in Figure 2,the primers that we selected for this study had high PIC values in different sampling sizes under random strategy in each accession. Furthermore,the analysis results showed that with an increase of the sample size,the TB,Ne,He,and I of the six varieties increased gradually. However,when the sample size increased to a certain number,the value of the genetic diversity of the six germplasms did not increase (Tables 4~7). The Ne value of the six germplasms in different sampling sizes represented more than 95% of the genetic diversity in the total population when the sample size was 10 (Table 5). The I and He parameters increased with an increase in the sample size,and more than 95% of the genetic diversity per population was covered when the sample size exceeded 30 and 40 individuals (Tables 6 and 7,respectively). When the sample size increased up to 40 individuals,the RP value of the six germplasms represented more than 90% genetic diversity (Table 4).

    Fig.2 Polymorphism Information Content of the six accessions with different sampling sizes under random strategyNote:(a) ‘ARCHER’;(b) ‘BOJA’;(c) ‘CUF101’;(d) ‘Maverick’;(e) ‘Ranger’;(f) ‘Zhongmu No.1’

    Table 4 The total number of bands (TB) and the Reserve Percentage (RP) with different sampling sizes (n) under random strategy in each variety

    Table 5 The Number of Effective Alleles (Ne) and the Percentage of Genetic diversity capture (GC) with different sampling sizes (n) under random strategy in each accession

    Table 6 The Shannon information index (I) and the Percentage of Genetic diversity capture (GC) with different sampling sizes (n) under random strategy in each variety

    Table 7 The Expected Heterozygosity (He) and the Percentage of Genetic diversity capture (GC) with different sampling sizes (n) under random strategy in each variety

    2.3 Cluster and Population Structure Analysis

    To investigate the relationships between the different sampling levels,the software of Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) and STRUCTURE 2.3.4 was used in this study. The cluster analysis carried out by the UPGMA method based on Jaccard’s genetic similarity,using arithmetic averages cluster analysis,showed that the sampling level of 40 individuals was consistent with that of 100 individuals,where 240 (Fig.3a) and 600 genotypes (Fig.3b) from six varieties were clustered into three major clusters (A-C). Cluster A was further divided into four subgroups. Among the six varieties of alfalfa,‘Archer’,‘BOJA’,‘Maverick’,and ‘Zhongmu No.1’ were assigned to Cluster A. Cluster B included one variety of Ranger,and the remaining variety,‘CUF101’,was assigned to cluster C (Fig.3).

    Furthermore,to verify the feasibility of the proposed random sampling results,the genetic structure of the six populations was analyzed using STRUCTURE software based on maximum likelihood and delta K (DK) values for each k,calculated by STRUCTURE HARVESTER according to the DK method of Evanno et al. for 20 simulations[35-36]. The result showed that 240 samples could be divided into three main clusters,which indicated that all 6 varieties were divided into three subpopulations,corresponding to Cluster A,B and C with a few admixed lines,which was consistent with clustering based on genetic distance (Fig.4). Meanwhile,the sampling level of 40 individuals was consistent with that of 100 individuals (Fig.4).

    Fig.3 The Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) dendrogram of alfalfa based on Jaccard’s genetic similarityNote:(a) 240 individuals from six germplasms;(b) 600 individuals from six germplasms

    Fig.4 STRUCTURE analysis of the genetic structure of the six alfalfa varietiesNote:Each structure was described by using two graphics of the process to detect the optimum K value. One on the left side was the mean LnP(K) over 20 runs for each K value (1~10),another on the right side was the maximum delta K values used to determine the uppermost level of structure for K ranging from 2 to 9. (a) The genetic structure of 40 individuals for each of the six varieties as inferred by STRUCTURE with the SCoT markers data set;(b) The genetic structure of 100 individuals for each of the six varieties as inferred by STRUCTURE with the SCoT markers data set

    3 DISCUSSION

    In recent years,DNA-based molecular markers have developed rapidly,and have become a versatile tool in various fields like genetic engineering,plant breeding,and genetic diversity[38]. The SCoT marker system in the present investigation has also been used previously as an effective method of assessing genetic diversity in various plant species. ForE.sibiricusgenetic diversity analysis by using SCoT markers,10.8 bands per primer were generated,89.0% of which were polymorphic[18];Five SCoT markers generated 122 products,what in average gave 24.4 bands per primer. Moreover,the Percentage of Polymorphic Bands (PPB) of the primers were all 100%[27]. Similar observations have also been found in our study,six SCoT primers were used to generate 13.3 bands per primer,and a 100% PPB was obtained across 6 varieties of alfalfa (Table 2);The PPB values (100%) was higher than the previous studies of ISSR variation (PPB=78%)[39],RAPD variation (PPB=82.69%)[40],IRAP variation (PPB=79.73%)[12],and SRAP variation (PPB=49.22%)[41]. Additionally,SCoT markers were applied to alfalfa because of several advantages to other marker assays:lower cost than AFLP,easier development of species-specific primers than SSR,and higher reproducibility than RAPD[42-43]. The results of this study indicated that SCoT markers have enough power to detect the genetic structure and diversity of alfalfa. Meanwhile,the primers showed polymorphisms among six alfalfa varieties,which indicated that this type of molecular marker can distinguish six alfalfa varieties well.

    The sample size is an important factor to consider for a reliable investigation of the diversity and differentiation of different plant species. Zhu et al. studied the population sampling strategy ofGlycinesoja,and found that the level of genetic diversity represented 95% of the population when the sample size reached 27 by using He and I like the response criteria. However,when TB was used as the evaluation indicator,the sample size needed to be increased to 52 to achieve 95% of the population’s genetic diversity[44]. In microsatellite studies that assess the genetic diversity ofMelospizamelodia,Pruett and Winker recommend that at samples of less than 40,the number of bands per locus is a poor measure of diversity[45]. These previous researches indicated that there are significant differences in genetic information among different species and the corresponding sample sizes. However,due to its cross-pollination and autotetraploid,the genome structure of alfalfa is very complicated[7,46]. In addition,alfalfa belongs to a species complex (M.sativaspecies complex) that includes diploid and tetraploid interfertile subspecies[6,47],and there is extensive gene flow between these subspecies[48]. Therefore,sampling strategies for self-pollinated and diploid plants,such asG.sojaandViciasativa,cannot provide a reference for alfalfa.

    In the current study,we explored the sampling strategy of alfalfa using SCOT markers,and the relationship between sample size and genetic diversity was studied. To our knowledge,this is the first survey on the genetic variability of cultivated tetraploid alfalfa with different sample sizes based on SCoT analysis. Our results showed that the increase in genetic diversity was strongly correlated with an increase in the number of randomly collected samples when TB and the RP values were used as the criterion to estimate the genetic diversity of the six alfalfa populations. As indicated in Table 4,90% of the genetic variation of the germplasms can be achieved by sampling 40 individuals because the rare bands (gene frequencies lower than 5%) accounted for about 13.51%~23.22% of the total bands in each of the varieties. Furthermore,95% of genetic variation of germplasms could be attained if the number of samples increased to 70 individuals. The optimal number of samples in a population should cover more than 95% of the bands with a gene frequency greater than 5%[44]. Therefore,a sample size of 30~40 genotypes could represent 95% of the genetic diversity of all six alfalfa varieties according to the values of I and He.

    Accurate genetic characteristics of alfalfa cultivars are necessary for plant breeders to distinguish between two cultivars,even closely related ones. Firstly,the results of UPGMA cluster analysis showed that the six alfalfa varieties could be clustered into three major groups. Cluster analysis with molecular data of 40 plant DNA samples divided the ecotypes into three groups that were consistent with 100 samples. Furthermore,this is also supported by the genetic clusters inferred from STRUCTURE analysis,wherein different varieties were grouped into three distinct clusters. The results showed that the sample size of 40 was sufficient to distinguish different alfalfa varieties.

    The accuracy of genetic diversity analysis increases with the samples size taken from the population. However,the cost of genetic analysis increases with the increase in the number of samples. Large scale experiments,cultivar identification in outcrossing heterogeneous species is crucial if a lower labor cost is the target. Based on our results,we can conclude that different sample sizes represent different genetic diversity,40 individual DNA samples is an adequate number to represent most of the genetic diversity within a population,and to differentiate various alfalfa populations. Although the sampling strategy in the present study is based on alfalfa,these results can also be recommended for diversity studies of other tetraploid plant,such as potato,strawberry,and sugarcane.

    4 CONCLUSIONS

    In summary,SCoT markers in the present study proved useful in evaluating the relationship among different alfalfa cultivars,which showed a high level of polymorphism. At different sample sizes,the genetic variation and genetic relationships among six populations of alfalfa were efficiently determined using SCoT markers. A sample size of 40 individuals can cover more than 95% of the variation of a sample of 100 individuals based on the data provided. Besides,the among population distinctiveness is more evident for the two varieties with opposite fall dormancy (Ranger in cluster B and CUF 101 in cluster C) and less clear cut in cluster A grouping varieties with intermediate fall dormancy coming from different geographical origin.

    插阴视频在线观看视频| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| h视频一区二区三区| 欧美人与善性xxx| 免费av不卡在线播放| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 久久久久网色| 伦理电影免费视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久久久国产网址| 高清毛片免费看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 一区在线观看完整版| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 欧美性感艳星| 少妇人妻 视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 亚洲国产色片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| freevideosex欧美| 亚洲精品一二三| 成人二区视频| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 久久99一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久久成人| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 日本wwww免费看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 久久av网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 一区二区av电影网| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| videosex国产| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲图色成人| 秋霞在线观看毛片| av卡一久久| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 亚洲精品视频女| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产高清三级在线| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 多毛熟女@视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 观看av在线不卡| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 欧美97在线视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 婷婷成人精品国产| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 少妇的逼好多水| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 久久热精品热| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 久久久久国产网址| 熟女av电影| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 成年av动漫网址| 婷婷成人精品国产| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 美女主播在线视频| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 久久av网站| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲成人手机| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 在线观看三级黄色| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲四区av| videossex国产| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 久久99一区二区三区| videosex国产| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 久久免费观看电影| 久久99一区二区三区| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲性久久影院| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 一级毛片我不卡| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 久久久久国产网址| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 大香蕉久久网| 色94色欧美一区二区| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 熟女电影av网| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久99一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 少妇高潮的动态图| 伦理电影大哥的女人| videosex国产| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| .国产精品久久| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 男女免费视频国产| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 18在线观看网站| 日本与韩国留学比较| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 草草在线视频免费看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| xxx大片免费视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 九色成人免费人妻av| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 久久久久久久精品精品| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| av电影中文网址| 在现免费观看毛片| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 午夜免费观看性视频| 人妻一区二区av| 黄色一级大片看看| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 免费少妇av软件| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 老司机影院毛片| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 午夜福利视频精品| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 七月丁香在线播放| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| a级毛色黄片| 日本欧美视频一区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲综合色网址| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 18在线观看网站| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 99热全是精品| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 日本欧美视频一区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产在视频线精品| 91精品国产九色| 久热这里只有精品99| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 精品一区在线观看国产| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产成人一区二区在线| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 日日撸夜夜添| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 久久人人爽人人片av| 欧美97在线视频| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | av播播在线观看一区| 美女主播在线视频| 色吧在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 少妇的逼好多水| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲综合色网址| 9色porny在线观看| 性色avwww在线观看| 婷婷成人精品国产| tube8黄色片| av视频免费观看在线观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 少妇人妻 视频| 有码 亚洲区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 在线播放无遮挡| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| av有码第一页| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| av福利片在线| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 丝袜美足系列| 久久精品夜色国产| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲av男天堂| 性色avwww在线观看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久精品夜色国产| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 中文天堂在线官网| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 人妻一区二区av| 在线天堂最新版资源| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产精品成人在线| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 成人免费观看视频高清| 精品国产一区二区久久| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 人妻一区二区av| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 大码成人一级视频| 久久午夜福利片| 久久久久久久国产电影| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 成人综合一区亚洲| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 美女国产视频在线观看| av在线播放精品| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 91久久精品电影网| 97超视频在线观看视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 欧美3d第一页| 免费av不卡在线播放| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 亚洲图色成人| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 日本av免费视频播放| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 制服诱惑二区| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 久久99一区二区三区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 久久久精品94久久精品| 99九九在线精品视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 三级国产精品片| kizo精华| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产视频内射| 国产毛片在线视频| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| freevideosex欧美| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 亚洲av福利一区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 国产 精品1| 考比视频在线观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 色哟哟·www| 丝袜美足系列| 老熟女久久久| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 免费观看性生交大片5| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 日韩av免费高清视频| 五月天丁香电影| 久久婷婷青草| 中文天堂在线官网| 色哟哟·www| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 一个人免费看片子| 免费观看在线日韩| 大码成人一级视频| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 多毛熟女@视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 日韩中字成人| 嫩草影院入口| 国产高清三级在线| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美3d第一页| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 99热网站在线观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 日韩视频在线欧美| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 内地一区二区视频在线| av.在线天堂| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲成色77777| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 一级黄片播放器| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 人人澡人人妻人| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 中国三级夫妇交换| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 天堂8中文在线网| 18+在线观看网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 日韩成人伦理影院| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 97超视频在线观看视频| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 三级国产精品片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 国产一级毛片在线| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 精品久久久久久电影网| 91精品国产九色| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产极品天堂在线| 婷婷色综合www| 国产探花极品一区二区|