• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effect of single-legged coil on 3D plasma boundary corrugation in EAST

    2021-10-31 08:15:08QibinLUAN欒其斌WendaZHANG張聞達YoujieDENG鄧有杰YanfeiWANG王燕飛LiLI李莉YueqiangLIU劉鉞強XiaojiangHUANG黃曉江andFangchuanZHONG鐘方川
    Plasma Science and Technology 2021年10期
    關(guān)鍵詞:李莉

    Qibin LUAN (欒其斌), Wenda ZHANG (張聞達), Youjie DENG (鄧有杰),Yanfei WANG (王燕飛), Li LI (李莉), Yueqiang LIU (劉鉞強),Xiaojiang HUANG (黃曉江) and Fangchuan ZHONG (鐘方川)

    1 Faculty of Electronic information and Electrical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, People’s Republic of China

    2 School of Physics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, People’s Republic of China

    3 College of Science, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, People’s Republic of China

    4 General Atomics, San Diego, CA 92186-5608, United States of America

    Abstract A single-legged coil behind the lower divertor and covering a 120°toroidal angle is utilized in a recent EAST discharge, for the purpose of increasing the wetted area of the divertor surface by locally modifying the magnetic field near the X-point.The plasma response, in particular, the plasma boundary surface corrugation due to the single-legged coil current, is modeled by the updated MARS-F code, by computing the plasma displacement for all important toroidal harmonics (n=1, 2, 4 and 5) associated with the partial toroidal coverage by the coil.The plasma response produced by the single-legged coil is found to be non-local and is of the kinkpeeling type.For a reference EAST plasma with a lower single-null magnetic configuration,the plasma boundary corrugation near the X-point, produced by the upper single-legged coil, is about twice as large as that produced by the lower single-legged coil,despite the proximity of the latter to the X-point.

    Keywords: single-legged coil, plasma response, EAST

    1.Introduction

    High heat flux on the plasma-facing components, due to various plasma perturbations, is a challenging issue for modern tokamaks, especially for future fusion reactors [1].Increasing the wetted area of the divertor is a plausible way to enhance the ability of the divertor to endure high heat flux from the plasma region.

    A new type of divertor has recently been developed in EAST, which is referred to as the Fishtail divertor [2].This divertor concept consists of a Fishtail-coil and the conventional divertor in EAST, where the Fishtail-coil is a singlelegged coil installed behind the lower divertor.In recent EAST discharge, this Fishtail-coil (single-legged coil) only covers a 120° toroidal angle.The other part of the (closed)coil current circuit is located outside the device far away from the plasma.Since the Fishtail-coil is close to the divertor, it can produce a magnetic field, with moderate coil current comparable to the equilibrium magnetic field near the divertor region.In other words,the magnetic footprint on the divertor surface can be modified by the Fishtail-coil.In particular,it is expected that the wetted area on the divertor surface, due to heat flux, can be widened.This is the main purpose of installing the Fishtail-coil in EAST experiments.

    However, besides changes to the vacuum magnetic field near the divertor, the plasma boundary can also be modified by the single-legged coil current, manifested as the boundary surface corrugation due to the plasma displacement in the edge region.The latter is due to the plasma response to the magnetic field perturbation produced by the coil current.As shown in many previous experimental and theoretical studies[3–6], the plasma response plays an important role in controlling the edge-localized modes (ELMs) by resonant magnetic perturbations(RMPs).It is therefore of high interest to investigate how the EAST plasma will respond to the magnetic field produced by the single-legged coil current,assuming the maximal current level as designed for experiments.

    Previous work [5, 7–9] has shown that 3D plasma boundary corrugation is an important measure of the plasma response to the externally applied magnetic field perturbation.In this work, we compute the plasma boundary displacement due to the single-legged coil current, utilizing the MARS-F code[10].Due to partial coverage of the toroidal angle by the single-legged coil, field perturbations with multiple toroidal harmonics are generated, and the plasma response to the dominant toroidal harmonics needs to be modeled.Because of the special coil current arrangement for the single-legged coil(compared to the conventional ELM control coils), the coil model within MARS-F has to be updated first,which we will also describe in this work.

    The paper is organized as follows.Section 2 describes the plasma and coil models assumed in this study, including the adopted EAST equilibrium.Section 3 reports the modeling results of the plasma boundary corrugation due to the singlelegged coil as designed in EAST.Section 4 reports the modeling results, hypothetically assuming that the singlelegged coil were installed at the upper divertor.Section 5 summarizes the work.

    2.Models and formulation

    In this section, we introduce the single-legged coil design in EAST and explain the corresponding numerical model implemented in MARS-F.We start by describing the plasma equilibrium adopted in this study.

    2.1.Plasma equilibrium

    The equilibrium is reconstructed from the EAST discharge 52340 at 3450 ms, representing a reference plasma from the ELM control experiments [11].Note that no Fishtail divertor had been installed when this discharge was carried out.Radial profiles of the plasma safety factor and the equilibrium pressure are shown in figure 1, whereψPis the normalized equilibrium poloidal magnetic flux.The safety factor values at the magnetic axis and at the 95% poloidal flux are 0.933 and 5.059, respectively.

    2.2.Single-legged coil configuration

    As mentioned before,the single-legged coil in EAST includes a single coil located at (1.87 ?1.09 m) on the (R,Z) poloidal plane and just behind the lower divertor[2].The coil location is indicted in figure 2(a),where for reference,we also plot the upper and lower rows of the ELM control coils in EAST.

    The ELM control coils in EAST are composed of eight window-frame coils in each row,with each coil covering 37°along the toroidal angle.This single-legged coil is very different—it in fact consists of only a single coil (with single turn) in the poloidal cross-section (figure 2(a)).It extends to 120° along the toroidal angle.The circuit is closed by wires that are installed farther away from the plasma.Therefore,these additional wire segments do not provide a significant contribution to the vacuum field perturbation near the plasma.

    The peculiar geometry of the single-legged coil generates multiple toroidal harmonics for the given coil current, as shown in figure 2(b).Besides then=0 component, which contributes to the equilibrium field, the main sidebands are the toroidal mode harmonics ofn=1, 2, 4 and 5.The toroidal spectrum of the coil current is calculated using the following formula:

    whereH(φ) is the Heaviside function equal to 1 for 0≤φ≤2π/ 3,and 0 elsewhere.The main non-axisymmetric sidebands are also documented in table 1.The actual current flowing in the single-legged coil is fixed at the maximal level of 5 kAt(single turn).Note that then=3k(k=1,2, 3, …) components of the coil current vanish due to the designed toroidal coverage(120°)of the single-legged coil,as is also evident from equation (1).Note also that the toroidal Fourier components of the coil current,I,ncoilare generally complex numbers.The phase of the complex number cannot be ignored when computing the total plasma response.

    Table 1.Dominant non-axisymmetric toroidal spectrum of thesingle-legged coil current.Shown are the coil current amplitude for each nth toroidal component, current amplitude ratio in percentage and current ratio including the phase.The actual current flowing in the single-legged coil is fixed at 5 kAt.

    In this work, we focus on modeling the plasma response and resulting boundary corrugation to the non-axisymmetric vacuum magnetic field components produced by the singlelegged coil.A DC current is assumed in the modeling,although AC current has been applied in experiments.In terms of the plasma response, the main AC effect is the reduction of the actual field reaching the plasma, due to shielding by various conducting structures surrounding the coil.Some of the conducting structures (e.g.the passive stabilizing plate) are of 3D geometry and cannot be properly modeled by MARS-F.However, this is not an issue with the DC single-legged coil current.

    We model the linear plasma response to the single-legged coil current, where the linear superposition principle applies.This means that we will compute the plasma response to each of the toroidal Fourier harmonics of the coil current with MARS-F, then sum all the response fields together to obtain the total field.

    2.3.MARS-F formulation and single-legged coil model

    In this work,we utilize the MARS-F code[10]to compute the linear plasma response to the single-legged coil.In the plasma region, MARS-F solves the linearized single fluid, resistive and full magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equations in general toroidal geometry.For the response problem, the main equations read as follows:

    where the variablesξ,v, j,b andpare the plasma displacement, perturbed velocity, current, magnetic field and pressure,respectively.ρ,B,J,Pand Ω denote the equilibrium density, magnetic field, current, pressure and angular frequency of the toroidal rotation, respectively.Ris the plasma major radius,φ?the unit vector along the toroidal angle andnthe toroidal harmonic number.

    The single-legged coil current, as a source term, enters into the MHD equation via Ampere’s law ?× b =jRMP.The previous MARS-F implementation always assumes that the coil current flows in a closed circuit.In other words,there are always two parallel legs of the coil along the toroidal/poloidal angle, where currents flow in opposite directions.However, the single-legged coil has only one leg along the toroidal angle for the current-carrying segment that we model.Therefore, we need to update the code in order to accommodate the one-leg geometry.

    To model the conventional window-frame ELM control coils, MARS-F assumes the following distribution for the toroidal component of the coil current density along the poloidal angleχ,

    To model the single-legged coil,we only assume one leg with the coil current density represented by.The MARS-F code is updated to include this single-leg option.Obviously,the new implementation can also be used to recover the conventional window-frame coil, by assuming two sets of coils with opposite signs of current.This consistency check has been carried out using the upper set of ELM control coils shown in figure 2(a) as a test example.First, the perturbed magnetic field produced by the upper row is computed with standard MARS-F implementation.Next,two perturbed fields are computed with the new implementation, assuming the single-leg geometry and opposite coil currents.These two fields are then superposed and compared with that from the first step.The results are identical (figure 3), with or without the inclusion of the plasma response.Note that the amplitude of the coil current is assumed to be 1 kAt in this test,and the toroidal spectrum is chosen to ben=1–3.

    For example, figure 3(a) compares radial profiles of the amplitude of the poloidal Fourier harmonicsm=1–8 of then=1 radial field perturbation, between the two MARS-F implementations.Both the vacuum field(solid)and total field perturbation are compared together with the resistive plasma response(dashed).The corresponding curves overlap between the two implementations.The amplitude of the resonant harmonics is extracted from figure 3(a) and plotted in

    figure 3(b)forn=1 RMP.The results again overlap between the two implementations.Similar tests have also been performed forn=2 and 3 RMP, with good agreement, as reported in figures 3(c) and (d), respectively.

    3.Single-legged coil-induced plasma boundary corrugation

    We compute the plasma response to the single-legged coil,with the coil current model described in the previous section.We focus on the plasma boundary corrugation,i.e.the normal displacement of the plasma boundary surface as one of the key indicators of the plasma response.This choice is motivated by the following considerations.

    First, according to previous studies [5–7, 12, 13], the normal displacement of the plasma boundary near the X-point(for divertor plasmas),ξxpt,together with the resonant radial magnetic field perturbation near the plasma edge,,serves as important figures of merit for predicting ELM control by RMPs in tokamak experiments.These two figures of merit,which often predict similar optimal ELM control coil configurations, have been successfully applied to a range of ELM control (either mitigation or suppression) experiments including MAST [12], ASDEX Upgrade [6, 7], EAST [14],DIII-D[15,16]and HL-2A[17].The same criteria have also recently been applied to ELM control optimization in DEMO[18] and ITER [8, 9].

    Second, partial toroidal coverage of the single-legged coil implies the co-existence of several toroidal harmonics of comparable amplitude (figure 2(b)).The radial locations of resonant radial magnetic perturbations(near the plasma edge)are obviously different for differentn, making it difficult to employ thecriterion.The X-point displacement criterionξxpt,on the other hand, is defined for the plasma boundary surface (which is independent of the toroidal mode number)and can thus be easily superposed for RMP fields with multiple toroidal harmonics.This superposition is important in order to investigate the plasma response to the single-legged coil with partial toroidal coverage.

    We start by reporting the MARS-F computed plasma response for each individual-nRMP field produced by the single-legged coil current (at 5 kAt).Figure 4 shows results for then=1 component.For comparison, we consider here both figures of merit mentioned before.Figures 4(a) and (b)plot the radial distribution of the poloidal Fourier harmonics of the resonant radial magnetic field, for both then= 1 vacuum field and the totaln=1 field including the plasma response.Compared to the vacuum field, a strong screening of the resonant field perturbation occurs, in both the plasma core and edge regions.Figure 4(c) plots the normal displacement amplitude of the plasma surface along the geometric poloidal angle.The X-point is located at ?103°.We are mostly interested in the local maximum of the plasma surface displacement near the X-point, which is about 1.07 mm in our case.The overall structure of the plasma displacement, including that inside the plasma, is shown in figure 4(d).An interesting observation is that large plasma displacement occurs near both the top and bottom of the plasma(as also confirmed by figure 4(c)),despite the fact that the single-legged coil is located only near the lower divertor.This means that the plasma response is not a local phenomenon.The computed displacement is strongest near the plasma edge, indicating a peeling-like response.

    Figure 1.Radial profiles of (a) the safety factor and (b) the equilibrium pressure normalized by /μ 0,for the EAST discharge 52340 at 3450 ms.Here,ψp is the normalized equilibrium poloidal magnetic flux.

    Figure 2.(a)Poloidal cross-section of the plasma boundary(black curve),the ELM control coils(blue squares)and the single-legged coil(red circle).(b) Toroidal spectrum of the single-legged coil current, normalized by the actual current flowing in the coil.

    Figure 3.Comparison of the resonant radial magnetic field perturbation between the standard and new implementations of MARS-F for the coil current.Both the vacuum field and total field perturbation are compared together with the plasma response: (a) radial profiles of the m=1–8 poloidal Fourier harmonics of the n=1 radial field perturbation, (b)–(d) amplitude of the pitch resonant radial magnetic field components at the corresponding rational surface locations for the n=1,2,3 perturbation,respectively.The upper row of the ELM control coils in EAST is considered, with a coil current of 1 kAt.Vertical dashed lines in (a) indicate the radial location of the n=1 rational surfaces.

    Figure 4.MARS-F computed plasma response to the n=1 single-legged coil current.(a) Radial distribution of the poloidal Fourier harmonics of the resonant radial magnetic field perturbation,with the vacuum field(in blue)being compared to the total field perturbation(in red)including the plasma response,(b)amplitude of the resonant radial magnetic field components at the corresponding rational surfaces,for the vacuum field(in blue)and the total field(in red),respectively,(c)amplitude of the normal displacement of the plasma boundary surface along the geometric poloidal angle, (d) amplitude of the normal displacement at the poloidal cross-section of the plasma.Vertical dashed l ines in(a)indicate the radial location of the n=1 rational surfaces.X-point corresponds to the poloidal angle of ?103°in(c).Single-leggedcoil current amplitude for n=1 harmonic? is assumed to be 5 kAt.

    Figure 5.MARS-F computed plasma response to the (a)–(b) n=2, (c)–(d) n=4 and (e)–(f) n=5 components of the single-legged coil current.Amplitude of the normal displacement of the plasma boundary surface along the geometric poloidal angle (left panels) and normal displacement at the poloidal cross-section(right panels).X-point corresponds to the poloidal angle of ?103°in the left panels.Single-legged coil current amplitude for each harmonic is assumed to be 5 kAt.

    Figure 6.Comparison of the overall plasma boundary corrugation amplitude along both the poloidal and toroidal angles,produced by(a)the single-legged coil and(b)the lower row of ELM control coils.Here,the amplitude of the coil current is fixed at 5 kAt in both(a)and(b),and the same set of weighting factors, Cn from equation (10), are assumed for the toroidal sidebands of the single-legged coil and the ELM control coils.

    Figure 7.MARS-F computed plasma response to the(a)–(b)n=1,(c)–(d)n=2,(e)–(f)n=4 and(g)–(h)n=5 components of the upper single-legged coil current.Amplitude of the normal displacement of the plasma boundary surface along the geometric poloidal angle (left panels) and the normal displacement at the poloidal cross-section (right panels) are plotted.X-point corresponds to the poloidal angle of?103° in the left panels.Single-legged coil current amplitude for each harmonic is assumed to be 5 kAt.

    Figure 8.Computed plasma boundary corrugation along both the poloidal and toroidal angles, assuming the upper single-legged coil with 5 kAt current.The n=1, 2, 4, 5 toroidal harmonics of the plasma response are superposed.

    The normal displacement amplitude forn=2, 4 and 5 single-legged coil currents is summarized in figure 5.The corresponding coil current amplitude is again fixed at 5 kAt,in order to compare it with the results for then=1 coil current.The MARS-F computed local maxima of the plasma surface displacement near the X-point are 0.757, 0.099 and 0.022 mm, with then=2, 3 and 5 single-legged coil currents,respectively.It is evident that,with the same amplitude of the coil current for each toroidal harmonic, the plasma response to then=1 (5) coil configuration produces the largest (smallest) X-point displacement.

    Several other interesting observations can also be made from figure 5.First, a relatively large plasma displacement is generally computed near the top and bottom of the torus.This is despite the fact that the external field perturbation is produced by the single-legged coil current located only near the bottom (behind the lower divertor).This again confirms the non-local nature of the plasma response,for all the low-ncoil current components.

    Next, although the plasma surface displacement near the X-point,∣ξxpt∣,is weakest for then=5 coil current, the ratio ofξmid∣∣toξxpt∣∣is largest.Here,ξmid∣∣denotes the plasma surface displacement at the outboard mid-plane.This is a clear indication of the kink-like plasma response [12] to then=5 single-legged coil current.

    As mentioned before, the plasma response to each individual toroidal component of the single-legged coil current can be superposed, in order to construct the overall response to the ‘physical’ coil current that contains a range of toroidal spectra.In particular,the overall plasma boundary corrugation amplitude,which now varies along both poloidal and toroidal angles, can be obtained utilizing the coil current weighting factors documented in table 1

    whereCnis the corresponding (complex) weighting coefficient for eachn-component of the single-legged coil current.

    In order to better understand the efficiency of the singlelegged coil geometry (in terms of the generated plasma corrugation magnitude),we compare it with that produced by the lower row of the ELM control coils in EAST, but assuming the same coil current and same sideband distribution as that of the single-legged coil.The plasma displacements from different toroidal harmonics are superposed following equation (10), and compared between the single-legged and RMP coils in figure 6.Two interesting observations can be made here.First, the maximum displacement along the toroidal angle and near the X-point (at ?103° poloidal angle),∣ξxpt∣ ,is 0.35 mm due to the single-legged coil current(figure 6(a)).This value is about four times smaller than that(1.27 mm) produced by the lower row of the ELM control coils with the same current configuration.This difference is due to two factors: (i) the lower row of ELM control coils is closer to the plasma than the single-legged coil; (ii)the ELM control coils geometrically cover a finite poloidal angle due to their window-frame structure.

    Next, we find it interesting that despite being a singlelegged coil (with a single turn) located behind the lower divertor, the single-legged coil is capable of generating a plasma response that is global, i.e.not just located near the X-point.Large displacement is also triggered near the top of the plasma, which is far from the single-legged coil location.This global response effect is similar to that produced by the ELM control coils.In fact, maximum displacement occurs near the top of the plasma at the poloidal angle of 106°,with both types of coil geometry.The corresponding values are 0.42 mm with the single-legged coil and 1.5 mm with the ELM control coils.

    4.Effect of upper single-legged coil on plasma boundary corrugation

    Due to engineering constraints, the single-legged coil is applied for an upper single-null magnetic configuration in EAST experiments,in contrast to the lower single-null plasma that we adopt in this study.Therefore, to better simulate the experimental situation, we assume that the single-legged coil is located near the upper top,at(R=1.87 m,Z=1.09 m)in the MARS-F model,while keeping the same lower single-null plasma equilibrium.In what follows,we investigate the effect of this new single-legged coil configuration on the plasma response.

    We again start by comparing the plasma response level among various toroidal sidebands of the single-legged coil current, assuming the same current of 5 kAt for eachn-harmonic.The computed normal displacements for then=1,2,4, 5 components, plotted in figure 7, show that the local maxima of the plasma surface corrugation near the X-point are 2.022, 0.831, 0.11 and 0.024 mm, respectively, i.e.sharply decreasing with increasingn-number.

    Compared to the results reported in section 3, we find that the lower and upper single-legged coils produce a similar plasma response to each toroidal harmonic.The strongest plasma surface distortion generally occurs near the top and bottom of the torus.The plasma displacement near the(lower single-null) X-point, produced by the upper single-legged coil,is slightly larger than that produced by the lower singlelegged coil.This again indicates the non-local nature of the plasma response.Despite a generally small displacement, the displacement ratio of the outboard mid-plane to the X-point,∣ξmid∣ /∣ξxpt∣,is largest for then=5 toroidal component.

    Figure 8 plots the computed plasma boundary corrugation along the poloidal and toroidal angles, produced by the upper single-legged coil, after superposition of then=1, 2,4, 5 contributions according to equation (10).Compared to the lower single-legged coil (figure 6(a)), the upper singlelegged coil produces about double (0.651 mm versus 0.344 mm) the plasma displacement near the X-point,assuming the same (lower single-null) plasma and same coil current of 5 kAt.Note that this is despite the much larger distance between the upper single-legged coil and the X-point.However,the X-point displacement with both singlelegged coils is still lower than that produced by the lower row of ELM control coils (figure 6(b)) with the same coil current configuration.

    5.Conclusion and discussion

    The Fishtail divertor, composed of a single-legged coil and the lower divertor, is designed in EAST for the purpose of modifying the local magnetic field structure near the X-point.However, our modeling shows that the single-legged coil is capable of triggering a more global plasma response.

    The single-legged coil is modeled as a single-current filament in the updated MARS-F code, covering a 120° toroidal angle.This finite toroidal coverage is realized by considering a range of important toroidal sidebandsn=1, 2, 4,5.Modeling result shows that the plasma response amplitude,in terms of the boundary corrugation, drops sharply with increasing toroidal mode number, assuming the same coil current.On the other hand, based on the computed response for each individual toroidal harmonic, the total plasma response to the single-legged coil current can be reconstructed via linear superposition with proper weighting factors, producing plasma surface corrugation that varies along both poloidal and toroidal angles.

    The total response shows that the single-legged coil triggers large plasma displacement near the top and bottom of the torus.This holds, independent of whether the single-legged coil is placed near the top or bottom of the plasma,for the same lower single-null equilibrium.Thus, the modeling results show that (i) the plasma response to the single-legged coil current is non-local and (ii) the total response is predominantly of the kink-peeling type.

    Another interesting result is that we find that for a discharge with the lower single-null magnetic configuration, the upper single-legged coil produces about double the X-point displacement compared to the lower single-legged coil,despite the fact that the latter is much closer to the X-point.There seems to be a certain correlation between the X-point displacement and the magnetic footprint on the divertor surface[19,20].The last result here suggests that a single-legged coil, placed opposite to the X-point on the poloidal plane (as in the EAST experiment),may be more effective in producing a wider magnetic footprint.Direct modeling of the magnetic footprint due to the single-legged coil,based on the MARS-F computed plasma response field, is the next step in our investigation.

    Acknowledgments

    This work is funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2232021G-10), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.12075053, 11505021 and 11975068) and the National Key R&D Program of China(Nos.2017YFE030052, 2017YFE0301100, 2017YFE0301104,2017YFE0300500 and 2017YFE0300501).The work was also supported by the U.S.DoE Office of Science (Nos.DEFG02–95ER54309 and DEFC02–04ER54698).This paper was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government.Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof,nor any of their employees,makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,completeness,or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.Reference herein to any specific commercial product,process,or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise,does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,recommendation or favouring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily represent or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission.

    猜你喜歡
    李莉
    Impact renaming non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to metabolic associated fatty liver disease in prevalence, characteristics and risk factors
    THE REGULARITY CRITERIA OF WEAK SOLUTIONS TO 3D AXISYMMETRIC INCOMPRESSIBLE BOUSSINESQ EQUATIONS?
    李莉作品(一)
    大眾文藝(2021年17期)2021-09-29 03:03:20
    李莉作品(二)
    大眾文藝(2021年17期)2021-09-29 03:03:20
    Dynamic and inner-dressing control of four-wave mixing in periodically-driven atomic system?
    故鄉(xiāng)一把土
    當代音樂(2019年4期)2019-06-11 14:54:47
    裝錯芯片的機器人
    Non-Markovianity Measure Based on Brukner–Zeilinger Invariant Information for Unital Quantum Dynamical Maps?
    樹葉上的優(yōu)點
    Numerical simulation of viscous flow past an oscillating square cylinder using a CIP-based model*
    赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 免费看光身美女| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 免费av观看视频| av在线老鸭窝| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 一边亲一边摸免费视频| freevideosex欧美| 在线天堂最新版资源| 三级经典国产精品| 国产成人精品福利久久| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 精品久久久噜噜| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 超碰97精品在线观看| 韩国av在线不卡| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 简卡轻食公司| 国产美女午夜福利| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 性色av一级| a级毛色黄片| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 香蕉精品网在线| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 亚洲在线观看片| 精品久久久噜噜| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| av在线app专区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 久久影院123| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲av一区综合| 欧美成人a在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 一级毛片 在线播放| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| av一本久久久久| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产av国产精品国产| 欧美激情在线99| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 久久影院123| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 日日撸夜夜添| 高清av免费在线| 欧美另类一区| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 久久97久久精品| 一级毛片我不卡| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | av播播在线观看一区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲综合色惰| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产综合精华液| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 毛片女人毛片| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 午夜福利在线在线| 国产精品成人在线| 国产精品成人在线| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产亚洲最大av| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 欧美性感艳星| 五月天丁香电影| 久热久热在线精品观看| av在线亚洲专区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 深夜a级毛片| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产毛片在线视频| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 欧美区成人在线视频| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 少妇丰满av| 国产精品三级大全| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 精品久久久精品久久久| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| av在线老鸭窝| 搞女人的毛片| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 少妇丰满av| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 午夜视频国产福利| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 99久久人妻综合| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 日韩伦理黄色片| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| www.av在线官网国产| 只有这里有精品99| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 成年免费大片在线观看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 综合色av麻豆| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 青春草国产在线视频| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 老司机影院成人| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 免费av毛片视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 丝袜脚勾引网站| av在线app专区| 黄色配什么色好看| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 超碰97精品在线观看| 免费av观看视频| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 777米奇影视久久| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 99久久人妻综合| 国产成人精品福利久久| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 精品一区二区免费观看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 成人二区视频| 欧美日本视频| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 在线播放无遮挡| 免费看a级黄色片| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 婷婷色综合www| 内地一区二区视频在线| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 性色av一级| 97超碰精品成人国产| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产成人精品婷婷| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 日韩电影二区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 高清av免费在线| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 99热这里只有是精品50| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 91久久精品电影网| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 九草在线视频观看| 视频区图区小说| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 日韩中字成人| 国产av国产精品国产| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 久热久热在线精品观看| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产毛片在线视频| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 舔av片在线| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产色婷婷99| av.在线天堂| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产淫语在线视频| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 欧美另类一区| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日本午夜av视频| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 秋霞伦理黄片| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 18禁在线播放成人免费| a级毛色黄片| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 99热这里只有是精品50| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 国产精品一二三区在线看| 欧美人与善性xxx| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 国产男人的电影天堂91| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲最大成人中文| av免费在线看不卡| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 免费看不卡的av| 黄片wwwwww| 国产亚洲最大av| 久热久热在线精品观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 老女人水多毛片| 男女边摸边吃奶| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 老司机影院毛片| 国产精品三级大全| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 久久久精品94久久精品| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 赤兔流量卡办理| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 人妻系列 视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| videos熟女内射| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲精品一二三| 成人国产av品久久久| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 极品教师在线视频| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 七月丁香在线播放| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 三级经典国产精品| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 免费看不卡的av| 99热网站在线观看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 久久精品国产自在天天线| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 色综合色国产| 夫妻午夜视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 一本一本综合久久| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 一级av片app| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 美女主播在线视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| av线在线观看网站| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产精品一及| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 观看免费一级毛片| 久久99精品国语久久久| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 99热全是精品| 亚洲成人av在线免费| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 在线观看三级黄色| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| av在线老鸭窝| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲av一区综合| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 精品久久久噜噜| 欧美bdsm另类| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 久久久久网色| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 欧美激情在线99| 熟女av电影| 欧美另类一区| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 深夜a级毛片| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| freevideosex欧美| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| av在线亚洲专区| av一本久久久久| av专区在线播放| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 中文字幕制服av| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 51国产日韩欧美| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 一级毛片我不卡| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲精品视频女| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 日本黄大片高清| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 亚洲在久久综合| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产成人a区在线观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| 香蕉精品网在线| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 精品久久久精品久久久| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 一级a做视频免费观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 少妇熟女欧美另类| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲最大成人av| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产高清三级在线| 日韩伦理黄色片| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 欧美bdsm另类| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 成年av动漫网址| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 人妻系列 视频| 只有这里有精品99| 国产视频内射| 亚洲精品视频女| 一级黄片播放器| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 色网站视频免费| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产成人freesex在线| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 18+在线观看网站| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 特级一级黄色大片| 久久久久久久精品精品| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲成色77777| 一级毛片我不卡| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 九九在线视频观看精品| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 直男gayav资源| 日本wwww免费看| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 五月天丁香电影| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 久久99精品国语久久久| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在|