[摘要] 目的 評(píng)價(jià)實(shí)時(shí)三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像技術(shù)用于冠心病合并二尖瓣反流的臨床價(jià)值。
方法 選擇我院2017年2月—2019年3月收治的110例冠心病病人作為冠心病組,根據(jù)相關(guān)影像學(xué)征象及相關(guān)診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)將該組病人再分為單純冠心病組與合并二尖瓣反流組,抽取同期在我院體檢的100例健康者作為對(duì)照組。比較3組受檢者超聲心動(dòng)圖、實(shí)時(shí)三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像左心房相關(guān)參數(shù)水平,以及實(shí)時(shí)三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像心肌應(yīng)變相關(guān)參數(shù)水平,采用雙變量Pearson相關(guān)性分析檢驗(yàn)冠心病合并二尖瓣反流病人左心房射血分?jǐn)?shù)(LAEF)與主要心肌應(yīng)變參數(shù)相關(guān)性。
結(jié)果 與對(duì)照組比較,合并二尖瓣反流組舒張?jiān)缙诙獍暄鞣逅俣龋‥)/舒張?jiān)缙诙獍戥h(huán)運(yùn)動(dòng)峰速度(Em)、左心房?jī)?nèi)徑(LAD)升高,Em/舒張晚期二尖瓣環(huán)運(yùn)動(dòng)峰速度(Am)、LAEF、左心室射血分?jǐn)?shù)(LVEF)、左心房被動(dòng)射血分?jǐn)?shù)(LApEF)降低,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=37.686~293.320,t=12.203~34.152,P<0.01)。與單純冠心病組比較,合并二尖瓣反流組左心房主動(dòng)收縮前容積(LAVp)、LAD、左心房最小容積(LAVmin)升高,LVEF、Em/Am、LApEF降低,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=30.159~293.320,t=3.994~12.948,P<0.05)。單純冠心病組、合并二尖瓣反流組左心房縱向及圓周應(yīng)變(GLS、GCS)較對(duì)照組降低,且單純冠心病組低于合并二尖瓣反流組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=123.095、450.012,t=12.405~42.356,P<0.01)。與對(duì)照組比較,單純冠心病組和合并二尖瓣反流組縱向、徑向、圓周達(dá)峰時(shí)間標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差(TLS-SD、TRS-SD、TCS-SD)升高,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=68.975~183.182,t=7.997~22.801,P<0.01)。冠心病合并二尖瓣反流病人的GLS、GCS與LAEF呈負(fù)相關(guān)(r=-0.612、-0.589,P<0.05),左心房徑向應(yīng)變(GRS)與LAEF呈正相關(guān)(r=0.835,P<0.05)。
結(jié)論 實(shí)時(shí)三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像技術(shù)能夠通過檢測(cè)冠心病合并二尖瓣反流病人左心房容積變化情況、計(jì)算其LVEF、追蹤其心肌運(yùn)動(dòng),對(duì)病人左心房心肌運(yùn)動(dòng)改變情況進(jìn)行準(zhǔn)確評(píng)價(jià),并可評(píng)估病人左心房功能,有重要的臨床應(yīng)用價(jià)值。
[關(guān)鍵詞] 冠心病;二尖瓣閉鎖不全;超聲檢查;實(shí)時(shí)三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像;心房功能,左
[中圖分類號(hào)] R543.3;R445.1
[文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)志碼] A
[文章編號(hào)] 2096-5532(2021)03-0393-05
doi:10.11712/jms.2096-5532.2021.57.109
[開放科學(xué)(資源服務(wù))標(biāo)識(shí)碼(OSID)]
[網(wǎng)絡(luò)出版] https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/37.1517.R.20210510.1625.015.html;2021-05-11 16:53:26
APPLICATION VALUE OF REAL-TIME THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPECKLE TRACKING IMAGING IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE AND MITRAL REGURGITATION
HUANG Ruili, TAN Weifeng, DONG Lingyun, WANG Na, MEI Shiyue
(Department of Acoustics, Zhumadian First People’s Hospital, Zhumadian 463000, China)
[ABSTRACT]Objective To investigate the clinical value of real-time three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging in coronary heart disease with mitral regurgitation.
Methods A total of 110 patients with coronary heart disease who were treated in our hospital from February 2017 to March 2019 were enrolled, and according to related imaging findings and diagnostic criteria, these patients were divided into coronary heart disease group and coronary heart disease+mitral regurgitation group. A total of 100 healthy individuals who underwent physical examination in our hospital during the same period of time were enrolled as control group. The three groups were compared in terms of echocardiogram, parameters of the left atrium on real-time three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging, and myocardial strain parameters on real-time three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging. A bivariate Pearson correlation analysis was used to investigate the correlation between left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF) and main myocar-
dial strain parameters in patients with coronary heart disease and mitral regurgitation.
Results Compared with the control group, the coronary heart disease+mitral regurgitation group had significant increases in early diastolic peak mitral flow velocity (E)/early diastolic mitral annular velocity (Em) and left atrium diameter (LAD) and significant reductions in Em/late diastolic mitral annular velocity (Am), LAEF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left atrial passive ejection fraction (LApEF) (F=37.686-293.320,t=12.203-34.152,Plt;0.01). Compared with the coronary heart disease group, the coronary heart disease+mitral regurgitation group had significant increases in left atrial volume before atrial contraction (LAVp), LAD, and minimum left atrial volume (LAVmin) and significant reductions in LVEF, Em/Am, and LApEF (F=30.159-293.320,t=3.994-12.948,Plt;0.05). Compared with the control group, the coronary heart di-sease group and the coronary heart disease+mitral regurgitation group had significant reductions in global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) of the left atrium, and the coronary heart disease group had significantly lower strains than the coronary heart disease+mitral regurgitation group (F=123.095,450.012;t=12.405-42.356;Plt;0.01). Compared with the control group, the coronary heart disease group and the coronary heart disease+mitral regurgitation group had significant increases in the standard deviations of longitudinal, radial, and circumferential peak time (TLS-SD, TRS-SD, and TCS-SD, respectively) (F=68.975-183.182,t=7.997-22.801,Plt;0.01). In the patients with coronary artery disease and mitral regurgitation, GLS and GCS were negatively correlated with LAEF (r=-0.612,-0.589;Plt;0.05), and global radial strain of the left atrium was positively correlated with LAEF (r=0.835,Plt;0.05).
Conclusion For patients with coronary artery disease and mitral regurgitation, real-time three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging can detect the change in left atrial volume, calculate LVEF, track myocardial motion, accurately evaluate the change in myocardial motion of the left atrium, and assess left atrial function. Therefore, it has an important clinical application value.
[KEY WORDS]coronary disease; mitral valve insufficiency; ultrasonography; real-time three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging; atrial function, left
二尖瓣反流是冠心病常見的并發(fā)癥[1]。一旦冠心病病人合并二尖瓣反流,且長(zhǎng)時(shí)間得不到合理處理,其左心容量負(fù)荷及壓力將明顯增加,導(dǎo)致左心房出現(xiàn)適應(yīng)性反應(yīng),左心房原發(fā)性擴(kuò)大后射血分?jǐn)?shù)升高[2]。而這種因二尖瓣反流引起的左心房功能變化將對(duì)左心室功能造成負(fù)面影響,使得心排血量降低,出現(xiàn)諸多臨床癥狀[3]。此外,左心房一旦發(fā)生心肌重塑將直接對(duì)心臟的舒張或收縮功能帶來影響,可引起卒中、心力衰竭甚至猝死[4]??梢姳M早為冠心病病人檢出二尖瓣反流并給予合理有效的治療,對(duì)改善病人預(yù)后極為關(guān)鍵。實(shí)時(shí)三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像技術(shù)是一種用于評(píng)價(jià)心臟房室腔功能與心肌運(yùn)動(dòng)功能的新技術(shù),該技術(shù)與傳統(tǒng)超聲技術(shù)比較,不存在角度依賴性,能夠更準(zhǔn)確地反映心肌功能變化情況,現(xiàn)已被廣泛用于左心室功能的評(píng)估[5]。三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像技術(shù)近年來被較多用于左心室功能變化的檢測(cè),但將其用于因冠狀動(dòng)脈病變引起的心肌缺血誘發(fā)的心臟左心室功能改變的評(píng)估相關(guān)研究并不多見。本研究旨在觀察實(shí)時(shí)三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像技術(shù)用于冠心病合并二尖瓣反流的臨床價(jià)值,現(xiàn)將結(jié)果報(bào)告如下。
1 對(duì)象與方法
1.1 研究對(duì)象
在征得我院醫(yī)學(xué)倫理委員會(huì)同意后,選擇我院2017年2月—2019年3月收治的110例冠心病病人作為冠心病組,其中男性60例,女性50例;年齡41~80歲,平均(60.47±12.14)歲;體質(zhì)量45~81 kg,平均(60.15±11.12)kg;受教育程度:初中及以下37例,高中及中專45例,大專及以上28例。參照相關(guān)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[6],按照有無二尖瓣反流發(fā)生將冠心病病人分為單純冠心病組(B組)與合并二尖瓣反流組(C組)。抽取同期在我院體檢的健康者100例作為對(duì)照組(A組),其中男性55例,女性45例;年齡40~80歲,平均(60.14±11.59)歲;體質(zhì)量46~82 kg,平均(61.01±12.01)kg;受教育程度:初中及以下34例,高中及中專41例,大專及以上25例。兩組性別、年齡、體質(zhì)量、受教育程度等一般資料比較,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。
1.2 入選標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
(1)納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):①冠心病組病人全部接受冠狀動(dòng)脈造影檢查,符合《2015年急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死診斷和治療指南》[7]中冠心病的診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn);②對(duì)照組均為健康體檢者,無合并疾病,均接受體格檢查、超聲心動(dòng)圖和心電圖等檢查,結(jié)合臨床病史證實(shí)身體無異常;③所有研究對(duì)象對(duì)本次研究的內(nèi)容均知情,并簽署知情同意書。(2)排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):①合并先天性心臟病、心肌病、高血壓等器質(zhì)性疾病者;②合并肝、腎等其他重要臟器功能不全者;③合并心理疾病、精神疾病等不能很好地配合研究者;④在參加本次研究的同時(shí)還參加其他類似研究者;⑤對(duì)照組中經(jīng)查體有異常者。
1.3 影像學(xué)檢查
所用超聲心動(dòng)圖診斷系統(tǒng)型號(hào)為Philips EPIQ 7C型,由荷蘭飛利浦公司提供,二維探頭為S5-1二維探頭,三維探頭為X5-1探頭,探頭頻率均為1~5 MHz。受檢者在檢查期間取左側(cè)臥位,保持呼吸平靜,首先通過二維探頭測(cè)定左心室舒張末期內(nèi)徑(LVEDd)、左心房?jī)?nèi)徑(LAD)、左心室收縮末期內(nèi)徑(LVEDs)等常規(guī)指標(biāo)。然后在心尖切面使用simpson法測(cè)定左心室射血分?jǐn)?shù)(LVEF),分別在心室舒張?jiān)缙凇⑼砥诮?jīng)二維探頭檢測(cè)二尖瓣血流峰速度(E、A)以及二尖瓣環(huán)運(yùn)動(dòng)峰速度(Em、Am)。將探頭切換至三維探頭,與心電圖連接,獲得清晰的心尖四腔切面二維圖像,啟動(dòng)全容積成像,使左心房心內(nèi)膜在取樣框內(nèi)完整顯示,固定探頭位置,叮囑病人屏住呼吸,采集連續(xù)的4個(gè)心動(dòng)周期圖像。Tomtec工作站脫機(jī),從數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)中獲取清晰的三維圖像,并調(diào)整3個(gè)平面上取樣線位置,用軟件對(duì)左心房?jī)?nèi)膜自動(dòng)掃描,手動(dòng)修正不同心動(dòng)周期時(shí)相內(nèi)膜,期間應(yīng)將肺靜脈排除,軟件自動(dòng)生成左心房容積(LAV),得到左心房縱向、徑向、圓周應(yīng)變(GLS、GRS、GCS)和達(dá)峰時(shí)間(TLS、TRS、TCS)。計(jì)算縱向、徑向、圓周達(dá)峰時(shí)間標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差(TLS-SD、TRS-SD、TCS-SD)。同時(shí)檢測(cè)并計(jì)算出心動(dòng)周期不同時(shí)相LAV,主要包括左心房最大容積(LAVmax,二尖瓣即將開放時(shí)左心房收縮末期的LAV)、左心房最小容積(LAVmin,二尖瓣即將關(guān)閉時(shí)測(cè)量得到的LAV)、左心房主動(dòng)收縮前容積(LAVp,心動(dòng)周期心電圖P波起始點(diǎn)時(shí)的LAV)。分別計(jì)算左心房不同時(shí)相的射血分?jǐn)?shù),包括左心房射血分?jǐn)?shù)(LAEF)、左心房被動(dòng)射血分?jǐn)?shù)(LApEF)和左心房主動(dòng)射血分?jǐn)?shù)(LAaEF)。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法
應(yīng)用SPSS 20.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件處理數(shù)據(jù)。計(jì)量資料以±s表示,多組比較采用單因素方差分析,相關(guān)性檢驗(yàn)采用Pearson線性相關(guān)性分析。P<0.05表示差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2 結(jié)" 果
2.1 二尖瓣反流檢出情況
本文110例冠心病病人中檢出二尖瓣反流72例(65.45%),單純冠心病病人38例(34.55%)。
2.2 各組常規(guī)超聲心動(dòng)圖和實(shí)時(shí)三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像相關(guān)參數(shù)比較
與對(duì)照組比較,合并二尖瓣反流組E/Em、LAD升高,Em/Am、LAEF、LVEF、LApEF降低,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=37.686~293.320,t=12.203~34.152,P<0.01)。與單純冠心病組比較,合并二尖瓣反流組LAVp、LAD、LAVmin升高,LVEF、Em/Am、LApEF降低,差異有顯著意義(F=30.159~293.320,t=3.994~12.948,P<0.05)。見表1。
2.3 各組三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像心肌應(yīng)變參數(shù)比較
單純冠心病組、合并二尖瓣反流組GLS、GCS較對(duì)照組降低,且單純冠心病組低于合并二尖瓣反流組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=123.095、450.012,t=12.405~42.356,P<0.01)。與對(duì)照組相比較,單純冠心病組和合并二尖瓣反流組TLS-SD、TRS-SD、TCS-SD升高,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(F=68.975~183.182,t=7.997~22.801,P<0.01)。見表2。
2.4 主要左心房心肌應(yīng)變指標(biāo)與LAEF的相關(guān)性分析
冠心病合并二尖瓣反流病人的GLS、GCS與LAEF呈負(fù)相關(guān)(r=-0.612、-0.589,P<0.05),GRS與LAEF呈正相關(guān)(r=0.835,P<0.05)。
3 討" 論
二尖瓣反流是冠心病常見并發(fā)癥之一,是心肌梗死后病死獨(dú)立高危因素,病人一旦合并二尖瓣反流常預(yù)示著預(yù)后不佳。冠心病合并二尖瓣反流機(jī)制復(fù)雜,二尖瓣病變由瓣環(huán)、瓣葉、乳頭肌和左心室共同參與[8]。心肌梗死后房室腔重構(gòu)會(huì)引起二尖瓣形態(tài)發(fā)生變化,這一變化是導(dǎo)致二尖瓣反流發(fā)生的關(guān)鍵機(jī)制[9]。重構(gòu)的發(fā)生導(dǎo)致心臟不同程度形態(tài)的改變,此時(shí)若采用二維超聲檢測(cè)左心房直徑及大小的準(zhǔn)確性將受到影響,而三維超聲心動(dòng)圖因?yàn)槟軌颢@得心臟腔室動(dòng)態(tài)容積數(shù)據(jù),故對(duì)房室腔容積的測(cè)量精確度以及用于評(píng)價(jià)左心房功能較二維超聲檢測(cè)更為理想[10-11]。
左心房具有管道、儲(chǔ)存、輔助泵等功能。其中儲(chǔ)存功能主要經(jīng)測(cè)量機(jī)體左心房總排空容積來計(jì)算LAEF獲得;管道功能以左心室舒張?jiān)缙诜戊o脈血液自左心房流入左心室來表現(xiàn),通過計(jì)算LAVmax與LAVp差值獲得,以LApEF表示;輔助泵功能體現(xiàn)為在心動(dòng)周期中左心室舒張末期將血液經(jīng)左心房向左心室泵入,通過計(jì)算LAVp與LAVmin差值獲得,以LAaEF表示[12]。這些功能均在左心房左心室充盈度調(diào)節(jié)及心臟正常排血量維持中起到關(guān)鍵作用。本研究結(jié)果顯示,單純冠心病組、合并二尖瓣反流組E/Em顯著高于對(duì)照組,LVEF、LAEF則顯著低于對(duì)照組,且合并二尖瓣反流組LAVmin較對(duì)照組明顯升高,提示冠心病合并二尖瓣反流病人左心房?jī)?chǔ)存功能、舒張功能及左心室收縮功能較正常人或單純冠心病病人明顯降低。有研究結(jié)果表明,E/Em能夠作為左心房整體舒張功能的標(biāo)志,LAEF和LAVmin可用于左心室舒張功能的評(píng)估[13-14]。由上述結(jié)果推測(cè),測(cè)量冠心病病人LAV變化情況與收縮期E/Em值能夠間接反映出病人左心室舒張功能的改變。本研究結(jié)果顯示,單純冠心病組、合并二尖瓣反流組病人LVEF均低于對(duì)照組,且以合各指標(biāo)3組間比較,F(xiàn)=6.696~326.958,P<0.01。單純冠心病組除E/A和LAaEF外的其他指標(biāo)與對(duì)照組比較,t=4.052~13.819,P<0.05;合并二尖瓣反流組各指標(biāo)與對(duì)照組比較,t=4.794~35.188,P<0.05;合并二尖瓣反流組各指標(biāo)與單純冠心病組比較,t=2.928~23.229,P<0.05。
各指標(biāo)3組間比較,F(xiàn)=68.975~450.012,P<0.01。單純冠心病組除GRS外的其他指標(biāo)與對(duì)照組比較,t=7.997~42.356,P<0.01;合并二尖瓣反流組各指標(biāo)與對(duì)照組比較,t=10.545~22.801,P<0.01;合并二尖瓣反流組各指標(biāo)與單純冠心病組比較,t=3.467~27.387,P<0.05。
并二尖瓣反流組水平最低,提示冠狀動(dòng)脈病變后心肌功能障礙導(dǎo)致心肌運(yùn)動(dòng)障礙,心肌運(yùn)動(dòng)被迫減弱,左心室收縮功能受影響,此時(shí)病人一旦出現(xiàn)二尖瓣功能障礙,因血流動(dòng)力學(xué)參數(shù)改變帶來的影響,將同步影響到病人局部心肌運(yùn)動(dòng),進(jìn)一步降低LVEF水平[15]。冠心病病人一旦合并二尖瓣反流其左心室舒張期間需要接受來自左心室反流與肺靜脈血液,病人LAVp較正常人或單純冠心病病人顯著升高,故合并二尖瓣反流病人LApEF最低,管道功能最差。在輔助泵功能方面,本研究結(jié)果顯示,冠心病合并二尖瓣反流病人的LAaEF水平較單純冠心病組和對(duì)照組顯著降低。究其原因,病人左心房主動(dòng)收縮,心肌運(yùn)動(dòng)減弱,LAVmin水平升高。為了更準(zhǔn)確地判斷冠心病病人二尖瓣反流情況,本研究進(jìn)一步對(duì)比分析了3組心肌應(yīng)變相關(guān)指標(biāo),結(jié)果顯示,單純冠心病組和合并二尖瓣反流組GCS、GLS均較對(duì)照組降低,且合并二尖瓣反流組較單純冠心病組更低,差異均有顯著性,表明冠心病合并二尖瓣反流對(duì)左心房心肌運(yùn)動(dòng)帶來的負(fù)面影響更大,病人心肌運(yùn)動(dòng)功能減弱明顯,該指標(biāo)可用于二尖瓣反流病人左心房主動(dòng)射血功能的間接評(píng)價(jià)。由此可見,結(jié)合心肌應(yīng)變指標(biāo)與容積變化情況更能夠?qū)ψ笮姆抗δ艿淖兓M(jìn)行全面分析。
左心房心肌分層走行,在心臟收縮及舒張期間,心肌可向不同的方向運(yùn)動(dòng),深層心肌以圓周、縱向運(yùn)動(dòng)為主,而淺層心肌徑向心肌組織薄弱,因此對(duì)于心房收縮而言,深層心肌的作用更大[16-17]。本研究結(jié)果顯示,冠心病合并二尖瓣反流病人的GCS、GLS、GRS較其他兩組降低,且以GCS降低幅度最為明顯。該結(jié)果與人體心肌結(jié)構(gòu)特性符合,也從側(cè)面反映了冠心病病人一旦合并二尖瓣反流其左心房心肌運(yùn)動(dòng)將降低,對(duì)心肌運(yùn)動(dòng)和心臟功能會(huì)產(chǎn)生嚴(yán)重的影響[18]。為了進(jìn)一步探討各心肌應(yīng)變參數(shù)在冠心病合并二尖瓣反流評(píng)估中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值,本研究分析了冠心病合并二尖瓣反流病人各主要心肌應(yīng)變指標(biāo)與LAEF的相關(guān)性,結(jié)果顯示,各心肌應(yīng)變指標(biāo)與LAEF均呈高度相關(guān)??梢姽谛牟〔∪艘坏┖喜⒍獍攴戳髌湫募?yīng)變降低,可誘發(fā)容積變化,降低左心房?jī)?chǔ)存功能及收縮功能。機(jī)體正常心房心肌同步性收縮依賴細(xì)胞興奮與電生理傳導(dǎo),若其中某環(huán)節(jié)異常將影響心肌同步性,降低心肌收縮協(xié)調(diào)性,進(jìn)一步對(duì)LVEF產(chǎn)生影響,出現(xiàn)不同程度的表現(xiàn)與相關(guān)癥狀[19-20]。本研究中,合并二尖瓣反流組病人TCS-SD、TLS-SD、TRS-SD較對(duì)照組和單純冠心病組升高,表明二尖瓣反流病人普遍存在左心房心肌運(yùn)動(dòng)不同步。因本研究未將左心耳對(duì)受檢者左心房功能帶來的潛在影響排除,研究所得結(jié)果可能有偏差,結(jié)論還需進(jìn)一步的前瞻性、大樣本研究加以證實(shí)。
綜上所述,實(shí)時(shí)三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像技術(shù)可通過測(cè)定冠心病合并二尖瓣反流病人的LAV變化情況、計(jì)算其LVEF、追蹤其心肌運(yùn)動(dòng),來評(píng)價(jià)病人心肌運(yùn)動(dòng)改變并對(duì)其左心房功能進(jìn)行客觀評(píng)估,有重要的臨床應(yīng)用價(jià)值。
[參考文獻(xiàn)]
[1]OBEID S, ATTINGER-TOLLER A, TARAMASSO M, et al. SYNTAX score II in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous mitral repair with the MitraClip[J]." International Journal of Cardiology, 2017,236:375-380.
[2]MENTIAS A, RAZA M Q, BARAKAT A F, et al. Prognostic significance of ischemic mitral regurgitation on outcomes in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction managed by primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J]." The American Journal of Cardiology, 2017,119(1):20-26.
[3]HIGASHI H, NISHIMURA K, IIO C, et al. Coronary spasm as an exaggerating factor of mitral regurgitation in a patient with dilated-phase hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]." International Journal of Cardiology, 2016,223:410-411.
[4]TARAMASSO M, GAEMPERLI O, MAISANO F. Treatment of degenerative mitral regurgitation in elderly patients[J]." Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2015,12(3):177-183.
[5]NAVARINI S, BELLSHAM-REVELL H, CHUBB H, et al. Myocardial deformation measured by 3-dimensional speckle tracking in children and adolescents with systemic arterial hypertension[J]." Hypertension (Dallas, Tex: 1979), 2017,70(6):1142-1147.
[6]SOLIS J, PIRO V, LOUGHLIN G, et al. How to grade mitral regurgitation: an integrative approach[J]." Cardiology Clinics, 2013,31(2):169-175.
[7]中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)心血管病分會(huì),中華心血管雜志編輯委員會(huì). 2015年急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死診斷和治療指南[J]." 中華心血管病雜志, 2015,43(5):380-393.
[8]VAHANIAN A, IUNG B. Mitral regurgitation[J]." Herz, 2016,41(1):3-9.
[9]PETRIS A O, ILIESCU D, ALEXANDRESCU D M, et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]." Revista Medico-Chirurgicala a Societatii De Medici Si Naturalisti Din Iasi, 2014,118(3):618-623.
[10]XU L, HUANG X M, MA J, et al. Value of three-dimensio-
nal strain parameters for predicting left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]." The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2017,33(5):663-673.
[11]DERKX S, NGUYEN V, CIMADEVILLA C, et al. Anatomical features of acute mitral valve repair dysfunction: Additional value of three-dimensional echocardiography[J]." Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases, 2017,110(3):196-201.
[12]DELGADO V, DI BIASE L, LEUNG M, et al. Structure and function of the left atrium and left atrial appendage: AF and stroke implications[J]." Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2017,70(25):3157-3172.
[13]RUSSO C, JIN Z Z, HOMMA S, et al. Left atrial minimum volume and reservoir function as correlates of left ventricular diastolic function: impact of left ventricular systolic function[J]." Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2012,98(10):813-820.
[14]LE BIHAN D C, DELLA TOGNA D J, BARRETTO R B, et al. Early improvement in left atrial remodeling and function after mitral valve repair or replacement in organic symptomatic mitral regurgitation assessed by three-dimensional echocardiography[J]." Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N Y), 2015,32(7):1122-1130.
[15]馬洪振,陳東風(fēng),王少春,等. 超聲二維斑點(diǎn)追蹤技術(shù)在二尖瓣反流患者左心室縱向收縮功能評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J]." 山東醫(yī)藥, 2015,55(8):41-43.
[16]夏紀(jì)筑,喻小蘭,馬雯妍,等. 三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像技術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)不同年齡正常成人左心室整體應(yīng)變[J]." 中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)影像技術(shù), 2013,29(4):541-544.
[17]王金花,劉雪玲,伍業(yè)冬,等. 實(shí)時(shí)三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤成像技術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)正常成人左心室收縮功能的效果[J]." 廣西醫(yī)學(xué), 2015,37(6):777-780.
[18]熊云濤,曹禮庭,蔡曉紅,等. 三維斑點(diǎn)追蹤技術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)性硬化病患者左心室收縮功能[J]." 成都醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào), 2016,11(4):462-465.
[19]WAAL K, PHAD N, LAKKUNDI A, et al. Cardiac function after the immediate transitional period in very preterm infants using speckle tracking analysis[J]." Pediatric Cardiology, 2016,37(2):295-303.
[20]ZHONG Y, BAI W J, XIE Q B, et al. Cardiac function in patients with polymyositis or dermatomyositis: a three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography study[J]." The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2018,34(5):683-693.
(本文編輯 馬偉平)