• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    “A Close Affinity with the Concept of the Dao”: Toward Walter Benjamin’s Idea of Revolution

    2020-11-18 04:20:47PeterFenves

    Peter Fenves

    Abstract: This paper takes its point of departure from an enigmatic concept Benjamin briefly discusses in one of the fragments he wrote in the early 1920s in conjunction with his search for an appropriate topic for a qualifying dissertation — the concept of action — or agent-determinative knowing, which, he suggests, may be comparable to the concept of the Dao.” After analyzing the fragment in question, the paper seeks to demonstrate that in the early 1930s Benjamin develops this Dao-like concept under the rubric of two terms drawn from the vocabulary of ancient Greek thought: “mimesis” is the name under which he develops the concept of agent-determinative knowing, while the “second technology” is his revised designation for action-determinative knowing. Taken together, these concepts lead him toward something like a Daoist-Marxist idea of revolution.

    Keywords: Walter Benjamin; revolution; Dao; mimesis; Daoist-Marxist

    This small essay revolves around a brief remark Benjamin makes in one of the notes he drafted in conjunction with his attempt in the early 1920s to identify an appropriate theme for a qualifying dissertation: “action-determinative knowing may have a close affinity with the concept of the Dao” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften6: 48). About this tentative remark, only one thing is clear: Benjamin draws attention to the concept of the Dao in order to contrast it with the Socratic doctrine of virtue, which consists in the paradoxical dictum that no one can knowingly do any wrong. The critique of the Socratic doctrine is dependent, however, on the elusive concept that generates Benjamin’s brief reflections: “the knowing that determines” (dasbestimmendeWissen). In only one other fragment in all of his extent writings does Benjamin concern himself with “the knowing that determines,” and in this case, too, his remarks are highly schematic, as though he could only hint at what this formula contains. And as for the vast commentary on his work, there are only a very few that even mention it, and none, so far as I know, that pose such questions as: what, after all, is meant by “the knowing that determines,” and why does Benjamin associate it with the concept of the Dao?①

    Split into two parts, this essay seeks to make up for this lacuna — first by elucidating the aim of Benjamin’s concept of action- and agent-determinative knowing, then by showing how these complementary modes of knowing inform two of the major projects he undertakes in the 1930s. The larger aim of the essay — responsive to the theme of the “travels of critical theory” — can be best expressed through a hypothetical judgment: if the transition from Benjamin’s early thought to his later projects is one of the primary sources of the various lines of inquiry that formed under the rubric of “critical theory,” and if, furthermore, a concept closely affinitive with that of the Dao facilitates this transition, then a certain Daoism must be seen as hitherto invisible element of critical theory.

    I. Action- and Agent-Determinative Knowing

    In a note entitled “Modes of Knowing” (ArtendesWissens), probably written in around 1922, Benjamin identifies five modes of knowing, the fourth of which is particularly puzzling, for its grammatical object is unstable:

    IV. Determinative Knowing [DasbestimmendeWissen]. This, namely action-determinative knowing, does exist. It is, however, determinative not as “motive” but, rather, by virtue of its linguistic structure. The linguistic moment in morality is connected to knowing. It’s certain that this knowing, which determines action, leads to silence. It is therefore not teachable. This action-determinative knowing may have a close affinity with the concept of the Dao. By contrast, it is strictly opposed to knowing in the form of the Socratic doctrine of virtue. For the latter motivates the action; it does not determine the agent. (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften6: 48-49)

    Benjamin begins an elucidation of the determinative mode of knowing by presenting action as its object; in the course of its brief development, however, the object changes from action to agent. This alteration leads to the suspicion that action and agent cannot ultimately be distinguished from each other whenever there is such a thing as “determinative knowing.” The action of the relevant agents, in other words, lasts throughout their agency; conversely, the agents whose actions are determined by a certain mode of knowing never cease to act, even when they seem to be at rest. Benjamin nowhere says as much, and indeed, says almost nothing about this concept of action- or agent-determinative knowing in any of his other extant writings. An altogether different situation obtains with the first “mode of knowing,” whose grammatical object is truth. About this Benjamin is succinct and certain: “I. The knowing of truth [DasWissenderWahrheit]. This does not exist. For truth is the death of theintentio” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften6: 48). Benjamin transposes this claim into the one of the central lines of thought developed in the “Epistemo-Critical Preface” with which he begins the qualifying dissertation he eventually completed (see Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften1: 216). In light of the manner in which Benjamin developed his outline of the first mode of knowing, something can be said about the fourth mode of knowing as well: it was supposed to have served as the nucleus of a practico-critical counterpart to his epistemo-critical inquiry.②

    Whereas there is no knowledge of truth, there is action- or agent-determinative knowing. The existence of such knowing is akin to the non-existent knowledge of truth in at least one respect: it cannot be spoken. It is therefore something like the death of intentional discourse, for agents whose actions are determined by knowing cannot represent either themselves or their actions in terms of either motivations or goals; rather, they are themselves determined by a knowing that permeates their agency. Which is to say: both the action and the agent are always already at their end, hence altogether “perfect” in some as yet undefined manner. This suggests a paradox that is the inverse of the one Plato puts into the voice of Socrates in several dialogues, includingTheGorgiasandTheProtagoras. If, as Socrates claims, no one can knowingly do wrong, then every agent is infallible, relative to his own agency.③The dominant response to this paradox from within the horizon of European philosophy derives from the seventh book ofTheNicomacheanEthics, where Aristotle describes a condition he callsakrasia, which designates an inability to exercise control over oneself. It was generally translated into Latin asincontinentiaand into English as “weakness of will.” Agents who are “incontinent” know perfectly well that their actions are wrong but do them anyway, for, while still in their “right mind,” they do not govern their actions.④The debate between Socrates and Aristotle is the setting for Benjamin’s construction of a concept of action- or agent-determinative knowing: the knowledge in question is co-equal with the agent, which means that it cannot be generalized into something like a “maxim” that would express its content. Each agent, in other words, is determined by a mode of knowing that is unique to the agent. Under this condition, not only is it impossible for agents to say what they are doing; they are also unable to suffer a loss of will. It is for this reason, finally, that the only other passage where Benjamin discusses the fourth modes of knowing concerns the intentional structure of “conviction” (überzeugung) — which is to say, an attitude or comportment in which “incontinence” is impossible, for any weakening of the will is incontrovertible proof that the agent in question lacks conviction.

    Instead of further analyzing the concept of conviction in the fragment under consideration, Benjamin draws attention to the concept of the Dao, which would presumably circumscribe a sphere from which the debate between Socrates and Aristotle can be suspended and from which the concept of action- and agent-determinative knowing can be developed more freely. This, though, did not happen. Or it does not happen immediately. As Benjamin transforms his claim that “truth is the death of theintentio” into a cornerstone of the critique of cognition with which he prefaces theOriginoftheGermanMourningPlay, he neglects its practico-critical counterpart. Until the early 1930s ....

    II. Mimesis and Technology

    Despite its apparent offhandedness and brevity, Benjamin’s claim that the concept of action- or agent-determinative knowing may correspond to the concept of the Dao represents the culmination of his studies of Chinese thought and literature. Probably first prompted by the educational theorist Gustav Wyneken, whom Benjamin identified as his “first teacher,” he intermittently pursued these studies from the early 1910s until early 1920s.⑤For Benjamin, Laozi served as a counter-Socrates, whose teachings he, like Nietzsche, found profoundly problematic.⑥Here is a small sample of the China-related book Benjamin read during this period: Richard Wilhelm’s translation of theDaodejing, which includes an extensive introduction and wide-ranging notes; a selection of Pu Songlin’s ghost stories, prefaced by Martin Buber; a collection of a Ming-Dynasty stories, followed by Eduard Grisebach’s survey of classical Chinese literature; and a massive study of “Chinese religion” published by Dutch sinologist Jan Jakob Maria de Groot shortly before his death.⑦The reference to the concept of the Dao in “Modes of Knowing” is probably indebted to de Groot’s treatise, whose provocative exposition of Daoism under the title of “universism” may have prompted Benjamin to solicit an essay on “the spirit of Chinese language” from another Dutch sinologist, Henri Borel, for inclusion in a journal he hoped to edit (Benjamin,GesammelteBriefe2: 191). Around the time in which plans for the journal collapsed due to the absence of financial support during the hyperinflation of 1923, Benjamin’s China studies also broke off.

    InOne-WayStreetBenjamin proposes several “techniques” for literary productivity, one of which describes the relation between initial inkling and final product: “Keep your pen aloof from inspiration [Eingebung], and it will attract it with the force of magnets. The more calmly you delay writing down an initial thought, the riper will it be when it surrenders itself” (Benjamin,GesammelteBriefe4: 106). A magnetization of this kind occurred for Benjamin in the early 1930s, when he discovered a way to develop the concept of action- or agent-determinative knowing by breaking it into its constitutive parts: agent-determinative knowing reappears under the rubric of “mimesis,” while action-determinative knowing gives shape to his inquiries into technology. The source of this terminological transformation can be briefly sketched in the following way. Mimesis is certainly not a mode of cognition, as Plato famously argues; yet it can nevertheless be called a “mode of knowing” in which agents become like what they “know” and demonstrate their “knowing” simply by being what they are like. As for technology, its etonym,technē, means a certain mode of knowing, specifically “know-how” as opposed to “knowledge-that,” for which the more appropriate ancient Greek term would beepistemē. In the early 1930s Benjamin proposed a consequential distinction between a first and a second technology: whereas the first technology involves mastery of the relevant objects, its second-order counterpart consists in sheer “know-how,” which, developing from the sphere of play and play-acting, is concerned with neither the mastery of nature nor with self-mastery, nor even with a lack of self-mastery, which is to say, in ancient Greek,akrasia.

    To the texts themselves — first, ever so briefly, those concerned with mimesis, then a few passages in which Benjamin sketches the concept of the second technology.

    In 1919, Benjamin discovered in de Groot’sUniversism, a concise depiction of the concept of the Dao: “Acting like the universe is adaptation to the universe [AnpassungandasWeltall], and since the universe is excellent in the highest degree, its imitation is virtue.... The ideal aim of human perfection is complete assimilation [Angleichung] to the Dao of heaven” (de Groot, 56-57). In response to this and similar passages inUniversism, Benjamin wrote a letter to a close friend in which he acknowledges its author’s expertise but faults the treatise for its antiquated attitude and ahistorical methodology (Benjamin,GesammelteBriefe2: 11). In the early 1930s, he begins a line of inquiry that has neither of these faults. Under the title “Moment of Birth,” he retrieves the core of de Groot’s concept of universism, viz. Daoism, and applies it to the way of the heavens: “Astrology is a late theory that stands askew to that early praxis whose data it arbitrarily and often erroneously interprets. It is not concerned with the influence of the stars or forces but, rather, with an archaic capacity of the human being to liken itself to the state of the stars at a certain hour: the hour of birth; in it, the first, incomparably wide-ranging act of adaptation may have happened: adaptation to the entire cosmos through assimilation to it [dieAnpassungandengesamtenKosmosdurchdieAngleichunganihn]” (Benjamin,GesammelteBriefe2: 976). Thus does de Groot’s treatment of the Dao become the nucleus of an inquiry into the “doctrine of the similar” and a corresponding exposition of the “mimetic capacity.” Unlike de Groot’s study, Benjamin’s investigations are thoroughly historical, beginning with the opening reflections in “On the Doctrine of the Similar”: “the circle of life that formerly seemed to be governed by the law of similarity was much larger. It was the microcosm and the macrocosm, to name only one version of many that the experience of similarity found in the course of history” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften2: 205). The contraction of the “circle of life” leaves traces of its movement, including — as he notes at the beginning of “On the Mimetic Capacity” — a certain “gift for seeing similarity,” which, as he conjectures, is “nothing but a rudiment of the once powerful compulsion to become like and conduct oneself alike. The human being perhaps possesses no higher function that is not co-determined by the mimetic capacity. This capacity, however, has a history in the phylogenetic and ontogenetic sense” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften2: 210).

    So much for mimesis, now onto technology. In some notes toward on the foundation of morality Benjamin probably wrote in 1915 or 1916, he makes a hitherto overlooked distinction between the first and second intention of an action: the first intention is circumscribed by the motives and goal of the relevant action, whereas the second intention intensifies the expression of the first intention to a point where it is “absolute,” which results in the “falling away” of the “intended correlate” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften6: 54). This distinction between first and second intention probably informs Benjamin’s concept of action-determinative knowing, for only a second intention could be ascribed to the action in question; if, by contrast, the action had a first intention, it would not be determined by knowing but, on the contary, by certain motivations and corresponding goals. By the early 1930s, Benjamin largely dropped the phenomenological vocabulary, including the description of intentional structures; but the distinction between first and second intention, transposed from its original function in moral theory, re-emerges as a distinction between first and second technology: the first is concerned with achieving something, namely the mastery of nature, whereas the second intensifies the expression of this intention to a point where the initial goal “falls away.”

    Such is the direction of the argument Benjamin pursues in some of the central sections of “The Artwork in the Age of its Technical Reproducibility.” The transformation of the first technology into the second is a matter of “play” or “games” (Spiel), which has no goal beyond its enactment and no motivation beyond its continuation or further transformation: “The origin of the second technology lies in the point where, by an unconscious ruse, human beings first began to distance themselves from nature. It lies, in other words, in play” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften7: 359). The intentional structure of the second technology follows directly from this distance: “It should be noted that ‘master over nature’ can be designated as the goal of the second technology only in the most questionable way; it is so designated only from the standpoint of the first technology. The intention of the first technology really is directed at the mastery of nature; the intention of the second, by contrast, is directed at the interplay [Zwischenspiel] between nature and humanity” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften7: 359). A particularly apposite case in point, so Benjamin argues, appears in the context of the filmic apparatus, which provides a largely neglected lesson for filmmakers, film actors, and film-audiences alike. What all of them come to know is notthatsuch-and-such is the case; rather, they get to know the conditions under which a second-order technology will finally free them from the first. They acquire a certain know-how, in other words, specifically how the first-order intention of technology falls away: “Acquaintance with this [the filmic] apparatus teaches human beings that subjugation in service of the apparatus will cede a place for liberation through the apparatus only when the constitution of humanity has adapted itself to the new productive forces that the second technology disclosed” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften7: 360). Benjamin saves the most significant consequence of this complicated claim for a footnote attached to the worddisclosed: “It is the goal of revolutions to accelerate this adaptation” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften7: 360).

    A question arises in relation to the claim above, when it is combined with the concept of action- and agent-determinative knowing, insofar as it is indeed affinitive with the concept of the Dao: Can the theory of revolution Benjamin sketches in “The Artwork in the Age of its Technical Reproducibility” be characterized as Daoist — or perhaps more exactly, as Marxist-Daoist? The answer is doubtless “no” if it is stipulated in advance that the proponent of the theory must have studied the classics of Chinese thought with the same degree of thoroughness and directness as he studied the classics of Marxism. Such a stipulation, though, may be shortsighted. Some of the notes with which Benjamin pursued the theory of revolution developed in the “Artwork” essay suggest in any case that he was working with a concept of agent-determinative knowing under the rubric of mimesis, understood as “the ur-phenomenon of artistic activity” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften7: 666).⑧After crossing out some notes in which he claims that “the imitator makes apparent the thing at hand [DerNachahmendemachteineSachescheinbar]” by “playing” this thing (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften7: 666), he replaces them with a draft of the aforementioned footnote: “It is the goal of the revolutions to accelerate this. The living body liberated through the liquidation of the first technology [EsistdasZielderRevolutionen,dieszubeschleunigen.DerdurchdieLiquidationdererstenTechnikbefreiteLeib]” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften7: 666) — where “this” refers either to adaptation to new forces of production or to emancipation of the body. There is no referential ambiguity, however, for the concerns action-determinative knowing, while the second is a description of its agent-determinative counterpart. Freed from the first technology, which is always only concerned with mastery of nature and a corresponding illusion of self-mastery, agents learn how to adapt themselves to the entirety of the cosmos in its physical-technological form.

    Notes

    ① For a productive engagement with the fourth “mode of knowing,” see N?gele, 32; for an unproductive discussion, see Brodersen, 100-101.

    ② The only other passage in Benjamin’s extant writings where he uses the concept of action-determinative knowing appears in a note associated with his 1921 essay, “Toward the Critique of Violence,” under the title “Notes on ‘Objective Mendacity’” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften6: 61-62).

    ③ See, for example, Plato,Gorgias509d-e andTheRepublic, 382a-c, 412e-413a, and 589c. Socrates’ dictum functions as the final fulcrum of Benjamin’s argument in theOriginoftheGermanMourningPlay(Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften1: 402), which again indicates that “Modes of Knowing” was an essential element of its composition.

    ④ In the seventh book ofTheNicomacheanEthicsAristotle seeks to resolve the apparent paradox ofakrasiaby distinguishing among two uses of the verb “to know” (episthasthai); see 1146b.

    ⑤ For the biographical and bibliographical support of this and the following few sentences, see Fenves.

    ⑥ See especially Benjamin’s brief polemic, “Socrates” (Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften2: 129-32); Laozi is quoted in the “Metaphysics of Youth” in Richard Wilhelm’s translation of theDaodejing(Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften2: 96).

    ⑦ “Universism” is de Groot’s idiosyncratic translation of “Daoism” (see de Groot, 5; for further references, see Fenves, esp.41-48).

    ⑧ The quotation is modified in accordance with my reading of the original note, as it is reproduced in Benjamin,DasKunstwerk148. These notes on mimesis were displaced to another footnote in later versions of the essay; see Benjamin,GesammelteSchriften7: 368.

    Works Cited

    Aristotle.EthicaNicomachea. Ed. L. Bywater. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

    Benjamin, Walter.DasKunstwerkimZeitalterseinertechnischenReproduzierbarkeit. Eds. B. Lindner, S. Broll, and J. Nitsche.WerkeundNachla?:KritischeGesamtausgabe, vol.16. Ed. Christoph G?dde and H. Lonitz in connection with the Walter Benjamin Archiv. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, 2012.

    - - -.GesammelteBriefe. Ed. C. G?dde and H. Lonitz. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, 1995-2000.

    - - -.GesammelteSchriften. Ed. C. G?dde and H. Lonitz. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, 1972-91.

    Brodersen, Momme.SpinneimeigenenNetz. Walter Benjamin — Leben und Werk. Baden-Baden: Elster, 1990.

    De Groot, J. J. M.Universismus:GrundlagederReligionundderEthik,desStaatswesensundderWissenschaftenChinas. Berlin: Riemer, 1918.

    Fenves, Peter. “Benjamin, Studying, China,”Positions:AsiaCritique. vol.26,2018.35-57.

    N?gele, R. “Thinking Images.”Benjamin’sGhost:InterventionsinContemporaryLiteraryandCulturalTheory. Ed. G. Richter. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2002.23-40.

    Plato.CompleteWorks. Ed. J. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997.

    91久久精品电影网| 国产在线男女| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| xxx大片免费视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 人妻系列 视频| 欧美3d第一页| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 99热6这里只有精品| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 性色av一级| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产精品一区www在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲av男天堂| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 少妇的逼好多水| 在线观看国产h片| 嫩草影院新地址| av卡一久久| 久久午夜福利片| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 中文字幕制服av| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲中文av在线| 91久久精品电影网| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 日韩av免费高清视频| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 高清毛片免费看| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 色视频www国产| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 观看av在线不卡| 久久6这里有精品| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 国产成人91sexporn| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 大香蕉久久网| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 久久婷婷青草| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产91av在线免费观看| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 18+在线观看网站| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 少妇的逼好多水| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 老司机影院成人| 国产视频内射| 直男gayav资源| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产精品.久久久| 午夜福利高清视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 久久久久久伊人网av| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 亚洲最大成人中文| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 大码成人一级视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 免费大片18禁| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产毛片在线视频| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 精品人妻视频免费看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片 | 国产色婷婷99| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 国产 精品1| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 久久97久久精品| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久久精品94久久精品| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 免费av不卡在线播放| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产淫语在线视频| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 99久久精品热视频| 高清不卡的av网站| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲在久久综合| 日本午夜av视频| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 成人影院久久| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 蜜桃在线观看..| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 成人影院久久| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产成人精品福利久久| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | www.色视频.com| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久精品国产自在天天线| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久久欧美国产精品| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 久久青草综合色| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产成人freesex在线| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 一区在线观看完整版| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| kizo精华| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 最黄视频免费看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| videos熟女内射| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| av国产免费在线观看| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 日本一二三区视频观看| av在线老鸭窝| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 一级a做视频免费观看| 一区二区av电影网| 九色成人免费人妻av| 精品久久久久久久末码| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 蜜桃在线观看..| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 成年免费大片在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲色图av天堂| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 大香蕉97超碰在线| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚州av有码| 伦理电影免费视频| 中文天堂在线官网| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 大码成人一级视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 久久久久久久久久久丰满| h日本视频在线播放| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 国产在线免费精品| .国产精品久久| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产乱人视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 久久久久久久精品精品| av在线app专区| 中文天堂在线官网| 男人舔奶头视频| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 九九在线视频观看精品| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| av在线老鸭窝| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| videossex国产| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国产在线免费精品| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 国产 一区精品| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 久久6这里有精品| 如何舔出高潮| h日本视频在线播放| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 嫩草影院新地址| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久久久性生活片| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产精品免费大片| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 午夜福利视频精品| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲在久久综合| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 在线看a的网站| 亚州av有码| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 国产亚洲最大av| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 尾随美女入室| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲四区av| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 1000部很黄的大片| 色哟哟·www| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 99热这里只有是精品50| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 三级经典国产精品| 精品久久久久久久久av| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 欧美bdsm另类| 草草在线视频免费看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 观看美女的网站| videos熟女内射| 国产乱人视频| 久久97久久精品| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 免费看光身美女| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 亚洲无线观看免费| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 极品教师在线视频| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产久久久一区二区三区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 日韩电影二区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| videossex国产| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲最大成人中文| 舔av片在线| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 美女主播在线视频| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 在线免费十八禁| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | av卡一久久| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 一本一本综合久久| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 插逼视频在线观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 日本av免费视频播放| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 成人综合一区亚洲| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲第一av免费看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 精品久久久久久电影网| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 黄色日韩在线| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 日本与韩国留学比较| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 在线免费十八禁| 99久久人妻综合| 久久久久久久久久成人| 亚洲中文av在线| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 黄色一级大片看看| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲国产色片| 免费看不卡的av| av播播在线观看一区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 97在线人人人人妻| 永久免费av网站大全| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 三级国产精品片| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 97在线人人人人妻| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产综合精华液| 久久久久久人妻| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 五月天丁香电影| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产在线免费精品| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 少妇丰满av| 婷婷色综合www| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 日韩成人伦理影院| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 午夜福利视频精品| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚州av有码| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 日本免费在线观看一区| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久久久人妻| 午夜福利高清视频| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 欧美97在线视频| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 毛片女人毛片| kizo精华| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 只有这里有精品99| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 久久久久久久久久成人| 大码成人一级视频| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 少妇的逼水好多| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 天堂8中文在线网| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 99热这里只有是精品50| 一级毛片 在线播放| 如何舔出高潮| 久久热精品热| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产精品.久久久| 国产精品三级大全| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| av视频免费观看在线观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 日本免费在线观看一区| 欧美人与善性xxx| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| kizo精华| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产91av在线免费观看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 内地一区二区视频在线| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 免费av不卡在线播放| 久久青草综合色| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 久久影院123| 熟女av电影| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 欧美+日韩+精品| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 国产色婷婷99| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 日韩中字成人| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 久久精品夜色国产| 午夜日本视频在线| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 日本wwww免费看| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 99久久精品热视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 少妇人妻 视频| 高清毛片免费看| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 久久久久久久久大av| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 精品久久久噜噜| 久久久国产一区二区| 久久久欧美国产精品| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| kizo精华| 国产综合精华液| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产美女午夜福利| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲不卡免费看| 最新中文字幕久久久久|