鄒積芹
【摘要】 目的:探究羅森塔爾效應(yīng)護(hù)理聯(lián)合認(rèn)知療法在鼻咽癌術(shù)后輔助放療患者護(hù)理干預(yù)中的應(yīng)用及對(duì)心理狀態(tài)和癌因性疲乏(CRF)的影響。方法:選取2017年12月-2018年12月于本院進(jìn)行放療的120例鼻咽癌術(shù)后患者的臨床資料進(jìn)行回顧性分析,將其按干預(yù)方法不同分為對(duì)照組和試驗(yàn)組,各60例。對(duì)照組給予常規(guī)護(hù)理,試驗(yàn)組在對(duì)照組基礎(chǔ)上給予羅森塔爾效應(yīng)護(hù)理聯(lián)合認(rèn)知療法干預(yù)。比較兩組干預(yù)前后生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分、心理狀況評(píng)分、CRF程度、依從性及護(hù)理滿意情況。結(jié)果:干預(yù)后,試驗(yàn)組各項(xiàng)生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分均高于對(duì)照組(P<0.05)。干預(yù)后,試驗(yàn)組焦慮自評(píng)量表(SAS)評(píng)分與抑郁自評(píng)量表(SDS)評(píng)分均低于對(duì)照組(P<0.05)。干預(yù)后,試驗(yàn)組CRF程度優(yōu)于對(duì)照組(P<0.05)。試驗(yàn)組平均堅(jiān)持鼻腔沖洗次數(shù)高于對(duì)照組(P<0.05)。試驗(yàn)組護(hù)理總滿意率為91.67%,高于對(duì)照組的75.00%(P<0.05)。結(jié)論:羅森塔爾效應(yīng)護(hù)理聯(lián)合認(rèn)知療法可提高鼻咽癌術(shù)后輔助放療患者的生活質(zhì)量,改善心理狀況,緩解CRF,增加鼻腔沖洗依從性及護(hù)理滿意度,值得臨床推廣與應(yīng)用。
【關(guān)鍵詞】 羅森塔爾效應(yīng) 認(rèn)知療法 鼻咽癌 癌因性疲乏
[Abstract] Objective: To explore the application of Rosenthal effect nursing combined with cognitive therapy in nursing intervention for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after adjuvant radiotherapy and the influence on psychological status and cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Method: The clinical data of 120 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy in our hospital from December 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different intervention methods, they were divided into control group and experimental group, 60 cases in each group. The control group was given routine nursing, and the experimental group was given Rosenthal effect nursing combined with cognitive therapy intervention on the basis of the control group. Life quality score, psychological status score, CRF degree, compliance and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups before and after intervention. Result: After intervention, all quality of life scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). After intervention, the scores of anxiety self-rating scale (SAS) and depression self-rating scale (SDS) in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). After intervention, the CRF degree of the experimental group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05). The average frequency of nasal irrigation in the experimental group was higher than that in control group (P<0.05). The total satisfaction rate of nursing in the experimental group was 91.67% higher than 75.00% in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The Rosenthal effect nursing combined with cognitive therapy can improve the quality of life, improve psychological status, relieve CRF, increase compliance with nasal irrigation and nursing satisfaction of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after adjuvant radiotherapy, it is worthy of clinical popularization and application.
[Key words] Rosenthal effect Cognitive therapy Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Cancer-related fatigue
First-authors address: Rongcheng Peoples Hospital, Rongcheng 264300, China
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2020.23.023
我國(guó)耳鼻喉癌中鼻咽癌所占比例為80%,鼻咽癌患者臨床表現(xiàn)為聽力功能下降、鼻孔堵塞、頭暈頭痛等[1]。臨床治療上術(shù)后首選放療,已有幾十年的應(yīng)用歷史,取得了一定的療效,但放療對(duì)機(jī)體會(huì)產(chǎn)生一定的損害,且由于患者對(duì)放療的認(rèn)識(shí)不足及經(jīng)濟(jì)因素等方面的影響,患者對(duì)鼻咽癌術(shù)后的輔助放療往往會(huì)有一定的抵觸[2]。據(jù)相關(guān)報(bào)道,75%~96%的放療患者會(huì)出現(xiàn)一定程度的癌因性疲乏(cancer related fatigue,CRF)[3]。CRF也稱癌癥疲勞綜合征或腫瘤相關(guān)性疲勞,是一種常見的癌癥并發(fā)癥,由于放療輔助治療時(shí)間較長(zhǎng),患者會(huì)出現(xiàn)主觀持續(xù)性、疲倦感和勞累感[4]。CRF長(zhǎng)期存在使患者正常生活受到影響,且長(zhǎng)期性疲倦感會(huì)使患者對(duì)術(shù)后繼續(xù)放療產(chǎn)生抵觸情緒,進(jìn)而導(dǎo)致治療效果變差,嚴(yán)重時(shí),會(huì)導(dǎo)致患者術(shù)后放棄治療[4]。且有研究發(fā)現(xiàn),心理狀態(tài)與癌癥患者術(shù)后治療效果呈顯著正相關(guān)[5]。因此,如何改善患者放療時(shí)期的心理狀態(tài)對(duì)患者鼻咽癌術(shù)后輔助治療意義重大。認(rèn)知療法在鼻咽癌術(shù)后輔助放療患者護(hù)理干預(yù)已廣泛應(yīng)用,取得了良好得的臨床效果,羅森塔爾效應(yīng)是指教師對(duì)學(xué)生的殷切希望能戲劇性地收到預(yù)期效果的現(xiàn)象,此效應(yīng)在教育領(lǐng)域應(yīng)用較多,但羅森塔爾效應(yīng)護(hù)理聯(lián)合認(rèn)知療法的護(hù)理干預(yù)模式罕見報(bào)道[6-7]。因此,本研究探索了羅森塔爾效應(yīng)護(hù)理聯(lián)合認(rèn)知療法在鼻咽癌術(shù)后輔助放療患者護(hù)理干預(yù)中的應(yīng)用及對(duì)心理狀態(tài)和CRF的影響,現(xiàn)報(bào)道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料 選取2017年12月-2018年12月于本院進(jìn)行放療的120例鼻咽癌患者的臨床資料進(jìn)行回顧性分析,納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)術(shù)中病理診斷為鼻咽癌;(2)卡氏(KPS)評(píng)分均在70分以上[8];(3)自愿參加本次研究。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)惡性腫瘤及凝血功能障礙;(2)嚴(yán)重認(rèn)知障礙及精神疾病;(3)長(zhǎng)期性營(yíng)養(yǎng)不良;(4)其他原因中斷治療。將患者按干預(yù)方法不同分為對(duì)照組和試驗(yàn)組,各60例。本研究已經(jīng)醫(yī)院倫理委員會(huì)批準(zhǔn)。
1.2 方法 對(duì)照組采用同步放化療方案,放療32次,放療開始便同時(shí)進(jìn)行鼻腔沖洗,采用溫度為37 ℃的100 mL 0.9%氯化鈉溶液進(jìn)行沖洗,每次放療前后各沖洗1次,共2次,沖洗次數(shù)共64次。在患者術(shù)后進(jìn)行常規(guī)護(hù)理,包括對(duì)鼻咽癌的原理,病因、手術(shù)后注意事項(xiàng)、用藥說明、衛(wèi)生標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等進(jìn)行詳細(xì)闡述;對(duì)放療會(huì)產(chǎn)生的生理反應(yīng)、毒副作用、前后注意事項(xiàng)進(jìn)行說明;對(duì)患者術(shù)后的飲食、鍛煉、心態(tài)調(diào)整等注意事項(xiàng)做成視頻,定期播放與講解。試驗(yàn)組在對(duì)照組的基礎(chǔ)上給予羅森塔爾效應(yīng)護(hù)理聯(lián)合認(rèn)知療法。(1)成立聯(lián)合護(hù)理小組:選取本院有5年以上鼻咽癌術(shù)后護(hù)理經(jīng)驗(yàn)的護(hù)士、陪同患者治療時(shí)間最長(zhǎng)的患者家屬及陪護(hù)人員、10年以上羅森塔爾效應(yīng)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的心理專家組成護(hù)理小組,研究開始前,心理專家對(duì)小組成員進(jìn)行1個(gè)月培訓(xùn),使小組成員對(duì)認(rèn)知療法和羅森塔爾效應(yīng)護(hù)理干預(yù)的意義、原理、操作方法、注意事項(xiàng)等詳細(xì)了解,并在此基礎(chǔ)上成立相關(guān)網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái),如QQ、微信、微博等,組建三方參與集體組織,平臺(tái)定時(shí)播報(bào)治療鼻咽癌相關(guān)有益信息,強(qiáng)化患者對(duì)鼻咽癌的正確認(rèn)知,緩解患者焦慮、抑郁情緒。(2)塑造環(huán)境:結(jié)合患者日常生活環(huán)境與住院情況,在患者房間及醫(yī)院病房采取相關(guān)措施營(yíng)造溫馨氛圍,如在醫(yī)院張貼相關(guān)宣傳海報(bào),強(qiáng)調(diào)病癥的可控性,提升主觀能動(dòng)性,通過家屬及醫(yī)生話語鼓勵(lì)患者,使其充滿自信心,通過鼻咽癌康復(fù)患者或其他癌癥康復(fù)患者定期與試驗(yàn)患者交流,使患者得到感染,增強(qiáng)其抗拒病魔的決心,對(duì)正常生活充滿信心。(3)羅森塔爾效應(yīng)的應(yīng)用:由于患者術(shù)后要經(jīng)歷多次放療,放療存在一定的痛苦,因此放療的每個(gè)階段,應(yīng)用羅森塔爾效應(yīng)對(duì)患者進(jìn)行心理疏導(dǎo),放療前,講解放療的原因與原理,使患者對(duì)放療有更正確的認(rèn)識(shí),鼓勵(lì)患者勇敢接受放療,放療后,積極溝通,通過放療成功的案例介紹與分享使患者樂觀,對(duì)康復(fù)更有信心和毅力。(4)生活護(hù)理:日常飲食進(jìn)行膳食控制,督促患者多食維生素、蛋白質(zhì)較高的食物,對(duì)高油脂、不易消化的食物盡量杜絕,患癌后,患者身體功能及活動(dòng)能力下降較快,因此,護(hù)理人員在臨床護(hù)理中,應(yīng)規(guī)定合理運(yùn)動(dòng)時(shí)間增加患者日常運(yùn)動(dòng)量,增強(qiáng)體質(zhì)與生活能力、自理能力。(5)聯(lián)合小組的進(jìn)步:根據(jù)患者臨床癥狀變化和身體、心理狀況,靈活調(diào)整護(hù)理措施,不斷學(xué)習(xí)最新鼻咽癌術(shù)后輔助放療護(hù)理的相關(guān)最新知識(shí),強(qiáng)化護(hù)理能力,使護(hù)理質(zhì)量不斷進(jìn)步。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo)與判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn) (1)生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分。干預(yù)前后采用健康調(diào)查簡(jiǎn)表(the MOS item short from health survey,SF-36)評(píng)定兩組生活質(zhì)量,包括生理功能、生理職能、軀體疼痛、總體健康、活力、社會(huì)功能、情感職能和心理健康,每項(xiàng)100分,分值與生活質(zhì)量呈正相關(guān)[9]。(2)心理狀況評(píng)分。干預(yù)前后采用抑郁自評(píng)量表(self-rating depression scale,SDS)、焦慮自評(píng)量表(self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)對(duì)兩組進(jìn)行心理狀況評(píng)分。SAS評(píng)分臨界值為50分,輕度50~59分、中度60~69分、重度70分及以上。SDS評(píng)分臨界值為53分,輕度53~62分、中度63~72分、重度72分及以上,分值越高所代表焦慮、抑郁程度越嚴(yán)重[10]。(3)癌癥相關(guān)性疲乏(CRF)評(píng)分。使用美國(guó)癌癥中心制定的簡(jiǎn)易CRF量表進(jìn)行測(cè)量,以0~10為本次試驗(yàn)的首尾區(qū)間,0分為無疲乏,1~3分為輕度疲乏,4~7分為中度疲乏,8~10分為重度疲乏[11]。患者在此區(qū)間內(nèi)選取符合自身狀況程度的分?jǐn)?shù)進(jìn)行標(biāo)記。(4)依從性。以試驗(yàn)期間兩組堅(jiān)持鼻腔沖洗的總數(shù)為評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),次數(shù)與依從性呈正相關(guān)。(5)護(hù)理滿意情況。采用本院自制調(diào)查問卷對(duì)兩組護(hù)理滿意情況進(jìn)行調(diào)查,總分100分,非常滿意:90~100分;基本滿意:70~89分;一般:60~69分;不滿意:<60分。滿意=顯效+一般滿意。
中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)創(chuàng)新2020年23期