• 
    

    
    

      99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

      利奈唑胺致血小板減少危險(xiǎn)因素的Meta分析

      2019-09-10 07:22:44白浩孫樸陳開杰
      中國藥房 2019年7期
      關(guān)鍵詞:血小板減少Meta分析危險(xiǎn)因素

      白浩 孫樸 陳開杰

      摘 要 目的:系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)利奈唑胺致血小板減少的危險(xiǎn)因素,為臨床合理用藥提供參考。方法:計(jì)算機(jī)檢索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane圖書館、Web of Science、中國生物醫(yī)學(xué)文獻(xiàn)數(shù)據(jù)庫、中國知網(wǎng)和萬方數(shù)據(jù),檢索時(shí)限均為建庫起至2018年10月,收集利奈唑胺致血小板減少危險(xiǎn)因素的臨床研究,對(duì)符合標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行資料提取,并采用紐卡斯?fàn)?渥太華質(zhì)量評(píng)估量表(NOS)對(duì)納入文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)后,采用Rev Man 5.3軟件進(jìn)行Meta分析。結(jié)果:共納入16項(xiàng)臨床研究,合計(jì)2 264例患者。Meta分析結(jié)果顯示,日公斤劑量高[SMD=0.62,95%CI(0.29,0.95),P=0.000 2]、用藥前血小板計(jì)數(shù)低[SMD=-0.90,95%CI(-1.62,-0.18),P=0.01]、肌酐清除率低 [SMD=-0.65,95%CI(-1.10,-0.19),P=0.005]、療程長 [SMD=0.45,95%CI(0.18,0.71),P=0.000 9]、體質(zhì)量低 [SMD=-0.36,95%CI(-0.60,-0.11),P=0.005]對(duì)血小板減少的發(fā)生均有顯著影響。結(jié)論:血小板基礎(chǔ)值低、肌酐清除率低、體質(zhì)量低,用藥療程長和日公斤劑量高是利奈唑胺致血小板減少的危險(xiǎn)因素。

      關(guān)鍵詞 利奈唑胺;血小板減少;危險(xiǎn)因素;Meta分析

      Meta-analysis of Risk Factors of Linezolid-induced Thrombocytopenia

      BAI Hao1,SUN Pu2,CHEN Kaijie3(1.Dept. of Pharmacy, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China;2.Dept. of Scientific Education, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China;3.Dept. of Medical Administration, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China)

      ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia systematically, and to provide reference for rational drug use in clinic. METHODS: Retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang database, during database establishment to Oct. 2018, clinical studies about risk factors of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia were collected, and the data of literatures met criteria were collected. After Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was applied for evaluating the quality of included literatures. Meta-analysis was conducted by using Rev Man 5.3 software. RESULTS: Sixteen clinical studies involving 2 264 patients in total were included. Results of Meta-analysis showed that daily per kg dose (DKPD) [SMD=0.62, 95%CI(0.29,0.95), P=0.000 2], low platelet count before medication [SMD=-0.90, 95%CI(-1.62, -0.18), P=0.01], low creatinine clearance rate [SMD=-0.65, 95%CI(-1.10,-0.19), P=0.005], long treatment course [SMD=0.45, 95%CI(0.18,0.71), P=0.000 9], low body weight [SMD=-0.36, 95%CI(-0.60,-0.11),P=0.005] significantly influenced the occurrence of thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors associated with linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia include low baseline platelet count, low creatinine clearance rate, low body weight, long medication course and high DKPD.

      KEYWORDS Linezolid; Thrombocytopenia; Risk factors; Meta-analysis

      利奈唑胺是美國FDA批準(zhǔn)用于臨床使用的首個(gè)全合成唑烷酮類抗菌藥物,為一種可逆的單胺氧化酶抑制劑[1]。該藥說明書批準(zhǔn)的適應(yīng)證有耐萬古霉素屎腸球菌引起的感染、由金黃色葡萄球菌或肺炎鏈球菌引起的醫(yī)院獲得性肺炎或社區(qū)獲得性肺炎、復(fù)雜性皮膚和皮膚軟組織感染、非復(fù)雜性皮膚和皮膚軟組織感染。在既往臨床試驗(yàn)中發(fā)現(xiàn),該藥可導(dǎo)致血小板計(jì)數(shù)異常,一項(xiàng)回顧性分析顯示利奈唑胺誘導(dǎo)的血小板減少會(huì)致使重癥患者死亡率升高[2]。文獻(xiàn)報(bào)道利奈唑胺引起血小板減少與多種因素相關(guān)[3-5],截至目前,筆者檢索的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)發(fā)現(xiàn),能夠影響利奈唑胺血小板減少的危險(xiǎn)因素主要有血藥谷濃度、體質(zhì)量、腎功能不全、血小板基礎(chǔ)值、療程等,研究多為單中心臨床試驗(yàn)和小樣本試驗(yàn)結(jié)果。本研究運(yùn)用Meta分析方法,對(duì)利奈唑胺引起血小板減少的危險(xiǎn)因素進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)和統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,以期為臨床合理用藥提供決策依據(jù)。

      1 資料與方法

      1.1 文獻(xiàn)檢索策略

      計(jì)算機(jī)檢索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane圖書館、Web of Science、中國生物醫(yī)學(xué)文獻(xiàn)數(shù)據(jù)庫、中國知網(wǎng)和萬方數(shù)據(jù),同時(shí)輔以手工檢索及追溯納入文獻(xiàn)的參考文獻(xiàn),檢索時(shí)間范圍為建庫起至2018年10月。檢索采用主題詞與自由詞相結(jié)合的方式,并根據(jù)各數(shù)據(jù)庫的特點(diǎn)對(duì)檢索式進(jìn)行調(diào)整。中文檢索詞包括“利奈唑胺”“血小板減少”“劑量調(diào)整”“治療藥物濃度監(jiān)測(cè)”。英文檢索詞包括“Linezolid”“Thrombocytopenia”“Dosage strategy”“TDM”。

      1.2 納入與排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn)

      利奈唑胺相關(guān)血小板減少的定義:排除其余原發(fā)或繼發(fā)血小板減少因素,在應(yīng)用利奈唑胺治療后出現(xiàn)血小板計(jì)數(shù)<100×109 L-1或者低于基線值的75%。納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)研究類型為病例對(duì)照研究;(2)研究對(duì)象是使用利奈唑胺抗感染治療的患者;(3)確診為應(yīng)用利奈唑胺相關(guān)的血小板減少不良事件;(4)比較使用利奈唑胺抗感染治療后發(fā)生血小板減少(Thrombocytopenia,TP)與未發(fā)生血小板減少(Normal platlet count,NPC)患者的各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)[年齡、日公斤劑量(DKPD)、體質(zhì)量、血小板基礎(chǔ)值、肌酐清除率、利奈唑胺血藥谷濃度、療程]。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):非利奈唑胺相關(guān)的血小板減少研究;重復(fù)發(fā)表文獻(xiàn);綜述或個(gè)案報(bào)道、專家評(píng)論、編輯意見、產(chǎn)品說明、新聞報(bào)道、會(huì)議征文等;僅以摘要發(fā)表的文獻(xiàn);原始數(shù)據(jù)無法使用,聯(lián)系原文作者也不能獲得有意義數(shù)據(jù)的文獻(xiàn)。

      1.3 文獻(xiàn)篩選、資料提取與質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)

      由兩位評(píng)價(jià)者各自獨(dú)立檢索和閱讀文獻(xiàn),獨(dú)立摘錄相關(guān)信息,按照納入與排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn)獨(dú)立篩選文獻(xiàn)、提取資料和評(píng)價(jià)納入研究的質(zhì)量,如遇分歧,則討論解決或交由第三方協(xié)助裁定。文獻(xiàn)資料質(zhì)量評(píng)定參照紐卡斯?fàn)?渥太華質(zhì)量評(píng)估量表(Newcastle-Ottawa scale,NOS)文獻(xiàn)質(zhì)量評(píng)估量表[6],該標(biāo)準(zhǔn)包括3個(gè)方面的評(píng)價(jià):病例組與對(duì)照組選擇方法;病例組與對(duì)照組的可比性;接觸暴露評(píng)估方法。NOS滿分為10分,其中研究對(duì)象選擇為4分,可比性2分,暴露評(píng)估方法4分,NOS>5分的研究可被納入分析,NOS≥7分的為高質(zhì)量文獻(xiàn)。

      1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理

      采用 Rev Man 5.3 軟件對(duì)入選文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行Meta分析,對(duì)各研究進(jìn)行異質(zhì)性檢驗(yàn)。當(dāng)異質(zhì)性檢驗(yàn)結(jié)果為P>0.10,I 2<50%,表明各研究間不存在異質(zhì)性,采用固定效應(yīng)模型時(shí)進(jìn)行Meta分析;若異質(zhì)性檢驗(yàn)結(jié)果為P≤0.1和/或I 2≥50%,提示各研究結(jié)果間存在異質(zhì)性,則采用隨機(jī)效應(yīng)模型進(jìn)行Meta分析。連續(xù)性變量采用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)均數(shù)差(Standard mean difference,SMD)為效應(yīng)分析統(tǒng)計(jì)量,區(qū)間估計(jì)采用 95%置信區(qū)間(CI)。P<0.05表示差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。

      2 結(jié)果

      2.1 文獻(xiàn)檢索結(jié)果與質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)

      初次檢索共得到6 243篇文獻(xiàn),其中英文文獻(xiàn)6 070篇,中文文獻(xiàn)173篇,通過閱讀文獻(xiàn)題目與摘要,排除明顯不相關(guān)者得到49篇文獻(xiàn),閱讀全文后經(jīng)NOS質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)篩選最終納入16篇文獻(xiàn)。16篇文獻(xiàn)中3篇為前瞻性研究,13篇為回顧性研究。

      16篇文獻(xiàn)均為英文文獻(xiàn)[7-22],涉及患者2 264例,所有患者均用利奈唑胺600 mg,q12 h給予抗感染治療,其中TP組 732例,NPC組1 532例。納入研究的基本特征以及質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果見表1,由于符合條件納入的文獻(xiàn)關(guān)于利奈唑胺谷濃度分析的僅有1篇[19],因此未對(duì)谷濃度進(jìn)行Meta分析。

      2.2 Meta分析結(jié)果

      Meta分析結(jié)果見圖1。

      2.2.1 DKPD 5項(xiàng)研究[7-11](668例患者)報(bào)道了利奈唑胺DKPD,各研究間有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)異質(zhì)性(P=0.01,I 2=75%),排除臨床異質(zhì)性來源采用隨機(jī)效應(yīng)模型合并效應(yīng)量進(jìn)行分析。Meta分析結(jié)果顯示,TP組利奈唑胺DKPD顯著高于NPC組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[SMD=0.62,95%CI(0.29,0.95),P=0.000 2],詳見圖1A。

      2.2.2 療程 11項(xiàng)研究[7,9,11-18,20](1 945例患者)報(bào)道應(yīng)用利奈唑胺的療程,各研究間有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)異質(zhì)性(P<0.001,I 2=82%),排除臨床異質(zhì)性來源采用隨機(jī)效應(yīng)模型合并效應(yīng)量進(jìn)行分析。Meta分析結(jié)果顯示,TP組應(yīng)用利奈唑胺的療程顯著長于NPC組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[SMD=0.45,95%CI(0.18,0.71),P=0.000 9],詳見圖1B。

      2.2.3 血小板基礎(chǔ)值 12項(xiàng)研究[7-12,14-17,20-21](1 189例患者)報(bào)道應(yīng)用利奈唑胺前的血小板基礎(chǔ)值,各研究間有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)異質(zhì)性(P<0.001,I 2=97%),排除臨床異質(zhì)性來源采用隨機(jī)效應(yīng)模型合并效應(yīng)量進(jìn)行分析。Meta分析結(jié)果顯示,TP組應(yīng)用利奈唑胺前的血小板基礎(chǔ)值低于NPC組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[SMD=-0.90,95%CI(-1.62,-0.18),P=0.01],詳見圖1C。

      2.2.4 肌酐清除率 6項(xiàng)研究[7,9-12,17](692例患者)報(bào)道患者肌酐清除率,各研究間有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)異質(zhì)性(P<0.001,I 2=84%),排除臨床異質(zhì)性來源采用隨機(jī)效應(yīng)模型合并效應(yīng)量進(jìn)行分析。Meta分析結(jié)果顯示,TP組給藥前肌酐清除率顯著低于NPC組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[SMD=-0.65,95%CI(-1.10,-0.19),P=0.005],詳見圖1D。

      2.2.5 體質(zhì)量 11項(xiàng)研究[7-12,14-15,18,20,22](1 291例患者)報(bào)道患者體質(zhì)量,各研究間有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)異質(zhì)性(P=0.000 1, I 2=72%),排除臨床異質(zhì)性來源采用隨機(jī)效應(yīng)模型合并效應(yīng)量進(jìn)行分析。Meta分析結(jié)果顯示,TP組體質(zhì)量顯著低于NPC組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[SMD=-0.36,95%CI(-0.60,-0.11),P=0.005],詳見圖1E。

      2.2.6 年齡 15項(xiàng)研究[7-18,20-22](2 258例患者)報(bào)道患者年齡,各研究間有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)異質(zhì)性(P<0.000 01,I 2=81%),排除臨床異質(zhì)性來源采用隨機(jī)效應(yīng)模型合并效應(yīng)量進(jìn)行分析。Meta分析結(jié)果顯示,TP組與NPC組年齡的差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義[SMD=0.10,95%CI(-0.13,0.34),P=0.39],詳見圖1F。

      2.3 發(fā)表偏倚

      以年齡為指標(biāo)繪制倒漏斗圖,結(jié)果倒漏斗圖結(jié)果顯示樣本主要分布于中線周圍且分布對(duì)稱,說明本研究納入的文獻(xiàn)發(fā)表偏倚較低,詳見圖2。

      3 討論

      利奈唑胺作為唑烷酮類藥物,能與核糖體50S亞基肽基轉(zhuǎn)移酶中心可逆結(jié)合起到抗菌作用。其結(jié)構(gòu)具有分子量小、脂溶性高的特點(diǎn),具有良好的組織穿透性,給藥后血藥濃度>4 μg/mL的時(shí)間在9~10 h,口服給藥生物利用度100%,非腎臟清除率為65%,具有良好的藥動(dòng)學(xué)和藥效學(xué)性質(zhì),在抗革蘭氏陽性菌感染中廣泛使用[23-24]。多例臨床研究報(bào)道在應(yīng)用利奈唑胺的過程中患者出現(xiàn)血小板減少的不良事件,對(duì)長期應(yīng)用利奈唑胺后進(jìn)行的安全性評(píng)價(jià)的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),血小板減少是利奈唑胺最主要的嚴(yán)重不良反應(yīng)[25]。

      本文采用Meta分析方法,對(duì)利奈唑胺引起血小板減少的危險(xiǎn)因素進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià),結(jié)果顯示TP組患者的體質(zhì)量、肌酐清除率和用藥前血小板計(jì)數(shù)低于NPC組;而TP組的療程長于NPC組,TP組DKPD高于NPC組;而兩組的年齡的差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。

      文獻(xiàn)報(bào)道利奈唑胺引起血小板減少的危險(xiǎn)因素具體包括療程≥14 d[12]、肌酐清除率<50 mL/min[18]、DKPD>22 mg/(kg·d)[9]、體質(zhì)量<55 kg[10]。另有研究表明,上述危險(xiǎn)因素與利奈唑胺谷濃度存在一定的聯(lián)系,長期應(yīng)用利奈唑胺進(jìn)行TDM的成年患者中發(fā)現(xiàn),當(dāng)利奈唑胺血藥谷濃度ctrough>7 mg/L或AUC>300 mg/(L·h)時(shí)血小板下降的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)>50%[25];Dong YH等[26]研究了利奈唑胺谷濃度與血小板減少和療效的關(guān)系,發(fā)現(xiàn)當(dāng)ctrough>2 mg/L時(shí)細(xì)菌清除的概率>80%,當(dāng)ctrough>6.3 mg/L時(shí)發(fā)生血小板減少的概率>50%,認(rèn)為給藥劑量及體質(zhì)量與血藥谷濃度密切相關(guān)。隨著利奈唑胺用藥時(shí)間的延長,血藥谷濃度逐漸上升,而血小板計(jì)數(shù)逐漸下降[25];Matsumoto K等[23]運(yùn)用群體藥動(dòng)學(xué)模型發(fā)現(xiàn)給藥劑量、肌酐清除率與血藥谷濃度密切相關(guān);Nukui Y等[24]研究發(fā)現(xiàn)在腎功能不全患者中,發(fā)生血小板減少患者的利奈唑胺谷濃度平均值為13.4 mg/L,未發(fā)生血小板減少患者為4.3 mg/L。但是由于研究中符合納入條件的樣本量較少(n=1)[19],無法對(duì)谷濃度進(jìn)行有意義的Meta分析,因此對(duì)于谷濃度是否作為利奈唑胺血小板減少的影響因素可能還需進(jìn)一步的研究。

      本研究發(fā)現(xiàn)DKPD與利奈唑胺誘導(dǎo)血小板減少直接相關(guān),提示可通過調(diào)整利奈唑胺DKPD來降低血小板下降風(fēng)險(xiǎn);分析顯示發(fā)生利奈唑胺誘發(fā)血小板減少的患者存在體質(zhì)量較輕、肌酐清除率低、血小板基礎(chǔ)值較低或者給藥療程長等個(gè)體因素,因此在調(diào)整給藥劑量時(shí)需要參考上述個(gè)體化因素。

      綜上所述,本次Meta分析結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)患者的血小板基礎(chǔ)值、肌酐清除率、體質(zhì)量和用藥療程是影響利奈唑胺誘發(fā)血小板減少的重要因素,患者應(yīng)用利奈唑胺的DKPD與血小板減少直接相關(guān)。筆者認(rèn)為需要根據(jù)患者的血小板基礎(chǔ)值、肌酐清除率、療程、體質(zhì)量等因素通過調(diào)整日給藥劑量來降低利奈唑胺誘發(fā)血小板減少發(fā)生風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。由于研究符合納入條件的樣本文獻(xiàn)較少,導(dǎo)致無法對(duì)谷濃度進(jìn)行Meta分析,但根據(jù)作者檢索的大量文獻(xiàn)結(jié)果,筆者仍然建議患者監(jiān)測(cè)利奈唑胺血藥谷濃度以防止可能的利奈唑胺誘導(dǎo)血小板減少。

      參考文獻(xiàn)

      [ 1 ] STALKER DJ,JUNGBLUTH GL,HOPKINS NK,et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of single- and multiple- dose oral or intravenous linezolid,an oxazolidinone antibiotic,in healthy volunteers[J]. JAC,2003,51(5):1239- 1246.

      [ 2 ] KIM HS,LEE E,CHO YJ,et al. Linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia increases mortality risk in intensive care unit patients,a 10 year retrospective study[J]. J Clin Pharm Ther,2019,44(1):84-90.

      [ 3 ] GERSON SL,KAPLAN SL,BRUSS JB,et al. Hematologic effects of linezolid:summary of clinical experience [J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2012,46(8):2723- 2726.

      [ 4 ] TAJIMA M,KATO Y,MATSUMOTO J,et al. Linezolid- induced thrombocytopenia is caused by suppression of platelet production via phosphorylation of myosin light chain 2[J]. Biol Pharm Bull,2016,39(11):1846-1851.

      [ 5 ] WUNDERINK RG,NIEDERMAN MS,KOLLEF MH, et al. Linezolid in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia:a randomized,controlled study[J]. CID,2012,54(5):621-629.

      [ 6 ] STANG A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa sc- ale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J]. Eur J Epidemiol,2010,25(9):603-605.

      [ 7 ] HANAI Y,MATSUO K,OGAWA M,et al. A retrospective study of the risk factors for linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia and anemia[J]. J Infect Chemother,2016,22(8):536-542.

      [ 8 ] NATSUMOTO B,YOKOTA K,OMATA F,et al. Risk factors for linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia in adult patients[J]. Infection,2014,42(6):1007-1012.

      [ 9 ] NIWA T,SUZUKI A,SAKAKIBARA S,et al. Retrospective cohort chart review study of factors associated with the development of thrombocytopenia in adult Japanese patients who received intravenous linezolid therapy[J]. Clin Ther,2009,31(10):2126-2133.

      [10] NIWA T,WATANABE T,SUZUKI A,et al. Reduction of linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia by the dose adjustment based on the risk factors such as basal platelet count and body weight[J]. Diagn Micr Infec Dis,2014,79(1):93-97.

      [11] CHEN C,GUO DH,CAO X,et al. Risk factors for thrombocytopenia in adult Chinese patients receiving linezolid therapy[J]. CTR,2012,73(6):195-206.

      [12] HIRANO R,SAKAMOTO Y,TACHIBANA N,et al. Retrospective analysis of the risk factors for linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in adult Japanese patients[J]. Int J Clin Pharm,2014,36(4):795-799.

      [13] TESSIER JM ,PUZIO T,YOUNG A,et al. Thrombocytopenia associated with linezolid therapy in solid organ transplant recipients:a retrospective cohort study[J]. Surg Infect,2015,16(4):361-366.

      [14] IKUTA S,TANIMURA K,YASUI C,et al. Chronic liver disease increases the risk of linezolid-related thrombocytopenia in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus-infected patients after digestive surgery[J]. J Infect Chemother,2011,17(3):388-391.

      [15] FUJII S,TAKAHASHI S,MAKINO S,et al. Impact of vancomycin or linezolid therapy on development of renal dysfunction and thrombocytopenia in Japanese patients[J]. Chemotherapy,2013,59(5):319-324.

      [16] ZHANG YM,YU W,ZHOU N,et al. High frequency of thrombocytopenia in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure treated with linezolid[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int,2015,14(3):287-292.

      [17] BI LQ,ZHOU J,HUANG M,et al. Efficacy of linezolid on gram-positive bacterial infection in elderly patients and the risk factors associated with thrombocytopenia[J]. Pak J Med Sci,2013,29(3):837-842.

      [18] TAKASHI Y,TAKESUE Y,NAKAJIMA K. Risk factors associated with the development of thrombocytopenia in patients who received linezolid therapy[J]. J Infect Chemother,2011,17(3):382-387.

      [19] MATSUMOTO K,TAKESHITA A,IKAWA K,et al. Higher linezolid exposure and higher frequency of thrombocytopenia in patients with renal dysfunction[J]. Int J Antimicrob Ag,2010,36(2):179-181.

      [20] BOAK LM,RAYNER CR,GRAYSON ML,et al. Clinical population pharmacokinetics and toxicodynamics of linezolid[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2014,58(4):2334-2343.

      [21] WANG TL,GUO DH,BAI Y,et al. Thrombocytopenia in patients receiving prolonged linezolid may be caused by oxidative stress[J]. Clin Drug Invest,2016,36(1):67-75.

      [22] CATTANEO D,ORLANDO G,COZZI V,et al. Linezolid plasma concentrations and occurrence of drug-related haematological toxicity in patients with gram-positive infections[J]. Int J Antimicrob Ag,2013,41(6):586-589.

      [23] MATSUMOTO K,SHIGEMI A,TAKESHITA A,et al. Analysis of thrombocytopenic effects and population pharmacokinetics of linezolid:a dosage strategy according to the trough concentration target and renal function in adult patients[J]. Int J Antimicrob Ag,2014,44(3):242-247.

      [24] NUKUI Y,HATAKEYAMA S,OKAMOTO K,et al. High plasma linezolid concentration and impaired renal function affect development of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia[J]. J Infect Chemother,2013,68(9):2128-2133.

      [25] PEA F,VIALE P,COJUTTI P,et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring may improve safety outcomes of long-term treatment with linezolid in adult patients[J]. J Infect Chemother,2012,67(8):2034-2042.

      [26] DONG YH,XIE J,CHEN LH,et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring and receiver operating characteristic curve prediction may reduce the development of linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol,2014,33(6):1029-1035.

      (收稿日期:2018-10-11 修回日期:2019-01-14)

      (編輯:劉明偉)

      猜你喜歡
      血小板減少Meta分析危險(xiǎn)因素
      系統(tǒng)性紅斑狼瘡合并妊娠繼發(fā)血小板減少1例
      血小板與冷沉淀聯(lián)合輸注在大出血臨床治療中應(yīng)用的Meta分析
      中藥熏洗治療類風(fēng)濕關(guān)節(jié)炎療效的Meta分析
      丹紅注射液治療特發(fā)性肺纖維化臨床療效及安全性的Meta分析
      產(chǎn)科出生缺陷的危險(xiǎn)因素及護(hù)理對(duì)策
      今日健康(2016年12期)2016-11-17 13:12:34
      普通外科術(shù)后切口感染危險(xiǎn)因素的分析
      今日健康(2016年12期)2016-11-17 12:29:29
      圍絕經(jīng)期婦女骨質(zhì)疏松癥的預(yù)防與保健指導(dǎo)
      科技資訊(2016年19期)2016-11-15 10:33:36
      多索茶堿聯(lián)合布地奈德治療支氣管哮喘的Meta分析及治療策略
      骨瓜提取物的不良反應(yīng)分析
      血小板減少對(duì)心內(nèi)科危重癥患者預(yù)后影響
      黎城县| 紫云| 黔西县| 额济纳旗| 垫江县| 勐海县| 普格县| 康马县| 安化县| 琼结县| 延吉市| 西丰县| 阜阳市| 龙川县| 宁海县| 磐安县| 湖口县| 光泽县| 闽清县| 华安县| 龙泉市| 沁水县| 岫岩| 甘谷县| 永仁县| 香港 | 祁东县| 海安县| 大洼县| 犍为县| 图木舒克市| 甘孜| 和平县| 裕民县| 东源县| 历史| 修武县| 长岛县| 石泉县| 通州市| 清新县|