鼓膜置管與穿刺對(duì)慢性分泌性中耳炎的療效*

熊子云

【摘要】 目的：比較耳內(nèi)鏡下鼓膜置管、鼓膜穿刺治療慢性分泌性中耳炎的臨床應(yīng)用價(jià)值。方法：用隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法在筆者所在醫(yī)院2017年1月-2018年3月收治的慢性分泌性中耳炎患者中納入75例為對(duì)象，單盲法分組為對(duì)照組32例和觀察組43例。采用耳內(nèi)鏡下鼓膜穿刺術(shù)治療對(duì)照組患者，采用耳內(nèi)鏡下鼓膜置管術(shù)治療觀察組患者，比較兩組患者臨床治療效果及并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率。結(jié)果：觀察組患者治療總有效率為95.35%，高于對(duì)照組的78.13%，觀察組患者并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率為4.65%，低于對(duì)照組的34.38%，差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P<0.05）。結(jié)論：慢性分泌性中耳炎患者臨床治療時(shí)，選擇耳內(nèi)鏡下鼓膜置管術(shù)治療的效果優(yōu)于鼓膜穿刺術(shù)，且患者術(shù)后并發(fā)癥少。

【關(guān)鍵詞】 慢性中耳炎; 分泌性; 耳內(nèi)鏡; 鼓膜置管術(shù); 鼓膜穿刺術(shù); 臨床價(jià)值

doi：10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2019.14.019 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼 B 文章編號(hào) 1674-6805（2019）14-00-02

Therapeutic Effect of Tympanic Membrane Catheterization and Puncture on Chronic Secretory Otitis Media/XIONG Ziyun.//Chinese and Foreign Medical Research，2019，17（14）：-46

【Abstract】 Objective：To compare the clinical value of tympanic membrane catheterization and tympanic membrane puncture under endotoscpe in the treatment of chronic secretory otitis media.Method：A total of 75 patients with chronic secretory otitis media admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to March 2018 were divided into control group（32 cases） and observation group（43 cases）.The patients in the control group were treated with endotoscpe tympanocentesis and the patients in the observation group were treated with endotoscpe tympanocentesis.The clinical effects and complications of the two groups were compared.

Result：The effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 95.35%，which was higher than 78.13% in the control group，the incidence of complications in the observation group was 4.65%，which was lower than 34.38% in the control group，the differences were statistically significant（P<0.05）.Conclusion：In the clinical treatment of chronic secretory otitis media，the effect of tympanic membrane catheterization under endotoscpe is better than that of tympanic membrane puncture，and the complications after operation are less.

【Key words】 Chronic otitis media; Secretory; Endotoscpe; Tympanoplasty; Tympanocentesis; Clinical value

First-authors address：Xiantao First Peoples Hospital Affiliated to Changjiang University，Xiantao 433000，China

分泌性中耳炎即滲出性中耳炎，通常均見患者的咽鼓管呈機(jī)械性、功能性功能障礙的情況[1]。目前，臨床上用來(lái)治療分泌性中耳炎的方法與手段諸多，但是對(duì)于慢性分泌性中耳炎則有著參差不齊的效果，為了進(jìn)一步提高慢性分泌性中耳炎的治療效果，本次研究則在筆者所在醫(yī)院2017年1月-2018年3月內(nèi)收治的慢性分泌性中耳炎患者中，納入75例患者為對(duì)象，依據(jù)單盲法分組法將其分為對(duì)照組和觀察組，兩組患者分別接受不同的手段治療，旨在對(duì)慢性分泌性中耳炎患者接受不同手段（耳內(nèi)鏡下鼓膜置管、鼓膜穿刺）治療的臨床效果進(jìn)行探討，現(xiàn)將獲得的各項(xiàng)數(shù)據(jù)作下述報(bào)道。

1 資料與方法

1.1 一般資料

用隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法在筆者所在醫(yī)院2017年1月-2018年3月收治的慢性分泌性中耳炎患者中納入75例為對(duì)象，患者病情均符合文獻(xiàn)[2]中的診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)描述，病情經(jīng)影像學(xué)檢查證實(shí)，見患者聽力降低、耳阻塞感強(qiáng)烈，部分患者合并耳聾、耳痛的情況，排除先天性聽力障礙、精神障礙、體循環(huán)和血液疾病及依從性/配合度不高的患者。單盲法分組為對(duì)照組32例和觀察組43例。對(duì)照組患者中男19例，女13例，年齡12～65歲，平均（30.85±5.29）歲，病程3～10個(gè)月，平均（6.73±1.85）個(gè)月，單耳發(fā)病21例，雙耳發(fā)病11例;觀察組患者中男23例，女