• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effects of Sea-Surface Waves and Ocean Spray on Air–Sea Momentum Fluxes

    2018-03-06 03:36:14TingZHANGandJinbaoSONGOceanCollegeZhejiangUniversityZhoushan36000China
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2018年4期

    Ting ZHANGand Jinbao SONG?Ocean College,Zhejiang University,Zhoushan 36000,China

    2State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics,Second Institute of Oceanography,State Oceanic Administration,Hangzhou 310012,China

    1.Introduction

    The air–sea boundary layer is an interface for the exchange for matter,momentum and energy between the ocean and atmosphere(Wang et al.,2013).Understanding air–sea interactions and oceanic and atmospheric dynamics requires an accurate understanding of the physical processes that occur in the air–sea boundary layer(He and Chen,2011;Li et al.,2013).

    Rapid advances in simulation techniques using computers have allowed complex physical processes in the marine atmospheric boundary layer(MABL)to be simulated,but coupled air–sea mechanisms are still not completely understood.Most coupled air–sea mechanisms currently neglect the physical processes induced by waves, such as wind–wave,wave–wave and wave–current interactions.Neglecting the effects of ocean waves causes large errors in simulation results because near-surface ocean waves have a very strong influence on small-scale air–sea exchanges(Gao et al.,2009;Zhao and Xie,2010).It is therefore important to determine how surface-wave effects on the MABL should be parameterized and to develop an appropriate parameterization to use in numerical models(Rutgersson et al.,2001;Liu et al.,2012).

    Under normal conditions,air–sea interface stress has two main components;namely,turbulent shear stress and wave-induced stress.For weak winds,fast-moving waves(for which the phase velocity is higher than the wind speed)induce upward momentum fluxes.The momentum is transformed upward when wave-induced stress is dominant.This upward momentum directly influences and modifies the dynamic and turbulent structures in the atmospheric boundary layer above the sea surface,causing jet fl ow to occur near the sea surface(Harris,1966),and causing the stress vector and wind direction to be distinct(Grachev et al.,2003).Many simple MABL models have been developed to investigate the effect of swell on the MABL(Hanley and Belcher,2008;Makin,2008;Semedo et al.,2009).Building on the findings of Hanley and Belcher(2008)and Makin(2008),Song et al.(2015)proposed a modified Ekman model to study the effects of surface waves on steady near-surface wind profiles over the ocean.They assumed that the eddy viscosity coeffi-cient varied linearly with height,and the Coriolis force was considered.To identify the impact of surface waves on wind profiles over the ocean,Song et al.(2015)used two examples and compared the analytical solution with observations made at a tower on the island of Ostergarnsholm in the Baltic Sea.The results showed that surface waves can affect near-surface wind profiles at low to moderate wind speed.

    However,discussion on the effects of various wave ages on air–sea momentum fluxes has not been presented clearly in previous studies(Andreas,2004;Kudryavtsev and Makin,2011).Some field and laboratory observational data(Powell et al.,2003;Jarosz et al.,2007)have been processed to show that the drag coefficient cannot increase with increasing wind speed at high wind speeds but reaches a maximum and then decreases as the wind speed increases.To explain this phenomenon,Andreas(2004)proposed an empirical formula describing the contribution of ocean spray to the total sea surface stress and pointed out that spray droplets lead to a reduction in drag coefficient at high wind speed.Since then,many researchers have realized the importance of ocean spray and many sea-spray-generation formulas have been proposed(Andreas,1998;Kudryavtsev,2006;Zhao and Xie,2010).Considering the relationship between spray and sea-surface roughness length,Liu et al.(2012)described the process of air–sea interaction at high wind speeds by parameterizing the sea-surface roughness length with ocean spray.Zhang et al.(2016)proposed a formula for describing the effects of ocean spray on the MABL as stress force based on the empirical formula developed by Andreas(2004).Nevertheless,the detailed physical process of spray production is hard to identify through an empirical spray-generation formula.

    In this paper,we investigate the effects of ocean surface waves and spray droplets on air–sea fluxes.Firstly,we introduce wave-induced stress to the model of the MABL in the presence of sea-spray droplets(Kudryavtsev and Makin,2011).Then,the analytical solution is obtained by assuming the viscosity coefficient varies linearly with height.Secondly,we calculate near-surface wind profiles and drag coefficients theoretically for different wave ages using the Joint North Sea Wave Project(JONSWAP)spectrum.The theoretical solutions obtained are compared with the model solutions with wave-induced stress or spray stress neglected.Thirdly,we compare the theoretical solutions with laboratory measurements presented by Donelan et al.(2004)and Troitskaya et al.(2012),and with field observations presented by Powell et al.(2003),to allow the accuracy of the model to be verified.Finally,we draw our conclusions and discuss how the model can be developed further in future work.

    2.MABL model

    2.1.Momentum conservation equation

    In winds approaching hurricane strength,ocean-spray droplets proliferate.According to Kudryavtsev and Makin(2011),sea-spray droplets are torn from the breaking waves and injected into the air flow at the height of the breaking wave crests. Thus,the interactions between ocean-spray droplets and wind-velocity shear are notable.The droplets being torn from breaking-wave crests inject momentum into the air flow.Therefore,the volume source of the momentum,defined as the rate of injection of the momentum of droplets per unit volume,should be introduced in the momentum conservation,which becomes(Kudryavtsev and Makin,2011)

    where z is the vertical coordinate,which is the height above the sea-surface roughness lengthis the vertical turbulent fluxes of momentum;U is the mean wind velocity;ρ=ρa(1+σs)is the air-droplet mixture density;σ=(ρw?ρa)/ρais the relative excess of the water density over that of air;ρaand ρware the air and water densities;s? 1 is the volume concentration of droplets;and Fs(z)is the droplet flux defined via Vsas

    where Vsis the total volume of droplets injected per unit time in unit volume of air and z′is the derivative of variable z.As argued by Kudryavtsev(2006),being torn from breaking wave crests by wind and accelerated to the wind velocity instantaneously,spume droplets are injected into the air fl ow along the mean wind direction.Thus,the effect of spume droplets on the air fl ow mainly concentrates along the mean wind direction.

    It is worth noting that winds blowing over the oceans excite the sea-surface waves.These wind waves are responsible for the formulation and regulation of the momentum transfer between the atmosphere and ocean(Gao et al.,2009;Song et al.,2015;Zhang et al.,2016).Herewith,we propose that surface waves extract part of the momentum flux from the total turbulent momentum flux.Based on the assumption that the mean wind and surface wave fields are aligned,we introduce the effect of surface waves into Eq.(1).The momentum conservation equation in consideration of the surface waves and ocean spray can be written as

    where τw(z)is the wave-induced stress along the wind direction due to the organized waves motions in the atmosphere induced by the waves.If the wave-induced stress is positive[τw(z)> 0],momentum is supplied from the atmosphere to the sea surface;whereas,if the wave-induced stress is negative[τw(z)< 0],the momentum is transferred from the sea surface to the atmosphere(Grachev et al.,2003;Hanley and Belcher,2008;Semedo et al.,2009).

    2.2.Closure

    Equation(3)indicates that the total momentum flux of turbulence and that induced by waves varies with height.Therefore,we reasonably suppose that the effects of droplets and surface waves on air fl ow dynamics can be neglected well above the sea surface,so that ρ = ρaandwhere u?is the friction velocity outside the layer affected by the sea-spray droplets and surface waves.Thus,Eq.(3)can be rewritten as

    in which the first term describes the redistribution of the momentum between the air and spray droplets and the second term depicts the injection of the droplets’momentum.

    The wave-induced stress τw(z)can be estimated by integrating the contributions from waves of all scales(Semedo et al.,2009;Song et al.,2015)using the equation

    where ω is the angular frequency in rad s?1,k is the modulus of the horizontal wavenumber vector kkk=(kx,ky)=(kcosθ,ksinθ)given by the dispersion relation ω2=gk for deep water,E(k,θ)is the directional wavenumber spectrum of the surface waves,θ is the direction of the wave vector,and β is the dimensionless rate of growth or decay of a component of the wave spectrum at wavenumber k.

    According to the classical closure for turbulent fl ow with suspended particles(Kudryavtsev,2006;Mueller and Veron,2009),turbulent stress can be parameterized as

    where KM(z)is the vertical eddy viscosity coefficient.

    Substituting Eqs.(5)–(7)into Eq.(3),normalized to the density of the mixture in the air,gives the equation

    where

    The boundary conditions are

    and

    where Uhis the wind speed at the reference level z=h.

    3. Solution for eddy viscosity increasing linearly with height

    The solutions to Eqs.(8),(10)and(11)can be determined theoretically if the eddy viscosity,wave-induced stress and spray stress are known.Kudryavtsev(2006)argued that ocean-spray droplets influence the strati fi cation of the lower MABL additively.Therefore,he applied Monin–Obukhov similarity theory to the boundary layer strati fi ed due to the presence of sea spray.Thus,the turbulent eddy viscosity reads

    where κ=0.4 is von Karman’s constant,LSis the Obukhov length for the turbulent fl ow strati fi ed due to the presence of droplets,and z0is the sea-surface roughness length determined by

    which is Charnock’s relation(Charnock,1955).

    However,applying Eq.(12)to the theoretical model of the MABL,Kudryavtsev and Makin(2011)pointed out that ocean spray affected the air–sea momentum flux in two ways:by changing the strati fi cation of the lower MABL,and by the effect of spray on the mixture momentum via the spray stress.The latter played such a dominant role that the efficiency of the strati fi cation mechanism could be negligible.Also,Andreas(2004)verified that strati fi cation effects on wind profiles could be negligible,since the residence time of spray droplets in the air fl ow is too short.In addition,sea-surface waves have no effect on atmospheric strati fi cation(Semedo et al.,2009;Song et al.,2015).Thus,without consideration of the effect of spray on strati fi cation,we can define the eddy viscosity increasing linearly with height for neutral strati fi cation as(Xiao and Taylor,2002;Andreas,2004)

    Inserting the KMshown in Eq.(15)into Eq.(8)gives

    The general solution to Eq.(16)is

    and

    It can be concluded from the surface boundary layer condition shown in Eq.(10)that?c1=0,and the condition shown in Eq.(11)gives

    The solution of Eqs.(8)–(11)is therefore

    Several interesting special cases can easily be derived from Eq.(24),as follows:

    (1)Neglecting the influence of wave-induced stress means that Tw=0 and spray stress and turbulent stress are retained,so the mean wind solution[Eq.(24)]is reduced to

    (2)Neglecting the influence of spray stress means that Fs=0 and the effects of wave-induced stress are retained,so the mean wind solution[Eq.(24)]is reduced to

    (3)Neglecting both wave-induced stress and spray stress means that Tw=Fs=0,so the wind speed is reduced to a logarithmic velocity profile,

    For neutral-stability wind speed considered here,the surface drag coefficient Cd,h(the subscript d is the abbreviation of drag)at z=h(uinits:m)can be estimated using the equation(Makin et al.,1995;Kudryavtsev and Makin,2011)

    Using Eqs.(7),(15)and(24)gives

    4.Illustrative examples and validation

    Several examples are presented in this section to illustrate the effects of surface waves and ocean spray on wind profiles and the drag coefficient in the MABL.As shown by Kudryavtsev and Makin(2011),the volume flux of droplet Fs(z)can be described using the equations

    and

    where γ is the surface tension,ν is the molecular viscosity coefficient for air,and cris a constant.Here,we use the values kb=5 rad m?1,cr=4.5,cs=1.4×10?5,z=10–100 m,ν=1.46×10?5m2s?1,and γ =7.18×10?2kg s?2.

    The behavior of the surface drag coefficient Cd,hand mean wind profiles shown in Eqs.(24)–(27)are investigated using ρa=1.2 kg m?3and ρw=1025 kg m?3and the JONSWAP theoretical directional spectrum(Lucas and Soares,2015):

    The constant α used here depends on the significant wave height Hsthrough the equation

    in which,because we investigated sea spectra for different wave ages,the significant wave height uses the 3/2 power lawapplicable to all wind seas(Liu et al.,2012;Zhang et al.,2016),and cp=g/ωp.

    As described by Polnikov(2011),the growth rate β is

    where cβis a dimensionless function(usually parameterized from various experimental measurements)represented in the form(Polnikov,2011)

    Hara and Belcher(2004)pointed out that the contribution to the wave-induced stress from waves propagating against the wind is negligible because energy in these components is so small.Herewith,Eqs.(6)and(9)can be reduced,respectively,to

    and

    For a given Uh,U10and u?can respectively be calculated using the equations

    and

    and v?can be estimated based on the Newton–Raphson iterative technique.Then,the wind profiles Uw(z),Usp(z),U(z)and U0(z),in the lowest 100 m of the MABL,can be calculated after the corresponding friction velocity u?and local friction velocity v?become known.

    4.1. Mean wind profiles

    In this section,the solutions of Eqs.(24)–(27)are calculated for different 100-m wind speeds Uhand four different wave ages(??=20,25,30,and 40)representing different developmental states of sea-surface waves.The behaviors of the wind profiles Uw(z)/Uh,Usp(z)/Uhand U(z)/Uh,in the lowest 100 m of the MABL,are shown in Figs.1–3,respectively,for wind speeds Uhof 15,25 and 40 m s?1.

    Firstly,the effects of surface waves(only)on the near-surface wind speed are investigated.The vertical profiles of Uw(z)/Uhfor four different wave ages with different fixed Uhvalues are shown in Figs.1a–c.Four different wave ages(??=20,25,30 and 40)that characterize the development of sea waves were used to allow the effects of surface waves on the wind speed at different wave ages to be investigated.A higher wave age corresponds to more mature waves,and in particular,??≥35 represents fully developed wind waves(Liu et al.,2012).It can be seen from Figs.1a and b that surface waves decrease the wind speed relative to U0/Uhin the lowest 100 m of the whole MABL,only taking surface waves into account at low-to-moderate wind speeds.It can be seen from Fig.1c that surface waves decrease wind distinctly less at a Uhhigher than 30 m s?1.This can be attributed to wave breaking at wind speeds reaching hurricane strength.

    Ignoring the effects of surface waves on the wind profiles,the Usp(z)/Uhprofiles from low to high wind speeds can be calculated.The profiles are shown in Fig.2.It is worth noting that the spray stress expression shown in Eq.(5)is not related to the wave age,so the Usp/Uhprofiles can be plotted irrespective of the wave age.It can be seen from Fig.2 that the spray force only accelerates the wind in the lowest 100 m of the MABL at strong Uhrelative to U0/Uh.This is consistent with the conclusion drawn by Kudryavtsev and Makin(2011)that the large amounts of spray droplets torn from breaking waves at high wind speeds cause the wind velocity to increase.However,the effect of spray can be neglected at low and moderate wind speeds,as shown by the overlapping lines in Fig.2.This is because,at such wind speeds,not enough spray droplets are produced to affect the wind speed.The higher the 100-m wind speed,the more ocean spray droplets are produced and the more the wind is accelerated relative to U0/Uh.

    The U(z)/Uhand U0(z)/Uhprofiles for different Uhand??,taking both wave-induced stress and spray stress into consideration,are shown in Fig.3.The physical processes of the air–sea interactions can be seen more clearly by inspecting the u?,v?,τw(0)/ρaand τsp(0)/ρavalues for different wave ages(??=20,25,30 and 40),shown in Table 1.

    Table 1.Values of u?,v?, τw(0)/ρaand τsp(0)/ρafor wave ages??=cp/u?of 20,25,30,and 40 for Uh=(a)15,(b)25,and(c)40 m s?1.

    As shown in Tables 1a and b,the wave-induced stress values are higher than the spray stress values at low-to-moderate wind speeds,indicating that surface waves affect the MABL more than ocean spray at such wind speeds.The wind profi les shown in Figs.3a and b are similar to the wind profiles shown in Figs.1a and b.Nevertheless,there is a significant difference between Figs.1c and 3c.It can be seen from Tables 1a and b that the u?values vary less and less as the wave age decreases for a fixed wind speed.This could theoretically be regarded as the reason why the wind speed decreases more for young wave fields than for old wave fields at a given 100-m wind speed,as shown in Figs.3a and b.

    Comparing Figs.3a and b shows that surface waves decrease the wind speed at low wind speeds more obviously.At wind speeds Uhexceeding hurricane strength(40 m s?1),the wind speed is stronger compared with U0/Uhin the lowest 100 m of the MABL,as shown in Fig.3c.This is the same as found in Fig.2.The overlapping colored lines in Figs.1c and 3c show that the effects of surface waves on near-surface wind speeds can be neglected.As stated by Kudryavtsev and Makin(2011),spray droplets generated by the wind acting on breaking-wave crests fall back to the sea surface.This accelerates the air fl ow in the spray-generation layer through interactions between the spray droplets and the wind-velocity shear.In turn,this increases the wind speed above the spray-generation layer because of the continuity of the wind velocity.The higher the wind speed,the more spray droplets will be produced and the more clearly the near-surface wind profiles will be affected by ocean spray.Correspondingly,local turbulent stress(v?)near the sea surface will increase and exceed total stress(u?),as shown in Table 1c.The increase in local turbulent stress is a consequence of the action of the force required to tear the droplets from breaking crests and accelerate them to the wind velocity.

    It can be concluded that both surface waves and ocean spray affect air–sea momentum fluxes,which in turn influence near-sea surface wind profiles.Various wave fields also play a significant role in the air–sea momentum exchanges.

    4.2. Sea-surface drag coefficient

    As mentioned above,the theoretical model shows that the friction velocity u?is smaller for young than for mature wave fields at low-to-moderate wind speeds,causing the wind speed to be lower for young wave fields than for old wave fields in the lowest 100 m of the MABL.The theoreti-cal model also indicates that the friction velocity will increase slowly at extremely high wind speeds because of ocean spray,causing near-surface wind to accelerate.Here,in order to compare the theoretical values with the observations,we calculate the drag coefficient Cd10using Eq.(28)for six different wave ages(?=0.2,0.3,0.4,0.6,0.8 and 1.2)and compare the results with previous laboratory and field observations.The wave age is herein defined as ?=cp/U10,similar to the way we define the developmental sea-surface wave field observations ??=cp/u?.The relationships between the drag coefficient and 10-m wind speeds for different wave ages are shown in Fig.4.The solid lines are the results of using Eq.(28),taking into account the ocean spray and the effects of surface waves at different wave ages,and the dotted lines are the results taking only the effects of ocean spray into account(τw=0,τsp≠ 0).

    As shown in Fig.4,the drag coefficients Cd10at low-to moderate wind speeds increase as the wind speed increases,and the Cd10values are lower for young than for old wave fields.The differences between the dotted and solid lines calculated by taking surface waves into account indicate that surface waves decrease the drag coefficient markedly,so surface waves cannot be ignored as they have been in previous studies(Andreas,2004;Kudryavtsev and Makin,2011).

    It can be seen from the almost overlapping solid and dotted lines in Fig.4,however,that at high wind speeds the drag coefficient starts to decrease at U10=40 m s?1.This corresponds to the friction velocity increasing more slowly as the wind speed increases[illustrated in Eq.(28)],which is consistent with observations and the theoretical results of several previous studies(Powell et al.,2003;Andreas,2004;Jarosz et al.,2007).This indicates that the effects of surface waves on the drag coefficient are negligible at high wind speeds compared with the effects of ocean spray caused by the wind tearing droplets from breaking waves and suppressing the total momentum in the MABL.As pointed out in Kudryavtsev and Makin(2011),at very high wind speeds,a thin part of the surface layer adjacent to the surface turns into a regime of saturation with spume droplets,resulting in a reduction in the drag coefficient asIt is worth noting from Fig.4a that,the lower the wave age,the higher the wind speed at which the drag coefficient begins to decrease.Spray stress is therefore indispensable in the MABL model,especially at high wind speeds.

    Laboratory measurements made by Donelan et al.(2004)and Troitskaya et al.(2012)are shown in Fig.4a to verify the accuracy of the model.Donelan et al.(2004)used a wind–wave tank to examine the wind stress at different wind speeds.The data presented by Troitskaya et al.(2012)were measured using a wind–wave tank with a wind fetch of 7 m.Liu et al.(2012)stated that wind fetch limitations in laboratory experiments mean that the waves,as measured,are younger than waves measured in field experiments.Field data from the Southern Ocean Waves Experiment for low and extreme wind speeds presented by Powell et al.(2003)are shown in Fig.4b to validate the theoretical solutions for old waves.Powell et al.(2003)analyzed 311 wind profiles measured using a GPS dropsonde in the vicinity of hurricane eye walls between 1977 and 1999,and the drag coefficients were estimated from the wind profiles obtained from measurements made in several layers above the sea surface.The data shown in Fig.4b are the 10–100 m and 10–150 m layers estimates.As shown in Fig.4a,the experimental observations and theoretical values matched very well for lower wave ages when U10≤30 m s?1,meaning the model presented here more accurately predicts drag coefficients for young wave fields than was possible using the previous model(dotted line in Fig.4a),which does not take surface waves into consideration.However,as can be seen from Fig.4a,the drag coefficients measured in the laboratory did not decrease as the 10-m wind speed increased above 30 m s?1.This was not consistent with the theoretical results.In other words,breaking waves in young wave fields cannot generate enough ocean spray to decrease the drag coefficient.The theoretical solutions cover the range of existing field observations well,as shown in Fig.4b,and can be used to make predictions at high wind speeds when it may be difficult for certain field observations to be made.

    Fig.3.U(z)/Uhwind profiles for different wave ages for Uh=(a)15,(b)25 and(c)40 m s?1.The solid blue,red,green and pink lines show wind profiles for wave ages ??=20,25,30 and 40,respectively.The dashed black lines show U0(z)/Uhwhen wave and spray effects are neglected.

    5.Conclusion and discussion

    The effects of surface waves and ocean spray on the MABL were studied by introducing wave-induced stress into the model of the MABL in the presence of sea-spray droplets described by Kudryavtsev and Makin(2011).A steady analytical solution to the wave-spray-modified model was obtained when the eddy viscosity coefficient was assumed to vary linearly with height.The main advantage of the model is that momentum exchange in the MABL can be investigated at low to extremely high wind speeds and different sea states,extending the research performed by Hara and Belcher(2004),who studied momentum exchange at low-to-moderate wind speeds,and by Kudryavtsev and Makin(2011),who investigated momentum distribution in the MABL under hurricane conditions.

    Fig.4.Relationships between the drag coefficient Cd10and the 10-m wind speed U10.The solid lines show the results calculated using Eq.(28),taking into account the effects of surface waves and ocean spray(τw ≠ 0,τsp ≠ 0)for various wave ages ?=0.2(blue),0.3(red),0.4(black),0.6(cyan),0.8(pink),and 1.2(green).The dotted lines show the results calculated taking only the effects of ocean spray(τw=0,τsp ≠ 0)into open green circles show data presented by Troitskaya et al.(2012).(b)The open black circles and asterisks show data presented by Powell et al.(2003)for the 10–100 m and 10–150 m layers,respectively.The vertical line around each data point shows the 90%confidence limit.

    Illustrative examples for 100-m wind speeds of 15,25 and 40 m s?1,and surface wave fields with wave ages ??=20,25,30 and 40,respectively,are presented.The growth rate β was determined using an expression proposed by Polnikov(2011),who investigated interactions between the air and surface waves.The directional JONSWAP spectrum described by Lucas and Soares(2015)and spray force defined by Kudryavtsev and Makin(2011)were both used to calculate the near-surface wind profiles over the ocean for different wind speeds and wave ages.The results were compared with the results obtained if wave-induced stress and/or spray stress was neglected.

    The theoretical drag coefficients calculated using the model were compared with previous laboratory and field observations reported by Powell et al.(2003),Donelan et al.(2004),and Troitskaya et al.(2012).Comparing the laboratory observations with theoretical solutions showed that young sea-surface waves have considerable effects on the wind profile and turbulent structure in the MABL at lowto-moderate wind speeds.The drag coefficient and friction velocity were found to increase as the wind speed increased.However,at high wind speeds the drag coefficient started to level off and decrease as the wind speed increased,consistent with field observations.The results showed that ocean spray droplets produced by wind acting on breaking-wave crests affect the wind profile and turbulent structure,suppressing the sea-surface drag coefficient.In summary,including a wave induced component and spray component in the total stress allows the range of existing observations to be covered and the scatter in current observations to be predicted to some extent.

    Although we have only presented results for the JONSWAP spectrum here,the model can also be applied to other wave spectra.The model has,of course,some weaknesses,including that the analytical drag coefficient values at high wind speeds for young wave fields were not consistent with laboratory data and the effects of mature sea waves on the wind profile and drag coefficient appeared to be too weak.We assumed that the Coriolis term can be neglected when calculating total stress,and that the eddy turbulent coefficient varies linearly with height.The parameterization of spray stress was found not to be related to the wave age.All the assumptions simplified the model construction and allowed the model to give relatively rational results.However,some common phenomena over the oceans,such as rain,atmospheric rolling,and large eddies,can markedly influence the MABL under certain conditions,but these physical processes were beyond the scope of this study.

    Acknowledgements.The research presented in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.41576013)and the National Key Research and Development Program of China(Grant No.2016YFC1401404).The research also was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.41476021 and 41621064)and the Indo-Pacific Ocean Environment Variation and Air–Sea Interaction project(GASI-IPOVAI-04).

    Andreas,E.L.,1998:A new sea spray generation function for wind speeds up to 32 m s?1.J.Phys.Oceanogr.,28,2175–2184, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028<2175:ANSSGF>2.0.CO;2.

    Andreas,E.L.,2004:Spray stress revisited.J.Phys.Oceanogr.,34,1429–1440,https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034<1429:SSR>2.0.CO;2.

    Charnock,H.,1955:Wind stress on a water surface.Quart.J.Roy.Meteor.Soc.,81,639–640,https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708135027.

    Donelan,M.A.,B.K.Haus,N.,Reul,W.J.Plant,M.Stiassnie,H.C.Graber,O.B.Brown,and E.S.Saltzman,2004:On the limiting aerodynamic roughness of the ocean in very strong winds.Geophys.Res.Lett.,31,L18306,https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019460.

    Gao,Z.Q.,Q.Wang,and M.Y.Zhou,2009:Wave-dependence of friction velocity,roughness length and drag coefficient over coastal and open water surfaces by using three databases.Adv.At mos.Sci.,26,887–894,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-009-8130-7.

    Grachev,A.A.,C.W.Fairall,J.E.Hare,J.B.Edson,and S.D.Miller,2003:Wind stress vector over ocean waves.J.Phys.Oceanogr.,33,2408–2429,https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033<2408:WSVOOW>2.0.CO;2.

    Hanley,K.E.,and S.E.Belcher,2008:Wave-driven wind jets in the marine atmospheric boundary layer.J.Atmos.Sci.,65,2646–2660,https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2562.1.

    Hara,T.,and S.E.Belcher,2004:Wind profile and drag coefficient over mature ocean surface wave spectra.J.Phys.Oceanogr.,34,2345–2358,https://doi.org/10.112275/JPO2633.1.

    Harris,D.L.,1966:The wave-driven wind.J.Atmos.Sci.,23,688–693,https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1966)023<0688:TWDW>2.0.CO;2.

    He,H.L.,and D.K.Chen,2011:Effects of surface wave breaking on the oceanic boundary layer.Geogphysical Research Letters,38,L07604.

    Jarosz,E.,D.A.Mitchell,D.W.Wang,and W.J.Teague,2007:Bottom-up determination of air-sea momentum exchange under a major tropical cyclone.Science,315,1707–1709,https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136466.

    Kudryavtsev,V.N.,2006:On the effect of sea drops on the atmospheric boundary layer.J.Geophys.Res.,111,C07020,https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC002970.

    Kudryavtsev,V.N.,and V.K.Makin,2011:Impact of ocean spray on the dynamics of the marine atmospheric boundary layer.Bound.-Layer Meteor.,140,383–410,https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-001-9624-2.

    Lewis,D.M.,and S.E.Belcher,2004:Time-dependent,coupled,Ekman boundary layer solutions incorporating Stokes drift.Dyn.Atmos.Oceans,37,313–351,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2003.11.001.

    Li,S.,M.Li,G.P.Gerbi,and J.B.Song,2013:Roles of breaking waves and Langmuir circulation in the surface boundary layer of a coastal ocean.J.Geophys.Res.Ocean,118,5173–5187.

    Liu,B.,C.L.Guan,and L.Xie,2012:The wave state and sea spray related parameterization of wind stress applicable from low to extreme winds.J.Geophys.Res.,117,C00J22,https://doi.org/100.1007/s11802-016-2655-z10.1029/2011JC 007786.

    Lucas,C.,and C.G.Soares,2015:On the modelling of swell spectra.Ocean Engineering,108,749–759,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.08.017.

    Makin,V.K.,2008:On the possible impact of a following-swell on the atmospheric boundary layer.Bound.-Layer Meteor.,129,469–478,https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-008-9320-z.

    Makin,V.K.,V.N.Kudryavtsev,and C.Mastenbroek,1995:Drag of the sea surface.Bound.-Layer Meteor.,73,159–182,https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708935.

    Mueller,J.A.,and F.Veron,2009:A sea state-dependent spume generation function.J.Phys.Oceanogr.,39,2363–2372,https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4113.1.

    Polnikov,V.G.,2011:Integrated model for a wave boundary layer.Marine Science,1,10–21,https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ms.20110101.02.

    Powell,M.D.,P.J.Vickery,and T.A.Reinhold,2003:Reduced drag coefficient for high wind speeds in tropical cyclones.Nature,422,279–283,https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01481.

    Rutgersson,A.,A.S.Smedman,and U.H?gstr?m,2001:Use of conventional stability parameters during swell.J.Geophys.Res.,106,27 117–27 134,https://doi.org/10.1029/2000 JC000543.

    Semedo,A.,?.Saetra,A.Rutgersson,K.K.Kahma,and H.Pettersson,2009:Wave-induced wind in the marine boundary layer.J.Atmos.Sci.,66,2256–2271,https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3018.1.

    Song,J.B.,W.Fan,S.Li.,and M.Zhou,2015:Impact of surface waves on the steady near-surface wind profiles over the ocean.Bound.-Layer Meteor.,155,C00J21,https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0959-610.1007/s10546-014-9983-6.

    Song,J.B.,2009:The effects of random surface waves on the steady Ekman current solutions.Deep-Sea Res.,56(5),659–671.

    Troitskaya,Y.I.,D.A.Sergeev,A.A.Kandaurov,G.A.Baidakov,M.A.Vdovin,and V.I.Kazakov,2012:Laboratory and theoretical modeling of air-sea momentum transfer under severe wind conditions.J.Geophys.Res.,117,50–60,https://doi.org/10.1029/2011/JC007778.

    Xiao,J.B.,and A.T.Taylor,2002:On equilibrium profiles of suspended particles.Bound.-Layer Meteor.,105,471–482,https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020395323626.

    Wang,J.J.,J.B.Song,Y.S.Huang,and C.H.Fan,2013:Application of the Hilbert–Huang transform to the estimation of air-sea turbulent fluxes.Bound.-Layer Meteor.,147(3),553–568,https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9784-8.

    Zhang,T.,J.B.Song,S.Li,and L.G.Yang,2016:The effects of wind-driven waves and ocean spray on the drag coefficient and near-surface wind profiles over the ocean.Acta Oceanologica Sinica,35,79–85,https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0950-6.

    Zhao,D.L.,and L.Xie,2010:A practical bi-parameter formula of gas transfer velocity depending on wave states.Journal of Oceanography,66,663–671,https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-010-0054-4.

    婷婷丁香在线五月| av网站在线播放免费| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 久久影院123| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 777米奇影视久久| 久久人妻av系列| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 精品第一国产精品| 多毛熟女@视频| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲成人手机| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 久久久精品区二区三区| 午夜视频精品福利| 乱人伦中国视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产片内射在线| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产高清激情床上av| 久久99一区二区三区| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 18禁观看日本| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 免费观看人在逋| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 精品国产一区二区久久| 老熟女久久久| 自线自在国产av| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 天堂动漫精品| 国产在线视频一区二区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲国产看品久久| 深夜精品福利| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 中文字幕制服av| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 久久性视频一级片| 免费在线观看日本一区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产单亲对白刺激| 午夜两性在线视频| 黄色视频不卡| 视频区图区小说| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日本av免费视频播放| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 极品教师在线免费播放| 久久久国产一区二区| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 人人澡人人妻人| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 国产av国产精品国产| 亚洲色图av天堂| 岛国在线观看网站| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 中文字幕色久视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| av电影中文网址| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 丝袜在线中文字幕| avwww免费| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 国产av又大| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 99热网站在线观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| av天堂在线播放| 五月开心婷婷网| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 一级毛片电影观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产精品.久久久| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产高清videossex| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 欧美乱妇无乱码| netflix在线观看网站| 国产淫语在线视频| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 一级黄色大片毛片| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 欧美大码av| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 悠悠久久av| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 黄片播放在线免费| 国产成人系列免费观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 日韩欧美免费精品| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产激情久久老熟女| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 亚洲综合色网址| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 不卡av一区二区三区| www.999成人在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产成人精品在线电影| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 女警被强在线播放| 另类精品久久| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 捣出白浆h1v1| 精品第一国产精品| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 天堂8中文在线网| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 精品久久久久久电影网| 飞空精品影院首页| 国产精品成人在线| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 国产男女内射视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产在视频线精品| 露出奶头的视频| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美在线黄色| av片东京热男人的天堂| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产三级黄色录像| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 无人区码免费观看不卡 | 一区在线观看完整版| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产麻豆69| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 手机成人av网站| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 伦理电影免费视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 另类精品久久| 大香蕉久久成人网| 曰老女人黄片| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲国产av新网站| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产精品九九99| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| av有码第一页| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 欧美午夜高清在线| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 精品国产一区二区久久| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 夫妻午夜视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| av天堂在线播放| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 脱女人内裤的视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产男女内射视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 丁香六月天网| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 大码成人一级视频| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 精品福利观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 99九九在线精品视频| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| av不卡在线播放| 欧美日韩av久久| 午夜两性在线视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲九九香蕉| 夜夜爽天天搞| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 久久香蕉激情| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 9191精品国产免费久久| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产精品.久久久| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 香蕉国产在线看| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 高清欧美精品videossex| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 成在线人永久免费视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 性少妇av在线| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 久久狼人影院| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 9191精品国产免费久久| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| www.999成人在线观看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 操出白浆在线播放| 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 久久热在线av| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 在线永久观看黄色视频| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 国产男女内射视频| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 午夜两性在线视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产精品免费视频内射| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲全国av大片| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 成人永久免费在线观看视频 | 成在线人永久免费视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 一级毛片精品| 国产成人欧美| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 又大又爽又粗| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 五月天丁香电影| 精品亚洲成国产av| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 中文欧美无线码| 咕卡用的链子| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 三级毛片av免费| 岛国在线观看网站| 午夜福利欧美成人| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 国产麻豆69| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 成人手机av| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 大型av网站在线播放| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 久久av网站| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 中文字幕制服av| 色94色欧美一区二区| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 日本a在线网址| 夫妻午夜视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| h视频一区二区三区| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 999精品在线视频| 国产成人精品在线电影| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 欧美日韩精品网址| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 99九九在线精品视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 深夜精品福利| 一区二区av电影网| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| av网站免费在线观看视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲国产欧美网| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 一级毛片精品| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| av电影中文网址| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 一进一出抽搐动态| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 成年动漫av网址| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 一本久久精品| 黄片小视频在线播放| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 久久性视频一级片| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 久久久国产一区二区| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 午夜91福利影院| 宅男免费午夜| 成人国语在线视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区 | 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 极品教师在线免费播放| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 一进一出好大好爽视频| av网站在线播放免费| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 99久久国产精品久久久| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产成人影院久久av| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 中文字幕制服av| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 欧美在线黄色| 伦理电影免费视频|