• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Idealized Experiments for Optimizing Model Parameters Using a 4D-Variational Method in an Intermediate Coupled Model of ENSO

    2018-03-06 03:36:00ChuanGAORongHuaZHANGXinrongWUandJichangSUNKeyLaboratoryofOceanCirculationandWavesInstituteofOceanologyChineseAcademyofSciencesQingdao26607China
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2018年4期

    Chuan GAO,Rong-Hua ZHANG,Xinrong WU,and Jichang SUNKey Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Waves,Institute of Oceanology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Qingdao 26607,China

    2Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology,Qingdao 266237,China

    3Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation,Shandong Academy of Sciences,Qingdao 266001,China

    4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China

    5Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Information Technology,State Oceanic Administration,National Marine Data and Information Service,Tianjin 300000,China

    1.Introduction

    The El Ni?o–Southern Oscillation(ENSO)is the strongest interannual signal of the climate system(Bjerknes,1966),which has significant impacts on the weather and climate worldwide through atmospheric teleconnection(e.g.,Huang et al.,2001;Xie et al.,2010).At present,the ENSO phenomenon is recognized as comprising of the most predictable short-term climate anomalies thanks to successful development of air–sea coupled models(e.g.,Chen et al.,2004;Zhang et al.,2013),including intermediate coupled models(ICMs;e.g.,Zebiak and Cane,1987;Zhang et al.,2003).Currently,various coupled models enable us to make six-month and longer real-time ENSO predictions in advance with reasonable success.For example,we developed an improved ICM at the Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences(IOCAS),named the IOCAS ICM(Zhang and Gao,2016a).The model has been routinely used to predict SST evolution in the tropical Pacific(for a summary of the model’s ENSO forecasts,see the International Research Institute for Climate and Society website at http://iri.columbia.edu/climate/ENSO/currentinfo/update.html). Nevertheless,IOCAS ICM still has systematic biases with large uncertainties in ENSO prediction(Zhang and Gao,2016b).

    Various methods have been developed to improve the quality of ENSO forecasts,which are affected by many factors,including the model itself and the initial conditions that are used to make predictions (Mu et al.,2002).To improve the ENSO prediction skill,one effective way is to calibrate the model prediction of ENSO by designing model-dependent statistical correction methods(Ren et al.,2014;Liu and Ren,2017).Also,one of the sources for ENSO prediction errors is the initial ocean conditions,because the initial error can grow and amplify through ocean dynamics and air–sea interactions.As observations are still sparse in the ocean,limited observational data need to be combined with models in a smart way to provide coherent initial conditions that are consistent with model dynamics(Wang et al.,2000).Recently,data assimilation methods have been successfully used to optimize the initial conditions for ocean model initialization,which can significantly improve ENSO simulation and prediction.Various data assimilation methods are currently available,including the Ensemble Kalman Filter(EnKF)and variational data assimilation methods(Dommenget and Stammer,2004;Zhang et al.,2005b;Zheng et al.,2006,2009;Wu et al.,2016).

    Another major source for ENSO prediction errors comes from model errors,including uncertainties in model parameters(Mu et al.,2010).Physically,model parameters are introduced to represent processes and quantify the relationships between related fields.Inevitably,approximations are often made in estimating parameters to represent real physics.Observations can be used to tune model parameters in a simple and straightforward way(Wu et al.,2012).Often,parameters are estimated in an empirical and subjective way,and such an a priori estimate of parameters may not be consistent with model dynamics.It is desirable to estimate parameters in an optimal way,in the sense that the best possible simulations can be produced for a given model(Liu et al.,2014).Furthermore,model error characteristics could be taken into account,and it is thus preferable to be able to automatically consider the feedback of model dynamics to parameter estimates.The 4D variational(4D-Var)data assimilation approach offers such an objective and comprehensive way to optimize model parameters for improving model simulations.Indeed,the variational data assimilation method has been widely applied to parameter estimation in ocean models.For example,Lu and Hsieh(1998)implemented an adjoint assimilation method into a simple equatorial air–sea coupled model to investigate the optimization of initial conditions and model parameters.Zhang et al.(2005b)examined the ability of the 4D-Var method to optimize the uncertainty of model parameters.Peng and Xie(2006)and Peng et al.(2013)developed a 4D-Var algorithm to correct the initial condition and wind stress drag coefficient for storm surge forecasting.Zhang et al.(2015)assimilated SST data in a two-equation turbulence model by 4D-Var data assimilation to estimate the wave-affected parameters.These studies clearly indicate that the combination of optimizing initial conditions and optimizing model parameters through data assimilation can effectively improve model simulation and prediction.

    In this study,we continue to channel our efforts into improving IOCAS ICM for better ENSO simulation and prediction.One way to improve its performance is through data assimilation.To this end,a 4D-Var data assimilation method has been implemented into the ICM to improve state analyses(Gao et al.,2016),which provides an optimal initial state that can be used to predict ENSO.However,this previous study only applied data assimilation to optimizing the ocean initial state.Because severe biases can be apparently derived from errors in model parameters,it is desirable to use the 4D-Var scheme and develop a method to optimize model parameters in combination with optimizing initial conditions.

    Here,we aim to implement a framework for optimizing model parameters in the ICM through the 4D-Var data assimilation system,and demonstrate the feasibility of constraining ENSO evolution.As described before(Zhang and Gao,2016a),one important feature of IOCAS ICM is the way in which the temperature of the subsurface water entrained into the mixed layer(Te)is parameterized;the thermocline effect on SST in the ICM is explicitly represented by the relationship between Teand sea level(SL;an indicator of thermocline fluctuation),written as Te=αTeFTe(SL),in which SL represents the thermocline variability,FTeis the relationship between the Teanomaly and SL anomaly derived using empirical statistical methods(such as SVD),and αTeis a scalar parameter introduced to represent the intensity of subsurface thermal forcing.Various studies have found that subsurface thermal effects(such as entrainment and mixing)play an important role in ENSO evolution(Ballester et al.,2016;Zhang and Gao,2016a).Indeed,our previous studies have shown that ENSO simulations are very sensitive to αTe(e.g.,Gao and Zhang,2017).Here,this parameter is chosen to demonstrate a way in which optimal parameter estimation can be achieved using the 4D-Var method equipped within the ICM.The effects of optimizing this parameter on the simulation and prediction of ENSO are examined,with the feasibility of the approach in recovering the ENSO evolution demonstrated.

    The paper is organized as follows:Section 2 describes the ICM,the parameter estimation procedure using the 4D-Var data assimilation method,and the experimental setup.The effects of the parameter estimation on the simulation and prediction of ENSO are analyzed in sections 3 and 4,respectively.Finally,a conclusion and discussion are presented in section 5.

    2.Methodology

    In this paper,we examine the feasibility and effectiveness of optimizing a model parameter in improving ENSO simulation and prediction using the 4D-Var data assimilation method implemented in the ICM.In this section,we briefly introduce the methodology used to optimize the model parameter based on the 4D-Var method.First,a short description of the ICM is presented.Second,the 4D-Var data assimilation scheme and optimal parameter estimation method are introduced.Finally,results from a twin experiment are used to demonstrate the feasibility of the approach,and the effects of optimal initialization and parameter estimation on ENSO evolution are compared.

    2.1.Description of the ICM

    The ICM used is an anomaly model consisting of an intermediate ocean model(IOM)and an empirical wind stress model(Fig.1).One crucial aspect of the ocean component is the way in which the subsurface entrainment temperature in the surface mixed layer(Te)is explicitly parameterized in terms of the thermocline variability(as represented by the SL),written as Te=αTeFTe(SL),in which FTeis the relationship between the anomalies of Teand SL derived using statistical methods from historical data.A parameter,αTe,is introduced in the ICM to represent the intensity of thermal forcing associated with subsurface anomalies(Zhang et al.,2005a).

    The model has already been successfully used for ENSO simulations and predictions;see Zhang and Gao(2016a)for more details. Various model parameters exist within the ICM;here,we pay special attention to the parameter αTe,since it represents the intensity of the thermocline feedback,an important parameter to ENSO.

    2.2.Optimal parameter estimation based on the 4D-Var data assimilation system

    Previously,we successfully implemented the 4D-Var method into the ICM and demonstrated that optimal initialization of the ocean state can improve ENSO simulation and prediction skill(Gao et al.,2016).However,the importance of variational estimation for major model parameters to ENSO in the ICM has not been demonstrated.Here,we aim to develop a modeling framework for optimizing model parameters using the 4D-Var method,which can be used further for improving real-time ENSO prediction.

    Variational methods(3D-Var and 4D-Var),as a sophisticated branch of data assimilation,convert the problem of seeking the optimal initial state to that of minimizing a cost function under the constraint of model dynamics.More specifically,optimal control theories are applied to ocean–atmosphere models,which act as a constraint in the minimization of the cost function representing the mis fi ts between model simulation and observation(Courtier et al.,1994).For example,the 4D-Var data assimilation method utilizes observational data within a data insertion time window,seeking optimal values of model variables and parameters by minimizing the cost function under dynamical constraint.As the control variables are adjusted,the mis fi ts are reduced accordingly between the model solution and observation.

    Generally,an adjoint model is an efficient solution for evaluating the gradient of the cost function with respect to high-dimensional control variables in the 4D-Var data assimilation method.The adjoint model of the ICM is written coding-by-coding.First,the tangent linear model of the ICM is obtained by linearization.Then,the adjoint model of the ICM is achieved by transposing the tangent linear model;i.e.,it features the reverse of the temporal and spatial integration and other characteristics.In fact,the tangent linear model does not directly participate in the 4D-Var assimilation system.It is only used to validate the correctness of the adjoint model of the ICM.More details can be seen in Gao et al.(2016).

    Optimal parameter estimation is realized through the 4DVar assimilation of observational data under the constraint of model dynamics.Previously,a 4D-Var data assimilation system has already been successfully constructed in the ICM(Gao et al.,2016);model parameters can then be optimized.specifically,the governing equations of the ICM can be expressed as follows(Kalnay,2003):

    where t is time and t0is the initial time;is the vector of control variables in the ICM;represents the model parameters to be optimized,in which q is the total number;is the initial value ofis the initial value ofand F is the nonlinear forward operator.

    For the parameter estimation in the 4D-Var data assimilation context,the cost function can be formulated as(Kalnay,2003)

    Fig.1.Schematic diagram showing the components of IOCAS ICM,consisting of an IOM and various anomaly models for wind stress(τ),SST and Te.See the main text for more details.

    where the first term on the right-hand side is the background error term and the second is the observation error term.The superscript“T”represents the transpose of a matrix and the subscripts“b”and“o”represent the background field and observation,respectively;N indicates the number of integrations in the minimization time window;represents the observation;andrepresent the background error covariance matrix,the observation error covariance matrix and the observation operator,respectively.In this study,andand are simply set as diagonal matrices,which are the identity matrix multiplied by the standard deviation of the observation.The parametersare implicitly expressed in the cost function,which are regarded as independent variables ofand the gradient of the cost function with respect toandis calculated by the adjoint model of the ICM.Essentially,the process of parameter estimation based on the 4D-Var method is the same as the optimal initialization process for obtaining the initial conditions,which is detailed in Gao et al.(2016).

    Figure 2 illustrates the procedure involved with the 4DVar algorithm in obtaining the optimized initial condition and parameters in the ICM.The Specific steps are as follows:First,for a given initial guess(model solution),model parameterand observationthe ICM is integrated forward to obtain the cost function J(a mis fi t between the model solution and observation).Second,the ICM is integrated backward with the adjoint model to obtain the gradient of J with respect toandandThird,a minimization process is performed to obtain optimal analysis solutions of the initial condition and model parameters;here,the Limited-Memory Broyden–Fletcher–Glodfarb–Shanno(L-BFGS)algorithm(Liu and Nocedal,1989)is adopted to minimize the cost function to reduce the mis fi t and obtain the optimal analysis field.When the gradient calculation converges to a value that satis fi es a certain level of precision,the iteration is stopped and an optimalfield andvalue are obtained;otherwise,the resultantandare used as a new estimate and the steps outline above are repeated.

    2.3.Experimental setup

    Fig.2.Schematic diagram illustrating the procedure to optimize the ocean initial state)and model parametersusing the 4D-Var data assimilation system.

    Our previous studies have shown that initial conditions can be optimized in the ICM through the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data to effectively improve ENSO simulation and prediction(Gao et al.,2016).Based on this,in this paper,a new application is demonstrated using the ICM-based 4DVar system for optimal parameter estimation.As mentioned above,αTeis an empirically introduced scalar parameter representing the intensity of the subsurface thermal effect on SST,which has an important influence on ENSO evolution.Thus,as an example,αTeis chosen to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the 4D-Var-based optimization of parameter estimation in improving ENSO modeling.

    A twin-experiment strategy is adopted.Two basic experiments are performed first.A control run is conducted using the ICM with its standard parameters,including the coupling coefficient between interannual anomalies of SST and wind stress(τ), ατ=1.03;vertical diffusivity coefficient,Kv=1.0×10?3;thermal damping coefficient for SST anomalies,λ=1/(100×86400);and the coefficient between anomalies of Teand SL,αTe=1.0.As shown in Gao et al.(2016),the control run simulates ENSO very well.A “biased”run is then conducted,in which some modifications are made to these model parameters,as follows:ατ=1.03×1.01;Kv=1.0×10?3×0.95;λ =1/(100×86400)×1.01;and αTe=1.1.Here,the ICM with these modified parameters is referred to as the “biased”model,considering a situation in which model errors are erroneously produced by the changes in these model parameters.Here,the changes in these parameters(ατ,Kv,λ)are quite subtle,to guarantee the periodic oscillation of ENSO.If the changes in the parameters are excessive,it may break the balance of the dynamical processes,and the oscillation will not be maintained.Note that αTeis set to have its change a little bigger for testing how well the parameter optimization using the 4D-Var method will work.

    Next,we examine the extent to which the ENSO evolution simulated using the “biased”model can be recovered through the 4D-Var assimilation of the SST data,which are taken from the control run.We refer to the control run as Expt.1,which is integrated for 20 years using the “truth”model(with the default model parameters and “truth”initial condition)to generate the “truth”or “observed”data.The daily“observed”SST field is sampled from the“truth”model simulation with a Gaussian noise added to mimic the“observation”error.The mean and standard deviation of“observational”SST error are set to be zero and 0.2°C.The constructed “observation”of SST data from Expt.1 is used for assimilation into the “biased”model.Note that the type of observational error approximated in this way is rather simple,and it is not the basic question to be focused on here;instead,a key focus is to demonstrate the effectiveness of parameter optimization using the 4D-Var method.

    Based on these basic runs,two optimizing experiments using the “biased”model are designed as follows(Table 1):Expt.2 uses the “biased”model in which the initial conditions are optimized by assimilation of the “observed”SST data from Expt.1.Expt.3 is a combined optimizing experiment,in which the initial condition and model parameter(αTe)are simultaneously optimized through assimilating the“observed”SST data from Expt.1.Notethatdaily“observed”SST data are assimilated into the “biased”model in Expt.2 and Expt.3 only at the first time-step of every month.The length of the assimilation window is set to be one month in consideration of the computational efficiency.The period of the experiments is 20 years,from model time 2060/01/01 to 2079/12/31.Comparisons of the ENSO evolution between these experiments(Expt.1,Expt.2 and Expt.3)are made to show how the optimization works and its effect on the recovery of ENSO features.Furthermore,a series of oneyear hindcast experiments are performed using the “biased”model,in which the optimized analyses(initial state and/or model parameter)are taken on the first day of each month when making hindcasts;the hindcast periods are from model time 2062/01/01 to 2079/12/01 after a 2-year spin-up period in the optimizing experiments.

    3.Effect on ENSO simulation

    The main purpose is to see how ENSO evolution in the“biased”model can be recovered using the 4D-Var assimilation of“observed”SST data sampled from the truth model.To this end,in this section,we examine how well the parameter αTeis optimized,which can lead to a recovery of ENSO evolution.Also,we compare the effects on ENSO simulations between experiments having only the initial condition optimized,and having both the initial condition plus this additional model parameter optimized.Based on these results,an effective way to recover the ENSO evolution is demonstrated through additionally optimizing this model parameter.

    3.1.Optimized estimate of the model parameter

    The “truth”value of αTeis 1.0 in the control experiment(Expt.1),and αTeis erroneously set to a “biased”value of 1.1 in Expt.2 and Expt.3 when using the “biased”model.The optimizing experiments are designed to see whether the“truth”αTevalue(1.0)can be recovered from the “biased”αTevalue in the “biased”model by the optimizing procedure using the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data taken from the “truth”model.Figure 3 shows the time series of αTeestimated from the first eight-year assimilation in Expt.3.It is seen that the estimated αTetends to approach the “truth”value through the optimization,which keeps a steady state after the first two-year spin-up period.In particular,the rescaled view shown for clarity in Fig.3 indicates that,after a few years of optimization,the optimized αTeduring the fiveto eight-year simulation in Expt.3 is in a steady state,being approximately 1.0.These results indicate that the model parameter can be effectively and reasonably well optimized by the 4D-Var-based method.The parameter estimation procedure is feasible and can give rise to the expected value.

    Table 1.Twin-experiment design using 4D-Var-based assimilation of SST data.Expt.1 is a control experiment using the“truth”model,in which the“observation”of SST data is obtained.Expt.2 is an optimizing experiment using a“biased”model,in which the initial condition is optimized through assimilation of“observed”SST data obtained from Expt.1.Expt.3 is a combined optimizing experiment using the “biased”model,in which the initial condition and model parameter are both optimized through assimilation of“observed”SST data obtained from Expt.1.

    3.2.Recovery of ENSO evolution

    In this subsection,we examine the evolution of various anomaly fields.As described above,the “biased”model is used to perform the optimizing experiments,with assimilation of SST data for only the initial condition in Expt.2,and the initial condition plus the model parameter in Expt.3,respectively.Figure 4 shows the longitude–time sections of SST anomalies along the equator from the simulations in Expt.1,Expt.2 and Expt.3 during the first 12-year simulation.The similarity indicates the effectiveness of the recovery.It is clearly illustrated that simulations based on Expt.2 and Expt.3 can both recover the basic characters of ENSO events well,including the period,spatial distribution,phase transition,and so on.For instance,after approximately the first two-year spin-up simulation period,the SST simulated in Expt.2(Fig.4b)is recovered to its“truth” field(Fig.4a)when the “observed”SST data are assimilated into the “biased”model.However,because of model parameter error,several departures still exist compared with the “truth” field.For example,the amplitude of the SST anomaly in Expt.2 is much larger than the“truth” field,and the phase transition time is changed slightly.By contrast,the SST field in Expt.3(Fig.4c)can recover to the “truth” field quickly(Fig.4a)after a short spin-up period.Thus,comparing these three experiments clearly indicates that additionally optimizing this model parameter using the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data can further improve ENSO simulation.

    It is expected that optimizing the model parameter αTecan have a direct influence on the Tefield when assimilating the “observed”SST data.Figure 5 shows the longitude–time sections of Teanomalies along the equator for the “truth”field,Expt.2 and Expt.3,during the first 12-year simulations.For Expt.2(Fig.5b),in which the model parameter αTeis not optimized,the Tefield can be seen to recover through assimilating the“observed”SST data.However,several departures still exist compared with the “truth” field(Fig.5a),which are induced by model parameter biases.It can be seen that a larger αTe(αTe=1.1)acts to produce a simulated Tefield that is also larger—consistent with our previous studies indicating that the subsurface thermal effect is stronger when αTeis chosen to be larger(Zhang and Gao,2016a).Therefore,when the subsurface effect on SST is stronger,the SST simulated in Expt.2 is larger than that of the “truth” field(Fig.4b).However,when αTeis optimized in Expt.3 to the “truth”model parameter(αTe=1.0;Fig.3)by parameter estimation based on assimilating the“observed”SST data,the simulated Teof Expt.3(Fig.5c)closely resembles the“truth” field.All these results indicate that optimizing both model parameters and the initial state through 4D-Var-based SST assimilation can recover the ENSO evolution more effectively than just optimizing the initial state alone.

    Fig.3.Time series of αTeestimated optimally using the 4D-Var method during the first eight-year assimilation periods.For clarity,a rescaled(ampli fi ed)view is also embedded in the figure for the αTeestimated during the five-to eight-year assimilation periods.

    Fig.4.Longitude–time sections of SST anomalies along the equator for(a)the “truth” field,(b)Expt.2 and(c)Expt.3 during the first 12-year simulation period.The contour interval is 0.5°C.

    3.3.Quanti fi cation in terms of the RMSE

    To quantify the effect on ENSO simulation of parameter estimation optimization,the RMSEs for some major variables are calculated.Here,the RMSE is defined as follows:

    Figure6 shows the RMSE time series for the anomalies of SST,wind stress,SL and Tecalculated over the full model domain(30°N–30°S,124°E–78°W).Expt.2 is a case in which only the initial condition is optimized by assimilating SST data;whereas,in Expt.3,both the initial condition and the model parameter are optimized.The results shown in the lefth and panels are calculated on the first day of each month in the first two-year simulation,and those in the right-hand panels are for the 3–12-year simulation for Expt.2(blue)and Expt.3(red).It is clearly evident that the RMSEs of both experiments decline consistently and systematically,reaching a steady state.Nevertheless,compared to Expt.2 without parameter estimation,the RMSEs of Expt.3 decline faster,being more effective at reaching the steady state(left-hand panels in Fig.6).Additionally,the values of the RMSEs are much smaller in Expt.3 compared with those in Expt.2 when reaching the steady state(right-hand panels in Fig.6).As with previous research in which it was shown that optimal initialization based on the 4D-Var method can effectively reduce the RMSEs of some major variables for ENSO simulation(Gao et al.,2016),here,optimal initialization and parameter estimation combined,based on4D-VarSST assimilation,work well too.Furthermore,it is also illustrated that parameter estimation based on assimilating SST data using the 4D-Var method can further improve the recovery of the simulation of the “truth” field using the “biased”model.Thus,ENSO simulations can be improved by simultaneously optimizing the initial conditions and model parameters through the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data.

    Next,the spatial distributions of the RMSEs are examined for some major model variables.Here,the RMSEs for each grid are calculated as follows:

    (2)地表水。井田南西側(cè)有下山河,在臨近河谷地帶開采,采空區(qū)可引起地表開裂與塌陷,從而溝通地表水體,導(dǎo)致地表水潰入井巷。在其附近地段開采時,應(yīng)加強頂板管理以及注意地表水體周邊隱伏斷層溝通地表水,以防水害發(fā)生。

    Fig.5.As in Fig.4 but for Teanomalies.The contour interval is 1°C.

    Fig.6.Time series of RMSEs for anomalies of(a,e)SST,(b,f)zonal τ,(c,g)SL and(d,h)Teover the full model domain(30°N–30°S,124°E–78°W).Here,the RMSEs are shown for the first two-year simulations(left-hand panels)and the three-to twelve-year simulations(right-hand panels)from Expt.2(blue)and Expt.3(red),respectively.The RMSEs are calculated on the first day of each month using the corresponding anomalies between Expt.1 and Expt.2 and between Expt.1 and Expt.3,respectively.The units are °C for SST and Te,dyn cm?2for τ,and cm for SL.

    Fig.7.Horizontal distributions of RMSEs for anomalies of(a,f)SST,(b,g)zonal τ,(c,h)meridional τ,(d,i)SL,and(e,j)Te.Here,the RMSEs are calculated from the first 20-year simulations for Expt.2(left-hand panels)and Expt.3(right-hand panels),respectively.The units are °C for SST and Te,dyn cm?2for τ,and cm for SL.

    Figure 7 shows the spatial distributions of the RMSEs for the anomalies of SST,zonal wind stress,meridional wind stress,SL and Te.Here,the RMSEs are calculated from Eq.(4)for the first 20-year simulations from Expt.2(left-hand panels)and Expt.3(right-hand panels).The results show that the spatial distributions of the RMSEs for all variables in Expt.3(right-hand panels in Fig.7)are all smaller than those in Expt.2(left-hand panels in Fig.7);whereas,the spatial patterns of the RMSEs are similar to each other in Expt.2 and Expt.3.For the SST field,the regions with maximum RMSE for Expt.2 and Expt.3 are both centered in the central and eastern Pacific;the maximum value is 0.25°C in Expt.3(Fig.7f),which is smaller than that in Expt.2 at 0.66°C(Fig.7a).For the zonal wind stress field,the larger RMSE regions are located in the central equatorial Pacific,with a maximum value of 0.1 dyn cm?2(1 dyn cm?2=0.1 N m?2)for Expt.2(Fig.7b)and0.042dyncm?2Expt.3(Fig.7g).For the meridional wind stress,the RMSEs have the same spatial pattern in Expt.2 and Expt.3,with a maximum value of 0.095 dyn cm?2in Expt.2(Fig.7c)and 0.032 dyn cm?2in Expt.3(Fig.7h).For the SL,the maximum RMSE values are 9 cm and 8 cm,with similar spatial distribution patterns for Expt.2(Fig.7d)and Expt.3(Fig.7i).For the Tefield,the maximum regions are both centered in the central equatorial Pacific,with a maximum value of 2°C in Expt.2(Fig.7e)and 0.55°C in Expt.3(Fig.7j).This represents a reduction in RMSEs by about 71%in Expt.3 compared with Expt.2.

    In general,the RMSE differences in the SST,wind stress and Tefields between Expt.2 and Expt.3 are much larger than those in the SL field.This is because,compared with Expt.2,the model parameter αTeis additionally optimized in Expt.3,leading to a Tefield that is effectively recovered.Since the subsurface thermal effect is very important to the evolution of SST anomalies,the improved Tefield in Expt.3 can further affect the simulation of the SST field.So,the biases in SST between the optimizing experiments and the “truth” field decrease faster in Expt.3 than in Expt.2.Thus,the modeled SST field is more likely to recover in Expt.3 compared with Expt.2.Furthermore,the wind stress anomaly field is constructed based on the relationship between the anomalies of SST and wind stress(τ):τ= ατFτ(SST).Therefore,the optimized SST field further improves the simulation of the wind stress anomaly.However,the SL anomaly field needs to be adjusted through dynamic processes when assimilating SST data in the ICM.Consequently,even though the SL field is adjusted to recover to its “truth”field,the biases between the optimizing experiments and the“truth” field are still large compared with other fields.

    All in all,additionally optimizing the model parameter αTeusing the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data in the ICM can effectively recover the simulation of major variables,especially for the Te,SST and wind stress fields.Simulation errors induced by biases in the model parameter can be effectively reduced by optimizing the parameter estimation using the 4D-Var method.As such,the optimization procedure can produce an adequate initial condition and model parameter that can be used for ENSO predictions.

    4.Effect on ENSO prediction

    It is clearly illustrated above that optimizing the model parameter αTethrough the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data can effectively recover the ENSO evolution.It is desirable to check if optimizing model parameters can also benefit ENSO forecasting,in combination with optimizing the initial condition.Here,we perform hindcast experiments using the“biased”model with optimized initial conditions and/or the optimized model parameter,αTe.A series of forecast experiments are conducted using the “biased”model during the period from model time 2062/01/01 to 2079/12/01.Two experiments are performed—one with only the initial condition optimized(Expt.2),and the other with both the model parameter(αTe)and initial condition optimized(Expt.3);the optimized initial condition and model parameter obtained on the first day of each month are used in Expt.2 and Expt.3,respectively.Thus,in these experiments,18×12(=216)hindcasts are obtained in total for analysis in each experiment.

    Figure 8 shows the time series of the Ni?o3.4 indices for the“truth”value(green)and hindcasts made at lead times of three months(Fig.8a),six months(Fig.8b)and nine months(Fig.8c)using the initial conditions and parameter obtained from Expt.2(blue)and Expt.3(red).The hindcast results indicate that the evolution can be predicted very well.As the hindcast time extends,the hindcast errors increase.When optimizing the initial conditions only in Expt.2,the hindcast results exhibit some biases compared with the “truth” field.When optimizing both the initial conditions and the model parameter in Expt.3,it is evident that the Ni?o3.4 indices produced closely follow the “truth”value.So,additionally optimizing this model parameter can contribute to further improvement in ENSO prediction.Quantitatively,the RMSEs of the Ni?o3.4 indices predicted in Expt.2 and Expt.3 at the six-month lead time with the “truth”value reduce from 0.47 to 0.06.As the constructed observation error type is simple in this idealized configuration context,the Ni?o3.4 indices in Expt.3 are almost the same as the“truth”value.

    5.Conclusion and discussion

    The IOCAS ICM used in this study still suffers from large biases in its real-time ENSO prediction. There are many ways to improve its performance.Previously,we developed a 4DVar data assimilation system for the ICM.As an application,the system was used to optimize the initial conditions for improved ENSO simulation and prediction.Because errors in model parameters are also important sources of model biases,in this paper,the 4D-Var system is used to demonstrate the feasibility of optimizing model parameters for improving ENSO analyses.

    Fig.8.Time series of the Ni?o3.4 indices for the“truth”model(green)and for hindcasts made using optimized initial conditions in Expt.2(blue)and the additionally optimized model parameter in Expt.3(red)at lead times of(a)three months,(b)six months and(c)nine months.The experiments are performed from model time 2063/01 to 2079/12.

    In this ICM,Teis used explicitly to represent the thermocline effect on SST(referred to simply as “the thermocline effect”),and a related parameter(αTe)is introduced to indicate the intensity of the thermocline feedback.In this paper,this model parameter,i.e.αTe,is used as an example to demonstrate the optimization of parameter estimates using the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data in the ICM.To this end,a twin-experiment approach is adopted with an idealized setting.

    Results from experiments having only the initial condition optimized and having both the initial condition plus the additional model parameter optimized are compared.As demonstrated before,the simulation and prediction of ENSO can be improved by optimal initialization using the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data in the ICM.Here,it is shown that ENSO evolution can be more effectively recovered by including the additional optimization of this parameter.Through optimizing this parameter,the reduction in RMSEs for anomalies of SST,wind stress,SL and Tetakes place relatively faster compared with that of SL.This is mainly because optimizing the model parameter αTecan effectively improve the simulation of the Tefield.As the subsurface thermal effect is important to SST evolution,the optimized Tefield leads to improved SST depictions.Additionally,the wind stress field is calculated as a response to the SST anomaly using its statistical model;thus,the wind stress anomaly is also improved in the optimized experiment.Since the SL field needs to be adjusted through dynamic processes when SST data are assimilated through the 4D-Var method,this field is less effectively improved.Thus,it is clearly evident that optimizing the model parameter using the 4D-Varbased assimilation of SST data can further improve the simulation and prediction of ENSO.The demonstrated feasibility of optimizing model parameters and initial conditions together through 4D-Var assimilation provides a modeling platform for ENSO studies.

    Another application of the 4D-Var data assimilation system implemented in IOCAS ICM to improve its ENSO modeling by optimizing model parameter estimates in the ICM is demonstrated in this paper.The results are obtained in the context of a twin experiment,and these idealized experiments are intended for demonstration purposes.Although only one parameter is considered for the optimized experiments under the idealized setting,it provides a theoretical demonstration and practical assimilation procedure to optimize model parameters.Further applications are underway using the 4DVar data assimilation technique.For example,the ICM’s performance is also sensitive to many other model parameters,including the coupling coefficient between interannual anomalies of SST and wind stress(ατ),the vertical diffusivity coefficient(Kv),the thermal damping coefficient for SST anomalies(λ),and so on.Thus,multi-parameter optimization procedures should be taken into account.Also,some potential problems may exist when applying this technique for fitting a model(which is necessarily biased)to real observed data.In particular,the parameter estimates may not converge as cleanly as shown in Fig.3,and the simultaneous estimation of multiple parameters may be difficult because multiple minima may emerge when estimating the cost function.Also,the spatial structure of the model parameters should be considered.Clearly,more experiments with respect to multi-parameter optimization need to be conducted.Additionally,the subsurface thermal state has considerable influence on the SST in the tropical Pacific.Thus,it is necessary to assimilate subsurface thermal fields into the ICM in addition to the SST data.For example,sea level and horizontal ocean current data need to be considered in the data assimilation procedure.Ultimately,such a combined assimilation of multiple variables and parameters should be considered when using the ICM.

    The resultant insight into this predictive understanding and the methodology gained from this work will be transferred to the improvement of real-time ENSO prediction using the IOCAS ICM(Zhang and Gao,2016b).Ultimately,all these efforts are expected to improve ENSO forecasting skill in IOCAS ICM by using the 4D-Var data assimilation system for various data(SST,SL,and others)and various model parameters(αTe,ατ,and others).

    Also,other data assimilation methods are currently available,including the EnKF method(Wu et al.,2016).It would be desirable to compare the advantages and disadvantages be-tween these methods in terms of ENSO simulation and prediction.In addition,the adjoint model of the 4D-Var data assimilation equipped with IOCAS ICM provides a way to calculate the gradient of the cost function;the adjoint method with the 4D-Var data assimilation system will be combined with the CNOP(conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation)approach(Mu and Duan,2003)to identify the error structure of initial conditions and model parameters(Tao et al.,2017).More results will be presented in future publications.

    Acknowledgements.We would like to thank Drs.Mu MU and Shaoqing ZHANG for their comments.We also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions.This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.41705082,41475101,41690122(41690120)),a Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategic Priority Project—the Western Pacific Ocean System(Grant Nos.XDA11010105 and XDA11020306),the National Programme on Global Change and Air–Sea Interaction(Grant Nos.GASI-IPOVAI-06and GASI-IPOVAI-01-01),the China Postdoctoral Science Foun-dation,and a Qingdao Postdoctoral Application Research Project.

    Ballester,J.,D.Petrova,S.Bordoni,B.Cash,M.García-Díez,and X.Rodó,2016:Sensitivity of El Ni?o intensity and timing to preceding subsurface heat magnitude.Scientific Reports,6,36344,https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36344.

    Bjerknes,J.,1966:A possible response of the atmospheric Hadley circulation to equatorial anomalies of ocean temperature.Tellus,18,820–829,https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1966.tb00303.x.

    Chen,D.,M.A.Cane,A.Kaplan,S.E.Zebiak,and D.Huang.,2004:Predictability of El Ni?o over the past 148 years.Nature,428,733–736,https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02439.

    Courtier,P.,J.N.Thépaut,and A.Hollings worth,1994:A strategy for operational implementation of4D-Var,using an incremental approach.Quart.J.Roy.Meteor.Soc.,120,1367–1387,https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712051912.

    Dommenget,D.,and D.Stammer,2004:Assessing ENSO simulations and predictions using adjoint ocean state estimation.J.Climate,17,4301–4315,https://doi.org/10.1175/3211.1.

    Gao,C.,and R.-H.Zhang,2017:The roles of atmospheric wind and entrained water temperature(Te)in the second-year cooling of the 2010-12 La Ni?a event.Climate Dyn.,48,597–617,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3097-4.

    Gao,C.,X.R.Wu,and R.-H.Zhang,2016:Testing a four-dimensional variational data assimilation method using an im-proved intermediate coupled model for ENSO analysis and prediction.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,33(7),875–888,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-5249-1.

    Huang,R.H.,R.H.Zhang,and B.L.Yan,2001:Dynamical effect of the zonal wind anomalies over the tropical western Pacific on ENSO cycles.Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences,44,1089–1098,https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906865.

    Kalnay,E.,2003:Atmospheric Modeling,Data Assimilation and Predictability.Cambridge University Press,342 pp.

    Liu,D.C.,and J.Nocedal,1989:On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization.Mathematical Programming,45,503–528,https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589116.

    Liu,Y.,andH.-L.Ren,2017: ImprovingENSO prediction in CFSv2 with an analogue-based correction method.International Journal of Climatology,37(15),https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5142.

    Liu,Y.,Z.Liu,S.Zhang,R.Jacob,F.Lu,X.Rong,and S.Wu.,2014:Ensemble-based parameter estimation in a coupled general circulation model.J.Climate,27,7151–7162,https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00406.1.

    Lu,J.X.,and W.W.Hsieh,1998:On determining initial conditions and parameters in a simple coupled atmosphere–ocean model by adjoint data assimilation.Tellus A,50,534–544,https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v50i4.14531.

    Mu,M.,and W.S.Duan,2003:A new approach to studying ENSO predictability:Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation.Chinese Science Bulletin,48,1045–1047,https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184224.

    Mu,M.,W.S.Duan,and C.J.Wang,2002:The predictability problems in numerical weather and climate prediction.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,19,191–204,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-002-0016-x.

    Mu,M.,W.Duan,Q.Wang,and R.Zhang,2010:An extension of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation approach and its applications.Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics,17,211–220,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-17-211-2010.

    Peng,S.-Q.,and L.Xie,2006:Effect of determining initial conditions by four-dimensional variational data assimilation on storm surge forecasting.Ocean Modelling,14,1–18,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2006.03.005.

    Peng,S.Q.,Y.N.Li,and L.Xie,2013:Adjusting the wind stress drag coefficient in storm surge forecasting using an adjoint technique.J.Atmos.Oceanic Technol.,30,590–608,https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00034.1.

    Ren,H.-L.,Y.Liu,F.-F.Jin,Y.P.Yan,and X.W.Liu,2014:Application of the analogue-based correction of errors method in ENSO prediction.Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters,7,157–161,https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1674-2834.13.0080.

    Tao,L.-J.,R.-H.Zhang,and C.Gao,2017:Initial error-induced optimal perturbations in ENSO predictions,as derived from an intermediate coupled model.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,34,791–803,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-6266-4.

    Wang,B.,X.L.Zou,and J.Zhu,2000:Data assimilation and its applications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,97(21),11 143–11 144,https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.21.11143.

    Wu,X.R.,S.Q.Zhang,Z.Y.Liu,A.Rosati,T.L.Delworth,and Y.Liu,2012:Impact of geographic-dependent parameter optimization on climate estimation and prediction:Simulation with an intermediate coupled model.Mon.Wea.Rev.,140,3956–3971,https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00298.1.

    Wu,X.R.,G.J,Han,S.Q.Zhang,and Z.Y.Liu,2016:A study of the impact of parameter optimization on ENSO predictability with an intermediate coupled model.Climate Dyn.,46,711–727,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2608-z.

    Xie,S.-P.,C.Deser,G.A.Vecchi,J.Ma,H.Y.Teng,and A.T.Wittenberg,2010:Global warming pattern formation:Sea surface temperature and rainfall.J.Climate,23,966–986,https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3329.1.

    Zebiak,S.E.,and M.A.Cane,1987:A model El Ni?o-southern oscillation.Mon.Wea.Rev.,115,2262–2278,https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<2262:AMENO>2.0.CO;2.

    Zhang,R.-H.,and C.Gao,2016a:Role of subsurface entrainment temperature(Te)in the onset of El Ni?oevents,as represented in an intermediate coupled model.Climate Dyn.,46,1417–1435,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2655-5.

    Zhang,R.-H.,and C.Gao,2016b:The IOCAS intermediate coupled model(IOCAS ICM)and its real-time predictions of the 2015-2016 El Ni?o event.Science Bulletin,61,1061–1070,https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-016-1064-4.

    Zhang,R.-H.,S.E.Zebiak,R.Kleeman,and N.Keenlyside,2003:A new intermediate coupled model for El Ni?o simulation and prediction.Geophys.Res.Lett.,30,2012,https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018010.

    Zhang,R.-H.,R.Kleeman,S.E.Zebiak,N.Keenlyside,and S.Raynaud,2005a:An empirical parameterization of subsurface entrainment temperature for improved SST anomaly simulations in an intermediate ocean model.J.Climate,18,350–371,https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3271.1.

    Zhang,R.-H.,F.Zheng,J.Zhu,and Z.G.Wang,2013:A successful real-time forecast of the 2010-11 La Ni?a event.Scientific Reports,3,1108,https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01108.

    Zhang,S.,M.J.Harrison,A.T.Wittenberg,A.Rosati,J.L.Anderson,and V.Balaji,2005b:Initialization of an ENSO forecast system using a parallelized ensemble filter.Mon.Wea.Rev.,133,3176–3201,https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3024.1.

    Zhang,X.F.,S.Q.Zhang,Z.Y.Liu,X.R.Wu,and G.J.Han,2015:Parameter optimization in an intermediate coupled climate model with biased physics.J.Climate,28,1227–1247,https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00348.1.

    Zheng,F.,J.Zhu,R.-H.Zhang,and G.Q.Zhou,2006:Ensemble hindcasts of SST anomalies in the tropical Pacific using an intermediate coupled model.Geophys.Res.Lett.,33,L19604,https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026994.

    Zheng,F.,J.Zhu,H.Wang,and R.-H.Zhang,2009:Ensemble hindcasts of ENSO events over the past 120 years using a large number of ensembles.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,26,359–372,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-009-0359-7.

    这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 成年动漫av网址| 亚洲成色77777| 日韩中字成人| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产乱来视频区| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 中国三级夫妇交换| 久久影院123| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 老司机影院成人| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 美女福利国产在线| 久久久久精品性色| 久久婷婷青草| 午夜日本视频在线| 久久久久视频综合| 观看av在线不卡| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 久久久精品区二区三区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| av电影中文网址| av在线app专区| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 午夜91福利影院| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 久久97久久精品| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 亚洲成人av在线免费| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 久久午夜福利片| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 精品福利永久在线观看| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 少妇 在线观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 日本色播在线视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 老熟女久久久| 熟女电影av网| 免费av中文字幕在线| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 成人二区视频| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲四区av| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 免费观看a级毛片全部| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 色吧在线观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| av一本久久久久| 久久久精品区二区三区| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产欧美亚洲国产| xxx大片免费视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 9191精品国产免费久久| 赤兔流量卡办理| 制服诱惑二区| 婷婷色综合www| 久久狼人影院| 99香蕉大伊视频| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产成人精品一,二区| 电影成人av| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 99久久综合免费| av在线老鸭窝| 大香蕉久久成人网| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 性色avwww在线观看| 日韩电影二区| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 欧美bdsm另类| 久久久久网色| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产成人精品婷婷| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 91精品三级在线观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 自线自在国产av| 久久狼人影院| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产精品成人在线| 国产精品三级大全| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 97在线人人人人妻| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲综合精品二区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产精品二区激情视频| 青草久久国产| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 一本久久精品| 91精品三级在线观看| 七月丁香在线播放| 超碰97精品在线观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 黄片播放在线免费| 免费少妇av软件| 91国产中文字幕| 亚洲国产欧美网| av视频免费观看在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 天堂8中文在线网| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 午夜久久久在线观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 满18在线观看网站| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 在线观看人妻少妇| 制服诱惑二区| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲精品视频女| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲成色77777| 精品一区在线观看国产| 午夜影院在线不卡| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产成人精品在线电影| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 伦理电影免费视频| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 免费看不卡的av| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久热这里只有精品99| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 秋霞伦理黄片| 少妇 在线观看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 搡老乐熟女国产| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 欧美日韩av久久| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 日本91视频免费播放| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 国产1区2区3区精品| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 999久久久国产精品视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 九草在线视频观看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 色哟哟·www| 老女人水多毛片| 日本午夜av视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲国产精品999| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲成色77777| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 香蕉国产在线看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 老司机影院成人| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 午夜福利,免费看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 久热久热在线精品观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 9色porny在线观看| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 久久午夜福利片| 国产探花极品一区二区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 丁香六月天网| 中文欧美无线码| 曰老女人黄片| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲av.av天堂| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| av一本久久久久| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 成年av动漫网址| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 制服诱惑二区| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 永久网站在线| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久午夜福利片| 黄片小视频在线播放| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 999精品在线视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 99九九在线精品视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲伊人色综图| av在线观看视频网站免费| 精品国产国语对白av| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 尾随美女入室| 精品久久久久久电影网| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 在线观看人妻少妇| av网站在线播放免费| 国产色婷婷99| 一级毛片电影观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 成人免费观看视频高清| 性色avwww在线观看| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 久久久久网色| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 日本欧美视频一区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 夫妻午夜视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 美国免费a级毛片| 在线天堂最新版资源| av不卡在线播放| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 男人操女人黄网站| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 精品久久久久久电影网| 免费看av在线观看网站| 午夜日本视频在线| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产一级毛片在线| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 少妇的逼水好多| 在线观看国产h片| 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲国产色片| 国产精品成人在线| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产视频首页在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久久久网色| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久热这里只有精品99| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 午夜免费观看性视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产在线视频一区二区| 99九九在线精品视频| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 欧美另类一区| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 电影成人av| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 在线天堂最新版资源| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 欧美97在线视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 伦精品一区二区三区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 美女午夜性视频免费| 天天影视国产精品| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 黄色一级大片看看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 在线天堂中文资源库| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 在线天堂中文资源库| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 亚洲国产精品999| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 精品国产一区二区久久| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| a 毛片基地| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 美女国产视频在线观看| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 精品福利永久在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 精品午夜福利在线看| 亚洲在久久综合| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 精品第一国产精品| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 婷婷色综合www| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 99久久综合免费| freevideosex欧美| 在线观看人妻少妇| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 黄频高清免费视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 97在线视频观看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 久久人人爽人人片av| 99热网站在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 久久久久网色| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| av电影中文网址| 国产 一区精品| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 男女边摸边吃奶| videos熟女内射| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 飞空精品影院首页| 免费av中文字幕在线| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲综合色网址| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 9热在线视频观看99| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 伦精品一区二区三区| 9热在线视频观看99| 美女国产视频在线观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久人人爽人人片av| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 精品酒店卫生间| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 人妻系列 视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产在线免费精品| 国产乱来视频区| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 夫妻午夜视频| 免费观看在线日韩|