• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Idealized Experiments for Optimizing Model Parameters Using a 4D-Variational Method in an Intermediate Coupled Model of ENSO

    2018-03-06 03:36:00ChuanGAORongHuaZHANGXinrongWUandJichangSUNKeyLaboratoryofOceanCirculationandWavesInstituteofOceanologyChineseAcademyofSciencesQingdao26607China
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2018年4期

    Chuan GAO,Rong-Hua ZHANG,Xinrong WU,and Jichang SUNKey Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Waves,Institute of Oceanology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Qingdao 26607,China

    2Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology,Qingdao 266237,China

    3Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation,Shandong Academy of Sciences,Qingdao 266001,China

    4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China

    5Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Information Technology,State Oceanic Administration,National Marine Data and Information Service,Tianjin 300000,China

    1.Introduction

    The El Ni?o–Southern Oscillation(ENSO)is the strongest interannual signal of the climate system(Bjerknes,1966),which has significant impacts on the weather and climate worldwide through atmospheric teleconnection(e.g.,Huang et al.,2001;Xie et al.,2010).At present,the ENSO phenomenon is recognized as comprising of the most predictable short-term climate anomalies thanks to successful development of air–sea coupled models(e.g.,Chen et al.,2004;Zhang et al.,2013),including intermediate coupled models(ICMs;e.g.,Zebiak and Cane,1987;Zhang et al.,2003).Currently,various coupled models enable us to make six-month and longer real-time ENSO predictions in advance with reasonable success.For example,we developed an improved ICM at the Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences(IOCAS),named the IOCAS ICM(Zhang and Gao,2016a).The model has been routinely used to predict SST evolution in the tropical Pacific(for a summary of the model’s ENSO forecasts,see the International Research Institute for Climate and Society website at http://iri.columbia.edu/climate/ENSO/currentinfo/update.html). Nevertheless,IOCAS ICM still has systematic biases with large uncertainties in ENSO prediction(Zhang and Gao,2016b).

    Various methods have been developed to improve the quality of ENSO forecasts,which are affected by many factors,including the model itself and the initial conditions that are used to make predictions (Mu et al.,2002).To improve the ENSO prediction skill,one effective way is to calibrate the model prediction of ENSO by designing model-dependent statistical correction methods(Ren et al.,2014;Liu and Ren,2017).Also,one of the sources for ENSO prediction errors is the initial ocean conditions,because the initial error can grow and amplify through ocean dynamics and air–sea interactions.As observations are still sparse in the ocean,limited observational data need to be combined with models in a smart way to provide coherent initial conditions that are consistent with model dynamics(Wang et al.,2000).Recently,data assimilation methods have been successfully used to optimize the initial conditions for ocean model initialization,which can significantly improve ENSO simulation and prediction.Various data assimilation methods are currently available,including the Ensemble Kalman Filter(EnKF)and variational data assimilation methods(Dommenget and Stammer,2004;Zhang et al.,2005b;Zheng et al.,2006,2009;Wu et al.,2016).

    Another major source for ENSO prediction errors comes from model errors,including uncertainties in model parameters(Mu et al.,2010).Physically,model parameters are introduced to represent processes and quantify the relationships between related fields.Inevitably,approximations are often made in estimating parameters to represent real physics.Observations can be used to tune model parameters in a simple and straightforward way(Wu et al.,2012).Often,parameters are estimated in an empirical and subjective way,and such an a priori estimate of parameters may not be consistent with model dynamics.It is desirable to estimate parameters in an optimal way,in the sense that the best possible simulations can be produced for a given model(Liu et al.,2014).Furthermore,model error characteristics could be taken into account,and it is thus preferable to be able to automatically consider the feedback of model dynamics to parameter estimates.The 4D variational(4D-Var)data assimilation approach offers such an objective and comprehensive way to optimize model parameters for improving model simulations.Indeed,the variational data assimilation method has been widely applied to parameter estimation in ocean models.For example,Lu and Hsieh(1998)implemented an adjoint assimilation method into a simple equatorial air–sea coupled model to investigate the optimization of initial conditions and model parameters.Zhang et al.(2005b)examined the ability of the 4D-Var method to optimize the uncertainty of model parameters.Peng and Xie(2006)and Peng et al.(2013)developed a 4D-Var algorithm to correct the initial condition and wind stress drag coefficient for storm surge forecasting.Zhang et al.(2015)assimilated SST data in a two-equation turbulence model by 4D-Var data assimilation to estimate the wave-affected parameters.These studies clearly indicate that the combination of optimizing initial conditions and optimizing model parameters through data assimilation can effectively improve model simulation and prediction.

    In this study,we continue to channel our efforts into improving IOCAS ICM for better ENSO simulation and prediction.One way to improve its performance is through data assimilation.To this end,a 4D-Var data assimilation method has been implemented into the ICM to improve state analyses(Gao et al.,2016),which provides an optimal initial state that can be used to predict ENSO.However,this previous study only applied data assimilation to optimizing the ocean initial state.Because severe biases can be apparently derived from errors in model parameters,it is desirable to use the 4D-Var scheme and develop a method to optimize model parameters in combination with optimizing initial conditions.

    Here,we aim to implement a framework for optimizing model parameters in the ICM through the 4D-Var data assimilation system,and demonstrate the feasibility of constraining ENSO evolution.As described before(Zhang and Gao,2016a),one important feature of IOCAS ICM is the way in which the temperature of the subsurface water entrained into the mixed layer(Te)is parameterized;the thermocline effect on SST in the ICM is explicitly represented by the relationship between Teand sea level(SL;an indicator of thermocline fluctuation),written as Te=αTeFTe(SL),in which SL represents the thermocline variability,FTeis the relationship between the Teanomaly and SL anomaly derived using empirical statistical methods(such as SVD),and αTeis a scalar parameter introduced to represent the intensity of subsurface thermal forcing.Various studies have found that subsurface thermal effects(such as entrainment and mixing)play an important role in ENSO evolution(Ballester et al.,2016;Zhang and Gao,2016a).Indeed,our previous studies have shown that ENSO simulations are very sensitive to αTe(e.g.,Gao and Zhang,2017).Here,this parameter is chosen to demonstrate a way in which optimal parameter estimation can be achieved using the 4D-Var method equipped within the ICM.The effects of optimizing this parameter on the simulation and prediction of ENSO are examined,with the feasibility of the approach in recovering the ENSO evolution demonstrated.

    The paper is organized as follows:Section 2 describes the ICM,the parameter estimation procedure using the 4D-Var data assimilation method,and the experimental setup.The effects of the parameter estimation on the simulation and prediction of ENSO are analyzed in sections 3 and 4,respectively.Finally,a conclusion and discussion are presented in section 5.

    2.Methodology

    In this paper,we examine the feasibility and effectiveness of optimizing a model parameter in improving ENSO simulation and prediction using the 4D-Var data assimilation method implemented in the ICM.In this section,we briefly introduce the methodology used to optimize the model parameter based on the 4D-Var method.First,a short description of the ICM is presented.Second,the 4D-Var data assimilation scheme and optimal parameter estimation method are introduced.Finally,results from a twin experiment are used to demonstrate the feasibility of the approach,and the effects of optimal initialization and parameter estimation on ENSO evolution are compared.

    2.1.Description of the ICM

    The ICM used is an anomaly model consisting of an intermediate ocean model(IOM)and an empirical wind stress model(Fig.1).One crucial aspect of the ocean component is the way in which the subsurface entrainment temperature in the surface mixed layer(Te)is explicitly parameterized in terms of the thermocline variability(as represented by the SL),written as Te=αTeFTe(SL),in which FTeis the relationship between the anomalies of Teand SL derived using statistical methods from historical data.A parameter,αTe,is introduced in the ICM to represent the intensity of thermal forcing associated with subsurface anomalies(Zhang et al.,2005a).

    The model has already been successfully used for ENSO simulations and predictions;see Zhang and Gao(2016a)for more details. Various model parameters exist within the ICM;here,we pay special attention to the parameter αTe,since it represents the intensity of the thermocline feedback,an important parameter to ENSO.

    2.2.Optimal parameter estimation based on the 4D-Var data assimilation system

    Previously,we successfully implemented the 4D-Var method into the ICM and demonstrated that optimal initialization of the ocean state can improve ENSO simulation and prediction skill(Gao et al.,2016).However,the importance of variational estimation for major model parameters to ENSO in the ICM has not been demonstrated.Here,we aim to develop a modeling framework for optimizing model parameters using the 4D-Var method,which can be used further for improving real-time ENSO prediction.

    Variational methods(3D-Var and 4D-Var),as a sophisticated branch of data assimilation,convert the problem of seeking the optimal initial state to that of minimizing a cost function under the constraint of model dynamics.More specifically,optimal control theories are applied to ocean–atmosphere models,which act as a constraint in the minimization of the cost function representing the mis fi ts between model simulation and observation(Courtier et al.,1994).For example,the 4D-Var data assimilation method utilizes observational data within a data insertion time window,seeking optimal values of model variables and parameters by minimizing the cost function under dynamical constraint.As the control variables are adjusted,the mis fi ts are reduced accordingly between the model solution and observation.

    Generally,an adjoint model is an efficient solution for evaluating the gradient of the cost function with respect to high-dimensional control variables in the 4D-Var data assimilation method.The adjoint model of the ICM is written coding-by-coding.First,the tangent linear model of the ICM is obtained by linearization.Then,the adjoint model of the ICM is achieved by transposing the tangent linear model;i.e.,it features the reverse of the temporal and spatial integration and other characteristics.In fact,the tangent linear model does not directly participate in the 4D-Var assimilation system.It is only used to validate the correctness of the adjoint model of the ICM.More details can be seen in Gao et al.(2016).

    Optimal parameter estimation is realized through the 4DVar assimilation of observational data under the constraint of model dynamics.Previously,a 4D-Var data assimilation system has already been successfully constructed in the ICM(Gao et al.,2016);model parameters can then be optimized.specifically,the governing equations of the ICM can be expressed as follows(Kalnay,2003):

    where t is time and t0is the initial time;is the vector of control variables in the ICM;represents the model parameters to be optimized,in which q is the total number;is the initial value ofis the initial value ofand F is the nonlinear forward operator.

    For the parameter estimation in the 4D-Var data assimilation context,the cost function can be formulated as(Kalnay,2003)

    Fig.1.Schematic diagram showing the components of IOCAS ICM,consisting of an IOM and various anomaly models for wind stress(τ),SST and Te.See the main text for more details.

    where the first term on the right-hand side is the background error term and the second is the observation error term.The superscript“T”represents the transpose of a matrix and the subscripts“b”and“o”represent the background field and observation,respectively;N indicates the number of integrations in the minimization time window;represents the observation;andrepresent the background error covariance matrix,the observation error covariance matrix and the observation operator,respectively.In this study,andand are simply set as diagonal matrices,which are the identity matrix multiplied by the standard deviation of the observation.The parametersare implicitly expressed in the cost function,which are regarded as independent variables ofand the gradient of the cost function with respect toandis calculated by the adjoint model of the ICM.Essentially,the process of parameter estimation based on the 4D-Var method is the same as the optimal initialization process for obtaining the initial conditions,which is detailed in Gao et al.(2016).

    Figure 2 illustrates the procedure involved with the 4DVar algorithm in obtaining the optimized initial condition and parameters in the ICM.The Specific steps are as follows:First,for a given initial guess(model solution),model parameterand observationthe ICM is integrated forward to obtain the cost function J(a mis fi t between the model solution and observation).Second,the ICM is integrated backward with the adjoint model to obtain the gradient of J with respect toandandThird,a minimization process is performed to obtain optimal analysis solutions of the initial condition and model parameters;here,the Limited-Memory Broyden–Fletcher–Glodfarb–Shanno(L-BFGS)algorithm(Liu and Nocedal,1989)is adopted to minimize the cost function to reduce the mis fi t and obtain the optimal analysis field.When the gradient calculation converges to a value that satis fi es a certain level of precision,the iteration is stopped and an optimalfield andvalue are obtained;otherwise,the resultantandare used as a new estimate and the steps outline above are repeated.

    2.3.Experimental setup

    Fig.2.Schematic diagram illustrating the procedure to optimize the ocean initial state)and model parametersusing the 4D-Var data assimilation system.

    Our previous studies have shown that initial conditions can be optimized in the ICM through the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data to effectively improve ENSO simulation and prediction(Gao et al.,2016).Based on this,in this paper,a new application is demonstrated using the ICM-based 4DVar system for optimal parameter estimation.As mentioned above,αTeis an empirically introduced scalar parameter representing the intensity of the subsurface thermal effect on SST,which has an important influence on ENSO evolution.Thus,as an example,αTeis chosen to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the 4D-Var-based optimization of parameter estimation in improving ENSO modeling.

    A twin-experiment strategy is adopted.Two basic experiments are performed first.A control run is conducted using the ICM with its standard parameters,including the coupling coefficient between interannual anomalies of SST and wind stress(τ), ατ=1.03;vertical diffusivity coefficient,Kv=1.0×10?3;thermal damping coefficient for SST anomalies,λ=1/(100×86400);and the coefficient between anomalies of Teand SL,αTe=1.0.As shown in Gao et al.(2016),the control run simulates ENSO very well.A “biased”run is then conducted,in which some modifications are made to these model parameters,as follows:ατ=1.03×1.01;Kv=1.0×10?3×0.95;λ =1/(100×86400)×1.01;and αTe=1.1.Here,the ICM with these modified parameters is referred to as the “biased”model,considering a situation in which model errors are erroneously produced by the changes in these model parameters.Here,the changes in these parameters(ατ,Kv,λ)are quite subtle,to guarantee the periodic oscillation of ENSO.If the changes in the parameters are excessive,it may break the balance of the dynamical processes,and the oscillation will not be maintained.Note that αTeis set to have its change a little bigger for testing how well the parameter optimization using the 4D-Var method will work.

    Next,we examine the extent to which the ENSO evolution simulated using the “biased”model can be recovered through the 4D-Var assimilation of the SST data,which are taken from the control run.We refer to the control run as Expt.1,which is integrated for 20 years using the “truth”model(with the default model parameters and “truth”initial condition)to generate the “truth”or “observed”data.The daily“observed”SST field is sampled from the“truth”model simulation with a Gaussian noise added to mimic the“observation”error.The mean and standard deviation of“observational”SST error are set to be zero and 0.2°C.The constructed “observation”of SST data from Expt.1 is used for assimilation into the “biased”model.Note that the type of observational error approximated in this way is rather simple,and it is not the basic question to be focused on here;instead,a key focus is to demonstrate the effectiveness of parameter optimization using the 4D-Var method.

    Based on these basic runs,two optimizing experiments using the “biased”model are designed as follows(Table 1):Expt.2 uses the “biased”model in which the initial conditions are optimized by assimilation of the “observed”SST data from Expt.1.Expt.3 is a combined optimizing experiment,in which the initial condition and model parameter(αTe)are simultaneously optimized through assimilating the“observed”SST data from Expt.1.Notethatdaily“observed”SST data are assimilated into the “biased”model in Expt.2 and Expt.3 only at the first time-step of every month.The length of the assimilation window is set to be one month in consideration of the computational efficiency.The period of the experiments is 20 years,from model time 2060/01/01 to 2079/12/31.Comparisons of the ENSO evolution between these experiments(Expt.1,Expt.2 and Expt.3)are made to show how the optimization works and its effect on the recovery of ENSO features.Furthermore,a series of oneyear hindcast experiments are performed using the “biased”model,in which the optimized analyses(initial state and/or model parameter)are taken on the first day of each month when making hindcasts;the hindcast periods are from model time 2062/01/01 to 2079/12/01 after a 2-year spin-up period in the optimizing experiments.

    3.Effect on ENSO simulation

    The main purpose is to see how ENSO evolution in the“biased”model can be recovered using the 4D-Var assimilation of“observed”SST data sampled from the truth model.To this end,in this section,we examine how well the parameter αTeis optimized,which can lead to a recovery of ENSO evolution.Also,we compare the effects on ENSO simulations between experiments having only the initial condition optimized,and having both the initial condition plus this additional model parameter optimized.Based on these results,an effective way to recover the ENSO evolution is demonstrated through additionally optimizing this model parameter.

    3.1.Optimized estimate of the model parameter

    The “truth”value of αTeis 1.0 in the control experiment(Expt.1),and αTeis erroneously set to a “biased”value of 1.1 in Expt.2 and Expt.3 when using the “biased”model.The optimizing experiments are designed to see whether the“truth”αTevalue(1.0)can be recovered from the “biased”αTevalue in the “biased”model by the optimizing procedure using the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data taken from the “truth”model.Figure 3 shows the time series of αTeestimated from the first eight-year assimilation in Expt.3.It is seen that the estimated αTetends to approach the “truth”value through the optimization,which keeps a steady state after the first two-year spin-up period.In particular,the rescaled view shown for clarity in Fig.3 indicates that,after a few years of optimization,the optimized αTeduring the fiveto eight-year simulation in Expt.3 is in a steady state,being approximately 1.0.These results indicate that the model parameter can be effectively and reasonably well optimized by the 4D-Var-based method.The parameter estimation procedure is feasible and can give rise to the expected value.

    Table 1.Twin-experiment design using 4D-Var-based assimilation of SST data.Expt.1 is a control experiment using the“truth”model,in which the“observation”of SST data is obtained.Expt.2 is an optimizing experiment using a“biased”model,in which the initial condition is optimized through assimilation of“observed”SST data obtained from Expt.1.Expt.3 is a combined optimizing experiment using the “biased”model,in which the initial condition and model parameter are both optimized through assimilation of“observed”SST data obtained from Expt.1.

    3.2.Recovery of ENSO evolution

    In this subsection,we examine the evolution of various anomaly fields.As described above,the “biased”model is used to perform the optimizing experiments,with assimilation of SST data for only the initial condition in Expt.2,and the initial condition plus the model parameter in Expt.3,respectively.Figure 4 shows the longitude–time sections of SST anomalies along the equator from the simulations in Expt.1,Expt.2 and Expt.3 during the first 12-year simulation.The similarity indicates the effectiveness of the recovery.It is clearly illustrated that simulations based on Expt.2 and Expt.3 can both recover the basic characters of ENSO events well,including the period,spatial distribution,phase transition,and so on.For instance,after approximately the first two-year spin-up simulation period,the SST simulated in Expt.2(Fig.4b)is recovered to its“truth” field(Fig.4a)when the “observed”SST data are assimilated into the “biased”model.However,because of model parameter error,several departures still exist compared with the “truth” field.For example,the amplitude of the SST anomaly in Expt.2 is much larger than the“truth” field,and the phase transition time is changed slightly.By contrast,the SST field in Expt.3(Fig.4c)can recover to the “truth” field quickly(Fig.4a)after a short spin-up period.Thus,comparing these three experiments clearly indicates that additionally optimizing this model parameter using the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data can further improve ENSO simulation.

    It is expected that optimizing the model parameter αTecan have a direct influence on the Tefield when assimilating the “observed”SST data.Figure 5 shows the longitude–time sections of Teanomalies along the equator for the “truth”field,Expt.2 and Expt.3,during the first 12-year simulations.For Expt.2(Fig.5b),in which the model parameter αTeis not optimized,the Tefield can be seen to recover through assimilating the“observed”SST data.However,several departures still exist compared with the “truth” field(Fig.5a),which are induced by model parameter biases.It can be seen that a larger αTe(αTe=1.1)acts to produce a simulated Tefield that is also larger—consistent with our previous studies indicating that the subsurface thermal effect is stronger when αTeis chosen to be larger(Zhang and Gao,2016a).Therefore,when the subsurface effect on SST is stronger,the SST simulated in Expt.2 is larger than that of the “truth” field(Fig.4b).However,when αTeis optimized in Expt.3 to the “truth”model parameter(αTe=1.0;Fig.3)by parameter estimation based on assimilating the“observed”SST data,the simulated Teof Expt.3(Fig.5c)closely resembles the“truth” field.All these results indicate that optimizing both model parameters and the initial state through 4D-Var-based SST assimilation can recover the ENSO evolution more effectively than just optimizing the initial state alone.

    Fig.3.Time series of αTeestimated optimally using the 4D-Var method during the first eight-year assimilation periods.For clarity,a rescaled(ampli fi ed)view is also embedded in the figure for the αTeestimated during the five-to eight-year assimilation periods.

    Fig.4.Longitude–time sections of SST anomalies along the equator for(a)the “truth” field,(b)Expt.2 and(c)Expt.3 during the first 12-year simulation period.The contour interval is 0.5°C.

    3.3.Quanti fi cation in terms of the RMSE

    To quantify the effect on ENSO simulation of parameter estimation optimization,the RMSEs for some major variables are calculated.Here,the RMSE is defined as follows:

    Figure6 shows the RMSE time series for the anomalies of SST,wind stress,SL and Tecalculated over the full model domain(30°N–30°S,124°E–78°W).Expt.2 is a case in which only the initial condition is optimized by assimilating SST data;whereas,in Expt.3,both the initial condition and the model parameter are optimized.The results shown in the lefth and panels are calculated on the first day of each month in the first two-year simulation,and those in the right-hand panels are for the 3–12-year simulation for Expt.2(blue)and Expt.3(red).It is clearly evident that the RMSEs of both experiments decline consistently and systematically,reaching a steady state.Nevertheless,compared to Expt.2 without parameter estimation,the RMSEs of Expt.3 decline faster,being more effective at reaching the steady state(left-hand panels in Fig.6).Additionally,the values of the RMSEs are much smaller in Expt.3 compared with those in Expt.2 when reaching the steady state(right-hand panels in Fig.6).As with previous research in which it was shown that optimal initialization based on the 4D-Var method can effectively reduce the RMSEs of some major variables for ENSO simulation(Gao et al.,2016),here,optimal initialization and parameter estimation combined,based on4D-VarSST assimilation,work well too.Furthermore,it is also illustrated that parameter estimation based on assimilating SST data using the 4D-Var method can further improve the recovery of the simulation of the “truth” field using the “biased”model.Thus,ENSO simulations can be improved by simultaneously optimizing the initial conditions and model parameters through the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data.

    Next,the spatial distributions of the RMSEs are examined for some major model variables.Here,the RMSEs for each grid are calculated as follows:

    (2)地表水。井田南西側(cè)有下山河,在臨近河谷地帶開采,采空區(qū)可引起地表開裂與塌陷,從而溝通地表水體,導(dǎo)致地表水潰入井巷。在其附近地段開采時,應(yīng)加強(qiáng)頂板管理以及注意地表水體周邊隱伏斷層溝通地表水,以防水害發(fā)生。

    Fig.5.As in Fig.4 but for Teanomalies.The contour interval is 1°C.

    Fig.6.Time series of RMSEs for anomalies of(a,e)SST,(b,f)zonal τ,(c,g)SL and(d,h)Teover the full model domain(30°N–30°S,124°E–78°W).Here,the RMSEs are shown for the first two-year simulations(left-hand panels)and the three-to twelve-year simulations(right-hand panels)from Expt.2(blue)and Expt.3(red),respectively.The RMSEs are calculated on the first day of each month using the corresponding anomalies between Expt.1 and Expt.2 and between Expt.1 and Expt.3,respectively.The units are °C for SST and Te,dyn cm?2for τ,and cm for SL.

    Fig.7.Horizontal distributions of RMSEs for anomalies of(a,f)SST,(b,g)zonal τ,(c,h)meridional τ,(d,i)SL,and(e,j)Te.Here,the RMSEs are calculated from the first 20-year simulations for Expt.2(left-hand panels)and Expt.3(right-hand panels),respectively.The units are °C for SST and Te,dyn cm?2for τ,and cm for SL.

    Figure 7 shows the spatial distributions of the RMSEs for the anomalies of SST,zonal wind stress,meridional wind stress,SL and Te.Here,the RMSEs are calculated from Eq.(4)for the first 20-year simulations from Expt.2(left-hand panels)and Expt.3(right-hand panels).The results show that the spatial distributions of the RMSEs for all variables in Expt.3(right-hand panels in Fig.7)are all smaller than those in Expt.2(left-hand panels in Fig.7);whereas,the spatial patterns of the RMSEs are similar to each other in Expt.2 and Expt.3.For the SST field,the regions with maximum RMSE for Expt.2 and Expt.3 are both centered in the central and eastern Pacific;the maximum value is 0.25°C in Expt.3(Fig.7f),which is smaller than that in Expt.2 at 0.66°C(Fig.7a).For the zonal wind stress field,the larger RMSE regions are located in the central equatorial Pacific,with a maximum value of 0.1 dyn cm?2(1 dyn cm?2=0.1 N m?2)for Expt.2(Fig.7b)and0.042dyncm?2Expt.3(Fig.7g).For the meridional wind stress,the RMSEs have the same spatial pattern in Expt.2 and Expt.3,with a maximum value of 0.095 dyn cm?2in Expt.2(Fig.7c)and 0.032 dyn cm?2in Expt.3(Fig.7h).For the SL,the maximum RMSE values are 9 cm and 8 cm,with similar spatial distribution patterns for Expt.2(Fig.7d)and Expt.3(Fig.7i).For the Tefield,the maximum regions are both centered in the central equatorial Pacific,with a maximum value of 2°C in Expt.2(Fig.7e)and 0.55°C in Expt.3(Fig.7j).This represents a reduction in RMSEs by about 71%in Expt.3 compared with Expt.2.

    In general,the RMSE differences in the SST,wind stress and Tefields between Expt.2 and Expt.3 are much larger than those in the SL field.This is because,compared with Expt.2,the model parameter αTeis additionally optimized in Expt.3,leading to a Tefield that is effectively recovered.Since the subsurface thermal effect is very important to the evolution of SST anomalies,the improved Tefield in Expt.3 can further affect the simulation of the SST field.So,the biases in SST between the optimizing experiments and the “truth” field decrease faster in Expt.3 than in Expt.2.Thus,the modeled SST field is more likely to recover in Expt.3 compared with Expt.2.Furthermore,the wind stress anomaly field is constructed based on the relationship between the anomalies of SST and wind stress(τ):τ= ατFτ(SST).Therefore,the optimized SST field further improves the simulation of the wind stress anomaly.However,the SL anomaly field needs to be adjusted through dynamic processes when assimilating SST data in the ICM.Consequently,even though the SL field is adjusted to recover to its “truth”field,the biases between the optimizing experiments and the“truth” field are still large compared with other fields.

    All in all,additionally optimizing the model parameter αTeusing the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data in the ICM can effectively recover the simulation of major variables,especially for the Te,SST and wind stress fields.Simulation errors induced by biases in the model parameter can be effectively reduced by optimizing the parameter estimation using the 4D-Var method.As such,the optimization procedure can produce an adequate initial condition and model parameter that can be used for ENSO predictions.

    4.Effect on ENSO prediction

    It is clearly illustrated above that optimizing the model parameter αTethrough the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data can effectively recover the ENSO evolution.It is desirable to check if optimizing model parameters can also benefit ENSO forecasting,in combination with optimizing the initial condition.Here,we perform hindcast experiments using the“biased”model with optimized initial conditions and/or the optimized model parameter,αTe.A series of forecast experiments are conducted using the “biased”model during the period from model time 2062/01/01 to 2079/12/01.Two experiments are performed—one with only the initial condition optimized(Expt.2),and the other with both the model parameter(αTe)and initial condition optimized(Expt.3);the optimized initial condition and model parameter obtained on the first day of each month are used in Expt.2 and Expt.3,respectively.Thus,in these experiments,18×12(=216)hindcasts are obtained in total for analysis in each experiment.

    Figure 8 shows the time series of the Ni?o3.4 indices for the“truth”value(green)and hindcasts made at lead times of three months(Fig.8a),six months(Fig.8b)and nine months(Fig.8c)using the initial conditions and parameter obtained from Expt.2(blue)and Expt.3(red).The hindcast results indicate that the evolution can be predicted very well.As the hindcast time extends,the hindcast errors increase.When optimizing the initial conditions only in Expt.2,the hindcast results exhibit some biases compared with the “truth” field.When optimizing both the initial conditions and the model parameter in Expt.3,it is evident that the Ni?o3.4 indices produced closely follow the “truth”value.So,additionally optimizing this model parameter can contribute to further improvement in ENSO prediction.Quantitatively,the RMSEs of the Ni?o3.4 indices predicted in Expt.2 and Expt.3 at the six-month lead time with the “truth”value reduce from 0.47 to 0.06.As the constructed observation error type is simple in this idealized configuration context,the Ni?o3.4 indices in Expt.3 are almost the same as the“truth”value.

    5.Conclusion and discussion

    The IOCAS ICM used in this study still suffers from large biases in its real-time ENSO prediction. There are many ways to improve its performance.Previously,we developed a 4DVar data assimilation system for the ICM.As an application,the system was used to optimize the initial conditions for improved ENSO simulation and prediction.Because errors in model parameters are also important sources of model biases,in this paper,the 4D-Var system is used to demonstrate the feasibility of optimizing model parameters for improving ENSO analyses.

    Fig.8.Time series of the Ni?o3.4 indices for the“truth”model(green)and for hindcasts made using optimized initial conditions in Expt.2(blue)and the additionally optimized model parameter in Expt.3(red)at lead times of(a)three months,(b)six months and(c)nine months.The experiments are performed from model time 2063/01 to 2079/12.

    In this ICM,Teis used explicitly to represent the thermocline effect on SST(referred to simply as “the thermocline effect”),and a related parameter(αTe)is introduced to indicate the intensity of the thermocline feedback.In this paper,this model parameter,i.e.αTe,is used as an example to demonstrate the optimization of parameter estimates using the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data in the ICM.To this end,a twin-experiment approach is adopted with an idealized setting.

    Results from experiments having only the initial condition optimized and having both the initial condition plus the additional model parameter optimized are compared.As demonstrated before,the simulation and prediction of ENSO can be improved by optimal initialization using the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data in the ICM.Here,it is shown that ENSO evolution can be more effectively recovered by including the additional optimization of this parameter.Through optimizing this parameter,the reduction in RMSEs for anomalies of SST,wind stress,SL and Tetakes place relatively faster compared with that of SL.This is mainly because optimizing the model parameter αTecan effectively improve the simulation of the Tefield.As the subsurface thermal effect is important to SST evolution,the optimized Tefield leads to improved SST depictions.Additionally,the wind stress field is calculated as a response to the SST anomaly using its statistical model;thus,the wind stress anomaly is also improved in the optimized experiment.Since the SL field needs to be adjusted through dynamic processes when SST data are assimilated through the 4D-Var method,this field is less effectively improved.Thus,it is clearly evident that optimizing the model parameter using the 4D-Varbased assimilation of SST data can further improve the simulation and prediction of ENSO.The demonstrated feasibility of optimizing model parameters and initial conditions together through 4D-Var assimilation provides a modeling platform for ENSO studies.

    Another application of the 4D-Var data assimilation system implemented in IOCAS ICM to improve its ENSO modeling by optimizing model parameter estimates in the ICM is demonstrated in this paper.The results are obtained in the context of a twin experiment,and these idealized experiments are intended for demonstration purposes.Although only one parameter is considered for the optimized experiments under the idealized setting,it provides a theoretical demonstration and practical assimilation procedure to optimize model parameters.Further applications are underway using the 4DVar data assimilation technique.For example,the ICM’s performance is also sensitive to many other model parameters,including the coupling coefficient between interannual anomalies of SST and wind stress(ατ),the vertical diffusivity coefficient(Kv),the thermal damping coefficient for SST anomalies(λ),and so on.Thus,multi-parameter optimization procedures should be taken into account.Also,some potential problems may exist when applying this technique for fitting a model(which is necessarily biased)to real observed data.In particular,the parameter estimates may not converge as cleanly as shown in Fig.3,and the simultaneous estimation of multiple parameters may be difficult because multiple minima may emerge when estimating the cost function.Also,the spatial structure of the model parameters should be considered.Clearly,more experiments with respect to multi-parameter optimization need to be conducted.Additionally,the subsurface thermal state has considerable influence on the SST in the tropical Pacific.Thus,it is necessary to assimilate subsurface thermal fields into the ICM in addition to the SST data.For example,sea level and horizontal ocean current data need to be considered in the data assimilation procedure.Ultimately,such a combined assimilation of multiple variables and parameters should be considered when using the ICM.

    The resultant insight into this predictive understanding and the methodology gained from this work will be transferred to the improvement of real-time ENSO prediction using the IOCAS ICM(Zhang and Gao,2016b).Ultimately,all these efforts are expected to improve ENSO forecasting skill in IOCAS ICM by using the 4D-Var data assimilation system for various data(SST,SL,and others)and various model parameters(αTe,ατ,and others).

    Also,other data assimilation methods are currently available,including the EnKF method(Wu et al.,2016).It would be desirable to compare the advantages and disadvantages be-tween these methods in terms of ENSO simulation and prediction.In addition,the adjoint model of the 4D-Var data assimilation equipped with IOCAS ICM provides a way to calculate the gradient of the cost function;the adjoint method with the 4D-Var data assimilation system will be combined with the CNOP(conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation)approach(Mu and Duan,2003)to identify the error structure of initial conditions and model parameters(Tao et al.,2017).More results will be presented in future publications.

    Acknowledgements.We would like to thank Drs.Mu MU and Shaoqing ZHANG for their comments.We also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions.This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.41705082,41475101,41690122(41690120)),a Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategic Priority Project—the Western Pacific Ocean System(Grant Nos.XDA11010105 and XDA11020306),the National Programme on Global Change and Air–Sea Interaction(Grant Nos.GASI-IPOVAI-06and GASI-IPOVAI-01-01),the China Postdoctoral Science Foun-dation,and a Qingdao Postdoctoral Application Research Project.

    Ballester,J.,D.Petrova,S.Bordoni,B.Cash,M.García-Díez,and X.Rodó,2016:Sensitivity of El Ni?o intensity and timing to preceding subsurface heat magnitude.Scientific Reports,6,36344,https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36344.

    Bjerknes,J.,1966:A possible response of the atmospheric Hadley circulation to equatorial anomalies of ocean temperature.Tellus,18,820–829,https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1966.tb00303.x.

    Chen,D.,M.A.Cane,A.Kaplan,S.E.Zebiak,and D.Huang.,2004:Predictability of El Ni?o over the past 148 years.Nature,428,733–736,https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02439.

    Courtier,P.,J.N.Thépaut,and A.Hollings worth,1994:A strategy for operational implementation of4D-Var,using an incremental approach.Quart.J.Roy.Meteor.Soc.,120,1367–1387,https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712051912.

    Dommenget,D.,and D.Stammer,2004:Assessing ENSO simulations and predictions using adjoint ocean state estimation.J.Climate,17,4301–4315,https://doi.org/10.1175/3211.1.

    Gao,C.,and R.-H.Zhang,2017:The roles of atmospheric wind and entrained water temperature(Te)in the second-year cooling of the 2010-12 La Ni?a event.Climate Dyn.,48,597–617,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3097-4.

    Gao,C.,X.R.Wu,and R.-H.Zhang,2016:Testing a four-dimensional variational data assimilation method using an im-proved intermediate coupled model for ENSO analysis and prediction.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,33(7),875–888,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-5249-1.

    Huang,R.H.,R.H.Zhang,and B.L.Yan,2001:Dynamical effect of the zonal wind anomalies over the tropical western Pacific on ENSO cycles.Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences,44,1089–1098,https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906865.

    Kalnay,E.,2003:Atmospheric Modeling,Data Assimilation and Predictability.Cambridge University Press,342 pp.

    Liu,D.C.,and J.Nocedal,1989:On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization.Mathematical Programming,45,503–528,https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589116.

    Liu,Y.,andH.-L.Ren,2017: ImprovingENSO prediction in CFSv2 with an analogue-based correction method.International Journal of Climatology,37(15),https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5142.

    Liu,Y.,Z.Liu,S.Zhang,R.Jacob,F.Lu,X.Rong,and S.Wu.,2014:Ensemble-based parameter estimation in a coupled general circulation model.J.Climate,27,7151–7162,https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00406.1.

    Lu,J.X.,and W.W.Hsieh,1998:On determining initial conditions and parameters in a simple coupled atmosphere–ocean model by adjoint data assimilation.Tellus A,50,534–544,https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v50i4.14531.

    Mu,M.,and W.S.Duan,2003:A new approach to studying ENSO predictability:Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation.Chinese Science Bulletin,48,1045–1047,https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184224.

    Mu,M.,W.S.Duan,and C.J.Wang,2002:The predictability problems in numerical weather and climate prediction.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,19,191–204,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-002-0016-x.

    Mu,M.,W.Duan,Q.Wang,and R.Zhang,2010:An extension of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation approach and its applications.Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics,17,211–220,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-17-211-2010.

    Peng,S.-Q.,and L.Xie,2006:Effect of determining initial conditions by four-dimensional variational data assimilation on storm surge forecasting.Ocean Modelling,14,1–18,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2006.03.005.

    Peng,S.Q.,Y.N.Li,and L.Xie,2013:Adjusting the wind stress drag coefficient in storm surge forecasting using an adjoint technique.J.Atmos.Oceanic Technol.,30,590–608,https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00034.1.

    Ren,H.-L.,Y.Liu,F.-F.Jin,Y.P.Yan,and X.W.Liu,2014:Application of the analogue-based correction of errors method in ENSO prediction.Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters,7,157–161,https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1674-2834.13.0080.

    Tao,L.-J.,R.-H.Zhang,and C.Gao,2017:Initial error-induced optimal perturbations in ENSO predictions,as derived from an intermediate coupled model.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,34,791–803,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-6266-4.

    Wang,B.,X.L.Zou,and J.Zhu,2000:Data assimilation and its applications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,97(21),11 143–11 144,https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.21.11143.

    Wu,X.R.,S.Q.Zhang,Z.Y.Liu,A.Rosati,T.L.Delworth,and Y.Liu,2012:Impact of geographic-dependent parameter optimization on climate estimation and prediction:Simulation with an intermediate coupled model.Mon.Wea.Rev.,140,3956–3971,https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00298.1.

    Wu,X.R.,G.J,Han,S.Q.Zhang,and Z.Y.Liu,2016:A study of the impact of parameter optimization on ENSO predictability with an intermediate coupled model.Climate Dyn.,46,711–727,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2608-z.

    Xie,S.-P.,C.Deser,G.A.Vecchi,J.Ma,H.Y.Teng,and A.T.Wittenberg,2010:Global warming pattern formation:Sea surface temperature and rainfall.J.Climate,23,966–986,https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3329.1.

    Zebiak,S.E.,and M.A.Cane,1987:A model El Ni?o-southern oscillation.Mon.Wea.Rev.,115,2262–2278,https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<2262:AMENO>2.0.CO;2.

    Zhang,R.-H.,and C.Gao,2016a:Role of subsurface entrainment temperature(Te)in the onset of El Ni?oevents,as represented in an intermediate coupled model.Climate Dyn.,46,1417–1435,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2655-5.

    Zhang,R.-H.,and C.Gao,2016b:The IOCAS intermediate coupled model(IOCAS ICM)and its real-time predictions of the 2015-2016 El Ni?o event.Science Bulletin,61,1061–1070,https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-016-1064-4.

    Zhang,R.-H.,S.E.Zebiak,R.Kleeman,and N.Keenlyside,2003:A new intermediate coupled model for El Ni?o simulation and prediction.Geophys.Res.Lett.,30,2012,https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018010.

    Zhang,R.-H.,R.Kleeman,S.E.Zebiak,N.Keenlyside,and S.Raynaud,2005a:An empirical parameterization of subsurface entrainment temperature for improved SST anomaly simulations in an intermediate ocean model.J.Climate,18,350–371,https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3271.1.

    Zhang,R.-H.,F.Zheng,J.Zhu,and Z.G.Wang,2013:A successful real-time forecast of the 2010-11 La Ni?a event.Scientific Reports,3,1108,https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01108.

    Zhang,S.,M.J.Harrison,A.T.Wittenberg,A.Rosati,J.L.Anderson,and V.Balaji,2005b:Initialization of an ENSO forecast system using a parallelized ensemble filter.Mon.Wea.Rev.,133,3176–3201,https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3024.1.

    Zhang,X.F.,S.Q.Zhang,Z.Y.Liu,X.R.Wu,and G.J.Han,2015:Parameter optimization in an intermediate coupled climate model with biased physics.J.Climate,28,1227–1247,https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00348.1.

    Zheng,F.,J.Zhu,R.-H.Zhang,and G.Q.Zhou,2006:Ensemble hindcasts of SST anomalies in the tropical Pacific using an intermediate coupled model.Geophys.Res.Lett.,33,L19604,https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026994.

    Zheng,F.,J.Zhu,H.Wang,and R.-H.Zhang,2009:Ensemble hindcasts of ENSO events over the past 120 years using a large number of ensembles.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,26,359–372,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-009-0359-7.

    老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久久久久久久大av| 免费观看人在逋| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美zozozo另类| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 级片在线观看| av在线老鸭窝| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 久久国产精品影院| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产乱人视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 长腿黑丝高跟| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 观看美女的网站| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 日本与韩国留学比较| or卡值多少钱| 极品教师在线视频| .国产精品久久| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产黄片美女视频| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 不卡一级毛片| 露出奶头的视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 国产探花极品一区二区| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 久久性视频一级片| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 久久精品影院6| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| av在线观看视频网站免费| 久久这里只有精品中国| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 精品人妻1区二区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 成年免费大片在线观看| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产黄片美女视频| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 日本三级黄在线观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲综合色惰| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲无线在线观看| av在线天堂中文字幕| 全区人妻精品视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产真实乱freesex| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 日韩欧美精品v在线| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲av熟女| 很黄的视频免费| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产美女午夜福利| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 久久6这里有精品| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 1000部很黄的大片| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 老司机福利观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 精品午夜福利在线看| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 永久网站在线| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 久久久色成人| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 一级黄色大片毛片| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 脱女人内裤的视频| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 午夜视频国产福利| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲最大成人中文| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 我要搜黄色片| 日韩免费av在线播放| 日韩高清综合在线| 直男gayav资源| 免费av不卡在线播放| 热99在线观看视频| 午夜福利在线在线| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 精品一区二区免费观看| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产野战对白在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 色视频www国产| 色综合婷婷激情| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 99热6这里只有精品| 看片在线看免费视频| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| eeuss影院久久| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 18+在线观看网站| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 午夜a级毛片| 欧美性感艳星| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 精品久久国产蜜桃| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产午夜精品论理片| 欧美在线黄色| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区 | 一级毛片我不卡| 国产成人a区在线观看| 久久热精品热| 中国国产av一级| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产成人freesex在线| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲av一区综合| 中文字幕制服av| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 色吧在线观看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 日韩电影二区| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产成人精品一,二区| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 高清av免费在线| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| eeuss影院久久| a级毛色黄片| 永久免费av网站大全| 久久午夜福利片| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 成人国产av品久久久| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 一级爰片在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 欧美日本视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 在线免费十八禁| av.在线天堂| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产成人91sexporn| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 色综合色国产| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 搞女人的毛片| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| av网站免费在线观看视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 看免费成人av毛片| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 亚洲色图av天堂| 免费观看性生交大片5| 尾随美女入室| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 久久久精品94久久精品| 97超碰精品成人国产| 97在线视频观看| av专区在线播放| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产高清三级在线| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| av黄色大香蕉| 精品一区二区免费观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 久久人人爽人人片av| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 中文天堂在线官网| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 久久久久性生活片| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 秋霞在线观看毛片| av播播在线观看一区| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 免费看av在线观看网站| 美女主播在线视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 在线观看一区二区三区| 99久久人妻综合| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 欧美另类一区| 免费av观看视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 日韩成人伦理影院| 久久久久久久精品精品| 精品酒店卫生间| 色播亚洲综合网| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| .国产精品久久| 成人无遮挡网站| 熟女电影av网| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 男人舔奶头视频| 青春草国产在线视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产精品一及| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| av在线亚洲专区| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 免费看a级黄色片| 免费看av在线观看网站| 精品国产三级普通话版| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 日韩av免费高清视频| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 精品一区在线观看国产| 日本熟妇午夜| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 免费看光身美女| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲图色成人| 一级片'在线观看视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 免费大片18禁| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 日日啪夜夜爽| 一级a做视频免费观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产亚洲最大av| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产91av在线免费观看| 亚州av有码| 成人欧美大片| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 国产老妇女一区| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 亚洲不卡免费看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 欧美激情在线99| 日本免费在线观看一区| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 美女主播在线视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 在线观看国产h片| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产老妇女一区| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国产精品无大码| av黄色大香蕉| 综合色av麻豆| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 内射极品少妇av片p| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 日韩伦理黄色片| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 在线观看国产h片| 黄色日韩在线| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 日韩伦理黄色片| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 一级黄片播放器| 视频区图区小说| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 免费少妇av软件| av在线天堂中文字幕| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 熟女电影av网| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频 | 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 赤兔流量卡办理| 中国国产av一级| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 欧美激情在线99| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 九九在线视频观看精品| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 日韩电影二区| 国产男女内射视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 精品一区在线观看国产| 中文资源天堂在线| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 色播亚洲综合网| 在线a可以看的网站| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 1000部很黄的大片| 51国产日韩欧美| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产视频首页在线观看| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 老司机影院毛片| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 久久热精品热| 色视频www国产| eeuss影院久久| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 看黄色毛片网站| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 黄色日韩在线| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 午夜福利在线在线| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产高清三级在线| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 简卡轻食公司| 深夜a级毛片| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产精品三级大全| av专区在线播放| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 中国三级夫妇交换| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 久久97久久精品| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久久欧美国产精品| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 永久网站在线| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 久久久久精品性色| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| av在线app专区| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看|