• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Idealized Experiments for Optimizing Model Parameters Using a 4D-Variational Method in an Intermediate Coupled Model of ENSO

    2018-03-06 03:36:00ChuanGAORongHuaZHANGXinrongWUandJichangSUNKeyLaboratoryofOceanCirculationandWavesInstituteofOceanologyChineseAcademyofSciencesQingdao26607China
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2018年4期

    Chuan GAO,Rong-Hua ZHANG,Xinrong WU,and Jichang SUNKey Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Waves,Institute of Oceanology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Qingdao 26607,China

    2Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology,Qingdao 266237,China

    3Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation,Shandong Academy of Sciences,Qingdao 266001,China

    4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100029,China

    5Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Information Technology,State Oceanic Administration,National Marine Data and Information Service,Tianjin 300000,China

    1.Introduction

    The El Ni?o–Southern Oscillation(ENSO)is the strongest interannual signal of the climate system(Bjerknes,1966),which has significant impacts on the weather and climate worldwide through atmospheric teleconnection(e.g.,Huang et al.,2001;Xie et al.,2010).At present,the ENSO phenomenon is recognized as comprising of the most predictable short-term climate anomalies thanks to successful development of air–sea coupled models(e.g.,Chen et al.,2004;Zhang et al.,2013),including intermediate coupled models(ICMs;e.g.,Zebiak and Cane,1987;Zhang et al.,2003).Currently,various coupled models enable us to make six-month and longer real-time ENSO predictions in advance with reasonable success.For example,we developed an improved ICM at the Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences(IOCAS),named the IOCAS ICM(Zhang and Gao,2016a).The model has been routinely used to predict SST evolution in the tropical Pacific(for a summary of the model’s ENSO forecasts,see the International Research Institute for Climate and Society website at http://iri.columbia.edu/climate/ENSO/currentinfo/update.html). Nevertheless,IOCAS ICM still has systematic biases with large uncertainties in ENSO prediction(Zhang and Gao,2016b).

    Various methods have been developed to improve the quality of ENSO forecasts,which are affected by many factors,including the model itself and the initial conditions that are used to make predictions (Mu et al.,2002).To improve the ENSO prediction skill,one effective way is to calibrate the model prediction of ENSO by designing model-dependent statistical correction methods(Ren et al.,2014;Liu and Ren,2017).Also,one of the sources for ENSO prediction errors is the initial ocean conditions,because the initial error can grow and amplify through ocean dynamics and air–sea interactions.As observations are still sparse in the ocean,limited observational data need to be combined with models in a smart way to provide coherent initial conditions that are consistent with model dynamics(Wang et al.,2000).Recently,data assimilation methods have been successfully used to optimize the initial conditions for ocean model initialization,which can significantly improve ENSO simulation and prediction.Various data assimilation methods are currently available,including the Ensemble Kalman Filter(EnKF)and variational data assimilation methods(Dommenget and Stammer,2004;Zhang et al.,2005b;Zheng et al.,2006,2009;Wu et al.,2016).

    Another major source for ENSO prediction errors comes from model errors,including uncertainties in model parameters(Mu et al.,2010).Physically,model parameters are introduced to represent processes and quantify the relationships between related fields.Inevitably,approximations are often made in estimating parameters to represent real physics.Observations can be used to tune model parameters in a simple and straightforward way(Wu et al.,2012).Often,parameters are estimated in an empirical and subjective way,and such an a priori estimate of parameters may not be consistent with model dynamics.It is desirable to estimate parameters in an optimal way,in the sense that the best possible simulations can be produced for a given model(Liu et al.,2014).Furthermore,model error characteristics could be taken into account,and it is thus preferable to be able to automatically consider the feedback of model dynamics to parameter estimates.The 4D variational(4D-Var)data assimilation approach offers such an objective and comprehensive way to optimize model parameters for improving model simulations.Indeed,the variational data assimilation method has been widely applied to parameter estimation in ocean models.For example,Lu and Hsieh(1998)implemented an adjoint assimilation method into a simple equatorial air–sea coupled model to investigate the optimization of initial conditions and model parameters.Zhang et al.(2005b)examined the ability of the 4D-Var method to optimize the uncertainty of model parameters.Peng and Xie(2006)and Peng et al.(2013)developed a 4D-Var algorithm to correct the initial condition and wind stress drag coefficient for storm surge forecasting.Zhang et al.(2015)assimilated SST data in a two-equation turbulence model by 4D-Var data assimilation to estimate the wave-affected parameters.These studies clearly indicate that the combination of optimizing initial conditions and optimizing model parameters through data assimilation can effectively improve model simulation and prediction.

    In this study,we continue to channel our efforts into improving IOCAS ICM for better ENSO simulation and prediction.One way to improve its performance is through data assimilation.To this end,a 4D-Var data assimilation method has been implemented into the ICM to improve state analyses(Gao et al.,2016),which provides an optimal initial state that can be used to predict ENSO.However,this previous study only applied data assimilation to optimizing the ocean initial state.Because severe biases can be apparently derived from errors in model parameters,it is desirable to use the 4D-Var scheme and develop a method to optimize model parameters in combination with optimizing initial conditions.

    Here,we aim to implement a framework for optimizing model parameters in the ICM through the 4D-Var data assimilation system,and demonstrate the feasibility of constraining ENSO evolution.As described before(Zhang and Gao,2016a),one important feature of IOCAS ICM is the way in which the temperature of the subsurface water entrained into the mixed layer(Te)is parameterized;the thermocline effect on SST in the ICM is explicitly represented by the relationship between Teand sea level(SL;an indicator of thermocline fluctuation),written as Te=αTeFTe(SL),in which SL represents the thermocline variability,FTeis the relationship between the Teanomaly and SL anomaly derived using empirical statistical methods(such as SVD),and αTeis a scalar parameter introduced to represent the intensity of subsurface thermal forcing.Various studies have found that subsurface thermal effects(such as entrainment and mixing)play an important role in ENSO evolution(Ballester et al.,2016;Zhang and Gao,2016a).Indeed,our previous studies have shown that ENSO simulations are very sensitive to αTe(e.g.,Gao and Zhang,2017).Here,this parameter is chosen to demonstrate a way in which optimal parameter estimation can be achieved using the 4D-Var method equipped within the ICM.The effects of optimizing this parameter on the simulation and prediction of ENSO are examined,with the feasibility of the approach in recovering the ENSO evolution demonstrated.

    The paper is organized as follows:Section 2 describes the ICM,the parameter estimation procedure using the 4D-Var data assimilation method,and the experimental setup.The effects of the parameter estimation on the simulation and prediction of ENSO are analyzed in sections 3 and 4,respectively.Finally,a conclusion and discussion are presented in section 5.

    2.Methodology

    In this paper,we examine the feasibility and effectiveness of optimizing a model parameter in improving ENSO simulation and prediction using the 4D-Var data assimilation method implemented in the ICM.In this section,we briefly introduce the methodology used to optimize the model parameter based on the 4D-Var method.First,a short description of the ICM is presented.Second,the 4D-Var data assimilation scheme and optimal parameter estimation method are introduced.Finally,results from a twin experiment are used to demonstrate the feasibility of the approach,and the effects of optimal initialization and parameter estimation on ENSO evolution are compared.

    2.1.Description of the ICM

    The ICM used is an anomaly model consisting of an intermediate ocean model(IOM)and an empirical wind stress model(Fig.1).One crucial aspect of the ocean component is the way in which the subsurface entrainment temperature in the surface mixed layer(Te)is explicitly parameterized in terms of the thermocline variability(as represented by the SL),written as Te=αTeFTe(SL),in which FTeis the relationship between the anomalies of Teand SL derived using statistical methods from historical data.A parameter,αTe,is introduced in the ICM to represent the intensity of thermal forcing associated with subsurface anomalies(Zhang et al.,2005a).

    The model has already been successfully used for ENSO simulations and predictions;see Zhang and Gao(2016a)for more details. Various model parameters exist within the ICM;here,we pay special attention to the parameter αTe,since it represents the intensity of the thermocline feedback,an important parameter to ENSO.

    2.2.Optimal parameter estimation based on the 4D-Var data assimilation system

    Previously,we successfully implemented the 4D-Var method into the ICM and demonstrated that optimal initialization of the ocean state can improve ENSO simulation and prediction skill(Gao et al.,2016).However,the importance of variational estimation for major model parameters to ENSO in the ICM has not been demonstrated.Here,we aim to develop a modeling framework for optimizing model parameters using the 4D-Var method,which can be used further for improving real-time ENSO prediction.

    Variational methods(3D-Var and 4D-Var),as a sophisticated branch of data assimilation,convert the problem of seeking the optimal initial state to that of minimizing a cost function under the constraint of model dynamics.More specifically,optimal control theories are applied to ocean–atmosphere models,which act as a constraint in the minimization of the cost function representing the mis fi ts between model simulation and observation(Courtier et al.,1994).For example,the 4D-Var data assimilation method utilizes observational data within a data insertion time window,seeking optimal values of model variables and parameters by minimizing the cost function under dynamical constraint.As the control variables are adjusted,the mis fi ts are reduced accordingly between the model solution and observation.

    Generally,an adjoint model is an efficient solution for evaluating the gradient of the cost function with respect to high-dimensional control variables in the 4D-Var data assimilation method.The adjoint model of the ICM is written coding-by-coding.First,the tangent linear model of the ICM is obtained by linearization.Then,the adjoint model of the ICM is achieved by transposing the tangent linear model;i.e.,it features the reverse of the temporal and spatial integration and other characteristics.In fact,the tangent linear model does not directly participate in the 4D-Var assimilation system.It is only used to validate the correctness of the adjoint model of the ICM.More details can be seen in Gao et al.(2016).

    Optimal parameter estimation is realized through the 4DVar assimilation of observational data under the constraint of model dynamics.Previously,a 4D-Var data assimilation system has already been successfully constructed in the ICM(Gao et al.,2016);model parameters can then be optimized.specifically,the governing equations of the ICM can be expressed as follows(Kalnay,2003):

    where t is time and t0is the initial time;is the vector of control variables in the ICM;represents the model parameters to be optimized,in which q is the total number;is the initial value ofis the initial value ofand F is the nonlinear forward operator.

    For the parameter estimation in the 4D-Var data assimilation context,the cost function can be formulated as(Kalnay,2003)

    Fig.1.Schematic diagram showing the components of IOCAS ICM,consisting of an IOM and various anomaly models for wind stress(τ),SST and Te.See the main text for more details.

    where the first term on the right-hand side is the background error term and the second is the observation error term.The superscript“T”represents the transpose of a matrix and the subscripts“b”and“o”represent the background field and observation,respectively;N indicates the number of integrations in the minimization time window;represents the observation;andrepresent the background error covariance matrix,the observation error covariance matrix and the observation operator,respectively.In this study,andand are simply set as diagonal matrices,which are the identity matrix multiplied by the standard deviation of the observation.The parametersare implicitly expressed in the cost function,which are regarded as independent variables ofand the gradient of the cost function with respect toandis calculated by the adjoint model of the ICM.Essentially,the process of parameter estimation based on the 4D-Var method is the same as the optimal initialization process for obtaining the initial conditions,which is detailed in Gao et al.(2016).

    Figure 2 illustrates the procedure involved with the 4DVar algorithm in obtaining the optimized initial condition and parameters in the ICM.The Specific steps are as follows:First,for a given initial guess(model solution),model parameterand observationthe ICM is integrated forward to obtain the cost function J(a mis fi t between the model solution and observation).Second,the ICM is integrated backward with the adjoint model to obtain the gradient of J with respect toandandThird,a minimization process is performed to obtain optimal analysis solutions of the initial condition and model parameters;here,the Limited-Memory Broyden–Fletcher–Glodfarb–Shanno(L-BFGS)algorithm(Liu and Nocedal,1989)is adopted to minimize the cost function to reduce the mis fi t and obtain the optimal analysis field.When the gradient calculation converges to a value that satis fi es a certain level of precision,the iteration is stopped and an optimalfield andvalue are obtained;otherwise,the resultantandare used as a new estimate and the steps outline above are repeated.

    2.3.Experimental setup

    Fig.2.Schematic diagram illustrating the procedure to optimize the ocean initial state)and model parametersusing the 4D-Var data assimilation system.

    Our previous studies have shown that initial conditions can be optimized in the ICM through the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data to effectively improve ENSO simulation and prediction(Gao et al.,2016).Based on this,in this paper,a new application is demonstrated using the ICM-based 4DVar system for optimal parameter estimation.As mentioned above,αTeis an empirically introduced scalar parameter representing the intensity of the subsurface thermal effect on SST,which has an important influence on ENSO evolution.Thus,as an example,αTeis chosen to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the 4D-Var-based optimization of parameter estimation in improving ENSO modeling.

    A twin-experiment strategy is adopted.Two basic experiments are performed first.A control run is conducted using the ICM with its standard parameters,including the coupling coefficient between interannual anomalies of SST and wind stress(τ), ατ=1.03;vertical diffusivity coefficient,Kv=1.0×10?3;thermal damping coefficient for SST anomalies,λ=1/(100×86400);and the coefficient between anomalies of Teand SL,αTe=1.0.As shown in Gao et al.(2016),the control run simulates ENSO very well.A “biased”run is then conducted,in which some modifications are made to these model parameters,as follows:ατ=1.03×1.01;Kv=1.0×10?3×0.95;λ =1/(100×86400)×1.01;and αTe=1.1.Here,the ICM with these modified parameters is referred to as the “biased”model,considering a situation in which model errors are erroneously produced by the changes in these model parameters.Here,the changes in these parameters(ατ,Kv,λ)are quite subtle,to guarantee the periodic oscillation of ENSO.If the changes in the parameters are excessive,it may break the balance of the dynamical processes,and the oscillation will not be maintained.Note that αTeis set to have its change a little bigger for testing how well the parameter optimization using the 4D-Var method will work.

    Next,we examine the extent to which the ENSO evolution simulated using the “biased”model can be recovered through the 4D-Var assimilation of the SST data,which are taken from the control run.We refer to the control run as Expt.1,which is integrated for 20 years using the “truth”model(with the default model parameters and “truth”initial condition)to generate the “truth”or “observed”data.The daily“observed”SST field is sampled from the“truth”model simulation with a Gaussian noise added to mimic the“observation”error.The mean and standard deviation of“observational”SST error are set to be zero and 0.2°C.The constructed “observation”of SST data from Expt.1 is used for assimilation into the “biased”model.Note that the type of observational error approximated in this way is rather simple,and it is not the basic question to be focused on here;instead,a key focus is to demonstrate the effectiveness of parameter optimization using the 4D-Var method.

    Based on these basic runs,two optimizing experiments using the “biased”model are designed as follows(Table 1):Expt.2 uses the “biased”model in which the initial conditions are optimized by assimilation of the “observed”SST data from Expt.1.Expt.3 is a combined optimizing experiment,in which the initial condition and model parameter(αTe)are simultaneously optimized through assimilating the“observed”SST data from Expt.1.Notethatdaily“observed”SST data are assimilated into the “biased”model in Expt.2 and Expt.3 only at the first time-step of every month.The length of the assimilation window is set to be one month in consideration of the computational efficiency.The period of the experiments is 20 years,from model time 2060/01/01 to 2079/12/31.Comparisons of the ENSO evolution between these experiments(Expt.1,Expt.2 and Expt.3)are made to show how the optimization works and its effect on the recovery of ENSO features.Furthermore,a series of oneyear hindcast experiments are performed using the “biased”model,in which the optimized analyses(initial state and/or model parameter)are taken on the first day of each month when making hindcasts;the hindcast periods are from model time 2062/01/01 to 2079/12/01 after a 2-year spin-up period in the optimizing experiments.

    3.Effect on ENSO simulation

    The main purpose is to see how ENSO evolution in the“biased”model can be recovered using the 4D-Var assimilation of“observed”SST data sampled from the truth model.To this end,in this section,we examine how well the parameter αTeis optimized,which can lead to a recovery of ENSO evolution.Also,we compare the effects on ENSO simulations between experiments having only the initial condition optimized,and having both the initial condition plus this additional model parameter optimized.Based on these results,an effective way to recover the ENSO evolution is demonstrated through additionally optimizing this model parameter.

    3.1.Optimized estimate of the model parameter

    The “truth”value of αTeis 1.0 in the control experiment(Expt.1),and αTeis erroneously set to a “biased”value of 1.1 in Expt.2 and Expt.3 when using the “biased”model.The optimizing experiments are designed to see whether the“truth”αTevalue(1.0)can be recovered from the “biased”αTevalue in the “biased”model by the optimizing procedure using the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data taken from the “truth”model.Figure 3 shows the time series of αTeestimated from the first eight-year assimilation in Expt.3.It is seen that the estimated αTetends to approach the “truth”value through the optimization,which keeps a steady state after the first two-year spin-up period.In particular,the rescaled view shown for clarity in Fig.3 indicates that,after a few years of optimization,the optimized αTeduring the fiveto eight-year simulation in Expt.3 is in a steady state,being approximately 1.0.These results indicate that the model parameter can be effectively and reasonably well optimized by the 4D-Var-based method.The parameter estimation procedure is feasible and can give rise to the expected value.

    Table 1.Twin-experiment design using 4D-Var-based assimilation of SST data.Expt.1 is a control experiment using the“truth”model,in which the“observation”of SST data is obtained.Expt.2 is an optimizing experiment using a“biased”model,in which the initial condition is optimized through assimilation of“observed”SST data obtained from Expt.1.Expt.3 is a combined optimizing experiment using the “biased”model,in which the initial condition and model parameter are both optimized through assimilation of“observed”SST data obtained from Expt.1.

    3.2.Recovery of ENSO evolution

    In this subsection,we examine the evolution of various anomaly fields.As described above,the “biased”model is used to perform the optimizing experiments,with assimilation of SST data for only the initial condition in Expt.2,and the initial condition plus the model parameter in Expt.3,respectively.Figure 4 shows the longitude–time sections of SST anomalies along the equator from the simulations in Expt.1,Expt.2 and Expt.3 during the first 12-year simulation.The similarity indicates the effectiveness of the recovery.It is clearly illustrated that simulations based on Expt.2 and Expt.3 can both recover the basic characters of ENSO events well,including the period,spatial distribution,phase transition,and so on.For instance,after approximately the first two-year spin-up simulation period,the SST simulated in Expt.2(Fig.4b)is recovered to its“truth” field(Fig.4a)when the “observed”SST data are assimilated into the “biased”model.However,because of model parameter error,several departures still exist compared with the “truth” field.For example,the amplitude of the SST anomaly in Expt.2 is much larger than the“truth” field,and the phase transition time is changed slightly.By contrast,the SST field in Expt.3(Fig.4c)can recover to the “truth” field quickly(Fig.4a)after a short spin-up period.Thus,comparing these three experiments clearly indicates that additionally optimizing this model parameter using the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data can further improve ENSO simulation.

    It is expected that optimizing the model parameter αTecan have a direct influence on the Tefield when assimilating the “observed”SST data.Figure 5 shows the longitude–time sections of Teanomalies along the equator for the “truth”field,Expt.2 and Expt.3,during the first 12-year simulations.For Expt.2(Fig.5b),in which the model parameter αTeis not optimized,the Tefield can be seen to recover through assimilating the“observed”SST data.However,several departures still exist compared with the “truth” field(Fig.5a),which are induced by model parameter biases.It can be seen that a larger αTe(αTe=1.1)acts to produce a simulated Tefield that is also larger—consistent with our previous studies indicating that the subsurface thermal effect is stronger when αTeis chosen to be larger(Zhang and Gao,2016a).Therefore,when the subsurface effect on SST is stronger,the SST simulated in Expt.2 is larger than that of the “truth” field(Fig.4b).However,when αTeis optimized in Expt.3 to the “truth”model parameter(αTe=1.0;Fig.3)by parameter estimation based on assimilating the“observed”SST data,the simulated Teof Expt.3(Fig.5c)closely resembles the“truth” field.All these results indicate that optimizing both model parameters and the initial state through 4D-Var-based SST assimilation can recover the ENSO evolution more effectively than just optimizing the initial state alone.

    Fig.3.Time series of αTeestimated optimally using the 4D-Var method during the first eight-year assimilation periods.For clarity,a rescaled(ampli fi ed)view is also embedded in the figure for the αTeestimated during the five-to eight-year assimilation periods.

    Fig.4.Longitude–time sections of SST anomalies along the equator for(a)the “truth” field,(b)Expt.2 and(c)Expt.3 during the first 12-year simulation period.The contour interval is 0.5°C.

    3.3.Quanti fi cation in terms of the RMSE

    To quantify the effect on ENSO simulation of parameter estimation optimization,the RMSEs for some major variables are calculated.Here,the RMSE is defined as follows:

    Figure6 shows the RMSE time series for the anomalies of SST,wind stress,SL and Tecalculated over the full model domain(30°N–30°S,124°E–78°W).Expt.2 is a case in which only the initial condition is optimized by assimilating SST data;whereas,in Expt.3,both the initial condition and the model parameter are optimized.The results shown in the lefth and panels are calculated on the first day of each month in the first two-year simulation,and those in the right-hand panels are for the 3–12-year simulation for Expt.2(blue)and Expt.3(red).It is clearly evident that the RMSEs of both experiments decline consistently and systematically,reaching a steady state.Nevertheless,compared to Expt.2 without parameter estimation,the RMSEs of Expt.3 decline faster,being more effective at reaching the steady state(left-hand panels in Fig.6).Additionally,the values of the RMSEs are much smaller in Expt.3 compared with those in Expt.2 when reaching the steady state(right-hand panels in Fig.6).As with previous research in which it was shown that optimal initialization based on the 4D-Var method can effectively reduce the RMSEs of some major variables for ENSO simulation(Gao et al.,2016),here,optimal initialization and parameter estimation combined,based on4D-VarSST assimilation,work well too.Furthermore,it is also illustrated that parameter estimation based on assimilating SST data using the 4D-Var method can further improve the recovery of the simulation of the “truth” field using the “biased”model.Thus,ENSO simulations can be improved by simultaneously optimizing the initial conditions and model parameters through the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data.

    Next,the spatial distributions of the RMSEs are examined for some major model variables.Here,the RMSEs for each grid are calculated as follows:

    (2)地表水。井田南西側有下山河,在臨近河谷地帶開采,采空區(qū)可引起地表開裂與塌陷,從而溝通地表水體,導致地表水潰入井巷。在其附近地段開采時,應加強頂板管理以及注意地表水體周邊隱伏斷層溝通地表水,以防水害發(fā)生。

    Fig.5.As in Fig.4 but for Teanomalies.The contour interval is 1°C.

    Fig.6.Time series of RMSEs for anomalies of(a,e)SST,(b,f)zonal τ,(c,g)SL and(d,h)Teover the full model domain(30°N–30°S,124°E–78°W).Here,the RMSEs are shown for the first two-year simulations(left-hand panels)and the three-to twelve-year simulations(right-hand panels)from Expt.2(blue)and Expt.3(red),respectively.The RMSEs are calculated on the first day of each month using the corresponding anomalies between Expt.1 and Expt.2 and between Expt.1 and Expt.3,respectively.The units are °C for SST and Te,dyn cm?2for τ,and cm for SL.

    Fig.7.Horizontal distributions of RMSEs for anomalies of(a,f)SST,(b,g)zonal τ,(c,h)meridional τ,(d,i)SL,and(e,j)Te.Here,the RMSEs are calculated from the first 20-year simulations for Expt.2(left-hand panels)and Expt.3(right-hand panels),respectively.The units are °C for SST and Te,dyn cm?2for τ,and cm for SL.

    Figure 7 shows the spatial distributions of the RMSEs for the anomalies of SST,zonal wind stress,meridional wind stress,SL and Te.Here,the RMSEs are calculated from Eq.(4)for the first 20-year simulations from Expt.2(left-hand panels)and Expt.3(right-hand panels).The results show that the spatial distributions of the RMSEs for all variables in Expt.3(right-hand panels in Fig.7)are all smaller than those in Expt.2(left-hand panels in Fig.7);whereas,the spatial patterns of the RMSEs are similar to each other in Expt.2 and Expt.3.For the SST field,the regions with maximum RMSE for Expt.2 and Expt.3 are both centered in the central and eastern Pacific;the maximum value is 0.25°C in Expt.3(Fig.7f),which is smaller than that in Expt.2 at 0.66°C(Fig.7a).For the zonal wind stress field,the larger RMSE regions are located in the central equatorial Pacific,with a maximum value of 0.1 dyn cm?2(1 dyn cm?2=0.1 N m?2)for Expt.2(Fig.7b)and0.042dyncm?2Expt.3(Fig.7g).For the meridional wind stress,the RMSEs have the same spatial pattern in Expt.2 and Expt.3,with a maximum value of 0.095 dyn cm?2in Expt.2(Fig.7c)and 0.032 dyn cm?2in Expt.3(Fig.7h).For the SL,the maximum RMSE values are 9 cm and 8 cm,with similar spatial distribution patterns for Expt.2(Fig.7d)and Expt.3(Fig.7i).For the Tefield,the maximum regions are both centered in the central equatorial Pacific,with a maximum value of 2°C in Expt.2(Fig.7e)and 0.55°C in Expt.3(Fig.7j).This represents a reduction in RMSEs by about 71%in Expt.3 compared with Expt.2.

    In general,the RMSE differences in the SST,wind stress and Tefields between Expt.2 and Expt.3 are much larger than those in the SL field.This is because,compared with Expt.2,the model parameter αTeis additionally optimized in Expt.3,leading to a Tefield that is effectively recovered.Since the subsurface thermal effect is very important to the evolution of SST anomalies,the improved Tefield in Expt.3 can further affect the simulation of the SST field.So,the biases in SST between the optimizing experiments and the “truth” field decrease faster in Expt.3 than in Expt.2.Thus,the modeled SST field is more likely to recover in Expt.3 compared with Expt.2.Furthermore,the wind stress anomaly field is constructed based on the relationship between the anomalies of SST and wind stress(τ):τ= ατFτ(SST).Therefore,the optimized SST field further improves the simulation of the wind stress anomaly.However,the SL anomaly field needs to be adjusted through dynamic processes when assimilating SST data in the ICM.Consequently,even though the SL field is adjusted to recover to its “truth”field,the biases between the optimizing experiments and the“truth” field are still large compared with other fields.

    All in all,additionally optimizing the model parameter αTeusing the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data in the ICM can effectively recover the simulation of major variables,especially for the Te,SST and wind stress fields.Simulation errors induced by biases in the model parameter can be effectively reduced by optimizing the parameter estimation using the 4D-Var method.As such,the optimization procedure can produce an adequate initial condition and model parameter that can be used for ENSO predictions.

    4.Effect on ENSO prediction

    It is clearly illustrated above that optimizing the model parameter αTethrough the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data can effectively recover the ENSO evolution.It is desirable to check if optimizing model parameters can also benefit ENSO forecasting,in combination with optimizing the initial condition.Here,we perform hindcast experiments using the“biased”model with optimized initial conditions and/or the optimized model parameter,αTe.A series of forecast experiments are conducted using the “biased”model during the period from model time 2062/01/01 to 2079/12/01.Two experiments are performed—one with only the initial condition optimized(Expt.2),and the other with both the model parameter(αTe)and initial condition optimized(Expt.3);the optimized initial condition and model parameter obtained on the first day of each month are used in Expt.2 and Expt.3,respectively.Thus,in these experiments,18×12(=216)hindcasts are obtained in total for analysis in each experiment.

    Figure 8 shows the time series of the Ni?o3.4 indices for the“truth”value(green)and hindcasts made at lead times of three months(Fig.8a),six months(Fig.8b)and nine months(Fig.8c)using the initial conditions and parameter obtained from Expt.2(blue)and Expt.3(red).The hindcast results indicate that the evolution can be predicted very well.As the hindcast time extends,the hindcast errors increase.When optimizing the initial conditions only in Expt.2,the hindcast results exhibit some biases compared with the “truth” field.When optimizing both the initial conditions and the model parameter in Expt.3,it is evident that the Ni?o3.4 indices produced closely follow the “truth”value.So,additionally optimizing this model parameter can contribute to further improvement in ENSO prediction.Quantitatively,the RMSEs of the Ni?o3.4 indices predicted in Expt.2 and Expt.3 at the six-month lead time with the “truth”value reduce from 0.47 to 0.06.As the constructed observation error type is simple in this idealized configuration context,the Ni?o3.4 indices in Expt.3 are almost the same as the“truth”value.

    5.Conclusion and discussion

    The IOCAS ICM used in this study still suffers from large biases in its real-time ENSO prediction. There are many ways to improve its performance.Previously,we developed a 4DVar data assimilation system for the ICM.As an application,the system was used to optimize the initial conditions for improved ENSO simulation and prediction.Because errors in model parameters are also important sources of model biases,in this paper,the 4D-Var system is used to demonstrate the feasibility of optimizing model parameters for improving ENSO analyses.

    Fig.8.Time series of the Ni?o3.4 indices for the“truth”model(green)and for hindcasts made using optimized initial conditions in Expt.2(blue)and the additionally optimized model parameter in Expt.3(red)at lead times of(a)three months,(b)six months and(c)nine months.The experiments are performed from model time 2063/01 to 2079/12.

    In this ICM,Teis used explicitly to represent the thermocline effect on SST(referred to simply as “the thermocline effect”),and a related parameter(αTe)is introduced to indicate the intensity of the thermocline feedback.In this paper,this model parameter,i.e.αTe,is used as an example to demonstrate the optimization of parameter estimates using the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data in the ICM.To this end,a twin-experiment approach is adopted with an idealized setting.

    Results from experiments having only the initial condition optimized and having both the initial condition plus the additional model parameter optimized are compared.As demonstrated before,the simulation and prediction of ENSO can be improved by optimal initialization using the 4D-Var assimilation of SST data in the ICM.Here,it is shown that ENSO evolution can be more effectively recovered by including the additional optimization of this parameter.Through optimizing this parameter,the reduction in RMSEs for anomalies of SST,wind stress,SL and Tetakes place relatively faster compared with that of SL.This is mainly because optimizing the model parameter αTecan effectively improve the simulation of the Tefield.As the subsurface thermal effect is important to SST evolution,the optimized Tefield leads to improved SST depictions.Additionally,the wind stress field is calculated as a response to the SST anomaly using its statistical model;thus,the wind stress anomaly is also improved in the optimized experiment.Since the SL field needs to be adjusted through dynamic processes when SST data are assimilated through the 4D-Var method,this field is less effectively improved.Thus,it is clearly evident that optimizing the model parameter using the 4D-Varbased assimilation of SST data can further improve the simulation and prediction of ENSO.The demonstrated feasibility of optimizing model parameters and initial conditions together through 4D-Var assimilation provides a modeling platform for ENSO studies.

    Another application of the 4D-Var data assimilation system implemented in IOCAS ICM to improve its ENSO modeling by optimizing model parameter estimates in the ICM is demonstrated in this paper.The results are obtained in the context of a twin experiment,and these idealized experiments are intended for demonstration purposes.Although only one parameter is considered for the optimized experiments under the idealized setting,it provides a theoretical demonstration and practical assimilation procedure to optimize model parameters.Further applications are underway using the 4DVar data assimilation technique.For example,the ICM’s performance is also sensitive to many other model parameters,including the coupling coefficient between interannual anomalies of SST and wind stress(ατ),the vertical diffusivity coefficient(Kv),the thermal damping coefficient for SST anomalies(λ),and so on.Thus,multi-parameter optimization procedures should be taken into account.Also,some potential problems may exist when applying this technique for fitting a model(which is necessarily biased)to real observed data.In particular,the parameter estimates may not converge as cleanly as shown in Fig.3,and the simultaneous estimation of multiple parameters may be difficult because multiple minima may emerge when estimating the cost function.Also,the spatial structure of the model parameters should be considered.Clearly,more experiments with respect to multi-parameter optimization need to be conducted.Additionally,the subsurface thermal state has considerable influence on the SST in the tropical Pacific.Thus,it is necessary to assimilate subsurface thermal fields into the ICM in addition to the SST data.For example,sea level and horizontal ocean current data need to be considered in the data assimilation procedure.Ultimately,such a combined assimilation of multiple variables and parameters should be considered when using the ICM.

    The resultant insight into this predictive understanding and the methodology gained from this work will be transferred to the improvement of real-time ENSO prediction using the IOCAS ICM(Zhang and Gao,2016b).Ultimately,all these efforts are expected to improve ENSO forecasting skill in IOCAS ICM by using the 4D-Var data assimilation system for various data(SST,SL,and others)and various model parameters(αTe,ατ,and others).

    Also,other data assimilation methods are currently available,including the EnKF method(Wu et al.,2016).It would be desirable to compare the advantages and disadvantages be-tween these methods in terms of ENSO simulation and prediction.In addition,the adjoint model of the 4D-Var data assimilation equipped with IOCAS ICM provides a way to calculate the gradient of the cost function;the adjoint method with the 4D-Var data assimilation system will be combined with the CNOP(conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation)approach(Mu and Duan,2003)to identify the error structure of initial conditions and model parameters(Tao et al.,2017).More results will be presented in future publications.

    Acknowledgements.We would like to thank Drs.Mu MU and Shaoqing ZHANG for their comments.We also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions.This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.41705082,41475101,41690122(41690120)),a Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategic Priority Project—the Western Pacific Ocean System(Grant Nos.XDA11010105 and XDA11020306),the National Programme on Global Change and Air–Sea Interaction(Grant Nos.GASI-IPOVAI-06and GASI-IPOVAI-01-01),the China Postdoctoral Science Foun-dation,and a Qingdao Postdoctoral Application Research Project.

    Ballester,J.,D.Petrova,S.Bordoni,B.Cash,M.García-Díez,and X.Rodó,2016:Sensitivity of El Ni?o intensity and timing to preceding subsurface heat magnitude.Scientific Reports,6,36344,https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36344.

    Bjerknes,J.,1966:A possible response of the atmospheric Hadley circulation to equatorial anomalies of ocean temperature.Tellus,18,820–829,https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1966.tb00303.x.

    Chen,D.,M.A.Cane,A.Kaplan,S.E.Zebiak,and D.Huang.,2004:Predictability of El Ni?o over the past 148 years.Nature,428,733–736,https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02439.

    Courtier,P.,J.N.Thépaut,and A.Hollings worth,1994:A strategy for operational implementation of4D-Var,using an incremental approach.Quart.J.Roy.Meteor.Soc.,120,1367–1387,https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712051912.

    Dommenget,D.,and D.Stammer,2004:Assessing ENSO simulations and predictions using adjoint ocean state estimation.J.Climate,17,4301–4315,https://doi.org/10.1175/3211.1.

    Gao,C.,and R.-H.Zhang,2017:The roles of atmospheric wind and entrained water temperature(Te)in the second-year cooling of the 2010-12 La Ni?a event.Climate Dyn.,48,597–617,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3097-4.

    Gao,C.,X.R.Wu,and R.-H.Zhang,2016:Testing a four-dimensional variational data assimilation method using an im-proved intermediate coupled model for ENSO analysis and prediction.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,33(7),875–888,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-5249-1.

    Huang,R.H.,R.H.Zhang,and B.L.Yan,2001:Dynamical effect of the zonal wind anomalies over the tropical western Pacific on ENSO cycles.Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences,44,1089–1098,https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906865.

    Kalnay,E.,2003:Atmospheric Modeling,Data Assimilation and Predictability.Cambridge University Press,342 pp.

    Liu,D.C.,and J.Nocedal,1989:On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization.Mathematical Programming,45,503–528,https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01589116.

    Liu,Y.,andH.-L.Ren,2017: ImprovingENSO prediction in CFSv2 with an analogue-based correction method.International Journal of Climatology,37(15),https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5142.

    Liu,Y.,Z.Liu,S.Zhang,R.Jacob,F.Lu,X.Rong,and S.Wu.,2014:Ensemble-based parameter estimation in a coupled general circulation model.J.Climate,27,7151–7162,https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00406.1.

    Lu,J.X.,and W.W.Hsieh,1998:On determining initial conditions and parameters in a simple coupled atmosphere–ocean model by adjoint data assimilation.Tellus A,50,534–544,https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v50i4.14531.

    Mu,M.,and W.S.Duan,2003:A new approach to studying ENSO predictability:Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation.Chinese Science Bulletin,48,1045–1047,https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184224.

    Mu,M.,W.S.Duan,and C.J.Wang,2002:The predictability problems in numerical weather and climate prediction.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,19,191–204,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-002-0016-x.

    Mu,M.,W.Duan,Q.Wang,and R.Zhang,2010:An extension of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation approach and its applications.Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics,17,211–220,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-17-211-2010.

    Peng,S.-Q.,and L.Xie,2006:Effect of determining initial conditions by four-dimensional variational data assimilation on storm surge forecasting.Ocean Modelling,14,1–18,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2006.03.005.

    Peng,S.Q.,Y.N.Li,and L.Xie,2013:Adjusting the wind stress drag coefficient in storm surge forecasting using an adjoint technique.J.Atmos.Oceanic Technol.,30,590–608,https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00034.1.

    Ren,H.-L.,Y.Liu,F.-F.Jin,Y.P.Yan,and X.W.Liu,2014:Application of the analogue-based correction of errors method in ENSO prediction.Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters,7,157–161,https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1674-2834.13.0080.

    Tao,L.-J.,R.-H.Zhang,and C.Gao,2017:Initial error-induced optimal perturbations in ENSO predictions,as derived from an intermediate coupled model.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,34,791–803,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-6266-4.

    Wang,B.,X.L.Zou,and J.Zhu,2000:Data assimilation and its applications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,97(21),11 143–11 144,https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.21.11143.

    Wu,X.R.,S.Q.Zhang,Z.Y.Liu,A.Rosati,T.L.Delworth,and Y.Liu,2012:Impact of geographic-dependent parameter optimization on climate estimation and prediction:Simulation with an intermediate coupled model.Mon.Wea.Rev.,140,3956–3971,https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00298.1.

    Wu,X.R.,G.J,Han,S.Q.Zhang,and Z.Y.Liu,2016:A study of the impact of parameter optimization on ENSO predictability with an intermediate coupled model.Climate Dyn.,46,711–727,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2608-z.

    Xie,S.-P.,C.Deser,G.A.Vecchi,J.Ma,H.Y.Teng,and A.T.Wittenberg,2010:Global warming pattern formation:Sea surface temperature and rainfall.J.Climate,23,966–986,https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3329.1.

    Zebiak,S.E.,and M.A.Cane,1987:A model El Ni?o-southern oscillation.Mon.Wea.Rev.,115,2262–2278,https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<2262:AMENO>2.0.CO;2.

    Zhang,R.-H.,and C.Gao,2016a:Role of subsurface entrainment temperature(Te)in the onset of El Ni?oevents,as represented in an intermediate coupled model.Climate Dyn.,46,1417–1435,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2655-5.

    Zhang,R.-H.,and C.Gao,2016b:The IOCAS intermediate coupled model(IOCAS ICM)and its real-time predictions of the 2015-2016 El Ni?o event.Science Bulletin,61,1061–1070,https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-016-1064-4.

    Zhang,R.-H.,S.E.Zebiak,R.Kleeman,and N.Keenlyside,2003:A new intermediate coupled model for El Ni?o simulation and prediction.Geophys.Res.Lett.,30,2012,https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018010.

    Zhang,R.-H.,R.Kleeman,S.E.Zebiak,N.Keenlyside,and S.Raynaud,2005a:An empirical parameterization of subsurface entrainment temperature for improved SST anomaly simulations in an intermediate ocean model.J.Climate,18,350–371,https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3271.1.

    Zhang,R.-H.,F.Zheng,J.Zhu,and Z.G.Wang,2013:A successful real-time forecast of the 2010-11 La Ni?a event.Scientific Reports,3,1108,https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01108.

    Zhang,S.,M.J.Harrison,A.T.Wittenberg,A.Rosati,J.L.Anderson,and V.Balaji,2005b:Initialization of an ENSO forecast system using a parallelized ensemble filter.Mon.Wea.Rev.,133,3176–3201,https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3024.1.

    Zhang,X.F.,S.Q.Zhang,Z.Y.Liu,X.R.Wu,and G.J.Han,2015:Parameter optimization in an intermediate coupled climate model with biased physics.J.Climate,28,1227–1247,https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00348.1.

    Zheng,F.,J.Zhu,R.-H.Zhang,and G.Q.Zhou,2006:Ensemble hindcasts of SST anomalies in the tropical Pacific using an intermediate coupled model.Geophys.Res.Lett.,33,L19604,https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026994.

    Zheng,F.,J.Zhu,H.Wang,and R.-H.Zhang,2009:Ensemble hindcasts of ENSO events over the past 120 years using a large number of ensembles.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,26,359–372,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-009-0359-7.

    中文字幕制服av| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 午夜激情欧美在线| 天堂网av新在线| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产极品天堂在线| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 久久草成人影院| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 成人二区视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲五月天丁香| av视频在线观看入口| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲五月天丁香| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| av.在线天堂| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 成人无遮挡网站| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 精品久久久噜噜| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 嫩草影院新地址| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 六月丁香七月| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| avwww免费| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 成人三级黄色视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 久久99精品国语久久久| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产成人精品一,二区 | 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 午夜激情欧美在线| kizo精华| 少妇丰满av| 69av精品久久久久久| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久久久网色| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 九九在线视频观看精品| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产亚洲欧美98| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产成人91sexporn| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 22中文网久久字幕| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 久久久色成人| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产精品无大码| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产成人a区在线观看| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 如何舔出高潮| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 高清毛片免费看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产成人福利小说| 91精品国产九色| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产av不卡久久| 午夜精品在线福利| 在线播放国产精品三级| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产在视频线在精品| 在线播放无遮挡| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 尾随美女入室| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲成人久久性| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 老司机影院成人| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 日本黄大片高清| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 久久久久久久久大av| 色哟哟·www| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产免费男女视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 97在线视频观看| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 国产成人精品久久久久久| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲图色成人| 国产三级中文精品| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久久精品94久久精品| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产视频首页在线观看| 在线免费十八禁| 欧美性感艳星| 色哟哟·www| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 日本在线视频免费播放| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 我要搜黄色片| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 中国美女看黄片| 老女人水多毛片| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 直男gayav资源| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 在线播放国产精品三级| 精品人妻视频免费看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 免费看日本二区| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| av在线播放精品| 天堂网av新在线| 精品人妻视频免费看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 91狼人影院| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看 | 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 亚洲性久久影院| 日韩欧美三级三区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 黑人高潮一二区| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 免费大片18禁| av专区在线播放| 久久这里只有精品中国| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 日本在线视频免费播放| 日日啪夜夜撸| 在线免费十八禁| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 久久久精品大字幕| 久久久久九九精品影院| 久久人人爽人人片av| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 97在线视频观看| 韩国av在线不卡| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 搞女人的毛片| 欧美日韩在线观看h| a级毛片a级免费在线| 简卡轻食公司| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 中国国产av一级| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 国产三级在线视频| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 搞女人的毛片| av国产免费在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 少妇高潮的动态图| 欧美区成人在线视频| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 在线天堂最新版资源| 免费大片18禁| 18+在线观看网站| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产成人精品婷婷| 午夜激情欧美在线| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| www日本黄色视频网| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲图色成人| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产精品,欧美在线| 在线观看一区二区三区| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 午夜精品在线福利| 成年版毛片免费区| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产成人一区二区在线| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 日韩视频在线欧美| 波多野结衣高清作品| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产 一区精品| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 永久网站在线| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产黄片美女视频| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 天堂网av新在线| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| ponron亚洲| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲av熟女| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 有码 亚洲区| 国产色婷婷99| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产精品野战在线观看| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 精品久久久久久成人av| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 有码 亚洲区| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 搞女人的毛片| 欧美激情在线99| 国产精品野战在线观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 全区人妻精品视频| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 午夜精品在线福利| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 精品久久久久久久末码| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| avwww免费| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 草草在线视频免费看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 99久久精品热视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 免费av观看视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 天堂网av新在线| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 少妇的逼好多水| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 三级经典国产精品| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 99久久人妻综合| 国产91av在线免费观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 成人欧美大片| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| kizo精华| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 波多野结衣高清作品| 精品久久久久久久久av| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 永久网站在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 美女大奶头视频| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 国产成人a区在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 两个人的视频大全免费| 97热精品久久久久久| 九草在线视频观看| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲av熟女| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 日韩中字成人| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 成年版毛片免费区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 一区福利在线观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产老妇女一区| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 色5月婷婷丁香| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 大香蕉久久网| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 午夜老司机福利剧场| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产精品永久免费网站| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 91狼人影院| 亚洲五月天丁香| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 免费看光身美女| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产日本99.免费观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 青春草视频在线免费观看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 性欧美人与动物交配| 午夜福利在线在线| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲av一区综合| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲18禁久久av| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 最好的美女福利视频网| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 亚洲五月天丁香| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| av在线蜜桃| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 一级av片app| 日韩欧美三级三区| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 一区二区三区免费毛片| av专区在线播放| 97在线视频观看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲av成人av| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 久久人妻av系列| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 黄色日韩在线| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产91av在线免费观看| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 一本一本综合久久| 国产成人a区在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲av熟女| h日本视频在线播放| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 熟女电影av网| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 久久99精品国语久久久| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 午夜老司机福利剧场| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 欧美zozozo另类| 久久久久国产网址| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 嫩草影院新地址| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 日本免费a在线| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 91久久精品电影网| 成人av在线播放网站| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 在现免费观看毛片| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| kizo精华| 在现免费观看毛片| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 两个人的视频大全免费| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 日韩高清综合在线| 日本黄大片高清| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产成人精品婷婷| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产中年淑女户外野战色|