李淑瑩 葉文峰
【摘要】 目的:研究并發(fā)癥預(yù)防護(hù)理應(yīng)用于重癥急性胰腺炎患者護(hù)理中的效果。方法:選取2015年1月-2016年11月重癥急性胰腺炎患者90例作為研究對象,按照隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為常規(guī)護(hù)理組和預(yù)防性護(hù)理組,各45例。常規(guī)護(hù)理組采用常規(guī)的護(hù)理方法,預(yù)防性護(hù)理組在常規(guī)護(hù)理方法基礎(chǔ)上給予并發(fā)癥預(yù)防護(hù)理。比較兩組治療總有效率,腸脹氣、消化道出血、腹腔感染、休克等并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率,護(hù)理前和護(hù)理后患者生理、心理、社會、精神/宗教、獨(dú)立性等WHO-QOL生存質(zhì)量測定量因子評分的差異;比較兩組平均住院時(shí)間,護(hù)理滿意度評分,護(hù)理前后腫瘤壞死因子、白細(xì)胞介素水平。結(jié)果:預(yù)防性護(hù)理組治療總有效率高于常規(guī)護(hù)理組(P<0.05);預(yù)防性護(hù)理組腸脹氣、消化道出血、腹腔感染、休克等并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率低于常規(guī)護(hù)理組(P<0.05)。護(hù)理前兩組生理、心理、社會、精神/宗教、獨(dú)立性等WHO-QOL生存質(zhì)量測定量因子評分比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);護(hù)理后預(yù)防性護(hù)理組生理、心理、社會、精神/宗教、獨(dú)立性等WHO-QOL生存質(zhì)量測定量因子評分改善幅度更大(P<0.05)。預(yù)防性護(hù)理組平均住院時(shí)間顯著短于常規(guī)護(hù)理組(P<0.05),護(hù)理滿意度評分顯著高于常規(guī)護(hù)理組(P<0.05)。護(hù)理前兩組腫瘤壞死因子、白細(xì)胞介素水平比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);護(hù)理后,預(yù)防性護(hù)理組腫瘤壞死因子、白細(xì)胞介素水平改善幅度更大(P<0.05)。結(jié)論:并發(fā)癥預(yù)防護(hù)理在重癥急性胰腺炎患者護(hù)理中的效果確切,可有效降低腸脹氣、消化道出血、腹腔感染、休克等并發(fā)癥發(fā)生,改善患者預(yù)后和生存質(zhì)量,值得在臨床推廣和應(yīng)用。
【關(guān)鍵詞】 并發(fā)癥預(yù)防護(hù)理; 重癥急性胰腺炎患者; 護(hù)理效果
Observation theEffect Observation of Complications Prevention Nursing in Nursing Care of Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis/LI Shu-ying,YE Wen-feng.//Medical Innovation of China,2017,14(16):109-112
【Abstract】 Objective:To study the effect of complications prevention nursing in the care of patients with severe acute pancreatitis.Method:From January 2015 to November 2016,90 patients with severe acute pancreatitis were divided into the routine care group and the preventive care group according to random number table method,45 cases in each group.The routine care group was given conventional care methods,the preventive care group was given complications prevention on the basis of the routine care group.The efficiency of total treatment,the incidence of complications(such as aerenterectasia,gastrointestinal bleeding,peritoneal infection and shock) and WHO-QOL quality of life measure factors(physical,psychological,social,spiritual/religion,independence and so on) score of two groups before and after nursing were compared.The average length of stay,nursing satisfaction score,levels of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin of two groups before and after nursing were compared.Result:The total effective rate of the preventive care group was higher than that of the routine care group(P<0.05).The incidence of the preventive care group was significantly lower than that of the preventive care group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the scores of WHO-QOL quality of life of two groups before treatment(P>0.05),and the scores of WHO-QOL quality of life of the preventive nursing group improved the greater(P<0.05).The average hospital stay of the preventive care group was significantly shorter than that of the routine care group(P<0.05).Nursing satisfaction score of the preventive care group was significantly higher than that of the routine care group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the levels of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin of two groups before treatment(P>0.05).The levels of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin of the preventive nursing group after treatment were significantly higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Complications prevention nursing is effective in the care of patients with severe acute pancreatitis,it can effectively reduce the complications of severe acute pancreatitis such as aerenterectasia,gastrointestinal bleeding,abdominal infection and shock,and improve the prognosis and quality of life.It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
【Key words】 Complications prevention nursing; Severe acute pancreatitis patients; Nursing effect
First-authors address:Ganzhou Peoples Hospital,Ganzhou 341000,China
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2017.16.031
重癥急性胰腺炎是消化內(nèi)科常見急癥,其發(fā)病因素復(fù)雜,是多種因素引起的胰腺內(nèi)胰酶異常激活,導(dǎo)致胰腺組織自身消化和水腫,甚至發(fā)生出血和壞死,并引發(fā)炎癥反應(yīng)。部分重癥急性胰腺炎患者在出血和壞死之后還可繼發(fā)感染、腹膜炎以及休克,若救治不及時(shí),容易進(jìn)展為膿毒血癥和多臟器功能衰竭,因此,需加強(qiáng)對并發(fā)癥的有效控制,以改善患者預(yù)后[1]。本研究分析了并發(fā)癥預(yù)防護(hù)理應(yīng)用于重癥急性胰腺炎患者護(hù)理中的效果,現(xiàn)報(bào)道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料 選取2015年1月-2016年11月重癥急性胰腺炎患者90例,根據(jù)隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為常規(guī)護(hù)理組和預(yù)防性護(hù)理組,每組各45例。預(yù)防性護(hù)理組男34例,女11例;年齡21~79歲,平均(48.34±2.57)歲;其中暴飲暴食18例,慢性胰腺炎病史10例,膽源性感染10例,飲酒6例,不明原因1例。常規(guī)護(hù)理組男35例,女10例;年齡21~79歲,平均(48.15±2.48)歲,其中暴飲暴食19例,慢性胰腺炎病史10例,膽源性感染9例,飲酒6例,不明原因1例。兩組患者一般資料比較差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),具有可比性。
1.2 方法
1.2.1 常規(guī)護(hù)理組 采用常規(guī)護(hù)理方法,提供舒適病房環(huán)境、心理疏導(dǎo)、健康教育、生活護(hù)理等,并加強(qiáng)用藥觀察和病情監(jiān)測。
1.2.2 預(yù)防性護(hù)理組 在常規(guī)護(hù)理方法基礎(chǔ)上給予并發(fā)癥預(yù)防護(hù)理。(1)腸脹氣:禁食,并給予大承氣湯口服,1包/次,2次/d,若脹氣嚴(yán)重則給予大承氣湯灌腸[2]。(2)感染:為預(yù)防感染的發(fā)生,需保持病房通風(fēng)干凈,定期用紫外線消毒,及時(shí)清洗和消毒器械,并定期監(jiān)測患者體溫,對其癥狀進(jìn)行評估,若出現(xiàn)感染需立刻隔離,并妥善處理患者一次性用品,預(yù)防感染傳播[3]。(3)高血糖:每天對患者血糖進(jìn)行監(jiān)測,對有高血糖趨勢者給予小劑量胰島素維持血糖水平平穩(wěn)。(4)消化道出血:應(yīng)激性潰瘍可引發(fā)消化道出血,可通過每天應(yīng)用制酸、護(hù)胃藥物進(jìn)行預(yù)防,并定期詢問有無反酸、噯氣、劍突下疼痛等感受,并觀察其排便情況和糞便性狀,若出現(xiàn)消化道出血等不良反應(yīng),需及時(shí)用去甲腎上腺素和冰鹽水治療,必要時(shí)給予胃鏡治療[4-5]。(5)多器官功能衰竭:密切監(jiān)測患者血氧飽和度和呼吸情況,必要時(shí)轉(zhuǎn)入ICU病房給予高流量吸氧和機(jī)械通氣。對患者生命體征進(jìn)行監(jiān)測,加強(qiáng)對尿液顏色和排尿量等的觀察,并預(yù)防腎衰竭的發(fā)生[6-8]。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo)與評定標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 比較兩組治療總有效率,腸脹氣、消化道出血、腹腔感染、休克等并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率,護(hù)理前后患者生理、心理、社會、精神/宗教、獨(dú)立性等WHO-QOL生存質(zhì)量測定量因子評分的差異(WHO-QOL生存質(zhì)量測定量表評分包括跟生活質(zhì)量相關(guān)的6個(gè)維度以及24個(gè)條目,共100個(gè)問題,每個(gè)問題1~5分,總分為500分,分?jǐn)?shù)越高則生活質(zhì)量越高)。比較兩組平均住院時(shí)間、護(hù)理滿意度評分,護(hù)理前后腫瘤壞死因子水平、白細(xì)胞介素水平。療效評價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)顯效:臨床癥狀完全消失,生化指標(biāo)恢復(fù)正常,患者生命體征穩(wěn)定;(2)有效:臨床癥狀改善,生化指標(biāo)改善,患者生命體征基本穩(wěn)定;(3)無效:未達(dá)到上述標(biāo)準(zhǔn)??傆行?顯效+有效[9]。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理 采用SPSS 20.0軟件對所得數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,計(jì)量資料用(x±s)表示,比較采用t檢驗(yàn);計(jì)數(shù)資料以率(%)表示,比較采用 字2檢驗(yàn),P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2 結(jié)果
2.1 兩組患者治療效果比較 預(yù)防性護(hù)理組治療總有效率為97.78%高于常規(guī)護(hù)理組的82.22% (字2=6.049,P=0.014),見表1。
2.2 兩組患者護(hù)理前后WHO-QOL生存質(zhì)量測定量因子評分比較 護(hù)理前,兩組生理、心理、社會、精神/宗教、獨(dú)立性等WHO-QOL生存質(zhì)量測定量因子評分比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);護(hù)理后,預(yù)防性護(hù)理組WHO-QOL生存質(zhì)量測定量各因子評分改善幅度更大(P<0.05),見表2。
2.3 兩組患者并發(fā)癥發(fā)生情況比較 預(yù)防性護(hù)理組腸脹氣、消化道出血、腹腔感染、休克等并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率低于常規(guī)護(hù)理組( 字2=9.687,P<0.05),見表3。
2.4 兩組患者平均住院時(shí)間、護(hù)理滿意度評分比較 預(yù)防性護(hù)理組平均住院時(shí)間顯著短于常規(guī)護(hù)理組,護(hù)理滿意度評分顯著高于常規(guī)護(hù)理組,比較差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05),見表4。
2.5 兩組患者護(hù)理前后腫瘤壞死因子、白細(xì)胞介素水平比較 護(hù)理前,兩組腫瘤壞死因子(TNF-α)、白細(xì)胞介素水平(IL-6、IL-8)比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);護(hù)理后,預(yù)防性護(hù)理組腫瘤壞死因子、白細(xì)胞介素水平改善幅度更大(P<0.05),見表5。
3 討論
重癥急性胰腺炎是臨床常見嚴(yán)重疾病,發(fā)病快且多為進(jìn)行性發(fā)展,可導(dǎo)致機(jī)體臟器損傷,以腎臟和肺部損傷最為明顯,甚至可引發(fā)功能障礙和衰竭。在重癥急性胰腺炎治療期間加強(qiáng)對并發(fā)癥的預(yù)防十分重要。通過并發(fā)癥預(yù)防性護(hù)理,可對重癥急性胰腺炎常見并發(fā)癥進(jìn)行預(yù)測、評估,依靠血壓、淀粉酶水平、血糖和炎癥指標(biāo)等的監(jiān)測,采取預(yù)防性措施,對預(yù)防并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生意義重大[10-14]。
并發(fā)癥預(yù)防護(hù)理通過對患者進(jìn)行精心護(hù)理,保持胃腸道通暢,給予禁食,以減輕胰腺分泌,維持水電解質(zhì)平衡。另外,還針對感染、高血糖、消化道出血、多器官功能衰竭等并發(fā)癥做好相應(yīng)的預(yù)防和護(hù)理措施,對于預(yù)防并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生和改善患者預(yù)后意義重大[15-24]。
本研究中,常規(guī)護(hù)理組采用常規(guī)的護(hù)理方法,預(yù)防性護(hù)理組在常規(guī)護(hù)理方法基礎(chǔ)上給予并發(fā)癥預(yù)防護(hù)理。結(jié)果顯示,預(yù)防性護(hù)理組治療總有效率高于常規(guī)護(hù)理組(P<0.05),并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率低于常規(guī)護(hù)理組(P<0.05),且生存質(zhì)量、炎癥因子均優(yōu)于常規(guī)組(P<0.05),住院時(shí)間明顯縮短(P<0.05),護(hù)理滿意度明顯提高(P<0.05)。
綜上所述,并發(fā)癥預(yù)防護(hù)理應(yīng)用于重癥急性胰腺炎患者中效果確切,可有效降低腸脹氣、消化道出血、腹腔感染、休克等重癥急性胰腺炎并發(fā)癥發(fā)生,改善患者預(yù)后和生存質(zhì)量,值得在臨床上推廣和應(yīng)用。
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]鄭薇.重癥急性胰腺炎患者經(jīng)血液凈化護(hù)理后的護(hù)理方法與措施探討[J].中國醫(yī)藥指南,2016,14(12):283.
[2]朱艷艷.早期腸內(nèi)營養(yǎng)在重癥急性胰腺炎患者中的應(yīng)用與護(hù)理措施[J].大家健康(下旬版),2016,10(5):239.
[3] Yang C J,Chen J,Phillips A R J,et al.Predictors of severe and critical acute pancreatitis:A systematic review[J].Digestive and Liver Disease,2014,46(5):446-451.
[4]潘肖銘.護(hù)理干預(yù)在重癥急性胰腺炎患者控制血糖中的效果觀察[J].當(dāng)代醫(yī)學(xué),2016,22(11):103-104.
[5]葉向紅,江方正,彭南海,等.1例重癥急性胰腺炎合并嚴(yán)重腹腔感染及骶尾部Ⅳ期壓瘡的護(hù)理[J].中華護(hù)理雜志,2016,51(6):756-758.
[6] Buddingh K T,Koudstaal L G,VanSantvoort H C,et al.Early angiopoietin-2 levels after onset predict the advent of severe pancreatitis,multiple organ failure,and infectious complications in patients with acute pancreatitis[J].Journal of the American College of Surgeons,2014,218(1):26-32.
[7]唐銳,汪佳明,王穎,等.中度重癥急性胰腺炎合并麻痹性腸梗阻患者的改良胃腸減壓及保留灌腸護(hù)理[J].護(hù)理學(xué)報(bào),2016,23(12):52-53.
[8]劉芳,陳麗麗,王宣麗,等.集束化護(hù)理在重癥急性胰腺炎患者腸內(nèi)營養(yǎng)管理中的應(yīng)用及評價(jià)[J].瀘州醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2016,39(3):276-279.
[9] Ramírez-Bueno A,Salazar-Ramírez C,Cota-Delgado F,et al.Plasmapheresis as treatment for hyperlipidemic pancreatitis[J].European Journal of Internal Medicine,2014,25(2):160-163.
[10]荊華,張晶.重癥急性胰腺炎患者實(shí)施優(yōu)質(zhì)護(hù)理的效果評價(jià)[J].基層醫(yī)學(xué)論壇,2016,20(7):883-884.
[11]喻楠.護(hù)理重癥急性胰腺炎患者的臨床體會[J].健康前沿,2016,23(1):47.
[12] LU J,Liao L M,Geng Y X,et al.A double-blind,randomized,controlled study to explore the efficacy of rFⅦa on intraoperative blood loss and mortality in patients with severe acute pancreatitis[J].Thrombosis Research,2014,133(4):574-578.
[13]凌莉.對進(jìn)行手術(shù)治療的重癥急性胰腺炎患者實(shí)施優(yōu)質(zhì)護(hù)理的效果探析[J].當(dāng)代醫(yī)藥論叢,2016,14(12):25-26.
[14]徐桂蘭.經(jīng)鼻空腸管早期腸內(nèi)營養(yǎng)在重癥急性胰腺炎患者中的應(yīng)用及護(hù)理[J].醫(yī)學(xué)信息,2016,29(28):146-147.
[15] Pardalis V,Palli E,Lambropoulou M,et al.Expression of Fas (CD95/APO-1) and Fas Ligand(FasL) in experimentally-induced acute pancreatitis[J].Journal of Investigative Surgery,2014,27(2):65-72.
[16]劉海棠.個(gè)性化健康教育對急性胰腺炎患者的護(hù)理效果、相關(guān)知識知曉率和自我管理能力的影響[J].中國健康教育,2016,32(3):278-280.
[17]陳春玲.糖尿病合并急性胰腺炎患者的連續(xù)性血糖監(jiān)測和整體性護(hù)理方案的應(yīng)用效果[J].現(xiàn)代消化及介入診療,2016,21(3):502-504.
[18]徐紅菊,范彩仙,李大鵬,等.醫(yī)護(hù)一體化護(hù)理干預(yù)對住院保守治療的急性胰腺炎患者住院時(shí)間和焦慮情緒的影響[J].臨床與病理雜志,2016,36(8):1162-1166.
[19]顧育靜,蘇少鋒.精細(xì)護(hù)理應(yīng)用于生長抑素治療急性胰腺炎患者中的效果觀察[J].現(xiàn)代消化及介入診療,2016,21(1):165-167.
[20]徐花,鐘園園.引流管護(hù)理對腹腔引流治療急性胰腺炎效果的影響[J].現(xiàn)代消化及介入診療,2016,21(2):289-291.
[21]劉桂蘭,許社玲,張?zhí)m華,等.重癥急性胰腺炎常見并發(fā)癥分析及其預(yù)防護(hù)理措施的效果[J].現(xiàn)代消化及介入診療,2015,20(3):299-300.
[22]孫巖,連素娜.護(hù)理干預(yù)在重癥急性胰腺炎患者術(shù)后并發(fā)癥治療中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值[J].現(xiàn)代中西醫(yī)結(jié)合雜志,2014,23(1):94-95.
[23]楊祎,張晶瑩.重癥急性胰腺炎并發(fā)癥的觀察及護(hù)理[J].醫(yī)藥前沿,2014,18(13):279-280.
[24]曾麗娟,陳燕,吳格怡,潘換.重癥急性胰腺炎并發(fā)癥的預(yù)防護(hù)理措施[J].中國實(shí)用醫(yī)藥,2014,(7):211-212.
(收稿日期:2017-02-21) (本文編輯:鄧朝陽)