摘要 目的:探討意義療法對(duì)機(jī)器人輔助腎移植術(shù)后腎功能喪失再行血液透析患者的影響。方法:選取2018年1月—2023年6月首都醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬北京友誼醫(yī)院行達(dá)芬奇機(jī)器人輔助腎移植手術(shù)的80例血液透析患者,按照信封法分為對(duì)照組和觀察組,每組各40例。對(duì)照組采用常規(guī)治療,觀察組在對(duì)照組基礎(chǔ)上采用意義療法,分析并比較兩組患者的腎功能指標(biāo)、心理狀況、應(yīng)對(duì)方式及生活質(zhì)量。結(jié)果:治療后,觀察組的血清尿素氮(BUN)、肌酐(Cr)水平低于對(duì)照組,肌酐清除率(Ccr)高于對(duì)照組(Plt;0.05);觀察組的漢密爾頓焦慮量表(HAMA)、漢密頓抑郁量表(HAMD)評(píng)分低于對(duì)照組(Plt;0.05),腎臟疾病生活質(zhì)量簡(jiǎn)表(KDQOL-SF)評(píng)分高于對(duì)照組(Plt;0.05);觀察組在積極應(yīng)對(duì)等方面的簡(jiǎn)易應(yīng)對(duì)方式問卷(SCSQ)評(píng)分高于對(duì)照組,消極應(yīng)對(duì)等方面的SCSQ評(píng)分低于對(duì)照組(Plt;0.05)。結(jié)論:意義療法可有效提高機(jī)器人輔助腎移植術(shù)后腎功能喪失再行血液透析患者的腎功能,并改善患者的不良心理狀況,使其積極面對(duì)疾病,進(jìn)而提高生活質(zhì)量,臨床值得推廣。
關(guān)鍵詞 意義療法;機(jī)器人輔助手術(shù);腎移植;腎功能;血液透析
中圖分類號(hào) R473 R692 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼 A 文章編號(hào) 2096-7721(2025)03-0475-06
Effect of meaning therapy on patients who accepted hemodialysis after loss of renal function following robot-assisted kidney transplantation
Abstract Objective: To explore the effect of meaning therapy on patients who accepted hemodialysis after loss of renal function following robot-assisted kidney transplantation. Methods: 80 hemodialysis patients who underwent Da Vinci robot-assisted kidney transplantation in Beijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University from January 201 to June 2023 were selected. They were divided into the control group (using routine treatment, n=40) and the observation group (using meaning therapy on the basis of routine treatment, n=40) using the envelope method. The renal function indicators, psychological statu, coping style, and quality of life of patients in the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results: After treatment, the blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level, creatinine (Cr) level, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) score, and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, While the creatinine clearance (Ccr) and Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form (KDQOL-SF) scores were higher than those in the control group (Plt;0.05). For the Simple Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), the observation group had a higher score in positive coping and a lower score in negative coping compared with the control group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion: Meaning therapy can effectively improve the renal function of patients who accepted hemodialysis after loss of renal function following robot-assisted kidney transplantation, improve patients’ adverse psychological status and help them actively face the disease, as well as raise their quality of life, which is worth promoting in clinical practice.
Key words Meaning Therapy; Robot-assisted Surgery; Renal Transplantation; Renal Function; Hemodialysis
腎移植是治療終末期腎病的主要方法之一,通過給腎臟發(fā)生病變且喪失腎功能的患者進(jìn)行腎臟移植,以幫助終末期腎病患者恢復(fù)健康[1-2]。機(jī)器人手術(shù)系統(tǒng)具有精確度高、操作靈活、失血量少、微創(chuàng)等優(yōu)勢(shì),已廣泛應(yīng)用于臨床各領(lǐng)域,這為機(jī)器人輔助腎移植手術(shù)的發(fā)展提供了良好的技術(shù)平臺(tái)[3-4]。但患者術(shù)后可能會(huì)出現(xiàn)急性排斥反應(yīng)、感染等并發(fā)癥,再加上自我管理不足、依從性差等導(dǎo)致移植腎功能喪失,因此患者需要通過長(zhǎng)期血液透析治療以清除體內(nèi)多余的代謝廢物或毒素,維持生命[5]。而長(zhǎng)期血液透析使患者存在較大的心理、經(jīng)濟(jì)等方面的壓力。意義療法可引導(dǎo)和協(xié)助患者從生活中領(lǐng)悟生命意義,減輕患者心理負(fù)擔(dān),樹立明確的生活目標(biāo),使患者能夠更好地管理疾病[6-7]。本研究旨在分析意義療法對(duì)機(jī)器人輔助腎移植術(shù)后腎功能喪失再行血液透析患者的影響,現(xiàn)報(bào)道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1一般資料 選取2018年1月—2023年6月首都醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬北京友誼醫(yī)院行達(dá)芬奇機(jī)器人輔助腎移植手術(shù)的80例血液透析患者,按照信封法分為對(duì)照組和觀察組,每組各40例,對(duì)照組采用常規(guī)治療,觀察組在對(duì)照組基礎(chǔ)上采用意義療法。比較兩組患者一般資料,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Pgt;0.05),見表1。本研究已獲醫(yī)院倫理委員會(huì)批準(zhǔn)(審批號(hào):京友倫審20180108)。
1.2納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):①首次接受腎移植手術(shù)者;②腎移植術(shù)后超過3個(gè)月者;③移植腎功能喪失后再行血液透析者;④符合血液透析指征(如術(shù)后早期少尿或無尿、嚴(yán)重的水鈉潴留、高鉀血癥、代謝性酸中毒及血肌酐等)[8-9];⑤依從性良好者;⑥臨床資料完整者;⑦患者及家屬均簽署手術(shù)知情同意書。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):①多器官移植者;②心、腦、肝、肺等重要臟器功能不全者;③合并感染性疾病者;④合并血液系統(tǒng)疾病者;⑤合并惡性腫瘤者;⑥合并精神系統(tǒng)疾病,不能配合相關(guān)治療者;⑦意識(shí)或認(rèn)知功能障礙,不能正常溝通交流者。
1.3方法 患者入手術(shù)室后取仰臥位,并進(jìn)行全身麻醉。繞臍切開長(zhǎng)約8 cm縱行皮膚切口,切開皮膚、皮下組織至腹腔,于切口上放置自制Port,并置入Trocar作為鏡頭孔,術(shù)中Port作為供腎進(jìn)入腹腔的通道。平臍在距鏡頭孔左、右側(cè)各7 cm及左側(cè)15 cm分別做10 mm皮膚切口標(biāo)記,作為機(jī)器人手術(shù)系統(tǒng)第1~3機(jī)械臂輔助孔。維持氣腹壓(P=14 mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),并在鏡頭孔置入12 mm Trocar,于鏡頭直視下切開各標(biāo)記處皮膚、皮下組織,并將不同Trocar置入各通道。移開鏡頭,將機(jī)器人機(jī)械臂系統(tǒng)移至床旁,機(jī)械臂與各輔助孔Trocar進(jìn)行對(duì)接,并在分別置入電剪刀(1號(hào)臂)、雙極(2號(hào)臂)、抓鉗(3號(hào)臂)后實(shí)施手術(shù)。術(shù)畢檢查腎臟及腎周組織、手術(shù)創(chuàng)面及盆腔等無活動(dòng)性出血,再次清點(diǎn)器械及紗布,關(guān)閉切口。待患者清醒后返回病房,術(shù)后回訪無特殊情況。
對(duì)照組采用常規(guī)治療。予以常規(guī)血液透析治療,在血液透析的過程中,嚴(yán)格保持無菌操作,并密切觀察患者的生命體征,積極處理透析期間出現(xiàn)的不良反應(yīng)。同時(shí)囑患者合理飲食,以低鹽低脂、優(yōu)質(zhì)蛋白、維生素及纖維素豐富的飲食為主;并避免過重的體力勞動(dòng),依據(jù)患者身體情況進(jìn)行散步、太極拳等輕體力運(yùn)動(dòng)。
觀察組在對(duì)照組基礎(chǔ)上予以意義療法。①建立意義療法小組。小組成員包括5名臨床經(jīng)驗(yàn)豐富的主治醫(yī)生和1名心理醫(yī)生。心理醫(yī)生定期對(duì)小組成員進(jìn)行意義療法的相關(guān)培訓(xùn),還包括與患者溝通時(shí)的技巧及相關(guān)注意事項(xiàng)等方面的培訓(xùn)。②治療前評(píng)估。治療前充分了解患者的性格、心理狀態(tài)以及對(duì)待血液透析的態(tài)度。另外,了解其家庭、生活等相關(guān)信息,并取得患者及家屬的信任,同時(shí)要注意言行得體。③治療方法實(shí)施。a.進(jìn)入血透室,主治醫(yī)生向患者講解血液透析原理及注意事項(xiàng),并解答患者的疑問,告知透析可能出現(xiàn)的不良反應(yīng)。另外,主治醫(yī)生通過全面了解患者的基本情況,采取不同方式勸解、開導(dǎo)患者,耐心傾聽患者主訴,引導(dǎo)其表述內(nèi)心真實(shí)感受,緩解其緊張、焦慮等不良情緒,使其能夠積極面對(duì)疾病,并與患者建立良好的關(guān)系。同時(shí),鼓勵(lì)家屬多與患者溝通交流,了解患者的內(nèi)心想法;且在生活中給予患者支持、理解和尊重,使患者感受到來自家庭的溫暖和關(guān)懷。b.采取一對(duì)一的約談方法,根據(jù)患者的意愿選擇在病房或談話間進(jìn)行談話。每次交談時(shí)間控制在30~60 min,避免交談時(shí)間過長(zhǎng)加重患者身心負(fù)擔(dān),且交談過程中注意患者情緒。主治醫(yī)生從正面引導(dǎo)患者,使其能夠充分表達(dá)自身意愿或需求,并對(duì)其需求提供可參考的解決方法(見表2)。c.每周進(jìn)行1次生命意義療法課程,舉辦適當(dāng)?shù)膴蕵坊顒?dòng)或?yàn)榛颊咛峁┌l(fā)泄室,這在一定程度上能夠釋放患者的壓力。由主治醫(yī)生在課程中詳細(xì)講解腎移植、血液透析的治療與康復(fù)方式等相關(guān)知識(shí),提高患者對(duì)疾病的認(rèn)知水平。由心理醫(yī)生教患者一些緩解心理壓力的方法,同時(shí)觀察患者情緒,鼓勵(lì)患者表達(dá)真實(shí)的內(nèi)心感受,如治療或生活給患者帶來的壓力,通過溝通等語(yǔ)言暗示讓患者感受到被關(guān)懷和被重視。
1.4 觀察指標(biāo)
1.4.1腎功能指標(biāo) 分別于治療前后(血液透析前、血液透析后3個(gè)月)采集兩組患者的空腹靜脈血5 mL,采用酶聯(lián)免疫吸附法檢測(cè)尿素氮(Blood Urea Nitrogen,BUN)、肌酐(Creatinine,Cr)水平,試劑盒分別購(gòu)自濟(jì)南博航生物技術(shù)有限公司、廣州健侖生物科技有限公司,嚴(yán)格按照試劑盒流程操作。同時(shí)計(jì)算肌酐清除率(Creatinine Clearance Rate,Ccr),Ccr=(140-年齡)×體重(kg)/ 72×Cr(mg/dL)。
1.4.2心理狀況 分別于治療前后(血液透析前、血液透析后3個(gè)月)采用漢密爾頓焦慮量表(Hamilton Anxiety Scale,HAMA)[10]、漢密頓抑郁量表(Hamilton Depression Scale,HAMD)[11]評(píng)估兩組患者的焦慮情況和抑郁情況。HAMA評(píng)分包括14項(xiàng)內(nèi)容,lt;6分為正常;輕度焦慮:7~13分;中度焦慮:14~20分;重度焦慮:21~28分;≥29分為嚴(yán)重焦慮,得分越高表示焦慮癥狀越嚴(yán)重。HAMD評(píng)分包括24項(xiàng)內(nèi)容,lt;8分為正常;輕度抑郁:8~20分;中度抑郁:20~35分;gt;35分為重度抑郁;得分越高表示抑郁癥狀越嚴(yán)重。
1.4.3應(yīng)對(duì)方式 分別于治療前后(血液透析前、血液透析后3個(gè)月)采用簡(jiǎn)易應(yīng)對(duì)方式問卷(Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire,SCSQ)[12-13]評(píng)估兩組患者的應(yīng)對(duì)方式,包括積極應(yīng)對(duì)和消極應(yīng)對(duì)2個(gè)維度。積極應(yīng)對(duì)總分為0~36分,消極應(yīng)對(duì)總分為0~24分。
1.4.4生活質(zhì)量 分別于治療前后(血液透析前、血液透析后3個(gè)月)采用腎臟疾病生活質(zhì)量簡(jiǎn)表(Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form,KDQOL-SF)[14-15]評(píng)估兩組患者的生活質(zhì)量,包括軀體、抑郁、疲勞、挫折、社交5個(gè)方面,總分26~182分,得分越高表示生活質(zhì)量越高。
1.5統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法 所有數(shù)據(jù)采用SPSS 26.0軟件進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析,計(jì)數(shù)資料用例數(shù)(百分比)[n(%)]表示,組間行 χ2檢驗(yàn);計(jì)量資料用均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差(x±s)表示,組間行t檢驗(yàn)。Plt;0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2 結(jié)果
2.1腎功能指標(biāo) 治療后觀察組患者的血清BUN、Cr水平低于對(duì)照組,而Ccr水平高于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05),見表3。
2.2心理狀況 治療后觀察組患者的HAMA、HAMD評(píng)分低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05),見表4。
2.3應(yīng)對(duì)方式 治療后觀察組患者積極應(yīng)對(duì)的SCSQ評(píng)分高于對(duì)照組,消極應(yīng)對(duì)的SCSQ評(píng)分低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05),見表5。
2.4生活質(zhì)量 治療后觀察組患者的軀體、抑郁、疲勞、挫折、社交5個(gè)方面的KDQOL-SF評(píng)分高于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Plt;0.05),見表6。
3 討論
達(dá)芬奇機(jī)器人手術(shù)系統(tǒng)是當(dāng)前新興科技在醫(yī)學(xué)上的革新,已應(yīng)用于臨床腎移植領(lǐng)域,相對(duì)于傳統(tǒng)手術(shù),機(jī)器人輔助手術(shù)可顯著縮短手術(shù)時(shí)間,減少手術(shù)出血量,提高手術(shù)管腔吻合的精度及速度等[16-17]。
但腎移植術(shù)后肺部感染、急性排斥反應(yīng)等并發(fā)癥是導(dǎo)致移植腎功能受損甚至喪失的重要原因之一[18-19]。因此,術(shù)后需再行血液透析,以輔助受損腎功能清除體內(nèi)代謝廢物,維持電解質(zhì)和酸堿平衡。
意義療法的核心就是幫助患者尋找失落的生活價(jià)值,建立明確的人生態(tài)度,積極面對(duì)疾病,進(jìn)而明白生命的意義[20-22]。本研究中,觀察組治療后的血清BUN、Cr及Ccr水平優(yōu)于對(duì)照組。這是由于意義療法能夠幫助患者提高對(duì)腎移植、血液透析的認(rèn)知,并通過正向引導(dǎo)讓患者建立正確的日常行為規(guī)范,積極配合主治醫(yī)生進(jìn)行治療,從而改善腎功能。另外,觀察組治療后的HAMA、HAMD、KDQOL-SF等評(píng)分優(yōu)于對(duì)照組。分析可能是由于主治醫(yī)生通過與患者建立信任的關(guān)系,讓患者敞開心扉表達(dá)其內(nèi)心感受,了解患者的需求及可利用的資源,進(jìn)而消除影響其心理狀況的不良因素[23-24];意義療法還可阻斷不良情緒對(duì)患者的負(fù)面影響,并幫助其正確認(rèn)識(shí)生命的意義,以積極心態(tài)面對(duì)疾病及治療[25-27]。此外,觀察組治療后的積極應(yīng)對(duì)評(píng)分高于對(duì)照組。這是由于意義療法通過正向引導(dǎo)、鼓勵(lì)能夠使患者積極面對(duì)疾病,并讓其知曉遵醫(yī)囑的意義;同時(shí)發(fā)揮家庭和社會(huì)功能,讓患者感受到家庭的關(guān)懷和溫暖,重新喚起患者對(duì)健康的渴望和對(duì)美好生活的向往,并建立積極認(rèn)知,激發(fā)患者自我管理的主動(dòng)性,將積極改變反饋到治療意識(shí)和實(shí)際行動(dòng)中[28-30]。
綜上所述,意義療法可有效提高機(jī)器人輔助腎移植術(shù)后腎功能喪失再行血液透析患者的腎功能,并改善患者的不良心理狀況,使其能夠積極面對(duì)疾病,進(jìn)而提高生活質(zhì)量,值得在臨床推廣應(yīng)用。
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1] Yozgat I, Cak?r U, Serdar M A, et al. Longitudinal non-targeted metabolomic profiling of urine samples for monitoring of kidney transplantation patients[J]. Ren Fail, 2024, 46(1): 2300736.
[2] 沈百欣, 倪斌, 張俊麒, 等. 機(jī)器人輔助經(jīng)腹膜后入路單孔腹腔鏡下活體供腎切取術(shù): 全球首例報(bào)道(附視頻)[J]. 機(jī)器人外科學(xué)雜志(中英文), 2024, 5(2): 233-237.
[3] 宋曉波, 肖明朝, 易鳳瓊, 等. 達(dá)芬奇機(jī)器人手術(shù)運(yùn)營(yíng)效率影響因素分析[J]. 機(jī)器人外科學(xué)雜志(中英文), 2024, 5(1): 45-49.
[4] Territo A, Bajeot A S, Mesnard B, et al. Open versus robotic-assisted kidney transplantation: a systematic review by the European Association of Urology (EAU)- Young Academic Urologists (YAU) kidney transplant working group[J]. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed), 2023, 47(8): 474-487.
[5] 臧格, 時(shí)秋英, 李博, 等. 腎移植術(shù)后腎功能喪失再行血液透析患者心理感受的質(zhì)性研究[J]. 護(hù)士進(jìn)修雜志, 2022, 37(20): 1894-1897.
[6] de Medeiros A Y B B V, Pereira E R, Silva R M C R A. The meaning of life and religious coping in the fight against cancer: a study with oncology patients in brazil in light of viktor frankl’s theory[J]. J Relig Health, 2024, 63(2): 1373-1389.
[7] 鄧雨欣, 韋琦, 蔡祥礽, 等. 癌癥管理與生命意義療法在癌癥患者中應(yīng)用的范圍綜述[J]. 中國(guó)實(shí)用護(hù)理雜志, 2023, 39(34): 2707-2713.
[8] Goto S, Fujii H, Mieno M, et al. Survival benefit of living donor kidney transplantation in patients on hemodialysis[J]. Clin Exp Nephrol, 2024, 28(2): 165-174.
[9] Ernst BLV, Kreher D, Patschan D, et al. Self-efficacy, social support and oral health-related quality of life in patients with kidney transplantation and under hemodialysis[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2024, 25(1): 441.
[10] Rabinowitz J, Williams J B W, Hefting N, et al. Consistency checks to improve measurement with the hamilton rating scale for anxiety (HAM-A)[J]."J Affect Disord, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.029.
[11] Santi N S, Biswal S B, Naik B N, et al. Comparison of hamilton depression rating scale and montgomery-?sberg depression rating scale: baked straight from a randomized study[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(9): e45098.
[12] Nooripour R, Hoseinian S, Vakili Y, et al. Psychometric properties of farsi version of the resilience scale (CD-RISC) and its role in predicting aggression among Iranian athletic adolescent girls[J]. BMC Psychol, 2022, 10(1): 142.
[13] Eweida R S, Rashwan Z I, Khonji L M, et al. Psychological first aid intervention: rescue from psychological distress and improving the pre-licensure nursing students’ resilience amidst COVID-19 crisis and beyond[J]. Sci Afr, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01472.
[14] 王穎, 吳娟娟, 許方方, 等. 基于老年?duì)I養(yǎng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)指數(shù)的分層式飲食治療對(duì)老年持續(xù)性血液透析患者營(yíng)養(yǎng)狀況及自我效能的影響[J]. 中國(guó)血液凈化, 2022, 21(7): 536-540.
[15] 尹小文, 萬桂芹, 李國(guó)紅. 血液透析患者實(shí)施授權(quán)賦能理論下運(yùn)動(dòng)訓(xùn)練對(duì)低血壓發(fā)生率的影響研究[J]. 中國(guó)急救復(fù)蘇與災(zāi)害醫(yī)學(xué)雜志, 2024, 19(12): 1600-1604.
[16] Kishore T A, Kaddu D J, Sodhi B S, et al. Robotic kidney transplant beyond the learning curve: 8-year single-center experience and matched comparison with open kidney transplant[J]. Urology, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.10.031.
[17] Williamson T, Song S E. Robotic surgery techniques to improve traditional laparoscopy[J]. JSLS, 2022, 26(2): e2022.00002.
[18] 豐永花, 王志剛, 謝紅昌, 等. 兒童腎移植202例回顧性分析[J]. 中華器官移植雜志, 2020, 41(1): 20-23.
[19] MAO Y J, XU D S, LIU S D, et al. An analysis of the relationship between donor and recipient biomarkers and kidney graft function, dysfunction, and rejection[J]. Transpl Immunol, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101934.
[20] Shaygan M, Khaki S, Zarei D, et al. Effects of meaning-based psychotherapy on post-traumatic growth and death anxiety in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2024, 32(4): 251.
[21] Marco J H, Martinez-Micó A, García-Alandete J, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of meaning-centred psychotherapies in depressed participants[J]. Clin Psychol Psychother, 2023. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2936.
[22] Heidary M, Heshmati R, Hayes J. Effect of group logotherapy on anxiety about death and existential loneliness in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Cancer Nurs, 2023, 46(1): E21-E30.
[23] Eskigülek Y, Kav S. Effect of logotherapy counseling program on chronic sorrow, dignity, and meaning in life of palliative care patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2024 , 32(9): 587.
[24] Raji Lahiji M, Sajadian A, Haghighat S, et al. Effectiveness of logotherapy and nutrition counseling on psychological status, quality of life, and dietary intake among breast cancer survivors with depressive disorder: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2022, 30(10): 7997-8009.
[25] Lotfifar B, Ghadampour E, Bagheri N. Comparative effectiveness of psychotherapy approaches on death anxiety in multiple sclerosis patients. a pilot randomized controlled trial[J]. Mult Scler Relat Disord, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102914.
[26] 董翠珍, 王曉娣, 曹菲, 等. 義療法治療對(duì)慢性腎小球腎炎患者焦慮、抑郁情緒影響效果分析[J]. 中國(guó)實(shí)用護(hù)理雜志, 2022, 38(14): 1105-1109.
[27] Kim C, Choi H. The efficacy of group logotherapy on community-dwelling older adults with depressive symptoms: a mixed methods study[J]. Perspect Psychiatr Care, 2020. DOI: 10.1111/ppc.12635.
[28] Fereydouni S, Forstmeier S. An islamic form of logotherapy in the treatment of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in university students in Iran[J]. J Relig Health, 2022, 61(1): 139-157.
[29] Rahgozar S, Giménez-Llort L. Design and effectiveness of an online group logotherapy intervention on the mental health of Iranian international students in European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2024. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1323774.
[30] Suarez Luna J C. The postmodern subject from a psychopolitical perspective: an analysis from logotherapy[J]. Medwave. 2024, 24(6): e2799.