• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A Fusion Localization Method Based on Target Measurement Error Feature Complementarity and Its Application

    2024-03-18 09:00:16XinYangHongmingLiuXiaokeWangWenYuJingqiuLiuSipeiZhang

    Xin Yang, Hongming Liu, Xiaoke Wang, Wen Yu, Jingqiu Liu, Sipei Zhang

    Abstract: In the multi-radar networking system, aiming at the problem of locating long-distance targets synergistically with difficulty and low accuracy, a dual-station joint positioning method based on the target measurement error feature complementarity is proposed.For dual-station joint positioning, by constructing the target positioning error distribution model and using the complementarity of spatial measurement errors of the same long-distance target, the area with high probability of target existence can be obtained.Then, based on the target distance information, the midpoint of the intersection between the target positioning sphere and the positioning tangent plane can be solved to acquire the target’s optimal positioning result.The simulation demonstrates that this method greatly improves the positioning accuracy of target in azimuth direction.Compared with the traditional the dynamic weighted fusion (DWF) algorithm and the filter-based dynamic weighted fusion (FBDWF) algorithm, it not only effectively eliminates the influence of systematic error in the azimuth direction, but also has low computational complexity.Furthermore, for the application scenarios of multi-radar collaborative positioning and multi-sensor data compression filtering in centralized information fusion, it is recommended that using radar with higher ranging accuracy and the lengths of baseline between radars are 20-100 km.

    Keywords: dual-station positioning; feature complementarity; information fusion; engineering applicability

    1 Introduction

    With the rapid development of military technology, the iteration of air defense equipment and increasingly complex battlefield environment,modern warfare has shifted from the single platform to the systematic confrontation.Traditional monostatic radar is not applicable for the contemporary warfare with increasing challenges and complex combat requirements [1].As the critical and important sensor, radar’s networking capability has drawn significant attention, and distributed radar networking for collaborative detection has become an inevitable trend [2].Multi-radar collaborative detection can effectively improve the combat effectiveness and survivability of radars.Moreover, it also fully utilizes the advantage of information and fire support of the systematic confrontation.By reducing the ambiguity of target information and the influence of sensor errors, after information fusion, the more accurate target status information can be obtained [3,4].

    The collaborative detection of radar networking mainly includes three parts: spatiotemporal unity, localization, and filtering.Spatiotemporal unity includes coordinate transformation and time registration.The former means that converting the observations of target by multiple radars into the same observation coordinate system.And the latter is that the time when multiple radars observe the target must be consistent.Commonly used time registration methods are the least squares method and the interpolation and extrapolation method [5,6], which will not be further discussed here.

    Due to the different number, working status and positioning principles of radars, multi-radar collaborative positioning is divided into multistation passive positioning, (T/R)nmulti-station positioning andT/R-RnorT-Rnmulti-base positioning [7-18].Further, multi-station passive positioning can be divided into two-step positioning methods and direct position determination(DPD) methods.In two-step positioning methods, after the target position parameters are estimated from signals intercepted.geometric positioning techniques, such as using multiple target positioning lines or positioning planes to intersect, are utilized to establish target positioning equations, which can be solved by exhaustive search [8,9], least squares estimation [10], pseudolinear method [11], Taylor expansion combined with gradient methods [13], etc.In contrast,DPD methods do not require target parameter estimation.It directly uses the correlation between target positioning parameter information contained in signals and signals to construct and solve target functions or cost functions, which are related to the target’s position [14-16].Compared to active positioning methods, the geometrical dilution of precision (GDOP) map of multistation passive positioning is unevenly distributed and the target positioning accuracy is low.

    In Ref.[17], for multi-base positioning, theT/R-Rnactive and passive target positioning technology was discussed by adding multiple receiving stations, which mainly equivalent ton T/R-Rbistatic positioning.The target measurement parameters were grouped and formed into measurement subsets, and the positioning was performed by employing the simplified weighted least squares method or measurement subset optimization fusion algorithm.However, due to the insufficient utilization of redundant information between target positioning parameters and the lack of consideration for the spatial distribution characteristics of target positioning errors,when the angle measurement error increases,the target positioning accuracy will decrease significantly.Furthermore, if multiple receiving stations are replaced with multiple monostatic radars, the target position is determined by the intersection of multiple positioning spherical surfaces of the same target.However, it requires at least three monostatic radars with appropriate deployment.Similarly, since only the target distance information is utilized, the influence of angle measurement errors and the spatial distribution characteristics of target positioning errors are not be considered, the positioning accuracy for long-distance targets is poor.On the other hand, in Ref.[18], only two monostatic radars are used to locate long-distance targets cooperatively,which has considered the azimuth and distance information and by taking the advantage of the higher ranging accuracy, combining the cosine theorem, a dual radars collaborative positioning algorithm is proposed.Compared to single radar,it has the higher precision for long-distance targets.Although the article only analyzed the target positioning in two-dimensional plane rather than in three-dimensional space, the idea that utilizing the high-precision target distance information and the geometric relationship between the target and radars for improving the long-distance target positioning accuracy is worth learning.

    The ultimate goal of multi-radar collaborative positioning is to achieve accurate target tracking, and the track fusion is one of the most important application areas for multi-sensor information fusion [19-22].According to the fusion structure, current fusion estimation algorithms are roughly divided into three categories:centralized, distributed and hybrid.Without any loss of information, the centralized fusion can utilize the raw measurement data of all sensors and acquire the optimal fusion result, which is also the main focus of this article.Furthermore, for the scenario that the measurement noises of different sensors are uncorrelated at the same time,common centralized fusion algorithms include parallel filtering, sequential filtering, and data compression filtering [23].

    Based on the extension of the Kalman filter(KF) algorithm, the centralized fusion algorithms that using parallel filtering and sequential filtering structures mainly process target track data by predicting and weighted fusion,while the data compression filtering method is based on the weighted least squares estimation to complete multi-sensor data fusion [24-26].Refs.[27] and [28] have shown that the centralized fusion method that using sequential filtering and data compression filtering have the same estimation accuracy as the parallel filtering structure.In addition, centralized fusion algorithms considering the correlation between measurement noise of different sensors can refer to Refs.[29] to [30].Of course, many nonlinear filtering algorithms have been derived for considering different target motion models and nonlinear systems,such as the extended Kalman filter (EKF), unscented Kalman filter (UKF) and particle filter (PF)[31-33].

    Analyzing the existing positioning algorithms and centralized fusion algorithms, there are two shortcomings.First of all, many related works are mainly on multi-station passive positioning andT/R-RnorT-Rnmulti-base positioning.But there are few studies on (T/R)nmultistation collaborative positioning.Moreover, in above algorithms, since without considering the geometric relationship between the target and radars, the spatial characteristics of the target positioning error distribution and the complementary between multiple measurement results,when the information is missing or distorted, it is difficult to obtain the target’s optimal positioning result.Secondly, for traditional weighted fusion algorithm, DWF algorithm and FBDWF algorithm, both filtering and weighting are linear methods, which can’t acquire the best positioning results [34-37].Therefore, the fusion result for locating long-distance targets is out of the uncertainty area of multi-sensor measurement,which means that the target positioning error is large.

    Aiming at the problem of locating long-distance targets synergistically with difficulty and low accuracy, which has not been considered in existing literatures.This article pays attention to engineering applicability for long-distance target positioning in multi-radar networking systems.By analyzing the influence of radar measurement error for targets, the target positioning error distribution model is constructed.Then, for two or more monostatic radars collaborative positioning, by utilizing the complementarity of spatial measurement errors of the same long-distance target, the area with high probability of target existence can be obtained.Finally, based on the high-precision target distance information and the geometric relationship between the target and radars, the midpoint of the intersection between the target positioning sphere and the target positioning tangent plane can be solved to acquire the target’s optimal positioning result.So, a dual-station fusion localization method based on the target measurement error feature complementarity is proposed.

    2 Target Positioning Error Distribution Model

    The measurement and estimation of target parameters are the fundamental task of radar.However, due to differences in the working mechanism of the radar and the signal waveform parameters used, the obtainable target parameters and spatial error distribution area will also be different.The focus here is on tracking measurement radar.It is noted that the article focuses on tracking measurement radar.

    Firstly, focusing on the angle direction, the main sources of error are thermal noise in the target channel, target scintillation errors, and errors caused by encoder quantization or other factors.Further, the angle error caused by thermal noise is generally considered as a Gaussian random distribution with the root mean square(RMS) given by the following equation.

    whereθ0.5represents the radar half beam width ,SNR is signal-to-noise ratio, andkis a constant.Similarly, other angle error components can be analyzed.Such as the angle quantization error is uniformly distributed and its RMS value is represented as

    whereQis the angle quantization factor.

    So, multiple angle error components are superimposed together to form the distribution of Gaussian noise with non-zero mean.Numerically,the angle error does not change with target distance.But when detecting targets in Cartesian Space, even if the angle error remains unchanged,the error in angle direction will increase significantly as the target detection distance becomes farther.

    Differently, distance error components include thermal noise, target scintillation error,data quantization error, calibration error, error of uncertainties caused by signal waveform, timing or transmission pulse jitter, etc.Similarly, distance errors caused by thermal noise are also generally assumed to follow the distribution of Gaussian noise with non-zero mean, and the root mean square error (RMSE) can be expressed as

    wherecis the speed of light,τeis the pulse width after pulse compression, andnRis the number of smooth pulses.

    In the same way, other distance error components can be analyzed.Such as the RMSE of the distance clock can be represented as represented as

    wherefcis the clock base frequency.Multiple distance error components are combined to behave as a distribution of Gaussian noise with a nonzero mean.And it is worth noting that the distance error does not change with the increase of target distance and angle error.So, by using the higher precision sampling clock and quantization methods, even if the radar is responsible for the search mission, it can still obtain appropriate distance accuracy.

    However, as the target detection distance increases, the error range caused by angle errors in azimuth direction and pitch direction will be much larger than the range of distance error.The distribution of target positioning error space shows a typical “watermelon peel” shape, which as shown in Fig.1.

    Fig.1 The range of target positioning error

    When two or more radars observe the same target, through the intersection of multiple target positioning error space areas, proper deployment of radars can reduce the range of target positioning errors, which provides the potential to acquire the best target position result.

    3 Methodology

    3.1 The Principle of Positioning

    The basic idea of multi-radar collaborative positioning in this article is that when two or more radars observe the same target, based on the proper deployment of radars, which can reduce the range of target positioning errors.Then through the intersection of multiple target positioning error space areas to obtain the high probability space area where the target exists.Finally, solving for the center of this area, which is the best positioning estimation result of the target.

    The diagram of the dual-station positioning based on the complementary characteristic of target error space distribution is illustrated in Fig.2.

    Fig.2 Schematic diagram of dual-station location

    In order to cover all possible areas where the target may exist, in the distance and angle dimension, the one-sided error range of the radar should be maximized, which can be represented by taking the sum of 4 times random error and 1 times systematic error.

    In Fig.2, the blue and red areas are the possible uncertainty areas that the target may exist and the error space ranges of target detected respectively by radar 1 and radar 2.So, by calculating the center of the intersecting space area ABCD-EFGH with high probability that the target exists, the best positioning estimation result of the target can be obtained.

    From Fig.2, it can also be observed that through linear weighting methods such as filtering and least squares, in the spatial area of the target observed by two radars, both the extrapolation and weighted fusion positioning results exceed the areas where the target may exist.And for locating long-distance target, due to the ranging error is generally much smaller than the positioning error in azimuth and pitch direction, this feature is even more obvious.

    Therefore, in the process of dual-station collaborative positioning for the long-distance target, high-precision target distance information can be more trusted and treat it as zero.Further,in the space, the uncertain area of target positioning can be approximated as a positioning slice.The midpoint on the intersection line of the two positioning slices will be the optimal fusion positioning estimation result of the target.

    3.2 Algorithm Description

    3.2.1 Spatiotemporal Unity

    When each radar uploads the target track to the radar data fusion center, due to the existence of time delay error and the different observation coordinate systems and data rates of radars, it is necessary to complete the time registration and coordinate transformation of various target data from radars.

    Time registration refers to the strict alignment in time domain for the track data of the same target.Here, we simply use the target velocity (Vx,Vy,Vz) obtained by the filter to extrapolate the target position at the desired moment.

    Under the north-up-east (NUE) coordinate system with the fusion center as the origin, the coordinate of the radariis (Xi,Yi,Zi) andi=1,2.The result observed for the target m by the radar i at the previous moment is (X?m,i,Y?m,i,Z?m,i).The time difference is Δt.So, the target position (Xmi,Ymi,Zmi) at the next moment can be extrapolated from the following formula.

    Considering engineering applications and practical situations, the geodetic coordinate system is selected as the coordinate system to perform coordinate transformation.If the fusion center and station coordinates of two radars are known as (L0,B0,H0) and (Li,Bi,Hi).

    In order to achieve coordinate unification of target track data, it is necessary to convert the coordinatethat the radariobservation targetmin the NUE coordinate system into the coordinate (Xmi,Ymi,Zmi) in the NUE coordinate system with the fusion center as the origin by using the following formulas

    The matrixFlis given by

    The matrixWlis given by

    The variableNlis given by

    The coordinate (Xmi,Ymi,Zmi) is the coordinate of the target in the geocentric rectangular coordinate system.And it is noted that the constantaand the constanteare the semi-major axis and the first eccentricity of the earth respectively.

    Then,l=0,i.So, whenl=i, the variableNi,matrixFiand matrixWican be obtained.Whenl=0, the variableN0, matrixF0and matrixW0can be obtained.

    3.2.2 Judgment of Intersectionality

    Considering the complex spatial relationships between positioning slices, such as there are various scenarios ranging from perfect orthogonal complementarity to small-angle intersection or complete non-overlapping, which depend on relationship of the target and radar position.So, for multi-radar collaborative positioning of long-distance targets, the judgment of intersectionality between positioning slices is a necessary step.

    IfRmiis the measurement distance of the radarito the targetm, then the positioning sphericalequationforthe targetmisξi=

    Taking dual-station collaborative positioning as an example, for the same target and using the following formula, by judging whether two endpoints (x1,y1,z1) and (x2,y2,z2) on the boundary line of the target positioning slice of radar 2 are on the opposite side of the target positioning sphereξm1of the radar 1, it can indirectly determine the intersection relationship between target positioning slices of two radars.

    If Eq.(8) is satisfied, the endpoint (x1,y1,z1)and the endpoint (x2,y2,z2) are on opposite side rather than the same side.Therefore, there is an intersection relationship between the positioning slice of two radars.

    3.2.3 Solve for Intersecting Area

    Based on the analysis in Section 3.1, the distance error can be considered as zero.So, for the radaritaking the sum of 4 times random error and 1 times systematic error to represent the maximum one-sided error range of the angle direction, which can be denotedσAiin azimuth direction andσEiin pitch direction.If(Rmi,Ami,Emi) is the polar coordinates of target observed by radari, the target positioning slice of radarican be obtained by using

    The overlapping area of the target pos itioning slice of two radars is usually an arc segment.Taking the example of the arc segment that the positioning slice of radar 2 intersects with the positioning sphere of radar 1, two endpoints of the arc segment arePf1(x1,y1,z1) andPe1(x1,y1,z1).The solution process is as follows:

    1) The vertex sorting of the radar 2 target positioning slice is recorded asp2j, andj=1,2,3,4.

    2) Initializing the number of intersectionsCfe=0, the starting point and the ending point arePf1(0,0,0)Pe1(0,0,0) respectively.

    3) Substituting each vertex into the equationξm1(x,y,z) to obtain the function valuesξp_2j(x,y,z).

    4) Processing the first and last points of the line segment, which means that ifξp_21=ξp_24=0,letPf1=p21andPe1=p24, exit the search process.

    5) Traversing the vertex from the first pointp21, for the pointp2j:

    a.If there areξp_2j ξp_2(j+1)≤0 andCfe=0, calculating the intersection pointpnewbetween the current line segment and the sphere plane.Then letPf1=pnew,Cfe=1, continue the search process.But ifξp_2j=0, letPf1=pnew=p2jandCfe=1, continue the search process.

    b.If there areξp_2j ξp_2(j+1)≤0 andCfe=1, calculating the intersection point between the current line segment and the sphere plane.Then, letPe1=pnewandCfe=2, exit the search process.However, ifξp_2j=0, letPe1=pnew=p2jandCfe=2, exit the search process.

    3.2.4 Estimate Target’s Optimal Positioning Result

    First of all, the intersection pointPf1(x1,y1,z1)andPe1(x1,y1,z1) between the target positioning slice of radar 1 and the target positioning sphere of radar 2.The midpoint of the line segment connecting the pointPf1andPe1can be used as the positioning result 1.In the same way, by using the method in section 3.2.3, the intersection pointPf2(x3,y3,z3) andPe2(x4,y4,z4)between the target positioning slice of radar 2 and the target positioning sphere of radar 1 can be solved.Then, the midpoint of the line segment connecting the pointPf2andPe2can be used as the positioning result 2.

    For dual-station collaborative positioning, as shown below, the average of two positioning results will be the optimal positioning result.

    In summary, based on the complementary characteristic of target measurement error, the flow chart of the fusion localization algorithm is shown in Fig.3.

    3.3 Evaluate Algorithm Performance

    It is evident that the proposed algorithm relies on the complementary feature of the target positioning error distribution space between radars,which means the smaller the area where the target positioning error space of multiple radars intersect, the better for the target positioning accuracy of multi-radar collaborative positioning.So, this feature can be used to evaluate algorithm performance.

    As shown in Fig.4, taking dual-station collaborative positioning as an example, when the target is far away and the pitch angle of target detected by radars is relatively low, in horizontal plane, by observing from the perpendicular direction to the line of radar sight, the twodimensional uncertainty area of target exists can be approximated by the two-dimensional uncertainty area of target distribution in the azimuth and range direction.

    αis the angle of target positioning error space of two radars.l1andl2are the length of the target positioning error space of two radars in the azimuth direction.Then, the overlapping area in Fig.4 is the quadrilateralABCD.

    Further, the value ofl1,l2, |AB| and |AD| can be calculated according to the cosine theorem and the following formula

    Fig.4 The two-dimensional uncertainty regions of target in azimuth and range directions

    And it is known thatl1andl2are the maximum positioning error ranges of radar 1 and radar 2 in the azimuth direction.

    So, the maximum positioning error Errormaxof the algorithm proposed in this article can be approximately calculated by

    4 Verification of Simulation

    In order to verify the effectiveness of the algorithm in this article, the DWF algorithm and the FBDWF algorithm will be simulated and compared with the algorithm.For the scenario of two radars collaborative positioning, in the NUE coordinate system with the fusion center as the origin, radar 1 is located at (-20 km, 0, 0) with system error(20 m, 0.2°, 0.2°)and random error of (30 m, 0.3°, 0.3°) in the distance, azimuth and pitch direction.But radar 2 is located at (20 km,0, 0) with system error (20m, 0.2°, 0.2°) and random error of (50 m, 0.5°, 0.5°) in the distance, azimuth and pitch direction.Then, the simulated target is located in the side view areas of two radars, within the azimuth range of -60°to 60°.

    When the target flies at a constant altitude of 5 km and a distance range of 300 km to 250 km,as shown in Fig.5, in theX(represents the azimuth direction),Y(represents the pitch direction), andZdirection, the comparative results of the positioning error of two radars and the three algorithms are given respectively.And for two radars and the three algorithms, the Tab.1 shows the comparison results of the positioning RMSE.

    Fig.5 Schematic diagram of target positioning error: (a)X direction; (b)Y direction; (c)Z direction

    Tab.1 The comparison of the positioning RMSE

    Obviously, as shown in Fig.5(a) and Tab.1,in theXdirection, the original positioning errors of radar 1 and radar 2 are the largest, and the positioning RMSE are 1 604.1 m and 2 642.4 m respectively.Compared with the positioning RMSE of the DWF algorithm and the FBDWF algorithm with system error inXdirection, which are 1 444.7 m and 1 100.8 m, the positioning RMSE of the algorithm proposed in this article is only 367.1 m.This means that it not only eliminates the influence of systematic error in the azimuth direction, but also has the best positioning effect and the smallest positioning error.

    Similarly, as shown in Fig.5(b), Fig.5(c)and Tab.1, in theYandZdirection, the positioning effect of the algorithm proposed in this article is the worst, which is basically consistent with the best positioning effect of one of two radars.Compared with the DWF algorithm,since filtering can effectively eliminate the influence of noise and fluctuation error, the FBDWF algorithm has the best positioning effect in theYandZdirection.

    In addition, in theXdirection, it is worth noting that the noise and fluctuation error have a greater impact on the algorithm proposed in this article compared to the FBDWF algorithm.In the future, some relevant filtering algorithms can be studied to eliminate the influence of noise and fluctuation error.Therefore, in azimuth direction,the accuracy of dual-station collaborative positioning can be further improved.

    Through simulation and theoretical analysis,the effectiveness of the algorithm proposed in this article is verified.The simulation results also show that the algorithm greatly improves the positioning accuracy of the target in the azimuth direction.But the positioning accuracy in the pitch direction is not high, which is basically consistent with the best positioning effect of one of two radars.So, focusing on the positioning accuracy in theXdirection andXOZplane, the influencing factors of the algorithm can be analyzed,which mainly include the baseline length and the ranging accuracy of two radars.

    In fact, because the system error in distance direction of radar is always much lower than random error of distance measurement and the maximum one-sided error range of the other radar in the angle dimension, and to ensure the error region can overlap, the one-sided error range of the radar in the angle dimension will be maximized to cover all measurement values as much as possible.Therefore, if there are systematic biases present in distance and angle direction, it has less impact on the algorithm.Further, when analyzing the impact of the baseline length and the ranging accuracy of two radars on the algorithm, the systematic biases in distance and angle direction does not need to be considered.

    So, let the target fly close to two radars at a constant speed from 300 km away along the center vertical direction of the two radar baselines,and for two radars, by setting the random error of angle measurement to 0.5° and systematic biases to zero in distance and angle direction,when the ranging accuracy is 20 m and baseline lengths of two radars are 20 km, 40 km, 60 km,80 km and 100 km respectively, after the target distance is equally divided into segments of 25 km,the comparison of the positioning RMSE inXdirection are given in the Tab.2.Then, similarly,change the ranging accuracy of two radars to 100 m,the simulation comparison results of the positioning RMSE inXdirection are shown in Tab.3.

    According to Tab.2 and Tab.3, three conclusions can be obtained.The first one is that when the baseline length of two radars is fixed,the greater the ranging accuracy of two radars is,the greater the positioning RMSE will be.This is because when performing dual-station positioning, the algorithm is highly dependent on the ranging accuracy of target.The second conclusion is that the farther the target distance or is or the shorter the baseline length of two radars is, the worse the algorithm performance will be.This is because the angle measurement error spreads in azimuth and pitch direction, which will lead the farther the target distance is, the worse the positioning effect of the radar in angle dimension will be.

    In addition, when the shorter the baselinelength of two radar or the farther the target distance, the smaller the angle between the measurement error spaces of two radars.It means that the measurement error spaces of two radars basically overlap as analyzed in Section 3.3,which will result in a decrease in the positioning performance of the algorithm proposed in this article.The final conclusion is that if the ranging accuracy of two radars is relatively high, the baseline length between two radars can be appropriately lengthened to increase the angle between error spaces for improving the positioning performance of the algorithm.

    Tab.2 The comparison of the positioning RMSE in X direction in different baseline lengths for two radars (σR1 = σR2 =20 m)m

    Tab.3 The comparison of the positioning RMSE in X direction in different baseline lengths for two radars(σR1 = σR2 =100 m)m

    Further, when the baseline length of two radars is 40 km, change the ranging accuracy of two radars toσR,andσRis equal to 10 m, 30 m,60 m, and 100 m respectively, the Fig.6 shows the target positioning RMSE comparison results inXOZplane under the corresponding error space angle interval.

    Fig.6 Positioning RMSE analysis in XOZ plane

    In the Fig.6, each error space angle interval from small to large corresponds to each 25 km target distance segment that target distance gradually decrease.It is obviously that when the baseline length of two radars is fixed, the closer the target is to radar 1 and radar 2, the larger the angle between error spaces and the higher the positioning accuracy inXOZplane.In the same way, the higher the ranging accuracy of two radars, the better the positioning effect of the algorithm inXOZplane.

    From the analysis in Section 3.3 and the geometric relationship, it can be concluded that the angle between two radars and the target is equal to the angle of the error space.The improvement of dual-station positioning accuracy is related to the layout between radars and the target distance, which determine the size of the angle between error spaces.

    Therefore, in order to evaluate the positioning effect of the algorithm proposed in this article, for example, the ranging accuracy of two radars is 10 m, under different error space angles,Fig.7 shows the theoretical maximum positioning error inXOZplan.

    Fig.7 Positioning performance analysis in XOZ plane

    In the Fig.7, it can be observed that when two radars detect the target vertically, the angle between the error spaces is 90°, the precision of collaborative positioning is the highest.And the smaller the error space angle is, the higher the positioning accuracy of targets in theXOZplane is, which also once again verified the previous simulation analysis results.

    Finally, different simulation results show that when the baseline length of two radars is 40 km,if the ranging accuracy is 60 m and the accuracy of angle measurement is 0.5°, within the radar's main working range (350 km), the positioning RMSE inXdirection andXOZplane are less than 500 m.

    5 Conclusion

    In summary, to address the difficulties and low accuracy of long-distance target positioning,through the collaborative detection of multiple radars(T/R) networking, taking advantage of the complementary characteristics of the measurement error space, a fusion localization is proposed.Compared with the traditional DWF algorithm and the FBDWF algorithm, it not only effectively eliminates the influence of systematic error in the azimuth direction, but also has the better positioning accuracy in the azimuth direction andXOZplane.Of course, since the proposed algorithm does not use matrices for calculation and does not need to calibrate the systematic error in the azimuth direction, it also has advantage of low computational complexity.

    Furthermore, for the application scenarios of the algorithm proposed, such as multi-radar collaborative positioning and multi-sensor data compression filtering in centralized information fusion, in order to ensure the effectiveness of the algorithm and according to the target orientation and distance required to be detected, suitable radar deployment should be selected to make the error space angle larger, which will also make the positioning accuracy of the algorithm higher in target azimuth and horizontal plane.Finally, for the algorithm proposed in this article,it is recommended that using radar with higher ranging accuracy and the baseline length between radars is 20-100 km.

    In the future, for the purpose of eliminating the influence of noise and fluctuation error in azimuth direction, the target error distribution after fusion localization will be considered for the filtering algorithm, which will be designed to further improve the algorithm performance.And it is worth nothing that the proposed algorithm in the pitch direction has basically not been improved.However, when no less than three radars are used for horizontal and vertical networking for collaborative detection, it can simultaneously improve the positioning accuracy in the pitch and azimuth directions.

    免费高清在线观看日韩| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 婷婷成人精品国产| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 夫妻午夜视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产成人影院久久av| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 日韩电影二区| 蜜桃在线观看..| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 国产色视频综合| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| www日本在线高清视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 后天国语完整版免费观看| www.精华液| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 九草在线视频观看| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 香蕉国产在线看| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲图色成人| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产麻豆69| 久9热在线精品视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产精品.久久久| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 欧美97在线视频| 国产一级毛片在线| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 日本91视频免费播放| av在线app专区| 国产精品免费视频内射| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 嫩草影视91久久| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 日本欧美视频一区| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | av不卡在线播放| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 午夜激情av网站| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 999久久久国产精品视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 在线看a的网站| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 中文字幕制服av| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 99久久人妻综合| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 一区二区av电影网| 国产成人91sexporn| 99热网站在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 在线观看www视频免费| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 只有这里有精品99| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 色播在线永久视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 久热这里只有精品99| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 在线av久久热| 日日夜夜操网爽| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 性少妇av在线| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 亚洲国产av新网站| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产男女内射视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲av美国av| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 1024香蕉在线观看| cao死你这个sao货| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 午夜av观看不卡| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 一个人免费看片子| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一二三| 精品久久久久久电影网| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| av视频免费观看在线观看| 视频区图区小说| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 成年动漫av网址| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 久久人人爽人人片av| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| av天堂久久9| 老熟女久久久| 制服诱惑二区| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 成人免费观看视频高清| 一级毛片电影观看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 一区二区av电影网| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 男女边摸边吃奶| 咕卡用的链子| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 考比视频在线观看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产成人影院久久av| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 两个人看的免费小视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲国产av新网站| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 不卡av一区二区三区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 午夜免费观看性视频| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 少妇 在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产精品三级大全| 91成人精品电影| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 一区二区三区精品91| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 一级毛片电影观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 欧美另类一区| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 七月丁香在线播放| av在线app专区| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产精品 国内视频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 我的亚洲天堂| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 免费看不卡的av| www.精华液| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产av国产精品国产| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲av男天堂| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲av男天堂| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产成人欧美| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 午夜视频精品福利| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 999久久久国产精品视频| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 99香蕉大伊视频| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 成人三级做爰电影| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| av不卡在线播放| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产片内射在线| 99九九在线精品视频| 蜜桃在线观看..| av网站在线播放免费| 亚洲 国产 在线| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 精品久久久久久电影网| 悠悠久久av| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 波野结衣二区三区在线| av在线播放精品| 亚洲av美国av| 国产片内射在线| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲第一av免费看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产1区2区3区精品| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 最黄视频免费看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 午夜久久久在线观看| 老熟女久久久| 1024视频免费在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 美女午夜性视频免费| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 国产成人91sexporn| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 女人久久www免费人成看片| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 午夜免费成人在线视频| av网站在线播放免费| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 性少妇av在线| av欧美777| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 婷婷成人精品国产| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 久久久国产精品麻豆| 一级毛片我不卡| 永久免费av网站大全| 精品久久久精品久久久| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 热re99久久国产66热| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 老司机影院成人| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 老司机靠b影院| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 成年动漫av网址| 两个人看的免费小视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 在线av久久热| 蜜桃在线观看..| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| a级毛片在线看网站| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 午夜91福利影院| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 午夜av观看不卡| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| av网站在线播放免费| 国产成人一区二区在线| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| tube8黄色片| 欧美大码av| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 咕卡用的链子| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产精品二区激情视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲精品在线美女| 日本wwww免费看| h视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 午夜av观看不卡| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 精品国产国语对白av| 男女边摸边吃奶| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| av欧美777| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 国产成人91sexporn| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 久久青草综合色| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 国产成人欧美| 久久久国产一区二区| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 免费不卡黄色视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 老司机影院毛片| 精品福利观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 又大又爽又粗| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 赤兔流量卡办理| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| tube8黄色片| 看免费av毛片| 免费观看av网站的网址| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产在线免费精品| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 免费不卡黄色视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久久久网色| 日韩伦理黄色片| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产在线观看jvid| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产在线免费精品| 午夜两性在线视频| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 色94色欧美一区二区| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 亚洲综合色网址| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 在线观看国产h片| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产男人的电影天堂91|