• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A Fusion Localization Method Based on Target Measurement Error Feature Complementarity and Its Application

    2024-03-18 09:00:16XinYangHongmingLiuXiaokeWangWenYuJingqiuLiuSipeiZhang

    Xin Yang, Hongming Liu, Xiaoke Wang, Wen Yu, Jingqiu Liu, Sipei Zhang

    Abstract: In the multi-radar networking system, aiming at the problem of locating long-distance targets synergistically with difficulty and low accuracy, a dual-station joint positioning method based on the target measurement error feature complementarity is proposed.For dual-station joint positioning, by constructing the target positioning error distribution model and using the complementarity of spatial measurement errors of the same long-distance target, the area with high probability of target existence can be obtained.Then, based on the target distance information, the midpoint of the intersection between the target positioning sphere and the positioning tangent plane can be solved to acquire the target’s optimal positioning result.The simulation demonstrates that this method greatly improves the positioning accuracy of target in azimuth direction.Compared with the traditional the dynamic weighted fusion (DWF) algorithm and the filter-based dynamic weighted fusion (FBDWF) algorithm, it not only effectively eliminates the influence of systematic error in the azimuth direction, but also has low computational complexity.Furthermore, for the application scenarios of multi-radar collaborative positioning and multi-sensor data compression filtering in centralized information fusion, it is recommended that using radar with higher ranging accuracy and the lengths of baseline between radars are 20-100 km.

    Keywords: dual-station positioning; feature complementarity; information fusion; engineering applicability

    1 Introduction

    With the rapid development of military technology, the iteration of air defense equipment and increasingly complex battlefield environment,modern warfare has shifted from the single platform to the systematic confrontation.Traditional monostatic radar is not applicable for the contemporary warfare with increasing challenges and complex combat requirements [1].As the critical and important sensor, radar’s networking capability has drawn significant attention, and distributed radar networking for collaborative detection has become an inevitable trend [2].Multi-radar collaborative detection can effectively improve the combat effectiveness and survivability of radars.Moreover, it also fully utilizes the advantage of information and fire support of the systematic confrontation.By reducing the ambiguity of target information and the influence of sensor errors, after information fusion, the more accurate target status information can be obtained [3,4].

    The collaborative detection of radar networking mainly includes three parts: spatiotemporal unity, localization, and filtering.Spatiotemporal unity includes coordinate transformation and time registration.The former means that converting the observations of target by multiple radars into the same observation coordinate system.And the latter is that the time when multiple radars observe the target must be consistent.Commonly used time registration methods are the least squares method and the interpolation and extrapolation method [5,6], which will not be further discussed here.

    Due to the different number, working status and positioning principles of radars, multi-radar collaborative positioning is divided into multistation passive positioning, (T/R)nmulti-station positioning andT/R-RnorT-Rnmulti-base positioning [7-18].Further, multi-station passive positioning can be divided into two-step positioning methods and direct position determination(DPD) methods.In two-step positioning methods, after the target position parameters are estimated from signals intercepted.geometric positioning techniques, such as using multiple target positioning lines or positioning planes to intersect, are utilized to establish target positioning equations, which can be solved by exhaustive search [8,9], least squares estimation [10], pseudolinear method [11], Taylor expansion combined with gradient methods [13], etc.In contrast,DPD methods do not require target parameter estimation.It directly uses the correlation between target positioning parameter information contained in signals and signals to construct and solve target functions or cost functions, which are related to the target’s position [14-16].Compared to active positioning methods, the geometrical dilution of precision (GDOP) map of multistation passive positioning is unevenly distributed and the target positioning accuracy is low.

    In Ref.[17], for multi-base positioning, theT/R-Rnactive and passive target positioning technology was discussed by adding multiple receiving stations, which mainly equivalent ton T/R-Rbistatic positioning.The target measurement parameters were grouped and formed into measurement subsets, and the positioning was performed by employing the simplified weighted least squares method or measurement subset optimization fusion algorithm.However, due to the insufficient utilization of redundant information between target positioning parameters and the lack of consideration for the spatial distribution characteristics of target positioning errors,when the angle measurement error increases,the target positioning accuracy will decrease significantly.Furthermore, if multiple receiving stations are replaced with multiple monostatic radars, the target position is determined by the intersection of multiple positioning spherical surfaces of the same target.However, it requires at least three monostatic radars with appropriate deployment.Similarly, since only the target distance information is utilized, the influence of angle measurement errors and the spatial distribution characteristics of target positioning errors are not be considered, the positioning accuracy for long-distance targets is poor.On the other hand, in Ref.[18], only two monostatic radars are used to locate long-distance targets cooperatively,which has considered the azimuth and distance information and by taking the advantage of the higher ranging accuracy, combining the cosine theorem, a dual radars collaborative positioning algorithm is proposed.Compared to single radar,it has the higher precision for long-distance targets.Although the article only analyzed the target positioning in two-dimensional plane rather than in three-dimensional space, the idea that utilizing the high-precision target distance information and the geometric relationship between the target and radars for improving the long-distance target positioning accuracy is worth learning.

    The ultimate goal of multi-radar collaborative positioning is to achieve accurate target tracking, and the track fusion is one of the most important application areas for multi-sensor information fusion [19-22].According to the fusion structure, current fusion estimation algorithms are roughly divided into three categories:centralized, distributed and hybrid.Without any loss of information, the centralized fusion can utilize the raw measurement data of all sensors and acquire the optimal fusion result, which is also the main focus of this article.Furthermore, for the scenario that the measurement noises of different sensors are uncorrelated at the same time,common centralized fusion algorithms include parallel filtering, sequential filtering, and data compression filtering [23].

    Based on the extension of the Kalman filter(KF) algorithm, the centralized fusion algorithms that using parallel filtering and sequential filtering structures mainly process target track data by predicting and weighted fusion,while the data compression filtering method is based on the weighted least squares estimation to complete multi-sensor data fusion [24-26].Refs.[27] and [28] have shown that the centralized fusion method that using sequential filtering and data compression filtering have the same estimation accuracy as the parallel filtering structure.In addition, centralized fusion algorithms considering the correlation between measurement noise of different sensors can refer to Refs.[29] to [30].Of course, many nonlinear filtering algorithms have been derived for considering different target motion models and nonlinear systems,such as the extended Kalman filter (EKF), unscented Kalman filter (UKF) and particle filter (PF)[31-33].

    Analyzing the existing positioning algorithms and centralized fusion algorithms, there are two shortcomings.First of all, many related works are mainly on multi-station passive positioning andT/R-RnorT-Rnmulti-base positioning.But there are few studies on (T/R)nmultistation collaborative positioning.Moreover, in above algorithms, since without considering the geometric relationship between the target and radars, the spatial characteristics of the target positioning error distribution and the complementary between multiple measurement results,when the information is missing or distorted, it is difficult to obtain the target’s optimal positioning result.Secondly, for traditional weighted fusion algorithm, DWF algorithm and FBDWF algorithm, both filtering and weighting are linear methods, which can’t acquire the best positioning results [34-37].Therefore, the fusion result for locating long-distance targets is out of the uncertainty area of multi-sensor measurement,which means that the target positioning error is large.

    Aiming at the problem of locating long-distance targets synergistically with difficulty and low accuracy, which has not been considered in existing literatures.This article pays attention to engineering applicability for long-distance target positioning in multi-radar networking systems.By analyzing the influence of radar measurement error for targets, the target positioning error distribution model is constructed.Then, for two or more monostatic radars collaborative positioning, by utilizing the complementarity of spatial measurement errors of the same long-distance target, the area with high probability of target existence can be obtained.Finally, based on the high-precision target distance information and the geometric relationship between the target and radars, the midpoint of the intersection between the target positioning sphere and the target positioning tangent plane can be solved to acquire the target’s optimal positioning result.So, a dual-station fusion localization method based on the target measurement error feature complementarity is proposed.

    2 Target Positioning Error Distribution Model

    The measurement and estimation of target parameters are the fundamental task of radar.However, due to differences in the working mechanism of the radar and the signal waveform parameters used, the obtainable target parameters and spatial error distribution area will also be different.The focus here is on tracking measurement radar.It is noted that the article focuses on tracking measurement radar.

    Firstly, focusing on the angle direction, the main sources of error are thermal noise in the target channel, target scintillation errors, and errors caused by encoder quantization or other factors.Further, the angle error caused by thermal noise is generally considered as a Gaussian random distribution with the root mean square(RMS) given by the following equation.

    whereθ0.5represents the radar half beam width ,SNR is signal-to-noise ratio, andkis a constant.Similarly, other angle error components can be analyzed.Such as the angle quantization error is uniformly distributed and its RMS value is represented as

    whereQis the angle quantization factor.

    So, multiple angle error components are superimposed together to form the distribution of Gaussian noise with non-zero mean.Numerically,the angle error does not change with target distance.But when detecting targets in Cartesian Space, even if the angle error remains unchanged,the error in angle direction will increase significantly as the target detection distance becomes farther.

    Differently, distance error components include thermal noise, target scintillation error,data quantization error, calibration error, error of uncertainties caused by signal waveform, timing or transmission pulse jitter, etc.Similarly, distance errors caused by thermal noise are also generally assumed to follow the distribution of Gaussian noise with non-zero mean, and the root mean square error (RMSE) can be expressed as

    wherecis the speed of light,τeis the pulse width after pulse compression, andnRis the number of smooth pulses.

    In the same way, other distance error components can be analyzed.Such as the RMSE of the distance clock can be represented as represented as

    wherefcis the clock base frequency.Multiple distance error components are combined to behave as a distribution of Gaussian noise with a nonzero mean.And it is worth noting that the distance error does not change with the increase of target distance and angle error.So, by using the higher precision sampling clock and quantization methods, even if the radar is responsible for the search mission, it can still obtain appropriate distance accuracy.

    However, as the target detection distance increases, the error range caused by angle errors in azimuth direction and pitch direction will be much larger than the range of distance error.The distribution of target positioning error space shows a typical “watermelon peel” shape, which as shown in Fig.1.

    Fig.1 The range of target positioning error

    When two or more radars observe the same target, through the intersection of multiple target positioning error space areas, proper deployment of radars can reduce the range of target positioning errors, which provides the potential to acquire the best target position result.

    3 Methodology

    3.1 The Principle of Positioning

    The basic idea of multi-radar collaborative positioning in this article is that when two or more radars observe the same target, based on the proper deployment of radars, which can reduce the range of target positioning errors.Then through the intersection of multiple target positioning error space areas to obtain the high probability space area where the target exists.Finally, solving for the center of this area, which is the best positioning estimation result of the target.

    The diagram of the dual-station positioning based on the complementary characteristic of target error space distribution is illustrated in Fig.2.

    Fig.2 Schematic diagram of dual-station location

    In order to cover all possible areas where the target may exist, in the distance and angle dimension, the one-sided error range of the radar should be maximized, which can be represented by taking the sum of 4 times random error and 1 times systematic error.

    In Fig.2, the blue and red areas are the possible uncertainty areas that the target may exist and the error space ranges of target detected respectively by radar 1 and radar 2.So, by calculating the center of the intersecting space area ABCD-EFGH with high probability that the target exists, the best positioning estimation result of the target can be obtained.

    From Fig.2, it can also be observed that through linear weighting methods such as filtering and least squares, in the spatial area of the target observed by two radars, both the extrapolation and weighted fusion positioning results exceed the areas where the target may exist.And for locating long-distance target, due to the ranging error is generally much smaller than the positioning error in azimuth and pitch direction, this feature is even more obvious.

    Therefore, in the process of dual-station collaborative positioning for the long-distance target, high-precision target distance information can be more trusted and treat it as zero.Further,in the space, the uncertain area of target positioning can be approximated as a positioning slice.The midpoint on the intersection line of the two positioning slices will be the optimal fusion positioning estimation result of the target.

    3.2 Algorithm Description

    3.2.1 Spatiotemporal Unity

    When each radar uploads the target track to the radar data fusion center, due to the existence of time delay error and the different observation coordinate systems and data rates of radars, it is necessary to complete the time registration and coordinate transformation of various target data from radars.

    Time registration refers to the strict alignment in time domain for the track data of the same target.Here, we simply use the target velocity (Vx,Vy,Vz) obtained by the filter to extrapolate the target position at the desired moment.

    Under the north-up-east (NUE) coordinate system with the fusion center as the origin, the coordinate of the radariis (Xi,Yi,Zi) andi=1,2.The result observed for the target m by the radar i at the previous moment is (X?m,i,Y?m,i,Z?m,i).The time difference is Δt.So, the target position (Xmi,Ymi,Zmi) at the next moment can be extrapolated from the following formula.

    Considering engineering applications and practical situations, the geodetic coordinate system is selected as the coordinate system to perform coordinate transformation.If the fusion center and station coordinates of two radars are known as (L0,B0,H0) and (Li,Bi,Hi).

    In order to achieve coordinate unification of target track data, it is necessary to convert the coordinatethat the radariobservation targetmin the NUE coordinate system into the coordinate (Xmi,Ymi,Zmi) in the NUE coordinate system with the fusion center as the origin by using the following formulas

    The matrixFlis given by

    The matrixWlis given by

    The variableNlis given by

    The coordinate (Xmi,Ymi,Zmi) is the coordinate of the target in the geocentric rectangular coordinate system.And it is noted that the constantaand the constanteare the semi-major axis and the first eccentricity of the earth respectively.

    Then,l=0,i.So, whenl=i, the variableNi,matrixFiand matrixWican be obtained.Whenl=0, the variableN0, matrixF0and matrixW0can be obtained.

    3.2.2 Judgment of Intersectionality

    Considering the complex spatial relationships between positioning slices, such as there are various scenarios ranging from perfect orthogonal complementarity to small-angle intersection or complete non-overlapping, which depend on relationship of the target and radar position.So, for multi-radar collaborative positioning of long-distance targets, the judgment of intersectionality between positioning slices is a necessary step.

    IfRmiis the measurement distance of the radarito the targetm, then the positioning sphericalequationforthe targetmisξi=

    Taking dual-station collaborative positioning as an example, for the same target and using the following formula, by judging whether two endpoints (x1,y1,z1) and (x2,y2,z2) on the boundary line of the target positioning slice of radar 2 are on the opposite side of the target positioning sphereξm1of the radar 1, it can indirectly determine the intersection relationship between target positioning slices of two radars.

    If Eq.(8) is satisfied, the endpoint (x1,y1,z1)and the endpoint (x2,y2,z2) are on opposite side rather than the same side.Therefore, there is an intersection relationship between the positioning slice of two radars.

    3.2.3 Solve for Intersecting Area

    Based on the analysis in Section 3.1, the distance error can be considered as zero.So, for the radaritaking the sum of 4 times random error and 1 times systematic error to represent the maximum one-sided error range of the angle direction, which can be denotedσAiin azimuth direction andσEiin pitch direction.If(Rmi,Ami,Emi) is the polar coordinates of target observed by radari, the target positioning slice of radarican be obtained by using

    The overlapping area of the target pos itioning slice of two radars is usually an arc segment.Taking the example of the arc segment that the positioning slice of radar 2 intersects with the positioning sphere of radar 1, two endpoints of the arc segment arePf1(x1,y1,z1) andPe1(x1,y1,z1).The solution process is as follows:

    1) The vertex sorting of the radar 2 target positioning slice is recorded asp2j, andj=1,2,3,4.

    2) Initializing the number of intersectionsCfe=0, the starting point and the ending point arePf1(0,0,0)Pe1(0,0,0) respectively.

    3) Substituting each vertex into the equationξm1(x,y,z) to obtain the function valuesξp_2j(x,y,z).

    4) Processing the first and last points of the line segment, which means that ifξp_21=ξp_24=0,letPf1=p21andPe1=p24, exit the search process.

    5) Traversing the vertex from the first pointp21, for the pointp2j:

    a.If there areξp_2j ξp_2(j+1)≤0 andCfe=0, calculating the intersection pointpnewbetween the current line segment and the sphere plane.Then letPf1=pnew,Cfe=1, continue the search process.But ifξp_2j=0, letPf1=pnew=p2jandCfe=1, continue the search process.

    b.If there areξp_2j ξp_2(j+1)≤0 andCfe=1, calculating the intersection point between the current line segment and the sphere plane.Then, letPe1=pnewandCfe=2, exit the search process.However, ifξp_2j=0, letPe1=pnew=p2jandCfe=2, exit the search process.

    3.2.4 Estimate Target’s Optimal Positioning Result

    First of all, the intersection pointPf1(x1,y1,z1)andPe1(x1,y1,z1) between the target positioning slice of radar 1 and the target positioning sphere of radar 2.The midpoint of the line segment connecting the pointPf1andPe1can be used as the positioning result 1.In the same way, by using the method in section 3.2.3, the intersection pointPf2(x3,y3,z3) andPe2(x4,y4,z4)between the target positioning slice of radar 2 and the target positioning sphere of radar 1 can be solved.Then, the midpoint of the line segment connecting the pointPf2andPe2can be used as the positioning result 2.

    For dual-station collaborative positioning, as shown below, the average of two positioning results will be the optimal positioning result.

    In summary, based on the complementary characteristic of target measurement error, the flow chart of the fusion localization algorithm is shown in Fig.3.

    3.3 Evaluate Algorithm Performance

    It is evident that the proposed algorithm relies on the complementary feature of the target positioning error distribution space between radars,which means the smaller the area where the target positioning error space of multiple radars intersect, the better for the target positioning accuracy of multi-radar collaborative positioning.So, this feature can be used to evaluate algorithm performance.

    As shown in Fig.4, taking dual-station collaborative positioning as an example, when the target is far away and the pitch angle of target detected by radars is relatively low, in horizontal plane, by observing from the perpendicular direction to the line of radar sight, the twodimensional uncertainty area of target exists can be approximated by the two-dimensional uncertainty area of target distribution in the azimuth and range direction.

    αis the angle of target positioning error space of two radars.l1andl2are the length of the target positioning error space of two radars in the azimuth direction.Then, the overlapping area in Fig.4 is the quadrilateralABCD.

    Further, the value ofl1,l2, |AB| and |AD| can be calculated according to the cosine theorem and the following formula

    Fig.4 The two-dimensional uncertainty regions of target in azimuth and range directions

    And it is known thatl1andl2are the maximum positioning error ranges of radar 1 and radar 2 in the azimuth direction.

    So, the maximum positioning error Errormaxof the algorithm proposed in this article can be approximately calculated by

    4 Verification of Simulation

    In order to verify the effectiveness of the algorithm in this article, the DWF algorithm and the FBDWF algorithm will be simulated and compared with the algorithm.For the scenario of two radars collaborative positioning, in the NUE coordinate system with the fusion center as the origin, radar 1 is located at (-20 km, 0, 0) with system error(20 m, 0.2°, 0.2°)and random error of (30 m, 0.3°, 0.3°) in the distance, azimuth and pitch direction.But radar 2 is located at (20 km,0, 0) with system error (20m, 0.2°, 0.2°) and random error of (50 m, 0.5°, 0.5°) in the distance, azimuth and pitch direction.Then, the simulated target is located in the side view areas of two radars, within the azimuth range of -60°to 60°.

    When the target flies at a constant altitude of 5 km and a distance range of 300 km to 250 km,as shown in Fig.5, in theX(represents the azimuth direction),Y(represents the pitch direction), andZdirection, the comparative results of the positioning error of two radars and the three algorithms are given respectively.And for two radars and the three algorithms, the Tab.1 shows the comparison results of the positioning RMSE.

    Fig.5 Schematic diagram of target positioning error: (a)X direction; (b)Y direction; (c)Z direction

    Tab.1 The comparison of the positioning RMSE

    Obviously, as shown in Fig.5(a) and Tab.1,in theXdirection, the original positioning errors of radar 1 and radar 2 are the largest, and the positioning RMSE are 1 604.1 m and 2 642.4 m respectively.Compared with the positioning RMSE of the DWF algorithm and the FBDWF algorithm with system error inXdirection, which are 1 444.7 m and 1 100.8 m, the positioning RMSE of the algorithm proposed in this article is only 367.1 m.This means that it not only eliminates the influence of systematic error in the azimuth direction, but also has the best positioning effect and the smallest positioning error.

    Similarly, as shown in Fig.5(b), Fig.5(c)and Tab.1, in theYandZdirection, the positioning effect of the algorithm proposed in this article is the worst, which is basically consistent with the best positioning effect of one of two radars.Compared with the DWF algorithm,since filtering can effectively eliminate the influence of noise and fluctuation error, the FBDWF algorithm has the best positioning effect in theYandZdirection.

    In addition, in theXdirection, it is worth noting that the noise and fluctuation error have a greater impact on the algorithm proposed in this article compared to the FBDWF algorithm.In the future, some relevant filtering algorithms can be studied to eliminate the influence of noise and fluctuation error.Therefore, in azimuth direction,the accuracy of dual-station collaborative positioning can be further improved.

    Through simulation and theoretical analysis,the effectiveness of the algorithm proposed in this article is verified.The simulation results also show that the algorithm greatly improves the positioning accuracy of the target in the azimuth direction.But the positioning accuracy in the pitch direction is not high, which is basically consistent with the best positioning effect of one of two radars.So, focusing on the positioning accuracy in theXdirection andXOZplane, the influencing factors of the algorithm can be analyzed,which mainly include the baseline length and the ranging accuracy of two radars.

    In fact, because the system error in distance direction of radar is always much lower than random error of distance measurement and the maximum one-sided error range of the other radar in the angle dimension, and to ensure the error region can overlap, the one-sided error range of the radar in the angle dimension will be maximized to cover all measurement values as much as possible.Therefore, if there are systematic biases present in distance and angle direction, it has less impact on the algorithm.Further, when analyzing the impact of the baseline length and the ranging accuracy of two radars on the algorithm, the systematic biases in distance and angle direction does not need to be considered.

    So, let the target fly close to two radars at a constant speed from 300 km away along the center vertical direction of the two radar baselines,and for two radars, by setting the random error of angle measurement to 0.5° and systematic biases to zero in distance and angle direction,when the ranging accuracy is 20 m and baseline lengths of two radars are 20 km, 40 km, 60 km,80 km and 100 km respectively, after the target distance is equally divided into segments of 25 km,the comparison of the positioning RMSE inXdirection are given in the Tab.2.Then, similarly,change the ranging accuracy of two radars to 100 m,the simulation comparison results of the positioning RMSE inXdirection are shown in Tab.3.

    According to Tab.2 and Tab.3, three conclusions can be obtained.The first one is that when the baseline length of two radars is fixed,the greater the ranging accuracy of two radars is,the greater the positioning RMSE will be.This is because when performing dual-station positioning, the algorithm is highly dependent on the ranging accuracy of target.The second conclusion is that the farther the target distance or is or the shorter the baseline length of two radars is, the worse the algorithm performance will be.This is because the angle measurement error spreads in azimuth and pitch direction, which will lead the farther the target distance is, the worse the positioning effect of the radar in angle dimension will be.

    In addition, when the shorter the baselinelength of two radar or the farther the target distance, the smaller the angle between the measurement error spaces of two radars.It means that the measurement error spaces of two radars basically overlap as analyzed in Section 3.3,which will result in a decrease in the positioning performance of the algorithm proposed in this article.The final conclusion is that if the ranging accuracy of two radars is relatively high, the baseline length between two radars can be appropriately lengthened to increase the angle between error spaces for improving the positioning performance of the algorithm.

    Tab.2 The comparison of the positioning RMSE in X direction in different baseline lengths for two radars (σR1 = σR2 =20 m)m

    Tab.3 The comparison of the positioning RMSE in X direction in different baseline lengths for two radars(σR1 = σR2 =100 m)m

    Further, when the baseline length of two radars is 40 km, change the ranging accuracy of two radars toσR,andσRis equal to 10 m, 30 m,60 m, and 100 m respectively, the Fig.6 shows the target positioning RMSE comparison results inXOZplane under the corresponding error space angle interval.

    Fig.6 Positioning RMSE analysis in XOZ plane

    In the Fig.6, each error space angle interval from small to large corresponds to each 25 km target distance segment that target distance gradually decrease.It is obviously that when the baseline length of two radars is fixed, the closer the target is to radar 1 and radar 2, the larger the angle between error spaces and the higher the positioning accuracy inXOZplane.In the same way, the higher the ranging accuracy of two radars, the better the positioning effect of the algorithm inXOZplane.

    From the analysis in Section 3.3 and the geometric relationship, it can be concluded that the angle between two radars and the target is equal to the angle of the error space.The improvement of dual-station positioning accuracy is related to the layout between radars and the target distance, which determine the size of the angle between error spaces.

    Therefore, in order to evaluate the positioning effect of the algorithm proposed in this article, for example, the ranging accuracy of two radars is 10 m, under different error space angles,Fig.7 shows the theoretical maximum positioning error inXOZplan.

    Fig.7 Positioning performance analysis in XOZ plane

    In the Fig.7, it can be observed that when two radars detect the target vertically, the angle between the error spaces is 90°, the precision of collaborative positioning is the highest.And the smaller the error space angle is, the higher the positioning accuracy of targets in theXOZplane is, which also once again verified the previous simulation analysis results.

    Finally, different simulation results show that when the baseline length of two radars is 40 km,if the ranging accuracy is 60 m and the accuracy of angle measurement is 0.5°, within the radar's main working range (350 km), the positioning RMSE inXdirection andXOZplane are less than 500 m.

    5 Conclusion

    In summary, to address the difficulties and low accuracy of long-distance target positioning,through the collaborative detection of multiple radars(T/R) networking, taking advantage of the complementary characteristics of the measurement error space, a fusion localization is proposed.Compared with the traditional DWF algorithm and the FBDWF algorithm, it not only effectively eliminates the influence of systematic error in the azimuth direction, but also has the better positioning accuracy in the azimuth direction andXOZplane.Of course, since the proposed algorithm does not use matrices for calculation and does not need to calibrate the systematic error in the azimuth direction, it also has advantage of low computational complexity.

    Furthermore, for the application scenarios of the algorithm proposed, such as multi-radar collaborative positioning and multi-sensor data compression filtering in centralized information fusion, in order to ensure the effectiveness of the algorithm and according to the target orientation and distance required to be detected, suitable radar deployment should be selected to make the error space angle larger, which will also make the positioning accuracy of the algorithm higher in target azimuth and horizontal plane.Finally, for the algorithm proposed in this article,it is recommended that using radar with higher ranging accuracy and the baseline length between radars is 20-100 km.

    In the future, for the purpose of eliminating the influence of noise and fluctuation error in azimuth direction, the target error distribution after fusion localization will be considered for the filtering algorithm, which will be designed to further improve the algorithm performance.And it is worth nothing that the proposed algorithm in the pitch direction has basically not been improved.However, when no less than three radars are used for horizontal and vertical networking for collaborative detection, it can simultaneously improve the positioning accuracy in the pitch and azimuth directions.

    欧美色视频一区免费| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 俺也久久电影网| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产单亲对白刺激| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 在线国产一区二区在线| 日本一本二区三区精品| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 色5月婷婷丁香| 黄色一级大片看看| av在线亚洲专区| 搞女人的毛片| 看片在线看免费视频| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 三级经典国产精品| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 黄色配什么色好看| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 嫩草影院精品99| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 老司机影院成人| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 久久久精品大字幕| 18+在线观看网站| 搞女人的毛片| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产三级在线视频| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| or卡值多少钱| 日本a在线网址| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 成年版毛片免费区| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 此物有八面人人有两片| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 丰满的人妻完整版| 97在线视频观看| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| av专区在线播放| 色综合色国产| 悠悠久久av| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲在线观看片| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 97碰自拍视频| 欧美区成人在线视频| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| av在线天堂中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久末码| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 免费av观看视频| 在线天堂最新版资源| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 在线观看一区二区三区| 97超视频在线观看视频| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 老司机福利观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 男人舔奶头视频| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 成人无遮挡网站| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲第一电影网av| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产成人一区二区在线| 九九在线视频观看精品| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 天堂√8在线中文| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 成人精品一区二区免费| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产 一区精品| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 性色avwww在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久久成人免费电影| 综合色av麻豆| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 色视频www国产| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| ponron亚洲| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 老司机福利观看| 尾随美女入室| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 丰满乱子伦码专区| videossex国产| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 身体一侧抽搐| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产精品久久视频播放| 美女高潮的动态| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 小说图片视频综合网站| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 波多野结衣高清作品| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 日韩强制内射视频| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 97在线视频观看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 三级经典国产精品| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 成人无遮挡网站| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产精品久久视频播放| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 91狼人影院| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 国产 一区精品| 综合色av麻豆| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| videossex国产| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产在线男女| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 久久久成人免费电影| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 欧美日本视频| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 老司机福利观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 一进一出抽搐动态| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日本色播在线视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 久久久色成人| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 俺也久久电影网| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 午夜激情欧美在线| 18+在线观看网站| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲五月天丁香| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 久久久久性生活片| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 97碰自拍视频| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产精品野战在线观看| 国产乱人视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 精品一区二区免费观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 99热精品在线国产| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 免费观看人在逋| 高清毛片免费看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 九色成人免费人妻av| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产色婷婷99| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 69人妻影院| 内地一区二区视频在线| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产成人freesex在线 | 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 午夜日韩欧美国产| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 观看免费一级毛片| 午夜福利高清视频| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 欧美3d第一页| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 香蕉av资源在线| 国内精品宾馆在线| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲最大成人av| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲av美国av| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| videossex国产| 午夜免费激情av| 嫩草影院新地址| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 91久久精品电影网| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 综合色丁香网| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 色在线成人网| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 成人精品一区二区免费| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 麻豆一二三区av精品| eeuss影院久久| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲不卡免费看| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 日本黄大片高清| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 亚洲在线观看片| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲av美国av| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 精品国产三级普通话版| 午夜激情欧美在线| 一级黄色大片毛片| 露出奶头的视频| 久久人妻av系列| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 在线免费十八禁| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美成人a在线观看| 尾随美女入室| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 一本精品99久久精品77| 嫩草影视91久久| 俺也久久电影网| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 免费看a级黄色片| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 少妇高潮的动态图| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 不卡一级毛片| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 久久草成人影院| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 床上黄色一级片| 直男gayav资源| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 成年版毛片免费区| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| .国产精品久久| 日本免费a在线| 久久久欧美国产精品| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 少妇丰满av| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 22中文网久久字幕| 日本一二三区视频观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| av专区在线播放| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 国产成人影院久久av| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 免费看日本二区| 久久热精品热| 1024手机看黄色片| 全区人妻精品视频| 嫩草影院入口| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | .国产精品久久| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 午夜日韩欧美国产| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 亚洲性久久影院| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产成人a区在线观看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 1024手机看黄色片| 在线a可以看的网站| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 毛片女人毛片| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 春色校园在线视频观看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 深夜精品福利| 国产日本99.免费观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 春色校园在线视频观看| av福利片在线观看| 欧美zozozo另类| 久久久久久久久久成人| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 午夜视频国产福利| 十八禁网站免费在线| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 久久久成人免费电影| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产成人91sexporn| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产真实乱freesex| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 国产乱人视频| 久久久久性生活片| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 嫩草影院入口| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 深夜精品福利| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 欧美激情在线99| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 午夜免费激情av| 1000部很黄的大片| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 22中文网久久字幕| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 色av中文字幕| 黄片wwwwww| 日本在线视频免费播放| 97超视频在线观看视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 此物有八面人人有两片| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产成人a区在线观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 熟女电影av网| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 成年av动漫网址| 99热只有精品国产| 赤兔流量卡办理| av视频在线观看入口| 久久久精品大字幕| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 久久久久国产网址| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 露出奶头的视频| 大香蕉久久网| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产av在哪里看| 国产精品永久免费网站| 色哟哟·www| 色5月婷婷丁香| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的|