Semi-global weighted output average tracking of discrete-time heterogeneous multi-agent systems subject to input saturation and external disturbances

Qilin Song·Yuanlong Li·Yijing Xie·Zongli Lin

Abstract In this paper, we revisit the semi-global weighted output average tracking problem for a discrete-time multi-agent system subject to input saturation and external disturbances.The multi-agent system consists of multiple heterogeneous linear systems as leader agents and multiple heterogeneous linear systems as follower agents.We design both the state feedback and output feedback control protocols for each follower agent.In particular, a distributed state observer is designed for each follower agent that estimates the state of each leader agent.In the output feedback case,state observer is also designed for each follower agent to estimate its own state.With these estimates,we design low gain-based distributed control protocols,parameterized in a scalar low gain parameter.It is shown that,for any bounded set of the initial conditions,these control protocols cause the follower agents to track the weighted average of the outputs of the leader agents as long as the value of the low gain parameter is tuned sufficiently small.Simulation results illustrate the validity of the theoretical results.

Keywords Distributed average tracking·Input saturation·Low gain feedback·Heterogeneous multi-agent systems·Output regulation

1 Introduction

The problem of multiple agents each tracking the average of multiple time-varying signals, each associated with one agent, using the information of its neighboring agents is called distributed average tracking [1, 2].Distributed average tracking problem has numerous applications in multi-agent systems including distributed estimation, distributed optimization and distributed formation control.The continuous-time distributed average tracking problem has been widely studied [3, 4].Specifically, Reference [3] presented distributed discontinuous control algorithms that achieve distributed average tracking for time-varying signals with bounded derivatives.Reference [4] designed eventtriggered average tracking algorithms for heterogeneous agents to achieve average tracking of time-varying signals.Reference[5]studied the distributed average tracking problem in the discrete-time setting.

Actuator limitation is ubiquitous in practice and, as a result, research on control systems with input saturation has been widely conducted.For example, low gain feedback laws[6]were proposed to achieve semi-global output regulation of the discrete-time linear systems that are asymptotically null controllable with bounded controls(ANCBC).A discrete-time linear system is said to be ANCBC if it is stabilizable and all its open-loop poles are on or inside the unit circle.Reference [7] studied cooperative output regulation for a discrete-time time-delay multi-agent system.Reference[8]presented an adaptive distributed observer for cooperative output regulation of a discrete-time multi-agent system so that the follower agents do not need the system matrix of the leader agent.Reference [9] studied the problem of semi-global leader-following output consensus whenthefolloweragentsarerepresentedbydiscrete-timelinear systems with input saturation and external disturbances.More recently, Reference [10] formulated and studied the semi-global weighted output average tracking problem for a multi-agent system, whose follower agents are heterogeneous and represented by continuous-time linear systems with input saturation and external disturbances.Both the reference signals, whose average is to be tracked by the follower agents, and the disturbances are generated by the leader agents that are also heterogeneous and represented by continuous-time linear systems.In addition, such a formulation does not require the number of leader agents and the number of follower agents to be the same.

In this paper,we focus on the semi-global weighted output average tracking problem for a multi-agent system whose heterogeneous agents are described by discrete-time linear systems with input saturation and external disturbances.We first construct,for each follower agent,distributed observers to estimate the states of the leader agents.In the output feedback case, a state observer is also constructed for each follower agent to estimate its own state via output information.We then utilize the low gain feedback design technique and the output regulation theory to design distributed state feedback and output feedback control laws to achieve semiglobal weighted output average tracking.We note that the discrete-time results we are to present are not direct extensions of[10].In particular,the continuous-time leader state observers constructed in[10]rely on high-gain action.The value of the gain parameter in the distributed observer is chosen sufficiently high to ensure a Hurwitz system matrix in proving the stability of the error dynamics.However,the stability property of the corresponding system matrix in the discrete-time setting is much more complicated than the continuous-time case.As a result, we have to resort to more subtle property of the system matrix under an additional assumption on the system matrix of the leader agent to ensure its stability[7].Partial results from this paper were presented at a conference [11], which focuses on the state feedback results.

Organization of the paper Sect.2 formulates the semiglobal weighted output average tracking problem for a multiagent system, where the leader agents are represented by discrete-time heterogeneous linear systems and the follower agents by discrete-time heterogeneous linear systems with input saturation and external disturbances.In Sects.3 and 4,we respectively design distributed state feedback and output feedback control protocols that solve the problem formulated in Sect.2.Section5 presents numerical examples to illustrate the theoretical results.Section6 concludes the paper.

2 Problem formulation

We focus on a multi-agent system containingMheterogeneous leader agentsvk,k∈I[1,M],andNheterogeneous follower agents,vi,i∈I[M+1,M+N].The dynamics of each leader agentvkis described by

wherewk(t)∈Rskis the state,zk(t)∈Rqis the output,andWk0?Rskis bounded.LetW0=W10×W20×···×WM0.The dynamics of each follower agentviis described by

Lemma 1 [12]Under Assumption 1,all the eigenvalues of Mk,k∈I[1,M],have a positive real part.

Lemma 2 [13]For the matrix

let aik> 0,i∈I[M+ 1,M+lk],and aik= 0,i∈I[M+lk+1,M+N],and the matrixLk be partitioned as

Assumption 2 For eachk∈I[1,M], all eigenvalues ofSkare on or inside the unit circle.

Assumption 3 For eachi∈I[M+1,M+N],(Ai,Bi)is stabilizable and all eigenvalues ofAiare on or inside the unit circle.

Assumption 4 For eachk∈I[1,M],(Sk,Qk)is detectable.

Assumption 5 For eachi∈I[M+1,M+N],(Ai,Ci)is detectable.

Lemma 3 [14]Under Assumption 3,for any ε∈(0,1],there is a unique matrix Pi(ε)>0,i∈I[M+1,M+N],which solves the following algebraic Riccati equation(ARE):

Assumption 7 For eachi∈I[M+1,M+N],there are a positive scalarδ<Δand a non-negative integerTsuch that,for allw(0)∈W0,‖Γiw(t)‖∞,T≤Δ-δ.

Since not all follower agents know the states of all leader agents, we design, for each follower agentvi,i∈I[M+1,M+N],distributed leader state observers to estimate the states of the leader agentsvk,k∈I[1,M],as follows:

whereμkis chosen according to Lemma 4.

Note that for follower agents that have access to the leaders, state observers are not needed.For simplicity in presentation, we have built state observers for all follower agents.

We introduce the following notation to help formulate the problem:

The problem we are to solve for the multi-agent system consisting of(1)and(2)via state feedback can be formulated as follows.

If the states of the leader agents and the follower agents are not available for the implementation of the control laws,we need to construct state observers to obtain the information of these states.

For eachk∈I[1,M],define

According to whether the follower agentvihas access to the information of the leader agentvk,we design the following two kinds of distributed leader state observers to estimate the states of the leader agents.They directly use the output information of the leader agentvkor the state of their neighbors’leader state observers to obtain their estimates of each leader’s state.

where ?wik(t)is the estimate of the state of the leader agentvk, the value ofτkwill be determined later, andLkis such thatSk+Lk Qkis Schur.The existence ofLkis guaranteed as(Sk,Qk)is detectable.

For each follower agentvi,i∈I[M+1,M+N], we design the following state observers to estimate its own statexi:

The problem we are to solve for the multi-agent system consisting of(1)and(2)via output feedback can be formulated as follows.

3 State feedback case

Using the states of the distributed leader state observers(6),we construct,for each follower agentvi,i∈I[M+1,M+N],the following low gain feedback control protocol:

where

andPi>0 solves the ARE(4).

Denote

We have

For notational brevity,we will denoteΥ(ε)byΥandΥi(ε)byΥi.

Theorem 1Consider the multi-agent system(1)–(2).Suppose Assumptions 1,2,3,6 and 7 hold.Then,with the control protocols(10),for any a priori given,arbitrarily large,bounded sets of initial conditions X0?Rn andthere exists ε?∈(0,1]such that,for any ε∈(0,ε?,the output tracking errors satisfy

ProofDenote the observer errors as

Then,it follows from(1)and(6)that

For eachk∈I[1,M],let

Then,we have

whereRk=(IN?Sk)-μk(Mk?Sk).Recall thatμkis chosen according to Lemma 4.By Lemma 4,Rkis Schur.We further let

and have

whereR=diag{R1,R2,...,RM}.Clearly,Ris Schur.

We congregate the dynamics of all leader agents (1) as follows:

whereS=diag{S1,S2,...,SM}.Similarly,the dynamics of all follower agents(2)can be congregated as follows:

where

and

Let

Then,the regulator Eq.(5)can be rearranged in a congregated form as

Denoteξ(t)=x(t)-Πˉw(t).In view of(12)–(14),we have

Letψi∈RNsbe the vector withith element being 1 and all other elements being 0.In view of the definitions of ˉw(t),?w(t)and ?w(t),we have

whereE1=(Υ Π+Γ)Ψ.

LetH=A-BΥ.In view of the ARE(4),

and

Since limε→0P(ε)=0,there is a constantη1>0 such that,for anyε∈(0,1],

SinceRis Schur,there exists a positive definite matrixG1∈RNs×Nsand a constantκ1>0 such that

Noting that

we have

and thus

Define

We have

Consider the Lyapunov function

SinceRis Schur,for any initial condition ?w(0)∈W0,there is a finite integerT1≥Tsuch that,for allε∈(0,1],

Note thatξ(t) is the solution of a linear difference equation with bounded inputsσΔ(u) and?！.Clearly,ξ(T1)belongs to a bounded setXξ(T1), independent ofεfor all.Letcbe a positive constant such that

Define

Letε?∈(0,1]be such that,for allε∈(0,ε?,

The existence ofε?is guaranteed since limε→0Υ(ε) = 0.Assumption 7 indicates that‖?！‖∞,T1≤Δ-δ,and hence,‖u‖∞,T1≤Δ,implying thatσΔ(u)=u,t≥T1.As a result,(15)simplifies to

Substituting(16)into(17),we obtain

Recall thatH=A-BΥ.Then,

With(11),we derive

Evaluating the time difference ofValong the trajectories ofξand ?winsideLV(c),we have

which indicates that

Thus,

In view of(14),we have

from which we have

This completes the proof.■

4 Output feedback case

Whenthestateofthefolloweragentvi,i∈I[M+1,M+N],is not available for implementation of the feedback control law(10),we construct the following output feedback control protocol(18)using its state observer(9):

Theorem 2Consider the multi-agent system(1)–(2).Suppose Assumptions 1-7 hold.Then,with the control protocols(18),for any a priori given,arbitrarily large,bounded sets of initial conditions X0?Rn,X0?Rn andW0?RNs,there exists ε?∈(0,1]such that,for any ε∈(0,ε?,the output tracking errors satisfy

ProofDenote the observer errors as

Fori∈Ik,by(1)and(7),we have

Fori∈ˉIk,by(1)and(8),we have

Fork∈I[1,M],denote

Denote

andLk∈RN×Nas the Laplacian matrix associated withAk.Let

By Lemma 2,Lkcan be written as(3).With(20),it is proved that

Thus,

the matrix

is Schur.Letqibe theith standard basis vector in RN.Note that

Then,

where

is Schur.

Denote the estimation errors as

In view of(2)and(9),we have

Denote

Then,

where

SinceAi-L X,iCi,i=I[M+1,M+N],are Schur,H1is Schur.

Let

Then,in view of(23)and(24),we have

where

Since bothH1andHvare Schur,H0is Schur.Thus,system(25)is asymptotically stable.

Note that ?w(t)- ˉw(t)=Ψ?w(t)and ?x(t)= ?x(t)-x(t).Let

Following an analysis similar to the analysis in the proof of Theorem 1,we obtain

and

whereE2=[-Υ(Υ Π+Γ)Ψ].

LetH=A-BΥ.Since limε→0P(ε) = 0,there exists a constantη2>0 that satisfies

SinceH0is Schur,there exist positive definite matrixG2∈RNs×Nsand constantκ2>0 such that

Noting that

we have

and thus

Define

We have

Consider the following Lyapunov function:

Recall that system (25) is asymptotically stable.Thus, for any initial valuesζ(0)and allε∈(0,1],there exists a finite integerT2≥Tsuch that

Let

Letε?∈(0,1]be such that,for allε∈(0,ε?,

Since limε→0P(ε)=0,suchε?exists.By Assumption 7,

Thus, we have ‖u‖∞,T2≤Δ, that is,σΔ(u) =u,t≥T2.Thus,Eq.(26)simplifies to

Substituting(27)into(28),we have

By(25)and(29),we have

Evaluating the time difference of the Lyapunov functionValong the trajectories of(30)insideLV(c),we have

Fig.1 The communication topology

that is,

Thus,limt→∞ξ(t)=0.In view of(14),we have

Thus,

This completes the proof.■

5 Simulation

Consider a multi-agent system of three leader agents and five follower agents with the communication topology represented by Fig.1,which satisfies Assumption 1.

The matrices for the dynamics of the leader agents(1)are given by

Assumption 2 holds since all eigenvalues ofSk,k∈I[1,3],are on the unit circle.For eachk∈I[1,3],(Sk,Qk)is observable and,hence,Assumption 4 is satisfied.

Let

and the weightings for the leader agent outputs be chosen asα1=0.2,α2=0.3 andα3=0.5.

The dynamics of the follower agents are described by(2).The system matrices for follower agentsvi,i= 4,5, are given by

The system matrices for the follower agentsvi,i= 6,7,8,are given by

All eigenvalues ofAi,i∈I[4,8], are on the unit circle,(Ai,Bi)is stabilizable and(Ai,Ci)is detectable.Thus,Assumptions 3 and 5 are satisfied.LetΔ=8.

Fori=4,5,we have

and fori=6,7,8,we have

which solve(5).It can be verified that Assumptions 6 and 7 are satisfied,withδ=0.1 andT=0.

In the following two subsections, we present simulation results for the state feedback and the output feedback,respectively.For simulation,we set

and

5.1 State feedback case

The Laplacian matrix of the communication topology among the follower agents is calculated as

Thus,μk,k∈I[1,3],can all be chosen as 0.5.

Let the initial conditions of the observers(6)be given by

Shown in Fig.2 are the states of the observers(6).For eachk∈I[1,3], the states of the observers ?wik(t),i∈I[4,8],converge to the stateswk(t)of the leader agentsvk.

We first letε= 0.1 in the control protocols (10).The solutions of the corresponding AREs(4)are

Fori=4,5,Υi=[0.2940 0.9842 1.4509].Fori=6,7,8,Υi= [0.0301 0.5115 3.1577].Figure3 shows that the tracking errorseikfail to converge to 0 and Fig.4 shows that the outputs of the follower agents fail to track the signalˉz.

We next choose a smaller value ofε= 0.01.With this,the solutions to AREs(4)are

Fori=4,5,Υi=[0.0954 0.4411 0.9507].Fori=6,7,8,Υi= [0.0226 0.4061 2.7085].Figure5 shows that the tracking errors converge to 0 and Fig.6 shows that the outputs of the follower agents track the signal ˉz.

5.2 Output feedback case

Following the development in Sect.4, we design two types of leader state observers (7) and (8).The gain matrices for observers(7)are given by

which are such thatSk+Lk Qk,k∈I[1,3],are Schur.We next determine the parameterτkin observers(8).We calculateL133,L233andL333as follows:

Fig.2 The states wk =[wk1 wk2]T,k ∈I[1,3],of the leader agents and their estimates ?wik =[?wik1 ?wik2]T,i ∈I[4,8],by the observers(6)

The eigenvalues ofLk33,k∈I[1,3], are all 1.Thus, by Lemma 4,

in view of which we chooseτk=0.5.In the state observers(9),for follower agentsvi,i=4,5,we choose

and,for follower agentsvi,i=6,7,8,we choose

This choice ofL X,iguarantees thatAi-L X,iCi,i∈I[4,8],are all Schur.The initial states of the observers (7)–(9) are selected as

Shown in Fig.7 are the states of the observers (7) and(8).For eachk∈I[1,3],the states of the observers ?wik(t),i∈I[4,8],converge to the stateswk(t)of the leader agentsvk.

We first chooseε= 0.1 in (18).The solutions to the corresponding AREs (4) and the feedback gainΥiare as given in Sect.5.1.Figure8 shows that the tracking errorseikfail to converge to 0 and Fig.9 shows that the outputs of the follower agents fail to track the signal ˉz.

We next choose a smaller valueε= 0.01.The solutions to the corresponding AREs(4)and the feedback gainΥiare as given in Sect.5.1.Figure10 shows that the tracking errorseikconverge to 0 and Fig.11 illustrates that the outputs of the follower agents can track the signal ˉz.

Fig.3 The tracking errors ei =[ei1 ei2]T,i ∈I[4,8],under the state feedback control protocols(10)with ε =0.1

Fig.4 The outputs yi = [yi1 yi2]T, i ∈I[4,8], of the follower agents and the reference signal ˉz = [ˉz1 ˉz2]T under the state feedback control protocols(10)with ε =0.1

Fig.5 The tracking errors ei =[ei1 ei2]T,i ∈I[4,8],under the state feedback control protocols(10)with ε =0.01

Fig.6 The outputs yi = [yi1 yi2]T, i ∈I[4,8], of the follower agents and the reference signal ˉz = [ˉz1 ˉz2]T under the state feedback control protocols(10)with ε =0.01

Fig.7 The states wk =[wk1 wk2]T,k ∈I[1,3],of the leader agents and their estimates ?wik =[?wik1 ?wik2]T,i ∈I[4,8],by the observers(7)and(8)

Fig.8 The tracking errors ei =[ei1 ei2]T,i ∈I[4,8],under the output feedback control protocols(18)with ε =0.1

Fig.9 The outputs yi = [yi1 yi2]T,i ∈I[4,8],of the follower agents and the reference signal ˉz = [ˉz1 ˉz2]T under the output feedback control protocols(18)with ε =0.1

Fig.10 The tracking errors ei =[ei1 ei2]T,i ∈I[4,8],under the output feedback control protocols(18)with ε =0.01

6 Conclusions

We revisited the semi-global weighted output average tracking problem for a discrete-time heterogeneous multi-agent system with input saturation and external disturbances.We assumed the existence of a directed path from each leader agent to each follower agent and designed low gain-based control protocols of both the state feedback and the output feedback types.It was shown that, for anya priorigiven,arbitrarily large,set of initial conditions,these control protocols cause the follower agents to track the weighted average of the outputs of the leader agents as long as the low gain parameter is tuned sufficiently small.

Data availability Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.