• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Using agent-based simulation to assess disease prevention measures during pandemics?

    2021-09-28 02:18:44YunheTong童蘊賀ChristopherKingandYanghuiHu胡楊慧
    Chinese Physics B 2021年9期
    關(guān)鍵詞:胡楊

    Yunhe Tong(童蘊賀),Christopher King,?,and Yanghui Hu(胡楊慧)

    1Department of Engineering Mathematics,University of Bristol,Bristol BS8 1UB,UK

    2State Key Laboratory of Fire Science,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230027,China

    Keywords:pedestrian dynamics,occupant exposure,COVID-19,simulation study

    1.Introduction

    With the rapid spread of COVID-19 around the world,the World Health Organization(WHO)declared a pandemic.[1]It has fundamentally altered the daily activities of humans all over the world.Governing bodies recognize that intervening strategies are needed to reduce the spread of COVID-19 and so reduce its impact on human health.[2]These measures include banning mass gatherings,introducing social distancing,where people must remain a fixed distance apart,and one-way systems in spaces with high footfalls.These restrictions could be present for months or years to come,[3]so it is worthwhile to attempt to model and quantify the transmission risk of people when they make necessary trips and expose them to other people.

    Modelling epidemiological transmission is crucial to understand the transmission dynamics of the pandemic and provide insights into the design of alternative interventions.[4]In previous work,the susceptible-infected-removed(SIR)model has been used widely to predict the spread of infectious diseases in humans.[5]In this model,people are categorized by S,I,or R(susceptible,infectious,or removed)states and can move between these states.SIR model and its extended modifications have been used to estimate disease spread at large scales.[6,7]However,these models do not explicitly consider the day-to-day interactions between people at smaller scales,such as in buildings.

    Understanding pedestrian dynamics is essential for studying disease transmission within buildings and has been extensively investigated through statistical modelling and simulation.These models can represent realistic pedestrian behaviors and are generally distinguished into macroscopic and microscopic ones.Macroscopic models generate the bulk properties of groups of pedestrians,such as flows and densities,without considering individuals,[8]and cannot be readily used for studying disease transmission.In contrast,microscopic models consider each pedestrian as a self-driven agent which has simple rules for interacting with both the environment and other agents,and aggregating these behaviors over large numbers of agents can lead to interesting collective phenomena.Cellular automata,[9,10]floor field models,[11]and force-based models[12]are common examples of these kinds of models.

    Exposure risk of pedestrians to most diseases in a confined space largely depends on the local interactions between other,potentially infected,pedestrians.Much empirical research has been done to enhance the understanding of interactions.[13–15]In force-based models,interactions of a pedestrian with both others and the environment can be thought of as attractive or repulsive forces acting on said pedestrian.[16,17]For example,a pedestrian is assumed to keep a certain distance from others(personal space),if someone enters this space,the pedestrian will try to move away to maintain their personal space.[18]Alternatively,there are some cases where pedestrians will stay close to others,for example,traveling with relatives or friends,or following guides.[19]

    While previous research has carefully studied pedestrian dynamics in various contexts,little is known about the influences of pedestrian behaviors on the spread of disease,especially in supermarkets,where everyone must visit to buy food.This is one of the essential activities which puts people at greater risk of contracting disease,due to being around others in a confined space.To try to reduce this risk,supermarkets have taken measures such as limiting the maximum number of occupants,introducing directional floor markings and signs to create one-way movement around the store(oneway system),and asking customers to maintain social distance from others.[20]Recently,the“exposed”model has been developed to assess the exposure risk of individuals in confined spaces during pandemics.[21]This model is designed to be used in tandem with microscopic pedestrian dynamics models to investigate different types of disease transmission.The effect of some preventative measures taken in supermarkets,including restricting the number of customers,keeping social distance,and entering with a shopping cart on the average contact degree of each person,has been investigated through simulation.[22]However,these restrictions may increase the amount of time people spend in supermarkets and thus increase their exposure time.So,it is essential to investigate the risk-efficiency trade-off to find the optimal strategy for the shopper.

    In this contribution,we employ a force-based model to implement preventative measures seen during this pandemic,such as social distancing.We focus on the influence of these measures in supermarkets on the exposure risk of customers.Specifically,we investigate the trade-off between exposure risk and the shopping time to develop the optimal shopping strategy when such protective measures are in place.

    There are two main aspects of innovation in this work.First,we develop a simulator that can illustrate disease transmission and pedestrian movement dynamics.It can generate data to assess a variety of metrics regarding strategies to limit the spread of disease and/or optimize pedestrian flow.The other is to establish a model that can evaluate the impact of different disease-prevention measures on customer shopping efficiency and infection risk simultaneously and determine which are the most suitable,given a user’s set of priorities.

    Compared with previous studies,the method we proposed considers how a manager of a supermarket may optimize their store in order to comply with local restrictions while maximizing store turnover.This work also compares shopping strategies that maybe used by customers and determines which has the maximum reduction in exposure risk.More importantly,our model can allow supermarket managers to adjust the weighting of risk and efficiency according to their needs.In addition,this framework allows for the inclusion of empirical data to calibrate the model.

    In the following,we first present an integrated simulation for shopper movements(Subsection 2.1)and choice behavior in a supermarket(Subsection 2.2).We then describe the exposed model and how we use it to assess a shopper’s exposure risk(Subsection 2.3).Using this framework,a simulation study(Subsection 3.1)is conducted,implementing different restrictions,including social distance and one-way systems,along with different shopping habits(Subsection 3.2).Results from this study are presented,examining the tradeoff between customers’exposure risk and shopping efficiency(Subsection 4)for the different scenarios.Finally,we assess the implications of these results on shopping behavior during the current pandemic(Subsection 5).

    2.Model

    We develop an integrated model to study pedestrian movements and shopping behavior in a supermarket.Specifically,we employ a modified force-based model that can vary the social distance between pedestrians to simulate current restrictions(Subsection 2.1).A simple destination choice model is used to govern the activities that shoppers perform(Subsection 2.2).In addition,the exposed model[21]is used to assess the exposure risk of pedestrians over the course of their shopping trip(Subsection 2.3).

    2.1.Force-based model with social distance

    Assuming that each person can be represented by a circle of given radius,the repulsive interaction between two people,i and j,is given by

    The interaction of person i with the wall W is treated analogously as

    where riis the radius of i,diWis the distance between the center of i to the closest point of the boundary of an obstacle,W.niWis the normalized vector acting perpendicularly to diW,and tiWis the vector acting tangentially to diW(perpendicular to niW).

    We use the minimum distance rij?dijto represent the social distance between people.Birepresents the effective length scale over which the interpersonal repulsive force takes effect,such that increasing Biincreases the effective distance between people.To calculate the value of Binecessary for rij?dijto be a specific social distance between two people,i and j,we use the following relation:

    where|vi(t)|is the magnitude of vi(t).Aiand Biare the same as that in Eq.(2).This assumes that the distances from person i to all other people(that are not j)and to all obstacles are much greater than dij,so that their contributions to fijin Eq.(1)are negligible.

    2.2.Pedestrian shopping behavior

    In this simulator,each agent is assigned a set of activities to perform in the supermarket.Each activity can be performed at only one destination in this work,though this need not be the case in general.Based on this schedule of activities,the probability of choosing which activity to perform/destination to visit next is computed using a multinomial logit discrete choice model[23]specified as follows:

    where Psis the probability of an agent choosing destination s,βdis the desirability parameter,and H is the normalization constant which ensures that the sum of choice probabilities over all destinations is unity.dsis the desirability of s,and is determined by the position of the activity associated with s in the activity schedule of the agent,such that

    where a is the position of the activity in the agent’s current schedule.For example,consider a scenario where an agent can choose from one of four destinations,and each has an activity labeled A–D,sequentially.If an agent has the schedule‘A,B,C,D’,then d1=e?1,d2=e?2,d3=e?3,d4=e?4.In this work,an agent’s next destination depends exclusively on its activity schedule,where the destination most likely to be visited is the one with the next activity.To ensure that agents almost always perform the next activity in their schedule,we setβd=20.

    3.Simulations

    3.1.Simulator description

    This section describes the agent-based simulator used in this study,which was written in Java.The simulator can be used to look at both movement and choice behavior of pedestrians in public spaces and is based on the simulator used in Bode and Codling.[26]There is a video showing the simulator in action in the supplementary materials.

    When agents reach a destination,they spend a short amount of time there,mimicking browsing or purchasing behavior.This shopping time,tsis sampled from a shifted exponential distribution,

    where t is the time measured in simulation time-steps(0.05 s),and t0andλare parameters such that t0=5 s andλ=0.01.t0controls the minimum possible waiting time at a destination andλcontrols the spread of possible waiting times.The values of t0andλwere chosen to produce a distribution of waiting times that are reasonable and intuitive.Once they have spent tstimesteps at the destination,they then select their next destination using the model described in Eq.(5).Their activity schedule is updated to remove the associated activity.They do this for each activity in their schedule until it is empty.At this point,the agent’s next destination is the exit,where they then leave the simulation.

    The simulator takes the following of inputs:

    ?the layout of the environment,

    ?the total number of agents,

    ?the total number of time steps to run the simulation for,

    ?the values of any choice model parameters,

    ?the length of the activity schedule for all agents.

    The different supermarket environments used in this study are shown in Fig.1.There are 12 destinations where each has one unique activity that can be performed(so there are 12 activities with only one place to perform each of them).For this study,agents are added at the entrance and initially prescribed a set of randomly allocated activities to perform.The activities are then sorted in order of increasing distance from the entrance to their associated destination.This is done to prevent agents from doubling back in the one-way system scenarios and represents the real-life tendency for supermarket shoppers to visit places closest to the supermarket entrance first.[27]The total size of the simulated spaces is 20×20 m2and,to replicate the capacity constraints imposed during a pandemic,a maximum of 20 agents are allowed in the spaces at any time,corresponding to an average density of 0.05 agents/m2.When there are fewer than 20 agents in the simulation,the simulator places new agents at the entrance,if no other agents are too close(i.e.,beyond social distance).

    The Aiand Bifrom Eq.(1)are fixed across all agents,with Ai=2000 andτi=0.5 s,as originally specified by Helbing et al.[12]Social distancing is implemented by changing the Biparameter(see Subsection 2.1).Under normal conditions,we use Bi=0.08,[12]and using Eq.(4),Bi≈0.15 for 1 m social distancing,and Bi≈0.4 for 2 m social distancing.However,due to the limitations in the simulator,Bicould not be increased above 0.2,so a social distance of 2 m was not possible,and instead we used Bi≈0.2,corresponding to a social distance of 1.2 m.This is smaller than the recommended social distances[28]but should be sufficient to establish general relationships between social distance with both exposure risk and shopping efficiency.For each scenario,the simulation is run for 1-hour of simulated time(72000 time steps at 0.05 s per time step)and repeated ten times.The average exposure risk and shopping efficiency over the 10 replicates is reported.The simulator outputs the positions and directions of each entity at each time step along with whether the agent has left the simulation.

    Fig.1.Destination layout of the supermarket(a)and three environments used in the simulations:the supermarket where agents can move freely(b),the one-way system with narrow passages(c),and one-way with wide passages(d).Each agent enters the supermarket through the entrance and then begins to visit each destination in the assigned schedule.Once their schedule is complete,each person heads toward the exit and are removed from the simulation.The colored stars represent destinations agents may visit.Each agent is represented as a circle colored according to which destination they are heading towards.The line indicates their current direction,and the length of it represents their current speed.

    3.2.Different scenarios

    Several different strategies/scenarios are investigated,looking at both a person’s exposure to others and how quickly they can complete their shopping trip.The different strategies considered are shown in Table 1.Firstly,there is the prepandemic shopping situation,where agents can move around supermarkets freely and do not need to observe social distancing.This“free-for-all with no social distancing”is our base case to which all other scenarios are compared.To look at the effect of social distancing on exposure and shopping efficiency,a scenario where agents can still move freely but observe social distancing(free-for-all with social distancing)is included.To investigate this further,two additional scenarios are defined,where the social distancing is 1 m or above 1 m,as commonly described in government guidance.[5]

    Customers often adopt two different strategies when shopping,both before and during the pandemic,where some shop frequently(e.g.,maybe every 2–3 days),but only shop for a small amount of time/buy only a few items,and others may shop relatively infrequently(e.g.,maybe once a week),but spend more time in the store/buy more items.To assess whether one of these strategies is better for people who are more concerned with minimizing their exposure or maximizing their shopping efficiency,these two strategies are included.These different shopping strategies are represented using the length of agent’s activity schedule as a proxy.

    In some supermarket chains,one-way systems are in place in an attempt to minimize the exposure risk of customers.[20]To test this idea,one-way versions of the freefor-all supermarket environment are created by placing artificial barriers to force entities to move along a prescribed route from the entrance to exit.One has wide walkways,where agents can pass each other,and the other has narrow walkways where they cannot.As mentioned in Subsection 3.1,to ensure that agents obey the one-way system,their schedules are ordered in terms of the distance of the destination associated with that activity from the entrance.The social distance for the scenarios is above 1 m,and each agent visits 5 different destinations in the scenarios unless otherwise specified.

    Table 1.Summary of the different scenarios.

    3.3.Scenario metrics

    COVID-19 can be transmitted in several ways,such as airborne and physical contact.[24]The EXPOSED model[21]allows for several types of disease transmission.When considering exposure by physical contact(the distance of two agents is smaller than two times of body radius)in this simulator,it is almost impossible for two agents to touch one another.This is due to the values of Bineeded to implement social distancing(see Subsection 2.1)and the small number of agents present at any one time(see Subsection 3.1).We consider exposure to others within some distance(here we use d≥1 m),with an additional face-to-face exposure if agents are facing each other within the social distance,defined by a fixed angle of contact(<120°)between the current directions of agents.Therefore,we assess two kinds of exposure:social distance and face-toface contact disease transmission in this work.

    We use the global assessment of exposure G defined as in the exposed model below:[21]

    where l is the number of people an agent is exposed to during a simulation,N is the maximum number of agents to which an agent is exposed,and rlis the risk degree.In this paper,we assume that the risk degree is equal to the number of people an agent is exposed to,i.e.,r1=1 means that an agent is exposed to 1 agent,r2=2 means that an agent is exposed to 2 agents,and so on.Clis cumulative exposure time-steps to l people.According to the literature,[25]the exposure mass percentage at 0 m is 100%,that at 1 m is about 40%,and that at 2 m is about 30%.In our study,the exposed distance we used is 1 m both for social distance method and face-to-face method.We assume that a homogeneous distribution of air in the environment.So the weights of exposure of two methods are weighted equally.

    The cumulative exposure time Clis defined below:

    The exposure time of each agent i exposed to a given number of agents l is calculated as follows:

    where to=1,tf=72000,i.e.,the total number of simulation time-step.When i is exposed to l agents,β=1,otherwise β=0.

    Though preventative measures can reduce the spread of disease,they can also impact the time spent by people in shops.From the perspective of supermarket managers,the rate of throughput(number of people that enter and leave the store per hour)is a good measure of store turnover.Therefore,we define the shopping efficiency as the total number of distinct agents that appeared over the course of the simulation(i.e.,over the course of 1 hour)and then subtracting 20,the maximum occupancy in the simulations.This assumes that there are 20 agents at the last time-step that have not finished their shopping.To consider the fact that agents with shorter schedules will,on average,finish their shopping quicker than those with longer schedules,we standardize shopping efficiency by multiplying by the length of activity schedules in each scenario.Similarly,since the length of activities in eight scenarios is different,to make our exposure results comparable,we standardize G in Eq.(6)by dividing by the schedule length in each scenario.Thus,we get a global assessment of exposure per activity per hour and shopping efficiency as the total number of activities completed over all agents per hour.

    4.Results

    4.1.Effects of social distancing

    We first establish how social distancing influences exposure risk and shopping efficiency.As shown in Fig.2(a),the total exposure due to agents being within social distance decreases as the social distance between agents increases.The exposure due to face-to-face contact also decreases when social distance is enforced.However,it does not make a big difference when the social distance is 1 m and above 1 m.This implies that,in this case,if a disease is primarily transmitted through face-to-face contact,then only relatively small social distances need to be implemented.Despite having no empirical validation,our results show that keeping social distancing is an effective way to reduce costumers’exposure during a pandemic in supermarkets.

    Fig.2.Average values over ten simulation replicates of the global assessment of exposure through social distance and face to face transmission(a)and shopping efficiency of people(b)with increasing social distance.Error bars represent one standard deviation from the average.

    In terms of shopping efficiency(Fig.2(b)),it is obvious that as social distance increases,the agents’shopping efficiency significantly decreases,dropping about 40%when the social distance is above 1 m.One possible explanation for this is that keeping social distance impedes the natural movements of agents,as agents must wait until there is sufficient distance from others before moving or performing activities.

    Our simulation results confirm the effectiveness of social distancing in reducing contact among customers and reveal the decrease in customers’shopping efficiency when implemented in supermarkets.

    4.2.Effects of shopping strategy

    Figure 3 shows the exposure and shopping efficiency of agents with different shopping strategies.When costumers have a longer shopping schedule,they have less exposure risk through both social distance and face-to-face contact.One possible reason for this might be that agents who have more activities to complete tend to stay longer in the supermarket and thus relatively reduce the maximum possible number of agents that enter the supermarket while they are present due to the occupancy constraint.The risk of exposure from adding more agents in the confined space might be greater than the risk of agents staying in the store for a long time.

    Fig.3.Average values over ten simulation replicates of the global assessment of exposure through social distance and face to face transmission(a)and shopping efficiency of people(b)when they have different shopping strategies,using schedule length as a proxy.Error bars represent one standard deviation from the average.

    In terms of shopping efficiency(Fig.3(b)),agents with a longer schedule are more likely to have higher shopping efficiency.Shopping efficiency is defined as the total number of activities agents perform in a simulation.Compared to agents with a long schedule,the agents with a short schedule can quickly complete the required shopping activities,while spending roughly the same amount of time entering and leaving the store.Therefore,from a general perspective,agents with a short schedule tend to spend a larger proportion of time entering and leaving the supermarket than those with a long schedule,therefore making better use of their time.This finding indicates the shopping strategy of shopping infrequently but buying more items is better than shopping frequently for a few items both in terms of reducing the exposure and improving shopping efficiency.

    4.3.Effects of one-way system

    Figure 4 shows agents’exposure risk and shopping efficiency with narrow/wide or without a one-way system.It is found that when agents can move freely in the supermarket,they have the highest shopping efficiency and highest exposure risk.There is only one obstacle in the supermarket(see Fig.1),so in this situation,agents with random assigned shopping schedules can direct head for the destinations freely,without considering the influence of the one-way system.It can reduce the time each agent spends on reaching the destinations but increase the chance to contact other agents,leading to higher exposure risk.It is also clear that the exposure risk for both wide and narrow one-way systems is similar,so there is little added benefit from narrowing passages such that people cannot pass each other.

    Fig.4.Average values over ten simulation replicates of the global assessment of exposure through social distance and face to face transmission(a)and shopping efficiency of people(b)both with and without a one-way system with either a wide or narrow passage.Free-for-all is a pre-pandemic shopping situation in which people can move around supermarkets freely.Error bars represent one standard deviation from the average.

    In contrast,when the one-way system is implemented in the supermarket,shopping efficiency decreases,particularly when narrow passages are employed.As agent movements are restricted by the one-way system,they are only allowed to move along pre-designed routes,which are unlikely to be the optimal ones in terms of travel time between destinations.On average,each agent’s speed may significantly decrease,due to other agents blocking the way,particularly when narrow passageways are used.In this case,customers must wait until others complete their shopping activities before they can proceed further along the passageway.

    Therefore,we confirm that the one-way system is effective in lowering the exposure risk of agents.In terms of the two kinds of the one-way system,both have similar exposure risks.However,the one-way system with wide passages only slightly decreases shopping efficiency compared to the prepandemic free-for-all scenario.So,the one-way system with wide passages is a good solution for supermarket managers in balancing infection risk while maintaining average throughput.

    4.4.Trade-off between exposure risk and shopping efficiency

    As discussed above,social distancing,a long shopping schedule,and a one-way system can all reduce the exposure of each agent to others.However,these measures reduce the shopping efficiency of agents of varying degrees.Therefore,it is worth developing a strategy that can take agents’exposure risk and shopping efficiency into consideration simultaneously.

    In this work,we introduce a ranking R,which scores each scenario in terms of minimizing exposure risk while maximizing shopping efficiency.R is given by

    Figure 5 shows the ranking strategies according to the importance of exposure.The strategy with the highest R at any given value ofαis the optimal one in terms of balancing exposure risk with shopping efficiency.The wide one-way system is the best strategy,reducing exposure risk while maintaining shopping efficiency for all values ofα.This implies that implementing one-way systems with passageways wide enough for people to move past each other while obeying social distancing is the ideal strategy for supermarket managers,who would need to implement measures for reducing exposure without compromising store turnover.This is followed closely by the narrow one-way system,except forα=0,where freefor-all with no social distancing higher in rank.However,this assumes that all agents strictly obey the rule of the one-way system,and therefore shows the theoretical result if everyone always obeys the one-way system.As for social distancing,it depends on the customer’s motivation,for example,if a customer is more concerned about minimizing the risk of infection,then they should obey social distancing rules,with larger distances providing more safety.Of course,this assumes that everyone is always equally compliant with social distancing.Finally,customers should shop less frequently but buy more when they do,as the long schedule has both a lower exposure risk and higher shopping efficiency during a situation where social distancing restrictions are in place.

    Fig.5.Ranking strategies as the weight of the exposure risk changes.The strategy with the highest ranking for a given exposure risk weighting is the optimal strategy for shoppers.

    5.Discussion

    This work aims to develop the optimal strategy for minimizing the exposure risk of people to disease while maximizing the shopping efficiency of customers in supermarkets during a pandemic.We propose an integrated agent-based simulator which can model both the decision behavior and movement of people.Agents make decisions on where to go next using a discrete choice model based only on their schedule of desired activities.Step-by-step locomotion is described by a force-based model.We implement social distance restrictions between agents by varying a parameter in the force-based model.A recent disease exposure model[21]is used to assess the exposure risk of shoppers in a supermarket environment.Two kinds of disease transmission are considered,based on known transmission routes of COVID-19:[24]social distance and face-to-face contact.

    We use our simulator to investigate several measures taken to slow down the spread of COVID-19 in supermarkets.These measures are social distancing(≥1 m),and one-way systems.However,these measures are likely to make it harder for shoppers to complete their shopping quickly,so the impact of these protective measures on shopping efficiency is also considered.We also investigate how shopping habits of customers impact their exposure risk,comparing the strategies where customers visit supermarkets less often but spend more time shopping,and the other where customers visit frequently but spend less time shopping.We rank these measures in terms of exposure risk and shopping efficiency to find the optimal shopping strategy during a pandemic.

    Our results confirm previous work[22]that the following government and general health guidelines can reduce the exposure risk of people to disease at the cost of the speed and ease of shopping.This work shows that supermarket managers should adopt one-way systems as they lower customers’exposure risk while preserving turnover,if the passageways are wide enough to allow for customers to move past each other while obeying any other social distancing restrictions.Narrowing the passageways of a one-way system to prevent people passing each other does not decrease overall exposure but does decrease shopping efficiency,so one-way systems should be deployed in stores whose layouts allow for wide passageways.One-way systems could be particularly effective in places where the culture and attitude of people improve compliance to restrictions.For the customers interested in minimizing their exposure to disease,reducing the number of shopping trips but buying more is the optimal strategy,and provides a more efficient use of time,compared to short,frequent store visits.This could be particularly useful in places where people are less likely to obey restrictions,as concerned individuals can benefit from this strategy even if others do not follow disease-prevention measures.

    We use simulations of our proposed model to illustrate the consequences of various measures taken by customers and supermarket managers in terms of exposure risk and shopping efficiency.Although we simplify the scenarios and only consider a few possible factors in disease transmission and customer behavior,we believe that it can achieve reasonable and intuitive results.However,further validation in more complex scenarios is still needed.

    Although some of these results are intuitive,they show that even a simple pedestrian dynamic simulator shows great potential to provide decision-makers and business owners with helpful information to predict infection risks and customer turnover.Of course,there are several limitations to this work that could provide several avenues for future research.

    These include potentially unrealistic assumptions about the behavior of shoppers,for example we assume that customers always obey restrictions all of the time,and that people choose their next destination based only on a pre-defined‘schedule’,whereas in reality,many factors could be important,such as distance traveled.Other behaviors could be included,such as impulse stops,which could be particularly disruptive for one-way systems and reduce their efficacy in both reducing exposure risk and shopping efficiency.The simulated environments could also be expanded to include areas such as checkouts and promotional stands,all of which could influence the amount of time spent in the supermarket and the extent of agent interactions.Perhaps using an environment based on the floorplan of a real supermarket would provide a more realistic setting.Validating these results with empirical data from current or previous pandemics would also be useful to do in the future.These are in addition to the limitations mentioned in previous sections.

    Microscopic pedestrian dynamics simulations could provide reliable and accurate quantitative forecasts for disease transmission,average shopping times,and many other metrics of pedestrian behavior,not just for this current pandemic,but any similar events in the future.

    Acknowledgment

    We are very grateful to Dr Nikolai Bode,who helped guide and improve this project through many helpful discussions and ideas.

    猜你喜歡
    胡楊
    胡楊
    龍門陣(2024年2期)2024-04-18 09:37:37
    《大漠胡楊》
    千年胡楊
    金橋(2021年11期)2021-11-20 06:37:30
    胡楊為什么能在沙漠中生存
    大美胡楊
    北廣人物(2020年47期)2020-12-09 06:24:12
    胡楊之戀
    胡楊 美術(shù)作品欣賞
    大眾文藝(2019年17期)2019-09-09 08:13:04
    家風(fēng)伴我成長
    胡楊頌
    “胡楊講堂”開講——大美天山·大美胡楊
    午夜视频精品福利| 午夜福利在线在线| 成人国语在线视频| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产精品二区激情视频| 黄色 视频免费看| 看黄色毛片网站| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 香蕉丝袜av| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 日本a在线网址| 天堂√8在线中文| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| av天堂在线播放| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 日本 欧美在线| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 国产av在哪里看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 美国免费a级毛片| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产成人影院久久av| a级毛片在线看网站| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 黄色视频不卡| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 18禁观看日本| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 免费观看精品视频网站| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 国产99久久九九免费精品| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产成人影院久久av| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 亚洲激情在线av| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 不卡一级毛片| 成人国产综合亚洲| 看黄色毛片网站| 伦理电影免费视频| 性欧美人与动物交配| 两性夫妻黄色片| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 91成年电影在线观看| 天堂动漫精品| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 午夜视频精品福利| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲国产欧美网| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 18禁观看日本| 一级黄色大片毛片| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 久久伊人香网站| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 大型av网站在线播放| av在线天堂中文字幕| 久久香蕉国产精品| 免费高清视频大片| 免费av毛片视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲成人久久性| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 91在线观看av| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 亚洲免费av在线视频| 久久久国产成人免费| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 99热只有精品国产| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产成人系列免费观看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 熟女电影av网| 国产野战对白在线观看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 老司机靠b影院| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 搡老岳熟女国产| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲av美国av| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲第一青青草原| 88av欧美| 深夜精品福利| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 变态另类丝袜制服| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 免费观看人在逋| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 久久中文字幕一级| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 精品日产1卡2卡| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 丁香六月欧美| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 少妇 在线观看| 999精品在线视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 午夜a级毛片| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产精品 国内视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲精品在线美女| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产av不卡久久| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 久久亚洲真实| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 九色国产91popny在线| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 成年版毛片免费区| 悠悠久久av| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 丰满的人妻完整版| 免费高清视频大片| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 午夜免费观看网址| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久香蕉激情| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 亚洲激情在线av| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 成人18禁在线播放| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 久久精品影院6| 大型av网站在线播放| 日韩有码中文字幕| 午夜久久久在线观看| 热re99久久国产66热| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| av天堂在线播放| 久久狼人影院| 1024香蕉在线观看| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 俺也久久电影网| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产片内射在线| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 在线av久久热| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲全国av大片| 午夜a级毛片| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 成人手机av| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲国产欧美网| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 香蕉国产在线看| 99久久国产精品久久久| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 精品电影一区二区在线| 丰满的人妻完整版| 久久中文字幕一级| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 宅男免费午夜| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 欧美色视频一区免费| 亚洲第一电影网av| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 草草在线视频免费看| 免费观看人在逋| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 久久久久久人人人人人| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 级片在线观看| 国产免费男女视频| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 夜夜爽天天搞| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 91字幕亚洲| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产野战对白在线观看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 色在线成人网| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 手机成人av网站| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 91成年电影在线观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 人人澡人人妻人| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 一区福利在线观看| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 香蕉国产在线看| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 女警被强在线播放| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 黄色视频不卡| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 成年免费大片在线观看| 香蕉久久夜色| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 69av精品久久久久久| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 制服诱惑二区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 操出白浆在线播放| 成人精品一区二区免费| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 成人18禁在线播放| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产真实乱freesex| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 满18在线观看网站| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 成人欧美大片| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观 | 一级毛片高清免费大全| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 免费av毛片视频| 欧美色视频一区免费| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 天堂动漫精品| 免费观看人在逋| 满18在线观看网站| cao死你这个sao货| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 成在线人永久免费视频| 91国产中文字幕| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲av成人av| 三级毛片av免费| 搞女人的毛片| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 999久久久国产精品视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 很黄的视频免费| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产成人影院久久av| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产成人影院久久av| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 欧美zozozo另类| 久久热在线av| 久久精品人妻少妇| 成在线人永久免费视频| 日本在线视频免费播放| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产不卡一卡二| 香蕉国产在线看| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 美国免费a级毛片| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产av不卡久久| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产精品九九99| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 97碰自拍视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 欧美日本视频| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产视频内射| 久久香蕉精品热| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 成人免费观看视频高清| 伦理电影免费视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 日本五十路高清| 久久九九热精品免费| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久久精品人妻少妇| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 又大又爽又粗| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 少妇 在线观看| 日本a在线网址| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 深夜精品福利| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 久久国产精品影院| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 日本五十路高清| 午夜精品在线福利| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| bbb黄色大片| 999精品在线视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| www.精华液| 一a级毛片在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 午夜福利18| 在线看三级毛片| www.自偷自拍.com| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 一本久久中文字幕| 一级黄色大片毛片| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 黄片播放在线免费| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 国产精品永久免费网站| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 在线观看一区二区三区| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 丁香欧美五月| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 91成人精品电影| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产日本99.免费观看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | av福利片在线| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 在线观看日韩欧美| 嫩草影视91久久| 免费在线观看成人毛片| av天堂在线播放| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久这里只有精品19| 国产三级在线视频| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 黄色成人免费大全| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 中国美女看黄片| 久久精品91蜜桃| 午夜精品在线福利| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 久久这里只有精品19| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| av在线播放免费不卡| 午夜久久久在线观看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 91在线观看av| 亚洲九九香蕉| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 曰老女人黄片|