• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Antimicrobial activity and mode of action of terpene linalyl anthranilate against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

    2021-05-12 06:30:32ShunKiYngKhtijhYusoffMokrishAjtWiSumYpSwHuErinLimKokSongLi
    Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 2021年2期

    Shun-Ki Yng,Khtijh Yusoff,Mokrish Ajt,Wi-Sum Yp,Sw-Hu Erin Lim,Kok-Song Li,*

    aDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology,Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences,Universiti Putra Malaysia,43400,Serdang,Selangor,Malaysia

    bDepartment of Microbiology,Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences,Universiti Putra Malaysia,43400,Serdang,Selangor,Malaysia

    cDepartment of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,Universiti Putra Malaysia,43400,Serdang,Selangor,Malaysia

    dDepartment of Biotechnology,Faculty of Applied Sciences,UCSI University,56000,Cheras,Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia

    eHealth Sciences Division,Abu Dhabi Women’s College,Higher Colleges of Technology,41012,Abu Dhabi,United Arab Emirates

    Keywords:

    Comparative proteomic

    KPC-KP

    Linalyl anthranilate

    Membrane damage

    ROS

    A B S T R A C T

    Mining of plant-derived antimicrobials is the major focus at current to counter antibiotic resistance.This study was conducted to characterize the antimicrobial activity and mode of action of linalyl anthranilate(LNA)against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae(KPC-KP).LNA alone exhibited bactericidal activity at 2.5%(V/V),and in combination with meropenem(MPM)at 1.25%(V/V).Comparative proteomic analysis showed a significant reduction in the number of cytoplasmic and membrane proteins,indicating membrane damage in LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.Up-regulation of oxidative stress regulator proteins and down-regulation of oxidative stress-sensitive proteins indicated oxidative stress.Zeta potential measurement and outer membrane permeability assay revealed that LNA increases both bacterial surface charge and membrane permeability.Ethidium bromide influx/efflux assay showed increased uptake of ethidium bromide in LNA-treated cells,inferring membrane damage.Furthermore,intracellular leakage of nucleic acid and proteins was detected upon LNA treatment.Scanning and transmission electron microscopies again revealed the breakage of bacterial membrane and loss of intracellular materials.LNA was found to induce oxidative stress by generating reactive oxygen species(ROS)that initiate lipid peroxidation and damage the bacterial membrane.In conclusion,LNA generates ROS,initiates lipid peroxidation,and damages the bacterial membrane,resulting in intracellular leakage and eventually killing the KPC-KP cells.

    1.Introduction

    The emergence of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneu-moniae(KPC-KP)has been a major setback in the patient’s treat-ment outcomes since its first appearance in 1996[1].KPC-KP was prioritized by WHO in 2017 as one of the few antibiotic-resistant pathogens that urgently require novel treatment[2].KPC-KP expresses the carbapenemase(KPC)gene that deactivates all existing β-lactam antibiotics including carbapenem,one of the last resort antibiotics used for severe bacterial infections.Within the next few years,antibiotic exposure pressures expedited the emergence of a more robust form of carbapenemase,the NDM-1 metallo-β-lactamase and VIM metallo-β-lactamase[3,4].Emergence of these carbapenemases increases the mortality rate of patients infected with KPC-KP cells due to the lack of treatment options.The situationwas exacerbated as the rates of novel antibiotic discovery have slowed significantly and the timelines for antibiotic approval for clinical use have been extended.A total of eleven antibiotics were discovered between 1995 and 1999,while only six were discovered between 2010 and 2014[5].

    To address the above issue on antibiotic resistance,the mining of novel antimicrobials is crucial;researchers have now diverted their attention to antimicrobial mining from the traditional microorganism to plants.This is because plants produce a plethora of complex secondary metabolites that have potential applications as novel antimicrobials.Plant secondary metabolites can be categorized into four classes,namely terpenes and terpenoids,phenolic compounds,alkaloids,and sulfur-containing compounds[6].Terpenes and terpenoids,one of the major classes of plant secondary metabolites,have gained much attention due totheir importance in physiological and ecological roles of plants,including industrial applications ranging from flavors to fragrances and pharmaceutical applications,particularly in aromatherapy[7].Terpenes have a base unit of five carbons known as an isoprene unit and can be categorized into different groups such as the monoterpenes(C10),sesquiterpenes(C15),diterpenes(C20)and triterpenes(C30)[8].Terpenoids,on the other hand,are oxygen-containing terpenes units[8].Numerous terpenes and terpenoids have been reported in previous studies for antimicrobial activity against pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli,Staphylococcus aureus,and Pseudomonas aeruginosa[9-11].For instance,Ultee et al.[12]reported the antibacterial activity of the monoterpene,cymene,and monoterpenoid,carvacrol against Bacillus cereus.Further investigation has shown that both compounds may have disrupted the cellular plasma membrane,resulting in the alteration of the membrane potential as well as the pH gradient and intracellular ATP levels[12].Lateron,Zuniga et al.[13]related the DNAdamage observed in terpene catechols-treated bacteria with the generation of reactive oxygen species(ROS).Another study by Rodenak-Kladniew et al.[14]has shown that terpene alcohol-linalool induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in HepG2 cells by generating ROS.

    Oxidative stress is essentially the imbalance between the production of ROS during cellular respiration and metabolism,and the ability of cells to neutralize their harmful effects.ROS consists of radical and non-radical oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide(H2O2),hydroxylion(OH-),hydroxylradical(OH·),peroxide(O22-),singlet oxygen(1O2),and superoxide anion(O2-);these generally affect cellular components,including lipids,proteins,and nucleic acids[15,16].Lipid peroxidation is a self-propagating chain reaction that involves reactions between ROS and membrane fatty acids[17,18].At the cellular level,such reaction will cause membrane damage and eventually kill the cells.Interaction between ROS and proteins often results in covalent modification,which generally destabilizes and inactivates a particular protein[19].Such modifications include carbonylation of arginine,lysine,proline,and threonine;conversion of histidine to oxo-histidine;and oxidation of cysteine and methionine,which impairs protein function[19].Furthermore,the nucleic acid is also the common target of ROS,and oxidizing nucleotides,such as guanine,cause lesion,and DNA breakage[20].This leads to the production of non-functional proteins that eventually kill the cells[20].Antibiotics such as aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, quinolones, and rifampicin,regardless of their modes of action,have been found to generate ROS during antimicrobial action[21].For example,aminoglycosides,which disrupt protein synthesis,produce large amounts of hydroxyl radicals when proteins are mistranslated and misfolded[22].Thus,the ROS inducer may serve as a potential therapeutic agent in the fight against antibiotic resistance.

    Linalyl anthranilate(LNA)is an arene and terpene found in a variety of plants such as marjoram,Mexican giant hyssop,lavender,and thyme[23-26].Currently,LNA is commonly used in the food and beverage industry as a food flavoring agent.Our previous study involving the antimicrobial activity of lavender essential oil revealed that LNA is one of the major compounds in lavender essential oil with the highest composition at 49.5%[27].This is similar to the study conducted by Yap et al.[25]which reported that LNA is the major compound in lavender essential oil with a total composition of 38.42%.This led us to believe that LNA could be the compound responsible for antimicrobial activity.To date,no study has been reported on the antimicrobial activity of this compound against any microorganism.However,LNA may play a role in inducing oxidative stress and killing the bacterial cell due to its nature and structure similarity to other members of a terpene.Therefore,this study aims to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of LNA alone and in combination with meropenem(MPM)against KPC-KP cells.This studyalso intendstoelucidate the mode of action of LNA against KPC-KP cells using a comparative proteomic profiling analysis.The postulated mode of action is further validated by various qualitative and quantitative experiments.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.LNA and MPM

    LNA(>99% purity,fragrance grade)and MPM(>98% purity,HPLC grade)used throughout the study were purchased fromPenta Manufacturing Company(NJ,USA)and Sigma-Aldrich Corporation(MO,USA).MPM was dissolved in water to prepare a 10 mg/mL stock solution.

    2.2.Bacterial strains and culture condition

    The bacterial strains used in this study were KPC-KP BAA-1705 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922(EC25922),both obtained from American Type Culture Collection(Manassas,VA,USA).The bacterial strains were grown and maintained on Mueller-Hinton agar(MHA;Sigma-Aldrich,Missouri,USA).Subsequently,a single colony was inoculated into Mueller-Hinton broth(MHB;Sigma-Aldrich,Missouri,USA)at 37°C and shaken at 250 rpm for 16 h according to the experimental procedures,unless otherwise specified.

    2.3.Minimum inhibitory concentration(MIC)assay

    The MIC assay was performed as described in the previous study[28].Two-fold dilutions were performed in each test well to yield final well volumes consisting of 50 μL of LNA,40 μL of a bacterial suspension at approximately 1× 105CFU/mL,and 10μL of resazurin(7-hydroxy-3H-phenoxazin-3-one-10-oxide)at a final concentration of 0.02%(m/V).Apart from negative and growth controls,EC25922 was treated with MPM(1000 ng/mL to 0.5 ng/mL)as a positive control in this assay.All assays were performed in triplicates and incubated for 20 h at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm.The MICs of LNA and MPM were determined qualitatively from color change of resazurin and the assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.4.Checkerboard assay

    The checkerboard assay was performed as detailed in the previous study[28].Ten serial,two-fold dilutions of MPM and five serial,two-fold dilutions of LNA were prepared to determine the combinatory effects of LNA and MPM against KPC-KP cells.Each well contained 25 μL of MPM and 25 μL of LNA,inoculated with 40μL of bacterial suspension and 10μL of resazurin to make a final concentration of approximately 1×105CFU/mL and 0.02%(m/V).The 96-well plates were then incubated for 20 h at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm and the assay was completed in triplicate.The combinatory relationship between LNA and MPM was expressed in terms of the combined fractional inhibitory concentration index(FICIc)using the following formulas[29,30]:

    2.5.Time kill assay

    A standard inoculum of 1×105CFU/mL was used for the time kill assay.The test concentrations of LNA and MPM used were determined from the checkerboard assay.The time kill analysis consisted of untreated KPC-KP cells(inoculum with MHB supplemented with 10%(m/V)Tween 80 at final concentration),KPC-KP cells treated with LNA(1.25%,V/V)and MPM(16μg/mL),alone and in combination.Each treatment had a final volume of 20 mL with Tween 80 incorporated at a final concentration of 10%(m/V)to improve the solubility of LNA.The cells were incubated at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm.Immediately after inoculation,viable counting was performed every half-hourly until 4 h.About 50μL of cells from each treatment group were obtained and subjected to a hundred-fold dilution with 0.85%(m/V)saline.The diluted samples were then plated onto MHA and incubated at 37°C for 16 h,followed by colony counting.The assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.6.Comparative proteomic analysis

    2.6.1.Protein extraction

    Protein extraction was carried out as described previously[31].The KPC-KP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The LNA-treated and untreated cultures were supplemented with Tween 80 at a final concentration of 10%(m/V)to improve the solubility of LNA.A standard inoculum of 1×105CFU/mL KPC-KP cells was used for both treated and untreated culture preparations.The cultures were incubated for 4 h at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm.The cell pellets from both treatment groups were obtained by centrifugation at 9,000 rpm for 10 min;pellets werewashed at least three times and resuspended in 500μL of cold protein extraction buffer(50 mM ammonium bicarbonate,10 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride).The samples were then ultra-sonicated on the ice at 20 amplitude for 10 cycles;each cycle consisted of 10 s of sonication,followed by a 20 s cooling period(Qsonica SonicatorQ55,FischerScientific,USA).The ultrasonicated samples were then centrifuged at 4°C and 10,000 rpm for 1 h;the supernatant was then collected and the protein concentration was quantified by Bradford assay.The protein concentration of each sample was standardized to 1 mg/mL for the subsequent proteomic analysis.The assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.6.2.Protein sample preparation

    Approximately 100μg of total protein was resuspended in 100μL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate(pH 8.0).RapiGest surfactant(Waters Corporation,USA)was added to the extracted protein in equal parts at a final concentration of 0.05%(V/V).The proteins from each sample were then concentrated to a volume of 100 μL using a Vivaspin? column(GE Healthcare,USA)with a molecular weight cut-off(MWCO)of 3000 Da and incubated at 80°C for 15 min.The protein was reduced using 5 mM dithiothreitol(DTT)at 60°C for 30 min and then alkylated in the dark using 10 mM iodoacetamide at room temperature for 45 min.Proteolytic digestion was performed using Trypsin Gold(Promega,USA)at a ratio by parts of 100:0.5 protein to trypsin,followed by overnight incubation at 37°C.Tryptic digestion and RapiGest activity were terminated by the addition of 1μL of concentrated trifluoroacetic acid and then the samples were incubated at 37°C for 20 min.The tryptic peptide solution from each sample was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 min and the resulting supernatants were collected and stored at-80°C until subsequent analysis.

    2.6.3.Nano liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry(LCMS/MS)analysis

    Nano LC-MS/MS analysiswas performedas described in Ref.[31]using an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer(Thermo Scientific,USA).The samples(2 μL containing 2 μg peptides)were injected and separated on an EASY-nLC 1000(Dionex,Thermo Scientific,USA)equipped with an Easy-Spray Column Acclaim PepMap?C18100 ?(2μm,50μm×15 cm,Thermo Scientific,USA).The samples were then separated by a gradient of 5%-40%(V/V)acetonitrile(ACN)with 0.1%(V/V)formic acid(FA)for 91 min,followed by a wash gradient of 85% ACN with 0.1% FA for 6 min and then equilibrated back to 5%(V/V)ACN with 0.1%(V/V)FA for 1 min and maintained until subsequent sample injection.The flow rate was set at 250 nL/min.The mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion mode with a nanospray voltage of 1.5 kV and a source temperature of 250°C.The instrument was operated in datadependent acquisition mode with a survey MS scan by Orbitrap MS using the following parameters:a mass range of m/z 310-1800 with resolving power of 120,000,automatic gain control(AGC)of 400,000 and maximum injection time of 50 ms.The top speed mode of 3 s was used in the selection of precursors with a monoisotopic charge state of 2-7.These precursors were further analyzed in the MS/MS scan.All precursors were filtered using a 20-s dynamic exclusion window and an intensity threshold of 5,000.The MS/MS spectra were analyzed by ion trap MS with the following parameters:rapid scan rate with resolving power of 60,000,AGC of 100,isolation window of 1.6 m/z and maximum injection time of 250 ms.Precursors were then fragmented by collision-induced dissociation and high-energy collision dissociation at a normalized collision energy of 30% to 28%.

    2.6.4.Protein identification and comparative analysis

    Raw data were processed using Thermo ScientificTM Proteome DiscovererTM Software v2.1 with the SEQUEST?HT search engine.The MS ion intensities were calculated based on the accurate mass and time tag strategy.The accurate alignment of detected LC retention time and m/z value across different analyses and the area under chromatographic elution profiles of the identified peptides can be compared between different samples.For protein identification,the peptide identification data were compared with the Uniprot?K.pneumoniae database with a 1% strict FDR and 5% relax FDR criteria using Percolator?.Search parameters were set up to two mis-cleavages with fixed amino acid modification through carbamidomethylation and variable modification through methionine oxidation,together with asparagine and glutamine deamidation.A fragment tolerance of 0.6 Da and a precursor tolerance of 10 ppm were used with trypsin as a digestion enzyme.identified proteins with at least two unique peptides suggested greater confidence of protein identity.Protein quantification and statistical analyses were performed using Perseus Software v1.6.0.7(Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry).Each control and the treated sample consisted of three biological replicates with three technical replicates,each analyzed by LC-MS/MS.A protein file with three technical replicates in txt format from Proteome Discoverer?was uploaded to the Perseus system for further comparative analysis between samples.The data were log2-transformed to stabilize the variance and scale-normalized to the same mean intensity across the technical replicates.The mean value for all three technical replicates of the same biological samples was grouped in the same matrix and the valid values were obtained by filtering with‘a(chǎn)t least two’,eliminating proteins that existed only in one of the technical replicates.Finally,all the biological replicates of the same treatment group were consolidated under the same matrix,with the missing values input to random numbers derived from the normal distribution.The histograms were plotted to obtain a similarity comparison of the ratio for all samples.The differential expressed protein between control and treatment was detected using a t-test,the P-value wasalso adjusted formultiple-testsusing a permutation-based false discovery rate with a randomization number of 250.Proteins were considered to be significantly differentiated between treatment groups with adjusted q-value<0.05 and fold change≤-1 or≥1.

    2.7.Bacterial membrane disruption assays

    2.7.1.Zeta potential measurement

    KPC-KP cell treatment is described in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The zeta potential of untreated,LNA-treated,and MPM-treated KPC-KP cells was determined as detailed in Ref.[28]using the Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument(Malvern Instruments,Malvern,UK).The treatment time for all treatment groups was determined in the time kill analysis,whereas the concentration of LNA and MPM used was determined by the checkerboard assay.Treated cells were washed with 0.85%(m/V)saline at least five times before zeta potential measurement.The experiment was performed in triplicate.

    2.7.2.Outer membrane permeability assay

    The outer membrane permeability assay was performed as detailed in previous studies[25,28].Overnight culture of KPC-KP cells was washed,adjusted to an optical density(OD600nm)0.3 and followed by treatment with LNA with concentration and treatment time as determined by the checkerboard assay and time kill analysis.After treatment completion,the samples were first washed with 0.85%(m/V)saline( five times)to remove the treatment and then divided into two equal portions of 10 mL.Next,sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS)solution at a final concentration of 0.1%(m/V)was added to one portion,whereas 0.85%(m/V)saline was added to the other.SDS acts as a permeabilizing probe that causes cell death when a sudden influx has occurred.This can be measured in terms of OD600nmat intervals of 0,5,10,30,and 60 min using a spectrophotometer.The assay was completed in triplicates.

    2.7.3.Ethidium bromide influx/efflux assay

    The assay was performed as described previously with slight modification[32].Overnight cultures of KPC-KP were washed and adjusted to OD600nmof 0.5 with MHB.The cells were then distributed into three groups;one group consisted of untreated KPC-KP cells and two groups were LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.Untreated KPC-KP cells were supplemented with ethidium bromide at a final concentration of 1μg/mL,whereas LNA-treated KPC-KP cells were supplemented with LNA and ethidium bromide at a final concentration of 1.25%(V/V)and 0.1%(m/V),respectively.The accumulationof ethidium bromide was measured using an EnSight multimode plate reader(PerkinElmer,Massachusetts,USA)with an excitation wavelength of 530 nm and an emission wavelength of 585 nm every 5 min up to 1 h at 37°C.Subsequently,the cells were harvested and washed with MHB at least 2 times.Fresh MHB supplemented with 0.5%(m/V)glucose was added to the untreated KPC-KPcells.OneoftheLNA-treatedKPC-KPgroupswas reconstituted with MHB supplemented with 0.5%(m/V)glucose and 1.25%(V/V)LNA,whereas the second group of LNA-treated KPC-KP cells were reconstituted with MHB supplemented with 0.5%(m/V)glucose,1.25%(V/V)LNA and 0.1%(m/V)ethidium bromide.Ethidium bromide efflux was again measured at the wavelength mentioned above for another 1 h every 5 min at 37°C.The assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.7.4.Nucleic acid leakage measurement

    The nucleic acid leakage was measured as detailed in Ref.[33].KPC-KP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The cell pellets of untreated and LNA-treated KPCKP cells were collected at 10,000 rpm centrifugation for 5 min.The supernatant was collected and measured for nucleic acid at a ultraviolet(UV)absorption wavelength of 260 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer(Thermo FischerScientific,Massachusetts,USA).The assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.7.5.Protein leakage measurement

    The protein leakage was measured as detailed in Ref.[33].KPCKP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The cell pellets of untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells were collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min.The supernatant was collected and measured at 595 nm for protein content using the Bradford solution.The assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.7.6.Scanning electron microscopy

    Scanning electron microscopy was performed as detailed previously[28].KPC-KP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The cells were harvested and the pellet was washed with 0.85%(m/V)saline for five times.Following this,the samples were then fixed with 4%(V/V)glutaraldehyde for 5 h and 1%(m/V)osmium tetroxide for 2 h at 4°C.Sodium cacodylate buffer at 0.1 M was used in all the washing steps.Then,the samples were further dehydrated by sequential exposure to increased acetone concentrations(35%-95%,V/V)for 10 min,followed by 100%(V/V)acetone for 15 min for three times.After dehydration,the samples were subjected to critical point drying for 30 min(BalTec CPD 030,Bal-Tec,Balzers,Liechtenstein).The samples were then secured onto the specimen stub using double-sided tape.Finally,the samples were sputter-coated with gold using a cool sputter coater(BalTec SCD 005)and observed via a JEOL JSM-6400 instrument(JEOL,Tokyo,Japan)at 15 kV.

    2.7.7.Transmission electron microscopy

    KPC-KP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).Untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells were harvested and the pellet was washed with 0.85%(m/V)saline for five times,followed by fixation in 4%(V/V)glutaraldehyde for 2 days at 4°C.Then,the specimen was washed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 30 min three times.Subsequently,the specimen was post-fixed in 1%(m/V)osmium tetroxide for 2 h at 4°C.The specimen was then washed again three times with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 30 min.Next,the specimen was subjected to a series of acetone washes for dehydration purposes.The specimen was washed with 35%(V/V)acetone,followed by 50%(V/V),75%(V/V)and 95%(V/V)acetone in each wash for 45 min.Finally,100%(V/V)acetone was used in the final washing step,which took 1 h and was repeated for three times.Next,the specimens were subjected to infiltration procedure with various ratios of acetone and resin mixture(1:1 for 12 h,1:3 for 12 h and 0:1 for 16 h),before beam capsulation.The capsulated specimen was polymerized in an oven at 60°C for 48 h.Upon completion of polymerization,the specimens block was cut into 1μm thick sections and stained with toluidine blue and dried on a hot plate.Excess stains were removed by washing under tap water.The specimens were then viewed under a light microscope and the areas of interest were selected for ultrathin sectioning.The resin block was then trimmed according to the selected area of interest by shaving the resin blocks into a trapezoid having dimensions notexceeding 0.5 mm acrossthe base,0.4 mm across the top,and 0.3 mm along the sides.Ultrathin sectioning was performed via i-Ultramicrotome EM UC6(Leica,Germany),and samples were collected from the surface of the water bath and placed on the copper mesh.The samples were then stained with uranyl acetate for 15 min and then with lead for 10 min.Each sample was washed before the next stain.The samples were then viewed under transmission electron microscope Leo Libra-120(ZEISS,Germany)at 120 kV.

    2.8.Oxidative stress assays

    2.8.1.Lipid peroxidation assay

    Lipid peroxidation assay was performed as detailed in Ref.[34].KPC-KP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The cell pellets were collected using centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min and washed with phosphate-buffered saline(PBS).The supernatant collected was referred to as treatment media.The resulting cell pellet was then sonicated as detailed in Section 2.7.1 with the supernatant collected and termed as cell lysate.Both treatment media and cell lysate were subjected to malondialdehyde(MDA)measurement by mixing 500μL of either treatment media and cell lysate to 400μL of 15%(V/V)trichloroacetic acid and 800μL of 0.67%(m/V)thiobarbituric acid(TBA)in 0.01%(V/V)butylated hydroxytoluene.The samples were then vortexed and incubated at 95°C for 20 min in a water bath.A volume of 3 mL of butanol was added to the sample,followed by gentle mixing.A volume of 200μL of the butanol phase was collected from each sample with absorbance measured at 532 nm.The amountof MDA present was estimated using the MDA standard curve and normalized based on the protein concentration of each sample.The assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.8.2.ROS measurement

    ROS measurement was performed as detailed in Ref.[34].KPCKP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The cell pellets were collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min and washed with PBS.Untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells were treated with 20 μM of 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate(DCF-DA)for 30 min at 37°C.After incubation,the cell pellet was collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min with a supernatant consisting of DCF-DA removed.The cell pellets were resuspended in PBS and the fluorescence intensity was measured at an excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 and 528 nm using the Tecan microplate reader(Tecan Trading AG,Switzerland).The assay was completed in triplicate.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Antimicrobial activity and killing kinetics of LNA against KPCKP cells

    In recent years,antibiotic resistance in human infections has been a major challenge in the clinical setting,preventing patients from recovering and even increasing mortality during infection.This is further complicated by the emergence of carbapenemresistant bacteria,such as KPC-KP,in the last decade.This resistance phenomenon is particularly worrying in the medical field,as carbapenem is the last-resort antibiotic,which has the widest range of activity and highest potency amongst allβ-lactam antibiotics[35].Thus,the discovery of novel antimicrobials is crucial,spurring many research groups to look at plant secondary metabolites with the hope of solving the problem,especially for terpenes and terpenoids,which are known to be bactericidal.Additionally,the discovery of novel antimicrobials will revive the efficacy of older generation antibiotics through combinatory antimicrobial treatment.As detailed in Table 1,LNA demonstrated bactericidal activity against KPC-KP cells at MIC of 2.5%(V/V),9.2μmol/L,while the combination with MPM resulted in an additive interaction that further reduces the MIC to 1.25%(V/V),4.6μmol/L.MPM had a MIC value of 32 μg/mL(0.00008 μmol/L)to 16 μg/mL(0.00004 μmol/L),indicating the potential of LNA as an antibiotic resistance modifier.

    Table 1 MIC,FIC and FIC indices of LNA and MPM against KPC-KP cells.

    Time kill analysis was first performed to determine the efficiency of LNA in killing KPC-KP cells,alone and in combinationwith MPM.As shown in Fig.1,the combination of LNA and MPM at their respective sub-inhibitor concentration successfully killed all KPCKP cells within 1.5 h.Hence,1.5 h was used as the standard treatment time for subsequent assays.

    Fig.1.Time kill kinetics of untreated carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae(KPC-KP)cells and KPC-KP cells treated with linalyl anthranilate(LNA),meropenem(MPM),and LNA-MPM combination.

    3.2.Comparative proteomic analysis revealed loss of membrane and cytoplasmic proteins and signs of oxidative stress in LNA-treated KPC-KP cells

    The untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells were subjected to whole protein extraction for comparative proteomic analysis.The Pearson correlation valueand principalcomponentanalysis showed good separation between the three treatment groups,indicating significant changes inproteomic abundance between the groups(Figs.S1 and S2).As shown in Fig.2A-i,we have successfully identified 368 proteins from untreated KPC-KP cells and 361 proteins from LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.A total of 296 similar proteins were shared by both groups.From the analysis,67 proteins were up-regulated and 85 proteins were down-regulated following the exposure to LNA(Fig.2A-ii&iii).

    Furthermore,65 proteins were found to be exclusive towards the LNA-treated cells and 72 proteins were exclusive to untreated cells(Fig.2A-ii).All identified proteins were subjected to gene ontology analysis and classified into three categories,namely,biological processes,cellular components,and molecular functions together with total protein abundance in each group,followed by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes(KEGG)pathway analysis to determine the overall effect of LNA on the proteome of the KPC-KP cells(Figs.2B and C).In terms of biological processes of KPC-KP cells exposed to LNA,the majority of the proteins identified were categorized under cellular and metabolic processes(36.21% and 34.22%),followed by cellular component organization and response to a stimulus(9.68% and 8.09%)as shown in Fig.2B-i.Cellular component-wise,the majority of proteins identified were categorized under cytoplasm and membrane(61.11% and 16.67%)followed by protein-containing complex and ribosome(10.61% and 8.84%;Fig.2B-ii).

    Fig.2.Comparative proteomic analysis between untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.(A-i)Venn diagram of the total protein obtained from untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells;(A-ii)The total numbers of exclusive,up-regulated,and down-regulated proteins;(A-iii)Volcano plot showing up-regulated(designated green square)and down-regulated(designated red square)proteins of the LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.GO analysis for LNA-treated KPC-KP cells in terms of biological processes(B-i),cellular components(B-ii)and molecular functions(B-iii)of identified proteins and their relative abundance in terms of the mentioned GO categories(B-iv).(C)KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed proteins in LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.The proteomic analysis is detailed in the Tables S1-S3.LNA:linalyl anthranilate;KPC-KP:carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae;GO:gene ontology;KEGG:Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

    Subsequently,the molecular function categorizations of the identified proteins showed that the majority of proteins were involved in binding and catalytic activity(43.60% and 41.09%;Fig.2B-iii).According to the KEGG pathway analysis shown in Fig.2C,proteins related to protein biosynthesis were most affected by the exposure towards LNA,with a total of 57 proteins.This was followed by stress response and amino acid biosynthesis proteins,with 44 and 32 proteins,respectively.As seen in Fig.2B-iv,LNA-treated KPC-KP cells reduced the abundance of cytoplasmic proteins compared to untreated cells.Additionally,after exposure to LNA,a large amount of membrane-related proteins had reduced abundance.For instance,after exposure to LNA,132 cytoplasmic proteins and 36 membrane-related proteins had reduced abundance compared to untreated KPC-KP cells,suggesting a disrupted bacterial membrane that could lead to intracellular leakage,explaining the loss of cytoplasmic proteins.

    From the proteomic KEGG pathway analysis,19 stress-related proteins had increased abundance following exposure to LNA.Of the 19 up-regulated proteins,4 were oxidative stress-related proteins involved in the repair of genetic material and proteins(Table 2).Additionally,we also found that the majority of proteins involved in ribosome biogenesis,and DNA and RNA processing in LNA-treated cells had reduced abundance compared to untreated KPC-KP cells(Table 2).Ribosomal and genetic material processing proteins are known to be relatively sensitive to oxidative stress[36,37].For instance,oxidative damage can induce base substitution,addition,deletion,and other mutations in nucleic acids,leading to the formation of non-functioning proteins[38].Besides,oxidative damage also affects proteins,especially ribosomal proteins due to the affinity of the ROS to RNA[39].Studies have reported that oxidation of RNA causes indirect damages to ribosomal RNA through covalent modification,leading to defective protein synthesis[36,39].Evidence from the proteomic analysis suggested that LNA induces oxidative stress in the KPC-KP cells.Induction of oxidative stress is also known to affect the integrity of the eukaryotic cell membranes.This is termed as lipid peroxidation,a self-propagating chain reaction that involves reactions between ROS and membrane fatty acid,eventually destroying the cell membrane[17,18].

    Table 2 List of up-regulated oxidative stress regulator proteins and down-regulated oxidative stress-sensitive proteins identified form LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.

    3.3.LNA kills KPC-KP cells by generating ROS,which disrupts the bacterial membrane via lipid peroxidation

    As demonstrated by the concept,membrane-related assays and electron microscopy techniques wereemployed todemonstratethe ability of LNA to disrupt the bacterial membrane of KPC-KP cells.Lipid peroxidation assay and ROS measurement were also performed to validate its role in inducing oxidative stress,which has cascaded into lipid peroxidation and membrane disruption.

    Lipopolysaccharide(LPS)is the major component in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria,which grants the bacterial membrane high negative charges[40].Thus,the disrupted outer membrane would have a more positive value indicated by an increase in the zeta potential measurement.According to Fig.3A,the zeta potential of untreated KPC-KP cells has a negative value of-12.1 mV.KPC-KP cells exposed to several concentrations of LNA had significantly more positive zeta potential,from-7.53 mV to-8.60 mV,than untreated KPC-KP cells.Additionally,we also found that the membrane disruption ability of LNA was concentration-independent.

    Moreover,the outer membrane permeability assay was performed to understand the bacterial membrane permeabilization role by LNA.A low concentration of SDS was used as a permeabilization probe,which shows bacterial membrane disruption.Under normal conditions,the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria is negatively charged due to the presence of LPS and generally repels other negatively-charged molecules,such as SDS.However,the disrupted bacterial membrane will enable the influx of SDS,eventually killing the cell.The concentration of SDS was optimized and fixed at 0.1%(m/V)as this concentration does not cause significant damages to bacterial cells with a healthy outer membrane.Also,the duration of this experiment was optimized and fixed at 1 h to prevent cell damages due to prolonged exposure to SDS.Fig.3B compares the growth of the untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells in terms of absorbance at 600 nm between pre-and post-exposure to 0.1%(m/V)SDS solution.The untreated group showed normal growth in the absence or presence of an SDS solution.However,in the absence or presence of 0.1%(m/V)SDS,bacterial cells treated with LNA had lower absorbance than that of untreated cells,indicating that the sub-inhibitory concentration of LNA slowed the growth of KPC-KP cells.A significant drop in absorbance could be detected when LNA treated KPC-KP cells were exposed to 0.1%(m/V)SDS.This indicated the ability of LNA to cause the influx of SDS into the cell and eventually kill it.

    Subsequently,ethidium bromide influx and efflux activity were performed to determine the effect of LNA on the influx and efflux activity of KPC-KP cells(Fig.3C).According to Fig.3C-i,untreated cells demonstrated an active efflux activity upon exposure towards ethidium bromide over time,whereas LNA-treated cells gradually increased the uptake of ethidium bromide as indicated by the relative fluorescence unit(Fig.3C-i).This suggested the ability of LNA to increase the membrane permeability of KPC-KP cells.Upon removal of LNA from the LNA-treated group in the efflux assay,the efflux activity of KPC-KP cells returned to normal with the reduction of fluorescent signal over time(Fig.3C-ii).This suggested that LNA does not play a role in inhibiting the efflux system of KPC-KP cells.

    Next,thepresenceofoxidativestressindicated bythe comparative proteomic profiling analysis in Section 3.2 suggests the presence of ROS,which leads to lipid peroxidation.To validate these phenomena,lipid peroxidation assay and measurement of ROS were performed.Lipid peroxidation assay measures the end product of lipid peroxidation,MDA,while the level of ROS generation was quantified by the reaction involving DCF-DA,esterase enzyme,and ROS species[25].Fig.3E-ii shows that the concentration of MDA quantified in LNA-treated KPC-KP cells is signi-ficantly higher than that in the untreated cells,indicating the presence of lipid peroxidation of cells when exposed to LNA.The level of ROS quantified in LNA-treated KPC-KP cells was also significantly higher than that in untreated cells(Fig.3E-i),indicating a high level of ROS generated in KPC-KP cells after exposure to LNA.

    Fig.3.LNA disrupts the bacterial membrane of KPC-KP cells by inducing oxidative stress.(A)Membrane zeta potential of untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells at several concentrations;(B)Outer membrane permeability of KPC-KP cells exposed to 0.1%(m/V)SDS or saline after treatment with LNA at 1.25%(V/V);(C)Ethidium bromide influx(i)and efflux(ii)activity of untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells;(D)Intracellular leakage of UV-absorbing material:nucleic acid(i)and protein(ii)of KPC-KP cells exposed to LNA;(E)Oxidative stress assessment via ROS measurement(i)and lipid peroxidation assay(ii);and(F)Scanning and transmission electron micrographs of untreated(i and ii)and LNA-treated(iii and iv)KPC-KP cells(Δindicates membrane damage).LNA:linalyl anthranilate;KPC-KP:carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae;SDS:sodium dodecyl sulfate;UV:ultraviolet;ROS:reactive oxygen species.

    In conclusion,our study reported antimicrobial activity and mode of action of LNA that had not been previously studied.In future clinical applications,LNA has demonstrated a tremendous potential as novel antimicrobial as it exhibits antimicrobial activity against the robust KPC-KP cells with a low MIC value of 2.5%(V/V),9.2μmol/L.The combination between LNA and MPM further reduces the MIC value of both by 2-fold;MIC of LNA to 1.25%,4.6 μmol/L,and MPM to 16 μg/mL,0.00004 μmol/L.This suggests that LNA has the potential in combinatory antibiotic therapy that will revive the efficacy of older generation antibiotics in the clinical setting.Besides,our study elucidated the antimicrobial mode of action of LNA,which involved the generation of ROSthat resulted in lipid peroxidation in KPC-KP cells and membrane damages.Subsequently,intracellular materials were lost,eventually killing the cell.We also found that LNA did not affect the efflux system of KPCKP cells.The proposed mode of action of LNA is illustrated in Fig.4.Compared to commercialized antibiotics currently in use in clinical settings,the antibacterial activity of LNA is lower in terms of effective concentration.However,LNA has a different approach in killing bacterial cells involving the induction of ROS,which eventually disrupts the bacterial membrane and kills the cell.This makes LNA a promising antibiotic adjuvant by which LNA would facilitate the uptake of antibiotics,thereby enhancing the activity of existing antibiotics.Shortly,an in vivo study may be performed to investigate the toxicity of LNA.Additionally,an effective delivery system can also be established for efficient delivery of LNA to the site of infection,enhancing the efficiency of this compound in the fight against infection.Taken together,this would eventually pave the way for the clinical use of LNA as an antimicrobial agent.

    Fig.4.Proposed mode of action of LNA against KPC-KP cells.(a)LNA reacted with bacterial membrane components to form ROS.(b)ROS initiates lipid peroxidation by attacking membrane lipid,causing a chain reaction,which disrupts the bacterial membrane.(c)Influx of ROS into the KPC-KP intracellular region.(d)ROS degrades nucleic acids,lipids,and proteins.(e)Intracellular materials leakage due to bacterial membrane disruption.LNA:linalyl anthranilate;KPC-KP:carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae;ROS:reactive oxygen species;LPS:lipopolysaccharide.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Acknowledgments

    This study was supported by the Higher College of Technology(HCT)Interdisciplinary Research Grant(Grant No.113118),the Malaysian Medical Association Grant,and the UCSI PSIF Grant(Grant No.Proj-2019-In-Fas-062).The authors would like to acknowledge all members of the Floral Biotechnology Laboratory(FBL),Universiti Putra Malaysia,and Malaysia Genome Institute(MGI)forproviding the necessary assistance and facilities throughout this study.

    Appendix A.Supplementary data

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2020.05.014.

    三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 怎么达到女性高潮| 黄色日韩在线| av天堂在线播放| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 在线看三级毛片| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 麻豆av在线久日| 在线观看日韩欧美| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产三级中文精品| 床上黄色一级片| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 亚洲国产色片| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国产成人av教育| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 欧美日韩黄片免| 岛国在线观看网站| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 丁香六月欧美| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 美女黄网站色视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 草草在线视频免费看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 国产熟女xx| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 亚洲中文av在线| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| av中文乱码字幕在线| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 丁香六月欧美| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 热99re8久久精品国产| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 午夜福利高清视频| 舔av片在线| 久久久久性生活片| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 成人国产综合亚洲| 香蕉av资源在线| 毛片女人毛片| 丁香六月欧美| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产精品 国内视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲精品在线美女| 久久久久久大精品| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 欧美zozozo另类| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 日本黄大片高清| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | h日本视频在线播放| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 在线国产一区二区在线| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 精品国产三级普通话版| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 精品电影一区二区在线| 黄片小视频在线播放| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 免费看日本二区| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 成人精品一区二区免费| 午夜视频精品福利| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 色播亚洲综合网| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| avwww免费| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产高清激情床上av| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 在线免费观看的www视频| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 黄片小视频在线播放| av片东京热男人的天堂| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 欧美激情在线99| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 怎么达到女性高潮| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 免费高清视频大片| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看 | 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 一夜夜www| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 男人舔奶头视频| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 精品国产亚洲在线| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 99久久国产精品久久久| 在线观看舔阴道视频| av天堂在线播放| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 日本一本二区三区精品| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 1024手机看黄色片| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 日本免费a在线| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 日本 欧美在线| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 午夜a级毛片| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 久久人妻av系列| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 搡老岳熟女国产| 91av网站免费观看| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 美女高潮的动态| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 男女那种视频在线观看| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 香蕉久久夜色| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 日本 欧美在线| www.精华液| 国产熟女xx| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 禁无遮挡网站| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 97碰自拍视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 精品电影一区二区在线| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| av女优亚洲男人天堂 | 中文资源天堂在线| 美女免费视频网站| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 综合色av麻豆| svipshipincom国产片| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 热99在线观看视频| 亚洲国产色片| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| a在线观看视频网站| 手机成人av网站| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 日本一本二区三区精品| 免费看a级黄色片| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 日韩免费av在线播放| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 天堂网av新在线| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 久久久久性生活片| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲国产色片| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 黄频高清免费视频| 成人欧美大片| 久久香蕉国产精品| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产视频内射| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲片人在线观看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲 国产 在线| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲成人久久性| av女优亚洲男人天堂 | 午夜免费激情av| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 久久这里只有精品19| 国产午夜精品论理片| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 少妇丰满av| av女优亚洲男人天堂 | 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 美女大奶头视频| 欧美激情在线99| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 精品日产1卡2卡| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产真实乱freesex| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| or卡值多少钱| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 91字幕亚洲| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 久久中文字幕一级| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 久99久视频精品免费| 小说图片视频综合网站| 午夜精品在线福利| netflix在线观看网站| 国产精品一及| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 国产精品一及| www.www免费av| 免费在线观看日本一区| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 一本综合久久免费| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| svipshipincom国产片| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 欧美大码av| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 观看免费一级毛片| 露出奶头的视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产高清videossex| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 久久伊人香网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 级片在线观看| av欧美777| 免费看日本二区| 香蕉av资源在线| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 观看美女的网站| 欧美日本视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 悠悠久久av| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 嫩草影视91久久| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产av在哪里看| 成人av在线播放网站| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 男女那种视频在线观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产精品 国内视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 久久中文字幕一级| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 青草久久国产| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 日韩欧美三级三区| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 日本免费a在线| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 午夜福利18| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 日本与韩国留学比较| 午夜激情欧美在线| 黄色女人牲交| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 88av欧美| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲18禁久久av| 亚洲第一电影网av| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 欧美日韩精品网址| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 国产高潮美女av| 一进一出抽搐动态| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 天天添夜夜摸| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 不卡一级毛片| 久久草成人影院| 丁香欧美五月| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 无限看片的www在线观看| 日本a在线网址| 不卡一级毛片| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 久久香蕉国产精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| www国产在线视频色| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 日本在线视频免费播放| 丰满的人妻完整版| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 色播亚洲综合网| 小说图片视频综合网站| 一进一出抽搐动态| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 免费观看人在逋| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产高清激情床上av| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 欧美日本视频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看 | 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲美女黄片视频| xxxwww97欧美| 久久这里只有精品中国| 香蕉久久夜色| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产成人aa在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 日本 欧美在线| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 免费高清视频大片| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 久久这里只有精品中国| 韩国av一区二区三区四区|