• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Antimicrobial activity and mode of action of terpene linalyl anthranilate against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

    2021-05-12 06:30:32ShunKiYngKhtijhYusoffMokrishAjtWiSumYpSwHuErinLimKokSongLi
    Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 2021年2期

    Shun-Ki Yng,Khtijh Yusoff,Mokrish Ajt,Wi-Sum Yp,Sw-Hu Erin Lim,Kok-Song Li,*

    aDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology,Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences,Universiti Putra Malaysia,43400,Serdang,Selangor,Malaysia

    bDepartment of Microbiology,Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences,Universiti Putra Malaysia,43400,Serdang,Selangor,Malaysia

    cDepartment of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,Universiti Putra Malaysia,43400,Serdang,Selangor,Malaysia

    dDepartment of Biotechnology,Faculty of Applied Sciences,UCSI University,56000,Cheras,Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia

    eHealth Sciences Division,Abu Dhabi Women’s College,Higher Colleges of Technology,41012,Abu Dhabi,United Arab Emirates

    Keywords:

    Comparative proteomic

    KPC-KP

    Linalyl anthranilate

    Membrane damage

    ROS

    A B S T R A C T

    Mining of plant-derived antimicrobials is the major focus at current to counter antibiotic resistance.This study was conducted to characterize the antimicrobial activity and mode of action of linalyl anthranilate(LNA)against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae(KPC-KP).LNA alone exhibited bactericidal activity at 2.5%(V/V),and in combination with meropenem(MPM)at 1.25%(V/V).Comparative proteomic analysis showed a significant reduction in the number of cytoplasmic and membrane proteins,indicating membrane damage in LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.Up-regulation of oxidative stress regulator proteins and down-regulation of oxidative stress-sensitive proteins indicated oxidative stress.Zeta potential measurement and outer membrane permeability assay revealed that LNA increases both bacterial surface charge and membrane permeability.Ethidium bromide influx/efflux assay showed increased uptake of ethidium bromide in LNA-treated cells,inferring membrane damage.Furthermore,intracellular leakage of nucleic acid and proteins was detected upon LNA treatment.Scanning and transmission electron microscopies again revealed the breakage of bacterial membrane and loss of intracellular materials.LNA was found to induce oxidative stress by generating reactive oxygen species(ROS)that initiate lipid peroxidation and damage the bacterial membrane.In conclusion,LNA generates ROS,initiates lipid peroxidation,and damages the bacterial membrane,resulting in intracellular leakage and eventually killing the KPC-KP cells.

    1.Introduction

    The emergence of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneu-moniae(KPC-KP)has been a major setback in the patient’s treat-ment outcomes since its first appearance in 1996[1].KPC-KP was prioritized by WHO in 2017 as one of the few antibiotic-resistant pathogens that urgently require novel treatment[2].KPC-KP expresses the carbapenemase(KPC)gene that deactivates all existing β-lactam antibiotics including carbapenem,one of the last resort antibiotics used for severe bacterial infections.Within the next few years,antibiotic exposure pressures expedited the emergence of a more robust form of carbapenemase,the NDM-1 metallo-β-lactamase and VIM metallo-β-lactamase[3,4].Emergence of these carbapenemases increases the mortality rate of patients infected with KPC-KP cells due to the lack of treatment options.The situationwas exacerbated as the rates of novel antibiotic discovery have slowed significantly and the timelines for antibiotic approval for clinical use have been extended.A total of eleven antibiotics were discovered between 1995 and 1999,while only six were discovered between 2010 and 2014[5].

    To address the above issue on antibiotic resistance,the mining of novel antimicrobials is crucial;researchers have now diverted their attention to antimicrobial mining from the traditional microorganism to plants.This is because plants produce a plethora of complex secondary metabolites that have potential applications as novel antimicrobials.Plant secondary metabolites can be categorized into four classes,namely terpenes and terpenoids,phenolic compounds,alkaloids,and sulfur-containing compounds[6].Terpenes and terpenoids,one of the major classes of plant secondary metabolites,have gained much attention due totheir importance in physiological and ecological roles of plants,including industrial applications ranging from flavors to fragrances and pharmaceutical applications,particularly in aromatherapy[7].Terpenes have a base unit of five carbons known as an isoprene unit and can be categorized into different groups such as the monoterpenes(C10),sesquiterpenes(C15),diterpenes(C20)and triterpenes(C30)[8].Terpenoids,on the other hand,are oxygen-containing terpenes units[8].Numerous terpenes and terpenoids have been reported in previous studies for antimicrobial activity against pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli,Staphylococcus aureus,and Pseudomonas aeruginosa[9-11].For instance,Ultee et al.[12]reported the antibacterial activity of the monoterpene,cymene,and monoterpenoid,carvacrol against Bacillus cereus.Further investigation has shown that both compounds may have disrupted the cellular plasma membrane,resulting in the alteration of the membrane potential as well as the pH gradient and intracellular ATP levels[12].Lateron,Zuniga et al.[13]related the DNAdamage observed in terpene catechols-treated bacteria with the generation of reactive oxygen species(ROS).Another study by Rodenak-Kladniew et al.[14]has shown that terpene alcohol-linalool induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in HepG2 cells by generating ROS.

    Oxidative stress is essentially the imbalance between the production of ROS during cellular respiration and metabolism,and the ability of cells to neutralize their harmful effects.ROS consists of radical and non-radical oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide(H2O2),hydroxylion(OH-),hydroxylradical(OH·),peroxide(O22-),singlet oxygen(1O2),and superoxide anion(O2-);these generally affect cellular components,including lipids,proteins,and nucleic acids[15,16].Lipid peroxidation is a self-propagating chain reaction that involves reactions between ROS and membrane fatty acids[17,18].At the cellular level,such reaction will cause membrane damage and eventually kill the cells.Interaction between ROS and proteins often results in covalent modification,which generally destabilizes and inactivates a particular protein[19].Such modifications include carbonylation of arginine,lysine,proline,and threonine;conversion of histidine to oxo-histidine;and oxidation of cysteine and methionine,which impairs protein function[19].Furthermore,the nucleic acid is also the common target of ROS,and oxidizing nucleotides,such as guanine,cause lesion,and DNA breakage[20].This leads to the production of non-functional proteins that eventually kill the cells[20].Antibiotics such as aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, quinolones, and rifampicin,regardless of their modes of action,have been found to generate ROS during antimicrobial action[21].For example,aminoglycosides,which disrupt protein synthesis,produce large amounts of hydroxyl radicals when proteins are mistranslated and misfolded[22].Thus,the ROS inducer may serve as a potential therapeutic agent in the fight against antibiotic resistance.

    Linalyl anthranilate(LNA)is an arene and terpene found in a variety of plants such as marjoram,Mexican giant hyssop,lavender,and thyme[23-26].Currently,LNA is commonly used in the food and beverage industry as a food flavoring agent.Our previous study involving the antimicrobial activity of lavender essential oil revealed that LNA is one of the major compounds in lavender essential oil with the highest composition at 49.5%[27].This is similar to the study conducted by Yap et al.[25]which reported that LNA is the major compound in lavender essential oil with a total composition of 38.42%.This led us to believe that LNA could be the compound responsible for antimicrobial activity.To date,no study has been reported on the antimicrobial activity of this compound against any microorganism.However,LNA may play a role in inducing oxidative stress and killing the bacterial cell due to its nature and structure similarity to other members of a terpene.Therefore,this study aims to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of LNA alone and in combination with meropenem(MPM)against KPC-KP cells.This studyalso intendstoelucidate the mode of action of LNA against KPC-KP cells using a comparative proteomic profiling analysis.The postulated mode of action is further validated by various qualitative and quantitative experiments.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.LNA and MPM

    LNA(>99% purity,fragrance grade)and MPM(>98% purity,HPLC grade)used throughout the study were purchased fromPenta Manufacturing Company(NJ,USA)and Sigma-Aldrich Corporation(MO,USA).MPM was dissolved in water to prepare a 10 mg/mL stock solution.

    2.2.Bacterial strains and culture condition

    The bacterial strains used in this study were KPC-KP BAA-1705 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922(EC25922),both obtained from American Type Culture Collection(Manassas,VA,USA).The bacterial strains were grown and maintained on Mueller-Hinton agar(MHA;Sigma-Aldrich,Missouri,USA).Subsequently,a single colony was inoculated into Mueller-Hinton broth(MHB;Sigma-Aldrich,Missouri,USA)at 37°C and shaken at 250 rpm for 16 h according to the experimental procedures,unless otherwise specified.

    2.3.Minimum inhibitory concentration(MIC)assay

    The MIC assay was performed as described in the previous study[28].Two-fold dilutions were performed in each test well to yield final well volumes consisting of 50 μL of LNA,40 μL of a bacterial suspension at approximately 1× 105CFU/mL,and 10μL of resazurin(7-hydroxy-3H-phenoxazin-3-one-10-oxide)at a final concentration of 0.02%(m/V).Apart from negative and growth controls,EC25922 was treated with MPM(1000 ng/mL to 0.5 ng/mL)as a positive control in this assay.All assays were performed in triplicates and incubated for 20 h at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm.The MICs of LNA and MPM were determined qualitatively from color change of resazurin and the assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.4.Checkerboard assay

    The checkerboard assay was performed as detailed in the previous study[28].Ten serial,two-fold dilutions of MPM and five serial,two-fold dilutions of LNA were prepared to determine the combinatory effects of LNA and MPM against KPC-KP cells.Each well contained 25 μL of MPM and 25 μL of LNA,inoculated with 40μL of bacterial suspension and 10μL of resazurin to make a final concentration of approximately 1×105CFU/mL and 0.02%(m/V).The 96-well plates were then incubated for 20 h at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm and the assay was completed in triplicate.The combinatory relationship between LNA and MPM was expressed in terms of the combined fractional inhibitory concentration index(FICIc)using the following formulas[29,30]:

    2.5.Time kill assay

    A standard inoculum of 1×105CFU/mL was used for the time kill assay.The test concentrations of LNA and MPM used were determined from the checkerboard assay.The time kill analysis consisted of untreated KPC-KP cells(inoculum with MHB supplemented with 10%(m/V)Tween 80 at final concentration),KPC-KP cells treated with LNA(1.25%,V/V)and MPM(16μg/mL),alone and in combination.Each treatment had a final volume of 20 mL with Tween 80 incorporated at a final concentration of 10%(m/V)to improve the solubility of LNA.The cells were incubated at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm.Immediately after inoculation,viable counting was performed every half-hourly until 4 h.About 50μL of cells from each treatment group were obtained and subjected to a hundred-fold dilution with 0.85%(m/V)saline.The diluted samples were then plated onto MHA and incubated at 37°C for 16 h,followed by colony counting.The assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.6.Comparative proteomic analysis

    2.6.1.Protein extraction

    Protein extraction was carried out as described previously[31].The KPC-KP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The LNA-treated and untreated cultures were supplemented with Tween 80 at a final concentration of 10%(m/V)to improve the solubility of LNA.A standard inoculum of 1×105CFU/mL KPC-KP cells was used for both treated and untreated culture preparations.The cultures were incubated for 4 h at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm.The cell pellets from both treatment groups were obtained by centrifugation at 9,000 rpm for 10 min;pellets werewashed at least three times and resuspended in 500μL of cold protein extraction buffer(50 mM ammonium bicarbonate,10 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride).The samples were then ultra-sonicated on the ice at 20 amplitude for 10 cycles;each cycle consisted of 10 s of sonication,followed by a 20 s cooling period(Qsonica SonicatorQ55,FischerScientific,USA).The ultrasonicated samples were then centrifuged at 4°C and 10,000 rpm for 1 h;the supernatant was then collected and the protein concentration was quantified by Bradford assay.The protein concentration of each sample was standardized to 1 mg/mL for the subsequent proteomic analysis.The assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.6.2.Protein sample preparation

    Approximately 100μg of total protein was resuspended in 100μL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate(pH 8.0).RapiGest surfactant(Waters Corporation,USA)was added to the extracted protein in equal parts at a final concentration of 0.05%(V/V).The proteins from each sample were then concentrated to a volume of 100 μL using a Vivaspin? column(GE Healthcare,USA)with a molecular weight cut-off(MWCO)of 3000 Da and incubated at 80°C for 15 min.The protein was reduced using 5 mM dithiothreitol(DTT)at 60°C for 30 min and then alkylated in the dark using 10 mM iodoacetamide at room temperature for 45 min.Proteolytic digestion was performed using Trypsin Gold(Promega,USA)at a ratio by parts of 100:0.5 protein to trypsin,followed by overnight incubation at 37°C.Tryptic digestion and RapiGest activity were terminated by the addition of 1μL of concentrated trifluoroacetic acid and then the samples were incubated at 37°C for 20 min.The tryptic peptide solution from each sample was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 min and the resulting supernatants were collected and stored at-80°C until subsequent analysis.

    2.6.3.Nano liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry(LCMS/MS)analysis

    Nano LC-MS/MS analysiswas performedas described in Ref.[31]using an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer(Thermo Scientific,USA).The samples(2 μL containing 2 μg peptides)were injected and separated on an EASY-nLC 1000(Dionex,Thermo Scientific,USA)equipped with an Easy-Spray Column Acclaim PepMap?C18100 ?(2μm,50μm×15 cm,Thermo Scientific,USA).The samples were then separated by a gradient of 5%-40%(V/V)acetonitrile(ACN)with 0.1%(V/V)formic acid(FA)for 91 min,followed by a wash gradient of 85% ACN with 0.1% FA for 6 min and then equilibrated back to 5%(V/V)ACN with 0.1%(V/V)FA for 1 min and maintained until subsequent sample injection.The flow rate was set at 250 nL/min.The mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion mode with a nanospray voltage of 1.5 kV and a source temperature of 250°C.The instrument was operated in datadependent acquisition mode with a survey MS scan by Orbitrap MS using the following parameters:a mass range of m/z 310-1800 with resolving power of 120,000,automatic gain control(AGC)of 400,000 and maximum injection time of 50 ms.The top speed mode of 3 s was used in the selection of precursors with a monoisotopic charge state of 2-7.These precursors were further analyzed in the MS/MS scan.All precursors were filtered using a 20-s dynamic exclusion window and an intensity threshold of 5,000.The MS/MS spectra were analyzed by ion trap MS with the following parameters:rapid scan rate with resolving power of 60,000,AGC of 100,isolation window of 1.6 m/z and maximum injection time of 250 ms.Precursors were then fragmented by collision-induced dissociation and high-energy collision dissociation at a normalized collision energy of 30% to 28%.

    2.6.4.Protein identification and comparative analysis

    Raw data were processed using Thermo ScientificTM Proteome DiscovererTM Software v2.1 with the SEQUEST?HT search engine.The MS ion intensities were calculated based on the accurate mass and time tag strategy.The accurate alignment of detected LC retention time and m/z value across different analyses and the area under chromatographic elution profiles of the identified peptides can be compared between different samples.For protein identification,the peptide identification data were compared with the Uniprot?K.pneumoniae database with a 1% strict FDR and 5% relax FDR criteria using Percolator?.Search parameters were set up to two mis-cleavages with fixed amino acid modification through carbamidomethylation and variable modification through methionine oxidation,together with asparagine and glutamine deamidation.A fragment tolerance of 0.6 Da and a precursor tolerance of 10 ppm were used with trypsin as a digestion enzyme.identified proteins with at least two unique peptides suggested greater confidence of protein identity.Protein quantification and statistical analyses were performed using Perseus Software v1.6.0.7(Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry).Each control and the treated sample consisted of three biological replicates with three technical replicates,each analyzed by LC-MS/MS.A protein file with three technical replicates in txt format from Proteome Discoverer?was uploaded to the Perseus system for further comparative analysis between samples.The data were log2-transformed to stabilize the variance and scale-normalized to the same mean intensity across the technical replicates.The mean value for all three technical replicates of the same biological samples was grouped in the same matrix and the valid values were obtained by filtering with‘a(chǎn)t least two’,eliminating proteins that existed only in one of the technical replicates.Finally,all the biological replicates of the same treatment group were consolidated under the same matrix,with the missing values input to random numbers derived from the normal distribution.The histograms were plotted to obtain a similarity comparison of the ratio for all samples.The differential expressed protein between control and treatment was detected using a t-test,the P-value wasalso adjusted formultiple-testsusing a permutation-based false discovery rate with a randomization number of 250.Proteins were considered to be significantly differentiated between treatment groups with adjusted q-value<0.05 and fold change≤-1 or≥1.

    2.7.Bacterial membrane disruption assays

    2.7.1.Zeta potential measurement

    KPC-KP cell treatment is described in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The zeta potential of untreated,LNA-treated,and MPM-treated KPC-KP cells was determined as detailed in Ref.[28]using the Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument(Malvern Instruments,Malvern,UK).The treatment time for all treatment groups was determined in the time kill analysis,whereas the concentration of LNA and MPM used was determined by the checkerboard assay.Treated cells were washed with 0.85%(m/V)saline at least five times before zeta potential measurement.The experiment was performed in triplicate.

    2.7.2.Outer membrane permeability assay

    The outer membrane permeability assay was performed as detailed in previous studies[25,28].Overnight culture of KPC-KP cells was washed,adjusted to an optical density(OD600nm)0.3 and followed by treatment with LNA with concentration and treatment time as determined by the checkerboard assay and time kill analysis.After treatment completion,the samples were first washed with 0.85%(m/V)saline( five times)to remove the treatment and then divided into two equal portions of 10 mL.Next,sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS)solution at a final concentration of 0.1%(m/V)was added to one portion,whereas 0.85%(m/V)saline was added to the other.SDS acts as a permeabilizing probe that causes cell death when a sudden influx has occurred.This can be measured in terms of OD600nmat intervals of 0,5,10,30,and 60 min using a spectrophotometer.The assay was completed in triplicates.

    2.7.3.Ethidium bromide influx/efflux assay

    The assay was performed as described previously with slight modification[32].Overnight cultures of KPC-KP were washed and adjusted to OD600nmof 0.5 with MHB.The cells were then distributed into three groups;one group consisted of untreated KPC-KP cells and two groups were LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.Untreated KPC-KP cells were supplemented with ethidium bromide at a final concentration of 1μg/mL,whereas LNA-treated KPC-KP cells were supplemented with LNA and ethidium bromide at a final concentration of 1.25%(V/V)and 0.1%(m/V),respectively.The accumulationof ethidium bromide was measured using an EnSight multimode plate reader(PerkinElmer,Massachusetts,USA)with an excitation wavelength of 530 nm and an emission wavelength of 585 nm every 5 min up to 1 h at 37°C.Subsequently,the cells were harvested and washed with MHB at least 2 times.Fresh MHB supplemented with 0.5%(m/V)glucose was added to the untreated KPC-KPcells.OneoftheLNA-treatedKPC-KPgroupswas reconstituted with MHB supplemented with 0.5%(m/V)glucose and 1.25%(V/V)LNA,whereas the second group of LNA-treated KPC-KP cells were reconstituted with MHB supplemented with 0.5%(m/V)glucose,1.25%(V/V)LNA and 0.1%(m/V)ethidium bromide.Ethidium bromide efflux was again measured at the wavelength mentioned above for another 1 h every 5 min at 37°C.The assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.7.4.Nucleic acid leakage measurement

    The nucleic acid leakage was measured as detailed in Ref.[33].KPC-KP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The cell pellets of untreated and LNA-treated KPCKP cells were collected at 10,000 rpm centrifugation for 5 min.The supernatant was collected and measured for nucleic acid at a ultraviolet(UV)absorption wavelength of 260 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer(Thermo FischerScientific,Massachusetts,USA).The assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.7.5.Protein leakage measurement

    The protein leakage was measured as detailed in Ref.[33].KPCKP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The cell pellets of untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells were collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min.The supernatant was collected and measured at 595 nm for protein content using the Bradford solution.The assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.7.6.Scanning electron microscopy

    Scanning electron microscopy was performed as detailed previously[28].KPC-KP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The cells were harvested and the pellet was washed with 0.85%(m/V)saline for five times.Following this,the samples were then fixed with 4%(V/V)glutaraldehyde for 5 h and 1%(m/V)osmium tetroxide for 2 h at 4°C.Sodium cacodylate buffer at 0.1 M was used in all the washing steps.Then,the samples were further dehydrated by sequential exposure to increased acetone concentrations(35%-95%,V/V)for 10 min,followed by 100%(V/V)acetone for 15 min for three times.After dehydration,the samples were subjected to critical point drying for 30 min(BalTec CPD 030,Bal-Tec,Balzers,Liechtenstein).The samples were then secured onto the specimen stub using double-sided tape.Finally,the samples were sputter-coated with gold using a cool sputter coater(BalTec SCD 005)and observed via a JEOL JSM-6400 instrument(JEOL,Tokyo,Japan)at 15 kV.

    2.7.7.Transmission electron microscopy

    KPC-KP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).Untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells were harvested and the pellet was washed with 0.85%(m/V)saline for five times,followed by fixation in 4%(V/V)glutaraldehyde for 2 days at 4°C.Then,the specimen was washed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 30 min three times.Subsequently,the specimen was post-fixed in 1%(m/V)osmium tetroxide for 2 h at 4°C.The specimen was then washed again three times with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 30 min.Next,the specimen was subjected to a series of acetone washes for dehydration purposes.The specimen was washed with 35%(V/V)acetone,followed by 50%(V/V),75%(V/V)and 95%(V/V)acetone in each wash for 45 min.Finally,100%(V/V)acetone was used in the final washing step,which took 1 h and was repeated for three times.Next,the specimens were subjected to infiltration procedure with various ratios of acetone and resin mixture(1:1 for 12 h,1:3 for 12 h and 0:1 for 16 h),before beam capsulation.The capsulated specimen was polymerized in an oven at 60°C for 48 h.Upon completion of polymerization,the specimens block was cut into 1μm thick sections and stained with toluidine blue and dried on a hot plate.Excess stains were removed by washing under tap water.The specimens were then viewed under a light microscope and the areas of interest were selected for ultrathin sectioning.The resin block was then trimmed according to the selected area of interest by shaving the resin blocks into a trapezoid having dimensions notexceeding 0.5 mm acrossthe base,0.4 mm across the top,and 0.3 mm along the sides.Ultrathin sectioning was performed via i-Ultramicrotome EM UC6(Leica,Germany),and samples were collected from the surface of the water bath and placed on the copper mesh.The samples were then stained with uranyl acetate for 15 min and then with lead for 10 min.Each sample was washed before the next stain.The samples were then viewed under transmission electron microscope Leo Libra-120(ZEISS,Germany)at 120 kV.

    2.8.Oxidative stress assays

    2.8.1.Lipid peroxidation assay

    Lipid peroxidation assay was performed as detailed in Ref.[34].KPC-KP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The cell pellets were collected using centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min and washed with phosphate-buffered saline(PBS).The supernatant collected was referred to as treatment media.The resulting cell pellet was then sonicated as detailed in Section 2.7.1 with the supernatant collected and termed as cell lysate.Both treatment media and cell lysate were subjected to malondialdehyde(MDA)measurement by mixing 500μL of either treatment media and cell lysate to 400μL of 15%(V/V)trichloroacetic acid and 800μL of 0.67%(m/V)thiobarbituric acid(TBA)in 0.01%(V/V)butylated hydroxytoluene.The samples were then vortexed and incubated at 95°C for 20 min in a water bath.A volume of 3 mL of butanol was added to the sample,followed by gentle mixing.A volume of 200μL of the butanol phase was collected from each sample with absorbance measured at 532 nm.The amountof MDA present was estimated using the MDA standard curve and normalized based on the protein concentration of each sample.The assay was completed in triplicate.

    2.8.2.ROS measurement

    ROS measurement was performed as detailed in Ref.[34].KPCKP cell treatment is detailed in Section 2.5(LNA,1.25%(V/V);MPM,16μg/mL).The cell pellets were collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min and washed with PBS.Untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells were treated with 20 μM of 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate(DCF-DA)for 30 min at 37°C.After incubation,the cell pellet was collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min with a supernatant consisting of DCF-DA removed.The cell pellets were resuspended in PBS and the fluorescence intensity was measured at an excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 and 528 nm using the Tecan microplate reader(Tecan Trading AG,Switzerland).The assay was completed in triplicate.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Antimicrobial activity and killing kinetics of LNA against KPCKP cells

    In recent years,antibiotic resistance in human infections has been a major challenge in the clinical setting,preventing patients from recovering and even increasing mortality during infection.This is further complicated by the emergence of carbapenemresistant bacteria,such as KPC-KP,in the last decade.This resistance phenomenon is particularly worrying in the medical field,as carbapenem is the last-resort antibiotic,which has the widest range of activity and highest potency amongst allβ-lactam antibiotics[35].Thus,the discovery of novel antimicrobials is crucial,spurring many research groups to look at plant secondary metabolites with the hope of solving the problem,especially for terpenes and terpenoids,which are known to be bactericidal.Additionally,the discovery of novel antimicrobials will revive the efficacy of older generation antibiotics through combinatory antimicrobial treatment.As detailed in Table 1,LNA demonstrated bactericidal activity against KPC-KP cells at MIC of 2.5%(V/V),9.2μmol/L,while the combination with MPM resulted in an additive interaction that further reduces the MIC to 1.25%(V/V),4.6μmol/L.MPM had a MIC value of 32 μg/mL(0.00008 μmol/L)to 16 μg/mL(0.00004 μmol/L),indicating the potential of LNA as an antibiotic resistance modifier.

    Table 1 MIC,FIC and FIC indices of LNA and MPM against KPC-KP cells.

    Time kill analysis was first performed to determine the efficiency of LNA in killing KPC-KP cells,alone and in combinationwith MPM.As shown in Fig.1,the combination of LNA and MPM at their respective sub-inhibitor concentration successfully killed all KPCKP cells within 1.5 h.Hence,1.5 h was used as the standard treatment time for subsequent assays.

    Fig.1.Time kill kinetics of untreated carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae(KPC-KP)cells and KPC-KP cells treated with linalyl anthranilate(LNA),meropenem(MPM),and LNA-MPM combination.

    3.2.Comparative proteomic analysis revealed loss of membrane and cytoplasmic proteins and signs of oxidative stress in LNA-treated KPC-KP cells

    The untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells were subjected to whole protein extraction for comparative proteomic analysis.The Pearson correlation valueand principalcomponentanalysis showed good separation between the three treatment groups,indicating significant changes inproteomic abundance between the groups(Figs.S1 and S2).As shown in Fig.2A-i,we have successfully identified 368 proteins from untreated KPC-KP cells and 361 proteins from LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.A total of 296 similar proteins were shared by both groups.From the analysis,67 proteins were up-regulated and 85 proteins were down-regulated following the exposure to LNA(Fig.2A-ii&iii).

    Furthermore,65 proteins were found to be exclusive towards the LNA-treated cells and 72 proteins were exclusive to untreated cells(Fig.2A-ii).All identified proteins were subjected to gene ontology analysis and classified into three categories,namely,biological processes,cellular components,and molecular functions together with total protein abundance in each group,followed by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes(KEGG)pathway analysis to determine the overall effect of LNA on the proteome of the KPC-KP cells(Figs.2B and C).In terms of biological processes of KPC-KP cells exposed to LNA,the majority of the proteins identified were categorized under cellular and metabolic processes(36.21% and 34.22%),followed by cellular component organization and response to a stimulus(9.68% and 8.09%)as shown in Fig.2B-i.Cellular component-wise,the majority of proteins identified were categorized under cytoplasm and membrane(61.11% and 16.67%)followed by protein-containing complex and ribosome(10.61% and 8.84%;Fig.2B-ii).

    Fig.2.Comparative proteomic analysis between untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.(A-i)Venn diagram of the total protein obtained from untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells;(A-ii)The total numbers of exclusive,up-regulated,and down-regulated proteins;(A-iii)Volcano plot showing up-regulated(designated green square)and down-regulated(designated red square)proteins of the LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.GO analysis for LNA-treated KPC-KP cells in terms of biological processes(B-i),cellular components(B-ii)and molecular functions(B-iii)of identified proteins and their relative abundance in terms of the mentioned GO categories(B-iv).(C)KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed proteins in LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.The proteomic analysis is detailed in the Tables S1-S3.LNA:linalyl anthranilate;KPC-KP:carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae;GO:gene ontology;KEGG:Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

    Subsequently,the molecular function categorizations of the identified proteins showed that the majority of proteins were involved in binding and catalytic activity(43.60% and 41.09%;Fig.2B-iii).According to the KEGG pathway analysis shown in Fig.2C,proteins related to protein biosynthesis were most affected by the exposure towards LNA,with a total of 57 proteins.This was followed by stress response and amino acid biosynthesis proteins,with 44 and 32 proteins,respectively.As seen in Fig.2B-iv,LNA-treated KPC-KP cells reduced the abundance of cytoplasmic proteins compared to untreated cells.Additionally,after exposure to LNA,a large amount of membrane-related proteins had reduced abundance.For instance,after exposure to LNA,132 cytoplasmic proteins and 36 membrane-related proteins had reduced abundance compared to untreated KPC-KP cells,suggesting a disrupted bacterial membrane that could lead to intracellular leakage,explaining the loss of cytoplasmic proteins.

    From the proteomic KEGG pathway analysis,19 stress-related proteins had increased abundance following exposure to LNA.Of the 19 up-regulated proteins,4 were oxidative stress-related proteins involved in the repair of genetic material and proteins(Table 2).Additionally,we also found that the majority of proteins involved in ribosome biogenesis,and DNA and RNA processing in LNA-treated cells had reduced abundance compared to untreated KPC-KP cells(Table 2).Ribosomal and genetic material processing proteins are known to be relatively sensitive to oxidative stress[36,37].For instance,oxidative damage can induce base substitution,addition,deletion,and other mutations in nucleic acids,leading to the formation of non-functioning proteins[38].Besides,oxidative damage also affects proteins,especially ribosomal proteins due to the affinity of the ROS to RNA[39].Studies have reported that oxidation of RNA causes indirect damages to ribosomal RNA through covalent modification,leading to defective protein synthesis[36,39].Evidence from the proteomic analysis suggested that LNA induces oxidative stress in the KPC-KP cells.Induction of oxidative stress is also known to affect the integrity of the eukaryotic cell membranes.This is termed as lipid peroxidation,a self-propagating chain reaction that involves reactions between ROS and membrane fatty acid,eventually destroying the cell membrane[17,18].

    Table 2 List of up-regulated oxidative stress regulator proteins and down-regulated oxidative stress-sensitive proteins identified form LNA-treated KPC-KP cells.

    3.3.LNA kills KPC-KP cells by generating ROS,which disrupts the bacterial membrane via lipid peroxidation

    As demonstrated by the concept,membrane-related assays and electron microscopy techniques wereemployed todemonstratethe ability of LNA to disrupt the bacterial membrane of KPC-KP cells.Lipid peroxidation assay and ROS measurement were also performed to validate its role in inducing oxidative stress,which has cascaded into lipid peroxidation and membrane disruption.

    Lipopolysaccharide(LPS)is the major component in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria,which grants the bacterial membrane high negative charges[40].Thus,the disrupted outer membrane would have a more positive value indicated by an increase in the zeta potential measurement.According to Fig.3A,the zeta potential of untreated KPC-KP cells has a negative value of-12.1 mV.KPC-KP cells exposed to several concentrations of LNA had significantly more positive zeta potential,from-7.53 mV to-8.60 mV,than untreated KPC-KP cells.Additionally,we also found that the membrane disruption ability of LNA was concentration-independent.

    Moreover,the outer membrane permeability assay was performed to understand the bacterial membrane permeabilization role by LNA.A low concentration of SDS was used as a permeabilization probe,which shows bacterial membrane disruption.Under normal conditions,the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria is negatively charged due to the presence of LPS and generally repels other negatively-charged molecules,such as SDS.However,the disrupted bacterial membrane will enable the influx of SDS,eventually killing the cell.The concentration of SDS was optimized and fixed at 0.1%(m/V)as this concentration does not cause significant damages to bacterial cells with a healthy outer membrane.Also,the duration of this experiment was optimized and fixed at 1 h to prevent cell damages due to prolonged exposure to SDS.Fig.3B compares the growth of the untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells in terms of absorbance at 600 nm between pre-and post-exposure to 0.1%(m/V)SDS solution.The untreated group showed normal growth in the absence or presence of an SDS solution.However,in the absence or presence of 0.1%(m/V)SDS,bacterial cells treated with LNA had lower absorbance than that of untreated cells,indicating that the sub-inhibitory concentration of LNA slowed the growth of KPC-KP cells.A significant drop in absorbance could be detected when LNA treated KPC-KP cells were exposed to 0.1%(m/V)SDS.This indicated the ability of LNA to cause the influx of SDS into the cell and eventually kill it.

    Subsequently,ethidium bromide influx and efflux activity were performed to determine the effect of LNA on the influx and efflux activity of KPC-KP cells(Fig.3C).According to Fig.3C-i,untreated cells demonstrated an active efflux activity upon exposure towards ethidium bromide over time,whereas LNA-treated cells gradually increased the uptake of ethidium bromide as indicated by the relative fluorescence unit(Fig.3C-i).This suggested the ability of LNA to increase the membrane permeability of KPC-KP cells.Upon removal of LNA from the LNA-treated group in the efflux assay,the efflux activity of KPC-KP cells returned to normal with the reduction of fluorescent signal over time(Fig.3C-ii).This suggested that LNA does not play a role in inhibiting the efflux system of KPC-KP cells.

    Next,thepresenceofoxidativestressindicated bythe comparative proteomic profiling analysis in Section 3.2 suggests the presence of ROS,which leads to lipid peroxidation.To validate these phenomena,lipid peroxidation assay and measurement of ROS were performed.Lipid peroxidation assay measures the end product of lipid peroxidation,MDA,while the level of ROS generation was quantified by the reaction involving DCF-DA,esterase enzyme,and ROS species[25].Fig.3E-ii shows that the concentration of MDA quantified in LNA-treated KPC-KP cells is signi-ficantly higher than that in the untreated cells,indicating the presence of lipid peroxidation of cells when exposed to LNA.The level of ROS quantified in LNA-treated KPC-KP cells was also significantly higher than that in untreated cells(Fig.3E-i),indicating a high level of ROS generated in KPC-KP cells after exposure to LNA.

    Fig.3.LNA disrupts the bacterial membrane of KPC-KP cells by inducing oxidative stress.(A)Membrane zeta potential of untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells at several concentrations;(B)Outer membrane permeability of KPC-KP cells exposed to 0.1%(m/V)SDS or saline after treatment with LNA at 1.25%(V/V);(C)Ethidium bromide influx(i)and efflux(ii)activity of untreated and LNA-treated KPC-KP cells;(D)Intracellular leakage of UV-absorbing material:nucleic acid(i)and protein(ii)of KPC-KP cells exposed to LNA;(E)Oxidative stress assessment via ROS measurement(i)and lipid peroxidation assay(ii);and(F)Scanning and transmission electron micrographs of untreated(i and ii)and LNA-treated(iii and iv)KPC-KP cells(Δindicates membrane damage).LNA:linalyl anthranilate;KPC-KP:carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae;SDS:sodium dodecyl sulfate;UV:ultraviolet;ROS:reactive oxygen species.

    In conclusion,our study reported antimicrobial activity and mode of action of LNA that had not been previously studied.In future clinical applications,LNA has demonstrated a tremendous potential as novel antimicrobial as it exhibits antimicrobial activity against the robust KPC-KP cells with a low MIC value of 2.5%(V/V),9.2μmol/L.The combination between LNA and MPM further reduces the MIC value of both by 2-fold;MIC of LNA to 1.25%,4.6 μmol/L,and MPM to 16 μg/mL,0.00004 μmol/L.This suggests that LNA has the potential in combinatory antibiotic therapy that will revive the efficacy of older generation antibiotics in the clinical setting.Besides,our study elucidated the antimicrobial mode of action of LNA,which involved the generation of ROSthat resulted in lipid peroxidation in KPC-KP cells and membrane damages.Subsequently,intracellular materials were lost,eventually killing the cell.We also found that LNA did not affect the efflux system of KPCKP cells.The proposed mode of action of LNA is illustrated in Fig.4.Compared to commercialized antibiotics currently in use in clinical settings,the antibacterial activity of LNA is lower in terms of effective concentration.However,LNA has a different approach in killing bacterial cells involving the induction of ROS,which eventually disrupts the bacterial membrane and kills the cell.This makes LNA a promising antibiotic adjuvant by which LNA would facilitate the uptake of antibiotics,thereby enhancing the activity of existing antibiotics.Shortly,an in vivo study may be performed to investigate the toxicity of LNA.Additionally,an effective delivery system can also be established for efficient delivery of LNA to the site of infection,enhancing the efficiency of this compound in the fight against infection.Taken together,this would eventually pave the way for the clinical use of LNA as an antimicrobial agent.

    Fig.4.Proposed mode of action of LNA against KPC-KP cells.(a)LNA reacted with bacterial membrane components to form ROS.(b)ROS initiates lipid peroxidation by attacking membrane lipid,causing a chain reaction,which disrupts the bacterial membrane.(c)Influx of ROS into the KPC-KP intracellular region.(d)ROS degrades nucleic acids,lipids,and proteins.(e)Intracellular materials leakage due to bacterial membrane disruption.LNA:linalyl anthranilate;KPC-KP:carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae;ROS:reactive oxygen species;LPS:lipopolysaccharide.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Acknowledgments

    This study was supported by the Higher College of Technology(HCT)Interdisciplinary Research Grant(Grant No.113118),the Malaysian Medical Association Grant,and the UCSI PSIF Grant(Grant No.Proj-2019-In-Fas-062).The authors would like to acknowledge all members of the Floral Biotechnology Laboratory(FBL),Universiti Putra Malaysia,and Malaysia Genome Institute(MGI)forproviding the necessary assistance and facilities throughout this study.

    Appendix A.Supplementary data

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2020.05.014.

    欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲av美国av| 久久精品人妻少妇| ponron亚洲| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 欧美在线黄色| av免费在线观看网站| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 久9热在线精品视频| videosex国产| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 国产三级在线视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 99久久国产精品久久久| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 午夜免费鲁丝| 热99re8久久精品国产| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 成人18禁在线播放| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 不卡av一区二区三区| 两个人看的免费小视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 久久中文字幕一级| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 热99re8久久精品国产| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品九九99| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久,| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 黄片小视频在线播放| 91成年电影在线观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 身体一侧抽搐| 悠悠久久av| 黄片播放在线免费| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 亚洲第一av免费看| 欧美成人午夜精品| netflix在线观看网站| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线 | 在线免费观看的www视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 色播在线永久视频| 我的亚洲天堂| 伦理电影免费视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 午夜老司机福利片| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 男人舔奶头视频| av免费在线观看网站| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 久久精品影院6| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 色av中文字幕| 国产亚洲欧美98| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 精品第一国产精品| 国产高清videossex| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产日本99.免费观看| tocl精华| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 国产精品野战在线观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 91麻豆av在线| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 在线观看日韩欧美| 青草久久国产| 成人手机av| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 91av网站免费观看| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 精品国产亚洲在线| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 欧美日韩精品网址| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产99白浆流出| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产精品免费视频内射| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 精品人妻1区二区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 一进一出抽搐动态| 很黄的视频免费| 国产片内射在线| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 熟女电影av网| 精品电影一区二区在线| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 在线观看一区二区三区| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 免费在线观看日本一区| 黄色 视频免费看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| xxx96com| 91在线观看av| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 色在线成人网| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 久久中文看片网| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 欧美zozozo另类| 1024手机看黄色片| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲最大成人中文| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| av在线播放免费不卡| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| av有码第一页| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 69av精品久久久久久| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲五月天丁香| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产熟女xx| 在线观看66精品国产| 999精品在线视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 中国美女看黄片| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 久久久国产成人免费| 精品久久久久久成人av| bbb黄色大片| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产高清videossex| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| a级毛片在线看网站| 女警被强在线播放| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| av有码第一页| 亚洲av熟女| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 看黄色毛片网站| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 在线播放国产精品三级| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲第一青青草原| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| av福利片在线| 国产1区2区3区精品| 精品久久久久久,| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产色视频综合| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 日本熟妇午夜| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 99热只有精品国产| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 一进一出抽搐动态| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 色综合婷婷激情| 午夜视频精品福利| 宅男免费午夜| 一级片免费观看大全| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| ponron亚洲| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| ponron亚洲| 亚洲av成人av| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 一本综合久久免费| 在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 午夜久久久在线观看| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 香蕉丝袜av| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 曰老女人黄片| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| www.999成人在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 国产av不卡久久| 一本一本综合久久| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 成人三级做爰电影| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲av成人av| 国产色视频综合| 国产精品永久免费网站| 一级毛片精品| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产精品二区激情视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 脱女人内裤的视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 天堂动漫精品| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 久久这里只有精品19| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 一级毛片精品| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 成人国语在线视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 亚洲av熟女| 欧美日本视频| 香蕉av资源在线| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | avwww免费| 午夜老司机福利片| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 宅男免费午夜| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| www日本在线高清视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 搞女人的毛片| a级毛片a级免费在线| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 成人18禁在线播放| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 国产精品野战在线观看| 十八禁网站免费在线| 制服人妻中文乱码| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久这里只有精品19| 一区二区三区激情视频| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 999精品在线视频| 成人午夜高清在线视频 | 宅男免费午夜| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 午夜影院日韩av| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 久久久久久大精品| 看免费av毛片| 1024香蕉在线观看| 日本在线视频免费播放| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 午夜激情av网站| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 观看免费一级毛片| 一区福利在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| av有码第一页| 窝窝影院91人妻| 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 88av欧美| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 精品久久久久久,| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 91成人精品电影| 在线av久久热| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 性欧美人与动物交配| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 久久亚洲真实| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| av在线天堂中文字幕| 在线国产一区二区在线| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 国产精品影院久久| av福利片在线| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| a级毛片在线看网站| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 久久久久久大精品| 久久人妻av系列| 草草在线视频免费看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 老司机福利观看| avwww免费| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 欧美午夜高清在线| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 日韩欧美三级三区| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 天天添夜夜摸| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 成人午夜高清在线视频 | 亚洲av成人av| 一级毛片精品| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 久久性视频一级片| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 午夜影院日韩av| 校园春色视频在线观看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 美国免费a级毛片| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 成人国产综合亚洲| a在线观看视频网站| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 手机成人av网站| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 欧美大码av| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 级片在线观看| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲第一电影网av| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 成人18禁在线播放| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| www.自偷自拍.com| 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲全国av大片| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 黄色 视频免费看| 国产真实乱freesex| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 很黄的视频免费| 一a级毛片在线观看| 91老司机精品| av在线天堂中文字幕| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 99国产精品99久久久久| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 在线观看舔阴道视频|