張大微 袁麗娟 王連濤 初曉麗 劉艷麗
【關鍵詞】 妊娠期高血壓疾病 血清 TLR4 HMW-ADP
[Abstract] Objective: To investigate the clinical significance and change of serum TLR4 and HMW-ADP level of patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Method: A total of 30 patients with gestational hypertension from October 2018 to April 2019 were selected as group A, 30 patients with mild preeclampsia were selected as group B, 30 patients with severe preeclampsia were selected as group C, and 30 healthy pregnant women during the same period were selected as group D for retrospective study. Serum TLR4, related indexes (NF-κB, IL-1β, IL-8 and IL-18) and HMW-ADP were detected and compared among four groups. At the same time, the test results of patients with different hypertension outcomes in group A, B and C were compared. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the relationship between serum TLR4 and related indicators, HMW-ADP and the outcome of hypertension. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyze the relationship between the above serum indexes and the severity of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Result: Comparison of serum TLR4 and related indexes and HMW-ADP among four groups, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Serum TLR4 and related indexes in group A, B and C were significantly higher than those in group D, group C were significantly higher than those in group A and B, group B were significantly higher than those in group A, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The serum HMW-ADP in group A, B and C were significantly lower than that in group D, group C was significantly lower than those in group A and B, group B was significantly lower than that in group A, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Comparison of serum TLR4 and related indicators and HMW-ADP in patients with different hypertension outcomes in group A, B and C, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that serum TLR4 and related indicators were positively correlated with the outcome of hypertension, and serum HMW-ADP was negatively correlated with the outcome of hypertension (P<0.05). Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that serum TLR4 and related indicators were positively correlated with the severity of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and serum HMW-ADP was negatively correlated with the severity of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (P<0.05). Conclusion: The expression of serum TLR4 and HMW-ADP level of patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are significantly abnormal, and they are closely related to severity degree, so their detection value in these patients with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy are higher.
[Key words] Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy Serum TLR4 HMW-ADP
First-author’s address: Shenzhen Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shenzhen 518104, China
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2021.26.031
妊娠期高血壓疾病的危害較大,是導致母嬰死亡的一類產科常見疾病,其在臨床的發(fā)病率為5%~10%,因此是臨床重視程度及防控、診治需求極高的一類疾病。臨床與妊娠期高血壓疾病相關的研究中,關于血液指標的研究較多,本類指標的標本采集相對簡便,因此掌握此類指標的臨床需求較高[1-2]。近年來臨床中關于血清TLR4和HMW-ADP在高血壓中的研究可見,且多數研究對上述指標與高血壓的關系給予了肯定[3-5],但是其在妊娠期高血壓疾病及疾病嚴重程度、高血壓轉歸中的檢測意義研究未見。本研究就妊娠期高血壓疾病患者血清TLR4和HMW-ADP的水平變化與臨床意義進行探究,現報道如下。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料 選取2018年10月-2019年4月的30例妊娠期高血壓患者為A組,30例輕度子癇前期患者為B組,30例重度子癇前期患者為C組,同時選取同期的30例健康孕婦為D組,進行回顧性研究。(1)納入標準:≥20歲;A組為妊娠期高血壓患者,B組為輕度子癇前期患者,C組為重度子癇前期患者,D組為健康同齡孕婦。(2)排除標準:雙胎及多胎;合并其他妊娠期疾病;妊娠前合并糖尿病、高血壓及其他慢性疾病;合并創(chuàng)傷及感染。研究對象均簽署知情同意書,本研究經醫(yī)院倫理學委員會批準。
1.2 方法 采集A、B、C組治療前空腹8~12 h的靜脈血5 mL,D組也于空腹8~12 h采集靜脈血5 mL,以3 000 r/min的速度離心10 min,采集血清進行血清TLR4及相關指標(NF-κB、IL-1β、IL-8及IL-18)、HMW-ADP的檢測,均采用酶聯免疫法進行定量檢測,由兩名經驗豐富者按照相關標準進行操作檢測。
1.3 觀察指標 比較四組的血清TLR4及相關指標、HMW-ADP的水平,同時比較A、B、C組中不同高血壓轉歸情況(產后42 d進行檢查,判斷是否遺留高血壓)患者的檢測結果。采用Pearson相關性分析血清TLR4及相關指標、HMW-ADP與高血壓轉歸情況的關系,采用Spearman秩相關分析上述血清指標與妊娠期高血壓疾病嚴重程度的關系。
1.4 統(tǒng)計學處理 采用SPSS 23.0軟件對所得數據進行統(tǒng)計分析,計量資料用(x±s)表示,比較采用t檢驗,重復測量的計量資料進行方差分析;計數資料以率(%)表示,比較采用字2檢驗;關系分析采用Pearson相關性分析及Spearman秩相關分析處理。以P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計學意義。
2 結果
2.1 四組一般資料比較 A組年齡20~35歲,平均(28.6±5.9)歲;孕周28.0~36.5周,平均(32.3±2.0)周;初產婦20例,經產婦10例。B組年齡20~36歲,平均(28.8±5.6)歲;孕周28.0~36.8周,平均(32.2±1.8)周;初產婦21例,經產婦9例。C組年齡21~36歲,平均(28.7±5.8)歲;孕周28.5~36.5周,平均(32.1±1.9)周;初產婦20例,經產婦10例。D組年齡20~36歲,平均(28.9±5.7)歲;孕周28.0~36.5周,平均(32.2±1.9)周;初產婦21例,經產婦9例。四組一般資料比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(P>0.05),具有可比性。
2.2 四組血清TLR4及相關指標、HMW-ADP比較 四組血清TLR4及相關指標、HMW-ADP比較,差異均有統(tǒng)計學意義(P<0.05)。A、B、C組血清TLR4及相關指標均顯著高于D組,C組均顯著高于A、B組,B組均顯著高于A組,差異均有統(tǒng)計學意義(P<0.05)。A、B、C組血清HMW-ADP均顯著低于D組,C組顯著低于A、B組,B組顯著低于A組,差異均有統(tǒng)計學意義(P<0.05)。見表1。
2.3 A、B、C組中不同高血壓轉歸情況者的血清TLR4及相關指標、HMW-ADP比較 A、B、C組中不同高血壓轉歸情況患者的血清TLR4及相關指標、HMW-ADP比較,差異均有統(tǒng)計學意義(P<0.05),見表2。
2.4 血清指標與高血壓轉歸情況、妊娠期高血壓疾病嚴重程度的關系分析 Pearson相關性分析顯示,血清TLR4及相關指標與高血壓轉歸情況呈正相關,血清HMW-ADP與高血壓轉歸情況呈負相關(P<0.05);Spearman秩相關分析顯示,血清TLR4及相關指標與妊娠期高血壓疾病嚴重程度呈正相關,血清HMW-ADP與妊娠期高血壓疾病嚴重程度呈負相關(P<0.05)。見表3。
3 討論
妊娠期高血壓疾病作為妊娠期的嚴重疾病之一,是導致孕產婦死亡的第二大原因,因此是臨床研究較多的方面,也是妊娠期的重點防控與診治方面。近年來臨床中關于妊娠期高血壓疾病發(fā)生發(fā)展相關指標的研究多見,其中血液指標的研究是重點[6-7]。TLR4作為在高血壓中研究較多的指標,其在妊娠期高血壓疾病患者中的表達變化研究可見,而其相關指標中的NF-κB、IL-1β、IL-8及IL-18作為與血管炎性損傷密切相關的指標,其在高血壓疾病患者的血液中多呈現高表達狀態(tài)[8-9],但是在妊娠期高血壓疾病患者中的細致表達變化研究相對不足,因此本方面進一步的細致探究需求較高。另外,HMW-ADP是在血管內皮細胞保護中作用突出的一類指標,其在抗炎及抗動脈粥樣硬化方面具有積極的作用[10-13],但是其在妊娠期高血壓疾病孕產婦中的表達變化研究同樣較為欠缺,因此對本方面的探究需求較高。
本研究就妊娠期高血壓疾病患者血清TLR4和HMW-ADP的水平變化與臨床意義進行探究,本研究結果顯示,妊娠期高血壓疾病患者的血清TLR4及相關指標顯著高于健康孕婦,HMW-ADP則顯著低于健康孕婦,同時,越為嚴重的患者其異常幅度相對越大,且遺留高血壓者的表達顯著異于無遺留高血壓者,且Pearson相關性分析及Spearman秩相關分析肯定了上述指標與高血壓轉歸情況及疾病嚴重程度的關系。分析原因,越為嚴重的患者其血管受損情況越為嚴重[14-16],因此相關指標表達越為異常,同時其血管內皮受損情況越為突出,因此在本類患者的嚴重程度及疾病發(fā)展轉歸方面均有積極的檢測作用[17-20]。
綜上所述,筆者認為妊娠期高血壓疾病患者血清TLR4和HMW-ADP的表達顯著異常,且與疾病嚴重程度及高血壓轉歸有密切的關系,因此在妊娠期高血壓疾病患者中的檢測價值較高。
參考文獻
[1]任春麗,唐興國,張玉芳,等.血清TLR4及MFG-E8與子癇前期患者表達及發(fā)生早期腎損傷的關系[J].中國實驗診斷學,2020,23(11):1770-1773.
[2]祁琨,仲劍克,張帆,等.老年高血壓病人外周血TLR4表達與血壓晝夜節(jié)律的關系探討[J].中西醫(yī)結合心腦血管病雜志,2019,17(5):744-747.
[3]郭志利,姚玉英,姚克青,等.妊娠期糖尿病患者脂肪細胞因子與TLR4/MyD88信號通路相關蛋白的關系研究及臨床意義[J].中國免疫學雜志,2019,35(23):2908-2910.
[4]臧博文,王寶軍.TLR2、TLR4相關疾病的研究進展[J/OL].臨床醫(yī)藥文獻電子雜志,2019,6(70):188-190.
[5]黃巧明.PAPP-A、AFP、NF-κB、TLR4及uE3在子癇前期患者血清中的表達及臨床意義[J].中國現代藥物應用,2019,13(13):63-65.
[6] Nair A R,Silva S D,Agbor L N,et al.Endothelial PPARγ (Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ) Protects From Angiotensin Ⅱ-Induced Endothelial Dysfunction in Adult Offspring Born From Pregnancies Complicated by Hypertension[J].Hypertension,2019,74(1):173-183.
[7]張華,王安幫.硝苯地平聯合酚妥拉明、硫酸鎂對妊娠期高血壓疾病患者NF-κB、PTX3水平的影響[J].臨床醫(yī)學研究與實踐,2019,3(28):138-140.
[8]蘭景尤,梁旭霞.血清高分子量脂聯素水平對初次妊娠高血壓綜合征患者再次妊娠后發(fā)生子癇的影響[J].解放軍預防醫(yī)學雜志,2019,37(3):170-171.
[9] Zhao X,Wang X.Candesartan targeting of angiotensin Ⅱ type 1 receptor demonstrates benefits for hypertension in pregnancy via the NF?κB signaling pathway[J].Mol Med Rep,2018,18(1):705-713.
[10]鄧成敏,辛麗嬌,賈丹,等.妊娠高血壓綜合征患者血清高分子量脂聯素水平對二次妊娠子癇發(fā)生的影響[J].醫(yī)學新知雜志,2019,29(6):603-606.
[11]朱穎,成章金,務秋蕾,等.妊娠期糖尿病患者腹部皮下脂肪組織中高分子量脂聯素的表達變化及調控機制[J].中國婦幼保健,2020,35(14):2591-2593.
[12]王葉寶,李建民.高血壓患者血清脂聯素,炎癥因子與左室肥厚的相關性分析[J].現代診斷與治療,2020,31(3):343-346.
[13]溫潔,邢軍,左振偉.護骨因子、白介素-1β、肝細胞生長因子對孕中、晚期妊娠糖尿病合并妊娠期高血壓疾病孕婦血糖和血壓的影響[J/OL].中國醫(yī)學前沿雜志(電子版),2020,12(3):39-43.
[14]倪步烤,吳建華,鄭開慧,等.吸煙女性妊娠期高血壓疾病患者血清炎癥細胞因子水平分析[J].中國婦幼保健,2020,35(23):4447-4449.
[15]王健,楊晶,張年萍,等.妊娠期高血壓疾病患者外周血中Th22/Th17/Th1細胞變化及臨床意義[J].中國免疫學雜志,2019,35(1):74-78,83.
[16] Huang S J,Wang H W,Wu H F,et al.Osteoprotegerin, interleukin and hepatocyte growth factor for prediction of diabetes and hypertension in the third trimester of pregnancy[J].World J Clin Cases,2020,8(22):5529-5534.
[17]梁玉貞,劉杰.妊娠期高血壓患者血清VEGF、IL-18、MCP-1水平及與血液流變學指標關系[J].中國計劃生育學雜志,2020,28(1):60-63.
[18]任靜華,季景環(huán),孫志敏,等.妊娠期高血壓患者凝血功能、炎性因子及血脂水平變化及臨床意義[J].解放軍醫(yī)藥雜志,2021,33(1):90-93.
[19]武妍,武婧.血脂及血清相關炎性因子水平變化在妊娠期高血壓疾病發(fā)展中的臨床意義[J].臨床醫(yī)學研究與實踐,2019,3(18):86-87,92.
[20]張云霞.妊娠期高血壓疾病與血清SOCS-3、IL-18水平及Th1/Th2相關性分析[J].中國計劃生育學雜志,2019,27(1):69-72.
(收稿日期:2021-08-05) (本文編輯:姬思雨)