• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Characteristics and chemical reactivity of biogenic volatile organic compounds from dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area,China

    2021-02-28 09:11:56YingLinXiaoxiuLunWeiTangZhongzhiZhangXiaoxiJingChongFanandQiangWang
    Forest Ecosystems 2021年4期

    Ying Lin,Xiaoxiu Lun*,Wei Tang,Zhongzhi Zhang,Xiaoxi Jing,Chong Fan and Qiang Wang*

    Abstract

    Keywords: Biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs), Isoprene, Monoterpenes,Jing-Jin-Ji area,Spatiotemporal characteristics, Chemical reactivity

    Background

    Biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) are low boiling point compounds commonly synthesized by secondary metabolic pathways in plants. Many vascular plants can discharge BVOCs into the atmosphere (Loreto and Schnitzler 2010). Forest is one of the primary sources that emit BVOCs, which occupies about 70% of the total BVOCs amounts from vegetation. It was estimated that the annual emission of BVOCs in the world was about 106Gg C·year-1(Guenther et al. 2012), accounting for more than 90% of the total non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) emission on the ground and far exceeding the anthropogenic compounds(Guenther et al. 1995). Isoprene (the simplest 5-carbon isoprenoid, C5H8, 2-methyl 1,3-butadiene) represents the highest emission component (Atkinson and Arey 2003)with an approximately 50% of the total annual global emissions of BVOCs in around 412–601 Tg C·year-1(Guenther et al. 2012). Monoterpenes are the 10-carbon isoprenoids that account for about 15% (32–157 Tg C·year-1) of global BVOCs emission (Guenther et al.2012). Both isoprene and monoterpenes are synthesized by the MEP pathway (Loreto and Schnitzler 2010).BVOCs are usually formed constitutively or after stress induction. Those components can improve plant tolerance towards abiotic stressors such as high temperature,oxidative stress and biotic stressors (e.g. competing plants and microorganisms) (Loreto and Schnitzler 2010;Filella et al. 2013).

    BVOCs play an essential role in tropospheric atmospheric chemical reactions (Sartelet et al. 2012; Kulmala et al. 2013). BVOCs are the main precursors to form tropospheric ozone and atmospheric aerosols, promoting the formation of secondary pollutants such as peroxyacetyl nitrate (PANs), secondary organic aerosols (SOA),particulate matter (PM), aldehydes and ketones (Claeys et al. 2004; Laothawornkitkul et al. 2009). In particular,the formation of ozone occurs when the isoprene is dissociated and react with NOx(Fehsenfeld et al. 1992)while the formation medium of secondary organic aerosols (Claeys et al. 2004) is contributed by monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes via cloud condensation nuclei, hence affecting the local or global climate.

    The Jing-Jin-Ji area locating on the North China Plain represents the core of north China and the most developed city cluster in China. With the rapid development of the economy and the acceleration of urbanization, the issue of air pollution requires immediate attention. The Jing-Jin-Ji area has been plagued by severe photochemical pollution and haze for many years (Tang et al. 2009;Han et al. 2013). It is known that the accumulation of particulate matter, primarily fine particulate matter PM2.5is the main factor that causes the haze (Li et al.2013; Zhai et al. 2016; Hsu et al. 2017; Zhao et al. 2013)showed that the hourly average concentration of PM2.5in Beijing reached 318 μg·m-3on hazy days. Several cities in Hebei province suffered more severe air pollution(Wang et al. 2012; Li et al. 2016a) used the PM2.5monitoring data of 161 cities to analyze the PM2.5pollution in mainland China. The results showed that the Jing-Jin-Ji and its surrounding areas were heavily polluted and ranked at one of China’s current four smoggy regions.Zhao et al. (2020) demonstrated that the average annual PM2.5concentration in the Jing-Jin-Ji area decreased by 8.66 μg·m-3from 2014 to 2018, indicating the population that exposed to high PM2.5concentration was decreasing. However, the average annual PM2.5concentration value was still far from the national standard limit (35 μg·m-3). Also, the ozone is another important pollutant that plagues the urban ambient air quality after PM2.5(Meng et al. 2017; Chen et al. 2013) reported that the ozone mixing ratio in the Jing-Jin-Ji area was very high, thus causing strong photochemical reactions from May to September. Wang et al. (2017) pointed out that the ozone concentration had exceeded the standard by 100–200% in the Jing-Jin-Ji area. During 2014–2018,the ozone concentration in the Jing-Jin-Ji area showed an upward trend with an average positive annual level of 4.90 μg·m-3as reported by Zhao et al. (2020). Some studies indicated that the contribution of BVOCs such as monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes to SOA formation was substantial (Steinbrecher et al. 2009; Aksoyoglu et al. 2011; Ghirardo et al. 2016) found that the contribution of BVOCs released by vegetation to SOA generation in Beijing was increased by two-fold within 2005–2010. Carlo et al. (2004) reported that the isoprene is highly reactive with hydroxyl radical (·OH) than most anthropogenic volatile organic compounds (AVOCs).Geng et al. (2011) suggested that BVOCs can contribute to the surface ozone concentrations. The above literatures show that the role of BVOCs in ozone formation cannot be ignored in the Jing-Jin-Ji area especially during summer (Xie et al. 2008; Ran et al. 2011), which would have led to severe impacts on human health, economic development, ecological environment, and climate change (Pierre et al. 2017). Considering the particular geographical location, diverse vegetation composition, and the enormous influence of BVOCs on ozone and secondary aerosols, it is crucial to clarify the BVOCs emission emitted from dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area.

    At present, the estimation of BVOCs emission from plants have been conducted through various studies using different methods, including models, land cover and meteorological data. Different results of the Jing-Jin-Ji area were obtained from different models and input parameters at home and abroad (Klinger et al. 2002;Song et al. 2012; Li et al. 2016b). Most of the previous estimations were conducted by grouping the forest species into several plant functional types (PFT) and then using the global average emission rates and biomass density of each vegetation type. However, such estimation was unsatisfactory because the differences between plant species and regions were ignored (Xia and Xiao 2019). Besides, most of the studies employed the recommended values of emission factors in the literature directly or selected the measured values of adjacent areas without the measured local primary data; hence the final results may not be representative (Song et al. 2012;Zhang et al. 2018). Different forest species or regions with different environments will cause different emission components and release rates of BVOCs (Owen et al.2002). The difference between the forest species could be the primary factor to determine the BVOCs emission,and different geographical locations own disparate environmental conditions (temperature, PAR) that will also distinguish the emissions eventually. Therefore, the precise emission rates and fluxes of BVOCs from specific forest species in different regions should be obtained before the evaluation of the spatiotemporal effects and interactions of BVOCs on the atmospheric environment.Until present, there has been limited evidence that supports the systematic comparison of the BVOCs measured emission rates of dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area. According to the order of volume from high to low, we have selected Platycladus orientalis,

    Quercus variabilis, Betula platyphylla, Populus tomentosa, Pinus tabuliformis, Robinia pseudoacacia, Ulmus pumila, Salix babylonica and Larix gmelinii as the dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area. Based on the field vegetation investigation and measured forest species emission rates, this study used the algorithm in G93 model (Guenther et al. 1993) to estimate the BVOCs emission from dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area to establish a more localized emission inventory and eliminate its uncertainty further, analyzed their spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and chemical reactivity to provide a theoretical basis for future air pollution prevention and control measures.

    Materials and methods

    Site description

    Jing-Jin-Ji area is located in the North China Plain(Fig. 1), including Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei (36°05′–42°40′ N, 113°27′–119°50′ E), with a total area of about 21.72 ha. This area is surrounded by Bohai Sea in the east, Tai-hang Mountains in the West and Yanshan Mountains in the north, 735 km from north to south,and 576 km from east to west, with various terrains and warm temperate continental monsoon climate. The annual average temperature is ranged from 0 to 13oC with an average yearly precipitation of 300–800 mm. There are various vegetation types in this area including forest,shrub, grassland, and so on. The sampling sites were selected in the forest parks with abundant plant resources and the collection of the air samples were performed on bright days.

    Fig.1 The site locations of the Jing-Jin-Ji area

    The sampling sites (solid circles) identified as follows:(1) Saihanba National Forest Park; (2) Heilongshan National Forest Park; (3) Labagou Primeval Forest Park; (4)Baicaowa National Forest Park; (5) Wuling Mountain Scenic Spot; (6) Yunmengshan National Forest Park; (7)Huangyangshan Forest Park; (8) Tianjin Jiulongshan National Forest Park; (9) Xishan National Forest Park; (10)Xiaolongmen National Forest Park; (11) Baihuashan National Nature Reserve; (12) Shangfangshan National Forest Park;(13) Wuyuezhai Scenic Spot.

    Estimation model of BVOCs emission

    Guenther series models are widely used to estimate BVOCs emission. Guenther combined the latest experimental data to deduce the G93 algorithm in 1993(Guenther et al.1993).The model was used to normalize the emission rate of BVOCs under various environmental conditions, including T=303 K and PAR=1000 μmol·m-2·s-1. The BVOCs emitted by dominant forest species were classified as isoprene, monoterpenes, and other VOCs (alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, esters, organic acids, low carbon alkanes and alkenes) in this paper. According to the model of light and temperature effect proposed by G93, the BVOCs emission classified by forest species were estimated respectively. Specific formulas are as follows:

    Isoprene:

    where, R is a gas constant (8.314 J·K-1·mol-1); Ts is the leaf temperature of the standard state (303 K). CT1(95,000 J·mol-1), CT2(230,000 J·mol-1) and TM(314 K) are empirical constants.

    The monoterpenes and other VOCs emission rate in algorithm G93 can be calculated using Eqs.4 and 5:

    where, M is the emission rate of monoterpenes and other VOCs (in C, μg·g-1·h-1) under a certain temperature T (K); MSis the standard emission rate of monoterpenes and other VOCs (in C, μg·g-1·h-1) under standard condition (Ts=303 K); CTMis the correction factor for the temperature of monoterpenes and other VOCs; β (0.09 K-1) is empirical constant.

    Experimental results showed that the emission rate of isoprene is mainly controlled by leaf temperature and PAR. However, the main factor affecting monoterpenes and other VOCs emission by plants is temperature(Guenther et al. 1993). Therefore, the emission estimation method of isoprene is:

    where, EISOPis the emission of isoprene (in C, μg·h-1);EMONOand EOVOCare the emissions of monoterpenes and other VOCs (in C, μg·h-1), respectively; and B is the leaf biomass (dry weight, g) of each species. The required meteorological data (temperature and PAR of every month in the Jing-Jin-Ji area in 2017) can be retrieved from MODIS satellite product data published on the NASA website (https://modis.ornl.gov/data.html).

    Determination of model parameters

    Emission rates

    Air samples were collected using a dynamic headspace method (Jing et al. 2020). The sampling system consists of a transparent Teflon film sampling bag (10 L), an atmospheric sampler (LaoDong QC-1 S, Beijing Municipal Institute of Labor Protection, China), two drying towers(filled with activated carbon particles that have been pre-dried for more than 5 h and allochroic silica gel, respectively), an ozone removal column (Cleanert KI:1.4 g/2.5 mL,Agela Technologies,China) and an adsorption tube (tube type: stainless steel tube, Camsco company, USA, filled with Carbograph 2 (60/80),Carbograph 1 (40/60) and Carbosieve SIII (60/80) adsorbents). All parts were connected with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubes (Fig. 2). Before sampling, the adsorption tubes were purged and activated at 270 °C for 2h under high-purity N2(purity: 99.99%), then stored under cold storage at 4 °C. When sampling, the branches with healthy foliage were selected and enclosed in the sampling bag. First, the air in the sampling bag was extracted, and then the air that has passed through the two drying towers and the ozone adsorption column was pumped in. Finally, the adsorption tube was connected to form a closed loop. The air samples were collected at a flow rate of 150 mL·min-1for 1 h. The temperature and relative humidity in the sampling bag were measured by a hand meteorometer instrument(NK4500, Kestrel, USA). The PAR in the sampling environment was measured using a light quantum meter(3415FQF, Spectrum, USA). Table 1 shows the sampling dates and averaged environmental conditions during the sampling. After collection, the adsorption tube was stored in the refrigerator at 4°C and analyzed within one week.

    Fig.2 Flow chart of dynamic headspace sampling

    The air samples were desorbed on PE TurboMatrix(650ATD-Clarus600) and analyzed by thermal desorption gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS, Agilent 6890, USA). Most of the organics in the adsorption tube were released after 5 min in a thermal resolver at 260 °C,and then the substances were adsorbed into the cold trap(–25°C).The substances condensed in the cold trap were quickly heated from 260 to 300 °C at a heating rate of 40 °C·s-1then transferred to the chromatograph for further separation and analysis. The column used was DB-5MS (column height of 30 m,inner diameter of 0.25 mm,pore diameter of 0.25 μm) and the carrier gas used was helium (1.0 mL·min-1). The heating process was divided into three stages at 40°C,160 and 270°C that maintained at 2, 2 and 3 min, respectively, with a heating rate of 4 °C·min-1. The mass spectrometer adopts an electron bombardment ionization mode with energy of 70 eV and a scanning atomic mass range of 30–500 amu. The compounds were retrieved from the database of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) based on their retention times and specific charge and quantified using the standard external method. The standard gases used were as follows: Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) (Spectra/Linde: 57) and n-hexane, isoprene, α-pinene, β-pinene, α-phellandrene, 3-carene, βmyrcene,α-terpinene,limonene,γ-terpinene,and ocimene made by the National Institute of Metrology, China. The TCT-GC-MS instrument has been calibrated using standard gases. The recovery rate of standard addition was between 90 and 110% and coefficients of variance were less than 5%.

    The emission rates of dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area were respectively calculated according to the following Equation:

    where, ER is the chemical substance emission rate of each forest species (in C, μg·g-1·h-1); m is the mass ofthe chemical substance in adsorption tube (in C, μg); t is the sampling time (h); M is the leaf biomass of forest species in the sapmling bag (dry weight, g).

    Table 1 Sampling dates and averaged environmental conditions during the samplings in 2017

    Leaf biomass calculation

    The leaf biomass data in the Jing-Jin-Ji area were obtained using the method of volume and biomass conversion. The statistical method of subdividing species enables them to correspond to more appropriate emission factors and biomass, by considering the difference of the same species in different regions. Based on the volumes obtained from the national forest resource inventory, the leaf biomass of the dominant forest species was calculated as follows:

    where B is leaf biomass of forest species (dry weight, g);V is tree volume (m3); DTis the basic density of tree trunk (the ratio of absolute dry wood mass to raw wood volume); PTand PLare the proportion of stem and leaf in the total biomass of tree layer respectively. The data of PT, PLand DTwere retrieved from literature (Wang et al. 2001). In this study, the proportion of trunk density, leaf and stem biomass to the total biomass of dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area were presented in Table A1. Tree volumes data were mainly based on national forest resources survey data, checked and supplemented by forestry network and field survey.

    Methods of chemical activity evaluation

    Different BVOCs components have different chemical compositions and physical properties, thus the atmospheric chemical reaction capacity is different (Goldan et al. 2004). The chemical reactivity of different components and their ability to generate ozone can provide reference for the control measures of BVOCs. This study adopted two methods namely the maximum incremental reactivity (MIR) method and the ·OH reaction rate(LOH) method, to comprehensively analyze the chemical activity of the BVOCs components of dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area.

    Ozone formation potential (OFP) was used to evaluate the potential release of BVOCs into the atmosphere under optimal reaction conditions for ozone generation and measure the reactivity of different BVOCs components (Carter 1991). The calculation of OFP is shown in Eq. 10:

    where OFPiis the ozone generation potential of each component (μg·m-3); MIRiis the maximum incremental response factor of each component ((g O3)/(g VOCs))(Carter 2008); Ciis the mass concentration of each component (μg·m-3).

    The chemical reaction of the troposphere during the daytime is mainly OH radicals (·OH). The volatile organic compounds will first react with ·OH, and then react with O2and NOxunder light condition to generate new free radicals to initiate the chain reaction. The first reaction is a key step that determines the rate of atmospheric photochemical reaction chain, so the consumption rate of ·OH can be used to evaluate the photochemical activity of BVOCs. The calculation is shown in Eq. 11:

    where LiOHis the consumption rate of each component to atmospheric ·OH (s-1); KiOHis the reaction rate constant between each component and atmospheric ·OH(cm3·molecule-1·s-1) (https://kinetics.nist.gov/kinetics/index.jsp); [BVOCs]iis the atmospheric molecular concentration of every component (molecule·cm-3).

    Results and discussion

    Emission budgets and compositions of BVOCs

    According to Eqs. 6 and 7, based on the measured standardized emission factors of each forest species, leaf biomass data obtained from the forest resource data and field survey, and the annual meteorological data through the NASA website,the annual BVOCs emission of every component of each forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area was estimated. BVOCs emitted from dominant forest species were divided into isoprene, monoterpenes (including αpinene, β-pinene, β-myrcene, limonene, 3-carene and so on), and other VOCs (OVOCs) (Table A2). The normalized emission rates of BVOCs in dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area are tabulated in Table 2. The total annual emission of BVOCs from dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area was estimated to be 70.8 Gg C·year-1, including 40.5% (28.7 Gg C·year-1) of isoprene,36.0% (25.5 Gg C·year-1) of monoterpenes and 23.4%(16.6 Gg C·year-1)of other VOCs,respectively.

    Different forest species can produce various components of BVOCs. Figure 3 shows each component and proportion of BVOCs emitted by nine dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area. Isoprene was emitted as the main component from broadleaf trees such as Betula platyphylla, Quercus variabilis, and Salix babylonica.Aside from isoprene, some of the broadleaf trees (i.e.Populus tomentosa, Robinia pseudoacacia, Ulmus pumila) and most coniferous trees like Platycladus orientalis, Pinus tabuliformis, and Larix gmelinii released monoterpenes such as α-pinene, β-pinene, β-myrcene and limonene. As shown in Fig. A1, the isoprene emission was mainly detected from Quercus variabilis andPopulus tomentosa that recording at 41.2 % and 31.1%,respectively. On the other hand, Platycladus orientalis and Pinus tabuliformis are the significant emitters of monoterpenes, providing 56.1 % and 36.0%, respectively.Therefore, it was revealed that these four forest species are the main contributors to BVOCs emission in the Jing-Jin-Ji area: 19.3 Gg C·year-1(27.2%) from Platycladus orientalis, 14.0 Gg C·year-1(19.8%) from Quercus variabilis, 13.4 Gg C·year-1(18.9%) from Populus tomentosa and 12.2 Gg C·year-1(17.2%) from of Pinus tabuliformis (Table A2).

    Table 2 Normalized emission rates of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs)in dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area (μg·g-1·h-1)

    Monthly and seasonal variations

    As shown in Eqs. 6 and 7, by multiplying the measured standardized emission factors of each forest species,monthly leaf biomass data obtained from the forest resource data and field survey, and the monthly meteorological data through the NASA website in 2017, the monthly and seasonal BVOCs emission of every component of each forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area were estimated. Table A3 and Fig. 4 indicate that the BVOCs emission and composition in the Jing-Jin-Ji area demonstrate significant variations for both monthly and seasonal. A distinct unimodal change with the month for the emissions of BVOCs was observed.

    Fig.3 The BVOCs emission(106 g C·year-1) (a) and proportion of each component (%)(b) from dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area(BP:Betula platyphylla; QV:Quercus variabilis; UP:Ulmus pumila; PoT:Populus tomentosa; RP:Robinia pseudoacacia; PO:Platycladus orientalis;PiT:Pinus tabuliformis; SB:Salix babylonica;LG: Larix gmelinii)

    Fig.4 The monthly BVOCs emission from dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area(106 g C)

    The total BVOCs emission was peaked in July with a total amount of 15.8 Gg C·year-1, while recorded a minimum value in January of 0.4 Gg C·year-1with two orders of magnitude difference. In January, the emission of isoprene from vegetation hit the lowest point at 1.9×106g C·year-1due to low temperature, less sunlight,and the limited leaves of biomass. In contrast, the emission of isoprene achieved the highest point at 7.4 Gg C·year-1in July when the air temperature was high with presence of strong sunlight, and abundant leaves of biomass. Nevertheless, the emission of isoprene fluctuated in other months between the maximum and minimum values obtained. The same trend was obtained from the emission of monoterpenes and other VOCs in which the highest emission was recorded in July while the lowest emission was detected in January.

    Overall, the total BVOCs emission was peaked in summer (June, July, and August) and bottomed out in winter(December,January and February). In spring,the BVOCs emission showed an upward trend in which the isoprene was increased the most. Despite the emissions of both monoterpenes and other VOCs also increased,the values recorded were comparatively lower than the isoprene that could be due to the more significant influence of sunlight and temperature on isoprene. Under these conditions in spring, the vegetation was still in the growing stage where the leaves were immature with regular enzyme activity. Therefore, the emission of BVOCs in spring only accounted for 17.8% in the whole year.Comparatively, the average daily temperature and sunshine time were significantly increased in summer than that in spring. Under these conditions, the vegetation leaves reached the mature stage and grown with maximum leaf area; consequently, the highest enzyme activity was achieved. As a result, high emission of BVOCs were observed in summer with the emission of 43.8 Gg C·year-1that accounting for 61.9% of the total annual emissions. In autumn, the temperature difference was noticeable. The leaves were transformed from the mature leaves to the decaying leaves. Therefore, the emission of BVOCs showed a decreasing trending in September, followed by a sharp decrease in October, and finally constant in November. The total emission of BVOCs recorded in autumn at only 18.5%. Due to low temperatures and limited solar irradiation in winter, the emission of BVOCs reached the lowest value of the year at only 1.8%.

    Spatial distribution

    The leaf biomass data of each dominant forest species from 13 cities in the Jing-Jin-Ji area were obtained based on the forest resources data and field survey, while the annual meteorological data of each city were retrieved from the NASA website. Then, the standardized emission factors,leaf biomass data and meteorological factors were calculated according to Eqs. 6 and 7 to obtain the annual BVOCs emission data of each forest species in 13 cities of the Jing-Jin-Ji area in 2017. The BVOCs emission of dominant forest species in 13 cities (Beijing,Tianjin, Baoding, Cangzhou, Chengde, Handan, Hengshui, Langfang, Qinhuangdao, Shijiazhuang, Tangshan,Xingtai, Zhangjiakou) throughout 2017 were calculated to study the spatial distribution of BVOCs emission in the Jing-Jin-Ji area. As shown in Table A4 and Fig. 5, the BVOCs emission fluxes and the compositions in the Jing-Jin-Ji area demonstrate an apparent spatial distribution. Given that Chengde and Beijing have high coverage of vegetation, and the presence of dominant species(Betula platyphylla, Quercus variabilis, Populus tomentosa and Pinus tabulaeformis) in Wuling Mountain Reserve and Saihanba Forest Farm in Chengde showed higher BVOCs emission rates. Therefore, Chengde contributed the highest BVOCs emission of dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area with 20.4 Gg C·year-1(28.8%), followed by Beijing with a total discharge of 17.6 Gg C·year-1(24.9%). The remaining proportion of BVOCs emission was detected from Baoding, Tangshan,Hengshui and Zhangjiakou. Furthermore, the detected BVOCs emission of Cangzhou (0.4 Gg C·year-1, 0.6%)and Langfang (0.5 Gg C·year-1, 0.8%) were less than the others due to their smaller city area and lower vegetation coverage. In terms of compositions (Fig. A2), Chengde presents the largest isoprene emission with 26.8% (7.7 Gg C·year-1) of the total isoprene emissions released by dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area. This could probably due to the extensive vegetation coverage of deciduous trees with high isoprene emissions such as Quercus variabilis. Asides from Chengde, Beijing also shows a high emissions of monoterpenes (9.4 Gg C·year-1) that accounting for 36.9% of the total monoterpenes emissions. This could be attributed to the emission of α-pinene and β-myrcene from coniferous such as Platycladus orientalis and Pinus tabuliformis,which could also explain the highest emissions detected for Chengde in spring, summer, and autumn, but lower than Beijing particularly in winter. Chengde possesses the most substantial difference in emissions in winter and summer because the dominant forest species here are mostly deciduous trees. The low temperature and less sunshine in winter would have caused the leaf biomass of deciduous trees to emit lower BVOCs; thus the emission was reduced significantly (Fig. 6). In general,the distribution of BVOCs emission fluxes was highly consistent with the distribution of vegetation.

    Overall, the BVOCs emission estimated in this study were much lower than those estimated by Klinger et al.(2002) (Table 3). It is due to the difference in the scope of the study objects where this study focused on the specific dominant forest species while Klinger et al. (2002)covered all species in this area, including grasslands,shrublands, forests,and peatlands.

    Chemical activity evaluation

    The contribution of BVOCs to atmospheric chemical reaction depends on the level of its emissions and closely related to their chemical activity. Since the olefins with double bonds are more active compounds in addition to the main BVOCs components released by dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area are isoprene and monoterpenes, the chemical activity of isoprene and monoterpenes by the maximum incremental reactivity(MIR) method and the ·OH reaction rate (LOH) method were analyzed comprehensively. Figure 7 shows the OFP and LiOHvalues and activity contribution rates of every dominant forest species. Overall, the activity contribution rate of isoprene and monoterpenes of each species calculated using two methods are basically consistent.Among them, the OFP values of Robinia pseudoacacia,

    Fig.5 The BVOCs emission(106 g C·year-1) (a)and proportion of each component (%)(b) in each city in the Jing-Jin-Ji area(BJ:Beijing;TJ:Tianjin;BD:Baoding;CZ:Cangzhou;CD:Chengde;HD:Handan;HS:Hengshui;LF: Langfang; QHD:Qinhuangdao; SJZ:Shijiazhuang;TS:Tangshan;XT:Xingtai;ZJK:Zhangjiakou)

    Fig.6 The seasonal BVOCs emission distribution of dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area(106 g C)

    Populus tomentosa and Quercus variabilis obtained by the MIR method were higher, followed by Betula platyphylla and Pinus tabuliformis while the lowest OFP value was obtained for Ulmus pumila. The forest species with higher LiOHvalue obtained by the LOHmethod were Robinia pseudoacacia, Populus tomentosa, Platycladus orientalis, Pinus tabuliformis and Quercus variabilis while Larix gmelinii had the lowest LiOHvalue. The difference between the two methods was due to their different principles in which the LOHmethod reflects the reactivity by calculating the ability of BVOCs and OH radical to produce RO2without considering the influence of other subsequent reactions. Although the MIRmethod considers a series of responses of BVOCs, the lack of some MIR coefficients also affect the results.Based on the two approaches, Robinia pseudoacacia, Populus tomentosa,Quercus variabilis and Pinus tabulaeformis are the dominant forest species that contribute higher BVOCs reaction activity in the Jing-Jin-Ji area. Among them, Robinia pseudoacacia,

    Table 3 Comparison of estimated BVOCs emission in different regions

    Populus tomentosa and Quercus variabilis have higher reactivity due to their higher isoprene activity contribution rate.The OFP and LOHvalue of Robinia pseudoacacia, Populus tomentosa, Quercus variabilis were 156.76 μg·m-3and 138.36×105, 87.19 μg·m-3and 78.86×105, 87.19 μg·m-3and 78.86×105,respectively.In addition,Pinus tabulaeformis was detected with a higher activity contribution rate of monoterpenes, especially β-myrcene, limonene, and αpinene, hence the OFP and LOHwere detected at 43.63 μg·m-3and 54.67×105,respectively.

    Uncertainty in BVOCs emission estimates

    Since the emissions of BVOCs by vegetation are influenced by multiple factors, the uncertainty needs to be taken into consideration for the estimation. The primary sources of uncertainty in BVOCs emission estimation include emission factors, leaf biomass, vegetation distribution, model algorithm and meteorological parameters.Estimation of total BVOCs emission released by vegetation on the ground in the Jing-Jin-Ji area was studied using different algorithms and data sources. Different models, emission factors or vegetation type data would produce considerably different emissions (approximately two-fold) (Carlton and Baker 2011; Hogrefe et al. 2011;Chen et al. 2018). Given the above, the BVOCs emission estimated in this study are based on the field vegetation investigation and measured forest species emission rates as an effort to eliminate the uncertainties further. However, the emission rates obtained through experiments are mostly related to plant physiological conditions.Hence, the differences in the values could be due to uncertainty or uncontrollable stressors, environmental conditions, or genetically related metabolic processes(Loreto et al. 2009; Monson et al. 2013). For the sampling method, the dynamic headspace method used in this study has more air circulation than the static system, thus the real existing environment of plants can be maintained in good condition. However, the disturbance to plants during the process and the unrealistic high concentration of H2O caused by transpiration may interfere with the leaf stomata; consequently the emissions could be impacted (Ortega et al. 2008). Moreover, the rapid reactivity of BVOCs would also affect the deviation of flux and the analysis performed by the GC-MS instrument may also possess potential measurement errors. As for the emission factors in this study, the influence of solar radiation on monoterpene emissions is not considered in the calculation. The emission mechanism of different monoterpenes varies greatly in which some of the monoterpenes are reported to be positively correlated with temperature (Guenther et al. 2012). The harvesting of leaf biomass was calculated via biological parameters such as forest vegetation accumulation and trunk density. It should be noted that the manual measurement errors would also affect the accuracy of the calculation. Furthermore, the meteorological data used in this study were retrieved from the MODIS satellite published on the NASA website. The acquisition, processing, analysis and conversion of satellite data would further introduce various types and degrees of uncertainty. For example, the positioning error of the ground station, the positioning error of the satellite and the tropospheric time delay will cause the accuracy and stability of the satellite calibration and the delay error in time transmission. In addition, in the inversion process of meteorological satellite remote sensing, atmospheric state deviation, model error, model parameter error, etc.,will also affect the inversion accuracy. In detail, there will be a systematic deviation between the reference temperature profile and the actual atmospheric profile during the seasonal transition, and solar radiation will cause large diurnal changes in the temperature of the troposphere bottom, which will cause inversion errors,and the errors caused are more complicated. Therefore,the estimated BVOCs emission using the satellite detection data may be higher or lower than the actual observed BVOCs emission. By comparing multiple sets of monthly measured data and satellite data, the difference between them is less than 5%. Overall, it is suggested that future work should be emphasized on the reduction and prevention of those uncertainties to obtain more accurate data.

    Fig.7 The reaction activity and activity contribution rate of BVOCs of dominant tree species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area calculated by MIR method(a)and LOH method(b)

    Conclusions

    The total annual emission of BVOCs released from dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area was estimated to be 70.8 Gg C·year-1. Isoprene, monoterpenes,and other VOCs contributed 40.5%, 36.0%, and 23.4%,respectively. As for monthly and seasonal variations, the emission of BVOCs was peaked in summer (June, July,and August) and bottomed out in winter (December,January, and February). This explains the summer represents the season with the most severe ozone pollution.In terms of spatial distribution, high BVOCs emission was mainly distributed in the Taihang Mountains and the Yanshan Mountains. Chengde contributed the most followed by Beijing, inferring that these two cities should have more attention to mitigate BVOCs emission to atmospheric ozone and particulate pollution. In terms of forest species, Platycladus orientalis, Quercus variabilis,Populus tomentosa, Pinus tabulaeformis and Robinia pseudoacacia were the primary contributors of BVOCs emission and atmospheric reactivity. In conclusion, it was recommended that the use of these forest species for greening configuration should be avoided since they negatively impact the atmosphere due to high emission or reactivity of BVOCs.

    Abbreviations

    BVOCs: Biogenic volatile organic compounds;AVOCs: Anthropogenic volatile organic compounds; G93: Guenther model developed in 1993;NMVOCs: Non-methane volatile organic compounds; PANs: Peroxyacetyl nitrate; SOA: Secondary organic aerosols; PM: Particulate matter;OH: Hydroxyl radical; PFT: Plant functional types; PAR:Photosynthetically active radiation; MIR:Maximum incremental reactivity; LOH: OH reaction rate;OFP: Ozone formation potential; OVOCs: Other VOCs; TVOCs: Total VOCs;NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology; PAMS: Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations

    Supplementary Information

    The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00322-y.

    Additional file 1: Table A1.The parameters of dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area.Table A2.The annual emissions of BVOCs from dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area (106g C·year–1).Table A3.The monthly emissions of BVOCs from dominant forest species in the Jing-Jin-Ji area (106g C).Table A4.The BVOCs emission of 13 cities in the Jing-Jin-Ji area (106g C·year–1).Figure A1.Contributions of dominant forest species to the components of BVOCs in the Jing-Jin-Ji area.Figure A2.The contribution of BVOCs emitted from the dominant forest species in each city in the Jing-Jin-Ji area.

    Acknowledgements

    Not applicable.

    Authors’contributions

    Xiaoxiu Lun, Qiang Wang and Ying Lin conceived the study; Ying Lin participated in study design, field measurements,data processing and writing the manuscript;Xiaoxi Jing and Chong Fan took part in the field measurements; Wei Tang and Zhongzhi Zhang took part in the procedure of data processing. All authors contributed critically to successive drafts and gave final approval for publication.

    Funding

    This work was supported by the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.42077454), National Research Program for Key Issues in Air Pollution Control (DQGG202126),National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.41605077).

    Availability of data and materials

    The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable requests.

    Declarations

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Author details

    1College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, 100083 Beijing, China.2Institute of Atmospheric Environment,Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, 100012 Beijing, China.

    Received: 22 October 2020 Accepted: 3 June 2021

    亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 赤兔流量卡办理| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 乱人视频在线观看| 色视频www国产| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 99久久精品热视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 永久网站在线| 国产精品三级大全| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 成人综合一区亚洲| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产成人精品婷婷| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产永久视频网站| or卡值多少钱| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 在线免费观看的www视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 内地一区二区视频在线| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 色视频www国产| 91狼人影院| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 伦精品一区二区三区| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲最大成人av| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 午夜视频国产福利| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 直男gayav资源| 亚洲成色77777| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 黑人高潮一二区| 久久久色成人| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 日本免费a在线| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 日韩中字成人| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产成人精品一,二区| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 日韩强制内射视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 岛国毛片在线播放| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 欧美97在线视频| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产在视频线在精品| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| a级毛色黄片| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产精品久久视频播放| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 免费看a级黄色片| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 欧美区成人在线视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 七月丁香在线播放| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 中文字幕制服av| 黄色日韩在线| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产一级毛片在线| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 99久国产av精品| av天堂中文字幕网| or卡值多少钱| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 中文字幕制服av| 日本免费在线观看一区| av一本久久久久| 久久草成人影院| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 插逼视频在线观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 青春草国产在线视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲图色成人| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| av卡一久久| 国产成人a区在线观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产av不卡久久| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲成色77777| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 精品久久久久久电影网| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 老司机影院毛片| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网 | 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| h日本视频在线播放| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | av天堂中文字幕网| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 全区人妻精品视频| 一夜夜www| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 97热精品久久久久久| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 少妇丰满av| 久久久久网色| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 直男gayav资源| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 美女主播在线视频| 亚洲精品第二区| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 69av精品久久久久久| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 在现免费观看毛片| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 午夜日本视频在线| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 日韩成人伦理影院| 九色成人免费人妻av| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | av专区在线播放| 精品国产三级普通话版| 超碰97精品在线观看| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 内地一区二区视频在线| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲国产色片| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 床上黄色一级片| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 美女主播在线视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| av专区在线播放| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 中国国产av一级| 国产成人a区在线观看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 欧美3d第一页| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 97热精品久久久久久| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲av一区综合| 日韩电影二区| 国产成人精品婷婷| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 老女人水多毛片| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 水蜜桃什么品种好| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 黄色日韩在线| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 日本一二三区视频观看| 黄色日韩在线| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 日韩中字成人| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产在视频线精品| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久午夜福利片| www.av在线官网国产| 免费大片18禁| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产成人精品婷婷| 日韩电影二区| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 精品久久久久久电影网| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 成人av在线播放网站| 久久久久国产网址| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 中文天堂在线官网| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 久久久久精品性色| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 午夜免费观看性视频| 成年版毛片免费区| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网 | 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 久久久久久久久久成人| 色吧在线观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 亚洲在线观看片| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 国产精品三级大全| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 秋霞伦理黄片| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| or卡值多少钱| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 赤兔流量卡办理| 两个人的视频大全免费| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 综合色丁香网| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 少妇丰满av| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产亚洲最大av| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产精品.久久久| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 99久久精品热视频| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 免费少妇av软件| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 赤兔流量卡办理| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 久久久久久久久中文| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 69人妻影院| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 美女高潮的动态| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲在线观看片| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 亚洲性久久影院| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲色图av天堂| 性色avwww在线观看| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 中文字幕制服av| www.色视频.com| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 欧美日本视频| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 欧美区成人在线视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| ponron亚洲| 国产视频内射| 热99在线观看视频| 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲国产色片| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 岛国毛片在线播放| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 91精品国产九色| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 亚洲av成人av| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 国产老妇女一区| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲精品视频女| 一级av片app| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 成人综合一区亚洲| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产黄片美女视频| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产视频内射| 免费av毛片视频| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 少妇的逼好多水| 特级一级黄色大片| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲图色成人| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 色综合色国产| 亚洲国产色片| 日韩中字成人| 中文字幕久久专区| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产色婷婷99| 免费观看性生交大片5| 日本免费在线观看一区| 色视频www国产| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 免费看不卡的av| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 91狼人影院| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 22中文网久久字幕| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| www.av在线官网国产| 在线 av 中文字幕| 深夜a级毛片| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| av专区在线播放| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 欧美+日韩+精品| 婷婷色综合www| av播播在线观看一区| 老女人水多毛片| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲精品一二三| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 麻豆成人av视频| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 国产成年人精品一区二区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 美女主播在线视频| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 一区二区三区免费毛片| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 成人欧美大片| 97热精品久久久久久| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| av天堂中文字幕网| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 一级毛片 在线播放| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 婷婷色综合www| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| av国产免费在线观看| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚州av有码| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看|