• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Linkage of microbial living communities and residues to soil organic carbon accumulation along a forest restoration gradient in southern China

    2021-02-28 09:13:40ShuoZhangQiDengYingPingWangJiChenMengxiaoYuXiFangHongboHeJinleiChenPingpingXuShenhuaWangandJunhuaYan
    Forest Ecosystems 2021年4期

    Shuo Zhang,Qi Deng,Ying-Ping Wang,Ji Chen,Mengxiao Yu,Xi Fang,Hongbo He,Jinlei Chen,Pingping Xu,2,Shenhua Wang,2 and Junhua Yan*

    Abstract

    Keywords: Soil carbon stock, Microbial biomass,Microbial residues, Forest restoration, Soil clay content, Soil layer

    Background

    Forest restoration or reforestation is considered an effective land-based climate mitigation strategy through carbon (C) sequestration in both plant biomass and soil(Lal 2003; Laganière et al. 2010). Many countries, especially China, have implemented national programs to preserve and expand forests, which have substantially contributed to Earth’s greening in the past 20 years(Chen et al. 2019). With the establishment of trees, plant biomass C of a restored forest can reach a similar amount to the previously undisturbed forest within several decades (Farley et al. 2004; Nave et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2017). However, the restoration of soil C to the level of undisturbed forests usually takes much longer times. Furthermore, the impact of forest restoration on soil C storage is more variable than C storage in plant biomass, and the key underlying mechanisms for those differential responses are still unclear (Dou et al. 2013;Zhang et al.2019;Xiong et al.2020).Therefore,our knowledge is very limited in accurately predicting the C sequestration potential of restored forests(Wieder et al.2018).

    Change of soil C pool with forest restoration depends on the balance between plant- and microbial-derived C inputs and outputs processes (Jastrow et al. 2007). However, recent work suggests that microorganisms can directly promote soil organic C (SOC) formation through the selective retention of anabolic byproducts, especially microbial cells and residues, via an in vivo turnover pathway (Liang et al. 2017). The fraction of soil C derived from microbial residues can be about 40 times larger than the living microbial biomass C, and even larger than 50% of total SOC in some regions (Liang et al. 2019). Amino sugars (AS) are the key compounds of microbial cell walls and primarily occur as microbial residues (Kallenbach et al. 2016). Amino sugars are stable against fluctuations in living microbial biomass size, providing a time-integrated indicator of microbial contributions to soil C storage (Liang et al. 2017). Three prominent AS in the soil are glucosamine (GluN), galactosamine (GalN), and muramic acid (MurA). Among them, GluN is more abundant in fungal than bacterial cell walls, while MurA is exclusively originated from bacteria, and GalN is an essential component of extracellular polymeric substances in the soil (Amelung et al.2001b). A recent study in northern China found that not only living microbial biomass (represent by phospholipid fatty acids, PLFAs) but also microbial residues (represent by amino sugars, AS) consistently increased with forest restoration (Shao et al. 2019). Therefore, microbial metabolism may play an increasingly important role in SOC sequestration following forest restoration (Kiem and K?gel-Knabner 2003; Ma et al. 2018; Chen et al.2020b). Meanwhile, the function of fungi and bacteria in C sequestration may be varied due to the different substrate utilization strategies (Rinnan and B??th 2009).Specifically, Xu et al. (2019) found that fungi are more able to utilize the recalcitrant substrates in soil, while Koranda et al. (2014)found that bacteria are more favorable in utilizing available substrates. Furthermore, Liang et al. (2019) found that the AS retention patterns in soil varied between fungi and bacteria. Consequently, a better understanding of different AS and their contribution to SOC would profoundly improve the model projection of soil C sequestration with the implementation of forest restoration.

    Forests in southern China account for about one-third of the total forest area in China (Zhou et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2013). Meanwhile, recent satellite data revealed that forest restoration or reforestation in southern China dominated the greening trend in China over the last three decades (Chen et al. 2019). Unlike northern China,southern China has a relatively warm and moist climate,favoring microbial proliferation and rapid C turnover(Yang et al. 2020). As a result, high-quality (low C:N)broadleaved litter in the southern forest is more easily decomposed by microorganisms than the coniferous litter in the northern forest. Furthermore, soils in southern China are rich in clay and reactive metal oxides (e.g.,iron and aluminum) (Xu et al. 2013), which may inhibit microbial activity through the formation of organomineral complexes that can protect SOC from microbial attack (Six et al. 2002). These factors influence the change of PLFAs and their metabolism may also have various effects on the accumulation of AS in soil following forest restoration. For instance, microbial-derived relatively low molecular weight residue-C is readily adsorbed by soil clay (Ni et al. 2020). Therefore, high soil clay content in subtropical forests may favor the retention of AS and stabilization of SOC. However, the contribution of AS-derived C (AS-C) to SOC and its underlying mechanisms following forest restoration in southern China are understudied.

    The objectives of this study were to explore how the contribution of PLFAs and AS-C to SOC, and its influencing factors during the forest restoration processes.Here, we substituted space for time by selecting forests across a restoration gradient with average stand ages of 14, 49, 70, and >90 years in Changsha County, southern China. Soil samples were collected from each of these four stages at 0–10 and 10–20 cm soil layers. We measured both PLFAs and AS. Our null hypothesis is that SOC, PLFAs and AS will increase due to the increasing rate of plant residue inputs to soil following forest restoration. In addition, we hypothesized that the contribution of AS-C to SOC increased with time after forest restoration.Three research questions motivated our study:(1) whether PLFAs, AS and SOC consistently increased following forest restoration;(2)how the retention patterns in soil between fungal and bacterial residues varied across the forest gradients; and (3) what factors controlled the change in PLFAs and the contribution of AS-C to SOC.

    Methods

    Site description

    The study was conducted at Changsha County, Hunan Province, southern China (113°17′–113°27′ E, 28°23′–28°24′ N). The terrains generally are low-hilly landforms with an altitude of 100 to 550 m, and the slope is between 20°and 30°. The regional climate is a typical monsoon climate. The mean annual temperature is 16.5 °C,with the warmest month in July (30.7 °C)and the coldest month in January (6.4 °C) (Ouyang et al. 2016). The mean annual precipitation is about 1,500 mm with most rainfall occurring between April and August (Zhu et al.2016). The soil is classified as Acrisol according to World Reference Base for Soil Resources that developed from slate and shale parent rock (IUSS Working Group WRB 2007).

    The climax vegetation of the region is subtropical evergreen broadleaved forests. A range of secondary forests following different restoration stages are found in this region with sporadic primary forests due to the harvesting and natural disturbances. Based on species composition, recovery time, and dominant tree species (Gu et al. 2019; Chen et al. 2020a), the restoration can be divided into four stages. These forests were regenerated naturally without any tree planting. In this study, four adjacent vegetation communities, with basically similar slope and soil parent materials, were selected to represent a vegetation restoration gradient (using the spacefor-time substitution method). The details of the restoration stages are as follows:

    (1) Shrub forests (hereinafter referred to as F14). The

    native evergreen broadleaved forests were cleared and prescribed-burnt in 1965, then reforested with Cunninghamia lanceolata in 1966. The plantations were clear-cut in 1989 and logged every 3 to 5 years until 2004, then left undisturbed. The community was dominated by shrubs;

    (2)Coniferous and broadleaved mixed forests(hereinafter referred to as F49). The native evergreen broadleaved forests were clear-cut in the early 1970 s,then naturally recovered for nearly 50 years, and formed coniferous and broadleaved mixed forests;

    (3) Evergreen broadleaved forests (hereinafter referred to as F70). The native evergreen broadleaved forests were protected by residents for many years, and the stand ages are about 70 years;

    (4) Old-growth forests (hereinafter referred to as UF).The native evergreen broadleaved forests were well protected without human disturbances. The stand ages are more than 90 years.

    Soil sampling

    In November 2019, 6 plots (20 m × 20 m) were randomly established within each restoration stage (F14,F49, F70, and UF) to avoid any possible pseudoreplicates. There were in total 24 selected plots across the four different restoration stages. Table 1 includes the general characteristics of the four forest restoration stages. Soil samples were collected with similar slopes(about 20°) and aspects (northwest) from the depth of 0–10 cm (herein defined as topsoil) and 10–20 cm(herein defined as subsoil) in each plot, respectively.After removing surface litter, 10 core samples were collected using a stainless-steel corer (5 cm diameter) along an S-shape pattern from each soil layer within each plot.The core samples were pooled and homogenized into a single sample. A total of 48 soil samples were collected,representing the 4 forest restoration stages × 6 plots × 2 soil layers. Fresh soils were placed in the Ziplocked bags and transported to the laboratory within 12 h ofcollection. Each soil sample was divided into 3 subsamples. All the subsamples were sieved through a 2-mm sieve to remove stones and coarse roots. The subsamples for physic-chemical analysis were air-dried for 30 days,then ground and passed through a 0.15-mm sieve. The other subsamples for analysis of PLFAs were stored at 4-°C and were completed within one month.

    Table 1 General characteristics of the four forest restoration stages

    Soil properties analysis

    The total carbon(TC) content of soil was measured with an elemental analyzer(Vario MAX,Elementar,Germany).Because soils are acidic (Table 2), the SOC content was equated to TC content. Soil pH was measured in the water and 1 mol·L–1KCL (1:2.5 soil: solution) using a pH meter (Five Easy Plus? FP20-Meter, Mettler Toledo,Switzerland). Soil clay (particle size <2 μm), silt (particle size 2–50 μm), and sand (particle size 50–2000 μm) contents were measured using laser diffraction (MasterSizer 2000, Malvern Corporation). Soil bulk density (BD) was measured gravimetrically in triplicate for generic horizons using the cutting-ring method. SOC stock was calculated as: SOC stock (Mg C·ha-1)=SOC (%) × BD (g·cm–3) ×soil depth (cm) × (1 – δ),and δ is the mass percentage of fragments and stone(>2 mm).

    Microbial PLFAs analysis

    Microbial PLFAs were measured following a protocol by Frosteg?rd et al. (1993). Briefly, PLFAs were extracted from 2-g freeze-dried and homogenized soil using a specific ratio (1:2:0.8 by vol.; pH 7.4) in a single-phase mixture of chloroform/methanol/phosphate buffer.The PLFA extractions were analyzed using a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame-ionization detector(Agilent 6890,Agilent Technologies,Palo Alto,CA,USA).The content of each fatty acid was expressed as nmol per g of dry soil (nmol·g–1) by the 19:0 internal standard contents (Vestal and White 1989). The total PLFAs content was calculated by summing up all fatty acids mentioned below (C atoms numbers <20). Microbial functional groups were represented by a suit of fatty acids in our study as follows(Frosteg?rd and B??th 1996;Zelles 1997):14:00, 15:00, 16:00, 17:00, 18:00, i19:0, c19:0ω8c, and 10Me19:1ω7c were used as general bacteria; i14:0, i15:0,a15:0, i16:0, i17:0, a17:0, i18:0, i17:1ω9c for gram-positive bacteria; 16:1ω7c, cy17:0, 18:1ω7, 17:1ω8c, and 10Me17:1ω7c for gram-negative bacteria; 18:1ω9c, 18:2ω6c, and 18:3ω3c for fungi; 16:1ω5c for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; 10Me16:0, 10Me17:0 and 10Me18:0 for actinomycete. The ratio of fungal to bacterial PLFAs (F:B) was calculated by dividing the sum of all fungal and bacterial fatty acids separately (Frey et al. 1999; Strickland and Rousk 2010).

    Amino sugars analysis

    Amino sugars were analyzed following a method by Zhang and Amelung (1996) with slight modifications.Briefly, 0.5 g air-dried soil sample (<2 mm) was hydrolyzed with 10 mL 6 mol·L–1HCl at 105 °C for 8 h in a closed hydrolysis flask. The internal standard (100 μg myoinositol) was added to the cooling hydrolysate. The filtered hydrolysate was dried at 52 °C using a rotary evaporator. The dried sample was re-dissolved in the approximately 6 mL deionized water and adjusted pH to 6.6–6.8 with 1 mol·L–1KOH. Then, the sample wascentrifuged for 10 min at 935 g and the supernatant was re-rotating evaporation at 52 °C. After drying, 3 mL absolute methanol was added to dissolve the residue.The supernatant was transferred to a conical reaction vial and dried by N2gas at 45 °C. The dried residue was added with 1 mL deionized water and 100 μL Nmethylglucamine, then freeze-drying. After drying, the residue was dissolved with a 300-μL derivatization reagent, which contains 32 mg?mL–1hydroxylamine hydrochloride and 40 mg?mL–14-dimethylaminopyridine in pyridine-methanol (4:1 v/v). The sample solution was fully mixed by swirling and heating at 75–80 °C for 35 min. After cooling, the derivative was acetylated with 1 mL acetic anhydride and reheated at 75–80 °C for 25 min, then mixed with 1.5 mL dichloromethane. Excessive derivatization reagent (residual anhydride)was removed by extracting with 1 mol?L–1HCL and deionized water. The remaining dichloromethane phase contains AS derivative was dried by N2gas at 45 °C. Finally, the AS derivatives were redissolved with 200 μL ethyl acetate-hexane (1:1) and separated on a gas chromatograph (HP 6890, Agilent, USA) equipped with an HP-5 fused silica column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm).The individual AS (glucosamine, galactosamine, and muramic acid) derivatives were separated by referencing the retention times of authentic standards. The total AS content was calculated as the sum of the individual AS(Amelung et al. 2001b). The fungal residue-C (GluN-C),bacterial residue-C (MurA-C), and GalN-C were using the following equations (Engelking et al. 2007): GluNC=72 × GluN/179.2, GalN-C=72 × GalN/179.2, and MurA-C=108 × MurA/251.23. The total AS-C was estimated as the sum of GluN-C, GalN-C and MurA-C. The proportion of AS-C in SOC content was used to describe the relative contribution of AS-C to SOC (AS-C/SOC) (Liang et al. 2019). The ratio of GluN to MurA(GluN:MurA) was calculated to differentiate fungal and bacterial residues in soil (Zhang et al. 1998; Amelung et al. 2001a;Six et al. 2006).

    Table 2 Soil and microbial properties between the four forest restoration stages

    Statistical analysis

    The data were first tested for normal distribution and homogeneity of variance, and no data were natural logtransformed. After confirming the data followed a normal distribution, a one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (HSD)was used to determine how SOC, microbial PLFAs, and AS changed between forest restoration stages and soil layers. In addition, a generalized linear model (GLM)with normal distribution was applied to evaluate the relationship of SOC, PLFAs, AS, and AS-C/SOC to plant and soil properties. All statistical analyses were carried out with IBM SPSS Version 24.0 (IBM Corp., New York,USA) statistical software. Figures were plotted with SigmaPlot 14.0 software (Systat Software Inc., San Jose,USA).

    Results

    Variation of soil properties following forest restoration

    The SOC content in both soil layers generally increased following forest restoration (Fig. 1, P <0.05), with the lowest value in F14 (10.65 and 6.96 g?kg–1in topsoil and subsoil, respectively). There was no significant difference in SOC content between F70 and UF in topsoil. Similarly, there was no difference in SOC content between F49 and F70 in subsoil. The SOC stock increased with time since forest restoration (Fig. 1, P <0.05), with the lowest value in F14 (24.60 Mg C?ha–1) and the highest value in UF (51.12 Mg C?ha–1).

    Soil pH, soil BD, and soil clay content changed with soil layer and forest restoration stage (Table 2, P <0.05).The soil was consistently acidic in both soil layers, with the lowest value in F49 (4.43 and 4.50 in topsoil and subsoil, respectively) and the highest value in F14 (4.75 and 4.78 in topsoil and subsoil, respectively). Soil BD in topsoil significantly decreased from F14 (1.35 g?cm–3) to F49 (1.11 g?cm–3) and then increased with forest restoration. In the subsoil, the BD in the F70 (1.29 g?cm–3)was significantly lower than it was in the other three restoration stages (Table 2, P <0.05). Soil clay content showed a trend of initial increase, then decline in both soil layers following forest restoration (Table 2), with the lowest value in F14 (4.14 and 5.53% in topsoil and subsoil, respectively) and the highest value in F70 (16.27 and 17.28% in topsoil and subsoil,respectively).

    Variation of soil living microbial biomass following forest restoration

    Soil living microbial biomass (represented as PLFAs)changed significantly between forest restoration stages.Total PLFAs showed a general trend of an initial decrease and then increase (Fig. 2a, P <0.05) in topsoil,with the lowest value in F49 (4.41 nmol?g–1) and the highest value in UF (11.54 nmol?g–1). While in subsoil,total PLFAs were significantly higher in UF (14.53 nmol?g–1) than in the other three restoration stages, and no significant difference was found between these three stages. The F:B ratio showed no significant differences between the different forest restoration stages in both soil layers (Fig. 2b). The content of different individual PLFAs in soil between the four forest restoration stages was listed in Table S1.

    Variation of soil microbial residues following forest restoration

    Fig.1 Variations of SOC stock(dotted line)and SOC contents(bar)following forest restoration. Different uppercase and lowercase letters indicate significant differences in topsoil(grey bar) and subsoil(white bar)between the four restoration stages at the P <0.05 level.Symbols and barsrepresent means±SE(n=6)

    We found that total AS contents increased following forest restoration in both soil layers (Fig. 3a, P <0.05), with the lowest value in F14 (437.53 and 162.84 mg?kg–1in topsoil and subsoil, respectively) and the highest value in UF (802.63 and 490.40 mg?kg–1in topsoil and subsoil,respectively). The GluN:MurA ratio increased following forest restoration at both soil layers (Fig. 3b, P <0.05),with the lowest value in F14 (11.66 and 9.16 in topsoil and subsoil, respectively) and the highest value in UF(21.85 and 16.68 in topsoil and subsoil,respectively).

    Contribution of microbial residue-C to SOC following forest restoration

    Fig.2 Variations of the total PLFAs content(panel aA ), the ratio of fungal to bacterial PLFAs(F:B, panel bB) following forest restoration. Different uppercase and lowercase letters indicate significant differences in topsoil(grey bar) or subsoil(white bar) between the four restoration stages at the P <0.05 level.Bars represent means±SE (n=6)

    Fig.3 Variations of total amino sugars content(AS,panel Aa ),and the ratio of fungal to bacterial residues in soil(GluN:MurA,panel Bb) following forest restoration. Different uppercase and lowercase letters indicate significant differences in topsoil(grey bar)and subsoil(white bar)between the four restoration stages at the P <0.05 level.Bars represent means±SE(n=6)

    The total microbial residue C accounted for 0.95–1.66%in SOC across all forest restoration stages (Fig. 4). In topsoil, the microbial residue-C in SOC (AS-C/SOC)was significantly lower in F70 (1.23%) than in other forests. In subsoil, the AS-C/SOC was significantly lower in F14 (0.95%) and UF (1.16%) than in other forests. The contribution of fungal residue-C in SOC (GluN-C/SOC)was significantly lower in F70 (0.91%) and F49 (1.11%)than in other forests in topsoil, which was significantly lower in F14 (0.68%) and UF (0.80%) in subsoil (Fig. 4b,P <0.05). The bacterial residue-C in SOC (MurA-C) decreased significantly in topsoil following forest restoration (P <0.05, Fig. 4c), with the lowest value in F70(0.05%) and the highest value in F14 (0.11%). In subsoil,the MurA-C/SOC was significantly lower in UF (0.05%)than in other forests.

    Correlation analysis

    The linear correlation showed that SOC content was positively correlated with AGB in both soil layers and with clay content in topsoil (Fig. 5a, b and P <0.001).The total AS content was also positively correlated with AGB and clay content in both soil layers (Fig. 5e, f and P <0.001). However, there was no relationship between total PLFAs and AGB or soil clay content across the forest restoration gradient (Fig. 5c, d and P ≥0.05). The AS-C/SOC was negatively correlated with clay content in topsoil (Fig.5 h,P <0.001), while it was positively correlated with clay content and AGB in subsoil (Fig. 5 g and 5 h, P <0.001).

    Discussion

    Changes in SOC, microbial living biomass and residues following forest restoration

    In terrestrial ecosystems, SOC stock depends mainly on the balance between the input and output of C in the soil. With the establishment and growth of trees, forest restoration generally increases the input of plant residues into the soil. At the same time, the input of plant residues and the improvement of soil conditions may also stimulate microbial activity and increase the decomposition of plant residues and soil organic matter.Our study demonstrated that forest restoration significantly increased SOC stock following forest restoration in the Changsha county area of southern China (Fig. 1).This result was consistent with previous studies (Lu et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2019), suggesting that the increased input of plant residues following forest restoration cannot be offset by the increased microbial decomposition. The positive linear relationship between SOC content and AGB observed here supported this view (Fig. 5a). In addition, the increasing vegetation cover and the developing root systems with the forest restoration may reduce loss of soil organic matter from erosion and promote aggregate formation to increase the soil clay content (Sauer et al. 2012; Sun et al. 2019).Meanwhile, the increasing clay content could also enhance SOC accumulation by forming clay-humic complexes and eventually protected SOC from microbial attack (Six et al. 2002). This explanation was supported by the positive linear relationship between SOC and soil clay content as observed in topsoil (Fig. 5b). Previous studies indicated that SOC accumulation might depend on litter quality rather than litter quantity (Zhou et al.2019). However, in this study, we did not find any significant relationship between SOC and litter C:N ratio,probably due to the relatively small variation of litter C:N ratio across the four forest sites. Previous studies indicated that soil C stocks could reach the equivalent level of the undisturbed old-growth forests within about 60 years of restoration in the tropical region (Zhang et al.2019), while it takes about 120 years in the northern temperate forests (Shao et al. 2019). However, our study sites are located in the subtropical region. Hence we speculate that SOC stock in our restored forests may take no than 120 years to reach the equivalent level of the undisturbed old-growth forests.

    Fig.4 Variations of total microbial residue-C(AS-C,panel aA ), fungal residue-C(GluN-C,panel Bb),and bacterial residue-C(MurA-C, panel Cc ) in SOC following forest restoration. Different uppercase and lowercase letters indicate significant differences in topsoil(grey bar)or subsoil(white bar)between the four restoration stages at the P <0.05 level.Bars represent means±SE(n=6)

    Fig.5 (See legend on next page.)Fig.5 Linear regression of SOC content(Aa –bB),total PLFAs content(Cc –Dd),total AS content(eE– Ff) content and its contribution to SOC(Gg –Hh)against AGB and soil clay content following forest restoration. Symbols(filled circle)and (open circle)correspond to topsoil and subsoil,respectively. Solid lines depict significant linear relationships,while plots without regression lines are not linearly related(P ≥0.05).Abbreviations:AGB,above-ground biomass;AS,amino sugar;AS-C/SOC,the contribution of total microbial residue-C to SOC

    The change of the PLFAs following forest restoration differed from SOC (Fig. 2a). The PLFAs reflect the instantaneous state of microorganisms, which decompose quickly after cell death (Zelles 1999; Veum et al. 2019).In this study, we did not find any significant relationship of the PLFAs with either AGB or soil clay content(Fig. 5c and d), probably because of the opposing effects of increasing AGB and soil clay content on PLFAs. With forest restoration, the increasing input of plant residues may stimulate microbial proliferation, while the enhanced soil clay content may restrain microbial activity due to the more robust physical protection of C from microbial attack (Lützow et al. 2006; Yu et al. 2019). For example, the PLFAs were reduced by the higher soil clay content in F49, as compared with those in F14 (Fig. 2a).

    Unlike the PLFAs, the AS content in soil represents the accumulation of microbial turnover over time.Despite relatively high soil clay content and low PLFAs in F49, the F49 had higher AS content than the F14(Fig. 3a). In addition, empirical evidence indicates that microbial-derived C generally has relatively low molecular weights, which are readily adsorbed by soil clay, and that a high content of soil clay is conducive to the retention of AS. Consequently, the positive relationships of AS with both AGB and soil clay content following forest restoration were also observed in this study (Fig. 5e and f). However, it is noteworthy that the AGB perks at the F49 and clay content perks at the F70, whereas both SOC and AS continually increased with the highest in UF. Therefore, a high microbial turnover rate might further increase the AS and hence SOC at the UF.

    Fungal residues dominate the contribute to SOC following forest restoration

    Soil F:B ratios are highly linked to soil C accumulation potential (Malik et al. 2016). Due to the different utilization of substrates, the growth and proliferation of bacteria and fungi are different, and may eventually lead to divergent F:B ratios in PLFAs and fungi/bacteria derived AS following forest restoration. Our study observed no significant change in F:B ratios across the forest restoration gradient (Fig. 2b), while GluN:MurA ratios significantly increased (Fig. 3b). This was contrary to a previous study in southern China showing that the GluN:MurA significantly decreased with forest succession (Shao et al. 2017). The decreasing GluN:MurA in Shao et al. (2017)’s study suggested a dramatic shift from needle-leaf to broad-leaf during forest succession.Higher quality of broad-leaf is more generally favored for bacterial proliferation and the production of its residues over fungi than needle-leaf (Bossuyt et al. 2001;Kramer et al. 2012). In our study, however, the litter quality under different restoration stages varied nonsignificantly. Therefore, no significant differences were found in the F:B of PLFAs following forest restoration.

    The accumulation of AS depends on not only the production but also the retention. Although the biomass turnover rate is thought to be slower in fungi than in bacteria, fungal biomass often contains high C content compared to bacteria biomass (Strickland and Rousk 2010). Thus, while the abundances of fungi and bacteria changed similarly following forest restoration, fungi might contribute to more AS production than bacteria.In addition, fungal residues are more decompositionresistant than bacterial counterparts after cell death(Nakas and Klein 1979), thus are likely the preferential retention following forest restoration. Higher fungal abundance has also been related to the higher capacity of C accumulation and lower turnover rate due to enhanced fungal mediated soil aggregation and/or changes in the physiology of the microbial biomass (Six et al.2006; Malik et al. 2016). Thus, a continuously increased fungal residues dominance in the forest restoration process is thought to enhance SOC accumulation and stabilization.

    Clay content affected the contributions of microbial residue C to SOC

    The AS is the critical and direct pathway of SOC formation (Liang et al. 2017). In this study, we found a slightly decreasing trend of AS-C/SOC at topsoil following forest restoration (Fig. 4a), which is contrary to a previous study by Shao et al. (2017) in southern China, probably due to the different changing patterns in vegetation communities and litter quality between our study sites.Alternatively, we found that change in soil clay content may have played an essential role in regulating AS-C/SOC following forest restoration with different mechanisms between the topsoil and subsoil layer.

    The topsoil is a hotspot for microbial activity (Xu et al.2013),as large amounts of plant residues can be assimilated by soil microorganisms (Cotrufo et al. 2015).Therefore, even a small change of microbial activity in topsoil may not only affect the production of AS but also the accumulation of plant residues (Ni et al. 2020). The negative relationship between the AS-C/SOC and soil clay content as observed in the topsoil in this study(Fig. 5 h) probably resulted from the negative effects of increasing soil clay content following forest restoration on the proliferation and the residues production of soil microbes, resulting in more plant residue-derived C retention in the soil. Furthermore, because of the difference in the ecological preferences of fungi versus bacteria in their habitats, the increased C availability due to clay adsorption may have more limited bacterial activities than fungal activities (Fomina and Skorochod 2020). The bacterial residues are more readily decomposed than fungal residues (Nakas and Klein 1979).Therefore the contribution of MurA-C/SOC in topsoil decreased significantly following forest restoration while the GluN-C/SOC remained relatively constant (Fig. 4b and c).

    In contrast to the topsoil, we found that AS-C/SOC was positively correlated with soil clay content in subsoil(Fig. 5 h). The PLFAs in subsoil were relatively lower than that in topsoil (Fig. 2a) due to lower SOC content(Fig. 1), and the direct effect of plant residues was weaker than in the topsoil. We speculate that AS in subsoil was not entirely derived from the counterparts of PLFAs after cell death, but also a large part of them may be derived from the input of topsoil AS via leaching.Collectively, higher clay content in subsoil likely favored the retention of topsoil AS when they moved down to subsoil, because the microbial-derived relatively low molecular weight residue-C is readily adsorbed by microaggregates. In addition, higher clay content would inhibit microbial metabolism in subsoil, resulting in a lower turnover rate of AS. The findings reported in our study were supported by a recent review by Ni et al. (2020),who found that AS in topsoil was dominantly determined by its production while in subsoil depended on its retention by soil clay content.

    Conclusions

    This study stressed the microbially regulated SOC accumulation following forest restoration by using measurements of two biomarkers, PLFAs and AS that represent microbial living biomass and residues, respectively. We found that SOC increased with increasing AGB with time after forest restoration. However, the PLFAs and AS changed differently following the forest restoration.Even though the ratio of fungal PLFAs to bacterial PLFAs showed no change following forest restoration,the ratio of fungal residues to bacterial residues significantly increased. These results suggest that fungal residues may play a more critical role than bacterial residues in SOC accumulation following forest restoration at our study site. In addition, the clay content had a significantly positive effect on the contribution of microbial residue-C to SOC in the 0–10 cm soil layer, but a significantly negative effect in the 10–20 cm soil layer.This result highlights the divergent physical mechanisms in regulating microbial-mediated SOC accumulation at two different soil layers following the forest restoration in subtropical ecosystems. The divergent contribution of microbial residues to soil C accumulation across a forest restoration gradient in our study is essential for improving forest management practices.

    Abbreviations

    AGB: Above-ground biomass; AMF:Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; AS: Amino sugars; AS-C: Microbial residue-C; AS-C/SOC: The contribution of total microbial residue-C to SOC; BD: Bulk density; C: Carbon;F:B: The ratio of fungal PLFAs to bacterial PLFAs; G+: Gram-positive bacteria; G-: Gramnegative bacteria; GalN: Galactosamine; GluN: Glucosamine; GluN-C: Fungal residue-C; GluN-C/SOC: The contribution of fungal residue-C to SOC; GluN;MurA: The ratio of fungal residues to bacterial residues;MurA: Muramic acid;MurA-C: Bacterial residue-C; MurA-C/SOC:The contribution of bacterial residue-C to SOC; PLFAs: Phospholipid fatty acids; SOC: Soil organic carbon;TC: Total carbon

    Supplementary Information

    The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00334-8.

    Additional file 1.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Zhongbing Chang, Yang Chen, Nannan Cao, and Zhiwei Cao for the help with field sampling. We also thank Lingxue Ma, Xiaoying You,Xiaoping Pan, Wei Zhang, and Yi Li for the help with laboratory analysis.

    Authors’contributions

    QD and JY conceived and designed the study; SZ analyzed the data, drew the figures and wrote the primary draft; SZ and SW did the measurements;YW and JC revised the draft; MY, PX and JC collected the samples; XF and HH discussed the draft with SZ. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

    Funding

    This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Distinguished Young Scholars (41825020) and General Program (31870461), the “Hundred Talent Program”of South China Botanical Garden at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y761031001), the“Young Top-notch Talent” in Pearl River talent plan of Guangdong Province(2019QN01L763), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021A1515012147),and the China Scholarships Council(No.202004910605).

    Availability of data and materials

    The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

    Declarations

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Author details

    1Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences,510650 Guangzhou,China.2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,100049 Beijing, China.3Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.4CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, PMB 1,Victoria 3195 Aspendale, Australia.5Aarhus University Centre for Circular Bioeconomy,Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele,Denmark.6iCLIMATE Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Change, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.7Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 410004 Changsha, China.8Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 110016 Shenyang,China.

    Received: 5 April 2021 Accepted: 18 July 2021

    色视频www国产| 国产综合懂色| av黄色大香蕉| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 久久人妻av系列| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 男人舔奶头视频| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 特级一级黄色大片| 不卡av一区二区三区| 一区二区三区激情视频| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 免费在线观看日本一区| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 亚洲18禁久久av| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 天堂动漫精品| 成年版毛片免费区| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 免费看光身美女| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 在线视频色国产色| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 成人国产综合亚洲| 特级一级黄色大片| 搞女人的毛片| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 欧美日韩黄片免| 美女午夜性视频免费| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 欧美大码av| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 99热只有精品国产| 一a级毛片在线观看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 在线观看66精品国产| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 久久伊人香网站| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 中文资源天堂在线| 欧美日本视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 在线看三级毛片| 脱女人内裤的视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产成人aa在线观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 一本一本综合久久| 91老司机精品| 全区人妻精品视频| 99热只有精品国产| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 日本五十路高清| 午夜免费观看网址| www.www免费av| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| svipshipincom国产片| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲av美国av| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 级片在线观看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产高清videossex| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 一a级毛片在线观看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 成在线人永久免费视频| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 色综合站精品国产| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 久久香蕉精品热| 欧美在线黄色| 香蕉丝袜av| 色视频www国产| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲av免费在线观看| www.www免费av| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 99热精品在线国产| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 少妇丰满av| 成人国产综合亚洲| 久久久精品大字幕| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲色图av天堂| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 露出奶头的视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 在线免费观看的www视频| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 欧美激情在线99| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 91在线观看av| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 九色成人免费人妻av| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 欧美乱妇无乱码| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产av在哪里看| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 看黄色毛片网站| 久久精品91蜜桃| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲18禁久久av| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 两性夫妻黄色片| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| av福利片在线观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 久久人人精品亚洲av| www日本黄色视频网| 精品国产亚洲在线| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 在线观看一区二区三区| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 香蕉丝袜av| 久久久国产成人免费| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 91av网一区二区| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 一进一出抽搐动态| svipshipincom国产片| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 免费看光身美女| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | www.999成人在线观看| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 此物有八面人人有两片| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 青草久久国产| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 中文资源天堂在线| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 丁香六月欧美| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 美女大奶头视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 黄色成人免费大全| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 日本与韩国留学比较| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 在线播放国产精品三级| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 无限看片的www在线观看| 美女大奶头视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 日本五十路高清| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 最新中文字幕久久久久 | 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲无线在线观看| 色视频www国产| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 久久精品人妻少妇| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 看免费av毛片| 久久精品人妻少妇| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 热99re8久久精品国产| 手机成人av网站| 1024香蕉在线观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 日日夜夜操网爽| av国产免费在线观看| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产精品九九99| 99久国产av精品| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 亚洲av美国av| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| av天堂在线播放| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲av美国av| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 国产日本99.免费观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 最新中文字幕久久久久 | a级毛片a级免费在线| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产精品一及| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 91老司机精品| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 丁香欧美五月| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 国产高清videossex| 国产免费男女视频| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 很黄的视频免费| 香蕉久久夜色| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 看免费av毛片| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| avwww免费| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 欧美在线黄色| 免费看十八禁软件| 窝窝影院91人妻| h日本视频在线播放| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 制服人妻中文乱码| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产视频内射| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| a级毛片a级免费在线| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 国产熟女xx| 久久久久久大精品| 两个人看的免费小视频| 少妇丰满av| 色视频www国产| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 91在线观看av| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| cao死你这个sao货| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 成人国产综合亚洲| 久久性视频一级片| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 日本免费a在线| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 美女免费视频网站| 国产成人精品无人区| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| av国产免费在线观看| tocl精华| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 最新中文字幕久久久久 | 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 午夜免费观看网址| 日本在线视频免费播放| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 悠悠久久av| 欧美激情在线99| 曰老女人黄片| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久末码| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产av在哪里看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 91麻豆av在线| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产精品永久免费网站| 精品人妻1区二区| 毛片女人毛片| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 1024香蕉在线观看| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 色av中文字幕| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 天天添夜夜摸| 中文资源天堂在线| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 成年人黄色毛片网站| ponron亚洲| 很黄的视频免费| av天堂中文字幕网| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲精品在线美女| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产精品 国内视频| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲国产欧美网| 黄频高清免费视频| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 黄频高清免费视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 免费看日本二区| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲国产色片| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 精品国产三级普通话版| 一本一本综合久久| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产高潮美女av| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 久久热在线av| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 日韩欧美三级三区| 在线播放国产精品三级| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 搞女人的毛片| 欧美zozozo另类| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 岛国在线免费视频观看| 香蕉久久夜色| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲五月天丁香| 一本综合久久免费| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av|