陳麗春 陳亞觀
[摘要] 目的 探討ICU護理風險干預在急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者中的應(yīng)用效果。方法 以2017年12月—2019年8月為研究時間段,隨機選取該院在此期間接受治療的急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者100例,依據(jù)患者接受護理方法的不同將其分為兩組,每組50例。常規(guī)護理定義為對照組,采用ICU護理風險干預實施護理的定義為實驗組。對比兩組患者的臨床護理效果。結(jié)果 實驗組實施ICU護理風險干預后,對照組護理質(zhì)量評分分別為(19.18±1.36)分、(16.24±1.39)分、(18.35±1.41)分、(17.41±1.25)分;實驗組護理質(zhì)量評分分別為(21.56±1.21)分、(22.16±1.54)分、(21.25±1.34)分、(21.33±1.56)分,患者護理質(zhì)量高于對照組(t=9.245、20.178、10.542、13.866,P=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000)。對照組SAS、SDS評分分別為(48.61±2.12)、(49.33±1.36)分;實驗組SAS、SDS評分分別為(37.25±2.14)分、(35.13±1.28)分;患者護理后的SAS、SDS評分相對于對照組明顯的好轉(zhuǎn)(t=26.666、53.763,P=0.000)。實驗組患者94.00%(47/50)的護理滿意度高于對照組78.00%(39/50),差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(χ2=0.021, P<0.05、0.000)。結(jié)論 在急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者護理中采用ICU護理風險干預,護理效果顯著。
[關(guān)鍵詞] ICU護理風險干預;急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者;應(yīng)用效果
[中圖分類號] R473? ? ? ? ? [文獻標識碼] A? ? ? ? ? [文章編號] 1674-0742(2020)06(b)-0169-03
[Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of ICU nursing risk intervention in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods From December 2017 to August 2019 as the research period, 100 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who were treated in the hospital during this period were random? selected, and they were divided into 2 groups according to the different nursing methods of patients. Each group 50 cases each. Routine nursing was defined as the control group, and ICU nursing risk intervention was used as the experimental group. Compare the clinical nursing effects of the two groups of patients. Results After the ICU nursing risk intervention was implemented in the experimental group, the nursing quality scores of the control group were (19.18 ± 1.36)points, (16.24 ± 1.39)points, (18.35 ± 1.41)points, (17.41 ± 1.25)points; the nursing quality scores of the experimental group were (21.56 ± 1.21)points, (22.16 ± 1.54)points, (21.25 ± 1.34)points, (21.33 ± 1.56)points, the quality of patient care was higher than that of the control group(t=9.245,20.178,10.542,13.866,P=0.000,0.000,0.000,0.000). The SAS and SDS scores of the control group were (48.61 ± 2.12)points and (49.33 ± 1.36)points; the SAS and SDS scores of the experimental group were (37.25 ± 2.14)points,(35.13 ± 1.28)points; the SAS and SDS scores of the patients after care were relative to the control group, improved significantly(t=26.666,53.763,P=0.000,0.000). The satisfaction of nursing in 94.00% (47/50) of the patients in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group, 78.00% (39/50), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.316, P<0.05). Conclusion ICU nursing risk intervention is used in the nursing of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, and the nursing effect is significant.
在該次研究過程中,通過對急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者實施ICU護理風險干預,在具體的護理過程中,強化了相應(yīng)工作人員的責任能力,對相應(yīng)的護理方法進行不斷地改進,綜合患者全面發(fā)展的需求,調(diào)節(jié)實施護理期間患者的治療心態(tài)[8]。改善患者的治療環(huán)境,從患者的病理特點出發(fā),不斷地對相應(yīng)的護理措施進行持續(xù)性地改進。把護理過程當中存有的問題全面地進行分析,并提出整改建議,做好患者生活環(huán)境管理,做好相應(yīng)并發(fā)癥的預防工作[9]。針對患者治療期間所采用的導管,要按時地清潔消毒,定期地更換,避免引發(fā)感染。
研究結(jié)果表明,對急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者實施ICU護理風險干預,相對于常規(guī)護理方式,實驗組急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者護理質(zhì)量優(yōu)于對照組;實驗組實施ICU護理風險干預后,對照組護理質(zhì)量評分分別為(19.18±1.36)分、(16.24±1.39)分、(18.35±1.41)分、(17.41±1.25)分;實驗組護理質(zhì)量評分分別為(21.56±1.21)分、(22.16±1.54)分、(21.25±1.34)分、(21.33±1.56)分,患者護理質(zhì)量高于對照組(P<0.05)。對照組SAS、SDS評分分別為(48.61±2.12)分、(49.33±1.36)分;實驗組SAS、SDS評分分別為(37.25±2.14)分、(35.13±1.28)分;患者護理后的SAS、SDS評分相對于對照組明顯的好轉(zhuǎn)(P<0.05)。實驗組患者94.00%(47/50)的護理滿意度高于對照組78.00%(39/50)(P<0.05)。彭懷銀等人[4]的風險護理干預應(yīng)用于急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者的臨床效果當中研究結(jié)果顯示,觀察組熟練技能、質(zhì)量控制、護理滿意度評分分別為(97.23±1.06)分、(98.71±1.36)分、(97.27±1.68)分,均高于對照組(89.34±1.15)分、(94.95±2.38)、(92.93±2.48)分(P<0.05);觀察組4.65%并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率低于對照組48.84%(P<0.05)。
綜上所述,對急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者采用ICU護理風險干預,強化了整體的護理措施,降低護理過程中護理期間不良事件的發(fā)生率,提升了整體的護理質(zhì)量,護理效果顯著。
[參考文獻]
[1]? 王笠.ICU護理風險干預應(yīng)用于急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者中的實施效果分析[J].心血管外科雜志:電子版,2019,8(4):198-199.
[2]? 劉冬銀.探討ICU護理風險干預應(yīng)用于急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者中的臨床價值[J].世界最新醫(yī)學信息文摘,2019, 19(65):355-356.
[3]? 林漢慧.ICU護理風險管理在預防急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者呼吸機獲得性肺炎中的應(yīng)用效果[J].中國全科醫(yī)學,2017, 20(S2):276-277.
[4]? 彭懷銀,李金利,陳小明.風險護理干預應(yīng)用于急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者的臨床效果[J].中國臨床護理,2019,11(3):245-247,254.
[5]? 羅藍,楊相宜,王秀芬.護理風險干預對ICU呼吸窘迫患者呼吸機相關(guān)肺炎并發(fā)癥的影響[J].中醫(yī)臨床研究,2017,9(33):23-25.
[6]? 胡彥昌,杜梅霜.ICU護理風險管理應(yīng)用于急性呼吸窘迫綜合征患者的護理[J].國際護理學雜志,2019,38(2):158-160.
[7]? 林日霞,張海燕,郭蕓.重癥ICU患者護理風險管理在其實施全過程臨床護理的應(yīng)用[J].國際護理學雜志,2017,36(23):3286-3289.
[8]? 趙婷,商臨萍,胡曉瑾,等.ICU護士分層管理在防控護理風險中的應(yīng)用效果[J].國際護理學雜志,2017,36(1):94-97.
[9]? 孫曉林,潘世琴,王皓,等.俯臥位通氣治療在高原重度急性呼吸窘迫綜合征中的應(yīng)用效果[J].中國實用護理雜志,2019, 35(9):699-703.
(收稿日期:2020-03-11)