• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Association between human leukocyte antigen gene polymorphisms and multiple EPIYA-C repeats in gastrointestinal disorders

    2020-09-23 10:03:52SuatSaribasSuleymanDemiryasErkanYilmazOmerUysalNurayKepilMehmetDemirciReyhanCaliskanHarikaOykuDincSeherAkkusNesrinGareayaghiSahraKirmusaogluDogukanOzbeyHrisiTokmanSerdarKoksalIhsanTasciBekirKocazeybek
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年32期
    關(guān)鍵詞:內(nèi)所價為單件

    Suat Saribas, Suleyman Demiryas, Erkan Yilmaz, Omer Uysal, Nuray Kepil, Mehmet Demirci, Reyhan Caliskan, Harika Oyku Dinc, Seher Akkus, Nesrin Gareayaghi, Sahra Kirmusaoglu, Dogukan Ozbey, Hrisi B Tokman, Serdar S Koksal, Ihsan Tasci, Bekir Kocazeybek

    Abstract

    Key words: Human leukocyte antigen; Helicobacter pylori; Gastric cancer; Duodenal ulcer; EPIYA; CagA

    INTRODUCTION

    Gastric cancer (GC) is the third most common cause of death among all cancer types (8.2% of all cancers, 2018, World Health Organization)[1]. GC has been closely associated withHelicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infections, which generally cause mild gastrointestinal symptoms. However, in a few infected patients, they may progress to peptic ulcer (PU) (10%-15%) or GC (1%-3%)[2].

    Generally,H. pyloriinfections cause gastric inflammation and a chronic inflammatory response that result in progressive mucosal damage. Eventually, the gastric mucosa transforms into metaplastic and dysplastic epithelia, which leads to gastric adenocarcinomas[3]. The development of GC is suggested to be related to the interactions between bacterial virulence factors, host genetic factors such as the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) gene, the immune response of the host, and environmental factors such as diet and smoking[4]. Some of the host factors may be related to polymorphisms genes such as HLA genes, which regulate the strength of the inflammatory response and influence the probability of specific clinical results[5].

    CagA is among the most important virulence factors specific toH. pyloriand is delivered into the gastric epithelium cells by the type IV secretion system (T4SS) of the bacterium. It is involved with intracellular signal transduction pathways and leads to the malignant transformation of gastric epithelial cells[6]. CagA subtypes are defined by the EPIYA variants (Glu-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Ala) in their C-terminal region, and there are four types of EPIYA motifs: EPIYA-A, -B, -C, and -D[7].H. pyloriisolates from East Asia are associated with a higher incidence of GC and contain EPIYA A-B-D motifs. However, in Western countries, GC cases have EPIYA A-B-C motifs.H. pyloristrains with multiple EPIYA-C repeats have higher phosphorylation capacity and SHP-2 binding affinity and are significantly associated with GC[8].

    HLA class I and II proteins bind to bacterial antigen peptides or tumor proteins and present these peptides and proteins to T cells, which leads to the differentiation of T cells into cytotoxic or helper T cells. In HLA gene polymorphism, a variety of alleles may occupy the same locus. A limited number of studies have focused on the relation between gastrointestinal pathologies such as the development of GC risk and HLA polymorphisms in different geographic regions and populations[9,10,11].

    In addition to HLA gene polymorphisms, the virulence factors ofH. pyloristrains may also be related to the intensity of the inflammatory response[3]. The limited studies on HLA polymorphisms have focused on MHC class II and specifically the relation of HLA polymorphisms and the development of GC risk[10,12,13]. In these studies, the following HLA class II polymorphisms were suggested to be associated with the development of GC risk: DQB1*03, HLA-DRB1*04, and HLA-DQA1*01/*03[14,15].

    Reported HLA allele frequencies related to GC pathologies withH. pyloripositivity have been contradictory among different ethnic groups. The regional and ethnic differences are very important for the association of HLA gene polymorphism and GC risk. These contradictory results may be attributed to factors such as differences in populations, research designs, environmental factors,H. pylorivirulence factors, and host genetic factors, such as polymorphisms of HLA alleles. For example, the HLADQB1*0301 allele was positively associated with GC in Caucasian populations but negatively associated with it in Taiwanese populations[13,16]. This HLA polymorphism had no effect in Japanese populations[17]. HLA-DQB1*0401 82 and *0602 alleles increase the GC risk in European and Indonesian populations[9,18].

    To the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared GC and duodenal ulcer (DU) cases with controls in regard to HLA allele frequencies in terms of differentiation by the CagA+ multiple (≥ 2) EPIYA-C repeat numbers. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the allele frequencies of HLA class I and II in a patient group [H. pylori(+) GC and DU patients] and compared the results to those of a control group [H. pylori(+) non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and asymptomaticH. pylori] in terms of CagA+ multiple EPIYA-C repeats for the first time in a Turkish population.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Study design and patients

    This case–control study was conducted between July 10, 2014 and November 9, 2017. The patient group comprised 94 patients, including 44 (46.8%) GC and 50 (53.2%) DU patients with 58 (61.7%) males, 36 (38.3%) females, a mean age of 49.6 years, and age range of 19–79 years. The control group comprised 86 individuals including 50 (58.1%) NUD patients and 36 (41.9%) people with asymptomaticH. pylori. This group had 30 (34.9%) males, 56 (65.1%) females, a mean age of 47.3 years, and age range of 18–86 years. All of the GC + DU patients and the NUD + asymptomaticH. pylorimembers of the control group members hadH. pylori.

    The NUD + AsymptomaticH. pyloricontrol group was matched with the GC + DU patient group according to the age and gender distribution of the patient group (P> 0.05). Blood samples for the genotyping of HLA alleles were collected when obtaining biopsy samples (from the corpus and antrum) on the same day. The antrum and corpus biopsy specimens were stored and used in molecular studies.

    We excluded patient and control group individuals with autoimmune diseases and who were under 18 years old, had previous gastric surgery andH. pylorieradication treatment with antibiotics, antisecretory drugs and bismuth salts, in the month prior to sampling. The study was reviewed and approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Board of Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine (No. 83045809/32-38/A-15/2014). The study was also conducted according to the standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. All study participants or their legal guardians provided informed written consent prior to the study.

    Polymerase chain reaction analyses

    H. pyloriDNA extractions were performed using the antrum and corpus biopsy specimens. Genomic DNA extraction (Real Genomics Quality Nucleic Acid/ Purification system; RBC Bioscience Laboratories, Taipei, Taiwan) and QIAamp DNA mini prep kits (Qiagen, Hilden Germany) were used.

    UreC gene detection in H. pylori

    AnH. pylori-QLS 1.0 kit (Fluorion, Iontek, Istanbul, Turkey) was used for the detection of 156 bp of theureCgene inH. pyloriDNA extractions[19].

    Amplification of the H. pylori cagA gene

    Primers reported in related studies were used for the detection of theH. pylori cagAgene (349 bp) (Table 1)[20,21]. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycles were as follows: Denaturation at 95 oC for 2 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 oC for 30 s, 45 s at 53 oC, and 45 s at 72 oC. The final elongation was done for 5 min at 72 oC.

    Molecular studies for the typing of EPIYA motifs

    The amplification ofH. pyloriDNA for EPIYA motifs was done using the forward primer cagA28F and reverse primers cagA-P1C, cagA-P2CG, cagA-P2TA, and cagAP3E (Table 1)[22]. In the PCR assay, the protocol steps were as follows: Initial denaturation step, one cycle at 95 oC for 2 min, 50 cycles at 95 oC for 30 s, 57 oC for 45 s, and 72 oC for 35 s; and a final extension at 72 oC for 5 min. After the PCR amplification, PCR products were sequenced bidirectionally using a Sequence Reagent Mix kit with an ABI Prism (310) analyzer (Applied Biosystems, United States).

    Empty-site PCR

    An empty-site-positive PCR assay was used to confirm the EPIYA-negativeH. pyloristrains[23]. To confirm cagPAI in all of the strains, amplification was performed with two primers (forward 468 HP519 and reverse 496 HP549 primers of the reference HP519 and HP549H. pyloristrains; Table 1, cag empty PCR). In the PCR assay, the protocol steps were as follows: Initial denaturation at 95 oC for 2 min, 40 cycles at 95 oC for 30 s, 57 oC for 30 s, and 72 oC for 20 s; followed by a final extension at 72 oC for 5 min.

    Blood collection, DNA extraction, and HLA sequence-specific oligonucleotide typing

    Whole blood samples (10 mL) were collected from the patient and control group cases during a biopsy procedure. An EZ1 DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Germany) was used in a DNA isolation device (Bio Robot EZ1; Qiagen, Germany) for the DNA isolation procedure from 3-mL blood samples collected in tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Isolated DNA samples were stored at -70 °C until laboratory studies. HLA typing at low levels (2 digits) of HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DQ alleles were done with a Luminex 100/200 instrument with sequencespecific oligonucleotide (SSO) probes bound to color-coded microbeads. LIFECODES SSO HLA typing kits (Lifecodes, Immucor, Germany) were used for the typing of HLA-A HLA-B, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQA1/B1. This typing test is a reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide (rSSO) DNA typing assay using SSO probes and color-coded microspheres.

    The PCR mixture was composed of 15 μL of lifecodes Master Mix, 200 ng ofgenomic DNA, and 2.5 U Taq polymerase in a final volume of 50 μL. In the PCR assay, the steps were as follows: Initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min; 40 cycles including 8 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 45 s, followed by 32 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 63 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 45 s, and a final extension step at 72 °C for 15 min. The hybridization steps were as follows: Initial step at 97 °C for 5 min followed by 30 min at 47 °C for 30 min and at 56 °C for 10 min with 15 μL of probe mix and 5 μL of PCR product. The obtained samples were diluted with 170 μL of 1:200 prediluted streptavidin-phycoerythrin solution and analyzed by a Luminex 200 system (Luminex Corp. United States). The obtained HLA patterns were compared with ah HLA sequence database (Database for IMGT/HLA Sequence, 3.11.0) using the MatchIT DNA program.

    Table 1 PCR primers

    Statistical analyses

    Hardy-Weinberg (H-W) equilibrium and Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) were examined for HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR1, HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 allele polymorphisms[24]. Genepop software version 4.7 was used to calculate the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and LD. H–W equilibrium was present forP-values > 0.05. The allele frequencies of the GC + DU patient and the NUD + AsymptomaticH. pyloricontrol groups and subgroups were compared by the chi-squared (χ2) test and Fisher’s exact test (Tables 2-5). CorrectedPvalues (Pc) were calculated by multiplying with the allele numbers (A = 15, B = 26, DRB1 = 12, DQA1 = 6, and DQB1 = 5) in each locus by Bonferroni correction. Multivariate logistic regression (enter method) was used to assess the relation of HLA alleles and the risk of GC and DU development in terms of CagA+ multiple EPIYA-C repeat numbers (Table 6).P< 0.05 was used to determine significance. SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, United States) was used for the analyses.

    RESULTS

    Sixty-four HLA alleles (41 for class I and 23 for class II) were found between the 94 HLA alleles tested in all of the groups (Table 7). The maximum numbers of alleles in the GC + DU patient group were 52 for HLA-A*02 (27.6%), 40 for HLA-B*35 (21.3%), 36 for HLA-DRB1*13 (19%), 76 for HLA-DQA1*01 (40%), and 52 for HLA-DQB1*06 (27.6%) (Figure 1). The maximum numbers of alleles in the NUD + AsymptomaticH. pyloricontrol group were 20 for HLA-A*03 (11.6%), 10 for HLA-B*50 (5.81%), 24 for HLA-DRB1*04 (13.95%), 54 for HLA-DQA1*05 (31.4%), and 64 for HLA-DQB1*03 (37.2%) (Figure 2). Among GC cases, the genotype frequencies of HLA- B, DQA1 and DQB1 loci were in H-W equilibrium. Among DU cases, all of the genotype frequencieswere in H-W equilibrium. Moreover, Among NUD cases, all of the genotype frequencies in H-W equilibrium except HLA-DQB1 cases and in asymptomaticH. pyloricontrol group, all of the genotype frequencies were in H-W equilibrium except HLA-A cases. H-W equilibrium is only valid with a very large sample size and therefore, we suggest that some of our genotype frequencies are not in H-W equilibrium. The deviations from H-W equilibrium is larger at small sample sizes like this study and smaller at large sample sizes. HLA-DR1*13-HLA-DQA1*01-HLADQB1*06 haplotype frequency (10/44, 22% for GC; 2/50, 4% for DU, 2/50, 4% for NUD and 0 for NGIS) showed LD and had an odds ratio (OR) value as 6.143 (95%CI: 1.33-28.31,P= 0.0027) in the comparison of patient and control group cases. Moreover, HLA-DR1*13-HLA-DQA1*01-HLA-DQB1*06 haplotype frequency compared between GC and DU cases and OR was detected as 10.58 (95%CI: 2.27-49.34).

    Table 2 Comparison of human leukocyte antigen alleles predisposing susceptibility and resistance to gastric cancer/duodenal ulcer in patient and control groups, n (%)

    Table 3 The comparison of human leukocyte antigen alleles which increase or decrease the gastric cancer risk in gastric cancer subgroup cases in terms of CagA+ (≥ 2) EPIYA-C, n (%)

    When comparing the prominent alleles detected, only HLA-DQA1*01 (OR: 3.211,P= 0.0001) and HLA-DQB1*06 (OR: 2.906,P= 0.0002) were significantly higher in theGC + DU patient group. The values also stayed significant after Bonferroni correction (DQB1*06:Pc= 0.001; DQA1*01:Pc= 0.0006). The prominent alleles in the NUD + AsymptomaticH. pyloricontrol group were HLA-B*50 (OR: 0.086,P= 0.02), HLADQA1*05 (OR: 0.384,P= 0.0003), and HLA-DQB1*03 (OR: 0.485,P= 0.0022), but after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, the changes were statistically significant for only HLA-DQA1*05 (Pc= 0.0018) and HLA-DQB1*03 (Pc= 0.011) and not HLA-B*50, (Pc= 0.52) (Table 2).

    Table 4 The comparison of human leukocyte antigen alleles which increase or decrease the duodenal ulcer risk in duodenal ulcer subgroup in terms of CagA+(≥ 2) EPIYA-C, n (%)

    Table 5 The comparison of human leukocyte antigen alleles which increase or decrease the gastric cancer/duodenal ulcer risk in gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer subgroups in terms of CagA+(≥ 2) EPIYA-C, n (%)

    Table 6 Results of logistic regressions analysis according to the variables in patient group (gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer cases)

    Multiple EPIYA-C repeat numbers and CagA positivity were found in 40 (42.5%) subjects in the GC + DU patient group. Multiple EPIYA-C repeats were observed in 26 (59%) GC subgroup cases and 14 (28%) DU subgroup cases in the GC + DU patient group, 2 (2.3%) NUD cases, and no asymptomaticH. pyloricases. Other EPIYA motifs and their numbers are shown in Table 8. It was not possible to perform statisticalanalysis due to small number of positive cases with CagA+ multiple EPIYA-C repeats in the NUD+ AsymptomaticH. pyloricontrol group (n= 2). Instead, we compared two groups without using any criteria with regard to HLA alleles.

    Table 7 Frequency of detected human leukocyte antigen class I alleles and the class II alleles in patients with cancer and ulcer and in the control groups, n (%)

    HLA: Human leukocyte antigen.

    Thus, we used the HLA-DQB1*06, HLA-DRB1*13, HLA-B*35, HLA-DQA1 and HLA-A*02 alleles (i.e., the alleles with the maximum numbers in the GC + DU patient group) to investigate their effects on GC/DU in terms of the CagA+ multiple EPIYA-C repeats, which is suitable for our purposes. First, we compared alleles in GC cases in terms of CagA+ multiple EPIYA-C repeat numbers. Only the HLA-DQB1*06 allele (OR: 0.37, 95%CI: 1.149-0.942,P= 0.0369) was significantly associated with GC, but after Bonferroni correction, there was no significant association between DQB1*06 and GC (DQB1*06,Pc= 0.1845).

    The HLA-DQA1*01 allele had a high ratio in the multiple EPIYA-C repeat group, but the univariate analysis did not show any significant association. None of the selected alleles were significantly higher in the GC cases in terms of CagA+ multiple EPIYA-C repeats (Table 3). Using the same criterion, we also compared allele frequencies in the DU cases, but none of the HLA alleles were significantly higher (Table 4). When we compared selected allele frequencies in the GC and DU cases together using this criterion, again, none of the HLA alleles were significantly higher (Table 5). HLA-DR1*13-HLA-DQA1*01-HLA-DQB1*06 haplotype frequency was 4/24, 16% and 2/12, 16% for GC and DU cases with multiple EPIYA-C repeat, respectively. No difference was detected between GC and DU cases in terms of multiple EPIYA-C repeat.

    Multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out for the risk of GC and DU development alone and both subcases of the GC + DU patient group combined involving HLA-DQB1*06, HLA-DRB1*13, HLA-A*02, HLA-DQA1*01, and HLA-B*35 alleles, and none of the alleles were detected as independent risk factors for the risk of GC and DU development in terms of CagA+ multiple EPIYA-C repeats. However, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was done without any specific criteria using only the significantly different detected alleles between GC + DU patient and the NUD+AsymptomaticH. pyloricontrol groups. The results showed that HLA-DQA1*01 (P= 0.004, OR = 1.848, 95%CI, 1.215-2.811), HLA-DQB1*06 (P= 0.009, OR = 1.821, 95%CI, 1.163-2.850), and HLA-A*02 (P= 0.04, OR = 1.579, 95%CI, 1.021-2.442) were risk factors for the development of GC and DU (Table 6).

    Table 8 The distribution of EPIYA motifs for study and control groups, n (%)

    Figure 1 The representations of the highest human leukocyte antigen allele frequencies (%) in the gastric cancer + duodenal ulcer patient group when compared to non-ulcer dyspepsis patients + asymptomatic Helicobacter pylori control group. HLA: Human leukocyte antigen; H. pylori: Helicobacter pylori.

    DISCUSSION

    The development of GC and PU or DU is influenced by the virulence factors ofH. pylorialong with the host’s genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. A variety of clinical consequences ofH. pyloriinfection may arise depending on the variability of host response to the specific virulence factors ofH. pylori[7]. For example, genes coding HLA class II molecules (HLA-DP/DQ/DR) may have genetically variable coding loci that lead to HLA gene polymorphisms. Therefore, specific HLA class II alleles were hypothesized to be related to the risks of some gastroduodenal malignancies such as GC and DU or PU development in patients withH. pyloriinfection.

    In the literature, there are only traditional comparison studies using onlyH. pyloripositivity for the association between HLA gene polymorphisms and the diseases caused byH. pyloriinfections. However, we focused on CagA+ multiple EPIYA-C repeats for the comparison of our study groups for HLA alleles for the first time in Turkey. The incidence of GC in Turkey is higher than in Eastern countries and lower than in Western countries at 5.7 and 9.6 cases per 100000 people for women and men, respectively. The mean age of occurrence is 56 years. It is the second and third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men and women in Turkey, respectively[25].

    Figure 2 The representations of the highest human leukocyte antigen allele frequencies (%) in the (%) in the non-ulcer dyspepsis patients + Asymptomatic Helicobacter pylori control group when compared gastric cancer + duodenal ulcer patient group. HLA: Human leukocyte antigen; H. pylori: Helicobacter pylori.

    The higher incidence in Turkey is mainly associated with dietary factors, and the differences in incidence are especially significant in the central, northeastern, and eastern regions of the country. Salt is commonly used for food preservation, and wood charcoal with dried cow dung is commonly used for cooking in these regions, which are known to have carcinogenic effects on food. Another important factor for the development of GC isH. pyloriinfections[25].

    Studies have shown an association between HLA gene polymorphisms and autoimmune diseases, and in genetically susceptible individuals, persistent bacterial infections can lead to autoimmune responses (e.g., HLA-DR4-restricted autoimmune chronic synovitis following Lyme disease)[26]. While evaluating the effects ofH. pyloriinfection on the pathogenesis of GC, the relationship between bacteria and the host should be considered becauseH. pyloriinfections may cause strong immune responses by causing the secretion of cytokines from the epithelial cells and gastric mucosa infiltration with neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes. After the interaction ofH. pyloriwith dendritic cells in luminal and subepithelial regions, dendritic cells may transform naive T cells into immunosuppressive Treg cells, and consequently, developed Th1 and Th17 cells may cause atrophic gastritis, epithelial hyperplasia, and intestinal metaplasia[27].H. pyloriinfections tend to cause chronic inflammation, which can increase an individual’s risk for the development of GC.

    A commonly seen (90%) type of GC is adenocarcinoma, which is known to originate from the epithelial cells in chronic inflammation states[28]. Moreover, cytokines, which are the effector cells of inflammatory responses, may regulate a variety of immunologic events, including the inflammation, proliferation, and differentiation of epithelial cells. In the progression of gastric carcinogenesis, initially,H. pyloristrongly induces specific cytokines, but the immune response generally is not sufficient to clear theH. pyloriinfection completely from the human epithelial cells. As a result, chronic inflammation may occur[29].

    Consequently, the tissue damage increases along with parietal cell atrophy and may progress to dysplasia and GC through the combined effects of the various factors of the host and the environment. A subtype of T cells, Th17 cells, and their associated inflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-23, and IL-1β, have important roles in the development of GC, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cytokine IL-23 plays a major role in the primary activation of IL-17A. Th17 responses are reported to be increased duringH pyloriinfections. The IL-17/IL-23 axis is believed to have an important role in the progression of chronic inflammation and related pathologies like gastric neoplasms[30].

    Other than their main roles in chronic inflammation in gastric epithelial cells, cytokines also have specific polymorphisms in their genes. Polymorphisms in cytokine genes may modify the effect of gene-environment interaction and increase the degree of cytokine expression in the promoter regions of the genes. Polymorphisms in genes coding various cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-8, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α are also suggested to be associated with the risk of GC. The IL1RN2 allele polymorphism is related to the risk of GC[31]. Wuet al[32]found a relation between IL-17F, A7488G and GC, and Felipeet al[33]also reported a relation between IL-8 (rs4073)–251A/T gene polymorphism and GC development.

    Some virulent factors ofH. pyloriseem to be associated with GC risk, including vacuolating cytotoxin A, cytotoxin associated antigen A, DU promoting gene protein A, and outer inflammatory protein with blood group antigen binding adhesins. Moreover, thecagAgene ofH. pyloristrains with multiple EPIYA-C repeats and EPIYA-D motif in itscagAgene are suggested to increase the risk of GC development. However, the role of host polymorphisms and the virulence factors ofH. pyloriin the risk of GC development varies among regions and ethnicities[31].

    Several studies suggest that atrophic gastritis and GC risk are increased by CagApositiveH. pyloristrains. An association has been reported between multiple EPIYA-C phosphorylation sites and GC. In a recent meta-analysis including 23 studies, Liet al[8]evaluated the association of EPIYA motifs and gastroduodenal pathologies. They concluded that the EPIYA-D motif was significantly related to GC risk, and multiple EPIYA-C motifs were related to PU and DU in Asia countries.

    Conversely, in the United States and Europe, multiple EPIYA-C motifs were commonly associated with GC risk. Multiple EPIYA-C repeats cause stronger binding of CagA to SHP-2 than a single EPIYA-C. Multiple EPIYA C repeats are associated with a higher risk of GC[34,35]. The functionality of CagA is increased with multiple EPIYA-C phosphorylation sites and is involved in cellular phenotypic changes. Therefore,H. pyloristrains with multiple EPIYA-C sites are related to the risk of GC.

    We could not find any studies specifically evaluating the interaction between EPIYA-C repeats, HLA alleles, and gastric pathologies. In our study, there were only two cases in the control group with CagA+ multiple EPIYA-C repeats, and it was not possible to make a comparison as the number was too low and our criteria were not met. HLA-DQA1, HLA-DRB1*13, HLA-A*02, HLA-B*35, and HLA-DQB1*06 alleles were shown to contribute to the susceptibility to GC and DU and were used for a comparison between GC and DU subgroups of patients. However, we did not compare the higher HLA alleles detected in the control group as it was not possible to determine an HLA allele with a protective effect without including a control group.

    In the comparison within the GC subgroup, due to our criterion, only the HLADQB1*06 allele was significantly low in the GC subgroup without EPIYA C repeats, but the difference was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. The higher frequency of the HLA-DQB1*06 allele suggests that this allele remains influential even in GC cases without multiple EPIYA-C repeats. With the presence of the HLA-DQB1*06 allele, we can suggest that mechanisms other than multiple EPIYAC repeats may contribute to the development of GC. On the other hand, in the GC subgroup, the number of HLA-DQA1*01 alleles was high in the multiple EPIYA-C repeats group, but the result was not significant after the univariate analysis.

    In the DU subgroup, none of the alleles were found to be significantly predominant in terms of frequencies. In addition, when the analyses were repeated while including GC and DU subgroups together, none of the HLA alleles were shown to either effective or protective. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for GC and DU subgroups alone and together, and none of the alleles were detected as independent risk factors. We then performed a multivariate logistic regression without including any discriminative criterion and only using the significantly different detected alleles between patient and control groups. As a result, HLA-DQA1*01, HLADQB1*0601, and HLA-A*2 alleles were found to be independent risk factors for the risk of GC and DU.

    There are no previous studies to compare our results based on the discrimination criteria for the selection of HLA alleles. Our results partly coincided with those of a meta-analysis of Asian populations by Wanget al[36]. In that study, the susceptibility genes forH. pyloriinfection were reported as DQB1*0401, DQA1*0103, and DQA1*0301. Garza-Gonzálezet al[37]reported that the HLA-DQA1*0503 allele served as an independent protective factor for GC. In our study, we also detected HLADQA1*05 as a protective allele.

    目前,我們在學(xué)校教育方面,也存在許多不完善的地方。一些學(xué)校為追求升學(xué)率,忽視了對青少年的青春期教育。一些學(xué)校對成績好的同學(xué)呵護(hù)有加,而對成績差的學(xué)生則放任自流。有的學(xué)校甚至對差生采取“停課”或“開除”等措施。不少學(xué)生流入社會后,成了“問題少年”。

    Similar to our results, Quinteroet al[9]reported that the DQB1*0602 allele increased the risk of GC risk in a Southern European population infected withH. pylori. On the other hand, the results of several case–control studies conducted with a Japanese population were contradictory. In contrast to our results, Azumaet al[38]found that the number of DQA1*0102 alleles was significantly lower in their study group ofH. pyloriinfected patients with GC than in control subjects. However, our data did not support their findings for the DQA1* alleles.

    In a study by Herrera-Goepfertet al[39], patients with GC displayed a high frequency of HLA-DQA1*0601, similar to our results. After our univariate analysis, DQA1*01 and HLA-DQB1*06 alleles were found to be positively associated with GC and DU, and DQB1*03 was found to be negatively associated with DU. These results are consistent with those of Herrera-Goepfertet al[39], Wuet al[13], and Quinteroet al[9].

    3.假設(shè)單件化妝品的不含稅價為P,買家購買套裝相對于分別購買套裝內(nèi)所含產(chǎn)品的可享優(yōu)惠率為R,則套裝化妝品的不含稅價為2P(1-R)。令,P≤2000,2P(1-R)>2000。 根據(jù)自網(wǎng)易考拉中選取的100組不參與活動打折的單件和套裝化妝品樣本,以“優(yōu)惠率=[單件價-(套裝價/套裝所含件數(shù))]/單件價”計算得知,優(yōu)惠率R大多集中在0.15%-1.75%。

    The reason for the conflicting results may be the different methods used in HLA typing, ethnicities, and the fact that GC is a heterogeneous disease. Specific HLA alleles may have the capability to modulate the presentation of peptides derived fromH. pyloriinfection to T cells. As a result of this presentation, the type or severity of T cell response may affect the proliferation of a lineage-specific malignant T cell clones[5].

    In the study by Liet al[10], the HLA-CW*03 ratio was significantly higher in cases with increased risk of GC andH. pylori-infected patients. A variety of exogenous stimulations such as toxins ofH. pyloriwith gastric and bile juices always affect the gastric mucosa[40]. These stimulations cause epithelial cells to secrete IL-12 and induce natural killer (NK) cells. These NK cells secrete IFN-g, which initiates the Th1 immune response from naive T cells and causes phenotypic changes in epithelial cells, resulting in the upregulation of HLA-DR and HLA-B27 genes[41].

    Different mechanisms may be responsible for the synergistic effect ofH. pyloriinfection and specific HLA genotypes. Specific HLA genotypes may influence the immune response and lead to carcinogenesis after the initial infection[17]. However, the common consensus is that genetically different host responses against the virulence factors ofH. pylorimay cause inflammation with varying intensities, as well as gastric epithelial erosions with different stages.

    Genetic and epigenetic factors may also influence the severity of inflammation and thereby contribute to different clinical outcomes. Upregulation of significant MHC class II type genes in epithelial cells may be related to the activation of T cells in the lamina propria and macrophages, as well as the consequent release of cytokines such as interferon-γ. Confirming this hypothesis, upregulated expression of MHC class II genes in gastric epithelial cells had a positive correlation with the T cells in the lamina propria in children withH. pyloriinfections according to Lopeset al[42].

    We could not detect any HLA allele as an independent risk factor for GC under our criterion, but without any criterion, some HLA alleles may regulate host susceptibility toH. pyloriinfection in the presence of its virulence factors. It can be suggested that some immunogenetic factors of the host may have important effects forH. pyloriinitiated inflammation leading to carcinogenesis. Although various host orH. pylorivirulence factors may have a role in the development of GC, specific host factors like HLAs could also modulate GC susceptibility or the resistance of individuals. Individuals who are at risk due to the susceptibility of HLA alleles to GC should be monitored prior to the initiation of carcinogenesis.

    We only focused on the association between HLA gene polymorphisms and multiple EPIYA-C repeats ofH. pyloriDNAs isolated from the gastric biopsy specimens. Only two of our control group cases had multiple EPIYA-C repeats, so we compared two subgroups of the study group. We could not find a significant difference between GC and DU subgroups in terms of multiple EPIYA-C repeats. On the other hand, in a simple comparison between study and control groups, HLADQA1*01 (OR = 1.848), HLA-DQB1*06 (OR = 1.821), and HLA-A*2 (OR = 1.579) alleles were detected as independent risk factors for GC and DU.

    This study has some limitations. The resolution of the HLA kits was low, which prevented an exact HLA comparison with other studies. We also did not evaluate some HLA alleles, such as HLA-C. Other important result of our study was that HLADR1*13-HLA-DQA1*01-HLA-DQB1*06 haplotype frequency was detected significantly higher in our GC subgroup cases more than both DU and control group cases. This results is similar for the locus type but different for HLA allele types from the study of Andoet al[43]They reported DRB1*04:05-DQA1*03:03-DQB1*04:01 haplotype frequency with 10%–30% in Japanese population and the risk of GC development.

    CONCLUSION

    This is the first study to evaluate the association between HLA alleles with GC and DU and asymptomaticH. pyloricases. Even though no HLA alleles were detected in multivariate analysis, HLA-DQB1*06 was significantly less frequent in the GC subgroup with multiple EPIYA repeats in the univariate analysis. However, this HLA allele was not detected as an independent risk factor in the multivariate analysis. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis using significantly different alleles and no discriminative criteria, HLA-DQA1*01 (OR = 1.848), HLA-DQB1*06 (OR = 1.821), and HLA-A*02 (OR = 1.579) alleles were found to be risk factors for GC and DU. However, we suggest that these HLA alleles make individuals prone to the development of GC without cagA and multiple EPIYA C repeats of the host. To clarify the effects of HLA alleles on the pathogenesis of gastric malignancies, more comprehensive, prospective, large-scale studies with high HLA resolution detection should be performed in the future.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We thank Assoc. Prof. Dr. Murat Telli from the Department of Biology in Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Turkey for the calculation of H-W equilirum and LD.

    猜你喜歡
    內(nèi)所價為單件
    現(xiàn)場電子音樂與單件樂器結(jié)合時的功能及其實現(xiàn)方式
    西門子推出緊湊型視覺單件分離器
    輕工機械(2021年4期)2021-12-30 12:40:50
    No.2 騰訊控股:授出4.98萬份購股權(quán),行權(quán)價溢價4.15%
    垂直層3D打印新技術(shù)助力波音制造單件大尺寸工裝
    新目標(biāo)英語七年級(上)Unit5 STEP BY STEP隨堂通
    鄭州日產(chǎn)東風(fēng)風(fēng)度MX5預(yù)售價103555元起
    汽車博覽(2016年10期)2016-11-11 19:06:03
    2015年11月世界農(nóng)產(chǎn)品價格動態(tài)
    10月世界農(nóng)產(chǎn)品價格動態(tài)
    Step Ⅱ
    同中求異
    免费高清视频大片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 亚洲在线观看片| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 嫩草影院精品99| 热99在线观看视频| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 国产三级在线视频| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| av天堂中文字幕网| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 日本 av在线| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 午夜久久久久精精品| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 少妇丰满av| 日本黄大片高清| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 九色国产91popny在线| 色视频www国产| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲最大成人av| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| h日本视频在线播放| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 精品人妻1区二区| av天堂中文字幕网| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产黄片美女视频| 91在线观看av| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 久久久久久大精品| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产高清三级在线| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办 | 欧美区成人在线视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 日本黄色片子视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲18禁久久av| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 久久久久久久久久成人| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲色图av天堂| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 日韩强制内射视频| 床上黄色一级片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产日本99.免费观看| 简卡轻食公司| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产精华一区二区三区| 成人无遮挡网站| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲av一区综合| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 99热只有精品国产| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 久久久久久久久大av| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 少妇丰满av| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 1000部很黄的大片| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产老妇女一区| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 嫩草影视91久久| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 日韩中字成人| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 搞女人的毛片| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 午夜视频国产福利| 欧美日本视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| av在线蜜桃| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产精品永久免费网站| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产单亲对白刺激| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 99热精品在线国产| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 最好的美女福利视频网| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 亚洲av中文av极速乱 | 69人妻影院| 久久亚洲真实| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 日本免费a在线| 久久久久国内视频| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| av在线老鸭窝| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 永久网站在线| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 日本在线视频免费播放| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 午夜福利18| 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲最大成人av| 久久久久性生活片| 精品日产1卡2卡| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 精品一区二区免费观看| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲无线观看免费| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 美女大奶头视频| 长腿黑丝高跟| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 内地一区二区视频在线| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产三级在线视频| 天堂动漫精品| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 51国产日韩欧美| 一本精品99久久精品77| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 两个人的视频大全免费| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 久久草成人影院| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| av福利片在线观看| 国产精品无大码| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产成人福利小说| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 精品久久久久久久末码| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 91av网一区二区| 亚洲无线在线观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 91狼人影院| ponron亚洲| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久亚洲真实| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 免费观看在线日韩| 99久久精品热视频| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 色av中文字幕| 内射极品少妇av片p| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 少妇的逼好多水| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 日本五十路高清| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产高清三级在线| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产高清激情床上av| av视频在线观看入口| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 国产高潮美女av| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 久久久久九九精品影院| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 午夜激情欧美在线| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 悠悠久久av| 久久精品影院6| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久久久久久久中文| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 色在线成人网| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| aaaaa片日本免费| 成人精品一区二区免费| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 免费av不卡在线播放| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 热99在线观看视频| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 久久久久久久久久成人| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 精品人妻视频免费看| 一夜夜www| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 久久久久久伊人网av| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 久久人妻av系列| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 色哟哟·www| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 我要搜黄色片| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| www.www免费av| 亚洲在线观看片| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国内精品久久久久精免费| ponron亚洲| 极品教师在线免费播放| 老司机福利观看| 欧美区成人在线视频| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产不卡一卡二| 久久久久九九精品影院| 窝窝影院91人妻| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 亚洲av熟女| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产高清三级在线| 此物有八面人人有两片| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 色av中文字幕| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| av在线天堂中文字幕| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 身体一侧抽搐| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 午夜免费激情av| 在线播放无遮挡| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产真实乱freesex| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国产三级在线视频| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产精品永久免费网站| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 成人欧美大片| avwww免费| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 免费看光身美女| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 看片在线看免费视频| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产真实乱freesex| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | av在线蜜桃| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产高清激情床上av| 在线看三级毛片| 久久香蕉精品热| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 欧美潮喷喷水| 丰满的人妻完整版| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办 | 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 国产老妇女一区| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 22中文网久久字幕| 俺也久久电影网| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产高潮美女av| a在线观看视频网站| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久久久久大精品| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 久久九九热精品免费| av福利片在线观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| netflix在线观看网站| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产精品永久免费网站| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久久久性生活片| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 午夜免费激情av| 黄色日韩在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 综合色av麻豆| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 88av欧美| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 色播亚洲综合网| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 我要搜黄色片| 色5月婷婷丁香| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 一本精品99久久精品77| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 久久久久性生活片| 亚洲av中文av极速乱 | 永久网站在线| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| videossex国产| 欧美区成人在线视频| www.www免费av| 久久香蕉精品热| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| av天堂中文字幕网| 成人无遮挡网站| 欧美区成人在线视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 欧美日韩黄片免| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 日本黄大片高清| 午夜免费激情av| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 俺也久久电影网| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 在线免费十八禁| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产三级在线视频| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频|