• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A perspective on regression and Bayesian approaches for system identification of pattern formation dynamics

    2020-07-01 05:13:50ZhenlinWngBoweiWuKrishnGrikiptiXunHun

    Zhenlin Wng, Bowei Wu,b, Krishn Grikipti, Xun Hun,*

    a Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

    b Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA

    c Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Mathematics, Michigan Institute for Computational Discovery & Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

    Keywords:Computational mechanics Materials physics Pattern formation Bayesian inference Inverse problem

    ABSTRACT We present two approaches to system identification, i.e. the identification of partial differential equations (PDEs) from measurement data. The first is a regression-based variational system identification procedure that is advantageous in not requiring repeated forward model solves and has good scalability to large number of differential operators. However it has strict data type requirements needing the ability to directly represent the operators through the available data.The second is a Bayesian inference framework highly valuable for providing uncertainty quantification, and flexible for accommodating sparse and noisy data that may also be indirect quantities of interest. However, it also requires repeated forward solutions of the PDE models which is expensive and hinders scalability. We provide illustrations of results on a model problem for pattern formation dynamics, and discuss merits of the presented methods.

    Pattern formation is a widely observed phenomenon in diverse fields including materials physics, developmental biology and ecology among many others. The physics underlying the patterns is specific to the mechanisms, and is encoded by partial differential equations (PDEs). Models of phase separation [1, 2]are widely employed in materials physics. Following Turing's seminal work on reaction-diffusion systems [3], a robust literature has developed on the application of nonlinear versions of this class of PDEs to model pattern formation in developmental biology [4–12]. Reaction-diffusion equations also appear in ecology, where they are more commonly referred to as activator-inhibitor systems, and are found to underlie large scale patterning[13, 14].

    All these pattern forming systems fall into the class of nonlinear, parabolic PDEs. They can be written as systems of first-order dynamics driven by a number of time-independent terms of algebraic and differential form. The spatiotemporal, differentioalgebraic operators act on either a composition (normalized concentration) or an order parameter. It also is common for the algebraic and differential terms to be coupled across multiple species. Identification of participating PDE operators from spatio-temporal observations can thus uncover the underlying physical mechanisms, and lead to improved understanding, prediction, and manipulation of these systems.

    Concomitant with the increasing availability of experimental data and advances in experimental techniques and diagnostics,there has been significant development in techniques for system identification. Early work in parameter identification within a given system of PDEs can be traced to nonlinear regression approaches [15–18] and Bayesian inference [19, 20]. Without knowing the PDEs, the complete underlying governing equations could be extracted from data by combining symbolic regression and genetic programming to infer algebraic expressions along with their coefficients [21, 22]. Recently, sparse regression techniques for system identification have been developed to determine the operators in PDEs from a comprehensive library of candidates [23–28]. Bayesian methods for system identification have also been proposed [29, 30] but mostly used for algebraic or ordinary differential equations and not yet deployed to PDE systems. In a different approach to solving the inverse problems,deep neural networks are trained to directly represent the solution variable [31, 32]. Using the neural network representations,the parameters within the given PDEs can be inferred through the approach of physics-informed neural network with strong forms of the target one- and two-dimensional PDEs embedded in the loss functions [33].

    One may broadly categorize the various approaches for system identification to those that access different data type (full field versus sparse quantities of interest (QoI)), and whether employing a deterministic or probabilistic framework (regression versus Bayesian) (see Fig. 1). In this paper, we focus on two methods that we have recently developed, falling in the top-left and bottom-right quadrants: (a) a stepwise regression approach coupled with variational system identification (VSI) based on the weak form that is highly effective in handling large quantities of composition field measurements [28], and (b) a Bayesian inference framework that offers quantified uncertainty, and is therefore well-suited for sparse and noisy data and flexible for different types of QoIs. The key objective and novelty of this paper is then to provide a perspective and comparison on the contrasting advantages and limitations of these two approaches for performing system identification. We illustrate key highlights of these techniques and compare their results through a model problem example below.

    Fig. 1. Broad categorization of system identification approaches,with our paper focusing on two methods falling in the top-left and bottom-right quadrants.

    Model problem. For demonstration, consider the following model form in [0, T] × ?:

    with

    and

    Here, C1(t, x) and C2(t, x) are the compositions, with diffusivities D11,D12,...,D22and reaction rates R10,R11,...,R23assumed constant in space and time. This model represents the coupled diffusion-reaction equations for two species following Schnakenberg kinetics [34]. For an activator-inhibitor species pair having autoinhibition with cross-activation of a short range species, and auto-activation with cross-inhibition of a long range species, these equations form so-called Turing patterns [3]. For simplicity, we pose the above initial and boundary value problem to be one-dimensional in space for x ∈(?40,40). A relatively fine uniform grid of 401 points is used to numerically discretize x; we note that data corresponding to too coarse of a resolution may lead to incorrect VSI results, and refer readers to Ref. [28] for a discussion on the data discretization fidelity. The initial conditions for all simulations are set to C10(x)=0.5 and C20(x)=0.5, and the value at each grid point is further corrupted with an independent perturbation drawn uniformly from [?0.01,0.01] in order to represent measurement error and experimental variability. Three sets of different diffusivities are considered to illustrate scenarios inducing different particle sizes (see Fig. 2 for examples of the composition fields under these three different parameter sets at time snapshot t = 15, which is long enough for the precipitates to have formed). The true prefactors of the PDE operators are summarized in Table 1. Our goal for the system identification problem is to estimate these PDE operator prefactors from available measurement data.

    VSI and stepwise regression using composition field data.When composition field data are available, the PDEs themselves can be represented directly. This can be achieved by constructing the operators either in strong form, such as with finite differencing in the sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics(SINDy) approach [23], or in weak form built upon basis functions in the VSI framework [28]. The weak form transfers derivatives to the weighting function, thus requiring less smoothness of the actual solution fields C1and C2that are constructed from data and allowing the robust construction of higher-order derivatives. Another advantage of using the weak form is that Neumann boundary conditions are explicitly included as surface integrals, making their identification feasible. We briefly present VSI in conjunction with stepwise regression below, while referring readers to Ref. [28] for further details and discussions.

    For infinite-dimensional problems with Dirichlet boundary conditions on Γc, the weak form corresponding to the strong form in Eq. (1) or (2) is, ? w ∈V={w|w=0, on Γc}, find C such that

    where ? is the domain, χ is the vector containing all possible independent operators in weak form:

    are the average of local maxima and average of local minima . c Histogram of the particle sizes corresponding to the top fig-Fig. 2. a C1 fields over a zoomed-in range of x at time snapshot t =15 generated using the three parameter cases. We see that the different diffusivity values in the three cases indeed lead to particles (the“crests”) of different sizes. b Example field C where the dashed lines ure, whose sample mean μ and standard deviation σ are chosen by us to be two of our QoIs in this problem. Together are our QoIs.

    Table 1 True PDE operator prefactors for the three different cases.

    and ω is the vector of operator prefactors. Using this notation,ω=[D11,D12,R10,...,R13] for Eq. (1) and ω=[D21,D22,R20,...,R23]for Eq. (2). Upon integration by parts, application of appropriate boundary conditions, and accounting for the arbitrariness of w,the finite-dimensionality leads to a vector system of residual equations: R =y ?χω, where y is the time derivative term and may be represented via a backward difference approximation

    with Nidenoting the basis function corresponding to degree of freedom (DOF) i, and ? t=t1?tn?1the time step. While other time-marching schemes are certainly also possible, we use backward differencing here for its simplicity, stability, and as a representative choice for illustration purposes when the focus of our problem is not on time-marching specifically. The other operators in χ are constructed similarly and grouped together into the matrix χ. Minimizing the residual norm towards ∥R∥=0 then yields the linear regression problem

    The construction of this linear system is quite inexpensive,equivalent to the finite element assembly process where the computational cost is a very small fraction of the overall solution process (even when considering a large set of candidate operators). Furthermore, this system only needs to be constructed once in the entire VSI procedure, and the subsequent regression steps do not ever need them to be reconstructed; this is because y and χ are constructed from data which are given and fixed.Solving Eq. (8) via standard regression, especially with noisy data, will lead to a non-sparse ω. Such a result will not sharply delineate the relevant bases for parsimonious identification of the governing system. Sparse regression (compressive sensing)techniques such as L1-based regularization are useful to promote sparse solutions of retained operators, but we found their performance for system identification to be highly sensitive to the selection of regularization parameters. We therefore use backward model selection by stepwise regression coupled with a statistical F-test, thus taking an approach to iteratively and gradually remove inactive operators instead of attempting to find a solution in one shot. Starting from a dictionary containing all relevant operators (such as in Eqs. (1) and (2)) and while the residual remains small, we eliminate the inactive operators iteratively until the model become underfit as indicated by a drastic increase of residual norm. Extensive algorithmic details are available in Ref. [28].

    With clean (noiseless) composition field data, VSI can pinpoint the complete governing equations of our model problem using data from as few as two time instants. Figure 3 shows the inferred operator prefactors for Eqs. (1) and (2) on the left, which is achieved when the residual norm increases dramatically upon further elimination of operators as shown in Fig. 4. All prefactors are correctly identified with high accuracy with reference to Table 1. Investigations of the effects from varying fidelity and data noise are further discussed in Ref. [28]. The main advantages of this approach are: (a) repeated forward PDE solves are not necessary and it is therefore computationally very fast, and (b) its efficiency can accommodate a large dictionary of candidate PDE operators, such as illustrated in Ref. [28] with more than 30 operators. However, this approach requires the availability of composition field data (full or partial [Ref. 35]) at instants separated by sufficiently small time steps, Δt.

    Fig. 3. Inferred operator prefactors at final iteration of the stepwise regression using composition field data generated from the three parameter sets. The identified coefficients of active operators on the y-axis are scaled by the true values of the first parameter set (for better visual presentation). Labels for the corresponding operators, χ 1,χ2,...,χ6, are shown on the x-axis and their definitions can be found previously in Eq.(6). All final VSI results achieve machine zero error here.

    Fig. 4. Residual norm at each iteration using composition field data generated from the three parameter sets. The algorithm for identifying governing equations of C1 (shown by solid curves) and C2(shown by dashed curves), respectively, converged at iterations number 3 or 4, beyond which the residual increases dramatically if any more operators are eliminated.

    Bayesian inference using QoIs. When only sparse and noisy data are available, the quantification of uncertainty in the prefactor estimates becomes highly important. Bayesian statistics[36, 37] provides a mathematically rigorous framework for solving the system identification problem while capturing uncertainty, and is particularly flexible in accommodating different QoIs simultaneously, that may also be arbitrary functionals of the solution fields. Letdenote the set of available QoI measurement data. Bayes' theorem states

    where p (ω|D) is the posterior probability density function (PDF),p(D|ω) is the likelihood function, and p(ω) is the prior. For example, in this work we choose priors for the prefactors to be log-normal and normal distributions, and model the likelihood to exhibit an additive Gaussian data noise: D =G(ω)+? where G (ω) is the forward model (i.e., PDE solve) andis a zero-mean independent (Σ diagonal) Gaussian random variable depicting measurement noise. The likelihood PDF can then be evaluated via p (D|ω)=p?(D ?G(ω)) where p?is the PDF of the multivariate Gaussian ?, hence each likelihood evaluation entails a forward PDE solve and together make up the most expensive portion of a Bayesian inference procedure. Solving the Bayesian inference problem then entails characterizing the posterior—that is, the distribution of the prefactors conditioned on the available data—from evaluations of the prior and likelihood PDFs.

    While different Bayesian inference algorithm exist, the primary method is Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) [38] that involves constructing a Markov chain exploring the parameter space in proportion to the true posterior measure. Variants of MCMC, especially when equipped with effective proposal mechanisms, are particularly powerful as they only require evaluations of p (ω|D) up to a normalization constant, which enables us to use only the prior and likelihood without needing to estimate the constant of proportionality on the righthand-side of Eq.(9), an otherwise extremely difficult task. In this work, we demonstrate the Bayesian framework using the delayed rejection adaptive Metropolis (DRAM) algorithm [39], which is a simple yet effective method that offers secondary proposal distributions and adapts proposal covariance based on chain history to better match the true target distribution. A brief summary of DRAM steps is provided below (please see Ref. [39] for full details), where we see that each of these MCMC iterations requires a new likelihood evaluation in Step 2 (and possibly also Step 4 if 1st-stage encountered a rejection) and thus a forward PDE model solve, and this requirement for repeated PDE solves can become computationally intensive or even prohibitive for some problems.

    1. From current chain location ωt, propose ωt+1from 1ststage proposal distribution;

    3. Draw u1~U(0,1), accept ωt+1if u1< α1and go to Step 5, else reject;

    4. (Delayed rejection) If rejected in Step 3, re-propose ωt+1from 2nd-stage proposal (usually smaller in scale compared to 1st-stage proposal) and evaluate α2and u2to decide acceptance/rejection (detailed formulas in Ref. [39]);

    5. (Adaptive Metropolis) At regular intervals (e.g., every 10 iterations) update proposal distributions using the sample covariance computed from the Markov chain history.

    In practice, surrogate models (e.g., polynomial chaos expansions, Gaussian processes, neural networks) are often employed to accelerate the Bayesian inference.

    Our Bayesian example targets the same system in Eqs. (1)and (2). We generate synthetic data D by first solving the PDEs using the true prefactors from Table 1 to obtain C1and C2at at only two (sparse) time snapshots (t = 7.5 and 15), then for each field we calculate four QoIswhich are respectively the mean and standard deviation of particle size distribution, and the composition field average local maxima and minima (see Fig. 2b). Hence D contains(2 species)×(2 snapshots)=16 scalars. Leveraging and illustrating the Bayesian prior as a mechanism to introduce physical constraints and domain expert knowledge, we set D12and D21to zero from prior knowledge and endow normal prior distributions for the remaining 10-dimensional ω prefactor vector, except furthermore targeting log D12and log D21to ensure positivity of diffusion coefficients.

    Figure 5 presents for Case 2 (Cases 1 and 3 yielded similar results and are omitted for brevity) the posterior PDF contours and selected chain traces that visually appear to be well-mixed.The posterior contours are plotted using a kernel density estimator, and the diagonal panels represent marginal distributions while off-diagonals are the pairwise joint distributions illustrating first-order correlation effects. Overall, strong correlations and non-Gaussian structures are present. The summarizing statistics (mean ± 1-standard-deviation) for the posterior marginals are presented in Table 2, all agreeing well with the true values for Case 2 although residual uncertainty remains. For system identification, sparse solutions may be sought by employing sparsityinducing priors (e.g., Laplace priors), coupled with eliminating prefactors that concentrate around zero with a sufficiently small uncertainty based on a thresholding policy analogous to that in the stepwise regression procedure. As an example, from Table 2,we may choose to eliminate prefactors based on criteria satisfying (a) the marginal posterior standard deviation falls below 10%of the largest marginal posterior mean magnitude (i.e., achieving a relative precision requirement), and (b) the interval of mean ± 1-standard-deviation covers zero (i.e., supporting operator to be inactive). This would lead to the elimination of R12in this case, while R21and R22(which are also zero in the true solution) cannot be eliminated yet since the available (sparse and noisy) data are not enough in reducing the uncertainty sufficiently to arrive at a conclusion. We note that the criteria above only serve as an example, and better thresholding strategies should be explored. The main advantages of this approach are:(a) the ability to quantify uncertainty in prefactor estimates, thus making it valuable for sparse and noisy data, and (b) its flexibility in accommodating various types of indirect QoIs that do not explicitly participate in the governing PDE. The drawback of this approach is its high computational cost, and weaker scalability compared to the regression VSI method introduced previously.

    Fig. 5. Lower left: marginal and pairwise joint posterior distributions of the ω for Case 2. Upper right: select chain traces of MCMC.

    Table 2 Bayesian inference marginal posterior mean ± 1-standarddeviation for the PDE operator prefactors. We emphasize that these are summarizing statistics for the Bayesian posterior that reflect the remaining uncertainty conditioned on the particular available data,and should not be compared to the true parameter values and then interpreted as an accuracy assessment.

    Summarizing remarks. In this paper we presented a perspective and comparison on the contrasting advantages and limitations of two approaches of system identification from a broader categorization of methods in Fig. 1, with illustration on a model problem for pattern formation dynamics. The first approach is a regression-based VSI procedure, which has the advantage of not requiring repeated forward PDE solutions and scales well to handle large numbers of candidate PDE operators. However this approach requires specific types of data where the PDE operators themselves can be directly represented through these data.More recently, we also have extended the VSI approach to uncorrelated, sparse and multi-source data for pattern forming physics [35]. However, as may be expected, data at high spatial and temporal resolution deliver more accurate identification outcomes. The second approach uses Bayesian statistics, and has advantages in its ability to provide uncertainty quantification. It also offers significant flexibility in accommodating sparse and noisy data that may also be different types of indirect QoIs.However, this approach requires repeated forward solutions of the PDE models, which is computationally expensive and may quickly become impractical when the number of PDE terms (i.e.,dimension of the identification problem) becomes high. It is thus best used in conjunction with surrogate models and other dimension reduction techniques.

    Acknowledgements

    We acknowledge the support of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Grant HR00111990S2), as well as of Toyota Research Institute (Award #849910).

    高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 一级毛片 在线播放| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 在线观看三级黄色| 搡老乐熟女国产| 有码 亚洲区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 夫妻午夜视频| 欧美zozozo另类| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 日日撸夜夜添| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 99久久精品一区二区三区| av.在线天堂| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 亚洲av一区综合| 国产成人aa在线观看| av黄色大香蕉| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产在视频线精品| 免费看av在线观看网站| 少妇的逼水好多| 成人免费观看视频高清| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久久久国产网址| 国产成人精品福利久久| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 91狼人影院| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 大香蕉久久网| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 久久久久精品性色| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 国产成人精品一,二区| 熟女av电影| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 免费观看性生交大片5| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 观看美女的网站| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 欧美人与善性xxx| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 99久久人妻综合| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 在线a可以看的网站| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 日韩伦理黄色片| 在线观看国产h片| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 成年免费大片在线观看| 在线免费十八禁| 三级国产精品片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 97超碰精品成人国产| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久久久久久精品精品| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| a级毛色黄片| 国产高清三级在线| 国产毛片在线视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 欧美zozozo另类| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 高清av免费在线| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| videos熟女内射| 黄色日韩在线| av播播在线观看一区| 在线观看三级黄色| 亚洲av福利一区| 日韩av免费高清视频| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久久久久久久大av| 久久影院123| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 在线天堂最新版资源| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 一本一本综合久久| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 极品教师在线视频| 在线播放无遮挡| 午夜福利在线在线| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产成人精品一,二区| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | av.在线天堂| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 嫩草影院新地址| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| av在线天堂中文字幕| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| av线在线观看网站| 日本免费在线观看一区| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 欧美区成人在线视频| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产高潮美女av| 欧美+日韩+精品| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 久久久久久久久大av| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 日韩强制内射视频| 51国产日韩欧美| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲内射少妇av| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久久久性生活片| av在线app专区| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产精品成人在线| 美女主播在线视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 午夜日本视频在线| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 少妇丰满av| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 久久久欧美国产精品| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 免费看不卡的av| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 少妇的逼好多水| 五月天丁香电影| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久久国产一区二区| 国内精品宾馆在线| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| av免费观看日本| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 直男gayav资源| 老司机影院毛片| 深夜a级毛片| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 身体一侧抽搐| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 国产成人a区在线观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 欧美+日韩+精品| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 超碰97精品在线观看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 毛片女人毛片| 欧美潮喷喷水| 只有这里有精品99| 久久97久久精品| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 日本与韩国留学比较| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲国产色片| 久热这里只有精品99| 日韩伦理黄色片| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 久久热精品热| 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国产成人一区二区在线| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 视频区图区小说| videossex国产| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| h日本视频在线播放| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 麻豆成人av视频| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 男女边摸边吃奶| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 久久97久久精品| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 激情 狠狠 欧美| tube8黄色片| 国产永久视频网站| 日韩强制内射视频| 直男gayav资源| 熟女电影av网| 久久久国产一区二区| 人妻系列 视频| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 男女国产视频网站| 一级黄片播放器| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 一区二区av电影网| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| av黄色大香蕉| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 久久久精品94久久精品| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| h日本视频在线播放| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| www.av在线官网国产| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产美女午夜福利| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 69人妻影院| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产在线男女| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 水蜜桃什么品种好| www.av在线官网国产| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲最大成人中文| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 黄色配什么色好看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产美女午夜福利| 欧美日本视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 欧美zozozo另类| videos熟女内射| 美女主播在线视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 免费观看性生交大片5| 18+在线观看网站| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 婷婷色综合www| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 如何舔出高潮| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 久久久久性生活片| 九九在线视频观看精品| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 亚洲图色成人| 久久99精品国语久久久| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 免费观看性生交大片5| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 久久久久久久国产电影| 免费观看av网站的网址| 免费观看性生交大片5| 欧美日本视频| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 丝袜喷水一区| av免费观看日本| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 有码 亚洲区| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 一本久久精品| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲最大成人av| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 在线 av 中文字幕| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 老女人水多毛片| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产探花极品一区二区| eeuss影院久久| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 有码 亚洲区| 国产高清三级在线| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 久久久久国产网址| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| av免费在线看不卡| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| av天堂中文字幕网| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲电影在线观看av| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 美女高潮的动态| 少妇人妻 视频| 老女人水多毛片| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 少妇丰满av| 99热这里只有是精品50| 舔av片在线| 成人免费观看视频高清| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 午夜视频国产福利| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 在线免费十八禁| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 97在线视频观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 在现免费观看毛片| 深夜a级毛片| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 久久久久国产网址| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 伦精品一区二区三区| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 三级经典国产精品| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| av国产免费在线观看| 97在线人人人人妻| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 在线观看人妻少妇| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产老妇女一区| 韩国av在线不卡| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久热久热在线精品观看| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产 精品1| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 成人欧美大片| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 亚洲在久久综合| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 禁无遮挡网站| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产成人91sexporn| 熟女av电影| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 99热全是精品| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲精品一二三| 综合色丁香网| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 69av精品久久久久久| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 高清毛片免费看| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 91精品国产九色| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 色播亚洲综合网| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久6这里有精品| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久午夜福利片| av.在线天堂| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 国产高清三级在线|