• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Service Function Chain in Small Satellite-Based Software De fined Satellite Networks

    2018-04-04 08:21:19TaixinLiHuachunZhouHongbinLuoQiXuSiHuaBohaoFeng
    China Communications 2018年3期

    Taixin Li, Huachun Zhou,*, Hongbin Luo, Qi Xu, Si Hua, Bohao Feng

    1 Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

    2 Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

    * The corresponding author, email: hchzhou@bjtu.edu.cn

    I. INTRODUCTION

    In recent years, due to the characteristics of global coverage, reliable transmission, and scalability, satellite networks have been widely used in communication, data transmission, navigation,remote sensing, and even Internet services.

    However, traditional satellite networks have problems in structure design. In traditional satellite networks, a satellite is configured by the ground station only when it flies over the station. It will consume very long time to configure the whole network if the network has a large scale. This characteristic does not satisfy the need of managing satellites in real time,including collecting network status timely, and making management strategies dynamically.Traditional satellite networks employ scheduled link allocation, and static routing strategies,which make it dif ficult to support flexible traf fic scheduling, and changing needs of users.

    There has been research about utilizing Software Defined Networks (SDN) [1] in multiple promising scenarios, for example,ubiquitous data center optical interconnection[2] and cloud radio access network [3]. To solve the structure design problem of satellite networks, some researchers have proposed to bring the technologies of SDN to satellite networks, forming SDSN. SDSN can support flexible and configurable satellite networks due to the characteristics of SDN, which decouples the control logic from the forwarding devices. SDN has been developed in terrestrial networks and achieved promising results.However, the research of SDSN has just begun [4] [5] [6]. There is just one article about implementing a SDSN prototype [7] based on OpenFlow [8] in the OpenStack environment to investigate SDSN.

    In this paper, we have investigated a new method for flexible service delivery in the satellite networks, applying SFC in the small satellite-based SDSN.

    Small satellites [9] are defined to be the arti ficial satellites with low weights and small size and are usually under 500Kg. Small satellites have several advantages, such as simple design, short development time, low cost,easy to launch, and strong survivability. These years, there is a rapid growth of the interest in using small satellites [10]. For example, One-Web plans a mega-constellation of at least 648 small satellites to provide low-delay and highspeed Internet service. A cluster of small satellites can fly in a formation. The satellites in a formation maintain relatively stable connections with each other. There has been research[11] about utilizing the on-board processing capability of satellites to process satellite traffic. Small satellites can carry network services that handle satellite data under control of the controller. The network services can be performance-enhancement-related, security-related, and data-processing-related. The small satellites are limited in computing capabilities and on-board resources due to their low cost.Therefore, small satellite cannot hold too much network services.

    SFC [12] is proposed to provide flexible,reconfigurable, task-oriented and reusable network services. The network services can be chosen on demand and chained in a certain order. The traf fic is steered among the selected services and the network services can be shared among different traf fic. There have been a great increase of research about SFC these years [13-16]. However, we have not seen any research that applies SFC in satellite networks.

    Traditional satellite service delivery method is based on the integrated network services provided by one big satellite [17][18]. However, utilizing distributed network services located on small satellites and chaining them as a SFC will achieve the following benefits against the traditional method. (1) Task-oriented. The network services can be chosen on demand. Diverse and customized satellite services can be provided. (2) Reconfigurable satellite services. Different set of network services are selected to form different satellite services. The traffic is steered among the selected network services under control of the controller. (3) Strong survivability. If one or some of the small satellites are broken, some services can still be provided using the remaining small satellites.

    Motivated by this, in this paper, we propose to utilize SFC in the small satellite-based SDSN. In this way, we can steer the traffic among the network services on the small satellites flexibly and achieve processing of the satellite data before they arrive at the ground station. We provide two deployment patterns for SFC in SDSN, namely, Multi-Domain pattern and Satellite Formation pattern. Then, we propose two SFP algorithms for two patterns,SFP-MD and SFP-SF, respectively. In addition, we conduct experiments in our Open-Flow-based and OpenStack-based prototype.We aim to compare the performance of the patterns in terms of hops, delay, and packet loss rate and summarize the applicable conditions of the deployment patterns.

    To sum up, our main technical contributions in this work are as follows.

    · We propose two deployment patterns for SFC in SDSN, Multi-Domain pattern and Satellite Formation pattern. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first ones to apply SFC in the satellite networks.

    · We propose two SFP algorithms for the patterns, SFP-MD and SFP-SF, and implement them in the OpenFlow-based and Open-Stack-based prototype.

    · We conduct contrast experiments in our prototype and summarize the applicable conditions of the deployment patterns according to the experimental results. It will bene fit the further investigations of applying SFC in SDSN.

    The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section II reviews the related work. Section III gives a description of the deployment patterns for SFC in SDSN. Section IV presents the tests of the algorithms, SFP-MD and SFPSF, and the experimental results. Finally, Sec-tion V sums up the paper and provide a further discussion about the study.

    II. RELATED WORK

    In this paper, we focus on deploying SFC in the small satellite-based SDSN. In this section,we first review some recent related work on SDSN and small satellite. Then, we review the state of the art in SFC.

    2.1 Software de fined satellite networks

    Bao et al. [4] proposed OpenSAN, a software de fined network architecture. The authors aim to provide satellite network with high efficiency, fine-grained control, and flexibility by decoupling the data plane and control plane of each satellite. Jiang et al. [5] aimed to overcome the issues of node failures and dynamic topology changes of satellite networks. They propose a fast recovery routing algorithm for the SDN-based ORS satellite networking scheme. Yang et al. [6] proposed a seamless handover mechanism that is tailored to and takes advantage of SDSN. Then, the authors conduct physical layer simulation and the experimental results show that the SDSN-based handover protocol has advantage over the existing hard and hybrid handover schemes for satellite networks.

    We focus on using the global control ability and flexible traf fic scheduling ability of SDSN rather than investigating the performance of SDSN in this paper.

    2.2 Small satellite

    Edmonson et al. [19] pointed out that a large number of heterogeneous small satellites can be deployed in space as a network using inter-satellite communications. Cello et al. [20]proposed ColdSel, an algorithm to mitigate possible congestion situations, to limit the nanosatellite (one kind of small satellite) buffer occupancy and to reduce the data delivery time in a Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN)based nanosatellite rural access network.There is also research about formation flight of the small satellites. Mazal et al. [21] presented a methodological study of cluster flight for disaggregated satellite systems. Furthermore,they presented a cooperative cluster establishment-keeping algorithm to enable the modules track a given orbit and keep a stable distance from each other.

    In this paper, we use small satellites as the Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites that carry the network services. The reason is that small satellites have the advantages such as low cost,easy to launch, and strong survivability. We can deploy a large number of small satellites as a network to provide network services at a low cost. While the Medium Earth Orbit (MEO)satellites need a higher forwarding capability and the Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO)satellites need a higher processing capability than the LEO satellites, therefore we prefer not to use small satellites as the MEO/ GEO satellites. In addition, we use the concept of satellite formation in one of the deployment patterns.

    2.3 Service function chain

    Wang et al. [13] investigated model and optimization of dynamic function composition problem. They developed a combinatorial optimization model and proposed a distributed algorithm using Markov approximation method. Taleb et al. [14] pointed out that the user generated content may cause severe congestion to mobile networks. The authors aim to address this challenge by exploiting SFC in data center that deployed in the Sgi-LAN.There is research about SFC in multi-domain scenario. Zhang et al. [15] presented a vertex-centric distributed orchestration framework for multi-domain networks and propose a distributed computing algorithm for mapping a service function chain request in multi-domain networks.

    The research of SDSN and small satellites makes it possible to enable satellite networks provide flexible network services. We propose to apply SFC in satellite networks to provide flexible satellite network services. However,the research of SFC is all in terrestrial networks. In this paper, we aim to apply SFC in the satellite networks to provide flexible network services, where the networking mode is different from that in terrestrial networks.

    III. DESCRIPTION OF THE DEPLOYMENT FOR SFC IN SDSN

    In this section, we will introduce the structure of SDSN, and two deployment patterns designed for deploying SFC in SDSN to provide flexible network services. Then, we propose two SFP algorithms, which fit the characteristics of the MD pattern and the SF pattern.

    3.1 Description of software de fined satellite networks

    SDSN is typically based on the multi-layer satellite networks because there are some problems in the single-layer satellite networks, especially in single-layer LEO satellite network.Firstly, big blocking probability. The probability of link handover will increase with the increase of inter satellite links among single-layer satellites. The blocking probability will increase as a result. Secondly, weak survivability. Path diversity is weak in the single-layer satellite networks. It is difficult to find an alternative path that can satisfy the need of Quality of Service (QoS) after a link failure.

    Fig. 1. Illustration of UDL, ISL, and IOL in the multi-layer constellation.

    We first introduce three kinds of satellite links existing in SDSN, User Data Link, Inter Satellite Link, and Inter Orbit Link. Then, we introduce the structure of SDSN, the Control Plane and the Forwarding Plane.

    1) User Data Link

    User Data Link (UDL) is the satellite-ground link between the ground station and the satellites. A ground station can maintain multiple UDLs to different satellites in different layers. As is shown in Fig. 1, we set two kinds of UDLs, the UDLs between ground station and LEO satellites, and the UDLs between ground station and GEO satellites. The traf fic from the ground station needs to be sent to the access LEO satellite via UDL before it is forwarded in the satellite networks.

    2) Inter Satellite Link

    Inter Satellite Link (ISL) is the satellite link among the satellites in the same layer. There are two kinds of ISL, inter-plane ISL and intra-plane ISL.

    A LEO satellite keeps three or four permanent ISLs. As is shown in Fig. 1, there are six planes of LEO satellites (marked as LEO1-* to LEO6-*). The satellites in LEO1-* and the satellites in LEO6-* fly in the opposite direction.We can say that there exists a reverse seam between LEO1-* and LEO6-*. The LEO satellites on both sides of the reverse seam keep three ISLs, two of which are intra-plane ISLs and connect the neighboring LEO satellites in the same plane. The other one is inter-plane ISL and connects the neighboring LEO satellite in the neighboring plane. The other satellites (in LEO-2* to LEO-5*) maintain four ISLs. Two of the ISLs are inter-plane ISLs and the other two are intra-plane ISLs.

    A MEO satellite maintains two permanent intra-plane ISLs and several temporary inter-plane ISLs. As is shown in figure 1, there are two planes of MEO satellites (marked as MEO-1* and MEO-2*). The MEO satellites connect two neighboring MEO satellites in the same plane. MEO satellites create inter-plane ISLs to the MEO satellites in the other plane whenever possible.

    A GEO satellite keeps two permanent intra-plane ISLs. As is shown in Fig. 1, we adopt one plane of GEO satellites, so there is no inter-plane ISL.

    3) Inter Orbit Link

    Inter Orbit Link (IOL) is the satellite link connecting the satellites in different layers.IOL is created temporarily when the lower layer satellites enter the coverage of the higher layer satellites. IOL is responsible for the communication between different layers.Therefore, IOL is unique and important in multi-layer satellite networks compared with the single-layer satellite networks. As is shown in Fig. 1, GEO satellites keep two kinds of IOLs, one kind is the IOLs to MEO satellites,and the other one is the IOLs to LEO satellites. MEO satellites keep IOLs to the LEO satellites that it covers.

    4) Control Plane

    Control Plane consists of GEO satellites.We deploy the controllers on GEO satellites for the reason that GEO satellites have a global view of the whole network. The controller on the GEO satellite collects the information of the satellite nodes and links via the IOLs and forwards this information to the ground station. The ground station sends instructions to GEO satellite via the UDL and GEO satellite distributes the instructions to the satellites it covers via the IOLs. The controller on the GEO satellite is very important because it is responsible for distributing instructions among the whole networks and preparing network information for strategies making.

    5) Forwarding Plane

    Forwarding Plane consists of MEO satellites and LEO satellites. SFC is achieved mainly based on this plane. The MEO satellites are responsible for forwarding the traf fic according to the instructions from the GEO satellites. The small satellite-based LEO satellites not only forward the traffic, but also carry the network services. The satellite traf fic is steered among the MEO satellites and the LEO satellites along the SFP.

    3.2 Description of the deployment patterns

    We de fine the link information that GEO satellite collects as the sets ISLLEO-LEO, ISLMEO-MEO,and IOLLEO-MEO. Here, ISLLEO-LEOmeans the ISLs among LEO satellites, ISLMEO-MEOmeans the ISLs among MEO satellites, and IOLLEO-MEOmeans the IOLs between the MEO layer and the LEO layer. The sets contain the connection information and distance information. We also de fine the coverage relationship as COV(x), which means the MEO satellites that cover the LEO x.

    A list of requested network services will be generated before the transmission starts.We define the requested network services as the set REQSERVICES={S1,S2,…,Sn+2}.Then, we add up the access LEO satellite of the source ground station, the LEO satellite nodes that carry these network services, and the access LEO satellite of the destination ground station successively to generate the set REQNODES={N1,N2,…,Nn+2}. The path that chaining the requested network services is called SFP, and we de fine the SFP as the set of links PATH.

    1) Multi-Domain Pattern

    As is introduced in Section III A, the small satellite-based LEO satellites are covered by the MEO satellites. A MEO satellite can cover several LEO satellites and a LEO satellite can also be covered by more than one MEO satellite. We consider the MEO satellite and the LEO satellites that it covers as a satellite domain. All the satellites form a multi-domain scenario. We call the deployment pattern in this scenario as the Multi-Domain (MD for short in this paper) pattern. We call the MEO satellite in a domain as the Domain Head(DH), and DH(x) as the DH of the LEO x.

    As is shown in Algorithm 1, we propose a heuristic algorithm, SFP-MD to calculate the SFPs in MD pattern. After generating the REQNODES, we need to work out the DHs for the nodes in REQNODES. If more than one MEO satellites cover the node k, we should select the MEO satellite which is closest to the node k as the DH according to the link information set IOLLEO-MEO. If there is only one MEO satellite that covers the node k, this MEO satellite is considered as the DH.

    Algorithm 1: SFP-MD Input:ISLLEO-LEO, ISLMEO-MEO, and IOLLEO-MEO;REQSERVICES; COV(x);Output:SFP in MD pattern;1: generate REQNODES according to REQSERVICES;2: for 1≤k≤n+1 do 3: if COV(k) is not unique then 4: select DH for node k as DH(k) based on IOLLEO-MEO;5: else if COV(k) is unique then 6: COV(k)= DH(k);7: end if 8: if DH(k)=DH(k+1) then 9: calculate the path from k to k+1 in the LEO layer;10: add this path to the set PATH;11: else if DH(k)≠DH(k+1) then 12: calculate the path from DH(k) to DH(k+1) in the MEO layer;13: add this path, the link from k to DH(k) and the link from k+1 to DH(k+1)to the set PATH;14: end if 15: end for 16: return the link set PATH;

    Fig. 2. Example of the routing algorithm for the MD pattern.

    If node k and the next node in REQNODES,namely node k+1, are in the same domain, the traf fic should be forwarded in the LEO layer.We calculate the path from node k to node k+1 based on Shortest Path algorithm according to ISLLEO-LEOand add this path to the set PATH.If node k and node k+1 are in the different domain, the traf fic should be forwarded in the MEO layer. We calculate the path from node k to node k+1 based on Shortest Path algorithm according to ISLMEO-MEOand add this path to PATH. Then, we will get the whole SFP from the source ground station to the destination ground station in the MD pattern.

    Figure 2 illustrates an example of the routing in the MD pattern. Tenants want to send data from the Station-A to the Station-B. In addition, they request for five services (S1 to S5) to process the data they send. S1 to S5 are deployed on LEO-1 to LEO-5, respectively.The access satellite of Station-A (LEO-1), and LEO-2 are in the same domain and the DH is MEO-a. Therefore, the traf fic is steered in the LEO layer. LEO-2 and LEO-3 are not in the same domain. The traf fic is sent to MEO-a and forwarded to MEO-b, which is the DH of LEO-3. LEO-3 and LEO-4 are in the different domain. The traffic is sent to MEO-b after processed by S3 on LEO-3 and forwarded to MEO-c, which is the DH of LEO-4. The DH of LEO-5 is MEO-e. Therefore, the traffic is forwarded to LEO-5 via MEO-d and MEO-e.Because LEO-5 and the access LEO satellite of the destination ground station are in the same domain, the traf fic is steered in the LEO layer to the destination, Station-B.

    2) Satellite Formation Pattern

    There are different types of Satellite Formations. The three most common types are trailing or leader-follower, cluster, and constellation [9]. Here, we adopt the trailing formation flying pattern to deploy SFC. We consider the LEO satellites in the same plane (LEO-1* to LEO-6* in figure 1) as a formation. We call the deployment pattern in this scenario as the Satellite Formation (SF for short in this paper)Pattern. We define the formation relationship of LEO satellites as FOR(x), which means the formation that LEO x in.

    As is shown in Algorithm 2, we propose a heuristic algorithm, SFP-SF to calculate the SFPs in SF pattern. First, we should generate REQNODESaccording to REQSERVICES. If node k and the next node in REQNODES, node k+1, are in the same formation, the traffic should be forwarded in this LEO plane. We add the path from node k to node k+1 to the set PATH. If node k and node k+1 are in the different formation, the traffic should be forwarded in the MEO layer. The traffic should be sent from LEO satellite k to the nearest MEO satellite, and forwarded to the MEO satellite that is closest to LEO satellite k+1 in the MEO layer according to ISLMEO-MEO. We add this path to PATH. Then,we will get the SFP from the source station to the destination station in the SF pattern.

    Figure 3 illustrates an example of the routing in the SF pattern. Tenants want to send data from the Station-A to the Station-B. They request for five services as the scenario in Fig.2. The Station-A first sends the traffic to the access LEO satellite, LEO-1, and this satellite happens to carry S1. LEO-1 and LEO-2 are in the different plane, therefore, the traf fic has to be forwarded in MEO layer. Because the nearest MEO satellite of LEO-1 and LEO-2 is the same one, MEO-a, the traf fic is forwarded via MEO-a. Similarly, LEO-2, LEO-3, and LEO-4 are in different formation, therefore, the traf fic is processed by S2, S3, and S4 on LEO-2, LEO-3, and LEO-4, respectively, and then forwarded by MEO-b, MEO-c, and MEO-d.LEO-4, LEO-5, and the access LEO satellite of Station-B are in the same formation, and the traffic is steered in the LEO satellites in the same plane. As last, the traf fic is forwarded to the destination, Station-B.

    The satellite traf fic is forwarded in different way in the MD pattern and SF pattern. Therefore, the network services that located along the forwarding path are chained together in different way in the patterns.

    IV. EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION

    In this section, we will introduce the design and the results of the experiments.

    Algorithm 2: SFP-SF Input:ISLLEO-LEO, ISLMEO-MEO and IOLLEO-MEO;REQSERVICES; COV(x); FOR(x);Output:SFP in SF pattern;1: generate REQNODES according to REQSERVICES;2: for 1≤k≤n+1 do 3: if FOR(k)=FOR(k+1) then 4: add the path from k to k+1 in LEO plane to PATH;5: else if FOR(k)≠FOR(k+1) then 6: calculate the path in the MEO layer based on COV(k) and COV(k+1);7: add this path to the set PATH;8: end if 9: end for 10: return the link set PATH;

    Fig. 3. Example of routing algorithm for the SF pattern.

    4.1 Experimental design

    We conduct experiments to compare the deployment patterns. As introduced in Section I, multi-layer satellite networks have advantages over the single-layer ones. We adopt the three-layer constellation named Tr [22]. We deploy Tr in Satellite Tool Kit (STK) and the parameters listed in Table I are based on Tr. We set two ground stations, Beijing station (116°E,40°N), and Washington station (77°W, 39°N).

    The experiments are conducted in our SDSN prototype, which is based on OpenFlow and OpenStack. It is deployed on five high-performance servers and can hold several hundreds of nodes. We can create or delete nodes, and set link parameters free in the prototype. The link parameters, such as bandwidth, packet loss rate,and delay are set with the help of Linux Traf fic Control tool. The connections of UDLs, ISLs,and IOLs are created according to the introductions in Section III A.

    The experimental parameters are listed in Table II. The total bandwidth of the UDLs and the ISLs in LEO layer is set 150Mbps. The total bandwidth of the ISLs in MEO layer and the IOLs between LEO layer and MEO layer isset 200Mbps. The source ground station sends data at rates between 1.4Mbps and 2.3Mbps,because the minimum of multi-media service is 1.4Mbps to meet the video demand for smoothly playing and the speed of 3G communication is approximately at 2.3Mbps [23].The source sends data at the speed of a random value between 1.4 and 2.3 in each experiment.The normal Bit Error Rate (BER) of satellite link is 10-6while 10-5means a relatively poor condition. Packet Loss Rate (PLR) can be calculate as PLR=1-(1-BER)packetlength, and the packet length is 1500 bytes. Therefore, the packet loss rate is set 0.15%-1.5%. We collect the distances of the links in STK at 8:00:00 and convert them to delay (divided by light speed). Then we set the delay in the prototype.

    Table I. Parameters of the Three-Layer Constellateion

    Fig. 4. DH satellites and the distances to DH satellites of the LEO satellites.

    We embed POX controller on the GEO satellite node. We add a python-based module to achieve the calculation process of the SFPMD algorithm and the SFP-SF algorithm.Then, the flow rules are created according to the computing results of the algorithms. Open vSwicth (v2.5.0) is embedded on the MEO/LEO satellite nodes to forward the traf fic under the instructions from GEO satellite.

    We design two sets of contrast experiments to test SFP-MD and SFP-SF. In each set of experiment, we design 12 scenes and the scenes are distinguished by the number of network services that the tenants request for. We assume that the tenants request for 1 to 12 network services. These services are distributed on the LEO satellite nodes in a random way and chained to a SFP in a flexible way. In each scene, we count the total hops, the number of used MEO satellite nodes and used LEO satellite nodes of the SFP. In addition, we collect the delay and the packet loss rate of the SFP.

    4.2 Experimental results

    As stated in Algorithm 1, we first need to work out the DHs for the needed LEO satellites. The DH satellites and the distances to DH satellites of the LEO satellites are illustrated in figure 4. We find out the DH satellites for the LEO satellites according to the distances from LEO satellites to the MEO satellites that cover them.

    The number of total hops, used MEO satellites, and used LEO satellites on the SFP is shown in Fig. 5. We can see that in most scenes, the number of total hops of SFP-SF is no more than that of SFP-MD (except for the scene where 9 services are requested). In addition, when the number of services is not big(less than 7), the MEO satellites on the SFP calculated by SFP-MD is no more than those by SFP-SF. While the situation is contrary when the number of services is big (no less than 7). We can also see that the LEO satellites on the SFP calculated by SFP-SF is no more than those by SFP-MD when the number of services is not big (less than 8). The calculation result of SFP-MD uses more LEO satellites than that of SFP-SF when the number of services is big (no less than 8).

    The delay of the SFPs calculated by SFPMD and SFP-SF in MD pattern and SF pattern is shown in Fig. 6. We can see that the delay of SFP-MD is no more than that of SFP-SF when the number of services is small (less than 7).However, when the number of services is no less than seven, the delay of SFP-SF is no more than that of SFP-MD.

    The packet loss rate of the SFPs calculated by SFP-MD and SFP-SF in MD pattern and SF pattern is shown in Fig. 7. We can see that the packet loss rate of SFP-SF is less than that of SFP-MD in most scenes.

    We can conclude from Fig. 5, Fig. 6, and Fig. 7 that the performance of SFP-SF is better than that of SFP-MD in terms of hops and packet loss rate. In other words, we can say that the SF pattern is better than the MD pattern. However, the conclusion would change if other requirements are considered. SFP-MD uses more LEO satellites than SFP-SF when the number of network services that tenants request for is small and the situation is contrary when the number of services is big. The delay of SFP-SF is bigger than that of SFP-MD when the number of services is small because SFP-SF uses more MEO satellites and the delay of links which contain MEO satellites is bigger than LEO satellites.

    Fig. 5. Number of total hops, MEO satellites, and LEO satellites on the SFP.

    Fig. 6. Delay of the MD pattern and the SF pattern.

    Fig. 7. Packet loss rate of the MD pattern and the SF pattern.

    Therefore, if the tenants care more about the packet loss rate, the SF pattern is a better choice. If the number of deployed network services is small and the load on ISLs among LEO satellites is heavy, we should choose the SF pattern to reduce the network burden. If the number of services is small and the load on ISLs among MEO satellites is heavy, we should choose the MD pattern. While, when the number of network services is big, if the load on LEO satellites is heavy, we should use the MD pattern, and if the load on MEO satellites is heavy, we should use the SF pattern.

    V. SUMMARY AND FUTURE WORK

    In this paper, we have investigated a new method for flexible service delivery in the satellite networks, applying SFC in the small satellite-based SDSN. We have introduced two deployment patterns, the MD pattern and the SF pattern. To compare the patterns, we proposed two algorithms to calculate the SFP,SFP-MD, and SFP-SF. Then, we introduced the implementation of the algorithms and conducted contrast experiments. Finally, we summarized the applicable conditions of MD pattern and SF pattern.

    There are still some directions that could be further explored based on this paper. We list some interesting ones as follows. Firstly,a generalized model for the SFC deployment problem in SDSN should be proposed. It will help to analyze the influence factors of the performance of the deployment patterns.Secondly, in this paper, we use Shortest Path algorithm to calculate the path between two nodes in REQNODES. However, only considering fewest hops is not enough. It is necessary to enhance SFP-MD and SFP-SF by considering QoS parameters, such as available bandwidth,delay, and packet loss rate. Thirdly, the link parameters are obtained from STK at 8:00:00.The experiments should be further extended by considering a dynamic and time-varying topology. Fourthly, we will propose more deployment patterns that is suitable for different situations.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    This work was supported in part by NSFC of China under Grant No.61232017, National Basic Research Program of China (“973 program”) under Grant No.2013CB329101,Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant No.2016YJS026, and NSAF of China under Grant No.U1530118.

    [1] W. Xia, Y. Wen, C. H Foh, et al., “A Survey on Software-De fined Networking,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 1, 2015,pp. 27-51.

    [3] H. Yang, J. Zhang, Y. Ji, et al., “Experimental demonstration of multi-dimensional resources integration for service provisioning in cloud radio over fiber network,” Sci Rep, vol. 30678, no.6, 2016, pp. 1-12.

    [4] J. Bao, B. Zhao, W. Yu, et al., “OpenSAN: a software-defined satellite network architecture,”P(pán)roc. Acm Sigcomm, 2014, pp. 347-348.

    [5] L. Jiang, J. Feng, Y. Shen, et al., “Fast Recovery Routing Algorithm for Software Defined Network based Operationally Responsive Space Satellite Networks,” KSII Transactions on Internet& Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 6, 2016, pp.2936-2951.

    [6] B. Yang, Y. Wu, X. Chu, et al., “Seamless Handover in Software-Defined Satellite Networking,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 20, no. 9,2016, pp. 1768-1771.

    [7] T.X Li, H.C Zhou, H.B Luo, et al., “SERvICE: A Software Defined Framework for Integrated Space-Terrestrial Satellite Communication,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. PP, no.99, 2017, pp. 1-1.

    [8] N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, et al.,“OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks,” Proc. Acm Sigcomm, 2008, pp. 69-74.

    [9] R. Radhakrishnan, W.W Edmonson, F. Afghah, et al., “Survey of Inter-satellite Communication for Small Satellite Systems: Physical Layer to Network Layer View,” IEEE Communications Surveys& Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 4, 2016, pp. 2442-2473.

    [10] R. Shimmin, J. Schalkwyck, A.D. Perez, et al.,“Small Spacecraft State of the Art Report 2015,”Nasa Technical Memorandum, 2016.

    [11] T. Taleb, D. Mashimo, A. Jamalipour, et al.,“Explicit Load Balancing Technique for NGEO Satellite IP Networks With On-Board Processing Capabilities,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Net-working, vol. 17, no. 1, 2009, pp. 281-293.

    [12] J. Halpern, C. Pignataro, “Service function chaining (sfc) architecture,” IETF RFC7665, 2015.

    [13] P. Wang, J. Lan, X. Zhang, et al., “Dynamic function composition for network service chain:model and optimization,” Computer Networks,vol. 92, no. 2, 2015, pp. 408-418.

    [14] T. Taleb, A. Ksentini, M. Chen, et al., “Coping with emerging mobile social media applications through dynamic service function chaining,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications,vol. 15, no. 4, 2016, pp. 2859-2871.

    [15] Q. Zhang, X. Wang, I. Kim, et al., “Vertex-centric computation of service function chains in multi-domain networks,” Proc. IEEE Netsoft Conference and Workshops, 2016, pp. 211-218.

    [16] T.X Li, H.C Zhou, H.B Luo, “A new method for providing network services: Service function chain,” Optical Switching & Networking, vol. 26,no. C, 2015, pp. 60-68.

    [17] S. Kittiperachol, Z. Sun, H. Cruickshank, “Performance Evaluation of On-Board QoS Support for Multiservice Applications on the Integrated Next Generation Satellite-Terrestrial Network,”P(pán)roc. IEEE Advanced Satellite Mobile Systems,2008, pp. 311-316.

    [18] R.J F RFang, “Broadband IP Transmission over SPACEWAY? Satellite with On-Board Processing and Switching,” Proc. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2011, pp. 1-5.

    [19] W. Edmonson, S. Gebreyohannes, A. Dillion, et al., “Systems engineering of inter-satellite communications for distributed systems of small satellites,” Proc. IEEE Systems Conference, 2015,pp. 705-710.

    [20] M. Cello, M. Marchese, F. Patrone, “ColdSel: A Selection Algorithm to mitigate congestion situations over Nanosatellite Networks,” Proc. IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2016, pp. 1-6.

    [21] L. Mazal, P. Gur fil, “Cluster Flight Algorithms for Disaggregated Satellites,” Journal of Guidance Control & Dynamics, vol. 36, no. 1, 2013, pp.124-135.

    [22] F. Long, “Satellite network robust QoS-aware routing,” Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014.

    [23] Z. Jiang, C. Liu, S. He, et al., “A QoS routing strategy using fuzzy logic for NGEO satellite IP networks,” Wireless Networks, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-016-1326-8.

    国产成人欧美| 国产成人av教育| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 中文字幕高清在线视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产成人影院久久av| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 人妻一区二区av| 天天添夜夜摸| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 两性夫妻黄色片| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 99热全是精品| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 在线观看国产h片| 大码成人一级视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 18禁观看日本| 另类精品久久| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 午夜91福利影院| 一级毛片我不卡| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| av有码第一页| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 宅男免费午夜| 美女中出高潮动态图| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲图色成人| videos熟女内射| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美网| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 精品少妇内射三级| 色播在线永久视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 久久久久网色| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 日本色播在线视频| 超色免费av| av网站免费在线观看视频| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 岛国毛片在线播放| 五月开心婷婷网| 成年动漫av网址| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 手机成人av网站| 热re99久久国产66热| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产片内射在线| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 多毛熟女@视频| av网站在线播放免费| 日韩av免费高清视频| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 91老司机精品| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 天堂8中文在线网| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久影院123| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 黄频高清免费视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产激情久久老熟女| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 亚洲国产看品久久| 大香蕉久久网| 精品福利永久在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 男人操女人黄网站| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 久久热在线av| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲精品一二三| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 热re99久久国产66热| 自线自在国产av| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 电影成人av| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久av网站| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| av天堂久久9| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 黄频高清免费视频| 高清av免费在线| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产精品九九99| 在线av久久热| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 久久久欧美国产精品| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 精品一区在线观看国产| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 在线天堂中文资源库| 日韩伦理黄色片| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 一级黄色大片毛片| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 久久av网站| 日本wwww免费看| 丝袜美足系列| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲精品自拍成人| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| av不卡在线播放| tube8黄色片| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 欧美成人午夜精品| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 超碰97精品在线观看| 在线天堂中文资源库| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 中文欧美无线码| 久久久精品94久久精品| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| avwww免费| 香蕉国产在线看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 亚洲图色成人| 天天添夜夜摸| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| h视频一区二区三区| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 91国产中文字幕| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 91字幕亚洲| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产麻豆69| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 久久av网站| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 极品人妻少妇av视频| 我的亚洲天堂| 欧美日韩av久久| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 午夜激情av网站| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产精品九九99| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 亚洲av男天堂| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 多毛熟女@视频| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产在线视频一区二区| 久久99一区二区三区| 日韩伦理黄色片| 搡老乐熟女国产| 99热全是精品| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 岛国毛片在线播放| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | 少妇的丰满在线观看| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 久久99精品国语久久久| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 女警被强在线播放| 脱女人内裤的视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 桃花免费在线播放| 下体分泌物呈黄色| av在线老鸭窝| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产成人精品在线电影| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 曰老女人黄片| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 亚洲人成电影观看| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲av男天堂| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产成人系列免费观看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 大陆偷拍与自拍| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 九草在线视频观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 99九九在线精品视频| 美女中出高潮动态图| 中国美女看黄片| 精品第一国产精品| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲中文av在线| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 麻豆av在线久日| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 18禁观看日本| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 视频区图区小说| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 成人手机av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲伊人色综图| 91精品三级在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 久热这里只有精品99| 91国产中文字幕| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 精品第一国产精品| 中文字幕制服av| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 成人三级做爰电影| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 两性夫妻黄色片| av电影中文网址| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 久9热在线精品视频| 久久热在线av| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产精品.久久久| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| av网站在线播放免费| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 深夜精品福利| 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 婷婷色综合www| 蜜桃在线观看..| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 最黄视频免费看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 成人手机av| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 大香蕉久久网| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 高清av免费在线| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 美国免费a级毛片| 免费看不卡的av| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 国产在线免费精品| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| av天堂在线播放| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 久久国产精品影院| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 精品亚洲成国产av| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 精品第一国产精品| 日本欧美视频一区| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 91精品三级在线观看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 老司机影院成人| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 精品高清国产在线一区| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 9热在线视频观看99| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | av在线老鸭窝| 操出白浆在线播放| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 无限看片的www在线观看| av有码第一页| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 精品福利观看| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 丝袜美足系列| 天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 伦理电影免费视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 桃花免费在线播放| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 91字幕亚洲| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 自线自在国产av| 久久这里只有精品19| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 中文字幕制服av| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产麻豆69| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 99热网站在线观看| 老熟女久久久| 视频区图区小说| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 成人国产av品久久久| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 免费不卡黄色视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 各种免费的搞黄视频| tube8黄色片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 操美女的视频在线观看| 97在线人人人人妻| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产av国产精品国产| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 一本久久精品| 男女免费视频国产| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 欧美另类一区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久狼人影院| 国产视频首页在线观看|