• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of rhizosphere and endophytic microbial communities of Chinese leek through high-throughput 16S rRNA gene Illumina sequencing

    2018-02-05 07:10:47HUANGYonghong
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年2期

    HUANG Yong-hong

    College of Horticulture, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, P.R.China

    1. Introduction

    Endophytes are microorganisms (bacteria, fungi and unicellular eukaryotes) that can live at least part of their life cycle inter- or intra-cellularly inside of plants, usually without inducing pathogenic symptoms (Murphyet al. 2014).Endophytes can cooperate with their host plant by producing secondary metabolites that can protect the plant, providing the ability to defend against predators and help their hosts to adapt to different stress conditions for survival (Abdalla and Matasyoh 2014). Diazotrophic endophytes of poplar and willow enhanced plant growth under N-limited conditions(Doty 2015). Two new strains of endophytic fungi isolated fromMoringa peregrinaproduced bioactive gibberellic acids(GAs) that increased the shoot length of GA-deficient mutantwaito-cand normal Dongjin-beyo rice seedlings (Khanet al.2014). Fourteen endophytic bacterial isolates from the rhizome ofCurcuma longaL. produced indole acetic acid(IAA) and effectively inhibited the growth ofEscherichia coliandKlebsiella pneumoniae, and fungal strains such asFusarium solaniandAlternaria alternata(Kumaret al.2016). Root endophytes isolated from wild populations ofHordeum murinumssp.murinumincreased grain yield in a nutrient-starved barley (Murphyet al. 2015a) and suppressed seed-borne infections in a barley cultivar (Murphyet al.2015b).Acremoniumsp. endophytes from root galls of tomato infected byMeloidogyne incognitareduced the incidence of root galls byca.60% (Yaoet al. 2015).

    Chinese leek (Allium tuberosumRottler ex Sprengel) is a common vegetable in China. It significantly reduced the incidence of banana Fusarium wilt in the field (Huanget al.2012), and reduced the gall index of tomato plants caused byM. incognita(Huanget al.2016). Then researchers isolated several antifungal (Zuoet al.2015) and nematicidal components (Huang 2015). Further studies showed that Chinese leek altered the microbial composition of banana rhizosphere soil (Huanget al. 2012). These results led to an altered hypothesis that antifungal or antibacterial endophytes were associated with the Chinese leek.Bacterial endophytes were isolated that significantly inhibited the mycelial growth ofBotryosphaeria berengerianaandValsa mali, the pathogenic agents of apple ring rot and apple valsa canker, respectively (data not shown).

    In this study, the rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities of Chinese leek were investigated using highthroughput Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. And the diversity of bacterial endophytes in the Chinese leek root and leaf was analyzed, then compared with that in Chinese leek rhizosphere soil, which was to identify the potential antifungal and nematicidal microbes.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Sample collection

    The Chinese leek used in the experiment was sampled from Xifu Town, Chengyang District, Qingdao City, China.The Chinese leek cultivar Dajingou was planted in field for 3 years. Then three composite samples were collected.Each composite sample included five clusters of whole plants with soil on root, which were collected randomly and at least 5 m apart from each other. All the collected samples were put into sterile plastic bags and brought to the laboratory.The redundant soil was removed through shaking the roots gently, then the soil sticked on the roots was collected with a brush and sieved with a 2-mm aperture sieve. The soil sticked on the roots was regarded as rhizosphere soil to analyze the rhizosphere bacterial community. Then the plants were washed with running water, then separated roots and leaves were cut into pieces of 2-cm long. The 2-cm long pieces were dipped into 75% ethyl alcohol for 2 min,then immersed into 3% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, finally washed with sterile water for 5 times. The fifth washing water was coated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) plate and incubated at 28°C for 7 d to determine the disinfection effect. Disinfection qualified leave and roots were used to analyze the endophytic bacterial community.

    2.2. DNA extraction, PCR amplifications and lllumina library generation

    Genomic DNA of the rhizosphere soil and the disinfection qualified leave and roots were extracted. The genomic DNA was stored at ?20°C until PCR amplification and metagenomic sequencing was carried out. The 16S rRNA gene consists of nine hypervariable regions flanked by regions of more conserved sequences. Because the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene provides ample information for taxonomic classification of microbial communities, this region was targeted for sequencing.

    PCR amplification was conducted in a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).PCR amplifications were performed using the KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix PCR Kit (KAPA Biosystems,USA). Each reaction (25 μL) contained 12.5 μL 2× KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix, 0.25 μmol L-1of each primer,and 10 ng of DNA template. Bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes were amplified with the universal primer B341F (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and B805R(5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) (Albertsenet al.2015; Nasrollahzadehet al. 2015) using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, 25 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

    Indexes that allowed sample multiplexing during sequencing were incorporated between the Illumina Miseq adaptor and the reverse primer in the amplification reaction.

    PCR amplicon libraries were prepared by combining the PCR products for each sample. After purification, the PCR products from the different samples were quantified using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer System (Santa Clara, CA,USA) and then pooled at equal concentrations. Amplicon sequencing was performed on the Illumina Miseq platform at Beijing Ori-Gene Science and Technology (China).

    2.3. Statistical and bioinformatics analysis

    Heatmap figures were generated using custom R scripts.Canoco 4.5 was used to run principal component analysis(PCA). The community richness index, community diversity index, data preprocessing, operational taxonomic unit-based analysis and hypothesis tests were performed using Mothur Software (http://www.mothur.org/). The data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA using SAS ver. 8.0 Software. The significance of the treatments was determined using Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test (P≤0.05).

    3. Results

    3.1. General analysis of the Illumina sequencing data

    Using Mothur Software, the short, low-quality and ambiguous sequences were removed and a total of 79 261 high-quality sequences were obtained from the nine samples. The number of high-quality sequences per sample ranged from 4 238 to 15 977 (Table 1). Based on 97% species similarity,1 239 operational taxonomical units (OTUs) were found using USEARCH Software (http://www.drive5.com/usearch/)and 11 930 sequences (15.1% of the total sequences) were returned as unclassified.

    3.2. Bacterial community composition

    In the nine samples, 28 phyla were identified in total, with 2 unclassified. When the bacterial communities were compared at the phylum level, the bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere samples was different from the endophytic bacterial community composition in the leaf and root samples. All 28 phyla were presented in the rhizosphere soil samples, whereas only 17 of them were presented in the leaf and root samples.

    The abundance of phyla in different samples were significantly different. In the rhizosphere soil, the five most abundant phyla were Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria,Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria, and Planctomycetes,which accounted for 71.97% of the total abundance phyla.And the percentage of them were 37.85, 10.99, 8.24,7.79 and 7.1%, respectively. In the endophytic bacterial communities, Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria were the two most abundant phyla, which accounted for 98.17 and 96.48% in the leaf and root samples, respectively. And Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria accunted for 75.44 and 21.04%, respectively in the leaf samples, 75.44 and 21.04%,respectively in the root samples.

    Of the 26 classified phyla, only the abundance of Cyanobacteria in the leaf and root bacterial communities was significantly higher than that in the rhizosphere soil(F=125.32,P<0.0001). The other 25 phyla in the leaf and root bacterial communities were significantly lower than that in the rhizosphere soil (Fig. 1).

    According to the bacterial community abundance, the 26 classified phyla were clustered into 3 groups. All the phyla, belonged to Cyanobacteria, which was the most abundant bacterial phyla in the leaf and root communities,were classfied into one group. And all the phyla, belonged to Proteobacteria, which was the the most abundant bacterial phyla in the rhizosphere soil, were classfied into another group. The other 24 bacterial phyla were classfied into the third group (Fig. 2).

    A total of 66 bacterial classes, 119 bacterial orders,and195 bacterial families were identified in total in the nine samples, the most five abundant class, order and family were accounted for 51.43, 29.24, and 29.06% in rhizosphere soil, 98.41, 97.72, and 97.63% in leave and 96.91, 95.15,and 95.05% in roots, respectively (Appendix A).

    Two hundred and eighty-four bacterial genera were identified from the nine samples, 131 of which were unclassified. In the rhizosphere soil samples, the abundance of 23 bacterial genera was higher than 1%, accounting for 57.5% of the total. Among these bacterial genera, the four most abundant genera (7.74, 7.03, 6.07 and 4.39%) were unclassified. The five most abundant classified genera were Pseudomonas (3.32%),Flavobacterium(2.45%),Sphingomonas(1.89%),Gemmatimonas(1.81%) andDongia(1.70%). For the endophytic bacterial community in the leaf and root samples, two unclassified bacterial genera accounted for 97.1 and 93.95% of the total community,respectively. Their abundance was significantly higher in the endophytic communities than that in the rhizosphere soil community (Table 2).

    Table 1 High-quality sequences that were used for further analysis after basic quality control for the three groups of Chinese leek samples

    3.3. Bacterial α-diversity

    Diversity parameters, such as the number of sequence analyxed, which were clustered into OTU, and good coverage were not significantly different between bacterial communities in the rhizosphere soil and in the leaf and root,whereas the other parameters were significantly different between them.

    The number of OTUs in the rhizosphere soil community was 5.20 and 4.26 times higher than those in the leaf and root communities, respectively. The Chao1 estimator for the rhizosphere soil community was 2.54 and 2.39 times more than that in the leaf and root communities, respectively.Abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE) in the rhizosphere soil community was 1.79 and 1.62 times more than that in the leaf and root communities, respectively.These results showed that richness in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community was more than that in the endophytic bacterial communities.

    Fig. 1 The relative abundance of different phyla in rhizosphere soil, leaf and root bacterial communities of Chinese leek. Bars represent the standard error of the three replicates and different letters above each phylum indicate significant differences at 0.05 probability according to the Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test.

    The Shannon diversity index in the rhizosphere soil community was 6.42 and 4.33 times higher than that in the leaf and root communities, respectively, and the simpson diversity index in the rhizosphere soil community was 50.15 and 37.20 times lower than that in the leaf and root communities, respectively. These results showed that the diversity in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community was more than that in the endophytic bacterial communities.

    The rank-abundance curve of the endophytic bacterial communities declined more sharply than that of the rhizosphere soil, which showed that the evenness in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community was higher than that in the endophytic bacterial communities (Appendix B).

    Fig. 2 Hierarchical cluster tree of bacterial communities from the rhizosphere, leaf and root of Chinese leek at the phylum level.

    Table 2 Significant differences of the bacterial genera among the three communities isolated from Chinese leek1)

    3.4. Bacterial community structure

    To analyze the relationships among the samples, OTUs were aligned with the SILVA database (https://www.arb-silva.de/)using PyNAST Software (https://sourceforge.net/projects/pynast/), and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using FastTree (Priceet al.2009). UniFrac Software (Lozupone and Knight 2005) was used to generate the distance matrix among bacterial communities. UniFrac analysis was carried out either unweighted, using only presence-absence information (Appendix C), or weighted, which took into account the relative proportions of each group (Appendix D).

    The cluster heatmap using the unweighted (Fig. 3-A) or weighted distance (Fig. 3-B) showed that the rhizosphere soil samples grouped together, and the leaf and root samples grouped together. PCA using the unweighted (Fig. 4-A)or weighted distance (Fig. 4-B) also revealed that thefirst principal component separated the soil samples from the leaf and root samples. The cluster heatmap and the PCA confirmed the differences between the rhizosphere soil bacterial community and the endophytic bacterial communities.

    ?

    Fig. 3 Heatmap of similarities between the rhizosphere soil bacterial communities and the endophytic bacterial communities of Chinese leek based on the unweighted (A) and weighted(B) UniFrac distance. The color gradient from blue to red indicated increasing similarity.S, rhizosphere soil; L, leaf; R, root.

    4. Discussion

    High throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragments has been successfully applied for in-depth analysis of bacterial communities associated with the animal gut (Guoet al. 2016;Jiaet al. 2016), water (Jiaoet al. 2016) and soil (Huaet al. 2015; Wanget al. 2016). In this paper, we adopted this technique to analyze the rhizosphere soil and endophytic (leaf and root) bacterial communities of Chinese leek, to characterize the unseen majority of these bacterial communities and to achieve a high throughput and deep insight into these bacterial communities, providing a basis for the development and utilization of Chinese leek endophytic or rhizospheric bacterial communities.

    In the rhizosphere soil, among 26 classified phyla, Proteobacteria (37.85%) was the most dominant phylum across all 3 rhizosphere soil samples, followed by Acidobacteria (10.99%) and Bacteroidetes (8.24%). The results were in agreement with those of previous studies. Sunet al.(2014) found in the apple rhizosphere soil of a replant site and a new planting site, Proteobacteria,Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the three dominant phyla, accounting for almost 50% of the reads (Sunet al.2014). In a banana mono-culture orchard, Proteobacteria,Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the three most abundant phyla at relative abundances of approximately 35,15 and 10%, respectively (Shenet al. 2014). Among the banana rhizosphere microbial community manipulated by 2 years of consecutive biofertilizer application, Proteobacteria accounted for 70.1% of the total bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences, followed by Bacteroidetes and Acidobacteria(Shenet al. 2015). Proteobacteria (accounting for 35.7–97.4% of species) was also the most abundant phylum in the tomato rhizosphere (Liet al. 2014). The results of these previous studies and this study revealed Proteobacteria was the dominant bacterial phylum in the rhizosphere soil. In the endophytic bacterial community of Chinese leek, Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria were the two most abundant phyla, accounting for 98.17 and 96.48% of the total community in the leaf and root, respectively. This showed that the composition and abundance of endophytic bacterial communities were different from those of the rhizosphere soil.

    In many previous studies, culture-based approaches were used to study microbial communities (Compantet al.2011; Koukolet al. 2012; Venkatachalamet al. 2015), but these methods suffered from organismal bias and were far too labor-intensive to adequately assess highly diverse microbial communities. In addition, in many cases, the vast majority of microbes are uncultivable using traditional methods. Direct DNA clone sequencing avoids culturing bias and has the potential to detect rare taxa, and has made it feasible to capture the often hidden microbial diversity (Masukoet al. 2013). Compared with the traditional culture-based methods, high-throughput sequencing can detect many minor members of the microbial community,many of which are not presented in the existing database(unclassified sequences). In this study, many unclassified sequences/phyla/genera were identified, including: 11 930(15.1%) of 79 261 high-quality sequences were unclassified;2 (7.14%) of 28 identified phyla were unclassified; and 135(52.46%) of the detected 284 genera were unclassified.In the rhizosphere soil, the top 4 genera, accounting for 25.22% of the total abundance, were all unclassified. In the endophytic communities, the top 2 genera were unclassified,which accounted for 97.1 and 93.95% of the total community in the leaf and in the root, respectively. In previous studies,substantial proportions of unclassified sequences were also identified (Shenet al. 2014, 2015; Wuet al. 2016). In a banana orchard soil, 12 845 (9.3% of the total sequences)of 137 646 sequences were unclassified (Shenet al. 2014).Among all bacterial and fungal sequences in banana rhizosphere soil, 4 179 bacterial sequences (4%) and 89 332 fungal sequences (58%) were returned as unclassified(Shenet al. 2015). At the genus level, unclassified bacteria in four fecal microbiota samples of dholes accounted for 39.36, 52.29, 37.34, and 25.66% of the total reads (Wuet al. 2016). The identification of unclassified members of the bacterial community in this study and the previous studies shows the efficiency of high-throughput sequencing in detecting bacteria, especially minor, rare and uncultured species, in a range of samples. In addition, our results showed that there were many unknown members of the rhizosphere soil and endophytic bacterial communities of Chinese leek, indicating the great potential of this resource for development of beneficial bacterial communities.

    Fig. 4 Principal component analysis (PCA) of the rhizosphere soil bacterial communities and the endophytic bacterial communities of Chinese leek based on the unweighted (A) and weighted (B) UniFrac distance.

    In the α-diversity analysis, parameters evaluating microbial richness such as Chao1, ACE, Shannon,Npshannon,Simpson and the rank-abundance curve revealed that microbial diversity, richness, and evenness were higher in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community than in the endophytic bacterial communities. This might be due to the rhizosphere acts as a bridge connecting plant roots and their surrounding soil environment and it is an important place where complex chemical, physical, and biological interactions occur. Interactions associated with the rhizosphere include root-root, root-insect, and root-microbe interactions (Baiset al. 2006). These complex interactions need more bacteria with different functions to finish, which led to increased diversity, richness and abundance of beneficial soil microbes. Compare with the complicated rhizosphere areas, relatively stable single environment in plants resulted in relatively single microbial population. That is to say, the rhizosphere bacterial community diversity and the relative simplification of the endophytic bacterial community are the results of their environment and functional adaptation.

    From the PCA, the three samples from the rhizosphere soil were clustered into one group, and the six samples from the endophytic bacterial communities (leaf and root) were clustered into together, which showed that the rhizosphere soil bacterial community was different from the endophytic bacterial communities. Although differences existed between the two types of bacterial communities,the abundances of the major components of the bacterial communities were similar, that was, Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria were the two most abundant bacterial phyla in rhizosphere soil and in the endophytic bacterial communities, which was in agreement with the following studies. Endophytic community composition isolated from four different teosintes and ten different maize varieties varied in relation to plant host phylogeny, however, a core microbiota of endophytes was conserved inZeaseeds across boundaries of evolution, ethnography and ecology(David and Raizada 2011).

    Chinese leek has antifungal (Huanget al. 2012) and nematicidal activities (Huanget al. 2016), which were got by our research program. In this paper, we also analyzed the rhizosphere soil bacterial community and endophytic bacterial communities. The finding of this study would contribute to the effort to isolate and identify the nematicidal and antifungal bacterial communities in Chinese leek.

    5. Conclusion

    Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA genes of rhizosphere soil, leaf and root bacterial communities revealed that the rhizosphere bacterial community was significantly different from the endophytic bacterial communities. Microbial diversity, richness and evenness in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community were higher than those in the endophytic bacterial communities. The bacterial community was composed of five dominant phyla (Proteobacteria,Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria and Planctomycetes) in the rhizosphere and two dominant phyla (Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria) in the root and leaf. The endophytic bacterial communities from the leaf and the root were slightly, but not significantly different from each other. The findings of this study will contribute to the goal of isolation and identification of the nematicidal and antifungal bacterial communities in Chinese leek.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471864 and 31272151) and the Qingdao Agricultural University High-level Personnel Startup Fund, China (6631115024). We thank Beijing Ori-Gene Science and Technology (China) for providing the Illumina Miseq platform.

    Appendicesassociated with this paper can be available on http://www.ChinaAgriSci.com/V2/En/appendix.htm

    Abdalla M A, Matasyoh J C. 2014. Endophytes as producers of peptides: An overview about the recently discovered peptides from endophytic microbes.Natural Products &Bioprospecting, 4, 257–270.

    Albertsen M, Karst S M, Ziegler A S, Kirkegaard R H, Nielsen P H. 2015. Back to basics - The influence of DNA extraction and primer choice on phylogenetic analysis of activated sludge communities.PLOS ONE, 10, e0132783

    Bais H P, Weir T L, Perry L G, Gilroy S, Vivanco J M. 2006.The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms.Annual Review of Plant Biology,57, 233–266.

    Caporaso J G, Bittinger K, Bushman F D, Desantis T Z,Andersen G L, Knight R. 2010. PyNAST: A flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment.Bioinformatics,26, 266-267

    Compant S, Mitter B, Colli-Mull J G, Gangl H, Sessitsch A.2011. Endophytes of grapevine flowers, berries, and seeds:Identification of cultivable bacteria, comparison with other plant parts, and visualization of niches of colonization.Microbial Ecology, 62, 188–197.

    David J M, Raizada M N. 2011. Conservation and diversity of seed associated endophytes inZeaacross boundaries of evolution, ethnography and ecology.PLoS ONE, 6, e20396.Doty S L. 2015. Diazotrophic endophytes of poplar and willow for growth promotion of rice plants in nitrogen-limited conditions.Crop Science, 55, 1765–1772.

    Guo J, Fu X, Liao H, Hu Z, Long L, Yan W, Ding Y, Zha L,Guo Y, Yan J. 2016. Potential use of bacterial community succession for estimating post-mortem interval as revealed by high-throughput sequencing.Scientific Reports, 6,24197.

    Hua F, Lian J, Wang H, Lin C, Yu Y. 2015. Exploring bacterial community structure and function associated with atrazine biodegradation in repeatedly treated soils.Journal of Hazardous Materials, 286, 457–465.

    Huang Y, Lü S, Li C, Wei Y, Yi G. 2012. Effects ofFusarium oxysporumf. sp.cubenserace 4 on microorganisms and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere soil of banana.Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences), 38,173–176. (in Chinese)

    Huang Y, Mao Z, Xie B. 2016. Chinese leek (Allium tuberosumRottler ex Sprengel) reduced disease symptom caused by root knot nematode.Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15,364–372.

    Huang Y H. 2015. Control effect on the root knot nematode and analysis of activity components of chinese leek. Postdoctoral research report, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,China. (in Chinese)

    Huang Y H, Wang R C, Li C H, Zuo C W, Wei Y R, Zhang L, Yi G J. 2012. Control ofFusarium wiltin banana with Chinese leek.European Journal of Plant Pathology, 134, 87–95.

    Jia H R, Geng L L, Li Y H, Wang Q, Diao Q Y, Zhou T, Dai P L.2016. The effects of Bt Cry1Ie toxin on bacterial diversity in the midgut ofApis mellifera ligustica(Hymenoptera:Apidae).Scientific Reports, 6, 24664.

    Jiao S, Liu Z, Lin Y, Yang J, Chen W, Wei G. 2016. Bacterial communities in oil contaminated soils: Biogeography and co-occurrence patterns.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 98,64–73.

    Khan A L, Waqas M, Hussain J, Alharrasi A, Alrawahi A,Alhosni K, Kim M J, Adnan M, Lee I J. 2014. EndophytesAspergillus caespitosusLK12 andPhomasp. LK13 ofMoringa peregrinaproduce gibberellins and improve rice plant growth.Journal of Plant Interactions, 9, 731–737.

    Koukol O, Kola?ík M, Kolá?ová Z, Baldrian P. 2012. Diversity of foliar endophytes in wind-fallenPicea abiestrees.Fungal Diversity, 54, 69–77.

    Kumar A, Singh R, Yadav A, Giri D D, Singh P K, Pandey K D.2016. Isolation and characterization of bacterial endophytes ofCurcuma longaL.Biotech, 6, 1–8.

    Li J G, Ren G D, Jia Z J, Dong Y H. 2014. Composition and activity of rhizosphere microbial communities associated with healthy and diseased greenhouse tomatoes.Plant and Soil, 380, 337–347.

    Lozupone C, Knight R. 2005. UniFrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities.Applied &Environmental Microbiology, 71, 8228-8235

    Masuko K, Murata M, Yudoh K, Shimizu H, Beppu M,Nakamura H, Kato T. 2013. Ion torrent PGM as tool for fungal community analysis: A case study of endophytes ineucalyptus grandisreveals high taxonomic diversity.PLoS ONE, 8, e81718.

    Murphy B R, Doohan F M, Hodkinson T R. 2015a. Fungal root endophytes of a wild barley species increase yield in a nutrient-stressed barley cultivar.Symbiosis, 65, 1–7.

    Murphy B R, Doohan F M, Hodkinson T R. 2015b. Persistent fungal root endophytes isolated from a wild barley species suppress seed-borne infections in a barley cultivar.Biocontrol, 60, 1–12.

    Murphy B, Hodkinson T, Doohan F. 2014. Fungal endophytes of barley roots.Journal of Agricultural Science, 152, 602–615.

    Nasrollahzadeh D, Malekzadeh R, Ploner A, Shakeri R,Sotoudeh M, Fahimi S, Nasserimoghaddam S, Kamangar F, Abnet C C, Winckler B. 2015. Variations of gastric corpus microbiota are associated with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and squamous dysplasia.Scientific Reports,5, 8820.

    Shen Z, Ruan Y, Chao X, Zhang J, Li R, Shen Q. 2015.Rhizosphere microbial community manipulated by 2 years of consecutive biofertilizer application associated with bananaFusariumwilt disease suppression.Biology & Fertility of Soils, 51, 553–562.

    Shen Z, Wang D, Ruan Y, Xue C, Zhang J, Li R, Shen Q.2014. Deep 16S rRNA pyrosequencing reveals a bacterial community associated with bananaFusariumwilt disease suppression induced by bio-organic fertilizer application.PLoS ONE, 9, e98420.

    Sun J, Zhang Q, Zhou J, Wei Q. 2014. Illumina amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA tag reveals bacterial community development in the rhizosphere of apple nurseries at a replant disease site and a new planting site.PLoS ONE,9, e111744.

    Venkatachalam A, Thirunavukkarasu N, Suryanarayanan T S. 2015. Distribution and diversity of endophytes in seagrasses.Fungal Ecology, 13, 60–65.

    Wang J, Xue C, Song Y, Wang L, Huang Q, Shen Q. 2016.Wheat and rice growth stages and fertilization regimes alter soil bacterial community structure, but not diversity.Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1207.

    Wu X, Zhang H, Chen J, Shang S, Wei Q, Yan J, Tu X.2016. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of dholes highthroughput Illumina sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene.Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,100, 1–10.

    Yao Y R, Tian X L, Shen B M, Mao Z C, Chen G H, Xie B Y.2015. Transformation of the endophytic fungusAcremonium implicatumwith GFP and evaluation of its biocontrol effect againstMeloidogyne incognita.World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 31, 549–556.

    Zuo C, Li C, Li B, Wei Y, Hu C, Yang Q, Yang J, Sheng O, Kuang R, Deng G, Biswas M K, Yi G. 2015. The toxic mechanism and bioactive components of Chinese leek root exudates acting againstFusarium oxysporumf. sp.cubensetropical race 4.European Journal of Plant Pathology, 143, 447–460.

    女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 高清av免费在线| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 精品一区在线观看国产| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 黑人高潮一二区| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产成人一区二区在线| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产在视频线精品| av卡一久久| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 黄色日韩在线| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 日韩伦理黄色片| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 亚洲国产精品999| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久婷婷青草| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 久久久久久久久大av| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 中文字幕制服av| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 身体一侧抽搐| 色网站视频免费| 国产永久视频网站| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产高清三级在线| 性色av一级| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产视频首页在线观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| av网站免费在线观看视频| 色综合色国产| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 成年av动漫网址| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 少妇丰满av| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 黄色日韩在线| 熟女av电影| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 九九在线视频观看精品| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 午夜福利在线在线| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲第一av免费看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产成人aa在线观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产高清三级在线| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲四区av| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 美女国产视频在线观看| av国产免费在线观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 1000部很黄的大片| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 色5月婷婷丁香| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 欧美3d第一页| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 性色avwww在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 在线观看国产h片| 精品久久国产蜜桃| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 少妇人妻 视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 最黄视频免费看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 22中文网久久字幕| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| av黄色大香蕉| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 免费看日本二区| 一级av片app| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| av线在线观看网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 久久热精品热| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 国产高潮美女av| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产成人91sexporn| www.色视频.com| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 少妇丰满av| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 人妻系列 视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久精品久久久久久久性| a级毛色黄片| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 中国国产av一级| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 免费大片18禁| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 久久青草综合色| 欧美成人a在线观看| 一级毛片我不卡| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 欧美日本视频| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产在线视频一区二区| 国产av一区二区精品久久 | 一级爰片在线观看| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产 一区精品| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 六月丁香七月| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 在线观看人妻少妇| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 免费观看在线日韩| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 日本色播在线视频| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| av网站免费在线观看视频| 在线观看三级黄色| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 丝袜喷水一区| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产精品.久久久| 身体一侧抽搐| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 一本一本综合久久| 性色av一级| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 欧美日本视频| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩av免费高清视频| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 久久久色成人| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 在现免费观看毛片| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| tube8黄色片| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产在线男女| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| av在线播放精品| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日韩电影二区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产综合精华液| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 精品一区二区三卡| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 久久久久久伊人网av| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| videos熟女内射| 国产成人freesex在线| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 国产精品成人在线| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 久久 成人 亚洲| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 在线观看国产h片| 久久久色成人| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产成人一区二区在线| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产探花极品一区二区| 男人舔奶头视频| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 亚洲成人手机| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产视频内射| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 亚洲成色77777| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产极品天堂在线| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 一级毛片我不卡| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产高潮美女av| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| av免费在线看不卡| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 日日啪夜夜爽| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产综合精华液| 性色av一级| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 男女边摸边吃奶| 色哟哟·www| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 成人国产av品久久久| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| kizo精华| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 赤兔流量卡办理| 午夜日本视频在线| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 中文字幕久久专区| 1000部很黄的大片| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 久久婷婷青草| 亚洲精品视频女| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 久久久久性生活片| 91狼人影院| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产av一区二区精品久久 | 久久久久视频综合| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 欧美97在线视频| 午夜福利高清视频| 日韩伦理黄色片| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 国产91av在线免费观看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 高清欧美精品videossex| 成人综合一区亚洲| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 欧美人与善性xxx| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 在线观看三级黄色| 51国产日韩欧美| 麻豆成人av视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产高潮美女av| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 韩国av在线不卡| 久久久久国产网址| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产 一区精品| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产乱人视频| 久久久久久久精品精品| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 舔av片在线| 99热这里只有精品一区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 两个人的视频大全免费| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| www.色视频.com| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 看免费成人av毛片| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 久久久久性生活片| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚州av有码| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 免费av中文字幕在线| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 最黄视频免费看| 久久久久精品性色| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 在线观看人妻少妇| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 在线观看三级黄色| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 国产美女午夜福利| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 欧美性感艳星| 国产色婷婷99| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 插逼视频在线观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 在线观看一区二区三区| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 久久青草综合色| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 久久久成人免费电影| 免费看av在线观看网站| 永久免费av网站大全| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 18+在线观看网站| 大码成人一级视频| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 黄色一级大片看看| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 日本欧美视频一区| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 韩国av在线不卡| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 多毛熟女@视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国产 一区精品| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 三级国产精品片| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| h视频一区二区三区| 中国三级夫妇交换| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| av.在线天堂| 成人无遮挡网站| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| xxx大片免费视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 22中文网久久字幕| 五月天丁香电影| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| videossex国产| 三级经典国产精品| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 在线看a的网站| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 欧美zozozo另类| 九草在线视频观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产毛片在线视频| 中国国产av一级| kizo精华| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 色哟哟·www| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| xxx大片免费视频| 一级爰片在线观看| 亚州av有码| 一级爰片在线观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产91av在线免费观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 久热久热在线精品观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 日本欧美视频一区| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 日韩视频在线欧美| 精品久久久久久久久av| 免费看不卡的av| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产av精品麻豆| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| a 毛片基地|