• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of rhizosphere and endophytic microbial communities of Chinese leek through high-throughput 16S rRNA gene Illumina sequencing

    2018-02-05 07:10:47HUANGYonghong
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年2期

    HUANG Yong-hong

    College of Horticulture, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, P.R.China

    1. Introduction

    Endophytes are microorganisms (bacteria, fungi and unicellular eukaryotes) that can live at least part of their life cycle inter- or intra-cellularly inside of plants, usually without inducing pathogenic symptoms (Murphyet al. 2014).Endophytes can cooperate with their host plant by producing secondary metabolites that can protect the plant, providing the ability to defend against predators and help their hosts to adapt to different stress conditions for survival (Abdalla and Matasyoh 2014). Diazotrophic endophytes of poplar and willow enhanced plant growth under N-limited conditions(Doty 2015). Two new strains of endophytic fungi isolated fromMoringa peregrinaproduced bioactive gibberellic acids(GAs) that increased the shoot length of GA-deficient mutantwaito-cand normal Dongjin-beyo rice seedlings (Khanet al.2014). Fourteen endophytic bacterial isolates from the rhizome ofCurcuma longaL. produced indole acetic acid(IAA) and effectively inhibited the growth ofEscherichia coliandKlebsiella pneumoniae, and fungal strains such asFusarium solaniandAlternaria alternata(Kumaret al.2016). Root endophytes isolated from wild populations ofHordeum murinumssp.murinumincreased grain yield in a nutrient-starved barley (Murphyet al. 2015a) and suppressed seed-borne infections in a barley cultivar (Murphyet al.2015b).Acremoniumsp. endophytes from root galls of tomato infected byMeloidogyne incognitareduced the incidence of root galls byca.60% (Yaoet al. 2015).

    Chinese leek (Allium tuberosumRottler ex Sprengel) is a common vegetable in China. It significantly reduced the incidence of banana Fusarium wilt in the field (Huanget al.2012), and reduced the gall index of tomato plants caused byM. incognita(Huanget al.2016). Then researchers isolated several antifungal (Zuoet al.2015) and nematicidal components (Huang 2015). Further studies showed that Chinese leek altered the microbial composition of banana rhizosphere soil (Huanget al. 2012). These results led to an altered hypothesis that antifungal or antibacterial endophytes were associated with the Chinese leek.Bacterial endophytes were isolated that significantly inhibited the mycelial growth ofBotryosphaeria berengerianaandValsa mali, the pathogenic agents of apple ring rot and apple valsa canker, respectively (data not shown).

    In this study, the rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities of Chinese leek were investigated using highthroughput Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. And the diversity of bacterial endophytes in the Chinese leek root and leaf was analyzed, then compared with that in Chinese leek rhizosphere soil, which was to identify the potential antifungal and nematicidal microbes.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Sample collection

    The Chinese leek used in the experiment was sampled from Xifu Town, Chengyang District, Qingdao City, China.The Chinese leek cultivar Dajingou was planted in field for 3 years. Then three composite samples were collected.Each composite sample included five clusters of whole plants with soil on root, which were collected randomly and at least 5 m apart from each other. All the collected samples were put into sterile plastic bags and brought to the laboratory.The redundant soil was removed through shaking the roots gently, then the soil sticked on the roots was collected with a brush and sieved with a 2-mm aperture sieve. The soil sticked on the roots was regarded as rhizosphere soil to analyze the rhizosphere bacterial community. Then the plants were washed with running water, then separated roots and leaves were cut into pieces of 2-cm long. The 2-cm long pieces were dipped into 75% ethyl alcohol for 2 min,then immersed into 3% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, finally washed with sterile water for 5 times. The fifth washing water was coated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) plate and incubated at 28°C for 7 d to determine the disinfection effect. Disinfection qualified leave and roots were used to analyze the endophytic bacterial community.

    2.2. DNA extraction, PCR amplifications and lllumina library generation

    Genomic DNA of the rhizosphere soil and the disinfection qualified leave and roots were extracted. The genomic DNA was stored at ?20°C until PCR amplification and metagenomic sequencing was carried out. The 16S rRNA gene consists of nine hypervariable regions flanked by regions of more conserved sequences. Because the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene provides ample information for taxonomic classification of microbial communities, this region was targeted for sequencing.

    PCR amplification was conducted in a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).PCR amplifications were performed using the KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix PCR Kit (KAPA Biosystems,USA). Each reaction (25 μL) contained 12.5 μL 2× KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix, 0.25 μmol L-1of each primer,and 10 ng of DNA template. Bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes were amplified with the universal primer B341F (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and B805R(5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) (Albertsenet al.2015; Nasrollahzadehet al. 2015) using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, 25 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

    Indexes that allowed sample multiplexing during sequencing were incorporated between the Illumina Miseq adaptor and the reverse primer in the amplification reaction.

    PCR amplicon libraries were prepared by combining the PCR products for each sample. After purification, the PCR products from the different samples were quantified using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer System (Santa Clara, CA,USA) and then pooled at equal concentrations. Amplicon sequencing was performed on the Illumina Miseq platform at Beijing Ori-Gene Science and Technology (China).

    2.3. Statistical and bioinformatics analysis

    Heatmap figures were generated using custom R scripts.Canoco 4.5 was used to run principal component analysis(PCA). The community richness index, community diversity index, data preprocessing, operational taxonomic unit-based analysis and hypothesis tests were performed using Mothur Software (http://www.mothur.org/). The data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA using SAS ver. 8.0 Software. The significance of the treatments was determined using Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test (P≤0.05).

    3. Results

    3.1. General analysis of the Illumina sequencing data

    Using Mothur Software, the short, low-quality and ambiguous sequences were removed and a total of 79 261 high-quality sequences were obtained from the nine samples. The number of high-quality sequences per sample ranged from 4 238 to 15 977 (Table 1). Based on 97% species similarity,1 239 operational taxonomical units (OTUs) were found using USEARCH Software (http://www.drive5.com/usearch/)and 11 930 sequences (15.1% of the total sequences) were returned as unclassified.

    3.2. Bacterial community composition

    In the nine samples, 28 phyla were identified in total, with 2 unclassified. When the bacterial communities were compared at the phylum level, the bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere samples was different from the endophytic bacterial community composition in the leaf and root samples. All 28 phyla were presented in the rhizosphere soil samples, whereas only 17 of them were presented in the leaf and root samples.

    The abundance of phyla in different samples were significantly different. In the rhizosphere soil, the five most abundant phyla were Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria,Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria, and Planctomycetes,which accounted for 71.97% of the total abundance phyla.And the percentage of them were 37.85, 10.99, 8.24,7.79 and 7.1%, respectively. In the endophytic bacterial communities, Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria were the two most abundant phyla, which accounted for 98.17 and 96.48% in the leaf and root samples, respectively. And Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria accunted for 75.44 and 21.04%, respectively in the leaf samples, 75.44 and 21.04%,respectively in the root samples.

    Of the 26 classified phyla, only the abundance of Cyanobacteria in the leaf and root bacterial communities was significantly higher than that in the rhizosphere soil(F=125.32,P<0.0001). The other 25 phyla in the leaf and root bacterial communities were significantly lower than that in the rhizosphere soil (Fig. 1).

    According to the bacterial community abundance, the 26 classified phyla were clustered into 3 groups. All the phyla, belonged to Cyanobacteria, which was the most abundant bacterial phyla in the leaf and root communities,were classfied into one group. And all the phyla, belonged to Proteobacteria, which was the the most abundant bacterial phyla in the rhizosphere soil, were classfied into another group. The other 24 bacterial phyla were classfied into the third group (Fig. 2).

    A total of 66 bacterial classes, 119 bacterial orders,and195 bacterial families were identified in total in the nine samples, the most five abundant class, order and family were accounted for 51.43, 29.24, and 29.06% in rhizosphere soil, 98.41, 97.72, and 97.63% in leave and 96.91, 95.15,and 95.05% in roots, respectively (Appendix A).

    Two hundred and eighty-four bacterial genera were identified from the nine samples, 131 of which were unclassified. In the rhizosphere soil samples, the abundance of 23 bacterial genera was higher than 1%, accounting for 57.5% of the total. Among these bacterial genera, the four most abundant genera (7.74, 7.03, 6.07 and 4.39%) were unclassified. The five most abundant classified genera were Pseudomonas (3.32%),Flavobacterium(2.45%),Sphingomonas(1.89%),Gemmatimonas(1.81%) andDongia(1.70%). For the endophytic bacterial community in the leaf and root samples, two unclassified bacterial genera accounted for 97.1 and 93.95% of the total community,respectively. Their abundance was significantly higher in the endophytic communities than that in the rhizosphere soil community (Table 2).

    Table 1 High-quality sequences that were used for further analysis after basic quality control for the three groups of Chinese leek samples

    3.3. Bacterial α-diversity

    Diversity parameters, such as the number of sequence analyxed, which were clustered into OTU, and good coverage were not significantly different between bacterial communities in the rhizosphere soil and in the leaf and root,whereas the other parameters were significantly different between them.

    The number of OTUs in the rhizosphere soil community was 5.20 and 4.26 times higher than those in the leaf and root communities, respectively. The Chao1 estimator for the rhizosphere soil community was 2.54 and 2.39 times more than that in the leaf and root communities, respectively.Abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE) in the rhizosphere soil community was 1.79 and 1.62 times more than that in the leaf and root communities, respectively.These results showed that richness in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community was more than that in the endophytic bacterial communities.

    Fig. 1 The relative abundance of different phyla in rhizosphere soil, leaf and root bacterial communities of Chinese leek. Bars represent the standard error of the three replicates and different letters above each phylum indicate significant differences at 0.05 probability according to the Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test.

    The Shannon diversity index in the rhizosphere soil community was 6.42 and 4.33 times higher than that in the leaf and root communities, respectively, and the simpson diversity index in the rhizosphere soil community was 50.15 and 37.20 times lower than that in the leaf and root communities, respectively. These results showed that the diversity in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community was more than that in the endophytic bacterial communities.

    The rank-abundance curve of the endophytic bacterial communities declined more sharply than that of the rhizosphere soil, which showed that the evenness in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community was higher than that in the endophytic bacterial communities (Appendix B).

    Fig. 2 Hierarchical cluster tree of bacterial communities from the rhizosphere, leaf and root of Chinese leek at the phylum level.

    Table 2 Significant differences of the bacterial genera among the three communities isolated from Chinese leek1)

    3.4. Bacterial community structure

    To analyze the relationships among the samples, OTUs were aligned with the SILVA database (https://www.arb-silva.de/)using PyNAST Software (https://sourceforge.net/projects/pynast/), and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using FastTree (Priceet al.2009). UniFrac Software (Lozupone and Knight 2005) was used to generate the distance matrix among bacterial communities. UniFrac analysis was carried out either unweighted, using only presence-absence information (Appendix C), or weighted, which took into account the relative proportions of each group (Appendix D).

    The cluster heatmap using the unweighted (Fig. 3-A) or weighted distance (Fig. 3-B) showed that the rhizosphere soil samples grouped together, and the leaf and root samples grouped together. PCA using the unweighted (Fig. 4-A)or weighted distance (Fig. 4-B) also revealed that thefirst principal component separated the soil samples from the leaf and root samples. The cluster heatmap and the PCA confirmed the differences between the rhizosphere soil bacterial community and the endophytic bacterial communities.

    ?

    Fig. 3 Heatmap of similarities between the rhizosphere soil bacterial communities and the endophytic bacterial communities of Chinese leek based on the unweighted (A) and weighted(B) UniFrac distance. The color gradient from blue to red indicated increasing similarity.S, rhizosphere soil; L, leaf; R, root.

    4. Discussion

    High throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragments has been successfully applied for in-depth analysis of bacterial communities associated with the animal gut (Guoet al. 2016;Jiaet al. 2016), water (Jiaoet al. 2016) and soil (Huaet al. 2015; Wanget al. 2016). In this paper, we adopted this technique to analyze the rhizosphere soil and endophytic (leaf and root) bacterial communities of Chinese leek, to characterize the unseen majority of these bacterial communities and to achieve a high throughput and deep insight into these bacterial communities, providing a basis for the development and utilization of Chinese leek endophytic or rhizospheric bacterial communities.

    In the rhizosphere soil, among 26 classified phyla, Proteobacteria (37.85%) was the most dominant phylum across all 3 rhizosphere soil samples, followed by Acidobacteria (10.99%) and Bacteroidetes (8.24%). The results were in agreement with those of previous studies. Sunet al.(2014) found in the apple rhizosphere soil of a replant site and a new planting site, Proteobacteria,Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the three dominant phyla, accounting for almost 50% of the reads (Sunet al.2014). In a banana mono-culture orchard, Proteobacteria,Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the three most abundant phyla at relative abundances of approximately 35,15 and 10%, respectively (Shenet al. 2014). Among the banana rhizosphere microbial community manipulated by 2 years of consecutive biofertilizer application, Proteobacteria accounted for 70.1% of the total bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences, followed by Bacteroidetes and Acidobacteria(Shenet al. 2015). Proteobacteria (accounting for 35.7–97.4% of species) was also the most abundant phylum in the tomato rhizosphere (Liet al. 2014). The results of these previous studies and this study revealed Proteobacteria was the dominant bacterial phylum in the rhizosphere soil. In the endophytic bacterial community of Chinese leek, Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria were the two most abundant phyla, accounting for 98.17 and 96.48% of the total community in the leaf and root, respectively. This showed that the composition and abundance of endophytic bacterial communities were different from those of the rhizosphere soil.

    In many previous studies, culture-based approaches were used to study microbial communities (Compantet al.2011; Koukolet al. 2012; Venkatachalamet al. 2015), but these methods suffered from organismal bias and were far too labor-intensive to adequately assess highly diverse microbial communities. In addition, in many cases, the vast majority of microbes are uncultivable using traditional methods. Direct DNA clone sequencing avoids culturing bias and has the potential to detect rare taxa, and has made it feasible to capture the often hidden microbial diversity (Masukoet al. 2013). Compared with the traditional culture-based methods, high-throughput sequencing can detect many minor members of the microbial community,many of which are not presented in the existing database(unclassified sequences). In this study, many unclassified sequences/phyla/genera were identified, including: 11 930(15.1%) of 79 261 high-quality sequences were unclassified;2 (7.14%) of 28 identified phyla were unclassified; and 135(52.46%) of the detected 284 genera were unclassified.In the rhizosphere soil, the top 4 genera, accounting for 25.22% of the total abundance, were all unclassified. In the endophytic communities, the top 2 genera were unclassified,which accounted for 97.1 and 93.95% of the total community in the leaf and in the root, respectively. In previous studies,substantial proportions of unclassified sequences were also identified (Shenet al. 2014, 2015; Wuet al. 2016). In a banana orchard soil, 12 845 (9.3% of the total sequences)of 137 646 sequences were unclassified (Shenet al. 2014).Among all bacterial and fungal sequences in banana rhizosphere soil, 4 179 bacterial sequences (4%) and 89 332 fungal sequences (58%) were returned as unclassified(Shenet al. 2015). At the genus level, unclassified bacteria in four fecal microbiota samples of dholes accounted for 39.36, 52.29, 37.34, and 25.66% of the total reads (Wuet al. 2016). The identification of unclassified members of the bacterial community in this study and the previous studies shows the efficiency of high-throughput sequencing in detecting bacteria, especially minor, rare and uncultured species, in a range of samples. In addition, our results showed that there were many unknown members of the rhizosphere soil and endophytic bacterial communities of Chinese leek, indicating the great potential of this resource for development of beneficial bacterial communities.

    Fig. 4 Principal component analysis (PCA) of the rhizosphere soil bacterial communities and the endophytic bacterial communities of Chinese leek based on the unweighted (A) and weighted (B) UniFrac distance.

    In the α-diversity analysis, parameters evaluating microbial richness such as Chao1, ACE, Shannon,Npshannon,Simpson and the rank-abundance curve revealed that microbial diversity, richness, and evenness were higher in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community than in the endophytic bacterial communities. This might be due to the rhizosphere acts as a bridge connecting plant roots and their surrounding soil environment and it is an important place where complex chemical, physical, and biological interactions occur. Interactions associated with the rhizosphere include root-root, root-insect, and root-microbe interactions (Baiset al. 2006). These complex interactions need more bacteria with different functions to finish, which led to increased diversity, richness and abundance of beneficial soil microbes. Compare with the complicated rhizosphere areas, relatively stable single environment in plants resulted in relatively single microbial population. That is to say, the rhizosphere bacterial community diversity and the relative simplification of the endophytic bacterial community are the results of their environment and functional adaptation.

    From the PCA, the three samples from the rhizosphere soil were clustered into one group, and the six samples from the endophytic bacterial communities (leaf and root) were clustered into together, which showed that the rhizosphere soil bacterial community was different from the endophytic bacterial communities. Although differences existed between the two types of bacterial communities,the abundances of the major components of the bacterial communities were similar, that was, Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria were the two most abundant bacterial phyla in rhizosphere soil and in the endophytic bacterial communities, which was in agreement with the following studies. Endophytic community composition isolated from four different teosintes and ten different maize varieties varied in relation to plant host phylogeny, however, a core microbiota of endophytes was conserved inZeaseeds across boundaries of evolution, ethnography and ecology(David and Raizada 2011).

    Chinese leek has antifungal (Huanget al. 2012) and nematicidal activities (Huanget al. 2016), which were got by our research program. In this paper, we also analyzed the rhizosphere soil bacterial community and endophytic bacterial communities. The finding of this study would contribute to the effort to isolate and identify the nematicidal and antifungal bacterial communities in Chinese leek.

    5. Conclusion

    Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA genes of rhizosphere soil, leaf and root bacterial communities revealed that the rhizosphere bacterial community was significantly different from the endophytic bacterial communities. Microbial diversity, richness and evenness in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community were higher than those in the endophytic bacterial communities. The bacterial community was composed of five dominant phyla (Proteobacteria,Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria and Planctomycetes) in the rhizosphere and two dominant phyla (Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria) in the root and leaf. The endophytic bacterial communities from the leaf and the root were slightly, but not significantly different from each other. The findings of this study will contribute to the goal of isolation and identification of the nematicidal and antifungal bacterial communities in Chinese leek.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471864 and 31272151) and the Qingdao Agricultural University High-level Personnel Startup Fund, China (6631115024). We thank Beijing Ori-Gene Science and Technology (China) for providing the Illumina Miseq platform.

    Appendicesassociated with this paper can be available on http://www.ChinaAgriSci.com/V2/En/appendix.htm

    Abdalla M A, Matasyoh J C. 2014. Endophytes as producers of peptides: An overview about the recently discovered peptides from endophytic microbes.Natural Products &Bioprospecting, 4, 257–270.

    Albertsen M, Karst S M, Ziegler A S, Kirkegaard R H, Nielsen P H. 2015. Back to basics - The influence of DNA extraction and primer choice on phylogenetic analysis of activated sludge communities.PLOS ONE, 10, e0132783

    Bais H P, Weir T L, Perry L G, Gilroy S, Vivanco J M. 2006.The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms.Annual Review of Plant Biology,57, 233–266.

    Caporaso J G, Bittinger K, Bushman F D, Desantis T Z,Andersen G L, Knight R. 2010. PyNAST: A flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment.Bioinformatics,26, 266-267

    Compant S, Mitter B, Colli-Mull J G, Gangl H, Sessitsch A.2011. Endophytes of grapevine flowers, berries, and seeds:Identification of cultivable bacteria, comparison with other plant parts, and visualization of niches of colonization.Microbial Ecology, 62, 188–197.

    David J M, Raizada M N. 2011. Conservation and diversity of seed associated endophytes inZeaacross boundaries of evolution, ethnography and ecology.PLoS ONE, 6, e20396.Doty S L. 2015. Diazotrophic endophytes of poplar and willow for growth promotion of rice plants in nitrogen-limited conditions.Crop Science, 55, 1765–1772.

    Guo J, Fu X, Liao H, Hu Z, Long L, Yan W, Ding Y, Zha L,Guo Y, Yan J. 2016. Potential use of bacterial community succession for estimating post-mortem interval as revealed by high-throughput sequencing.Scientific Reports, 6,24197.

    Hua F, Lian J, Wang H, Lin C, Yu Y. 2015. Exploring bacterial community structure and function associated with atrazine biodegradation in repeatedly treated soils.Journal of Hazardous Materials, 286, 457–465.

    Huang Y, Lü S, Li C, Wei Y, Yi G. 2012. Effects ofFusarium oxysporumf. sp.cubenserace 4 on microorganisms and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere soil of banana.Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences), 38,173–176. (in Chinese)

    Huang Y, Mao Z, Xie B. 2016. Chinese leek (Allium tuberosumRottler ex Sprengel) reduced disease symptom caused by root knot nematode.Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15,364–372.

    Huang Y H. 2015. Control effect on the root knot nematode and analysis of activity components of chinese leek. Postdoctoral research report, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,China. (in Chinese)

    Huang Y H, Wang R C, Li C H, Zuo C W, Wei Y R, Zhang L, Yi G J. 2012. Control ofFusarium wiltin banana with Chinese leek.European Journal of Plant Pathology, 134, 87–95.

    Jia H R, Geng L L, Li Y H, Wang Q, Diao Q Y, Zhou T, Dai P L.2016. The effects of Bt Cry1Ie toxin on bacterial diversity in the midgut ofApis mellifera ligustica(Hymenoptera:Apidae).Scientific Reports, 6, 24664.

    Jiao S, Liu Z, Lin Y, Yang J, Chen W, Wei G. 2016. Bacterial communities in oil contaminated soils: Biogeography and co-occurrence patterns.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 98,64–73.

    Khan A L, Waqas M, Hussain J, Alharrasi A, Alrawahi A,Alhosni K, Kim M J, Adnan M, Lee I J. 2014. EndophytesAspergillus caespitosusLK12 andPhomasp. LK13 ofMoringa peregrinaproduce gibberellins and improve rice plant growth.Journal of Plant Interactions, 9, 731–737.

    Koukol O, Kola?ík M, Kolá?ová Z, Baldrian P. 2012. Diversity of foliar endophytes in wind-fallenPicea abiestrees.Fungal Diversity, 54, 69–77.

    Kumar A, Singh R, Yadav A, Giri D D, Singh P K, Pandey K D.2016. Isolation and characterization of bacterial endophytes ofCurcuma longaL.Biotech, 6, 1–8.

    Li J G, Ren G D, Jia Z J, Dong Y H. 2014. Composition and activity of rhizosphere microbial communities associated with healthy and diseased greenhouse tomatoes.Plant and Soil, 380, 337–347.

    Lozupone C, Knight R. 2005. UniFrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities.Applied &Environmental Microbiology, 71, 8228-8235

    Masuko K, Murata M, Yudoh K, Shimizu H, Beppu M,Nakamura H, Kato T. 2013. Ion torrent PGM as tool for fungal community analysis: A case study of endophytes ineucalyptus grandisreveals high taxonomic diversity.PLoS ONE, 8, e81718.

    Murphy B R, Doohan F M, Hodkinson T R. 2015a. Fungal root endophytes of a wild barley species increase yield in a nutrient-stressed barley cultivar.Symbiosis, 65, 1–7.

    Murphy B R, Doohan F M, Hodkinson T R. 2015b. Persistent fungal root endophytes isolated from a wild barley species suppress seed-borne infections in a barley cultivar.Biocontrol, 60, 1–12.

    Murphy B, Hodkinson T, Doohan F. 2014. Fungal endophytes of barley roots.Journal of Agricultural Science, 152, 602–615.

    Nasrollahzadeh D, Malekzadeh R, Ploner A, Shakeri R,Sotoudeh M, Fahimi S, Nasserimoghaddam S, Kamangar F, Abnet C C, Winckler B. 2015. Variations of gastric corpus microbiota are associated with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and squamous dysplasia.Scientific Reports,5, 8820.

    Shen Z, Ruan Y, Chao X, Zhang J, Li R, Shen Q. 2015.Rhizosphere microbial community manipulated by 2 years of consecutive biofertilizer application associated with bananaFusariumwilt disease suppression.Biology & Fertility of Soils, 51, 553–562.

    Shen Z, Wang D, Ruan Y, Xue C, Zhang J, Li R, Shen Q.2014. Deep 16S rRNA pyrosequencing reveals a bacterial community associated with bananaFusariumwilt disease suppression induced by bio-organic fertilizer application.PLoS ONE, 9, e98420.

    Sun J, Zhang Q, Zhou J, Wei Q. 2014. Illumina amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA tag reveals bacterial community development in the rhizosphere of apple nurseries at a replant disease site and a new planting site.PLoS ONE,9, e111744.

    Venkatachalam A, Thirunavukkarasu N, Suryanarayanan T S. 2015. Distribution and diversity of endophytes in seagrasses.Fungal Ecology, 13, 60–65.

    Wang J, Xue C, Song Y, Wang L, Huang Q, Shen Q. 2016.Wheat and rice growth stages and fertilization regimes alter soil bacterial community structure, but not diversity.Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1207.

    Wu X, Zhang H, Chen J, Shang S, Wei Q, Yan J, Tu X.2016. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of dholes highthroughput Illumina sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene.Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,100, 1–10.

    Yao Y R, Tian X L, Shen B M, Mao Z C, Chen G H, Xie B Y.2015. Transformation of the endophytic fungusAcremonium implicatumwith GFP and evaluation of its biocontrol effect againstMeloidogyne incognita.World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 31, 549–556.

    Zuo C, Li C, Li B, Wei Y, Hu C, Yang Q, Yang J, Sheng O, Kuang R, Deng G, Biswas M K, Yi G. 2015. The toxic mechanism and bioactive components of Chinese leek root exudates acting againstFusarium oxysporumf. sp.cubensetropical race 4.European Journal of Plant Pathology, 143, 447–460.

    777米奇影视久久| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 欧美性长视频在线观看| www.自偷自拍.com| 黄色女人牲交| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 自线自在国产av| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 老司机亚洲免费影院| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| av网站在线播放免费| 国产区一区二久久| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 一本综合久久免费| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产精品永久免费网站| 久久 成人 亚洲| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 精品福利观看| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 91成人精品电影| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 一区福利在线观看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 黄色视频不卡| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| www.精华液| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 一级毛片精品| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 欧美在线黄色| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 丁香欧美五月| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 高清av免费在线| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 国产亚洲欧美98| 美国免费a级毛片| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 免费av中文字幕在线| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 满18在线观看网站| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 又大又爽又粗| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 人妻一区二区av| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产精品九九99| bbb黄色大片| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 久久九九热精品免费| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 大码成人一级视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 欧美午夜高清在线| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 91字幕亚洲| 国产成人精品在线电影| 一级片'在线观看视频| www日本在线高清视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 极品教师在线免费播放| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲三区欧美一区| videosex国产| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 十八禁人妻一区二区| 9色porny在线观看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 满18在线观看网站| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| cao死你这个sao货| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 91国产中文字幕| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲 国产 在线| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久久国产一区二区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 久久精品成人免费网站| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲成人手机| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| a级毛片黄视频| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 成人手机av| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 欧美在线黄色| 一进一出抽搐动态| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲片人在线观看| 国产精品成人在线| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 在线免费观看的www视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 91老司机精品| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 在线观看日韩欧美| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 性少妇av在线| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 午夜影院日韩av| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 一级片免费观看大全| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 女警被强在线播放| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产精品.久久久| 777米奇影视久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 久久中文字幕一级| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 久9热在线精品视频| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 天堂动漫精品| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 岛国在线观看网站| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 久久 成人 亚洲| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 男女免费视频国产| 成人精品一区二区免费| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 亚洲 国产 在线| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 青草久久国产| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 少妇 在线观看| 天天添夜夜摸| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 成年动漫av网址| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 极品教师在线免费播放| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲av美国av| 免费av中文字幕在线| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 美国免费a级毛片| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲第一av免费看| 日本wwww免费看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 在线看a的网站| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲九九香蕉| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 天天影视国产精品| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 国产99白浆流出| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| xxx96com| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| xxx96com| 人妻一区二区av| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 精品亚洲成国产av| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 超碰97精品在线观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 看黄色毛片网站| 1024香蕉在线观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 免费观看精品视频网站| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| netflix在线观看网站| 国产又爽黄色视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 国产av又大| 咕卡用的链子| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 满18在线观看网站| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 中文字幕色久视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 成人18禁在线播放| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 一a级毛片在线观看| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲人成电影观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 精品福利观看| 久久久久国内视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产精品久久视频播放| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片 | 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 女警被强在线播放| av中文乱码字幕在线| 99热网站在线观看| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 成年动漫av网址| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 人人澡人人妻人| 91成人精品电影| 国产区一区二久久| 亚洲国产看品久久| 多毛熟女@视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| svipshipincom国产片| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 国产男女内射视频| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 91成年电影在线观看| 成人精品一区二区免费| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 91字幕亚洲| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 99国产精品99久久久久| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 久久国产精品影院| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产成人欧美| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 成人三级做爰电影| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 免费观看精品视频网站| 成在线人永久免费视频| 岛国在线观看网站| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 久久久久视频综合| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| a级毛片黄视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 日韩有码中文字幕| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 91麻豆av在线| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 午夜91福利影院| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 天天影视国产精品| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| ponron亚洲| 国产精品成人在线| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 91在线观看av| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 大码成人一级视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 操出白浆在线播放| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 9色porny在线观看| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 一区在线观看完整版| 午夜影院日韩av| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| www日本在线高清视频| 成人手机av| videos熟女内射| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 国产在线观看jvid| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 亚洲成人手机| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| tocl精华| 午夜影院日韩av| 久久影院123| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久青草综合色| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 一级作爱视频免费观看| av欧美777| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 很黄的视频免费| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| av在线播放免费不卡| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲五月天丁香| 自线自在国产av| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产1区2区3区精品| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 操出白浆在线播放| av视频免费观看在线观看| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 精品一区二区三卡| 美女福利国产在线| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 午夜影院日韩av| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 一级片免费观看大全| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 日本a在线网址| 91字幕亚洲| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 亚洲国产欧美网| 青草久久国产| av欧美777| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 亚洲av成人av| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 悠悠久久av| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 黄色 视频免费看| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 飞空精品影院首页| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 18禁美女被吸乳视频|