• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of rhizosphere and endophytic microbial communities of Chinese leek through high-throughput 16S rRNA gene Illumina sequencing

    2018-02-05 07:10:47HUANGYonghong
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年2期

    HUANG Yong-hong

    College of Horticulture, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, P.R.China

    1. Introduction

    Endophytes are microorganisms (bacteria, fungi and unicellular eukaryotes) that can live at least part of their life cycle inter- or intra-cellularly inside of plants, usually without inducing pathogenic symptoms (Murphyet al. 2014).Endophytes can cooperate with their host plant by producing secondary metabolites that can protect the plant, providing the ability to defend against predators and help their hosts to adapt to different stress conditions for survival (Abdalla and Matasyoh 2014). Diazotrophic endophytes of poplar and willow enhanced plant growth under N-limited conditions(Doty 2015). Two new strains of endophytic fungi isolated fromMoringa peregrinaproduced bioactive gibberellic acids(GAs) that increased the shoot length of GA-deficient mutantwaito-cand normal Dongjin-beyo rice seedlings (Khanet al.2014). Fourteen endophytic bacterial isolates from the rhizome ofCurcuma longaL. produced indole acetic acid(IAA) and effectively inhibited the growth ofEscherichia coliandKlebsiella pneumoniae, and fungal strains such asFusarium solaniandAlternaria alternata(Kumaret al.2016). Root endophytes isolated from wild populations ofHordeum murinumssp.murinumincreased grain yield in a nutrient-starved barley (Murphyet al. 2015a) and suppressed seed-borne infections in a barley cultivar (Murphyet al.2015b).Acremoniumsp. endophytes from root galls of tomato infected byMeloidogyne incognitareduced the incidence of root galls byca.60% (Yaoet al. 2015).

    Chinese leek (Allium tuberosumRottler ex Sprengel) is a common vegetable in China. It significantly reduced the incidence of banana Fusarium wilt in the field (Huanget al.2012), and reduced the gall index of tomato plants caused byM. incognita(Huanget al.2016). Then researchers isolated several antifungal (Zuoet al.2015) and nematicidal components (Huang 2015). Further studies showed that Chinese leek altered the microbial composition of banana rhizosphere soil (Huanget al. 2012). These results led to an altered hypothesis that antifungal or antibacterial endophytes were associated with the Chinese leek.Bacterial endophytes were isolated that significantly inhibited the mycelial growth ofBotryosphaeria berengerianaandValsa mali, the pathogenic agents of apple ring rot and apple valsa canker, respectively (data not shown).

    In this study, the rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities of Chinese leek were investigated using highthroughput Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. And the diversity of bacterial endophytes in the Chinese leek root and leaf was analyzed, then compared with that in Chinese leek rhizosphere soil, which was to identify the potential antifungal and nematicidal microbes.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Sample collection

    The Chinese leek used in the experiment was sampled from Xifu Town, Chengyang District, Qingdao City, China.The Chinese leek cultivar Dajingou was planted in field for 3 years. Then three composite samples were collected.Each composite sample included five clusters of whole plants with soil on root, which were collected randomly and at least 5 m apart from each other. All the collected samples were put into sterile plastic bags and brought to the laboratory.The redundant soil was removed through shaking the roots gently, then the soil sticked on the roots was collected with a brush and sieved with a 2-mm aperture sieve. The soil sticked on the roots was regarded as rhizosphere soil to analyze the rhizosphere bacterial community. Then the plants were washed with running water, then separated roots and leaves were cut into pieces of 2-cm long. The 2-cm long pieces were dipped into 75% ethyl alcohol for 2 min,then immersed into 3% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, finally washed with sterile water for 5 times. The fifth washing water was coated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) plate and incubated at 28°C for 7 d to determine the disinfection effect. Disinfection qualified leave and roots were used to analyze the endophytic bacterial community.

    2.2. DNA extraction, PCR amplifications and lllumina library generation

    Genomic DNA of the rhizosphere soil and the disinfection qualified leave and roots were extracted. The genomic DNA was stored at ?20°C until PCR amplification and metagenomic sequencing was carried out. The 16S rRNA gene consists of nine hypervariable regions flanked by regions of more conserved sequences. Because the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene provides ample information for taxonomic classification of microbial communities, this region was targeted for sequencing.

    PCR amplification was conducted in a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).PCR amplifications were performed using the KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix PCR Kit (KAPA Biosystems,USA). Each reaction (25 μL) contained 12.5 μL 2× KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix, 0.25 μmol L-1of each primer,and 10 ng of DNA template. Bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes were amplified with the universal primer B341F (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and B805R(5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) (Albertsenet al.2015; Nasrollahzadehet al. 2015) using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, 25 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

    Indexes that allowed sample multiplexing during sequencing were incorporated between the Illumina Miseq adaptor and the reverse primer in the amplification reaction.

    PCR amplicon libraries were prepared by combining the PCR products for each sample. After purification, the PCR products from the different samples were quantified using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer System (Santa Clara, CA,USA) and then pooled at equal concentrations. Amplicon sequencing was performed on the Illumina Miseq platform at Beijing Ori-Gene Science and Technology (China).

    2.3. Statistical and bioinformatics analysis

    Heatmap figures were generated using custom R scripts.Canoco 4.5 was used to run principal component analysis(PCA). The community richness index, community diversity index, data preprocessing, operational taxonomic unit-based analysis and hypothesis tests were performed using Mothur Software (http://www.mothur.org/). The data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA using SAS ver. 8.0 Software. The significance of the treatments was determined using Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test (P≤0.05).

    3. Results

    3.1. General analysis of the Illumina sequencing data

    Using Mothur Software, the short, low-quality and ambiguous sequences were removed and a total of 79 261 high-quality sequences were obtained from the nine samples. The number of high-quality sequences per sample ranged from 4 238 to 15 977 (Table 1). Based on 97% species similarity,1 239 operational taxonomical units (OTUs) were found using USEARCH Software (http://www.drive5.com/usearch/)and 11 930 sequences (15.1% of the total sequences) were returned as unclassified.

    3.2. Bacterial community composition

    In the nine samples, 28 phyla were identified in total, with 2 unclassified. When the bacterial communities were compared at the phylum level, the bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere samples was different from the endophytic bacterial community composition in the leaf and root samples. All 28 phyla were presented in the rhizosphere soil samples, whereas only 17 of them were presented in the leaf and root samples.

    The abundance of phyla in different samples were significantly different. In the rhizosphere soil, the five most abundant phyla were Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria,Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria, and Planctomycetes,which accounted for 71.97% of the total abundance phyla.And the percentage of them were 37.85, 10.99, 8.24,7.79 and 7.1%, respectively. In the endophytic bacterial communities, Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria were the two most abundant phyla, which accounted for 98.17 and 96.48% in the leaf and root samples, respectively. And Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria accunted for 75.44 and 21.04%, respectively in the leaf samples, 75.44 and 21.04%,respectively in the root samples.

    Of the 26 classified phyla, only the abundance of Cyanobacteria in the leaf and root bacterial communities was significantly higher than that in the rhizosphere soil(F=125.32,P<0.0001). The other 25 phyla in the leaf and root bacterial communities were significantly lower than that in the rhizosphere soil (Fig. 1).

    According to the bacterial community abundance, the 26 classified phyla were clustered into 3 groups. All the phyla, belonged to Cyanobacteria, which was the most abundant bacterial phyla in the leaf and root communities,were classfied into one group. And all the phyla, belonged to Proteobacteria, which was the the most abundant bacterial phyla in the rhizosphere soil, were classfied into another group. The other 24 bacterial phyla were classfied into the third group (Fig. 2).

    A total of 66 bacterial classes, 119 bacterial orders,and195 bacterial families were identified in total in the nine samples, the most five abundant class, order and family were accounted for 51.43, 29.24, and 29.06% in rhizosphere soil, 98.41, 97.72, and 97.63% in leave and 96.91, 95.15,and 95.05% in roots, respectively (Appendix A).

    Two hundred and eighty-four bacterial genera were identified from the nine samples, 131 of which were unclassified. In the rhizosphere soil samples, the abundance of 23 bacterial genera was higher than 1%, accounting for 57.5% of the total. Among these bacterial genera, the four most abundant genera (7.74, 7.03, 6.07 and 4.39%) were unclassified. The five most abundant classified genera were Pseudomonas (3.32%),Flavobacterium(2.45%),Sphingomonas(1.89%),Gemmatimonas(1.81%) andDongia(1.70%). For the endophytic bacterial community in the leaf and root samples, two unclassified bacterial genera accounted for 97.1 and 93.95% of the total community,respectively. Their abundance was significantly higher in the endophytic communities than that in the rhizosphere soil community (Table 2).

    Table 1 High-quality sequences that were used for further analysis after basic quality control for the three groups of Chinese leek samples

    3.3. Bacterial α-diversity

    Diversity parameters, such as the number of sequence analyxed, which were clustered into OTU, and good coverage were not significantly different between bacterial communities in the rhizosphere soil and in the leaf and root,whereas the other parameters were significantly different between them.

    The number of OTUs in the rhizosphere soil community was 5.20 and 4.26 times higher than those in the leaf and root communities, respectively. The Chao1 estimator for the rhizosphere soil community was 2.54 and 2.39 times more than that in the leaf and root communities, respectively.Abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE) in the rhizosphere soil community was 1.79 and 1.62 times more than that in the leaf and root communities, respectively.These results showed that richness in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community was more than that in the endophytic bacterial communities.

    Fig. 1 The relative abundance of different phyla in rhizosphere soil, leaf and root bacterial communities of Chinese leek. Bars represent the standard error of the three replicates and different letters above each phylum indicate significant differences at 0.05 probability according to the Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test.

    The Shannon diversity index in the rhizosphere soil community was 6.42 and 4.33 times higher than that in the leaf and root communities, respectively, and the simpson diversity index in the rhizosphere soil community was 50.15 and 37.20 times lower than that in the leaf and root communities, respectively. These results showed that the diversity in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community was more than that in the endophytic bacterial communities.

    The rank-abundance curve of the endophytic bacterial communities declined more sharply than that of the rhizosphere soil, which showed that the evenness in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community was higher than that in the endophytic bacterial communities (Appendix B).

    Fig. 2 Hierarchical cluster tree of bacterial communities from the rhizosphere, leaf and root of Chinese leek at the phylum level.

    Table 2 Significant differences of the bacterial genera among the three communities isolated from Chinese leek1)

    3.4. Bacterial community structure

    To analyze the relationships among the samples, OTUs were aligned with the SILVA database (https://www.arb-silva.de/)using PyNAST Software (https://sourceforge.net/projects/pynast/), and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using FastTree (Priceet al.2009). UniFrac Software (Lozupone and Knight 2005) was used to generate the distance matrix among bacterial communities. UniFrac analysis was carried out either unweighted, using only presence-absence information (Appendix C), or weighted, which took into account the relative proportions of each group (Appendix D).

    The cluster heatmap using the unweighted (Fig. 3-A) or weighted distance (Fig. 3-B) showed that the rhizosphere soil samples grouped together, and the leaf and root samples grouped together. PCA using the unweighted (Fig. 4-A)or weighted distance (Fig. 4-B) also revealed that thefirst principal component separated the soil samples from the leaf and root samples. The cluster heatmap and the PCA confirmed the differences between the rhizosphere soil bacterial community and the endophytic bacterial communities.

    ?

    Fig. 3 Heatmap of similarities between the rhizosphere soil bacterial communities and the endophytic bacterial communities of Chinese leek based on the unweighted (A) and weighted(B) UniFrac distance. The color gradient from blue to red indicated increasing similarity.S, rhizosphere soil; L, leaf; R, root.

    4. Discussion

    High throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragments has been successfully applied for in-depth analysis of bacterial communities associated with the animal gut (Guoet al. 2016;Jiaet al. 2016), water (Jiaoet al. 2016) and soil (Huaet al. 2015; Wanget al. 2016). In this paper, we adopted this technique to analyze the rhizosphere soil and endophytic (leaf and root) bacterial communities of Chinese leek, to characterize the unseen majority of these bacterial communities and to achieve a high throughput and deep insight into these bacterial communities, providing a basis for the development and utilization of Chinese leek endophytic or rhizospheric bacterial communities.

    In the rhizosphere soil, among 26 classified phyla, Proteobacteria (37.85%) was the most dominant phylum across all 3 rhizosphere soil samples, followed by Acidobacteria (10.99%) and Bacteroidetes (8.24%). The results were in agreement with those of previous studies. Sunet al.(2014) found in the apple rhizosphere soil of a replant site and a new planting site, Proteobacteria,Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the three dominant phyla, accounting for almost 50% of the reads (Sunet al.2014). In a banana mono-culture orchard, Proteobacteria,Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the three most abundant phyla at relative abundances of approximately 35,15 and 10%, respectively (Shenet al. 2014). Among the banana rhizosphere microbial community manipulated by 2 years of consecutive biofertilizer application, Proteobacteria accounted for 70.1% of the total bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences, followed by Bacteroidetes and Acidobacteria(Shenet al. 2015). Proteobacteria (accounting for 35.7–97.4% of species) was also the most abundant phylum in the tomato rhizosphere (Liet al. 2014). The results of these previous studies and this study revealed Proteobacteria was the dominant bacterial phylum in the rhizosphere soil. In the endophytic bacterial community of Chinese leek, Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria were the two most abundant phyla, accounting for 98.17 and 96.48% of the total community in the leaf and root, respectively. This showed that the composition and abundance of endophytic bacterial communities were different from those of the rhizosphere soil.

    In many previous studies, culture-based approaches were used to study microbial communities (Compantet al.2011; Koukolet al. 2012; Venkatachalamet al. 2015), but these methods suffered from organismal bias and were far too labor-intensive to adequately assess highly diverse microbial communities. In addition, in many cases, the vast majority of microbes are uncultivable using traditional methods. Direct DNA clone sequencing avoids culturing bias and has the potential to detect rare taxa, and has made it feasible to capture the often hidden microbial diversity (Masukoet al. 2013). Compared with the traditional culture-based methods, high-throughput sequencing can detect many minor members of the microbial community,many of which are not presented in the existing database(unclassified sequences). In this study, many unclassified sequences/phyla/genera were identified, including: 11 930(15.1%) of 79 261 high-quality sequences were unclassified;2 (7.14%) of 28 identified phyla were unclassified; and 135(52.46%) of the detected 284 genera were unclassified.In the rhizosphere soil, the top 4 genera, accounting for 25.22% of the total abundance, were all unclassified. In the endophytic communities, the top 2 genera were unclassified,which accounted for 97.1 and 93.95% of the total community in the leaf and in the root, respectively. In previous studies,substantial proportions of unclassified sequences were also identified (Shenet al. 2014, 2015; Wuet al. 2016). In a banana orchard soil, 12 845 (9.3% of the total sequences)of 137 646 sequences were unclassified (Shenet al. 2014).Among all bacterial and fungal sequences in banana rhizosphere soil, 4 179 bacterial sequences (4%) and 89 332 fungal sequences (58%) were returned as unclassified(Shenet al. 2015). At the genus level, unclassified bacteria in four fecal microbiota samples of dholes accounted for 39.36, 52.29, 37.34, and 25.66% of the total reads (Wuet al. 2016). The identification of unclassified members of the bacterial community in this study and the previous studies shows the efficiency of high-throughput sequencing in detecting bacteria, especially minor, rare and uncultured species, in a range of samples. In addition, our results showed that there were many unknown members of the rhizosphere soil and endophytic bacterial communities of Chinese leek, indicating the great potential of this resource for development of beneficial bacterial communities.

    Fig. 4 Principal component analysis (PCA) of the rhizosphere soil bacterial communities and the endophytic bacterial communities of Chinese leek based on the unweighted (A) and weighted (B) UniFrac distance.

    In the α-diversity analysis, parameters evaluating microbial richness such as Chao1, ACE, Shannon,Npshannon,Simpson and the rank-abundance curve revealed that microbial diversity, richness, and evenness were higher in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community than in the endophytic bacterial communities. This might be due to the rhizosphere acts as a bridge connecting plant roots and their surrounding soil environment and it is an important place where complex chemical, physical, and biological interactions occur. Interactions associated with the rhizosphere include root-root, root-insect, and root-microbe interactions (Baiset al. 2006). These complex interactions need more bacteria with different functions to finish, which led to increased diversity, richness and abundance of beneficial soil microbes. Compare with the complicated rhizosphere areas, relatively stable single environment in plants resulted in relatively single microbial population. That is to say, the rhizosphere bacterial community diversity and the relative simplification of the endophytic bacterial community are the results of their environment and functional adaptation.

    From the PCA, the three samples from the rhizosphere soil were clustered into one group, and the six samples from the endophytic bacterial communities (leaf and root) were clustered into together, which showed that the rhizosphere soil bacterial community was different from the endophytic bacterial communities. Although differences existed between the two types of bacterial communities,the abundances of the major components of the bacterial communities were similar, that was, Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria were the two most abundant bacterial phyla in rhizosphere soil and in the endophytic bacterial communities, which was in agreement with the following studies. Endophytic community composition isolated from four different teosintes and ten different maize varieties varied in relation to plant host phylogeny, however, a core microbiota of endophytes was conserved inZeaseeds across boundaries of evolution, ethnography and ecology(David and Raizada 2011).

    Chinese leek has antifungal (Huanget al. 2012) and nematicidal activities (Huanget al. 2016), which were got by our research program. In this paper, we also analyzed the rhizosphere soil bacterial community and endophytic bacterial communities. The finding of this study would contribute to the effort to isolate and identify the nematicidal and antifungal bacterial communities in Chinese leek.

    5. Conclusion

    Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA genes of rhizosphere soil, leaf and root bacterial communities revealed that the rhizosphere bacterial community was significantly different from the endophytic bacterial communities. Microbial diversity, richness and evenness in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community were higher than those in the endophytic bacterial communities. The bacterial community was composed of five dominant phyla (Proteobacteria,Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria and Planctomycetes) in the rhizosphere and two dominant phyla (Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria) in the root and leaf. The endophytic bacterial communities from the leaf and the root were slightly, but not significantly different from each other. The findings of this study will contribute to the goal of isolation and identification of the nematicidal and antifungal bacterial communities in Chinese leek.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471864 and 31272151) and the Qingdao Agricultural University High-level Personnel Startup Fund, China (6631115024). We thank Beijing Ori-Gene Science and Technology (China) for providing the Illumina Miseq platform.

    Appendicesassociated with this paper can be available on http://www.ChinaAgriSci.com/V2/En/appendix.htm

    Abdalla M A, Matasyoh J C. 2014. Endophytes as producers of peptides: An overview about the recently discovered peptides from endophytic microbes.Natural Products &Bioprospecting, 4, 257–270.

    Albertsen M, Karst S M, Ziegler A S, Kirkegaard R H, Nielsen P H. 2015. Back to basics - The influence of DNA extraction and primer choice on phylogenetic analysis of activated sludge communities.PLOS ONE, 10, e0132783

    Bais H P, Weir T L, Perry L G, Gilroy S, Vivanco J M. 2006.The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms.Annual Review of Plant Biology,57, 233–266.

    Caporaso J G, Bittinger K, Bushman F D, Desantis T Z,Andersen G L, Knight R. 2010. PyNAST: A flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment.Bioinformatics,26, 266-267

    Compant S, Mitter B, Colli-Mull J G, Gangl H, Sessitsch A.2011. Endophytes of grapevine flowers, berries, and seeds:Identification of cultivable bacteria, comparison with other plant parts, and visualization of niches of colonization.Microbial Ecology, 62, 188–197.

    David J M, Raizada M N. 2011. Conservation and diversity of seed associated endophytes inZeaacross boundaries of evolution, ethnography and ecology.PLoS ONE, 6, e20396.Doty S L. 2015. Diazotrophic endophytes of poplar and willow for growth promotion of rice plants in nitrogen-limited conditions.Crop Science, 55, 1765–1772.

    Guo J, Fu X, Liao H, Hu Z, Long L, Yan W, Ding Y, Zha L,Guo Y, Yan J. 2016. Potential use of bacterial community succession for estimating post-mortem interval as revealed by high-throughput sequencing.Scientific Reports, 6,24197.

    Hua F, Lian J, Wang H, Lin C, Yu Y. 2015. Exploring bacterial community structure and function associated with atrazine biodegradation in repeatedly treated soils.Journal of Hazardous Materials, 286, 457–465.

    Huang Y, Lü S, Li C, Wei Y, Yi G. 2012. Effects ofFusarium oxysporumf. sp.cubenserace 4 on microorganisms and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere soil of banana.Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences), 38,173–176. (in Chinese)

    Huang Y, Mao Z, Xie B. 2016. Chinese leek (Allium tuberosumRottler ex Sprengel) reduced disease symptom caused by root knot nematode.Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15,364–372.

    Huang Y H. 2015. Control effect on the root knot nematode and analysis of activity components of chinese leek. Postdoctoral research report, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,China. (in Chinese)

    Huang Y H, Wang R C, Li C H, Zuo C W, Wei Y R, Zhang L, Yi G J. 2012. Control ofFusarium wiltin banana with Chinese leek.European Journal of Plant Pathology, 134, 87–95.

    Jia H R, Geng L L, Li Y H, Wang Q, Diao Q Y, Zhou T, Dai P L.2016. The effects of Bt Cry1Ie toxin on bacterial diversity in the midgut ofApis mellifera ligustica(Hymenoptera:Apidae).Scientific Reports, 6, 24664.

    Jiao S, Liu Z, Lin Y, Yang J, Chen W, Wei G. 2016. Bacterial communities in oil contaminated soils: Biogeography and co-occurrence patterns.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 98,64–73.

    Khan A L, Waqas M, Hussain J, Alharrasi A, Alrawahi A,Alhosni K, Kim M J, Adnan M, Lee I J. 2014. EndophytesAspergillus caespitosusLK12 andPhomasp. LK13 ofMoringa peregrinaproduce gibberellins and improve rice plant growth.Journal of Plant Interactions, 9, 731–737.

    Koukol O, Kola?ík M, Kolá?ová Z, Baldrian P. 2012. Diversity of foliar endophytes in wind-fallenPicea abiestrees.Fungal Diversity, 54, 69–77.

    Kumar A, Singh R, Yadav A, Giri D D, Singh P K, Pandey K D.2016. Isolation and characterization of bacterial endophytes ofCurcuma longaL.Biotech, 6, 1–8.

    Li J G, Ren G D, Jia Z J, Dong Y H. 2014. Composition and activity of rhizosphere microbial communities associated with healthy and diseased greenhouse tomatoes.Plant and Soil, 380, 337–347.

    Lozupone C, Knight R. 2005. UniFrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities.Applied &Environmental Microbiology, 71, 8228-8235

    Masuko K, Murata M, Yudoh K, Shimizu H, Beppu M,Nakamura H, Kato T. 2013. Ion torrent PGM as tool for fungal community analysis: A case study of endophytes ineucalyptus grandisreveals high taxonomic diversity.PLoS ONE, 8, e81718.

    Murphy B R, Doohan F M, Hodkinson T R. 2015a. Fungal root endophytes of a wild barley species increase yield in a nutrient-stressed barley cultivar.Symbiosis, 65, 1–7.

    Murphy B R, Doohan F M, Hodkinson T R. 2015b. Persistent fungal root endophytes isolated from a wild barley species suppress seed-borne infections in a barley cultivar.Biocontrol, 60, 1–12.

    Murphy B, Hodkinson T, Doohan F. 2014. Fungal endophytes of barley roots.Journal of Agricultural Science, 152, 602–615.

    Nasrollahzadeh D, Malekzadeh R, Ploner A, Shakeri R,Sotoudeh M, Fahimi S, Nasserimoghaddam S, Kamangar F, Abnet C C, Winckler B. 2015. Variations of gastric corpus microbiota are associated with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and squamous dysplasia.Scientific Reports,5, 8820.

    Shen Z, Ruan Y, Chao X, Zhang J, Li R, Shen Q. 2015.Rhizosphere microbial community manipulated by 2 years of consecutive biofertilizer application associated with bananaFusariumwilt disease suppression.Biology & Fertility of Soils, 51, 553–562.

    Shen Z, Wang D, Ruan Y, Xue C, Zhang J, Li R, Shen Q.2014. Deep 16S rRNA pyrosequencing reveals a bacterial community associated with bananaFusariumwilt disease suppression induced by bio-organic fertilizer application.PLoS ONE, 9, e98420.

    Sun J, Zhang Q, Zhou J, Wei Q. 2014. Illumina amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA tag reveals bacterial community development in the rhizosphere of apple nurseries at a replant disease site and a new planting site.PLoS ONE,9, e111744.

    Venkatachalam A, Thirunavukkarasu N, Suryanarayanan T S. 2015. Distribution and diversity of endophytes in seagrasses.Fungal Ecology, 13, 60–65.

    Wang J, Xue C, Song Y, Wang L, Huang Q, Shen Q. 2016.Wheat and rice growth stages and fertilization regimes alter soil bacterial community structure, but not diversity.Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1207.

    Wu X, Zhang H, Chen J, Shang S, Wei Q, Yan J, Tu X.2016. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of dholes highthroughput Illumina sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene.Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,100, 1–10.

    Yao Y R, Tian X L, Shen B M, Mao Z C, Chen G H, Xie B Y.2015. Transformation of the endophytic fungusAcremonium implicatumwith GFP and evaluation of its biocontrol effect againstMeloidogyne incognita.World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 31, 549–556.

    Zuo C, Li C, Li B, Wei Y, Hu C, Yang Q, Yang J, Sheng O, Kuang R, Deng G, Biswas M K, Yi G. 2015. The toxic mechanism and bioactive components of Chinese leek root exudates acting againstFusarium oxysporumf. sp.cubensetropical race 4.European Journal of Plant Pathology, 143, 447–460.

    叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 久久久久久久久中文| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 熟女电影av网| 99久久精品热视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 女警被强在线播放| 两个人看的免费小视频| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日本在线视频免费播放| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 日本 欧美在线| www国产在线视频色| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 日本三级黄在线观看| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 午夜影院日韩av| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 欧美3d第一页| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 午夜视频国产福利| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 精品人妻1区二区| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 很黄的视频免费| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| tocl精华| av专区在线播放| 身体一侧抽搐| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 日韩有码中文字幕| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 1000部很黄的大片| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 免费搜索国产男女视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 日本一本二区三区精品| 日本黄大片高清| 88av欧美| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 一本精品99久久精品77| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 天堂√8在线中文| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲18禁久久av| 1024手机看黄色片| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 午夜福利高清视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 色综合婷婷激情| av天堂在线播放| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产成人av教育| 日日夜夜操网爽| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 岛国在线观看网站| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产精品,欧美在线| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲激情在线av| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 久久久色成人| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产高清三级在线| 中文资源天堂在线| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产真实乱freesex| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 日本 欧美在线| xxx96com| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 观看美女的网站| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产乱人视频| 嫩草影院入口| 看黄色毛片网站| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美zozozo另类| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲无线观看免费| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 欧美成人a在线观看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 美女免费视频网站| 天天添夜夜摸| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 91久久精品电影网| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| bbb黄色大片| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产不卡一卡二| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产乱人视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 免费观看人在逋| 69人妻影院| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 亚洲av一区综合| 国产真实乱freesex| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 看片在线看免费视频| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 欧美在线黄色| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 免费看光身美女| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 精品久久久久久,| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 香蕉久久夜色| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 岛国在线观看网站| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 91久久精品电影网| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 少妇丰满av| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| www.色视频.com| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| h日本视频在线播放| 国产成人福利小说| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产成人a区在线观看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 久久久色成人| 午夜两性在线视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 级片在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 亚洲国产色片| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 男人舔奶头视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 久久亚洲真实| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 三级毛片av免费| 男女那种视频在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 国产日本99.免费观看| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 少妇丰满av| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 欧美bdsm另类| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产高潮美女av| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 亚洲国产色片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 精品久久久久久成人av| 欧美bdsm另类| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲国产色片| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 1024手机看黄色片| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 色吧在线观看| 国产三级黄色录像| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 免费看光身美女| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| xxxwww97欧美| 熟女电影av网| 舔av片在线| 内地一区二区视频在线| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 久久久色成人| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| www.色视频.com| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产三级在线视频| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 俺也久久电影网| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 手机成人av网站| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 久久久久久久久中文| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产av在哪里看| 操出白浆在线播放| 91字幕亚洲| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 搡老岳熟女国产| 午夜激情欧美在线| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 日本五十路高清| 1000部很黄的大片| 长腿黑丝高跟| 欧美3d第一页| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲第一电影网av| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 女警被强在线播放| 一级黄色大片毛片| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 99久久精品热视频| 美女高潮的动态| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 高清在线国产一区| www日本黄色视频网| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 久久久久国内视频| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久 | 看免费av毛片| 亚洲激情在线av| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲av成人av| 久久人妻av系列| 少妇丰满av| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | e午夜精品久久久久久久| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产亚洲欧美98| 午夜a级毛片| 日本一本二区三区精品| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 一本久久中文字幕| 97碰自拍视频| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 久久久色成人| 色在线成人网| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 黄片小视频在线播放| 怎么达到女性高潮| 免费大片18禁| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 午夜影院日韩av| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 久久精品影院6| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 午夜两性在线视频| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 老司机福利观看| 午夜免费观看网址| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 欧美激情在线99| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 三级毛片av免费| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 婷婷亚洲欧美| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 88av欧美| 高清在线国产一区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 手机成人av网站| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 中文资源天堂在线| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 香蕉久久夜色| 日韩欧美免费精品| 色综合婷婷激情| 嫩草影院精品99| 色综合婷婷激情| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 香蕉久久夜色| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 少妇高潮的动态图| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 99热精品在线国产| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 1024手机看黄色片| 久久精品91蜜桃| 1024手机看黄色片| 嫩草影视91久久| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 长腿黑丝高跟| 免费在线观看日本一区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产熟女xx| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲精品在线美女| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 午夜a级毛片| 在线国产一区二区在线| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品影院久久| 内地一区二区视频在线| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 一区二区三区激情视频| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 在线视频色国产色| 免费在线观看日本一区| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 岛国在线观看网站| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲五月天丁香| 最好的美女福利视频网| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 午夜精品在线福利| 热99在线观看视频| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 一a级毛片在线观看| netflix在线观看网站| 久久久久九九精品影院| 午夜福利欧美成人| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看 | 色吧在线观看| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 日韩欧美三级三区| 成年版毛片免费区| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 |