• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    The efficiency of long-term straw return to sequester organic carbon in Northeast China’s cropland

    2018-02-05 07:10:55WANGShichaoZHAOYawenWANGJinzhouZHUPingCUlXianHANXiaozengXUMinggangLUChangai
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年2期
    關(guān)鍵詞:癌病流膠病櫻桃樹

    WANG Shi-chao, ZHAO Ya-wen, WANG Jin-zhou, ZHU Ping, CUl Xian, HAN Xiao-zeng, XU Minggang, LU Chang-ai

    1 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory for Improving Quality of Arable Land, Beijing 100081, P.R.China

    2 Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130124, P.R.China

    3 Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Heihe 164300, P.R.China

    4 Northeast Institute of Geography and Agro-ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, P.R.China

    1. lntroduction

    Soil contains the largest carbon (C) pool of the global terrestrial ecosystem. The total soil organic carbon (SOC)pool is approximately 1 500 Pg C, which is three times that of the atmospheric carbon pool (Songet al.2014). Soil organic matter (SOM) not only plays a vital role in global carbon cycling, but also contributes considerably to improvements in soil quality, crop production, and terrestrial ecosystem health(Wanget al.2008; Luet al.2009). However, increasing SOM has become a major global problem (Fanet al.2013;Keesstraet al.2016). SOC dynamics are strongly influenced by agricultural management practices, such as fertilization,crop residue return, and tillage (Luet al.2009; Luoet al.2010; Louet al.2011; Ouyanget al.2013; Douet al.2016).

    It has recently been proposed that straw input can lead to SOC accumulation and improvements in soil structure(Luet al.2009; Liu Cet al.2014; Lu 2015; Wanget al.2015a). For example, Liu Cet al.(2014) found that straw return increased SOC by 12.8%, with a 42.0% increase in the active C fraction after 22 years. Previous research has also demonstrated that continuous straw return boosts SOC accumulation in early years, but that these effects decrease after a decade (Liu Cet al.2014; Wanget al.2015a).Specifically, Liu Cet al.(2014) reported that straw return enhanced SOC sequestration over the first three years, but that these effects were minimal in the experimental site after 15 years. However, opposing results have also been reported(Pittelkowet al.2015), which may be attributed to different environmental conditions, land management approaches,and soil types. Additional factors, such as straw-C input rate,number of cultivation years, initial SOC levels, and methods for straw disposal, are also critical in explaining why certain soil carbon pools react differently to straw return. Therefore,evaluating the changes in SOC under long-term cultivation would be beneficial for determining how land management practices influence soil and global carbon cycling.

    The black soil of Northeast China is one of the main crop production areas in the country, and provides a third of the country’s grain commodity. The black soil area covers 1.1×108ha, including arable land (2.4×107ha in Heilongjiang Province, 1.1×107ha in Jilin Province, 0.6×107ha in Liaoning Province, and 0.6×107ha in Inner Mongolia) that is characterized by black soil (Mollisols) which is rich in organic matter (Liang A Zet al.2011; Zhanget al.2013). The large amount of agricultural straw that is produced in this region every year is not fully utilized. Instead of being returned to the soil, the straw is usually used as livestock feed or to provide energy for heating (Douet al.2016). Hence, soil degradation,a result of the loss of SOC and nutrients, is a considerable challenge for sustainable cultivation in this region (Liuet al.2010), as intensive cultivation has reduced SOC by 50%over about 60 years of tillage (Yuet al.2006), with a loss of 0.5% each year (Liuet al.2010). Rather than being used to provide energy, the organic material of straw could be used to promote the SOC stock. Many studies have investigated how straw return affects soil fertility (Yanet al.2007; Sun Bet al.2013). However, the approach of using straw return to reverse SOC reduction faces some problems. For example,the extent we depend on straw return to improve SOC is unknown. Also, the short- and long-term effects of using straw return to improve SOC in the black soil region in China have not been assessed.

    Long-term experiments can provide reliable data for assessing and predicting the influence of straw return on SOC sequestration and soil fertility. There is currently minimal knowledge about the influence of different environmental conditions on the long-term effects of straw return (Dinget al.2014; Songet al.2014), and limited research has focused on black soils. In this study, we used long-term field experiments in Northeast China to study the influence of straw return on SOC. The objectives of this study were: 1) to analyze the SOC dynamics of longterm straw return; 2) to examine the relative contribution of straw return to SOC sequestration; and 3) to evaluate the sustainability of straw return for improving SOC and straw-C sequestration efficiency. We hypothesized that straw return could efficiently increase the SOC stock of the black soil region in Northeast China. However, we also expected clear differences among different regions in Northeast China.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Site description

    This study was conducted at three different sites in the Northeast China: Heihe (50°15′N, 127o27′E); Hailun(47°27′N, 126°55′E); and Gongzhuling (43°30′N, 124°48′E)(Fig. 1, Table 1). Three long-term straw return experiments with different fertilization treatments were initiated in 1979,1990, and 1990 for Heihe, Hailun, and Gongzhuling,respectively. Prior to the experiment, the field was under crop production for at least 60 years at Gongzhuling site, 110 years at Hailun site, or 150 years at Heihe site. The soil at all three sites originated from quaternary loess-like sediments.The study sites are characterized by a temperate sub-humid climate. The average annual precipitation is 528 mm, with most of the rainfall occurring from July to September. The frost-free period ranges from 105 days at the Heihe site to 140 days at the Gongzhuling site. Crop rotations include wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)/soybean (Glycine max(L.)Merrill.) at the Heihe site, wheat/maize (Zea maysL.)/soybean at the Hailun site, and a mono-cropping system with maize at the Gongzhuling site. Each year, spring wheat seeds are sown in strips in early April and harvested in mid-August. Soybean seeds are sown in holes in early May and harvested in late September. Maize seeds are sown in holes in early May and harvested in early October. The average annual temperature ranges from –0.5°C at Heihe to 4.5°C at Gongzhuling. Soil textures are clay loam, heavy loam, and loamy clay soil at Heihe, Hailun and Gongzhuling,respectively. The fine mineral contents were 33.4% (Heihe),34.5% (Hailun), and 31.1% (Gongzhuling). All sites had black soils, with initial SOC contents between 13.5–31.3 g kg–1, initial total nitrogen (TN) contents between 1.24–2.23 g kg–1, and soil pH values between 6.1–7.6 (Table 1).

    Fig. 1 Locations of the study sites in Northeast China.

    2.2. Experimental design and sampling

    Three treatments were implemented at each site: (1) no fertilization (CK); (2) inorganic fertilization N, P and K (NPK);and (3) NPK plus straw return (NPKS). The plots were arranged in a randomized block design, and each treatment was replicated three times. The plot sizes were 212 m2at Heihe, 224 m2at Hailun, and 400 m2at Gongzhuling.The chemical fertilizer and straw input rates are in Table 2.The applied chemical fertilizers included urea, calcium superphosphate, and potassium sulfate, with the exception that no potassium fertilizer was used at the Heihe site. The application rates of inorganic fertilizer for each growing season ranged from 37.5 to 245.3 kg N ha–1, 16.4 to 62 kg P ha–1, and 0 to 68.5 kg K ha–1(Table 2).

    The aboveground straw was removed from the CK and NPK treatments after each harvest (around October 10th).In the NPKS treatment, which included straw return, the aboveground straw was removed after each harvest and re-incorporated into the soil. At the Heihe and Hailun sites,wheat/maize/soybean organic material was returned by deep plowing, while at the Gongzhuling site maize straw was used for mulching material. The average annual rates of straw return were 3.0, 4.5, and 7.5 Mg ha–1(dry weight) at the Heihe, Hailun, and Gongzhuling sites, respectively. Straw was applied after cutting it into pieces of 5–15 cm length after harvesting. The amounts of C (straw-C and root-C) added to soil were 0.44–1.97 Mg ha–1at Heihe, 1.59–3.35 Mg ha–1at Hailun, and 4.4–5.9 Mg ha–1at Gongzhuling (Fig. 2).

    2.3. Soil analysis

    Surface soil samples (0–20 cm depth) were collected from each treatment plot after each harvest (around October 10th),after which they were air-dried and sieved through either a 1-mm mesh for pH and available P analyses or a 0.15-mm mesh for organic matter, total N, and total P analyses. Soil organic matter was determined by quantifying the oxidizable soil carbon in a heated dilution of K2Cr2O7subjected to a volumetric oxidation method (Nelson and Sommers 1996).Soil available P was measured using Olsen’s method (Van Reeuwijk 2002), while total nitrogen was measured using the micro-Kjeldahl digestion, distillation, and titration method(Bremner and Mulvaney 1982). All results were normalized to a dry mass basis. The soil bulk density (g cm–3) was determined by the core sampler method described by Piper(1966). We also collected soil samples from the 0–20 cm layer at the beginning of this study, in 1979, 1990, and 1990 for the Heihe, Hailun, and Gongzhuling experiments,respectively. These samples were analyzed to determine the basic physical and chemical properties.

    2.4. Calculation of C sequestration rate and C sequestration efficiency

    SOC stock (Mg ha–1) was calculated using the following equation:

    ?

    Where, C is SOC content (g kg–1), BD is soil bulk density (g cm–3), anddis soil depth(m). In this study, we only calculated SOC stocks for the top layer of soil (0–20 cm).

    The annual SOC changes (DSOC, Mg C ha–1yr–1) were calculated using the following equation:

    全區(qū)櫻桃產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的專業(yè)化、專職化的人才團(tuán)隊(duì)十分匱乏,嚴(yán)重制約烏當(dāng)櫻桃產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展壯大。在全區(qū)各政府部門中,農(nóng)業(yè)局負(fù)責(zé)統(tǒng)籌全區(qū)櫻桃全產(chǎn)鏈發(fā)展,專業(yè)、專職農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)推廣人才團(tuán)隊(duì)成員約5名,在數(shù)量和專業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)上都遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不能滿足發(fā)展好3.6萬余畝櫻桃種植基地及中下游產(chǎn)業(yè)的需求。烏當(dāng)櫻桃產(chǎn)業(yè)正面臨著很多技術(shù)瓶頸,特別是在病蟲害防治方面,如下壩鎮(zhèn)出現(xiàn)櫻桃根癌病、流膠病、病毒病及果實(shí)褐腐病等,造成櫻桃樹勢衰退和減產(chǎn),嚴(yán)重時(shí)成片死亡,而現(xiàn)有人員的技術(shù)能力難以有效解決這一問題。

    Where, SOCTand SOC0represent the SOC stock at the end and beginning of a year, respectively, andtis the duration of the experiment in years.

    The relative changes of SOC stock are represented as SOCNPKS(or SOCNPK) minus SOCCK, and the relative contribution (RC) of straw return to the soil was calculated using the following equation:

    The carbon sequestration rate (CSR, Mg C ha–1yr–1) was calculated using the following equation:

    Where, DSOCTand DSOC0represent the respective annual change in the SOC stock of a particular treatment (CK, NPK, or NPKS). DSOCTdescribes the DSOC aftertyears of experiments whereas DSOC0represents the DSOC at the beginning of a year.

    The carbon sequestration efficiency (CSE) for each paired-trial was calculated as follows:

    Where, SOCNPKis the SOC stock of the NPK treatment, SOCNPKSis the SOC stock of the NPKS treatment, and TSC is the total straw C input (Mg C ha–1) over the duration of the experiment.

    2.5. Statistical analyses

    Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons were performed in SAS (ver.8.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to identify between treatment differences in SOC sequestration, carbon sequestration rate, and/or straw-C sequestration efficiency of the topsoil. If the ANOVA results were significant, further comparisons using leastsquares differences were conducted in SAS. A correlation analysis was carried out in SPSS (ver. 17.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) to examine how different treatments affected various factors, e.g., soil C/N ratio, initial SOC (ISOC), available phosphorus (AP),pH, the cumulative straw-C input (SC), SC/ISOC ratio, the SC/SMBC (soil microbial biomass carbon) ratio, and cultivation year, and to construct the soil organic carbon sequestration property matrix.

    3. Results

    3.1. Changes in the SOC stock under straw return

    The SOC stock of CK treatment plots at the three sites decreased throughout the entire long-term experiment period (Fig. 3). In this study, the SOC stocks of NPKS treatment plots varied between 31.7 and 58.3 Mg ha–1. When compared to the CK treatment plots, the SOC stock of NPKS treatment plots increased, on average, by 11.7% (Heihe site), 3.0% (Hailun site), and 7.0% (Gongzhuling site), respectively. The SOC stocks of NPKS plots were 4.0 and 5.7% higher than those of the NPK plots at the Hailun and Heihe sites, respectively. However, the straw return, when compared with the NPK treatment, did not significantly affect the SOC stock at the Gongzhuling site. These results demonstrate that long-term NPKS treatment maintained, and sometimes increased SOC, while long-term NPK treatment maintained (or slightly decreased) SOC compared with the original SOC stock. On the other hand, a lack of fertilization (CK treatment) tended to decrease SOC stocks.

    The DSOC values for the fertilization treatments were≥0, while the CK treatment showed negative DSOC values(Fig. 4). The DSOC values ranged from –1.65 to 6.60 Mg C ha–1, with an average of –0.05 Mg C ha–1. The DSOC values for the three treatments at the Heihe and Hailun sites were ranked as NPKS>NPK>CK, while an equilibrium state between the three treatments was observed at Gongzhuling.At the Heihe site, the DSOC values for the NPKS and NPK treatments were 102.0 and 41.8% higher, respectively, than the DSOC value for the CK treatment. Both of the fertilization treatments significantly increased DSOC compared to the CK treatment (P<0.05). In addition, both fertilization treatments at the Hailun site, when compared to the CK treatment,significantly increased DSOC (P<0.05). The initial DSOC value for the NPK treatment was higher than that for the NPKS treatment. However, the NPK treatment showed a five-fold decrease in DSOC over 5 years at the Gongzhuling site. In contrast, the DSOC value for the NPKS treatment remained stable over the course of the experiment.

    Table 2 Fertilizer inputs for each treatment

    Fig. 2 Changes in straw-C inputs and reclamation years at three experimental sites in Northeast China.

    3.2. Soil carbon sequestration rate in response to straw return

    As expected, straw return primarily enhanced CSR at the Heihe site, relative to the Gongzhuling and Hailun sites(Fig. 5). The CSR value decreased over time at the Heihe site. In addition, straw return had a significant effect on CSR at the Heihe site (F=6.28,P=0.02); CSR ranged from 0.24 to 1.50 Mg C ha–1yr–1, compared with 0.15–0.50 Mg C ha–1yr–1for NPK. The Hailun site also showed a decreasing trend in CSR over time. However, at this site, both fertilization regimes yielded similar CSR values ((0.32±0.23) Mg C ha–1yr–1) (Fig. 5-C). At the Gongzhuling site, the NPK treatment resulted in a significantly higher CSR value ((0.84±1.08)Mg C ha–1yr–1,F=7.8,P<0.05) than the NPKS treatment((0.11±0.24) Mg C ha–1yr–1) (Fig. 5-D). Regression analysis results showed that the CSR for the NPKS treatments equated to cultivation times of 17, 11, and 8 years at the Heihe, Hailun and Gongzhuling sites, respectively. This result indicates that the CSR of the black soils in northeastern China is close to a stable equilibrium state.

    Fig. 3 Soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks for different fertilization treatments, as well as initial condition, at the three sites over the whole experimental period. CK, no fertilizer application;NPK, inorganic fertilization N, P and K; NPKS, NPK plus straw return. The results are presented as mean values with standard deviations (Heihe, n=11; Hailun, n=16; Gongzhuling,n=19). Mean values with different letters represent statistically significant differences (P<0.05).

    3.3. Straw-C sequestration efficiency

    The CSE calculated for the Heihe site (46.8%) was significantly higher than the calculated values for the Hailun(13.3%) and Gongzhuling (–1.6%) sites (P<0.01) (Fig. 6-A).The CSE ranged from –22.1 to 97.1% over 1–33 years. On average, (15.3±27.8)% of the straw-C input was converted to SOC. In addition, the CSE at the Heihe and Hailun sites decreased exponentially as cultivation increased, appearing to attain equilibrium at the end of the experiments (Fig. 6-B).The CSE at the Gongzhuling site, on the other hand,consistently remained in a steady state. The regression analyses for the Hailun and Heihe sites show that after a continual decline for 13 and 17 years respectively, the CSE remained stable at 1.0–6.0% and 15.6–38.8%, respectively.At the Gongzhuling site, CSE remained at approximately 0% over 18 years.

    Fig. 4 Annual soil organic carbon (DSOC) changes for different fertilization treatments. CK, no fertilizer application; NPK,inorganic fertilization N, P and K; NPKS, NPK plus straw return;HH, Heihe site; HL, Hailun site; GZL, Gongzhuling site.

    4. Discussion

    4.1. lmpact of straw return on the SOC stock

    Fig. 5 Soil carbon sequestration rate (CSR) under different fertilization treatments. A, all three experiment sites. Box-and-whisker diagrams show the median, 5th, 25th, 75th and 95th percentiles for CSR. The solid lines represent median values and the short dashed lines represent mean values. B, Heihe site. C, Hailun site. D, Gongzhuling site.

    Fig. 6 Straw-C sequestration efficiency (CSE) in the treatment with straw. A, the range of CSE at different sites. Box-and-whisker diagrams show the median, 5th, 25th, 75th and 95th percentiles for CSE. The solid lines represent median values and the short dashed lines represent mean values. B, variation with cultivation year of CSE at three sites. All, three experiment sites; HH, Heihe site; HL, Hailun site; GZL, Gongzhuling site.

    Our experiments showed that the application of fertilizer(NPK and NPKS treatments), when compared to the CK treatment, led to higher SOC stocks in absolute terms(Fig. 7) Straw return at the high SOC density site (Heihe)was an exception, as SOC rapidly increased during the earlier stages of the experiment only to decline in the later stages. Although the SOC stocks at the Hailun site only changed slightly and gradually increased at the Gongzhuling site (Fig. 8), straw-C input has been shown to be more effective than NPK and CK treatments in driving microbial activity (Majumder and Kuzyakov 2010; Bastidaet al.2013). This difference may stem from the shorter history of reclamation, lower straw-C input, and higher SOC density at the Heihe site relative to the other two sites(Figs. 2 and 7) (Lehtinenet al.2014; Lu 2015; Poeplauet al.2015). At Heihe, the SOC stock could continue to decrease for 50 years under natural conditions (Yuet al.2006). Furthermore, the SOC increase could probably be related to an increase of the C input (Duiker and Lal 1999;Panet al.2003; Wiesmeieret al.2015); in Hailun and Heihe,stagnating C inputs over time led to a constant SOC level(Hailun) or even a decline of SOC (Heihe). This is in line with our results that stagnating C inputs in agricultural soils led to SOC decreases over longer periods. On the other hand, temperature increases and low precipitation caused by climate change will result in intensified decomposition of native SOC (Wiesmeieret al.2016). The effects of straw return on improving SOC at the Heihe and Hailun sites were not evident, probably due to the increasing temperature over the experimental period (Fig. 9).

    It is worth emphasizing that straw return increased SOC stocks in this region by either 6% (when compared to fertilized plots) or 12% (when compared to unfertilized plots)(Fig. 7-B). Interestingly, straw return increased SOC stocks by 5.7% in Northeast China, a result that was lower than previously reported values for upland soils in China (9.9%),Europe (7%), and North America (10.8%) (Powlsonet al.2011; Lehtinenet al.2014; Wanget al.2015a). Overall,straw return had a relatively weak effect on the SOC stocks in Northeast China.

    Fig. 7 Average relative changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks for two different fertilization management practices over the experimental period. A, all three experiment sites. B, Heihe. C, Hailun. D, Gongzhuling. NPK, inorganic fertilization N, P and K;NPKS, NPK plus straw return; ?NPKS, NPKS minus NPK. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at P<0.05.Box-and-whisker diagrams show the median, 5th, 25th, 75th and 95th percentiles for relative change in SOC stocks. The solid lines represent median values and the short dashed lines represent mean values.

    Fig. 8 Soil organic carbon (SOC) stock dynamics under straw return in the black soils at the three long-term experimental sites.A, Heihe. B, Hailun. C, Gongzhuling.

    4.2. Factors regulating straw-C sequestration efficiency

    Our findings show that the average for all sites straw-C sequestration efficiency was 15.3% over the experimental duration of 33 years (Fig. 6). This CSE value is in agreement with a previously reported average CSE (15.9%) value for the upland area of northern China (Zhanget al.2010), but lower than the CSE (30%) value reported for upland India by Srinivasaraoet al.(2012). In contrast, the CSE value for wheat and maize crops has been reported to be only 7.6%in the USA (Konget al.2005). The differences in straw-C sequestration efficiency are mainly related to soil fertility,climate, and cultivation (Luoet al.2010; Ouyanget al.2013).The CSE value for Northeast China was correlated with soil C/N, available P, pH, reclamation year, SC/SOC, SC/SMBC, mean annual temperature, and annual precipitation(Tables 3 and 4).

    Microbial communities differ based on climatic conditions,with the climate in Northeast China potentially affecting the structure of the microbial community, which can influence the rate of straw decomposition (Sun Bet al.2013). Straw addition clearly improved the carbon content and CSE in the northern region (Heihe), and this result was probably due to this site having a shorter cultivation history (Fig. 2),higher SOC content, and lower inputs of C relative to the other studied sites.

    Our data indicated that the CSE value was significantly higher at the Heihe site (46.8%) than at the Hailun (13.3%)or Gongzhuling (?1.6%) sites (P<0.01). Soil carbon sequestration may be restricted by certain aspects of initial soil quality associated with low inputs of C, such as initial SOC content, pH, or the total carbon and nitrogen ratios(Wanget al.2015b). Despite corroborating Wangetal.(2015b) that reported a significant correlation between changes in SOC and the amount of C input, a comparison of data from different experimental sites suggests that the continuous maize system in Gongzhuling is less efficient at sequestering C from added C inputs than systems that include wheat and/or soybean. Gongzhuling had the lowest CSE value of all three sites, a finding that is likely a consequence of a long history of reclamation (Fig. 2), and the high input of C (straw mulch at Gongzhuling site) coupled with low SOC density. However, straw return can accelerate the turnover rate of native soil organic carbon and introduce large amounts of labile C, such as microbial biomass carbon(Jenkinsonet al.1985; Kuzyakovet al.2000; Blagodatskaya and Kuzyakov 2008) and water-soluble organic carbon(WSOC) (Guenetet al.2012; Zhanget al.2012; Kirkbyet al.2014; Anet al.2015). Previous research in Gongzhuling has shown that NPKS treatment, when compared to CK treatment, increased WSOC content by 40.1% (Zhenget al.2006; Liang Yet al.2011). Furthermore, Pang and Huang(2006) showed that straw mulch can significantly improve SOC content at the soil surface, but can also impede straw decomposition and the accumulation of SOC.

    Fig. 9 Mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation at three experimental sites in our studied regions.

    4.3. How to improve long-term straw-C sequestration with straw return in black soil

    Our results showed that the equilibrium value of CSR equated to cultivation times of 17, 11, and 8 years for the NPKS treatment at the Heihe, Hailun, and Gongzhuling sites, respectively. These relatively short time could cause apparent new equilibrium states, which could be related to the C saturation status of the investigated soils (Wiesmeieret al.2014). Significantly positive linear correlations between SOC stocks for the NPKM treatment at the three sites and experiment duration (Fig. 10) indicated that the black soil was not saturated in C sequestration. Moreover,a significant increase in SOC stock at Hailun was also observed with higher organic manure input after 10 years(Dinget al.2014). The degree of increase in SOC was lower in the NPKS treatment compared to the NPKM treatment in our study area and did not reach the saturation level; this result was explained by different net carbon production rates(accumulation of straw derived SOC and decomposition of old C) with straw return. After the SOC equilibrium, CSE cannot improve further. Interestingly, when the relationships among CSE and soil properties, climatic factors, amount of straw returned, and the cropping system are investigated(Tables 3 and 4), CSE has the strongest correlation with SMBC and soil availability. However, the most effective way to translate straw return into soil C sequestration still remains unclear.

    Previous studies have found that the major limiting factors of increasing SOC under straw return conditions include tillage, fertilization practices, and cropping system(Liang A Zet al.2011; Mathieuet al.2015). For example,the application of organic manure may stimulate the decomposition of added straw-C due to increased microbial biomass (Kuzyakow 2010). In addition, a laboratory experiment (25°C incubation over 95 days) by Aitaet al.(2012), in which both manure and straw were added to thesystem, found that the mineralization of straw-C accelerated by 24% over 95 days compared to a treatment in which only straw was added. This resulted in higher SOC stock and positive effects for soil fertility. Similarly, Zhanget al.(2017)observed an increase in SOC variables after coupling the long-term application of nitrogen fertilizer with straw return.These findings suggest that the optimized fertilization with straw return leads to higher SOC content.

    Table 3 Correlation coefficients between straw-C sequestration efficiency (CSE) and soil factors in Northeast China1)

    Table 4 Correlation coefficients between straw-C sequestration efficiency (CSE), cultivation years and climatic factors1)

    Fig. 10 Soil organic carbon (SOC) stock dynamics under the N, P, K fertilizer in combination with manure (NPKM) treatment in the black soils at the three long-term experimental sites.

    It is also important to consider cultivation modes that may affect straw-C sequestration. The combination of no-tillage and straw mulching resulted in a loss of straw-C,as the straw was left on the soil surface (Luet al.2009).According to a meta-analysis, a no-tillage approach had a 9% advantage over chopped straw in straw return situations,which increased to 12% with plough tillage, and to 16%with rotary tillage (Lu 2015). These increases occurred because straw buried in deep soil layers is favorable for straw-C sequestration (Caiet al.2015). Reasonable crop rotation (e.g., rotated soybean) can also improve the decomposition and transformation of straw-C returned to soil, as this could provide the nitrogen necessary for microorganism activity (Liu Set al.2014).

    Overall, reasonable agronomic management practices,such as ploughing and rotary tillage, crop rotation, and optimized fertilization, have a significant effect on straw-C sequestration, but their long-term effects should be further investigated in future studies.

    5. Conclusion

    The results from our study indicate that the SOC stocks of black soil in the southern region of Northeast China were approximately at a stable equilibrium state, whereas the SOC stocks continued to decrease in the northern region. Furthermore, the rate of change of SOC stocks was directly related to the initial SOC density. Straw return and fertilization enhanced soil carbon sequestration in the northern and high latitude regions that were characterized by high SOC density, but the input of straw maintained the SOC stocks at a stable state in the southern region.However, a longer period of straw return would result in a very low or even negative CSE after which SOC would not increase further. Additional variables, such as reasonable agronomic management practices, i.e., tillage, rotation, and optimized fertilization, should be considered if the objective is a long-term improvement in the straw-C sequestration in black soil.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2013CB127404)and the Collaborative Innovation Action of Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. We are grateful to the staff that worked on the project, and contributed to the field management of the long-term experiments.

    An T, Schaeffer S, Zhuang J, Radosevich M, Li S, Li H, Pei J, Wang J. 2015. Dynamics and distribution of13C-labeled straw carbon by microorganisms as affected by soil fertility levels in the Black Soil region of Northeast China.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 51, 605–613.

    Bastida F, Torres I F, Hernández T, Bombach P, Richnow H H, García C. 2013. Can the labile carbon contribute to carbon immobilization in semiarid soils? Priming effects and microbial community dynamics.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 57, 892–902.

    Bremner J M, Mulvaney C S. 1982. Nitrogen-total. In: Page L A, Milley R H, Keeney D R, eds.,Methods of Soil Analysis.American Society of Agronomy, Madison. pp. 595–642.

    Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y. 2008. Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: Critical review.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45, 115–131.

    Cai M, Dong Y J, Chen Z J, Kalbitz K, Zhou J B. 2015. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the composition of maize roots and their decomposition at different soil depths.European Journal of Soil Biology, 69, 43–50.

    Ding X, Yuan Y, Liang Y, Li L, Han X. 2014. Impact of long-term application of manure, crop residue, and mineral fertilizer on organic carbon pools and crop yields in a Mollisol.Journal of Soils and Sediments, 14, 854–859.

    Dou X, He P, Zhu P, Zhou W. 2016. Soil organic carbon dynamics under long-term fertilization in a black soil of China: Evidence from stable C isotopes.Scientific Reports,6, 21488.

    Duiker S W, Lal R. 1999. Crop residue and tillage effects on carbon sequestration in a Luvisol in central Ohio.Soil and Tillage Research, 52, 73–81.

    Fan M, Lal R, Gao J, Qiao L, Su Y, RF J, Zhang F. 2013.Plant-based assessment of inherent soil productivity and contributions to China’s cereal crop yield increase since 1980.PLOS ONE, 8, 1–11.

    Guenet B, Juarez S, Bardoux G, Abbadie L, Chenu C. 2012.Evidence that stable C is as vulnerable to priming effect as is more labile C in soil.Soil Biology and Biochemistry,52, 43–48.

    Jenkinson D S, Fox R H, Rayner J H. 1985. Interactions between fertilizer nitrogen and soil nitrogen - the so-called‘priming’ effect.Journal of Soil Science, 36, 425–444.

    Keesstra S D, Bouma J, Wallinga J, Tittonell P, Smith P,Cerdà A, Montanarella L, Quinton J N, Pachepsky Y,van der Putten W H, Bardgett R D, Moolenaar S, Mol G,Jansen B, Fresco L O. 2016. The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.Soil, 2, 111–128.

    Kirkby C A, Richardson A E, Wade L J, Passioura J B, Batten G D, Blanchard C, Kirkegaard J A. 2014. Nutrient availability limits carbon sequestration in arable soils.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 68, 402–409.

    Kong A Y Y, Six J, Bryant D C, Denison R F, van Kessel C.2005. The relationship between carbon input, aggregation,and soil organic carbon stabilization in sustainable cropping systems.Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 1078.

    Kuzyakov Y, Friedel J K, Stahr K. 2000. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32, 1485–1498.

    Kuzyakov Y. 2010. Priming effects: interactions between living and dead organic matter.Soil Biology and Biochemistry,42, 1363–1371.

    Lehtinen T, Schlatter N, Baumgarten A, Bechini L, Krüger J,Grignani C, Zavattaro L, Costamagna C, Spiegel H. 2014.Effect of crop residue incorporation on soil organic carbon and greenhouse gas emissions in European agricultural soils.Soil Use Manage, 30, 524–538.

    Liang A Z, Zhang X P, Yang X M, Fang H J, Shen Y, Li W F.2011. Distribution of soil organic carbon and its loss in black soils in Northeast China.Chinese Journal of Soil Science,39, 533–538. (in Chinese)

    Liang Y, Han X, Song C, Li H. 2011. Impacts of returning organic materials on soil labile organic carbon fractions redistribution of Mollisol in Northeast China.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 44, 3565–3574. (in Chinese)

    Liu C, Lu M, Cui J, Li B, Fang C. 2014. Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: A metaanalysis.Global Change Biology, 20, 1366–1381.

    Liu S, Jia S, Zhang X, Chen X, Zhang S, Sun B, Chen S, Dou Y. 2014. Effects of corn and soybean residues return on microbial biomass and respiration in a black soil.Soil and Crop, 3, 105–111. (in Chinese)

    Liu X, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Sui Y, Zhang S, Herbert S, Ding G. 2010. Soil degradation: A problem threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in Northeast China.Plant Soil Environment, 56, 87–97.

    Lou Y, Xu M, Wang W, Sun X, Zhao K. 2011. Return rate of straw residue affects soil organic C sequestration by chemical fertilization.Soil Tillage Research, 113, 70–73.

    Lu F. 2015. How can straw incorporation management impact on soil carbon storage? A meta-analysis.Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20, 1545–1568.

    Lu F, Wang X, Han B, Ouyang Z, Duan X, Zheng H, Miao H. 2009. Soil carbon sequestrations by nitrogen fertilizer application, straw return and no-tillage in China’s cropland.Global Change Biology, 15, 281–305.

    Luo Z, Wang E, Sun O J. 2010. Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments.Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment, 139,224–231.

    Majumder B, Kuzyakov Y. 2010. Effect of fertilization on decomposition of14C labelled plant residues and their incorporation into soil aggregates.Soil Tillage Research,109, 94–102.

    Mathieu J A, Hatte C, Balesdent J, Parent E. 2015. Deep soil carbon dynamics are driven more by soil type than by climate: A worldwide meta-analysis of radiocarbon profiles.Global Change Biology, 21, 4278–4292.

    Nelson D W, Sommers L E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon,and organic matter. In:Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, USA. pp. 961–1010.

    Ouyang W, Qi S, Hao F, Wang X, Shan Y, Chen S. 2013. Impact of crop patterns and cultivation on carbon sequestration and global warming potential in an agricultural freeze zone.Ecological Modelling, 252, 228–237.

    Pan G, Li L, Wu L, Zheng X. 2003. Storage and sequestratio potential of topsoil organic carbon in China’s paddy soils.Global Change Biology, 10, 79–92.

    Pang L, Huang G B. 2006. Impact of different tillage method on changing of soil organic carbon in semi-arid area.Soil and Water Conservation, 20, 110–113.

    Piper C S. 1966.Soil and Plant Analysis. Inter Science Publishers, New York.

    Pittelkow C M, Liang X, Linquist B A, van Groenigen K J, Lee J,Lundy M E, van Gestel N, Six J, Venterea R T, van Kessel C. 2015. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture.Nature, 517, 365–368.

    Poeplau C, K?tterer T, Bolinder M A, B?rjesson G, Berti A,Lugato E. 2015. Low stabilization of aboveground crop residue carbon in sandy soils of Swedish long-term experiments.Geoderma, 237, 246–255.

    Powlson D S, Glendining M J, Coleman K, Whitmore A P.2011. Implications for soil properties of removing cereal straw: Results from long-term studies.Agronomy Journal,103, 279.

    Van Reeuwijk L P. 2002.Procedures for Soil Analysis. 6th ed. International Soil Reference and Information Centre,Wageningen.

    Song Z W, Zhu P, Gao H J, Peng C, Deng A X, Zheng C Y, Mannaf M A, Islam M N, Zhang W J. 2014. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil organic carbon content and aggregate composition under continuous maize cropping in Northeast China.Journal of Agricultural Science, 153,236–244.

    Srinivasarao C, Deshpande A N, Venkateswarlu B, Lal R,Singh A K, Kundu S, Vittal K P R, Mishra P K, Prasad J V N S, Mandal U K, Sharma K L. 2012. Grain yield and carbon sequestration potential of post monsoon sorghum cultivation in Vertisols in the semi arid tropics of central India.Geoderma, 175, 90–97.

    Sun B, Wang X Y, Wang F, Jiang Y J, Zhang Y X. 2013.Assessing the relative effects of geographic location and soil type on microbial communities associated with straw decomposition.Applied and Environmental Microbiology,79, 3327–3335.

    Sun Y, Huang S, Yu X, Zhang W. 2013. Stability and saturation of soil organic carbon in rice fields: Evidence from a longterm fertilization experiment in subtropical China.Journalof Soils and Sediments, 13, 1327–1334.

    Wang J, Wang X, Xu M, Feng G, Zhang W, Lu C A. 2015a.Crop yield and soil organic matter after long-term straw return to soil in China.Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,102, 371–381.

    Wang J, Wang X, Xu M, Feng G, Zhang W, Yang X, Huang S.2015b. Contributions of wheat and maize residues to soil organic carbon under long-term rotation in north China.Scientific Reports, 5, 11409.

    Wang L, Qiu J, Tang H, Li H, Li C, Van Ranst E. 2008. Modelling soil organic carbon dynamics in the major agricultural regions of China.Geoderma, 147, 47–55.

    Wiesmeier M, Hübner R, K?gel-Knabner I. 2015. Stagnating crop yields: An over looked risk for the carbon balance of agricultural soils.Science of the Total Environment, 536,1045–1051.

    Wiesmeier M, Hübner R, Sp?rlein P, Geuss U, Hangen E,Reischl A, Schilling B, vov Lützow M, K?gel-Knabner I.2014. Carbon sequestration potential of soils in southeast Germay derived from stable soil organic carbon saturation.Global Chang Biology, 20, 653–665.

    Wiesmeier M, Poeplau C, Sierra C A, Maier H, Frühauf C,Hübner R, Kühnel A, Sp?rlein P, Geuss U, Hangen E,Schilling B, von Lützow M, K?gel-Knabner I. 2016. Projected loss of soil organic carbon in temperate agricultural soils in the 21st century: Effects of climate change and carbon input trends.Scientific Reports, 6, 1–17.

    Yan D, Wang D, Yang L. 2007. Long-term effect of chemical fertilizer, straw, and manure on labile organic matter fractions in a paddy soil.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 44,93–101.

    Yu G, Fang H, Gao L, Zhang W. 2006. Soil organic carbon budget and fertility variation of black soils in Northeast China.Ecological Research, 21, 855–867.

    Zhang J, Hu K, Li K, Zheng C, Li B. 2017. Simulating the effects of long-term discontinuous and continuous fertilization with straw return on crop yields and soil organic carbon dynamics using the DNDC model.Soil Tillage Research,165, 302–314.

    Zhang W, Wang X, Xu M, Huang S, Liu H, Peng C. 2010. soil organic carbon dynamics under long-term fertilizations in arable land of northern China.Biogeosciences, 7, 409–425.

    Zhang W, Xu M, Wang X, Huang Q, Nie J, Li Z, Li S, Hwang S W, Lee K B. 2012. Effects of organic amendments on soil carbon sequestration in paddy fields of subtropical China.Journal of Soils and Sediments, 12, 457–470.

    Zhang X, Sui Y, Song C. 2013. Degradation process of arable Mollisols.Soil Crop, 2, 1–6.

    Zheng L, Xie H, Zhang W, Zhang X. 2006. Effects of different ways of returning straw to the soils on soluble organic carbon.Ecological Research, 15, 80–83.

    猜你喜歡
    癌病流膠病櫻桃樹
    淺析黃瓜流膠病害與細(xì)菌性流膠病
    櫻桃樹屋
    櫻桃樹上的座位
    趣味(語文)(2021年4期)2021-08-05 07:52:04
    藍(lán)莓根癌病的發(fā)生與防治
    煙臺果樹(2021年3期)2021-07-21 10:34:42
    大棚櫻桃樹冬季修剪要點(diǎn)
    櫻桃引種過程中根癌病的發(fā)生情況調(diào)查
    河北果樹(2020年4期)2020-11-26 06:05:06
    武漢地區(qū)不同桃品種流膠病情況調(diào)查與評價(jià)
    落葉果樹(2020年5期)2020-10-22 07:32:12
    “櫻桃樹是我砍的”
    保護(hù)地黃瓜細(xì)菌性流膠病發(fā)生原因及防治對策
    甜櫻桃流膠病研究綜述
    煙臺果樹(2015年3期)2015-12-10 07:46:54
    欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 99香蕉大伊视频| 久久草成人影院| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 成年动漫av网址| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产在线观看jvid| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 999精品在线视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 91麻豆av在线| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 中文字幕制服av| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲三区欧美一区| av天堂久久9| 69av精品久久久久久| 天天影视国产精品| 精品国产亚洲在线| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 69av精品久久久久久| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 人人澡人人妻人| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产精品久久视频播放| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 黄色成人免费大全| 热re99久久国产66热| 成人三级做爰电影| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产av又大| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 色在线成人网| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 香蕉丝袜av| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片 | 女人被狂操c到高潮| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 久久国产精品影院| 怎么达到女性高潮| 校园春色视频在线观看| 久久性视频一级片| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 日本五十路高清| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| cao死你这个sao货| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲全国av大片| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 嫩草影视91久久| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 丁香六月欧美| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 免费av中文字幕在线| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产精品成人在线| 日韩有码中文字幕| 成人影院久久| 手机成人av网站| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲精品在线美女| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院 | 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 午夜免费鲁丝| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产精品免费大片| 久久久久视频综合| 日本wwww免费看| 女警被强在线播放| 成人手机av| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 超碰97精品在线观看| netflix在线观看网站| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 久久这里只有精品19| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| tocl精华| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 精品国产国语对白av| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 看免费av毛片| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | av不卡在线播放| 久久热在线av| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 久久中文字幕一级| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲人成电影观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 香蕉国产在线看| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 超色免费av| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 日日夜夜操网爽| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 免费在线观看日本一区| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久人妻av系列| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| svipshipincom国产片| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产99白浆流出| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片 | 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产精华一区二区三区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久青草综合色| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产成人精品在线电影| 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 超碰成人久久| 精品亚洲成国产av| 久久久精品区二区三区| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产精品久久视频播放| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产免费男女视频| 亚洲片人在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 中国美女看黄片| 免费不卡黄色视频| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| av免费在线观看网站| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| a级毛片黄视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 久久青草综合色| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 91av网站免费观看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产成人精品无人区| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 国产在线观看jvid| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 在线av久久热| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 1024香蕉在线观看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品二区激情视频| 超色免费av| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 欧美日韩精品网址| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 精品久久久精品久久久| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 成在线人永久免费视频| 18在线观看网站| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 欧美日韩黄片免| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 久久久国产成人免费| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产麻豆69| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 欧美日韩av久久| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产av又大| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美日韩黄片免| 大香蕉久久网| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产高清激情床上av| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 一级黄色大片毛片| 午夜91福利影院| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 搡老岳熟女国产| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲伊人色综图| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 成人三级做爰电影| 午夜两性在线视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 1024视频免费在线观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| aaaaa片日本免费| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 91老司机精品| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片 | www.精华液| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 中文欧美无线码| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 天天影视国产精品| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 国产成人av教育| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 91大片在线观看| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 精品电影一区二区在线| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲片人在线观看| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 精品国产国语对白av| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 黄色视频不卡| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲国产欧美网| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 久久人妻av系列| 免费看a级黄色片| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 不卡一级毛片| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 不卡一级毛片| av网站免费在线观看视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 人妻一区二区av| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 婷婷成人精品国产| 久久99一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| tube8黄色片| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 岛国在线观看网站| 午夜福利,免费看| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 国产精品成人在线| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 悠悠久久av| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| a级毛片在线看网站| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产av又大| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 在线天堂中文资源库| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 黄片小视频在线播放| 欧美色视频一区免费| 无限看片的www在线观看| www.999成人在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 不卡一级毛片| 免费观看人在逋| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 色综合婷婷激情| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 热99re8久久精品国产| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 9色porny在线观看| 精品人妻1区二区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产av精品麻豆| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 精品第一国产精品| 久久国产精品影院| 十八禁网站免费在线| 超色免费av| 精品高清国产在线一区| 欧美午夜高清在线| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 日韩欧美三级三区| 热99re8久久精品国产| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 亚洲精品在线美女| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 国产精品二区激情视频| svipshipincom国产片| 精品电影一区二区在线| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产成人av教育| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 午夜免费观看网址| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 99香蕉大伊视频| 午夜视频精品福利| 国产成人影院久久av| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 天天添夜夜摸| 丁香六月欧美| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 99国产精品99久久久久| 亚洲精品一二三| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 一级片免费观看大全| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产区一区二久久| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 捣出白浆h1v1| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| av国产精品久久久久影院| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 国产成人av教育| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类|