• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    The efficiency of long-term straw return to sequester organic carbon in Northeast China’s cropland

    2018-02-05 07:10:55WANGShichaoZHAOYawenWANGJinzhouZHUPingCUlXianHANXiaozengXUMinggangLUChangai
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年2期
    關(guān)鍵詞:癌病流膠病櫻桃樹

    WANG Shi-chao, ZHAO Ya-wen, WANG Jin-zhou, ZHU Ping, CUl Xian, HAN Xiao-zeng, XU Minggang, LU Chang-ai

    1 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory for Improving Quality of Arable Land, Beijing 100081, P.R.China

    2 Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130124, P.R.China

    3 Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Heihe 164300, P.R.China

    4 Northeast Institute of Geography and Agro-ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, P.R.China

    1. lntroduction

    Soil contains the largest carbon (C) pool of the global terrestrial ecosystem. The total soil organic carbon (SOC)pool is approximately 1 500 Pg C, which is three times that of the atmospheric carbon pool (Songet al.2014). Soil organic matter (SOM) not only plays a vital role in global carbon cycling, but also contributes considerably to improvements in soil quality, crop production, and terrestrial ecosystem health(Wanget al.2008; Luet al.2009). However, increasing SOM has become a major global problem (Fanet al.2013;Keesstraet al.2016). SOC dynamics are strongly influenced by agricultural management practices, such as fertilization,crop residue return, and tillage (Luet al.2009; Luoet al.2010; Louet al.2011; Ouyanget al.2013; Douet al.2016).

    It has recently been proposed that straw input can lead to SOC accumulation and improvements in soil structure(Luet al.2009; Liu Cet al.2014; Lu 2015; Wanget al.2015a). For example, Liu Cet al.(2014) found that straw return increased SOC by 12.8%, with a 42.0% increase in the active C fraction after 22 years. Previous research has also demonstrated that continuous straw return boosts SOC accumulation in early years, but that these effects decrease after a decade (Liu Cet al.2014; Wanget al.2015a).Specifically, Liu Cet al.(2014) reported that straw return enhanced SOC sequestration over the first three years, but that these effects were minimal in the experimental site after 15 years. However, opposing results have also been reported(Pittelkowet al.2015), which may be attributed to different environmental conditions, land management approaches,and soil types. Additional factors, such as straw-C input rate,number of cultivation years, initial SOC levels, and methods for straw disposal, are also critical in explaining why certain soil carbon pools react differently to straw return. Therefore,evaluating the changes in SOC under long-term cultivation would be beneficial for determining how land management practices influence soil and global carbon cycling.

    The black soil of Northeast China is one of the main crop production areas in the country, and provides a third of the country’s grain commodity. The black soil area covers 1.1×108ha, including arable land (2.4×107ha in Heilongjiang Province, 1.1×107ha in Jilin Province, 0.6×107ha in Liaoning Province, and 0.6×107ha in Inner Mongolia) that is characterized by black soil (Mollisols) which is rich in organic matter (Liang A Zet al.2011; Zhanget al.2013). The large amount of agricultural straw that is produced in this region every year is not fully utilized. Instead of being returned to the soil, the straw is usually used as livestock feed or to provide energy for heating (Douet al.2016). Hence, soil degradation,a result of the loss of SOC and nutrients, is a considerable challenge for sustainable cultivation in this region (Liuet al.2010), as intensive cultivation has reduced SOC by 50%over about 60 years of tillage (Yuet al.2006), with a loss of 0.5% each year (Liuet al.2010). Rather than being used to provide energy, the organic material of straw could be used to promote the SOC stock. Many studies have investigated how straw return affects soil fertility (Yanet al.2007; Sun Bet al.2013). However, the approach of using straw return to reverse SOC reduction faces some problems. For example,the extent we depend on straw return to improve SOC is unknown. Also, the short- and long-term effects of using straw return to improve SOC in the black soil region in China have not been assessed.

    Long-term experiments can provide reliable data for assessing and predicting the influence of straw return on SOC sequestration and soil fertility. There is currently minimal knowledge about the influence of different environmental conditions on the long-term effects of straw return (Dinget al.2014; Songet al.2014), and limited research has focused on black soils. In this study, we used long-term field experiments in Northeast China to study the influence of straw return on SOC. The objectives of this study were: 1) to analyze the SOC dynamics of longterm straw return; 2) to examine the relative contribution of straw return to SOC sequestration; and 3) to evaluate the sustainability of straw return for improving SOC and straw-C sequestration efficiency. We hypothesized that straw return could efficiently increase the SOC stock of the black soil region in Northeast China. However, we also expected clear differences among different regions in Northeast China.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Site description

    This study was conducted at three different sites in the Northeast China: Heihe (50°15′N, 127o27′E); Hailun(47°27′N, 126°55′E); and Gongzhuling (43°30′N, 124°48′E)(Fig. 1, Table 1). Three long-term straw return experiments with different fertilization treatments were initiated in 1979,1990, and 1990 for Heihe, Hailun, and Gongzhuling,respectively. Prior to the experiment, the field was under crop production for at least 60 years at Gongzhuling site, 110 years at Hailun site, or 150 years at Heihe site. The soil at all three sites originated from quaternary loess-like sediments.The study sites are characterized by a temperate sub-humid climate. The average annual precipitation is 528 mm, with most of the rainfall occurring from July to September. The frost-free period ranges from 105 days at the Heihe site to 140 days at the Gongzhuling site. Crop rotations include wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)/soybean (Glycine max(L.)Merrill.) at the Heihe site, wheat/maize (Zea maysL.)/soybean at the Hailun site, and a mono-cropping system with maize at the Gongzhuling site. Each year, spring wheat seeds are sown in strips in early April and harvested in mid-August. Soybean seeds are sown in holes in early May and harvested in late September. Maize seeds are sown in holes in early May and harvested in early October. The average annual temperature ranges from –0.5°C at Heihe to 4.5°C at Gongzhuling. Soil textures are clay loam, heavy loam, and loamy clay soil at Heihe, Hailun and Gongzhuling,respectively. The fine mineral contents were 33.4% (Heihe),34.5% (Hailun), and 31.1% (Gongzhuling). All sites had black soils, with initial SOC contents between 13.5–31.3 g kg–1, initial total nitrogen (TN) contents between 1.24–2.23 g kg–1, and soil pH values between 6.1–7.6 (Table 1).

    Fig. 1 Locations of the study sites in Northeast China.

    2.2. Experimental design and sampling

    Three treatments were implemented at each site: (1) no fertilization (CK); (2) inorganic fertilization N, P and K (NPK);and (3) NPK plus straw return (NPKS). The plots were arranged in a randomized block design, and each treatment was replicated three times. The plot sizes were 212 m2at Heihe, 224 m2at Hailun, and 400 m2at Gongzhuling.The chemical fertilizer and straw input rates are in Table 2.The applied chemical fertilizers included urea, calcium superphosphate, and potassium sulfate, with the exception that no potassium fertilizer was used at the Heihe site. The application rates of inorganic fertilizer for each growing season ranged from 37.5 to 245.3 kg N ha–1, 16.4 to 62 kg P ha–1, and 0 to 68.5 kg K ha–1(Table 2).

    The aboveground straw was removed from the CK and NPK treatments after each harvest (around October 10th).In the NPKS treatment, which included straw return, the aboveground straw was removed after each harvest and re-incorporated into the soil. At the Heihe and Hailun sites,wheat/maize/soybean organic material was returned by deep plowing, while at the Gongzhuling site maize straw was used for mulching material. The average annual rates of straw return were 3.0, 4.5, and 7.5 Mg ha–1(dry weight) at the Heihe, Hailun, and Gongzhuling sites, respectively. Straw was applied after cutting it into pieces of 5–15 cm length after harvesting. The amounts of C (straw-C and root-C) added to soil were 0.44–1.97 Mg ha–1at Heihe, 1.59–3.35 Mg ha–1at Hailun, and 4.4–5.9 Mg ha–1at Gongzhuling (Fig. 2).

    2.3. Soil analysis

    Surface soil samples (0–20 cm depth) were collected from each treatment plot after each harvest (around October 10th),after which they were air-dried and sieved through either a 1-mm mesh for pH and available P analyses or a 0.15-mm mesh for organic matter, total N, and total P analyses. Soil organic matter was determined by quantifying the oxidizable soil carbon in a heated dilution of K2Cr2O7subjected to a volumetric oxidation method (Nelson and Sommers 1996).Soil available P was measured using Olsen’s method (Van Reeuwijk 2002), while total nitrogen was measured using the micro-Kjeldahl digestion, distillation, and titration method(Bremner and Mulvaney 1982). All results were normalized to a dry mass basis. The soil bulk density (g cm–3) was determined by the core sampler method described by Piper(1966). We also collected soil samples from the 0–20 cm layer at the beginning of this study, in 1979, 1990, and 1990 for the Heihe, Hailun, and Gongzhuling experiments,respectively. These samples were analyzed to determine the basic physical and chemical properties.

    2.4. Calculation of C sequestration rate and C sequestration efficiency

    SOC stock (Mg ha–1) was calculated using the following equation:

    ?

    Where, C is SOC content (g kg–1), BD is soil bulk density (g cm–3), anddis soil depth(m). In this study, we only calculated SOC stocks for the top layer of soil (0–20 cm).

    The annual SOC changes (DSOC, Mg C ha–1yr–1) were calculated using the following equation:

    全區(qū)櫻桃產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的專業(yè)化、專職化的人才團(tuán)隊(duì)十分匱乏,嚴(yán)重制約烏當(dāng)櫻桃產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展壯大。在全區(qū)各政府部門中,農(nóng)業(yè)局負(fù)責(zé)統(tǒng)籌全區(qū)櫻桃全產(chǎn)鏈發(fā)展,專業(yè)、專職農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)推廣人才團(tuán)隊(duì)成員約5名,在數(shù)量和專業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)上都遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不能滿足發(fā)展好3.6萬余畝櫻桃種植基地及中下游產(chǎn)業(yè)的需求。烏當(dāng)櫻桃產(chǎn)業(yè)正面臨著很多技術(shù)瓶頸,特別是在病蟲害防治方面,如下壩鎮(zhèn)出現(xiàn)櫻桃根癌病、流膠病、病毒病及果實(shí)褐腐病等,造成櫻桃樹勢衰退和減產(chǎn),嚴(yán)重時(shí)成片死亡,而現(xiàn)有人員的技術(shù)能力難以有效解決這一問題。

    Where, SOCTand SOC0represent the SOC stock at the end and beginning of a year, respectively, andtis the duration of the experiment in years.

    The relative changes of SOC stock are represented as SOCNPKS(or SOCNPK) minus SOCCK, and the relative contribution (RC) of straw return to the soil was calculated using the following equation:

    The carbon sequestration rate (CSR, Mg C ha–1yr–1) was calculated using the following equation:

    Where, DSOCTand DSOC0represent the respective annual change in the SOC stock of a particular treatment (CK, NPK, or NPKS). DSOCTdescribes the DSOC aftertyears of experiments whereas DSOC0represents the DSOC at the beginning of a year.

    The carbon sequestration efficiency (CSE) for each paired-trial was calculated as follows:

    Where, SOCNPKis the SOC stock of the NPK treatment, SOCNPKSis the SOC stock of the NPKS treatment, and TSC is the total straw C input (Mg C ha–1) over the duration of the experiment.

    2.5. Statistical analyses

    Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons were performed in SAS (ver.8.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to identify between treatment differences in SOC sequestration, carbon sequestration rate, and/or straw-C sequestration efficiency of the topsoil. If the ANOVA results were significant, further comparisons using leastsquares differences were conducted in SAS. A correlation analysis was carried out in SPSS (ver. 17.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) to examine how different treatments affected various factors, e.g., soil C/N ratio, initial SOC (ISOC), available phosphorus (AP),pH, the cumulative straw-C input (SC), SC/ISOC ratio, the SC/SMBC (soil microbial biomass carbon) ratio, and cultivation year, and to construct the soil organic carbon sequestration property matrix.

    3. Results

    3.1. Changes in the SOC stock under straw return

    The SOC stock of CK treatment plots at the three sites decreased throughout the entire long-term experiment period (Fig. 3). In this study, the SOC stocks of NPKS treatment plots varied between 31.7 and 58.3 Mg ha–1. When compared to the CK treatment plots, the SOC stock of NPKS treatment plots increased, on average, by 11.7% (Heihe site), 3.0% (Hailun site), and 7.0% (Gongzhuling site), respectively. The SOC stocks of NPKS plots were 4.0 and 5.7% higher than those of the NPK plots at the Hailun and Heihe sites, respectively. However, the straw return, when compared with the NPK treatment, did not significantly affect the SOC stock at the Gongzhuling site. These results demonstrate that long-term NPKS treatment maintained, and sometimes increased SOC, while long-term NPK treatment maintained (or slightly decreased) SOC compared with the original SOC stock. On the other hand, a lack of fertilization (CK treatment) tended to decrease SOC stocks.

    The DSOC values for the fertilization treatments were≥0, while the CK treatment showed negative DSOC values(Fig. 4). The DSOC values ranged from –1.65 to 6.60 Mg C ha–1, with an average of –0.05 Mg C ha–1. The DSOC values for the three treatments at the Heihe and Hailun sites were ranked as NPKS>NPK>CK, while an equilibrium state between the three treatments was observed at Gongzhuling.At the Heihe site, the DSOC values for the NPKS and NPK treatments were 102.0 and 41.8% higher, respectively, than the DSOC value for the CK treatment. Both of the fertilization treatments significantly increased DSOC compared to the CK treatment (P<0.05). In addition, both fertilization treatments at the Hailun site, when compared to the CK treatment,significantly increased DSOC (P<0.05). The initial DSOC value for the NPK treatment was higher than that for the NPKS treatment. However, the NPK treatment showed a five-fold decrease in DSOC over 5 years at the Gongzhuling site. In contrast, the DSOC value for the NPKS treatment remained stable over the course of the experiment.

    Table 2 Fertilizer inputs for each treatment

    Fig. 2 Changes in straw-C inputs and reclamation years at three experimental sites in Northeast China.

    3.2. Soil carbon sequestration rate in response to straw return

    As expected, straw return primarily enhanced CSR at the Heihe site, relative to the Gongzhuling and Hailun sites(Fig. 5). The CSR value decreased over time at the Heihe site. In addition, straw return had a significant effect on CSR at the Heihe site (F=6.28,P=0.02); CSR ranged from 0.24 to 1.50 Mg C ha–1yr–1, compared with 0.15–0.50 Mg C ha–1yr–1for NPK. The Hailun site also showed a decreasing trend in CSR over time. However, at this site, both fertilization regimes yielded similar CSR values ((0.32±0.23) Mg C ha–1yr–1) (Fig. 5-C). At the Gongzhuling site, the NPK treatment resulted in a significantly higher CSR value ((0.84±1.08)Mg C ha–1yr–1,F=7.8,P<0.05) than the NPKS treatment((0.11±0.24) Mg C ha–1yr–1) (Fig. 5-D). Regression analysis results showed that the CSR for the NPKS treatments equated to cultivation times of 17, 11, and 8 years at the Heihe, Hailun and Gongzhuling sites, respectively. This result indicates that the CSR of the black soils in northeastern China is close to a stable equilibrium state.

    Fig. 3 Soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks for different fertilization treatments, as well as initial condition, at the three sites over the whole experimental period. CK, no fertilizer application;NPK, inorganic fertilization N, P and K; NPKS, NPK plus straw return. The results are presented as mean values with standard deviations (Heihe, n=11; Hailun, n=16; Gongzhuling,n=19). Mean values with different letters represent statistically significant differences (P<0.05).

    3.3. Straw-C sequestration efficiency

    The CSE calculated for the Heihe site (46.8%) was significantly higher than the calculated values for the Hailun(13.3%) and Gongzhuling (–1.6%) sites (P<0.01) (Fig. 6-A).The CSE ranged from –22.1 to 97.1% over 1–33 years. On average, (15.3±27.8)% of the straw-C input was converted to SOC. In addition, the CSE at the Heihe and Hailun sites decreased exponentially as cultivation increased, appearing to attain equilibrium at the end of the experiments (Fig. 6-B).The CSE at the Gongzhuling site, on the other hand,consistently remained in a steady state. The regression analyses for the Hailun and Heihe sites show that after a continual decline for 13 and 17 years respectively, the CSE remained stable at 1.0–6.0% and 15.6–38.8%, respectively.At the Gongzhuling site, CSE remained at approximately 0% over 18 years.

    Fig. 4 Annual soil organic carbon (DSOC) changes for different fertilization treatments. CK, no fertilizer application; NPK,inorganic fertilization N, P and K; NPKS, NPK plus straw return;HH, Heihe site; HL, Hailun site; GZL, Gongzhuling site.

    4. Discussion

    4.1. lmpact of straw return on the SOC stock

    Fig. 5 Soil carbon sequestration rate (CSR) under different fertilization treatments. A, all three experiment sites. Box-and-whisker diagrams show the median, 5th, 25th, 75th and 95th percentiles for CSR. The solid lines represent median values and the short dashed lines represent mean values. B, Heihe site. C, Hailun site. D, Gongzhuling site.

    Fig. 6 Straw-C sequestration efficiency (CSE) in the treatment with straw. A, the range of CSE at different sites. Box-and-whisker diagrams show the median, 5th, 25th, 75th and 95th percentiles for CSE. The solid lines represent median values and the short dashed lines represent mean values. B, variation with cultivation year of CSE at three sites. All, three experiment sites; HH, Heihe site; HL, Hailun site; GZL, Gongzhuling site.

    Our experiments showed that the application of fertilizer(NPK and NPKS treatments), when compared to the CK treatment, led to higher SOC stocks in absolute terms(Fig. 7) Straw return at the high SOC density site (Heihe)was an exception, as SOC rapidly increased during the earlier stages of the experiment only to decline in the later stages. Although the SOC stocks at the Hailun site only changed slightly and gradually increased at the Gongzhuling site (Fig. 8), straw-C input has been shown to be more effective than NPK and CK treatments in driving microbial activity (Majumder and Kuzyakov 2010; Bastidaet al.2013). This difference may stem from the shorter history of reclamation, lower straw-C input, and higher SOC density at the Heihe site relative to the other two sites(Figs. 2 and 7) (Lehtinenet al.2014; Lu 2015; Poeplauet al.2015). At Heihe, the SOC stock could continue to decrease for 50 years under natural conditions (Yuet al.2006). Furthermore, the SOC increase could probably be related to an increase of the C input (Duiker and Lal 1999;Panet al.2003; Wiesmeieret al.2015); in Hailun and Heihe,stagnating C inputs over time led to a constant SOC level(Hailun) or even a decline of SOC (Heihe). This is in line with our results that stagnating C inputs in agricultural soils led to SOC decreases over longer periods. On the other hand, temperature increases and low precipitation caused by climate change will result in intensified decomposition of native SOC (Wiesmeieret al.2016). The effects of straw return on improving SOC at the Heihe and Hailun sites were not evident, probably due to the increasing temperature over the experimental period (Fig. 9).

    It is worth emphasizing that straw return increased SOC stocks in this region by either 6% (when compared to fertilized plots) or 12% (when compared to unfertilized plots)(Fig. 7-B). Interestingly, straw return increased SOC stocks by 5.7% in Northeast China, a result that was lower than previously reported values for upland soils in China (9.9%),Europe (7%), and North America (10.8%) (Powlsonet al.2011; Lehtinenet al.2014; Wanget al.2015a). Overall,straw return had a relatively weak effect on the SOC stocks in Northeast China.

    Fig. 7 Average relative changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks for two different fertilization management practices over the experimental period. A, all three experiment sites. B, Heihe. C, Hailun. D, Gongzhuling. NPK, inorganic fertilization N, P and K;NPKS, NPK plus straw return; ?NPKS, NPKS minus NPK. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at P<0.05.Box-and-whisker diagrams show the median, 5th, 25th, 75th and 95th percentiles for relative change in SOC stocks. The solid lines represent median values and the short dashed lines represent mean values.

    Fig. 8 Soil organic carbon (SOC) stock dynamics under straw return in the black soils at the three long-term experimental sites.A, Heihe. B, Hailun. C, Gongzhuling.

    4.2. Factors regulating straw-C sequestration efficiency

    Our findings show that the average for all sites straw-C sequestration efficiency was 15.3% over the experimental duration of 33 years (Fig. 6). This CSE value is in agreement with a previously reported average CSE (15.9%) value for the upland area of northern China (Zhanget al.2010), but lower than the CSE (30%) value reported for upland India by Srinivasaraoet al.(2012). In contrast, the CSE value for wheat and maize crops has been reported to be only 7.6%in the USA (Konget al.2005). The differences in straw-C sequestration efficiency are mainly related to soil fertility,climate, and cultivation (Luoet al.2010; Ouyanget al.2013).The CSE value for Northeast China was correlated with soil C/N, available P, pH, reclamation year, SC/SOC, SC/SMBC, mean annual temperature, and annual precipitation(Tables 3 and 4).

    Microbial communities differ based on climatic conditions,with the climate in Northeast China potentially affecting the structure of the microbial community, which can influence the rate of straw decomposition (Sun Bet al.2013). Straw addition clearly improved the carbon content and CSE in the northern region (Heihe), and this result was probably due to this site having a shorter cultivation history (Fig. 2),higher SOC content, and lower inputs of C relative to the other studied sites.

    Our data indicated that the CSE value was significantly higher at the Heihe site (46.8%) than at the Hailun (13.3%)or Gongzhuling (?1.6%) sites (P<0.01). Soil carbon sequestration may be restricted by certain aspects of initial soil quality associated with low inputs of C, such as initial SOC content, pH, or the total carbon and nitrogen ratios(Wanget al.2015b). Despite corroborating Wangetal.(2015b) that reported a significant correlation between changes in SOC and the amount of C input, a comparison of data from different experimental sites suggests that the continuous maize system in Gongzhuling is less efficient at sequestering C from added C inputs than systems that include wheat and/or soybean. Gongzhuling had the lowest CSE value of all three sites, a finding that is likely a consequence of a long history of reclamation (Fig. 2), and the high input of C (straw mulch at Gongzhuling site) coupled with low SOC density. However, straw return can accelerate the turnover rate of native soil organic carbon and introduce large amounts of labile C, such as microbial biomass carbon(Jenkinsonet al.1985; Kuzyakovet al.2000; Blagodatskaya and Kuzyakov 2008) and water-soluble organic carbon(WSOC) (Guenetet al.2012; Zhanget al.2012; Kirkbyet al.2014; Anet al.2015). Previous research in Gongzhuling has shown that NPKS treatment, when compared to CK treatment, increased WSOC content by 40.1% (Zhenget al.2006; Liang Yet al.2011). Furthermore, Pang and Huang(2006) showed that straw mulch can significantly improve SOC content at the soil surface, but can also impede straw decomposition and the accumulation of SOC.

    Fig. 9 Mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation at three experimental sites in our studied regions.

    4.3. How to improve long-term straw-C sequestration with straw return in black soil

    Our results showed that the equilibrium value of CSR equated to cultivation times of 17, 11, and 8 years for the NPKS treatment at the Heihe, Hailun, and Gongzhuling sites, respectively. These relatively short time could cause apparent new equilibrium states, which could be related to the C saturation status of the investigated soils (Wiesmeieret al.2014). Significantly positive linear correlations between SOC stocks for the NPKM treatment at the three sites and experiment duration (Fig. 10) indicated that the black soil was not saturated in C sequestration. Moreover,a significant increase in SOC stock at Hailun was also observed with higher organic manure input after 10 years(Dinget al.2014). The degree of increase in SOC was lower in the NPKS treatment compared to the NPKM treatment in our study area and did not reach the saturation level; this result was explained by different net carbon production rates(accumulation of straw derived SOC and decomposition of old C) with straw return. After the SOC equilibrium, CSE cannot improve further. Interestingly, when the relationships among CSE and soil properties, climatic factors, amount of straw returned, and the cropping system are investigated(Tables 3 and 4), CSE has the strongest correlation with SMBC and soil availability. However, the most effective way to translate straw return into soil C sequestration still remains unclear.

    Previous studies have found that the major limiting factors of increasing SOC under straw return conditions include tillage, fertilization practices, and cropping system(Liang A Zet al.2011; Mathieuet al.2015). For example,the application of organic manure may stimulate the decomposition of added straw-C due to increased microbial biomass (Kuzyakow 2010). In addition, a laboratory experiment (25°C incubation over 95 days) by Aitaet al.(2012), in which both manure and straw were added to thesystem, found that the mineralization of straw-C accelerated by 24% over 95 days compared to a treatment in which only straw was added. This resulted in higher SOC stock and positive effects for soil fertility. Similarly, Zhanget al.(2017)observed an increase in SOC variables after coupling the long-term application of nitrogen fertilizer with straw return.These findings suggest that the optimized fertilization with straw return leads to higher SOC content.

    Table 3 Correlation coefficients between straw-C sequestration efficiency (CSE) and soil factors in Northeast China1)

    Table 4 Correlation coefficients between straw-C sequestration efficiency (CSE), cultivation years and climatic factors1)

    Fig. 10 Soil organic carbon (SOC) stock dynamics under the N, P, K fertilizer in combination with manure (NPKM) treatment in the black soils at the three long-term experimental sites.

    It is also important to consider cultivation modes that may affect straw-C sequestration. The combination of no-tillage and straw mulching resulted in a loss of straw-C,as the straw was left on the soil surface (Luet al.2009).According to a meta-analysis, a no-tillage approach had a 9% advantage over chopped straw in straw return situations,which increased to 12% with plough tillage, and to 16%with rotary tillage (Lu 2015). These increases occurred because straw buried in deep soil layers is favorable for straw-C sequestration (Caiet al.2015). Reasonable crop rotation (e.g., rotated soybean) can also improve the decomposition and transformation of straw-C returned to soil, as this could provide the nitrogen necessary for microorganism activity (Liu Set al.2014).

    Overall, reasonable agronomic management practices,such as ploughing and rotary tillage, crop rotation, and optimized fertilization, have a significant effect on straw-C sequestration, but their long-term effects should be further investigated in future studies.

    5. Conclusion

    The results from our study indicate that the SOC stocks of black soil in the southern region of Northeast China were approximately at a stable equilibrium state, whereas the SOC stocks continued to decrease in the northern region. Furthermore, the rate of change of SOC stocks was directly related to the initial SOC density. Straw return and fertilization enhanced soil carbon sequestration in the northern and high latitude regions that were characterized by high SOC density, but the input of straw maintained the SOC stocks at a stable state in the southern region.However, a longer period of straw return would result in a very low or even negative CSE after which SOC would not increase further. Additional variables, such as reasonable agronomic management practices, i.e., tillage, rotation, and optimized fertilization, should be considered if the objective is a long-term improvement in the straw-C sequestration in black soil.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2013CB127404)and the Collaborative Innovation Action of Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. We are grateful to the staff that worked on the project, and contributed to the field management of the long-term experiments.

    An T, Schaeffer S, Zhuang J, Radosevich M, Li S, Li H, Pei J, Wang J. 2015. Dynamics and distribution of13C-labeled straw carbon by microorganisms as affected by soil fertility levels in the Black Soil region of Northeast China.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 51, 605–613.

    Bastida F, Torres I F, Hernández T, Bombach P, Richnow H H, García C. 2013. Can the labile carbon contribute to carbon immobilization in semiarid soils? Priming effects and microbial community dynamics.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 57, 892–902.

    Bremner J M, Mulvaney C S. 1982. Nitrogen-total. In: Page L A, Milley R H, Keeney D R, eds.,Methods of Soil Analysis.American Society of Agronomy, Madison. pp. 595–642.

    Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y. 2008. Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: Critical review.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45, 115–131.

    Cai M, Dong Y J, Chen Z J, Kalbitz K, Zhou J B. 2015. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the composition of maize roots and their decomposition at different soil depths.European Journal of Soil Biology, 69, 43–50.

    Ding X, Yuan Y, Liang Y, Li L, Han X. 2014. Impact of long-term application of manure, crop residue, and mineral fertilizer on organic carbon pools and crop yields in a Mollisol.Journal of Soils and Sediments, 14, 854–859.

    Dou X, He P, Zhu P, Zhou W. 2016. Soil organic carbon dynamics under long-term fertilization in a black soil of China: Evidence from stable C isotopes.Scientific Reports,6, 21488.

    Duiker S W, Lal R. 1999. Crop residue and tillage effects on carbon sequestration in a Luvisol in central Ohio.Soil and Tillage Research, 52, 73–81.

    Fan M, Lal R, Gao J, Qiao L, Su Y, RF J, Zhang F. 2013.Plant-based assessment of inherent soil productivity and contributions to China’s cereal crop yield increase since 1980.PLOS ONE, 8, 1–11.

    Guenet B, Juarez S, Bardoux G, Abbadie L, Chenu C. 2012.Evidence that stable C is as vulnerable to priming effect as is more labile C in soil.Soil Biology and Biochemistry,52, 43–48.

    Jenkinson D S, Fox R H, Rayner J H. 1985. Interactions between fertilizer nitrogen and soil nitrogen - the so-called‘priming’ effect.Journal of Soil Science, 36, 425–444.

    Keesstra S D, Bouma J, Wallinga J, Tittonell P, Smith P,Cerdà A, Montanarella L, Quinton J N, Pachepsky Y,van der Putten W H, Bardgett R D, Moolenaar S, Mol G,Jansen B, Fresco L O. 2016. The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.Soil, 2, 111–128.

    Kirkby C A, Richardson A E, Wade L J, Passioura J B, Batten G D, Blanchard C, Kirkegaard J A. 2014. Nutrient availability limits carbon sequestration in arable soils.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 68, 402–409.

    Kong A Y Y, Six J, Bryant D C, Denison R F, van Kessel C.2005. The relationship between carbon input, aggregation,and soil organic carbon stabilization in sustainable cropping systems.Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 1078.

    Kuzyakov Y, Friedel J K, Stahr K. 2000. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32, 1485–1498.

    Kuzyakov Y. 2010. Priming effects: interactions between living and dead organic matter.Soil Biology and Biochemistry,42, 1363–1371.

    Lehtinen T, Schlatter N, Baumgarten A, Bechini L, Krüger J,Grignani C, Zavattaro L, Costamagna C, Spiegel H. 2014.Effect of crop residue incorporation on soil organic carbon and greenhouse gas emissions in European agricultural soils.Soil Use Manage, 30, 524–538.

    Liang A Z, Zhang X P, Yang X M, Fang H J, Shen Y, Li W F.2011. Distribution of soil organic carbon and its loss in black soils in Northeast China.Chinese Journal of Soil Science,39, 533–538. (in Chinese)

    Liang Y, Han X, Song C, Li H. 2011. Impacts of returning organic materials on soil labile organic carbon fractions redistribution of Mollisol in Northeast China.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 44, 3565–3574. (in Chinese)

    Liu C, Lu M, Cui J, Li B, Fang C. 2014. Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: A metaanalysis.Global Change Biology, 20, 1366–1381.

    Liu S, Jia S, Zhang X, Chen X, Zhang S, Sun B, Chen S, Dou Y. 2014. Effects of corn and soybean residues return on microbial biomass and respiration in a black soil.Soil and Crop, 3, 105–111. (in Chinese)

    Liu X, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Sui Y, Zhang S, Herbert S, Ding G. 2010. Soil degradation: A problem threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in Northeast China.Plant Soil Environment, 56, 87–97.

    Lou Y, Xu M, Wang W, Sun X, Zhao K. 2011. Return rate of straw residue affects soil organic C sequestration by chemical fertilization.Soil Tillage Research, 113, 70–73.

    Lu F. 2015. How can straw incorporation management impact on soil carbon storage? A meta-analysis.Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20, 1545–1568.

    Lu F, Wang X, Han B, Ouyang Z, Duan X, Zheng H, Miao H. 2009. Soil carbon sequestrations by nitrogen fertilizer application, straw return and no-tillage in China’s cropland.Global Change Biology, 15, 281–305.

    Luo Z, Wang E, Sun O J. 2010. Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments.Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment, 139,224–231.

    Majumder B, Kuzyakov Y. 2010. Effect of fertilization on decomposition of14C labelled plant residues and their incorporation into soil aggregates.Soil Tillage Research,109, 94–102.

    Mathieu J A, Hatte C, Balesdent J, Parent E. 2015. Deep soil carbon dynamics are driven more by soil type than by climate: A worldwide meta-analysis of radiocarbon profiles.Global Change Biology, 21, 4278–4292.

    Nelson D W, Sommers L E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon,and organic matter. In:Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, USA. pp. 961–1010.

    Ouyang W, Qi S, Hao F, Wang X, Shan Y, Chen S. 2013. Impact of crop patterns and cultivation on carbon sequestration and global warming potential in an agricultural freeze zone.Ecological Modelling, 252, 228–237.

    Pan G, Li L, Wu L, Zheng X. 2003. Storage and sequestratio potential of topsoil organic carbon in China’s paddy soils.Global Change Biology, 10, 79–92.

    Pang L, Huang G B. 2006. Impact of different tillage method on changing of soil organic carbon in semi-arid area.Soil and Water Conservation, 20, 110–113.

    Piper C S. 1966.Soil and Plant Analysis. Inter Science Publishers, New York.

    Pittelkow C M, Liang X, Linquist B A, van Groenigen K J, Lee J,Lundy M E, van Gestel N, Six J, Venterea R T, van Kessel C. 2015. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture.Nature, 517, 365–368.

    Poeplau C, K?tterer T, Bolinder M A, B?rjesson G, Berti A,Lugato E. 2015. Low stabilization of aboveground crop residue carbon in sandy soils of Swedish long-term experiments.Geoderma, 237, 246–255.

    Powlson D S, Glendining M J, Coleman K, Whitmore A P.2011. Implications for soil properties of removing cereal straw: Results from long-term studies.Agronomy Journal,103, 279.

    Van Reeuwijk L P. 2002.Procedures for Soil Analysis. 6th ed. International Soil Reference and Information Centre,Wageningen.

    Song Z W, Zhu P, Gao H J, Peng C, Deng A X, Zheng C Y, Mannaf M A, Islam M N, Zhang W J. 2014. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil organic carbon content and aggregate composition under continuous maize cropping in Northeast China.Journal of Agricultural Science, 153,236–244.

    Srinivasarao C, Deshpande A N, Venkateswarlu B, Lal R,Singh A K, Kundu S, Vittal K P R, Mishra P K, Prasad J V N S, Mandal U K, Sharma K L. 2012. Grain yield and carbon sequestration potential of post monsoon sorghum cultivation in Vertisols in the semi arid tropics of central India.Geoderma, 175, 90–97.

    Sun B, Wang X Y, Wang F, Jiang Y J, Zhang Y X. 2013.Assessing the relative effects of geographic location and soil type on microbial communities associated with straw decomposition.Applied and Environmental Microbiology,79, 3327–3335.

    Sun Y, Huang S, Yu X, Zhang W. 2013. Stability and saturation of soil organic carbon in rice fields: Evidence from a longterm fertilization experiment in subtropical China.Journalof Soils and Sediments, 13, 1327–1334.

    Wang J, Wang X, Xu M, Feng G, Zhang W, Lu C A. 2015a.Crop yield and soil organic matter after long-term straw return to soil in China.Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,102, 371–381.

    Wang J, Wang X, Xu M, Feng G, Zhang W, Yang X, Huang S.2015b. Contributions of wheat and maize residues to soil organic carbon under long-term rotation in north China.Scientific Reports, 5, 11409.

    Wang L, Qiu J, Tang H, Li H, Li C, Van Ranst E. 2008. Modelling soil organic carbon dynamics in the major agricultural regions of China.Geoderma, 147, 47–55.

    Wiesmeier M, Hübner R, K?gel-Knabner I. 2015. Stagnating crop yields: An over looked risk for the carbon balance of agricultural soils.Science of the Total Environment, 536,1045–1051.

    Wiesmeier M, Hübner R, Sp?rlein P, Geuss U, Hangen E,Reischl A, Schilling B, vov Lützow M, K?gel-Knabner I.2014. Carbon sequestration potential of soils in southeast Germay derived from stable soil organic carbon saturation.Global Chang Biology, 20, 653–665.

    Wiesmeier M, Poeplau C, Sierra C A, Maier H, Frühauf C,Hübner R, Kühnel A, Sp?rlein P, Geuss U, Hangen E,Schilling B, von Lützow M, K?gel-Knabner I. 2016. Projected loss of soil organic carbon in temperate agricultural soils in the 21st century: Effects of climate change and carbon input trends.Scientific Reports, 6, 1–17.

    Yan D, Wang D, Yang L. 2007. Long-term effect of chemical fertilizer, straw, and manure on labile organic matter fractions in a paddy soil.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 44,93–101.

    Yu G, Fang H, Gao L, Zhang W. 2006. Soil organic carbon budget and fertility variation of black soils in Northeast China.Ecological Research, 21, 855–867.

    Zhang J, Hu K, Li K, Zheng C, Li B. 2017. Simulating the effects of long-term discontinuous and continuous fertilization with straw return on crop yields and soil organic carbon dynamics using the DNDC model.Soil Tillage Research,165, 302–314.

    Zhang W, Wang X, Xu M, Huang S, Liu H, Peng C. 2010. soil organic carbon dynamics under long-term fertilizations in arable land of northern China.Biogeosciences, 7, 409–425.

    Zhang W, Xu M, Wang X, Huang Q, Nie J, Li Z, Li S, Hwang S W, Lee K B. 2012. Effects of organic amendments on soil carbon sequestration in paddy fields of subtropical China.Journal of Soils and Sediments, 12, 457–470.

    Zhang X, Sui Y, Song C. 2013. Degradation process of arable Mollisols.Soil Crop, 2, 1–6.

    Zheng L, Xie H, Zhang W, Zhang X. 2006. Effects of different ways of returning straw to the soils on soluble organic carbon.Ecological Research, 15, 80–83.

    猜你喜歡
    癌病流膠病櫻桃樹
    淺析黃瓜流膠病害與細(xì)菌性流膠病
    櫻桃樹屋
    櫻桃樹上的座位
    趣味(語文)(2021年4期)2021-08-05 07:52:04
    藍(lán)莓根癌病的發(fā)生與防治
    煙臺果樹(2021年3期)2021-07-21 10:34:42
    大棚櫻桃樹冬季修剪要點(diǎn)
    櫻桃引種過程中根癌病的發(fā)生情況調(diào)查
    河北果樹(2020年4期)2020-11-26 06:05:06
    武漢地區(qū)不同桃品種流膠病情況調(diào)查與評價(jià)
    落葉果樹(2020年5期)2020-10-22 07:32:12
    “櫻桃樹是我砍的”
    保護(hù)地黃瓜細(xì)菌性流膠病發(fā)生原因及防治對策
    甜櫻桃流膠病研究綜述
    煙臺果樹(2015年3期)2015-12-10 07:46:54
    中文欧美无线码| 久久久欧美国产精品| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 国产成人freesex在线| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 色哟哟·www| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产毛片在线视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 中文字幕制服av| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 黄色日韩在线| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 一级毛片 在线播放| 久久久成人免费电影| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产综合懂色| 在线观看人妻少妇| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 久久热精品热| 午夜日本视频在线| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 一级av片app| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 欧美日韩在线观看h| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产乱来视频区| 国产成人福利小说| av免费在线看不卡| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产亚洲最大av| 一本一本综合久久| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 色吧在线观看| 少妇丰满av| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲在久久综合| 亚洲精品视频女| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产男女内射视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| av在线老鸭窝| 精品久久久噜噜| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 免费观看在线日韩| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 一区二区三区精品91| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 国产成人精品久久久久久| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 欧美3d第一页| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | av女优亚洲男人天堂| 性色av一级| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 中文资源天堂在线| 欧美日本视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 极品教师在线视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 日本免费在线观看一区| freevideosex欧美| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 性色av一级| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 午夜福利高清视频| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 青春草国产在线视频| 高清毛片免费看| 欧美97在线视频| 在线a可以看的网站| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久热精品热| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 七月丁香在线播放| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 欧美性感艳星| 久久久久精品性色| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 日韩成人伦理影院| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 观看美女的网站| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 三级经典国产精品| 美女国产视频在线观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| av专区在线播放| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产 一区精品| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 久久精品人妻少妇| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 在线观看国产h片| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 免费看光身美女| 国产探花极品一区二区| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 日韩av免费高清视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产永久视频网站| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产黄片美女视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 色播亚洲综合网| a级毛色黄片| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 看黄色毛片网站| 久久99精品国语久久久| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产成人福利小说| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 天堂网av新在线| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 91狼人影院| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 在现免费观看毛片| av福利片在线观看| 69av精品久久久久久| 赤兔流量卡办理| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产毛片在线视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 成年av动漫网址| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 水蜜桃什么品种好| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 男女国产视频网站| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 国产精品成人在线| 国产视频内射| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产成人精品婷婷| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 美女主播在线视频| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产 一区精品| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 免费看光身美女| 嫩草影院精品99| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲不卡免费看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 久久久久九九精品影院| 色网站视频免费| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 日本黄色片子视频| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 六月丁香七月| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 日日啪夜夜撸| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产成人aa在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 亚洲性久久影院| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 日韩中字成人| 一级黄片播放器| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产视频首页在线观看| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 欧美3d第一页| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产成人福利小说| av在线老鸭窝| 国产 一区精品| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 在线观看国产h片| a级毛色黄片| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 深夜a级毛片| 在线免费十八禁| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 五月天丁香电影| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产成人freesex在线| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 国产成人aa在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 色哟哟·www| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| eeuss影院久久| 亚洲不卡免费看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 日本三级黄在线观看| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产成人精品婷婷| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| .国产精品久久| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 在线看a的网站| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 香蕉精品网在线| 少妇人妻 视频| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲性久久影院| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 一级爰片在线观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 久久久久久久久久成人| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 黄色配什么色好看| 婷婷色综合www| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 在线播放无遮挡| 欧美激情在线99| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 婷婷色综合www| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| xxx大片免费视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久久久性生活片| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 中国三级夫妇交换| 老女人水多毛片| 久久久成人免费电影| av线在线观看网站| 99久久精品热视频| 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| av国产免费在线观看| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 一区二区av电影网| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 日本午夜av视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 只有这里有精品99| 99热全是精品| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 国内精品宾馆在线| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 在线a可以看的网站| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 男人舔奶头视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 99久国产av精品国产电影| av播播在线观看一区| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产高清三级在线| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 91狼人影院| 日本一二三区视频观看| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 日本黄色片子视频| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲无线观看免费| 一本久久精品| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 午夜免费鲁丝| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 九草在线视频观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 国产一级毛片在线| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 亚州av有码| 日韩视频在线欧美| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| av黄色大香蕉| 日韩av免费高清视频| 麻豆成人av视频| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| www.av在线官网国产| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 永久免费av网站大全| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 高清欧美精品videossex| 在线看a的网站| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 精品午夜福利在线看| 成人欧美大片| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产综合精华液| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲四区av| 在线观看一区二区三区| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 视频区图区小说| 熟女av电影| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 草草在线视频免费看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 日日撸夜夜添| 黄色配什么色好看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新|