• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    The efficiency of long-term straw return to sequester organic carbon in Northeast China’s cropland

    2018-02-05 07:10:55WANGShichaoZHAOYawenWANGJinzhouZHUPingCUlXianHANXiaozengXUMinggangLUChangai
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年2期
    關(guān)鍵詞:癌病流膠病櫻桃樹

    WANG Shi-chao, ZHAO Ya-wen, WANG Jin-zhou, ZHU Ping, CUl Xian, HAN Xiao-zeng, XU Minggang, LU Chang-ai

    1 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory for Improving Quality of Arable Land, Beijing 100081, P.R.China

    2 Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130124, P.R.China

    3 Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Heihe 164300, P.R.China

    4 Northeast Institute of Geography and Agro-ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, P.R.China

    1. lntroduction

    Soil contains the largest carbon (C) pool of the global terrestrial ecosystem. The total soil organic carbon (SOC)pool is approximately 1 500 Pg C, which is three times that of the atmospheric carbon pool (Songet al.2014). Soil organic matter (SOM) not only plays a vital role in global carbon cycling, but also contributes considerably to improvements in soil quality, crop production, and terrestrial ecosystem health(Wanget al.2008; Luet al.2009). However, increasing SOM has become a major global problem (Fanet al.2013;Keesstraet al.2016). SOC dynamics are strongly influenced by agricultural management practices, such as fertilization,crop residue return, and tillage (Luet al.2009; Luoet al.2010; Louet al.2011; Ouyanget al.2013; Douet al.2016).

    It has recently been proposed that straw input can lead to SOC accumulation and improvements in soil structure(Luet al.2009; Liu Cet al.2014; Lu 2015; Wanget al.2015a). For example, Liu Cet al.(2014) found that straw return increased SOC by 12.8%, with a 42.0% increase in the active C fraction after 22 years. Previous research has also demonstrated that continuous straw return boosts SOC accumulation in early years, but that these effects decrease after a decade (Liu Cet al.2014; Wanget al.2015a).Specifically, Liu Cet al.(2014) reported that straw return enhanced SOC sequestration over the first three years, but that these effects were minimal in the experimental site after 15 years. However, opposing results have also been reported(Pittelkowet al.2015), which may be attributed to different environmental conditions, land management approaches,and soil types. Additional factors, such as straw-C input rate,number of cultivation years, initial SOC levels, and methods for straw disposal, are also critical in explaining why certain soil carbon pools react differently to straw return. Therefore,evaluating the changes in SOC under long-term cultivation would be beneficial for determining how land management practices influence soil and global carbon cycling.

    The black soil of Northeast China is one of the main crop production areas in the country, and provides a third of the country’s grain commodity. The black soil area covers 1.1×108ha, including arable land (2.4×107ha in Heilongjiang Province, 1.1×107ha in Jilin Province, 0.6×107ha in Liaoning Province, and 0.6×107ha in Inner Mongolia) that is characterized by black soil (Mollisols) which is rich in organic matter (Liang A Zet al.2011; Zhanget al.2013). The large amount of agricultural straw that is produced in this region every year is not fully utilized. Instead of being returned to the soil, the straw is usually used as livestock feed or to provide energy for heating (Douet al.2016). Hence, soil degradation,a result of the loss of SOC and nutrients, is a considerable challenge for sustainable cultivation in this region (Liuet al.2010), as intensive cultivation has reduced SOC by 50%over about 60 years of tillage (Yuet al.2006), with a loss of 0.5% each year (Liuet al.2010). Rather than being used to provide energy, the organic material of straw could be used to promote the SOC stock. Many studies have investigated how straw return affects soil fertility (Yanet al.2007; Sun Bet al.2013). However, the approach of using straw return to reverse SOC reduction faces some problems. For example,the extent we depend on straw return to improve SOC is unknown. Also, the short- and long-term effects of using straw return to improve SOC in the black soil region in China have not been assessed.

    Long-term experiments can provide reliable data for assessing and predicting the influence of straw return on SOC sequestration and soil fertility. There is currently minimal knowledge about the influence of different environmental conditions on the long-term effects of straw return (Dinget al.2014; Songet al.2014), and limited research has focused on black soils. In this study, we used long-term field experiments in Northeast China to study the influence of straw return on SOC. The objectives of this study were: 1) to analyze the SOC dynamics of longterm straw return; 2) to examine the relative contribution of straw return to SOC sequestration; and 3) to evaluate the sustainability of straw return for improving SOC and straw-C sequestration efficiency. We hypothesized that straw return could efficiently increase the SOC stock of the black soil region in Northeast China. However, we also expected clear differences among different regions in Northeast China.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Site description

    This study was conducted at three different sites in the Northeast China: Heihe (50°15′N, 127o27′E); Hailun(47°27′N, 126°55′E); and Gongzhuling (43°30′N, 124°48′E)(Fig. 1, Table 1). Three long-term straw return experiments with different fertilization treatments were initiated in 1979,1990, and 1990 for Heihe, Hailun, and Gongzhuling,respectively. Prior to the experiment, the field was under crop production for at least 60 years at Gongzhuling site, 110 years at Hailun site, or 150 years at Heihe site. The soil at all three sites originated from quaternary loess-like sediments.The study sites are characterized by a temperate sub-humid climate. The average annual precipitation is 528 mm, with most of the rainfall occurring from July to September. The frost-free period ranges from 105 days at the Heihe site to 140 days at the Gongzhuling site. Crop rotations include wheat (Triticum aestivumL.)/soybean (Glycine max(L.)Merrill.) at the Heihe site, wheat/maize (Zea maysL.)/soybean at the Hailun site, and a mono-cropping system with maize at the Gongzhuling site. Each year, spring wheat seeds are sown in strips in early April and harvested in mid-August. Soybean seeds are sown in holes in early May and harvested in late September. Maize seeds are sown in holes in early May and harvested in early October. The average annual temperature ranges from –0.5°C at Heihe to 4.5°C at Gongzhuling. Soil textures are clay loam, heavy loam, and loamy clay soil at Heihe, Hailun and Gongzhuling,respectively. The fine mineral contents were 33.4% (Heihe),34.5% (Hailun), and 31.1% (Gongzhuling). All sites had black soils, with initial SOC contents between 13.5–31.3 g kg–1, initial total nitrogen (TN) contents between 1.24–2.23 g kg–1, and soil pH values between 6.1–7.6 (Table 1).

    Fig. 1 Locations of the study sites in Northeast China.

    2.2. Experimental design and sampling

    Three treatments were implemented at each site: (1) no fertilization (CK); (2) inorganic fertilization N, P and K (NPK);and (3) NPK plus straw return (NPKS). The plots were arranged in a randomized block design, and each treatment was replicated three times. The plot sizes were 212 m2at Heihe, 224 m2at Hailun, and 400 m2at Gongzhuling.The chemical fertilizer and straw input rates are in Table 2.The applied chemical fertilizers included urea, calcium superphosphate, and potassium sulfate, with the exception that no potassium fertilizer was used at the Heihe site. The application rates of inorganic fertilizer for each growing season ranged from 37.5 to 245.3 kg N ha–1, 16.4 to 62 kg P ha–1, and 0 to 68.5 kg K ha–1(Table 2).

    The aboveground straw was removed from the CK and NPK treatments after each harvest (around October 10th).In the NPKS treatment, which included straw return, the aboveground straw was removed after each harvest and re-incorporated into the soil. At the Heihe and Hailun sites,wheat/maize/soybean organic material was returned by deep plowing, while at the Gongzhuling site maize straw was used for mulching material. The average annual rates of straw return were 3.0, 4.5, and 7.5 Mg ha–1(dry weight) at the Heihe, Hailun, and Gongzhuling sites, respectively. Straw was applied after cutting it into pieces of 5–15 cm length after harvesting. The amounts of C (straw-C and root-C) added to soil were 0.44–1.97 Mg ha–1at Heihe, 1.59–3.35 Mg ha–1at Hailun, and 4.4–5.9 Mg ha–1at Gongzhuling (Fig. 2).

    2.3. Soil analysis

    Surface soil samples (0–20 cm depth) were collected from each treatment plot after each harvest (around October 10th),after which they were air-dried and sieved through either a 1-mm mesh for pH and available P analyses or a 0.15-mm mesh for organic matter, total N, and total P analyses. Soil organic matter was determined by quantifying the oxidizable soil carbon in a heated dilution of K2Cr2O7subjected to a volumetric oxidation method (Nelson and Sommers 1996).Soil available P was measured using Olsen’s method (Van Reeuwijk 2002), while total nitrogen was measured using the micro-Kjeldahl digestion, distillation, and titration method(Bremner and Mulvaney 1982). All results were normalized to a dry mass basis. The soil bulk density (g cm–3) was determined by the core sampler method described by Piper(1966). We also collected soil samples from the 0–20 cm layer at the beginning of this study, in 1979, 1990, and 1990 for the Heihe, Hailun, and Gongzhuling experiments,respectively. These samples were analyzed to determine the basic physical and chemical properties.

    2.4. Calculation of C sequestration rate and C sequestration efficiency

    SOC stock (Mg ha–1) was calculated using the following equation:

    ?

    Where, C is SOC content (g kg–1), BD is soil bulk density (g cm–3), anddis soil depth(m). In this study, we only calculated SOC stocks for the top layer of soil (0–20 cm).

    The annual SOC changes (DSOC, Mg C ha–1yr–1) were calculated using the following equation:

    全區(qū)櫻桃產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的專業(yè)化、專職化的人才團(tuán)隊(duì)十分匱乏,嚴(yán)重制約烏當(dāng)櫻桃產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展壯大。在全區(qū)各政府部門中,農(nóng)業(yè)局負(fù)責(zé)統(tǒng)籌全區(qū)櫻桃全產(chǎn)鏈發(fā)展,專業(yè)、專職農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)推廣人才團(tuán)隊(duì)成員約5名,在數(shù)量和專業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)上都遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不能滿足發(fā)展好3.6萬余畝櫻桃種植基地及中下游產(chǎn)業(yè)的需求。烏當(dāng)櫻桃產(chǎn)業(yè)正面臨著很多技術(shù)瓶頸,特別是在病蟲害防治方面,如下壩鎮(zhèn)出現(xiàn)櫻桃根癌病、流膠病、病毒病及果實(shí)褐腐病等,造成櫻桃樹勢衰退和減產(chǎn),嚴(yán)重時(shí)成片死亡,而現(xiàn)有人員的技術(shù)能力難以有效解決這一問題。

    Where, SOCTand SOC0represent the SOC stock at the end and beginning of a year, respectively, andtis the duration of the experiment in years.

    The relative changes of SOC stock are represented as SOCNPKS(or SOCNPK) minus SOCCK, and the relative contribution (RC) of straw return to the soil was calculated using the following equation:

    The carbon sequestration rate (CSR, Mg C ha–1yr–1) was calculated using the following equation:

    Where, DSOCTand DSOC0represent the respective annual change in the SOC stock of a particular treatment (CK, NPK, or NPKS). DSOCTdescribes the DSOC aftertyears of experiments whereas DSOC0represents the DSOC at the beginning of a year.

    The carbon sequestration efficiency (CSE) for each paired-trial was calculated as follows:

    Where, SOCNPKis the SOC stock of the NPK treatment, SOCNPKSis the SOC stock of the NPKS treatment, and TSC is the total straw C input (Mg C ha–1) over the duration of the experiment.

    2.5. Statistical analyses

    Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons were performed in SAS (ver.8.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to identify between treatment differences in SOC sequestration, carbon sequestration rate, and/or straw-C sequestration efficiency of the topsoil. If the ANOVA results were significant, further comparisons using leastsquares differences were conducted in SAS. A correlation analysis was carried out in SPSS (ver. 17.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) to examine how different treatments affected various factors, e.g., soil C/N ratio, initial SOC (ISOC), available phosphorus (AP),pH, the cumulative straw-C input (SC), SC/ISOC ratio, the SC/SMBC (soil microbial biomass carbon) ratio, and cultivation year, and to construct the soil organic carbon sequestration property matrix.

    3. Results

    3.1. Changes in the SOC stock under straw return

    The SOC stock of CK treatment plots at the three sites decreased throughout the entire long-term experiment period (Fig. 3). In this study, the SOC stocks of NPKS treatment plots varied between 31.7 and 58.3 Mg ha–1. When compared to the CK treatment plots, the SOC stock of NPKS treatment plots increased, on average, by 11.7% (Heihe site), 3.0% (Hailun site), and 7.0% (Gongzhuling site), respectively. The SOC stocks of NPKS plots were 4.0 and 5.7% higher than those of the NPK plots at the Hailun and Heihe sites, respectively. However, the straw return, when compared with the NPK treatment, did not significantly affect the SOC stock at the Gongzhuling site. These results demonstrate that long-term NPKS treatment maintained, and sometimes increased SOC, while long-term NPK treatment maintained (or slightly decreased) SOC compared with the original SOC stock. On the other hand, a lack of fertilization (CK treatment) tended to decrease SOC stocks.

    The DSOC values for the fertilization treatments were≥0, while the CK treatment showed negative DSOC values(Fig. 4). The DSOC values ranged from –1.65 to 6.60 Mg C ha–1, with an average of –0.05 Mg C ha–1. The DSOC values for the three treatments at the Heihe and Hailun sites were ranked as NPKS>NPK>CK, while an equilibrium state between the three treatments was observed at Gongzhuling.At the Heihe site, the DSOC values for the NPKS and NPK treatments were 102.0 and 41.8% higher, respectively, than the DSOC value for the CK treatment. Both of the fertilization treatments significantly increased DSOC compared to the CK treatment (P<0.05). In addition, both fertilization treatments at the Hailun site, when compared to the CK treatment,significantly increased DSOC (P<0.05). The initial DSOC value for the NPK treatment was higher than that for the NPKS treatment. However, the NPK treatment showed a five-fold decrease in DSOC over 5 years at the Gongzhuling site. In contrast, the DSOC value for the NPKS treatment remained stable over the course of the experiment.

    Table 2 Fertilizer inputs for each treatment

    Fig. 2 Changes in straw-C inputs and reclamation years at three experimental sites in Northeast China.

    3.2. Soil carbon sequestration rate in response to straw return

    As expected, straw return primarily enhanced CSR at the Heihe site, relative to the Gongzhuling and Hailun sites(Fig. 5). The CSR value decreased over time at the Heihe site. In addition, straw return had a significant effect on CSR at the Heihe site (F=6.28,P=0.02); CSR ranged from 0.24 to 1.50 Mg C ha–1yr–1, compared with 0.15–0.50 Mg C ha–1yr–1for NPK. The Hailun site also showed a decreasing trend in CSR over time. However, at this site, both fertilization regimes yielded similar CSR values ((0.32±0.23) Mg C ha–1yr–1) (Fig. 5-C). At the Gongzhuling site, the NPK treatment resulted in a significantly higher CSR value ((0.84±1.08)Mg C ha–1yr–1,F=7.8,P<0.05) than the NPKS treatment((0.11±0.24) Mg C ha–1yr–1) (Fig. 5-D). Regression analysis results showed that the CSR for the NPKS treatments equated to cultivation times of 17, 11, and 8 years at the Heihe, Hailun and Gongzhuling sites, respectively. This result indicates that the CSR of the black soils in northeastern China is close to a stable equilibrium state.

    Fig. 3 Soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks for different fertilization treatments, as well as initial condition, at the three sites over the whole experimental period. CK, no fertilizer application;NPK, inorganic fertilization N, P and K; NPKS, NPK plus straw return. The results are presented as mean values with standard deviations (Heihe, n=11; Hailun, n=16; Gongzhuling,n=19). Mean values with different letters represent statistically significant differences (P<0.05).

    3.3. Straw-C sequestration efficiency

    The CSE calculated for the Heihe site (46.8%) was significantly higher than the calculated values for the Hailun(13.3%) and Gongzhuling (–1.6%) sites (P<0.01) (Fig. 6-A).The CSE ranged from –22.1 to 97.1% over 1–33 years. On average, (15.3±27.8)% of the straw-C input was converted to SOC. In addition, the CSE at the Heihe and Hailun sites decreased exponentially as cultivation increased, appearing to attain equilibrium at the end of the experiments (Fig. 6-B).The CSE at the Gongzhuling site, on the other hand,consistently remained in a steady state. The regression analyses for the Hailun and Heihe sites show that after a continual decline for 13 and 17 years respectively, the CSE remained stable at 1.0–6.0% and 15.6–38.8%, respectively.At the Gongzhuling site, CSE remained at approximately 0% over 18 years.

    Fig. 4 Annual soil organic carbon (DSOC) changes for different fertilization treatments. CK, no fertilizer application; NPK,inorganic fertilization N, P and K; NPKS, NPK plus straw return;HH, Heihe site; HL, Hailun site; GZL, Gongzhuling site.

    4. Discussion

    4.1. lmpact of straw return on the SOC stock

    Fig. 5 Soil carbon sequestration rate (CSR) under different fertilization treatments. A, all three experiment sites. Box-and-whisker diagrams show the median, 5th, 25th, 75th and 95th percentiles for CSR. The solid lines represent median values and the short dashed lines represent mean values. B, Heihe site. C, Hailun site. D, Gongzhuling site.

    Fig. 6 Straw-C sequestration efficiency (CSE) in the treatment with straw. A, the range of CSE at different sites. Box-and-whisker diagrams show the median, 5th, 25th, 75th and 95th percentiles for CSE. The solid lines represent median values and the short dashed lines represent mean values. B, variation with cultivation year of CSE at three sites. All, three experiment sites; HH, Heihe site; HL, Hailun site; GZL, Gongzhuling site.

    Our experiments showed that the application of fertilizer(NPK and NPKS treatments), when compared to the CK treatment, led to higher SOC stocks in absolute terms(Fig. 7) Straw return at the high SOC density site (Heihe)was an exception, as SOC rapidly increased during the earlier stages of the experiment only to decline in the later stages. Although the SOC stocks at the Hailun site only changed slightly and gradually increased at the Gongzhuling site (Fig. 8), straw-C input has been shown to be more effective than NPK and CK treatments in driving microbial activity (Majumder and Kuzyakov 2010; Bastidaet al.2013). This difference may stem from the shorter history of reclamation, lower straw-C input, and higher SOC density at the Heihe site relative to the other two sites(Figs. 2 and 7) (Lehtinenet al.2014; Lu 2015; Poeplauet al.2015). At Heihe, the SOC stock could continue to decrease for 50 years under natural conditions (Yuet al.2006). Furthermore, the SOC increase could probably be related to an increase of the C input (Duiker and Lal 1999;Panet al.2003; Wiesmeieret al.2015); in Hailun and Heihe,stagnating C inputs over time led to a constant SOC level(Hailun) or even a decline of SOC (Heihe). This is in line with our results that stagnating C inputs in agricultural soils led to SOC decreases over longer periods. On the other hand, temperature increases and low precipitation caused by climate change will result in intensified decomposition of native SOC (Wiesmeieret al.2016). The effects of straw return on improving SOC at the Heihe and Hailun sites were not evident, probably due to the increasing temperature over the experimental period (Fig. 9).

    It is worth emphasizing that straw return increased SOC stocks in this region by either 6% (when compared to fertilized plots) or 12% (when compared to unfertilized plots)(Fig. 7-B). Interestingly, straw return increased SOC stocks by 5.7% in Northeast China, a result that was lower than previously reported values for upland soils in China (9.9%),Europe (7%), and North America (10.8%) (Powlsonet al.2011; Lehtinenet al.2014; Wanget al.2015a). Overall,straw return had a relatively weak effect on the SOC stocks in Northeast China.

    Fig. 7 Average relative changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks for two different fertilization management practices over the experimental period. A, all three experiment sites. B, Heihe. C, Hailun. D, Gongzhuling. NPK, inorganic fertilization N, P and K;NPKS, NPK plus straw return; ?NPKS, NPKS minus NPK. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at P<0.05.Box-and-whisker diagrams show the median, 5th, 25th, 75th and 95th percentiles for relative change in SOC stocks. The solid lines represent median values and the short dashed lines represent mean values.

    Fig. 8 Soil organic carbon (SOC) stock dynamics under straw return in the black soils at the three long-term experimental sites.A, Heihe. B, Hailun. C, Gongzhuling.

    4.2. Factors regulating straw-C sequestration efficiency

    Our findings show that the average for all sites straw-C sequestration efficiency was 15.3% over the experimental duration of 33 years (Fig. 6). This CSE value is in agreement with a previously reported average CSE (15.9%) value for the upland area of northern China (Zhanget al.2010), but lower than the CSE (30%) value reported for upland India by Srinivasaraoet al.(2012). In contrast, the CSE value for wheat and maize crops has been reported to be only 7.6%in the USA (Konget al.2005). The differences in straw-C sequestration efficiency are mainly related to soil fertility,climate, and cultivation (Luoet al.2010; Ouyanget al.2013).The CSE value for Northeast China was correlated with soil C/N, available P, pH, reclamation year, SC/SOC, SC/SMBC, mean annual temperature, and annual precipitation(Tables 3 and 4).

    Microbial communities differ based on climatic conditions,with the climate in Northeast China potentially affecting the structure of the microbial community, which can influence the rate of straw decomposition (Sun Bet al.2013). Straw addition clearly improved the carbon content and CSE in the northern region (Heihe), and this result was probably due to this site having a shorter cultivation history (Fig. 2),higher SOC content, and lower inputs of C relative to the other studied sites.

    Our data indicated that the CSE value was significantly higher at the Heihe site (46.8%) than at the Hailun (13.3%)or Gongzhuling (?1.6%) sites (P<0.01). Soil carbon sequestration may be restricted by certain aspects of initial soil quality associated with low inputs of C, such as initial SOC content, pH, or the total carbon and nitrogen ratios(Wanget al.2015b). Despite corroborating Wangetal.(2015b) that reported a significant correlation between changes in SOC and the amount of C input, a comparison of data from different experimental sites suggests that the continuous maize system in Gongzhuling is less efficient at sequestering C from added C inputs than systems that include wheat and/or soybean. Gongzhuling had the lowest CSE value of all three sites, a finding that is likely a consequence of a long history of reclamation (Fig. 2), and the high input of C (straw mulch at Gongzhuling site) coupled with low SOC density. However, straw return can accelerate the turnover rate of native soil organic carbon and introduce large amounts of labile C, such as microbial biomass carbon(Jenkinsonet al.1985; Kuzyakovet al.2000; Blagodatskaya and Kuzyakov 2008) and water-soluble organic carbon(WSOC) (Guenetet al.2012; Zhanget al.2012; Kirkbyet al.2014; Anet al.2015). Previous research in Gongzhuling has shown that NPKS treatment, when compared to CK treatment, increased WSOC content by 40.1% (Zhenget al.2006; Liang Yet al.2011). Furthermore, Pang and Huang(2006) showed that straw mulch can significantly improve SOC content at the soil surface, but can also impede straw decomposition and the accumulation of SOC.

    Fig. 9 Mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation at three experimental sites in our studied regions.

    4.3. How to improve long-term straw-C sequestration with straw return in black soil

    Our results showed that the equilibrium value of CSR equated to cultivation times of 17, 11, and 8 years for the NPKS treatment at the Heihe, Hailun, and Gongzhuling sites, respectively. These relatively short time could cause apparent new equilibrium states, which could be related to the C saturation status of the investigated soils (Wiesmeieret al.2014). Significantly positive linear correlations between SOC stocks for the NPKM treatment at the three sites and experiment duration (Fig. 10) indicated that the black soil was not saturated in C sequestration. Moreover,a significant increase in SOC stock at Hailun was also observed with higher organic manure input after 10 years(Dinget al.2014). The degree of increase in SOC was lower in the NPKS treatment compared to the NPKM treatment in our study area and did not reach the saturation level; this result was explained by different net carbon production rates(accumulation of straw derived SOC and decomposition of old C) with straw return. After the SOC equilibrium, CSE cannot improve further. Interestingly, when the relationships among CSE and soil properties, climatic factors, amount of straw returned, and the cropping system are investigated(Tables 3 and 4), CSE has the strongest correlation with SMBC and soil availability. However, the most effective way to translate straw return into soil C sequestration still remains unclear.

    Previous studies have found that the major limiting factors of increasing SOC under straw return conditions include tillage, fertilization practices, and cropping system(Liang A Zet al.2011; Mathieuet al.2015). For example,the application of organic manure may stimulate the decomposition of added straw-C due to increased microbial biomass (Kuzyakow 2010). In addition, a laboratory experiment (25°C incubation over 95 days) by Aitaet al.(2012), in which both manure and straw were added to thesystem, found that the mineralization of straw-C accelerated by 24% over 95 days compared to a treatment in which only straw was added. This resulted in higher SOC stock and positive effects for soil fertility. Similarly, Zhanget al.(2017)observed an increase in SOC variables after coupling the long-term application of nitrogen fertilizer with straw return.These findings suggest that the optimized fertilization with straw return leads to higher SOC content.

    Table 3 Correlation coefficients between straw-C sequestration efficiency (CSE) and soil factors in Northeast China1)

    Table 4 Correlation coefficients between straw-C sequestration efficiency (CSE), cultivation years and climatic factors1)

    Fig. 10 Soil organic carbon (SOC) stock dynamics under the N, P, K fertilizer in combination with manure (NPKM) treatment in the black soils at the three long-term experimental sites.

    It is also important to consider cultivation modes that may affect straw-C sequestration. The combination of no-tillage and straw mulching resulted in a loss of straw-C,as the straw was left on the soil surface (Luet al.2009).According to a meta-analysis, a no-tillage approach had a 9% advantage over chopped straw in straw return situations,which increased to 12% with plough tillage, and to 16%with rotary tillage (Lu 2015). These increases occurred because straw buried in deep soil layers is favorable for straw-C sequestration (Caiet al.2015). Reasonable crop rotation (e.g., rotated soybean) can also improve the decomposition and transformation of straw-C returned to soil, as this could provide the nitrogen necessary for microorganism activity (Liu Set al.2014).

    Overall, reasonable agronomic management practices,such as ploughing and rotary tillage, crop rotation, and optimized fertilization, have a significant effect on straw-C sequestration, but their long-term effects should be further investigated in future studies.

    5. Conclusion

    The results from our study indicate that the SOC stocks of black soil in the southern region of Northeast China were approximately at a stable equilibrium state, whereas the SOC stocks continued to decrease in the northern region. Furthermore, the rate of change of SOC stocks was directly related to the initial SOC density. Straw return and fertilization enhanced soil carbon sequestration in the northern and high latitude regions that were characterized by high SOC density, but the input of straw maintained the SOC stocks at a stable state in the southern region.However, a longer period of straw return would result in a very low or even negative CSE after which SOC would not increase further. Additional variables, such as reasonable agronomic management practices, i.e., tillage, rotation, and optimized fertilization, should be considered if the objective is a long-term improvement in the straw-C sequestration in black soil.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2013CB127404)and the Collaborative Innovation Action of Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. We are grateful to the staff that worked on the project, and contributed to the field management of the long-term experiments.

    An T, Schaeffer S, Zhuang J, Radosevich M, Li S, Li H, Pei J, Wang J. 2015. Dynamics and distribution of13C-labeled straw carbon by microorganisms as affected by soil fertility levels in the Black Soil region of Northeast China.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 51, 605–613.

    Bastida F, Torres I F, Hernández T, Bombach P, Richnow H H, García C. 2013. Can the labile carbon contribute to carbon immobilization in semiarid soils? Priming effects and microbial community dynamics.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 57, 892–902.

    Bremner J M, Mulvaney C S. 1982. Nitrogen-total. In: Page L A, Milley R H, Keeney D R, eds.,Methods of Soil Analysis.American Society of Agronomy, Madison. pp. 595–642.

    Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y. 2008. Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: Critical review.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45, 115–131.

    Cai M, Dong Y J, Chen Z J, Kalbitz K, Zhou J B. 2015. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the composition of maize roots and their decomposition at different soil depths.European Journal of Soil Biology, 69, 43–50.

    Ding X, Yuan Y, Liang Y, Li L, Han X. 2014. Impact of long-term application of manure, crop residue, and mineral fertilizer on organic carbon pools and crop yields in a Mollisol.Journal of Soils and Sediments, 14, 854–859.

    Dou X, He P, Zhu P, Zhou W. 2016. Soil organic carbon dynamics under long-term fertilization in a black soil of China: Evidence from stable C isotopes.Scientific Reports,6, 21488.

    Duiker S W, Lal R. 1999. Crop residue and tillage effects on carbon sequestration in a Luvisol in central Ohio.Soil and Tillage Research, 52, 73–81.

    Fan M, Lal R, Gao J, Qiao L, Su Y, RF J, Zhang F. 2013.Plant-based assessment of inherent soil productivity and contributions to China’s cereal crop yield increase since 1980.PLOS ONE, 8, 1–11.

    Guenet B, Juarez S, Bardoux G, Abbadie L, Chenu C. 2012.Evidence that stable C is as vulnerable to priming effect as is more labile C in soil.Soil Biology and Biochemistry,52, 43–48.

    Jenkinson D S, Fox R H, Rayner J H. 1985. Interactions between fertilizer nitrogen and soil nitrogen - the so-called‘priming’ effect.Journal of Soil Science, 36, 425–444.

    Keesstra S D, Bouma J, Wallinga J, Tittonell P, Smith P,Cerdà A, Montanarella L, Quinton J N, Pachepsky Y,van der Putten W H, Bardgett R D, Moolenaar S, Mol G,Jansen B, Fresco L O. 2016. The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.Soil, 2, 111–128.

    Kirkby C A, Richardson A E, Wade L J, Passioura J B, Batten G D, Blanchard C, Kirkegaard J A. 2014. Nutrient availability limits carbon sequestration in arable soils.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 68, 402–409.

    Kong A Y Y, Six J, Bryant D C, Denison R F, van Kessel C.2005. The relationship between carbon input, aggregation,and soil organic carbon stabilization in sustainable cropping systems.Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 1078.

    Kuzyakov Y, Friedel J K, Stahr K. 2000. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32, 1485–1498.

    Kuzyakov Y. 2010. Priming effects: interactions between living and dead organic matter.Soil Biology and Biochemistry,42, 1363–1371.

    Lehtinen T, Schlatter N, Baumgarten A, Bechini L, Krüger J,Grignani C, Zavattaro L, Costamagna C, Spiegel H. 2014.Effect of crop residue incorporation on soil organic carbon and greenhouse gas emissions in European agricultural soils.Soil Use Manage, 30, 524–538.

    Liang A Z, Zhang X P, Yang X M, Fang H J, Shen Y, Li W F.2011. Distribution of soil organic carbon and its loss in black soils in Northeast China.Chinese Journal of Soil Science,39, 533–538. (in Chinese)

    Liang Y, Han X, Song C, Li H. 2011. Impacts of returning organic materials on soil labile organic carbon fractions redistribution of Mollisol in Northeast China.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 44, 3565–3574. (in Chinese)

    Liu C, Lu M, Cui J, Li B, Fang C. 2014. Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: A metaanalysis.Global Change Biology, 20, 1366–1381.

    Liu S, Jia S, Zhang X, Chen X, Zhang S, Sun B, Chen S, Dou Y. 2014. Effects of corn and soybean residues return on microbial biomass and respiration in a black soil.Soil and Crop, 3, 105–111. (in Chinese)

    Liu X, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Sui Y, Zhang S, Herbert S, Ding G. 2010. Soil degradation: A problem threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in Northeast China.Plant Soil Environment, 56, 87–97.

    Lou Y, Xu M, Wang W, Sun X, Zhao K. 2011. Return rate of straw residue affects soil organic C sequestration by chemical fertilization.Soil Tillage Research, 113, 70–73.

    Lu F. 2015. How can straw incorporation management impact on soil carbon storage? A meta-analysis.Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20, 1545–1568.

    Lu F, Wang X, Han B, Ouyang Z, Duan X, Zheng H, Miao H. 2009. Soil carbon sequestrations by nitrogen fertilizer application, straw return and no-tillage in China’s cropland.Global Change Biology, 15, 281–305.

    Luo Z, Wang E, Sun O J. 2010. Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments.Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment, 139,224–231.

    Majumder B, Kuzyakov Y. 2010. Effect of fertilization on decomposition of14C labelled plant residues and their incorporation into soil aggregates.Soil Tillage Research,109, 94–102.

    Mathieu J A, Hatte C, Balesdent J, Parent E. 2015. Deep soil carbon dynamics are driven more by soil type than by climate: A worldwide meta-analysis of radiocarbon profiles.Global Change Biology, 21, 4278–4292.

    Nelson D W, Sommers L E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon,and organic matter. In:Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, USA. pp. 961–1010.

    Ouyang W, Qi S, Hao F, Wang X, Shan Y, Chen S. 2013. Impact of crop patterns and cultivation on carbon sequestration and global warming potential in an agricultural freeze zone.Ecological Modelling, 252, 228–237.

    Pan G, Li L, Wu L, Zheng X. 2003. Storage and sequestratio potential of topsoil organic carbon in China’s paddy soils.Global Change Biology, 10, 79–92.

    Pang L, Huang G B. 2006. Impact of different tillage method on changing of soil organic carbon in semi-arid area.Soil and Water Conservation, 20, 110–113.

    Piper C S. 1966.Soil and Plant Analysis. Inter Science Publishers, New York.

    Pittelkow C M, Liang X, Linquist B A, van Groenigen K J, Lee J,Lundy M E, van Gestel N, Six J, Venterea R T, van Kessel C. 2015. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture.Nature, 517, 365–368.

    Poeplau C, K?tterer T, Bolinder M A, B?rjesson G, Berti A,Lugato E. 2015. Low stabilization of aboveground crop residue carbon in sandy soils of Swedish long-term experiments.Geoderma, 237, 246–255.

    Powlson D S, Glendining M J, Coleman K, Whitmore A P.2011. Implications for soil properties of removing cereal straw: Results from long-term studies.Agronomy Journal,103, 279.

    Van Reeuwijk L P. 2002.Procedures for Soil Analysis. 6th ed. International Soil Reference and Information Centre,Wageningen.

    Song Z W, Zhu P, Gao H J, Peng C, Deng A X, Zheng C Y, Mannaf M A, Islam M N, Zhang W J. 2014. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil organic carbon content and aggregate composition under continuous maize cropping in Northeast China.Journal of Agricultural Science, 153,236–244.

    Srinivasarao C, Deshpande A N, Venkateswarlu B, Lal R,Singh A K, Kundu S, Vittal K P R, Mishra P K, Prasad J V N S, Mandal U K, Sharma K L. 2012. Grain yield and carbon sequestration potential of post monsoon sorghum cultivation in Vertisols in the semi arid tropics of central India.Geoderma, 175, 90–97.

    Sun B, Wang X Y, Wang F, Jiang Y J, Zhang Y X. 2013.Assessing the relative effects of geographic location and soil type on microbial communities associated with straw decomposition.Applied and Environmental Microbiology,79, 3327–3335.

    Sun Y, Huang S, Yu X, Zhang W. 2013. Stability and saturation of soil organic carbon in rice fields: Evidence from a longterm fertilization experiment in subtropical China.Journalof Soils and Sediments, 13, 1327–1334.

    Wang J, Wang X, Xu M, Feng G, Zhang W, Lu C A. 2015a.Crop yield and soil organic matter after long-term straw return to soil in China.Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,102, 371–381.

    Wang J, Wang X, Xu M, Feng G, Zhang W, Yang X, Huang S.2015b. Contributions of wheat and maize residues to soil organic carbon under long-term rotation in north China.Scientific Reports, 5, 11409.

    Wang L, Qiu J, Tang H, Li H, Li C, Van Ranst E. 2008. Modelling soil organic carbon dynamics in the major agricultural regions of China.Geoderma, 147, 47–55.

    Wiesmeier M, Hübner R, K?gel-Knabner I. 2015. Stagnating crop yields: An over looked risk for the carbon balance of agricultural soils.Science of the Total Environment, 536,1045–1051.

    Wiesmeier M, Hübner R, Sp?rlein P, Geuss U, Hangen E,Reischl A, Schilling B, vov Lützow M, K?gel-Knabner I.2014. Carbon sequestration potential of soils in southeast Germay derived from stable soil organic carbon saturation.Global Chang Biology, 20, 653–665.

    Wiesmeier M, Poeplau C, Sierra C A, Maier H, Frühauf C,Hübner R, Kühnel A, Sp?rlein P, Geuss U, Hangen E,Schilling B, von Lützow M, K?gel-Knabner I. 2016. Projected loss of soil organic carbon in temperate agricultural soils in the 21st century: Effects of climate change and carbon input trends.Scientific Reports, 6, 1–17.

    Yan D, Wang D, Yang L. 2007. Long-term effect of chemical fertilizer, straw, and manure on labile organic matter fractions in a paddy soil.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 44,93–101.

    Yu G, Fang H, Gao L, Zhang W. 2006. Soil organic carbon budget and fertility variation of black soils in Northeast China.Ecological Research, 21, 855–867.

    Zhang J, Hu K, Li K, Zheng C, Li B. 2017. Simulating the effects of long-term discontinuous and continuous fertilization with straw return on crop yields and soil organic carbon dynamics using the DNDC model.Soil Tillage Research,165, 302–314.

    Zhang W, Wang X, Xu M, Huang S, Liu H, Peng C. 2010. soil organic carbon dynamics under long-term fertilizations in arable land of northern China.Biogeosciences, 7, 409–425.

    Zhang W, Xu M, Wang X, Huang Q, Nie J, Li Z, Li S, Hwang S W, Lee K B. 2012. Effects of organic amendments on soil carbon sequestration in paddy fields of subtropical China.Journal of Soils and Sediments, 12, 457–470.

    Zhang X, Sui Y, Song C. 2013. Degradation process of arable Mollisols.Soil Crop, 2, 1–6.

    Zheng L, Xie H, Zhang W, Zhang X. 2006. Effects of different ways of returning straw to the soils on soluble organic carbon.Ecological Research, 15, 80–83.

    猜你喜歡
    癌病流膠病櫻桃樹
    淺析黃瓜流膠病害與細(xì)菌性流膠病
    櫻桃樹屋
    櫻桃樹上的座位
    趣味(語文)(2021年4期)2021-08-05 07:52:04
    藍(lán)莓根癌病的發(fā)生與防治
    煙臺果樹(2021年3期)2021-07-21 10:34:42
    大棚櫻桃樹冬季修剪要點(diǎn)
    櫻桃引種過程中根癌病的發(fā)生情況調(diào)查
    河北果樹(2020年4期)2020-11-26 06:05:06
    武漢地區(qū)不同桃品種流膠病情況調(diào)查與評價(jià)
    落葉果樹(2020年5期)2020-10-22 07:32:12
    “櫻桃樹是我砍的”
    保護(hù)地黃瓜細(xì)菌性流膠病發(fā)生原因及防治對策
    甜櫻桃流膠病研究綜述
    煙臺果樹(2015年3期)2015-12-10 07:46:54
    欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产 一区精品| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产成人系列免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 777米奇影视久久| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 黄色 视频免费看| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久久精品94久久精品| 欧美成人午夜精品| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 高清不卡的av网站| 黄色 视频免费看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 成人影院久久| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 人妻一区二区av| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 另类精品久久| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 青草久久国产| 久久97久久精品| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 综合色丁香网| 久久久久久人妻| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产精品三级大全| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产毛片在线视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 丝袜美足系列| 天天影视国产精品| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 看免费成人av毛片| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 美女主播在线视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产成人系列免费观看| tube8黄色片| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 成人三级做爰电影| 五月天丁香电影| av在线老鸭窝| 欧美在线一区亚洲| svipshipincom国产片| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 久久免费观看电影| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 电影成人av| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产av精品麻豆| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 亚洲在久久综合| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 免费观看性生交大片5| 性色av一级| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 色吧在线观看| 99热全是精品| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 国产成人91sexporn| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 乱人伦中国视频| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产片内射在线| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 视频区图区小说| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 久久97久久精品| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 午夜影院在线不卡| 制服诱惑二区| 不卡av一区二区三区| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 日韩视频在线欧美| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲中文av在线| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 在线观看国产h片| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲成色77777| 在线观看三级黄色| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 自线自在国产av| 丁香六月天网| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 婷婷色综合www| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| videos熟女内射| 国产精品 国内视频| 91老司机精品| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 少妇人妻 视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲成色77777| 国产精品三级大全| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 9191精品国产免费久久| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产成人精品无人区| 黄片播放在线免费| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 操美女的视频在线观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产在视频线精品| 黄色视频不卡| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 日本色播在线视频| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 曰老女人黄片| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| av线在线观看网站| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 美女午夜性视频免费| 日本午夜av视频| a级毛片黄视频| av有码第一页| 9色porny在线观看| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| av免费观看日本| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产在线免费精品| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 午夜91福利影院| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 一级毛片 在线播放| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 久久青草综合色| 精品一区二区三卡| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 飞空精品影院首页| 91国产中文字幕| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 大香蕉久久网| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 丁香六月天网| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲在久久综合| 欧美另类一区| 美女中出高潮动态图| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 最黄视频免费看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 91老司机精品| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 黄色视频不卡| 久久97久久精品| 尾随美女入室| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 日韩av免费高清视频| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 视频区图区小说| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 9色porny在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 制服人妻中文乱码| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 欧美97在线视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 香蕉国产在线看| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 18在线观看网站| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 黄色视频不卡| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲中文av在线| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 超色免费av| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 电影成人av| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲精品视频女| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产精品 国内视频| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲人成电影观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 又大又爽又粗| 超碰97精品在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产一级毛片在线| bbb黄色大片| 18禁观看日本| 免费不卡黄色视频| tube8黄色片| 中文字幕色久视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 一级毛片电影观看| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| a级毛片黄视频| 电影成人av| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久久久久网色| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 999精品在线视频| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 如何舔出高潮| 久久这里只有精品19| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 中国三级夫妇交换| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 在线观看国产h片| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 不卡av一区二区三区| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 中文字幕制服av| 午夜老司机福利片| 天天影视国产精品| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 在现免费观看毛片| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 黄色一级大片看看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 99久久综合免费| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 在线观看三级黄色| 老熟女久久久| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲成色77777| 成人影院久久| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 韩国av在线不卡| 香蕉丝袜av| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 精品亚洲成国产av| 日本午夜av视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 9热在线视频观看99| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 久久久久久人妻| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 曰老女人黄片| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| av一本久久久久| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲av男天堂| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 男女免费视频国产| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 一级黄片播放器| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| tube8黄色片| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产探花极品一区二区| 人人澡人人妻人| 久久av网站| 在线观看国产h片| 1024香蕉在线观看| av天堂久久9| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 精品一区在线观看国产| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久狼人影院| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲国产看品久久| 中文字幕色久视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 99久久综合免费| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 日本91视频免费播放| 男女国产视频网站| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 午夜激情av网站| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产成人系列免费观看| 观看美女的网站| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 日本wwww免费看| 久久婷婷青草| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产极品天堂在线| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产极品天堂在线| 在线观看人妻少妇| 观看美女的网站| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 性色av一级| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 大香蕉久久成人网| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久狼人影院| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲图色成人| 在线观看国产h片| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 1024香蕉在线观看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产 一区精品| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久热在线av| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产一级毛片在线| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产乱来视频区| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲av男天堂| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 熟女av电影| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 99香蕉大伊视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 嫩草影院入口| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 欧美97在线视频| 99久久综合免费| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 一区福利在线观看| 咕卡用的链子| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 国产在视频线精品| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 少妇人妻 视频| 人妻一区二区av| 欧美日韩av久久| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 久久久国产一区二区| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av|