• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A major quantitative trait locus controlling phosphorus utilization efficiency under different phytate-P conditions at vegetative stage in barley

    2018-02-05 07:10:39GAOShangqingCHENGuangdengHUDeyiZHANGXizhouLlTingxuanLlUShihangLIUChunji
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年2期

    GAO Shang-qing, CHEN Guang-deng, HU De-yi, ZHANG Xi-zhou, Ll Ting-xuan, LlU Shi-hang, LIU Chun-ji

    1 College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China

    2 Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China

    3 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Agriculture Flagship, St Lucia, Queensland 4067,Australia

    1. lntroduction

    Phosphorus (P) is an essential nutrient for plant growth and development. Globally, application of P fertilizer was greater than removal of P by harvested crops in 2000. In addition, deficits of P occurred in 30% of cropland areas around the globe (MacDonaldet al. 2011). In soils, P has low mobility and a high rate of fixation (Schachtmanet al.1998; Tianet al. 2012). Because of these characteristics, P limits crop productivity around the world (Vanceet al. 2003).At present, applying phosphate fertilizer is still an effective way to improve yield and quality of crops (Cordellet al.2009). Statistics from the International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA) (http://www.fertilizer.org/ifa/) in 2006 showed that the annual input of phosphate fertilizer (P2O5)was more than 30 million tons, with the average input into wheat crops being 20 kg or more P2O5per ha (FAO 2006).However, the extensive application of phosphate fertilizer has fundamentally altered the global P cycle, and caused eutrophication and other environmental problems (Maet al.2012). Organic P constitutes 50–80% of total P in soils(Turneret al. 2002). Phytate-P is an important component of soil organic P, which can be absorbed and used by plantsviaacid phosphatase and phytase hydrolysis (Sharmaet al.2007; Starneset al. 2008; Yeet al. 2015). Therefore, it is desirable to develop cultivars with enhanced efficiency of phytate-P use because they may offer a sustainable solution for managing P supplementation in crop production.

    Phosphorus utilization efficiency (PUE) is mainly controlled by complex polygenic regulation, and significant differences in regulation exist between crop varieties and genotypes(Suet al. 2009; Wanget al. 2010). Previous studies have shown that plant tolerance to low P is regulated by multiple genes (Suet al. 2006; Oonoet al. 2013). Tolerance to low P and quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of related traits has been conducted in rice (Wissuwaet al. 1998), corn (Zhuet al. 2005), rapeseed (Yanget al. 2011), common bean (Liaoet al. 2004), and soybean (Liet al. 2005). In a rapeseed recombinant inbred line (RIL), Yanget al. (2011) conducted a QTL analysis and assessed six phenotypic traits at the vegetative stage under high P and low P conditions. They detected a total of 71 QTLs on 13 linkage groups, including 28 in low P conditions, 22 in high P conditions and 21 for relative traits. Kinget al. (2013) analyzed QTL for P accumulation in soybean, and identified three candidate genes on chromosomes 7, 12 and 17. In common bean, 19 related root morphology and P uptake traits were detected in eight linkage groups (Yanet al. 2004). Most of the phenotypic variance explained by these QTLs are low, and the identified markers could be difficult to use in breeding.A low P tolerance gene named asPSTOL1was detected in rice using a population of RILs under P deficiency (Wissuwaet al. 1998). Expression analysis in low P soil showed that this gene significantly enhanced grain yield. Further analysis showed that the gene significantly enhanced seedling root length and improved ability of P uptake (Gamuyaoet al.2012).

    The genotypic differences of PUE in wheat under P deficiency have been confirmed (Batten 1992). Hayeset al.(2004) showed that the P-efficient wheat accumulated 32%more P at a similar dry weight than P-inefficient wheat under low P conditions. At present, a variety of methods have been used in studying resistance to low P in wheat. These methods include the use of Chinese Spring nullisomics and substitution lines for a given chromosome and as well as QTL mapping(Liet al. 1999a, b; Suet al. 2006, 2009). In Chinese Spring nullisomic-tetrasomic lines, genes conferring resistance to low P stress have been found on chromosomes 1A, 4A, 7A, 3B,5B, and 7D. In addition, suppressor genes were also detected on chromosomes 1B, 4B, 7B, 3A, and 6D (Liet al. 1999a, b).QTL analysis using hybrids of Chinese Spring and the low P tolerant variety Lovrin 10 indicated that the main effect QTL controlling P efficiency was found on chromosomes 3B, 4B,and 5A (Suet al. 2006). A further study found seven QTLs for P absorption and six QTLs controlled PUE (Suet al. 2009).

    Barley is one of the most important cereal crops and is grown all over the world; it is widely used in feed and in the food industry, and is the main raw material for brewing beer(Feuillet and Muehlbauer 2009). It has a planting area of about 560 000 km2worldwide, with a total output of about 120 000 million kg (FAO, http://www.fao.org). Widely used in feed and food industry, barley is the main raw material for brewing beer (Feuillet and Muehlbauer 2009). Genotype differences also exist in PUE in barley (Asmaret al. 1995;Georgeet al. 2011). There are few studies on QTL mapping and genetic analysis of genes associated with PUE in barley,however, three QTLs for PUE have been identified on chromosomes 2H and 5H under different P conditions (Gonget al. 2016). Górny and Ratajczak (2008) successfully imported an exogenous gene to improve P uptake and utilization efficiency in barley and thus showed that improvement of PUE in barley is feasible. In this study, a RIL population derived from the cultivated barley variety Baudin and wild barley CN4027 was used to map QTLs for PUE, and to analyze the correlation of QTLs for PUE and P efficiency related traits at the vegetative stage under normal organic P (+P, 0.5 mmol L–1) and low organic P (–P, 0.05 mmol L–1)conditions using phytate-P as an organic P source.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Plant materials

    A population of RILs were generated using the embryo culture procedure described in previous studies (Chenet al.2013; Zhenget al. 2013). The RIL population contained 128 lines derived from a hybrid between a P-efficient wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) genotype CN4027 and a P-inefficient cultivated barley (H.vulgare) variety Baudin.

    2.2. Experimental design

    Hydroponic culture experiments were conducted to investigate the phenotypic traits of the two parents and the RIL population. Uniform seeds selected from the 128 RILs and the two parents were surface-sterilized for 15 min in 3% H2O2and then washed three times with deionized water.The surface-sterilized seeds were germinated on filter paper that was placed in Petri dishes covered with deionized water,followed by growth in an illuminated culture room until the cotyledons were fully developed after 6 days at 22–24°C.Uniform seedlings were then transferred carefully to a container containing modified Hoagland’s solution (Hoagland and Arnon 1950) without monopotassium phosphate. The P deficient solution consisted of 5.0 mmol L–1KNO3,2.0 mmol L–1MgSO4·7H2O, 4.0 mmol L–1Ca(NO3)2·4H2O,1.0 μmol L–1H3BO3, 0.5 μmol L–1CuSO4·5H2O,1.0 μmol L–1ZnSO4·7H2O, 1.0 μmol L–1MnCl2·4H2O,0.5 μmol L–1NaMoO4·2H2O, and 50 μmol L–1EDTA-Fe.The pH value of the nutrient solution was adjusted to 5.7±0.2 using 2 mol L–1NaOH or HCl every 2 days.

    A low phytate-P condition (0.05 mmol L–1) and a normal phytate-P condition (0.5 mmol L–1) added as phytate isolated from rice (myo-inositol hexaphosphoric acid dodecasodium salt, Sigma, USA) (Yeet al. 2015)were used in the RIL population and three replicates were conducted in two independent trials. Experiments were conducted in a split plot design, with P conditions as the main plot and genotype as the subplot. The two trials in the RIL population were conducted in the same greenhouse at Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu,China. Trial 1 was carried out from September 1 to November 6, 2014 and trial 2 was carried out from February 27 to April 25, 2015. The minimum and maximum temperatures in trial 1 ranged from 6 to 10°C and from 21 to 25°C and those in trial 2 ranged from 5 to10°C and from 16 to 21°C, respectively.

    2.3. Evaluation of plant performance

    After harvesting, tiller numbers (TN) were calculated and recorded. Then, roots and shoots were separated, and harvested tissues were dried at 105°C for 30 min followed by 75°C to constant weight. Shoot dry weight (SDW) and root dry weight (RDW) were measured for each line. Dried plants were ground to a fine powder and digested with 5 mL of a mixture of concentrated H2SO4and H2O2. Total P content was analyzed with Mo-Sb colorimetry at 700 nm using a spectrophotometer (UV-1200, MAPADA Instrument Co., Ltd., China) (Lu 1999). PUE was expressed as dry weight per unit of P taken up in shoots and roots (Yanget al. 2011).

    2.4. Molecular marker analysis and linkage map construction

    The method used for DNA isolation was as described by Chenet al. (2012). Diversity array technology (DArT)markers were initially used for linkage map construction and QTL analyses using 128 lines from the Baudin/CN4027 population. DArT genotyping of the parents and the mapping population was carried out by Triticarte Pty. Ltd. (http://www.tritcarte.com.au). Hybridization of genomic DNA to the DArT array, image analysis, and polymorphism scoring were conducted as described by Wenzlet al. (2004). Linkage analysis was carried out using the computer package JoinMap?4.0 (Van Ooijen 2006).

    2.5. Data analysis and QTL mapping

    Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v22.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Pearson correlation coefficients and least significant difference (LSD) tests were estimated between traits and trials. Analysis of variance(ANOVA) was employed to estimate genetic variance (σ2G),environmental variance (σ2E), and subsequently broad-sense heritability (h2b). The effects of replicate and genotype for PUE, TN, and biomass were determined using covariance analysis.

    Segregation ratios of assessed markers were tested by Chi-square goodness-of-fit to a 1:1 ratio at the significance level ofP=0.01. LOD thresholds from 3 to 10 were tested,until a threshold with the optimum number of markers in linkage groups maintaining linkage order and distance was obtained. The Kosambi mapping function was used to convert recombination ratios to map distances. MapQTL?5.0 (Van Ooijen 2004) was used for QTL analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used as a preliminary test of associations between markers. Interval mapping (IM)was then used to identify major QTL. Automatic cofactor selection was used to fit the multiple QTL model (MQM) and to select significantly associated-markers as cofactors. A linkage map showing the QTL positions was drawn using Mapchart (Voorrips 2002).

    3. Results

    3.1. Phenotypic variation under two phytate-P levels

    Significant differences in PUE were found between the two parents harvested at the vegetative stage. The PUE of CN4027 for shoots and roots were higher than those of Baudin for both phytate-P conditions (Fig. 1). Under low phytate-P, shoot and root PUE of the parent CN4027 were 534.2 and 426.5 g DW g–1P, respectively, and for the parent Baudin, these values were 366.8 and 328.3 g DW g–1P, respectively. Under normal phytate-P, shoot and root PUE of CN4027 were 156.8 and 141.0 g DW g–1P,respectively and those for the parent Baudin were 132.8 and 120.9 g DW g–1P, respectively. The RIL population exhibited distinct differences from parents in PUE under the two different phytate-P levels. The coefficients of variation ranged from 16.53 to 27.29% in roots and shoots. Lines with better PUE than the parent CN4027 were detected under both of the phytate-P conditions. Transgressive segregation of PUE was observed in the RIL population(Table 1).

    Highly significant differences in P efficiency related traits (TN, RDW, and SDW) were detected between the commercial cultivar Baudin and wild barley CN4027(Table 1). The RIL population exhibited distinct differences in most of the investigated traits in both phytate-P levels.All traits showed continuously and approximately Gaussian distributtion (data not shown), which indicated that the traits were also suitable for QTL mapping. Theh2bfor different traits varied from 66.95 to 87.01%.

    Fig. 1 QTL conferring phosphorus utilization efficiency (PUE) with root (A) and shoot (B) detected on chromosome 3H under the low (–P) and normal phytate-P (+P) conditions. The vertical dotted line indicates the average significance threshold (LOD=3.0)derived from permutation tests. RPUE01 and RPUE02, root P utilization efficiency in trail 1 (September 1 to November 6, 2014)and trail 2 (February 27 to April 25, 2015), respectively; SPUE01 and SPUE02, shoot PUE in trails 1 and 2, respectively.

    3.2. Genetic linkage map construction

    The linkage map constructed in this study consisted of 607 DArT markers that spanned 1 148.70 cM in length with an average interval of 1.89 cM between adjacent markers(Appendix A). The seven linkage groups ranged from 198.11 cM for chromosome 2H to 128.65 cM for chromosome 5H,and the average distances between markers ranged from 1.45 cM for 4H to 2.15 cM for 1H. Linkage distances larger than 20 cM were present only in 3H and 5H. The number of markers ranged from 64 for 4H to 103 for 2H, with an overall average number of markers per chromosome of 87.

    3.3. QTL mapping for PUE

    A large-effect QTL for PUE in shoots and roots was mapped on 3H (Fig. 1). The LOD values of this QTL varied from 5.08 to 9.16 (Table 2). The QTL was designatedQpue.sau-3H, wherepuestands for P utilization efficiency andsaustands for Sichuan Agricultural University. Based on MQM analysis, markers flanking the locus were bPb3256099 and bPb3931069 under both phytate-P conditions assessed (Table 2). TheQpue.sau-3Hin shoots explains up to 30.2 and 29.5% of the phenotypic variance under low and normal phytate-P conditions, respectively. Favorable alleles from theQpue.sau-3Hin shoots mapped on chromosome 3H, which were from the higher PUE parent CN4027 and contribute to increase PUE. The phenotypic variance in roots explained byQpue.sau-3Hwas 28.9 and 30.7% under the low and normal phytate-P conditions, respectively.

    3.4. QTL mapping for P efficiency related traits under two phytate-P levels

    A QTL for TN at the vegetative stage was detected under both the low and normal phytate-P conditions (Table 3). The QTL,designatedQtn.sau-5H, was located between bPb6277350 and bPb3265782 on chromosome 5H. This QTL explained 13.8 to 19.7% with an average of 16.8%of the phenotypic variance under the low phytate-P condition and 15.8 to 22.7% with an average of 19.2% of the phenotypic variance under the normal phytate-P condition. LOD values ofQtn.sau-5Hvaried from 4.01 to 6.36 with an average of 5.20, and favorable alleles came from the male parent CN4027.

    Two QTLs for DW were identified under the both phytate-P conditions (Table 3).One of them,Qdw.sau-3H, was located on chromosome 3H under both phytate-P conditions (Fig. 2). This QTL explained on an average of 14.2% (–P) and 18.8% (+P)of the phenotypic variance in roots, and an average of 30.9% (–P) and 25.2% (+P)of the phenotypic variance in shoots. The other QTL was only detected under the low P condition. This QTL was localized between bPb6277350 and bPb3265782 on chromosome 5H and it explained 15.1 to 17.8% with an average of 16.4% of the phenotypic variance in roots.

    3.5. Effects of TN and biomass on PUE

    ?

    Correlation analyses were performed among the traits and their relative values in different phytate-P conditions (Table 4). TN was not correlated with PUE in roots or shoots under either of the phytate-P conditions. DW was significantly correlated with PUE in roots and shoots under both of the phytate-P conditions, and the correlation coefficient varied from 0.27 to 0.46.

    The location ofQdw.sau-3Hwas similar to that ofQpue.sau-3H. To quantify the possible effect of DW on PUE, data from the two PUE trials were analysed against data from the two DW trials by covariance analysis. Thisanalysis showed that the LOD value ofQpue.sau-3Hwas reduced when the effect of DW was accounted for by the covariance analysis. However, the position ofQpue.sau-3Hwas unchanged on chromosome 3H (Fig. 3).

    Table 2 Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping for phosphorus utilization efficiency (PUE) under the low (–P) and normal phytate-P(+P) conditions

    Fig. 2 Quantitative trait locus (QTL) conferring dry weight (DW) with root (A) and shoot (B) detected on chromosome 3H under the low (–P) and normal phytate-P (+P) conditions. RDW01 and RDW02, root DW in trail 1 (September 1 to November 6, 2014) and trail 2 (February 27 to April 25, 2015), respectively; SDW01 and SDW02, shoot DW in trails 1 and 2, respectively.

    Table 4 Correlation coefficients between investigated traits in two trails1)

    4. Discussion

    4.1. Variation in PUE of parents and the RlL population at two phytate-P levels

    Significant differences in PUE were found between the two parents at the vegetative stage at both phytate-P conditions. The results showed that theH.spontaneumaccession CN4027 was more effective in utilizing organic P for plant growth. Previous studies were focused on variation in P uptake and utilization efficiency using inorganic P sources. However, few studies have explored PUE under organic P treatment. Some researchers found that two types of grass (Duo grass and rye grass) could obtain enough P from phytate to meet their requirements for P, and they had better dry weight growth than plants that were not supplied with P (Priya and Sahi 2009; Sharma and Sahi 2011). The mining ecotype ofPolygonum hydropiperis also capable of assimilating P from Po media supplied as phytate. Compared with the non-mining ecotype ofP.hydropiper, the mining ecotype had significantly higher root and shoot biomass (Yeet al. 2015). Our previous study suggested that P accumulation of P-efficient genotypes was higher than that of P-inefficient genotypes under the various concentrations of phytate-P in barley(Caiet al. 2014).

    The RILs in this study also exhibited distinct differences in PUE under both phytate-P levels. RIL lines had significantly higher or lower values than the parents for PUE, indicating potential transgressive variations. In wheat, different fertilization regimes of N and P in 182 RILs led to broad,continuous variation in 22 phenotypic traits, as well as significant transgressive segregation (Xuet al. 2014).Shiet al. (2008) determined that there was a significant separation of P content in grains from 119 lines of a doubled haploid wheat population (Shiet al. 2008). In maize, traits related to P efficiency were found to segregate continuously,and to have an approximately normal distribution with absolute values of less than one for skewness and curtness(Chenet al. 2008). For all of the traits studied, transgressive variation in rice was typically negative with only PUE showing positive transgression (Wissuwaet al. 1998). The phenotypic value of PUE inBrassica napusalso showed large variation among the RIL population under both P conditions (Yanget al. 2011).

    Fig. 3 Logarithm of odds (LOD) values of Qpue.sau-3H with root (A) and shoot (B) obtained from combined data of the two trials pre-adjustment by biomass (combined) and post-adjustment by biomass (adjusted). RPUE, root P utilization efficiency; SPUE,shoot P utilization efficiency. –P, low phytate-P condition; +P, normal phytate-P condition.

    4.2. QTL for PUE under the two phytate-P levels

    P uptake and utilization efficiency is regulated by multiple genes (Suet al. 2006; Oonoet al. 2013). A study on QTL mapping for PUE in barley showed that three loci were mapped on chromosomes 2H and 5H under different P conditions and explained 7.47 to 8.99% in a doubled haploid Commander/Fleet population (Gonget al. 2016). Naturally,breeding barley cultivars with nutrient efficiency require more QTLs. In this study, a novel and major locus controlling PUE, located at the chromosome 3H (Qpue.sau-3H), was detected in P-efficient wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum)genotype CN4027. This QTL explains 28.3 and 30.7%of the phenotypic variation in roots under low and normal phytate-P conditions, respectively.

    Collinearity between genomes of closely related species has been used to predict and locate genes and markers of interest (Chenet al. 2013). In wheat and barley, gene order is highly conserved, however, there are a few translocations between wheat genomes A and B that have been well characterized (Liuet al. 1992; Devos 2005).With the use of Chinese Spring nullisomic-tetrasomic lines genes conferring low P tolerance and suppressor genes were also detected on chromosomes 1B, 4B, 7B,3A, and 6D (Liet al. 1999a, b). Six loci regulating P utilization efficiencies are located on chromosomes 1A,2A, 3A, 3B, 5A, and 6B (Suet al. 2009). The positive and negative linkages between the QTLs mapped to these six loci, suggest that the locus on chromosome 3B is a good candidate for selection to improve PUE. Two QTLs for PUE in shoots were located on chromosomes 1B and 5A,and three QTLs for PUE in the whole plant were located on chromosomes 2B, 5A, and 7A in the RIL population derived from two wheat varieties W7984 and Opata85 (Caoet al.2001). Guoet al. (2012) used QTL mapping in wheat to assess seedling traits under varying concentrations of N,P and K, and found that a locus for PUE in roots is located on chromosome 1B. Thus the QTL controlling PUE on 3A and 3B in wheat is unlikely to be homologous withQpue.sau-3Hin barley.

    4.3. Correlation between PUE and P efficiency related traits

    PUE is a complex trait, which can be evaluated by biomass,TN, root morphology, and leaf area (Liaoet al. 2004). In this study, DW and TN were selected to evaluate the P efficiency of barley. TN was not correlated with PUE in roots and shoots under either of the phytate-P conditions. However,Suet al. (2006) showed that TN was significantly positively correlated with shoot P uptake, and negatively related with PUE under both of the P conditions. QTL analysis detected a locus for TN from both phytate-P conditions. Different from that ofQpue.sau-3H, this locus for TN was located on 5H (Qtn.sau-5H).

    DW was significantly correlated with PUE in roots and shoots of the RIL population. Suet al. (2009) also showed that PUE has a positive correlation with shoot DW in wheat.Two QTLs affecting DW were detected in this study; the location ofQdw.sau-3Hon chromosome 3H was similar to that ofQpue.sau-3H. Similar results have been found for nitrogen-related traits in wheat (Xuet al. 2014). Further analysis showed that the LOD value ofQpue.sau-3Hwas reduced when the effect of DW was accounted for by covariance analysis. But, the position ofQpue.sau-3Hwas unchanged on chromosome 3H. Developing and exploiting near isogenic lines (NILs) and NIL-derived populations(Chenet al. 2012), as carried out for traits related to PUE,could be an option to further investigate the relationship between gene(s) controlling PUE and DW in barley.

    5. Conclusion

    In summary, enhancing P efficiency is an important target in barley breeding. We report in this paper a QTL study on PUE and PUE related traits under different phytate-P levels (normal phytate-P, 0.5 mmol L–1and low phytate-P,0.05 mmol L–1) using a RIL population. A novel and major locus (Qpue.sau-3H) was detected on chromosome 3H conferring PUE in shoots and roots from the RIL population under two different phytate-P levels. Results from this study also showed that TN was not correlated with PUE, and a QTL controlling TN was detected on chromosome 5H in the RIL population. However, DW was significantly and positively correlated with PUE, and a QTL controlling DW was detected near theQpue.sau-3Hlocus. Existing data by covariance analysis indicated that different genes at this locus are likely involved in controlling these two traits. The existence ofQpue.sau-3Hmay offer valuable clues for fine mapping and map-based cloning in barley.

    Acknowledgements

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401377), the Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Province, China (2017JY0126),and the Key Project of Education Department of Sichuan Province, China (14ZA0002).

    Appendix associated with this paper can be available on http://www.ChinaAgriSci.com/V2/En/appendix.htm

    Asmar F, Singh T, Gahoonia, Nielsen N E. 1995. Barley genotypes differ in activity of soluble extracellular phosphatase and depletion of organic phosphorus in the rhizosphere soil.Plant and Soil, 172, 117–122.

    Batten G D. 1992. A review of phosphorus efficiency in wheat.Plant and Soil, 146, 163–168.

    Cai Q Y, Zhong X Z, Li T X, Chen G D. 2014. Effects of phosphorus sources on phosphorus fractions in rhizosphere soil of wild barley genotypes with high phosphorus utilization efficiency.Journal of Applied Ecology, 25, 3207–3214.

    Cao W D, Jia J Z, Jin J Y. 2001. Identification and interaction analysis of QTL for phosphorus use efficiency in wheat.Plant Natrition & Fertilizen Science, 92, 76–77.

    Chen G D, Li H B, Zheng Z, Wei Y M, Zheng Y L, McIntyre C L, Zhou M X, Liu C J. 2012. Characterization of a QTL affecting spike morphology on the long arm of chromosome 3H in barley (Hordeum vulgareL.) based on near isogenic lines and a NIL-derived population.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 125, 1385–1392.

    Chen G D, Liu Y X, Ma J, Zheng Z, Wei Y M, Mclntyre C L,Zheng Y L, Liu C J. 2013. A novel and major quantitative trait locus for fusarium crown rot resistance in a genotype of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneumL.).PLoS ONE, 8, e58040.

    Chen J Y, Xu L, Cai Y L, Xu J. 2008. QTL mapping of phosphorus efficiency and relative biologic characteristics in maize (Zea maysL.) at two sites.Plant and Soil, 313,251–266.

    Cordell D, Drangert J O, White S. 2009. The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought.Global Environmental Change, 19, 292–305.

    Devos K M. 2005. Updating the ‘Crop Circle’.Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 8, 155–162.

    FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2006.Fertilizer Use by Crop in the Sudan.Natural Resources Management and Environment Department, Rome. pp. 1–108.

    Feuillet C, Muehlbauer G J. 2009.Genetics and Genomics of the Triticeae, Plant Genetics and Genomics:Crops and Models. Springer, Berlin. p. 7.

    Gamuyao R, Chin J H, Pariasca-Tanaka J, Pesaresi P,Catausan S, Dalid C, Slamet-Loedin I, Tecson-Mendoza E M, Wissuwa M, Heuer S. 2012. The protein kinase Pstol1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency.Nature, 7412, 535–539.

    George T S, Brown L K, Newton A C, Hallett P D, Sun B H,Thomas W T B, White P J. 2011. Impact of soil tillage on the robustness of the genetic component of variation in phosphorus (P) use efficiency in barley (Hordeum vulgareL.).Plant and Soil, 339, 113–123.

    Gong X, Wheeler R, Bovill W D, McDonald G K. 2016. QTL mapping of grain yield and phosphorus efficiency in barley in a Mediterranean-like environment.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 129, 1657–1672.

    Górny A G, Ratajczak D. 2008. Efficiency of nitrogen and phosphorus utilization in progenies of factorial crosses between European and exotic cultivars of spring barley(Hordeum vulgareL.).Journal of Applied Ecology, 49,349–355.

    Guo Y, Kong F M, Xue Y F, Zhao Y, Liang X, Wang Y Y, An D G, Li S S. 2012. QTL mapping for seedling traits in wheat grown under varying concentrations of N, P and K nutrients.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 124, 851–865.

    Hayes J E, Zhu Y G, Mimura T, Reid R J. 2004. An assessment of the usefulness of solution culture in screening for phosphorus efficiency in wheat.Plant and Soil, 261, 91–97.

    Hoagland D R, Arnon D I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil.California Department of Agriculture Experimental Station, 347, 357–359.

    King K E, Lauter N, Lin S F, Scott M P, Shoemaker R C. 2013.Evaluation and QTL mapping of phosphorus concentration in soybean seed.Euphytica, 189, 261–269.

    Li Y D, Wang Y J, Tong Y P, Gao J G, Zhang J S, Chen S Y.2005. QTL mapping of phosphorus deficiency tolerance in soybean (Glycine maxL. Merr.).Euphytica, 142, 137–142.

    Li Y J, Liu J Z, Li B, Li J Y, Yao S J, Li Z S. 1999a. Chromosomal control of the tolerance to phosphorus deficiency in genome ofTriticum aestivumChinese Spring.Acta Genetica Sinica,26, 529–538. (in Chinese)

    Li Y J, Liu J Z, Li B, Li J Y, Yao S J, Li Z S. 1999b. Ear length elytrigiarepens genome and resistance to low phosphorus nutrition chromosomal location of genes related to stress.Acta Genetica Sinica, 26, 703–710. (in Chinese)

    Liao H, Yan X L, Rubio G, Beebe S E, Blair M W, Lynch J P. 2004. Genetic mapping of basal root gravitropism and phosphorus acquisition efficiency in common bean.Functional Glant Biology, 31, 959–970.

    Liu C J, Atkinson M D, Chinoy C N, Devos K M, Gale M D.1992. Nonhomoeologous translocations between group 4,5 and 7 chromosomes within wheat and rye.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 83, 305–312.

    Lu R K. 1999.Analysis of Soil Agrochemistry. Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing. pp.312–314. (in Chinese)

    Ma L, Velthof G L, Wang F H, Zhang W F, Wei J, Lesschen J P, Ma W Q, Oenema O, Zhang F S. 2012. Nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies and losses in the food chain in China at regional scales in 1980 and 2005.Science of the Total Environment, 434, 51–61.

    MacDonald G K, Bennett E M, Potter P A, Navin R. 2011.Agronomic phosphorus imbalances across the world’s croplands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 3086–3091.

    Van Ooijen J W. 2004. MapQTL version 5.0, software for the mapping of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations.Kyazma B.V., Wageningen, Netherlands.

    Van Ooijen J W. 2006. JointMap?4, software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations.Kyazma B.V., Wageningen, Netherlands.

    Oono Y, Kobayashi F, Kawahara Y, Yazawa1 T, Handa H,Itoh T, Matsumoto T. 2013. Characterisation of the wheat(Triticum aestivumL.) transcriptome byde novo-assembly for the discovery of phosphate starvation-responsive genes:Gene expression in Pi-stressed wheat.BMC Genomics,14, 77.

    Priya P, Sahi S V. 2009. Influence of phosphorus nutrition on growth and metabolism of Duo grass (Duo festulolium).Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 47, 31–36.

    Schachtman D P, Reid R J, Ayling S M. 1998. Phosphorus uptake by plants: From soil to cell.Plant Physiollogy, 116,447–453.

    Sharma N C, Sahi S V. 2011. Enhanced organic phosphorus assimilation promoting biomass and shoot P hyper accumulations inLolium multiflorumgrown under sterile conditions.Environmental Science & Technology, 45,10531–10537.

    Sharma N C, Starnes D L, Sahi S V. 2007. Phytoextraction of excess soil phosphorus.Environmental Pollution, 146,120–127.

    Shi R L, Li H W, Tong Y P, Jing R L, Zhang F S, Zou C Q.2008. Identification of quantitative trait locus of zinc and phosphorus density in wheat (TriticumaestivumL.)grain.Plant and Soil, 306, 95–104.

    Starnes D L, Padmanabhan P, Sahi S V. 2008. Effect of P sources on growth, P accumulation and activities of phytase and acid phosphatases in two cultivars of annual ryegrass(Lolium multiflorumL.).Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,46, 580–589.

    Su J Y, Li H W, Li B, Jing R L, Li Z S. 2009. Detection of QTLs for phosphorus use efficiency inrelation to agronomic performance of wheat grown under phosphorus sufficient and limited conditions.Plant Science, 176, 824–836.

    Su J Y, Xiao Y M, Li M, Liu Q Y, Li B, Tong Y P, Jia J Z, Li Z S.2006. Mapping QTLs for phosphorus-deficiency tolerance at wheat seedling stage.Plant and Soil, 281, 25–36.

    Tian J, Wang X, Tong Y, Chen X, Liao H. 2012. Bioengineering and management for efficient phosphorus utilization in crops and pastures.Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 23,866–871.

    Turner B L, Paphazy M J, Haygarth P M, McKelvie I D. 2002.Inositol phosphates in the environment, philosophical transactions-royal society.Biological Sciences(London),357, 449–469.

    Vance C P, Uhde-Stone C, Allan D L. 2003. Phosphorus acquisition and use: Critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource.New Phytologist, 157,423–447.

    Voorrips R E. 2002. MAPCHART: Software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs.Journal of Heredity,93, 77–78.

    Wang X, Shen J, Liao H. 2010. Acquisition or utilization, which is more critical for enhancing phosphorus efficiency in modern crops?Plant Science, 179, 302–306.

    Wenzl P, Carling J, Kudrna D, Jaccoud D, Huttner E, Kleinhofs A, Kilian A. 2004. Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for whole-genome profiling of barley.Proceedings of the National Aademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 9915–9920.

    Wissuwa M, Yano M, Ae N. 1998. Mapping of QTLs for phosphorus-deficiency tolerance in rice (Oryza sativaL.).Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 97, 777–783.

    Xu Y F, Wang R F, Tong Y P, Zhao H T, Xie Q G, Liu D C,Zhang A M, Li B, Xu H X, An D G. 2014. Mapping QTLs for yield and nitrogen-related traits in wheat: Influence of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on QTL expression.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 127, 59–72.

    Yan X L, Liao H, Beebe S E, Blair M W, Lynch J P. 2004. QTL mapping of root hair and acid exudation traits and their relationship to phosphorus uptake in common bean.Plant and Soil, 265, 17–29.

    Yang M, Ding G D, Shi L, Xu F S, Meng J L. 2011. Detection of QTL for phosphorus efficiency at vegetative stage inBrassica napus.Plant and Soil, 339, 97–111.

    Ye D H, Li T X, Zheng Z C, Zhang X Z, Chen G D, Yu H Y.2015. Root physiological adaptations involved in enhancing P assimilation in mining and non-mining ecotypes ofPolygonum hydropipergrown under organic P media.Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 1–10.

    Zheng Z, Wang H B, Chen G D, Yan G J, Liu C J. 2013. A procedure allowing up to eight generations of wheat and nine generations of barley per annum.Euphytica, 191,311–316.

    Zhu J M, Kaeppler S M, Lynch J P. 2005. Mapping of QTL controlling root hair length in maize (Zea maysL.) under phosphorus deficiency.Plant and Soil, 270, 299–310.

    男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 一本一本综合久久| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产老妇女一区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 久久影院123| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产探花极品一区二区| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 婷婷色av中文字幕| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久久av| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产91av在线免费观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 中文字幕制服av| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 日韩视频在线欧美| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 精品酒店卫生间| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 直男gayav资源| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 插逼视频在线观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产高清三级在线| av.在线天堂| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 免费少妇av软件| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 久久久成人免费电影| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 日本黄大片高清| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | av黄色大香蕉| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 日日啪夜夜爽| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 七月丁香在线播放| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产成人freesex在线| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 人妻一区二区av| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 直男gayav资源| 全区人妻精品视频| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 欧美人与善性xxx| 欧美bdsm另类| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 大香蕉久久网| 97超视频在线观看视频| 青春草国产在线视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 超碰97精品在线观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 舔av片在线| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美另类一区| 51国产日韩欧美| 精品一区二区三卡| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产av不卡久久| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| av在线亚洲专区| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 久久精品夜色国产| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产成人91sexporn| 人妻一区二区av| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产精品成人在线| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 观看美女的网站| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产视频内射| 成年版毛片免费区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 欧美日本视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| 在线 av 中文字幕| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 少妇人妻 视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 人人妻人人看人人澡| 午夜免费观看性视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲无线观看免费| 伦精品一区二区三区| 人妻一区二区av| 搞女人的毛片| 在线a可以看的网站| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 一级爰片在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 久久97久久精品| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 天美传媒精品一区二区| av黄色大香蕉| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产淫语在线视频| 成人国产麻豆网| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 免费看光身美女| 国产精品成人在线| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 美女国产视频在线观看| 性色av一级| 国产成人一区二区在线| av免费在线看不卡| 国产成人aa在线观看| 搞女人的毛片| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产黄片美女视频| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| videos熟女内射| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 嫩草影院新地址| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久久久精品性色| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲内射少妇av| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 熟女电影av网| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 精品午夜福利在线看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 嫩草影院入口| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 91狼人影院| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲成色77777| 精品久久久久久久久av| 观看免费一级毛片| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 青春草国产在线视频| 全区人妻精品视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 日本wwww免费看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 欧美zozozo另类| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 久久久成人免费电影| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 中文欧美无线码| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 黑人高潮一二区| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 欧美另类一区| 久久久久久久精品精品| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产一级毛片在线| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 日日啪夜夜撸| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| av.在线天堂| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 日本一二三区视频观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 777米奇影视久久| 免费看日本二区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 日韩强制内射视频| 国产色婷婷99| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲在线观看片| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲综合色惰| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久热精品热| 亚洲国产色片| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 久久久色成人| 永久网站在线| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 夫妻午夜视频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 欧美bdsm另类| 超碰97精品在线观看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| av线在线观看网站| 久久热精品热| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 欧美日本视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 有码 亚洲区| 精品久久久精品久久久| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 日韩av免费高清视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 色吧在线观看| 老司机影院成人| 人妻一区二区av| 久久久成人免费电影| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 毛片女人毛片| 午夜日本视频在线| 简卡轻食公司| 日日啪夜夜撸| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| freevideosex欧美| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 日本午夜av视频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 色5月婷婷丁香| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 日韩中字成人| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产成人91sexporn| 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲内射少妇av| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 黄色一级大片看看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产老妇女一区| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 视频区图区小说| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产综合精华液| 黄色一级大片看看| 国内精品宾馆在线| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 秋霞伦理黄片| 嫩草影院新地址| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 一级毛片 在线播放| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 美女主播在线视频| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 色吧在线观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲av一区综合| 岛国毛片在线播放| 久久久色成人| 国产精品无大码| 99久久人妻综合| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产男女内射视频| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 亚洲综合色惰| 丝袜喷水一区| 嫩草影院精品99| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 99久久人妻综合| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 久久久国产一区二区| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲精品视频女| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 国产视频内射| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 香蕉精品网在线| 中国三级夫妇交换| kizo精华| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 高清av免费在线| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 国产精品无大码| av专区在线播放| av一本久久久久| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲四区av| 午夜福利在线在线| 一级av片app| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 99热全是精品| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 一级毛片我不卡| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久久久九九精品影院| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 午夜福利视频精品| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久久av| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| tube8黄色片| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 欧美bdsm另类| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 性色av一级| 少妇丰满av| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| av.在线天堂| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 日本色播在线视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 中文欧美无线码| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 一级爰片在线观看| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产成人精品婷婷| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 青春草国产在线视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 国产 一区精品| 午夜视频国产福利| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 深夜a级毛片| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站|