• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A major quantitative trait locus controlling phosphorus utilization efficiency under different phytate-P conditions at vegetative stage in barley

    2018-02-05 07:10:39GAOShangqingCHENGuangdengHUDeyiZHANGXizhouLlTingxuanLlUShihangLIUChunji
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年2期

    GAO Shang-qing, CHEN Guang-deng, HU De-yi, ZHANG Xi-zhou, Ll Ting-xuan, LlU Shi-hang, LIU Chun-ji

    1 College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China

    2 Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China

    3 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Agriculture Flagship, St Lucia, Queensland 4067,Australia

    1. lntroduction

    Phosphorus (P) is an essential nutrient for plant growth and development. Globally, application of P fertilizer was greater than removal of P by harvested crops in 2000. In addition, deficits of P occurred in 30% of cropland areas around the globe (MacDonaldet al. 2011). In soils, P has low mobility and a high rate of fixation (Schachtmanet al.1998; Tianet al. 2012). Because of these characteristics, P limits crop productivity around the world (Vanceet al. 2003).At present, applying phosphate fertilizer is still an effective way to improve yield and quality of crops (Cordellet al.2009). Statistics from the International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA) (http://www.fertilizer.org/ifa/) in 2006 showed that the annual input of phosphate fertilizer (P2O5)was more than 30 million tons, with the average input into wheat crops being 20 kg or more P2O5per ha (FAO 2006).However, the extensive application of phosphate fertilizer has fundamentally altered the global P cycle, and caused eutrophication and other environmental problems (Maet al.2012). Organic P constitutes 50–80% of total P in soils(Turneret al. 2002). Phytate-P is an important component of soil organic P, which can be absorbed and used by plantsviaacid phosphatase and phytase hydrolysis (Sharmaet al.2007; Starneset al. 2008; Yeet al. 2015). Therefore, it is desirable to develop cultivars with enhanced efficiency of phytate-P use because they may offer a sustainable solution for managing P supplementation in crop production.

    Phosphorus utilization efficiency (PUE) is mainly controlled by complex polygenic regulation, and significant differences in regulation exist between crop varieties and genotypes(Suet al. 2009; Wanget al. 2010). Previous studies have shown that plant tolerance to low P is regulated by multiple genes (Suet al. 2006; Oonoet al. 2013). Tolerance to low P and quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of related traits has been conducted in rice (Wissuwaet al. 1998), corn (Zhuet al. 2005), rapeseed (Yanget al. 2011), common bean (Liaoet al. 2004), and soybean (Liet al. 2005). In a rapeseed recombinant inbred line (RIL), Yanget al. (2011) conducted a QTL analysis and assessed six phenotypic traits at the vegetative stage under high P and low P conditions. They detected a total of 71 QTLs on 13 linkage groups, including 28 in low P conditions, 22 in high P conditions and 21 for relative traits. Kinget al. (2013) analyzed QTL for P accumulation in soybean, and identified three candidate genes on chromosomes 7, 12 and 17. In common bean, 19 related root morphology and P uptake traits were detected in eight linkage groups (Yanet al. 2004). Most of the phenotypic variance explained by these QTLs are low, and the identified markers could be difficult to use in breeding.A low P tolerance gene named asPSTOL1was detected in rice using a population of RILs under P deficiency (Wissuwaet al. 1998). Expression analysis in low P soil showed that this gene significantly enhanced grain yield. Further analysis showed that the gene significantly enhanced seedling root length and improved ability of P uptake (Gamuyaoet al.2012).

    The genotypic differences of PUE in wheat under P deficiency have been confirmed (Batten 1992). Hayeset al.(2004) showed that the P-efficient wheat accumulated 32%more P at a similar dry weight than P-inefficient wheat under low P conditions. At present, a variety of methods have been used in studying resistance to low P in wheat. These methods include the use of Chinese Spring nullisomics and substitution lines for a given chromosome and as well as QTL mapping(Liet al. 1999a, b; Suet al. 2006, 2009). In Chinese Spring nullisomic-tetrasomic lines, genes conferring resistance to low P stress have been found on chromosomes 1A, 4A, 7A, 3B,5B, and 7D. In addition, suppressor genes were also detected on chromosomes 1B, 4B, 7B, 3A, and 6D (Liet al. 1999a, b).QTL analysis using hybrids of Chinese Spring and the low P tolerant variety Lovrin 10 indicated that the main effect QTL controlling P efficiency was found on chromosomes 3B, 4B,and 5A (Suet al. 2006). A further study found seven QTLs for P absorption and six QTLs controlled PUE (Suet al. 2009).

    Barley is one of the most important cereal crops and is grown all over the world; it is widely used in feed and in the food industry, and is the main raw material for brewing beer(Feuillet and Muehlbauer 2009). It has a planting area of about 560 000 km2worldwide, with a total output of about 120 000 million kg (FAO, http://www.fao.org). Widely used in feed and food industry, barley is the main raw material for brewing beer (Feuillet and Muehlbauer 2009). Genotype differences also exist in PUE in barley (Asmaret al. 1995;Georgeet al. 2011). There are few studies on QTL mapping and genetic analysis of genes associated with PUE in barley,however, three QTLs for PUE have been identified on chromosomes 2H and 5H under different P conditions (Gonget al. 2016). Górny and Ratajczak (2008) successfully imported an exogenous gene to improve P uptake and utilization efficiency in barley and thus showed that improvement of PUE in barley is feasible. In this study, a RIL population derived from the cultivated barley variety Baudin and wild barley CN4027 was used to map QTLs for PUE, and to analyze the correlation of QTLs for PUE and P efficiency related traits at the vegetative stage under normal organic P (+P, 0.5 mmol L–1) and low organic P (–P, 0.05 mmol L–1)conditions using phytate-P as an organic P source.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Plant materials

    A population of RILs were generated using the embryo culture procedure described in previous studies (Chenet al.2013; Zhenget al. 2013). The RIL population contained 128 lines derived from a hybrid between a P-efficient wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) genotype CN4027 and a P-inefficient cultivated barley (H.vulgare) variety Baudin.

    2.2. Experimental design

    Hydroponic culture experiments were conducted to investigate the phenotypic traits of the two parents and the RIL population. Uniform seeds selected from the 128 RILs and the two parents were surface-sterilized for 15 min in 3% H2O2and then washed three times with deionized water.The surface-sterilized seeds were germinated on filter paper that was placed in Petri dishes covered with deionized water,followed by growth in an illuminated culture room until the cotyledons were fully developed after 6 days at 22–24°C.Uniform seedlings were then transferred carefully to a container containing modified Hoagland’s solution (Hoagland and Arnon 1950) without monopotassium phosphate. The P deficient solution consisted of 5.0 mmol L–1KNO3,2.0 mmol L–1MgSO4·7H2O, 4.0 mmol L–1Ca(NO3)2·4H2O,1.0 μmol L–1H3BO3, 0.5 μmol L–1CuSO4·5H2O,1.0 μmol L–1ZnSO4·7H2O, 1.0 μmol L–1MnCl2·4H2O,0.5 μmol L–1NaMoO4·2H2O, and 50 μmol L–1EDTA-Fe.The pH value of the nutrient solution was adjusted to 5.7±0.2 using 2 mol L–1NaOH or HCl every 2 days.

    A low phytate-P condition (0.05 mmol L–1) and a normal phytate-P condition (0.5 mmol L–1) added as phytate isolated from rice (myo-inositol hexaphosphoric acid dodecasodium salt, Sigma, USA) (Yeet al. 2015)were used in the RIL population and three replicates were conducted in two independent trials. Experiments were conducted in a split plot design, with P conditions as the main plot and genotype as the subplot. The two trials in the RIL population were conducted in the same greenhouse at Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu,China. Trial 1 was carried out from September 1 to November 6, 2014 and trial 2 was carried out from February 27 to April 25, 2015. The minimum and maximum temperatures in trial 1 ranged from 6 to 10°C and from 21 to 25°C and those in trial 2 ranged from 5 to10°C and from 16 to 21°C, respectively.

    2.3. Evaluation of plant performance

    After harvesting, tiller numbers (TN) were calculated and recorded. Then, roots and shoots were separated, and harvested tissues were dried at 105°C for 30 min followed by 75°C to constant weight. Shoot dry weight (SDW) and root dry weight (RDW) were measured for each line. Dried plants were ground to a fine powder and digested with 5 mL of a mixture of concentrated H2SO4and H2O2. Total P content was analyzed with Mo-Sb colorimetry at 700 nm using a spectrophotometer (UV-1200, MAPADA Instrument Co., Ltd., China) (Lu 1999). PUE was expressed as dry weight per unit of P taken up in shoots and roots (Yanget al. 2011).

    2.4. Molecular marker analysis and linkage map construction

    The method used for DNA isolation was as described by Chenet al. (2012). Diversity array technology (DArT)markers were initially used for linkage map construction and QTL analyses using 128 lines from the Baudin/CN4027 population. DArT genotyping of the parents and the mapping population was carried out by Triticarte Pty. Ltd. (http://www.tritcarte.com.au). Hybridization of genomic DNA to the DArT array, image analysis, and polymorphism scoring were conducted as described by Wenzlet al. (2004). Linkage analysis was carried out using the computer package JoinMap?4.0 (Van Ooijen 2006).

    2.5. Data analysis and QTL mapping

    Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v22.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Pearson correlation coefficients and least significant difference (LSD) tests were estimated between traits and trials. Analysis of variance(ANOVA) was employed to estimate genetic variance (σ2G),environmental variance (σ2E), and subsequently broad-sense heritability (h2b). The effects of replicate and genotype for PUE, TN, and biomass were determined using covariance analysis.

    Segregation ratios of assessed markers were tested by Chi-square goodness-of-fit to a 1:1 ratio at the significance level ofP=0.01. LOD thresholds from 3 to 10 were tested,until a threshold with the optimum number of markers in linkage groups maintaining linkage order and distance was obtained. The Kosambi mapping function was used to convert recombination ratios to map distances. MapQTL?5.0 (Van Ooijen 2004) was used for QTL analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used as a preliminary test of associations between markers. Interval mapping (IM)was then used to identify major QTL. Automatic cofactor selection was used to fit the multiple QTL model (MQM) and to select significantly associated-markers as cofactors. A linkage map showing the QTL positions was drawn using Mapchart (Voorrips 2002).

    3. Results

    3.1. Phenotypic variation under two phytate-P levels

    Significant differences in PUE were found between the two parents harvested at the vegetative stage. The PUE of CN4027 for shoots and roots were higher than those of Baudin for both phytate-P conditions (Fig. 1). Under low phytate-P, shoot and root PUE of the parent CN4027 were 534.2 and 426.5 g DW g–1P, respectively, and for the parent Baudin, these values were 366.8 and 328.3 g DW g–1P, respectively. Under normal phytate-P, shoot and root PUE of CN4027 were 156.8 and 141.0 g DW g–1P,respectively and those for the parent Baudin were 132.8 and 120.9 g DW g–1P, respectively. The RIL population exhibited distinct differences from parents in PUE under the two different phytate-P levels. The coefficients of variation ranged from 16.53 to 27.29% in roots and shoots. Lines with better PUE than the parent CN4027 were detected under both of the phytate-P conditions. Transgressive segregation of PUE was observed in the RIL population(Table 1).

    Highly significant differences in P efficiency related traits (TN, RDW, and SDW) were detected between the commercial cultivar Baudin and wild barley CN4027(Table 1). The RIL population exhibited distinct differences in most of the investigated traits in both phytate-P levels.All traits showed continuously and approximately Gaussian distributtion (data not shown), which indicated that the traits were also suitable for QTL mapping. Theh2bfor different traits varied from 66.95 to 87.01%.

    Fig. 1 QTL conferring phosphorus utilization efficiency (PUE) with root (A) and shoot (B) detected on chromosome 3H under the low (–P) and normal phytate-P (+P) conditions. The vertical dotted line indicates the average significance threshold (LOD=3.0)derived from permutation tests. RPUE01 and RPUE02, root P utilization efficiency in trail 1 (September 1 to November 6, 2014)and trail 2 (February 27 to April 25, 2015), respectively; SPUE01 and SPUE02, shoot PUE in trails 1 and 2, respectively.

    3.2. Genetic linkage map construction

    The linkage map constructed in this study consisted of 607 DArT markers that spanned 1 148.70 cM in length with an average interval of 1.89 cM between adjacent markers(Appendix A). The seven linkage groups ranged from 198.11 cM for chromosome 2H to 128.65 cM for chromosome 5H,and the average distances between markers ranged from 1.45 cM for 4H to 2.15 cM for 1H. Linkage distances larger than 20 cM were present only in 3H and 5H. The number of markers ranged from 64 for 4H to 103 for 2H, with an overall average number of markers per chromosome of 87.

    3.3. QTL mapping for PUE

    A large-effect QTL for PUE in shoots and roots was mapped on 3H (Fig. 1). The LOD values of this QTL varied from 5.08 to 9.16 (Table 2). The QTL was designatedQpue.sau-3H, wherepuestands for P utilization efficiency andsaustands for Sichuan Agricultural University. Based on MQM analysis, markers flanking the locus were bPb3256099 and bPb3931069 under both phytate-P conditions assessed (Table 2). TheQpue.sau-3Hin shoots explains up to 30.2 and 29.5% of the phenotypic variance under low and normal phytate-P conditions, respectively. Favorable alleles from theQpue.sau-3Hin shoots mapped on chromosome 3H, which were from the higher PUE parent CN4027 and contribute to increase PUE. The phenotypic variance in roots explained byQpue.sau-3Hwas 28.9 and 30.7% under the low and normal phytate-P conditions, respectively.

    3.4. QTL mapping for P efficiency related traits under two phytate-P levels

    A QTL for TN at the vegetative stage was detected under both the low and normal phytate-P conditions (Table 3). The QTL,designatedQtn.sau-5H, was located between bPb6277350 and bPb3265782 on chromosome 5H. This QTL explained 13.8 to 19.7% with an average of 16.8%of the phenotypic variance under the low phytate-P condition and 15.8 to 22.7% with an average of 19.2% of the phenotypic variance under the normal phytate-P condition. LOD values ofQtn.sau-5Hvaried from 4.01 to 6.36 with an average of 5.20, and favorable alleles came from the male parent CN4027.

    Two QTLs for DW were identified under the both phytate-P conditions (Table 3).One of them,Qdw.sau-3H, was located on chromosome 3H under both phytate-P conditions (Fig. 2). This QTL explained on an average of 14.2% (–P) and 18.8% (+P)of the phenotypic variance in roots, and an average of 30.9% (–P) and 25.2% (+P)of the phenotypic variance in shoots. The other QTL was only detected under the low P condition. This QTL was localized between bPb6277350 and bPb3265782 on chromosome 5H and it explained 15.1 to 17.8% with an average of 16.4% of the phenotypic variance in roots.

    3.5. Effects of TN and biomass on PUE

    ?

    Correlation analyses were performed among the traits and their relative values in different phytate-P conditions (Table 4). TN was not correlated with PUE in roots or shoots under either of the phytate-P conditions. DW was significantly correlated with PUE in roots and shoots under both of the phytate-P conditions, and the correlation coefficient varied from 0.27 to 0.46.

    The location ofQdw.sau-3Hwas similar to that ofQpue.sau-3H. To quantify the possible effect of DW on PUE, data from the two PUE trials were analysed against data from the two DW trials by covariance analysis. Thisanalysis showed that the LOD value ofQpue.sau-3Hwas reduced when the effect of DW was accounted for by the covariance analysis. However, the position ofQpue.sau-3Hwas unchanged on chromosome 3H (Fig. 3).

    Table 2 Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping for phosphorus utilization efficiency (PUE) under the low (–P) and normal phytate-P(+P) conditions

    Fig. 2 Quantitative trait locus (QTL) conferring dry weight (DW) with root (A) and shoot (B) detected on chromosome 3H under the low (–P) and normal phytate-P (+P) conditions. RDW01 and RDW02, root DW in trail 1 (September 1 to November 6, 2014) and trail 2 (February 27 to April 25, 2015), respectively; SDW01 and SDW02, shoot DW in trails 1 and 2, respectively.

    Table 4 Correlation coefficients between investigated traits in two trails1)

    4. Discussion

    4.1. Variation in PUE of parents and the RlL population at two phytate-P levels

    Significant differences in PUE were found between the two parents at the vegetative stage at both phytate-P conditions. The results showed that theH.spontaneumaccession CN4027 was more effective in utilizing organic P for plant growth. Previous studies were focused on variation in P uptake and utilization efficiency using inorganic P sources. However, few studies have explored PUE under organic P treatment. Some researchers found that two types of grass (Duo grass and rye grass) could obtain enough P from phytate to meet their requirements for P, and they had better dry weight growth than plants that were not supplied with P (Priya and Sahi 2009; Sharma and Sahi 2011). The mining ecotype ofPolygonum hydropiperis also capable of assimilating P from Po media supplied as phytate. Compared with the non-mining ecotype ofP.hydropiper, the mining ecotype had significantly higher root and shoot biomass (Yeet al. 2015). Our previous study suggested that P accumulation of P-efficient genotypes was higher than that of P-inefficient genotypes under the various concentrations of phytate-P in barley(Caiet al. 2014).

    The RILs in this study also exhibited distinct differences in PUE under both phytate-P levels. RIL lines had significantly higher or lower values than the parents for PUE, indicating potential transgressive variations. In wheat, different fertilization regimes of N and P in 182 RILs led to broad,continuous variation in 22 phenotypic traits, as well as significant transgressive segregation (Xuet al. 2014).Shiet al. (2008) determined that there was a significant separation of P content in grains from 119 lines of a doubled haploid wheat population (Shiet al. 2008). In maize, traits related to P efficiency were found to segregate continuously,and to have an approximately normal distribution with absolute values of less than one for skewness and curtness(Chenet al. 2008). For all of the traits studied, transgressive variation in rice was typically negative with only PUE showing positive transgression (Wissuwaet al. 1998). The phenotypic value of PUE inBrassica napusalso showed large variation among the RIL population under both P conditions (Yanget al. 2011).

    Fig. 3 Logarithm of odds (LOD) values of Qpue.sau-3H with root (A) and shoot (B) obtained from combined data of the two trials pre-adjustment by biomass (combined) and post-adjustment by biomass (adjusted). RPUE, root P utilization efficiency; SPUE,shoot P utilization efficiency. –P, low phytate-P condition; +P, normal phytate-P condition.

    4.2. QTL for PUE under the two phytate-P levels

    P uptake and utilization efficiency is regulated by multiple genes (Suet al. 2006; Oonoet al. 2013). A study on QTL mapping for PUE in barley showed that three loci were mapped on chromosomes 2H and 5H under different P conditions and explained 7.47 to 8.99% in a doubled haploid Commander/Fleet population (Gonget al. 2016). Naturally,breeding barley cultivars with nutrient efficiency require more QTLs. In this study, a novel and major locus controlling PUE, located at the chromosome 3H (Qpue.sau-3H), was detected in P-efficient wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum)genotype CN4027. This QTL explains 28.3 and 30.7%of the phenotypic variation in roots under low and normal phytate-P conditions, respectively.

    Collinearity between genomes of closely related species has been used to predict and locate genes and markers of interest (Chenet al. 2013). In wheat and barley, gene order is highly conserved, however, there are a few translocations between wheat genomes A and B that have been well characterized (Liuet al. 1992; Devos 2005).With the use of Chinese Spring nullisomic-tetrasomic lines genes conferring low P tolerance and suppressor genes were also detected on chromosomes 1B, 4B, 7B,3A, and 6D (Liet al. 1999a, b). Six loci regulating P utilization efficiencies are located on chromosomes 1A,2A, 3A, 3B, 5A, and 6B (Suet al. 2009). The positive and negative linkages between the QTLs mapped to these six loci, suggest that the locus on chromosome 3B is a good candidate for selection to improve PUE. Two QTLs for PUE in shoots were located on chromosomes 1B and 5A,and three QTLs for PUE in the whole plant were located on chromosomes 2B, 5A, and 7A in the RIL population derived from two wheat varieties W7984 and Opata85 (Caoet al.2001). Guoet al. (2012) used QTL mapping in wheat to assess seedling traits under varying concentrations of N,P and K, and found that a locus for PUE in roots is located on chromosome 1B. Thus the QTL controlling PUE on 3A and 3B in wheat is unlikely to be homologous withQpue.sau-3Hin barley.

    4.3. Correlation between PUE and P efficiency related traits

    PUE is a complex trait, which can be evaluated by biomass,TN, root morphology, and leaf area (Liaoet al. 2004). In this study, DW and TN were selected to evaluate the P efficiency of barley. TN was not correlated with PUE in roots and shoots under either of the phytate-P conditions. However,Suet al. (2006) showed that TN was significantly positively correlated with shoot P uptake, and negatively related with PUE under both of the P conditions. QTL analysis detected a locus for TN from both phytate-P conditions. Different from that ofQpue.sau-3H, this locus for TN was located on 5H (Qtn.sau-5H).

    DW was significantly correlated with PUE in roots and shoots of the RIL population. Suet al. (2009) also showed that PUE has a positive correlation with shoot DW in wheat.Two QTLs affecting DW were detected in this study; the location ofQdw.sau-3Hon chromosome 3H was similar to that ofQpue.sau-3H. Similar results have been found for nitrogen-related traits in wheat (Xuet al. 2014). Further analysis showed that the LOD value ofQpue.sau-3Hwas reduced when the effect of DW was accounted for by covariance analysis. But, the position ofQpue.sau-3Hwas unchanged on chromosome 3H. Developing and exploiting near isogenic lines (NILs) and NIL-derived populations(Chenet al. 2012), as carried out for traits related to PUE,could be an option to further investigate the relationship between gene(s) controlling PUE and DW in barley.

    5. Conclusion

    In summary, enhancing P efficiency is an important target in barley breeding. We report in this paper a QTL study on PUE and PUE related traits under different phytate-P levels (normal phytate-P, 0.5 mmol L–1and low phytate-P,0.05 mmol L–1) using a RIL population. A novel and major locus (Qpue.sau-3H) was detected on chromosome 3H conferring PUE in shoots and roots from the RIL population under two different phytate-P levels. Results from this study also showed that TN was not correlated with PUE, and a QTL controlling TN was detected on chromosome 5H in the RIL population. However, DW was significantly and positively correlated with PUE, and a QTL controlling DW was detected near theQpue.sau-3Hlocus. Existing data by covariance analysis indicated that different genes at this locus are likely involved in controlling these two traits. The existence ofQpue.sau-3Hmay offer valuable clues for fine mapping and map-based cloning in barley.

    Acknowledgements

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401377), the Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Province, China (2017JY0126),and the Key Project of Education Department of Sichuan Province, China (14ZA0002).

    Appendix associated with this paper can be available on http://www.ChinaAgriSci.com/V2/En/appendix.htm

    Asmar F, Singh T, Gahoonia, Nielsen N E. 1995. Barley genotypes differ in activity of soluble extracellular phosphatase and depletion of organic phosphorus in the rhizosphere soil.Plant and Soil, 172, 117–122.

    Batten G D. 1992. A review of phosphorus efficiency in wheat.Plant and Soil, 146, 163–168.

    Cai Q Y, Zhong X Z, Li T X, Chen G D. 2014. Effects of phosphorus sources on phosphorus fractions in rhizosphere soil of wild barley genotypes with high phosphorus utilization efficiency.Journal of Applied Ecology, 25, 3207–3214.

    Cao W D, Jia J Z, Jin J Y. 2001. Identification and interaction analysis of QTL for phosphorus use efficiency in wheat.Plant Natrition & Fertilizen Science, 92, 76–77.

    Chen G D, Li H B, Zheng Z, Wei Y M, Zheng Y L, McIntyre C L, Zhou M X, Liu C J. 2012. Characterization of a QTL affecting spike morphology on the long arm of chromosome 3H in barley (Hordeum vulgareL.) based on near isogenic lines and a NIL-derived population.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 125, 1385–1392.

    Chen G D, Liu Y X, Ma J, Zheng Z, Wei Y M, Mclntyre C L,Zheng Y L, Liu C J. 2013. A novel and major quantitative trait locus for fusarium crown rot resistance in a genotype of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneumL.).PLoS ONE, 8, e58040.

    Chen J Y, Xu L, Cai Y L, Xu J. 2008. QTL mapping of phosphorus efficiency and relative biologic characteristics in maize (Zea maysL.) at two sites.Plant and Soil, 313,251–266.

    Cordell D, Drangert J O, White S. 2009. The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought.Global Environmental Change, 19, 292–305.

    Devos K M. 2005. Updating the ‘Crop Circle’.Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 8, 155–162.

    FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2006.Fertilizer Use by Crop in the Sudan.Natural Resources Management and Environment Department, Rome. pp. 1–108.

    Feuillet C, Muehlbauer G J. 2009.Genetics and Genomics of the Triticeae, Plant Genetics and Genomics:Crops and Models. Springer, Berlin. p. 7.

    Gamuyao R, Chin J H, Pariasca-Tanaka J, Pesaresi P,Catausan S, Dalid C, Slamet-Loedin I, Tecson-Mendoza E M, Wissuwa M, Heuer S. 2012. The protein kinase Pstol1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency.Nature, 7412, 535–539.

    George T S, Brown L K, Newton A C, Hallett P D, Sun B H,Thomas W T B, White P J. 2011. Impact of soil tillage on the robustness of the genetic component of variation in phosphorus (P) use efficiency in barley (Hordeum vulgareL.).Plant and Soil, 339, 113–123.

    Gong X, Wheeler R, Bovill W D, McDonald G K. 2016. QTL mapping of grain yield and phosphorus efficiency in barley in a Mediterranean-like environment.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 129, 1657–1672.

    Górny A G, Ratajczak D. 2008. Efficiency of nitrogen and phosphorus utilization in progenies of factorial crosses between European and exotic cultivars of spring barley(Hordeum vulgareL.).Journal of Applied Ecology, 49,349–355.

    Guo Y, Kong F M, Xue Y F, Zhao Y, Liang X, Wang Y Y, An D G, Li S S. 2012. QTL mapping for seedling traits in wheat grown under varying concentrations of N, P and K nutrients.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 124, 851–865.

    Hayes J E, Zhu Y G, Mimura T, Reid R J. 2004. An assessment of the usefulness of solution culture in screening for phosphorus efficiency in wheat.Plant and Soil, 261, 91–97.

    Hoagland D R, Arnon D I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil.California Department of Agriculture Experimental Station, 347, 357–359.

    King K E, Lauter N, Lin S F, Scott M P, Shoemaker R C. 2013.Evaluation and QTL mapping of phosphorus concentration in soybean seed.Euphytica, 189, 261–269.

    Li Y D, Wang Y J, Tong Y P, Gao J G, Zhang J S, Chen S Y.2005. QTL mapping of phosphorus deficiency tolerance in soybean (Glycine maxL. Merr.).Euphytica, 142, 137–142.

    Li Y J, Liu J Z, Li B, Li J Y, Yao S J, Li Z S. 1999a. Chromosomal control of the tolerance to phosphorus deficiency in genome ofTriticum aestivumChinese Spring.Acta Genetica Sinica,26, 529–538. (in Chinese)

    Li Y J, Liu J Z, Li B, Li J Y, Yao S J, Li Z S. 1999b. Ear length elytrigiarepens genome and resistance to low phosphorus nutrition chromosomal location of genes related to stress.Acta Genetica Sinica, 26, 703–710. (in Chinese)

    Liao H, Yan X L, Rubio G, Beebe S E, Blair M W, Lynch J P. 2004. Genetic mapping of basal root gravitropism and phosphorus acquisition efficiency in common bean.Functional Glant Biology, 31, 959–970.

    Liu C J, Atkinson M D, Chinoy C N, Devos K M, Gale M D.1992. Nonhomoeologous translocations between group 4,5 and 7 chromosomes within wheat and rye.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 83, 305–312.

    Lu R K. 1999.Analysis of Soil Agrochemistry. Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing. pp.312–314. (in Chinese)

    Ma L, Velthof G L, Wang F H, Zhang W F, Wei J, Lesschen J P, Ma W Q, Oenema O, Zhang F S. 2012. Nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies and losses in the food chain in China at regional scales in 1980 and 2005.Science of the Total Environment, 434, 51–61.

    MacDonald G K, Bennett E M, Potter P A, Navin R. 2011.Agronomic phosphorus imbalances across the world’s croplands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 3086–3091.

    Van Ooijen J W. 2004. MapQTL version 5.0, software for the mapping of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations.Kyazma B.V., Wageningen, Netherlands.

    Van Ooijen J W. 2006. JointMap?4, software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations.Kyazma B.V., Wageningen, Netherlands.

    Oono Y, Kobayashi F, Kawahara Y, Yazawa1 T, Handa H,Itoh T, Matsumoto T. 2013. Characterisation of the wheat(Triticum aestivumL.) transcriptome byde novo-assembly for the discovery of phosphate starvation-responsive genes:Gene expression in Pi-stressed wheat.BMC Genomics,14, 77.

    Priya P, Sahi S V. 2009. Influence of phosphorus nutrition on growth and metabolism of Duo grass (Duo festulolium).Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 47, 31–36.

    Schachtman D P, Reid R J, Ayling S M. 1998. Phosphorus uptake by plants: From soil to cell.Plant Physiollogy, 116,447–453.

    Sharma N C, Sahi S V. 2011. Enhanced organic phosphorus assimilation promoting biomass and shoot P hyper accumulations inLolium multiflorumgrown under sterile conditions.Environmental Science & Technology, 45,10531–10537.

    Sharma N C, Starnes D L, Sahi S V. 2007. Phytoextraction of excess soil phosphorus.Environmental Pollution, 146,120–127.

    Shi R L, Li H W, Tong Y P, Jing R L, Zhang F S, Zou C Q.2008. Identification of quantitative trait locus of zinc and phosphorus density in wheat (TriticumaestivumL.)grain.Plant and Soil, 306, 95–104.

    Starnes D L, Padmanabhan P, Sahi S V. 2008. Effect of P sources on growth, P accumulation and activities of phytase and acid phosphatases in two cultivars of annual ryegrass(Lolium multiflorumL.).Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,46, 580–589.

    Su J Y, Li H W, Li B, Jing R L, Li Z S. 2009. Detection of QTLs for phosphorus use efficiency inrelation to agronomic performance of wheat grown under phosphorus sufficient and limited conditions.Plant Science, 176, 824–836.

    Su J Y, Xiao Y M, Li M, Liu Q Y, Li B, Tong Y P, Jia J Z, Li Z S.2006. Mapping QTLs for phosphorus-deficiency tolerance at wheat seedling stage.Plant and Soil, 281, 25–36.

    Tian J, Wang X, Tong Y, Chen X, Liao H. 2012. Bioengineering and management for efficient phosphorus utilization in crops and pastures.Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 23,866–871.

    Turner B L, Paphazy M J, Haygarth P M, McKelvie I D. 2002.Inositol phosphates in the environment, philosophical transactions-royal society.Biological Sciences(London),357, 449–469.

    Vance C P, Uhde-Stone C, Allan D L. 2003. Phosphorus acquisition and use: Critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource.New Phytologist, 157,423–447.

    Voorrips R E. 2002. MAPCHART: Software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs.Journal of Heredity,93, 77–78.

    Wang X, Shen J, Liao H. 2010. Acquisition or utilization, which is more critical for enhancing phosphorus efficiency in modern crops?Plant Science, 179, 302–306.

    Wenzl P, Carling J, Kudrna D, Jaccoud D, Huttner E, Kleinhofs A, Kilian A. 2004. Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for whole-genome profiling of barley.Proceedings of the National Aademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 9915–9920.

    Wissuwa M, Yano M, Ae N. 1998. Mapping of QTLs for phosphorus-deficiency tolerance in rice (Oryza sativaL.).Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 97, 777–783.

    Xu Y F, Wang R F, Tong Y P, Zhao H T, Xie Q G, Liu D C,Zhang A M, Li B, Xu H X, An D G. 2014. Mapping QTLs for yield and nitrogen-related traits in wheat: Influence of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on QTL expression.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 127, 59–72.

    Yan X L, Liao H, Beebe S E, Blair M W, Lynch J P. 2004. QTL mapping of root hair and acid exudation traits and their relationship to phosphorus uptake in common bean.Plant and Soil, 265, 17–29.

    Yang M, Ding G D, Shi L, Xu F S, Meng J L. 2011. Detection of QTL for phosphorus efficiency at vegetative stage inBrassica napus.Plant and Soil, 339, 97–111.

    Ye D H, Li T X, Zheng Z C, Zhang X Z, Chen G D, Yu H Y.2015. Root physiological adaptations involved in enhancing P assimilation in mining and non-mining ecotypes ofPolygonum hydropipergrown under organic P media.Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 1–10.

    Zheng Z, Wang H B, Chen G D, Yan G J, Liu C J. 2013. A procedure allowing up to eight generations of wheat and nine generations of barley per annum.Euphytica, 191,311–316.

    Zhu J M, Kaeppler S M, Lynch J P. 2005. Mapping of QTL controlling root hair length in maize (Zea maysL.) under phosphorus deficiency.Plant and Soil, 270, 299–310.

    国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 中文字幕制服av| 午夜视频国产福利| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 国产在线免费精品| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 色94色欧美一区二区| 亚洲成色77777| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久久精品94久久精品| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 久久99一区二区三区| 中国三级夫妇交换| 精品国产国语对白av| 久久久久久人人人人人| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲成色77777| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| videossex国产| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 日本免费在线观看一区| 成人国产麻豆网| 黑人高潮一二区| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久久久精品性色| 成年动漫av网址| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 日韩中字成人| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 精品少妇内射三级| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 岛国毛片在线播放| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产成人精品福利久久| 最新中文字幕久久久久| av电影中文网址| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 在线看a的网站| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 精品久久久精品久久久| 一个人免费看片子| 久久免费观看电影| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| www.av在线官网国产| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 久久av网站| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 色哟哟·www| 国产成人aa在线观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 深夜精品福利| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 在线观看人妻少妇| 91精品三级在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产成人精品福利久久| 国产永久视频网站| av片东京热男人的天堂| av天堂久久9| 婷婷色综合www| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| www.av在线官网国产| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 日本色播在线视频| 男女国产视频网站| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 如何舔出高潮| 考比视频在线观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 观看美女的网站| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲在久久综合| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 性色av一级| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 色94色欧美一区二区| 午夜av观看不卡| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| www.av在线官网国产| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 免费看光身美女| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产激情久久老熟女| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 有码 亚洲区| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲图色成人| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 一级a做视频免费观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 美女主播在线视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 三级国产精品片| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 国产极品天堂在线| 亚洲国产av新网站| 久久 成人 亚洲| 51国产日韩欧美| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 久久久久视频综合| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 老女人水多毛片| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲av.av天堂| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 精品久久久久久电影网| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 老熟女久久久| 国产精品.久久久| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 韩国av在线不卡| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产男女内射视频| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 成年动漫av网址| 22中文网久久字幕| 一级a做视频免费观看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲精品视频女| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 99热全是精品| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 精品福利永久在线观看| 久久热在线av| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 91成人精品电影| 老司机影院毛片| 日本午夜av视频| av卡一久久| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 男女免费视频国产| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产成人精品无人区| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产在线视频一区二区| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产色婷婷99| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 看免费av毛片| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 国产激情久久老熟女| 日韩视频在线欧美| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 91国产中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 一本大道久久a久久精品| 日韩电影二区| 91国产中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 丝袜喷水一区| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 国产男女内射视频| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 人妻一区二区av| 免费av中文字幕在线| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件 | 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 熟女av电影| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲综合精品二区| 成年动漫av网址| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| videossex国产| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| av免费在线看不卡| 精品久久久精品久久久| 美国免费a级毛片| 日本欧美视频一区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 一级毛片 在线播放| 性色av一级| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 国产探花极品一区二区| 久久这里只有精品19| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产精品免费大片| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 日日撸夜夜添| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 日本免费在线观看一区| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 香蕉精品网在线| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 制服诱惑二区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产男女内射视频| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 欧美人与善性xxx| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 色94色欧美一区二区| 一级毛片电影观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 在线观看三级黄色| 韩国精品一区二区三区 | 性色av一级| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产成人精品在线电影| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 亚洲四区av| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 在线观看国产h片| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| av在线app专区| 国产麻豆69| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 成人国产av品久久久| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 日日撸夜夜添| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 免费看不卡的av| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| h视频一区二区三区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 久久精品国产自在天天线| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 成人综合一区亚洲| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| www.色视频.com| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 久热久热在线精品观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 久久久久视频综合| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 人妻一区二区av| 欧美另类一区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 日本欧美国产在线视频| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 多毛熟女@视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 一级黄片播放器| 五月开心婷婷网| 久久午夜福利片| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产视频首页在线观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 另类精品久久| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 内地一区二区视频在线| xxx大片免费视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 99久久综合免费| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 久久热在线av| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产精品一国产av| 91成人精品电影| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 久久精品国产自在天天线| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 在线观看国产h片| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 只有这里有精品99| av线在线观看网站| 国产激情久久老熟女| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 美女中出高潮动态图| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 黑人高潮一二区| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 精品人妻在线不人妻| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 超色免费av| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产精品 国内视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 丁香六月天网| 国产综合精华液| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 青春草国产在线视频| 一级毛片 在线播放| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 伦理电影免费视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 秋霞伦理黄片| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产永久视频网站| 99久久人妻综合| 一级毛片电影观看| 免费av不卡在线播放| 秋霞在线观看毛片| av片东京热男人的天堂| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 精品久久久精品久久久| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 午夜免费鲁丝| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产男女内射视频| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 一级黄片播放器| av免费在线看不卡| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 91成人精品电影| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 成年av动漫网址| 国产视频首页在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 成人二区视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲成色77777| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 高清av免费在线| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 国产 一区精品| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 99九九在线精品视频| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久精品国产综合久久久 | 国产 精品1| 男女免费视频国产| 欧美日韩av久久| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲内射少妇av| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 色吧在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 色哟哟·www| 国产在线视频一区二区| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美|