周騰飛 朱良付 李天曉 邵秋季 吳立恒 周志龍 宋朝陽(yáng)
Solitaire AB可回收支架在急性缺血性卒中血管內(nèi)治療中的應(yīng)用
周騰飛 朱良付 李天曉 邵秋季 吳立恒 周志龍 宋朝陽(yáng)
目的 探討Solitaire AB可回收支架治療顱內(nèi)前循環(huán)大動(dòng)脈閉塞致急性缺血性卒中的有效性和安全性。方法 回顧分析31例采用Solitaire AB支架機(jī)械取栓治療顱內(nèi)前循環(huán)大動(dòng)脈閉塞致急性缺血性卒中患者的臨床資料,采用腦梗死溶栓血流分級(jí)(TICI)評(píng)價(jià)血管再通、美國(guó)國(guó)立衛(wèi)生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)評(píng)價(jià)神經(jīng)功能、改良Rankin量表(mRS)評(píng)價(jià)預(yù)后,記錄圍手術(shù)期栓塞事件以及術(shù)后3個(gè)月內(nèi)顱內(nèi)出血或死亡。結(jié)果 31例患者共使用33枚Solitaire AB支架,其中19例首次機(jī)械取栓即實(shí)現(xiàn)血管再通;11例進(jìn)一步行支架植入術(shù),9例實(shí)現(xiàn)血管再通,最終總體血管再通率為90.32%(28/31)。術(shù)后1周NIHSS評(píng)分(8.81±3.40)分,低于術(shù)前的(16.06±4.82)分(t=?7.104,P=0.000)。術(shù)后3個(gè)月預(yù)后良好(mRS評(píng)分≤2分)16例(51.61%)。圍手術(shù)期發(fā)生栓塞事件3例,隨訪期間發(fā)生顱內(nèi)出血4例,共死亡6例。結(jié)論 Solitaire AB支架用于急性缺血性卒中的機(jī)械取栓安全、有效,首次機(jī)械取栓血管再通失敗可以聯(lián)合支架植入術(shù)作為補(bǔ)充治療。
卒中; 腦缺血; 血管成形術(shù); 支架; 手術(shù)后并發(fā)癥
腦卒中是全球第3位、我國(guó)首位病死原因,且病殘率較高,其中60%~80%為急性缺血性卒中。靜脈溶栓作為國(guó)內(nèi)外一致推薦的急性缺血性卒中標(biāo)準(zhǔn)治療方法,其療效已經(jīng)多項(xiàng)臨床試驗(yàn)證實(shí)[1?2],但靜脈溶栓時(shí)間窗較短,血管再通率較低,且仍存在較高的病殘率和病死率[3]。近年來(lái),各種血管內(nèi)取栓裝置的應(yīng)用使血管內(nèi)治療迅速發(fā)展,特別是Solitaire AB可回收支架其治療效果獲得數(shù)項(xiàng)大型臨床試驗(yàn)的肯定[4?8]。采用支架取栓裝置治療動(dòng)脈閉塞迅速被國(guó)內(nèi)外指南推薦為急性大動(dòng)脈閉塞的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)治療方法[9?10]。本研究回顧分析近2年鄭州大學(xué)人民醫(yī)院采用Solitaire AB可回收支架治療顱內(nèi)大動(dòng)脈閉塞致急性缺血性卒中的臨床資料,探討其有效性和安全性。
一、臨床資料
1.納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn) (1)均經(jīng)頭部CT和(或)MRI檢查排除顱內(nèi)出血,并經(jīng)CTA、MRA或數(shù)字減影血管造影術(shù)(DSA)證實(shí)顱內(nèi)前循環(huán)大動(dòng)脈閉塞。(2)年齡 ≤ 80 歲。(3)發(fā)病至動(dòng)脈穿刺時(shí)間 <8 h。(4)入院時(shí)美國(guó)國(guó)立衛(wèi)生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)評(píng)分6~30分。(5)本研究經(jīng)鄭州大學(xué)人民醫(yī)院道德倫理委員會(huì)審核批準(zhǔn),所有患者或其家屬均知情同意并簽署知情同意書(shū)。
2.排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn) (1)既往出血性腦血管病病史或出血傾向。(2)近6個(gè)月內(nèi)嚴(yán)重腦卒中病史。(3)合并重要臟器功能障礙或衰竭。(4)基于早期非增強(qiáng)CT的 ASPECT(The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT)評(píng)分 <6分。(5)入院時(shí)NIHSS評(píng)分 >30分。(6)術(shù)前收縮壓 ≥ 185 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)或舒張壓≥110 mm Hg。
3.一般資料 選擇2013年6月-2015年6月鄭州大學(xué)人民醫(yī)院介入科采用Solitaire AB可回收支架治療的急性缺血性卒中患者共31例,男性16例,女性15例;年齡31~78歲,平均(55.70±14.56)歲;發(fā)病至入院時(shí)間1.70~6.20 h,平均(3.86±1.92)h;既往高血壓17例(54.84%)、冠心病5例(16.13%)、糖尿病8例(25.81%)、高脂血癥7例(22.58%),吸煙7例(22.58%)、飲酒12例(38.71%);入院時(shí)NIHSS評(píng)分6~26分,平均(16.06±4.82)分;單純頸內(nèi)動(dòng)脈(ICA)顱內(nèi)段閉塞12例(38.71%),單純大腦中動(dòng)脈(MCA)閉塞14例(45.16%),合并頸內(nèi)動(dòng)脈和大腦中動(dòng)脈串聯(lián)閉塞5例(16.13%);根據(jù)改良TOAST分型,大動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化(LAA)型15例(48.39%),心源性栓塞(CE)型16例(51.61%);術(shù)前腦梗死溶栓血流分級(jí)(TICI)均為0級(jí)。
二、研究方法
1.術(shù)前管理 術(shù)前行CT檢查排除顱內(nèi)出血,基于早期非增強(qiáng)CT的ASPECT評(píng)分評(píng)價(jià)梗死灶范圍,部分患者在時(shí)間允許情況下行多模態(tài)影像學(xué)(多模態(tài)MRI和CT)檢查明確動(dòng)脈閉塞部位和缺血?再灌注情況。對(duì)于處于靜脈溶栓時(shí)間窗的患者,先予尿激酶或重組組織型纖溶酶原激活物(rt?PA)靜脈溶栓治療,效果不佳者再行Solitaire AB可回收支架機(jī)械取栓治療。
2.手術(shù)方法 患者仰臥位,全身麻醉或局部麻醉下經(jīng)股動(dòng)脈穿刺,導(dǎo)入6F導(dǎo)管鞘,選擇6F~8F導(dǎo)引導(dǎo)管,先以0.014英寸微導(dǎo)絲協(xié)同造影導(dǎo)管通過(guò)閉塞段血管,撤出微導(dǎo)絲后逐步回撤微導(dǎo)管,分段造影以明確閉塞部位遠(yuǎn)端,將Rebar18微導(dǎo)管(美國(guó)Covidien公司)頂端置于閉塞段以遠(yuǎn)至少5 mm處,經(jīng)微導(dǎo)管將Solitaire AB支架(美國(guó)Covidien公司)遠(yuǎn)端送至微導(dǎo)管頂端,緩慢回撤微導(dǎo)管并釋放支架,植入支架后即刻復(fù)查DSA以觀察血流灌注情況,留置3~5 min后回撤支架取栓,將微導(dǎo)管逆行向上對(duì)Solitaire AB支架的剩余部分回收,關(guān)閉導(dǎo)引導(dǎo)管尾端三通連接的灌注水,以50 ml注射器連接三通連接的開(kāi)放端持續(xù)抽吸血栓,取栓過(guò)程根據(jù)個(gè)體情況配合應(yīng)用抗血小板藥物。頸內(nèi)動(dòng)脈和大腦中動(dòng)脈串聯(lián)閉塞患者一般開(kāi)通原則為先開(kāi)通近端血管,再開(kāi)通遠(yuǎn)端血管,術(shù)后復(fù)查DSA,若血管開(kāi)通不理想或機(jī)械取栓后30 min內(nèi)出現(xiàn)血管再狹窄或閉塞,則決定是否進(jìn)一步行支架植入術(shù)(圖1)。對(duì)于植入支架的患者,釋放支架前先予以替羅非班(欣維寧)靜脈注射(8 μg/kg,3 min內(nèi)注射完畢),術(shù)后再予以0.10 μg/(kg·min)維持24 h。術(shù)后即刻復(fù)查CT觀察有無(wú)顱內(nèi)出血,手術(shù)全程靜脈滴注低分子肝素。
3.術(shù)后管理 術(shù)后密切監(jiān)測(cè)血壓,維持收縮壓110~140 mm Hg;酌情皮下注射低分子肝素;術(shù)后48 h內(nèi)復(fù)查影像學(xué),觀察有無(wú)顱內(nèi)出血和新發(fā)梗死灶。植入支架的患者停用替羅非班后予雙聯(lián)抗血小板藥物(阿司匹林100 mg/d和氯吡格雷75 mg/d)治療,連續(xù)3個(gè)月后長(zhǎng)期服用單聯(lián)抗血小板藥物(阿司匹林100 mg/d);未植入支架的患者出院后長(zhǎng)期服用單聯(lián)抗血小板藥物(阿司匹林100 mg/d)預(yù)防腦卒中復(fù)發(fā)。
4.療效和安全性評(píng)價(jià) (1)療效評(píng)價(jià):血管再通評(píng)價(jià)采用TICI分級(jí),TICI分級(jí)2b~3級(jí)為血管再通;術(shù)后1周采用NIHSS量表評(píng)價(jià)神經(jīng)功能,NIHSS評(píng)分減少≥8分為神經(jīng)功能改善;術(shù)后3個(gè)月采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)評(píng)價(jià)預(yù)后,mRS評(píng)分≤2分為預(yù)后良好。(2)安全性評(píng)價(jià):記錄圍手術(shù)期栓塞事件并發(fā)癥,術(shù)后3個(gè)月內(nèi)顱內(nèi)出血并發(fā)癥或死亡。癥狀性顱內(nèi)出血定義為任何性質(zhì)的顱內(nèi)出血且NIHSS評(píng)分增加≥4分。
5.統(tǒng)計(jì)分析方法 采用SPSS 22.0統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)處理與分析。計(jì)量資料以均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差(x±s)表示,采用配對(duì)t檢驗(yàn)。以P≤0.05為差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
本組31例患者共使用33枚Solitaire AB支架,其中1例(3.23%)機(jī)械取栓前予尿激酶靜脈溶栓。發(fā)病至動(dòng)脈穿刺時(shí)間2.50~7.00 h,平均為(4.52±1.98)h;動(dòng)脈穿刺至血管再通時(shí)間32~128 min,平均(77.46±24.33)min;發(fā)病至血管再通時(shí)間201~486 min,平均為(348.66±105.60)min。19例患者首次機(jī)械取栓后即實(shí)現(xiàn)血管再通(TICI分級(jí)為2b~3級(jí)),血管再通率達(dá)61.29%(19/31),其中TICI分級(jí)3級(jí)9例(29.03%)。1例患者雖然首次機(jī)械取栓未實(shí)現(xiàn)血管再通,但血流達(dá)TICI分級(jí)2a級(jí),遠(yuǎn)端血供良好,未予治療。余11例患者進(jìn)一步行支架植入術(shù),其中6例采用Solitaire AB支架機(jī)械取栓后解脫植入,9例實(shí)現(xiàn)血管再通。最終總體血管再通率為90.32%(28/31)。術(shù)后1周NIHSS評(píng)分2~32分,平均(8.81±3.40)分,低于術(shù)前[(16.06±4.82)分]且差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=?7.104,P=0.000),其中 14例(45.16%)NIHSS評(píng)分減少>8分。術(shù)后3個(gè)月預(yù)后良好(mRS評(píng)分≤2分)16例(51.61%),9例遺留不同程度神經(jīng)功能障礙。
圍手術(shù)期血栓形成3例,2例機(jī)械取栓過(guò)程中血管遠(yuǎn)端血栓形成,其中1例予替羅非班動(dòng)脈溶栓,效果不佳,1例未予特殊處理,余1例支架植入術(shù)中穿支動(dòng)脈閉塞,未予特殊處理。顱內(nèi)出血4例,2例為癥狀性顱內(nèi)出血,2例為非癥狀性顱內(nèi)出血;3例為缺血?再灌注區(qū)出血性轉(zhuǎn)化,1例為術(shù)中導(dǎo)絲戳破血管致蛛網(wǎng)膜下隙出血,予術(shù)中緊急降壓,注射魚(yú)精蛋白和低分子肝素抗凝,出血自行停止。術(shù)后隨訪3個(gè)月,死亡6例(19.35%),住院期間死亡2例,1例死于顱內(nèi)出血繼發(fā)腦水腫和腦疝形成,1例死于心功能衰竭;隨訪期間死亡4例,2例死于腦水腫,2例死于肺部感染致呼吸功能衰竭。
近年來(lái),一系列取栓裝置的研發(fā)和臨床應(yīng)用,使急性缺血性卒中的血管內(nèi)治療進(jìn)入快速發(fā)展時(shí)期,從早期的Merci取栓裝置(美國(guó)Stryker公司)、Penumbra血栓抽吸裝置(美國(guó)Penumbra公司)到后來(lái)的Trevo XP ProVue可回收取栓支架裝置(美國(guó)Stryker公司)、Solitaire AB可回收支架(美國(guó)Covidien公司)。Solitaire AB可回收支架是美國(guó)食品與藥品監(jiān)督管理局(FDA)于2012年批準(zhǔn)用于臨床的新一代取栓裝置,支架釋放時(shí)相當(dāng)于進(jìn)行血管成形術(shù),通過(guò)與外周血管壁擠壓栓子以實(shí)現(xiàn)血管再通,支架回收時(shí)可以取出血栓,具有精確導(dǎo)向和快速再通血管的功能,較其他取栓裝置具有更高的血管再通率和良好預(yù)后。多項(xiàng)采用可回收支架取栓裝置的臨床研究均證實(shí)其血管內(nèi)治療效果優(yōu)于傳統(tǒng)靜脈溶栓[4?8]。
本組31例患者首次機(jī)械取栓后血管再通率為61.29%(19/31),處于既往研究得出的血管再通率58% ~ 88%的下限[4?8]。大動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化致急性閉塞,單純機(jī)械取栓常無(wú)法解除靶血管原位狹窄,對(duì)于合并原位狹窄的患者應(yīng)行支架植入術(shù)[11?12]。研究顯示,心源性栓塞致大動(dòng)脈閉塞對(duì)可回收支架機(jī)械取栓的反應(yīng)更佳,血管再通率更高[13?14],與本研究結(jié)果相一致。亞洲人群急性缺血性卒中病因主要是動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化(30%~50%),遠(yuǎn)高于歐美等西方國(guó)家[15],可能是本研究首次應(yīng)用Solitaire AB支架血管再通率相對(duì)較低的主要原因。對(duì)于血管再通不理想或者血管再通后再狹窄或閉塞患者,支架植入術(shù)可以作為補(bǔ)救性治療方法并取得較好療效。本研究進(jìn)一步行支架植入術(shù)后最終總體血管再通率達(dá)90.32%(28/31)。本研究?jī)H1例患者機(jī)械取栓前予尿激酶靜脈溶栓,與單純機(jī)械取栓相比,靜脈溶栓聯(lián)合機(jī)械取栓的橋接治療可以快速溶栓,有助于提高血管再通率,對(duì)于機(jī)械取栓裝置難以到達(dá)的小血管再通效果較好。然而一項(xiàng)比較單純機(jī)械取栓與靜脈溶栓聯(lián)合機(jī)械取栓橋接治療效果的Meta分析顯示,橋接治療最終總體血管再通率(P=0.370)和預(yù)后(P=0.860)并不優(yōu)于單純機(jī)械取栓,反而延遲血管再通時(shí)間(P=0.010)[16]。
圖1 男性患者,51歲,主因右側(cè)肢體無(wú)力伴言語(yǔ)不清5 h入院,入院時(shí)NIHSS評(píng)分18分,臨床診斷為急性缺血性卒中、左側(cè)頸內(nèi)動(dòng)脈遠(yuǎn)端閉塞,遂行血管內(nèi)機(jī)械取栓術(shù),術(shù)后3個(gè)月隨訪mRS評(píng)分2分。手術(shù)前后頭部影像學(xué)檢查所見(jiàn) 1a 術(shù)前橫斷面DWI顯示,左側(cè)額顳島葉梗死灶(箭頭所示) 1b 術(shù)前MRA顯示,左側(cè)頸內(nèi)動(dòng)脈遠(yuǎn)端閉塞(箭頭所示) 1c 術(shù)前DSA顯示,左側(cè)頸內(nèi)動(dòng)脈遠(yuǎn)端閉塞(箭頭所示) 1d 術(shù)前DSA顯示,左側(cè)大腦中動(dòng)脈和大腦前動(dòng)脈A1段顯影尚可(箭頭所示) 1e 于頸內(nèi)動(dòng)脈閉塞處釋放Solitaire AB支架,術(shù)中DSA顯示左側(cè)頸內(nèi)動(dòng)脈遠(yuǎn)端顯影(箭頭所示) 1f 于首次機(jī)械取栓后5 min復(fù)查DSA顯示,左側(cè)頸內(nèi)動(dòng)脈遠(yuǎn)端局部顯影不良(箭頭所示) 1g 予Sprinter Legend球囊擴(kuò)張病變,DSA仍顯示局部充盈缺損(箭頭所示) 1h 于狹窄處植入2.50 mm×8.00 mm Apollo支架,復(fù)查DSA顯示左側(cè)頸內(nèi)動(dòng)脈遠(yuǎn)端原閉塞處顯影良好,其遠(yuǎn)端血流通暢(箭頭所示) 1i 術(shù)后1周復(fù)查MRA顯示,左側(cè)頸內(nèi)動(dòng)脈血流通暢(箭頭所示)Figure 1 A 51?year?old man presented right limb weakness and speech disorder for 5 h.The baseline NIHSS score was 18.He was diagnosed as acute ischemic stroke and distal occlusion of left internal carotid artery(ICA)and underwent mechnical thrombectomy.The mRS score was 2 after 3?month follow up.Head imaging findings before and after operation Preoperative axial DWI showed infarction of left fronto?temporo?insular lobe(arrow indicates,Panel 1a).Preoperative MRA and DSA showed occlusion of left ICA(arrows indicate;Panel 1b,1c).Preoperative DSA showed clear A1 segment of left middle cerebral artery(MCA)and anterior cerebral artery(ACA;arrow indicates,Panel 1d).Deploy the Solitaire AB stent in the occlusion site,and intraoperative DSA showed visualization of distal left ICA(arrow indicates,Panel 1e).Five minutes later,DSA showed poor visualization of distal left ICA after the first stent retrieval(arrow indicates,Panel 1f).DSA showed partial filling defect after Sprinter Legend balloon dilatation(arrow indicates,Panel 1g).A 2.50 mm×8.00 mm Apollo stent was implanted,and DSA showed good visualization of the occulsion site and fluent blood flow of distal left ICA(arrow indicates,Panel 1h).MRA performed one week after procedure showed fluent blood flow of left ICA(arrow indicates,Panel 1i).
本組有2例患者首次機(jī)械取栓成功實(shí)現(xiàn)血管再通,但在術(shù)后觀察期間發(fā)生血管再閉塞,遂行支架植入術(shù)。急性期血管再閉塞是機(jī)械取栓術(shù)后重要并發(fā)癥,若早期無(wú)法及時(shí)解除則影響長(zhǎng)期預(yù)后,血管再閉塞原因可能與取栓裝置損傷血管內(nèi)皮致血小板聚集有關(guān),因此機(jī)械取栓聯(lián)合應(yīng)用抗血小板藥物有助于減少血管再閉塞的發(fā)生。Heo等[17]采用替羅非班動(dòng)脈溶栓治療急性期血管再閉塞取得較好效果,他們還證實(shí)原位狹窄基礎(chǔ)上血栓形成致血管閉塞患者機(jī)械取栓后更易發(fā)生血管再閉塞。本組有2例患者發(fā)生術(shù)中血管遠(yuǎn)端血栓形成,均是手術(shù)操作過(guò)程中栓子脫落堵塞遠(yuǎn)端所致,急性血管內(nèi)再通治療過(guò)程中栓子易破碎并脫落至遠(yuǎn)端,術(shù)中及時(shí)應(yīng)用溶栓藥物或抗血小板藥物有助于解除血管遠(yuǎn)端栓塞事件。
急性缺血性卒中機(jī)械取栓過(guò)程中血管壁損傷、缺血?再灌注損傷、溶栓藥物和抗血小板藥物等均可能造成圍手術(shù)期顱內(nèi)出血。研究顯示,性別、入院時(shí)NIHSS評(píng)分、既往糖尿病和發(fā)病至血管再通時(shí)間均是顱內(nèi)出血的危險(xiǎn)因素[18],為減少顱內(nèi)出血這一并發(fā)癥,除要求術(shù)者經(jīng)驗(yàn)豐富外,術(shù)前準(zhǔn)確評(píng)價(jià)出血風(fēng)險(xiǎn)亦十分重要。本研究圍手術(shù)期癥狀性顱內(nèi)出血均為機(jī)械取栓術(shù)聯(lián)合支架植入術(shù)患者,有文獻(xiàn)報(bào)道,與單獨(dú)機(jī)械取栓相比,機(jī)械取栓術(shù)聯(lián)合支架植入術(shù)增加顱內(nèi)出血發(fā)生率[19]。部分行支架植入術(shù)的患者,手術(shù)時(shí)間延長(zhǎng)導(dǎo)致的血管再通延遲也可能增加再灌注出血風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。此外,行支架植入術(shù)的患者均應(yīng)用抗血小板藥物,也可能是導(dǎo)致癥狀性顱內(nèi)出血的重要原因。
綜上所述,Solitaire AB可回收支架用于顱內(nèi)前循環(huán)大動(dòng)脈閉塞致急性缺血性卒中血管內(nèi)治療安全、有效,首次機(jī)械取栓后血管再通不理想或者血管再狹窄或閉塞行支架植入術(shù)作為補(bǔ)充治療效果較好。本研究尚存很多不足之處:術(shù)前缺少充分的多模態(tài)影像學(xué)檢查,對(duì)患者可能存在的缺血半暗帶區(qū)評(píng)價(jià)不全面;院內(nèi)外轉(zhuǎn)運(yùn)過(guò)程不順暢,使患者發(fā)病至血管再通時(shí)間相對(duì)較長(zhǎng),對(duì)于縮短血管再通時(shí)間方面仍有潛力改進(jìn)。盡管多項(xiàng)大樣本臨床試驗(yàn)證實(shí)新型可回收支架在機(jī)械取栓中取得可喜成果,但對(duì)可回收支架療效及其在不同發(fā)病機(jī)制致急性缺血性卒中患者治療中表現(xiàn)出來(lái)的差異,尚待進(jìn)一步深入研究;此外,新型可回收支架的中遠(yuǎn)期療效也要進(jìn)一步評(píng)價(jià)。
[1]Clark WM,Albers GW,Madden KP,Hamilton S.The rtPA(alteplase)0?to 6?hour acute stroke trial,part A(A0276g):results of a double?blind,placebo?controlled,multicenter study.Thromblytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke study investigators.Stroke,2000,31:811?816.
[2]Xu AD,Wang YJ,Wang DZ;Chinese Stroke Therapy Expert Panel for Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator.Consensus statementon the use ofintravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator to treat acute ischemic strokebythe ChineseStrokeTherapyExpertPanel.CNS Neurosci Ther,2013,19:543?548.
[3]Zhu LN,Chen D,Chen T,Lin Y,Xu D,Liu L.Efficacy and safety of rt?PA intravenous thrombolysis for treating acute ischemic stroke beyond the therapeutic window:a Meta?analysis.Zhongguo Xian Dai Shen Jing Ji Bing Za Zhi,2016,16:64?70[.朱麗娜,陳鄧,陳濤,林燕,徐達(dá),劉凌.重組組織型纖溶酶原激活物靜脈溶栓治療超時(shí)間窗急性缺血性卒中的Meta分析.中國(guó)現(xiàn)代神經(jīng)疾病雜志,2016,16:64?70.]
[4]Berkhemer OA,Fransen PS,Beumer D,van den Berg LA,Lingsma HF,Yoo AJ,Schonewille WJ,Vos JA,Nederkoorn PJ,Wermer MJ,van Walderveen MA,Staals J,Hofmeijer J,van Oostayen JA,Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ,Boiten J,Brouwer PA,Emmer BJ,de Bruijn SF,van Dijk LC,Kappelle LJ,Lo RH,van Dijk EJ,de Vries J,de Kort PL,van Rooij WJ,van den Berg JS,van Hasselt BA,Aerden LA,Dallinga RJ,Visser MC,Bot JC,Vroomen PC,Eshghi O,Schreuder TH,Heijboer RJ,Keizer K,Tielbeek AV,den Hertog HM,Gerrits DG,van den Berg?Vos RM,Karas GB,Steyerberg EW,Flach HZ,Marquering HA,Sprengers ME,Jenniskens SF,Beenen LF,van den Berg R,Koudstaal PJ,van Zwam WH,Roos YB,van der Lugt A,van Oostenbrugge RJ,Majoie CB,Dippel DW;MR CLEAN Investigators.A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke.N Engl J Med,2015,372:11?20.
[5]Campbell BC,Mitchell PJ,Kleinig TJ,Dewey HM,Churilov L,Yassi N,Yan B,Dowling RJ,Parsons MW,Oxley TJ,Wu TY,Brooks M,Simpson MA,Miteff F,Levi CR,Krause M,Harrington TJ,Faulder KC,Steinfort BS,Priglinger M,Ang T,Scroop R,Barber PA,McGuinness B,Wijeratne T,Phan TG,Chong W,Chandra RV,Bladin CF,Badve M,Rice H,de Villiers L,Ma H,Desmond PM,Donnan GA,Davis SM;EXTEND?IA Investigators.Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion?imaging selection.N Engl J Med,2015,372:1009?1018.
[6]Goyal M,Demchuk AM,Menon BK,Eesa M,Rempel JL,Thornton J,Roy D,Jovin TG,Willinsky RA,Sapkota BL,Dowlatshahi D,Frei DF,Kamal NR,Montanera WJ,Poppe AY,Ryckborst KJ,Silver FL,Shuaib A,Tampieri D,Williams D,Bang OY,Baxter BW,Burns PA,Choe H,Heo JH,Holmstedt CA,Jankowitz B,Kelly M,Linares G,Mandzia JL,Shankar J,Sohn SI,Swartz RH,Barber PA,Coutts SB,Smith EE,Morrish WF,Weill A,Subramaniam S,Mitha AP,Wong JH,Lowerison MW,Sajobi TT, Hill MD; ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke.N Engl J Med,2015,372:1019?1030.
[7]Jovin TG,Chamorro A,Cobo E,de Miquel MA,Molina CA,Rovira A,San Román L,Serena J,Abilleira S,Ribó M,Millán M,Urra X,Cardona P,López?Cancio E,Tomasello A,Casta?o C,Blasco J,Aja L,Dorado L,Quesada H,Rubiera M,Hernandez?Pérez M,Goyal M,Demchuk AM,von Kummer R,Gallofré M,Dávalos A;REVASCAT Trial Investigators.Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke.N Engl J Med,2015,372:2296?2306.
[8]Saver JL,Goyal M,Bonafe A,Diener HC,Levy EI,Pereira VM,Albers GW,Cognard C,Cohen DJ,Hacke W,Jansen O,Jovin TG,Mattle HP,Nogueira RG,Siddiqui AH,Yavagal DR,Baxter BW,Devlin TG,Lopes DK,Reddy VK,du Mesnil de Rochemont R,Singer OC,Jahan R;SWIFT PRIME Investigators.Stent?retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t?PA vs t?PA alone in stroke.N Engl J Med,2015,372:2285?2295.
[9]Mulder MJ,van Oostenbrugge RJ,Dippel DW;MR CLEAN Investigators.Letter by Mulder et al regarding article,"2015 AHA/ASA focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment:a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association".Stroke,2015,46:E235.
[10]Chinese Stroke Association, Chinese Interventional Neuroradiology Society of Chinese Stroke Association,Chinese Preventive Medicine Association Stroke Prevention and Control Committee Intervention Study Group.Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment 2015 in China.Zhongguo Zu Zhong Za Zhi,2015,10:590?606[.中國(guó)卒中學(xué)會(huì),中國(guó)卒中學(xué)會(huì)神經(jīng)介入分會(huì),中華預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)卒中預(yù)防與控制專業(yè)委員會(huì)介入學(xué)組.急性缺血性卒中血管內(nèi)治療中國(guó)指南2015.中國(guó)卒中雜志,2015,10:590?606.]
[11]Liu H,Zhong HL,Jia JW,Li Y,Sun YQ.Application of solitaire stents in treatment of intracranial arterial atherosclerotic stenosis.Zhonghua Jie Ru Fang She Xue Dian Zi Za Zhi,2015,3:115?118.[劉赫,鐘紅亮,賈建文,李熒,孫永全.Solitaire支架在顱內(nèi)動(dòng)脈硬化性狹窄治療中的應(yīng)用.中華介入放射學(xué)電子雜志,2015,3:115?118.]
[12]Dong FJ,Fan YM,Chang BG.Stent treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.Zhongguo Xian Dai Shen Jing Ji Bing Za Zhi,2012,12:465?469[.董鳳菊,范一木,常斌鴿.癥狀性顱內(nèi)動(dòng)脈狹窄的支架治療.中國(guó)現(xiàn)代神經(jīng)疾病雜志,2012,12:465?469.]
[13]Kim TK,Rhim JK,Lee CJ,Oh SH,Chung BS.The limitations of thrombectomy with SolitaireTMAB as first?line treatment in acute ischemic stroke:a single centerexperience.JCerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg,2012,14:203?209.
[14]Lee JS,Hong JM,Lee KS,Suh HI,Demchuk AM,Hwang YH,Kim BM,Kim JS.Endovascular therapy of cerebral arterial occlusions:intracranial atherosclerosis versus embolism.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2015,24:2074?2080.
[15]Wong LK.Global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis.Int J Stroke,2006,1:158?159.
[16]Broeg?Morvay A,Mordasini P,Bernasconi C,Bühlmann M,Pult F,Arnold M,Schroth G,Jung S,Mattle HP,Gralla J,Fischer U.Direct mechanical intervention versus combined intravenous and mechanical intervention in large artery anterior circulation stroke:a matched?Pairs analysis.Stroke,2016,47:1037?1044.
[17]Heo JH,Lee KY,Kim SH,Kim DI.Immediate reocclusion following a successful thrombolysis in acute stroke:a pilot study.Neurology,2003,60:1684?1687.
[18]Jiang S,Fei A,Peng Y,Zhang J,Lu YR,Wang HR,Chen M,Pan S.Predictors of outcome and hemorrhage in patients undergoing endovascular therapy with solitaire stent for acute ischemic stroke.PLoS One,2015,10:E0144452.
[19]Dorado L,Casta?o C,Millán M,Aleu A,de la Ossa NP,Gomis M,López?Cancio E,Vivas E,Rodriguez?Campello A,Castellanos M,Dávalos A.Hemorrhagic risk of emergent endovascular treatment plus stenting in patients with acute ischemic stroke.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2013,22:1326?1331.
Application of Solitaire AB stent in endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke
ZHOU Teng?fei,ZHU Liang?fu,LI Tian?xiao,SHAO Qiu?ji,WU Li?heng,ZHOU Zhi?long,SONG Zhao?yang
Department of Interventional Therapy,Zhengzhou University People's Hospital,Zhengzhou 450003,He'nan,China
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficiency of mechnical thrombectomy with Solitaire AB stent in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke caused by large artery occlusion of anterior circulation. Methods Clinical data of 31 patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large artery occlusion of anterior circulation,who underwent mechnical thrombectomy with Solitaire AB stent,were reviewed retrospectively. Recanalization results were assessed by immediate scale of thrombolysis in cerebral infarction(TICI)after thrombectomy.National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)was used to evaluate neurological function at one week after operation,and modified Rankin Scale(mRS)was used to evaluate outcomes at3 months afteroperation. Complicationsrelated to the procedure,such as perioperative embolic events,intracranial hemorrhage or death within 3 months after operation,were recorded.Results A total of 33 Solitaire AB stents were used in 31 patients.The initial success rate of recanalization was 61.29%(19/31).Among the other 12 patients,one patient with TICI Grade 2a and favorable distal blood supply was not further freated,while 11 patients underwent stent implantation as a rescue treatment and 9 of them were successful.The final recanalization rate was 90.32%(28/31).The NIHSS score one week after operation was 8.81±3.40,which was significantly lower than the score 16.06±4.82 on admission(t=?7.104,P=0.000).Three months after operation,there were 16 patients(51.61%)with good prognosis(mRS score≤2). Perioperative embolization occurred in 3 patients. Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 4 patients during the 3?month follow ?up period,and 6 patients were dead.Conclusions The application of Solitaire AB stent in mechnical thrombectomy for treating acute ischemic stroke isefficientand safe. Stentimplantation can be used asadjunctive treatmentwhen initial recanalization with Solitaire AB stent is failed.
Stroke; Brain ischemia; Angioplasty; Stents; Postoperative complications
LI Tian?xiao(Email:doctorlitianxiao@163.com)
10.3969/j.issn.1672?6731.2017.05.011
450003 鄭州大學(xué)人民醫(yī)院介入科
李天曉(Email:doctorlitianxiao@163.com)
2017?05?03)