• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Investigation of rotating stall for a centrifugal pump impeller using various SGS models*

    2017-04-26 06:00:50PeijianZhou周佩劍FujunWang王福軍ZhengjunYang楊正軍JiegangMou牟介剛
    關(guān)鍵詞:佩劍

    Pei-jian Zhou (周佩劍), Fu-jun Wang (王福軍), Zheng-jun Yang (楊正軍), Jie-gang Mou (牟介剛)

    1.College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

    2.College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China,

    E-mail: peijianzhou@gmail.com

    Investigation of rotating stall for a centrifugal pump impeller using various SGS models*

    Pei-jian Zhou (周佩劍)1,2, Fu-jun Wang (王福軍)1, Zheng-jun Yang (楊正軍)1, Jie-gang Mou (牟介剛)2

    1.College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

    2.College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China,

    E-mail: peijianzhou@gmail.com

    The accurate modeling and prediction of the rotating stall in a centrifugal pump is a significant challenge. One of the modeling techniques that can improve the accuracy of the flow predictions is the large eddy simulation (LES). The quality of the LES predictions depends on the sub-grid-scale (SGS) model implemented in the LES. This paper assesses the influence of various SGS models that are suitable for predicting rotating stall in a low-specific speed centrifugal pump impeller. The SGS models considered in the present work include the Smagorinsky model (SM), the dynamic Smagorinsky model (DSM), the dynamic non-linear model (DNM), the dynamic mixed model (DMM) and the dynamic mixed non-linear model (DMNM). The results obtained from these models are compared with the PIV and LDV experimental data. The analysis of the results shows that the SGS models have significant influences on the flow field. Among the models, the DSM, the DMM and the DMNM can successfully predict the“two-channel” stall phenomenon, but not the SM and the DNM. According to the simulations, the DMNM gives the best prediction on the mean velocity flow field and also indicates improvements for the simulation of the turbulent flow. Moreover, the high turbulent kinetic energy predicted by the DMNM is in the best agreement with the experiment data.

    Centrifugal impeller, rotating stall, large eddy simulation, sub-grid-scale (SGS) model

    Introduction

    The rotating stall is a key issue for the stable operation of centrifugal pumps[1,2]. This phenomenon often occurs under a part load condition and is usually accompanied with a large flow separation and strong anisotropy, which serves as a very severe test for the flow simulation by turbulence models based on the linear eddy viscosity concept. It is a challenging task to accurately predict the rotating stall within a pump.

    The improvements in the computer power make it possible to implement advanced models such as the LES to study the performance of pumps. The application of the LES for pumps becomes a widely used technique in recent years. Byskov et al.[3]applied the LES and the RANS models to a centrifugal pump impeller containing two bladed channels. The results indicate that the LES results are in superior agreement with the measurements as compared to the RANS ones, particularly at the stall point. Feng et al.[4]implemented the hybrid RANS-LES approach to predict a “two-channel” stall phenomenon in the impeller, where the RNGand SSG models fail to provide such predictions. Lucius and Brenner[5,6]used another hybrid RANS-LES method called the scaleadaptive simulation to determine the rotating stall in a centrifugal pump, while Hasmatuchi[7]also applied the same methodology to investigate the stall flow in a pump-turbine. Tao et al.[8]considered a novel rotating correction on the RANS, to improve the accuracy under the designed condition. However, a large deviation can still be observed during the stall flow. In the study presented by Braun[9], numerical investigations of the rotating stall in a pump-turbine were performed. The results indicate that the SSTmodel fails toaccurately reproduce the phenomenon. Pacot et al.[10]investigated the rotating stall phenomena in a pumpturbine under a part load condition. The results demonstrate that unlike the RANS approach, the LES is a powerful tool to predict the stall flow.

    According to the literature, the reliability of the LES relies on the performance of the employed SGS model. The early work presented by Kato et al.[11]shows that the stall point predicted by the SM for a mixed-flow pump is at a slightly lower flow-rate ratio, as compared to the measurements. Posa et al.[12]tested the SM and the filtered structured function (FSF) model for a mixed-flow pump, and it is shown that the FSF model performs better for the complex flow under the off-design condition. Yang et al.[13]evaluated SGS models including the SM, the DSM and the DMM for the LES in a shrouded six-bladed centrifugal pump impeller under the design condition. Among the models, the DMM showed improvement in predictions of both the surface shear stress and the velocity distributions. Furthermore, Yang and Wang[14]proposed a dynamic mixed nonlinear model (DMNM) which combines the advantages of the DMM and the DNM. Their study shows that the DMNM can capture the detailed vortex characteristics more accurately. The SGS models have great effects on the rotating stall in a pump. According to the knowledge of the authors, it is still not clear which SGS model can provide better predictions under similar circumstances. It is an urgent task to evaluate the performance of various SGS models.

    The present study investigates the performance of five SGS models (SM, DSM, DNM, DMM and DMNM) in the internal flow prediction of a low specific speed centrifugal pump impeller under the stall condition. Various features studied include velocities, vortices and the turbulent kinetic energy, and the results predicted by the SGS models are compared with available experimental data obtained from the PIV and the LDV.

    1. Description of SGS models

    In the LES, the effects of large-scale eddies are considered while small-scale eddies are modeled according to a pattern. Compared to the original N-S governing equations, the LES involves an additional SGS stress tensor termwithin the governing equation. This term can be modeled with various SGS models such as SM, DSM, DNM, DMM and DMNM.

    1.1Smagorinsky model (SM)

    One of the earliest SGS model is proposed by Smagorinsky[15]for weather report. It is referred to as SM. The stress term of the SGS can be computed as

    where the over-bar represents the spatial filter ring for a filtered sizeis the magnitude ofandis the Smagorinsky coefficient.

    This model requires a small amount of computation and can be quite accurate in describing the subgrid dissipation characteristics. However, it has the following drawbacks:is a constant coefficient (the value of which depends on experience), it cannot describe the asymptotic behavior near the wall and it does not allow the SGS energy backscatter to the resolved scales.

    1.2Dynamic Smagorinsky model (DSM)

    Afterwards, a more comprehensive model (referred to as DSM) as compared to the SM was proposed[16]. This model overcomes some of the drawbacks of the SM and can be regarded as a modified SM[17]. The stress tensor can be expressed as

    where the tilde denotes the test filtering at a test filter scaleis the resolved velocity componentis the SGS stress foris the so-called Leonard stress tensor which can be computed by the resolved scales.

    Applying the SM to model the SGS stress, we have

    The DSM coefficient is calculated by using the least-squares method[15]

    The DSM is one of the most popular SGS models due to its robustness, its ease to implement and the low computational cost. Also, it has many other desirable features, i.e., it requires only one input parameter,it has the correct asymptotic behavior near the wall and in laminar flows, and it does not prohibit the energy backscatter. However, the DSM has several aspects that require improvements. The model assumes that the SGS stress is only dependent on the resolved strain rate tensor. The principal axes of the SGS stress tensor are to be aligned with those of the resolved strain rate tensor. This model requires a slightly more computational time than the SM.

    1.3Dynamic mixed model (DMM)

    Singh and You[18]presented a DMM which employs a mixed model as the basis model. The anisotropic part of the SGS stress at a grid filter scale is expressed as follows

    The anisotropic part of the SGS stress at a test filter scale is expressed as

    The mixed SGS models have several advantages: (1) they require less sophisticated modeling due to the explicit calculation of the modified Leonard term, and only the residual stresses have to be modeled, (2) the modified Leonard term can provide the energy backscatter to the resolved scales, (3) the models will reduce the excessive backscatter represented by the eddy viscosity model which causes the previously mentioned numerical instability, and (4) they do not require alignment of the principal axes of the SGS stress tensor and the resolved strain rate tensor. Note that the DMM requires more computational time than the DSM.

    1.4Dynamic non-linear model (DNM)

    In the study presented by Yang et al.[19], the SGS was expressed in a general third-order formulation. In the current study, the modified cross term and the modified SGS Reynolds stress are modeled by using the following equation

    The anisotropic part of the SGS stress at a test filter scale is expressed as:

    The two coefficients can be obtained by:

    The SGS stress expression includes tensors of the resolved strain rate and the rotation rate, which represent the anisotropy of the rotating flows. Unlike the SM, it does not require an alignment between the SGS stress tensor and the resolved strain rate tensor. Also this model reflects both the forward and the backward scatters of the SGS turbulence kinetic energy between the filtered and the SGS motions, however, it does not consider the Leonard term. The amount of computations required by the DNM is almost the same as the DMM.

    1.5Dynamic mixed non-linear model (DMNM)

    Yang and Wang[14]developed a new model (known as DMNM) that retains the resolved modified Leonard term along with the modified expressions for the cross term and the SGS Reynolds stress. The SGS stress can be expressed as:

    By substituting Eq.(15) and Eq.(16) into Eq.(3), the following equation is obtained

    A similar approach in the DSM is implemented by using the least squares minimization of the error. The two coefficients in the DMNM are obtained by using the following equations:

    This model combines the advantages of the DMM and the DNM, however, it needs the largest amount of computational time among the discussed SGS models. Yang and Wang[14]showed that the DMNM is more suitable for high curvature and strong rotational turbulence calculations as it considers the turbulent anisotropic properties.

    2. The investigated pump impeller and simulation details

    As shown in Fig.1, the considered pump impeller in this study is a shrouded, low specific-speed centrifugal impeller. The pump flow rate isand the head isunder the design condition. The simulation of the off-design condition(=Qis performed in this paper. The main geometry data of the impeller are summarized in Table 1. Note that more detailed geometry and experimental data are available in Ref.[20].

    Fig.1 Geometry of the impeller

    Table 1 Impeller geometry

    The full passages of the impeller are simulated in the present work. To reduce the boundary influence, extensions are made at the outlet and the inlet of the flow passage, respectively. Due to the complexity of the computational domain, an unstructured hexahedron mesh is employed as it enjoys a good adaptability. In the near-wall regions, the mesh is refined according to the requirement of the LES. The grid stretching factor is selected to allow the wall-adjacent cells to be located within 0.02 mm of the surface corresponding tovalues, less than 5 near the wall, whereas the grids are also refined in the stream-wise and span-wise directions. A mesh of totally 2 381 970 cells is selected as the best adjustment between the solution accuracy requirements and the computer resources. Increasing the number of grids does not show a significant change of the results as shown by the grid independent test. Figure 2 represents the mesh construction of the full passage. The stretching factor near the wall is 1.1 and the value of the maximum aspect ratio is 218.

    Fig.2 Computational grid

    The rotation reference frame is adopted for the flow passage with the rotation speed being set to the rotation speed of the impeller. The inlet velocity boundary condition is determined by the flow rate, whichincludes some fluctuated velocity components normal to the inlet boundary. The Neumann conditionis adopted for the pressure. The value of the pressure is given at the outlet of the passage and the Neumann condition is taken into account for the velocity. Note that no-slip wall condition is adopted as

    The time step is set as 0.00023 s that corresponds to a Courant number estimation of less than 10, i.e., overall 360 time steps per impeller revolution. The residual convergence criterion for each time step is reduced to 1.0×10-5, while the allowed maximum number of iterations per time step is limited to 15.

    The introduced five SGS models are considered in the simulation and the calculated results are compared with the PIV and LDV experimental data taken from Ref.[20]. According to the standard error of the PIV data estimates and based on 1000 statistically uncorrelated samples, the statistical uncertainty in the mean velocities is set to 1.2. The statistical uncertainties in the LDV mean velocities are estimated to be 0.7%[20].

    Fig.3 (Color online) Time-averaged velocity fields obtained by various SGS models

    Fig.4 Radial and tangential velocities

    3. Mean velocity field predicted

    The following results are presented for the impeller mid-height. Figures.3(a)-3(e) show the time-averaged streamlines computed by using the SGS models and Fig.3(f) demonstrates the velocity vectors measured by the LDV. As shown in the LDV experiment, the blocked passage and the unblocked passage occur alternately in the impeller. This “two channel” phenomenon consisting of the alternated stalled and un-stalled passages, is captured by the DSM, the DMM and the DMNM, but not the SM and the DNM. The predictions are almost consistent with the measurement results, however an unreal small vortex is found for these three models in the blade suction of the un-stalled passage. This remarkable difference ismainly caused by the pre-rotation disregarded in the simulations[3]. According to the results, the size and the shape of the vortex computed by three models are different as the calculated vortex near the outlet obtained by the DMM is much smaller than those obtained by the other two models.

    Fig.5 (Color online) Contour plots of the0.5)

    In order to further examine the performance of the three SGS models in simulating the rotating stall phenomena, the radial and tangential velocities at theare compared for the points at the radial positions of(as shown in Fig.4). The velocity profiles at 0.25demonstrate a decent periodicity for every two passages within the full annulus. Therefore, only the results within a circumferential range ofare presented in the following sections, which contain two adjacent passages: A is the un-stalled passage, and B is the stalled passage. The results of the DNM and the SM are not presented in Fig.4 as these models fail to do the job. At0.5, the PIV measurements reveal that the velocity profiles in the passage A are skewed towards the suction side. However, all simulations predict velocity profiles that are displaced to the pressure side. This remarkable difference is mainly associated to the effects of pre-rotation[3]. According to Fig.4, in the passage B, the radial and tangential velocities illustrate a reversed flow along the suction side. The results of the DMNM and the DSM are in a decent agreement with the PIV results, however the DMM’s performance is not within the acceptable range. At, the performances of four models are almost the same in the passage A. Nevertheless in the passage B, the performance of the DMNM is in better agreement with the PIV results. At, all models appear to give predictions substantially deviated from the measurements of the radial velocity of the passage A. However, the predicted variation trend by the DMNM is in the best agreement with the experimental data. The tangential velocities of the passage B, predicted by the DMNM are in the best agreement with the PIV data. According to this detailed analysis of the models, the DMNM enjoys the highest accuracy in predicting the flow behavior.

    4. Vorticity analysis

    Figure 5 shows the time-averagedvorticity computed by using the SGS models. As shown in Fig.5(d), it presents the signi ficant strength of the inlet stall cell in passage B. According to this figure, avorticity of pronounced large magnitude is obtained across the inlet. Additional small clockwise rotating vortex is also observed to be shed from the pressure leading edge. It is clearly shown that thevorticity predicted by the DMM remarkably deviates from the measurements. Both the DMNM and the DSM have successfully captured small clockwise rotating vortices in the passage, however the size and the shape of the vortices still substantially deviate from the PIV results. Furthermore, the large value region in the DSM is larger than the region predicted by the DMNM and is more consistent with the PIV results.

    5. Turbulence behavior analysis

    Figure 6 illustrates the distribution of the twodimensional turbulent kinetic energyat the middle sectionof the impeller. This kinetic energy characterizes the extent of the instantaneous velocity deviation from the mean velocity, which is defined asNote thatu′ andare values of the instantaneous velocity rootmean square (rms) inplane. The stall phenomenon in passage B is associated with the high turbulence activity. Furthermore, the strong reversed flow from the vortex in the outlet region of the passage B gives rise to a signi ficant turbulence intensity. In the passage A, the DMM overestimates the turbulent kinetic energy. Also, a low value region is created near the entrance by using the DSM and the DMNM, which is in agreement with the PIV results. However, the DMM fails to predict such region. In the passage B, the DMM also gives an over-prediction at the passage entrance. In addition, the high value area predicted by the DSM has a lower value than the DMNM. The above explanations show that the predicted results by the DMNM are more consistent with the PIV results as compared to the results predicted by the other SGS models.

    Fig.6 (Color online) Contours of the turbulent kinetic energy

    In order to further evaluate the performance of the presented SGS models in the turbulence intensity prediction, the comparisons of the blade-to-blade distribution of the turbulence intensity are presented in Fig.7 at two radial positions, i.e.,and. According to this figure, atthe DMM over-predictsextensively as compared to PIV results. In the passage A, the DSM and the DMNM appear to be more reasonable, although both models predict profiles that are flatter than the PIV results due to the pre-rotation. In the passage B, the two models give the same peak magnitudes of the turbulent intensity in agreement with the PIV data. Nonetheless, when different positions are considered, the DMNM is more accurate than the DSM. Based on the results obtained atin the passage A, all predicted profiles for the turbulence intensity see higher values than the PIV results. Also, the models can not predict the peak value at the suction side. In the passage B, the DMNM and the DSM give results in a good agreement with the PIV results, unlike the DMM which gives a lower estimation of the turbulence intensity. Thus, it can be concluded that the twodimensional turbulent kinetic energy predicted by the DMNM is in the best agreement with the experimental values.

    Fig.7 Turbulence intensity profiles

    6. Conclusions

    The internal flow in a shrouded six-bladed centri-fugal pump impeller under the stall condition is investigated in this paper by considering five different SGS models: SM, DSM, DNM, DMM and DMNM. The qualitative and quantitative comparisons are conducted between the simulation results and experimental tests.

    Based on the results presented in this paper, the DMNM has great potentials to be used by pump designers to predict the flow performance under the stall condition of the pump.

    [1] Luo X., Ji B., Tsujimoto Y. A review of cavitation in hydraulic machinery [J].Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2016, 28(3): 335-358.

    [2] Zhou P. J., Wang F. J., Yao Z. F. Study on effects of blade number on stall characteristics for centrifugal pump impeller [J].Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 52(10): 207-215(in Chinese).

    [3] Byskov R. K., Jacobsen C. B., Pedersen N. Flow in a centrifugal pump impeller at design and off-design conditions-Part II: Large eddy simulations [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2003, 125(1): 73-83.

    [4] Feng J., Benra F., Dohmen H. J. Application of different turbulence models in unsteady flow simulations of a radial diffuser pump [J].Forschung Im Ingenieurwesen, 2010, 74(3): 123-133.

    [5] Lucius A., Brenner G. Numerical simulation and evaluation of velocity fluctuations during rotating stall of a centrifugal pump [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2011, 133(8): 081102.

    [6] Lucius A., Brenner G. Unsteady CFD simulations of a pump in part load conditions using scale-adaptive simulation [J].International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2010, 31(6): 1113-1118.

    [7] Hasmatuchi V., Roth S., Botero F. et al. Hydrodynamics of a pump-turbine at off-design operating conditions: Numerical simulation [C].Proceeding of ASME-JSMEKSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference. Shizuoka, Japan, 2011.

    [8] Tao R., Xiao R., Yang W. et al. A comparative assessment of Spalart-Shur rotation/curvature correction in RANS simulations in a centrifugal pump impeller [J].Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 2014: 342905.

    [9] Braun O. Part load flow in radial centrifugal pumps [D]. Doctoral Thesis, Lausanne, Switzerland: école Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 2009.

    [10] Pacot O., Kato C., Avellan F. High-resolution LES of the rotating stall in a reduced scale model pump-turbine [C].27th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems (IAHR 2014). Montreal, Canada, 2014.

    [11] Kato C., Mukai H., Manabe A. Large-eddy simulation of unsteady flow in a mixed-flow pump [J].International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2003, 9(5): 345-351.

    [12] Posa A., Lippolis A., Verzicco R. et al. Large-eddy simulations in mixed-flow pumps using an immersed-boundary method [J].Computers and Fluids, 2011, 47(1): 33-43.

    [13] Yang Z., Wang F., Zhou P. Evaluation of subgrid-scale models in large-eddy simulations of turbulent flow in a centrifugal pump impeller [J].Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 25(5): 911-918.

    [14] Yang Z., Wang F. A dynamic mixed nonlinear subgridscale model for large-eddy simulation [J].Engineering Computations, 2012, 29(7): 778-791.

    [15] Smagorinsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations [J].Monthly Weather Review, 1963, 91(3): 99-164.

    [16] Ryu S., Iaccarino G. A subgrid-scale eddy-viscosity model based on the volumetric strain-stretching [J].Physics of Fluids, 2014, 26(6): 065107.

    [17] Vollant A, Balarac G., Corre C. A dynamic regularized gradient model of the subgrid-scale stress tensor for largeeddy simulation [J].Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28(2): 025114.

    [18] Singh S., You D. A dynamic global-coefficient mixed subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows [J].International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2013, 42: 94-104.

    [19] Yang Z., Cui G., Xu C. et al. Large eddy simulation of rotating turbulent channel flow with a new dynamic globalcoefficient nonlinear subgrid stress model [J].Journal of Turbulence, 2012, 13(48):1-20.

    [20] Pedersen N., Larsen P. S., Jacobsen C. B. Flow in a centrifugal pump impeller at design and off-design conditions?Part I: Particle image velocimetry (PIV) and laser doppler velocimetry (LDV) measurements [J].Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2003, 125(1): 61-72.

    (Received December 30, 2014, Revised June 30, 2015)

    * Project supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51139007, 51321001), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. LQ17E090005) and the National Science and Technology

    Support Program of China (Grant No. 2015BAD20B01).

    Biography: Pei-jian Zhou (1986-), Male, Ph. D.

    Fu-jun Wang,

    E-mail:wangfj@cau.edu.cn

    猜你喜歡
    佩劍
    江蘇青年女子佩劍運(yùn)動(dòng)員主動(dòng)進(jìn)攻技術(shù)分析
    我國(guó)女子佩劍技戰(zhàn)術(shù)打法特征及發(fā)展趨勢(shì)探究
    2019年全國(guó)擊劍錦標(biāo)賽佩劍冠軍傅穎技戰(zhàn)術(shù)的運(yùn)用
    Unsteady flow structures in centrifugal pump under two types of stall conditions *
    從戎贊
    放飛歷史思維創(chuàng)新課堂教學(xué)
    考試周刊(2018年31期)2018-03-22 12:21:08
    淺析中國(guó)佩劍文化及刀劍的文化意象
    我國(guó)男子佩劍運(yùn)動(dòng)員比賽中進(jìn)攻技術(shù)統(tǒng)計(jì)分析
    擊劍體驗(yàn)課
    孔子佩劍考
    卷宗(2014年12期)2014-04-02 18:30:57
    嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产精品一区二区性色av| kizo精华| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产黄片美女视频| 三级经典国产精品| 麻豆成人av视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 观看免费一级毛片| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 午夜福利视频精品| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲国产精品999| 欧美97在线视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 蜜桃在线观看..| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 在线观看人妻少妇| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 久热这里只有精品99| 久热久热在线精品观看| 一本一本综合久久| av不卡在线播放| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 日本wwww免费看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 99热全是精品| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 国产视频首页在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 欧美bdsm另类| 精品久久久久久电影网| 日本wwww免费看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲精品一二三| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 九色成人免费人妻av| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产成人精品福利久久| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 99热这里只有是精品50| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频 | 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 久久久欧美国产精品| 一个人免费看片子| 丁香六月天网| 全区人妻精品视频| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 一区在线观看完整版| 成人影院久久| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 日日啪夜夜撸| 精品国产一区二区久久| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 精品一区二区免费观看| 视频区图区小说| 桃花免费在线播放| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 桃花免费在线播放| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 午夜影院在线不卡| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 乱人伦中国视频| 免费少妇av软件| 秋霞伦理黄片| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产 精品1| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 尾随美女入室| 精品久久久噜噜| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 熟女av电影| 黄色一级大片看看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 99久久综合免费| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 三级国产精品片| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久人人爽人人片av| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲性久久影院| 免费少妇av软件| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久久久久久久大av| 成人无遮挡网站| 在线观看www视频免费| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看 | 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 日本免费在线观看一区| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 桃花免费在线播放| 中国国产av一级| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 赤兔流量卡办理| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 一级a做视频免费观看| 人人澡人人妻人| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 欧美3d第一页| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 赤兔流量卡办理| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产精品人妻久久久影院| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 少妇丰满av| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 嫩草影院新地址| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产在线男女| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 日本与韩国留学比较| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 两个人的视频大全免费| av在线观看视频网站免费| 777米奇影视久久| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 免费看日本二区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产极品天堂在线| 亚洲av福利一区| 日韩强制内射视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放 | 男女边摸边吃奶| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产高清三级在线| 久久av网站| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久 成人 亚洲| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 在线播放无遮挡| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 七月丁香在线播放| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 曰老女人黄片| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 日日啪夜夜撸| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 人妻系列 视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美人与善性xxx| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲图色成人| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 春色校园在线视频观看| 一级av片app| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 熟女电影av网| 日韩av免费高清视频| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 香蕉精品网在线| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产 精品1| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 9色porny在线观看| 一本一本综合久久| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 99久久人妻综合| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 成人影院久久| 日本黄色片子视频| 人妻一区二区av| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产av国产精品国产| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| videos熟女内射| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| av一本久久久久| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 欧美97在线视频| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 麻豆成人av视频| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 韩国av在线不卡| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲国产色片| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 精品酒店卫生间| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 精品一区二区三卡| 精品久久久久久久久av| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 夫妻午夜视频| 免费看不卡的av| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产一级毛片在线| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| av不卡在线播放| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲四区av| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 在线天堂最新版资源| 精品久久久精品久久久| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| av.在线天堂| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 色网站视频免费| 成人无遮挡网站| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲成人av在线免费| videossex国产| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲成人手机| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 99九九在线精品视频 | 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 色网站视频免费| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 精品久久久精品久久久| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 欧美3d第一页| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 中文字幕制服av| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 亚洲综合色惰| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 精品久久久久久久久av| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 欧美区成人在线视频| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 国产精品无大码| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 99九九在线精品视频 | 国产成人aa在线观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产黄片美女视频| 一本一本综合久久| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| a级毛色黄片| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 大码成人一级视频| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 777米奇影视久久| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 三级经典国产精品| 在现免费观看毛片| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| www.色视频.com| 免费少妇av软件| av一本久久久久| 亚洲在久久综合| 精品少妇内射三级| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 少妇 在线观看| av播播在线观看一区| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 中国三级夫妇交换| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 天堂8中文在线网| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产成人91sexporn| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产乱来视频区| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 男人舔奶头视频| 如何舔出高潮| av免费在线看不卡| 两个人免费观看高清视频 | 色网站视频免费| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 9色porny在线观看| 国产黄片美女视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 成年av动漫网址| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 午夜91福利影院| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 人人澡人人妻人| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 成人综合一区亚洲| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 三级国产精品片| 精品一区二区免费观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 蜜桃在线观看..| 中文字幕久久专区| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲国产av新网站| 蜜桃在线观看..| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产永久视频网站| 高清毛片免费看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| a级毛色黄片| 成人国产av品久久久| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 亚洲精品第二区| 少妇人妻 视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 日本wwww免费看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 日日啪夜夜撸| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 各种免费的搞黄视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 成年人免费黄色播放视频 | 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放 | 三上悠亚av全集在线观看 | 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 一级a做视频免费观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 在线观看三级黄色| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 国内精品宾馆在线| 观看av在线不卡| 国产在线男女| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| av福利片在线| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 成年人免费黄色播放视频 | 我的老师免费观看完整版| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 在线天堂最新版资源| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久久国产一区二区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花|