• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Applicability of an eddy covariance system based on a close-path quantumcascade laser spectrometer for measuring nitrous oxide fluxes from subtropical vegetable fields

    2016-11-23 04:47:23WANGDongWANGKiEugenioAZPINZHENGXunhundKlusBUTTERBACHBAHL
    關(guān)鍵詞:氧化亞氮渦動亞熱帶

    WANG Dong, WANG Ki, Eugenio DíAZ-PINéS, ZHENG Xunhund Klus BUTTERBACH-BAHL

    aState Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IAP-CAS), Beijing, China;bCollege of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;cInstitute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany

    Applicability of an eddy covariance system based on a close-path quantum
    cascade laser spectrometer for measuring nitrous oxide fluxes from subtropical vegetable fields

    WANG Donga,b, WANG Kaia, Eugenio DíAZ-PINéSc, ZHENG Xunhuaaand Klaus BUTTERBACH-BAHLc

    aState Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IAP-CAS), Beijing, China;bCollege of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;cInstitute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany

    The soil of subtropical vegetable felds is an important source of the atmospheric greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O). In a feld study in subtropical China, the authors used an eddy covariance (EC)system based on a close-path quantum cascade laser (QCL) spectrometer to measure N2O fuxes from a vegetable feld. During the experimental period from 9 October 2014 to 18 February 2015,the observed half-hourly N2O fuxes ranged from -10.7 to 1077.4 μg N m-2h-1, with a mean value of 99.3 μg N m-2h-1. The detection limit (95% confdence level) of the EC system for half-hourly fuxes was estimated at 18.5 μg N m-2h-1, i.e. smaller than 97.5% of all measured fuxes, and within the range of the lower limit of reported N2O emissions from subtropical vegetable felds. The random uncertainties in the half-hourly fuxes were estimated at 60% on average, of which 62% was due to stochastic variations caused by turbulence and 38% by instrumental noise. The fux systematic uncertainties were estimated at -18% on average, mainly due to the spectral attenuation; however,this negative bias had already been corrected for by calculating half-hourly fuxes. In conclusion,the close-path QCL-based EC technique is capable of measuring the N2O fuxes from the subtropical vegetable felds of China with high reliability and accuracy.

    ARTICLE HISTORY

    Revised 11 May 2016

    Accepted 13 May 2016

    Nitrous oxide; fux; quantum cascade laser; eddy covariance; subtropical vegetable feld

    亞熱帶蔬菜地是氧化亞氮 (N2O) 的重要排放源, 本研究首次采用基于閉路量子級聯(lián)激光吸收光譜儀的渦動相關(guān) (QCLAS-EC) 法觀測亞熱帶蔬菜地秋冬季非施肥階段的N2O排放通量, 以評估QCLAS-EC法測量亞熱帶蔬菜地N2O通量的適用性。結(jié)果表明, QCLAS-EC觀測系統(tǒng)在野外條件下能長期穩(wěn)定運行, 可觀測到N2O排放的季節(jié)變化趨勢, 其檢測限為18.5 μg N m-2h-1(95%置信水平), 試驗期間獲得的97.5%的N2O通量大于此檢測限, 表明QCLAS-EC觀測系統(tǒng)可有效并準確測量亞熱帶蔬菜地的N2O排放通量, 儀器本身的靈敏度不是通量檢測的限制因素。

    1. Introduction

    Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a very important greenhouse gas(IPCC 2007). Agricultural soils have been identifed as the dominant source of anthropogenic N2O emissions, contributing approximately 1.7-4.8 Tg N yr-1on the global scale(IPCC 2006). Emissions from agricultural soils are mainly due to the intensive use of nitrogen fertilizers. However,there are signifcant uncertainties in estimated N2O emissions at both regional and global scales, mainly due to the lack of fux data for representative crop and management systems.

    During the last two decades there has been rapid development in the application of fast response N2O analyzers based on spectroscopic techniques, e.g. the tunable diode laser (TDL) spectrometer and the quantum cascade laser(QCL) spectrometer. Due to the achieved gains in measuring sensitivity, N2O fuxes for diferent ecosystems can now be measured by the micrometeorological method of eddy covariance (EC) (e.g. Kroon et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2013). As compared to other commonly used techniques,e.g. the static chamber method, the EC technique has the advantage of providing spatially averaged fuxes at the feld scale without disturbing the environment of the measured objects, and also produces temporally continuous data (Wang et al. 2013).

    The production of vegetables under subtropical climate conditions has been identifed as a major source of atmospheric N2O (e.g. Mei et al. 2011; Yao et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2016). These studies have shown that the lowest level of N2O emissions from subtropical vegetable felds rangesfrom 10 to 30 μg N m-2h-1, usually occurring during the non-fertilization period in winter due to lower temperature and lowered soil nitrogen availability, as compared to the vegetable growing seasons. However, none of the above studies were carried out using the EC technique. First attempts at measuring soil N2O fuxes from crop felds using the EC technique with a close-path TDL spectrometer (Wang et al. 2013) were found to be not entirely satisfactory, because the detection limit of 37.6 μg N m-2h-1for half-hourly N2O fuxes was too high to measure fuxes in low-emissions periods. The question therefore arises as to whether an EC method based on the state-of-the-art closepath QCL approach might reliably measure the lowest level of N2O fuxes from subtropical vegetable felds.

    Figure 1.Satellite image of the experimental felds on 19 December 2014 (source: Google Earth).

    In this study, we assembled an EC system linked to a close-path N2O analyzer based on a QCL spectrometer(model QC-TILDAS-DUAL, Aerodyne Research Inc., U.S.A)to measure N2O fuxes from a vegetable feld in subtropical China. Compared with the traditional laser spectrometer,this type of laser is more sensitive and carries a number of other advantages such as compactness, high selectivity in operating frequencies, and without using liquid-nitrogen for laser cooling. QCL instruments have been previously used for N2O fux measurements on managed grasslands(Kroon et al. 2007; Neftel et al. 2007, 2010; Merbold et al. 2014) and agricultural felds (Huang et al. 2014; Rannik et al. 2015). However, the performance of the laser in these studies varied due to many factors, such as the wavelength and mode of the laser adopted during operation, the feld and environmental conditions, and the manner of the daily maintenance applied by the instrument users, which led to diferences in the performance of the QCL-EC system. Therefore, the aims of this study were to evaluate the applicability of the QCL-EC technique for measuring N2O fuxes from vegetable felds in subtropical China, as well as to investigate the characteristics of the N2O emissions during the non-fertilization period and assess fux uncertainties.

    2. Field measurements and data processing

    2.1. Field site

    Field measurements were conducted on a vegetable feld located in the suburbs of Yueyang, Hunan, China((29°30′21.24′′N, 112°53′42.95′′E), 29 m MSL). The site has a subtropical monsoon climate with a hot and rainy summer and a temperate winter. The mean annual temperature is 17.0 °C, while the mean annual precipitation is 1,260 mm. The soil of the site is classifed as sandy loam,with a pH 7.0-8.0 in the top layer of 10 cm. As is usual for this region, the vegetable feld was divided into many plots managed by diferent farmers (Figure 1). Vegetables(cabbage, hot pepper, or pumpkin) are grown in two consecutive seasons, which normally start in March and August, respectively. Nitrogen fertilizers are applied at the beginning of both seasons at a rate of 300-400 kg N ha-1. Our measurements began in early October 2014, when all plots were still planted with cabbages (maximum canopy height: 0.35 m), and with nitrogen fertilization having already commenced two months earlier, meaning it was unlikely to have had any substantial efect on N2O emissions during this period. Due to management diferences, the date of cabbage harvest for the plots within the EC footprint varied from mid-October to mid-December,which led to spatial heterogeneity in the canopy height from 0.10 to 0.35 m during this period. Following harvest,the felds were left fallow until the end of the measuring campaign.

    2.2. Field measurements

    N2O fux measurements were taken from 9 October 2014 to 18 February 2015. We used an EC system consisting of a QCL gas analyzer (QC-TILDAS-DUAL, Aerodyne Research Inc., U.S.A.), a three-dimensional sonic anemometer(CSAT3, Campbell Scientifc Inc., U.S.A.), a scroll vacuum pump (XDS35i, BOC Edwards, U.K.), a data logger (CR3000,Campbell Scientifc Inc., U.S.A.), and a sampling tube. The gas analyzer was equipped with a 76-m multi-path sample cell and two QC lasers, with one of them operating with a continuous wave at a wave number of 2,246.3 cm-1for N2O detection. It was placed in a house equipped with an air conditioner. The house was located to the east of the mast to avoid fow distortion. The sonic anemometer was mounted on the mast, 2.3 m above the ground, from9 October to 15 November 2014, and was then lowered to 2 m until the end of the experiment. The air inlet was installed 12 cm to the east of the sonic anemometer. The vacuum pump was used to draw ambient air to the multi-pass cell via an 11 m-long Tefon tube (inner diameter: 6.4 mm) at a nominal fow rate of 15 l min-1. To avoid water condensation, the tube was heated and coated with heat insulation material. Besides, inlet flters (polycarbonate;pore size: 0.45 μm) were added to prevent contamination of the multi-pass mirrors. The pressure of the sample cell was kept at around 53.2 hPa, and the flters were replaced regularly. Automatic zero calibration was implemented on the QCL every 4 h using pure N2. We released a standard gas of 380 nmol mol-1of N2O in N2/O2into the sample cell at the beginning and the end of the campaign. The measured N2O difered less than 5% from the standard concentration. Therefore, no further span calibration was performed. Data from the sonic anemometer and the QCL were simultaneously stored in the data logger at a frequency of 10 Hz.

    A meteorological station (WS3000, Beijing Techno Solutions, China) was used to observe the environmental conditions every 30 min, including the air and soil (5 cm depth) temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation. The volumetric water content of the soil (0-6 cm) was measured manually every day with a portable probe (ML2x,Delta-T Devices, U.K.). The volumetric records were converted into water-flled pore space (WFPS) using a theoretical particle density of 2.65 g cm-3and the bulk density of the measured soil.

    2.3. Flux calculation and quality control

    In this study, the EddyPro software (Li-COR, U.S.A.) was used for fux calculation and correction. The vertical N2O fux was calculated as

    where Frawis the raw turbulent fux (μg N m-2h-1); w′ andrepresent the instantaneous deviations of the vertical wind velocity (m s-1) and N2O concentration (nmol mol-1)from the mean values, respectively; the overbar indicates the averaging period of 30 min; ρais the air density(kg m-3); Mais the molar mass of air (0.029 kg mol-1), 3,600 denotes 3,600 s h-1, and 28 is the molar mass of two N atoms in N2O (g mol-1).

    The routine schemes proposed by Aubinet et al. (2000)were used to calculate the covariance in Equation (1), which included the steps of spike detection, double rotation of wind components, lag-time compensation, block averaging, and de-trending. The fux correction due to water dilution efect(Webb, Pearman, and Leuning 1980) and water broadening line efect (Neftel et al. 2010) were ignored, because the Aerodyne analyzer simultaneously measured the water vapor and reported the mixing ratio of N2O with respect to dry air with an empirical algorithm (Rannik et al. 2015). The methods proposed by Moncrief et al. (2004) and Ibrom et al. (2007)were used to correct the fux losses in the low and high ranges of the spectra, respectively.

    The half-hourly N2O fuxes were quality controlled using the following steps: First, fux records during instrument maintenance were discarded. Second, fuxes assigned with a quality fag of ‘2’ were rejected after stationarity and integral turbulence characteristic tests (Mauder and Foken 2004). Third, nighttime fuxes with weak wind conditions were fltered out using a friction velocity threshold of 0.12 m s-1, according to the method proposed by Gu et al.(2005). Fourth, fux outliers were removed if they exceeded three times the standard deviation in a window of one day. Finally, fuxes that were more negative than the lower detection limit of the EC system were rejected, based on the assumption that signifcant N2O uptake in agroecosystems with extensive nitrogen fertilizer input is not well explained by common knowledge; the determination of the detection limit of the EC system is described in the following section.

    2.4. Estimation of random uncertainty

    The random uncertainties in the measured N2O fuxes(δF) were mainly produced by the stochastic characteristics of the turbulence (δF_turb) and the instrumental noise(δF_noise). In this study, δFwas calculated using Equation(8) in Finkelstein and Sims (2001). The component δF_noisecan also be regarded as the detection limit of the EC system (Rannik et al. 2015), which can be estimated as δF_noise=2σw×2σc×(fT)-1/2, here f is the measurement frequency; T is the averaging time; σwand σcrepresent the noise level of the vertical wind speed and the N2O concentration, respectively; and the factor of 2 represents the detection limit at the 95% confdence level.

    3. Results and discussion

    3.1. Environmental conditions and N2O fluxes

    The daily mean air temperature ranged from -0.3 to 22.0 °C, with a mean value of 10.2 °C, during the campaign. The variation pattern of the daily mean soil temperature was similar to that of the air temperature (Figure 2(a)). During the experiment from 6 October 2014 to 18 February 2015, precipitation totaled 424.6 mm. Changes in WFPS were closely related with rainfall events (Figure 2(b)).The sonic data showed that nearly 80% of the winds during the campaign came from northern directions (0°-60° and 300°-360°).

    Figure 3.Time series of the 10 Hz N2O mixing ratio (grey dots)and the corresponding Allan variance plot (black line) under feld conditions.

    We collected a total of 5944 half-hourly N2O fuxes during the campaign. 3761 of the fux data remained following the frst four quality control steps described above, and a further 19 were rejected after the ffth step. This resulted in a fnal data coverage of 58.2%. The emissions were characterized by bursts of higher fuxes after rainfall and by lower fuxes during other periods; and the minimum,median, mean, and maximum values of the half-hourly fuxes were -10.7, 60.8, 99.3, and 1077.4 μg N m-2h-1,respectively (Figure 2(c)). The coefcient of variation of the half-hourly fuxes within each day varied between 10% and 169%, with a mean value of 44%. The daily fuxes that averaged over the half-hourly data ranged from 21.8 to 676.0 μg N m-2h-1(Figure 2(d)), which were well correlated with the variation of the WFPS (data not shown). According to footprint analysis (Kormann and Meixner 2001), 90% of the fuxes were coming from the area 80-100 m away from the EC mast under unstable conditions. The fetch was long enough even for stable conditions because the borders of the vegetable feld in the upwind directions were more than 200 m away.

    3.2. Performance of the EC measuring system

    Using the Allan variance technique (Werle, Miike, and Slemr 1993), we estimated the precision of the QCL spectrometer to be 0.26 nmol mol-1at a sampling rate of 1 Hz under feld conditions (Figure 3). This piece of data was collected in the afternoon of 20 December 2014, when turbulence was well developed and N2O emissions were weak. Although the precision may have been even better by taking samples of standard gas, it was very close to the average estimates (0.31 ± 0.29 nmol mol-1at 1 Hz)reported by previous studies that applied this kind of QCL analyzer (Kroon et al. 2007; Neftel et al. 2007, 2010; Huang et al. 2014; Rannik et al. 2015).

    Figure 4.Normalized co-spectra of the vertical wind speed and N2O (solid circles) during the period (a) 1000-1530 BT 2 December 2014, and (b) 1230-1700 BT 17 February 2015. Both periods were under unstable conditions, with Monin-Obukhov length L < 0 and friction velocity u*> 0.15 m s-1.

    During previous feld experiments based on chamber measurements, it has been found that the lowest N2O emissions from subtropical vegetable felds normally occur during winter, with fuxes being in the range of 10-30 μg N m-2h-1(e.g. Mei et al. 2011; Yao et al. 2015;Zhang et al. 2016). The detection limit of our instrument(95% confdence level) was within this range, indicating that the current EC system can reliably measure N2O fuxes from subtropical vegetable felds all year around, except for a short period in winter in some cases. Moreover, the detection limit can be improved by regular optical alignment and mirror cleaning, as suggested by the manufacturer (Aerodyne), since the current instrumental noise of the QCL was one to two times larger than that in the instrumental specifcation. This means that in future work the sensitivity and performance of the EC system can be potentially improved.

    3.3. Co-spectra

    In general, N2O fuxes measured by the EC system were underestimated due to data acquisition and processing and the non-ideal measuring system (e.g. Moore 1986). This can be illustrated by the co-spectra attenuation in the low and high frequency ranges. We analyzed the co-spectra of N2O and vertical wind velocity during the periods of 1000-1530 Beijing Time (BT) 2 December 2014(Figure 4(a)) and 1230-1700 BT 17 February 2015(Figure 4(b)). The results were averaged to achieve better statistics of the co-spectra, and were obtained under unstable conditions with a Monin-Obukhov length L of less than 0 and a friction velocity u*of greater than 0.15 m s-1. The theoretical undamped co-spectra according to Kaimal et al.(1972) and the temperature co-spectra are also presented in Figure 4. We noticed that the temperature co-spectra were smooth and had almost no damping along the entire frequency range. The pattern of the N2O co-spectra was almost consistent with the theoretical one, as well as the temperature co-spectra, but disagreed slightly at the high frequency ends, indicating losses of fuxes. According to the methods introduced by Moncrief et al. (2004) and Ibrom et al. (2007), the fnal N2O fuxes were corrected for this systematic underestimation by on average of 18%. The magnitude of the co-spectra correction agreed with the results reported by Huang et al. (2014).

    The two periods we analyzed had diferent canopy conditions. The underlying surface of the major footprint area was fat on 17 February 2015. However, the feld was much rougher on 2 December 2014, owing to the presence of cabbage plants in two feld plots in the northern direction of the EC mast. We compared the co-spectra behavior of the two periods, since the spectral pattern may have been distorted due to the drag produced by the cabbages. However, we did not fnd a signifcant difference between the two curves of the N2O co-spectra in Figure 4. Nevertheless, we do not have adequate evidence to quantify the infuence of the heterogeneous surface on fux measurements.

    3.4. Random uncertainty of the fluxes

    The total relative random uncertainty of the half-hourly N2O fuxes varied greatly. Most of the estimates were smaller than 150%, and the mean value was 57% (95% confdence level). Meanwhile, the random uncertainties caused by the turbulence characteristics and instrumental noise contributed 62% and 38% to the total, respectively. Rannik et al. (2015) used a similar N2O gas analyzer,but equipped with only one laser (model CW-TILDAS-CS,Aerodyne Research Inc., U.S.A.) for EC measurements, and used the same method for random uncertainty estimation. They reported that the mean relative random uncertainty was around 120% while applying a confdence level of 95%. Since the relative estimates depend on the fux magnitude, the absolute fux random uncertainty in this study was on average twice as large as the one reportedin Rannik et al. (2015). The diference can be explained by the lower instrumental noise and more homogeneous underlying surface in their study.

    4. Conclusions

    The close-path QCL-based EC system was running smoothly during the whole experimental period, with a mean detection limit of 18.5 μg N m-2h-1for half-hourly N2O fuxes. Although this precision was within the range of the lower limit of the N2O emissions from the subtropical vegetable felds of China reported by previous chamber studies, the EC system detected more than 97% of the half-hourly fuxes from the vegetable felds of the current study, as the magnitude of fuxes was mostly higher than the detection limit. The random and systematic uncertainties in the measured N2O fuxes were within the same order of magnitude as those reported by other studies that utilized similar QCL gas analyzers. We conclude that the QCL-based EC system is capable of reliably measuring N2O fuxes from vegetable felds in subtropical China. This useful tool will enable future work related to biosphere-atmosphere exchanges of N2O in a wide range of agricultural and natural ecosystems.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors thank YAO Zhisheng, LIU Chunyan, WANG Rui, and LI Ping from IAP-CAS, and David NELSON and Stanley HUANG from Aerodyne, for their generous help with this work.

    Disclosure statement

    No potential confict of interest was reported by the authors.

    Funding

    This work was supported from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [grant number 2012CB417106]; the Chinese Academy of Sciences [grant number XDA05020100]; the German Science Foundation [contract number BU1173/12-1]; and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 41405137 and 41321064].

    References

    Aubinet, M., A. Grelle, A. Ibrom, ü. Rannik, J. Moncrief, T. Foken,A. S. Kowalski, et al. 2000. “Estimates of the Annual Net Carbon and Water Exchange of European Forests: The EUROFLUX Methodology.” Advances in Ecological Research 30: 113-175.

    Finkelstein, P. L., and P. F. Sims. 2001. “Sampling Error in Eddy Correlation Flux Measurements.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 106: 3503-3509.

    Gu, L., E. M. Falge, T. Boden, D. D. Baldocchi, T. A. Black,S. R. Saleska, T. Suni, et al. 2005. “Objective Threshold Determination for Nighttime Eddy Flux Filtering.” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 128: 179-197.

    Huang, H., J. Wang, D. Hui, D. R. Miller, S. Bhattarai, S. Dennis,D. Smart, T. Sammis, and K. C. Reddy. 2014. “Nitrous Oxide Emissions from a Commercial Cornfeld (Zea Mays) Measured Using the Eddy Covariance Technique.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14: 12839-12854.

    Ibrom, A., E. Dellwik, S. E. Larsen, and K. Pilegaard. 2007. “On the Use of the Webb-Pearman-Leuning Theory for Closed-path Eddy Correlation Measurements.” Tellus B 59: 937-946.

    IPCC. 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Kanagawa: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.

    IPCC. 2007. The Physical Science Basis: In Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Kaimal, J. C., J. C. Wyngaard, Y. Izumi, and O. R. Coté. 1972. “Spectral Characteristics of Surface Layer Turbulence.” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 98: 563-589.

    Kormann, R., and F. X. Meixner. 2001. “An Analytical Footprint Model for Nonneutral Stratifcation.” Boundary-Layer Meteorology 99: 207-224.

    Kroon, P. S., A. Hensen, H. J. J. Jonker, M. S. Zahniser, W. H. van’t Veen, and A. T. Vermeulen. 2007. “Suitability of Quantum Cascade Laser Spectroscopy for CH4and N2O Eddy Covariance Flux Measurements.” Biogeosciences 4: 715-728.

    Mauder, M., and T. Foken. 2004. “Documentation and Instruction Manual of the Eddy Covariance Software Package.” http:// www.geo.uni-bayreuth.de/mikrometeorologie/ARBERG/ ARBERG26.pdf.

    Mei, B., X. Zheng, B. Xie, H. Dong, Z. Yao, C. Liu, Z. Zhou, R. Wang,J. Deng, and J. Zhu. 2011. “Characteristics of Multiple-year Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Conventional Vegetable Fields in Southeastern China.” Journal of Geophysical Research 116: D12113.

    Merbold, L., W. Eugster, J. Stieger, M. Zahniser, D. Nelson, and N. Buchmann. 2014. “Greenhouse Gas Budget (CO2, CH4and N2O) of Intensively Managed Grassland Following Restoration.” Global Change Biology 20: 1913-1928.

    Moncrief, J., R. Clement, J. Finnigan, and T. Meyers. 2004.“Averaging, Detrending, and Filtering of Eddy Covariance Time Series.” Chap. 2 in Handbook of Micrometeorology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Moore, C. J. 1986. “Frequency Response Corrections for Eddy Correlation Systems.” Boundary-Layer Meteorology 37: 17-35.

    Neftel, A., C. R. Flechard, C. Ammann, F. Conen, L. Emmenegger, and K. Zeyer. 2007. “Experimental Assessment of N2O Background Fluxes in Grassland Systems.” Tellus B 59: 470-482.

    Neftel, A., C. Ammann, C. Fischer, C. Spirig, F. Conen,L. Emmenegger, B. Tuzson, and S. Wahlen. 2010. “N2O Exchange over Managed Grassland: Application of a Quantum Cascade Laser Spectrometer for Micrometeorological Flux Measurements.” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 150: 775-785.

    Rannik, ü., S. Haapanala, N. J. Shurpali, I. Mammarella, S. Lind,N. Hyv?nen, O. Peltola, M. Zahniser, P. J. Martikainen, and T. Vesala. 2015.“Intercomparison of Fast Response Commercial Gas Analysers for Nitrous Oxide Flux Measurements under Field Conditions.” Biogeosciences 12: 415-432.

    Wang, K., X. Zheng, M. Pihlatie, T. Vesala, C. Liu, S. Haapanala,I. Mammarella, ü. Rannik, and H. Liu. 2013. “Comparison between Static Chamber and Tunable Diode Laser-based Eddy Covariance Techniques for Measuring Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from a Cotton Field.” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 171-172: 9-19.

    Webb, E. K., G. I. Pearman, and R. Leuning. 1980. “Correction of Flux Measurements for Density Efects Due to Heat and Water Vapour Transfer.” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 106: 85-100.

    Werle, P., R. Miike, and F. Slemr. 1993. “The Limits of Signal Averaging in Atmospheric Trace-gas Monitoring by Tunable Diode-laser Absorption Spectroscopy (TDLAS).” Applied Physics B Photophysics and Laser Chemistry 57: 131-139.

    Yao, Z., C. Liu, H. Dong, R. Wang, and X. Zheng. 2015. “Annual Nitric and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from Chinese Subtropical Plastic Greenhouse and Conventional Vegetable Cultivations.”Environmental Pollution 196: 89-97.

    Zhang, Y., F. Lin, Y. Jin, X. Wang, S. Liu, and J. Zou. 2016. “Response of Nitric and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes to N Fertilizer Application in Greenhouse Vegetable Cropping Systems in Southeast China.” Scientifc Reports 6: 20700.

    25 April 2016

    CONTACT WANG Kai kai.wang@mail.iap.ac.cn

    ? 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    猜你喜歡
    氧化亞氮渦動亞熱帶
    生物炭對農(nóng)田氧化亞氮排放及其影響機制的研究進展
    淺談醫(yī)用氧化亞氮在口腔??漆t(yī)院的管理
    《亞熱帶農(nóng)業(yè)研究》2019年征稿簡則
    XLNO型低溫脫除氧化亞氮催化劑性能研究
    戶撒刀
    BTA鉆桿渦動數(shù)學建模及實驗研究
    理想條件下BTA鉆鉆桿的渦動分析
    亞熱帶水果深加工技術(shù)獲突破
    中國果菜(2015年2期)2015-03-11 20:01:08
    兩種亞熱帶森林土壤甲烷氧化活性的垂直分布特征
    基于LabVIEW的油膜渦動及油膜振蕩故障特征分析研究
    国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 一级毛片精品| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 91精品国产国语对白视频| av网站在线播放免费| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 亚洲伊人色综图| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 中文字幕色久视频| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 成人永久免费在线观看视频 | 精品国产国语对白av| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久这里只有精品19| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 男女免费视频国产| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 美女午夜性视频免费| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久青草综合色| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲天堂av无毛| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 成年动漫av网址| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 超碰成人久久| 午夜福利视频精品| 两个人看的免费小视频| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产在线免费精品| www.999成人在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 老熟女久久久| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 欧美大码av| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 人人妻人人澡人人看| 中文欧美无线码| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| tocl精华| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 极品教师在线免费播放| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 成人永久免费在线观看视频 | 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 国产成人影院久久av| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产在线视频一区二区| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 在线观看www视频免费| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 国产不卡一卡二| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 午夜老司机福利片| 99热网站在线观看| 91麻豆av在线| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 青草久久国产| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲人成电影观看| 成人手机av| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 99香蕉大伊视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲国产av新网站| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 精品国产国语对白av| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产在线视频一区二区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| av在线播放免费不卡| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 丝袜喷水一区| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 久久九九热精品免费| www.精华液| 在线 av 中文字幕| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 天天添夜夜摸| 久久性视频一级片| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| www.精华液| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 另类精品久久| 国产av一区二区精品久久| cao死你这个sao货| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产1区2区3区精品| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 18在线观看网站| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲色图av天堂| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 精品久久久久久电影网| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 乱人伦中国视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 天天添夜夜摸| 操出白浆在线播放| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| svipshipincom国产片| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产淫语在线视频| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产淫语在线视频| 精品福利永久在线观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 精品国产一区二区久久| 午夜91福利影院| 丁香六月天网| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产不卡一卡二| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 日韩视频在线欧美| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| av一本久久久久| 久久国产精品影院| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| av国产精品久久久久影院| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 777米奇影视久久| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 91大片在线观看| 不卡av一区二区三区| 99久久人妻综合| 捣出白浆h1v1| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 精品久久久精品久久久| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 一个人免费看片子| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 少妇 在线观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 99re在线观看精品视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 超色免费av| 伦理电影免费视频| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 国产成人精品在线电影| 香蕉国产在线看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 久久久国产成人免费| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 咕卡用的链子| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 久久免费观看电影| 一级片'在线观看视频| 99九九在线精品视频| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 日本wwww免费看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 777米奇影视久久| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| av国产精品久久久久影院| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 久久久国产成人免费| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| av免费在线观看网站| 亚洲国产看品久久| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 悠悠久久av| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 91av网站免费观看| av片东京热男人的天堂| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | e午夜精品久久久久久久| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产片内射在线| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 精品人妻1区二区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 国产精品二区激情视频| 国产色视频综合| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲综合色网址| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 18禁观看日本| 国产三级黄色录像| 女警被强在线播放| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 制服诱惑二区| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 色在线成人网| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 色综合婷婷激情| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 在线播放国产精品三级| videos熟女内射| 99香蕉大伊视频| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 极品教师在线免费播放| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 久9热在线精品视频| 不卡一级毛片| 中文欧美无线码| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 久9热在线精品视频| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 免费观看人在逋| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 看免费av毛片| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 五月天丁香电影| 久久中文字幕一级| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产精品成人在线| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 久热这里只有精品99| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 美女主播在线视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 成在线人永久免费视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 乱人伦中国视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 深夜精品福利| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 久久久久久久国产电影| 久久亚洲真实| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 在线天堂中文资源库| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 18在线观看网站| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲人成电影观看| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 高清欧美精品videossex| av有码第一页| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 黄频高清免费视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 国产在线观看jvid| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 91大片在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 午夜激情av网站| a在线观看视频网站| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产野战对白在线观看| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 99re在线观看精品视频| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 1024香蕉在线观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 在线看a的网站| 黄色成人免费大全| 久久久久国内视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 1024视频免费在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 久久99一区二区三区| 岛国在线观看网站| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 久久九九热精品免费| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产av又大| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 久久久久国内视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 久久中文字幕一级| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲伊人色综图| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久狼人影院| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲av美国av| 久久青草综合色| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产有黄有色有爽视频|