Neurochemical plasticity of Müller cells after retinal injury: overexpression of GAT-3 may potentiate excitotoxicity

Neurochemical plasticity of Müller cells after retinal injury: overexpression of GAT-3 may potentiate excitotoxicity

The retina is a multilayered tissue that develops following a central-to-peripheral gradient. Its structure derives from multipotent precursors, as shown through clonal analysis of retinal cell lineage. These progenitors generate diverse cell types, controlled by complex infl uences of intrinsic and extrinsic factors (Hatakeyama and Kageyama, 2004).

Several types of neurons and one main glia cell constitute the vertebrate retina, constructed in a highly organized manner. Müller cell is the predominant glia of the retina and the last cell type to diff erentiate. Upon damage or under the infl uence of growth factor stimulation, they proliferate, de-diff erentiate and become a source of new neurons for retinal regeneration in fi sh and, to a much less extent, postnatal chicks. Evidence indicates that some Müller glial cells in mammals also have the potential to proliferate in response to N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) treatment and produce bipolar cells and rod photoreceptors (reviewed in Goldman, 2014). Three cellular layers make the fi nal organization of the retina, with each of the six types of neurons and the Müller glia. Selective markers in the adult vertebrate retina (mice for all, except GAT-3 for chick) can identify these elements as shown in Figure 1. Opsin and rhodopsin label photoreceptors, calbindin identifies horizontal cells, CHX10 (C. elegans ceh-10 homeodomain-containing homolog) identifies bipolar cells, GAT-3 transporter labels selective GABAergic amacrine cells, BetaIIItubulin (tuj-1) recognizes retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and glutamine synthetase (GS) labels Müller glia.

Anti-glial fi brilary acidic protein (GFAP) is used to identify reactive glial cells that involve the axons of RGCs that make the optic nerve. Retinal diseases aff ect millions of patients worldwide aff ecting photoreceptors, as in age-associated macular degeneration (AMD) and retinitis pigmentosa, or RGCs, as glaucoma or diabetic retinopathy. Several laboratories are looking for the possibility of retinal regeneration based on cellular and or molecular strategies.

Normally, GFAP or nestin (a progenitor marker) do not label Müller cells (Figure 1) in the undamaged retina, as opposed to GS, a marker that shows Müller glia processes extend across all retinal layers going from the inner to the outer limiting membranes (Figure 1).

Traumatic lesion of the retina induces Müller cell proliferation due to inflammatory processes. This condition is mimicked artifi cially by neurotoxins like NMDA or kainate injected into the eye of postnatal chick (Fischer and Reh, 2001). This procedure makes Müller glia to acquire neurogenic potential in response to injury providing a source of neural stem cells in this tissue. Several pathways seem to be involved with Müller glial proliferation and dediff erentiation such as Notch, initially discovered in zebrafi sh (reviewed in Goldman, 2014). Notch plays a central role in the conservation of stemness throughout retinal development. Notch-signaling components are expressed at low levels in healthy Müller glia in the postnatal retina, but upon stimulation with basic fi broblast growth factor (FGF2) and insulin, Müller glia proliferate and dediff erentiate. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) together with repression of Notch induce Müller glia to proliferate in the adult zebrafi sh retina, generating neuronal progenitor cells (reviewed in Goldman, 2014). Wnt/β-catenin also induces proliferation of Müller glia-derived progenitors and regeneration after damage, or during degeneration in the adult rodent retina (reviewed in Goldman, 2014). Finally, sonic hedgehog (Shh) has been shown to stimulate Müller glial proliferation through its receptor. Shh-treated Müller glial dediff erentiate through expression of progenitor-specifi c markers, leading to the fate of rod photoreceptor. Together, these results provide evidence that Müller glia operate on diverse signaling mechanisms (for a complete list of factors acting on Mü ller cells, see Goldman, 2014) to reprogram and generate progenitors in zebrafi sh and perhaps give a clue as potential stem cells in mammalian retina.

Examples depicting the phenotypic plasticity of Müller cells after injury have been described in diff erent vertebrate models. For instance, spatiotemporal distribution of retinal cells induced by lesion is shown in the adult zebrafi sh (Yurco and Cameron, 2005). They show double labeling immunohistochemistry using proliferation (anti-BrdU or anti-PCNA) and Müller glial markers (carbonic anhydrase, or GS). Müller cell proliferation is also shown in postnatal chick (Fischer and Reh, 2001). Finally, in mammals, few Müller glial cells injected in the adult rat retina to stimulate proliferation produce bipolar cells and rod photoreceptors (reviewed in Goldman, 2014).

Müller glia obtained from rat retina can generate clonal spheres capable of diff erentiating into functional neurons (Das et al., 2006); In addition, retinal neurospheres from postnatal mice have the potential to generate neurons and Müller glia as identifi ed by calcium imaging protocols (De Melo Reis et al., 2011). The possibility to obtain different types of retinal cells from precursors raise the possibility of developing cell transplants methodologies to restore proper visual function lost in retina degeneration.

The elimination of neurons from mixed retinal neuron-glia cultures makes Müller cells to express several markers found in neuronal cells. Among these, glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), TH, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) receptors (Kubrusly et al., 2005) and Nurr1, a transcriptional factor associated with dopaminergic phenotype were described. Dopamine D1 receptors are also functional as they generate cyclic AMP. Consequently, purifi ed cultures of Müller cells develop the full complement of functional dopaminergic phenotype, including the release of dopamine. This seems to be due to a default pathway for Müller cells under this condition. This dopaminergic default occurs in Müller cells obtained from avian, mouse and monkey retina (Stutz et al., 2014). Dopaminergic Müller cells

transplanted into the striatum of hemi-parkinsonian mice fully recover motor behavioral deficits (Stutz et al., 2014). Therefore, it is an attractive possibility to suggest that these dopaminergic Müller cells could be of potential use in cellular therapies for dopaminergic dysfunction. The fact that the dopaminergic default does not require hard manipulation for cells to express the dopaminergic phenotype makes it less likely to cause hazardous infl uence on healthy tissues.

Figure 1 Immunohistochemistry of selective markers of the adult mouse retina.

Figure 2 Schematic illustration showing γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) signaling in avian retina.

Müller cells are actively involved in the synaptic control of retinal neurons through the release of transmitters and trophic factors (de Melo Reis et al., 2008). These cells interact with most of the retinal neurons, ranging from RGC to photoreceptors. However, the majority of retinal synapses are glutamatergic and GABAergic in close association with glial cells. In this sense, recent data show that GAT-3, a GABA transporter found in purified Müller glia, is functionally regulated by glutamate. This response involves ionotropic glutamatergic receptors. In addition to GAT-3, GAT-1 is expressed in purifi ed glial cells. However, only GAT-3 seems to be functional (De Sampaio Schitine et al., 2007). Glutamate decreases the levels of GAT-3 transporter in the plasma membrane of Müller cells as well as its mRNA.

In the avian retina, GAT-3 is primarily expressed in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and in some cell bodies in the INL, where most of the amacrine cells are located (Figure 1; Schitine et al., 2015). Müller glia also have their soma in the INL. Retinal lesion induced by NMDA injections provokes a large increase in GAT-3 immunoreactivity in Müller fi bers (Figure 2), followed by damage to RGCs, and an increase in GFAP expression. Reactive gliosis is a hallmark in several neurologic diseases but not so well understood, and in the retina, it has been associated with several degenerative conditions such as hepatic retinopathy, macular edema, and retinitis pigmentosa.

Evidence from Ortinski et al. (2010) shows that reactive gliosis artifi cially induced in hippocampal circuits leads to decreased expression of GS, implying a reduction in the glutamate production from glutamine. Therefore, a rapid decrease of GABA content in gabaergic synapses leads to a decreased inhibitory tonus on synaptic transmission in mouse CA1 pyramidal neurons. This seems to favor excitotoxicity. Our recent data suggest that in vivo lesions of the retina may be potentiated by decreased inhibitory tonus, due to increased GABA uptake by Müller cells overexpressing GAT-3 (Figure 2). Further investigations are necessary to reveal the molecular mechanisms involved in glutamate-dependent GAT-3 plasma membrane level reduction. Interestingly however, our observations open the possibility of using GABA transport inhibitors to prevent RGCs degeneration eventually caused by reactive gliosis that follow retina degeneration.

This work was supported by grants from FAPERJ, CNPq (INCT- INNT), CAPES and PROLAB LARC/IBRO/CNPq. The authors thank Dr. Patricia Gardino, Dr. Silmara Lima (for the Tuj1 image) and Dr. Rodrigo Martins (for the CHK10 image) in Figure 1. CS is recipient of a CAPES- FAPERJ Postdoc fellowship.

Clarissa S. Schitine, Fernando G. de Mello, Ricardo A.M. Reis*

Laboratório de Neuroquímica, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-902, Brazil (Schitine CS, de Mello FG, Reis RAM)

Laboratório de Neuroanatomia Celular, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-902, Brazil (Schitine CS)

*Correspondence to: Ricardo A.M. Reis, Ph.D., ramreis@biof.ufrj.br. Accepted: 2015-06-05

Das AV, Mallya KB, Zhao X, Ahmad F, Bhattacharya S, Thoreson WB, Hegde GV, Ahmad I (2006) Neural stem cell properties of Müller glia in the mammalian retina: regulation by Notch and Wnt signaling. Dev Biol 299:283-302.

de Melo Reis RA, Ventura AL, Schitine CS, de Mello MC, de Mello FG (2008) Müller glia as an active compartment modulating nervous activity in the vertebrate retina: neurotransmitters and trophic factors. Neurochem Res 33:1466-1474.

De Melo Reis RA, Schitine CS, Kofalvi A, Grade S, Cortes L, Gardino PF, Malva JO, de Mello FG (2011) Functional identifi cation of cell phenotypes diff erentiating from mice retinal neurospheres using single cell calcium imaging. Cell Mol Neurobiol 31:835-846.

De Sampaio Schitine C, Kubrusly RC, De Melo Reis RA, Yamasaki EN, De Mello MC, De Mello FG (2007) GABA uptake by purifi ed avian Müller glia cells in culture. Neurotox Res 12:145-153.

Fischer AJ, Reh T (2001) Müller glia are a potential source of neural regeneration in the postnatal chicken retina. Nat Neurosci 4:247-252.

Goldman D (2014) Müller glial cell reprogramming and retina regeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci 15:431-442.

Hatakeyama J, Kageyama R (2004) Retinal cell fate determination and bHLH factors. Semin Cell Dev Biol 15:83-89.

Kubrusly RC, da Cunha MC, Reis RA, Soares H, Ventura AL, Kurtenbach E, de Mello MC, de Mello FG (2005) Expression of functional receptors and transmitter enzymes in cultured Müller cells. Brain Res 1038:141-149.

Ortinski PI, Dong J, Mungenast A, Yue C, Takano H, Watson DJ, Haydon PG, Coulter DA (2010) Selective induction of astrocytic gliosis generates defi cits in neuronal inhibition. Nat Neurosci 13:584-591.

Schitine CS, Mendez-Flores OG, Santos LE, Ornelas I, Calaza KC, Pérez-Toledo K, López-Bayghen E, Ortega A, Gardino PF, de Mello FG, Reis RAM (2015) Functional plasticity of GAT-3 in avian Mü ller cells is regulated by neurons via a glutamatergic input. Neurochem Int 82:42-51.

Stutz B, da Conceicao FS, Santos LE, Cadilhe DV, Fleming RL, Acquarone M, Gardino PF, de Melo Reis RA, Dickson PW, Dunkley PR, Rehen S, Houzel JC, de Mello FG (2014) Murine dopaminergic Müller cells restore motor function in a model of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem 128:829-840.

Yurco P, Cameron DA (2005) Responses of Müller glia to retinal injury in adult zebrafi sh. Vision Res 45:991-1002.

10.4103/1673-5374.165224 http://www.nrronline.org/

Schitine CS, de Mello FG, Reis RAM (2015) Neurochemical plasticity of Müller cells after retinal injury: overexpression of GAT-3 may potentiate excitotoxicity. Neural Regen Res 10(9):1376-1378.