• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Experimental study of breach process of landslide dams by overtopping and its initiation mechanisms*

    2015-12-01 02:12:15YANGYang楊陽CAOShuyou曹叔尤YANGKejun楊克君LIWenping李文萍StateKeyLaboratoryofHydraulicsandMountainRiverEngineeringCollegeofWaterResourceandHydropowerSichuanUniversityChengdu60065China2KeyLaboratoryofEngineeringSedimentofMinis
    關(guān)鍵詞:楊陽

    YANG Yang (楊陽), CAO Shu-you (曹叔尤), YANG Ke-jun (楊克君), LI Wen-ping (李文萍). State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 60065, China2. Key Laboratory of Engineering Sediment of Ministry of Transport, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, Tianjin 300456, China, E-mail: yangyangscu@63.com

    Experimental study of breach process of landslide dams by overtopping and its initiation mechanisms*

    YANG Yang (楊陽)1,2, CAO Shu-you (曹叔尤)1, YANG Ke-jun (楊克君)1, LI Wen-ping (李文萍)1
    1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
    2. Key Laboratory of Engineering Sediment of Ministry of Transport, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, Tianjin 300456, China, E-mail: yangyangscu@163.com

    (Received June 30, 2014, Revised November 6, 2014)

    The present paper studies the physics of the breach erosion process, particularly, the breach initiation process in overtopped landslide dams. Due to great complexities involved, only homogeneous landslide dams are considered. The flume experiments of dam overtopping are conducted to study the breach growth process. And in order to reveal the effects of the seepage during the breach development, the permeability characteristics of the dam materials are also taken into consideration. With the experimental observation, the details of the breach growth are examined, and the whole breach process could be distinguished into five stages, i.e.,Stage I, the seepage erosion, Stage II, the formation of the initial breach, Stage III, the erosion toward the head, Stage IV, the expansion and incision of the breach, and Stage V, the re-equilibration of the river channel through the breach. It is shown that once triggered the entire breach process goes continually without stop, which highlights the significant impact of the early stages on the later deformation of the dam. Evidence shows that the initial breach of the dam is most likely to take place in the downstream slope of the dam, near the upper edge of the seepage face. The experimental results show a “headcut” mechanism of the breach initiation.

    experimental study, landslide dams, breach process, overtopping, breach initiation, seepage, headward erosion

    Introduction0F

    Massive landslide dams induced by the recent two earthquakes in west China (i.e., the Wenchuan Earthquake, 2008 and the Ya'an Earthquake, 2013)have once again attracted worldwide attentions with regard to the potential dam failure risks[1,2]. From the experience of historical events, a dam failure would generate destructive flash flood and debris flow, leading to catastrophic losses. It is recognized that accurate knowledge of the dam breach process is essential to help build an early warning system for the evacuation of people and property. And a better understanding of the dam breach development is required for an emergency preparedness for taking adequate engineering measures to prevent further damages.

    Physically, the problems of dam breach are very complicated. In the first place, a landslide dam could fail in a variety of ways (e.g., the overtopping, the piping, the slope failures, etc.) due to its random formation and different inflow conditions. Even if the dam breaches in a specific mode, the key concerns of the breach process such as the breach initiation, the breach growth rate and the induced maximum flood discharge would be affected by two aspects of factors,the material aspect, including the dam grain size distribution, the dam structure and geometries, and the water aspect, including the inflow magnitude and the reservoir volume. Generally speaking, the dam breach process is the outcome of the water-sediment interaction involving these two factors.

    A landslide dam usually consists of non-cohesive clast materials ranging a wide grain size distribution(e.g., from millimeters to meters and with the mean grain size in the order of 0.1 m)[3,4]. Such dominant non-cohesive property of the material grains would give rise to different eroding behaviors comparing with the man-made clay dams[5,6]. In addition, since the dam is made of non-cohesive materials, the seepage in the slopes is inevitable, and sometimes itcould even be the decisive cause for the dam failure,for instance, the piping[7]. However, according to Costa and Schuster[8], of all 55 natural dam failure cases they have reviewed, in over 50 cases, the dam was breached in the way of overtopping and in very rare cases the dam was breached by seepage (either by the piping or the slope failure), which indicates that the erosion from overflow during the flood events should be the principal cause of the dam failures. The following-up researches on the dam breach process mostly chose the overtopping mode as their background setting.

    Fig.1 Flow regimes of the overtopped dam described by Powledge et al.[9]

    Fig.2 Breach growth process described by Visser[10]

    Fig.3 Breach growth development described by Yang et al.[12]

    Powledge et al.[9]experimentally studied the mechanism of the flow regimes when an embankment dam was overtopped. Over the dam crest, they identified three regimes of the water flow and three corresponding erosion zones (see Fig.1). They demonstrated that the place near the downstream edge of the crest is the transition zone where the flow will transit from subcritical to supercritical regimes, and due to the high tractive stress, erosion is expected to initiate there or in the slope below. Visser[10]experimentally studied the breach growth by overtopping in sandy sea dikes. Based on some hypotheses and his experimental observation, he established a conceptual model of the process of the breach erosion in five stages (see Fig.2). In his observations, as the flow accelerates on the downstream slope, the breach will initiate when the sand grains at rest begin to be entrained as a suspended load by the high speed flow (at x=ln) and then erosion will progress and retreat in parallel until the whole dam is washed out. Coleman et al.[11]studied the overtopping breaching of non-cohesive homogeneous embankments in laboratory flumes. For an accurate estimation of a breach outflow hydrograph,their study focused on the deformation of the breach and the outflow discharge. It is shown that, in the varying process, the breach cross-sectional profile will maintain a parabolic shape. From their experimental data, they finally developed a set of dimensionless expressions for the prediction of the breach geometry and the discharge. More recently, Yang et al.[12]studied the overtopping breach growth processes in sand dams of quake lakes in laboratory experiments. Similar to Visser's[10]description, they presented a fourstage picture of the breach growth processes (see Fig.3). However, they demonstrated that the dam will not erode to the end, because, due to the finite reservoir volume, the water level will drop as the breach vertically incises until the flow is less erosive to carry away the bed materials, and finally the dam erosion ceases. Moreover their findings also emphasized the important role of the angle of repose of the sediment particles in the retreat erosion stage.

    Apart from experimental researches, physicallybased mathematical models were also established for practical uses. The most popular physically-based mathematical models for embankment dam breaching problems are the BREACH model and the BEED model[13]. Since many aspects of the breaching mechanism remain unclear, these models empirically preset the breach initiation and subsequent deformation behaviors. For example, they assume that the breach initiates in a regular profile (e.g., rectangular, triangular,or trapezoid) and its shape remains nearly unchanged during the enlargement. And they also assume that the breach erodes down and retreats at a steady rate. With the combination of the weir formula and the bed-load type erosion formulas, this kind of models are applied to calculate the breach process and the outflow hydrograph. The accuracy of these models highly relies on the parameters such as the soil erodibility and the flow resistance. More recently, Chang and Zhang[14]developed a similar model to simulate the overtopping erosion process of landslide dams especially with consideration of the layered dam structure of varying erodibility along the depth direction. And they reproducedthe breaching process of the famous Tangjiashan landslide dam.

    Fig.4 Experimental layout

    From the above review, one may see the state of the art of the study of the dam breach process. Some of the results may be applied to the breach process of a landslide dam, but others may not. It should be noted that none of these researches have considered the effects of the seepage on the dam breach process. As stated earlier, because of the non-cohesive property of the dam materials, the seepage in dam slopes is unavoidable. Without consideration of the seepage,some of the erosion mechanisms would not be revealed when a dam is overtopped. And another point is that it is essential to determine how the breach initiates to help reliably determine how long it takes for a breach to develop to a critical point, which in turn can help emergency planners in establishing the flood risk and the potential warning time for areas downstream. However, from the literature review, it is seen that,except for Visser[10], who explicitly pointed out the formation and the location of the initial breach, the quantitative knowledge of the initiation processes for overtopping is very rare. And moreover, in view of the research background, even Visser's[10]theory is questionable to be applied to decide the initial breach point of a landslide dam. In his experiments, the water level was preset as a constant the same as the sea level and it would not drop with the breach growing, which is hardly the case in landslide dams. Thus the suspended mechanism of the initial breach may no longer be valid.

    For the rare and inadequate knowledge of the breach process in landslide dams, further study is of importance. The objective of the present study is to investigate the physics of the breach erosion process,particularly, the breach initiation process in overtopped landslide dams. Due to the great complexities involved, only homogeneous landslide dams are considered. The flume experiments of dam overtopping are conducted to study the breach growth process. In order to reveal the effects of the seepage during the breach development, the permeability characteristics of the dam materials are also considered. Finally based on the experimental results, the mechanism of the breach initiation is discussed in details.

    Fig.5 Cross-section profiles of the dam

    1. Experimental study of the breach growth process

    1.1 Experimental layout and setup

    Experiments are performed in a flume with two glass sidewalls and a steel bed, about 16 m long, 0.3 m wide and with an average slope of S=0.003. As shown in Fig.4, the dam is located about 8 m downstream the triangle weirW . The weir is used to verify the inlet discharge Q0. E1-E5 are automatic electric water-level probes, and they are deployed to measure the stage hydrographs along the flume. C1-C4 are digital video cameras which are to capture the dam breach process from three different perspectives(i.e., C1 from the top, C2 from the downstream, and C3 and C4 from the sides). Along the dam site,0.05 m×0.05 m grids are painted on the glass side wall in order to help observation and measuring.

    Table 1 Experimental parameters in the present study

    Figure 5 shows the geometric dimensions of the dam. Except for the length of the dam crestL and the upstream slope Su, which vary in different Runs, all other (longitudinal and cross-sectional) dimensions remain the same. The dam heightH is 0.3 m, the dam widthB is 0.3 m, the downstream slope Sdis 1:2.5(see Table 1).

    Fig.6 Grain size distribution in the present study

    The sediment materials used for the dams are artificially graded (see Fig.6, whereP is the percentage finer by weight). During construction, each dam is compacted with the same compact force (i.e., by keeping the same dry density of the material ρd≈ 1610 kg/m3). After a dam is built, a trapezoidal pilot channel of fixed geometry is dug in the crest, bordering upon one side of the flume walls (see Fig.5(b)). The depth of the channeld is 0.05 m, the top width btis 0.1 m, and the bottom width bbis 0.05 m. It should be noted that the pilot channel is not a preset initial breach, instead, it is dug to lead the water to flow to the side wall. Such an arrangement not only maximizes the possible lateral erosion within the limited flume width but also enables a better condition for observation.

    Values of other relevant experimental parameters are also listed in Table 1, where Q0is the inlet discharge,D50is the mean diameter of the dam materials, σgis the geometric standard deviation of the particle size,ρsis the solid density,φis the friction angle and Pois the porosity of the dry sediment samples.

    In order to simulate the practical overtopping process of landslide dams, we start each experiment from the beginning of the reservoir impoundment. The valve Vis turned on and the inlet discharge is preset to a given value Q0. As the water in the reservoir rises to a certain level, a distinguished saturation line is formed (as seen from the side wall), then the video cameras and the water-level probes are switched on to capture, respectively, the pictures and the real-time variation of the water level. Through a frame-by-frame analysis, the video acquired could provide a series of profiles of the dam erosion process.

    It is known that the water balance equation for a reservoir is dV/dt=Qin-Qout, whereVis the volume of the reservoir,Qinis the inflow discharge, and Qoutis the outflow discharge (herein ignoring the impact of the rainfall, the evaporation and other factors). Thus in the present experiment, the outflow discharge Q (including the seepage discharge Qseepageand the overflow discharge through the breach Qbreach) could be calculated as follows:

    where Q0is the inlet discharge,dV/dtis the variation rate of the reservoir volume in the flume.

    1.2 Dam breach process and experimental results

    Generally speaking, as shown in Fig.7, the breach growth in sand dams could be described in five stages, namely, Stage I, the seepage erosion, Stage II,the formation of the initial breach, Stage III the erosion toward the head, Stage IV the expansion and the incision of the breach, and Stage V the re-equilibrium of the river channel through the breach.

    Fig.7 General erosive stages observed in the experiments (images (a)-(d) are from the experiment Run 6, while (e) is from Run 5, and(f) from Run 2)

    As Stage I starts, the water level in the reservoir begins to rise at a low rate. Since the water level has not reached the elevation of the pilot channel, there is no overflow except for the seepage going through the dam. After the seepage in the dam is well developed,the water begins to release from the downstream slope. The higher the water level is, the larger the magnitude of the seepage becomes. It is seen that along with the released water, “seepage-induced transport”[15]works:small amount of sand grains in the seepage face begin to move downwards partly by individual grain motions but mostly by the intermittent shallow mass wasting (see Fig.7(b)). However it should be pointed out that the seepage-induced transport is so weak and so slow that the erosion in the downstream slope remains almost negligible and poses no threat to the stability of the slope. Then Stage I ends when, the water level reaches the invert point of the pilot channel.

    Stage II starts when the rising water enters the pilot channel and forms an overflow. However the amount of the overflow is quite small and it is almost in a way of creeping downstream. The time for the overflow to take going through the entire pilot channel depends on the length of the channel, which is in proportion to the length of the dam crest. At the moment that the overflow exits the pilot channel (see Fig.7(c)),the velocity of the water begins to accelerate. Despite the fact that the velocity of the flow is relatively high,the overflow is not erosive enough to cause an extensive damage to the downstream slope due to the limited quantity. Only a discernable gully is formed soon after the flow exits the pilot channel. In the meanwhile,the seepage as described in Stage I still works at the lower region of the downstream slope. As soon as the overflow reaches the upper edge of the seepage face,considerable breach occurs and Stage II ends.

    The spot where the overflow meets with the upper edge of the seepage face when Stage III begins is taken as the initial breach point, about which the process quickly develops in the downstream slope face. It could be seen that above the point, the gully gets deepened sharply and widened slightly, while beneath it since the sediment is flushed downstream, the breach outlet in the downstream face spreads fast laterally from near the observation side wall to the opposite side, forming an alluvial fan. In this Stage, the erosion of the dam mainly happens within the developing gully. The gully bed retreats and flattens gradually. At the same time the water level in the reservoir is still rising, thus such erosion toward the head would continue and become a little more severely as the overflow discharge increases. In the end of Stage III,when the erosion toward the head reaches the entrance of the pilot channel, the water level in the reservoir reaches its maximum and an entire breach channel is formed (see Fig.7(d)). In addition, comparing with the distinct erosion toward the head upstream the initial breaking point, the elevation of the initial breaking point drops little during the whole stage (see Fig.9).

    Stage IV, i.e., the breach expansion and incision stage, is the main stage of the breach growth, and it starts when the entrance of the breach channel begins to be eroded down. From this moment on, the water level begins to drop with the decrease of the elevation of the breach channel entrance, and thus the outflow of the flood water continues increasing and surpasses the inlet discharge Q0. However, the quickly enlarged flow discharge makes the whole bed of the breach channel more erodible. Focusing on the entrance of the breach channel, the highly erosive flow washes away the remained sediment there and enables the breach entrance to expand and incise. Simultaneously in turn, the magnified breach entrance allows much more flood water to release from the reservoir and again causes further erosion. Down below the breachentrance, similar erosional process (i.e., in both lateral and vertical directions) takes place in the whole breach channel. Due to the high gradient of the channel bed, the sediment-laden flow is quite torrential. It could be easily understood that the sediment phase is mostly transported as the contact load, supported by frictional and collisional grain-grain interactions, and without the stream-wise sorting during the transport. Apart from the previously described erosional process,one significant distinguished phenomenon happens in the breach channel is that the lateral collapse: the sediment bulks slip apart from the dam body and fall into the breach channel (see Fig.7(e)). And the larger the discharge grows the more frequently the lateral collapse becomes. Since the reservoir is of a finite volume,when the breach of the dam grows to a certain degree,the outflow discharge reaches its maximum. Afterwards, the outflow discharge begins to decrease and the erosional process in the breach channel turns weak. At the moment when the eroding down process stops at the breach entrance, Stage IV ends.

    The last stage of the breach process is the reequilibrium. When it begins, the breach through the dam has almost reached its final dimensions (Fig.7(f)). The stream power becomes too small to cause considerable lateral erosion and thus the collapse is halted. As the flow discharge reduces, the stream width reduces as well. It could be seen that a part of the side bank of the breach channel which used to be under the water has now been exposed to air and in addition, the slope of it is much more flattened comparing with the adjacent steep side wall above. Slowly, the flow discharge becomes equal to Q0, and when an armored layer forms in the channel bed, the whole breach process ends.

    Fig.8 Hydrographs of the outflow in different experimental runs

    Figure 8 shows the outflow hydrographs from the breach.Q?represents the dimensionless outflow discharge:Q?=Q/ Q, whereQis the outflow discha-0rge and Q0is the inlet discharge. The time origin herein is set at the moment when the water depth reaches 0.24 m in each experimental run. In order to clarify the similarity, the time intervals of different breach stages are separated by vertical dashed lines, and TI-II,TII-III,TIII-IVand TIV-Vare notated as the transitional moments for every two adjacent stages, respectively (in fact the separation shown in Fig.8 is just simplified and is a schematic diagram, for instance, in each experiment, the transitional point from Stage III to Stage IV should be the intersection of the hydrograph curve with the horizontal line Q?=1).

    However, it could be seen that each hydrograph goes from a very low flow at early stages (i.e., in Stages I and II,Q?≈0.14-0.39) to the outburst after the dam is overtopped (i.e., in Stage IV,Q?≈4-9.58 at the peak) and in the end it returns to the magnitude of Q?=1. The differences of the hydrograph shapes during the flood period are mainly caused by the differences of the inlet discharges and the dam dimensions. Apparently it is shown that for the same inlet discharge, a shorter length of the dam crest would lead to a quicker and higher flood peak (i.e., Run 1- Run 4) and the style of the peak tends to vary from a multimodal to a unimodal one. Reversely for the same crest length of the dam, a larger inlet discharge would also result in a quicker flood peak (i.e., Run 4 vs. Run 6 and Run 5 vs. Run7).

    Fig.9 Breach growth process in the dams (the breach profiles are recorded every 10 s)

    The flash flood induced by a gradual breaching is controlled by the deformation of the breach, thus highly depends on the interactions between the dam materials and the flows. Figure 9 shows the eroding process of the dam in the longitudinal profile for the experiment Run 1 and Run 7.Tmax,Tmax1and Tmax2arethe flood peak moments and TII-III,TIII-IVand TIV-Vare as previously defined.

    Figure 9 indicates that the channel bed may retreat in parallel after the erosion toward the head reaches the entrance of the breach (i.e., after the moment TIII-IV), and such a finding is similar to that reported by Visser[10]and Yang et al.[12]. However in the present study it is shown that the retreat slope would not maintain at the angle of repose (as shown by Visser[10]and Yang et al.[12]), but at a much smaller angle.

    3. Mechanisms of breach initiation by overtopping

    It is clear that once triggered, the entire breach process goes continually without stop, which highlights the prominent impact of the initial developing erosive manner (caused by the small flow discharge in Stages I, II and III) on the later breach evolution and flash flood. The outflow consists of two parts in the early stages: the seepage flow and the overflow (seepage exists in Stage I only), and they are at the same order of magnitude and then neither could be ignored.

    Fig.10 Experimental apparatus for the measurement of the coefficient of permeability

    3.1 Seepage flow in the dams

    Generally speaking, for a porous medium, a basic physical equation could be written as[16]

    whereJ is the seepage gradient,Vis the average seepage velocity,K is the universal coefficient of permeability with the dimension of speed, andm is a parameter that identifies the flow condition and varies from 1 to 2. For instance, if m=1, the seepage flow is laminar, and the famous linear Darcy's law holds, and if m=2, the flow condition will be turbulent, and if m=1-2, it means that the flow condition is transitional. Taking the logarithm on both sides of Eq.(2), we have

    Fig.11 Plot oflgV versuslgJ

    In order to investigate the seepage characteristics of the dam material, an additional experiment is carried out similar to Darcy's, measuring the coefficient of permeability. The test apparatus is shown in Fig.10. To maximize the similar state of stress, the sediment sample is kept of the same dry density as that used for the dam construction. Different hydraulic gradientsJ are produced by shifting the tank to different elevations, and the average seepage velocitiesV are measured by the volumetric method. It is observed that when Jis small, clear seepage water from the sediment sample comes out evenly, no significant sediment movement is observed in the container. AsJ grows larger, a couple of small sands begin to get washed out from inside the sample and at J=0.35, a considerable spring hole is caused by piping. The measurement does not terminate until more spring holes are formed and the static sand face of the sample becomes rolling and totally unstable. The datalgV versuslgJare plotted in Fig.11.

    Figure 11 shows that whenJ is less than 0.35, the data measured are well along a straight line of the slope very close to unity, which indicates that the flow condition in the sample is laminar and is a Darcy flow. And thus the coefficient of permeability Kcould be calculated as 0.0209 m/s.

    Table 2 lists the main seepage parameters recorded at TI-IIin the dam breach experiments, where huis the water depth before the dam,heis the height measured from the bottom to the upper edge of the seepage face,J is the average seepage gradient,Q?is the dimensionless seepage discharge, and qm(= Q*Q/ B)is the measured seepage discharge per unit width. It could be seen that the average seepage gradient in each experimental run is far less than 0.35,and that is to say, during Stages I through II the seepage in the dam is the Darcy flow. Herein the famous and simple Dupuit's Equation[16]is applied to calculate the seepage discharge per unit width at the TI-II. Asalso listed in Table 2, the comparison of the calculated values of the seepage discharge per unit width (i.e., qc) with the measured ones (i.e.,qmreconfirms that that the seepage flow in the dam follows the Darcy's law.

    Table 2 Major seepage parameters at the moment TI-II

    3.2 Stress state of the sediment in the seepage face

    Now, consider a 2-D element near to the seepage face in the downstream slope of the dam in Stage I as shown in Fig.12.

    Fig.12 Stress state of the sediment element in the seepage face

    Besides the gravitational force (per unit width) Fg, the emergent seepage will impose a force per unit width Fson the element. Their resultant force could be thus divided into two components, respectively, the tangential forceT and the normal forceN. Using the Coulomb failure theory, the factor of safety against failure could be written as

    with T=Fgsinθ+Fscosβand N=Fgcosθ-Fssinβ, whereθis the slope angle,βis the angle between the seepage force and the slope, andφis the angle of internal friction, which for non-cohesive materials is generally considered as equal to the angle of repose φ0.

    Since it is the Darcy flow in the dam, and the element is thoroughly infiltrated, the seepage force[16]and the gravitational force could be written as

    whereJ is the average seepage gradient,γwis the unit weight of water, andγ′is the effective unit weight of the sediment element. Now Eq.(5) could be expressed as

    Typically, at the upper edge of the seepage face(i.e., the element is settled at Point A in Fig.12), the angleβis thought to be zero and with the element moving downward[16],βturns larger. The value ofβ is in the range of [0,90)in the seepage face. If the slope is stable under the seepage, it is at least required that the safety factor is no less than unity, thus we have

    Rearranging Eq.(6), we obtain

    where γsatis the saturated weight of the sediment element. It could be seen that on the right side of Expression (9), except for the angleβ, other variables are all constants. Thus it could be inferred that the larger βis, the smallertanθwill be. Under the critical condition F =1,tanθreaches its maximum at β= 0 (i.e., at the upper edge of the seepage face, see Point A in Fig.12), and then it will decrease all the way to zero at the end of the dam slope due to the variation of β. As for the experimental setup in the present study,[tanθ]max=(γ′/γsat)tanφ0≈0.37,[θ]=arctan0.37≈20.3o, that is to say, the maximaxmum slope angle, which could hold at A. Now an interesting phenomenon would appear: if the preset of the downstream slope of the dam is steeper than[θ]max, a gap of discontinuity is surely to take shape at A, otherwise if the present slope is equal to or smaller than [θ]max, then no discontinuity would form but the slope will gradually turn milder from the upper edge of the seepage face to the bottom end (see Fig.13).

    Fig.13 Slope deformation under seepage

    Fig.14 Stress state of the sediment under both overflow and seepage flow conditions

    In the present study, the downstream slope is preset as arctan0.4, which is a little greater than[θ]max=arctan0.37, then the slope in the seepage face needs to adjust, that explains the reason for the previously observed “intermittent described shallow mass wasting” (see Fig.7(b) and Fig.11(a)) It should be noted that the deformed slope becomes generally stable, and such a change in the profile of the slope would provide a more erodible condition for the subsequent breach process.

    3.3 Threshold of the sediment under both overflow and seepage flow

    Figure 14 shows the stress state of the sediment on the slope under both overflow and seepage flow conditions around the moment TII-III, where FDis the drag force induced by the overflow,F(xiàn)sand Fgare, respectively, the seepage force and the gravitational force as previously defined,θis the slope angle,α? is the angle between the seepage force and the horizontal line,δis the angle between the perpendicular line (to the drag force) and the segment (connecting the sediment centroid with the rotating point).

    Since the non-uniform sediment condition is considered in the present study, for simplicity, we apply the definition of equivalent sediment diameter D[17].eqThus the equation of the incipient motion of the sediment could be written as

    The critical drag force FDcould be interpreted as

    where CDis the drag force coefficient, and τcis the critical shear stress. From Eq.(6) and Eq.(7), the seepage force and the gravitational force could be expressed as

    where Csand Cgare the coefficients related to the grain shape and the exposure,J is the average seepage gradient,γwis the unit weight of water, and γsis the unit weight of the sediment material. Substituting Eq.(12)-Eq.(14) into Eq.(11), and after rearranging, we obtain,

    Table 3 Dimensionless critical shear stress on a slope with/without the consideration of seepage

    Equation (15) is the expression of the dimensionless critical shear stresstaking the effects of both the slope and the seepage into consideration. It could be seen that on right hand side of Eq.(15), the first item represents the slope factor, and the second item represents the seepage factor. Given the condition that no seepage exists, Eq.(15) reduces as

    Due to the random location of the sediment as shown in Fig.14, the relative position of the concerned sediment grain with the adjacent ones is uncertain, and the value of angleδwill also change accordingly. Yang[18]derived the formula for the mathematical expectation ofδby applying Han and He's relative exposure function[19]and it is E(tanδ)=1.11. If we assume that Cs=Cg, and similar to Eq.(10), taking the critical condition for F =1, we have

    It is shown that from the upper edge of the seepage face downward, if taking no consideration of the effect of the seepage in the sediment threshold, the lower the place is, the smallerθwould be and the larger the critical shear stress (i.e.,) would become, which means that the sediment herein is harder to incipient.

    On the contrary, however, if considering the effect of the seepage, the critical shear stress (i.e.,) would decrease with the reduction ofθ, which means that in the lower part of the slope the sediment is easier to incipient. The ratio ofandindicates that the existence of seepage has largely promoted the sediment incipient motion on the slope, and moreover,the lower it is, the greater contribution of the seepage to the sediment incipient would be.

    3.4 Formation of the initial breaching point

    In fact, Eq.(16) could also be applied to describe the critical shear stress that is required for the sediments upstream the upper edge of the seepage face. It could be seen that taking the upper edge of the seepage face as a distinguishing point (i.e., the point A in Fig.12 and Fig.13), only 0.7 to 0.395 times of the threshold stress is needed for the lower part as compared with the upper part (see Table 4). In the end of Stage II, when the overflow coming along the slope from the gully reaches the distinguishing point, a significanterosion with different manners would appear (see Fig.15): in the upstream, the little discontinuity (see Fig.13(a), i.e., as shown in the present experiment)will rapidly develop into a headcut[20-23]while in the downstream, an intense flush of the sediment will take place.

    Fig.15 A sketch of the breach initiation

    Additionally, even given the situation as shown in Fig.13(b), due to the different stress states for the sediments on both sides of the distinguishing point,the overflow would definitely give rise to a quick formation of a discontinuity and then a headcut as well for the same mechanism as previously discussed. Therefore, we define this distinguishing point at the moment TII-IIIas the initial breaching point. And from that time on, the dam will experience mega deformation and breaching.

    4. Conclusions

    In this paper, experimental and theoretical studies are carried out for the breach process of homogeneous non-cohesive dams by overtopping. Based upon the experimental results, a five-stage conceptual model is established to interpret the whole breach process, i.e.,Stage I, the seepage erosion, Stage II, the formation of the initial breach, Stage III the erosion toward the head, Stage IV the expansion and incision of the breach, and Stage V the re-equilibration of the river channel through the breach. It is shown that once triggered, the entire breach process goes continually without stop, which highlights the significant impact of the early stages on the later deformation of the dam.

    The investigation reveals that the seepage flow through the dam in early stages is the Darcy flow, and it plays an important role in the breach initiation. Analysis shows that the initial breach of the dam is most likely to take place in the downstream slope of the dam, and more specifically, it would be near the upper edge of the seepage face. It is the first time that the exact initial breach location is identified with a strong evidence from both experimental observations and theoretical considerations. However, one has to accept that the Darcy flow condition of the seepage flow derived in the present study mainly based on the choice of the dam material. Although it could be consistent with the situation in many dams in nature, there are exceptions. Thus, further study of non-Darcy flow conditions is desirable.

    In addition, it is shown in the present study that the erosion toward the head is the main pattern that the breach develops. In Stage IV, it is once again shown that the parallel retreat phenomenon might be an essential and decisive manner in the dam erosion. However due to the limitation of the experimental apparatus, the hydraulics in the developing breach channel is not fully revealed. In the follow-up research we will focus on this part of job.

    [1] YIN Y., WANG F. and SUN P. Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan,China[J]. Landslides, 2009, 8(2): 139-152.

    [2] XU Q., FAN X. and HUAHG R. et al. Landslide dams triggered by the Wenchuan Earthquake, Sichuan Province, south west China[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and The Environment, 2009, 68(3): 373-386.

    [3] LIU Nin, ZHANG Jian-xin and LIN Wei et al. Draining Tangjiashan Barrier Lake after Wenchuan Earthquake and the flood propagation after the dam-break[J]. Science in China Series E:Technological Sciences, 2009,52(4): 801-809.

    [4] CUI P., ZHU Y. and HAN Y. et al. The 12 May Wenchuan Earthquake-induced landslide lakes: Distribution and preliminary risk evaluation[J]. Landslides,2009, 6(3): 209-223.

    [5] ZHANG Jian-yun, LI Yun and XUAN Guo-xiang et al. Overtopping breaching of cohesive homogeneous earth dam with different cohesive strength[J]. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52(10):3024-3029.

    [6] ZHU Y.ong-hui, VISSER P. J., VRIJLING J. K. et al. Experimental investigation on breaching of embankments[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011,54(1): 148-155.

    [7] SINGH V. P. Dam breach modeling technology[M]. Boston, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996, 34-45.

    [8] COSTA J. E., SCHUSTER R. L. The formation and failure of natural dams[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1988, 100(7): 1054-1068.

    [9] POWLEDGE G., RALSTON D. and MILLER P. et al. Mechanics of overflow erosion on embankments Part II:Hydraulic and design considerations[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 1989, 115(8): 1056-1075.

    [10] VISSER P. J. Breach growth in sand-dikes[D]. Doctoral Thesis, Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, 1998.

    [11] COLEMAN S. E., ANDREWS D. P. and WEBBY G. Overtopping breaching of noncohesive homogeneous embankments[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,ASCE, 2002, 123(9): 829-838.

    [12] YANG F., ZHOU X. and LIU X. et al. Experimental study of breach growth processes in sand dams of quake lakes[J]. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 2011,5(5): 445-459.

    [13] DANG C., CHU N. and DING Y. Predictive uncertainty of peak outflow relations for landslides dam breach[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 72(11): 4265-4271.

    [14] CHANG D. S., ZHANG L. M. Simulation of the erosion process of landslide dams due to overtopping considering variations in soil erodibility along depth[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 2010,10(4): 933-946.

    [15] FOX G. A., WILSON G. V. and SIMON A. et al. Measuring streambank erosion due to ground water seepage:Correlation to bank pore water pressure, precipitation and stream stage[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2007, 32(10): 1558-1573.

    [16] HARR M. E. Groundwater and seepage[M]. New York, USA: Dover Publications Inc., 2011, 34-95.

    [17] LIU Xing-nian. Gravel bed-load transport and its modelling[D]. Doctoral Thesis, Chengdu, China:Sichuan University, 2004(in Chinese).

    [18] YANG Feng-guang. Study on the stochastic theory of sediment transport[D]. Dotoral Thesis, Chengdu,China: Sichuan University, 2009(in Chinese).

    [19] HAN Q., HE M. Stochastic theory of sediment motion[C]. The proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Stochastic Dydraulics. Beijing, China,2000.

    [20] HANSON G. J., COOK K. R. and HUNT S. L. Physical modeling of overtopping erosion and breach formation of cohesive embankments[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 2005, 48(5): 1783-1794.

    [21] FRENETTE R., PESTOV I. Flow and erosive stresses at the base of a headcut[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2005, 131(2): 139-141.

    [22] CHEN L. K., CHEN S. C. Retrogressive erosion and longitudinal profile evolution in noncohesive material[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research,2006, 21(2): 113-122.

    [23] ZHAO G., VISSER P. J. and PEETERS P. et al. Headcut migration prediction of the cohesive embankment breach[J]. Engineering Geology, 2013, 164(18): 18-25.

    * Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51479128, 51279117).

    Biography: YANG Yang (1986- ), Male, Ph. D.

    LI Wen-ping,

    E-mail: liwpzy@126.com

    猜你喜歡
    楊陽
    Analytical formula describing the non-saturating linear magnetoresistance in inhomogeneous conductors
    我愛洋甘菊
    職場高手請“兼職”,請出大驚喜
    EXISTENCE OF SOULUTIONS FOR THE FRACTIONAL (p,q)-LAOLACIAN PROBLEMS INVOLVING A CRITICL SOBLEV EXPNN*
    Accuracy improvement of quantitative analysis of calorific value of coal by combining support vector machine and partial least square methods in laserinduced breakdown spectroscopy
    A potential germ cell-speci fic marker in Japanese flounder,Paralichthys olivaceus: identi fication and characterization of lymphocyte antigen 75 (Ly75/CD205)*
    數(shù)學(xué)的簡潔美
    東方教育(2017年17期)2017-10-31 19:10:58
    A Historical View on Translation Theory and Practice in China
    我是你的王子
    有朋自遠方來
    三月三(2015年5期)2015-05-05 16:34:22
    精品国产一区二区久久| 制服人妻中文乱码| 免费少妇av软件| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 两个人看的免费小视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 女警被强在线播放| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| av欧美777| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| www.精华液| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产在线免费精品| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久免费观看电影| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久久热在线av| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 久久热在线av| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产av精品麻豆| h视频一区二区三区| 一区二区三区激情视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 成人永久免费在线观看视频 | 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 国产免费福利视频在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 欧美日韩av久久| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 国产色视频综合| 美女午夜性视频免费| 午夜激情av网站| 精品国产国语对白av| 成人国产av品久久久| 超色免费av| 乱人伦中国视频| netflix在线观看网站| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲国产av新网站| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 多毛熟女@视频| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产又爽黄色视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 欧美日韩精品网址| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 成人影院久久| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 精品国产亚洲在线| 一本综合久久免费| 午夜福利视频精品| av国产精品久久久久影院| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 考比视频在线观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 日本wwww免费看| 超色免费av| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 国产又爽黄色视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 午夜福利视频精品| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| av天堂在线播放| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 日韩欧美三级三区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 精品人妻1区二区| 飞空精品影院首页| 午夜两性在线视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 成人国语在线视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 不卡av一区二区三区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 久久中文看片网| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产成人欧美| 香蕉久久夜色| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产色视频综合| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 一区在线观看完整版| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 精品少妇内射三级| 91老司机精品| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲成人手机| 手机成人av网站| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| svipshipincom国产片| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 两性夫妻黄色片| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 青草久久国产| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 午夜视频精品福利| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 自线自在国产av| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| avwww免费| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| av有码第一页| 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| av福利片在线| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| a在线观看视频网站| 国产av又大| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲欧美激情在线| 一级黄色大片毛片| 中文字幕制服av| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲免费av在线视频| 在线av久久热| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产激情久久老熟女| 成人影院久久| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产精品免费大片| 人人澡人人妻人| 无限看片的www在线观看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 另类精品久久| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 操美女的视频在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 手机成人av网站| 97在线人人人人妻| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 精品福利永久在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 777米奇影视久久| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 无限看片的www在线观看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 黄色视频不卡| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 亚洲国产av新网站| av一本久久久久| av天堂久久9| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 久久青草综合色| 欧美日韩精品网址| 中文字幕制服av| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 久久免费观看电影| 一级片'在线观看视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 日本欧美视频一区| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲国产看品久久| av有码第一页| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| netflix在线观看网站| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产精品九九99| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 1024香蕉在线观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 午夜老司机福利片| 免费在线观看日本一区| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 嫩草影视91久久| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 在线观看www视频免费| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 9色porny在线观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 日韩欧美免费精品| 精品第一国产精品| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 亚洲九九香蕉| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产在线视频一区二区| 久久热在线av| www.999成人在线观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 深夜精品福利| 91老司机精品| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 免费观看av网站的网址| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产成人精品在线电影| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 老司机影院毛片| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 丁香六月欧美| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 香蕉丝袜av| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 极品教师在线免费播放| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 满18在线观看网站| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 男人操女人黄网站| 18禁观看日本| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产在线观看jvid| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 一区福利在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 大香蕉久久网| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 午夜视频精品福利| 99久久国产精品久久久| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 18在线观看网站| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 一区在线观看完整版| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产野战对白在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 考比视频在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 青草久久国产| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产区一区二久久| av欧美777| 搡老乐熟女国产| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 免费观看人在逋| 手机成人av网站| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 黄片播放在线免费| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 两个人看的免费小视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 天天影视国产精品| 欧美大码av| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| av网站在线播放免费| av视频免费观看在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 91字幕亚洲| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 婷婷丁香在线五月| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 高清av免费在线| 亚洲精品一二三| 午夜福利视频精品| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| bbb黄色大片| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 9色porny在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 午夜激情av网站| 久久香蕉激情| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 日本五十路高清| 多毛熟女@视频| 黄色视频不卡| 久久久久网色| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 亚洲色图av天堂| 美女主播在线视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 99热网站在线观看| 蜜桃在线观看..| 9191精品国产免费久久| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产男女内射视频| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 成在线人永久免费视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 蜜桃国产av成人99| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产精品二区激情视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲色图av天堂| 女警被强在线播放| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 精品少妇内射三级| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 成在线人永久免费视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 男人操女人黄网站| 日韩视频在线欧美| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 欧美日韩精品网址| 日本wwww免费看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲全国av大片| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 天天添夜夜摸| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 成人国语在线视频| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 女警被强在线播放| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 9191精品国产免费久久| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 国产1区2区3区精品|