Geochemical and geochronological studies of the Aketas granite from Fuyun County，Xinjiang：the implications of the petrogenesis and tectonic setting

Xiaofeng Wei·Xin Zhang·Jiuhua Xu·Rufu Ding· Guorui Zhang·Yong Tang

Geochemical and geochronological studies of the Aketas granite from Fuyun County，Xinjiang：the implications of the petrogenesis and tectonic setting

Xiaofeng Wei1，2·Xin Zhang3·Jiuhua Xu1·Rufu Ding2· Guorui Zhang1·Yong Tang3

As the wall rock of the Aketas gold deposit，the Aketas granite is about 45 km away from Fuyun County，Xinjiang Province.The zircon weighted mean U—Pb age of the Aketas granite is 309.0±4.7 Ma，indicating that the Aketas granite was emplaced during the late Carboniferous.The Aketas granite belongs to the High-K calcalkaline series，with SiO2content from 63.00 to 68.20%，K2O content from 3.06 to 4.49%and Na2O content from 4.14 to 6.02%.The Alkaline Ratio（AR）of the Aketas granite is high，from 1.89 to 3.47，and is 2.95 on average. The Aketas granite has lowPREE（92.42—122.73 ppm）and highPLREE/PHREE ratios（6.54—11.88）.For the trace elements，the Aketas granite is enriched in LILE（Rb，U，Th，K）and incompatible elements，and marked depleted in HFSE（Nb，Ta，P，Ti）.The geochemical characteristics of the Aketas granite suggest that it is a typical I-type and volcanic arc granite，and that the crystallization of clinopyroxene and hornblende is notable during the magmatic evolution.In combination with the regional tectonic studies，we propose that the emplacement of the Aketas granite implies the Altai and East Junggar area was still dominated by a subduction system at～309 Ma.

The Central Asian Orogenic Belt·Volcanic arc granite·Subduction·Zircon U—Pb age

1 Introduction

As one of the largest Phanerozoic orogenic belts in the world，the Central Asian Orogenic Belt is located among the Siberia，Eastern Europe，Tarim and North China Cratons（Sengo¨r et al.1993；Badarch et al.2002；Jahn et al. 2004；Yakubchuk 2004；Xiao et al.2008）.From the Neoproterozoic to the late Paleozoic，the Central Asian Orogenic Belt had experienced subduction，terrane accretion，craton collision and post-collisional extension.Such a long-term，complex tectonic evolution not only contributed to its massive continental crust growth in the Phanerozoic，but also played a crucial role in the formation of the Central Asian metallogenic province（Sengo¨r et al. 1993；Xiao et al.2004，2009，2010；Chen and Jahn 2004；Windley et al.2007）.

The Siberia-Altai block and Kazakhstan-Junggar block are the important parts of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt，and are located in Russia，Kazakhstan，China and Mongolia-Kazakhstan（Fig.1a，Chen and Jahn 2004）.The late Paleozoic tectonic evolution of the Siberia-Altai block and Kazakhstan-Junggar block has drawn extensive attention for the past years（Filippova et al.2001；Li et al.2003；Zhang et al.2003；Buslov et al.2004；Windley et al.2007；Xiao et al.2009，2010，2014）.Recent studies show that the Altai orogen was developed as an island arc within the Paleo-Asian Ocean during the early Paleozoic，and was accreted onto the southern margin of the Siberia block during the middle Paleozoic（Sun et al.2008；Cai et al. 2011a，b，c；Xiao and Santosh 2014）.Collision between the Siberia and the Kazakhstan blocks probably occurredduring the late Paleozoic，and this collision acted directly between the Altai orogenic belt and the East Junggar（Filippova et al.2001；Li et al.2003；Zhang et al.2003；Buslov et al.2004；Windley et al.2007；Xiao et al.2009，2010，2014）.

Fig.1 a Tectonic sketch map of the Junggar-Altai area；b Geological sketch map of the studied area；c geological sketch map of the Aketas granite（modified after Wang and Xu 2006；Pan et al.2012）

However，there is a considerable debate on the age of the subduction-collision of the Altai and Junggar blocks：from Ordovician to Silurian（Kheraskova et al.2003），from Devonian to Carboniferous（Hendrix et al.1996），and from Carboniferous to Permian（Filippova et al.2001；Li et al.2003；Zhang et al.2003；Buslov et al.2004）. After the final collision between the Siberia and Kazakhstan plates，the Altai and East Junggar region was dominated by a post-collision extensional tectonic setting（Wang et al.2003，2010；Chen 2011；Ren et al.2011；Lu¨ et al.2012a，b）.

The Aketas granite is located at the contact zone between the Altai orogen and East Junggar，which is obviously an ideal place to study the tectonic evolution of Altai orogen and East Junggar（He et al.1994；Li et al. 2003，2006；Xiao et al.2004；Yang et al.2010；Li et al. 2010；Wang et al.2010；Dong et al.2012）.However，little is known about the age and petrology of the Aketas granite.Thus，we carriedoutthe geochemicaland geochronological studies of Aketas granite in this work，in order to unravel the petrogenesis and the tectonic setting of the granite.

2 Regional geological background

Aketas granite is located at the contact zone of the NWW-trending Sarbulak-Aketas and NNW-trending Kayierte faults（Fig.1b）.Theexposedstratainthestudiedareaarethe Middle Devonian Beitashan group（D2b），Yundukala group（D2y）andlateCarboniferousNanmingshuigroup（C1n）.The Beitashan group（D2b）is mainly composed of andesite breccia，andesitic volcanic，limestone and tuffaceous sandstone，and the Nanmingshui group（C1n）is comprised of carbonaceoussandstoneandlimestone.Extensivemagmatic activities occurred within this region，and can be subdivided into two phases：during the Devonian，this region was dominated by mafic magmatism，including the rock types of diabase，diorite，dioritic porphyrite；and during the Carboniferous，the leading magmatism was mafic-acidicbimodal，producing the Kalatongke gabbro-norite and the Aketas granite（Fig.1b）.

Fig.2 Field and microscope photographs for the Aketas granite：a field photograph of the Aketas granite；b hand specimen picture of the Aketas granite；c—f microscope pictures of the Aketas granite.Pl plagioclase，Q quartz，Ser sericite，Pr perthite，Mic microcline perthite

Fig.3 The cathodoluminescence（CL）images of the zircons from the Aketas granite

Table 1 Zircon U—Pb dating of the Aketas granite

3 Petrological characteristics of Aketas granite

The Aketas granite has two oval-shaped rock bodies.The northwestern rock body is defined by a cropping of 400×300 m2，while the other one on the southeast has an area of 400×100 m2（Fig.1c）.The Aketas granite intruded into the middle Devonian Beitashan group（D2b）（Fig.1b）.The alteration of the wall rocks mainly shows phyllite sericitization，silicification，epidotization，potassic alteration.

The Aketas granite is light red and light gray in color，with a subhedral granular texture and massive structure in the hand specimen.The rock-forming minerals mainly includeplagioclase（40%—50%），K-feldspar（30%—40%），quartz（10%—15%）and biotite（1%—2%），with a small amount of accessory minerals of zircon，apatite，and magnetite.Under the microscope，the plagioclase is grey in color，and is a hypidiomorphic column，with the size of 0.2—3.0 mm.The polysynthetic twins are developed，with sericitization and clayization alteration.The K-feldspar with a size of 0.3—3.0 mm is a hypidiomorphic-euhedral column in shape.The quartz with the size of 0.5—3.5 mm is a xenomorphic granular（Fig.2）.

4 Analytical samples

4.1 Samples characteristics

We collected a total of 30 outcrop samples and core samples of the Aketas granite in this study，and tried to avoid contact zones and alteration zones in order to ensure that the samples were fresh.After careful microscopic identification，we picked out six samples on which to conduct the major and trace elements geochemical analysis.Samples for the LA-ICP-MS zircon U—Pb geochronological analysis were all taken from the drill-core，and the coordinates of the sampling location was 46°44′01′N，89°48′04′E.

4.2 Analytical methods

Major and trace elements analyses of the Aketas granite were carried out in the analytical laboratory of Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology.Major elements were carried out with the X-ray fluorescence（XRF）spectrometry method，XRF was implemented in accordance with the national standard GB/T 14506.28-1993，with RSD＜2.5%.The FeO contents were determined by wet chemical analysis separately，and the loss on ignition（LOI）was obtained by baking it in the oven at 1000°C high temperature with 90 min，then weighing.Analysis for trace elements was performed by Element I high-resolutioninductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer（HR-ICPMS）made by Finnigan MAT，with RSD＜3%.The analytical processes were performed with room temperature of 20°C and relative humidity of 30%.

Fig.4 U—Pb concordia diagrams of zircons from the Aketas granite

Table 2 Major element contents of the Aketas granite（wt%）

The LA-ICP-MS zircon U—Pb dating was carried out at the State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics of the Northwest University.The instrument for the ICP-MS is a combination of the Geo Las 200 M laser ablation system with the Elan 6100DRC ICP-MS made by German Micronas.During the analysis，a laser frequency of 10 Hz， with a laser diameter of 30 μm and laser energy of 32—36 mJ were adopted，with the ablated depths of 20—40 μm.International standard zircon 91500 was used as the external standard.Details of the analytical methods and data processing approach are referred to Yuan et al.2003. The apparent and field dia U—Pb ages were calculated by using the ISOPLOT program（Ludwig 1991）.Uncertainty of individual analysis was reported with 1σ and the weighted mean206Pb/238U age was calculated at the 2σ level.

5 Analytical results

5.1 Zircon U-Pb field dialog

The zircons of the Aketas granite are long columnar，euhedral，pale yellow and transparent crystals with a length of 0.05—0.15 mm and a width of 0.05—0.10 mm.

A total of 18 spots of zircons from the Aketas granite are selected for the determination of the U and Pb isotope.The concentric oscillatory zones of the zircons are observed clearly in the cathodoluminescence（CL）images，showing the typical characteristics of the magmatic zircons（Fig.3）. However，some zircons have a dark rim，which was probably produced by the late hydrothermal activity，such as the spots of AG-01-01，AG-01-03，AG-01-05，AG-01-08，or AG-01-16（Fig.3）.The U—Pb isotopic compositions of the 18 analyzed zircons are presented in Table 1，showing the features of magmatic zircons with high Th/U ratios of 0.63—1.47，with an average of 0.89（Hoskin and Black 2000）.

In the diagram，16 analyzed spots are very close to the concordantline，withaweightedaverageageof 309.0±4.7 Ma（MSWD=1.4）（Fig.4）.Meanwhile，two spots of AG-01-05 and AG-01-16 are deviated from the concordant line，and have younger U—Pb ages of 225.8 and 232.7 Ma.In the CL image，these two spots are quite near the rim of the zircon，and reach the dark edge.In addition，their Th/U ratios are 0.63 and 0.69，lower than the average value of 0.89 of the 18 spots.Therefore，these two measurement points are likely to have been affected by late hydrothermal metasomatism，and they can not represent the native zircon ages（Fig.3）.

5.2 Major element geochemistry

Fig.5 Classification diagrams of the Aketas granite：a QAP diagram；b TAS diagram；c K2O versus SiO2diagram；d A/NK versus A/CNK diagram（after Maniar and Piccoli 1989；Wilson 1989）

The Aketas granite's SiO2content ranged from 63.00%to 68.20%，K2O content from 3.06%to 4.49%and Na2O content from 4.14%to 6.02%（Table 2）.The major elements show features of high FeO and Al2O3（with FeO content of 3.18%—5.98%and Al2O3content of 15.97%—17.45%），low MgO，TiO2and CaO（with MgO content of 0.22%—1.07%，TiO2content of 0.21%—0.36%and CaO content of 1.14%—2.85%）.In the QAP and TAS diagrams，the plots of the Aketas granite fall mainly within the‘quartz monzonite diorite''and the‘quartz monzonite''fields.Combined with the microscopic observations，we named it as quartz monzonite（Fig.5a，b）.

In the SiO2—K2O diagram，the samples of the Aketas granite are distributed in the high-K calc-alkaline series（Fig.5c）.In the A/CNK-A/NK diagram，most of the samples fall into the‘metaluminous''or weakly‘peraluminous''area，showing features on a transition from calcalkaline to alkaline（Fig.5d）.In addition，the Rittman index（σ）of the Akrtas granite is from 2.82 to 3.89.

5.3 Trace elements

In the primitive mantle normalized spider diagram（Fig.7），samples from the Aketas granite are enriched in LILE（Rb，U，Th，K）and incompatible elements，and are relatively depleted in high field strength elements（Nb，Ta，P and Ti），illustrating the participation of a large number of crust source material during the magmatic processes.

Table 3 Trace element compositions of the Aketas granite（10-6）

6 Discussion

6.1 Zircon U-Pb age

The zircon LA-ICP-MS U—Pb dating of the Aketas granite gives a weighted mean age of 309.0±4.7 Ma，indicating a late Carboniferous age for the emplacement of the granite.

Fig.6 Chondrite-normalized REE pattern diagram of the Aketas granite（after Sun and McDonough 1979）

Fig.7 Primitive mantle normalized spider diagram of the Aketas granite（after Sun and McDonough 1979）

6.2 Petrogenesis

6.2.1 Rock classification

In the 10000Ga/Al versus Ce diagram and the 10000Ga/Al versus Zr diagram，the samples of the Aketas granite are plotted into the I-，S-，M-type granite area（Fig.8a，b）.In addition，sample spots of the Aketas granite in the SiO2versus Zr diagram and the SiO2versus P2O5diagram show a good match with I-type granite，ruling out the possibility of a S-type granite（Fig.8c，d）.Therefore，the Aketas granite can be classified as an I-type granite.

Fig.8 Geochemical classification diagrams of the Aketas granite：a 10000Ga/Al versus Ce；b 10000Ga/Al versus Zr；c SiO2versus Zr；d SiO2versus P2O5（after Collins et al.1982；Huang et al.2013）

6.3 Magmatic evolution

The analytic data of the Aketas granite are consistent with the trend of crystallization differentiation in the Zr versus Zr/Nb diagram，illustrating that its magmatic composition is mainly controlled by crystallization differentiation rather than partial melting during the magmatic evolution（Fig.9a）.As shown in the Sr versus Rb/Sr diagram，compared with plagioclase and biotite，the fractional crystallization of orthopyroxene and amphibole is much stronger，which is compatible with the slight Eu depletion feature in the REE diagram（Fig.9b）. Likewise，in the Eu/Eu*versus Ba diagram，the sample plots of the Aketas granite show that the fractional crystallization of plagioclase and K-feldspar is obviously limited（Fig.9c）. Moreover，as shown in Fig.9d，sample plots from the Aketas granite are parallel to the crust contamination line，indicating a great deal of involvement from the crustal materials.

In the primitive mantle normalized spider diagram，samples of the Aketas granite show a negative anomaly of Nb and Ta，indicating a significant contamination of crustal materials（Fig.7，Rudnick and Gao 2003）.Commonly，the crustal material is accepted to be sourced from either the partial melting of ancient crust（Nelson et al.1986；Bernard-Griffiths et al.1991）or the subduction-related fluids and sediments（Tatsumi et al.1986；Donnelly et al.2004）. Previous studies suggested that the subduction-related fluids are featured by enrichment in LILE（Rb，Ba，Sr），U and Pb（Seghedi et al.2001），hence the high Ba/Nb，Sr/Th andBa/Thratios（46.75—128.18，60.84—250.18and 117.92—271.27，respectively）of the Aketas granite indicate an involvement of subduction-related fluids during the magmatic evolution.In addition，the depletion of Th of the Aketas granite may imply that the involvement of oceanic sediments is limited（Guo et al.2006）.

Fig.9 Diagrams for magmatic evolution of the Aketas granite：a Zr versus Zr/Nb；b Sr versus Rb/Sr；c Eu/Eu*versus Ba；d Th/Nb versus Zr（after Eby 1990；Geng et al.2009；Zhong et al.2013）

6.4 Tectonic environment

As shown in the Zr versus Zr/Nb diagram and Sr versus Rb/ Sr diagram，the spots of the Aketas granite are plotted within the island-arc-granite area，indicating that the granite was originated from an island arc tectonic setting（Fig.10a，b）.In the（La/Sm）Nversus Ba/Th diagram and the Al2O3+Fe2O3+MgO+TiO2versus Al2O3/（Fe2-O3+MgO+TiO2）diagram，the plots of the Aketas granite match with the trend lines of‘fluid added''and‘high pressure''，indicating that a great amount of fluids were involved in its magma source and that it was formed in a high pressure tectonic environment，which was well accordant with the island-arc magmatism（Fig.10c，d）.

6.5 Petrogenetic model

The geochemical characteristics of the Aketas granite suggest that it is an I-type island arc granite with intensive crystallization of orthopyroxene and amphibole.As to island-arc magmatism，the Aketas granite was probably derived from the partial melting of the mantle wedge and/ or oceanic curst with the contamination of slab materials，which corresponds to the feature of fluid involvement，as shown in Fig.10c（Pearce et al.1984）.Therefore，the petrogenesis of the Aketas granite can be divided into the following three stages：（1）the subducted slab dehydrates due to high pressure；（2）the fluid from the subducted slab triggers the mantle wedge and/or oceanic crust to partial melt；（3）the magma moves upward and crystallizes into granite after a long evolution（Fig.11）.

Fig.10 Tectionic discrimination diagrams of the Aketas granite：a Y+Nb versus Rb；b Rb/30-Hf—Ta*3；c（La/Sm）Nversus Ba/Th；d Al2O3+Fe2O3+MgO+TiO2versus Al2O3/（Fe2O3+MgO+TiO2）（after Pearce et al.1984；Geng et al.2009）

Fig.11 Sketch map of the tectonic setting of the Altay-East Junggar area during the late Carboniferous（after Xiao et al. 2008；Shen et al.2011）

RecentzirconU—Pbdatingresultsforigneousrocksindicate that the magmatism was widespread in the Altai-Junggar area，continuously from early Paleozoic to early Mesozoic（Zhu et al.2006；Briggs et al.2007；Yuan et al.2007；Long et al.2007；Sun et al.2008；Cai et al.2011a，b，c；Shen et al. 2011）.It is noted that the subduction-related magmatism lasted from 497 Ma to 313 Ma，and the first record of postcollision magmatism of Saertielieke granite in the East Junggar was dated at 308 Ma（Long et al.2007；Sun et al. 2008；Cai et al.2011a，b，c；Shen et al.2011；Wang et al. 2011）.ThegeochemicalcharacteristicsoftheAketasgranite indicate that it was probably derived from the island-arc magmatism in a subduction tectonic setting（Fig.11）.In combination with the geochronology of the rock，it can beproposed that the Altai-Junggar area was still controlled by subduction at～309 Ma.More recently，after systematic discussions of the petrogenesis and tectonic setting of the granites in the Altai-Junggar area，a late Carboniferous to Early Permian collision is becoming more acceptable to an increasing number of authors（Xiao et al.2008，2009，2010，2014；Chen 2011；Han et al.2010，2011；Xu et al.2014；Zhang et al.2014；Zhang and Zhang 2014；Chen et al.2015；Muhetaer et al.2015；Yang et al.2015）.Therefore，the emplacement of this island-arc granite of the Aketas granite demonstrates that the collision of the East Junggar and the Altai orogen probably occurred after～309 Ma，which provides a new evidence for further studies on the exact collision time between the Siberia and Kazakhstan blocks.

7 Conclusions

（1） The zircon U—Pb isotope data demonstrate that the Aketas granite was emplaced at 309.0±4.7 Ma.

（2） The Aketas granite belongs to the High-K cal-calkaline series，with a SiO2content from 63.00%to 68.20%，K2O content from 3.065%to 4.49%and Na2O content from 4.14%to 6.02%.Combined with microscopic observation，we named it as a quartz monzonite.

（3） The geochemical characteristics reveal that the Aketas granite is an I-type island arc granite.During the magmatic evolution of the Aketas granite，the fractionalcrystallizationofclinopyroxeneand amphibole was intense，and a great deal of crustal materials have involved in its magma source.

（4） Geochronological studies of the Aketas granite suggest that Altai-East Junggar area was still dominated by a subduction tectonic setting at～309 Ma.

AcknowledgmentsThis research project was jointly financially supported by the Mineral Prospecting and Assessment project，CGS（1212011085020）and the National Nature Science Foundation of China（40972066）.

Badarch G，Cunningham WD，Windley BF（2002）A new terrane subdivision for Mongolia：implications for the Phanerozoic crustal growth of Central Asia.J Asian Earth Sci 21：87—110

Bernard-Griffiths J，F(xiàn)ourcade S，Dupuy C（1991）Isotopic study（Sr，Nd，O and C）of lamprophyres and associated dykes from Tamazert（Moroco）：crustal contamination processes and source characteristics.Earth Planet Sci Lett 103：190—199

區(qū)內圍巖蝕變較發(fā)育，主要沿巖體內外接觸帶分布，蝕變主要有矽卡巖化、角巖化。其中含礦矽卡巖出露寬度為200～400m。鉆探表明，矽卡巖順層發(fā)育，受巖性控制明顯，上部為角巖化和矽卡巖化，深部矽卡巖化增強，厚度為50～100m，向南部傾斜，產狀300°～310°∠40°～50°，大致呈層狀披蓋在小巖株南東側。矽卡巖在地表風化后，呈黃褐色的土狀塊體，局部由于含硫化物較高，見赤鐵礦與褐鐵礦分布其中，外觀與鐵帽極為類似。角巖帶主要位于矽卡巖帶之下，以長英質角巖為主，少量呈夾層產于矽卡巖帶內部，并伴有矽卡巖化含銅磁鐵礦礦石。

Briggs SM，Yin A，Manning CE，Chen ZL，Wang XF，Grove M（2007）Late Paleozoic tectonic history of the Ertix fault in the Chinese Altai and its implications for the development of the Central Asian Orogenic System.Geol Soc Am Bull 119：944—960

Buslov MM，Watanabe T，F(xiàn)ujiwara Y，Iwata K，Smirnova LV，Yu Safonova I，Semakov NN，Kiryanova AP（2004）Late Paleozoic faults of the Altai region，Central Asia：tectonic pattern and model of formation.J Asian Earth Sci 23：655—671

Cai K，Sun M，Yuan C，Long X，Xiao W （2011a）Geological framework and Paleozoic tectonic history of the Chinese Altai，NW China：a review.Russ Geol Geophys 52：1619—1633

Cai K，Sun M，Yuan C，Zhao G，Xiao W，Long X，Wu F（2011b）Geochronology，petrogenesis and tectonic significance of peraluminous granites from the Chinese Altai，NW China.Lithos 127：261—281

Cai K，Sun M，Yuan C，Zhao G，Xiao W，Long X，Wu F（2011c）Prolonged magmatism，juvenile nature and tectonic evolution of the Chinese Altai，NW China：evidence from zircon U—Pb and Hf isotopic study of Paleozoic granitoids.J Asian Earth Sci 42：949—968

Chen JF（2011）Geochemistry of the Part of the Plate of the Altai No. 3 Pegmatite and its formation and evolution.Institute of Geochemistry，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Guiyang（in Chinese）

Chen B，Jahn BM （2004）Gensis of post-collisional granitoids an basement nature of the Junggar Terrane，NW China：Nd—Sr isotopeandtraceelementevidence.JAsianEarthSci 23：691—703

Chen GW，Deng T，Liu R，Xia H，Liu Q（2015）Geochemistry of bimodal volcanic rocks in Permian Taerdetao formation in Awulale area of western Tianshan，Xinjiang.Acta Petrol Sin 31（1）：105—118（in Chinese with English abstract）

Collins WJ，Beams SD，White AJK（1982）Nature and origin of A type granites with particular reference to southeasten Australia. Contrib Mineral Petrol 80：189—200

Dong LH，Qu X，Zhao TY，Xu SQ，Zhou RH，Wang KZ，Zhu ZX（2012）Magmatic sequence of early Palaeozoic granitic intrusions and its tectonic implications in north Altay orogen，Xinjiang.Acta Petrol Sin 28（08）：2307—2316（in Chinese）

Donnelly KE，Goldstein SL，Langmuir CH，Spiegelman M（2004）Origin of enriched ocean ridge basalts and implications for mantle dynamics.Earth Planet Sci Lett 226：347—366

Eby GN（1990）A-type granitoids：a review of their occurrence and chemical characteristics and speculations on their petrogenesis. Lithos 26：115—134

Filippova IB，Bush VA，Didenko AN （2001）Middle Paleozoic subduction belts：the leading factor in the formation of the Central Asian fold-and-thrust belt.Russ J Earth Sci 3：405—426

Geng HY，Sun M，Yuan C，Xiao WJ，Xian WS，Zhao GC，Zhang LF，Wong K，Wu FY（2009）Geochemical，Sr—Nd and zircon U—Pb—Hf isotopic studies of late Carboniferous magmatism in the West Junggar，Xinjiang：implications for ridge subduction？Chem Geol 266：373—398

Guo Z，Wilson M，Liu J（2006）Post-collisional，potassic and ultrapotassic magmatism of the northern Tibetan plateau：constraints on characteristics of the mantle source，geodynamic setting and uplift mechanisms.J Petrol 47（6）：1177—1220

Han BF，Guo ZJ，Zhang ZC，Zhang L，Chen JF，Song B（2010）Age，geochemistry，and tectonic implications of a late Paleozoic stitching pluton in the North Tian Shan suture zone，western China.Geol Soc Am Bull 122：627—640

Han BF，He GQ，Wang XC，Guo ZJ（2011）Late Carboniferous collision between the Tarim and Kazakhstan—Yili terranes in the western segment of the South Tian Shan Orogen，Central Asia，and implications for the Northern Xinjiang，western China.Earth Sci Rev 109：74—93

He GQ，Li MS，Liu DQ，Tang YL，Zhou RH（1994）Paleozoic crustal evolution and mineralization in Xinjiang of China.Xinjiang People's Publishing House&Hongkong Education and Cultural Press Ltd，Urumqi，pp 1—437（in Chinese）

Hendrix MS，Graham SA，Amory JY，Badarch G（1996）Noyon Uul syncline，southern Mongolia；lower Mesozoic sedimentaryrecord of the tectonic amalgamation of Central Asia.Geol Soc Am Bull 108：1256—1274

Hoskin PWO，Black LP（2000）Metamorphic zircon formation by solid-state recrytallization of protolith igneous zircon.J Metamorph Geol 18（4）：423—439

Huang XL，Yu Y，Li J，Tong LX，Chen LL（2013）Geochronology and petrogenesis of the early Paleozoic I-type granite in the Taishan area，South China：middle-lower crustal melting during orogenic collapse.Lithos 177：268—284

Jahn BM，Windley BF，Natalin's B，Dobretsov N（2004）Phanerozoic continental growth in central Asia.J Asian Earth Sci 23：599—603

Kheraskova TN，Didenko AN，Bush VA，Volozh YA（2003）The Vendian—Early Paleozoic history of the continental margin of Eastern Paleogondwana，Paleoasian Ocean，and Central Asian Foldbelt.Russ J Earth Sci 5：165—184

Li JY，Xiao WJ，Wang KZ，Sun GH，Gao LM（2003）Neoproterozoic-Paleozoic tectonostratigraphy，magmatic activities and tectonic evolution of the eastern Xinjiang，NW China.In：Mao J，Goldfarb RJ，Seltman R，Wang DH，Xiao WJ，Hart C（eds）Tectonic evolution and metallogeny of the Chinese Altai and Tianshan，IAGOD Guidebook Series，10CERCAM/NHM，London，pp 31—74

Li JY，He GQ，Xu X，Li HQ，Sun GH，Yang TN，Gao LM，Zhu ZX（2006）Crustal tectonic framework of Northern Xinjiang and adjacent regions and its formation.Acta Geol Sin 80（1）：148—168（in Chinese）

Li HJ，He GQ，Wu TR，Wu B（2010）Discovery of the early Paleozoic post-collisional granite in Altay，China and its geological significance.Acta Petrol Sin 26（08）：2445—2451（in Chinese）

Long XP，Sun M，Yuan C，Xiao WJ，Lin SF，Wu FY，Xia XP，Cai KD（2007）U—Pb and Hf isotopic study of zircons from metasedimentary rocks in the Chinese Altai：implications for early Palaeozoic tectonic evolution.Tectonics 26：TC5015

Lu¨SJ，Yang FQ，Chai FM，Zhang XB，Jiang LP，Liu F，Zhang ZX，Geng XX，Ouyang LJ（2012a）Zircon U—Pb dating for intrusions in Laoshankou Ore District in northern margin of east Junggar and their significances.Geol Rev 58（1）：149—164（in Chinese）

Lu¨ZH，Zhang H，Tang Y，Guan SJ（2012b）Petrogenesis and magmatic-hydrothermal evolution time limitation of Kelumute No.112 pegmatite in Altay，Northwestern China：evidence from zircon U—Pb and Hf isotopes.Lithos 154：374—391

Ludwig KR（1991）Isoplot：a plotting and regression program for radiogenic isotope data.US Geol Surv Open-File Rep 39：91—445

Maniar PD，Piccoli PM（1989）Tectonic discrimination of granitoids. Geol Soc Am Bull 101：635—643

Muhetaer Z，Nijat A，Wu ZN（2015）Geochemical characteristics of the volcanics from the southern Jueluotage area and their constraints on the tectonic evolution of Paleo-Asian Ocean.Earth Sci Front 22（1）：238—250（in Chinese with English abstract）

Nelson DR，McCulloch MT，Sun SS （1986）The origins of ultrapotassic rocks as inferred from Sr，Nd and Pb isotopes. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 50：231—245

Pan D，Ding RF，Zhang H，You J（2012）Main characteristics and prospecting perspective of Aketasi gold field prospecting target areainFuyunCounty，Xinjiang.SciTechnolEng 12（5）：1007—1013（in Chinese）

Pearce JA，Harris NBW，Tindle AG（1984）Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rock. J Petrol 25：956—983

Ren BQ，Zhang H，Tang Y，Lu¨ZH（2011）LA-ICPMS U—Pb Zircon geochronology of the Altai Pegmatites and its geological significance.Acta Mineral Sin 31（3）：587—596（in Chinese）

Rudnick RL，Gao S（2003）Composition of the continental crust. Treatise Geochem 3：1—64

Seghedi I，Downes H，Pe′cskay Z（2001）Magma genesis in a subduction-related post-collisional volcanic arc segment：the Ukrainian Carpathians.Lithos 57：237—262

Sengo¨r AMC，Natalin BA，Burtman VS（1993）Evolution of the Altaid tectonic collage and Paleozoic crustal growth in Eurasia. Nature 364：299—307

Shen XM，Zhang HX，Wang Q，Wyman DA，Yang YH（2011）Late Devonian—Early Permian A-type granites in the southern Altay Range，NorthwestChina：petrogenesisandimplicationsfortectonic setting of‘‘A2-type''granites.J Asian Earth Sci 42：986—1007

Sun SS，McDonough WF（1979）Chemical approximationg to the modal QAPF classification of the igneous rocks.N Jb Miner Abh 136：169—206

Sun M，Yuan C，Xiao W，Long X，Xia X，Zhao G，Lin S，Wu F，Kro¨ner A（2008）Zircon U—Pb and Hf isotopic study of gneissic rocks from the Chinese Altai：progressive accretionary history in the early to middle Palaeozoic.Chem Geol 247：352—383

Tatsumi Y，Hamilton DL，Nesbitt RW（1986）Chemical characteristics of fluid phase released from a subducted lithosphere and origin of arc magmas：evidence from high-pressure experiments and natural rocks.J Volcanol Geoth Res 29：293—309

Wang JB，Xu X （2006）Post-collisional tectonic evolution and metallogenesis in Northern Xinjiang，China.Acta Geol Sin 80（1）：24—27

Wang DH，Chen YC，Xu ZG（2003）40Ar/39Ar isotope dating on muscovites from Indosinian raremetal deposits in central Altay，northwestern China.Bull Mineral Petrol Geochem 22（1）：14—17（in Chinese）

Wang T，Tong Y，Li S，Zhang JJ，Shi XJ，Li JT，Han BF，Hong DW（2010）Spatial and temporal variations of granitoids in the Altay orogen and their implications for tectonic setting and crustal growth：perspectives from Chinese Altay.Acta Petrol Mineral 29（6）：605—607（in Chinese）

Wang YJ，Yuan C，Long XP，Sun M，Xiao WJ，Zhao GC，Cai KD，Jiang YD （2011）Geochemistry，zircon U—Pb ages and Hf isotopes of the Paleozoic volcanic rocks in the northwestern Chinese Altai：petrogenesis and tectonic implications.J Asian Earth Sci 42：969—985

Wilson M（1989）Igneous petrogenesis.Springer，London

Windley BF，Alexeiev D，Xiao W，Kroner A，Badarch G（2007）Tectonic models for accretion of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt.J Geol Soc Lond 164：31—47

Xiao WJ，Santosh M （2014）The western Central Asian Orogenic Belt：a window to accretionary orogenesis and continental growth.Gondwana Res 25（4）：1429—1444

Xiao WJ，Windley BF，Badarch G，Sun S，Li J，Qin K，Wang Z（2004）Palaeozoic accretionary and convergent tectonics of the Southern Altaids：implications for the growth of Central Asia.J Geol Soc Lond 161（3）：339—342

Xiao WJ，Han CM，Yuan C，Sun M，Lin SF，Chen HL，Li ZL，Li JL，Sun S（2008）Middle Cambrian to Permian subduction-related accretionary orogenesis of Northern Xinjiang，NW China：implications for the tectonic evolution of central Asia.J Asian Earth Sci 32：102—117

Xiao WJ，Kro¨ner A，Windley BF（2009）Geodynamic evolution of Central Asia in the Paleozoic and Mesozoic.Int J Earth Sci 98：1185—1188

Xiao WJ，Huang BC，Han CM，Sun S，Li JL（2010）A review of the western part of the Altaids：a key to understanding the architecture of accretionary orogens.Gondwana Res 18：253—273

Xu XY，Li RS，Chen JL，Ma ZP，Li ZP，Wang HL，Bai JK，Tang Z（2014）New constrains on the Paleozoic tectonic evolution of the northern Xinjiang area.Acta Petrol Sin 30（6）：1521—1534（in Chinese with English abstract）

Yakubchuk AS（2004）Architecture and mineral deposit settings of Altaid orogenic collage：a revised model.J Asian Earth Sci 23：761—779

Yang GX，Li YJ，Li ZC，Liu XY，Yang BK，Wu HE（2010）Genesis and tectonic settings of post-collision volcanic rocks in northeastern margin of East Junggar，Xinjiang.Earth Sci Frontiers 17（1）：049—060（in Chinese）

Yang M，Wang JL，Wang JQ，Liu C（2015）Late Carboniferous intraoceanic subduction and mineralization in western Junggar：evidence from the petrology，geochemistry and zircon U—Pb geochronology of I#ore-bearing granite body in Suyunhe molybdenite orefield，Xinjiang.Acta Petrol Sin 31（2）：523—533（in Chinese with English abstract）

Yuan HL，Wu FY，Gao S，Liu XM，Xu P，Sun DY（2003）LA-ICPMS Zircon U—Pb age and Ree analysis in Cenozoic intrusive rock in northeast China.Chin Sci Bull 48（14）：1511—1520（in Chinese）

Yuan C，Sun M，Xiao WJ，Li XH，Chen HL，Lin SF，Xia XP，Long XP（2007）Accretionary orogenesis of the Chinese Altai：insights from Paleozoic granitoids.Chem Geol 242：22—39

Zhang X，Zhang H（2014）Geochronological，geochemical，and Sr—Nd—Hf isotopic studies of the Baiyanghe A-type granite porphyry in the western Junggar：implications for its petrogenesis and tectonic setting.Gondwana Res 25：1554—1569

Zhang HX，Niu HC，Terada K，Yu XY，Sato H，Ito J（2003）Zircon SHRIMP U—Pb dating on plagiogranite from the Kuerti ophiolite in Altay.North Xinjiang.Chinese Science Bulletin 48（2）：231—235

Zhang F，Chen JP，Xu T，F(xiàn)an JJ，Pan AJ，Guo XD，Li JM，Chao YY（2014）Late Paleozoic subduction in the eastern Junggar：evidence from the petrology，geochemistry and geochronology ofCarboniferousvolcanicrocks.GeotectonMetallog 38（1）：140—156（in Chinese with English abstract）

Zhong YF，Ma CQ，Zhang C，Wang SM，She ZB，Liu L，Xu HJ（2013）Zircon U—Pb age，Hf isotopic compositions and geochemistry of the Silurian Fengdingshan I-type granite Pluton and Taoyuan mafic—felsic complex at the southeastern margin of the Yangtze Block.J Asian Earth Sci 74：11—24

Zhu YF，Zeng Y，Gu L（2006）Geochemistry of the rare metal-bearing pegmatite No.3 vein and related granites in the Keketuohai region，Altay Mountains，northwest China.J Asian Earth Sci 27（1）：61—77

10.1007/s11631-015-0071-5

25 November 2014/Revised：17 April 2015/Accepted：25 August 2015/Published online：12 September 2015

? Xin Zhang

zhangxin869@126.com

1University of Science and Technology Beijing，Beijing 100083，People's Republic of China

2Beijing Institute of Geology for Mineral Resources，Beijing 100012，People's Republic of China

3Key Laboratory of High-temperature and High-pressure Study of the Earth's Interior，Institute of Geochemistry，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Guiyang 550002，People's Republic of China

?Science Press，Institute of Geochemistry，CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015