• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Classification of Precipitation Types Using Fall Velocity–Diameter Relationships from 2D-Video Distrometer Measurements

    2015-06-09 21:30:01JeongEunLEESungHwaJUNGHongMokPARKSoohyunKWONPayLiamLINandGyuWonLEE
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2015年9期
    關(guān)鍵詞:精確性數(shù)據(jù)處理實(shí)效性

    Jeong-Eun LEE,Sung-Hwa JUNG,,Hong-Mok PARK,Soohyun KWON, Pay-Liam LIN,and GyuWon LEE?,

    1Department of Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences,Research and Training Team for Future Creative Astrophysicists and Cosmologists,Kyungpook National University,Korea

    2Center for Atmospheric Remote Sensing,Kyungpook National University,Korea

    3Departmentof Atmospheric Sciences,NCU,Taipei

    Classification of Precipitation Types Using Fall Velocity–Diameter Relationships from 2D-Video Distrometer Measurements

    Jeong-Eun LEE1,Sung-Hwa JUNG1,2,Hong-Mok PARK2,Soohyun KWON1, Pay-Liam LIN3,and GyuWon LEE?1,2

    1Department of Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences,Research and Training Team for Future Creative Astrophysicists and Cosmologists,Kyungpook National University,Korea

    2Center for Atmospheric Remote Sensing,Kyungpook National University,Korea

    3Departmentof Atmospheric Sciences,NCU,Taipei

    Fall velocity–diameter relationships for four different snowflake types(dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel)were investigated in northeastern South Korea,and a new algorithm for classifying hydrometeors is proposed for distrometric measurements based on the new relationships.Falling ice crystals(approximately 40 000 particles)were measured with a two-dimensional video disdrometer(2DVD)during a winter experiment from 15 January to 9 April 2010.The fall velocity–diameter relationships were derived for the four types of snowflakes based on manual classification by experts using snow photos and 2DVD measurements:the coefficients(exponents)for different snowflake types were 0.82(0.24)for dendrite, 0.74(0.35)for plate,1.03(0.71)for needle,and 1.30(0.94)for graupel,respectively.These new relationships established in the present study(PS)were compared with those from two previous studies.Hydrometeor types were classified with the derived fall velocity–diameter relationships,and the classification algorithm was evaluated using 3×3 contingency tables for one rain–snow transition event and three snowfall events.The algorithm showed good performance for the transition event: the critical success indices(CSIs)were 0.89,0.61 and 0.71 for snow,wet-snow and rain,respectively.For snow events, the algorithm performance for dendrite and plate(CSIs=1.0 and 1.0,respectively)was better than for needle and graupel (CSIs=0.67 and 0.50,respectively).

    snowflake types,wet snow,fall velocity–diameter,hydrometeor type classification,2DVD

    1.Introduction

    Snowfall can cause damage to life and property during winter.However,the accurate measurement and prediction of ground snowfall is difficult due to wind-driven horizontal movement of snowflakes,and to the large variability in particle density as a function of the vertical structure of humidity (degree of supersaturation)and air temperature(Roebber et al.,2003;Baker et al.,2012;Nitu,2013).To accurately estimate the amount of snowfall on the ground,previous studies have been carried out using radar measurements with high spatial and temporal resolutions(e.g.Fujiyoshi et al.,1990; Matrosov,1992,1998;Huang et al.,2010).However,it is evident that the accuracy of radar-based snowfall estimations is mainly affected by the radarmeasurementheight,wind shear, and radar reflectivity–snowfall rate relationships(Z–S relationships),which depend on the size,shape,fall velocity and density of the snowflakes(Fujiyoshi et al.,1990;Matrosov, 1992,1998;Rasmussen et al.,2003).The fall velocity of snowflakes plays a particularly significant role in governing the trail of snowfall,and in representing the density of snow and microphysical processes.Therefore,research on the relationship between the size and fall velocity of snowflakes is essential for the accurate estimation of snowfall amount.

    Langleben(1954)suggested that melting or riming processes were the main causes of an increase in snowflake fall velocity,and derived fall velocity–diameterrelationships(V–D relationship)according to snowflake types.Hansch(1999) investigated variables governing fall velocity(e.g.,vertical size,area of perpendicular circumscribed circle,and the area ratio between the cross-sectional area and the circumscribed ellipse area)based on a theoretical approach,and conducted experiments using 2D Video Disdrometer(2DVD)measure-ments;thestudysuggestedvariousV–Drelationshipsaccording to snowflake type and degree of riming.It is of note that the variability of coefficients in V–D relationships is greater for the degree of riming than for snowflake types.

    Barthazy and Schefold(2006)(BS hereafter)presented power-law and exponential V–D relationships for various snowflake types according to the degree of riming(classes 0–5),which is proportional to the coverage ratio of a droplet on a snowflake’s surface,using a Hydrometeor Velocity and ShapeDetector(HVSD).Intheirstudy,theV–Drelationships were relatively independent of the degree of riming in weak riming stages(classes 1–3),whereas the relationships varied significantly with the degreeof rimingin heavy riming stages (classes 3–5).Zawadzki et al.(2010)investigated the variability and uncertainties in snowfall velocity measurements that occurred when using an HVSD,such as instrument uncertainty in the fall velocity measurement,the effect of wobbling snowflakes on the accuracy of velocity measurements, and naturalvariabilityin the homogeneoussnow terminal fall velocity.They also analyzed the correlations of the coefficients of V–D relationships with surface temperature,the temperature at echo top,and vertical depth of the precipitation system,all of which were derived using aircraft soundings and a vertically pointing X-band radar.

    Yuter et al.(2006)used the Particle Size and Velocity(PARSIVEL)to present various two-dimensional distributions between the size and fall velocity of rain,mixedphase precipitation(rain and wet snow),and dry snow,and suggested a classification technique for mixed precipitation. Sheppard and Joe(2000)compared automatic measurements from various sensors[Vaisala FD12P,HSS Model 402B, WeatherIdentifierandVisibilitySensor(WIVis),andthePrecipitation Occurrence Sensor System(POSS)]with manned observations,and then presented the limitations of each sensor.Grazioli et al.(2014)developedthe hydrometeorclassif ication method using 2DVD measurements based on the support vector machine method.In addition,dual-polarization weather radar has been recently used to classify hydrometeor types(e.g.Vivekanandan et al.,1999;Liu and Chandrasekar, 2000;Lim et al.,2005;Park et al.,2009).The hydrometeor classification algorithm utilizes a fuzzy logic approach to combine feature parameters by employing polarimetric radar measurements(horizontal reflectivity,differential reflectivity,differential propagation phase shift,correlation coef ficient,and linear depolarization ratio),and then classi fies various hydrometeor types(such as drizzle,rain,dry snow, wet snow,hailstone,graupel).Furthermore,Moisseev et al. (2009)showed that dual-polarization radar is a useful tool for identifying the growth processes of snowflakes,such as aggregation,riming,and deposition.

    This study aims to derive new V–D relationships according to snowflake types in Korea,and to develop a new hydrometeor classification algorithm based on the derived relationships using 2DVD measurements.The paper is presented as follows:2DVD measurements and snowflake photographs used in this study are described in section 2.The quality control process of the 2DVD measurements,and the procedures used to derive the V–D relationships and to develop the hydrometeor classification algorithm are explained in section 3. Insection4,thenew V–Drelationshipsarecomparedwith results fromthepreviousstudies ofBS andLocatelliandHobbs (1974)(LH hereafter),and the Hydrometeor Classification Algorithm(HCA)is evaluated.Section 5 then summarizes the processes and results of this study.

    2.Data

    2DVD data and close-up pictures of snowflakes collected at the Cloud Physical Observation Station[CPOS,(37?41′N, 128?45′E),842 m MSL]from 15 January to 9 April 2010 were analyzed.2DVD instruments provided various details of precipitation particles(e.g.,fall velocity,equivalent volume spherical diameter,major and minor axes,and canting angle)using two light sheets(with widths of 10 cm containing 512 pixels each)that are transmitted from two orthogonal light sources to the line scan cameras(which can capture the shadows of a particle)on a horizontal plane(see Fig.1).The two light sheets were placed at a vertical distance of 6.2 mm from each other,creating a virtual measuring area of 10 cm ×10 cm.The captured images then entered the image processingprocedureofthe2DVD,whichintegratesinformation received from each line-scan camera in relation to the particles.The fall velocity and equivalent volume spherical diameter were then estimated for particles that fell into the virtual measuring area only(Kruger and Krajewski,2002;Schonhuber et al.,2008).

    Snowflakes were photographed using a high-resolution digital camera system every 10 min after collection,by means of a rectangular-shaped collection plate with a size of 21.0 cm×29.7 cm(623.7 cm2)that was covered with black velvet to alleviate particle breaking(Fig.2).This plate was exposed to snowfall for approximately 2–5 s,depending on the snowfall intensity.The snowflakes that collected on the plate were then moved into a dark room,where the intensity of illumination was steadily maintained,and the temperature was maintained close to that of the temperature outdoors,to avoid melting the snowflakes.Snowflake photographs were taken using a Nikon D80 Digital Single Lens Reflector camera with a high resolutionof 3872×2592pixels,a fixed focal length of 60 mm,an exposure time of 1/30 s,and a focallength-aperture ratio of F3.8(Fig.2).

    To derive the V–D relationships for the various types of snow particles,the 2DVD measurements were classified into four different snowflake types(dendrite,plate,needle, and graupel),based on the dominant snowflakes present after photo-interpretation(Figs.2c–f),as determined by experts analyzing the silhouettes of snowflakes on the x–z or y–z planeofthe 2DVD.Anyambiguousand/ormixed-phased events were excluded(Fig.2b)from the dataset.If one of the snowflake types accounted for more than at least 70%of all snowflake types in the photograph,it was determined to be the dominant snowflake type.Therefore,even if it is possible to roughly identify the snowflake type using photographs taken of large collections of snowflakes,habit identification is effective.However,sucha meansofidentificationhaslimitations because each size of snowflake and its velocitycannot be determined.

    The periods during which the 2DVD measurements were obtained to derive the V–D relationship for each type of snowflake is listed in Table 1.The number of each snowflake type counted was 2754 for dendrite,824 for plate,23 584 for needle,and 6698 for graupel.In addition,to evaluate the HCA,a rain–snowtransition event(9 February2010)andthree snow events(12 February,15 February,and 4 March 2010)were used(Table 2).

    3.Methodology

    3.1.Quality control of 2DVD data

    The quality control procedure used in relation to 2DVD data consisted of two steps.The first step employed 2DVD software to remove mismatched particles caused by contamination,such as the overlap of snow particles in the line of sight and particles crossing the virtual measuring area,in addition to the aerodynamics effects related to the 2DVD,tumbling snowflakes,and side views of snowflakes that were significantly different(particularlyneedle-type).This used individual information related to particles captured by the upper and lower line-scan cameras(Hansch,1999;Krugerand Krajewski,2002;Huang et al.,2010).The following particles were eliminated by quality control:fall velocity>4 m s?1or diameter<0.2 mm.In addition,particles that were shown to have significantly different areas in the images taken between one camera and another were eliminated.This quality control may eliminate particles that have very different areas from two cameras,although real snow particles can exhibit different shapes from different view angles.However,these particles may lead to significant errors in the velocity measurements.

    In BS,the V–D relationships for four snowflake types (dendrite,plate,needle,and irregular crystals including graupel)were derived based on the degree of riming obtained by using the HVSD at different altitudes.In the present study (PS),the diameter of the precipitation particles was defined as the equivalent diameter of particles as captured by the two line cameras in the 2DVD instruments,whereas the maximum diameter of precipitation particles captured by two parallel beams from HVSD was used in BS.Therefore,the difference in the diameter definitions gives rise to some differences between PS and BS.

    To derive accurate V–D relationships,minor types of snowflakeswereremovedfromtheraw2DVDdata.Themost probable velocity and its standard deviation(σ)were calculated with a diameter interval of 0.2 mm,and any particles that crossed±σfrom the most probable velocity were then removed.Figure 3 shows an example of the quality control used for the 2DVD measurements obtained from 1618 UTC to 1623 UTC 15 February 2010.The scatter plot between the fall velocity and diameter of raw 2DVD measurements is described in Fig.3a,and Fig.3b shows the distribution after removing mismatched and ambiguous particles.In this example,mismatched particles were mostly distributed at diameters of less than 1.0 mm,and minor types of snowflakes were then removed using a threshold of one standard deviation from the most probable velocity(Fig.3c).

    For a rainfall event,particles that were beyond the followingrangewereidentifiedas mismatchedparticles(Kruger and Krajewski,2002)and thus removed:

    whereVmeasured(units:m s?1)is the velocitymeasured by the 2DVD,andVAindicates the calculated velocityfromthe V–D relationship(V=9.65?10.3e?0.6D)for raindrops(Atlas et al.,1973,hereafter AT73).

    3.2.Derivation of V–D relationships

    The V–D relationships for various snowflake types were derived by the power-law regression as follows:

    where a and b are coefficients,and D and V(D)represent the diameter(mm)and the fall velocity(m s?1),respectively. Since power-law relationships are simple and useful in determining the analytic solution of a model(e.g.for Dopplerspectra calculations),they are mostly used to derive the V–D relationship for snow particles(Langleben,1954;Hansch, 1999;Zawadzki et al.,2010).In this study,the V–D relationships were derived using the weighted total least squares (WTLS)fitting method(Amemoya,1997)rather than the ordinary least squares fitting method,as the WTLS method is able to minimize both uncertainties in the diameter,as well as in the fall velocity of 2DVD measurements,unlike the ordinary least squares fit.

    3.3.Algorithm for hydrometeor classification

    The proposed HCA classifies the hydrometeor into six particle types(rain,wet snow/sleet,and the snowflake types of dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel),based on the AT73 relationship for raindrops and the newly proposed relationships for four different types of snowflakes.To classify the hydrometeor types,the HCA utilizes the difference between the velocity[Vj(Dobs,i)]from empirical relationships and the measured velocity(Vobs,i)from the 2DVD as follows:

    where Dobs,iand Vobs,iare the diameter and velocity of each particle measured by 2DVD within a given time window (e.g.,5 min);j indicates the hydrometeor type(rain,or the snowflake types of dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel);and N is the total number of particles.Thus,five fjare calculated for a time window of 5 min.

    Figure 4 shows a flow chart of the HCA.The theoretical fall velocity[Vj(Dobs,i)]at a given diameter was firstly calculated from the V–D relationships for each hydrometeor type. The averaged absolute value(fj)of the difference between the theoretical fall velocity from the V–D relationship and the measured velocity from the 2DVD were then calculated using Eq.(3).When the minimum value(fj,min)among the calculated fjwas less than the threshold(fthreshold),the subscript j was finally identified as one of the hydrometeortypes (e.g.,rain,or the snowflake types of dendrite,plate,needle, or graupel);otherwise,it was classified as wet snow/sleet.

    4.Results

    4.1.V–D relationships of snowflake types

    Figure 5 shows the two-dimensional normalized frequency distribution between the fall velocity and diameter in the 2DVDmeasurements,according to the type ofsnowflakes based on photo-interpretation by human experts.Class intervals for the diameter and fall velocity were 0.1 mm and 0.1 m s?1,respectively.The solid line shown in Fig.5 represents the V–Drelationship fitted by the WTLS method.The fall velocities of both dendrite and plate are distributed in the range from 0.6 to 1.3 m s?1.The diameter of dendrite has a rangefrom 0.0 to 4.0 mm,with a relatively high frequency at diameters<1.5 mm(Fig.5a),whereas that of plate is confined to less than around 2.0 mm.The exponents and coefficients in the V–D relationship are 0.82 and 0.24 for dendrite,and 0.74 and 0.35 for plate,respectively.However,their fall velocities tend to remain almost constant(between 0.6 and 1.3 m s?1),with a small exponent(<0.4)and coefficient(<1.0), due to their low densities and flat-snowflake shapes.The exponent of dendrite is particularly small,which indicates that the growth of dendrite was by aggregation and deposition, causing an increase in size but no significant change in density.

    The diametersof needleandgraupelrangefrom0.0to 4.0 mm,and are mostly concentratedat diameters under 1.5 mm; the range of their fall velocities(0.6–2.2m s?1)is wider than that of dendrite and plate(0.6–1.3 m s?1).While the diameter ranges of both needle and graupel are similar to that of dendrite,their fall velocities increase more rapidly than that of dendrite,with increasing diameters.This indicates that the needle-typeparticles developedundera rimingregime,as the rimingprocess usuallycausesthe fall velocityto increasesignificantly.Furthermore,weak aggregated or rimed needles were frequently observed during the photo-interpretation in thefield(Fig.2e).Inaddition,the graupel-typeparticleswere a result of significant riming,which caused such a change in the originalshape of the snowflake that it was no longer identifiable.Therefore,the coefficients and exponents of both the needle(1.03and0.71,respectively)andthe graupel(1.30and 0.94,respectively)in the V–D relationships were larger than those of both the dendrite and plate.

    The averaged difference(fj)between fall velocities calculated from the V–D relationship and 2DVD measurements was calculatedbyEq.(3),accordingto thehydrometeortype. The value of fjfor dendrite,plate,needle and graupel were 0.10,0.05,0.21 and 0.18 m s?1,respectively.In addition,the value of fjfor raindrop(0.41)was calculated by comparing with the V–D relationship(AT73)for rainfall events occurring g on 8 February 2010(not shown).

    4.2.Comparison with previous studies

    For a comparison of the V–D relationships between PS and BS,the fall velocities in the V–D relationships were converted into at mean sea level(MSL)(1013 hPa)using Eq. (4),which requires consideration of the effect of air density changes due to differences in observing altitudes(Brandes et al.,2008):

    whereVobsandV1013,expressedin m s?1,indicate the fall velocity of each snowflake at observational altitude and MSL, respectively;ρ1013(1.225 kg m?3)andρobs(1.112 kg m?2) refer to the density of air at 1013 hPa and at an observational altitude(842 m MSL),where the air density is linearly in-terpolated in the vertical direction based on the air density profile of the standard atmosphere.In BS,the fall velocity of snowflakes was measured at an altitude of 1604 m MSL and aρobscorresponding to 1.048 kg m?3.

    Table 3 and Fig.6 illustrate the V–D relationships corresponding to snowflake types in PS(solid lines)and BS (dashed lines),both after and before applying a height reduction to obtain values corresponding to those at MSL,and in LH(dashed lines).The results of LH are mostly used as a reference in the community,although in their study the authors did not report temperatures and the pressure conditions whenmeasuringthe fall velocity.Thedifferencein the observational height between PS and BS does not cause a differenceinthevalueoftheexponentsbetweenV–Drelationships. Four types of snowflakes show similar trends in terms of the V–D relationships.In PS and BS,the V–D relationship for dendrite(graupel)is gentlest(steepest).Thecoefficientofthe adjusted V–D relationship for dendrite in PS(0.79)is smaller than that in BS(0.91 for moderately rimed dendrite and 0.98 for densely rimed dendrite)and is close to that of LH(0.80 for unrimed dendrite and 0.79 for densely rimed dendrite),as shown in Table 3.The exponent for dendrite in PS(0.24)is equal to that for denselyrimed dendritein BS,and is between that of unrimed(0.16)and densely rimed dendrite(0.27)in LH.On the contrary,the coefficient for plate in PS(0.71)is smaller than that in BS(that for unrimed,moderately rimed, anddenselyrimedplateare0.94,1.12and1.26,respectively), and its exponent in PS(0.35)is between that of moderately rimed(0.26)and densely rimed plate(0.40)in BS.The coefficient for needle in PS(0.99)is between that for unrimed (0.90)and moderately rimed needle(1.17)in BS,and the exponent for needle in PS(0.71)is greater than that for densely rimed needle(0.35)in BS.Furthermore,the coefficient for graupel in PS is smaller(greater)than that for graupel in BS(LH),and its exponent in PS is greater than that in BS (0.61)and LH(range between 0.28 and 0.65).The temperature range for graupel is?1.2?C to?1.0?C in PS,whereas BS reported a temperature range of?5.0 to?1.0?C for the 15 cases.Assuming the temperature for graupel is colder in BS than in PS,the density of graupel would be higher in PS than in BS(Garrett and Yuter,2014),and thus the difference in power-law exponentsbetween PS and BS would be caused by the differences in temperature.

    Fortheentirerangesofdiameters,thefall velocityofdendrite and plate in PS is smaller than that of dendrite and plate in BS,as shown in Fig.6,and,in addition,the fall velocity of needle and graupel in PS is smaller than that of needle and graupel in BS,with a range in diameter of<approximately 1.5 mm.However,the fall velocity of needle and graupel in PS is greater than that of needle and graupel in BS,with a range in diameter of>1.5 mm,and the fall velocity increases more rapidly with increasing diameter than in BS.The V–D relationship of needle and graupel with increasing diameter in PS intersects that of needle and graupel in BS.

    4.3.Classification of hydrometeor types using the V–D relationship

    4.3.1.Rain–snow transition case

    The performance of the HCA was examined using a transition case(between rain and snow on 9 February 2010),as shown in Table 2.Equations(10)to(13),given in Table 3, were applied as the reference V–D relationship corresponding to the type of snowflake in the HCA,and AT73 was used as the reference V–D relationship for raindrops.

    The two-dimensional distribution between the fall velocity and diameter corresponding to the precipitation types in the 2DVD measurements was investigated(Fig.7)prior to a performance test of the HCA.The class intervals in the twodimensional normalized frequency distribution were 0.1 mmand 0.1 m s?1,as shown in Fig.7.The solid line refers to AT73,and the blue,red,purple and green dashed lines represent the V–D relationship for the snowflake types of dendrite, plate,needle and graupel,respectively,in this study.

    Table 3.Comparison of V–D relationships between this study and previous studies.

    Results show that,although AT73 was slightly higher than the measured fall velocity overthe entire diameterrange, the fallvelocity ofraindropsin 2DVDagreed wellwith AT73. In addition,the V–D relationship for raindrops increased remarkably as its diameterincreased(Fig.7a).In thisstudy,the fall velocity of snowflakes(needle)increased less remarkably than that of raindrops with increasing diameter,according to the V–Drelationship forneedle(Fig.7b).Forwetsnow/sleet, the fall velocity was widely distributed between the V–D relationships of raindrops and graupel(Fig.7c).The V–D relationship of considerably(relatively)melted small(large)ice crystals was particularly close to AT73(apart from the V–D relationship of graupel).Hence,an optimal V–D relationship for wet snow/sleet was impossible to derive,due to the large variation in fall velocity,which depends on the ratio between the water and ice contents in the precipitation particles.Thurai et al.(2007)found similar results,i.e.,that the fall velocity and diameter data from 2DVD deviated slightly from the Gunn–Kinzer(G–K)curve during a period of rain,while the fall velocities distributed below the G–K curve in the case of wet snow,and the fall velocities of dry snow were less than about 2.8 m s?1.

    In the HCA,wet snow/sleet can be classified based on the difference in the V–D relationships of raindrops and snowflakes.The value of fj,0.60,applied as a threshold, is larger than the maximum fj(0.41)among the values of fjfor the five hydrometeor types(raindrop,and the snowflake types of plate,dendrite,needle,and graupel)in the previous section.In other words,if the minimum fjis larger than 0.6, the event can be classified as a wet snow/sleet event.

    Figure 8 illustratesthe time seriesoffive fjs derived from the HCA and the final classification by applying the threshold value of 0.6 for the transition case of rain and snow on 9 February 2010.The reference classification of hydrometeor types based on photo-interpretation and 2DVDmeasurements by experts is presented in the upper part of Fig.8b.

    For a quantitative evaluation of the HCA’s performance, it is necessary to predetermine the reference classification by using the particle shape from 2DVD measurements and from the photo-interpretation by human experts.The hydrometeor types were classified into raindrop,wet snow/sleet,and snowflakes(dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel).The performance of the HCA was then evaluated using three skill scores(probability of detection,POD;false alarm ratio,FAR; critical success index,CSI)derived from the 3×3 contingency table for three categories(raindrop,wet snow/sleet, and snowflakes)(Wilks,2006,Fig.9).The symbol“O”implies the reference hydrometeor types determined by human experts,and“P”stands for the hydrometeor types classified with the HCA in Fig.9.Moreover,“r”–“z”represents thenumber of classifications for each type category;for example,“r”and“u”represent the number of rainfall events that are classified by the HCA correctly asraindrop events,and incorrectly as wet snow/sleet events,respectively.To derive the skill score for individual precipitation types,the 3×3 contingency table was reduced to 2×2(Fig.9),and the performance was then evaluated by using the score of the three skills(POD,FAR,and CSI),as follows:

    where e is the numberofwet snow/sleet events correctly classified by the HCA;f is the numberof othereventsincorrectly classified;and g is the numberofwet snow/sleet eventsincorrectly classified as other types by the HCA.

    The skill scores according to the type of precipitation are listed in Table 4.PODs for both raindrops and wet snow/sleet(0.90)are larger than that of snow(0.71).The low skill score for snow is due to the large variation in the fall velocity of snowflakes,and hence snowflakes with a large fall velocity are incorrectly identified as wet snow.The FAR of wet snow/sleet(0.35)is larger than that of rain(0.03)and snow(0.00).Precipitation types were mostly misclassified during transition periods(e.g.,snow to wet snow/sleet,wetsnow/sleet to rain,etc.),due to the large variations in velocities during transitions.The CSI of wet snow/sleet(0.61)is smaller than that of rain(0.89)and snow(0.71).

    4.3.2.Snowfall case

    The performance of the HCA for four snowflake types (dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel)was evaluated by comparing with photo-interpretation by human experts using the snowfall cases(cases 2–4)listed in Table 2.Representative examples are shown in Fig.10.

    The skill scores for four snowflake types are listed in Table 5.POD,FAR,and CSI for dendrite were 1.00,0.00, and 1.00,respectively,and for plate were 1.00,0.00,and 1.00,respectively.All the dendrite and plate of snowflakes were,therefore,correctly classified.The POD,FAR,and CSI for needle were 0.67,0.00,and 0.67,respectively.CSI and POD of needle were relatively smaller than those of dendrite and plate because the coefficient and exponent values of the V–D relationship for needle were between those of graupel and dendrite,and because the fall velocity of needle may strongly depend on the degree of riming under different growth regimes.The POD of graupel was 1.00,and its CSI was smaller than that of the other snowflake types due to its high FAR(0.50).The misclassification of needle to graupel in the HCA results with a high value of FAR is considered to have occurred because the fall velocity of densely rimed needle may be similar to that of graupel.

    5.Summary and conclusion

    The V–D relationships by snowflake type were derived, and the HCA was developedusing snow particle photographs taken at intervals of 10 minutes and 2DVD measurements at CPOS from 9 January to 9 April 2010.

    在大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代下,數(shù)據(jù)激增對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)處理的精確性和實(shí)效性等都提出了更高的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),新型電網(wǎng)規(guī)劃體系獲取數(shù)據(jù)的主要方法是結(jié)合無人機(jī)、衛(wèi)星遙感等先進(jìn)的技術(shù)來獲取數(shù)據(jù)。無人機(jī)、衛(wèi)星遙感等技術(shù)的發(fā)展日

    Mismatched and/or minor-type particles were removed during the quality control procedure.The V–D relationships for four snowflake types(dendrite,plate,needle and graupel) were derived from 2DVD measurements based on photointerpretations by human experts.Finally,a classification algorithm for six precipitation particles,including raindrops and wet snow/sleet,was developed using the 2DVD measurements.The HCA is based on the difference between the fall velocity from the predetermined V–D relationship for a given diameter and that of particles captured by 2DVD.For the classification of raindrops,AT73 was applied,and wet snow/sleet was classified using the threshold value of the averaged difference of fall velocities.

    The fall velocities of dendrite and plate were narrowly ranged between 0.6 and 1.3 m s?1and slowly increased with increasing diameter due to the aerodynamic effects caused by their low density and flat shapes.Note that the diameter range of dendrite(0.0–4.0 mm)was twice as large as that of plate(0.0–2.0 mm),whereas both snowflakes had a similar fall velocity.It is considered that,in this study,dendrite grew under aggregation and deposition regimes.In addition,the fall velocities of needle and graupel were distributed within a range of 0.6–2.2 m s?1,and had a larger range than those of dendrite and plate.The coefficient and exponent of both needle and graupel were larger than those of dendrite;that is, the fall velocity of needle and graupel increased more rapidly with increasing diameter than that of dendrite,due to growth under riming regimes.

    The derived V–D relationships were adjusted with respect to the reference height(1013 hPa)and,then,compared with the V–D relationships in BS.The fall velocities of both dendrite and plate in this study were consistently smaller than those of BS over the whole diameter range;for needle and graupel,the fall velocities in this study increased more rapidly with increasing diameter than those of BS.It is considered that instrumental and geographical differences may have caused the discrepancy of the V–D relationships between the two studies.

    We then calculated the averaged difference between the fallvelocities,whichwerecalculatedusingempiricalV–Drelationships and observed 2DVD measurements according to hydrometeortype.The averageddifferencesof the fall velocities accordingto hydrometeortypewereusedtodiscriminate wet snow/sleet from other hydrometeortypes.The HCA was applied to alternating transition cases of snow and rain.It was found that the fall velocity of wet snow/sleet varied significantly according to the ratio of air and water in particles. Therefore,it is impossible to determine an optimal,single V–D relationship for wet snow/sleet that can be discriminated from other hydrometeor types,based on the minimum average difference(fj)between the fall velocity derived from the V–D relationship and the fall velocity measurements.In this study,a threshold value of fj,0.6,was used to identify wet snow/sleet.

    We then evaluated the performance of the HCA using the skill scores from a 3×3 contingency table.The CSI for raindrops(0.89)and snow(0.71)was larger than that for wet snow/sleet(0.61).However,the FAR for wet snow/sleet (0.35)was larger than both rain(0.03)and snow(0.00).The V–D relationship of needle was located between that of den-drite and graupel,and the POD and CSI(0.67 and 0.67)of needle were smaller than those(1.00 and 1.00)of both dendrite and plate due to fluctuationsin the fall velocitybased on the degree of riming of needle.The CSI of needle(0.5)was the smallest.

    Table 4.Skill scores for rain,wet snow,and snow precipitation types.

    Table 5.Skill scores for dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel snowflake types.

    Yuteret al.(2006)suggestedaclassification algorithmfor precipitation particles based on the fall velocity and diameter of particles.However,this algorithm can only distinguish snow from rain and mixed rain using a two-dimensional frequencydistribution,whichisnotsuitableforsnowflaketypes. In contrast,our HCA is able to classify hydrometeorsinto six different types of precipitation:rain,wet snow/sleet,and the snowflake types of dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel.

    ThederivedV–Drelationshipsinthisstudycanbeusedas a reference relationship for snowfall events over the Korean peninsula and,in addition,the HCA can be utilized for future studies related to snowfall estimation and V–D relationships. However,it is considered that the classification of precipitation particles needs to be further categorized by taking into consideration the growth regime of precipitation particles.In addition,our HCA could be further improved by considering surface temperature,or by using the vertical profile of temperature from a model.

    Acknowledgements.The efforts of You Yu MAO and Y.R CHEN at the NCU in Taipei in setting up and maintaining the2DVD are gratefully acknowledged.The hard work of junior scientists Kwang-Deuk AHN and Yo-Han CHO at the National Institute of Meteorological Research and Young-A OH,Su-Hyang LEE,and Jun-Youn JUNG during the collection of high-quality field data is greatly appreciated.This work was funded by the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under Grant KMIPA2015-1010.

    REFERENCES

    Amemoya,Y.,1997:Generalization of the TLS approach in the errors-in-variables problem.Proc.the Second International Workshop on Recent Advances in Total Least Squares Techniques and Errors-in-Variables Modeling,S.Van Huffel,Ed., SISM,77–86.

    Atlas,D.,Srivastava,R.C.and Sekhon,R.S.,1973:Doppler radar characteristicsof precipitation at vertical incidence.Rev.Geophys.Space Phys.,11,1–35.

    Baker,B.,and Coauthors,2012:How well are we measuring snow?The NOAA/FAA/NCAR winter precipitation test bed. Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc.,93,811–829.

    Barthazy,E.,and R.Schefold,2006:Fall velocity of snowflakes of different riming degree and crystal types.Atmospheric Research,82,391–398.

    Brandes,E.A.,K.Ikeda,G.Thompson,and M.Sch¨onhuber,2008: Aggregate terminal velocity/temperature relations.J.Appl. Meteor.Climatol.,47,2729–2736.

    Fujiyoshi,Y.,T.Endoh,T.Yamada,K.Tsuboki,Y.Tachibana,and G.Wakahama,1990:Determination of a Z-R relationship for snowfall using a radar and high sensitivity snow gauges.J. Appl.Meteor.,29,147–152.

    Garrett,T.J.,and S.E.Yuter,2014:Observed influence of riming, temperature,and turbulence on the fallspeed of solid precipitation.Geophys.Res.Lett.,41,6515–6522.

    Grazioli,J.,D.Tuia,S.Monhart,M.Schneebeli,T.Raupach, and A.Berne,2014:Hydrometeor classification from twodimensional video disdrometer data.Atmos.Meas.Tech.,7, 2869–2882.

    Hansch,M.,1999:Fall velocity and shape of snowflakes.Ph.D. thesis,Swiss Federal Institute of Technology,117 pp.

    Huang,G.-J.,V.N.Bringi,R.Cifelli,D.Hudak,and W.A.Petersen,2010:A methodology to derive radar reflectivityliquid equivalent snow rate relations using C-Band radar and a 2D video disdrometer.J.Atmos.Oceanic Technol.,27,637–651.

    Kruger,A.,and W.F.Krajewski,2002:Two-dimensional video disdrometer:A description.J.Atmos.Oceanic Technol.,19, 602–617.

    Langleben,M.P.,1954:The terminal velocity of snowflakes. Quart.J.Roy.Meteor.Soc.,80,174–181.

    Lim,S.,V.Chandrasekar,and V.N.Bringi,2005:Hydrometeor classification system using dual-polarization radar measurements:Model improvements and in situ verification.IEEE Trans.Geosci.Remote Sens.,43,792–801.

    Liu,H.P.,and V.Chandrasekar,2000:Classification of hydrometeors based on polarimetric radar measurements:Development of fuzzy logic and neuro-fuzzy systems,and in situ verification.J.Atmos.Oceanic Technol.,17,140–164.

    Locatelli,J.D.,and P.V.Hobbs,1974:Fall speeds and masses of solid precipitation particles.J.Geophys.Res.,79,2185–2197.

    Matrosov,S.Y.,1992:Radar reflectivity in snowfall.IEEE Trans. Geosci.Remote Sens.,30,454–461.

    Matrosov,S.Y.,1998:A dual-wavelength radar method to measure snowfall rate.J.Appl.Meteor.,37,1510–1521.

    Moisseev,D.,E.Saltikoff,and M.Leskinen,2009:Dualpolarization weather radar observations of snow growth processes.34th Conference on Radar Meteorology,Williamsburg,VA,Amer.Meteor.Soc.,13B.2.

    Nitu,R.,2013:Cold as SPICE.Meteorological Technology International,148–150.

    Park,H.S.,A.V.Ryzhkov,D.S.Zrni′c and K.-E.Kim,2009: The hydrometeor classification algorithm for the polarimetric WSR-88D:Description and application to an MCS.Wea. Forecasting,24,730–748.

    Rasmussen,R.,M.Dixon,S.Vasiloff,F.Hage,S.Knight,J. Vivekanandan,and M.Xu,2003:Snow nowcasting using a real-time correlation of radar reflectivity with snow gauge accumulation.J.Appl.Meteor.,42,20–36.

    Roebber,P.J.,S.L.Bruening,D.M.Schultz,and J.V.Cortinas Jr.,2003:Improving snowfall forecasting by diagnosing snow density.Wea.Forecasting,18,264–287.

    Schonhuber,M.,Lammer,G.,and Randeu,W.L.,2008:The 2DVideo-Distrometer.Precipitation:Advances in Measurement, Estimation,and Prediction,S.Michaelides,Ed.Springer,3–31.

    Sheppard,B.E.,and P.I.Joe,2000:Automated precipitation detection and typing in winter:A two-year study.J.Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,17,1493–1507.

    Thurai,M.,D.Hudak,V.N.Bringi,G.W.Lee,and B.Sheppard, 2007:Cold rain event analysis using 2-D video disdrometer,C-band polarimetric radar,X-band vertically-pointing radar and POSS.Preprints,33rd Conf.on Radar Meteorology,Cairns,Australia,Amer.Meteor.Soc.,P10.5.[Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/123455.pdf.]

    Vivekanandan,J.,S.Ellis,D.Oye,D.S.Zrnic,A.V.Ryzhkov, and J.Straka,1999:Cloud microphysics retrieval using S-band dual-polarization radar measurements.Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc.,80,381–388.

    Wilks,D.,2006:Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, 2nd ed.,Academic,Burlington,Mass,627 pp.

    Yuter,S.E.,D.E.Kingsmill,L.B.Nance,and M.Loffler-Mang, 2006:Observations of precipitation size and fall speed characteristics within coexisting rain and wet snow.J.Appl.Meteor.Climatol.,45,1450–1464.

    Zawadzki,I.,E.Jung,and G.Lee,2010:Snow Studies.Part I:A study of natural variability of snow terminal velocity.J.Atmos.Sci.,67,1591–1604.

    :Lee,J.-E.,S.-H.Jung,H.-M.Park,S.Kwon,P.-L.Lin,and G.-W.Lee,2015:Classification of precipitation types using fall velocity–diameter relationships from 2D-video distrometer measurements.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,32(9),1277–1290,

    10.1007/s00376-015-4234-4.

    26 October 2014;revised 1 March 2015;accepted 26 March 2015)

    ?Corresponding author:GyuWon LEE

    Email:gyuwon@knu.ac.kr

    猜你喜歡
    精確性數(shù)據(jù)處理實(shí)效性
    認(rèn)知診斷缺失數(shù)據(jù)處理方法的比較:零替換、多重插補(bǔ)與極大似然估計(jì)法*
    小學(xué)德育工作實(shí)效性的提高
    甘肅教育(2021年12期)2021-11-02 06:29:38
    ILWT-EEMD數(shù)據(jù)處理的ELM滾動(dòng)軸承故障診斷
    怎樣增強(qiáng)人大專題詢問的實(shí)效性
    數(shù)字有形狀嗎?數(shù)字信息精確性和品牌標(biāo)識(shí)形狀的匹配效應(yīng)*
    陣列式煙氣流量測(cè)量裝置在脫硫CEMS中的應(yīng)用
    提高初中歷史教學(xué)的實(shí)效性
    基于希爾伯特- 黃變換的去噪法在外測(cè)數(shù)據(jù)處理中的應(yīng)用
    測(cè)量工程的質(zhì)量控制分析
    協(xié)商民主的實(shí)效性
    日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚州av有码| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 少妇的逼水好多| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲国产av新网站| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 中国国产av一级| 久久久久精品性色| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产色婷婷99| 午夜视频国产福利| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 91精品国产九色| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 欧美潮喷喷水| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产黄片美女视频| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 日本黄大片高清| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 免费少妇av软件| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 熟女av电影| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 欧美性感艳星| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 成人二区视频| av福利片在线观看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产91av在线免费观看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 一级毛片我不卡| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产av不卡久久| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲精品视频女| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| av在线播放精品| 香蕉精品网在线| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 午夜免费鲁丝| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 国产精品国产av在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 久热这里只有精品99| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久热精品热| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 中文字幕制服av| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 免费av毛片视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 插逼视频在线观看| 少妇的逼好多水| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 欧美人与善性xxx| av免费观看日本| av卡一久久| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 色综合色国产| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产乱来视频区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 欧美激情在线99| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 在线a可以看的网站| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产色婷婷99| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 一级a做视频免费观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| kizo精华| 亚洲av男天堂| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲无线观看免费| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 禁无遮挡网站| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 免费看日本二区| 国产黄片美女视频| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 一本久久精品| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 美女主播在线视频| 在现免费观看毛片| 搞女人的毛片| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产精品.久久久| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲综合精品二区| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 日本欧美国产在线视频| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲图色成人| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| av在线播放精品| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲av男天堂| 免费看日本二区| 免费观看在线日韩| 免费观看性生交大片5| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 日韩欧美精品v在线| videossex国产| 看黄色毛片网站| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 九草在线视频观看| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产在视频线精品| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产 精品1| 免费看光身美女| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 少妇 在线观看| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 一本一本综合久久| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 一级片'在线观看视频| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 在线播放无遮挡| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产老妇女一区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 六月丁香七月| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产男女内射视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 视频区图区小说| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 在线观看国产h片| videos熟女内射| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| av在线app专区| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲综合精品二区| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 日本色播在线视频| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产精品.久久久| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 在线观看三级黄色| av在线app专区| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 亚洲国产色片| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 99久久人妻综合| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产成人精品福利久久| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 成人二区视频| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| av在线蜜桃| 国产av国产精品国产| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 五月天丁香电影| 搞女人的毛片| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 婷婷色综合www| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产 一区精品| 欧美成人a在线观看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| freevideosex欧美| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 成年av动漫网址| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 亚洲最大成人中文| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产在线男女| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产男女内射视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 美女主播在线视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 精品人妻视频免费看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产极品天堂在线| 三级国产精品片| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 午夜福利高清视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 两个人的视频大全免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产 精品1| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产乱来视频区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 成年av动漫网址| 少妇人妻 视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 国产 精品1| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 午夜免费鲁丝| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国内精品宾馆在线| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产 精品1| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 少妇 在线观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 视频区图区小说| 亚洲不卡免费看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| www.色视频.com| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲av.av天堂| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产毛片在线视频| 日韩强制内射视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| av福利片在线观看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| av免费在线看不卡| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产av不卡久久| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 有码 亚洲区| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产 一区精品| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲精品视频女| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲国产av新网站| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频 | 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲在久久综合| 午夜免费鲁丝| 熟女电影av网| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 久久久成人免费电影| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| av在线天堂中文字幕| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 黄色配什么色好看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 22中文网久久字幕| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产在视频线精品| 男人舔奶头视频| 中文字幕制服av| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 午夜福利视频精品| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 欧美日本视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 午夜视频国产福利| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 久久久成人免费电影| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 视频区图区小说| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 中国三级夫妇交换| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 直男gayav资源| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 一级a做视频免费观看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 成年av动漫网址| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲自拍偷在线| tube8黄色片| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 午夜视频国产福利| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 精品久久久久久久久av| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 午夜免费鲁丝| 18+在线观看网站| 精品一区在线观看国产| 91精品国产九色| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 日韩中字成人| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 日韩电影二区| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 99热这里只有精品一区| 99热网站在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 久久久久国产网址| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 久久99热6这里只有精品| av在线观看视频网站免费| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 插逼视频在线观看| 成人二区视频| 有码 亚洲区| av福利片在线观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 久久久久网色| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 天堂网av新在线| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 综合色丁香网| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 高清av免费在线| av福利片在线观看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 少妇高潮的动态图| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 一级毛片 在线播放| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 中国三级夫妇交换| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 成人特级av手机在线观看| av福利片在线观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 日韩av免费高清视频| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 性色av一级| 九色成人免费人妻av| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 日本免费在线观看一区| 91精品国产九色|