• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Classification of Precipitation Types Using Fall Velocity–Diameter Relationships from 2D-Video Distrometer Measurements

    2015-06-09 21:30:01JeongEunLEESungHwaJUNGHongMokPARKSoohyunKWONPayLiamLINandGyuWonLEE
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2015年9期
    關(guān)鍵詞:精確性數(shù)據(jù)處理實(shí)效性

    Jeong-Eun LEE,Sung-Hwa JUNG,,Hong-Mok PARK,Soohyun KWON, Pay-Liam LIN,and GyuWon LEE?,

    1Department of Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences,Research and Training Team for Future Creative Astrophysicists and Cosmologists,Kyungpook National University,Korea

    2Center for Atmospheric Remote Sensing,Kyungpook National University,Korea

    3Departmentof Atmospheric Sciences,NCU,Taipei

    Classification of Precipitation Types Using Fall Velocity–Diameter Relationships from 2D-Video Distrometer Measurements

    Jeong-Eun LEE1,Sung-Hwa JUNG1,2,Hong-Mok PARK2,Soohyun KWON1, Pay-Liam LIN3,and GyuWon LEE?1,2

    1Department of Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences,Research and Training Team for Future Creative Astrophysicists and Cosmologists,Kyungpook National University,Korea

    2Center for Atmospheric Remote Sensing,Kyungpook National University,Korea

    3Departmentof Atmospheric Sciences,NCU,Taipei

    Fall velocity–diameter relationships for four different snowflake types(dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel)were investigated in northeastern South Korea,and a new algorithm for classifying hydrometeors is proposed for distrometric measurements based on the new relationships.Falling ice crystals(approximately 40 000 particles)were measured with a two-dimensional video disdrometer(2DVD)during a winter experiment from 15 January to 9 April 2010.The fall velocity–diameter relationships were derived for the four types of snowflakes based on manual classification by experts using snow photos and 2DVD measurements:the coefficients(exponents)for different snowflake types were 0.82(0.24)for dendrite, 0.74(0.35)for plate,1.03(0.71)for needle,and 1.30(0.94)for graupel,respectively.These new relationships established in the present study(PS)were compared with those from two previous studies.Hydrometeor types were classified with the derived fall velocity–diameter relationships,and the classification algorithm was evaluated using 3×3 contingency tables for one rain–snow transition event and three snowfall events.The algorithm showed good performance for the transition event: the critical success indices(CSIs)were 0.89,0.61 and 0.71 for snow,wet-snow and rain,respectively.For snow events, the algorithm performance for dendrite and plate(CSIs=1.0 and 1.0,respectively)was better than for needle and graupel (CSIs=0.67 and 0.50,respectively).

    snowflake types,wet snow,fall velocity–diameter,hydrometeor type classification,2DVD

    1.Introduction

    Snowfall can cause damage to life and property during winter.However,the accurate measurement and prediction of ground snowfall is difficult due to wind-driven horizontal movement of snowflakes,and to the large variability in particle density as a function of the vertical structure of humidity (degree of supersaturation)and air temperature(Roebber et al.,2003;Baker et al.,2012;Nitu,2013).To accurately estimate the amount of snowfall on the ground,previous studies have been carried out using radar measurements with high spatial and temporal resolutions(e.g.Fujiyoshi et al.,1990; Matrosov,1992,1998;Huang et al.,2010).However,it is evident that the accuracy of radar-based snowfall estimations is mainly affected by the radarmeasurementheight,wind shear, and radar reflectivity–snowfall rate relationships(Z–S relationships),which depend on the size,shape,fall velocity and density of the snowflakes(Fujiyoshi et al.,1990;Matrosov, 1992,1998;Rasmussen et al.,2003).The fall velocity of snowflakes plays a particularly significant role in governing the trail of snowfall,and in representing the density of snow and microphysical processes.Therefore,research on the relationship between the size and fall velocity of snowflakes is essential for the accurate estimation of snowfall amount.

    Langleben(1954)suggested that melting or riming processes were the main causes of an increase in snowflake fall velocity,and derived fall velocity–diameterrelationships(V–D relationship)according to snowflake types.Hansch(1999) investigated variables governing fall velocity(e.g.,vertical size,area of perpendicular circumscribed circle,and the area ratio between the cross-sectional area and the circumscribed ellipse area)based on a theoretical approach,and conducted experiments using 2D Video Disdrometer(2DVD)measure-ments;thestudysuggestedvariousV–Drelationshipsaccording to snowflake type and degree of riming.It is of note that the variability of coefficients in V–D relationships is greater for the degree of riming than for snowflake types.

    Barthazy and Schefold(2006)(BS hereafter)presented power-law and exponential V–D relationships for various snowflake types according to the degree of riming(classes 0–5),which is proportional to the coverage ratio of a droplet on a snowflake’s surface,using a Hydrometeor Velocity and ShapeDetector(HVSD).Intheirstudy,theV–Drelationships were relatively independent of the degree of riming in weak riming stages(classes 1–3),whereas the relationships varied significantly with the degreeof rimingin heavy riming stages (classes 3–5).Zawadzki et al.(2010)investigated the variability and uncertainties in snowfall velocity measurements that occurred when using an HVSD,such as instrument uncertainty in the fall velocity measurement,the effect of wobbling snowflakes on the accuracy of velocity measurements, and naturalvariabilityin the homogeneoussnow terminal fall velocity.They also analyzed the correlations of the coefficients of V–D relationships with surface temperature,the temperature at echo top,and vertical depth of the precipitation system,all of which were derived using aircraft soundings and a vertically pointing X-band radar.

    Yuter et al.(2006)used the Particle Size and Velocity(PARSIVEL)to present various two-dimensional distributions between the size and fall velocity of rain,mixedphase precipitation(rain and wet snow),and dry snow,and suggested a classification technique for mixed precipitation. Sheppard and Joe(2000)compared automatic measurements from various sensors[Vaisala FD12P,HSS Model 402B, WeatherIdentifierandVisibilitySensor(WIVis),andthePrecipitation Occurrence Sensor System(POSS)]with manned observations,and then presented the limitations of each sensor.Grazioli et al.(2014)developedthe hydrometeorclassif ication method using 2DVD measurements based on the support vector machine method.In addition,dual-polarization weather radar has been recently used to classify hydrometeor types(e.g.Vivekanandan et al.,1999;Liu and Chandrasekar, 2000;Lim et al.,2005;Park et al.,2009).The hydrometeor classification algorithm utilizes a fuzzy logic approach to combine feature parameters by employing polarimetric radar measurements(horizontal reflectivity,differential reflectivity,differential propagation phase shift,correlation coef ficient,and linear depolarization ratio),and then classi fies various hydrometeor types(such as drizzle,rain,dry snow, wet snow,hailstone,graupel).Furthermore,Moisseev et al. (2009)showed that dual-polarization radar is a useful tool for identifying the growth processes of snowflakes,such as aggregation,riming,and deposition.

    This study aims to derive new V–D relationships according to snowflake types in Korea,and to develop a new hydrometeor classification algorithm based on the derived relationships using 2DVD measurements.The paper is presented as follows:2DVD measurements and snowflake photographs used in this study are described in section 2.The quality control process of the 2DVD measurements,and the procedures used to derive the V–D relationships and to develop the hydrometeor classification algorithm are explained in section 3. Insection4,thenew V–Drelationshipsarecomparedwith results fromthepreviousstudies ofBS andLocatelliandHobbs (1974)(LH hereafter),and the Hydrometeor Classification Algorithm(HCA)is evaluated.Section 5 then summarizes the processes and results of this study.

    2.Data

    2DVD data and close-up pictures of snowflakes collected at the Cloud Physical Observation Station[CPOS,(37?41′N, 128?45′E),842 m MSL]from 15 January to 9 April 2010 were analyzed.2DVD instruments provided various details of precipitation particles(e.g.,fall velocity,equivalent volume spherical diameter,major and minor axes,and canting angle)using two light sheets(with widths of 10 cm containing 512 pixels each)that are transmitted from two orthogonal light sources to the line scan cameras(which can capture the shadows of a particle)on a horizontal plane(see Fig.1).The two light sheets were placed at a vertical distance of 6.2 mm from each other,creating a virtual measuring area of 10 cm ×10 cm.The captured images then entered the image processingprocedureofthe2DVD,whichintegratesinformation received from each line-scan camera in relation to the particles.The fall velocity and equivalent volume spherical diameter were then estimated for particles that fell into the virtual measuring area only(Kruger and Krajewski,2002;Schonhuber et al.,2008).

    Snowflakes were photographed using a high-resolution digital camera system every 10 min after collection,by means of a rectangular-shaped collection plate with a size of 21.0 cm×29.7 cm(623.7 cm2)that was covered with black velvet to alleviate particle breaking(Fig.2).This plate was exposed to snowfall for approximately 2–5 s,depending on the snowfall intensity.The snowflakes that collected on the plate were then moved into a dark room,where the intensity of illumination was steadily maintained,and the temperature was maintained close to that of the temperature outdoors,to avoid melting the snowflakes.Snowflake photographs were taken using a Nikon D80 Digital Single Lens Reflector camera with a high resolutionof 3872×2592pixels,a fixed focal length of 60 mm,an exposure time of 1/30 s,and a focallength-aperture ratio of F3.8(Fig.2).

    To derive the V–D relationships for the various types of snow particles,the 2DVD measurements were classified into four different snowflake types(dendrite,plate,needle, and graupel),based on the dominant snowflakes present after photo-interpretation(Figs.2c–f),as determined by experts analyzing the silhouettes of snowflakes on the x–z or y–z planeofthe 2DVD.Anyambiguousand/ormixed-phased events were excluded(Fig.2b)from the dataset.If one of the snowflake types accounted for more than at least 70%of all snowflake types in the photograph,it was determined to be the dominant snowflake type.Therefore,even if it is possible to roughly identify the snowflake type using photographs taken of large collections of snowflakes,habit identification is effective.However,sucha meansofidentificationhaslimitations because each size of snowflake and its velocitycannot be determined.

    The periods during which the 2DVD measurements were obtained to derive the V–D relationship for each type of snowflake is listed in Table 1.The number of each snowflake type counted was 2754 for dendrite,824 for plate,23 584 for needle,and 6698 for graupel.In addition,to evaluate the HCA,a rain–snowtransition event(9 February2010)andthree snow events(12 February,15 February,and 4 March 2010)were used(Table 2).

    3.Methodology

    3.1.Quality control of 2DVD data

    The quality control procedure used in relation to 2DVD data consisted of two steps.The first step employed 2DVD software to remove mismatched particles caused by contamination,such as the overlap of snow particles in the line of sight and particles crossing the virtual measuring area,in addition to the aerodynamics effects related to the 2DVD,tumbling snowflakes,and side views of snowflakes that were significantly different(particularlyneedle-type).This used individual information related to particles captured by the upper and lower line-scan cameras(Hansch,1999;Krugerand Krajewski,2002;Huang et al.,2010).The following particles were eliminated by quality control:fall velocity>4 m s?1or diameter<0.2 mm.In addition,particles that were shown to have significantly different areas in the images taken between one camera and another were eliminated.This quality control may eliminate particles that have very different areas from two cameras,although real snow particles can exhibit different shapes from different view angles.However,these particles may lead to significant errors in the velocity measurements.

    In BS,the V–D relationships for four snowflake types (dendrite,plate,needle,and irregular crystals including graupel)were derived based on the degree of riming obtained by using the HVSD at different altitudes.In the present study (PS),the diameter of the precipitation particles was defined as the equivalent diameter of particles as captured by the two line cameras in the 2DVD instruments,whereas the maximum diameter of precipitation particles captured by two parallel beams from HVSD was used in BS.Therefore,the difference in the diameter definitions gives rise to some differences between PS and BS.

    To derive accurate V–D relationships,minor types of snowflakeswereremovedfromtheraw2DVDdata.Themost probable velocity and its standard deviation(σ)were calculated with a diameter interval of 0.2 mm,and any particles that crossed±σfrom the most probable velocity were then removed.Figure 3 shows an example of the quality control used for the 2DVD measurements obtained from 1618 UTC to 1623 UTC 15 February 2010.The scatter plot between the fall velocity and diameter of raw 2DVD measurements is described in Fig.3a,and Fig.3b shows the distribution after removing mismatched and ambiguous particles.In this example,mismatched particles were mostly distributed at diameters of less than 1.0 mm,and minor types of snowflakes were then removed using a threshold of one standard deviation from the most probable velocity(Fig.3c).

    For a rainfall event,particles that were beyond the followingrangewereidentifiedas mismatchedparticles(Kruger and Krajewski,2002)and thus removed:

    whereVmeasured(units:m s?1)is the velocitymeasured by the 2DVD,andVAindicates the calculated velocityfromthe V–D relationship(V=9.65?10.3e?0.6D)for raindrops(Atlas et al.,1973,hereafter AT73).

    3.2.Derivation of V–D relationships

    The V–D relationships for various snowflake types were derived by the power-law regression as follows:

    where a and b are coefficients,and D and V(D)represent the diameter(mm)and the fall velocity(m s?1),respectively. Since power-law relationships are simple and useful in determining the analytic solution of a model(e.g.for Dopplerspectra calculations),they are mostly used to derive the V–D relationship for snow particles(Langleben,1954;Hansch, 1999;Zawadzki et al.,2010).In this study,the V–D relationships were derived using the weighted total least squares (WTLS)fitting method(Amemoya,1997)rather than the ordinary least squares fitting method,as the WTLS method is able to minimize both uncertainties in the diameter,as well as in the fall velocity of 2DVD measurements,unlike the ordinary least squares fit.

    3.3.Algorithm for hydrometeor classification

    The proposed HCA classifies the hydrometeor into six particle types(rain,wet snow/sleet,and the snowflake types of dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel),based on the AT73 relationship for raindrops and the newly proposed relationships for four different types of snowflakes.To classify the hydrometeor types,the HCA utilizes the difference between the velocity[Vj(Dobs,i)]from empirical relationships and the measured velocity(Vobs,i)from the 2DVD as follows:

    where Dobs,iand Vobs,iare the diameter and velocity of each particle measured by 2DVD within a given time window (e.g.,5 min);j indicates the hydrometeor type(rain,or the snowflake types of dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel);and N is the total number of particles.Thus,five fjare calculated for a time window of 5 min.

    Figure 4 shows a flow chart of the HCA.The theoretical fall velocity[Vj(Dobs,i)]at a given diameter was firstly calculated from the V–D relationships for each hydrometeor type. The averaged absolute value(fj)of the difference between the theoretical fall velocity from the V–D relationship and the measured velocity from the 2DVD were then calculated using Eq.(3).When the minimum value(fj,min)among the calculated fjwas less than the threshold(fthreshold),the subscript j was finally identified as one of the hydrometeortypes (e.g.,rain,or the snowflake types of dendrite,plate,needle, or graupel);otherwise,it was classified as wet snow/sleet.

    4.Results

    4.1.V–D relationships of snowflake types

    Figure 5 shows the two-dimensional normalized frequency distribution between the fall velocity and diameter in the 2DVDmeasurements,according to the type ofsnowflakes based on photo-interpretation by human experts.Class intervals for the diameter and fall velocity were 0.1 mm and 0.1 m s?1,respectively.The solid line shown in Fig.5 represents the V–Drelationship fitted by the WTLS method.The fall velocities of both dendrite and plate are distributed in the range from 0.6 to 1.3 m s?1.The diameter of dendrite has a rangefrom 0.0 to 4.0 mm,with a relatively high frequency at diameters<1.5 mm(Fig.5a),whereas that of plate is confined to less than around 2.0 mm.The exponents and coefficients in the V–D relationship are 0.82 and 0.24 for dendrite,and 0.74 and 0.35 for plate,respectively.However,their fall velocities tend to remain almost constant(between 0.6 and 1.3 m s?1),with a small exponent(<0.4)and coefficient(<1.0), due to their low densities and flat-snowflake shapes.The exponent of dendrite is particularly small,which indicates that the growth of dendrite was by aggregation and deposition, causing an increase in size but no significant change in density.

    The diametersof needleandgraupelrangefrom0.0to 4.0 mm,and are mostly concentratedat diameters under 1.5 mm; the range of their fall velocities(0.6–2.2m s?1)is wider than that of dendrite and plate(0.6–1.3 m s?1).While the diameter ranges of both needle and graupel are similar to that of dendrite,their fall velocities increase more rapidly than that of dendrite,with increasing diameters.This indicates that the needle-typeparticles developedundera rimingregime,as the rimingprocess usuallycausesthe fall velocityto increasesignificantly.Furthermore,weak aggregated or rimed needles were frequently observed during the photo-interpretation in thefield(Fig.2e).Inaddition,the graupel-typeparticleswere a result of significant riming,which caused such a change in the originalshape of the snowflake that it was no longer identifiable.Therefore,the coefficients and exponents of both the needle(1.03and0.71,respectively)andthe graupel(1.30and 0.94,respectively)in the V–D relationships were larger than those of both the dendrite and plate.

    The averaged difference(fj)between fall velocities calculated from the V–D relationship and 2DVD measurements was calculatedbyEq.(3),accordingto thehydrometeortype. The value of fjfor dendrite,plate,needle and graupel were 0.10,0.05,0.21 and 0.18 m s?1,respectively.In addition,the value of fjfor raindrop(0.41)was calculated by comparing with the V–D relationship(AT73)for rainfall events occurring g on 8 February 2010(not shown).

    4.2.Comparison with previous studies

    For a comparison of the V–D relationships between PS and BS,the fall velocities in the V–D relationships were converted into at mean sea level(MSL)(1013 hPa)using Eq. (4),which requires consideration of the effect of air density changes due to differences in observing altitudes(Brandes et al.,2008):

    whereVobsandV1013,expressedin m s?1,indicate the fall velocity of each snowflake at observational altitude and MSL, respectively;ρ1013(1.225 kg m?3)andρobs(1.112 kg m?2) refer to the density of air at 1013 hPa and at an observational altitude(842 m MSL),where the air density is linearly in-terpolated in the vertical direction based on the air density profile of the standard atmosphere.In BS,the fall velocity of snowflakes was measured at an altitude of 1604 m MSL and aρobscorresponding to 1.048 kg m?3.

    Table 3 and Fig.6 illustrate the V–D relationships corresponding to snowflake types in PS(solid lines)and BS (dashed lines),both after and before applying a height reduction to obtain values corresponding to those at MSL,and in LH(dashed lines).The results of LH are mostly used as a reference in the community,although in their study the authors did not report temperatures and the pressure conditions whenmeasuringthe fall velocity.Thedifferencein the observational height between PS and BS does not cause a differenceinthevalueoftheexponentsbetweenV–Drelationships. Four types of snowflakes show similar trends in terms of the V–D relationships.In PS and BS,the V–D relationship for dendrite(graupel)is gentlest(steepest).Thecoefficientofthe adjusted V–D relationship for dendrite in PS(0.79)is smaller than that in BS(0.91 for moderately rimed dendrite and 0.98 for densely rimed dendrite)and is close to that of LH(0.80 for unrimed dendrite and 0.79 for densely rimed dendrite),as shown in Table 3.The exponent for dendrite in PS(0.24)is equal to that for denselyrimed dendritein BS,and is between that of unrimed(0.16)and densely rimed dendrite(0.27)in LH.On the contrary,the coefficient for plate in PS(0.71)is smaller than that in BS(that for unrimed,moderately rimed, anddenselyrimedplateare0.94,1.12and1.26,respectively), and its exponent in PS(0.35)is between that of moderately rimed(0.26)and densely rimed plate(0.40)in BS.The coefficient for needle in PS(0.99)is between that for unrimed (0.90)and moderately rimed needle(1.17)in BS,and the exponent for needle in PS(0.71)is greater than that for densely rimed needle(0.35)in BS.Furthermore,the coefficient for graupel in PS is smaller(greater)than that for graupel in BS(LH),and its exponent in PS is greater than that in BS (0.61)and LH(range between 0.28 and 0.65).The temperature range for graupel is?1.2?C to?1.0?C in PS,whereas BS reported a temperature range of?5.0 to?1.0?C for the 15 cases.Assuming the temperature for graupel is colder in BS than in PS,the density of graupel would be higher in PS than in BS(Garrett and Yuter,2014),and thus the difference in power-law exponentsbetween PS and BS would be caused by the differences in temperature.

    Fortheentirerangesofdiameters,thefall velocityofdendrite and plate in PS is smaller than that of dendrite and plate in BS,as shown in Fig.6,and,in addition,the fall velocity of needle and graupel in PS is smaller than that of needle and graupel in BS,with a range in diameter of<approximately 1.5 mm.However,the fall velocity of needle and graupel in PS is greater than that of needle and graupel in BS,with a range in diameter of>1.5 mm,and the fall velocity increases more rapidly with increasing diameter than in BS.The V–D relationship of needle and graupel with increasing diameter in PS intersects that of needle and graupel in BS.

    4.3.Classification of hydrometeor types using the V–D relationship

    4.3.1.Rain–snow transition case

    The performance of the HCA was examined using a transition case(between rain and snow on 9 February 2010),as shown in Table 2.Equations(10)to(13),given in Table 3, were applied as the reference V–D relationship corresponding to the type of snowflake in the HCA,and AT73 was used as the reference V–D relationship for raindrops.

    The two-dimensional distribution between the fall velocity and diameter corresponding to the precipitation types in the 2DVD measurements was investigated(Fig.7)prior to a performance test of the HCA.The class intervals in the twodimensional normalized frequency distribution were 0.1 mmand 0.1 m s?1,as shown in Fig.7.The solid line refers to AT73,and the blue,red,purple and green dashed lines represent the V–D relationship for the snowflake types of dendrite, plate,needle and graupel,respectively,in this study.

    Table 3.Comparison of V–D relationships between this study and previous studies.

    Results show that,although AT73 was slightly higher than the measured fall velocity overthe entire diameterrange, the fallvelocity ofraindropsin 2DVDagreed wellwith AT73. In addition,the V–D relationship for raindrops increased remarkably as its diameterincreased(Fig.7a).In thisstudy,the fall velocity of snowflakes(needle)increased less remarkably than that of raindrops with increasing diameter,according to the V–Drelationship forneedle(Fig.7b).Forwetsnow/sleet, the fall velocity was widely distributed between the V–D relationships of raindrops and graupel(Fig.7c).The V–D relationship of considerably(relatively)melted small(large)ice crystals was particularly close to AT73(apart from the V–D relationship of graupel).Hence,an optimal V–D relationship for wet snow/sleet was impossible to derive,due to the large variation in fall velocity,which depends on the ratio between the water and ice contents in the precipitation particles.Thurai et al.(2007)found similar results,i.e.,that the fall velocity and diameter data from 2DVD deviated slightly from the Gunn–Kinzer(G–K)curve during a period of rain,while the fall velocities distributed below the G–K curve in the case of wet snow,and the fall velocities of dry snow were less than about 2.8 m s?1.

    In the HCA,wet snow/sleet can be classified based on the difference in the V–D relationships of raindrops and snowflakes.The value of fj,0.60,applied as a threshold, is larger than the maximum fj(0.41)among the values of fjfor the five hydrometeor types(raindrop,and the snowflake types of plate,dendrite,needle,and graupel)in the previous section.In other words,if the minimum fjis larger than 0.6, the event can be classified as a wet snow/sleet event.

    Figure 8 illustratesthe time seriesoffive fjs derived from the HCA and the final classification by applying the threshold value of 0.6 for the transition case of rain and snow on 9 February 2010.The reference classification of hydrometeor types based on photo-interpretation and 2DVDmeasurements by experts is presented in the upper part of Fig.8b.

    For a quantitative evaluation of the HCA’s performance, it is necessary to predetermine the reference classification by using the particle shape from 2DVD measurements and from the photo-interpretation by human experts.The hydrometeor types were classified into raindrop,wet snow/sleet,and snowflakes(dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel).The performance of the HCA was then evaluated using three skill scores(probability of detection,POD;false alarm ratio,FAR; critical success index,CSI)derived from the 3×3 contingency table for three categories(raindrop,wet snow/sleet, and snowflakes)(Wilks,2006,Fig.9).The symbol“O”implies the reference hydrometeor types determined by human experts,and“P”stands for the hydrometeor types classified with the HCA in Fig.9.Moreover,“r”–“z”represents thenumber of classifications for each type category;for example,“r”and“u”represent the number of rainfall events that are classified by the HCA correctly asraindrop events,and incorrectly as wet snow/sleet events,respectively.To derive the skill score for individual precipitation types,the 3×3 contingency table was reduced to 2×2(Fig.9),and the performance was then evaluated by using the score of the three skills(POD,FAR,and CSI),as follows:

    where e is the numberofwet snow/sleet events correctly classified by the HCA;f is the numberof othereventsincorrectly classified;and g is the numberofwet snow/sleet eventsincorrectly classified as other types by the HCA.

    The skill scores according to the type of precipitation are listed in Table 4.PODs for both raindrops and wet snow/sleet(0.90)are larger than that of snow(0.71).The low skill score for snow is due to the large variation in the fall velocity of snowflakes,and hence snowflakes with a large fall velocity are incorrectly identified as wet snow.The FAR of wet snow/sleet(0.35)is larger than that of rain(0.03)and snow(0.00).Precipitation types were mostly misclassified during transition periods(e.g.,snow to wet snow/sleet,wetsnow/sleet to rain,etc.),due to the large variations in velocities during transitions.The CSI of wet snow/sleet(0.61)is smaller than that of rain(0.89)and snow(0.71).

    4.3.2.Snowfall case

    The performance of the HCA for four snowflake types (dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel)was evaluated by comparing with photo-interpretation by human experts using the snowfall cases(cases 2–4)listed in Table 2.Representative examples are shown in Fig.10.

    The skill scores for four snowflake types are listed in Table 5.POD,FAR,and CSI for dendrite were 1.00,0.00, and 1.00,respectively,and for plate were 1.00,0.00,and 1.00,respectively.All the dendrite and plate of snowflakes were,therefore,correctly classified.The POD,FAR,and CSI for needle were 0.67,0.00,and 0.67,respectively.CSI and POD of needle were relatively smaller than those of dendrite and plate because the coefficient and exponent values of the V–D relationship for needle were between those of graupel and dendrite,and because the fall velocity of needle may strongly depend on the degree of riming under different growth regimes.The POD of graupel was 1.00,and its CSI was smaller than that of the other snowflake types due to its high FAR(0.50).The misclassification of needle to graupel in the HCA results with a high value of FAR is considered to have occurred because the fall velocity of densely rimed needle may be similar to that of graupel.

    5.Summary and conclusion

    The V–D relationships by snowflake type were derived, and the HCA was developedusing snow particle photographs taken at intervals of 10 minutes and 2DVD measurements at CPOS from 9 January to 9 April 2010.

    在大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代下,數(shù)據(jù)激增對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)處理的精確性和實(shí)效性等都提出了更高的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),新型電網(wǎng)規(guī)劃體系獲取數(shù)據(jù)的主要方法是結(jié)合無人機(jī)、衛(wèi)星遙感等先進(jìn)的技術(shù)來獲取數(shù)據(jù)。無人機(jī)、衛(wèi)星遙感等技術(shù)的發(fā)展日

    Mismatched and/or minor-type particles were removed during the quality control procedure.The V–D relationships for four snowflake types(dendrite,plate,needle and graupel) were derived from 2DVD measurements based on photointerpretations by human experts.Finally,a classification algorithm for six precipitation particles,including raindrops and wet snow/sleet,was developed using the 2DVD measurements.The HCA is based on the difference between the fall velocity from the predetermined V–D relationship for a given diameter and that of particles captured by 2DVD.For the classification of raindrops,AT73 was applied,and wet snow/sleet was classified using the threshold value of the averaged difference of fall velocities.

    The fall velocities of dendrite and plate were narrowly ranged between 0.6 and 1.3 m s?1and slowly increased with increasing diameter due to the aerodynamic effects caused by their low density and flat shapes.Note that the diameter range of dendrite(0.0–4.0 mm)was twice as large as that of plate(0.0–2.0 mm),whereas both snowflakes had a similar fall velocity.It is considered that,in this study,dendrite grew under aggregation and deposition regimes.In addition,the fall velocities of needle and graupel were distributed within a range of 0.6–2.2 m s?1,and had a larger range than those of dendrite and plate.The coefficient and exponent of both needle and graupel were larger than those of dendrite;that is, the fall velocity of needle and graupel increased more rapidly with increasing diameter than that of dendrite,due to growth under riming regimes.

    The derived V–D relationships were adjusted with respect to the reference height(1013 hPa)and,then,compared with the V–D relationships in BS.The fall velocities of both dendrite and plate in this study were consistently smaller than those of BS over the whole diameter range;for needle and graupel,the fall velocities in this study increased more rapidly with increasing diameter than those of BS.It is considered that instrumental and geographical differences may have caused the discrepancy of the V–D relationships between the two studies.

    We then calculated the averaged difference between the fallvelocities,whichwerecalculatedusingempiricalV–Drelationships and observed 2DVD measurements according to hydrometeortype.The averageddifferencesof the fall velocities accordingto hydrometeortypewereusedtodiscriminate wet snow/sleet from other hydrometeortypes.The HCA was applied to alternating transition cases of snow and rain.It was found that the fall velocity of wet snow/sleet varied significantly according to the ratio of air and water in particles. Therefore,it is impossible to determine an optimal,single V–D relationship for wet snow/sleet that can be discriminated from other hydrometeor types,based on the minimum average difference(fj)between the fall velocity derived from the V–D relationship and the fall velocity measurements.In this study,a threshold value of fj,0.6,was used to identify wet snow/sleet.

    We then evaluated the performance of the HCA using the skill scores from a 3×3 contingency table.The CSI for raindrops(0.89)and snow(0.71)was larger than that for wet snow/sleet(0.61).However,the FAR for wet snow/sleet (0.35)was larger than both rain(0.03)and snow(0.00).The V–D relationship of needle was located between that of den-drite and graupel,and the POD and CSI(0.67 and 0.67)of needle were smaller than those(1.00 and 1.00)of both dendrite and plate due to fluctuationsin the fall velocitybased on the degree of riming of needle.The CSI of needle(0.5)was the smallest.

    Table 4.Skill scores for rain,wet snow,and snow precipitation types.

    Table 5.Skill scores for dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel snowflake types.

    Yuteret al.(2006)suggestedaclassification algorithmfor precipitation particles based on the fall velocity and diameter of particles.However,this algorithm can only distinguish snow from rain and mixed rain using a two-dimensional frequencydistribution,whichisnotsuitableforsnowflaketypes. In contrast,our HCA is able to classify hydrometeorsinto six different types of precipitation:rain,wet snow/sleet,and the snowflake types of dendrite,plate,needle,and graupel.

    ThederivedV–Drelationshipsinthisstudycanbeusedas a reference relationship for snowfall events over the Korean peninsula and,in addition,the HCA can be utilized for future studies related to snowfall estimation and V–D relationships. However,it is considered that the classification of precipitation particles needs to be further categorized by taking into consideration the growth regime of precipitation particles.In addition,our HCA could be further improved by considering surface temperature,or by using the vertical profile of temperature from a model.

    Acknowledgements.The efforts of You Yu MAO and Y.R CHEN at the NCU in Taipei in setting up and maintaining the2DVD are gratefully acknowledged.The hard work of junior scientists Kwang-Deuk AHN and Yo-Han CHO at the National Institute of Meteorological Research and Young-A OH,Su-Hyang LEE,and Jun-Youn JUNG during the collection of high-quality field data is greatly appreciated.This work was funded by the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under Grant KMIPA2015-1010.

    REFERENCES

    Amemoya,Y.,1997:Generalization of the TLS approach in the errors-in-variables problem.Proc.the Second International Workshop on Recent Advances in Total Least Squares Techniques and Errors-in-Variables Modeling,S.Van Huffel,Ed., SISM,77–86.

    Atlas,D.,Srivastava,R.C.and Sekhon,R.S.,1973:Doppler radar characteristicsof precipitation at vertical incidence.Rev.Geophys.Space Phys.,11,1–35.

    Baker,B.,and Coauthors,2012:How well are we measuring snow?The NOAA/FAA/NCAR winter precipitation test bed. Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc.,93,811–829.

    Barthazy,E.,and R.Schefold,2006:Fall velocity of snowflakes of different riming degree and crystal types.Atmospheric Research,82,391–398.

    Brandes,E.A.,K.Ikeda,G.Thompson,and M.Sch¨onhuber,2008: Aggregate terminal velocity/temperature relations.J.Appl. Meteor.Climatol.,47,2729–2736.

    Fujiyoshi,Y.,T.Endoh,T.Yamada,K.Tsuboki,Y.Tachibana,and G.Wakahama,1990:Determination of a Z-R relationship for snowfall using a radar and high sensitivity snow gauges.J. Appl.Meteor.,29,147–152.

    Garrett,T.J.,and S.E.Yuter,2014:Observed influence of riming, temperature,and turbulence on the fallspeed of solid precipitation.Geophys.Res.Lett.,41,6515–6522.

    Grazioli,J.,D.Tuia,S.Monhart,M.Schneebeli,T.Raupach, and A.Berne,2014:Hydrometeor classification from twodimensional video disdrometer data.Atmos.Meas.Tech.,7, 2869–2882.

    Hansch,M.,1999:Fall velocity and shape of snowflakes.Ph.D. thesis,Swiss Federal Institute of Technology,117 pp.

    Huang,G.-J.,V.N.Bringi,R.Cifelli,D.Hudak,and W.A.Petersen,2010:A methodology to derive radar reflectivityliquid equivalent snow rate relations using C-Band radar and a 2D video disdrometer.J.Atmos.Oceanic Technol.,27,637–651.

    Kruger,A.,and W.F.Krajewski,2002:Two-dimensional video disdrometer:A description.J.Atmos.Oceanic Technol.,19, 602–617.

    Langleben,M.P.,1954:The terminal velocity of snowflakes. Quart.J.Roy.Meteor.Soc.,80,174–181.

    Lim,S.,V.Chandrasekar,and V.N.Bringi,2005:Hydrometeor classification system using dual-polarization radar measurements:Model improvements and in situ verification.IEEE Trans.Geosci.Remote Sens.,43,792–801.

    Liu,H.P.,and V.Chandrasekar,2000:Classification of hydrometeors based on polarimetric radar measurements:Development of fuzzy logic and neuro-fuzzy systems,and in situ verification.J.Atmos.Oceanic Technol.,17,140–164.

    Locatelli,J.D.,and P.V.Hobbs,1974:Fall speeds and masses of solid precipitation particles.J.Geophys.Res.,79,2185–2197.

    Matrosov,S.Y.,1992:Radar reflectivity in snowfall.IEEE Trans. Geosci.Remote Sens.,30,454–461.

    Matrosov,S.Y.,1998:A dual-wavelength radar method to measure snowfall rate.J.Appl.Meteor.,37,1510–1521.

    Moisseev,D.,E.Saltikoff,and M.Leskinen,2009:Dualpolarization weather radar observations of snow growth processes.34th Conference on Radar Meteorology,Williamsburg,VA,Amer.Meteor.Soc.,13B.2.

    Nitu,R.,2013:Cold as SPICE.Meteorological Technology International,148–150.

    Park,H.S.,A.V.Ryzhkov,D.S.Zrni′c and K.-E.Kim,2009: The hydrometeor classification algorithm for the polarimetric WSR-88D:Description and application to an MCS.Wea. Forecasting,24,730–748.

    Rasmussen,R.,M.Dixon,S.Vasiloff,F.Hage,S.Knight,J. Vivekanandan,and M.Xu,2003:Snow nowcasting using a real-time correlation of radar reflectivity with snow gauge accumulation.J.Appl.Meteor.,42,20–36.

    Roebber,P.J.,S.L.Bruening,D.M.Schultz,and J.V.Cortinas Jr.,2003:Improving snowfall forecasting by diagnosing snow density.Wea.Forecasting,18,264–287.

    Schonhuber,M.,Lammer,G.,and Randeu,W.L.,2008:The 2DVideo-Distrometer.Precipitation:Advances in Measurement, Estimation,and Prediction,S.Michaelides,Ed.Springer,3–31.

    Sheppard,B.E.,and P.I.Joe,2000:Automated precipitation detection and typing in winter:A two-year study.J.Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,17,1493–1507.

    Thurai,M.,D.Hudak,V.N.Bringi,G.W.Lee,and B.Sheppard, 2007:Cold rain event analysis using 2-D video disdrometer,C-band polarimetric radar,X-band vertically-pointing radar and POSS.Preprints,33rd Conf.on Radar Meteorology,Cairns,Australia,Amer.Meteor.Soc.,P10.5.[Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/123455.pdf.]

    Vivekanandan,J.,S.Ellis,D.Oye,D.S.Zrnic,A.V.Ryzhkov, and J.Straka,1999:Cloud microphysics retrieval using S-band dual-polarization radar measurements.Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc.,80,381–388.

    Wilks,D.,2006:Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, 2nd ed.,Academic,Burlington,Mass,627 pp.

    Yuter,S.E.,D.E.Kingsmill,L.B.Nance,and M.Loffler-Mang, 2006:Observations of precipitation size and fall speed characteristics within coexisting rain and wet snow.J.Appl.Meteor.Climatol.,45,1450–1464.

    Zawadzki,I.,E.Jung,and G.Lee,2010:Snow Studies.Part I:A study of natural variability of snow terminal velocity.J.Atmos.Sci.,67,1591–1604.

    :Lee,J.-E.,S.-H.Jung,H.-M.Park,S.Kwon,P.-L.Lin,and G.-W.Lee,2015:Classification of precipitation types using fall velocity–diameter relationships from 2D-video distrometer measurements.Adv.Atmos.Sci.,32(9),1277–1290,

    10.1007/s00376-015-4234-4.

    26 October 2014;revised 1 March 2015;accepted 26 March 2015)

    ?Corresponding author:GyuWon LEE

    Email:gyuwon@knu.ac.kr

    猜你喜歡
    精確性數(shù)據(jù)處理實(shí)效性
    認(rèn)知診斷缺失數(shù)據(jù)處理方法的比較:零替換、多重插補(bǔ)與極大似然估計(jì)法*
    小學(xué)德育工作實(shí)效性的提高
    甘肅教育(2021年12期)2021-11-02 06:29:38
    ILWT-EEMD數(shù)據(jù)處理的ELM滾動(dòng)軸承故障診斷
    怎樣增強(qiáng)人大專題詢問的實(shí)效性
    數(shù)字有形狀嗎?數(shù)字信息精確性和品牌標(biāo)識(shí)形狀的匹配效應(yīng)*
    陣列式煙氣流量測(cè)量裝置在脫硫CEMS中的應(yīng)用
    提高初中歷史教學(xué)的實(shí)效性
    基于希爾伯特- 黃變換的去噪法在外測(cè)數(shù)據(jù)處理中的應(yīng)用
    測(cè)量工程的質(zhì)量控制分析
    協(xié)商民主的實(shí)效性
    久久青草综合色| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 一级黄色大片毛片| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 日韩欧美免费精品| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 欧美成人午夜精品| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| av福利片在线| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| www.999成人在线观看| 麻豆av在线久日| 午夜激情久久久久久久| a 毛片基地| 国产成人系列免费观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 考比视频在线观看| 亚洲人成电影观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久国产精品影院| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲九九香蕉| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频 | 另类精品久久| 国产精品九九99| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| videosex国产| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 蜜桃国产av成人99| www.av在线官网国产| 最黄视频免费看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 脱女人内裤的视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产精品影院久久| 久久中文字幕一级| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 亚洲九九香蕉| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 久久国产精品影院| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 成人国语在线视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| www.自偷自拍.com| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 精品福利观看| www.999成人在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| av电影中文网址| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 自线自在国产av| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 免费观看a级毛片全部| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 在线av久久热| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 99香蕉大伊视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 1024视频免费在线观看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 天堂8中文在线网| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 免费观看人在逋| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 久久热在线av| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产在线观看jvid| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 一级毛片精品| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 最黄视频免费看| 国产在视频线精品| 黄片小视频在线播放| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 老司机影院成人| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 日本a在线网址| 欧美另类一区| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| videos熟女内射| 永久免费av网站大全| 窝窝影院91人妻| av天堂在线播放| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| av在线播放精品| 丁香六月天网| 两性夫妻黄色片| 热re99久久国产66热| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| bbb黄色大片| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 99香蕉大伊视频| 不卡av一区二区三区| 欧美午夜高清在线| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 在线看a的网站| 高清在线国产一区| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 日本欧美视频一区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲精品第二区| 五月开心婷婷网| 大码成人一级视频| 亚洲全国av大片| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 日韩电影二区| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 精品少妇内射三级| 1024香蕉在线观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 18在线观看网站| 精品少妇内射三级| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲精品在线美女| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 高清在线国产一区| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 视频区图区小说| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 男女国产视频网站| 欧美97在线视频| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 午夜激情av网站| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频 | 久久狼人影院| 成人国语在线视频| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 视频区图区小说| 亚洲精品第二区| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 美女福利国产在线| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产高清videossex| 99久久人妻综合| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 国产在线视频一区二区| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 精品人妻1区二区| 两性夫妻黄色片| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 两个人看的免费小视频| 在线观看人妻少妇| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| videosex国产| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 精品久久久久久电影网| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 久久国产精品影院| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 亚洲国产看品久久| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 一级片'在线观看视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久国产精品影院| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 精品福利观看| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 久久久欧美国产精品| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 咕卡用的链子| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产又爽黄色视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 久久久精品94久久精品| 美女午夜性视频免费| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 亚洲人成电影观看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| cao死你这个sao货| 久久久久网色| av网站免费在线观看视频| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 久久热在线av| 蜜桃在线观看..| av网站在线播放免费| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 免费不卡黄色视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 91字幕亚洲| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久性视频一级片| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲精品第二区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 色94色欧美一区二区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 精品第一国产精品| 久久中文看片网| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲国产精品999| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 欧美97在线视频| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久中文看片网| 制服人妻中文乱码| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 久久久欧美国产精品| 欧美大码av| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 欧美另类一区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| videosex国产| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 青青草视频在线视频观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 看免费av毛片| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 1024视频免费在线观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| av天堂在线播放| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 成人国产av品久久久| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 91字幕亚洲| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 大香蕉久久网| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 天堂8中文在线网| 大香蕉久久网| 超碰成人久久| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 欧美在线黄色| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 亚洲中文av在线| 99九九在线精品视频| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产精品免费视频内射| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 18禁观看日本| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 手机成人av网站| 久久性视频一级片| av天堂在线播放| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久中文看片网| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 999精品在线视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 国产成人av教育| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产高清videossex| 岛国毛片在线播放| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| av线在线观看网站| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产在视频线精品| a在线观看视频网站| 嫩草影视91久久| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 99久久人妻综合| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面 | 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| bbb黄色大片| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 99热全是精品| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 美女福利国产在线| 国产精品 国内视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 久久中文看片网| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 99久久综合免费| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 精品人妻1区二区| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 日本五十路高清| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产精品二区激情视频| www日本在线高清视频| 久久香蕉激情| 亚洲国产看品久久| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 电影成人av| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 男女国产视频网站| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 丁香六月欧美| 1024视频免费在线观看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 中文字幕制服av| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 婷婷成人精品国产| 老司机福利观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产麻豆69| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 国产av又大| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 99国产精品99久久久久| 超色免费av| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 又大又爽又粗| 一个人免费看片子| 一级毛片精品| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国产在线观看jvid| 99国产精品99久久久久| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 美女福利国产在线| 大香蕉久久成人网| 久久狼人影院| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 久久香蕉激情| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| av网站在线播放免费| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产|