• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Blood group type antigens in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

    2014-05-04 02:52:30AdrianaHandraLuca

    Adriana Handra-Luca

    Bobigny, France and Baltimore, USA

    Blood group type antigens in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

    Adriana Handra-Luca

    Bobigny, France and Baltimore, USA

    BACKGROUND:There are few data on blood group (BG) types and types of pancreatic cancers. The aims of this study were to study BG types and BG-antigens in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs).

    METHODS:BG type and tumor BG-antigen (glycoprotein) expression (studied by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays) were analyzed with regard to characteristics of 101 surgically resected pancreatic IPMNs.

    RESULTS:Non-O BG type predicted invasive carcinoma independently from high serum CA19-9 and male gender. BG type A was observed more frequently in women than in men. Chronic pancreatitis was more frequently seen in patients with BG type B or AB. Aberrant tumor expression (with regard to BG type) of loss of A antigen expression type occurred in 15.0% of IPMNs and of loss of B antigen expression type in 62.5% of IPMNs. Intraneoplasm BG-antigen expression was not related to dysplasia grade or invasion.

    CONCLUSION:The results of the study suggest that in pancreatic IPMN, non-O BG type predicted invasive carcinoma, whereas for intratumor BG-antigen expression no specific patterns were detected with regard to the progression of glandular epithelial dysplasia or invasion. (Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2014;13:74-80)

    blood group type;

    blood group antigen;

    immunohistochemistry;

    CA19-9;

    prognosis;

    invasive carcinoma;

    pancreas;

    intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

    Introduction

    Blood group(BG) type is considered to be significantly associated with the risk of pancreatic cancer, particularly of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Study participants with BG type O have a lower risk of pancreatic cancer than those with BG type A, AB or B.[1, 2]More recently, BG type A has been reported to be associated with pancreatic adenocarcinoma risk along with other patients' characteristics such as HBsAgpositive/anti-HBc-positive status, anti-HBs-positive/anti-HBc-positive status, diabetes mellitus, cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, and a family history of other cancer.[3]Greer et al[4]reported a higher frequency of BG type A in pancreatic cancer patients compared to regional blood donors and, a lower frequency of BG type O relatively to blood donors, patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma having less frequently BG type O as compared with those with other cancers.[5]

    Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are part of the epithelial pancreatic tumor category, and are defined as macroscopically cystic or mass-forming epithelial neoplasms with ductal differentiation, derived primarily from the pancreatic duct system.[6]Risk factors for IPMNs overlap in part with those for pancreatic adenocarcinomas, a history of diabetes, especially with insulin use, chronic pancreatitis, and a family history of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma being relevant to the development of IPMNs.[7]These tumors are known to express several ductal cell keratins and glycoproteins such as CA19-9, CEA, TAG72 or mucin glycoproteins.[6]To our knowledge, glycoprotein expression of BG type A and B and BG type distribution in human IPMNs have not been reported since this tumor group, characterized by the entire spectrum of epithelial dysplasia and invasive carcinoma, has been identified and defined.[6]

    The aims of this study were to determine the relationships between BG A and B antigens in IPMN patients, both when located on erythrocytes (defining the general background as BG type) and when located on epithelial cells, neoplastic or not (defining a localpancreatic background) and clinicomorphological characteristics in pancreatic IPMNs.

    Methods

    Patients

    Patients with pancreatic IPMN diagnosed between 1998 and 2006 at Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions who had been treated by surgical resection were analyzed in terms of clinical (gender, age, BG type, type and date of surgical resection, serum CA19-9 levels, date of death or of the last visit) and morphological data (tumor size, degree of dysplasia, lymph node metastases, vascular and perineural invasion, presence of mucinous morphology, presence of chronic pancreatitis or presence of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia-PanIN-lesions) available. An approval was obtained from the institutional review board. IPMNs were classified according to the WHO classification into invasive IPMNs and non-invasive IPMNs, the latter being further classified according to the highest degree of dysplasia present into low and/or intermediate grade and, into high grade IPMN.[6]

    According to current guidelines, histological chronic pancreatitis was de fi ned as pancreatic fi broin fl ammatory changes with unevenly distributed inter- and intralobular fi brosis (leaving the lobular pattern of the organ focally preserved) along with duct changes (obstruction, dilatation or distortion, lined by dystrophic, metaplastic or reactive epithelium) and with varied numbers of lymphocytes, plasma cells and macrophages (either in local accumulations or scattered diffusely throughout the fi brous tissue).[6, 8]Chronic pancreatitis lesions were assessed accordingly on the whole tissue section slides. Since there is no widely accepted standardized system of chronic pancreatitis classification and, that based on the degree and extent of lesions is considered not reproducible, the severity of chronic pancreatitis was not evaluated.[9]PanIN precursor pancreatic ductal lesions have been assessed according to current guidelines, being defined as papillary or flat epithelial ductal neoplasms (non-invasive, confined to the duct), less of 5 mm in size.[6]According to the degree of cytological and architectural atypical, 3 grades of PanIN have been assessed: PanIN1, PanIN2 and PanIN3. Only PanINs present on the tissue microarrays (TMA) slides tissue sections have been studied.

    Immunohistochemistry

    Immunohistochemistry was performed on slide sections obtained from TMA constructed as previously reported.[10-12]The BG A antigen/glycoprotein, monoclonal mouse (MA1-19693; dilution 1:200, Thermo Scientific, Pierce Protein Research, Rochford, IL, USA) and the BG B antigen/glycoprotein, monoclonal mouse (MA1-19691; dilution 1:100, Pierce Protein Research) have been used. The primary antibody was applied for 60 minutes, the secondary for 30 minutes (Dako EnVision+anti-mouse/HRP polymer, Carpinteria, CA, USA). The slides were treated for 3 minutes with DAB, 4 minutes in hematoxylin. Immunohistochemistry slides (Olympus BX51, 30× objective, Center Valley, PA, USA) were analyzed without knowledge of clinical or morphological data. Expression of A or B antigens was assessed in the non-invasive IPMN in the different dysplasia lesions (low or intermediate grade dysplasia and high grade dysplasia) and in invasive IPMNs (IPMN associated with adenocarcinoma). Cytoplasmic and/or membrane stainings in these lesions were evaluated as the percentage of stained cells with regard to the total number of neoplastic cells.[12]Membrane and/or cytoplasmic expression was also assessed in PanIN lesions available on the TMAs as well as in nontumoral pancreatic acini and ducts, and the percentage of stained cells was noted. The highest percentage noted for each structure (acini, ducts) or lesion type (low or intermediate dysplasia, high grade dysplasia, adenocarcinoma, PanIN1, PanIN2, PanIN3) was retained. Subsequently, the expression pattern was classified as negative or positive (corresponding to the biological classification of expression patterns), and was used as such for the statistical analyses.

    Statistical analysis

    Patients' characteristics and tumor features including the immunohistochemical ones were compared by using Fisher's exact test or the Chi-square test. For all tests and models, the variables have been considered as binary. Multivariate logistic regression models have been constructed for predicting the presence of invasive adenocarcinoma in IPMN (invasive IPMN, IPMN associated with adenocarcinoma) and the presence of high grade dysplasia or invasive IPMN. The relationship to postsurgical survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Variables associated with a statistical significance of P<0.05 on univariate survival analysis were studied in Cox multivariate survival models. All studied variables have been analyzed for redundancy before constructing the multivariable models. Statistical tests and graphics were performed with the Medcalc (v11.1.1, Belgium) software. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.[11, 13]

    Results

    Characteristics of non-invasive and invasive IPMN

    The main clinicopathological characteristics of the studied IPMNs are shown in Table 1. Non-invasive IPMN occurred in 53 patients (low or intermediate grade dysplasia 33 patients, and high grade dysplasia 20 patients) and invasive IPMN in 48 patients. Women showed more frequently BG type A than men (28/43, 65% vs 15/43, 35%, P=0.01). Histological chronic pancreatitis was seen more frequently in BG type B or AB patients than in BG type A or O patients (6/7, 85% vs 12/37, 32%, P=0.01). PanIN1 lesions were observed in 7 patients (6 patients with BG type O and 1 with BG type A), and PanIN2 in 3 patients (2 patients with BG type O and 1 with BG type A).

    An elevated serum CA19-9 (>36 U/mL) was observed more frequently in invasive IPMNs than in non-invasive IPMNs (17/26, 65% vs 5/26, 19%, P<0.01). In the multivariate logistic regression model that could be constructed (after checking variables for redundancy), a high serum CA19-9 predicted presence of invasive IPMN, along with the presence of non-O BG type and male gender, independently of these two clinical characteristics. Although the P value for non-O BG type in predicting invasive IPMN was less statistically relevant when comparing invasive versus high grade dysplasia IPMNs as compared to the invasive versus non-invasive IPMNs, the odds ratio for non-O BG type in predicting invasive IPMN increased from 8.05 (in the model considering invasive versus non-invasive IPMNs) to 12.32 (in the model invasive versus high grade dysplasia IPMNs), while the odds ratios for male gender and high serum CA19-9 decreased from 15.21 to 12.70 and, from 28.20 to 10.27, respectively (Table 2).

    A shorter overall survival was related to the presence of elevated serum CA19-9 and lymph node metastases as well as lack of chronic pancreatitis (P<0.01, P<0.01 and P=0.02, respectively) (Figs. 1 and 2). Postsurgical overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with invasive IPMNs than in those with non-invasive IPMN (median survival of 23 versus 81 months, P<0.01); the rate of death was significantly higher in patients with invasive IPMNs (30/48, 62.5% vs 13/53, 24.5%, P<0.01). Among the different characteristics, high serum CA19-9 only maintained statistically significant for a shorter overall survival in the Cox multivariate model that could be constructed after checking for redundancy (Table 3).

    Table 1.Baseline characteristics of the patients and of the pancreatic IPMNs

    Table 2.Results of multivariate logistic regression models for predicting presence of invasive pancreatic IPMNs when considering the entire series of patients (A) and when considering only the high grade dysplasia and invasive IPMNs (B)

    Fig. 1.Postsurgical overall survival curves for IPMN patients according to the serum CA19-9 levels, a high serum CA19-9 being related to a shorter survival.

    Fig. 2.Postsurgical overall survival curves for IPMN patients according to presence of histological chronic pancreatitis (A) and presence of lymph node metastases (B). Lack of chronic pancreatitis and presence of lymph node metastases related to a worse outcome.

    Table 3.Multivariate Cox models for postsurgical overall survival in IPMNs

    BG antigen tumor expression in IPMN

    The data on IPMN BG antigen expression are shown in Table 4. The expression of each antigen/ glycoprotein correlated strongly to the respective BG type (Fisher P<0.01 for both antigens). The A BG-antigen was expressed in 45% of the IPMNs whereas the B BG-antigen in 4% of the IPMNs. Microscopic aspects of positive normal pancreatic tissue, pancreatic adenocarcinoma and low or intermediate grade IPMN for both antigens are shown in Fig. 3. The percentage of positive cells varied from 0 to 97% for each antigen. Compared to duct expression, the lack of A BG-antigen expression in IPMNs (regardless the dysplasia grade, presence of invasive IPMN or patients' BG type) was directly related to the lack of expression in pancreatic ducts (12/14, 85% vs 12/19, 63%, P=0.02). The immunophenotype for A or B BG-antigen was not different in low or intermediate grade dysplasia IPMNs or in high grade dysplasia IPMNs, when it was associated with more severe lesions (high grade dysplasia or invasive adenocarcinoma and invasive adenocarcinoma, respectively) as compared to when unassociated with more severe lesions. An aberrant expression pattern consisting of loss of A BG-antigen expression (patients with BG type A or AB) occurred in 15.0% of IPMNs. Loss of B antigen expression occurred in 62.5% of IPMNs (patients with BG type B or AB). Intraneoplasm expression of A or B BG-antigen did not vary with dysplasia grade or with presence of invasive IPMN (IPMN associated with adenocarcinoma). For A BG-antigen expression, the dysplasia progression lesions (different types/degrees of dysplasia for a sameIPMN) were positive in 11/22 IPMNs and the dysplasiaadenocarcinoma progression lesions (different types/ degrees of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma for a same IPMN) in 2/4 IPMNs. One tumor showed the intratumor variation of A BG-antigen expression (loss of expression from high grade dysplasia to adenocarcinoma). For B BG-antigen expression, the dysplasia progression lesions were positive in 1/25 IPMNs and the dysplasiaadenocarcinoma progression lesions in none of 7 IPMNs. PanIN lesions showed a similar immunophenotype as the coexisting IPMN (Table 4): A BG-antigen was expressed in 1/2 PanINs2 and in 0/5 PanINs1, whereas B BG-antigen was not expressed in the available 5 PanINs1 and 2 PanINs2.

    Fig. 3.A and B BG antigen expression in IPMNs. The upper line comprises microscopic figures from A antigen positive cases (normal pancreas, adenocarcinoma IPMN, and low and intermediate grade dysplasia IPMN:A,BandC, respectively) and the bottom line from B antigen positive cases (normal pancreas, adenocarcinoma IPMN, and low and intermediate grade dysplasia IPMN:D,EandF, respectively). Both A and B antigens were expressed in a cytoplasmic or membrane pattern in tumor cells and in normal acinar cells (original magnification ×40).

    Table 4.Immunohistochemical expression of A and B BG antigens in IPMN according to the patients BG type

    Discussion

    The results of this study suggest that among patients with pancreatic IPMNs, patients with non-O BG type have a higher risk for invasive IPMN independently of high serum CA19-9 and male gender, which was in agreement with the increased risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma observed in patients of non-O BG type.[1, 2]Although the statistical relevance of non-O BG type in predicting invasive IPMN was less significant than that of male gender and high serum CA19-9, non-O BG type predicted invasive carcinoma not only in comparison of non-invasive with invasive IPMNs but also in comparison of only high grade dysplasia IPMN with invasive IPMNs. The extent to which tumor BG antigen expression changes, when passing to an invasive adenocarcinoma stage, might be relevant for this relationship, remains difficult to establish. However, results of our study on pancreatic ductal invasive adenocarcinomas[12]suggested interference for lack or loss of tumor A antigen with invasive tumor stage characteristics such as vascular invasion and metastatic disease.

    Interestingly, a second clinical variable, male gender, also predicted the presence of invasive IPMN, which parallels the data on pancreatic cysts.[14]The third clinical variable we found predictive of invasive IPMN was high serum CA19-9, which is in agreement with the already reported data.[15-21]Cholestasis as well asseveral benign hepatobiliary and pancreatic conditions are found to influence the concentrations of serum tumor markers,[22-24]Therefore CA19-9 data should be taken cautiously. Interestingly, a high concentration of CA19-9 also predicted invasion in comparison of high grade dysplasia IPMN with invasive IPMN, suggesting a role in the invasive tumor phenotype. Further studies are required to determine the precise significance of the predictive factors of invasive IPMN we have found, in the context of already reported clinical or serum markers such as history of pancreatitis, diabetes, symptoms, jaundice, loss of weight, increase of age, or total level of serum bilirubin.[17, 21 ,22, 25-28]

    The results of this study point out two other clinical and pathological correlations, previously not reported to our knowledge. First, there was a relationship between female gender and BG type A in patients with IPMNs, these tumors being more frequent in women with BG type A. Whether this is a reflection of a higher frequency of BG type A in IPMN patients than in the general population[29]remains hypothetical. Second, there was a higher frequency of histological pancreatitis in patients, carriers of B antigen on red blood cells, who are patients with BG type B or AB. Although BG antigens may alter inflammatory response,[2, 5]thus influencing the risk of pancreatic cancer, data on BG type and inflammation are few. Greer et al[30]studied this relationship and found that patients of non-O BG type were less likely to have chronic pancreatitis. In the present series of IPMNs, chronic pancreatitis was found to be related to a better outcome possibly due to earlier symptoms.

    We also studied BG glycoprotein expression in tumor specimen from human IPMNs characterized by abundant mucosecretion. Aberrant patterns of BG antigen expression which occurred in this series of IPMNs comprising the entire morphological spectrum from dysplasia to invasive adenocarcinoma were only of loss of expression type, and related more frequently to B antigen expression. For both A and B antigens, the intraneoplasm expression patterns were not related to the dysplasia degree or to the presence of invasive IPMN. Further studies are required to determine the relevance of BG antigens for the progression of epithelial glandular dysplasia, one of the limitations of the present study being the limited number of premalignant IPMNs available for microscopic analysis. Regardless of patients' BG type, lack of A antigen expression in IPMNs was related to ductal lack of expression, suggesting that changes in BG type A antigen expression might precede changes of dysplasia.

    We found previously that non-AB BG type predicts death in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas,[12]whereas in this series of pancreatic IPMNs, non-O BG type predicted the presence of invasive IPMN. Interestingly, in human epithelial pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells, A BG glycoprotein was related to low invasiveness tumor features such as lack of vascular invasion or few lymph node metastases, whereas B glycoprotein was related to non-mucinous histological type.[12]In IPMNs, BG glycoprotein expression did not show specific expression patterns with progression of dysplasia. However, the biological or clinical relevance of BG type antigens in red blood cells or pancreatic neoplastic cells remains incompletely elucidated, and further investigation is warranted.

    Acknowledgments:The author acknowledges Dr M Goggins (Director, Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection Research Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA). The author thanks C Lubek for assistance in technical procedures and SM Hong for advice as well as Prof. B Terris. I thank Dr M Tanaka, Dr M Tachezy, Dr S Navarro and Dr J Greer as well as K Kealoha, Dr VH Tran Thi, Dr M Khallouf i, Dr C Gonzalez and Pr M Reid. I thank P Cusenier with reference search, N Cole, K Blair and LR Butler as well as J Baltaze, N Kemache, L Yahaya, C Adam, S Morard and M Bechani for administrative help.

    Contributors:HLA proposed the study, designed the study, wrote the first draft, and analyzed the data. HLA is the guarantor.

    Funding:None.

    Ethical approval:An approval was obtained from the institutional review board.

    Competing interest:No benefits in any form have been received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

    1 Amundadottir L, Kraft P, Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Fuchs CS, Petersen GM, Arslan AA, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants in the ABO locus associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Nat Genet 2009;41:986- 990.

    2 Wolpin BM, Chan AT, Hartge P, Chanock SJ, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, et al. ABO blood group and the risk of pancreatic cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:424-431.

    3 Wang DS, Chen DL, Ren C, Wang ZQ, Qiu MZ, Luo HY, et al. ABO blood group, hepatitis B viral infection and risk of pancreatic cancer. Int J Cancer 2012;131:461-468.

    4 Greer JB, Yazer MH, Raval JS, Barmada MM, Brand RE, Whitcomb DC. Significant association between ABO blood group and pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16: 5588-5591.

    5 Iodice S, Maisonneuve P, Botteri E, Sandri MT, Lowenfels AB. ABO blood group and cancer. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:3345- 3350.

    6 Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND. WHO Classification of digestive tumors, 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2010.

    7 Capurso G, Boccia S, Salvia R, Del Chiaro M, Frulloni L, Arcidiacono PG, et al. Risk factors for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas: a multicentre case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:1003-1009.

    8 Kl?ppel G. Chronic pancreatitis, pseudotumors and other tumor-like lesions. Mod Pathol 2007;20:S113-131.

    9 Odze RD, Goldblum JR. Surgical Pathology of the GI Tract, Liver, Biliary Tract and Pancreas: Expert Consult, 2nd ed. Philadelphia PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.

    10 Hong SM, Kelly D, Griffith M, Omura N, Li A, Li CP, et al. Multiple genes are hypermethylated in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Mod Pathol 2008;21: 1499-1507.

    11 Handra-Luca A, Hong SM, Walter K, Wolfgang C, Hruban R, Goggins M. Tumour epithelial vimentin expression and outcome of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Br J Cancer 2011;104:1296-1302.

    12 Handra-Luca A. A and B blood group antigens in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Oncology 2013;84:141- 149.

    13 Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.

    14 Lee CJ, Scheiman J, Anderson MA, Hines OJ, Reber HA, Farrell J, et al. Risk of malignancy in resected cystic tumors of the pancreas < or =3 cm in size: is it safe to observe asymptomatic patients? A multi-institutional report. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:234-242.

    15 Fritz S, Hackert T, Hinz U, Hartwig W, Büchler MW, Werner J. Role of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between benign and invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Br J Surg 2011;98:104-110.

    16 Hwang DW, Jang JY, Lee SE, Lim CS, Lee KU, Kim SW. Clinicopathologic analysis of surgically proven intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas in SNUH: a 15-year experience at a single academic institution. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012;397:93-102.

    17 Hirono S, Tani M, Kawai M, Okada K, Miyazawa M, Shimizu A, et al. The carcinoembryonic antigen level in pancreatic juice and mural nodule size are predictors of malignancy for branch duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2012;255:517-522.

    18 Lou WH, Wang DS, Ji Y, Xu XF, Kuang TT, Ni XL, et al. Clinical features and prognosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of pancreas: analysis of 38 cases. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2006;86:947-950.

    19 Maire F, Voitot H, Aubert A, Palazzo L, O'Toole D, Couvelard A, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: performance of pancreatic fluid analysis for positive diagnosis and the prediction of malignancy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:2871-2877.

    20 Mimura T, Masuda A, Matsumoto I, Shiomi H, Yoshida S, Sugimoto M, et al. Predictors of malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010;44:e224-229.

    21 Shin SH, Han DJ, Park KT, Kim YH, Park JB, Kim SC. Validating a simple scoring system to predict malignancy and invasiveness of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. World J Surg 2010;34:776-783.

    22 Basso D, Fabris C, Plebani M, Del Favero G, Muraca M, Vilei MT, et al. Alterations in bilirubin metabolism during extra- and intrahepatic cholestasis. Clin Investig 1992;70:49-54.

    23 Dogan üB, Gümürdülü Y, G?lge N, Kara B. Relationship of CA 19-9 with choledocholithiasis and cholangitis. Turk J Gastroenterol 2011;22:171-177.

    24 Ong SL, Sachdeva A, Garcea G, Gravante G, Metcalfe MS, Lloyd DM, et al. Elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19.9 in benign hepatobiliary conditions and its correlation with serum bilirubin concentration. Dig Dis Sci 2008;53:3213-3217.

    25 Fujii T, Ishikawa T, Kanazumi N, Sugimoto H, Nomoto S, Inoue S, et al. Analysis of clinicopathological features and predictors of malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Hepatogastroenterology 2007;54: 272-277.

    26 Ingkakul T, Sadakari Y, Ienaga J, Satoh N, Takahata S, Tanaka M. Predictors of the presence of concomitant invasive ductal carcinoma in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2010;251:70-75.

    27 Sugiyama M, Izumisato Y, Abe N, Masaki T, Mori T, Atomi Y. Predictive factors for malignancy in intraductal papillarymucinous tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg 2003;90:1244- 1249.

    28 Nara S, Onaya H, Hiraoka N, Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y, et al. Preoperative evaluation of invasive and noninvasive intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: clinical, radiological, and pathological analysis of 123 cases. Pancreas 2009;38:8-16.

    29 Stanford School of Medicine, Blood Center. Blood types in the US. 2008 Available from: http://bloodcenter.stanford.edu/ about_blood/blood_types.html. Retrieved February 2013.

    30 Greer JB, LaRusch J, Brand RE, O'Connell MR, Yadav D, Whitcomb DC; NAPS2 Study Group. ABO blood group and chronic pancreatitis risk in the NAPS2 cohort. Pancreas 2011; 40:1188-1194.

    Received February 11, 2013

    Accepted after revision June 5, 2013

    Author Affiliations: Departments of Pathology, Sydney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA; and APHP Universite Paris Nord Sorbonne Cite-Sce Anatomie Pathologique, GHU Avicenne, 125 rue Stalingrad, Bobigny 93000, France (Handra-Luca A)

    Adriana Handra-Luca, MD, PhD, APHP Universite Paris Nord Sorbonne Cite-Sce Anatomie Pathologique, GHU Avicenne, 125 rue Stalingrad, Bobigny 93000, France (Tel: 0033-1-48955555ext2047; Fax: 0033-1-48955602; Email: adriana.handra-luca@avc.aphp.fr)

    ? 2014, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. All rights reserved.

    10.1016/S1499-3872(14)60010-2

    日本与韩国留学比较| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 日本色播在线视频| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 色网站视频免费| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 日本黄色片子视频| 少妇 在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产 精品1| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 午夜免费鲁丝| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 少妇人妻 视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 欧美区成人在线视频| 日本免费在线观看一区| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 永久网站在线| av网站免费在线观看视频| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 日韩伦理黄色片| www.色视频.com| 精品午夜福利在线看| 有码 亚洲区| 97在线视频观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 欧美另类一区| 嫩草影院新地址| 一区二区三区免费毛片| av卡一久久| 春色校园在线视频观看| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产精品一区www在线观看| a 毛片基地| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产乱来视频区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 久久人人爽人人片av| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 精品亚洲成国产av| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 直男gayav资源| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产成人精品福利久久| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 永久网站在线| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产在视频线精品| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 在线观看人妻少妇| 日本欧美视频一区| 欧美日本视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 九草在线视频观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产av精品麻豆| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 国产视频首页在线观看| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| av一本久久久久| 毛片女人毛片| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 成人国产麻豆网| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 少妇的逼好多水| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产在视频线精品| 免费看av在线观看网站| 97在线人人人人妻| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 男女国产视频网站| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 成人国产麻豆网| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 视频区图区小说| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 一本一本综合久久| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 国产精品三级大全| 毛片女人毛片| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 黄色配什么色好看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 久久久久久久久大av| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| a 毛片基地| 精品亚洲成国产av| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 久热久热在线精品观看| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| h日本视频在线播放| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 在线看a的网站| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 亚洲精品自拍成人| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片 | 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 精品一区二区三卡| 老司机影院毛片| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 大香蕉久久网| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 精品一区在线观看国产| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 久久久欧美国产精品| 免费av不卡在线播放| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 国产乱来视频区| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 熟女电影av网| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 免费少妇av软件| 欧美区成人在线视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 美女国产视频在线观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 色哟哟·www| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 老熟女久久久| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| h日本视频在线播放| 一区在线观看完整版| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产91av在线免费观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 久久久久视频综合| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 99热这里只有精品一区| 欧美人与善性xxx| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 日本wwww免费看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产 一区精品| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 欧美3d第一页| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 日韩大片免费观看网站| 婷婷色综合www| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| www.色视频.com| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 美女福利国产在线 | 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产成人精品婷婷| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 欧美+日韩+精品| 美女国产视频在线观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产综合精华液| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 日本黄色片子视频| 大香蕉久久网| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久av网站| 色吧在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 色视频www国产| 国产精品.久久久| 97超视频在线观看视频| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 婷婷色综合www| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 尾随美女入室| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 内地一区二区视频在线| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 最黄视频免费看| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产成人freesex在线| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产成人91sexporn| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 观看美女的网站| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 99久久精品热视频| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 大香蕉久久网| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 91狼人影院| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 精品久久久久久电影网| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 久久久久视频综合| 一级av片app| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| av国产免费在线观看| 一本一本综合久久| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产极品天堂在线| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 一级爰片在线观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| a 毛片基地| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产视频内射| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 丝袜喷水一区| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产美女午夜福利| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| h日本视频在线播放| 久久久久网色| 老司机影院毛片| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 久久婷婷青草| 国产成人91sexporn| 极品教师在线视频| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 丝袜喷水一区| 日韩伦理黄色片| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日日啪夜夜撸| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 色综合色国产| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 日本黄大片高清| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| .国产精品久久| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 1000部很黄的大片| 亚洲四区av| 插逼视频在线观看| 久久6这里有精品| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲综合精品二区| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 午夜老司机福利剧场| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片 | 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 男女免费视频国产| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 男女国产视频网站| 久久婷婷青草| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| av在线app专区| 色吧在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 久久久久久久国产电影| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 久久久久精品性色| 午夜福利高清视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 老司机影院成人| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 久久久精品94久久精品| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 大码成人一级视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看 | 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 在线天堂最新版资源| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 日本色播在线视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲av福利一区| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 美女国产视频在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲图色成人| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 高清毛片免费看| 美女国产视频在线观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 亚州av有码| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 久久久精品94久久精品| av专区在线播放| 国产成人精品婷婷| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 久久av网站| 久久青草综合色| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 中文资源天堂在线| 久久青草综合色| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 两个人的视频大全免费| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 99热这里只有是精品50| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 97超碰精品成人国产| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 国内精品宾馆在线| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 高清毛片免费看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 在线观看国产h片| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 黄色配什么色好看| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 人妻系列 视频| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| av免费在线看不卡| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 九九爱精品视频在线观看|