• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Software development in the age of intelligence:embracing large language models with the right approach

    2023-12-11 02:41:08XinPENG

    Xin PENG

    School of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China

    E-mail: pengxin@fudan.edu.cn

    The emergence of large language models(LLMs), represented by ChatGPT, has had a profound impact on various fields, including software engineering, and has also aroused widespread concerns.To see a right way through the fog, we have recently been discussing and contemplating a theme of “software development in the age of LLMs,” or rather “the capability of LLMs in software development,” based on various technical literature, shared experiences, and our own preliminary explorations.Additionally,I have participated in several online interviews and discussions on the theme, which have triggered further insights and reflections.Based on the aforementioned thinking and discussions, this article has been composed to disseminate information and foster an open discussion within the academic community.LLMs still largely remain a black box,and the technology is still rapidly iterating and evolving.Moreover, the existing cases reported by practitioners and our own practical experiences with LLM-based software development are relatively limited.Therefore,many of the insights and reflections in this article may not be accurate, and they may be constantly refreshed as technology and practice continue to develop.

    1 Impact of large language models

    The wave of enthusiasm surrounding ChatGPT(based on GPT-3.5) has yet to subside when suddenly GPT-4 made its debut,bringing about a comprehensive impact across all domains(OpenAI,2023;Zhao et al., 2023).In the field of software engineering, both the academic and industrial communities have been astounded by the all-encompassing capabilities of LLMs in software development.Numerous technical experts have enthusiastically harnessed the power of LLMs to tackle a myriad of development tasks.These tasks encompass requirement analysis, software design, code implementation, software testing, code refactoring, defect detection, and repair, spanning each stage of the software development process illustrated in Fig.1 (Dou et al., 2023;Du et al., 2023; Hou et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2023;Wang et al., 2023; Yuan et al., 2023a,2023b; Zheng et al., 2023).Some have even attempted end-to-end software application development using LLMs (Wu et al., 2023).The results have been nothing short of astonishing, to the extent that many have exclaimed, “programming is about to be terminated”or “programmers will be laid offin large numbers.”Consequently, there have been numerous assertions of a “new era in software engineering;” some call it Software Engineering 3.0, while others refer to it as Software 2.0,signifying that software development is poised to enter a fully intelligent new era.

    The powerful capabilities of LLMs in software development are undoubtedly undeniable, and their disruptive impact on the field can be foreseen.In other words, it is certain that LLMs will drive software development into a new era of intelligence.However, what remains uncertain is what this new era will look like.What kind of changes can be expected in the foreseeable future regarding software development approaches? Which software development roles will disappear, and which new roles will emerge? Both the academic and industrial communities are perplexed and anxious because the road ahead is unclear.For instance, Matt Welsh, former professor of computer science at Harvard University and director of engineering at Google,predicted that generative artificial intelligence (AI) will lead to the end of programming within three years,leaving only two roles for humans in software development: product manager and code reviewer (Welsh, 2023).If his prediction comes true, many research directions and related job positions in the current field of software engineering, such as software architecture and software maintenance,would become unnecessary.

    2 Calm reflection

    ChatGPT (and other LLM-based tools) has been widely accepted as an effective intelligent assistant in various software development tasks (Hou et al.,2023).This reminds me of the research I conducted 15 to 20 years ago on software reuse and software product lines.While achieving local and partial reuse through code copy–paste and application program interface (API) calls is relatively straightforward, the real challenge lies in systematic reusebased software development that takes into account the requirements and design (as promised by software product lines).Similarly, using ChatGPT for intelligent assistance in local software development tasks, such as code snippet generation and technical queries, is not difficult.The real challenge lies in harnessing it for end-to-end, systemic generative development.

    In this regard, some industry experts have explored this area and shared their experiences on various platforms.From these explorations,we can observe that for common small-scale software applications like Tetris or Snake, ChatGPT can gradually generate complete executable programs through natural language interactions when properly guided,producing code with reasonably high quality.This leads to the question of whether this end-to-end generative software development capability can be extended to larger, more complex enterprise software projects.It reminds me of Brooks’ discourse on the fundamental difficulties (essence) and accidental difficulties (accident) in software development in his classic work “No Silver Bullet Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering” (Brooks,1987).The essence of difficulties lies in conceptualizing complex abstract software entities, while the programming language representation of these entities is only an accidental difficulty.Most of the progress in software engineering over the past few decades has been in dealing with accidental difficulties, while fundamental difficulties (primarily centered around requirements and design)have seen little advancement.

    End-to-end generative software development clearly requires overcoming the two major challenges of requirement analysis and software design.How capable is ChatGPT in these areas? Based on the current shared experiences, it appears that ChatGPT does possess some analysis and design capabilities,including:

    1.automatically generating detailed requirements based on high-level requirements and organizing them into items,

    2.generating standardized representations of requirements, such as unified modeling language(UML)sequence diagrams,

    3.automatically generating design structures consisting of multiple classes,

    4.incrementally generating application code based on developer prompts and understanding the existing code structure,

    5.automatically refactoring code based on general design principles to enhance comprehensibility and scalability,and

    6.generating database schemas and corresponding SQL statements based on requirements.

    Can ChatGPT really perform analysis and design in software development? Based on the practical experiences shared by various experts,it is not accurate to say that it cannot.However, the attempted software applications are relatively small in scale(e.g.,two or three hundred lines of code)with simple requirements(e.g.,Tetris games and library management) or even readily available code and documents for similar applications online.In addition,to enable ChatGPT to generate complete code through dialogic interactions, developers need to possess strong communication and guidance skills, consistently expressing requirements clearly,decomposing development tasks into a series of well-defined steps, and guiding ChatGPT accordingly.For example, in a case shared by an industrial expert (https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/sUMt9oyASUU0eO9jlCurEw),the implementation process of a simple Tetris game was broken down into 10 tasks: create a game framework,replace the console with a graphical user interface(GUI), display an L-shaped block on the GUI, move the block and perform collision detection, rotate the block,let the block fall and create a new block,check for game over,add a line elimination feature,include all types of blocks, and add scoring capability.This task breakdown reflects a very rational process of incremental and iterative development, where subsequent tasks depend on the completion of previous tasks, and each task’s result can be confirmed (e.g.,the program is runnable).Although this task breakdown was also inspired by ChatGPT’s output,developers still need to grasp the overall iterative process,and design considerations are incorporated.Furthermore, developers need to continuously check Chat-GPT’s output, promptly identifying errors and executing corrections.Particularly, in the requirement analysis process,ChatGPT’s requirement refinement relies mainly on common sense or general features of certain software, which may overlook some critical requirements, and innovative or personalized requirements need to be supplemented by developers.

    Let us discuss some possible limitations of the current application of LLMs in the field of software engineering,considering their training approach and the essence of software development.These limitations are not specific to any particular stage;instead,they span various stages in the software development lifecycle, including planning, design, development,testing,deployment, and maintenance.

    1.Scale and complexity of software development may limit the capabilities of LLMs from both human and machine perspectives.

    First,the generative development process heavily relies on developers’step-by-step guidance of the LLM,which requires developers have a complete and in-depth understanding of the entire software design and implementation process.Only then can they break down tasks in a reasonable manner and guide the LLM to generate code progressively.When a software project reaches tens of thousands,hundreds of thousands, or even millions of lines of code, the human brain may no longer be able to fully grasp the entire code generation process.Additionally, for large-scale complex software systems, task breakdown and implementation are not strictly sequential; instead, they involve multiple parallel threads with continuous forking and joining.In traditional software development, developers need to decompose large-scale complex systems into multiple layers,with different teams and individuals responsible for different levels and sections of work.The development team needs to communicate, coordinate,and adjust design plans as needed.This process is challenging to replace with LLMs.Furthermore,LLMs themselves have limitations in their ability to fully comprehend the global development process of complex systems.For instance, a comparative study by our team (https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/GMMjF9sDv0c31AoRTXSIYA)found that even in the small-scale software generation process, Chat-GPT might“forget” previously generated code(e.g.,inconsistent method names or method return values).This suggests that LLMs may have difficulty in generating code for large-scale software implementations.Similarly, while LLMs can excel in generating unit tests for individual functions,their performance in generating system-level tests for complex systems is less than ideal.Finally, the existence of manual code review underscores the ongoing significance of software design and code quality.Even the most optimistic estimates acknowledge that code generated by LLMs still requires human review.As a result,for large-scale software systems, principles such as modularity, information hiding, separation of concerns, and code comprehensibility remain essential.Otherwise, developers responsible for reviewing the code may struggle to understand the code generated by LLMs, and become bottlenecks in the software development process.

    2.LLMs may lack abstract thinking capabilities and may exhibit limitations in precision.

    Software design, especially high-level architecture design, often involves complex abstract thinking.Some design abstractions have clear layer-bylayer refinement, such as gradually refining interface designs into concrete implementations.However, there are also design abstractions that involve global system abstractions, often including complex trade-offdecisions, such as selecting software architecture styles and patterns.These complex design abstractions may not be the strong suit of LLMs.The training approach of LLMs makes them proficient in generating relevant content based on flattened context and prompt information.They can achieve creative and associative effects through finegrained (e.g., word-level) flexible combinations, but they may lack the corresponding comprehension and application abilities for extensive abstract design decisions.Additionally, the probabilistic nature of LLMs conflicts with the precision sought in software development.Therefore, while LLMs can often achieve 80%–90%accuracy in local coding tasks,they require developers to promptly identify issues for alert,correction,or even direct modification and supplementation.

    3.In software requirements and design, there exists a significant amount of tacit knowledge that is difficult to capture.

    The success of LLMs largely comes from learning existing Internet text corpora (including code)and professional books and materials.In contrast,much of the knowledge related to software development requirements and design does not have explicit written records.It might exist in the minds of developers (including architects), on whiteboards, or within discussions from project meetings.Even if the development team provides detailed requirements and design documents, it is generally understood that not all the important information about requirements and design can be found in the documents.

    Furthermore,there are often numerous comparisons and debates concerning requirements and design decisions, and these decision-making processes are typically not explicitly recorded.While one could argue that LLMs can learn requirements and design knowledge given sufficient data, these tacit knowledge aspects are challenging to capture,and meeting the prerequisite of sufficient data might be difficult.

    Even if we try to record such information through photographs or meeting minutes, its high level of abstraction or ambiguity (e.g., the meaning of a certain element in a design and its impact on code implementation) might make it hard for LLMs to learn and apply this knowledge.

    4.There are doubts about the long-term maintenance and support capabilities of LLMs for complex software systems.

    Enterprise software systems generally have long lifecycles, during which they may undergo modifications for various reasons such as changing requirements,evolving usage environments,fixing bug,improving performance, and customizing for different clients.These software maintenance and evolution processes entail many software engineering challenges and issues.

    To achieve intelligent development support for software systems, LLMs cannot be a one-time solution (i.e., only responsible for initial code generation).Instead, they need to be able to handle various tasks related to functionality extensions and code modifications throughout the extended software maintenance and evolution processes.This requires the LLMs understand the various requirements and design solutions already implemented in the code,as well as the precise correspondence between requirement/design elements and code elements.Additionally, the models need to be aware of and manage the interaction relationships between code modifications and different parts of the system (e.g., direct or indirect impacts caused by modifications).Furthermore,the code generated by LLMs may contain many repetitive segments,and the long-term maintenance, especially consistency modifications, of these code clones could become burdensome.

    3 Embracing large language models with the right approach

    The remarkable performance of LLMs in some programming tasks has brought excitement to many,and it has also fostered optimistic prospects for the disruption of software engineering and the realization of comprehensive generative software development.However, I believe that when discussing the software development capabilities of LLMs,we must first differentiate the types of software being developed.For small-scale software applications or even applications suitable for end-user programming tasks, it is entirely possible to use LLMs for end-to-end code generation.However, for large-scale and complex software systems, achieving end-to-end code generation based solely on the given requirements is not yet feasible.

    Embracing LLMs is undoubtedly a correct and even necessary direction for software enterprises to improve their quality and efficiency.In fact, if information security risks are not a concern, directly using LLMs like ChatGPT in the enterprise development process can significantly enhance development productivity and quality.However, to achieve comprehensive and systematic software intelligent development, there is still a lot of foundational work to do, and there are several key issues that need to be explored.Here are some related considerations and suggestions, corresponding to the four limitations outlined in Section 2.

    1.Solidly building a digitized and knowledgedriven foundation for software development.

    Software development provides digital solutions for various industries, yet the level of digitization within software development itself is often quite low.For instance,common software assets such as public components are not effectively organized or reused,and the phenomenon of reinventing the wheel (repeatedly implementing the same functionality) is widespread.The cause and effect of each code modification are often unclear, and development tasks that trigger code changes (e.g., feature implementation or bug fixes) and the impact of code modifications (e.g., introducing code issues or changes in metrics) lack systematic records.Additionally, the description of requirements and design knowledge embedded within the software lacks explicit documentation and clear mapping to the code, leading developers to frequently rethink the same problems.In such cases, expecting LLMs to directly provide transformative and comprehensive intelligent development experiences might be unrealistic.The correct approach may be to solidly build a digitized and knowledge-driven foundation for software development, and then to combine it with LLMs to achieve more systematic intelligent development support.

    For instance, this digitized and knowledgedriven foundation could involve creating a library of domain-specific common components and establishing a descriptive system, implementing a comprehensive tracking and management system for software code clones and the software supply chain,establishing tracking relationships among development tasks (e.g., feature implementations and bug fixes), developers, and code submissions and modifications, and establishing and maintaining highlevel design descriptions and their mapping to code units.These digitized and knowledge-driven efforts can themselves enhance the quality and efficiency of software development.LLMs can provide technical and domain-specific knowledge to support the digitization and knowledge-driven aspects of software development,while also serving as a powerful means to integrate information and knowledge within these digitized and knowledge-driven platforms.

    2.Placing greater emphasis on fundamental software engineering capabilities such as requirements,design, and validation.

    I agree with the viewpoint expressed by Bertrand Meyer in his blog post atCommunications of the ACM(Meyer,2023).He suggested that LLMs like ChatGPT will not bring about the end of programming but instead revive some good old mainstays of software engineering, such as requirement analysis, precise specification, and software validation (including dynamic testing and static analysis).These traditional software engineering techniques have the potential to rejuvenate in the era of LLMs, but it may require careful consideration that how to integrate them organically with data-driven LLM technologies.As mentioned earlier,there is also a need to strengthen the digitized and knowledgedriven infrastructure in areas such as requirement analysis,design,and testing.

    3.Exploring an intelligent interactive engine that effectively integrates LLMs, developers, and various tool capabilities.

    The current situation in the field of software development is similar to the challenges addressed by Gartner’s recent promotion of hyperautomation.There are many automation tools(such as debugging and testing tools, compilation and building tools,and code static analysis tools) that have formed rich repositories of software artifacts and processes(such as general component libraries, open-source code repositories,software development online Q&A systems, defect tracking systems, and version management systems).However, the problem is how to seamlessly integrate these automation capabilities and resources into an intelligent experience in the entire process with the support of AI technology.

    For software development,another important issue is how to organically integrate the capabilities of humans (developers) and machines (LLMs and various tools) to achieve efficient human–machine collaboration.As mentioned before, the role of LLMs in generative software development is closely related to the interaction and guidance abilities of humans.Additionally, human experience plays a significant role in high-level decision-making and code review processes.

    Therefore,a systematic intelligent development process should not rely solely on the interaction abilities between developers and LLMs.Instead,it should pursue the establishment of an intelligent interaction engine capable of unifying and effectively integrating the capabilities of LLMs, developers, and various tools.For example, relying on the next-generation integrated development environment(IDE),a unified developer portal can use an intelligent interaction engine to understand the current development tasks and progress.Based on this,it can flexibly schedule and use the generative capabilities of LLMs (such as refining requirements or generating code segments), existing digitized information and knowledge (such as code dependencies,general components, and software design decisions),various tool capabilities(such as running code static analysis or automated testing, querying relevant defect reports,and submitting new defect reports),and developers’subjective judgments(such as making requirements and design decisions and reviewing the results generated by LLMs).

    A prominent feature of this process is that the intelligent interaction engine takes the lead, combining developers’ experiential judgments with the capabilities of various tools and LLMs in an organic manner,thus achieving a highly smooth, intelligent,and automated development process.Additionally,the intelligent interaction engine needs to manage and switch session states and contexts during the human–machine interaction process between developers and LLMs.

    Furthermore, the intelligent interaction engine should support interactive exploration with LLMs in a “multi-threaded” manner and enable the ondemand splitting (fork) and merging (join) of these exploration threads.In this process, the intelligent interaction engine needs to manage and switch session states and contexts effectively.

    4 Conclusions

    Embracing LLMs is definitely a correct and even necessary direction for software enterprises to improve quality and efficiency.However,achieving systematic and comprehensive intelligent software development still requires careful consideration and there is much fundamental work to do.For enterprises, solidifying the digitization and knowledge accumulation of software development, as well as the fundamental capabilities of software engineering such as requirement analysis, design, and validation, remains crucial and is also a basic condition for achieving higher levels of intelligent development.For academic research,there is still much work to do in the direction of systematic and comprehensive intelligent software development.This also requires us have a deeper understanding of the complexity of software systems and software requirements and design, based on understanding the capabilities of LLMs.

    Compliance with ethics guidelines

    Xin PENG declares that he has no conflict of interest.

    成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲av.av天堂| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 成人无遮挡网站| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 在现免费观看毛片| 午夜91福利影院| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 婷婷色综合www| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 黄色配什么色好看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 永久网站在线| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲精品视频女| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 精品一区二区免费观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 视频区图区小说| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 久久人人爽人人片av| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 午夜影院在线不卡| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| www.av在线官网国产| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 午夜av观看不卡| 美女国产视频在线观看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 欧美性感艳星| 久久午夜福利片| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产 精品1| 免费看av在线观看网站| 久热久热在线精品观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲精品视频女| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 免费观看在线日韩| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 成人无遮挡网站| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 美女中出高潮动态图| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 免费大片18禁| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 久久久精品区二区三区| 91成人精品电影| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 日韩中字成人| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 国内精品宾馆在线| 亚洲人成网站在线播| av线在线观看网站| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚州av有码| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 曰老女人黄片| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| kizo精华| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 99久久综合免费| 国产乱来视频区| 国产色婷婷99| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 午夜日本视频在线| 成人国产av品久久久| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 欧美性感艳星| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 欧美精品国产亚洲| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 丁香六月天网| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 日本黄大片高清| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 精品久久久精品久久久| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 午夜av观看不卡| 国产亚洲最大av| 老司机亚洲免费影院| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲在久久综合| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 精品酒店卫生间| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| a 毛片基地| 老女人水多毛片| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产在视频线精品| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 超色免费av| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 高清毛片免费看| 国产成人freesex在线| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 免费少妇av软件| 国产av精品麻豆| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 久久久午夜欧美精品| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 视频中文字幕在线观看| a级毛色黄片| kizo精华| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 午夜激情av网站| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 观看美女的网站| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 久久免费观看电影| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 老司机影院成人| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 满18在线观看网站| 一级片'在线观看视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 黑人高潮一二区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产高清三级在线| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 亚洲av.av天堂| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 成人国产av品久久久| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 成人二区视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 好男人视频免费观看在线| av在线app专区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲av福利一区| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 欧美性感艳星| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲成色77777| 七月丁香在线播放| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 永久免费av网站大全| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产 一区精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 老熟女久久久| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 日本黄大片高清| 多毛熟女@视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| kizo精华| av免费观看日本| av卡一久久| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| freevideosex欧美| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 成人免费观看视频高清| 中国三级夫妇交换| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 午夜福利,免费看| 视频区图区小说| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产av国产精品国产| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 777米奇影视久久| 人妻系列 视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 99热6这里只有精品| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 午夜av观看不卡| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 日韩电影二区| 男人操女人黄网站| 99九九在线精品视频| 日韩电影二区| 日韩中字成人| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 日日撸夜夜添| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 成人免费观看视频高清| 日韩av免费高清视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 日本91视频免费播放| av播播在线观看一区| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 九草在线视频观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产在视频线精品| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 中文天堂在线官网| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 人妻一区二区av| 七月丁香在线播放| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| av卡一久久| 蜜桃在线观看..| 色吧在线观看| 另类精品久久| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 91国产中文字幕| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产毛片在线视频| 777米奇影视久久| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 久久热精品热| videossex国产| 久久av网站| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 久久热精品热| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 一级毛片 在线播放| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 午夜视频国产福利| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产精品免费大片| 亚洲不卡免费看| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 久久久久精品性色| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| h视频一区二区三区| 色吧在线观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 成人影院久久| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 蜜桃在线观看..| 777米奇影视久久| 老熟女久久久| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 午夜激情av网站| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 亚洲在久久综合| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| av电影中文网址| 丁香六月天网| 日韩伦理黄色片| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 只有这里有精品99| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 免费观看av网站的网址| 丝袜美足系列| 黄色配什么色好看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 午夜影院在线不卡| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说 | 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 中国国产av一级| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 两个人免费观看高清视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 曰老女人黄片| 免费观看在线日韩| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 岛国毛片在线播放| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 精品久久蜜臀av无| tube8黄色片| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 女人久久www免费人成看片| av国产精品久久久久影院| 麻豆成人av视频| 观看美女的网站| 免费看光身美女| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲在久久综合| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 尾随美女入室| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 免费看不卡的av| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 色哟哟·www| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 制服人妻中文乱码| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 午夜激情av网站| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 韩国av在线不卡| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 91精品国产九色| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 18禁观看日本| 国产成人91sexporn| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产精品三级大全| 免费看不卡的av| 9色porny在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 插逼视频在线观看| 五月天丁香电影| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 中文欧美无线码| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 日本wwww免费看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 日韩中字成人| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 成人国产av品久久久| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 18禁观看日本| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 多毛熟女@视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| av在线播放精品| .国产精品久久| 亚洲四区av| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产乱来视频区| 观看av在线不卡| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 免费看不卡的av| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 久久久久精品性色| 国产精品成人在线|