呂綺,徐曉珍,高國(guó)生,蔡挺
血清CHI3L1在HBV相關(guān)肝癌患者中的表達(dá)及臨床價(jià)值
呂綺1,徐曉珍2,3,高國(guó)生4,5,蔡挺5,6
1.寧波大學(xué)附屬第一醫(yī)院檢驗(yàn)科,浙江寧波 315010;2.寧波市第二醫(yī)院肝病科,浙江寧波 315010;3.國(guó)科寧波生命與健康產(chǎn)業(yè)研究院,浙江寧波 315010;4.寧波市第二醫(yī)院檢驗(yàn)科,浙江寧波 315010;5.浙江省消化系統(tǒng)腫瘤診治及研究重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室,浙江寧波 315010;6.寧波市第二醫(yī)院黨政綜合辦公室,浙江寧波 315010
探討HBV相關(guān)肝癌患者血清殼多糖酶3樣蛋白1(chitinase 3-like protein 1,CHI3L1)表達(dá)水平的關(guān)聯(lián)因素及臨床應(yīng)用價(jià)值。選取2018年11月至2023年1月寧波市第二醫(yī)院肝病科住院慢性乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B virus,HBV)感染患者359例,分為慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)組(=108)、乙肝肝硬化組(=92)、乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)組(=98)和乙肝相關(guān)肝癌經(jīng)治組(=61),同時(shí)以40例健康體檢者作為正常對(duì)照,采用雙抗體夾心法酶聯(lián)免疫吸附試驗(yàn)檢測(cè)血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平,對(duì)所有研究對(duì)象的檢測(cè)結(jié)果進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析。正常對(duì)照組、CHB組、乙肝肝硬化組和乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)組的血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平分別為47.57(32.74,54.75)ng/ml、80.45(56.69,126.80)ng/ml、143.92(94.97,287.87)ng/ml、149.36(68.75,273.47)ng/ml,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(<0.001),乙肝肝硬化和乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者均顯著高于其他組(<0.001)。血清CHI3L1鑒別診斷CHB和乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者的曲線下面積(area under the curve,AUC)為0.706(0.632~0.780)(<0.001),與血清AFP相仿;但其鑒別診斷乙肝肝硬化和乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者的AUC為0.484(0.400~0.567)(=0.698),顯著低于血清AFP。在校正了HBeAg、肝癌個(gè)數(shù)和大小、有無(wú)癌栓和遠(yuǎn)處轉(zhuǎn)移、Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)評(píng)分等混雜因素后,HBV-DNA、年齡和腫瘤淋巴結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)移(tumor-node-metastasis,TNM)分期為影響乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)的獨(dú)立危險(xiǎn)因素。乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平顯著高于手術(shù)治療組(=0.046),但顯著低于TACE治療組(=0.003),而與復(fù)發(fā)組之間比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(=0.240)。血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平隨著慢性HBV感染疾病的進(jìn)展而上調(diào),特別是終末期肝?。ǜ斡不透伟┗颊唢@著升高。對(duì)于乙肝相關(guān)肝癌患者,其表達(dá)水平與年齡、病理學(xué)、病毒學(xué)、治療手段以及是否復(fù)發(fā)等諸多因素密切相關(guān)。
乙型肝炎病毒;肝癌;殼多糖酶3樣蛋白1
原發(fā)性肝癌(primary liver cancer,PLC)是全球范圍內(nèi)第6種常見(jiàn)癌癥,也是第四大癌癥相關(guān)死亡原因[1]。肝細(xì)胞癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)是其最主要的病理類別,占75%~85%[1]。由于肝癌隱匿發(fā)作,復(fù)發(fā)率高,肝癌患者總生存率不理想[2]。盡管在篩查和預(yù)測(cè)肝癌預(yù)后方面取得了進(jìn)展,但仍然缺乏可靠和簡(jiǎn)單的生物標(biāo)志物來(lái)檢測(cè)和監(jiān)測(cè)肝癌患者的預(yù)后[3]。血清殼多糖酶3樣蛋白1(chitinase 3-like protein 1,CHI3L1)屬于18糖基水解酶家族,但缺乏甲殼質(zhì)分解活性[4]。Lu等[5]基于血漿代謝組學(xué)和炎性細(xì)胞因子分析,證實(shí)CHI3L1促進(jìn)肝癌的腫瘤進(jìn)展。既往研究表明,CHI3L1在慢性乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B Virus,HBV)感染相關(guān)疾病中表達(dá)上調(diào),但其單獨(dú)應(yīng)用鑒別診斷慢性乙型肝炎和乙肝肝硬化(特別是早期)的價(jià)值可能有限[6]。本研究進(jìn)一步探討血清CHI3L1在乙型肝炎病毒相關(guān)HCC(以下簡(jiǎn)稱乙肝相關(guān)肝癌)患者中的表達(dá)及臨床價(jià)值。
選取2018年11月至2023年1月寧波市第二醫(yī)院肝病科住院的359例慢性HBV感染患者電子病歷和實(shí)驗(yàn)室檢測(cè)數(shù)據(jù),分為慢性乙型肝炎(chronic hepatitis B,CHB)患者108例,乙肝肝硬化(liver cirrhosis,LC)患者92例,乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者98例,乙肝相關(guān)肝癌經(jīng)治患者61例。診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn):參照《慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2022年版)》[7]和《原發(fā)性肝癌診療指南(2022年版)》[8]。納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):①CHB患者:乙型肝炎表面抗原(hepatitis B surface antigen,HBsAg)陽(yáng)性,血清ALT反復(fù)或持續(xù)升高,或肝臟病理學(xué)證實(shí)有慢性炎癥;②LC患者:同時(shí)存在HBV感染和臨床或病理學(xué)(提示肝硬化)證據(jù);③乙肝相關(guān)肝癌:同時(shí)存在HBV感染和血清腫瘤標(biāo)志物、病理或影像學(xué)檢查證據(jù)。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):①合并其他病毒感染;②合并其他原因?qū)е碌母尾?;③合并其他惡性腫瘤和血液系統(tǒng)疾病;④合并其他系統(tǒng)嚴(yán)重疾病。病例組中男270例,女89例,年齡21~89歲,平均(52.48±12.89)歲。收集40例健康體檢人群血清作為正常對(duì)照組,正常對(duì)照組中男25例,女15例,年齡24~70歲,平均(42.25±10.38)歲。本研究通過(guò)寧波市第二醫(yī)院倫理委員會(huì)批準(zhǔn)(倫理審批號(hào):PJ-NBEY-KY-2017-070-01)。
血清CHI3L1檢測(cè)試劑盒由杭州普望生物技術(shù)有限公司提供,檢測(cè)方法采用酶聯(lián)免疫吸附實(shí)驗(yàn)(雙抗體夾心法)。HBV血清標(biāo)志物(乙肝三系)采用美國(guó)雅培公司i2000免疫發(fā)光分析儀和配套試劑盒進(jìn)行檢測(cè)。HBV-DNA采用美國(guó)ABI 7500型熒光定量PCR儀和中山大學(xué)達(dá)安基因股份有限公司試劑盒進(jìn)行檢測(cè)。
采用SPSS 22.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行處理分析,通過(guò)GraphPad Prism 9.0軟件進(jìn)行繪圖。非正態(tài)分布的計(jì)量資料以中位數(shù)(四分位數(shù)間距)[(1,3)]表示,兩組和多組比較分別采用Mann-Whitney和Kruskal-Wallis檢驗(yàn)。二分類Logistic回歸分析篩選影響CHI3L1表達(dá)的獨(dú)立影響因素。通過(guò)繪制受試者工作特征(receiveroperator characteristic,ROC)曲線,計(jì)算曲線下面積(area under curve,AUC)以評(píng)價(jià)血清CHI3L1鑒別診斷乙肝相關(guān)肝癌的價(jià)值。<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
正常對(duì)照組、CHB組、LC組和乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)組患者的血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平分別為47.57(32.74,54.75)ng/ml、80.45(56.69,126.80)ng/ml、143.92(94.97,287.87)ng/ml、149.36(68.75,273.47)ng/ml,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(<0.001)。兩兩比較結(jié)果顯示,除乙肝肝硬化和乙肝相關(guān)肝癌患者外,其余組別之間,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(<0.001),見(jiàn)圖1。
圖1 四組研究對(duì)象血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平的比較
血清CHI3L1鑒別診斷CHB和乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者的AUC為0.706(0.632~0.780),血清AFP的AUC為0.687(0.611~0.763),二者比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(<0.001),見(jiàn)圖2A;血清CHI3L1鑒別診斷LC和乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者的AUC為0.484(0.400~0.567)(=0.698),顯著低于血清AFP的AUC[0.671(0.593~0.784),<0.001],見(jiàn)圖2B。
男性(84例)和女性(14例)乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平分別為143.50(69.32,273.70)ng/ml、183.10(67.04,231.60)ng/ml,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(=552.00,=0.725);但與年齡呈明顯正相關(guān)(=0.277,=0.006),見(jiàn)圖3。
以1×104IU/ml將患者分為低水平和高水平病毒復(fù)制兩組,結(jié)果顯示后者顯著高于前者[248.00(149.40,305.80)ng/ml. 111.30(66.62,231.60)ng/ml],差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(=652.00,=0.001);同時(shí)HBeAg陽(yáng)性患者顯著高于陰性患者[265.59(166.23,318.37)ng/ml114.24(66.63,228.59)ng/ml],差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(=652.00,=0.001),見(jiàn)圖4。
按腫瘤個(gè)數(shù)是否>1個(gè)、直徑是否≥5cm、有無(wú)癌栓、周圍有無(wú)侵犯、區(qū)域淋巴結(jié)有無(wú)腫大、有無(wú)遠(yuǎn)處轉(zhuǎn)移將乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者進(jìn)行分組,結(jié)果顯示多發(fā)HCC組、≥5cm組、有癌栓組、遠(yuǎn)處轉(zhuǎn)移組的血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平均顯著高于對(duì)應(yīng)組別(=704.00、552.00、412.00、60.00,<0.05);而周圍有無(wú)侵犯、區(qū)域淋巴結(jié)有無(wú)腫大不影響血清CHI3L1的表達(dá)(=340.00、528.00,>0.05),見(jiàn)圖5。
圖2 血清CHI3L1鑒別診斷乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者的ROC曲線
A.血清CHI3L1和AFP鑒別診斷CHB和乙肝相關(guān)肝癌;B.血清CHI3L1和AFP鑒別診斷LC和乙肝相關(guān)肝癌
圖3 性別和年齡與乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平的關(guān)聯(lián)
A.不同性別乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平比較;B.年齡與乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平的相關(guān)性
圖4 病毒學(xué)因素與乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平的關(guān)聯(lián)
A.不同病毒復(fù)制乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平比較;B.HBeAg陽(yáng)性和陰性乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平比較
圖5 腫瘤病理學(xué)因素與乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平的關(guān)聯(lián)
A.不同腫瘤個(gè)數(shù)乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平比較;B.不同腫瘤大小乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平比較;C.有或無(wú)癌栓乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平比較;D.有或無(wú)周圍侵犯乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平比較;E.有或無(wú)區(qū)域淋巴結(jié)腫大乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平比較;F.有或無(wú)遠(yuǎn)處轉(zhuǎn)移乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平比較
CTP評(píng)分(B+C)組顯著高于CTP評(píng)分A組(=192.00,<0.001);除了TNM Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期外,血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平隨TNM分期升高而顯著升高(均>0.05);中晚期[TNM(Ⅲ+Ⅳ)期]肝癌顯著高于早期[TNM(Ⅰ+Ⅱ)期]肝癌(=464.00,<0.001),見(jiàn)圖6。
對(duì)與乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)的相關(guān)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行二分類Logistic回歸分析,自變量包括年齡、HBV-DNA(0為低水平復(fù)制組,1為高水平復(fù)制組)、HBeAg(0為HBeAg陰性,1為陽(yáng)性)、肝癌個(gè)數(shù)(單個(gè)為0,多個(gè)為1)、肝癌大小(<5cm為0,≥5cm為1)、有無(wú)癌栓(無(wú)為0,有為1)、有無(wú)遠(yuǎn)處轉(zhuǎn)移(無(wú)為0,有為1)、CTP評(píng)分、TNM分期(Ⅰ+Ⅱ期為0,Ⅲ+Ⅳ為1);應(yīng)變量:1為血清CHI3L1≥79ng/ml的患者,0為<79ng/ml的患者(79ng/ml為說(shuō)明書(shū)規(guī)定的正常參考區(qū)間上限);納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):<0.05,剔除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):>0.10,回歸方法選擇Backward:wald。在校正了HBeAg、肝癌個(gè)數(shù)和大小、有無(wú)癌栓和遠(yuǎn)處轉(zhuǎn)移、CTP評(píng)分等混雜因素后,HBV-DNA、年齡和TNM分期為影響乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)的獨(dú)立危險(xiǎn)因素,見(jiàn)表1。
初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平顯著高于手術(shù)治療組(=662.00,=0.046),顯著低于TACE治療組(=752.00,=0.003),而與復(fù)發(fā)組之間比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(=684.00,=0.240)。
圖6 CTP評(píng)分、TNM分期與乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平的關(guān)聯(lián)
A.不同CTP評(píng)分乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平比較;B.不同TNM分期乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平比較;C.早晚期乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平比較
表1 乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)的獨(dú)立危險(xiǎn)因素
圖7 血清CHI3L1水平在不同治療方法及復(fù)發(fā)乙肝相關(guān)肝癌患者中的表達(dá)
原發(fā)性肝癌是中國(guó)最常見(jiàn)的消化系統(tǒng)惡性腫瘤類型之一[9]。慢性HBV病毒感染是國(guó)內(nèi)原發(fā)性肝癌的最重要原因。目前,實(shí)驗(yàn)室主要使用血清AFP進(jìn)行肝癌篩查,但其敏感度不足[10]。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),CHI3L1位于人類染色體1q31-q32中,這是HCC相關(guān)基因經(jīng)常被擴(kuò)增的區(qū)域[11]。因此,本研究重點(diǎn)探討血清CHI3L1檢測(cè)對(duì)乙肝相關(guān)肝癌的臨床價(jià)值。
研究表明,隨慢性HBV感染肝病的進(jìn)展,血清CHI3L1呈逐漸升高的趨勢(shì),這與既往文獻(xiàn)報(bào)道基本一致。但需要特別指出的是,本研究中乙肝LC和乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平相差不大。雖然ROC曲線分析結(jié)果顯示血清CHI3L1鑒別診斷CHB和肝癌的價(jià)值與AFP相仿,但其鑒別診斷乙肝LC和初發(fā)乙肝相關(guān)肝癌的價(jià)值顯著低于血清AFP。本研究結(jié)果與毛玉環(huán)等[12]、石玉如等[13]認(rèn)為L(zhǎng)C和肝癌患者表達(dá)水平相差不大的觀點(diǎn)一致,但與Qiu等[14]和Jiang等[15]、呂桂芳等[16]、曾光群等[17]認(rèn)為肝癌患者顯著高于LC患者的觀點(diǎn)不一致。不同報(bào)道結(jié)論不一致的原因可能與研究對(duì)象的選擇存在偏倚有關(guān),譬如一些研究中選擇了CTP評(píng)分更高或更低的LC患者,事實(shí)上已有多個(gè)研究(包括本研究在內(nèi))證實(shí)CTP評(píng)分與CHI3L1水平呈正相關(guān)[14-15]。由此可見(jiàn)針對(duì)LC和肝癌患者血清CHI3L1的表達(dá)研究有待進(jìn)一步深入。
本研究重點(diǎn)對(duì)可能影響乙肝相關(guān)肝癌初發(fā)患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)的因素進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)分析,結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)諸多因素都可能導(dǎo)致其表達(dá)上調(diào)。Qiu等[14]和Jiang等[15]認(rèn)為CTP評(píng)分B和C級(jí)患者的血清CHI3L1水平顯著高于A級(jí)患者,Jiang等[15]認(rèn)為CTP評(píng)分和TNM分期高者均顯著高于低者,Wang等[18]認(rèn)為TNM分期、CTP分期、腫瘤最大直徑、肝硬化存在密切影響血清CHI3L1的表達(dá),但與性別與年齡無(wú)關(guān)。以上觀點(diǎn)與本文結(jié)論大致相同,但年齡可能是血清CHI3L1表達(dá)的重要影響因素,且與肝硬化存在與否無(wú)關(guān)(鑒于篇幅限制未在文中列出相應(yīng)結(jié)果)。進(jìn)一步的二分類邏輯回歸分析顯示HBV-DNA、年齡和TNM分期為影響初發(fā)乙肝相關(guān)肝癌患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)的獨(dú)立危險(xiǎn)因素。目前針對(duì)HBV是否參與調(diào)解血清CHI3L1的表達(dá)未見(jiàn)報(bào)道,下一步可重點(diǎn)予以探討。
本研究還對(duì)不同治療手段及復(fù)發(fā)與否對(duì)乙肝相關(guān)肝癌患者血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平的影響進(jìn)行了分析,結(jié)果顯示根治手術(shù)治療患者顯著下降,但與復(fù)發(fā)者相差不大,同時(shí)還顯著低于TACE治療者。鑒于臨床上TACE多用于晚期肝癌的姑息治療,此類患者多為TNM Ⅲ至Ⅳ期,故其血清CHI3L1水平將顯著升高。另一方面,建議將血清CHI3L1作為手術(shù)治療效果監(jiān)測(cè)的有用指標(biāo),其對(duì)肝癌的復(fù)發(fā)可能有比較好的提示作用。
綜上所述,血清CHI3L1表達(dá)水平隨著慢性HBV感染疾病的進(jìn)展而上調(diào),特別是終末期肝?。ǜ斡不透伟┗颊唢@著升高。對(duì)于乙肝相關(guān)肝癌患者,血清CHI3L1表達(dá)與年齡、病理學(xué)、病毒學(xué)、治療手段以及復(fù)發(fā)與否等諸多因素密切相關(guān)。鑒于本研究中某些組別的樣本量仍偏小,確切結(jié)論仍需大樣本、多中心的研究予以澄清。
[1] BRAY F, FERLAY J, SOERJOMATARAM I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394–424.
[2] 赫捷, 陳萬(wàn)青, 沈洪兵, 等. 中國(guó)人群肝癌篩查指南(2022, 北京)[J]. 中華消化外科雜志, 2022, 21(8): 971–996.
[3] SAHIN T, SERIN A, EMEK E, et al. Effectiveness of noninvasive fibrosis markers for the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis B+D induced cirrhosis[J]. Transplant Proc, 2019, 51(7): 2397–2402.
[4] ZHAO T, SU Z, LI Y, et al. Chitinase-3 like-protein-1 function and its role in diseases[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2020, 5(1): 201.
[5] LU D, LIN Z, WANG R, et al. Multiomics profiling reveals Chitinase-3-like protein 1 as a key mediator in the crosstalk between sarcopenia and liver cancer[J]. Redox Biol, 2022, 58: 102538.
[6] 呂綺, 樓柯宏, 高國(guó)生, 等. 血清殼多糖酶3樣蛋白1表達(dá)與慢性乙型肝炎的關(guān)系[J]. 中國(guó)衛(wèi)生檢驗(yàn)雜志, 2022, 32(19): 2378–2381, 2385.
[7] 中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)肝病學(xué)分會(huì), 中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)感染病學(xué)分會(huì). 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2022年版)[J]. 中華傳染病雜志, 2023, 41(1): 3–28.
[8] 國(guó)家衛(wèi)生健康委員會(huì). 原發(fā)性肝癌診療指南(2022年版)[J]. 中華普通外科學(xué)文獻(xiàn)(電子版), 2022, 16(2): 81–96.
[9] LI J, LI H, ZENG H, et al. Trends in high-risk rates and screening rates for the population-based cancer screening program on esophageal, stomach and liver cancer in China, 2010-2016[J]. J National Cancer Center, 2021, 1(3): 101–107.
[10] JOHNSON P, ZHOU Q, DAO D Y, et al. Circulating biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 19(10): 670–681.
[11] YANG J D, KIM E, PEDERSEN R A, et al. Utility of serum YKL-40 as a Tumor-specific marker of hepatobiliary malignancies[J]. Gut Liver, 2010, 4(4): 537–542.
[12] 毛玉環(huán), 譚黎明, 李建英, 等. 血清殼多糖酶3樣蛋白1和甲胎蛋白及鐵蛋白檢測(cè)在原發(fā)性肝癌診斷中的應(yīng)用評(píng)價(jià)[J]. 實(shí)用預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué), 2018, 25(4): 401–404.
[13] 石玉如, 岳莉, 趙長(zhǎng)城, 等. 血清殼多糖酶3樣蛋白1檢測(cè)在不同肝臟疾病中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值[J]. 現(xiàn)代檢驗(yàn)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志, 2017, 32(6): 154–157.
[14] QIU H, ZHANG X. The value of serum CHI3L1 for the diagnosis of chronic liver diseases[J]. Int J Gen Med, 2022, 15: 5835–5841.
[15] JIANG Z, WANG S, JIN J, et al. The clinical significance of serum chitinase 3-like 1 in hepatitis B-related chronic liver diseases[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2020, 34(5): e23200.
[16] 呂桂芳, 張春, 林建源, 等. 血清DCP, CHI3L1聯(lián)合AFP檢測(cè)在肝細(xì)胞癌早期診斷中的意義研究[J]. 中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)創(chuàng)新, 2021, 18(18): 154–157.
[17] 曾光群, 魏世剛, 楊成, 等. 血清殼多糖酶3樣蛋白1和甲胎蛋白聯(lián)合檢測(cè)對(duì)不同肝臟疾病的診斷價(jià)值[J]. 實(shí)用醫(yī)院臨床雜志, 2019, 16(5): 83–86.
[18] WANG S, CHEN S, JIN M, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum Chitinase 3-like protein 1 in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2022, 36(2): e24234.
Expression and clinical value of serum CHI3L1 in patients with HBV associated liver cancer
LYU Qi, XU Xiaozhen, GAO Guosheng, CAI Ting
1.Department of Laboratory, Ningbo University Affiliated First Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China; 2.Department of Hepatology, Ningbo Second Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China; 3.Guoke Ningbo Life and Health Industry Research Institute, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China; 4.Department of Laboratory, Ningbo Second Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China; 5.Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Diagnosis, Treatment and Research of Digestive System Tumors, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China; 6.Party and Government Comprehensive Office, Ningbo Second Hospital, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, China
To explore the correlation factors and clinical application value of serum chitosanase 3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1) expression in patients with hepatitis Bvirus (HBV) associated liver cancer.A total of 359 hospitalized patients with chronic HBV infection in the Department of Hepatology of our hospital from November 2018 to January 2023 were collected, which were divided into chronic hepatitis B (CHB) group (=108), hepatitis B cirrhosis group (=92), hepatitis B related liver cancer primary group (=98) and hepatitis B related liver cancer treated group (=61), while 40 healthy individuals were used as normal controls. The expression level of serum CHI3L1 was detected using a double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Statistical analysis was conducted on the detection results of all study subjects.The levels of serum CHI3L1 expression in normal control group, CHB group, hepatitis B cirrhosis group and primary hepatitis B related liver cancer group were 47.57 (32.74, 54.75) ng/ml, 80.45 (56.69, 126.80) ng/ml, 143.92 (94.97, 287.87) ng/ml, 149.36 (68.75, 273.47) ng/ml, respectively. The total difference among the four groups was statistically significant (<0.001). The levels of serum CHI3L1 expression in hepatitis B cirrhosis and primary hepatitis B related liver cancer patients were significantly higher than other groups (<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of serum CHI3L1 for differential diagnosis of CHB and primary hepatitis B related liver cancer patients was 0.706 (0.632-0.780) (<0.001), similar to that of serum AFP. However, its area under the curve(AUC) for differential diagnosis of hepatitis B cirrhosis and primary hepatitis B related liver cancer patients was 0.484 (0.400-0.567) (=0.698), significantly lower than serum AFP. After adjusting for such confounding factors as HBeAg, the number and size of liver cancer, presence or absence of tumor thrombus and distant metastasis, and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, HBV-DNA, age, and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage were independent risk factors affecting the expression of serum CHI3L1 in patients with primary hepatitis B related liver cancer. The level of serum CHI3L1 expression in patients with primary hepatitis B related liver cancer was significantly higher than that in the surgical treatment group (=0.046), but significantly lower than that in the TACE treatment group (=0.003), but there was no significant difference between the recurrence group and the primary hepatitis B related liver cancer patients (=0.240).The expression level of serum CHI3L1 is upregulated with the progression of chronic HBV infection, especially in patients with end-stage liver disease (cirrhosis and liver cancer). For patients with hepatitis B related liver cancer, its expression level is closely related to many factors, such as age, pathology, virology, treatment methods and whether it relapses or not.
Hepatitis B virus; liver cancer; Chitinase 3-like protein 1
R512.6
A
10.3969/j.issn.1673-9701.2023.26.004
浙江省消化系統(tǒng)腫瘤診治及研究重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室(2019E10020);寧波市公益類科技計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(2019C50035)
蔡挺,電子信箱:caiting@ucas.ac.cn
(2023–04–19)
(2023–08–30)