• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Photometric Monitoring of Blazar 3C 66A with the Yunnan University Astronomical Observatory 1m Telescope

    2023-05-29 10:27:20WeiZengTaoWenZhenLuGongShiChenFanWuHaoYangZhangandBenZhongDai

    Wei Zeng , Tao Wen, Zhen-Lu Gong, Shi Chen, Fan Wu, Hao-Yang Zhang, and Ben-Zhong Dai

    1 School of Physics & Astronomy, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China; zengwei@ynu.edu.cn, bzhdai@ynu.edu.cn

    2 Key Laboratory of Astroparticle Physics, Yunnan Province, Kunming 650091, China

    3 Astronomical Observatory, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China

    Abstract 3C 66A is one of our first batches of photometric monitoring objects with the 1 m optical telescope at Yunnan University Astronomical Observatory.In the present work,the observational campaign was performed from 2021 November 1 to 2022 February 27 in the Johnson–Morgan system V and R bands.The average magnitudes in each band were V = 15.52 ±0.18 mag and R = 15.07 ±0.17 mag.The overall variability amplitudes were ΔV=0 74, Amp=70.27% and ΔR=0 72, Amp=68.56%, respectively.Most of the intraday variabilities(IDVs) occurred in 2021 December and 2022 February.The minimal rise/decay timescale was about 6 minutes(5.82±2.74 minutes and 6.18±2.81 minutes on 2022 February 11,6.99±3.70 minutes and 6.17±2.91 minutes on 2022 February 12).Durations of these rapid variabilities were from 11.99 to 179.67 minutes.The discrete correlation function analyses between V and R bands showed significantly correlated variability.Color index analysis of IDVs showed that the spectrums do not change with variabilities.

    Key words: (galaxies:) BL Lacertae objects: individual (3C 66A) – galaxies: photometry – galaxies: active

    1.Introduction

    3C 66A (or0219+428;α=02:22:39.6114,δ = +43:02:07.799, J2000) is one of the most luminous blazars at TeV γ-rays,which is a BL Lac type object classified as an intermediate synchrotron peaked blazar(Ackermann et al.2015) at redshift z=0.444 (Miller & McGimsey 1978) by detected Mg II emission line, or z=0.340 by detected host galaxy (Torres-Zafra et al.2016)).It was detected at VHE γrays (very high energy, VHE; E >100 GeV) by the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS,Acciari et al.2009)and the Major Atmospheric Gamma Imaging Cherenkov Telescopes(MAGIC,Aleksi? et al.2011).

    In optical bands, the 1.56 m telescope of the Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (ShAO) had been monitored from 1996 December 11 to 2009 December 28(Fan et al.2018).The GLAST-AGILE Support Program (GASP) of the Whole Earth Blazar Telescope (WEBT) carried out multiwavelength monitoring in 2003–2004 (B?ttcher et al.2005) and 2007–2008(B?ttcher et al.2009).The Steward Observatory of the University of Arizona in support of the Fermi γ-ray observations (Smith et al.2009) contributed optical data from years 2008 to 2018.Using an extremely wide field of view camera,the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) (Bellm et al.2019; Masci et al.2019)scanning the entire Northern sky from 2018 March also carried out the optical monitoring of 3C 66A in ZTF_g,ZTF_r, and ZTF_i bands.

    Combining the above-mentioned sky survey data and additional observational data, 3C 66A intra-day variability(IDV) has been widely addressed by several authors with timescales ranging from 14.5 to 344.0 minutes (Gupta et al.2012; Kaur et al.2017; Fan et al.2018; Pasierb et al.2020).This source also exhibited quasi-periodic variability.Lainela et al.(1999) investigated a period of 65 days, similar to~50–57 days by B?ttcher et al.(2005), while different longterm analyses claimed periods of 156 days, ~2 yr (Fan et al.2018),~2.3 yr(Cheng et al.2022),~2.5 yr(Kaur et al.2017),and ~3 yr (Otero-Santos et al.2020; Cheng et al.2022).

    Blazars are characterized by non-thermal emission, strong and rapid variability, and corresponding timescales extending from a few minutes to years and even decades.So photometric monitoring is a powerful tool to study the structure and radiation mechanism of blazars by measuring their variability amplitude,periodic or aperiodic timescales,and color behavior.In this work, we performed optical monitoring of 3C 66A to study its flux and color variability on short-term timescales.In Section 2,we will describe the observations and data reduction procedures.Section 3 presents the results.Our discussions and conclusions are given in Section 4.

    2.Observations

    Figure 1.Contour map of YNUAO location.The observatory is located on the top of Yunshan Mountain,with an altitude of 2009.5 m.The upper right corner is the layout of the Chenggong Campus of Yunnan University.

    The one-meter ALT-AZ Ritchey Chret?ien Telescope at Yunnan University Astronomical Observatory (hereafter,YNUAO) was officially operational on 2021 December 27.It is operated by Department of Astronomy, Yunnan University.This is a Ritchey–Chretien telescope made by APM-Telescopes GmbH in Germany,equipped with Andor’s iKon-XL 231 CCD camera platform.

    2.1.Site Conditions

    The location of the YNUAO is 102° 51′ 02″ (E),2 4°4 9 ′1 2″(N),with an altitude of 2009.5 m (Figure 1).Figure 2 shows the data recorded from 2017 March 23 to April 13 to evaluate the site seeing conditions of YNUAO.

    2.2.1-meter Telescope and CCD Characteristics

    The one-meter telescope at YNUAO (YNUAO-1m) has a Ritchey ?

    Chretien design with an effective system focal ratio of f/8 by LOMO Optic Set.It has a hyperbolic primary mirror with an effective diameter of 1005 mm(1019.4 mm mechanical diameter), and a hyperbolic secondary mirror with an effective diameter of 369 mm (375 mm mechanical diameter).Two Nasmyth focal stages with image de-rotators are switched through the tunable tertiary mirror.The images have 80%encircled energy (EE80) of 0 5 maximum, over the entire corrected field of view.The telescope has been optimized for the wavelength range of 350–900 nm with a reflectance of at least 85%on each mirror.The baseline for the telescope mirror coatings (for primary, secondary, and tertiary mirrors) is aluminum with protection.The blind pointing accuracy is less than 10″rms (i.e., open-loop).Tracking accuracy and field derotation compensation will not degrade images at the periphery of the field of view by more than 1 0 rms over a minimum period of 1000 s.Figure 3 shows the distribution of displacement deviation of 1000 s of continuous exposure image over time (single 10 s exposure, 100 consecutive frames).The accuracy can reach 0 72 rms for open-loop tracking.

    The iKon-XL 231 CCD camera is used for photometry for YNUAO-1 m.It is a thermoelectrically(TE)cooled,very large area CCD camera platform with the e2v CCD231-84 Astro back-illuminated sensor, offering a very large 61.4×61.4 mm imaging area from a 4096×4108 array format and 15 μm pixel size.The minimum temperature achieved for the TE cooler is set to-100°C with water/liquid cooling.For a standard silicon sensor with mid-band AR coating, peak quantum efficiency could be larger than 95%.The high sensitivity model offers the absolute best CCD performance available, combining exceptionally low read noise of 2.2 electrons with a very large well depth of 350,000 electrons (in system readout rate 100KHz 18 bit).The minimum dark current achievable is 0.0002 electrons pixel-1second-1(@ sensor temperature of -100°C with 16°C water cooling).

    Figure 2.The curve of seeing at Chenggong Campus of Yunnan University from 2017 March 23 to April 12.

    Figure 3.The distribution of displacement deviation of 1000 s continuous exposure image(single 10 s exposure,100 consecutive frames).The left panel is open-loop tracking, and the right panel is closed-loop tracking.

    2.3.Data Reduction

    Our monitoring of 3C 66A with the YNUAO-1 m was from 2021 November 1 to 2022 February 27 in Johnson–Morgan system V and R bands in the alternate mode.The typical exposure times for V and R bands are 120 s and 80 s respectively.A total of 42 observation nights and 2533 CCD frames (including 1280 in the V band and 1253 in the R band) were obtained.All images were still reduced with the standard image reduction and analysis facility (IRAF).4IRAF is the Image Reduction and Analysis Facility, a general purpose software system for the reduction and analysis of astronomical data.IRAF was written by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories (NOAO) in Tucson,Arizona.However, development and maintenance of IRAF is discontinued since 2013 October.The iraf-community is still working on integrating the available patches into the IRAF source code and fixing bugs.Aperture photometry radii of the source and comparison stars are performed with the same value in each frame,which is determined by the FWHM of the source.As in our previous work, we concentrate on an aperture radius of about 1.5 FWHM for our analysis, which always provides the best signal-to-noise ratio(S/N)(Zeng et al.2017,2018,2019).We used the three comparison stars,star“2,”star“3”and star “5”listed in Table 1, to obtain magnitudes for 3C 66A, and then calculated the average and corresponding standard deviation as the magnitude of 3C 66A in each photometric observation.According to the deviation of the average of the differential instrumental magnitude of comparison stars “2”and “5,”Δ(star 2-star 5), we estimated the uncertainty in our observation campaign to be ±0.05 mag.Figure 4 shows the distribution of uncertainty in our observation in each band for the entire observational campaign.

    Figure 4.Distribution of uncertainty in our observation in each band for the entire observational campaign.The left panel is the distribution of the deviation of the differential instrumental magnitudes of comparison stars 2 and 5 in bands V and R.The right panel is the distribution of full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 3C 66A for each observation.

    Table 1 The Magnitudes of the Comparison Stars

    3.Results

    3.1.Variability

    We used a variability parameter C, generalized by Romero et al.(1999), as

    Figure 5.Light curves from 2021 November 1 to 2022 February 27 in V and R bands.

    Table 2 Results of the Timescale Analysis are Shown in Figure 6

    where σSource-Star2, σSource-Star5, and σStar2-Star5are standard deviations of the differential instrumental magnitudes of 3C 66A and comparison star 2, 3C 66A and comparison star 5, and comparison stars 2 and 5, respectively.

    The χ2test is also used,

    To investigate thepresence ofvariability,theFtest(and χ2test) was comparedwith the Fα,ν(and)critical value,where ν is the degrees of freedom and α is the significance level.In this paper,both the F test and χ2test were performed at two significance levels: 0.99 and 0.999.As described by Romero et al.(1999), if C >2.576, then the source was classified as a variable at significance levels: 0.99.We considered an IDV to have occurred (variable, V), if the statistics from both tests were satisfied at the 0.999 level (or C >2.576).None of the criteria was met at the 0.99 level (or C <2.576): it was marked as non-variable (NV), nor was it marked as a probable variable (PV).The results of the F-test,C-test, χ2-test, and the IDV observations in V and R bands are presented in Table A1.

    Figure 6.Light curves of 3C 66A with flux in units of mJy and time in units of JD-JDstart.The red lines are the best fitting by an asymmetric flare template and the corresponding gray areas are 3σ confidence intervals.

    Table 3 Color Variability Epochs and Fit Parameters of Figures 11, 12, and 13

    During the 42 observation nights, two light curves were marked as “V”in the V band, while 12 were in the R band.Among the 12 nights IDV occurred,2021 December accounted for 6, and 2022 February accounted for 4.Some of the IDVs showed monotonically increasing or decreasing trends during observations.While for others shown flares, we fitted them with an asymmetric flare template (Danforth et al.2013):

    where Tr,imeans rise timescales and Td,imeans decay timescales.The results of the light curves are shown in Figure 6 and Table 2.The reliable minimal rise/decay timescale is about 6 minutes, while the durations of variations can last 12 minutes or more.

    3.2.Cross-Correlation Analysis

    Figure 7.The DCFs between the V and R bands in daily average magnitudes,the time lag was τcent=0.52±0.08 day.The dots represent the cross-correlation for the data,while the color lines show the distribution of random cross-correlations obtained by the Monte Carlo method with 1σ(red),2σ(orange),and 3σ(green).The left panel shows uncertainties with Model-dependent Monte Carlo Method and the right panel with Model-independent.

    In the variability analysis, we found that the light curves in the V and R bands showed consistency of variability, so we carried out the discrete correlation function (DCF) (Edelson &Krolik 1988) to analyze the correlation between the V and R bands with uncorrected light curves.While there is no general agreement on how to estimate the confidence levels (or significant levels) in DCFs, probably the method that has the widest acceptance is Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.For Model-dependent Monte Carlo Method, confidence is estimated by generating multiple randomized versions of time series with the same statistical properties (a simple power-law power spectral density, PSD ∝ν-α, α ≈2.0±0.5) and rerunning the DCF.All simulated time series are generated by a power law noise algorithm (Timmer & Koenig 1995), which randomizes both the amplitude and phase of the Fourier transform coefficients consistent with the statistical properties of the periodogram.Each simulated time series applied the same sampling,interpolated into the same time grid,and added corresponding errors.The distribution of DCFs of these simulated light curves is used to estimate the confidence levels of the data DCF (Max-Moerbeck et al.2014; Jackman et al.2018).

    The determination of a model responding to discrete time series is similarly fraught with uncertainty because the origin of irregular continuum variations is unknown, which leads to the uncertainty of the index α and simulated light curve model.Therefore,methods by which the uncertainties in DCFs can be estimated in a less model-dependent fashion that is simple to implement.

    In our photometric monitoring program, uncertainties in measured fluxes can be a significant source of error.The uncertainties in our observation campaign are normally distributed (as shown in Figure 4 left panel).We thus modify each flux by random Gaussian deviation based on the quoted error for each datum, which is regarded as “flux randomization”(FR).Cross-correlation results can be highly sensitive to the dispersion of data resulting from non-continuously sampled light curves and different time resolutions (exposure times).Thus, random subset selection (RSS) based on a randomly chosen subset of the original data points is implemented.Each MC realization is based on a number of data points that is typically 37% (1/e ≈0.37, Poisson probability) smaller than the real data set.The two elements can be combined in a single MC realization as Monte Carlo “FR/RSS”(Peterson et al.1998, 2004) method.

    We took 103MC simulations for both methods, shown in Figures 7, 8, and 9, the color lines show the 1σ (red), 2σ(orange), and 3σ (green) uncertainties.Then we fitted DCFs with a Gaussian function as: DCF (τ) =Ae-(τ-τcent)2(2σ2).Generally, the centroid of the DCF τcentis recommended as the lag rather than the location of the peak τpeak.During our observation campaign, variation in V and R bands showed a correlation, and time lag was τcent=0.52±0.08 day for daily average magnitudes and τcent=0.12±0.08 day for all observation frames.From this comparison, it can be found that in the optical V and R bands, the 3C 66A had an intra-day delay timescale.For 2021 December, the time lag was τcent=(5.35±1.02)×10-3day (7.70±1.47 minutes).While in 2022 February, it was τcent=(-3.60±0.43)×10-3day(-5.18±0.16 minutes).As time resolutions were ~3.90 minutes between V and R bands, these time lags were acceptable.

    3.3.The Spectral Properties

    Figure 8.The DCF between the V and R bands, the time lag was τcent=0.12±0.08 day.The dots represent the cross-correlation for all data, while the color lines show the distribution of random cross-correlations obtained by the Monte Carlo method with 1σ (red), 2σ (orange), and 3σ (green).

    Figure 9.The DCFs between the V and R bands.The left panel is from 2021 December,the time lag was τcent=(5.35±1.02)×10-3 day,and the right panel is from 2022 February, the time lag was τcent=(-3.60±0.43)×10-3 days.

    DCF analysis indicated that 3C 66A should have consistent spectral behavior during variability.Here we considered variations in the color indices V-R of 3C 66A with respect to variations in its brightness in the R band in 2021 December and 2022 February (as shown in Figure 10).Analysis of these two time periods showed that a weak positive correlation between the color index and brightness, with a slope of-0.40±0.05, r = -0.40 for 2021 December, and a slope of-0.16±0.05, r = -0.19 for 2022 February.The color bar represents the progression of time of color index variability with brightness, in units of Julian Day and from observation start time.Figures 11, 12, and 13 show the color–magnitude correlation for individual nights in consecutive months.Table 3 lists the slope and correlation coefficient for each color variability diagram.The intra-day analysis results showed that,in most cases, there was a negative correlation between the color index and the magnitude.However, the strength of this correlation had nothing to do with whether the variability occurred.Irregular minor variations in timescales of days superimposed on long-term trends led to a weak negative correlation between the color index and magnitude.

    Figure 10.Optical color index vs.magnitude plots of 3C 66A in 2021 December and 2022 February.The color bars indicate the progression of time in units of JD-JDstart.

    Figure 11.Optical color index vs.magnitude plots of 3C 66A in 2021 December.The color bars indicate the progression of time in units of JD-JDstart.

    Figure 12.Optical color index vs.magnitude plots of 3C 66A in January 2022.The color bars indicate the progression of time in units of JD-JDstart.

    4.Discussions and Conclusions

    3C 66A has been observed intensively in the optical band(Lainela et al.1999;B?ttcher et al.2005,2009;Tao et al.2011;Gupta et al.2012; Kaur et al.2017; Fan et al.2018; Otero-Santos et al.2020;Pasierb et al.2020 and references therein).It is also one of our first batches of photometric monitoring objects with the 1 m optical telescope at Yunnan University Astronomical Observatory (YNUAO-1m).Our observational campaign was performed from 2021 November 1 to 2022 February 27 in the Johnson–Morgan system V and R bands.The average magnitudes in each band wereV= 15.52 ±0.18 mag andR= 15.07 ±0.17 mag.Corresponding variability amplitude in each band was respectively ΔV=0 74,Amp=70.27% and ΔR=0 72, Amp=68.56%, while distribution of Amp was around AmpV,median~10.32% and AmpR,median~9.63%(shown in Figure 14).During this period,3C 66A showed active states twice: 2021 December and 2022 February.The flux showed a continuous increasing or decreasing trend during the observation nights, which meant most intraday light curves showed monotonic variations(shown in Figure 15) with timescales greater than the observational duration.Combined with the minimal rise/decay timescale (shown in Figure 6 and Table 2), the durations of variations were ΔT ?11.99-179.67 minutes.These timescales were consistent with the results of ΔT=23.18-344.02 minutes(with Amp=13.2%–92.8%)by Fan et al.(2018)and ΔT=10–32 minutes (with ΔB=0 52–0 46) by Xie et al.(1992).

    Figure 13.Optical color index vs.magnitude plots of 3C 66A in 2022 February.The color bars indicate the progression of time in units of JD-JDstart.

    Figure 14.Distribution of the variability amplitude(Amp)in V and R bands in Table A1.

    Considering that the non-thermal radiation in the optical band is dominated by synchrotron radiation, we can estimate the strength of the magnetic field as Zeng et al.(2018, 2019),Yan et al.(2018).The radiation cooling timescale (in the observer frame) of typical particles emitting synchrotron radiation can be defined as (Chiaberge & Ghisellini 1999):

    where σTis the electron Thompson cross-section, and UB≡B2/8π is the magnetic energy density.The characteristic frequency can be expressed as:

    In the observer frame, our observed the minimum timescale must be longer than the radiative cooling timescale.Therefore,the strength of magnetic field should be satisfied with

    Figure 15.Intraday light curves in the R band with time in units of JD-JDstart.

    Figure 16.Light curves from 2021 July 17 to 2022 March 2.

    The minimal timescales in our observation campaign were 5.82±2.74 and 6.18±2.81 minutes in the V band (as shown in Table 2),which means the magnetic field strength of the jet should be larger than 7.28 G (δD~27.09).Assuming an equipartition parameter eB≡u(píng)B/ue,which refers to the energy density of the electrons in the co-moving frame, the magnetic field can be estimated asBeB=2.9eB27G for δ=15(B?ttcher et al.2005).Modeling of the overall SED with a Synchrotron Self-Compton(SSC)plus External Compton(EC)model with an external near-infrared radiation field, Abdo et al.(2011),Itoh et al.(2013) found comoving magnetic field B=0.21 ~0.35 G.Mohana et al.(2021) also determined the magnetic field as B=0.014 G(δD~27.09/21.95)through broad-band SED fitting of the two distinct states.Compared with the results by fitting the SED with the theoretical models,the magnetic field strength of the jet obtained by giving the minimum IDV timescale was much higher than expected.Therefore, the rapid variability with such a short timescale in our case may be caused by turbulence in the jet rather than by synchrotron radiation cooling.In the shock-in-jet model, a compact emission region (shock) propagates down the relativistic jet and interacts with a highly nonuniform portion in the jet flow.Any changes in the physical mechanisms of blazars, such as the accelerating particles or compressing magnetic fields, can trigger a shock that leads to optical photometric variabilities.Turbulence behind the shock-in-jet can be an excellent way to explain such minutes’timescale rapid variability of blazars (Wagner & Witzel 1995; B?ttcher& Dermer 2010; Wu et al.2012; B?ttcher 2021).

    In our observation campaign, most of the IDVs occurred in 2021 December and 2022 February.The correlation analysis with DCF between V and R bands revealed time lags of τcent=7.70±1.47 minutes in 2021 December, and τcent=-5.18±0.16 minutes in 2022 February.These inconsistent inter-band time lags were exactly as expected by the internal-shock model for blazars (B?ttcher & Dermer 2010).This semi-analytical model described the time-dependent radiative output from internal shocks arising from colliding relativistic shells in a blazar jet.Variations of specific parameters (such as the external radiation energy density, the electron equipartition fraction, the magnetic-field equipartition fraction, the electron acceleration efficiency parameter, the electron injection spectral index,and the relative Lorentz factor between the shells) may lead to changing signs of inter-band time lags,potentially explaining the lack of persistent trends of time lags in most blazars.

    The relationship between the color index and magnitude is used to ascertain whether variabilities are associated with spectral changes.We investigated the color–magnitude correlation for individual nights (shown in Figures 11, 12, and 13).The individual night results showed that, in most cases, there was a negative correlation between the color index and the magnitude.Irregular variations superimposed on long-term trends led to a weak negative correlation between the color index and magnitude.As shown in Figure 10, the analysis of two time periods with obvious IDVs showed a weak negative color–magnitude correlation (with a slope of -0.40±0.05,r = -0.40 for 2021 December, and a slope of -0.16±0.05,r = -0.19 for 2022 February), which suggested redder when brighter (RWB) or bluer when fainter (BWF) behavior.Gaur et al.(2019)found a weak positive correlation, with a slope of-0.021±0.019, r = 0.13 between B and R versus R magnitude.Such a weak correlation coefficient tended to consider that the spectrums do not change with variabilities.This conclusion was also consistent with the results of B?ttcher et al.(2005, 2009), no matter whether in a high optical state with R ~13.4 or a low brightness state with R ≥14.0,3C 66A did not display spectral variability.Such achromatic variation may be produced by geometric effects (lighthouse effect or microlensing effect) in the shock-in-jet model.When shocks moved toward an observer on helical trajectories in the jet, the flux variations could be produced by the sweeping beam,which usually produced achromatic variation (Camenzind & Krockenberger 1992;Wu et al.2007;Man et al.2016).Gravitational microlensing effects were from the external origin, which usually generated the light curves achromatically and symmetrically (Sun et al.2021).

    3C 66A, as a TeV blazar with optical quasi-periodic variation, was also the target of multiwavelength WEBT monitoring projects and Steward Observatory AGNs Optical Observational Program.Katzman Automatic Imaging Telescope(KAIT,Li et al.2003),the LX-200 0.4 m telescope from the St.Petersburg University, and the AZT-8 0.7 m telescope from the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory(SPB and CrAO)provided long-term optical monitoring data(Otero-Santos et al.2020).Now, as one of our first batches of photometric monitoring objects with YNUAO-1 m, it can well complement the vacant observation time of the ZTF monitoring project.Figure 16 shows the light curve from 2021 July 17 to 2022 March 2, transformations between ZTF magnitudes to Johnson–Morgan system R band following Lupton et al.(2005).5https://www.sdss.org/dr16/algorithms/sdssUBVRITransform/Our data filled in gaps in ZTF observations, and continuous observational data are critical for the accuracy of the quasi-periodic analysis and multiband correlation analysis.YUNAO-1 m will also conduct long-term monitoring with VHE sources, and provide high-quality optical photometric data in conjunction with various sky survey monitoring projects.

    Acknowledgments

    We acknowledge the support of the staff of the Lijiang 2.4 m telescope.This work is supported by the fund for the Youth Project of Basic Research Program of Yunnan Province(202001BB050012) and the Joint Foundation of Department of Science and Technology of Yunnan Province and Yunnan University (202201BF070001-020).This research uses data obtained through the one-meter optical telescopes at Yunnan University Astronomical Observatory (YNUAO-1m) which is funded by the “Yunnan University Development Plan for World-Class Astronomy Discipline.”

    Appendix

    Results of the IDV Observations of 3C 66A

    ORCID iDs

    Wei Zeng https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4144-5378

    Ben-Zhong Dai https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7908-4996

    videos熟女内射| 在线 av 中文字幕| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 91国产中文字幕| 91国产中文字幕| 中文欧美无线码| av播播在线观看一区| 国产极品天堂在线| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产在线视频一区二区| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 午夜av观看不卡| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 免费观看在线日韩| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| www日本在线高清视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产淫语在线视频| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 日日啪夜夜爽| 色网站视频免费| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 多毛熟女@视频| 嫩草影院入口| 久久人人爽人人片av| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 蜜桃在线观看..| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 最黄视频免费看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 国产男女内射视频| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲中文av在线| 满18在线观看网站| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久久久精品性色| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 超色免费av| 九色成人免费人妻av| 观看美女的网站| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 久久人人爽人人片av| 97在线人人人人妻| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 日韩一区二区三区影片| av黄色大香蕉| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产成人91sexporn| 一级a做视频免费观看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| av黄色大香蕉| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 国产一区二区三区av在线| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| videossex国产| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 三级国产精品片| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 在现免费观看毛片| 宅男免费午夜| 精品少妇内射三级| 老女人水多毛片| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 中文天堂在线官网| 黄色配什么色好看| 老女人水多毛片| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲av福利一区| 婷婷色综合www| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 蜜桃在线观看..| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 18在线观看网站| 色吧在线观看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 九草在线视频观看| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| av免费观看日本| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 飞空精品影院首页| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 国产综合精华液| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 制服诱惑二区| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产精品三级大全| 成年av动漫网址| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产精品无大码| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲第一av免费看| av免费观看日本| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 免费大片18禁| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 伦精品一区二区三区| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 久久久精品区二区三区| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 一级毛片 在线播放| av不卡在线播放| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 高清av免费在线| 久久久久久人人人人人| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 考比视频在线观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 1024视频免费在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 熟女av电影| 中国三级夫妇交换| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| av片东京热男人的天堂| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在 | 两个人看的免费小视频| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 一区在线观看完整版| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 久久久久视频综合| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 永久免费av网站大全| 嫩草影院入口| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 高清av免费在线| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 满18在线观看网站| 成人无遮挡网站| 捣出白浆h1v1| 欧美性感艳星| 熟女av电影| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 91成人精品电影| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久99一区二区三区| 丝袜美足系列| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| videosex国产| 嫩草影院入口| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 久久久久久伊人网av| 老司机影院成人| 97超碰精品成人国产| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 黄片播放在线免费| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 嫩草影院入口| 少妇的逼水好多| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| av国产精品久久久久影院| 色5月婷婷丁香| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 国产精品免费大片| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 成人国产麻豆网| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 少妇精品久久久久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产麻豆69| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 日本色播在线视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 视频区图区小说| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 亚洲性久久影院| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| kizo精华| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 一级毛片我不卡| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 久久久久网色| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 成人二区视频| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 伦理电影免费视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 一本久久精品| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 老女人水多毛片| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 自线自在国产av| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 飞空精品影院首页| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产av国产精品国产| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 三级国产精品片| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 老熟女久久久| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 免费看不卡的av| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产在线免费精品| a 毛片基地| av.在线天堂| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 国产永久视频网站| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 一级毛片 在线播放| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 嫩草影院入口| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲第一av免费看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 曰老女人黄片| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产成人欧美| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 午夜福利视频精品| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 久久av网站| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲综合色惰| 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 最黄视频免费看| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲av男天堂| 宅男免费午夜| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 性色av一级| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 99久久综合免费| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 精品酒店卫生间| a级毛片黄视频| av福利片在线| 久久婷婷青草| 午夜福利视频精品| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 丝袜美足系列| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 欧美另类一区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 久久人人爽人人片av| 久久久久久伊人网av| 宅男免费午夜| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 熟女电影av网| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 色吧在线观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 一区二区av电影网| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 99久久综合免费| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 91成人精品电影| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| xxx大片免费视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 亚洲综合色惰| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| videossex国产| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| av免费在线看不卡| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 免费观看性生交大片5| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 五月天丁香电影| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 韩国精品一区二区三区 | 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 国产在线一区二区三区精| 欧美性感艳星| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看 | 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲av福利一区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲av福利一区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 亚洲综合色网址| 亚洲成色77777| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 视频区图区小说| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久久久视频综合| 国产精品.久久久| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| kizo精华| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看|