• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Photometric Monitoring of Blazar 3C 66A with the Yunnan University Astronomical Observatory 1m Telescope

    2023-05-29 10:27:20WeiZengTaoWenZhenLuGongShiChenFanWuHaoYangZhangandBenZhongDai

    Wei Zeng , Tao Wen, Zhen-Lu Gong, Shi Chen, Fan Wu, Hao-Yang Zhang, and Ben-Zhong Dai

    1 School of Physics & Astronomy, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China; zengwei@ynu.edu.cn, bzhdai@ynu.edu.cn

    2 Key Laboratory of Astroparticle Physics, Yunnan Province, Kunming 650091, China

    3 Astronomical Observatory, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China

    Abstract 3C 66A is one of our first batches of photometric monitoring objects with the 1 m optical telescope at Yunnan University Astronomical Observatory.In the present work,the observational campaign was performed from 2021 November 1 to 2022 February 27 in the Johnson–Morgan system V and R bands.The average magnitudes in each band were V = 15.52 ±0.18 mag and R = 15.07 ±0.17 mag.The overall variability amplitudes were ΔV=0 74, Amp=70.27% and ΔR=0 72, Amp=68.56%, respectively.Most of the intraday variabilities(IDVs) occurred in 2021 December and 2022 February.The minimal rise/decay timescale was about 6 minutes(5.82±2.74 minutes and 6.18±2.81 minutes on 2022 February 11,6.99±3.70 minutes and 6.17±2.91 minutes on 2022 February 12).Durations of these rapid variabilities were from 11.99 to 179.67 minutes.The discrete correlation function analyses between V and R bands showed significantly correlated variability.Color index analysis of IDVs showed that the spectrums do not change with variabilities.

    Key words: (galaxies:) BL Lacertae objects: individual (3C 66A) – galaxies: photometry – galaxies: active

    1.Introduction

    3C 66A (or0219+428;α=02:22:39.6114,δ = +43:02:07.799, J2000) is one of the most luminous blazars at TeV γ-rays,which is a BL Lac type object classified as an intermediate synchrotron peaked blazar(Ackermann et al.2015) at redshift z=0.444 (Miller & McGimsey 1978) by detected Mg II emission line, or z=0.340 by detected host galaxy (Torres-Zafra et al.2016)).It was detected at VHE γrays (very high energy, VHE; E >100 GeV) by the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS,Acciari et al.2009)and the Major Atmospheric Gamma Imaging Cherenkov Telescopes(MAGIC,Aleksi? et al.2011).

    In optical bands, the 1.56 m telescope of the Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (ShAO) had been monitored from 1996 December 11 to 2009 December 28(Fan et al.2018).The GLAST-AGILE Support Program (GASP) of the Whole Earth Blazar Telescope (WEBT) carried out multiwavelength monitoring in 2003–2004 (B?ttcher et al.2005) and 2007–2008(B?ttcher et al.2009).The Steward Observatory of the University of Arizona in support of the Fermi γ-ray observations (Smith et al.2009) contributed optical data from years 2008 to 2018.Using an extremely wide field of view camera,the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) (Bellm et al.2019; Masci et al.2019)scanning the entire Northern sky from 2018 March also carried out the optical monitoring of 3C 66A in ZTF_g,ZTF_r, and ZTF_i bands.

    Combining the above-mentioned sky survey data and additional observational data, 3C 66A intra-day variability(IDV) has been widely addressed by several authors with timescales ranging from 14.5 to 344.0 minutes (Gupta et al.2012; Kaur et al.2017; Fan et al.2018; Pasierb et al.2020).This source also exhibited quasi-periodic variability.Lainela et al.(1999) investigated a period of 65 days, similar to~50–57 days by B?ttcher et al.(2005), while different longterm analyses claimed periods of 156 days, ~2 yr (Fan et al.2018),~2.3 yr(Cheng et al.2022),~2.5 yr(Kaur et al.2017),and ~3 yr (Otero-Santos et al.2020; Cheng et al.2022).

    Blazars are characterized by non-thermal emission, strong and rapid variability, and corresponding timescales extending from a few minutes to years and even decades.So photometric monitoring is a powerful tool to study the structure and radiation mechanism of blazars by measuring their variability amplitude,periodic or aperiodic timescales,and color behavior.In this work, we performed optical monitoring of 3C 66A to study its flux and color variability on short-term timescales.In Section 2,we will describe the observations and data reduction procedures.Section 3 presents the results.Our discussions and conclusions are given in Section 4.

    2.Observations

    Figure 1.Contour map of YNUAO location.The observatory is located on the top of Yunshan Mountain,with an altitude of 2009.5 m.The upper right corner is the layout of the Chenggong Campus of Yunnan University.

    The one-meter ALT-AZ Ritchey Chret?ien Telescope at Yunnan University Astronomical Observatory (hereafter,YNUAO) was officially operational on 2021 December 27.It is operated by Department of Astronomy, Yunnan University.This is a Ritchey–Chretien telescope made by APM-Telescopes GmbH in Germany,equipped with Andor’s iKon-XL 231 CCD camera platform.

    2.1.Site Conditions

    The location of the YNUAO is 102° 51′ 02″ (E),2 4°4 9 ′1 2″(N),with an altitude of 2009.5 m (Figure 1).Figure 2 shows the data recorded from 2017 March 23 to April 13 to evaluate the site seeing conditions of YNUAO.

    2.2.1-meter Telescope and CCD Characteristics

    The one-meter telescope at YNUAO (YNUAO-1m) has a Ritchey ?

    Chretien design with an effective system focal ratio of f/8 by LOMO Optic Set.It has a hyperbolic primary mirror with an effective diameter of 1005 mm(1019.4 mm mechanical diameter), and a hyperbolic secondary mirror with an effective diameter of 369 mm (375 mm mechanical diameter).Two Nasmyth focal stages with image de-rotators are switched through the tunable tertiary mirror.The images have 80%encircled energy (EE80) of 0 5 maximum, over the entire corrected field of view.The telescope has been optimized for the wavelength range of 350–900 nm with a reflectance of at least 85%on each mirror.The baseline for the telescope mirror coatings (for primary, secondary, and tertiary mirrors) is aluminum with protection.The blind pointing accuracy is less than 10″rms (i.e., open-loop).Tracking accuracy and field derotation compensation will not degrade images at the periphery of the field of view by more than 1 0 rms over a minimum period of 1000 s.Figure 3 shows the distribution of displacement deviation of 1000 s of continuous exposure image over time (single 10 s exposure, 100 consecutive frames).The accuracy can reach 0 72 rms for open-loop tracking.

    The iKon-XL 231 CCD camera is used for photometry for YNUAO-1 m.It is a thermoelectrically(TE)cooled,very large area CCD camera platform with the e2v CCD231-84 Astro back-illuminated sensor, offering a very large 61.4×61.4 mm imaging area from a 4096×4108 array format and 15 μm pixel size.The minimum temperature achieved for the TE cooler is set to-100°C with water/liquid cooling.For a standard silicon sensor with mid-band AR coating, peak quantum efficiency could be larger than 95%.The high sensitivity model offers the absolute best CCD performance available, combining exceptionally low read noise of 2.2 electrons with a very large well depth of 350,000 electrons (in system readout rate 100KHz 18 bit).The minimum dark current achievable is 0.0002 electrons pixel-1second-1(@ sensor temperature of -100°C with 16°C water cooling).

    Figure 2.The curve of seeing at Chenggong Campus of Yunnan University from 2017 March 23 to April 12.

    Figure 3.The distribution of displacement deviation of 1000 s continuous exposure image(single 10 s exposure,100 consecutive frames).The left panel is open-loop tracking, and the right panel is closed-loop tracking.

    2.3.Data Reduction

    Our monitoring of 3C 66A with the YNUAO-1 m was from 2021 November 1 to 2022 February 27 in Johnson–Morgan system V and R bands in the alternate mode.The typical exposure times for V and R bands are 120 s and 80 s respectively.A total of 42 observation nights and 2533 CCD frames (including 1280 in the V band and 1253 in the R band) were obtained.All images were still reduced with the standard image reduction and analysis facility (IRAF).4IRAF is the Image Reduction and Analysis Facility, a general purpose software system for the reduction and analysis of astronomical data.IRAF was written by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories (NOAO) in Tucson,Arizona.However, development and maintenance of IRAF is discontinued since 2013 October.The iraf-community is still working on integrating the available patches into the IRAF source code and fixing bugs.Aperture photometry radii of the source and comparison stars are performed with the same value in each frame,which is determined by the FWHM of the source.As in our previous work, we concentrate on an aperture radius of about 1.5 FWHM for our analysis, which always provides the best signal-to-noise ratio(S/N)(Zeng et al.2017,2018,2019).We used the three comparison stars,star“2,”star“3”and star “5”listed in Table 1, to obtain magnitudes for 3C 66A, and then calculated the average and corresponding standard deviation as the magnitude of 3C 66A in each photometric observation.According to the deviation of the average of the differential instrumental magnitude of comparison stars “2”and “5,”Δ(star 2-star 5), we estimated the uncertainty in our observation campaign to be ±0.05 mag.Figure 4 shows the distribution of uncertainty in our observation in each band for the entire observational campaign.

    Figure 4.Distribution of uncertainty in our observation in each band for the entire observational campaign.The left panel is the distribution of the deviation of the differential instrumental magnitudes of comparison stars 2 and 5 in bands V and R.The right panel is the distribution of full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 3C 66A for each observation.

    Table 1 The Magnitudes of the Comparison Stars

    3.Results

    3.1.Variability

    We used a variability parameter C, generalized by Romero et al.(1999), as

    Figure 5.Light curves from 2021 November 1 to 2022 February 27 in V and R bands.

    Table 2 Results of the Timescale Analysis are Shown in Figure 6

    where σSource-Star2, σSource-Star5, and σStar2-Star5are standard deviations of the differential instrumental magnitudes of 3C 66A and comparison star 2, 3C 66A and comparison star 5, and comparison stars 2 and 5, respectively.

    The χ2test is also used,

    To investigate thepresence ofvariability,theFtest(and χ2test) was comparedwith the Fα,ν(and)critical value,where ν is the degrees of freedom and α is the significance level.In this paper,both the F test and χ2test were performed at two significance levels: 0.99 and 0.999.As described by Romero et al.(1999), if C >2.576, then the source was classified as a variable at significance levels: 0.99.We considered an IDV to have occurred (variable, V), if the statistics from both tests were satisfied at the 0.999 level (or C >2.576).None of the criteria was met at the 0.99 level (or C <2.576): it was marked as non-variable (NV), nor was it marked as a probable variable (PV).The results of the F-test,C-test, χ2-test, and the IDV observations in V and R bands are presented in Table A1.

    Figure 6.Light curves of 3C 66A with flux in units of mJy and time in units of JD-JDstart.The red lines are the best fitting by an asymmetric flare template and the corresponding gray areas are 3σ confidence intervals.

    Table 3 Color Variability Epochs and Fit Parameters of Figures 11, 12, and 13

    During the 42 observation nights, two light curves were marked as “V”in the V band, while 12 were in the R band.Among the 12 nights IDV occurred,2021 December accounted for 6, and 2022 February accounted for 4.Some of the IDVs showed monotonically increasing or decreasing trends during observations.While for others shown flares, we fitted them with an asymmetric flare template (Danforth et al.2013):

    where Tr,imeans rise timescales and Td,imeans decay timescales.The results of the light curves are shown in Figure 6 and Table 2.The reliable minimal rise/decay timescale is about 6 minutes, while the durations of variations can last 12 minutes or more.

    3.2.Cross-Correlation Analysis

    Figure 7.The DCFs between the V and R bands in daily average magnitudes,the time lag was τcent=0.52±0.08 day.The dots represent the cross-correlation for the data,while the color lines show the distribution of random cross-correlations obtained by the Monte Carlo method with 1σ(red),2σ(orange),and 3σ(green).The left panel shows uncertainties with Model-dependent Monte Carlo Method and the right panel with Model-independent.

    In the variability analysis, we found that the light curves in the V and R bands showed consistency of variability, so we carried out the discrete correlation function (DCF) (Edelson &Krolik 1988) to analyze the correlation between the V and R bands with uncorrected light curves.While there is no general agreement on how to estimate the confidence levels (or significant levels) in DCFs, probably the method that has the widest acceptance is Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.For Model-dependent Monte Carlo Method, confidence is estimated by generating multiple randomized versions of time series with the same statistical properties (a simple power-law power spectral density, PSD ∝ν-α, α ≈2.0±0.5) and rerunning the DCF.All simulated time series are generated by a power law noise algorithm (Timmer & Koenig 1995), which randomizes both the amplitude and phase of the Fourier transform coefficients consistent with the statistical properties of the periodogram.Each simulated time series applied the same sampling,interpolated into the same time grid,and added corresponding errors.The distribution of DCFs of these simulated light curves is used to estimate the confidence levels of the data DCF (Max-Moerbeck et al.2014; Jackman et al.2018).

    The determination of a model responding to discrete time series is similarly fraught with uncertainty because the origin of irregular continuum variations is unknown, which leads to the uncertainty of the index α and simulated light curve model.Therefore,methods by which the uncertainties in DCFs can be estimated in a less model-dependent fashion that is simple to implement.

    In our photometric monitoring program, uncertainties in measured fluxes can be a significant source of error.The uncertainties in our observation campaign are normally distributed (as shown in Figure 4 left panel).We thus modify each flux by random Gaussian deviation based on the quoted error for each datum, which is regarded as “flux randomization”(FR).Cross-correlation results can be highly sensitive to the dispersion of data resulting from non-continuously sampled light curves and different time resolutions (exposure times).Thus, random subset selection (RSS) based on a randomly chosen subset of the original data points is implemented.Each MC realization is based on a number of data points that is typically 37% (1/e ≈0.37, Poisson probability) smaller than the real data set.The two elements can be combined in a single MC realization as Monte Carlo “FR/RSS”(Peterson et al.1998, 2004) method.

    We took 103MC simulations for both methods, shown in Figures 7, 8, and 9, the color lines show the 1σ (red), 2σ(orange), and 3σ (green) uncertainties.Then we fitted DCFs with a Gaussian function as: DCF (τ) =Ae-(τ-τcent)2(2σ2).Generally, the centroid of the DCF τcentis recommended as the lag rather than the location of the peak τpeak.During our observation campaign, variation in V and R bands showed a correlation, and time lag was τcent=0.52±0.08 day for daily average magnitudes and τcent=0.12±0.08 day for all observation frames.From this comparison, it can be found that in the optical V and R bands, the 3C 66A had an intra-day delay timescale.For 2021 December, the time lag was τcent=(5.35±1.02)×10-3day (7.70±1.47 minutes).While in 2022 February, it was τcent=(-3.60±0.43)×10-3day(-5.18±0.16 minutes).As time resolutions were ~3.90 minutes between V and R bands, these time lags were acceptable.

    3.3.The Spectral Properties

    Figure 8.The DCF between the V and R bands, the time lag was τcent=0.12±0.08 day.The dots represent the cross-correlation for all data, while the color lines show the distribution of random cross-correlations obtained by the Monte Carlo method with 1σ (red), 2σ (orange), and 3σ (green).

    Figure 9.The DCFs between the V and R bands.The left panel is from 2021 December,the time lag was τcent=(5.35±1.02)×10-3 day,and the right panel is from 2022 February, the time lag was τcent=(-3.60±0.43)×10-3 days.

    DCF analysis indicated that 3C 66A should have consistent spectral behavior during variability.Here we considered variations in the color indices V-R of 3C 66A with respect to variations in its brightness in the R band in 2021 December and 2022 February (as shown in Figure 10).Analysis of these two time periods showed that a weak positive correlation between the color index and brightness, with a slope of-0.40±0.05, r = -0.40 for 2021 December, and a slope of-0.16±0.05, r = -0.19 for 2022 February.The color bar represents the progression of time of color index variability with brightness, in units of Julian Day and from observation start time.Figures 11, 12, and 13 show the color–magnitude correlation for individual nights in consecutive months.Table 3 lists the slope and correlation coefficient for each color variability diagram.The intra-day analysis results showed that,in most cases, there was a negative correlation between the color index and the magnitude.However, the strength of this correlation had nothing to do with whether the variability occurred.Irregular minor variations in timescales of days superimposed on long-term trends led to a weak negative correlation between the color index and magnitude.

    Figure 10.Optical color index vs.magnitude plots of 3C 66A in 2021 December and 2022 February.The color bars indicate the progression of time in units of JD-JDstart.

    Figure 11.Optical color index vs.magnitude plots of 3C 66A in 2021 December.The color bars indicate the progression of time in units of JD-JDstart.

    Figure 12.Optical color index vs.magnitude plots of 3C 66A in January 2022.The color bars indicate the progression of time in units of JD-JDstart.

    4.Discussions and Conclusions

    3C 66A has been observed intensively in the optical band(Lainela et al.1999;B?ttcher et al.2005,2009;Tao et al.2011;Gupta et al.2012; Kaur et al.2017; Fan et al.2018; Otero-Santos et al.2020;Pasierb et al.2020 and references therein).It is also one of our first batches of photometric monitoring objects with the 1 m optical telescope at Yunnan University Astronomical Observatory (YNUAO-1m).Our observational campaign was performed from 2021 November 1 to 2022 February 27 in the Johnson–Morgan system V and R bands.The average magnitudes in each band wereV= 15.52 ±0.18 mag andR= 15.07 ±0.17 mag.Corresponding variability amplitude in each band was respectively ΔV=0 74,Amp=70.27% and ΔR=0 72, Amp=68.56%, while distribution of Amp was around AmpV,median~10.32% and AmpR,median~9.63%(shown in Figure 14).During this period,3C 66A showed active states twice: 2021 December and 2022 February.The flux showed a continuous increasing or decreasing trend during the observation nights, which meant most intraday light curves showed monotonic variations(shown in Figure 15) with timescales greater than the observational duration.Combined with the minimal rise/decay timescale (shown in Figure 6 and Table 2), the durations of variations were ΔT ?11.99-179.67 minutes.These timescales were consistent with the results of ΔT=23.18-344.02 minutes(with Amp=13.2%–92.8%)by Fan et al.(2018)and ΔT=10–32 minutes (with ΔB=0 52–0 46) by Xie et al.(1992).

    Figure 13.Optical color index vs.magnitude plots of 3C 66A in 2022 February.The color bars indicate the progression of time in units of JD-JDstart.

    Figure 14.Distribution of the variability amplitude(Amp)in V and R bands in Table A1.

    Considering that the non-thermal radiation in the optical band is dominated by synchrotron radiation, we can estimate the strength of the magnetic field as Zeng et al.(2018, 2019),Yan et al.(2018).The radiation cooling timescale (in the observer frame) of typical particles emitting synchrotron radiation can be defined as (Chiaberge & Ghisellini 1999):

    where σTis the electron Thompson cross-section, and UB≡B2/8π is the magnetic energy density.The characteristic frequency can be expressed as:

    In the observer frame, our observed the minimum timescale must be longer than the radiative cooling timescale.Therefore,the strength of magnetic field should be satisfied with

    Figure 15.Intraday light curves in the R band with time in units of JD-JDstart.

    Figure 16.Light curves from 2021 July 17 to 2022 March 2.

    The minimal timescales in our observation campaign were 5.82±2.74 and 6.18±2.81 minutes in the V band (as shown in Table 2),which means the magnetic field strength of the jet should be larger than 7.28 G (δD~27.09).Assuming an equipartition parameter eB≡u(píng)B/ue,which refers to the energy density of the electrons in the co-moving frame, the magnetic field can be estimated asBeB=2.9eB27G for δ=15(B?ttcher et al.2005).Modeling of the overall SED with a Synchrotron Self-Compton(SSC)plus External Compton(EC)model with an external near-infrared radiation field, Abdo et al.(2011),Itoh et al.(2013) found comoving magnetic field B=0.21 ~0.35 G.Mohana et al.(2021) also determined the magnetic field as B=0.014 G(δD~27.09/21.95)through broad-band SED fitting of the two distinct states.Compared with the results by fitting the SED with the theoretical models,the magnetic field strength of the jet obtained by giving the minimum IDV timescale was much higher than expected.Therefore, the rapid variability with such a short timescale in our case may be caused by turbulence in the jet rather than by synchrotron radiation cooling.In the shock-in-jet model, a compact emission region (shock) propagates down the relativistic jet and interacts with a highly nonuniform portion in the jet flow.Any changes in the physical mechanisms of blazars, such as the accelerating particles or compressing magnetic fields, can trigger a shock that leads to optical photometric variabilities.Turbulence behind the shock-in-jet can be an excellent way to explain such minutes’timescale rapid variability of blazars (Wagner & Witzel 1995; B?ttcher& Dermer 2010; Wu et al.2012; B?ttcher 2021).

    In our observation campaign, most of the IDVs occurred in 2021 December and 2022 February.The correlation analysis with DCF between V and R bands revealed time lags of τcent=7.70±1.47 minutes in 2021 December, and τcent=-5.18±0.16 minutes in 2022 February.These inconsistent inter-band time lags were exactly as expected by the internal-shock model for blazars (B?ttcher & Dermer 2010).This semi-analytical model described the time-dependent radiative output from internal shocks arising from colliding relativistic shells in a blazar jet.Variations of specific parameters (such as the external radiation energy density, the electron equipartition fraction, the magnetic-field equipartition fraction, the electron acceleration efficiency parameter, the electron injection spectral index,and the relative Lorentz factor between the shells) may lead to changing signs of inter-band time lags,potentially explaining the lack of persistent trends of time lags in most blazars.

    The relationship between the color index and magnitude is used to ascertain whether variabilities are associated with spectral changes.We investigated the color–magnitude correlation for individual nights (shown in Figures 11, 12, and 13).The individual night results showed that, in most cases, there was a negative correlation between the color index and the magnitude.Irregular variations superimposed on long-term trends led to a weak negative correlation between the color index and magnitude.As shown in Figure 10, the analysis of two time periods with obvious IDVs showed a weak negative color–magnitude correlation (with a slope of -0.40±0.05,r = -0.40 for 2021 December, and a slope of -0.16±0.05,r = -0.19 for 2022 February), which suggested redder when brighter (RWB) or bluer when fainter (BWF) behavior.Gaur et al.(2019)found a weak positive correlation, with a slope of-0.021±0.019, r = 0.13 between B and R versus R magnitude.Such a weak correlation coefficient tended to consider that the spectrums do not change with variabilities.This conclusion was also consistent with the results of B?ttcher et al.(2005, 2009), no matter whether in a high optical state with R ~13.4 or a low brightness state with R ≥14.0,3C 66A did not display spectral variability.Such achromatic variation may be produced by geometric effects (lighthouse effect or microlensing effect) in the shock-in-jet model.When shocks moved toward an observer on helical trajectories in the jet, the flux variations could be produced by the sweeping beam,which usually produced achromatic variation (Camenzind & Krockenberger 1992;Wu et al.2007;Man et al.2016).Gravitational microlensing effects were from the external origin, which usually generated the light curves achromatically and symmetrically (Sun et al.2021).

    3C 66A, as a TeV blazar with optical quasi-periodic variation, was also the target of multiwavelength WEBT monitoring projects and Steward Observatory AGNs Optical Observational Program.Katzman Automatic Imaging Telescope(KAIT,Li et al.2003),the LX-200 0.4 m telescope from the St.Petersburg University, and the AZT-8 0.7 m telescope from the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory(SPB and CrAO)provided long-term optical monitoring data(Otero-Santos et al.2020).Now, as one of our first batches of photometric monitoring objects with YNUAO-1 m, it can well complement the vacant observation time of the ZTF monitoring project.Figure 16 shows the light curve from 2021 July 17 to 2022 March 2, transformations between ZTF magnitudes to Johnson–Morgan system R band following Lupton et al.(2005).5https://www.sdss.org/dr16/algorithms/sdssUBVRITransform/Our data filled in gaps in ZTF observations, and continuous observational data are critical for the accuracy of the quasi-periodic analysis and multiband correlation analysis.YUNAO-1 m will also conduct long-term monitoring with VHE sources, and provide high-quality optical photometric data in conjunction with various sky survey monitoring projects.

    Acknowledgments

    We acknowledge the support of the staff of the Lijiang 2.4 m telescope.This work is supported by the fund for the Youth Project of Basic Research Program of Yunnan Province(202001BB050012) and the Joint Foundation of Department of Science and Technology of Yunnan Province and Yunnan University (202201BF070001-020).This research uses data obtained through the one-meter optical telescopes at Yunnan University Astronomical Observatory (YNUAO-1m) which is funded by the “Yunnan University Development Plan for World-Class Astronomy Discipline.”

    Appendix

    Results of the IDV Observations of 3C 66A

    ORCID iDs

    Wei Zeng https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4144-5378

    Ben-Zhong Dai https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7908-4996

    真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 色在线成人网| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 9热在线视频观看99| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 18禁观看日本| 日本欧美视频一区| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| or卡值多少钱| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 人妻久久中文字幕网| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 亚洲,欧美精品.| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| www.www免费av| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 成年版毛片免费区| av中文乱码字幕在线| www.999成人在线观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 精品久久久精品久久久| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 9191精品国产免费久久| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 禁无遮挡网站| www.精华液| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| avwww免费| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 电影成人av| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| netflix在线观看网站| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 很黄的视频免费| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 国产免费男女视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 日本 欧美在线| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 一本综合久久免费| 97碰自拍视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 成年人黄色毛片网站| av天堂久久9| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产片内射在线| 曰老女人黄片| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 后天国语完整版免费观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲精品在线美女| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 天天一区二区日本电影三级 | 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 老司机靠b影院| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 嫩草影院精品99| a在线观看视频网站| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 69av精品久久久久久| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 午夜福利高清视频| 黄色视频不卡| 99香蕉大伊视频| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 久久久国产成人免费| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 欧美日韩黄片免| 99热只有精品国产| 久久性视频一级片| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 禁无遮挡网站| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清 | 国产成人av教育| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 18禁观看日本| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| netflix在线观看网站| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产区一区二久久| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 99re在线观看精品视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久这里只有精品19| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲av电影在线进入| aaaaa片日本免费| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久久久久久久中文| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 99re在线观看精品视频| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 免费高清视频大片| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 很黄的视频免费| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 满18在线观看网站| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产av又大| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 最好的美女福利视频网| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 久久亚洲真实| 我的亚洲天堂| 18禁观看日本| 免费观看人在逋| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 97碰自拍视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产成人av教育| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 97碰自拍视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 午夜福利视频1000在线观看 | 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久久香蕉激情| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 一区在线观看完整版| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 精品人妻1区二区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 精品人妻1区二区| 日本 欧美在线| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 黄片小视频在线播放| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产精品影院久久| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 美女午夜性视频免费| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | av网站免费在线观看视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 亚洲中文av在线| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产三级黄色录像| 日本在线视频免费播放| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 91在线观看av| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 两个人看的免费小视频| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 制服诱惑二区| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 在线天堂中文资源库| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产精品 国内视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 免费不卡黄色视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 一夜夜www| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| av天堂在线播放| 一区二区三区精品91| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 日日夜夜操网爽| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| www国产在线视频色| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 超碰成人久久| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 久久青草综合色| 两个人免费观看高清视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产色视频综合| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 免费观看精品视频网站| 免费av毛片视频| 大码成人一级视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 青草久久国产| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 色播在线永久视频| 长腿黑丝高跟| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 久久这里只有精品19| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 日韩欧美三级三区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 露出奶头的视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产高清videossex| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| av片东京热男人的天堂| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 9色porny在线观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 多毛熟女@视频| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| www国产在线视频色| 国产三级在线视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 久久香蕉国产精品| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 精品久久久精品久久久| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| netflix在线观看网站| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 精品高清国产在线一区| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 久久久久久大精品| 色播在线永久视频| 免费高清在线观看日韩| netflix在线观看网站| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 露出奶头的视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 乱人伦中国视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久久这里只有精品19| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 咕卡用的链子| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 美国免费a级毛片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 91麻豆av在线| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 脱女人内裤的视频| av有码第一页| 久久久久久久久中文| 久久中文字幕一级| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲精品在线美女| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲全国av大片| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 欧美大码av| 十八禁网站免费在线| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 一本大道久久a久久精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 99久久国产精品久久久| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 一区在线观看完整版| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 美女午夜性视频免费| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| www.999成人在线观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 香蕉丝袜av| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 一区二区三区精品91| 精品电影一区二区在线| 在线av久久热| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 在线免费观看的www视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 9色porny在线观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 亚洲午夜理论影院| 大型av网站在线播放| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 美女大奶头视频| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 咕卡用的链子| 电影成人av| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 成人欧美大片| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 制服人妻中文乱码| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 成人国产综合亚洲| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 日本五十路高清| 日本在线视频免费播放| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 色播在线永久视频| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 午夜福利18| 久久热在线av| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 热99re8久久精品国产| 一区福利在线观看| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 欧美日本视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产乱人伦免费视频| bbb黄色大片| 黄色女人牲交|