• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Constraining the Temperature-density Relation of the Inter-galactic Medium from Analytically Modeling Lyα Forest Absorbers

    2023-05-29 10:28:00LiYangZhengZhengandKim

    Li Yang , Zheng Zheng, and T.-S.Kim

    1 Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China; liyang@shao.ac.cn

    2 School of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    3 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, 115 S 1400 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; zhengzheng@astro.utah.edu

    4 Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin, 475 North Charter Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA

    Abstract The absorption by neutral hydrogen in the intergalactic medium (IGM) produces the Lyα forest in the spectra of quasars.The Lyα forest absorbers have a broad distribution of neutral hydrogen column density NH I and Doppler b parameter.The narrowest Lyα absorption lines (of lowest b) with neutral hydrogen column density above~1013cm-2 are dominated by thermal broadening, which can be used to constrain the thermal state of the IGM.Here we constrain the temperature-density relation T = T0 (ρ ρˉ)γ -1of the IGM at 1.6 <z <3.6 by using NH I and b parameters measured from 24 high-resolution and high-signal-to-noise quasar spectra and by employing an analytic model to model the NH I-dependent low-b cutoff in the b distribution.In each NH I bin, the b cutoff is estimated using two methods, one non-parametric method from computing the cumulative b distribution and a parametric method from fitting the full b distribution.We find that the IGM temperature T0 at the mean gas density ρˉ shows a peak of ~1.5×104 K at z ~2.7–2.9.At redshift higher than this, the index γ approximately remains constant, and it starts to increase toward lower redshifts.The evolution in both parameters is in good agreement with constraints from completely different approaches, which signals that He II reionization completes around z ~3.

    Key words: (galaxies:) intergalactic medium – (galaxies:) quasars: absorption lines – radiation mechanisms:thermal

    1.Introduction

    The Lyman-α (Lyα) forest, namely the ensemble of absorption lines blueward of the Lyα emission in the spectra of the quasar,is caused by the absorption of intervening neutral hydrogen in the intergalactic medium (IGM) (e.g., Cen et al.1994; Bi & Davidsen 1997; Rauch 1998).As the largest reservoir of baryons, the evolution of the IGM is affected by several processes, such as adiabatic cooling caused by cosmic expansion, heating by ionizing photons from galaxies and quasars, and heating from gravitational collapse.The Lyα forest encodes the thermal state of the IGM (Gunn &Peterson 1965; Lynds 1971; Hui & Gnedin 1997; Schaye et al.1999, 2000) and therefore it has become the premier probe of the thermal and ionization history of the IGM.

    The thermal state of the IGM is usually characterized by the temperature-density relation, parameterized as T=T0Δγ-1(Hui & Gnedin 1997).Here,ρ ρΔ ≡ ˉ is the ratio of the gas density to its cosmic mean,the normalization T0corresponds to the temperature of the gas at the mean density, and γ denotes the slope of the relation.Measuring T0and γ as a function of redshift would allow the reconstruction of the thermal and ionization history of the IGM.In particular,the H I reionization and He II reionization leave distinct features in the evolution of T0and γ, and the properties of the Lyα forest contain their imprint(e.g.,Miralda-Escudé&Rees 1994;Theuns et al.2002;Hui & Haiman 2003; Worseck et al.2011; Puchwein et al.2015; Upton Sanderbeck et al.2016; Worseck et al.2016;Gaikwad et al.2019;Worseck et al.2019;Upton Sanderbeck&Bird 2020).Various statistical properties of the Lyα forest have been applied to measure T0and γ, such as the Lyα forest flux power spectrum and the probability distribution of flux(Theuns et al.2000; McDonald et al.2001; Zaldarriaga et al.2001;Bolton et al.2008; Viel et al.2009; Calura et al.2012; Lee et al.2015; Rorai et al.2017; Walther et al.2018; Boera et al.2019; Khaire et al.2019; Walther et al.2019; see Gaikwad et al.2021 for a summary).

    There is also a method of measuring the IGM thermal state based on Voigt profile decomposition of the Lyα forest (e.g.,Schaye et al.1999; Bryan & Machacek 2000; Ricotti et al.2000; Schaye et al.2000; McDonald et al.2001; Rudie et al.2012;Bolton et al.2014;Hiss et al.2018;Rorai et al.2018).In this approach, the Lyα absorption spectrum is treated as a superposition of multiple discrete Voigt profiles,with each line described by three parameters:redshift z,Doppler parameter b,and neutral hydrogen column density NHI.By studying the statistical properties of these parameters, i.e., the b–NHIdistribution at a given redshift, one can recover the thermal information encoded in the absorption profiles.The underlying principle of this approach is that the narrow absorption lines(with low b)are dominated by thermal broadening,determined by the thermal state of the IGM.

    Such an approach involves the determination of the cutoff in the b distribution as a function of NHI.The commonly-used method follows an iterative procedure introduced by Schaye et al.(1999):fit the observed b–NHIdistribution with a power law; discard the data points 1σ above the fit; iterate the procedure until convergence in the fit.With the small number of H I lines around the b cutoff and contamination by noise and metals, different line lists can lead to different results on the T0and γ constraints (e.g., Rudie et al.2012; Hiss et al.2018).

    In this paper, we employ the low-b cutoff profile approach to constrain the IGM thermal state at z ~3.We circumvent the above problem of determining the profile of the b cutoff by proposing two different methods.The first one is a nonparametric method,which measures the lower 10th percentile in the b distribution from the cumulative b distribution in each NHIbin.The other one is a parametric method, which infers the lower 10th percentile in the b distribution from a parametric fit to the full b distribution in each NHIbin.With the determined b cutoff profiles, to derive the constraints on T0and γ, we apply a physically motivated and reasonably calibrated analytic model describing the b cutoff, which avoids using intensive simulations.Unlike previous work(e.g., Schaye et al.1999; Rudie et al.2012; Hiss et al.2018),where the low-b cutoff profile is obtained by iteratively removing data points based on power-law fits, our methods make use of a well-defined NHI-dependent low-b cutoff threshold, i.e., the lower 10th percentile in the b distribution.Adopting such a quantitative cutoff threshold allows a direct comparison to the analytic model of Garzilli et al.(2015)with the same cutoff threshold, providing a simple and efficient way of constraining the thermal state of the IGM.In this paper, we present the methods and apply them for the first time to observed Lyα forest line measurements for T0and γ constraints.

    In Section 2,we describe the data used in this work,which is a list of Lyα absorption lines with Voigt profile measurements from 24 observed high-resolution and high-signal-to-noise(high-S/N) quasar spectra by Kim et al.(2021).In Section 3,we present the overall distribution of NHIand b.Then we present the two methods of determining the b cutoff profile and obtain the constraints on T0and γ in the redshift range of 1.6 <z <3.6.Finally, we summarize our results in Section 4.In the Appendix, we list the constraints in Table A1.

    In this work,we analyze the fitted line parameters of the Lyα forest by Kim et al.(2021): the absorber redshift z, the(logarithmic) neutral hydrogen column density logNHI=log [NHI(c m-2)], and the Doppler parameter

    2.Data Samples and Reduction Methods

    b(km s-1).This list is based on Voigt profile fitting analysis for the 24 high-resolution and high-S/N quasar spectra, taken from HIRES (HIgh-Resolution Echelle Spectrometer; Vogt et al.1994; Vogt 2002) on Keck I and UVES (UV-Visible Echelle Spectrograph; Dekker et al.2000) on the Very Large Telescope (VLT).The resolution is about 6.7 km s-1.The list of quasars and the details of the fitting analysis can be found in Kim et al.(2021).

    The data set from 24 HIRES/UVES quasar spectra in Kim et al.(2021) is unique in combining three aspects of the line fitting analysis: high-S/N (>45 per pixel) to reduce the possibility of misidentifying metal lines as H I absorption lines,without Damped Lyα Absorbers(DLAs)in the spectra to avoid cutting down the available wavelength region significantly and the difficulty in spectra normalization and removal of metals blended with H I, and Voigt profile fitting both from Lyα only and from available Lyman series to more effectively deblend saturated lines.As a comparison, in studying the IGM thermal state, Hiss et al.(2018) use 75 HIRES/UVES spectra at 2.0 <z <3.4 with low S/N (>15 per pixel) containing DLAs,with parameters derived from Lyα-only fit; Gaikwad et al.(2021) use 103 HIRES spectra at 2.0 <z <4.0 with low S/N(>5 per pixel) without DLAs or sub-DLAs, also with parameters derived from Lyα-only fit; Rudie et al.(2012) use 15 HIRES spectra with high S/N (>50 per pixel) containing DLAs, with parameters from fitting both Lyα and Lyβ, but only covering 2 <z <2.8.The line measurements in Kim et al.(2021) from the self-consistent, uniform in-depth Voigt profile fitting analysis with reduced systematics are well suited to our application of testing new methods of studying the IGM around z ~3.

    Figure 1.A portion of the reconstructed Lyα forest spectrum,using NH I and b parameters measured from QSO Q0636+6801 in Kim et al.(2021)either based on the Lyman series fit(left panels)and the Lyα-only fit(right panels).The upper and lower panels show the NH I and b measurements with their uncertainties,respectively,and the middle panels show the normalized flux with short vertical lines indicating the locations of the identified Lyα absorbers.

    We refer interested readers to Kim et al.(2021)for details on the line analysis.As an illustration,Figure 1 shows a portion of the reconstructed Lyα forest spectrum from the line list of one quasar (Q0636+6801), with parameters based on the Lyman series fit (left) and the Lyα-only fit (right).For each set, the reconstructed high-resolution spectrum is shown in the middle panel.As expected, there are no noticeable differences in the reconstructed spectra from the two sets of fitting parameters,since the fitting is performed to reproduce absorption profiles.The small vertical lines in each middle panel mark the locations of individual absorbers, and the dots in the top and bottom panels are the valueslogNHIand b from Voigt fitting for these absorbers, as in the line list from Kim et al.(2021).Note that the uncertainties inlogNHIand b on the left panels are typically smaller, as not only Lyα lines but also all available Lyman series lines are used in deriving these parameters.Lyman series lines of good signal-to-noise ratios also help resolve absorption structures, especially for saturated Lyα absorptions.While this leads to small differences in the exact line lists in the left and right panels, it has little effect on the overall statistical properties of line parameters (Kim et al.2021).

    We will analyze the properties of absorbers from the line list(Kim et al.2021) and use them to constrain T0and γ of the IGM thermal state.

    3.Constraining the Temperature-density Relation from Lyα Absorbers

    3.1.b–NH I Distribution and b Cutoff

    The color-scale maps in Figure 2 show the overall distribution of NHIand b for the full absorber redshift range z ∈[1.6, 3.6] (top) and for z ~3 (z ∈[2.8, 3.2];bottom), based on the line lists from the Lyman series fit (left) and the Lyαonly fit (right), respectively.We exclude lines with b <10 km s-1as they are most likely metal line contaminants or Voigt fit artifacts5.Lines with b >100 km s-1are also excluded as they have a larger contribution from turbulent broadening than from thermal broadening.These extremely broad lines are rare and discarding them does not affect any of our results.To produce each map, we represent the likelihood of each pair of thelogNHIandlogbmeasurement as a bivariate Gaussian distribution using the measurement uncertainties and evaluate the sum of the likelihoods from all the absorbers in grid cells withΔ logNHI=0.2andΔlogb=0.01.The results are shown with a coarser grid.

    The b–NHIdistributions in Figure 2 look similar to each other.The b distribution peaks around 20–30 km s-1, with a slightly higher value at the lower end of the column density.Lyα absorption lines are broadened by both thermal motion and non-thermal broadening resulting from the combination of Hubble flow, peculiar velocities, and turbulence.In many applications (e.g., Schaye et al.1999; Ricotti et al.2000;Schaye et al.2000; McDonald et al.2001; Rudie et al.2012;Boera et al.2014;Bolton et al.2014;Garzilli et al.2015;Hiss et al.2018; Rorai et al.2018; Telikova et al.2021), the narrowest Lyα absorption lines in the Lyα forests are identified and used to constrain the IGM thermal state,as the broadening of these lines is supposed to be purely thermal and the nonthermal broadening is negligible.

    The narrowest Lyα absorption lines define the overall lower cutoff in the b distribution as a function of NHI.We perform such an analysis by computing the locus of the boundary of the lower 10th percentile in the b distribution in each NHIbin.The black points in each panel of Figure 2 delineate such a cutoff boundary, with error bars estimated from bootstrap resampling the data points 100 times.The black solid curve is from an analytic model developed in Garzilli et al.(2015), which describes the minimum line broadening (defined by the 10th percentile cutoff b) as the sum (in quadrature) of the thermal broadening(dotted red line)and the Hubble broadening(dotted blue line).

    The analytic curve is described by Garzilli et al.(2015) as

    Below logNHI~13,the data fall below the model curve.A possible cause is the incompleteness in the data—for low column density absorption systems,those with high values of b would show up as shallow absorption features in the quasar spectrum,which are hard to identify.In Garzilli et al.(2015),a 10th percentile cutoff boundary in the b–NHIdistribution for z ~3 absorbers is presented based on one OWLS simulation(Schaye et al.2010), shown as the empty triangles in each panel of Figure 2.The values of NHIand b are directly computed from the simulation data.Garzilli et al.(2020)further provide the cutoff boundary from Voigt fitting to the simulated Lyα forest spectra (see their Figure A1), which resembles the procedure in analyzing observational data.This is shown as the solid triangles in Figure 2.Compared to the case without Voigt fitting,the cutoff values of b are lowered at the low column density end.That is, at fixed, low column density, Voigt fitting tends to miss shallow absorption lines with high values of b.It is encouraging that our inferred cutoff boundary(shown with black circles)is in good agreement with their simulation-based one from Voigt fitting, including the trend at column density below logNHI~13.

    We make an attempt to use the analytic model developed in Garzilli et al.(2015), i.e., Equations (1)–(4), to constrain the redshift-dependent T0and γ,the two parameters describing the temperature-density relation, T=T0Δγ-1.We first fix fN, fJ,and Γ at their fiducial values as in Equations (1)–(4) and will discuss possible systematic effects introduced by adopting these values.The cosmological parameters(Ωb,Ωm,and h)are also fixed at their fiducial values,which are consistent with the Planck constraints (Planck Collaboration et al.2020).

    We use the 10th percentile cutoff in b for the parameter constraints, as the analytic model is tuned for such a cutoff threshold.Two methods are applied to estimate the 10th percentile cutoff in b in each NHIbin,a non-parametric method that directly measures the 10th percentile from the cumulative b distribution and a parametric method from fitting the full b distribution, as detailed in the following two subsections.

    3.2.T0–γ Constraints from the 10th Percentile b Cutoff Estimated from a Non-parametric Method

    We first present the results based on the 10th percentile cutoff profile estimated using a non-parametric method.Similar to those done in Section 3.1 and in Figure 2,at a given redshift,in eachlogNHIbin, we derive the 10th percentile cutoff boundary of b by computing the cumulative distribution function of b, where each b measurement is taken as a Gaussian distribution with the standard deviation set by the observational uncertainty.The uncertainty in the 10th percentile locus is estimated through bootstrap resampling the data points 100 times.The analytic model is then applied to constrain T0and γ.

    The results are shown in the top two panels of Figure 3(labeled as “10th percentiles”), and T0and γ constraints as a function of z are found in Table A1.The red and blue points are based on b-NHIparameters measured through the Lyman series fit and the Lyα-only fit, respectively.They appear to be consistent with each other, typically within 1σ.Compared to those based on the Lyα-only fit, those based on the Lyman series fit have larger uncertainties at lower redshifts, since the number of available sightlines for the Lyman series fit is smaller.

    Both the values of T0and γ show a clear trend with redshift,with a transition around z ~2.8.The temperature T0at mean density increases from ~104K at z ~1.7 to ~1.55×104K at z ~2.7, then decreases toward higher redshifts, reaching~1.15×104K at z ~3.5.The T0value at z ~3.1 for the Lyman series fit case and that at z ~3.3 for the Lyα-only fit case deviate the trend of decreasing with increasing redshifts,with T0~1.4–1.5×104K, but they are consistent with being fluctuations.For the values of γ, the broad trend appears to be decreasing from γ ~1.4–1.5 to 1.3 in the redshift range of 1.6 to 2.8–2.9 and then flattened (or maybe slightly increasing)toward higher redshifts.The transitions seen in T0and γ around z ~2.7–2.9 are signatures of He II reionization (e.g., Upton Sanderbeck et al.2016; Worseck et al.2019; Villasenor et al.2022).Photons ionizing He II heat the IGM, and the temperature T0climbs up, reaches a peak, and then drops when adiabatic expansion starts to dominate the temperature evolution.Heating the IGM makes γ decrease (e.g., γ would become unity if the IGM is heated to be isothermal)and then it increases when the effect of adiabatic expansion kicks in.

    The temperature-density relation has been observationally constrained with various methods.Early constraints show large scatters and have large uncertainties.We choose to compare to a few recent constraints.As a comparison, the gray squares in the top panels of Figure 3 are from Hiss et al.(2018).They are also constrained through the low-b boundary of the b-NHIdistribution with high-resolution spectra,but by comparing to a set of hydrodynamic simulations.The overall trend is similar to ours,e.g.,a peak in T0at z ~2.8.The variation amplitude in T0from Hiss et al.(2018)appears higher than ours—while the T0values at the low- and high-redshift ends are consistent with ours, their peak T0value is much higher, ~2×104K, ~25%higher than ours(1.55×104K).Similarly,the value of γ from their constraints has a steeper drop from z ~2 to z ~2.9 (with larger uncertainties though).

    Villasenor et al.(2022) constrain the temperature-density relation and the evolution of the ionization rate by fitting the Lyα forest power spectrum from high-resolution spectroscopic observations using a large set of hydrodynamic simulations.The black curves in the top panels show T0and γ constraints from their best fit model, with the shaded bands representing the 1σ uncertainty (very narrow in the γ constraints).Our results agree well with theirs in terms of the variation amplitude of T0, while the peak in our results occurs at a lower redshift(z ~2.7)than theirs(z ~3.0).The trends in γ are also similar to our results showing a slightly lower (higher) γ at low (high)redshifts.Given the uncertainties in our inferred γ values, our results are consistent with theirs.

    The yellow data points are constraints from Gaikwad et al.(2021), based on four different flux distribution statistics of Lyα forests in high-resolution and high-S/N quasar spectra.Accounting for the uncertainties, our results show a good agreement with theirs.

    The green curve in each panel represents the prediction from a hydrodynamic simulation in Upton Sanderbeck et al.(2016),which includes the effect of He II reionization.It almost falls on top of the constraints in Villasenor et al.(2022) for T0.It appears to be slightly lower in γ,but with a quite similar trend.The broad features predicted from this hydrodynamic simulation are similar to our results, except for the small shift in the redshift of the peak T0.

    3.3.T0–γ Constraints from the 10th Percentile b Cutoff Estimated from a Parametric Fit to the b Distribution

    Estimating the b cutoff directly from the cumulative b distribution, while straightforward, can have limitations.First,the IGM thermal state impacts all the lines, not just the narrowest lines.Therefore, by restricting the use of the data in the tail of the distribution near the cutoff,this approach throws away information, which can significantly reduce the sensitivity to the IGM thermal state.Second, in practice, determining the location of the cutoff is vulnerable to systematic effects,such as contamination from unidentified metal lines or misidentified metal lines as H I and noise.

    To overcome these limitations, we develop an approach to infer the 10th percentile b cutoff by a parametric fit to the full b distribution in each NHIbin.To describe the b distribution,we adopt the functional form suggested by Hui&Rutledge(1999),derived based on the Gaussian random density and velocity field.It is a single-parameter distribution function,

    Such a distribution function naturally explains the salient features of the observed b distribution: a sharp low-b cutoff,corresponding to narrow and high amplitude absorptions(statistically rare, related to the tail of the Gaussian distribution), and a long power-law tail toward high b, coming from broad and low-amplitude absorptions.The parameter bσmarks the transition from the exponential cutoff to the power-law part.With this distribution, the b value for the lower 10 percentile cutoff isbσ(l n 10)14.

    For every redshift bin, in each NHIbin, with the observed values of b,we derive the constraints on bσusing the maximum likelihood method6We adopt the publicly available Python Package kafe2 (https://github.com/PhiLFitters/kafe2) to perform the maximum likelihood estimation..The inferred values of the 10th percentile cutoffσbln 1014( ) as a function of NHIare used to constrain T0and γ,as in Section 3.2.The results are shown in the bottom panels of Figure 3 (labeled as “b σ(l n 10)14”).The constraints on T0are similar to those inferred from using the 10th percentile b cutoff estimated from the non-parametric method.The peak is around z ~2.8 with a value of ~1.5×104K.The fluctuation in the trend with redshift is reduced, as expected,given that the 10th percentile boundary is from fitting the overall b distribution.For γ, the trend with redshift is also similar to that based on the non-parametric b cutoff estimate,but the amplitude appears to be lower.The systematic trend may reflect the fact that the analytic model is tuned for the first method, not the second one.However, for most γ values the systematic shifts are within 2σ with the data we use in our analysis.

    Figure 3.Constraints on T0 and γ,the two parameters describing the temperature-density relation T=T0Δγ-1 in the IGM.Our results are shown as open circles,red(blue)circles correspond to Lyα absorber parameters NH I and b measured from the Lyman-series(Lyα-only)fit.In the top panels,our constraints are derived using the b cutoff relation estimated from the data, while those in the bottom panels are from the b cutoff relation inferred from fitting the b distribution.See the text for details.In each panel,The gray squares are constraints from Hiss et al.(2018),also from modeling the b cutoff relation,but with a set of hydrodynamic simulations.The yellow squares are from Gaikwad et al.(2021),constrained based on four different Lyα forest flux statistics.The black curve(with the 95%confidence interval shaded) corresponds to the constraints in Villasenor et al.(2022) by fitting the Lyα forest power spectrum with a large set of hydrodynamic simulations.The green curve is the prediction in Upton Sanderbeck et al.(2016) from a hydrodynamic simulation including the effect of He II reionization.The horizontal line at T0=1.5×104K or γ=1.32 is shown simply as a reference to aid the comparison.

    As a whole, our derived constraints on T0and γ based on two methods of estimating the b cutoff profile broadly agree with each other.They also appear to be consistent with the results inferred by Gaikwad et al.(2021).While the main difference in our two types of constraints lies in the amplitude of γ, both of them appear to be around the Gaikwad et al.(2021) values, typically within 1σ.

    We present the results here as the marginalized constraints on T0and γ,respectively.For completeness,the full constraints with both methods of deriving the b cutoff are shown in the Appendix, where we also provide Table A1 for the T0and γ constraints.

    3.4.Sensitivity of the T0–γ Constraints on Parameters in the Analytic Model

    In obtaining the constraints on T0and γ in Sections 3.2 and 3.3, we have fixed the model parameters fN, fJ, and Γ to their fiducial values in Equations (1)–(4).That is, we neglect their dependence on redshift.One may worry that this could introduce systematic uncertainties in the inferred T0and γ.

    We can study the sensitivity of the T0and γ constraints on these model parameters by considering the low-NHIand high-NHIlimit in the model.At low NHI, where the Hubble broadening dominates, the cutoff in b is approximately

    While the above tests to the sensitivity are general, they do not reflect the expected redshift dependence on the model parameters.For a more realistic assessment of the potential systematics,we turn to simple models of these parameters.The parameter fN, which is the proportionality coefficient relating NHIand the product of the number density nHIand the filtering scale λF=fJλJ, is expected to be insensitive to redshift.The filtering (smoothing) scale λFat a given epoch depends on the history of the Jeans length λJ,i.e.,on the thermal history of the IGM.Therefore, we expect fJto evolve with redshift.The photoionization rate Γ is expected to depend on redshift,as the ionizing photons come from the evolving populations of starforming galaxies and quasars.We perform further tests on the T0-γ constraints by modeling fJ(z) and Γ(z).

    Gnedin &Hui(1998)derive an analytic expression of λFin linear theory,

    To test the potential effect of the evolution of fJ(z)=λF(z)/λJ(z) on our constraints, we compute fJ(z) by adopting an IGM temperature evolution similar in shape to that in Villasenor et al.(2022), starting from T0~0K at z ?7 and increasing to T0?104K at lower redshifts with two bumps at z ~6 and z ~3 caused by H I and He II reionization,respectively.The values of fJare scaled such that fJ(z=3)=0.88 to match the fiducial value tuned in Garzilli et al.(2015).The resultant fJ(z) is ~0.9 for 2.9 <z <3.6 and ramps up toward lower redshifts to a value of ~1.27 at z ~1.6.

    In the redshift range of interest here, the empirically measured hydrogen photoionization rate Γ only shows a mild evolution (e.g., Becker et al.2007, 2013;Villasenor et al.2022).We model the evolution to be Γ(z)=10-12s-1[(1+z)/2.6]-1, consistent with the model in Haardt & Madau (2012) and those empirical measurements with a steeper evolution.

    Figure 4.Similar to Figure 3,but our constraints are compared to those with evolving model parameters.The red and blue open circles are the same as in Figure 3,where fJ and Γ parameters in the analytic model are fixed at their fiducial values.The pink and cyan filled circles are constraints when allowing fJ and Γ to evolve with redshift.See the text for details.For clarity,the pink and cyan points are shifted by Δz=0.05.The ratios of the latter constraints to the former ones are shown in the small panels, with the shaded regions representing the 1σ uncertainties.

    The test results with the evolving fJand Γ are shown in Figure 4, in comparison with the fiducial results.For the constraints using the 10th percentile b cutoff estimated nonparametrically (top panels), T0appears to be slightly lower at lower redshifts, before reaching the peak.The value of γ is slightly higher at lower redshifts and lower at higher redshifts.Each lower small panel shows the ratio of the constraints to those from the fiducial ones, and all the changes in the constraints caused by the evolving fJand Γ are well within the 1σ uncertainty.

    For the results using the b cutoff determined by a parametric fit to the b distribution(bottom panels),the trends are similar to those in the top panels, but with changes of larger amplitude.For γ, the changes are still well within the 1σ uncertainty.For T0,most of the changes are also within 1σ and others are within 1.5σ(if accounting for uncertainties in the constraints with both fixed and varying fJand Γ).For both methods, adopting the evolving fJand Γ leads to constraints more in line with those from Gaikwad et al.(2021) and Villasenor et al.(2022) at lower redshifts.

    As a whole, the tests demonstrate that fixing the parameters in the analytic model to their fiducial values does not introduce significant systematic trends in the T0-γ constraints with the data we use.The amplitude and shape of the column-densitydependent b cutoff profile of Lyα absorbers atlogNHI∈ [13,15] enable robust constraints on the temperature-density relation of the IGM around z ~3 within the framework of the analytic model.

    4.Summary and Discussion

    Based on the distribution of the neutral hydrogen column density NHIand Doppler b parameter measurements of 1.6 <z <3.6 Lyα absorbers in the Lyα forest regions of high-resolution and high-S/N quasar spectra, we employ an analytic model to constrain T0and γ, the two parameters describing the temperature-density relation of the IGM,T=T0Δγ-1.The constraints come from the NHI-dependent low b cutoff, contributed by Lyα absorbers dominated by thermal broadening.The IGM temperature T0at the mean density shows a peak of ~1.5×104K at z ~2.7–2.9 and drops to ~104K at the lower and higher end of the redshift range.The index γ reaches a minimum around z ~3.The evolution in both parameters signals that He II reionization finishes around z ~3.

    The low b cutoff profile as a function of NHIis obtained using two methods.The first one is a non-parametric method.With the measured values of NHIand b and their uncertainties,in each NHIbin,we compute the cumulative distribution of the measured b parameter to find the cutoff value corresponding to the lower 10th percentile and the uncertainty in the cutoff value is obtained through bootstrapping.The second method is a parametric one.In each NHIbin, we fit the b distribution with an analytic function (Hui & Rutledge 1999) using a maximum likelihood method to infer the 10th-percentile b cutoff value.The analytic model developed in Garzilli et al.(2015) is then applied to model these b cutoff profiles to obtain the T0-γ constraints.For T0, using the b cutoff profiles estimated from the two methods leads to similar constraints.For γ,using the b cutoff profile from fitting the b distribution results in lower values of γ than that using the non-parametrically inferred b cutoff.This may result from the fact that the analytic model is effectively calibrated with the first method.Nevertheless, the constraints of γ with b cutoff profiles from the two methods are consistent within 2σ in most redshift bins.In obtaining the constraints,we use NHIand b parameters measured from fitting the Lyman series lines and from only fitting the Lyα lines,respectively, and the results agree with each other.

    Our results are in line with some recent T0–γ constraints from completely different approaches.Those include Gaikwad et al.(2021),who measure the IGM thermal state by using four different flux statistics in the Lyα forest regions of highresolution and high-S/N quasar spectra and by using a code developed to efficiently construct models with a wide range of IGM thermal and ionization histories without running full hydrodynamic simulations.Our results also agree with those in Villasenor et al.(2022), where the constraints on the IGM thermal and ionization history are obtained from modeling the one-dimensional Lyα forest power spectrum with a massive suite of more than 400 high-resolution cosmological hydrodynamic simulations.These nontrivial agreements with other work of different approaches suggest that the analytic model we adopt not only correctly captures the main physics in the low b cutoff but also is reasonably calibrated.

    There are a few model parameters in the analytic model: fJrelates the Jeans length to the filtering (smoothing) scale, fNis the proportional coefficient in determining the neutral hydrogen column density from the neutral hydrogen number density and the filtering scale, and Γ is the hydrogen photoionization rate.At high NHIthat we mainly use for the T0–γ constraints, the b cutoff profiles and hence the constraints are insensitive to these parameters, e.g., with b2approximately depending on(fJ fNΓ)-0.25.We further test the sensitivity by adopting an evolving fJfactor from linear theory and an assumed thermal evolution of the IGM and an observationally and theoretically motivated Γ evolution, and we find no significant changes in the constraints.That is, adopting the fiducial values of the model parameters result in no significant systematic trend in the T0–γ constraints within the framework of the analytic model and with the observational data in our analysis.

    The analytic model, with its current functional form, however,could still have systematic uncertainties in that it may not perfectly fit the results from the hydrodynamic simulations.Garzilli et al.(2020) have discussed the possible improvements to the model.While directly using simulations to perform parameter constraints(e.g.,Villasenor et al.2022)is a route to largely reduce systematic uncertainties,it would still be useful to calibrate an analytic model with a set of hydrodynamic simulations at different output redshifts.To be self-consistent,model parameters like fJand Γ should encode the dependence on the IGM’s thermal and ionization history.The model can also be calibrated to accommodate different ways of inferring the b cutoff profile, as well as different percentile thresholds for defining the cutoff(e.g.,Garzilli et al.2020).Such a model would have the advantage of being computationally efficient and can be easily applied to model observed Lyα absorbers to learn about the physical properties of the IGM.

    At z ?3, when He II reionization is not complete, a large number of sightlines are needed to fully probe the IGM state with patchy He II reionization.The sample of the 24 highresolution and high-S/N quasar spectra used in our analysis may still have appreciable cosmic variance (more exactly sample variance) effects, and the uncertainties in our T0and γ may have been underestimated.In fact, this is true for the constraints in most work.A large sample of Lyα forest absorbers from high-resolution and high-S/N quasar spectra is desired to probe the IGM state and He II reionization, which would help tighten the constraints on T0and γ and also make it possible to constrain quantities like fJand Γ.

    Acknowledgments

    This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No.2018YFA0404503).L.Y.gratefully acknowledges the support of China Scholarship Council (No.201804910563)and the hospitality of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Utah during her visit.Z.Z.is supported by NSF grant AST-2007499.The support and resources from the Center for High Performance Computing at the University of Utah are gratefully acknowledged.

    Appendix

    In Figure A1, we show the constraints in the T0–γ plane for different redshift bins, using b cutoff profile estimated non-parametrically from the data (top panels) and parametrically from fitting the b distribution,with absorber NHIand b measurements based on the Lyman series fit (left panels)and the Lyα-only fit (right panels).As discussed in Section 3.4, with the relation between the b cutoff and NHI, the constraints on T0are mainly from the relation’s amplitude, while those on γ come from its shape.At each redshift, the constraints in the T0–γ show a degeneracy direction: a higher T0is compensated by a lower γ.This is easy to understand—with a higher T0(hence higher amplitude from the model), a lower γ value can tilt the model so that the amplitude of the b cutoff profile toward high NHIcan be lowered.

    Figure A1.Joint constraints on the IGM temperature-density relation parameters,T0 and γ,from NH I and b values measured based on the Lyman series fit(left panels)and Lyα-only fit(right panels).The constraints in the top panels are derived using the b cutoff relation estimated from the data,while those in the bottom panels are from the b cutoff relation inferred from fitting the b distribution.The contours show the central 39% of the distribution for the two parameters.

    Table A1 Constraints on T0 and γ at Different Redshifts, Using NH I-dependent b Cutoff Profile Estimated Non-parametrically from the Cumulative b Distribution (“10th Percentiles”)and Parametrically from Fitting the Full b Distribution(“ σb ln 10 14( ) ”),with Absorber NH I and b Measurements Based on the Lyman Series Fit and the Lyα-only Fit

    ORCID iDs

    Li Yang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5353-2957

    久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 极品教师在线视频| 极品教师在线视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产成年人精品一区二区| videossex国产| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 色5月婷婷丁香| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 美女主播在线视频| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产视频内射| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| videos熟女内射| av天堂中文字幕网| 日日撸夜夜添| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产成人福利小说| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 成人免费观看视频高清| 欧美bdsm另类| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 伦精品一区二区三区| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲在线观看片| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 永久网站在线| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产成人精品一,二区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 成人国产av品久久久| 岛国毛片在线播放| 一区二区av电影网| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| av线在线观看网站| 国产老妇女一区| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲国产色片| 国产色婷婷99| 久久热精品热| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| h日本视频在线播放| 一区二区av电影网| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 老女人水多毛片| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 丝袜喷水一区| 日本黄色片子视频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 观看美女的网站| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 日韩伦理黄色片| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 97在线视频观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 美女主播在线视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产成人一区二区在线| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 91狼人影院| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 97超碰精品成人国产| av国产免费在线观看| 一本久久精品| kizo精华| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 99热全是精品| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 免费看不卡的av| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 六月丁香七月| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频 | 日本午夜av视频| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产成人91sexporn| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 成人国产av品久久久| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 成人免费观看视频高清| 一级毛片电影观看| av线在线观看网站| 国产极品天堂在线| 嫩草影院入口| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 99热网站在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产在线男女| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| av在线app专区| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 三级经典国产精品| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 禁无遮挡网站| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲国产精品999| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 免费看日本二区| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产在线男女| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 午夜免费鲁丝| 午夜视频国产福利| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 免费看av在线观看网站| 22中文网久久字幕| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 18+在线观看网站| 国产成人91sexporn| 色视频www国产| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 国产av码专区亚洲av| 欧美性感艳星| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| av免费在线看不卡| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 春色校园在线视频观看| 大香蕉久久网| 97在线视频观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 一本一本综合久久| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 日本午夜av视频| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 高清毛片免费看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 久久久久网色| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| kizo精华| 高清av免费在线| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产 一区精品| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 日韩欧美 国产精品| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 中国三级夫妇交换| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 69av精品久久久久久| 91狼人影院| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 中文字幕久久专区| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产综合懂色| 99热网站在线观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 免费看日本二区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 身体一侧抽搐| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产精品成人在线| 人妻系列 视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 1000部很黄的大片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 简卡轻食公司| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久久久网色| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 在线天堂最新版资源| 久久6这里有精品| 内射极品少妇av片p| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国产亚洲最大av| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 秋霞伦理黄片| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | videos熟女内射| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 日韩中字成人| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| av线在线观看网站| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 777米奇影视久久| 国产成人a区在线观看| 97超视频在线观看视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| kizo精华| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产av国产精品国产| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 国产 一区精品| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 97在线人人人人妻| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 国产精品无大码| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 九色成人免费人妻av| 日韩视频在线欧美| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 69av精品久久久久久| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 少妇 在线观看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 欧美+日韩+精品| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 亚州av有码| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 免费大片18禁| 国产黄片美女视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 色哟哟·www| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产成人freesex在线| 成人国产麻豆网| 久久人人爽人人片av| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产精品三级大全| 欧美+日韩+精品| av卡一久久| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲在久久综合| av国产精品久久久久影院| av天堂中文字幕网| 简卡轻食公司| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产男女内射视频| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| videossex国产| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 草草在线视频免费看| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 毛片女人毛片| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 色5月婷婷丁香| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 永久网站在线| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久久欧美国产精品| av在线播放精品| av.在线天堂| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 天堂网av新在线| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 少妇高潮的动态图| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产在视频线精品| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 亚洲最大成人av| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 男女国产视频网站| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| av在线app专区| 国产亚洲最大av| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 极品教师在线视频| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产在视频线精品| 中文欧美无线码| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 69av精品久久久久久| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产 精品1| 成人国产麻豆网| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 免费看光身美女| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 精品久久久精品久久久| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 男女那种视频在线观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产91av在线免费观看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| a级毛色黄片| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 在现免费观看毛片| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 免费观看av网站的网址| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 一级黄片播放器| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 五月天丁香电影| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 亚洲精品视频女| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| av线在线观看网站| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 舔av片在线| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲av二区三区四区| 人妻系列 视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 九草在线视频观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 大码成人一级视频| 国产黄片美女视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产成人福利小说| 欧美区成人在线视频| 一级av片app| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲成色77777| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 少妇熟女欧美另类| 777米奇影视久久| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 日韩av免费高清视频| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 99热这里只有精品一区| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产|