• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Angiography-derived radial wall strain predicts coronary lesion progression in non-culprit intermediate stenosis

    2023-01-06 05:22:42ZhiQingWANGBoXUChunMingLIChangDongGUANYueCHANGLiHuaXIESuZHANGJiaYueHUANGPatrickSerruysWilliamWijnsLiangLongCHENShengXianTU
    Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2022年12期

    Zhi-Qing WANG, Bo XU, Chun-Ming LI, Chang-Dong GUAN, Yue CHANG, Li-Hua XIE, Su ZHANG, Jia-Yue HUANG, Patrick W Serruys, William Wijns, Liang-Long CHEN?,Sheng-Xian TU,?

    1. Department of Cardiology, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fujian Institute of Coronary Heart Disease, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China; 2. Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; 3. Department of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; 4. The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine and Curam,University of Galway, Galway, Ireland

    ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Intermediate coronary lesions (ICLs) are highly prevalent but ported mixed prognosis. Radial strain has been associated with plaque vulnerability, yet its role in predicting lesion progression is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive value of angiography-derived radial wall strain (RWS) for progression of untreated non-culprit ICLs. METHODS Post-hoc analysis was conducted in a study cohort including 603 consecutive patients with 808 ICLs identified at index procedure with angiographic follow-up of up to two years. RWS analysis was performed on selected angiographic frames with minimal foreshortening and vessel overlap. Lesion progression was defined as ≥ 20% increase in percent diameter stenosis. RESULTS Lesion progression occurred in 49 ICLs (6.1%) with a median follow-up period of 16.8 months. Maximal RWS (RWSmax),frequently located at the proximal and throat plaque regions, distinguished progressive ICLs from silent ones. The largest area under the curve value of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.82, P < 0.001) was reached at the optimal RWSmax cutoff value of > 12.6%. According to this threshold, 178 ICLs were classified as having a high strain pattern. Exposure to a high strain amplitude with RWSmax >12.6% was independently associated with an increased risk of lesion progression (adjusted HR = 6.82, 95% CI: 3.67-12.66, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Assessment of RWS from coronary angiography is feasible and provides independent prognostic value in patients with untreated ICLs.

    Intermediate coronary lesion (ICL) in the major epicardial coronary arteries is frequently observed in patients undergoing angiography.[1,2]Despite optimal medical therapy, a subset of these lesions will indeed progress and subsequently result in a cardiovascular event during follow-up.[3,4]Invasive imaging studies have revealed that progressive lesions are typically characterized by vulnerable plaque features, including large lipid burden, thincap fibroatheroma, layered plaque, and intraplaque microchannels.[5,6]Growing evidence suggests that morphological evaluation using invasive imaging modalities may provide predictive insights into high-risk lesions which tend to progress and cause events.[6,7]

    Coronary strain represents the biomechanical response of arterial wall exposed to pulsatile blood flow and cardiac contraction, and varies depending on intrinsic structural properties.[8]It is well recognized that atherosclerotic plaques with a high strain pattern detected by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-based elastography and palpography represent vulnerable phenotypes, characterized by high lipid and macrophage content and few smooth muscle cells.[9,10]Meanwhile, the high strain amplitude could in turn contribute to further plaque destabilization potentially through the regulation of endothelial barrier dysfunction, stromal cell modification, as well as plaque fatigue.[11-13]These hypotheses are supported by the colocalization of high strain spots and the rupture sites mostly at the proximal plaque shoulder.[14,15]Furthermore, a recent study based onin vivoIVUS imaging and finite element analysis showed that the strain amplitude correlated positively with stenosis progression.[12]Incorporating coronary strain analysis into prognostic evaluation, thus may hold promise to improve the accuracy of event prediction.[16]However, requirement of additional invasive procedure, with increased time and costs consumption, as well as inaccuracies caused by out-ofplane motion of the imaging catheter, have prevented application of these IVUS-derived strain analyses in clinical practice.

    Recently, we have developed an angiography-derived radial wall strain (RWS) analysis by characterizing lumen diameter variation during an entire cardiac cycle from a single angiographic image run.[17]In the preliminary validation study, the maximal RWS(RWSmax), defined as the highest RWS value across the stenotic segment, was found to correlate significantly with optical coherence tomography-derived vulnerable plaque features at a threshold of RWSmax>12%.[17]This simplified novel method allows plaque assessment from the biomechanical perspective in a simple and practical way. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of RWSmaxfor the prediction of lesion progression from serial diagnostic coronary angiograms in a large group of untreated non-culprit ICLs.

    METHODS

    Study Population

    Thispost-hocanalysis of a high volume single-center cohort study was performed at the Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. We searched the institutional database for consecutive patients with ≥ 1de novoand untreated non-culprit ICLs at index angiography between January 2010 and December 2013, and with repeat angiography performed during a follow-up of up to two years. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) missing parameters in the angiographic digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) files for analysis; (2) insufficient image quality, including suboptimal angiographic projection with much overlap and foreshortening of the interrogated segment, blurry lumen contour, and complete contrast filling less than one cardiac cycle; (3) percent diameter stenosis (DS%) >70% or reference vessel diameter < 2.0 mm by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) assessment;(4) distal or ostial lesions with a distance of > 90 mm or < 5 mm from the vessel ostium; (5) in-stent restenosis between 5 mm from the proximal and distal stent margins; and (6) obvious myocardial bridge, coronary dilation, aneurysm, or dissection within the lesion segment. ICL was defined as 30% to 70% DS%by visual estimation.[1]The detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in the flowchart (Figure 1).The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki for investigation in human beings and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fuwai Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China (No.2020-1256).Patient informed consent was waived. All the patient demographics, laboratory examinations, and angiographic characteristics were prospectively recorded in a dedicated database.

    Figure 1 Study flowchart.

    QCA and RWS Analysis

    Angiograms were acquired after administration of nitroglycerine at 15 frames/s. QCA and RWS analyses were performed by experienced analysts at the CardHemo core lab (Med-X Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China) who were blinded to the follow-up data, using the AngioPlus Core software (version V3; Pulse Medical, Shanghai,China). Figure 2A shows the framework of the RWS analysis as previously described.[17]Briefly, an optimal angiographic projection of the interrogated coronary artery with minimal overlap and foreshortening at the stenotic segment was selected. Then, a frame with sharp lumen silhouette, usually at end-diastole, was chosen as the key analysis frame. Subsequently, lumen contours of the interrogated vessel and its side branches were automatically delineated using artificial intelligence algorithms.[18]A step-down reference diameter function assuming the healthy lumen would decrease in size across bifurcations according to the Murray fractal law was used to quantify the stenosis severity. QCA parameters, such as minimal lumen diameter (MLD), DS%, and step-down reference vessel diameter, were then obtained. At the next step, RWS was analyzed using the strain analysis module embedded in the AngioPlus software. The software automatically selected three other image frames with sharp lumen contours at representative phases of the cardiac cycle (i.e., early-systole, end-systole, and mid-diastole) co-registered with electrocardiogram. Then, the region of interest in the four selected frames was determined according to the stenotic segment identified by QCA analysis. The lumen contours of the corresponding vessel segment on these representative frames were automatically delineated and co-registered with the assistance of artificial intelligence. Finally, RWS at every position along the angiographic centerline was calculated as the absolute difference between the largest lumen diameter and the smallest lumen diameter divided by the largest lumen diameter. For each lesion, three segments along the longitudinal direction were defined: throat segment, including the MLD position and the stenotic segments extending 1.5 mm proximal and 1.5 mm distal to the MLD, and the proximal and distal segments(Figure 2A). The RWSmaxand its location were recorded. A representative example of RWS analysis of a right coronary artery (RCA) lesion with subsequent progression and a paralleling example without progression are shown in Figure 2B & 2C. The analysis usually takes no more than a few minutes including the time for user interactions.

    Figure 2 Representative examples of RWS analysis. (A): The underlying principle of RWS analysis. RWS relies on the relative variation of lumen diameter during an entire cardiac cycle (represented by four paradigmatic moments) at the identical site of coronary wall,when exposed to pulsatile blood flow and cardiac contraction; and (B & C): representative cases of RWSmax in the prediction of lesion progression [B1: patient 1 with an intermediate coronary lesion observed in the proximal right coronary artery at index procedure (DS% =38%, MLD = 2.3 mm); B2: lesion progression occurred at 22-month follow-up (DS% = 59%, MLD = 1.4 mm); and B1’: RWSmax was detected at the throat region with a value of 15.2%. C1: patient 2 with a similar lesion at the index procedure (DS% = 37%, MLD = 2.3 mm); C2:the lesion kept silent during a 23-month follow-up (DS% = 37%, MLD = 2.3 mm); and C1’: RWSmax was detected at the proximal region with a value of 7.9%]. DS%: percent diameter stenosis; MLD: minimal lumen diameter; RWS: radial wall strain; RWSmax: maximal radial wall strain.

    For methodological reproducibility assessment, angiograms of 50 random ICLs were analyzed repeatedly and by two independent core lab analysts to calculate intra- and inter-observer variability of RWS computation, respectively. In addition, in each of these angiograms, an angiographically normal segment was analyzed to assess the distribution of RWS in healthy vessels.

    Study Endpoints

    Clinical data were retrieved from the institution’s database. QCA analysis of the follow-up angiograms was conducted by separate analysts blinded to the baseline information. The primary outcome was angiographic lesion progression, which was defined as ≥ 20% increase in DS% within the same stenotic segment between baseline and follow-up.[19]The correspondence of the segments between baseline and follow-up was readily determined by side branches in the same angiographic projections.

    Statistical Analysis

    Continuous variables were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test: normally distributed continuous variables were presented as mean ±SD and compared using the independent Student’st-test; continuous variables with skewed distribution were presented as median (interquartile range,IQR) and compared using the Mann-WhitneyUtest.Categorical variables were presented as counts (percentages) and were compared with the Pearson’s chisquared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Area under the curve by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was applied to describe the predictive values of RWSmaxand other morphological variables for lesion progression, and the optimal cutoff points were determined by maximizing the Youden index. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent indicators of lesion progression by adjusting several potential confounding variables. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility assessments of RWS analysis were performed using the Bland-Altman analysis and the intraclass correlation coefficient. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).A two-tailedP-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    RESULTS

    Patient Demographics and Follow-up Outcomes

    In total 1048 patients with 1399 untreated ICLs were screened (Figure 1). We excluded 445 patients with 591 lesions which were not suitable for QCA and RWS analyses. The final analysis cohort consisted of 808 lesions in 603 patients. The baseline clinical characteristics of enrolled patients are summarized on Table 1.Median age was 58.0 years (IQR: 51.0-64.0 years) and 77.6% of patients were men. Usual risk factors of cardiovascular disease were highly prevalent. The majority of patients were diagnosed with unstable angina-(74.1%), followed by stable angina (24.3%), and 45.3%of patients had three-vessel coronary disease.

    During a median follow-up of 16.8 months (IQR: 12.2-22.9 months), angiographic progression occurred in 49 lesions in 49 patients. Of which, 11 lesions (22.4%)progressed to total occlusion, 36 lesions (73.5%) had a≥ 20% increase of a pre-existing stenosis ≥ 30% and< 50%, and two lesions (4.1%) had a ≥ 20% increase of a pre-existing stenosis ≥ 50%. Baseline patient-level parameters were well balanced between the progression and non-progression groups.

    Baseline Angiographic Findings

    Angiographic characteristics were compared between lesions with and without progression (Table 2).Generally, the interrogated lesions were frequently located in RCA (n= 353, 43.7%), followed by left anterior descending coronary artery (n= 288, 35.6%) and left circumflex coronary artery (n= 167, 20.7%). Distributions of ICLs in three major coronary arteries were comparable between the progression and non-progression groups. Baseline angiographic DS% varied between 22% and 65% with a median value of 37% (IQR:34%-42%) in the overall ICLs, and was similar between groups. The median DS% in the progression group was 37% (IQR: 33%-44%) at index procedure and 68% (IQR: 61%-77%) at follow-up, compared with 37%(IQR: 34%-42%) at index procedure and 38% (IQR: 33%-43%) at follow-up in lesions without progression. Lesions with progression were mostly clustered in the distal RCA (24.5%), the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (22.4%) and the proximal RCA (18.4%).Lesions with progression tended to be longer than those that remained quiescent during follow-up [20.0 mm(IQR: 13.6-27.5 mm)vs.16.6 mm (IQR: 12.6-22.8 mm),P= 0.023]. In addition, lesions without progression had a significant higher rate of percutaneous coronary intervention performed at any location at baseline (73.9%vs.57.1%,P= 0.010). Baseline DS%, MLD, and reference vessel diameter did not differ significantly between the two groups.

    Table 1 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients with and without lesion progression.

    Characteristics of RWSmax

    The range of RWSmaxvaried from 5.1% to 22.0% in ICLs, with a median value of 11.0% (IQR: 10.0%-12.1%). Baseline median RWSmaxwas 13.0% in ICLs with progression compared with 11.0% in those without progression (P< 0.001). The median absolute diameter change was larger in the progression group compared with the non-progression group [0.30 mm(IQR: 0.27-0.33 mm)vs.0.25 mm (IQR: 0.22-0.29 mm),P< 0.001]. RWSmaxlocalizes mostly at the proximal(38.1%) and throat region (41.7%) of the stenotic segment. As illustrated in Figure 3, there was no significant difference in the distribution of RWSmaxamong the three major coronary arteries (P= 0.060) and between progressive and non-progressive ICLs (P= 0.086).

    The intraclass correlation coefficients for intra- and inter-observer variability in repeated RWS analysis were 0.905 (95% CI: 0.838-0.945,P< 0.001) and 0.896(95% CI: 0.823-0.939,P< 0.001), respectively (Figure 4). In addition, median RWSmaxof stenotic segments was significantly higher than that of normal segments[11.5% (IQR: 10.6%-12.9%)vs.8.0% (IQR: 7.5%-9.1%),P< 0.001].

    Predictors of Lesion Progression

    The area under the curve of RWSmaxfor prediction of lesion progression was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.82,P<0.001) at the optimal cutoff value of > 12.6% (Figure 5).The presence of RWSmax> 12.6%, deemed as a high strain pattern, occurred in 22.0% of ICLs. At this optimal threshold, RWSmaxhad a sensitivity of 65.3%, a specificity of 80.8%, a positive predictive value of 18.0%,and a negative predictive value of 97.3% in predicting lesion progression.

    Figure 3 Distribution of RWSmax along lesion segment among three major coronary arteries and between progressive and non-progressive lesions. ICL: intermediate coronary lesion; RWSmax: maximal radial wall strain.

    Figure 4 Intra- and inter-observer variability of radial wall strain analysis in 50 randomly selected intermediate coronary lesions. (A &C): Correlation and Bland-Altman plot between repeated results of RWSmax by the same observer; and (B & D): correlation and Bland--Altman plot between the RWSmax results by two independent observers. CI: confidence interval; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient;RWSmax: maximal radial wall strain.

    Figure 5 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of RWSmax in the prediction of lesion progression. The AUC was 0.75(95% CI: 0.67-0.82, P < 0.001) for RWSmax, compared with 0.60(95% CI: 0.51-0.68, P = 0.023) for lesion length and 0.58 (95% CI:0.50-0.66, P = 0.065) for age. The best cutoffs were RWSmax > 12.6%,lesion length > 18.6 mm, and age < 52 years, respectively. AUC: area under the curve; CI: confidence interval; RWSmax: maximal radial wall strain.

    The baseline demographic, clinical and angiographic factors of ICL-related lesion progression were listed in Table 3. Univariate Cox regression analysis identified the presence of RWSmax> 12.6%, lesion length >18.6 mm, age < 52 years, blood glucose > 5.17 mmol/L,glycated hemoglobin > 6.2%, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein > 2.01 mg/L, percutaneous coronaryintervention performed at any location, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor use during follow-up as candidate predictors of lesion progression (P< 0.10). The aforementioned variables were then entered into a multivariate model. RWSmax> 12.6%[adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 6.82, 95% CI: 3.67-12.66,P< 0.001], lesion length > 18.6 mm (adjusted HR = 1.84,95% CI: 1.01-3.33,P= 0.045), and age < 52 years (adjusted HR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.19-3.91,P= 0.011) were identified as independent predictors of lesion progression.

    Table 2 Angiographic characteristics of the interrogated lesions with and without subsequent progression.

    Table 3 Cox-proportional hazard analyses of demographic and angiographic characteristics in the prediction of lesion progression.

    DISCUSSION

    The current study evaluated for the first time the utility of strain analysis from coronary angiography and its prognostic implications in lesion progression of ICLs. We found that the presence of RWSmax> 12.6%,classified as a high strain pattern, was independently associated with lesion progression. The RWSmaxlocalized mostly at the proximal and throat regions of the stenotic segment. This retrospective cohort study with angiographic follow-up introduces RWSmaxas a potentially useful indicator for risk stratification of ICLs.

    The concept of IVUS-derived radial strain analysis (i.e., elastography and palpography) had been initially proposed for plaque characterization based on biomechanical behavior of the plaque. As demonstrated previously, the presence of a high strain amplitude correlated well with high lipid burden and thin fibrous cap identified by histology,[9,10]which were exactly the morphological predictors of subsequent lesion progression.[6]In turn, the high strain pattern might contribute to further endothelial dysfunction,cell and matrix turn-over, inflammatory reaction,and intraplaque hemorrhage.[13,20,21]Thein vivoIVUS study by Guo,et al.[12]using finite element analysis suggested strain variation as an indicator of plaque fatigue and found a positive correlation between strain amplitude and stenosis progression. Therefore,for those untreated ICLs with an unknown risk of future adverse events, the strain analysis might have potential prognostic implications. However, accuracy ofin vivostrain analysis by IVUS is impaired by the out-of-plaque motion of the IVUS probe with re-spect to the imaging cross-section due to cardiac contraction. Besides, it is not cost-effective to use IVUS in every patient undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. These issues have limited the clinical applications of IVUS-derived radial strain analysis.

    Conversely, a recently proposed RWS analysis from a single angiographic view can be performed real-time in the cardiac catheterization laboratory or offline in a core laboratory, without the need of additional invasive examinations.[17]Theoretically, radial strain represents the response of vessel wall to the circumferential force mainly arising from pulsatile blood flow, whereas the concept of angiographyderived RWS represents the diameter variation of lumen contour, which corresponds to the wall strain at the inner side of the superficial wall. Similar to the IVUS-derived strain, our previous validation study showed significant correlations of RWSmaxwith vulnerable plaque features assessed by optical coherence tomography.[17]In the present study, we examined the prognostic value of RWS in lesion progression of ICLs. In keeping with prior findings,[12]the angiography-derived RWS was also predictive of stenosis progression with a threshold of 12.6%. Intriguingly,the optimal cutoff for RWSmax(> 12.6%) in predicting lesion progression was similar to that (> 12%) in identifying optical coherence tomography-derived lipid-to-cap ratio > 0.33, albeit the decimal difference.[17,22]Although the variation in lumen diameter was subtle, the dedicated software with artificial intelligence algorithms was able to distinct RWSmaxvalues between stenotic and normal segment, and between progressive and non-progressive ICLs. The reproducibility of this method was further supported by the excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement, and the consistency of prognostic cutoffs between different datasets.

    IVUS-derived strain studies have revealed that high radial strain spots are predominantly found to be exposed to high circumferential stress at the proximal plaque shoulder,[14,23]which is most often the site of plaque rupture.[15]Besides, the midcap is another common colocalization region of maximal or sub-maximal stress/strain and plaque rupture, which accounts for approximately 40% plaque rupture at rest and 75% at exertion.[15,24]In our study, spatial distribution of RWSmaxover the stenotic segment was frequently found at the proximal (38.1%) and throat (41.7%)regions of the interrogated plaques as well. These findings are in line with the results of IVUS-derived radial strain and the previous RWS validation data.[17,23]The mechanism of distinctive distribution of radial strain along the lesion segment is not fully understood. It may be partially explained by the trans-stenotic pressure gradient, with local intracoronary pressure and circumferential stress higher in the proximal and midcap regions and lower in the distal region. In addition, vulnerable features preferentially cluster in the proximal and throat segments whereas the distal region may be stiffer because of the increased concentration of smooth muscle cells,[8,23]while the RWSmaxhas been shown to correlate positively with lipid burden (r= 0.411) and lipid-to-cap ratio (r=0.584) and to correlate negatively with fibrous cap thickness (r= -0439).[17]The colocalization trend of high strain spots and fragile sites may provide insights into predicting sudden plaque rupture and acute cardiovascular events, and warrants further investigation into the causal relationship between RWSmaxand subsequent morphological evaluation of demonstrated plaque rupture.

    Of note, we did not observe significant prognostic implication of MLD and DS% in ICL progression, which was in line with previous studies.[5,6,19]In the post-hoc analysis of the PROSPECT study, non-culprit lesions with substantial progression were even less severe than those without progression (mean DS%: 26.4%vs.53.8%).[19]Although seemingly mild angiographic lesions responsible for acute events may have a large plaque burden and small minimal lumen area,[25]it has been proposed that the vulnerability and rate of progression are far more important than absolute degree of luminal stenosis.[4]Besides, evidence supporting stenotic severity in the prediction of coronary disease progression usually investigates clinical rather than angiographic endpoints.[26]

    LIMITATIONS

    This study has several limitations that must be noted. Firstly, RWS analysis was performed from four representative frames automatically selected by the software, instead of frame by frame. In theory, selected frames might not always correspond to the maximum range of lumen contour variation. However,analysis of all the frames might introduce extra errors in the lumen diameters due to cardiac motion. The angiographic lumen edges are becoming blurred at some cardiac phases, resulting in inaccurate lumen diameters and strain. Therefore, we only selected four representative frames with sharp lumen contours for RWS analysis. Secondly, an angiographic method is unqualified for detection of positive or negative remodeling, which may result in inaccurate assessment of plaque progression. Thirdly, we only included patients who had undergone repeated angiography during follow-up of up to two years, possible selection bias thus might be involved. In addition, a substantial proportion of lesions had to be excluded from RWS analysis mainly because of insufficient image quality. In future prospective studies with prespecified image acquisition process, the proportion of lesions unqualified for RWS analysis is likely to be reduced. Fourthly, the cumulative incidence of progression was 6.1% of lesions during follow-up, which is relatively infrequent. Actually, rates of lesion progression were inconsistent in different studies, which might be largely attributed to heterogeneous study cohort,sample size, follow-up interval, as well as definition of progression.[6,19]Last but not least, this is a retrospective analysis of a study cohort without clinical endpoints. Prospective studies with rigorous design and longer follow-up period are expected to further validate the utility of RWS in risk assessment of atherosclerotic lesions.

    CONCLUSIONS

    In summary, assessment of RWS from coronary angiography is feasible and provides independent prognostic value in patients with untreated ICLs. The present findings underscore the potential of RWSmaxas a novel risk stratification indicator of ICLs prone to progression of stenosis severity.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82020108015 & No.81871460 & No.82170333). All authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose.

    国产高清视频在线观看网站| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产黄片美女视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 97超视频在线观看视频| 有码 亚洲区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办 | 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久久成人免费电影| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 舔av片在线| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 亚洲四区av| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 亚洲综合色惰| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产在视频线在精品| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 一区福利在线观看| www.www免费av| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 成年版毛片免费区| 色吧在线观看| 简卡轻食公司| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久亚洲真实| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 18禁在线播放成人免费| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 成人三级黄色视频| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 黄色日韩在线| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产精品永久免费网站| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 免费看a级黄色片| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 国产 一区精品| 免费大片18禁| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 在线观看66精品国产| 99热网站在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲av美国av| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 少妇的逼水好多| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 很黄的视频免费| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 欧美+日韩+精品| 91av网一区二区| 欧美激情在线99| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲18禁久久av| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产三级中文精品| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| netflix在线观看网站| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 九色成人免费人妻av| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 成人国产麻豆网| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| av黄色大香蕉| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 很黄的视频免费| 国产免费男女视频| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 免费av观看视频| 国产 一区精品| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 中文资源天堂在线| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 日本 av在线| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲五月天丁香| 久久久久性生活片| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 国产不卡一卡二| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 中国美女看黄片| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲电影在线观看av| eeuss影院久久| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产高清激情床上av| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 不卡一级毛片| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 色视频www国产| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 在线天堂最新版资源| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产美女午夜福利| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 特级一级黄色大片| 久久精品影院6| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 亚洲性久久影院| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产老妇女一区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 国产精品三级大全| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 成人二区视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 日本成人三级电影网站| 一区福利在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 色综合站精品国产| 内地一区二区视频在线| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 午夜福利高清视频| 欧美激情在线99| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 美女大奶头视频| 乱人视频在线观看| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲四区av| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产精品三级大全| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| av黄色大香蕉| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| www.色视频.com| 久久6这里有精品| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 99热精品在线国产| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 色综合站精品国产| 毛片女人毛片| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 97热精品久久久久久| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产精品永久免费网站| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲色图av天堂| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 成人国产麻豆网| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 欧美zozozo另类| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲内射少妇av| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 精品久久久久久久末码| 少妇高潮的动态图| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 日本免费a在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产精品一及| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产探花极品一区二区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 内地一区二区视频在线| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久精品人妻少妇| 亚洲av一区综合| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 久久久久久伊人网av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 久久久精品大字幕| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 91精品国产九色| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产乱人视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 美女黄网站色视频| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产在视频线在精品| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产成人av教育| 国产高潮美女av| 在现免费观看毛片| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| av国产免费在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 夜夜爽天天搞| 免费观看精品视频网站| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 日韩中字成人| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 久久久成人免费电影| 日本三级黄在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 色av中文字幕| 国产高清激情床上av| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久久成人免费电影| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 欧美成人a在线观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产成人影院久久av| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 免费观看在线日韩| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| av国产免费在线观看| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 嫩草影院新地址| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 久久久久国内视频| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 黄色女人牲交| 99热这里只有是精品50| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 内射极品少妇av片p| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产黄片美女视频| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 免费观看的影片在线观看| 永久网站在线| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 88av欧美| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 免费观看人在逋| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 精品欧美国产一区二区三| ponron亚洲| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 91狼人影院| 一夜夜www| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 国产精华一区二区三区| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 午夜福利欧美成人| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 日韩高清综合在线| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 日韩欧美免费精品| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 97热精品久久久久久| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 少妇的逼好多水| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| xxxwww97欧美| av专区在线播放| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 69人妻影院| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 露出奶头的视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 99热网站在线观看| 国产在视频线在精品| 免费av毛片视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲图色成人| 久久久成人免费电影| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 免费观看精品视频网站| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲图色成人| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 精品国产三级普通话版| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 97碰自拍视频| 色视频www国产| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 日本一本二区三区精品| 99热网站在线观看| 久久久精品大字幕| 长腿黑丝高跟| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲性久久影院| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 中国美女看黄片| 在线a可以看的网站| www.www免费av| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 午夜老司机福利剧场| av天堂中文字幕网| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 一本一本综合久久| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 免费观看在线日韩| 久久久色成人| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产三级中文精品| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| xxxwww97欧美| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 免费av毛片视频| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲av美国av| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 亚州av有码| 联通29元200g的流量卡| www日本黄色视频网| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 日本成人三级电影网站| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 日本黄大片高清| 国产真实乱freesex| 日日啪夜夜撸| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 18+在线观看网站| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 尾随美女入室| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲av美国av| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 我要搜黄色片| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 露出奶头的视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 91av网一区二区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 日韩高清综合在线| 日本五十路高清| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲18禁久久av| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产成人av教育| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 我要搜黄色片| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 夜夜爽天天搞|